The fatal flaw of the original article has never been addressed.
The authors premise is Mao was the originator/inventor/author of the CCP policies implemented during his time as Chairman. He is thus measured as being responsible for the success or failures of those policies.
The debate about the efficacy of those policies is irrelevant.
The bantering over the moral justifications or morality of those policies is also irrelevant.
This whole line of argument is an absurd non-sequitur which only makes the articles authorseem
vindicated. He has honestly and accurately provided valid info, which supports his STRAWMAN Mao.
Herein lies the rub:
To what extent did Mr. Mao’s personal interests ambitions ideologies superstitions etc… influence policy.
The author of the article concedes Mao was only Chairman, nothing more nothing less.
Indeed, but how much of Mao was actually IN those policies, Our author conveniently offers ZERO evidence.
Thus he wishes to credit Mao with all success in one breath but affirms his position is merely as Chief Spokesperson for the agendas in the next.
Now lets judges apples to apples to see if his argument holds water.
Take ANY National leader and dig into their personal contributions to the policies implemented during their tenure.
Close examination is available in print for most leaders.
Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini being dictators naturally should be expected as having the most potential for having their OWN personals agendas implemented.
I argue historians have thoroughly & consistently pointed out how little actual power despots enjoyed and dispensed. Moreover how delicate and fragile that power was. and how sensitive it was if the ‘Right” policies were not championed. And how a “Leaders” longevity is so directly proportional to his “Leadership Role” in implementing promoting or rejecting ‘HIS? policies’”
Ask Saddam or Muammar how well it went for them when they exerted their personal desires and changed their countries policies to bite the hand that fed them.
Now scroll down to Mao and Churchill, Roosevelt etc…
We should expect an even far more restrictive environment for investment of personal preferences and initiatives, save embellishing their own aggrandizement self-accreditation.
Judged in this light FDR, Churchill rank as Supreme Sycophants.
Mao was thus ENTHRONED as G.M. of ZOG’s farm team with plans to enter the Majors and was later awarded a National franchise.
Just as IKE was enthroned as S.C.A.F. not for his military skills and experience which were no-existent, save incompetency, Especially so in Mao’s case . No he was likewise enthroned for his political savvy i.e. Skill as a sycophant.
Mao’s Chairmanship was directly proportional to his skill as a sycophant.
He has been thoroughly doxed as a product of the Rockefeller Globalist progroms.
Our intentionally incompetant author will dare not reveal who is the true author of the ‘Five Year Plans” of both Russia and China as it would again negate his premise.
What is also well documented, which again the author of the article has decided to ignore dismiss, is that on the occasions Mao did take a personal active interest to assert his own energy and zeal (as aggressively as he did with the Sparrows and Teen girls). We find a direct correlation to the more painful and disastrous episodes in China’s history.
In this light we can now understand the quality and competency of the Author and the article.
I've gone through this Mao's-Gigantic-Famine-Never-Happened nonsense too many times to bother arguing it again, but here's China's official demographic population from a couple of decades later, which shows a *gigantic* hole right around 1959-1961:
My grandparents lived in rural, they don’t know anyone who starved to dead either, neither do the grandparents of about two dozens of my schoolmates.
Finding people who “didn’t notice anything” is easy, it’s finding the opposite that is hard.
See Gao Mobo (2018), Ch.8.
In brief:
What makes the issue of the Great Leap Forward (GLF) death toll more contestable is that there was no population census, nor a sample survey, at that time. The population statistics of 1958–61 were released for the first time in the China Statistical Yearbook in 1983, according to which the population at the year-end of 1960 and 1961 decreased by ten million and 3.48 million from the previous years respectively. Neither the minister for Public Security nor the State Statistics Bureau provided, or has ever been able to provide, an explanation for the dent. Hence the famine death toll was given as the obvious explanation. But a mathematician, prof. Sun Jingxian (2016) provides an alternative account:
1) missing registration or double registration happened at a time when the hukou system regulations could not be fully enforced and when
2) there was huge migration during the GLF
3) the rural sector did not rely on government ration tickets for food and welfare provisions, and therefore hukou registration only restricted their movement to the urban sector but did not impact their livelihood when they returned to the country, facts of which can be confirmed in Luo Pinghan (2003).
Blacks beat up whites in schools, stations, buses, trains. In ‘street sports’, blacks dominate others.
And in high schools, it doesn’t take too many blacks to take over the sports. If a high school is 10% black, they will dominate much of the popular sports. It means white guys will be reduced to benchwarmers and fan cucks, and white girls will go with black athletes. At least in the past, pop culture didn’t promote that, but that’s all pop culture does with music, advertising, and tv shows.
Blacks only dominate in basketball and American football; even in professional baseball, the percentage of blacks participating is decreasing. Winter sports? next to no presence. Boxing? Blacks are on the way down.
Such a party would have to be controlled by Jews to have any chance whatsoever to claim legitimacy. That sums up the situation, IMHO.
Contemplate the paradox before proceeding any further.
An interesting rant.
If you don’t quickly build a new political party to address all this anomie, the jews will just continue to press forward until everyone gets burnt out. Why can’t you see we suffer the same fate as the Wiemar republic, imposed on us by the very same psychopaths? WTF are you waiting for???
Whites wont last for much longer!
They are trying to ram Critical Race Theory (CRT) into schools (although it is being increasingly rejected). Its aim is to teach Blacks and Browns that the only reason they’re behind is because of “White Privilege”. It uses words such as “oppressor” and “oppressed”.
Let me tell you about my White Privilege. I spent more hours around the kitchen table helping my kids with their homework than their teachers did teaching them. It was hard work, but I didn’t mind doing it if it helped my children. I didn’t care if they were the top of the class; I just didn’t want them to be at the bottom. This is what Black and Brown parents don’t want to do. It’s easier to just blame others, to play the VICTIM again.
On White Privilege:
“It’s not privilege. It’s cultural heritage. If someone feels uncomfortable because I’m White, they sure picked a funny place to live. What you claim as privilege would vanish in an instant if I moved to Japan, Saudi Arabia or Africa. In-group preference and cultural heritage are not privilege.”
White culture has been systematically crippled by the sexual revolution, the pill, the porn industry, the Immigration Act, multiculturalism, by Jews wresting control of the media/Hollywood/academia, by blaming White men for all ills, feminism gone wild (the roots of feminism were good), LGBTQ gone wild, forced busing and desegregation, the coddling welfare state, etc.
But White culture is not dead. It’s just lying dormant. Whites need to put their “niceness” aside, see the enemy clearly, become warriors and take back their country.
“Trump couldn’t win either way, Jews couldn’t lose either way.” Why? Because Jews own the media.
“Why do Americans…care NOTHING about Palestinians?” Because Jews own the media.
“The reason why whites feel a special thing for blacks…” Because Jews own the media.
Jews and Blacks are both predators, Jews just being the more intelligent predator. Jews, because they own the media, have painted both themselves and Blacks as the ultimate victims, exactly what sociopaths/psychopaths like to do. They lack honor, fear and empathy. They will cheat, lie, steal and kill.
A grievance (victimhood) will be held as long as it promises you some reward. It doesn’t have to have anything to do with reality. It’s just that if it gives someone an advantage, they’ll hold the grudge. It’s game, a hustle.
So Whites are squeezed between two predators, two tribes who see themselves separate and distinct from White America. Jews are using Blacks to maintain power, and Blacks have been basking in a fake-adoration, courtesy of the Jewish media.
Whites are trusting, they believed their government. They do have empathy and honor (most of them). They must do, otherwise the Jews would not have been so successful.
Whites want to be seen as “nice”. They’re too caught up in what other people think of them. This is a mistake as you’re only seeing yourself through someone else’s eyes. Whites must see these two pseudo-victim groups for what they are: predators. Once seen in this light, they can develop healthy boundaries, fight back, and regain respect.
I see this happening right now. Whites are waking up. That’s why the Jews are clamping down hard; they’re afraid. More and more people are waking up all over the Internet and they’re angry.
Always beware of people who habitually paint themselves as VICTIMS because, in reality, they are predators in sheep’s clothing.
jungfreud’s coming articles:
1. hawaii five o: how sexist zionist infiltrated and corrupted american legal system and terrorized the christians.
2. the a team: the narratology of zionist terrorism and the pogrom of american christians.
The Chinese Great Proletarian Revolution was frenzy, but it was in no way crazy. There were many lynch mobs arising all the time, but there were no Floyds being glorified : whenever those kind of street monkeys (there were many in China) came to be known to the public, they were shot and their family had to pay for the bullet. The Cultural Revolution glorified workers and suspected all non-menial workers to be parasites : the main target of the Cultural revolution were cultural marxists actually. The American phenomenon, on BOTH sides of the political divide, attacks workers first and foremost while setting street delinquents, cult leaders, eternal students in useless studies and shady businessmen as moral examples. The people that animated the cultural revolution were all against the American Liberal Democrats first and foremost, they felt somewhat more in tune, if only as adverse negotiators, with culturally conservative Republicans.
The verticals between the trend line and the actual population line would show the missing lives for whatever reason.
Since the Communists always said that they were responsible for anything that happens in a communist country, even the drop in the birth rate would be their responsibility.
That would simply imply what the population would be if the trend in population growth continued as previously and not how many people were actually killed. The negative blips are mostly due to people killed and who died of whatever cause and they hardly add up to what you mentioned.
Why don’t you continue the trend line that has the first break in it, marking the beginning of WW 1 at 1914?
„Bolshevism cannot escape responsibility for the establishment of a dictatorship instilled with hatred for the individual. As a result of its criminal actions, more than sixty million people were exterminated. Bolshevism, as a species and forerunner of fascism, made itself the principal force in the genocide of its own people.”
(Alexander N. Yakovlev: a Century of Violence in Soviet Russia, Yale University Press, 2002, p.237.)
Now Yakovlev was a high ranking soviet functionary, one of the highest ranking.
So the USA is wallowing in the crimes of its Holy Ally. Remarkable observation.
what an empire of lie!
make such parallels so conveniently simply because such kind of projections about China and Mao have been made in decades.
build up new lies, based on old lies, and sounds all concrete, amazing!!!
It’s easy when the MSM is a sewer of vicious liars. NO presstitute in Austfailia would dare to outline the truth of Russia’s position re. the fascist Ukronazi regime, the truth of MH17, the truth about Israel, the truth of US aggression, the truth of Lockerbie, the truth regarding Xinjiang etc, etc, because it would not be published and they would be unemployable. No wonder the curs, particularly the feminazi bitches, turned on Assange, a truth-teller, which such uniform viciousness. Not so much the Big Lie but Universal Lies.
Exactly my point Bhai. Communist elites enjoy life while majority live like slaves.
The ordinary Indians today are very, very lucky indeed. Their standard of living is so much better than that of the ordinary Chinese! I have learnt from Indian posters on the web that all those supposed progress (e.g. HS trains, brand new cities, etc) in China is nothing but commie propaganda. 🙂
Kingdom Bhai,
The cursed Luo died on August 3, 1978, while in West Germany for medical treatment. How he go to Germany for medical treatment? How many common people in Chin could go to Germany for medical treatment? And why he go to West Germany and not Communist East Germany?
Bhai, Communism is Communist elite enjoying good life while majority of people live like the gulams (slaves). Communism is Gulami, it is slavery.
Mao also made the most of the lifestyle of an emperor, this is implicitly encouraged in Chinese culture,
Exactly my point Bhai. Communist elites enjoy life while majority live like slaves. Even Nehru was doing such dirty things because even he was Communist thug mind as well he was English thief type. He did not have Indian-Bharatiya mind. One who thinks like Muslim, like English, like Marxwadi, he can never be a true Indian, he is lost to dirty foreign thinking, not the great thinking of our ancient sages.
Compared to that, our Modiji not do such dirty things as this is not part of our ancient Bharatiya culture. Modiji gave his life as pracharak for RSS. He sacrificed his life for welfare of nation and now he takes us to new heights.
Take care Bhai.
Mehool Bhai.
Thanks Kingdom Bhai
Luo attempted suicide by jumping off a building but failed
Hahaha Karma. Attack India and then face karma. Bhai, Communism is like mafia. Just like Amrika. In Communism there is always power struggle in between mafia.
Mao’s letter to Zhou En-Lai on Dec 27, 1966 which showed his position about Cultural Revolution:
“恩来同志:最近,不少来京革命师生和革命群众来信问我,给走资本主义道路的当权派和牛鬼蛇神戴高帽子、打花脸、游街是否算武斗?我认为:这种作法应该算是武斗的一种形式。这种作法不好。这种作法达不到教育人民的目的。这里我强调一下,在斗争中一定要坚持文斗,不用武斗,因为武斗只能触及人的身体,不能触及人的灵魂。只有坚持文斗,不用武斗,摆事实,讲道理,以理服人,才能斗出水平来,才能真正达到教育人民的目的。应该分析,武斗绝大多数是少数别有用心的资产阶级反动分子挑动起来的,他们有意破坏党的政策,破坏无产阶级文化大革命,降低党的威信。凡是动手打人的,应该依法处之。
请转告来京革命师生和革命群众。”
Google translate:
“Comrade Enlai: Recently, many revolutionary teachers and students and revolutionary masses who have come to Beijing have written to me asking me whether wearing high hats, punching their faces, and parading the streets of the establishment who take the capitalist road is considered martial combat. I think this practice should be regarded as a form of armed combat. This is not good. This practice does not serve the purpose of educating the people. Here I would like to emphasize that in the struggle, we must persist in literary fighting and do not use armed combat, because armed fighting can only touch people’s bodies, not people’s souls. Only by persisting in fighting with literature, not using armed combat, laying out facts, reasoning, and convincing people with reason can we fight to the level and truly achieve the goal of educating the people. It should be analyzed that the overwhelming majority of armed struggle was instigated by a small number of bourgeois reactionaries with ulterior motives, who deliberately sabotaged the Party’s policies, undermined the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, and lowered the Party’s prestige.Anyone who beats someone with his hands should be punished according to law.
Please convey to the revolutionary teachers and students and the revolutionary masses who have come to Beijing”
— My bolded text
https://www.marxists.org/chinese/maozedong/1968/5-235.htm
I have to give it to the Western propagandists in that they’re so good at inventing ‘fake history’ by rewriting the past. They had to weave a tangled web of half-truths and outright lies, blended together so no one notices the contradictions in their pseudo-historical narrative which gets confirmed in their own echo chamber. Repeated over time, those echoes become accepted not as an article of faith but as a matter of fact as if a Big Lie repeated long enough becomes truth. You can see this process clearly in how Hirohito has been ‘sanitized’ by the Ministry of Truth, so much so that Hirohito’s ‘sainthood’ has become accepted as historical fact in the so-called ‘Collective West’.
A loathsome racist and misogynist. This place certainly attracts the detritus of humanity. Pig ignorant, too, as usual.
The West has a beef with Mao. But where’s the beef?
Thirty million or three crores is not a small figure. When one million people died in Britain’s colony, Ireland, in 1846-47, the world knew about it. When three million people died in the 1943-44 Bengal famine, the fact that a famine occurred was known. Yet 30 million people are supposed to have died in China without anyone knowing at that time that a famine took place. The reason no one knew about it is simple, for a massive famine did not take place at all. The intellectuals who quote the massive famine deaths figure of 30 million today are no doubt outstandingly clever in the small,im kleinen, but are proving themselves to be rather foolish,im grossen, in the large. A person has to be very foolhardy indeed to say that 30 million people died in a famine without anyone including the foreign diplomats in China and the China-watchers abroad having the slightest inkling of it. And those who credulously believe this claim and uncritically repeat it show an even greater folly than the originators of the claim.
The Western powers that be and the Western MSM sewer ONLY lie about China. It’s part racist and cultural supremacism, and, lately, as China’s rise went hyperbolic, sheer fucking terror and ‘…rage at the dying of the White’. It’s quite common for deranged, hate-crazed, Western simpletons to accuse Mao, plainly the greatest figure of the 20th century, of ‘killing’ one hundred million. ANY number will do.
In China, you ask 'where pok?'Replies: @antibeast
The West has a beef with Mao. But where’s the beef?
In China, you ask ‘where pok?’
In China, there’s a saying — “Kill the chicken to scare the monkey!” (殺雞儆猴) — which is exactly what happened during the Cultural Revolution. As for the so-called ‘Great Leap Forward’, that was a ‘red herring’ intended by Mao to divert attention away from his secretive “Two Bombs and One Satellite” program which is equivalent to two Manhattan and one Sputnik projects, all started during the GLF. Of course, Westoids like you don’t know about the “Two Bombs and One Satellite” program because Western propagandists only focus on the GLF, specifically his notorious ‘backyard furnaces’ which serves as a meme to ‘demonize’ Mao, as some kind of metaphor alluding to the ‘gas chambers’ of Auschwitz. And to make Mao look like a monster worse than Hitler, the Western propagandists (which includes their paid-for Chinese collaborators) had to fabricate ‘fake stats’ and invent pseudo-historical narratives about the GLF without even bothering to verify their lurid claims against historical facts. What comes out is a tangled web of deceitful half-truths and outright falsehoods which became more bizarre as time went by. As Shakespeare puts it: “Oh what a tangled web we weave/When first we practice to deceive”.
Yes I did mean Wilhelm. The Cultural Marxists had interesting insightful things to say until they got into their mostly depraved ideology. Intellectual Jews and women tend to be like that. Charles Reich was an American Jewish professor whose book The Greening of America saw redemption in early 1970s hedonistic College students. Koestler pooh poohed him as not at all original but the book was a best seller. Time magazine reviewer called it the Fourth Reich.
Charles Reich? You mean Wilhelm Reich, don’t You?
Revolution devour its wong
Mehool Bhai, the PLA commander of the Sino-Indian War Luo Ruiqing 罗瑞卿 was purged during the Cultural Revolution.
On March 18, 1966, Luo attempted suicide by jumping off a building but failed. He was put into a basket and carried for more struggle sessions.
Liu Shaoqi commented: “Actually, suicide requires some skill, it should have been head first, but he landed feet first, his feet were broken, and his head was not injured.”
Deng Xiaoping: “Just like a female diving athlete, jumped like a popsicle”.
Ye Jianying composed an impromptu poem: “The general’s reputation is shattered in one jump”;
Mao only said: “What a loser.”
To be fair, Mao’s military strategy, political theory, commentaries on history, poetry, calligraphy, alone qualified him as a literati,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Contradiction
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Protracted_War
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poetry_of_Mao_Zedong
https://en.thevalue.com/articles/mao-zedong-letter-sothebys-auction
Mao also made the most of the lifestyle of an emperor, this is implicitly encouraged in Chinese culture,
Hahaha Karma. Attack India and then face karma. Bhai, Communism is like mafia. Just like Amrika. In Communism there is always power struggle in between mafia.
Luo attempted suicide by jumping off a building but failed
Exactly my point Bhai. Communist elites enjoy life while majority live like slaves. Even Nehru was doing such dirty things because even he was Communist thug mind as well he was English thief type. He did not have Indian-Bharatiya mind. One who thinks like Muslim, like English, like Marxwadi, he can never be a true Indian, he is lost to dirty foreign thinking, not the great thinking of our ancient sages.
Mao also made the most of the lifestyle of an emperor, this is implicitly encouraged in Chinese culture,
The West has a beef with Mao. But where’s the beef?
Thirty million or three crores is not a small figure. When one million people died in Britain’s colony, Ireland, in 1846-47, the world knew about it. When three million people died in the 1943-44 Bengal famine, the fact that a famine occurred was known. Yet 30 million people are supposed to have died in China without anyone knowing at that time that a famine took place. The reason no one knew about it is simple, for a massive famine did not take place at all. The intellectuals who quote the massive famine deaths figure of 30 million today are no doubt outstandingly clever in the small,im kleinen, but are proving themselves to be rather foolish,im grossen, in the large. A person has to be very foolhardy indeed to say that 30 million people died in a famine without anyone including the foreign diplomats in China and the China-watchers abroad having the slightest inkling of it. And those who credulously believe this claim and uncritically repeat it show an even greater folly than the originators of the claim.
The West has a beef with Mao. But where’s the beef?
In China, you ask ‘where pok?’
In China, you ask ‘where pok?’In China, there’s a saying — “Kill the chicken to scare the monkey!” (殺雞儆猴) — which is exactly what happened during the Cultural Revolution. As for the so-called ‘Great Leap Forward’, that was a ‘red herring’ intended by Mao to divert attention away from his secretive “Two Bombs and One Satellite” program which is equivalent to two Manhattan and one Sputnik projects, all started during the GLF. Of course, Westoids like you don’t know about the “Two Bombs and One Satellite” program because Western propagandists only focus on the GLF, specifically his notorious ‘backyard furnaces’ which serves as a meme to ‘demonize’ Mao, as some kind of metaphor alluding to the ‘gas chambers’ of Auschwitz. And to make Mao look like a monster worse than Hitler, the Western propagandists (which includes their paid-for Chinese collaborators) had to fabricate ‘fake stats’ and invent pseudo-historical narratives about the GLF without even bothering to verify their lurid claims against historical facts. What comes out is a tangled web of deceitful half-truths and outright falsehoods which became more bizarre as time went by. As Shakespeare puts it: “Oh what a tangled web we weave/When first we practice to deceive”.
You don’t really need to talk about China with Japanese. The Japanese don’t even acknowledge the massacres they did, and hypocritical races like the Japanese can only exist as sex slaves for the Americans.
The West has a beef with Mao. But where’s the beef?
Thirty million or three crores is not a small figure. When one million people died in Britain’s colony, Ireland, in 1846-47, the world knew about it. When three million people died in the 1943-44 Bengal famine, the fact that a famine occurred was known. Yet 30 million people are supposed to have died in China without anyone knowing at that time that a famine took place. The reason no one knew about it is simple, for a massive famine did not take place at all. The intellectuals who quote the massive famine deaths figure of 30 million today are no doubt outstandingly clever in the small,im kleinen, but are proving themselves to be rather foolish,im grossen, in the large. A person has to be very foolhardy indeed to say that 30 million people died in a famine without anyone including the foreign diplomats in China and the China-watchers abroad having the slightest inkling of it. And those who credulously believe this claim and uncritically repeat it show an even greater folly than the originators of the claim.
Wendy’s no longer has the beef and a fast food hamburger meal cost almost as much as a sit down restaurant meal. In Jew world you have FAKE egg shortages which effects a long list of products that use eggs. Wendy’s ( no matter which one you happen upon) has become one the slowest fast food burger chains out there. Thanks, Jews, the Kangz of Shit.
It’s safe to say that there is more to this situation than meets the eye. There is in fact more to the human condition than can be codified by law or interpreted by faith. The ancients called it Fate, some today call it destiny; maybe it’s just human imagination in overdrive, but the idea is appealing that the “karma” accumulated from a lifetime of evil deeds may have indeed attracted evil to itself in the case of George Floyd, in the form of a homicidal police officer. Net loss to society might be reckoned pretty much as zero. Neither of these dangerous men will ever hurt another innocent citizen. In a perfect world, perhaps, both might have lived to see the hurtfulness of their ways and to seek atonement, but that world is not the planet we inhabit.
That Mr. Floyd has become the hero of a so-called justice movement only strikes me as yet more evidence of how tightly the narrative is being controlled in our time on behalf of those who profit most from maintaining an unjust status quo. Throughout history, the two great tools of tyranny are distraction and division. We are free to argue among ourselves to our hearts’ content, call one another vulgar names, carry silly protest signs, raise up makeshift memorials or tear down ancient statues. But are we not able to have laws passed and enforced that acknowledge and remedy the fundamental problem of our time, the unprecedented acquisition of vast wealth and influence by a tiny cabal of power-addicted men.
More Priss Bhai about monster.
The excess mortality associated with the famine has been estimated by former CCP officials and international experts, with most giving a number in the range of 15–55 million deaths. According to historian Mobo Gao, those who are anti-Communist want to stretch the death toll number as high as possible, whereas those who are sympathetic to the Chinese Revolution would like to see the numbers as low as possible. Some specific estimates include the following (ranging from lowest to highest):
Yang Songlin (杨松林), researcher at the Development Research Center of the State Council in Henan, estimated that roughly 2.6–4 million people died during the famine years.
Sun Jingxian (孙经先), scholar in applied mathematics and professor at Shandong University, concluded an estimate of 3.66 million “anomalous deaths” during the famine years.
Utsa Patnaik, an Indian Marxian economist, estimated that 11 million deaths were caused due to the famine.
Daniel Houser, Barbara Sands and Erte Xiao writing in the Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization estimated that China suffered 14.8 million excess deaths during the famine. About 69% of the deaths (or 10.3 million) seem attributable to effects stemming from national policies.
In 1989, a research team of the Chinese Academy of Sciences concluded that at least 15 million people died of malnutrition.
Shujie Yao (姚书杰), chair of economics at the Business School of Middlesex University, concluded that 18 million people perished due to the famine.
Li Chengrui (李成瑞), former Minister of the National Bureau of Statistics of China, estimated 22 million deaths (1998). His estimate was based on the 27 million deaths[8][35] estimated by Ansley J. Coale, and the 17 million deaths estimated by Jiang Zhenghua (蒋正华).
Peng Xizhe (彭希哲), Professor of Population and Development at Fudan University, estimated 23 million excess deaths during the famine.
Cao Shuji (曹树基), Distinguished Professor at Shanghai Jiao Tong University, estimated 32.5 million.
Yang Jisheng, senior journalist from Xinhua News Agency, concluded there were 36 million deaths due to starvation, while another 40 million others failed to be born, so that “China’s total population loss during the Great Famine then comes to 76 million.”
Mao Yushi, a Chinese economist and winner of the 2012 Milton Friedman Prize for Advancing Liberty, put the death toll at 36 million.
Liao Gailong (廖盖隆), former Vice Director of the History Research Unit of the CCP, reported 40 million “unnatural” deaths due to the famine.
Chen Yizi (陈一谘), a former senior Chinese official and a top advisor to former CCP General Secretary Zhao Ziyang, concluded that 43 million people died due to the famine.
Frank Dikötter, Chair Professor of Humanities at the University of Hong Kong and the author of Mao’s Great Famine, estimated that at least 45 million people died from starvation, overwork and state violence during the Great Leap Forward, claiming his findings to be based on access to recently opened local and provincial party archives. His study also stressed that state violence exacerbated the death toll. Dikötter claimed that at least 2.5 million of the victims were beaten or tortured to death. Dikötter provides a graphic example of what happened to a family after one member was caught stealing some food:
Liu Desheng, guilty of poaching a sweet potato, was covered in urine … He, his wife, and his son were also forced into a heap of excrement. Then tongs were used to prise his mouth open after he refused to swallow excrement. He died three weeks later.
Yu Xiguang (余习广), an independent Chinese historian and a former instructor at the Central Party School of the Chinese Communist Party, estimated that 55 million people died due to the famine. His conclusion was based on two decades of archival research.
Lu Baoguo, a Xinhua reporter based in Xinyang, explained to Yang Jisheng why he never reported on his experience:
In the second half of 1959, I took a long-distance bus from Xinyang to Luoshan and Gushi.Out of the window, I saw one corpse after another in the ditches. On the bus, no one dared to mention the dead. In one county, Guangshan, one-third of the people had died. Although there were dead people everywhere, the local leaders enjoyed good meals and fine liquor. … I had seen people who had told the truth being destroyed. Did I dare to write it?
Yu Dehong, the secretary of a party official in Xinyang in 1959 and 1960, stated:
I went to one village and saw 100 corpses, then another village and another 100 corpses. No one paid attention to them. People said that dogs were eating the bodies. Not true, I said. The dogs had long ago been eaten by the people.
There are widespread oral reports, though no official documentation, ofhuman cannibalism being practiced in various forms as a result of the famine. To survive, people had to resort to every possible means, from eating soil and poisons to stealing and killing and even to eating human flesh. Due to the scale of the famine, some have speculated that the resulting cannibalism could be described as “on a scale unprecedented in the history of the 20th century”
Priss Bhai, yes monster. I not know much about the Cixi.
He mass murder people.
Zhao Ziyang, former General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party, once said that “our Party never admitted mistakes. If things got really bad, we just found some scapegoats and blamed them, like Lin Biao and the Gang of Four. If scapegoats were hard to find, we simply blamed natural disasters, such as for the great famine in the late 1950s and early 1960s when tens of millions of people died, which was simply due to political errors of the Party.”
Bo Yibo, one of the Eight Elders and former Vice Premier of the People’s Republic of China, once said, “During the three difficult years, people across the country went into malnutrition due to lack of food, and edema was prevalent, resulting in an increasing number of deaths due to starvation among many rural areas. It is estimated that in 1960 alone, more than 10 million people died. With such thing happening during a time of peace, we as members of the Communist Party feel truly guilty in front of the people, and we must never forget this heavy lesson! ”
Wan Li, former President of the National People’s Congressof China, stated that “during the three difficult years after the People’s Commune movement, people everywhere had edema and even starved to death.In Anhui alone, according to reports, there were 3-4 million people died ‘abnormally’ …… We had been ‘ left ‘ for too long, and farmers were no longer motivated to work.”
Tian Jiyun, former Vice Premier of Chinaand former Vice President of the National People’s Congress of China, stated that “looking back at the Three Years of Difficulty,people everywhere had edema and died of starvation, and tens of millions of people died abnormally, more than the total death toll during the entire Democratic Revolution. What was the reason for that? Liu Shaoqi said it was ‘30% natural disasters and 70% human error.’ But it is now clear that the famine was mainly due to human error, which was the erroneous command, the ‘Utopian Socialism’, and the ‘Left opportunism’.”
Pot calling the kettle…..your response is all over the place.
If one digs a little deeper into the "winners version" of History, you find giant leaps of faith and conclusions based on deceptive data or no data (dogma). Two examples jump out:
Revisiting Alleged 30 Million Famine Deaths during China’s Great Leap
By Utsa Patnaik (Posted Jun 26, 2011)
But Mao came out the winner against the Yanks who tried everything they could to stop him from building China’s first A-bomb under his ‘Two Bombs and One Satellite’ projects which coincided with the Great Leap Forward. Unlike Stalin, Mao didn’t do stuff likeDekulakization which led to the Holodomor or banish people to Soviet-style Gulags. Western propagandists are so desperate to demonize Mao that they equate Mao’s ‘backyard furnaces’ with Hitler’s ‘gas chambers’ which is utter nonsense. They didn’t even bother to fact-check their innuendos against Mao who stepped down as China’s Head of State in December 1958, just one year into the Great Leap Forward (GLF) which was run by Liu from 1959 when he took over as China’s Head of State to 1961 when he ended the GLF. Since Mao was no longer running the GLF during the worst years of the famine, then how can the West blame him for those famine deaths? Even the ‘excess deaths’ attributed to the GLF are hardly credible, as Utsa Patnaik writes:
Thirty million or three crores is not a small figure. When one million people died in Britain’s colony, Ireland, in 1846-47, the world knew about it. When three million people died in the 1943-44 Bengal famine, the fact that a famine occurred was known. Yet 30 million people are supposed to have died in China without anyone knowing at that time that a famine took place. The reason no one knew about it is simple, for a massive famine did not take place at all. The intellectuals who quote the massive famine deaths figure of 30 million today are no doubt outstandingly clever in the small,im kleinen, but are proving themselves to be rather foolish,im grossen, in the large. A person has to be very foolhardy indeed to say that 30 million people died in a famine without anyone including the foreign diplomats in China and the China-watchers abroad having the slightest inkling of it. And those who credulously believe this claim and uncritically repeat it show an even greater folly than the originators of the claim.
The West has a beef with Mao. But where’s the beef?
In China, you ask 'where pok?'Replies: @antibeast
The West has a beef with Mao. But where’s the beef?
Is he into afro-colonization of white wombs? He’s no better.
https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/彭德怀#文革身死
During his detention, Peng wrote his last letter to Mao Zedong on January 1, 1967. In the letter, he briefly introduced the process of his detention and said, "I salute you for the last time! I wish you a long and healthy life!” This letter was sent to Zhou Enlai from the guardianship point, and after he read it at the meeting of the Central Committee, he sent the letter to Mao Zedong, Lin Biao and Jiang Qing for reading. Mao Zedong saw Peng’s letter in Zhongnanhai, picked up a black pencil, and drew an irregular circle on the letter without any comments.
With the support of Kang Sheng and Chen Boda, on July 9, 1967, Han Aijing forced Peng Dehuai to confess and beat him, claiming that at the "struggle session" wanted to "see the red with a bayonet", and asked Peng to explain "why did you write an opposition letter at the Lushan Conference against 'three sides Red Flag'?" "Why do you oppose Chairman Mao?" Peng was "knocked down" seven times, his forehead was injured and bleeding, his fifth and tenth ribs were broken, and Li Zhongqi slapped Peng Dehuai in public. [64][65]
https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/刘少奇#病重去世Replies: @Mehool Mehta, @Godfree Roberts
In early 1968, Liu was still in solitary confinement in Fuluju, Zhongnanhai [6]:984. Liu's mental and living conditions continued to deteriorate. Since 1968, he had successively suffered from pneumonia, diabetes, hypertension, autonomic disorders, etc., and his condition worsened after March [6]:984.
In October 1969, Mao Zedong estimated that the international situation might suddenly deteriorate according to the world dynamics at that time, so he decided to take a large-scale national war preparation operation [6]: 985. The CPC Central Committee decided to evacuate Liu
Due to bumps and colds on the way, Liu's condition continued to worsen after he arrived in Kaifeng[6]:985.
At midnight on November 13, when registering the "cremation application form", the task force falsely used Liu Yuan's name to apply[98], and filled in the "name of the deceased" as "Liu Weihuang"[6]: 986, and the occupation as "unemployed". Liu's body was falsely claimed to be that of a patient with a severe infectious disease [6]: 986. On November 14, Liu's body was secretly cremated on the spot at the Eastern Suburb Crematorium in Kaifeng City [99]: 17. The ashes were packed in an ordinary wooden box and stored in the ashes storage room of Kaifeng Crematorium[6]:986.
16 years after the Communists took power nothing had changed in the lives of the peasants. Dismayed by urbanites and Party officials living privileged lives, Mao initiated the Cultural Revolution to emancipate 400,000,000 voiceless peasants whose social status had not changed in 3,000 years and remained unchanged. He succeeded. Throughout the CR’s ten years, Mao drove inequality to the lowest level ever recorded while growing the economy six percent annually–twice America’s rate–and mechanizing agriculture. By the end, rural literacy was taken for granted and rural people (no longer ‘peasants’) were as intolerant of oppression and corruption, as vocal about their priorities, as enthusiastic about voting, and as eager to voice complaints as their urban cousins. For the first time in history they were full citizens who could point to the infrastructure they built, the agricultural advances they had made, and the problems they had solved.
Xi’s father, Liu and Peng were treated identically.
None was tortured.
All lived far longer than the life expectancy at the time.
All wanted to keep the peasants enslaved until the Revolution was secure, but Mao knew this meant another 4,000 years of slavery, so sidelined them.
A small price to pay for the emancipation of 400,000,000 people.
Mao was a monster but Jung Chang is a nutter. She’s bitter about the Cultural Revolution but her mentality hasn’t changed one bit. In the past, Mao was 100% good, now he’s 100% evil.
Her revisionist view of Cixi aka dowager empress has some validity but goes too far. It seems Jung Chang can’t understand anything except total good vs total bad. So, she makes the empress out to be totally good against the official narrative.
Whatever the case, the fact remains China lagged Japan way behind in modernization, and even though she did take some necessary steps, they weren’t enough.
The best rebuttal I have seen of the anti-Mao ‘demonization’ campaign launched by the West since the 1980s is this article by Utsa Patnaik, a Marxist economist based in India, excerpts below:
This is the best example of projection I have seen. It comes about because some Indians want to divert attention from the fact that millions of Indians– especially children– die of malnutrition.
Revisiting Alleged 30 Million Famine Deaths during China’s Great Leap
By Utsa Patnaik (Posted Jun 26, 2011)
If one digs a little deeper into the “winners version” of History, you find giant leaps of faith and conclusions based on deceptive data or no data (dogma). Two examples jump out:
1) Westernclaims of Uyghur Genocide:
https://thegrayzone.com/2021/02/18/us-media-reports-chinese-genocide-relied-on-fraudulent-far-right-researcher/
2) Medical Science:
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/science-vs-dogma:4
The West has a beef with Mao. But where’s the beef?
Thirty million or three crores is not a small figure. When one million people died in Britain’s colony, Ireland, in 1846-47, the world knew about it. When three million people died in the 1943-44 Bengal famine, the fact that a famine occurred was known. Yet 30 million people are supposed to have died in China without anyone knowing at that time that a famine took place. The reason no one knew about it is simple, for a massive famine did not take place at all. The intellectuals who quote the massive famine deaths figure of 30 million today are no doubt outstandingly clever in the small,im kleinen, but are proving themselves to be rather foolish,im grossen, in the large. A person has to be very foolhardy indeed to say that 30 million people died in a famine without anyone including the foreign diplomats in China and the China-watchers abroad having the slightest inkling of it. And those who credulously believe this claim and uncritically repeat it show an even greater folly than the originators of the claim.
Can’t fathom why the “god of Moses” is clung to so fiercely.
J-F made one point in this dog vomit: Jews define god, and that for themselves as well as for non-Jews.
The JQ will NOT be resolved unless-untilChristians, especially the Anglo spin-offs, get their noses out of Jewry’s premier book of propaganda, the Bibull.
Speaking of books: 8900 words is 15 pages of Robert Penn Warren’s All the King’s Men, still relevant 75 years on.
Anyone think J-F’s jottings will have anything valuable to say in 2100?
From p. 9:
The end of man is knowledge but there is one thing he can’t know: he can’t know whether knowledge will save him or kill him. He will be killed, all right, but he can’t know whether he is killed because of the knowledge which he has got or because of the knowledge which he hasn’t got and which if he had it, would save him.
For 2000 years Western culture has been run on “bible” knowledge enforced by Jews.
Isn’t it time to question it in a radical way?
claims:
Of course, they make excuses for all of the bloodshed, misery, and other results of the imposition of communism throughout history.
And of course capitalism has createed the garden of Eden withou a drop of blood, right?
Every generation has its promoters of communism who argue that“communism would work if properly implemented”. Throughout the decades, I have seen many starry-eyed young people state as such.
Of course, they make excuses for all of the bloodshed, misery, and other results of the imposition of communism throughout history.
All fools…
There is one thing young people should be aware of:
communism=judaism
judaism=communism
…it’s all in their talmudic playbook…
This is the best example of projection I have seen. It comes about because some Indians want to divert attention from the fact that millions of Indians-- especially children-- die of malnutrition. This is STILL happening every year:
He did not mind that millions of people died of starvation. Indeed even before the Great Leap
Replies: @antibeast
Infant mortality is 0.8 crore annually or 80,00,000 children die every year in our country before six months of age. This means that on an average as many as 21,917 children die every day in India.2020年9月30日
https://www.google.com/search?q=millions+of+indian+children+die+of+malnuttrition+every+year&rlz=1C5CHFA_enHK1009HK1009&oq=millions+of+indian+children+die+of+malnuttrition+every+year&aqs=chrome..69i57.20703j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
This is the best example of projection I have seen. It comes about because some Indians want to divert attention from the fact that millions of Indians– especially children– die of malnutrition.
The best rebuttal I have seen of the anti-Mao ‘demonization’ campaign launched by the West since the 1980s is this article by Utsa Patnaik, a Marxist economist based in India, excerpts below:
Revisiting Alleged 30 Million Famine Deaths during China’s Great Leap
By Utsa Patnaik (Posted Jun 26, 2011)
If one digs a little deeper into the "winners version" of History, you find giant leaps of faith and conclusions based on deceptive data or no data (dogma). Two examples jump out:
Revisiting Alleged 30 Million Famine Deaths during China’s Great Leap
By Utsa Patnaik (Posted Jun 26, 2011)
No shit Sherlock.
Anyone who isn’t a n00b worked that out at the time of the first J-F article. You can also click on ‘Web site’ on any Priss post to read more if you want to. Other u-names are known to non-n00bs here,moi aussi, but who cares?
Priss seems to spend most of most days composing rants and posting on the ‘net, if it isn’t her (or his?) job, a fortunate person to have so much free time.
Jung-Freud is always fun to read, no matter what the subject matter is — Jews or movies. In fact, his rambling is what makes his writing unique and interesting, like walking around leisurely in a woods not needing to get to anywhere fast, but still be provided with insightful and colorful observations along the way. I always look forward to his next article, no matter how long it may be, and it comes quite frequently. I often wonder: how does he get the energy to write so prolifically?
He did not mind that millions of people died of starvation. Indeed even before the Great Leap
This is the best example of projection I have seen. It comes about because some Indians want to divert attention from the fact that millions of Indians– especially children– die of malnutrition. This is STILL happening every year:
Infant mortality is 0.8 crore annually or 80,00,000 children die every year in our country before six months of age. This means that on an average as many as 21,917 children die every day in India.2020年9月30日
https://www.google.com/search?q=millions+of+indian+children+die+of+malnuttrition+every+year&rlz=1C5CHFA_enHK1009HK1009&oq=millions+of+indian+children+die+of+malnuttrition+every+year&aqs=chrome..69i57.20703j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
The best rebuttal I have seen of the anti-Mao ‘demonization’ campaign launched by the West since the 1980s is this article by Utsa Patnaik, a Marxist economist based in India, excerpts below:
This is the best example of projection I have seen. It comes about because some Indians want to divert attention from the fact that millions of Indians– especially children– die of malnutrition.
God be with Derek Chauvin.
Why?
Why should He comfort Derek when Whites themselves refuse to help Chauvin? Or protect each other. What did Whites, the majority of the country, do for the Proud Boys, Ashli Babbitt, Jansixers, etc.?
Blacksrioted to support of a violent, drug-addicted, repeat-offending knicker convict who also did pornos (“Big Floyd”).
Whites did squat to help Chauvin…who had to deal daily with orcs…and now rots in jail.
Once-proud Whites are now pussies who get boners when pegged by Juden, Inc.
Miriam Elman, hasbarista for the pro-Israel groupAcademic Engagement Network eructed thusly:
“In 2012 some Minneapolis police officers attended an FBI-hosted counter-terror seminar where a few Israeli law enforcement officials were invited to speak.”
TRANSLATION: AshkeNAZI thugs taught MN cops how to use chokeholds like the IDF (Israeli Donkey Fellators) use on Palestinian schoolgirls. Chauvin followed their training.
Elman deflects:
“[T]he notion that this training program…caused or contributed to police shootings by American cops on the beat is ludicrous.”
If you say so, yenta.
(Note, though, how she dodged the question of chokeholds.)
Ludicrous like logging every “odd look” given to odd-looking Matzonians as WWIII?
Strange like Jewsconstantly nagging, bitching, kvetching, grifting, mooching, whining, finagling, etc.?
Weird like Jewsdisappearing Kanye West after he said Jews “disappear” their critics?
Now, name a group that constantly brags about how smart, successful, and chosen it is.
Name one that eternally denies it ever does anything wrong…EVAH!
Cite one that views goyim asuntermenschen who deserve to be lied to, fleeced, and enslaved.
Notice a pattern?
Elman snarks that holding Jews accountable…
“smacks of antisemitic tropes and canards.”
Tropes and canards that…amazingly…always seem to arise out of thin air, for no reason at all, ‘cuz tribal dindus “dint do nuttin’!”
Jews get trillions of dollars for a Lolocaust that they forbid anyone to examine.
>sustained anti-Jewish hatred across the millennia.”
Due to the Tribe shit-stirring for eons?
“Scapegoating American Jews for societal ills is one of the hallmarks of antisemtic discourse.”
And also…true.
More and more people are waking up and saying, “Gradually I began to hate them.”
It’ll be interesting to see how Jews react when Putin finally pulverizes Ukraine: a country led by a Jew…who’s supported by key US political-banking-media Jews…who want Ukraine to become Israel II.
It will also be interesting to see how Jews around the world get treated after cheering on (or silently endorsing) a needless war that killed so many Slavs.
The arrogance, insolence, and white-hot white-hatred of the Tribe is reaching a boiling point. People are getting sick of hearing that Jews suffer the most. Wearying of their claim to be the smartest, chosenest, most innocentvolk of all.
Why is such a teeny-weeny percent of the world allowed so much power?
Goyim are getting sick of the Tribe’s constant-constant-constant promotion of ideas and rules it itself ignores.
Hell, even their owngod, Yahweh, repeatedly got sick for their shenanigans, kicking their arses multiple times for being stool-brains:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nns9HfOM-Ro&t=2s&ab_channel=MOVClips
Video Link
Sadly true. China [the government, the people, the party] was able to self-correct within a few years after they realized their mistakes. As a result, Chinese of the 1950/60 lived better than their ancestors, and of the 1970/80 lived better than the 1950/60s and so on.
"How can anything be fixed/corrected when a country continues to blindly point the finger."
And it was not because China had/has less problems than America. On the contrary, China’s problems were MUCH more complicated and numerous than what faced US today. For example, China also had a very militant group of Muslim minority called Hui, and their history (dated back to Qinq) of extreme violence against Hans made the American Blacks’ crimes look like kindergarten brawl. So, after almost a century of fights [Ref 1], in 1949, Mao proposed the “three equality”: equality among races, between man/woman, and among all people. Fast forward today, we can see Hui people live harmoniously with Hans, and Hui restaurants striving next to Tiananmen in Beijing.
As for integration and assimilation, that is the beauty of the Chinese civilization. By making the minorities accept their own new found Chinese identity, they will become integral and equal parts of us. This is not something that the Japanese or Europeans can achieve. Their societies will forever be ridden with racial animosities, which in China will only manifest as transitional phenomena.
https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/彭德怀#文革身死
During his detention, Peng wrote his last letter to Mao Zedong on January 1, 1967. In the letter, he briefly introduced the process of his detention and said, "I salute you for the last time! I wish you a long and healthy life!” This letter was sent to Zhou Enlai from the guardianship point, and after he read it at the meeting of the Central Committee, he sent the letter to Mao Zedong, Lin Biao and Jiang Qing for reading. Mao Zedong saw Peng’s letter in Zhongnanhai, picked up a black pencil, and drew an irregular circle on the letter without any comments.
With the support of Kang Sheng and Chen Boda, on July 9, 1967, Han Aijing forced Peng Dehuai to confess and beat him, claiming that at the "struggle session" wanted to "see the red with a bayonet", and asked Peng to explain "why did you write an opposition letter at the Lushan Conference against 'three sides Red Flag'?" "Why do you oppose Chairman Mao?" Peng was "knocked down" seven times, his forehead was injured and bleeding, his fifth and tenth ribs were broken, and Li Zhongqi slapped Peng Dehuai in public. [64][65]
https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/刘少奇#病重去世Replies: @Mehool Mehta, @Godfree Roberts
In early 1968, Liu was still in solitary confinement in Fuluju, Zhongnanhai [6]:984. Liu's mental and living conditions continued to deteriorate. Since 1968, he had successively suffered from pneumonia, diabetes, hypertension, autonomic disorders, etc., and his condition worsened after March [6]:984.
In October 1969, Mao Zedong estimated that the international situation might suddenly deteriorate according to the world dynamics at that time, so he decided to take a large-scale national war preparation operation [6]: 985. The CPC Central Committee decided to evacuate Liu
Due to bumps and colds on the way, Liu's condition continued to worsen after he arrived in Kaifeng[6]:985.
At midnight on November 13, when registering the "cremation application form", the task force falsely used Liu Yuan's name to apply[98], and filled in the "name of the deceased" as "Liu Weihuang"[6]: 986, and the occupation as "unemployed". Liu's body was falsely claimed to be that of a patient with a severe infectious disease [6]: 986. On November 14, Liu's body was secretly cremated on the spot at the Eastern Suburb Crematorium in Kaifeng City [99]: 17. The ashes were packed in an ordinary wooden box and stored in the ashes storage room of Kaifeng Crematorium[6]:986.
China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms Bhai, Meow Tze Tung did not give crap about the millions dying in the famines. Meow was squeezing out grain from Chinese farmers and exported food to Eastern European Communist regimes (even when his Chinese people were dying) to get weapons and nuclear technology. He did not mind that millions of people died of starvation. Indeed even before the Great Leap backwards, Charman Meow cold calculated that millions of Chinese may die, he did not care, he wanted global power to dominate world, technology and weapons above all. For his projects to take off, half of China may have to die, Meow did not care. Meow was jealous of the Soviet Union and wanted to overtake Rus as well as Bartania and Amrika at any cost.
Kingdoms Bhai, please watch this.
Video LinkUtopia, Mao and the Empress Dowager Cixi – An SWF 2013 Lecture by Jung Chang
Check from 6:50 to 12:00
She found from years of research. She experience Cultural Revolution personally in China.
—–Mehool Bhai from the India.
This is the best example of projection I have seen. It comes about because some Indians want to divert attention from the fact that millions of Indians-- especially children-- die of malnutrition. This is STILL happening every year:
He did not mind that millions of people died of starvation. Indeed even before the Great Leap
Replies: @antibeast
Infant mortality is 0.8 crore annually or 80,00,000 children die every year in our country before six months of age. This means that on an average as many as 21,917 children die every day in India.2020年9月30日
https://www.google.com/search?q=millions+of+indian+children+die+of+malnuttrition+every+year&rlz=1C5CHFA_enHK1009HK1009&oq=millions+of+indian+children+die+of+malnuttrition+every+year&aqs=chrome..69i57.20703j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Bhai Log.
Namaskar to you all. It is me, myself Mehool Bhai to bring facts.
Cultural Revolution of Charman Meow destroyed 5000 years of Chinese civilization. Except cunning strategies to take and keep power, all other good things about Chinese teachings was destroyed by Communist. Why? As Mr. Wu explains well in video below. Communists are the most power hungry people in World and to gain & keep power they an shamelessly destroy everything in path. The CCP wants absolute power over the World at the end
First about Mr. Wu. Wu bhai is ethnic Chinese but worked for famous Swedish Company in China, at very high level. While working there as well as because he is Chinese, he understood what was happening and the evil danger brewing inside that country. He smelled the tea and snake curry. According to him, Communist China was only interested in stealing technology from foreign companies.
Please watch, Mr. Wu’s video below. He explain how power hungry CCP is.
Video Link
The Destiny of Chinese Culture: The Cultural Revolution
—- Your Mehool Bhai. Concered and scared in Mumbai.
The constitution doesn't matter much. Even in the US, with a far longer and deeper history of constitutionality, few wars were declared by Congress.The fact is that Japan's modern emperor's followed than led. In the end, Hirohito signed onto what others planned and pushed. Had Japan had no Emperor, the history would have been much the same.
Under the Meiji Constitution, the Emperor did have executive power.
Squeezed in the imperial game with the West and China, it seemed the militarists had the only answer.
Facing a serious threat of Communism in East Asia which could lead to the God like Japanese Imperial Family being assassinated (like in Russia), a lot of Commie movements in China leading to the real possibility of a hostile red coast in Eastern Eurasia facing the Japanese Empire. And most importantly of all the so called Democratic, Christian USA not doing much about this red menace.
Also miscreant politicians riling up populations in China with unnecessary anti-Japanesism (today miscreant politicians rile up Indians with unnecessary anti-Sinoism!!! Karma and history repeats itself) and a rising distrust of the West and specifically the Anglo World with how the Anglo-Japanese treaty was discontinued due to Murican pressure. A move which turned out as a disaster for both Japan and Britain.
“Britain the Suicidal”, as usual.
Excessive Christian morality + Jew worship = Suicidal policies.
Hitler, friendly to Britain and even the British empire (in the beginning). USSR and USA hostile to British Empire. What does suicidal Britain do? Support the USA and USSR. Loses Empire, treated as a bitch by both the USA and USSR during the Suez crisis. Confused pikachu face.
Appreciate the author’s laying out the Maoist Cultural Revolution, which doesn’t get enough air time and displays many parallels with woke madness during the Trump era. Especially appreciate the clear statements about how the Antifa/BLM forces were the goon squads of the establishment, the real insurrectionists, and how they enjoyed broad corporate sponsorship.
What happened in DC on 1/6/21 was a mild protest compared to the riots and chaos in 2020, just imagine where we would be if a tiny fraction of the 1/6 fed actions were directed to looking into the Floyd riots and destruction. In Portland, Oregon the federal courthouse and city police headquarters have been boarded up like fortresses now for over two and a half years. Nobody talks about that anymore, and the local media stopped showing the world all the pictures last summer.
The one thing that puzzles me about this piece is the almost complete failure to mention Obama. He is the liberal God figure in this country, America’s Mao, alongside his rich white enablers, not the Jews. Blame the Jews all you want, but it was white and black Democrats on Team Obama that tore up the country, not the Jews.
Plus, MLK Jr. was killed by the CIA for the way he threatened the US war machine and neocolonial plunder. His national holiday is part of the coverup. Random insertions of MLK denunciation tweets in this piece betray a neocolonialist, CIA-friendly vibe. Do the Jews run the CIA, or is it a bunch of conservative white folks and atheistic liberals joined together to preserve the empire at all costs? I mean seriously, at some point white Americans have to hold themselves accountable for what has happened here, instead of constantly pointing fingers at a religious group in the abstract.
I don’t know much about Stalin but what I do know is that Mao ain’t no mass murderer. I view Mao as a revolutionary leader turned despotic tyrant whose far Left Communism was necessary to cure the Chinese body-politic of its myriad ailments, after the well-known political and social failures of Chiang whose far Right Nationalism was necessary to fight and defeat both Soviet Communism and Japanese imperialism.
The history of China over the 20th century was shaped by four Chinese men — Sun, Chiang, Mao and Deng — all of whom have been vilified by the West in one form or another. All four of them could not have done what they have achieved without the other. China’s history after the Fall of the Qing should be viewed as a pendulum swinging between the far Right Nationalism of Chiang and far Left Communism of Mao which the centrist Liberalism of Sun could not hold together against both extremes. Only after Deng took over China after the death of Mao did the pendulum stabilize and settle for the center Left Socialism of his ‘market reform’ period. Now Xi is taking China to the center Right Nationalism of his ‘China Dream’ period which harks back to the ancient Silk Road era.
Westoids like you have too much baggage — whether ideological, racial, cultural — that make you lose any and all chances to view China’s history as anything but ‘Chinese’. At the end of the day, it’s the Chinese view of China’s history that matters, not yours or any Westoid for that matter. Period.
Interestingly this Black Doctor rips apart Critical Race theory.
Video Link
Watch Black Father Blast Critical Race Theory At Board Meeting In Viral Video
” They wanted predictability and consistency in the rulers, not the tempestuous style of Mao who drove history like a Chinese man drives a car”
LMAO 🤣🤣🤣
This writer needs an editor to cut out the endless repetition and self-indulgence.
The more you know about Churchill, the smaller he becomes.
Thanks 300,000 out of 450 million less than 1/10 of 1%. Makes me happy its that low Writing from Costa Rica, where I have only met a few as usual trying to rip everyone off.
Really?
the torture and murder Mao did to Liu Shaoqi and Peng Dehuai?
The Thoughts of Jiang Jie Shi on the Island of Taiwan lamenting his loss and likewise Song Mae Ling in DC asking for another big handout. China would have been USA today had the old pirate gained control —-actually, Jiang (Ching Kai Shek) forces forcibly took residents from South to fight against Mao and they lost Mao had the people’s ) peasants interests at heart overthrowing Ching Kai Shek but again —absolute power over time corrupts.
Plug the article into chatgpt and ask it to cut out duplication and simplify
It is true that America was at its peak in the 1950/60s, but that was NOT because the people were more honest / hard-working, or there was less Black behavior. It was because Europe and Asia were totally wrecked. East Asia hadn't risen, and most colonialized countries still hadn't gained their independence (or for long).
"America is long past the 1950s – when we were more honest, more hard-working, and less represented by Negro behavior and “buck grabbing”."
America was bombing and using bio-weapons in Korea in the 1950s. Then they used agent orange in Vietnam in the 1960s. They nuclear bombed and tested radiation on South Pacific islanders. They sprayed bacteria in the street of San Franc. and injected Blacks and prisoners with experimental diseases. They performed color-revolution everywhere... etc. And you are proud that they were even more patriotic?
"In the 1950s, Americans were basically “corny” – very interested in conforming to older standards of behavior and patriotism."
Oh, please don't flatter yourself. Chinese has been hardworking since ancient time, and celebrated Chinese New Year long before there was a country called USA.
"the Chinese are imitating our 50s culture"
The America of the 1950s was as racist and "quick buck" minded (or maybe more) as America of the 2020s.Replies: @Trinity
"we are stuck in some definitely, uncultured era – the era of the Quick Buck."
And JewSA is more racist than America ever dreamed about being. No Cohencidence that immediately after WWII the nation wrecking Jew started coming out of the shadows. Make a quick buck while ripping people off is a Jewy trait that unfortunately many Whites have adopted over the years.
Herbert Marcuse advocated homosexuals and blacks as leading the revolution in his Eros and Civilization. Later he considered homosexuality was also being exploited by the consumer society. Identity politics was completely outside his spectrum and scarcely existed in his era. He gave it a theoretical excuse I suppose. But I doubt LGBTQ read Marcuse.
So true. How can anything be fixed/corrected when a country continues to blindly point the finger.Replies: @d dan
Similarly, US problems today are not all caused by Jews-this-Jews-that. Too many fucking racist and supremacist Whites in the country and everywhere, including this site – that is the problem.
“How can anything be fixed/corrected when a country continues to blindly point the finger.”
Sadly true. China [the government, the people, the party] was able to self-correct within a few years after they realized their mistakes. As a result, Chinese of the 1950/60 lived better than their ancestors, and of the 1970/80 lived better than the 1950/60s and so on.
And it was not because China had/has less problems than America. On the contrary, China’s problems were MUCH more complicated and numerous than what faced US today. For example, China also had a very militant group of Muslim minority called Hui, and their history (dated back to Qinq) of extreme violence against Hans made the American Blacks’ crimes look like kindergarten brawl. So, after almost a century of fights [Ref 1], in 1949, Mao proposed the “three equality”: equality among races, between man/woman, and among all people. Fast forward today, we can see Hui people live harmoniously with Hans, and Hui restaurants striving next to Tiananmen in Beijing.
If America of the 2020s is really similar to the China of 1950/60s as this author claims, let see how America self-corrects itself in a few years or a few decades. Anyone wants to place a bet? Please count me out.
Ref 1:
As for integration and assimilation, that is the beauty of the Chinese civilization. By making the minorities accept their own new found Chinese identity, they will become integral and equal parts of us. This is not something that the Japanese or Europeans can achieve. Their societies will forever be ridden with racial animosities, which in China will only manifest as transitional phenomena.
And it was not because China had/has less problems than America. On the contrary, China’s problems were MUCH more complicated and numerous than what faced US today. For example, China also had a very militant group of Muslim minority called Hui, and their history (dated back to Qinq) of extreme violence against Hans made the American Blacks’ crimes look like kindergarten brawl. So, after almost a century of fights [Ref 1], in 1949, Mao proposed the “three equality”: equality among races, between man/woman, and among all people. Fast forward today, we can see Hui people live harmoniously with Hans, and Hui restaurants striving next to Tiananmen in Beijing.
Really?
the torture and murder Mao did to Liu Shaoqi and Peng Dehuai?
During his detention, Peng wrote his last letter to Mao Zedong on January 1, 1967. In the letter, he briefly introduced the process of his detention and said, “I salute you for the last time! I wish you a long and healthy life!” This letter was sent to Zhou Enlai from the guardianship point, and after he read it at the meeting of the Central Committee, he sent the letter to Mao Zedong, Lin Biao and Jiang Qing for reading. Mao Zedong saw Peng’s letter in Zhongnanhai, picked up a black pencil, and drew an irregular circle on the letter without any comments.
With the support of Kang Sheng and Chen Boda, on July 9, 1967, Han Aijing forced Peng Dehuai to confess and beat him, claiming that at the “struggle session” wanted to “see the red with a bayonet”, and asked Peng to explain “why did you write an opposition letter at the Lushan Conference against ‘three sides Red Flag’?” “Why do you oppose Chairman Mao?” Peng was “knocked down” seven times, his forehead was injured and bleeding, his fifth and tenth ribs were broken, and Li Zhongqi slapped Peng Dehuai in public. [64][65]
https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/彭德怀#文革身死
In early 1968, Liu was still in solitary confinement in Fuluju, Zhongnanhai [6]:984. Liu’s mental and living conditions continued to deteriorate. Since 1968, he had successively suffered from pneumonia, diabetes, hypertension, autonomic disorders, etc., and his condition worsened after March [6]:984.
In October 1969, Mao Zedong estimated that the international situation might suddenly deteriorate according to the world dynamics at that time, so he decided to take a large-scale national war preparation operation [6]: 985. The CPC Central Committee decided to evacuate Liu
Due to bumps and colds on the way, Liu’s condition continued to worsen after he arrived in Kaifeng[6]:985.
At midnight on November 13, when registering the “cremation application form”, the task force falsely used Liu Yuan’s name to apply[98], and filled in the “name of the deceased” as “Liu Weihuang”[6]: 986, and the occupation as “unemployed”. Liu’s body was falsely claimed to be that of a patient with a severe infectious disease [6]: 986. On November 14, Liu’s body was secretly cremated on the spot at the Eastern Suburb Crematorium in Kaifeng City [99]: 17. The ashes were packed in an ordinary wooden box and stored in the ashes storage room of Kaifeng Crematorium[6]:986.
“America is long past the 1950s – when we were more honest, more hard-working, and less represented by Negro behavior and “buck grabbing”.”
It is true that America was at its peak in the 1950/60s, but that was NOT because the people were more honest / hard-working, or there was less Black behavior. It was because Europe and Asia were totally wrecked. East Asia hadn’t risen, and most colonialized countries still hadn’t gained their independence (or for long).
“In the 1950s, Americans were basically “corny” – very interested in conforming to older standards of behavior and patriotism.”
America was bombing and using bio-weapons in Korea in the 1950s. Then they used agent orange in Vietnam in the 1960s. They nuclear bombed and tested radiation on South Pacific islanders. They sprayed bacteria in the street of San Franc. and injected Blacks and prisoners with experimental diseases. They performed color-revolution everywhere… etc. And you are proud that they were even more patriotic?
“the Chinese are imitating our 50s culture”
Oh, please don’t flatter yourself. Chinese has been hardworking since ancient time, and celebrated Chinese New Year long before there was a country called USA.
“we are stuck in some definitely, uncultured era – the era of the Quick Buck.”
The America of the 1950s was as racist and “quick buck” minded (or maybe more) as America of the 2020s.
Jews in Latin America may not be highly regarded but that hardly matters :
Another similarity between Mao’s Red Guard and today’s attempt in the U.S. to create chaos that will lead to the Marxist socialist utopia is the destruction of our culture, history, religion and legal structure. In Mao’s time the Red Guard focused on the destruction of the “Four Olds”. The Four Olds were: Old Ideas, Old Culture, Old Customs, and Old Habits. The 1967 “Destroy the old world” poster depicts the Red Guard destroying the structures of old society and can be found on the internet.
The globalist elite had to be a bit more creative and use the “new proletariate” to promote the idea that white supremacy and systemic racism are the foundation of our society to justify the destruction of everything and the rebuilding of society into a socialist utopia.
A true non-White comment if ever there was one. This kind of Jewish triumphalism pretending to be criticism is all over Unz.Replies: @Trinity
Poor Whites kiss Black ass to survive, rich white traitor trash kiss Black ass
Nope, it is constructive criticism meant to kick start Whites and WAKE THEM THE FUCK UP. Insults, particularly when the insult is TRUE, help much more than bullshit FAKE attaboys. I have seen Whites kiss nonwhite ass my whole life, particularly Jew and Black ass. I have seen countless Whites all but suck some non whites cawk in public and then confide in me how they really felt in PRIVATE. I have no time for white trash like this at all. I have lots of contempt for the RICH white traitor trash especially. Whites have been door mats for too long.
What irony.
Last I heard, the West had wanted to award the Nobel Peace Prize to Emperor Hirohito but gave it to Barack Obama instead.
It’s as if the negro has outsourced his Dunning-Kruger effect, to be performed on his behalf by whites, and whites jump at the chance.
There’s a lot of myths about Mao and why he started the Great Leap Forward. While his initial exhortations seem exuberant at best and delusional at worst, Mao stepped down less than one year after launching the GLF because he was in a hurry to build China’s first A-bomb. So that’s myth number one, that Mao somehow run the GLF for three years wherein he allegedly starved tens of millions of people to death when in fact it was Liu who took over as China’s Head of State and ran the GLF for another two years. Myth number two is that Mao somehow intended to depend upon rural villages to build backyard furnaces — which were scrapped after less than a year — in order for China to surpass the UK in steel production. Instead, Mao encouraged rural industrialization by building modern steel mills located in inland provinces as a way to reduce the concentration of heavy industries in Northeast China, which was vulnerable to potential U.S. military attacks from Japan and South Korea.
As if to demonstrate this, he embarked on one of the most ambitious projects in human history: The Great Leap Forward. It would turn peasants into steel-producers overnight. Harvests would double, triple, quadruple within years. China would soon catch up with the UK and then even with the US. The will of the Chinese people, orchestrated by Mao, would make anything possible. Mao’s East Wind would indeed prevail over everything. But in fact, the whole thing turned out to be ill-conceived and ill-planned.
The famine was caused by natural disasters such as floods and droughts in the North which became worse during the last year of the GLF when Liu stopped the exports of food crops to the USSR but instead started importing food crops from abroad. In fact, Liu blamed Mao for the famine in the North caused by natural disasters during the first year of the GLF which forced Mao to step down in 1958, less than a year into the GLF. That’s myth number three, that the GLF policies such as agricultural collectivization caused the “greatest famine” in human history which is itself myth number four. While the famine did hit China hard during the first two years of the GLF and the hardest in the last year of the GLF, there is no material evidence of any kind to support the fabricated allegations of the “greatest famine” in human history. The death toll of 25M to 40M is a big joke intended to demonize Mao who, by the way, launched the most ambitious scientific project in China’s history — the ‘Two Bombs and One Satellite’ project — during the GLF. How was that possible if people were dying like flies as alleged during the “greatest famine” in human history? If the death toll was more than 10M, there would have been another bloody revolution in China. But there wasn’t any violent uprisings nor any mass migrations nor any photographic evidence nor any intelligence reports from the CIA, KGB, MI6, etc. that would attest to the alleged “greatest famine” in human history, news of which would have been splashed all over the Western Media during that period. Instead, what we have today in the West is a well-orchestrated conspiracy to demonize Mao by fabricating “research studies” using fake stats to invent the alleged “greatest famine” in human history, three, four or even five decades later, with the fabricated death tolls rising every decade. Seriously, the realistic estimate of the death toll during the GLF is more like 5M which is already quite high during peacetime. After all, the death toll caused by war-induced famine during the Second Sino-Japanese War is estimated at 10M. Half of that is 5M for four years of war-induced famine vs 5M for three years of weather-induced famine.
Despite all the enthusiasm of the populace swept up in the fervor, it not only undermined the industrial sector but wrecked the all-important agricultural sector (in a nation that was overwhelmingly agrarian). What ensued was the biggest famine in history, losing anywhere from 25 to 40 million lives to starvation. It proved to be so calamitous that it endangered the authority of Mao, a godlike figure at the time. While the criticism of the Great Helmsman was tempered in most quarters, the very fact that some dared to criticize him at all was deeply unsettling to Mao.
It’s been my experience that whenever Mao’s uglier aspects are mentioned, his defenders quickly arrive.
The gist of their argument is Mao = Chinese Jesus.
Much the same thing happens whenever the subject of the Holodomor turns up.. Stalin could do no wrong, and certainly was as pure and innocent as the driven snow regarding the massive die-off he allowed to happen in Ukraine. That the Ukrainians tried to cozy up to Hitler in 1941 is surely understandable.
Poor Whites kiss Black ass to survive, rich white traitor trash kiss Black ass
A true non-White comment if ever there was one. This kind of Jewish triumphalism pretending to be criticism is all over Unz.
I skimmed the article; it’s impossible for me to take it whole because the author is really all over the place. He (or she?) really needs an editor, if they cannot better organize it themself.
You lasted longer than I did, for I gave up on even the “skimming” 3/4 of the way through this unbelievably incoherent piece.
Before that point, the only real thing I got out of it was that Mao was even more of a disaster for China than I’d ever imagined.
I’m curious. What was the right way to view the Vietnam war?
Respectfully,
A.
What is happening to the US has nothing to do Mao, nor with the Bolsheviks, good Lord. The main big difference is that marxism in early Soviet Union and even more in Mao’s China did tap an infinite reservoir of mass enthusiasm and hatred, the frenzy elicited was real and genuine and of the very same species as experienced under Hitler and under South American populist right-wingers, while now, in the anti-Trump camp, there is neither enthusiasm neither sincerity, especially among the flattered minorities such as the Blacks : they are as a rule very disappointed by the Obama regime, from now on some will march but only for money, and even those who get money from Burn, Loot and Murder or directly from the Jewish media know that these Jews behave as Whiter than Whites when it comes to real redistribution and that the money redistributed is not for them as it was never for them actually during the Civil Rights but for Jews.
Witness the Black Hebrews who are therein because they know where the pork barrel is. All they were allowed to adore as a leader is Floyd, as a sequel to OJ Simpson, as if there were not thousands of Malcom X’es lurking and being constantly shadow-banned or worse. Well Trump, is (or rather has been, since what he was hired to perform was a dress rehearsal, not the real jazz) next to the same thing as a White equivalent, as dependent on very big Jewish money and having had far more popularity in percentage among Israeli voters than the reddest US states.
What the big media are pushing for (mark that only the “secular” media have been overwhelmingly and rabidly anti-Trump : the media that abetted Trump were essentially non-secular, mostly evangelical Dixie style and South American style, and actually far more important in volume and in deep state financing and Israeli commitment : it is thanks to them that one US citizen out of two is ready to become a slave of Israel to save his soul not to save his savings) is not a second Bolshevik or Maoist revolution (was there ever an American Long March?) but a second civil war, rather on the Spanish model (another former glorious world empire reduced to misery) this time to be won by the very same baddies that are supposed to have been defeated as a conclusion of the first, and so as to put an end to America’s existence as an industrial empire it had become by virtue of the first civil war, so as to close the parenthesis opened by Lincoln and a few others.
The Spanish Civil War might give some idea of the things to come and of who will be the victors after all : of course the religious right but not a good one. Franco was a Marrano after all. Make no mistake about it : whenever in history sexual perversion becomes the big priority of mainstream media it means that what is aimed for is a planned defeat and suicide of their own viewership of choice. They promote Woke to make broke anyone who gnaws at it line, hook and sinker. They are there as circling vultures, not as ravenous wolves.
Buried by academia long ago was the voice of German sociologist-historian Max Weber as to what to do about the Jewish Question (or Jewish Disconcertion – inability to deal with or understand something).
Despite that Weber was dubbed the “founder” of academic sociology, sociology was mainly founded as a scientific “conspiracy” to subdue and exterminate the white, bourgeoise and working classes (Marx, Durkheim, Spencer (Oberlin College, Mannheim, Simmel,, Oppenheimer, Coser, Merton, Wirth, Reisman, Adorno, Herberg, Glazer, Arendt, Jacobs, Lowenthal).
Weber was an outlier who was German who proposed that forced assimilation was the only answer to the Jewish Question (see Max Weber and the Jewish Question: A Study of the Social Outlook and His Sociology by Gary Abraham). Weber had a strong, fundamental bias against pluralism even for Poles and Catholics (see Weber’s books Ancient Judaism and The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism and his writings on the Polish and Prussian Junker labor problem in Germany). He proposed to “find out the ‘secrets’ of the Jewish success”.
Has Marx himself ever endorse them? If not, they were not Marxists. Marx opposed bourgeoise degeneracy. So did Mao.
Actually degenerates are product of society with parasitic classes, existed in ancient slave holding societies already. Logically can’t exist in socialist society where everyone works.
Too much BS from the author, too little time to read let alone reply.
If you had “too little time to read let alone reply,” then how did you manage to reply? Seems to me you should have spent your precious timereading and spared us your vacuousreply.
I’m not correcting it as much as I’m pointing out that this rather unique idiomatic tic is one shared by Priss Factor and Jung-Freud, leading me to infer that they are one and the same.
the general culture of ugliness
You can have money-is-everything and “diversity”,
or you can have race and culture
– but you can’t have both.
Hmmm, it was the Jew who decided to use Blacks to intimidate Whites. Blacks in America were hopelessly outnumbered, and even where there was a sizable portion of Blacks, they (Blacks) were nearly as docile as post 1970s Whites. Think of a Southern plantation where Blacks outnumbered the Whites. A Black uprising was rare. Blacks were too broken spiritually and just accepted their lot just like Whites of today. At least Blacks had the excuse of being hopelessly outnumbered and outgunned, Whites GAVE AWAY America without a fight. No other tribe has LAID DOWN like Whites, no one.
The Anglo? Plenty of non Anglo White sellouts as well. White raitor trash can be Greek or Irish or even a Russkie. The Catholic church has done their share of damage. Bringing in all sorts of non whites and setting them up with FREE education, housing, etc. I am pretty sure this is where Black on Yellow hate started to fester. Blackie saw Whitey go off to fight the Yellow man and then turn around and import him to America, giving him freebies that poor Whites and Blacks could not receive.
Poor Whites kiss Black ass to survive, rich white traitor trash kiss Black ass because of other reasons like money, social status, fashion, etc. Take Anderson Cooper, the dude’s ancestors owned slaves and of course the opportunistic Jew did his share of suppressing Blacks.
A true non-White comment if ever there was one. This kind of Jewish triumphalism pretending to be criticism is all over Unz.Replies: @Trinity
Poor Whites kiss Black ass to survive, rich white traitor trash kiss Black ass
Jews recently thrown out of Cuba by Castro, circa 1960. THERE were 30,000, now about 1000. SOUNDS LIKE a little slice of heaven. SBF’s attempted takeover of the Bahamas foiled. Meyer Lanksy almost controlled Batista in Cuba. FORTUNATELY Jews in Latín América are not highly regarded and have no say in anything, as it should be.
Utter and pathetic nonsense.
Communism is Judaism; Capitalism is Judaism.
And the Jews openly brag about both of these facts.
Shilling for one is Shilling for the other.
Are you a Jew, a shill, or just a traitor to the white (and all other), races?
Herow-hetow victimised the "gooks" just as the whites did/do-- e.g. Korea, Nam, etc...
Can you imagine the Yanks publishing a similar news article on Hitler celebrating his birthday in the USA?
Hirohito’s war crimes involved Whites too… But the Japs now complain about any comparison between Hirohito and Hitler, as described in the incident below:
Ukrainian gov’t apologizes for showing Emperor Hirohito’s photo next to Hitler’s in video
https://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20220425/p2a/00m/0na/020000c
I’m sorry, did he just say the Holocaust is real history?
WTF??!?!!!
Bantu blacks are all that younsay. Other black Africans are less savage, ,less delighted with the kist gruesome tortures.
So one way to see bantus is that they are like pre-christian Germanic tribes, just lower IQs, which means they are much less a threat unless a high IQ people back them. And that is what the WASP elites began doing before the American ‘Civil War.’ Jews jumped on that bus some time early in he 20th century but it was Anglo-Saxons who’s tarted to use blacks as their weapons Anas pawns against all the white that WASP elites hated or feared.
Mao told everyone he would useluan, chaos, to start the CR, and send the Red Guards back to school once they had awakened the country to the peasants' plight. They did and he did. No harm done.
If Mao hadn’t rallied the minions, there would have been no Cultural Revolution in China. Indeed, when Mao and the military had just about enough (and the usefulness of Red Guards had passed the expiration date), the mass movement suddenly came to a halt, and many young ones were conveniently deployed to villages to ‘learn from the peasants’, thus no longer able to destabilize cities.
Asa former RT viewer, I was annoyed when the US media got that network taken off the air. Eventually, I got around to watching the Chinese network CGTN. It seemed boring – the news shows were what we used to call “talking heads” – static groups of distinguished folks sitting around talking about events. And the entertainment shows reminded me of American shows in the 1940s and 1950s – shows like the “Lawrence Welk” show or “Your Hit Parade” – well dressed singers backed by orchestral groups – singing quiet, pretty musical numbers.
And then it hit me – as hard as a rock – we have zero chance of beating the Chinese. America is long past the 1950s – when we were more honest, more hard-working, and less represented by Negro behavior and “buck grabbing”. In the 1950s, Americans were basically “corny” – very interested in conforming to older standards of behavior and patriotism. The youth were very earnest and eager to join adult society.
This month, the Chinese celebrate their Springtime New Year and their entertainment will be “old fashioned” with old standards of polite society. And next month, we will celebrate our Super Bowl and our entertainment will probably be some clown grabbing his crotch and yelling about “f-cking somebody else up”. The rest of the day will be spent in overeating and watching large men slamming into each other
That is it – the Chinese are imitating our 50s culture and we are celebrating some apocalyptic crap. The Chinese are stuck in our 1950 era of striving and cultural enrichment and we are stuck in some definitely, uncultured era – the era of the Quick Buck.
Tell me – how the Hell are we going to prevail?
It is true that America was at its peak in the 1950/60s, but that was NOT because the people were more honest / hard-working, or there was less Black behavior. It was because Europe and Asia were totally wrecked. East Asia hadn't risen, and most colonialized countries still hadn't gained their independence (or for long).
"America is long past the 1950s – when we were more honest, more hard-working, and less represented by Negro behavior and “buck grabbing”."
America was bombing and using bio-weapons in Korea in the 1950s. Then they used agent orange in Vietnam in the 1960s. They nuclear bombed and tested radiation on South Pacific islanders. They sprayed bacteria in the street of San Franc. and injected Blacks and prisoners with experimental diseases. They performed color-revolution everywhere... etc. And you are proud that they were even more patriotic?
"In the 1950s, Americans were basically “corny” – very interested in conforming to older standards of behavior and patriotism."
Oh, please don't flatter yourself. Chinese has been hardworking since ancient time, and celebrated Chinese New Year long before there was a country called USA.
"the Chinese are imitating our 50s culture"
The America of the 1950s was as racist and "quick buck" minded (or maybe more) as America of the 2020s.Replies: @Trinity
"we are stuck in some definitely, uncultured era – the era of the Quick Buck."
Similarly, US problems today are not all caused by Jews-this-Jews-that. Too many fucking racist and supremacist Whites in the country and everywhere, including this site – that is the problem.
So true. How can anything be fixed/corrected when a country continues to blindly point the finger.
Sadly true. China [the government, the people, the party] was able to self-correct within a few years after they realized their mistakes. As a result, Chinese of the 1950/60 lived better than their ancestors, and of the 1970/80 lived better than the 1950/60s and so on.
"How can anything be fixed/corrected when a country continues to blindly point the finger."
Herow-hetow victimised the "gooks" just as the whites did/do-- e.g. Korea, Nam, etc...
Can you imagine the Yanks publishing a similar news article on Hitler celebrating his birthday in the USA?
Can you imagine the Yanks publishing a similar news article on Hitler celebrating his birthday in the USA?
Herow-hetow victimised the “gooks” just as the whites did/do– e.g. Korea, Nam, etc…
Hitler victimised the whites!!!
The “whites” (i.e. Slavs) Hitler victimized were considered “sub-humans” and grouped with black people, mixed-race people, Roma and Jews.
Antibeast’s original comment holds. As usual, this article is more Anglo propaganda using carefully selected bits of incomplete and distorted history to continue the “divide and conquer” modus operandi.
Gab comment posted by CORVID:
If a Christian group in israel started facilitating illegal immigration into the country they‘d be shut down and thrown in jail.
So why must we in the west tolerate all the jewish groups masquerading as ‘charities’ that only exist to grease the wheels of 3rd world immigration into our countries?
Mao and the rise of the Chicoms was not an organic movement. It was created by the CIA. The CIA is the puppet master of China to this day. Always has been. Most likely, always will be.
Here is an outline of succession: CIA—>State Dept.—>Carnegie Endowment (CEIP)
The CIA gets its marching orders from the State Dept. The State Dept. gets its marching orders from the Carnegie Endowment. Want to know what is going down in the Ukraine right now? Just follow that formula. It’s a long game that has been playing out for more than a decade. Follow the .orgs and the money trail. How many .orgs are affiliated with George Soros? He is an agent of that process. He didn’t come into all of his wealth just because he flipped a few bucks into some more bucks in the financial markets. His wealth isn’t even really his wealth. He and his ‘wealth’ are instruments of the above process.
There is nothing organic about BLM. There is nothing or5ganic about ANTIFA. There is nothing organic about the massive level of illegal immigration taking place across Europe and the US. There’s nothing organic about the huge uptick in crime across our country. It’s all part of a carefully coordinated, choreographed process that is engineering global societies into a particular direction.
China is a puppet state. The US is a puppet state. The EU is a puppet state. Etc., etc., etc.
Mao told everyone he would useluan, chaos, to start the CR, and send the Red Guards back to school once they had awakened the country to the peasants' plight. They did and he did. No harm done.
If Mao hadn’t rallied the minions, there would have been no Cultural Revolution in China. Indeed, when Mao and the military had just about enough (and the usefulness of Red Guards had passed the expiration date), the mass movement suddenly came to a halt, and many young ones were conveniently deployed to villages to ‘learn from the peasants’, thus no longer able to destabilize cities.
During his rule, Adolf developed rocketry far ahead of it’s time, built the first cruise missiles, salvaged and restored his country’s economy, built the first network of super highways, developed the first jet fighters, wiped out unemployment, held a massive, successful Olympic games, built a technically advanced submarine fleet, dominated auto racing with Mercedes and Auto Union. Developing and integrating a whole variety of technologies that, quite frankly, most countries would still find difficulty in doing today. Adolf began his reforms in 1933.
See how easy that is!
To tell the truth, even though both Mao and Adolf accomplished a lot, I would probably not be all that happy as a citizen of their respective countries during their rules. Too authoritarian for my likes. Your experience may differ.
I grew up believing the horseshit about Hitler like every other duped Westerner. I started to become Jew wise in the early 1990s, aware enough to view movies, like “Schindler’s List” as a work of evil propaganda and Jewish fiction. Once the scales were removed from my eyes I began to see Hitler as one of the greatest of men who ever lived. Of course I then began to see (((our heroes))) in a different light. The “great statesman” and “great orator”, Winston Churchill, slurred his words, spoke drunken unintelligible garbage, just a drunk, fat, opportunist, his kind are a dime a dozen. A pompous, wealthy, white trash good ole boy with a decadent, self centered lifestyle. The ideal shabbos goy. Hitler was the hero of the White race, certainly not some drunk fat boy traitor like Churchill. And to make it worse, Churchill wad wise to the Jew, he knew of their intentions. What a POS. Hitler was a man of the people.
The red states are more like Mao’s red Army in the days before the civil war. Mao was a patriot and the Chinese economy grew faster under Mao than Deng. Don’t believe all the crazy things (like this guy) written about Mao’s China by the British Empire presstitutes.
What you can do is protect your family and yourself from the insanity that is coming.
Merely protecting your family is not enough. We must protect the world from the multi-eyers:
{US diplomats are trained to rely on a combination of cold, hard, strategic calculations and ruthless deal-making. While all nations have elements of realism in their geopolitical calculus, few can bring themselves to abandon morality and ethics on the scale that the US does. While other nations may be guided at least partially by human values – say, whether their decisions will lead to civilian deaths – US leaders are unconcerned by such trivialities. US bureaucrats are determined to get the job done and serve US hegemony – no matter the number of murdered children or destroyed cities they leave in their wake.}
{In essence, the foreign policy of the US regime – and indeed, that of most western regimes from Britain to Nazi Germany – is merely a reflection of western values: institutionalized racism, a willingness to commit military aggression and even genocide to achieve goals, an unbridled nihilism disguised as vacuous optimism, a constant mistrust of others, an inability to appreciate differences, and a civilizational affinity for hypocrisy and deception.}
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/533574-us-india-allies-against-china/