I accidentally created a duplicate for the test caseZ16421 for the functionZ16409. --Volvox (talk)19:08, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Done --Ameisenigel (talk)08:03, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by:Ameisenigel (talk)08:03, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Z13343 is a duplicate ofZ12427, but it only has one implementation and no tests. I think it can be deleted.ScienceD90 (talk)02:09, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Done --Ameisenigel (talk)06:20, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by:Ameisenigel (talk)06:20, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

I tried creating a natural language but created a function. Can you please delete this function I created?Kurmanbek (talk)00:30, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Done, thanks.99of9 (talk)01:14, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by:Ameisenigel (talk)06:23, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Function created by @RuzDD. Seems to be done for testing and learning purposes. The implementation seems to be copy and pasted from somewhere, and tries to run Flash from a given source, which is nothing we currently support. Implementation is here:Z13080, and should be deleted too. --Denny (talk)18:18, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

I did not know the exact purpose of Wikifunctions and you may be right, but I did not copy the implementation from somewhere. Why you think I was copied the implementation from somewhere @Denny? I never made edits with copyvios. (By the way, even if won't be deleted, I should largely edit this implementation to make it not use Ruffle if the browser asks for permission.)RuzDD (talk)08:08, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Also, it was not done for testing and learning purposes.RuzDD (talk)10:16, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

@RuzDD: Apologies, I did not mean any disrespect. I now read up on the April discussion, and sorry I missed the discussion back then. But yes, this does not align with the current capabilities of Wikifunctions, nor will it for a long while. Thanks! --Denny (talk)19:24, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

We discussed this function as RuzDD was creating it backhere. Because it doesn't match what Wikifunctions is capable of, I suggest we delete this and you try some simpler functions more similar to the ones we already have working. --99of9 (talk)13:10, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Thanks everyone, deletion of this function is not a problem for me.RuzDD (talk)09:01, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Done --Ameisenigel (talk)18:45, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by:Ameisenigel (talk)18:45, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

This is a duplicate ofZ17186. Please delete it and it's tests.ScienceD90 (talk)02:11, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Done. I've tranferred the tests to the other one.99of9 (talk)06:04, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by:Ameisenigel (talk)19:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Is using "byte" instead of "natural number" as the type for the second argument, and "codepoint" instead of "string" for the third argument. I was planning to fix it up, but then discovered that we already haveZ14770, which is using exactly these argument types. So I moved the missing labels from Z10093 to Z14770, also switched the JS implementationZ10094 from Z10093 to Z14770. The Python implementations of both functions,Z14772 andZ10107 are the same (modulo a bug). Therefore I suggest to also deleteZ10107. There are no tests to be brought over. --Denny (talk)21:22, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Done --Ameisenigel (talk)17:47, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by:Ameisenigel (talk)17:47, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

I accidentally made this with the wrong signature. It is suppose to take an object and a key reference but I accidently only put the object as the inputScienceD90 (talk)01:13, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

You can just add another input to the function. --Ameisenigel (talk)16:55, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Not done Second input was added. --Ameisenigel (talk)17:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by:Ameisenigel (talk)17:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Duplicate ofZ16693 it seems. --Denny (talk)01:46, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Whoops! I'll merge now, thanks for picking it up. --99of9 (talk)01:52, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Done99of9 (talk)02:10, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by:Ameisenigel (talk)17:47, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

duplicate ofZ17435 --ScienceD90 (talk)01:20, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Done --Ameisenigel (talk)17:49, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by:Ameisenigel (talk)17:49, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Unneded ZObject for an empty string. Current usage could be easily converted to use an empty string directly. --Ameisenigel (talk)18:26, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

But it may sometimes be easier to read an object with a label instead of a string literal, or tell the intention better. I am a bit torn about such literals, I really don't know. I for sure do not have a principled stand on this yet. (Note that this comment is explicitly in my hat as a volunteer). --Denny (talk)15:03, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

The interface should distinguish between different code points that are currently displayed as "". In the meantime, I guess it is convenient to have a literal Z6 for each invisible code point that is used in a composition or test case. (I feel a new implementation ofZ10008 coming on…Z17075.)

In any event, I do not believe that an object should be formally proposed for deletion on this page without a notice on its own talk page that notifies its watchers of what is proposed (except for recently created objects that fall into the categories listed in the first paragraph of this page). Perhaps we should have a “Consider for deletion” section or page?GrounderUK (talk)10:42, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Keep. I think it helps to have examples of a handful of hardcoded objects of each type. They are easily accessible viaSpecial:ListObjectsByType. This one is also especially useful for making compositions more readable. One slight concern is that a vandal could change the underlying object, and break multiple functions. So I'd actually favour some kind of page protection on it. --99of9 (talk)00:06, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Seems like there is no consensus, soRequest withdrawn --Ameisenigel (talk)15:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by:Ameisenigel (talk)15:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)