The role of the non-linearity in controlling the surface roughness in the one-dimensional Kardar-Parisi-Zhang growth process.(English)Zbl 1519.82096
Summary: We explore linear control of the one-dimensional non-linear Kardar-Parisi-Zhang (KPZ) equation with the goal to understand the effects the control process has on the dynamics and on the stationary state of the resulting stochastic growth kinetics. In linear control, the intrinsic non-linearity of the system is maintained at all times. In our protocol, the control is applied to only a small number \(n_{\mathrm{c}}\) of Fourier modes. The stationary-state roughness is obtained analytically in the small-\(n_{\mathrm{c}}\) regime with weak non-linear coupling wherein the controlled growth process is found to result in Edwards-Wilkinson dynamics. Furthermore, when the non-linear KPZ coupling is strong, we discern a regime where the controlled dynamics shows scaling in accordance to the KPZ universality class. We perform a detailed numerical analysis to investigate the controlled dynamics subject to weak as well as strong non-linearity. A first-order perturbation theory calculation supports the simulation results in the weak non-linear regime. For strong non-linearity, we find a temporal crossover between KPZ and dispersive growth regimes, with the crossover time scaling with the number \(n_{\mathrm{c}}\) of controlled Fourier modes. We observe that the height distribution is positively skewed, indicating that as a consequence of the linear control, the surface morphology displays fewer and smaller hills than in the uncontrolled growth process, and that the inherent size-dependent stationary-state roughness provides an upper limit for the roughness of the controlled system.
MSC:
| 82C31 | Stochastic methods (Fokker-Planck, Langevin, etc.) applied to problems in time-dependent statistical mechanics |
| 82C22 | Interacting particle systems in time-dependent statistical mechanics |
| 60H15 | Stochastic partial differential equations (aspects of stochastic analysis) |
| 93E03 | Stochastic systems in control theory (general) |
Cite
References:
| [1] | Baer D R et al 2013 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 31 05 ·doi:10.1116/1.4818423 |
| [2] | Makeev M A, Cuerno R and Barabási A L 2002 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 197 185 ·doi:10.1016/s0168-583x(02)01436-2 |
| [3] | Li J, Hu J, Zhu Y, Yu X, Yu M and Yang H 2020 Addit. Manuf.34 101283 ·doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101283 |
| [4] | Villapún V M et al 2020 Addit. Manuf.36 101528 ·doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101528 |
| [5] | Elsholz F, Schöll E and Rosenfeld A 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett.84 4167 ·doi:10.1063/1.1755425 |
| [6] | Barabási A L and Stanley H E 1995 Fractal Concepts in Surface Growth (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) ·Zbl 0838.58023 ·doi:10.1017/CBO9780511599798 |
| [7] | Kuramoto Y 1978 Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.64 346 ·doi:10.1143/ptps.64.346 |
| [8] | Sivashinsky G I 1980 SIAM J. Appl. Math.39 67 ·Zbl 0464.76055 ·doi:10.1137/0139007 |
| [9] | Kardar M, Parisi G and Zhang Y-C 1986 Phys. Rev. Lett.56 889 ·Zbl 1101.82329 ·doi:10.1103/physrevlett.56.889 |
| [10] | Amar J G and Family F 1993 Phys. Rev. E 47 1595 ·doi:10.1103/physreve.47.1595 |
| [11] | Halpin-Healy T and Yang Y-C 1995 Phys. Rep.254 215 ·doi:10.1016/0370-1573(94)00087-j |
| [12] | Zhang K A, Sano M, Sasamoto T and Spohn H 2011 Sci. Rep.1 34 ·doi:10.1038/srep00034 |
| [13] | Fukai Y T and Takeuchi K A 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett.119 030602 ·doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.030602 |
| [14] | Halpin-Healy T and Takeuchi K A 2015 J. Stat. Phys.160 794 ·Zbl 1327.82065 ·doi:10.1007/s10955-015-1282-1 |
| [15] | Kriecherbauer T and Krug J 2010 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.43 403001 ·Zbl 1202.82058 ·doi:10.1088/1751-8113/43/40/403001 |
| [16] | Family F and Vicsek T 1985 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.18 L75 ·doi:10.1088/0305-4470/18/2/005 |
| [17] | Forster D, Nelson D R and Stephen M J 1977 Phys. Rev. A 16 732 ·doi:10.1103/physreva.16.732 |
| [18] | Edwards S F and Wilkinson D R 1982 Proc. R. Soc. A 381 17 ·doi:10.1098/rspa.1982.0056 |
| [19] | Armaou A and Christofides P D 2000 Physica D 137 49 ·Zbl 0952.93060 ·doi:10.1016/s0167-2789(99)00175-x |
| [20] | Lou Y and Christofides P D 2003 IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol.11 737 ·doi:10.1109/tcst.2003.816405 |
| [21] | Lou Y and Christofides P D 2006 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.45 7177 ·doi:10.1021/ie060410h |
| [22] | Gomes S N, Pradas M, Kalliadasis S, Papageorgiou D T and Pavliotis G A 2015 Phys. Rev. E 92 022912 ·doi:10.1103/physreve.92.022912 |
| [23] | Gomes S N, Kalliadasis S, Papageorgiou D T, Pavliotis G A and Pradas M 2017 Physica D 348 33 ·Zbl 1376.93119 ·doi:10.1016/j.physd.2017.02.011 |
| [24] | Priyanka, Täuber U C and Pleimling M 2020 Phys. Rev. E 101 022101 ·doi:10.1103/physreve.101.022101 |
| [25] | Ueno K, Sakaguchi H and Okamura M 2005 Phys. Rev. E 71 046138 ·doi:10.1103/physreve.71.046138 |
| [26] | Spalart P R, Moser R D and Rogers M M 1991 J. Comput. Phys.96 297 ·Zbl 0726.76074 ·doi:10.1016/0021-9991(91)90238-g |
| [27] | Frey E and Täuber U C 1994 Phys. Rev. E 50 1024 ·doi:10.1103/physreve.50.1024 |
| [28] | Bhattacharjee J K and Bhattacharyya S 2007 Non-Linear Dynamics Near and Far from Equilibrium (Netherlands: Springer) ·Zbl 1114.82001 |
| [29] | Corwin I 2012 Random Matrices: Theor. Appl.01 1130001 ·Zbl 1247.82040 ·doi:10.1142/s2010326311300014 |
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.
