^Oliver Elbs,Neuro-Esthetics: Mapological foundations and applications (Map 2003), (Munich 2005)
^Descartes, R. (1641)Meditations on First Philosophy, inThe Philosophical Writings of René Descartes, trans. by J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff and D. Murdoch, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984, vol. 2, pp. 1-62.
^3.03.1Dictionary.com网络词典： "mind": "1. (in a human or otherconscious being) the element, part, substance, or process that reasons, thinks, feels, wills, perceives, judges, etc.:the processes of the human mind. 2. Psychology. the totality ofconscious and unconscious mental processes and activities. 3. intellect or understanding, as distinguished from the faculties of feeling and willing;intelligence."
^Google给出的定义： "mind": "Theelement of a person that enables them to be aware of the world and their experiences, to think, and to feel; the faculty of consciousness.."[1] （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）
^Redding, Paul, "Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), forthcoming.[2] （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. See section "2.1 Background: “Idealism” as understood in the German tradition".[expand reference]
^Oxford American College Dictionary, "mind": "1. the element of a person that enables them to be aware of the world and their experiences, to think, and to feel; the faculty of consciousness and thought."
^Druckman, D. and Swets, J. A. eds. Enhancing Human Performance: Issues, Theories and Techniques. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. 1988: 22.ISBN 0-309-07465-7.
^Reuters.Telepathy gets academic in Sweden. CNN. 2003-09-05 [2009-03-09]. （原始内容存档于2009-06-28）.Despite decades of experimental research ... there is still no proof that gifts such as telepathy and the ability to see the future exist, mainstream scientists say.
^Flew, Antony. Grim, Patrick , 编. Philosophy of Science and the Occult. 1982.|contribution=被忽略 (帮助)
^Cordón, Luis A.Popular psychology: an encyclopedia. Westport, Conn:Greenwood Press. 2005:182.ISBN 0-313-32457-3.The essential problem is that a large portion of the scientific community, including most research psychologists, regards parapsychology as a pseudoscience, due largely to its failure to move beyond null results in the way science usually does. Ordinarily, when experimental evidence fails repeatedly to support a hypothesis, that hypothesis is abandoned. Within parapsychology, however, more than a century of experimentation has failed even to conclusively demonstrate the mere existence of paranormal phenomenon, yet parapsychologists continue to pursue that elusive goal.
