討論總結:提出咗諗法,又搵到證據撐自己個諗法之後,研究者正路會大致上噉總結吓自己搵到嘅結果,包括係嘗試解釋呢啲結果(解釋現象係學術研究嘅一大目標)或者講吓呢啲結果同現有嘅知識有咩關係(會唔會挑戰某啲既有嘅睇法)... 呀噉[16]-例如「對於我而家呢個實驗,手上呢兩個理論會作出唔同嘅假說,做呢個實驗嘗試驗證邊個理論作嘅假說先至係真確,實驗結果撐理論 A 多過撐理論 B,而理論 B 要作出噉噉噉嘅修改先至可以令佢有說服力」噉嘅推論。
喺學術寫作上,「文獻綜述要點做」可以幾撈絞。求知呢家嘢本質上就係要求個人大量噉睇前人諗過嘅嘢:想像家陣有位學者想對理論 A 作出創新,要挑戰理論 A 嘅某啲基本假設,同時提出新嘅諗頭答「嗰啲基本假設唔成立,今後要點樣思考理論 A 相關嗰啲現象?」噉嘅問題;噉嘅話,佢必然要好熟理論 A 嘅嘢;喺最理想嘅情況下,佢可以將古往今來講理論 A 嘅文獻冚唪唥睇嗮佢-但現實係唔理想嘅,人類有嘅文獻多得滯,嗰位學者頂攏淨係可以集中睇最重要嗰啲文獻。於是就帶出咗以下呢啲問題[19][20]:
摷文獻嚟睇嗰陣,要點摷法先至可以摷到嗮最重要嗰啲料出嚟呢?
睇一位學者寫嘅文嗰陣,係咪要考慮埋佢摷文獻嘅方法,知佢有冇咩甩漏?
... 呀噉。
Google Scholar 係廿一世紀初學者最常用嘅搜尋器之一;專畀人用嚟摷學術文-想像例如有人發現 Google Scholar 嘅演算法有問題,噉研究者就知「齋靠 Google Scholar 嚟摷文獻睇嘅學者寫嘅嘢,可能有偏差」。
Colquitt, J. A., & George, G. (2011).Publishing in AMJ - Part 1: topic choice (PDF).Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 432-435,呢篇文討論點樣先算係好嘅管理學文,講一篇學術文選題應該要揀有人關注嘅課題、要能夠改變現有嘅諗頭、要能夠引起讀者嘅好奇、份研究嘅樣本要有返咁上下廣、仲有係要帶出可以實行嘅改革。
Creme, P., & Lea, M. (2008).Writing at university: A guide for students. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Crysler, C. G. (2003).Writing spaces: discourses of architecture, urbanism and the built environment, 1960-2000. Routledge,呢本書專講建築學入面嘅學術寫作。
Grant, A. M., & Pollock, T. G. (2011).Publishing in AMJ - Part 3: Setting the hook (PDF).Academy of management journal, 54(5), 873-879,呢篇文提出咗個諗法,覺得一篇引起到人興趣嘅文,通常一係就係挑戰緊現有嘅共識,一係就係喺未有共識嘅課題度帶出個共識。
Sparrowe, R. T., & Mayer, K. J. (2013). From the editors: Integrating theories in AMJ articles.Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 917-922,呢篇文討論有四種情況下,可以將幾套唔同嘅理論拉埋一齊講。
↑MacDonald, S. (1994).Professional academic writing in the humanities and social sciences. SIU Press.
↑Aghaei Chadegani, A., Salehi, H., Yunus, M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2013). A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of Science and Scopus databases.Asian social science, 9(5), 18-26.
↑Björk, Bo-Christer; Solomon, David (October 2013). "The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals".Journal of Informetrics. 7 (4): 914-923.
↑8.08.18.2Patriotta, G. (2017).Crafting papers for publication: Novelty and convention in academic writing (PDF).Journal of Management Studies, 54(5), 747-759,引咗嗰句:"I propose that academic writing is an act of communication, based on an established set of conventions, involving a plurality of actors (authors, editors, reviewers, and other scholars), and aimed at conveying a core message (contribution) to an audience of... scholars and practitioners."
↑Jefferson, T., Alderson, P., Wager, E., & Davidoff, F. (2002). Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review.Jama, 287(21), 2784-2786.
↑Tennant, J. P. (2018). The state of the art in peer review.FEMS Microbiology letters, 365(19), fny204.
↑Shatz, David (2004).Peer Review: A Critical Inquiry. Rowman & Littlefield.
↑Turnbull, H. W. ed., (1959).The Correspondence of Isaac Newton: 1661-1675, Volume 1, London, UK: Published for the Royal Society at the University Press. p. 416,原句:"If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants."
↑Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review.MIS quarterly, xiii-xxiii.
↑Khan, K. S., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J., & Antes, G. (2003). Five steps to conducting a systematic review.Journal of the royal society of medicine, 96(3), 118-121.
↑Biolchini, J., Mian, P. G., Natali, A. C. C., & Travassos, G. H. (2005).Systematic review in software engineering (PDF).System engineering and computer science department COPPE/UFRJ, Technical Report ES, 679(05), 45.
↑Harley, B., & Hardy, C. (2004). Firing blanks? An analysis of discursive struggle in HRM.Journal of Management Studies, 41(3), 377-400.
↑Patriotta, G., & Hirsch, P. M. (2016). Mainstreaming innovation in art worlds: Cooperative links, conventions and amphibious artists.Organization Studies, 37(6), 867-887.
↑Lampel, J., Lant, T., & Shamsie, J. (2000). Balancing act: Learning from organizing practices in cultural industries.Organization science, 11(3), 263-269.
↑Johanson, L. A. (2007). 'Sitting in your reader's chair'.Journal of Management Inquiry, 16, 290-4.
↑Eco, U. (1984).Postscript to the Name of the Rose. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich,原文:"... books always speak of other books, and every story tells a story that has already been told."
↑Roozen, Kevin. (2015) "Texts Get Their Meaning from Other Texts."Naming What We Know: Threshold Concepts in Writing Studies, Adler-Kassner & Wardle, eds. Logan: Utah State UP, 44-47.
↑Leitch, Vincent B.Deconstructive Criticism. New York: Cornell UP, 1983: 145.
↑Huff, A. S. (1998).Writing for Scholarly Publication. London: Sage.
↑Association of Legal Writing Directors & Darby Dickerson, ALWD Citation Manual: A Professional System of Citation, 4th ed. (New York: Aspen, 2010),
↑Eaton, Sarah Elaine (August 2017). "Comparative Analysis of Institutional Policy Definitions of Plagiarism: A Pan-Canadian University Study".Interchange. 48 (3): 271-281.
↑Thomas, Gary (2009)Your Research Project. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
↑Parncutt, Richard; Meyer-Kahlen, Nils; Sattmann, Sabrina (2019-12-20). Iles, Alastair (ed.). "Live-streaming at international academic conferences: Technical and organizational options for single- and multiple-location formats".Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene. 7 (54).