Paez, Eze (2017)What harmful practices? The material scope of animal protection legislation.Animal Sentience 16(17)
Invited Commentary
Jonathan Birch,Animal sentience and the precautionary principle
Jonathan Birch proposes a criterion for the subjective scope of animal protection legislation. He says nothing about its material scope: which harmful practices it should regulate. I argue, first, that most moral views would agree that the worst forms of animal exploitation should be legally forbidden, even if there will inevitably be disagreement about some cases of animal experimentation. I also argue that, when feasible, there should be legal provisions to help wild animals.
10.51291/2377-7478.1260
Cognition and Perception Commons,Cognitive Neuroscience Commons,Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons,Evolution Commons,Philosophy of Mind Commons,Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons,Zoology Commons
Home |About |FAQ |My Account |Accessibility Statement
Animal Sentience is a publication of WellBeing International