Documentation
statement supported by
entity that supports a given statement
| Description | entity that supports a given statement |
|---|
| Represents | controversy(Q1255828),opinion(Q3962655) |
|---|
| Data type | Item |
|---|
| Example | - Choekyi Gyaltsen, 10th Panchen Lama(Q83312)followed by(P156)Panchen Erdeni Choskyi Gyalpo(Q724350), <statement supported by>People's Republic of China(Q148);Choekyi Gyaltsen, 10th Panchen Lama(Q83312)followed by(P156)Gedhun Choekyi Nyima(Q372526), <statement supported by>Central Tibetan Administration(Q326343)
- Use ofdesignated as terrorist by(P3461) can be replaced withinstance of(P31)terrorist organization(Q17127659) with this qualifier
(note: this information should be moved to a property statement; use propertyWikidata property example(P1855),Wikidata property example for properties(P2271),Wikidata property example for lexemes(P5192),Wikidata property example for forms(P5193) orWikidata property example for senses(P5977)) |
|---|
| See also | criterion used(P1013),statement disputed by(P1310),nature of statement(P5102) |
|---|
| Lists | |
|---|
| Proposal discussion | Proposal discussion |
|---|
| Current uses | | Total | 175,318 | | | Main statement | 82 | <0.1% of uses | | Qualifier | 174,946 | 99.8% of uses | | Reference | 290 | 0.2% of uses |
|
|---|
[
createCreate a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here] | This property is being used by:
Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.) |
I think we forgot aboutapproved by(P790).d1g (talk)05:35, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
- @D1gggg: Looks like it. I think maybe we should get rid of the qualifier use of P790 rather than delete this, though. (Not certain.) Still, we definitely shouldn't have a duplicate. --Yair rand (talk)22:15, 15 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
Use in references ?
[edit]I used this property in a reference snak to source a religion claim :https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q329&oldid=997580975#P140 . It’s a constraint violation but I don’t really think it should be. We have stuff to say that something is stated in a news article, « stated in », but not really « by whom », here it’s the case of a person that proclaims something in an event, that thing is reported in a newspaper article.statement supported by(P3680) seems perfect to say the « who » said.author TomT0m /talkpage08:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
