Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems
Online ISSN : 1745-1361
Print ISSN : 0916-8532
Regular Section
A Hybrid Feature Selection Method for Software Fault Prediction
Yiheng JIANXiao YUZhou XUZiyi MA
Author information
  • Yiheng JIAN

    School of Information and Electronics, Beijing Institute of Technology

  • Xiao YU

    School of Computer Science, Wuhan University

  • Zhou XU

    School of Computer Science, Wuhan University

  • Ziyi MA

    School of Computer Science, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Corresponding author

ORCID
Keywords:fault prediction,feature selection,hierarchical agglomerative clustering
JOURNALFREE ACCESS

2019 Volume E102.DIssue 10Pages 1966-1975

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1587/transinf.2019EDP7033
Details
  • Published: October 01, 2019Manuscript Received: February 01, 2019Released on J-STAGE: October 01, 2019Accepted: -Advance online publication: -Manuscript Revised: May 25, 2019
Download PDF(473K)
Download citationRIS

(compatible with EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite, RefWorks)

BIB TEX

(compatible with BibDesk, LaTeX)

Text
How to download citation
Contact us
Article overview
Share
Abstract

Fault prediction aims to identify whether a software module is defect-prone or not according to metrics that are mined from software projects. These metric values, also known as features, may involve irrelevance and redundancy, which hurt the performance of fault prediction models. In order to filter out irrelevant and redundant features, a Hybrid Feature Selection (abbreviated as HFS) method for software fault prediction is proposed. The proposed HFS method consists of two major stages. First, HFS groups features with hierarchical agglomerative clustering; second, HFS selects the most valuable features from each cluster to remove irrelevant and redundant ones based on two wrapper based strategies. The empirical evaluation was conducted on 11 widely-studied NASA projects, using three different classifiers with four performance metrics (precision, recall, F-measure, and AUC). Comparison with six filter-based feature selection methods demonstrates that HFS achieves higher average F-measure and AUC values. Compared with two classic wrapper feature selection methods, HFS can obtain a competitive prediction performance in terms of average AUC while significantly reducing the computation cost of the wrapper process.

References (29)
Related articles (0)
Figures (0)
Content from these authors
Supplementary material (0)
Result List ()
Cited by (3)
© 2019 The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers
Previous articleNext article
Favorites & Alerts
Related articles

Recently viewed articles
    Announcements from publisher
    • Readers can also download the PDF fromhttps://search.ieice.org/iss/
    • PayPerView service
    • Please contact trans-d [a] ieice.org, if you want to unlock PDF security.
    Share this page
    feedback
    Top

    Register with J-STAGE for free!

    Register

    Already have an account? Sign inhere


    [8]ページ先頭

    ©2009-2025 Movatter.jp