I request deletion of the following function and tests:

• Z28383
• Z28384
• Z28431
• Z28430
• Z28429

Reason: I decided to adopt a different approach, which has resulted inZ28432 (which shouldnot be deleted). Thanks!DMartin (WMF) (talk)01:21, 25 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

InZ28432 I don't understand why you supply the item as well as the statement. The statement already specifies the item as its subject. So the sentence could be generated from a statement alone?99of9 (talk)03:31, 25 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

I did that for one reason, an optimization – to avoid having to fetch the item again unnecessarily. I expect/assume the item has already been fetched by the calling function (so that it could choose the statement of interest). The item is still needed, to get its label in the requested language. If it's not passed through as a separate argument, the implementation ofZ28432 would be forced to fetch it again. (The statement, of course, merely carries a reference to the item, not the full item.)DMartin (WMF) (talk)02:04, 15 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. --99of9 (talk)05:06, 20 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

@DMartin (WMF): FYI --Ameisenigel (talk)18:52, 13 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Could I request these two implementations:Z28769 andZ29063? --GrimRob (talk)20:17, 24 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Done~/Bunnypranav:<ping>03:48, 25 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment.~/Bunnypranav:<ping>03:48, 25 October 2025 (UTC)Reply