Movatterモバイル変換

Wow, the ultimate in arrogance: “the Word of God (Scripture) is subordinate to the traditions of the rabbis.”

Now we know what orthodox jewish believers think of us, the other-believing people. And we’re supposed to deem them worthy of love and respect?

There is no such thing as a follower of 2nd temple Judaism. Judaism died when the 10th Legion destroyed the Temple in AD 70. The Pharisees tried to put something of a religion together after the end of the sacrificial system, but calling it Judaism is not proper. There is no Judaism without the priesthood or the sacrificial system.

@Ron Unz, Unz readers – please keep this article and Michael Hoffman’s efforts at the forefront of what Unz does.

@Michael Hoffman – let us know how to support your effort to expose Talmudic Supremacy, Hatred, Murder and Insanity for all to see while applying Christian values of forgiveness in the face of ADMISSION of Crimes and Sin.

There are ZERO Jews on the*American* right.

Those Jews speaking of God and country and defense have neglected to tell you that they’re not talking of YOUR God and country and defense.

How many “right wing Jews” have blabbed about 9/11? Go ahead, count heads. I’ll even hold my breath while holding my hand on a hot stove while needing to piss like a race horse.

Never trust a magician conartist.

Organized religion and religion in general are mind control. All lies.

This guy is a fraud. The people he is discussing are insane and the sooner they die out, the better the world will be when they’re no longer around to enslave everyone.
Don’t read this obvious bullshit. Just more trickery and lies and obfuscations. Directed violence at the international bankers is the only path to solving this shit show slavery human society is currently experiencing.

Since when the contents of a neighbor’s intelectual property (writings, speech, remarks, comment(s) published on social media) a thing to be
copy-cated/copied-cat?

-Alejandro Grace Ararat

I have unfortunately seen the black community adjudicating the intelectual ideas of what others write, and create and pass them as their own in shows, interviews, media segments, YouTube videos of any length, when it was not their intelectual ideas they are regurgitating ……..it’s undeniable they took the ideas from my original comments and they think no one will notice:::: as I saw your interview Link to the 90-minute televised conversation with Steven Muhammad and historian Ilia Rashad. It is obvious they read the original comment I posted on this thread and then they decided to take the content of comment as their own when it did not came from them in the first place. The intelectual property in written or speech/verbal form is not a copy-cat thing. Since when the contents of a neighbor’s intelectual property (comment, letter book) a thing to be copied-cat? And then turn its contents into and a video format to follow? Such things are not ethical much less morally right to express them as if they were the originators of such observations and I have seen these mode of acting by many many in the black community. They should not pretend to be the originators and expand on the intelectual property of one’s neighbor. — Alejandro Grace Ararat

And a Jewish led, Jewish funded and Jewish media flanked BLM movement celebrated by raceless, atomized, confused, propagandized, decadent Americans, a great non-people, at the end of their history, isn’t an aberration from what America truly is. No, it is its final form and logical conclusion: the permanent experiment of the JSA finds its destiny in a permanent negro riot celebrated by its Jewish intellectual and media class, its ruling elite and Jewish owned companies executing the social transformation with great calculation; the permanent revolution for the Jesus negro, led by Jews, with the white gentile flock, drunken with religious zeal. That’s a bingo!

That’s also brilliant!

Sadly, the JSA spreads this condition to every country it comes into contact with like a highly contagious virus. At least Mao’s cultural revolution was contained in China.

FYI, Mao’s Cultural Revolution was also a Jew operation, and it is not entirely true that it was contained in China. On the contrary, I would argue that the Cultural Revolution was worldwide and that it was imported to China.

The dates for the Chinese Cultural Revolution is 1966 to 1976, but the so-called American Civil Rights Movement precedes it by 3 years, if we take as its starting point the 1963 March on Washington, when Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his “I Have a Dream” speech.

What took place in China in 1967– at the height of the madness and violence– also took place in America. The summer of 1967 is infamously known as “the long, hot summer of 1967,” which refers to the 159 race riots that erupted across the United States in the summer of 1967.

Moreover, the so-called “French” intellectuals behind the political unrest and student protests of May 1968 in Paris, France, were, in fact, Jews (Daniel Cohn-Bendit in particular), and self-identified as “Maoists” in another massive Jewish misdirection and gaslighting operation. 

If I live in the Jewnited States, you live in the Jewish Federal Republic of Germany…

Why do I say the USA is occupied?

Because the American people (composed of many German Americans as you know) have never had the slightest bit of interest in harming Germany. We have simply been highly drilled with the same lies that the entire Anglo world was drilled in … and that Germans fell victim to post war (and many Germans during the war!) You fell victim to it also, and not too very long ago you were spouting that very stuff here on Unz!

Everyone is highly susceptible when they only hear one side of the story. I was fortunate in that when I grew up here in America in the late 40s and 50’s, no one was talking about the war, genocidal Germans, concentration camps or even “Jews.” It wasn’t in my midwestern schools. But itwas in your German schools at the time, wasn’t it? I never had a bad thought about Adolf Hitler during those years, or ever, only wondered the few times it came up what it was really all about. But even German kids in Germany were not confronted with it during those earlier years to the extent they were later. It really wasn’t “taking” very well while the memories were still fresh. (Actually, the holocaust hadn’t yet been invented.)

I do recall the comedy sitcom about Sgt. Schultz and the American pow’s – imagine making a comedy about it! That didn’t start until 1965.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hogan%27s_Heroes I was a little uncomfortable with it because I didn’t like the way it made fun of Germans.

The “occupation” started here in the late 70s … and it came from Hollywood and network television. If I live in the Jewnited States, you live in the Jewish Federal Republic of Germany and most German people are just as complicit in that. Germans have the same right to a secret vote as Americans, so why do they keep voting for the establishment parties, and now more and more the Green party that wants unlimited immigration into Germany/Europe? It’s not the US that’s forcing them to do that. For my money, Germany’s public broadcasterDeutsche Welle, is the worst excuse for news I know of. Well, except for America’s NPR.

But the last three vids are real nice. And this:Opa war SS und das ist auch gut so! Indeed.
Please give me a contact address if you will; I’d like to get in touch with you about something worthwhile. -HH

I have answered this so many times. CJB said so himself, writing on his own blog, that used to exist years ago, before he turned to just selling books. He wrote about how proud he was of that Jewish genetics through his father, as I recall. (It may be 1/4, someone said that but I remembered half.) I guess he’s lived as a Christian? Adam Green is a fucktard.

I suggest you ask Bjerknes.

The elites of this wicked empire which is the Jewnited States of the Great Satan don’t look occupied to me, but complicit. The people maybe, but the majority goes along with the views of their elite. The paradox of Pax Americana and the “””American””” Empire is of course that it is a state which denies nationhood, people hood, culture and root; genus. Not just race. Anything essential, inherited; it’s an ever lasting experiment, a permanent revolution, an existence in free fall. Sure, American Jews cook the meals, but the restaurant was still built by Anglos and they paid the cooks.

The JSA is also where all things go to mutate, rot and die; after they were taken apart by resentful Jewish merchants of perversion who take unending hateful revenge for real and invented wrong doings against them. Anything that the JSA did not take from Europe is an abomination and I only need to look at the abhorrent mixture of BLM, Jewish pedo media and Weinstein Hollywood which the JSA exports around the world, to regret that we did not get to nuke this disgusting country. And sure enough JSA’s oligarchs have become perversely rich and they make even Russia’s kleptocracy look civilized and modest in comparison. They are probably the greatest robber barons in human history to whom even Seneca or Crassus do not compare, not to mention Blackrock and other manifestations of institutionalized, globalized greed. Anglo-Saxon style capitalism, which we used to be able to resist for half a century post WW-2, and Judaism are a marriage of love after all.

Now! There is a lot of shizo garbage being written about Hitler, how he was an agent of the Rothschilds and so forth. (In a worse quality than Sutton; whom at least did point to Wall Street which is a good direction.) That has exactly one reason: Americans can easily cope with the fact that Stalin was the bad guy. What they cannot, under any circumstances, accept, is, that America was the bad guy. That it was and is profoundly evil. The UK, too. And not just the Fox News/Tom Clancy boomer crowd would have their views implode about their own countryand who runs it. And about the whole world and who runs that now, too. And while the rather bizarre horse shoe theory that Stalinism and Hitlerism are identical is very popular in the controlled (Jewish) opposition and its media, the more honest and truthful and accurate relationship is completely ignored: that liberalism and leftism are two sides of the same coin. And a Jewish led, Jewish funded and Jewish media flanked BLM movement celebrated by raceless, atomized, confused, propagandized, decadent Americans, a great non-people, at the end oftheirhistory, isn’t an aberration from what America truly is. No, it is its final form and logical conclusion: the permanent experiment of the JSA finds its destiny in a permanent negro riot celebrated by its Jewish intellectual and media class, its ruling elite and Jewish owned companies executing the social transformation with great calculation; the permanent revolution for the Jesus negro, led by Jews, with the white gentile flock, drunken with religious zeal. That’s a bingo! Sadly, the JSA spreads this condition to every country it comes into contact with like a highly contagious virus. At least Mao’s cultural revolution was contained in China.

Right now it feels almost like divine punishment for a state concept which has prevented the great restoration, renaissance and birth of a new high culture within European civilization in its deepest winter. A promise, the last promise to humanity which was at the core of the German soul (genius and genus in one!) and contained within the national socialist movement. Both of which have now been so completely annihilated. And it may have indeed irreversibly doomed the European peoples. That the JSA pissed away its entire world power in less than a century, faster thananyworld empire in human history, is equally telling. When the JSA is gone, its memory will be that of the Soviet Union, or Mongol Empire. A great desert, violent and feared, but which left the world absolutely nothing but dysfunction and barbarism. And to be honest: even the Soviet Union seems rather masculine right now in comparison.

The barbaric and wicked empire of greed and nothing has, at the side of its Bolshevik allies, destroyed the people of the Brandenburgische Konzerte so a negro could lap dance a white women, degraded to a hooker, with lyrics singing “ass ass ass ass ass”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pn1VGytzXus
Video LinkThe JSA has turned European civilization into a mongrelized idiocracy under Jewish subjugation. The deepest pits of hell are not enough of a punishment for this monstrosity.

And to also solve “the JQ” once and for all: The answer to it would be full assimilation. But Jews in America and the UK have won WW 2, because they didnot assimilate while German Americans did (which can be read here in The Old World in the New) – and betrayed their Vaterland.

But to more cheerful things! The ADL has not yet managed to completely censor or shut down bitchute. And for now I was able to listen to our old WW 2 songs.


Video LinkA great playlist! And what do I hear when I listen to it? Freedom, liberation, truth, purity. Or simply put: Deutschtum. The last pearls of whiteness in a world order of darkness and perversity while Jewish supremacists arrest Europeans for speech in their own countries, at the hands of their traitor governments. These songs are last messages of a liberated people who knew what it meant, and if it were only for a little more than a decade, to be free from Jewish tyranny, Americanization, materialism, usury, degeneration and barbarism – all which are one and the same, which are their demonic so called civilization. Let’s not forget that the Jewnited States and Soviet Union almost eradicated all life on earth with nuclear weapons!

Well, you however may be happy to hear, that I have finally come around to accept National Socialism as part of our history, but not quite in the way which our occupants wanted! Opa war SS und das ist auch gut so! 🙂


Video Link

Ade, mein Fräulein Jäger!


Video Link
– HH

Why would you look in a book titled ‘Hitler: Enemy of the German People’ that’s just a copy of half-Jew Christopher Jon Bjerknes previous book on the same subject?

PTI, but do you have a reliable source that CJB is half Jewish?

Only reason I ask is he’s a frequent guest of Adam Green’sKnow More News and has a lot of controversial things to say and knowing his background may shed a little light on his motivations.

“I’m searching, posing questions.” Bully for you. So just what are you trying to find out?
Why would you look in a book titled ‘Hitler: Enemy of the German People’ that’s just a copy of half-Jew Christopher Jon Bjerknes previous book on the same subject? Makes no sense unless that’s already your preference, which I’m convinced it is.

AH is not “my hero” and I don’t “adore him,” I respect him, so you are absolutely coming from the same nasty mindset as Michael Hoffman and Franklin Ryckaert. What “question-marks” are around the figure of Hitler? Only the made up stuff put there by hateful Poles, Jews, communists and anarchists. It’s all conspiratorial crap.

“what we know now, is that Germany is still occupied.” All Europe is ‘occupied.’ The USA is occupied, for God’s sake. Why don’t you ask whythat is? It’s a globalist occupation everywhere. Globalism/Communism won the war – three major powers against one. If Hitler had not fought, nothing would be different today than what it is, with “Germany occupied.” As it is, we at least have the stirring example of heroic NS fighters and a memory of what could be. Hoffman’s precious Catholic Church cooperates fully with the globalist octopus in order to keep its own little area of control.

“The war result is ME-mayhem.” It’s not Germany’s fault. Certainly not Hitler’s fault.

Besides genital mutilation aka circumcision… they also worship the same Satanic black cube!

[MORE]

You are right.
It’s complicated, a complex thing.
As I said, I ’m searching, posing questions.
But what we know now, is that Germany is still occupied.
The war result is ME-mayhem.
You could say the war continued.
We know who does this, and should resist them together.
As for your hero, you can adore as much as you like, but don’t expect others to join, when there are so many question-marks around the figure.
For the moment also I have no time with you, especially the woidness of your answers.
Remember, you are the expert, and I ask to get some substantial answer.
But thank you anyway, for taking time.

Two of whomI heard of, most certainly was military geniuses: Guderian and von Manstein.

You don’t even know if they were military geniuses, you only ‘heard of them.’ Hitler had as many successes as they did (they also had losses) so why were they geniuses and Hitler was not? Their memoirs are self-serving.

You don’t know enough about any of this to discuss it. It’s very complex and is just idle speculation on your part. Who has time? Not me. I reject M. Hoffman altogether and I already told you why. He’s basically saying Hitler’s and Germany’s objective should have been different than it was, and if so, things might have gone better for them. Stupid.

Thank you.
I am surely not suggesting I now the minds of der führer, or his Generals.
Two of whom I heard of, most certainly was military geniuses: Guderian and von Manstein.
There are also of course inumerable good and sincere soldiers, of German extraction, that I respect!
As Alexandros stated though, the whole thing was lost from the beginning.
He says, ”were we are now”, they would have been without fighting, that is submit.
So it was a gamble, then, and no good prospect.
The question must be, and I agree with Hoffman posing it, what would have happened if Germany hadn’t overstretched itself?
As for oil supply, wouldn’t a smaller, more defensive front, require less?
Would that perhaps opened for a lot of other poissbilities?
I would like to say to this, that l have read Joachim Hoffman, and think he has a strong argument.
But then again, for good will, what would a defensive instead of an aggressor role have given?
Anyway, I’m iterating, asking, searching, curious for different views, and by no means on anybodys side.

Must we worship? Isn’t it enough to acknowledge that we are puny creatures faced with an infinity we can neither understand nor combat. I believe there is a creator but I’ll not grovel. He understands that and doesn’t require my debasement. Personal acknowledgement, thanks, and understanding is all that is required. Getting on my knees and whining isn’t acceptable. God detests it as well.

Thanks. Michael Hoffman is not a military expert, not by any stretch of the imagination. What he has done in this book is read a number of Hitler-critical opinions on a variety of topics, the war being one, and put together from that his “arguments” in his own book. There is nothing new here, no original thinking. It’s just a hit piece that flopped and that’s why he’s held off on writing the “sequel” or book #2 that he had planned.

What do either you or Hoffman know about what was in Hitler’s mind, or in his General’s minds, in 1940-41? Nothing. So why would I waste my time getting into a discussion with you. Your last line above is is truly idiotic – even I can tell that. Their (German’s) purpose was not to “endure,” but to put the Soviet Union out of business.

Dear Michael Hoffman, This article is a must read for the security and safety of gentile nation states (including at the social interpersonal level) because this is worst than Jewish-bolshevism’s totalitarian regime (more akin to heathenish satanical) where the modus operandi against entire gentile nations include clandestine unethical attacks through daily social interactions that are inculcated since birth to subvert gentile nations/populations/state. It’s covert mode becomes apparent only if it’s influence gets to be unaccountable, and these things irrefutably constitutes the synagogue of satan. Here is the biblical foundation. It was He (and still is, The Lord Jesus Christ of Nazareth) who declared “and the evil-speaking of those saying themselves to be Jews, and are not, but are a synagogue of the Adversary” (ourosboros, shekhinah, ein sof=satan).

The religious Jews or the fig tree of pharisaical judaism trust in themselves. Their source was the fig tree of pharisaical judaism, self and ourousboros as their pharisaical judaism was their downfall. Just as the fig tree, paganistic pharisaical judaism, withered from the roots up, indeed, the religious Jews rotted from the inside-out. Then The Lord Christ Jesus answered and said to the fig tree (Talmudic pharisaical judaism) “NEVER man eat fruit of you hereafter WHILE THE WORLD STANDS. Rev 2:9, Mark 11:14.

The paganistical, Babylonian, satanic, devices of superstitious talmudic-pharisaical-rabbinical=judaism=judaic-men do not only NOT fulfill the law/Word of God (as they blasphemously persuade themselves) but also do utterly take (reject) it away. What the gentile masses are censured from knowing and realizing is the truth that Judaism is paganistical, pharisaic, satanistic, supremacistic, Babylonic at its core and it irrefutably is none of the religion of the Old Testament prophets. Let us not confuse exposing the hatred of those who observe the malevolent binding contents of Talmudic-judaic passages against gentiles/heathens because since when supremacist oppression and subjugation offer not little value to a free and open gentile society? Since when is truth relative or since when truth amounts to six hundred and sixty six schemes of covert Babylonian Talmudic oppression, repression and subjugation against gentiles by/via beguilement? “For you reject (set away, cast/put aside apart, void and nullify) the Word/commandment of God for your [talmudic-Zohar. Kabbalah – tradition which is mere superstitious supernal refuse of traditions or pharisaical oral law consisting of occultism, self-worship, racist hatred for non-Jews,
extra-nonbiblical superstitions which abode is from ourousboros’ abyss] man made tradition(s) of the elders (or oral law) that you delivered; and many such like things you do.” “Well do you put (aside, cast away) the Word/commandment of God to observe your own tradition” (known as talmudic-paganistic-rabbinical ‘tradition of the elders’ or oral law). Mark 7:9, Mark 7:13. Thus, this rabbinical-pharisaical oral law (=paganistic-Talmudic-pharisaic Judaism) is irrefutably, and explicitly condemned — by the ONE whom even Moses spoke of, declared,and foretold; The Lord Jesus Christ — as counterfeit.

Herr general, you offer only two solutions!
What about a third, defensive, non-submissive?

The opinion is, as I percieve it after reading Hoffman’s book, that they, the German army (Ostheer), were not strong enough for the task they set up. That is; penetrating Russia’s vast areas on a broad front, and take Moscow.
So, the argument goes further, they, the German army, should have awaited the Russian attack.
On a smaller front, and with supply close, they would have had a better chance to endure.

Never a shortage of armchair generals thinking they can perform miracles.

Shorter front means shorter front for the USSR too. The ability to supply the front means little when your oil in Romania is hijacked by the enemy. Holding out will be a futile exercise when you are attacked in the North, the West, the South and the East by vastly superior resources.

The German war plan was close to optimal. It just wasn’t enough. The only other choice was to submit, which would only leave them right where they are now.

The opinion is, as I percieve it after reading Hoffman’s book, that they, the German army (Ostheer), were not strong enough for the task they set up. That is; penetrating Russia’s vast areas on a broad front, and take Moscow.
So, the argument goes further, they, the German army, should have awaited the Russian attack.
On a smaller front, and with supply close, they would have had a better chance to endure.

On what grounds did Hoffman object “that Germany should have kept a low offensive profile towards Russia, or even a defensive one.” What does he mean by ‘a low offensive profile?’

Excuse me, but I have not read his book, but only the Introduction which sets the tone.

Isn’t the objection reasonable, which Hoffman conveys, that Germany should have kept a low offensive profile towards Russia, or even a defensive one?

Appointed because they won the election. Made dictator by vote from the Reichstag. In what universe is this not being elected? It’s not exactly Gerald Ford appointing Nelson Rockefeller VP out of nowhere.

> “https://carolynyeager.net/saturday-afternoon-roots-myth-national-socialisms-occult-roots”

I barely ever listened to any of your idealist (aka: schizo Christian) podcasts, but what I am horrified at is that you, with all your love for Hitler over the decades, have not bothered to learn a few easy rules for German pronunciation. I am appalled that you pronounce VOLK as “wolk” and not /folk/, Germanen as “jirmanen”… At least, Savitri spoke French, German, English, Bengali, Hindi…
http://savitridevi.com/M&R_chapter_1.html
http://savitridevi.com/M&R_chapter_11.html

Emendation of my comment of September 29, 2020 at 10:32 pm GMT, which replied to your comment of September 29, 2020 at 4:45 pm GMT (comment # 300):

After I clicked on the “Publish Comment” button to post my above-referenced September 29, 2020 at 10:32 pm GMT comment and seconds before the 5-minute editing period ended, I noticed an editing error that caused a grammar-error. The error is in this paragraph:

Humanity’s overwhelming majority have done nothing of merit or have wrought (or not resisted) endless, mammoth harm, destruction, pain, horror, depredation — and, worst, massive slaughter, torture, enslavement, habitat-ruination……even annihilation of the innocents of Earth, Earth’s birds, non-human beasts, and other non-human creatures.

The error is an apparent number-disagreement — “have” (occurring twice) where the grammatically correct term would be “has.” Here is a corrected edition of the same paragraph:

Humanity’s overwhelming majorityhas done nothing of merit orhas wrought (or not resisted) endless, mammoth harm, destruction, pain, horror, depredation — and, worst, massive slaughter, torture, enslavement, habitat-ruination……even annihilation of the innocents of Earth, Earth’s birds, non-human beasts, and other non-human creatures.

I cannot spare time enough to proofread the following text. I commit typing/editing errors. I apologize now for any typing or editing errors that may trouble the following text.

You wrote:

When asked a much simpler version of the kinds of questions you raise here, “How did you determine the truth of your claim that animals do not have nor hallucinate gods or a divine aspect of their existences or an overall design to their greater universe?”, you asked the person asking the question how they were born such an idiot.

“…you asked the person…”? Why do you reference yourself with third-person grammar? Do you deem yourself a monarch? Or are you just nuts?

You deserved my question-form answer [“How were you born such an idiot?”]. Your question was an absurd display of mental blindness or a silly attempt of sparring with me on a risibly absurd premise, or both. See my comment of September 28, 2020 at 9:06 pm GMT (comment # 289),https://www.unz.com/article/what-does-rabbinic-judaism-say-about-what-makes-jews-and-gentiles-different/#comment-4191281

For you comment to which this comment replies, you deserve a similar response. But, this final time, I shall oblige your desire that I recognize your existence as if it were that of a creature deserving kindness and respect.

* [Side-Note
(a)Respect: A human must EARN respect; you have not, but earned not better than disregard. My dog and my wife love and respect me. I earned the respect of my respectable colleagues; and I care not for the regard of others. My dogs have respected me; and I have loved and honored my dogs.

(b)Kindness: Kindness is evidence of capable of evil. For, if kindness occurs, goodness does not exist. See my comment of September 23, 2020 at 10:26 am GMT (comment # 36),https://www.unz.com/article/what-does-rabbinic-judaism-say-about-what-makes-jews-and-gentiles-different/#comment-4180855 .

With quite enough comments, I have shown I am virtually a misanthrope. Humanity is the bane of Earth. Were humanity eliminated magically without any harm of the rest of Earth’s life (vegetable and animal) or harm of Earth’s resources, Earth’s life would live infinitely better lives.

Some few humans have produced good or beauty and done no harm — e.g., Johann Sebastian Bach (whose music sufficed so that if no other music occurred ever, still our ears would have all of the best of enthralling sonic art) and Lao Tzu (his Tao Te Ching, itsphilosophy, NOT the religion “Taoism).

But Bach and Lao Tzu were very rare rarities. Humanity’s overwhelming majority have done nothing of merit or have wrought (or not resisted) endless, mammoth harm, destruction, pain, horror, depredation — and, worst, massive slaughter, torture, enslavement, habitat-ruination……even annihilation of the innocents of Earth, Earth’s birds, non-human beasts, and other non-human creatures.
End Side-Note]

Your comment consists of much goopy blather, redundancy, preachy hogwash, and unbearably long, ill-constructed paragraphs all presuming to “change” my “heart” and “mind” so that I shall become a patient, kindly gentleman who tries to “see” the “good” that may live, or hide, in others, albeit they are emotionally hard-warped neurotics, character neurotics, emotional plague ridden, or psychopaths. I shall not respond to more of your comments

You wrote:

You cannot really change any hearts and minds if you are unwilling to demonstrate the epistemic power of charity to overcome the social dysfunction of ego.

What distinguishes “really change” from “change” or “any hearts” or “any minds” from “hearts” or “minds”? “[E]pistemic power”? What pretentious dross. What pseudo-intelligent dreck may be costumed in such puff?

I do not try to “change” “hearts” with my comments. I limit my heart-treatments to curing or mitigating cardiovascular disease, which I treat near-exclusively with dietary medicine (occasionally supplemented with Chinese herbs) —never with means that involve killing, hurting, torturing, or using non-human creatures.

I do not try tochange minds with my comments. No one can change another’s mind. But, some few minds are not quite fixed. Their perceptions are open or somewhat malleable.

Mostly, I present evidence, facts, analyses, arguments and various observations that that (a) expose the psychopathy-or-emotional-plague sourced false premises and specious arguments put in Unz Review articles and comments and (b) impeach the credibility of those who put such false premises and specious arguments.

Sometimes my credibility-impeachments involve language-impeachment or logic-deconstruction designed to show that the impeachment-subject’s cerebration is flawed enough to render the subject’s premises or argument’s unreliable. If a comment’s incorrigible idiocy or a commenter’s intractable stupidity, apparent psychopathy, or emotional plague exasperates me, my reaction may reduce to criticisms of grammar, diction, or punctuation (though I avoid criticizing flaws that seem typing errors) or evenad hominem slams.

Decades ago, I underwent Orgonomic psychotherapy. Serendipitously, I had seen I had been deprived of capacity of love and being loved because of the fear and hard “emotional armoring” my parents gifted me with years of beyond-Dickensian physical abuse, disregard, sexual repression, and abandonment. I interviewed several Orgonomic psychiatrists. I chose Dr. Morton Herskowitz, because I saw he was the only one I could not manipulate.

Doctor Herskowitz? See,e.g., Morton Herskowitz, Emotional Armoring: An Introduction to Psychiatric Orgone Therapy (LIT Verlag Münster 1997), ISBN 3825835553, 9783825835552 .

I recall, gratefully, Dr. Herskowitz’s barkingmany times: “Shut up and [do this or that grueling physical action], or “Do not try that crap on me, just……”

Wilhelm Reich was Dr. Herskowitz’s training therapist. To receive Reich’s training therapy, Dr. Herskowitz had to drive from Philadelphia PA to Orgonon, Maine, a distance of about 540 miles, on the old U.S. Route 1 and State-of-Maine roads, years before the advent of the Interstate Highway system.

In an interview conducted by a journalist of the Philadelphia Inquirer (when that paper was not yet a fake news engine), the interviewer asked Dr. Herskowitz: “How could you endure making that trip week after week even in winter and through the harsh driving conditions of New England and, worse, northeast Maine?” Dr. Herskowitz replied: “If a patient will not endure such travail to attain psychic health, he does not deserve therapy.”

Birds and non-human beasts (of land and sea) must do or die. An alpha wolf or mated Canada goose will fight anything to the death to save his mate. A mountain goat will brave ricocheting down the jagged walls of an Alpine crevasse to avoid a predator or find food. D.H. Lawrence wrote:

I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself.
A small bird will drop frozen dead from a bough
Without ever having felt sorry for itself.

An aboriginal American tribe abides this saying:

I am not interested in whether you buy your child fine food or beautiful clothes or house it in a glorious mansion.

I am interested in whether, if you suffer pneumonia and a 104 degree temperature and great pain, still you will leave your bed and go to your crying child and cradle it in your arms and sing it to sleep.

I have no time for horse-shit, especially when it is spewed by psychopaths and emotional plague people.

I am blunt, immodest, and ruthless. I do not care, even a whit, for what others (except my wife) may think of me.

I am a beast. But like a beast, I am good as I am good,mindlessly. And, like a beast, I ammindlessly loyal and loving to other beasts, like my wife and my dog.Mindlessly, I would fight anything to the death to save my wife or dog. Ihave risked my life to save my sweet dog-son. More than a few times,mindlessly I have risked my life or freedom to savestrangers, but afterwards did not care for their lives. Again see my comment of September 23, 2020 at 10:26 am GMT (comment # 36),https://www.unz.com/article/what-does-rabbinic-judaism-say-about-what-makes-jews-and-gentiles-different/#comment-4180855 .

But you, Polemos, deserve nought better than disregard, which I shall accord you henceforth.

The answer is obvious everywhere non-human animal life has not suffered human intrusion. The same answer has been obvious for all the brief time Homo sapiens has existed and for about 550 million years before.

When Robert Whatever asked an open question about a possibly observable phenomenon among Jews, you challenged him with the following:

Surely you can support your question’s premising assertion with a valid, reliable study done in the 21st century and performed on a truly random sample of at least 40% of the entire world’s adult Jewish population.

How would the study-designers determine, validly and reliably, which “Jews” were JEWS?

What would be the study-validating, outcome-reliability-assuring, necessary, non-biasing questions the study must have asked the subjects?

When asked a much simpler version of the kinds of questions you raise here, “How didyou determinethe truth of your claim that animals do not have nor hallucinate gods or a divine aspect of their existences or an overall design to their greater universe?”, you asked the person asking the question how they were born such an idiot. That’s not an engagement seeking truth, wisdom, or reconciliation. You had an opportunity to demonstrate how a person follow the steps you took to arrive at your conclusions — why else would you link us to information also accessible on the Web and further advise us to also pursue the sources and citations made on those pages, if not to educate us and help us to come to the same conclusions you did?

But you instead choose —choose — to treat other people as idiots and ridiculous and beneath you, with clear contempt for them because they havea different perspective, while you also try to further elevate your moral and discursive positions by pointing out that you are a great volunteer for the unjustly accused and a healer and advocate for the exploited animals and ill-treated kin. Whom do you unjustly accuse? Whom do you exploit? Whom do you treat ill when you come to comment? Who will protect us from you, if you are unwilling to let down your own guards and defenses and love your fellow commentors as yourself? And will they also post comments in multiple languages and styles, too?

So, you could take the measure by which you beat down other commentors’ opinions and views and demonstratehow it is obvious to you, a human, that it is obviousto you what “non-human animal life” is like without you, a human, moving into their spaces in which they previously had “not suffered human intrusion” without yourself suffering those animals through your intrusions. Such an answer brings forth a helpful account of one’s latent first principles as well as experiential connection to one’s conceptions, and when done with open regard for decency or compassion, changes minds and hearts.

Or, you could continue to avoid your own inconsistencies and contradictions in a similarly revealing though less humbling manner. Because, as it stands, when you say that science “is a largely egotistical enterprise of a puny species enamored by itself so much that it cannot perceive the error-engendering effects of its arrogance,” I put it to you that your non-conscious selves want you to listen carefully and responsibly to what you are trying to put into the world and reconcile that with your own behavior and intrusion into these spaces.

You cannot really change any hearts and minds if you are unwilling to demonstrate the epistemic power ofcharity to overcome the social dysfunction ofego. Everything you think you are doing through comments to an essay on this website is useless waste if you have an intention to motivate others to improve our shared world or nurture a shared culture that pursues mutual improvement and reciprocal worth but adopt a style that reflects more your own internal spiritual struggle exploiting other people’s easiest mistakes or their ignorance. There are some commentors who are clearly doing all this for their own gratification or the amusement of others. Is that you? Perhaps some part, but I could not square the honesty of that with your zeal and high principled stands for proper citation, proper structure, and proper understanding. You mar your beauty when you act so petty.

Yeah I totally missed that. Everyone is entitled to a bad posting now and then. Does not erase what a total goof ball Loopy is.

Contrast this stuff with the clarity, directness, accessibility and universality of the best of Greek (and Roman) philosophy. There is simply no contest.

Bravo. You go right to the point.
There is no philosophy nor even theology in judaism.
It has nothing to offer of universal or civilisational value to the world.
It is not even a religion.

Judaism’s purpose is to maintain control over its tribe,
subjugating them with rules – which they dignify as “laws” [their own] .
A tribe kept in fear by tales of hate, commanded to hate.
A tribe used and sacrificed by its chiefs. A tribe instructed
by its rules [“laws”] to break moral, national and international law
to profit / aid the group.

In sum, a cult internally, a mafia externally.
A terrible situation for its adherents and a problem for us.

2 Commandments met with them worshipping the Golden Calf—back up the mountain for another 8. “We want Barabbas” – and Barabbas was a thief. Third strkc -” He saved others but can not save Himself”? “My ways are not your ways”—-

Sorry: I neglected to indicate that I addressed to YOU my comment of September 29, 2020 at 3:02 am GMT (comment # 292).

As usual, your do not read, but your psychopathy edits and adds words to create the meaning it demands.

I am not my father. I eat beans. Pythagoras was a lunatic, brilliant, but bonkers. Your comment bears zero relation to anything I have said ever at Unz Review.

Also “nutrias” is not an English language word, at least not a word related to nutrition. Or did your father eat swamp rats?
*https://www.livescience.com/nutria.html
*https://www.invasivespeciesinfo.gov/aquatic/fish-and-other-vertebrates/nutria
*https://californiaagtoday.com/nutria-swamp-rats-need-control/

My father was a wonderful human being and father.

Your opinion does not determine whether your father was wonderful, or even a human being. [The Sioux insisted that only Sioux and Cheyenne were Human Beings, all the rest (humans and other animals) being “Wasichu.”]

I fail to divine the purpose of your assertion that your “father was…a father,” a statement that parallels A = A. Do you doubt that your “father” was a man whose sperm fertilized an ovam (human or other)?

He ate beans an all othernutrias foods

Interesting diet, Fran. Did you father reside in South America?

nutrias
a large semiaquatic rodent resembling a beaver, native to South America. It is kept in captivity for its fur and has become naturalized in many other areas.

That explains Loopy why you are such a freaking nut job. My father was a wonderful human being and father. He ate beans an all other nutrias foods, and never met a moon person he did not like.
You are a real legend in your own lunch box.

I cannot spare time enough to proofread the following text. I commit typing/editing errors. I apologize now for any typing or editing errors that may trouble the following text.

You wrote:

You’re basically overcrediting religion. Take away the religious trappings and people still behave similarly. Something like 50% of Jews now claim to be non-religious but that doesn’t seem to do an awful lot in the way of diminishing their attachment to their otherwise malignant culture.

In my language that you quoted,nothing suggests I assert that a deity-involving religion explainsall human conduct or thought or evenall cruel or evil human behavior. Rather, I hold that seemingly endemic, surely epidemic, human psychic sickness explains all religion and that all religion is bred by and breeds psychic sickness, even pshchopathy and emotional plague.

Religion occurs in two forms, not necessarily, but likely never, exclusive of each other:

* (a) Religion rooted in fear of perceived threatening natural and supernatural forces. The fear and fearful perceptions produce personification or other symbols of the feared forces and myths and rules pursued per belief that somehow the believer can supplicate the personified or symbolized forces for mercy.

* (b) Greed-driven religion. The believer(s) invent a deity or deities who will give the believers what they want or think they need if the believers sacrifice things to the deity or deities or follow the rules the believers invent but attribute to the deity or deities they invented.

The latter religion-type [type (b)] involves fear of not getting what is wanted or perceive to be a need. The former [type (a)] involves a kind of greed — seeking things to which the believer considers he is not entitled but may be permitted if he supplicates the force he symbolized or rendered personified.

Both religion-types involve rules that pretend to be, or to associate with, “morals,” sometimes called “moral” rules, usually much ritualized, though any reasonably intelligent, truly psychically healthy, fully empathic human would deem such rules IMMORAL. The “moral” is getting the “good” or protection one wants from the invented deity or deities, the rules are costs of acquisition. The rituals are magics that avoid or dispel natural barriers or induce the deity or deities to show mercy or grant wishes.

RE: the immorality of “moral rules,” please see my comment of September 23, 2020 at 10:26 am GMT (comment # 36),https://www.unz.com/article/what-does-rabbinic-judaism-say-about-what-makes-jews-and-gentiles-different/#comment-4180855and see also the sources listed at the close of this comment.

Neither religion-type (a) nor religion-type (b) must be formal, or followed by a societal group, or even followed by two or more humans. Either religion-type can be apersonal moral code of one individual; but, being a code, such moralcode is a set of rules of conduct. The personal moral code may be subliminal, not organized or expressible coherently; it may be merely a superego’sconsistent repression of certain aspirations of a weak ego.

Often, like many formal religions, personal moral codes involve rituals. In extreme cases, the rituals may be counting certain numbers while one acts or evading break-lines of sidewalks or cleaning oneself in always-same elaborate ways involving many precise steps — a parallel of rituals of,e.g., Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox Christian, and Orthodox Jewish rites, a parallel that is very far from accidental. Perform the ritual correctly, and your God loves you, does not hate you, forgives you, does not threaten you: YOU ARE “MORAL,” “GOOD.”

All rules, especially “moral” or legal rules, are pathological. All are bred by and breed psychic ills, often ingredients of psychopathy or emotional plague. Since all religions are constellations of “moral” rules, all religions are bred by and breed psychic pathology, often psychopathy or emotional plague. Again please see my comment of September 23, 2020 at 10:26 am GMT (comment # 36),https://www.unz.com/article/what-does-rabbinic-judaism-say-about-what-makes-jews-and-gentiles-different/#comment-4180855and see also the sources listed at the close of this comment.

Most, if not all, religions and their rules derive from sexual repression — including, and especially, repression of childhood sexuality, but also importantly, repression of early post-pubescent heterosexual sexuallove. The sexual repression is driven by the repressors’ and their religions’ codes of “moral” rules.

* [Side-Note:
I shall not address homosexuality or transgenderism, because both are symptoms of character neurosis; and I will not argue that matter with anyone, since all such argument is useless because of brainwashing by very sick liberals whos suffer and spread emotional plague.
End Side-Note.]

If you want to be realistic you have to view the behavior of any human group as a complex thing involving many variables. There is an irony here because isolating one variable and declaring it to be the root of all evil sounds an awful lot like simplistic religious thinking.

Ironically, in the perception of idots who worship the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, a person who believes one candefine psychic ills (even in quasi-slide-rule fashion), problematic behavior seems complex.

To one who understands that specific psychic ills are not definable but submit only to being described with many thousands of words issues from rigorous therapeutic experience with a patient, religion-related/religion-explaining psychic ills are very simple and of immensely few species of origin, ultimately just ONE source. I have adumbrated that source above. At this comment’s close. are references that fill in the rest and render the matter clear.

I have not asserted, or even intimated,ever, that religion is the “root of all evil.” Rather, psychic ills are the sources and fuels of all religions. Religions, and their “moral rules,” are bred by, thence breed, psychic ills, especially character neuroses, psychopathy, and emotional plague. Because of your serious misreadings (or misrepresentations??) of my statements, I add that I didNOT say, or even intimate, that religions, and their “moral rules,” are bred by, thence breed,ALL psychic ills.

Againplease see my comment of September 23, 2020 at 10:26 am GMT (comment # 36),https://www.unz.com/article/what-does-rabbinic-judaism-say-about-what-makes-jews-and-gentiles-different/#comment-4180855
AND COMPARE
* Paul Radin, “Primitive Religion: Its Nature and Origin,”https://books.google.com/books/about/Primitive_religion.html?id=Cw4PAQAAMAAJ
* James George Frazer, “The Golden Bough,”https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/408862.The_Golden_Bough
* Wilhelm Reich, INVASION OF COMPULSORY SEX-MORALITY, excerpted here:https://www.wilhelmreichtrust.org/invasion_of_compulsory_sex-morality.pdf
* THE EMOTIONAL PLAGUE,https://anarchy.org.au/anarchist-texts/reich-emotional-plague/ [full text of Chapter 16 of Wilhelm Reich, CHARACTER ANALYSIS (cited infra)
* Wilhelm Reich, The Murder of Christ: The Emotional Plague of Mankind, ISBN-13: 978-0374504762, ISBN-10: 0374504768 (Farrar, Straus, and Giroux (1953), <bexcerpted athttps://www.amazon.com/Murder-Christ-Emotional-Plague-Mankind/dp/0374504768/ref=pd_bxgy_2/132-8804494-8788735?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_i=0374504768&pd_rd_r=f9e2a012-76d0-457e-b475-a67c150341d8&pd_rd_w=ZjFDf&pd_rd_wg=xzcyp&pf_rd_p=ce6c479b-ef53-49a6-845b-bbbf35c28dd3&pf_rd_r=R5M1DZEB4BCBQSF3KRN8&psc=1&refRID=R5M1DZEB4BCBQSF3KRN8
* Wilhelm Reich, PEOPLE IN TROUBLE PA (Emotional Plague of Mankind) (Farrar, Straus, and Giroux 1974), ISBN-10: 0374510350, ISBN-13: 978-0374510350, excerpted athttps://www.amazon.com/People-Trouble-Emotional-Plague-Mankind/dp/0374510350
* Wilhelm Reich, Wilhelm Reich, CHARACTER ANALYSIS (Farrar, Straus, and Giroux 1972, paperback 1990), Paperback ISBN-13: 978-0-374-50!J8IJ–l, Paperback ISBN-lO: 0-:374-50980-8
* Morton Herskowitz, Emotional Armoring: An Introduction to Psychiatric Orgone Therapy (LIT Verlag Münster 1997), ISBN 3825835553, 9783825835552, excerpted here:
https://books.google.com/books?id=MGYRg7sCyLsC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepa
* Wilhelm Reich, THE MASS PSYCHOLOGY OF FASCISM (Orgone Institute Press New York 1946),http://ouleft.org/wp-content/uploads/reich-fascism.pdf
* Charles Konia,The Emotional Plague: The Root of Human Evil (Aco Press, 1st Ed. 2007) ISBN-10: 0967967031, ISBN-13: 978-0967967035, excerpted athttps://www.amazon.com/Emotional-Plague-Root-Human-Evil/dp/0967967031
*https://www.orgonomy.org/articles/Science_Links/TJOG_42_2_extract_crist.pdf
*http://wilhelmreich.gr/en/orgonomy/orgonomy-and-sociology/social-psychopathology/emotional-plague/

The “Chosen People” are not unique. Many human groups — “primitive” or “civilized” — have invented a God or Gods or “Great Spirit” or…….. to do their bidding or to justify or excuse their cruel or evil deeds.

You’re basically overcrediting religion. Take away the religious trappings and people still behave similarly. Something like 50% of Jews now claim to be non-religious but that doesn’t seem to do an awful lot in the way of diminishing their attachment to their otherwise malignant culture. If you want to be realistic you have to view the behavior of any human group as a complex thing involving many variables. There is an irony here because isolating one variable and declaring it to be the root of all evil sounds an awful lot like simplistic religious thinking.

He could be helping write the laws of his local community or volunteering as a CASA, using his life experiences for constructive and healthy ends to those neighbors and people who need him the most. But, instead, like the rest of us unemployed and innumerate, ungrammatical blockheads, he’s here among us, —the animals.

(1) I am not retired, but continue to practice both law and medicine.

(2) I volunteer several hundred hours each year to free from prison and clear the names of people unjustly convicted of crimes they did not commit.

(3) I provide medical caregratis, always. I became a physician to help people,gratis, avoid the gross malpractice of much of allopathy and homepathy.

(4) Except eatingclearly non-sentient creatures (bi-valve molluscs), I do not eat, kill, harm, or use any non-human animals, even bugs (except to defend myself). I do not use products tested on animals.

You are presumptuous, just as you are inclined to issue assertions lacking logic or tenable premise, even sometimes lacking ANY premise.

This comment related to:
https://www.unz.com/article/what-does-rabbinic-judaism-say-about-what-makes-jews-and-gentiles-different/#comment-4187800
AND
https://www.unz.com/article/what-does-rabbinic-judaism-say-about-what-makes-jews-and-gentiles-different/#comment-4188067
AND
https://www.unz.com/article/what-does-rabbinic-judaism-say-about-what-makes-jews-and-gentiles-different/#comment-4191103

The answer is obvious everywhere non-human animal life has not suffered human intrusion. The same answer has been obvious for all the brief time Homo sapiens has existed and for about 550 million years before.

You are blind.

And you seem to abide, agree with, or have joined certain religious psychopaths [Zionist Orthodox Jews] and their psychopathic society, politics, and religion:
https://www.unz.com/article/what-does-rabbinic-judaism-say-about-what-makes-jews-and-gentiles-different/#comment-4191162

Talmudic Rabbis renounce God The Father’s authority over them and consider God subservient to them

Yahweh’s “Chosen People”invented Yahwehto be their servant.

A “Chosen People” man sacrifices [kills] a sheep to Yahweh and Yahweh gives the “Chosen People” man what he wants.

The “Chosen People” invoke Yahweh and obtain from Yahweh (their invention) a command that they [“Chosen People”] invade another people to take the other people’s land and [per their invented Yahweh’s command] slaughter every man, woman, child,and beast of the invaded people and make the invaded people’s land (part of) the “Promised Land” that their invented Yahweh promised them (per their fabrication). See,e.g., Tanakh Book of JoshuaBook of Joshua [Christian “Bible” Old Testament Book of Joshua].

Cf. Laurent Guyénot, “The Devil’s Trick: Unmasking the God of Israel,”https://www.unz.com/article/the-devils-trick-unmasking-the-god-of-israel/

Cf. also Goldman Sachs, the Rothschilds, and Zionism and Zionist Israel.

The “Chosen People” are not unique. Many human groups — “primitive” or “civilized” — have invented a God or Gods or “Great Spirit” or…….. to do their bidding or to justify or excuse their cruel or evil deeds.

Genghis Khan invoked the “Blue Sky” or “Eternal Heaven” — the “Protector God” who gave the Mongols, hence Genghis Khan, a right of ruling the entire world. The Great Khan invoked the Protector God’s conquest-authority with the incantation “Mongke Tenggiri-yin Kucun-dur” [“By the Power of Eternal Heaven”].

Marx was wrong. Religion is not the “opiate of the masses.” All religions, even personal moral codes, are pathological. Most are psychopathic or concoctions or devices of emotional plague.See also my comment of September 23, 2020 at 10:26 am GMT (comment # 36),https://www.unz.com/article/what-does-rabbinic-judaism-say-about-what-makes-jews-and-gentiles-different/#comment-4180855

If he talkedwith animals, he might learn something of their ways, thinking, perspectives, and cultures. Plenty of people talkto animals, even as they squash them. Some of us have the patience to talk with animals and other non-human beings.

But, given how quickly Loup-Bouc starts to insult people who challenge his claims and/or his self-assessments, it’s evident he doesn’t have that kind of patience to do so. What is evident is that he spends a lot of time talking with and writing for himself. It’s always the other person who is at fault for having a different perspective, and you can see how one of his persistent ways of engaging with the perspectives of others is to say that the other person didn’t read what he wrote and then he dishes out a lot of ridicule and attempts to humiliate the other, losing the plot along the way.

A whole life of accomplishments — as our old friend will eventually remind us — and it is still not enough emotional security or personal valor for him to pass over gracefully our ignorant selves left wallowing in mud. How weighty are the pearls he throws at us, such swine! Perhaps I am so short-sighted, and maybe it is an honor that someone who has excelled in both law and medicine takes the time in his post-retirement to correct our grammar, call us names, and rub our faces in our own horse shit. He could be helping write the laws of his local community or volunteering as a CASA, using his life experiences for constructive and healthy ends to those neighbors and people who need him the most. But, instead, like the rest of us unemployed and innumerate, ungrammatical blockheads, he’s here among us, —the animals.

According to the Babylonian Talmud, God himself is subservient to the rabbis: “Since God already gave the Torah to the Jewish people on Mt. Sinai we no longer pay attention to heavenly voices. God must submit to the decisions of a majority vote of the rabbis.” (BT Bava Metzia 59b).

The male Jew ego is a blight on humanity – period!

How was I born such an idiot?

So, you don’t have an answer to the question?

That is such an important point. My abysmal mind – just cannot grapple with your awe-inspiring “know it all ego.”

One cannot find in cyberspace or anywhere else an example of a “know it allego,” since none can exist, as I have observed in other comments:
https://www.unz.com/article/what-does-rabbinic-judaism-say-about-what-makes-jews-and-gentiles-different/#comment-4188137
https://www.unz.com/article/what-does-rabbinic-judaism-say-about-what-makes-jews-and-gentiles-different/#comment-4189178

But one can find in Hollywood film at least one example of a “know [nearly] it all” character:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=huqrR5v5320

Video Link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0c8e0XSHDE

Video Link

Enjoy.

Eternally precious takeaway:

The oral traditions of the Pharisees is the foundation of the Talmud, as Jesus declared (cf. Mark 7; Matthew 15). Those traditions consist of extra-Biblical superstitions and occultism, self-worship, racist hatred for non-Jews and sheer nonsense.

And just as God Incarnate Jesus renounced the tradition which was later reduced to writing as the Talmud, Talmudic Rabbis renounce God The Father’s authority over them and consider God subservient to them:

According to the Babylonian Talmud, God himself is subservient to the rabbis: “Since God already gave the Torah to the Jewish people on Mt. Sinai we no longer pay attention to heavenly voices. God must submit to the decisions of a majority vote of the rabbis.” (BT Bava Metzia 59b).

Mr. Hoffman’s courageous diligence enabling him to authoritatively state this conclusion is a service to both God and man, man including Jews/Judiacs ensnared in their satanically false doctrine:

However, the investigator who examines the historic discipline and practice of Orthodox Judaism can ascertain that a body of law codified in the Babylonian Talmud exerts the most profound command over individual Judaics and governs their conduct.

Understanding who/Jew we’re dealing with:

Because the principle of situation ethics is central to Orthodox Judaism…

“Show no mercy to a non-Jew.”

WARNING – Here’s where we are today, which is the same place the Russians were 103 years ago:

Maimonides also taught that Christians should, under the proper circumstances, be killed. The “proper circumstances” are predicated on Rabbi Maimonides’ situation ethics:when Talmudists are powerfully dominant over goyimthen worshippers of Jesus can be executed.

…looks upon Maimonides’ rulingnot as a ban on the killing of goyim,but a means for temporarily dispensing a Jew from the obligation to kill them…

Brilliant work by Adam Green ofKnow More News.

Rabbis Explain the Noahide Laws
EVERY CHRISTIAN MUST
UNDERSTAND!!!!!!!

https://youtu.be/MqDlL1DhF3w
Video Link

My heroes are the San (a.k.a. Bushman people), and the precolonized Trobriand Islanders, Tahitians, and Hawaiians — especially the San.

Yeah, you should pack your bags and go live with them. Godspeed.

I appreciate your choice of grammar: “may be the only one.” That (subjunctive) grammar accounts the insufficiency of valid, reliable data that would be necessary to determining the number whose abysmal ignorance causes them to feel they utter competent statements.

That is such an important point. My abysmal mind – just cannot grapple with your awe-inspiring “know it all ego.”

Emendation of my comment of September 28, 2020 at 1:35 am GMT (comment # 278). In the above-referenced comment, the penultimate paragraph was:

Hence [per the necessary implications of your own assertions] consciousness exists as manifestation of its symbols and is part of nature hence describable by the symbols of consciousness, your argument and consciousness-description are self-negating.

That language is marred by a typing error —actually, my failing to complete an editing-effort: I failed to delete the second sentence’s first term “Hence” and substitute the terms “Yet since.” That same paragraph ought to be this [the correction highlighted by bold italic typeface]:

Since consciousness is part of nature, consciousness cannot be or be limited or described by the symbols that constitute your comment.Yet since [per the necessary implications of your own assertions] consciousness exists as manifestation of its symbols and is part of nature hence describable by the symbols of consciousness, your argument and consciousness-description are self-negating.

An astounding amalgam of word-salad, other nonsense, and steaming horse-shit. World class. Too amazing — too monumentally blithering — to merit even an utterly disrespectful comment.

I shall not respond to any more of your comments.

Here I shall observe only the following regarding your post.

I have already shown this.

In describing nature we use symbols. These symbols are designed by and for conscious agents. Consciousness itself, categorically, is not amenable to symbolic description/explanation.

You never even stated such dreck previously, so never even tried earlier to “show” it.

If consciousness describes nature with symbols designed by and for conscious “agents” [and what are the “agents” you do not describe?], how can consciousness not be “amenable to symbolic description/explanation,” despite [per the necessary implications of your own assertions] consciousness exists (at least partly) as manifestation of its symbols and despite consciousness is part of nature hence describable by the symbols of consciousness.

Humans may describe nature however humans presume to do. But nature does not equal the symbols humans use to describe it.

Since consciousness is part of nature, consciousness cannot be or be limited or described by the symbols that constitute your comment. Hence [per the necessary implications of your own assertions] consciousness exists as manifestation of its symbols and is part of nature hence describable by the symbols of consciousness, your argument and consciousness-description are self-negating.

Your comment involves immensely more horse-shit and nonsense. But the preceding demonstration suffices.

I infer that I’m in good company.

YOUR task is showing that no analytic discipline has determined, or can be able to determine, the content, source, operation, or function of consciousness. For, such is a necessary foundation of YOUR thesis.

Yes. I agree. I have already shown this.

In describing nature we use symbols. These symbols are designed by and for conscious agents. Consciousness itself, categorically, is not amenable to symbolic description/explanation.

In physics: a state of affairs is transformed into another state of affairs via mathematics. One can infer the past or predict the future with appropriate equations. All states may be modeled and measured quantitatively. Configurations of positions, momenta, &c. All may be measured and quantified.

No such mechanism exists for the world of the mind. Which set of symbols may be “equated” to consciousness? The obvious answer: none! Can you, even in theory, scribble out a string of symbols that will somehow link a physical configuration with a conscious experience? If not, symbolic reasoning isn’t up to the task of describing the mind.

Art is much closer to understanding consciousness than science. Art also lacks rigor. This isn’t a coincidence.

Why do most Jews revere the Babylonian Talmud over the Torah (Old Testament)?

Do they?

Surely you can support your question’s premising assertion with a valid, reliable study done in the 21st century and performed on a truly random sample of at least 40% of the entire world’s adult Jewish population.

How would the study-designers determine, validly and reliably, which “Jews” were JEWS?

What would be the study-validating, outcome-reliability-assuring, necessary, non-biasing questions the study must have asked the subjects?

I thank you for decodifying ’s term “past history” with a puzzle of the occult.

Because you may have steeped yourself in occultism, you may enjoy reading Madame Helena Petrovna Blavatsky’s “THE SECRET DOCTRINE,”
https://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/sd/sd-hp.htm

My father — a brilliant, uneducated, religiously drunken, anatomically simian-like human — studied “THE SECRET DOCTRINE” near-daily. Like Pythagoras, my father would not eat beans because, like Pythagoras, my father believed beans were akin to humans, though, unlike Pythagoras, my father «knew» beans were “Moon people.”

Why do most Jews revere the Babylonian Talmud over the Torah (Old Testament)?

You may be the only one on the internet that does not get the full meaning of “know it all ego.” I am sure that no one else had to google it.

So, you are “sure that no one else had to google it”? Your assuredness is warranted. The world’s weak-minded and poorly educated (like you) far outnumber the few who have properly functioning minds blessed with knowledge of the subjects they address.

I appreciate your choice of grammar: “may be the only one.” That (subjunctive) grammar accounts the insufficiency of valid, reliable data that would be necessary to determining the number whose abysmal ignorance causes them to feel they utter competent statements.

I am reassured by the fact that I am NOT “on the internet.” Is being “on the internet” like finding oneself stuck on a giant cybernautic spider web?

“Full meaning”? I am gratified by learning that your ignorant proposition may bear, perhaps, a half or quarter meaning.

Thank you for creating a diversion from suffering the tedious details of psychoanalytic/characteranalytic nomenclature. But now, after drinking a cup of coffee, I find myself swooped back to the reality that an “ego” does not “know”anything. See the literature I referenced in my comment of September 27, 2020 at 12:16 am GMT (comment # 261).

Past history…the opposite of going back to the future?

Great article thanks. I would like to see some facts backing up the zionist conspiracy theories that seem to be accepted as ‘Gospel’ (no pun intended !) by certain factions of the far right. For example..

– Liberal Agendas such as homosexuality, trans etc to weaken and corrupt the white christian race. Is it jews lobbying and pushing for these agenda to deliberately mess with us? What evidence is there that can be easily traced back to Zionists?

-Race Mixing: Is this is a zionist scheme to weaken the white race and all other races and religions by forced and encouraged mixing via immigration and media manipulation (adverts with mixed couples etc) Again, can this be linked to zionists?

-Media Manipulation: I constantly read about the Jewish run media but which newspapers etc are owned by Jews etc that are actively engaging in Zionist behaviour.

Just because someone has a Jewish name and owns a media outlet, does this mean they are part of the zionist conspiracy?

Is all this done with the aim of creating a single world government run by Jews in Israel?

I hear about the ruling elite and the zionists. Not all of the ruling elite are jews/zionists / globalists?

Are globalists and zionists the same thing?

Its very difficult to red-pill norms without basic examples as any criticism or investigation into Judaism is automatically treated as Neo-Nazism, which is a slippery slope to being ‘Cancelled’ and having your life and professional reputation ruined. I have done my own research but am interested to hear what other people think. Thanks in advance!

Egos do not “know” anything. I suggest you read the works of Sigmund Freud and Wilhelm Reich, especially Wilhelm Reich’s “CHARACTER ANALYSIS

You may be the only one on the internet that does not get the full meaning of “know it all ego.” I am sure that no one else had to google it. (And you still got it wrong.)

It’s scary really scary Loopy that you think you are on the cutting edge of smart. You are the dullest of dull. Religion is based on the supernatural, and lo and behold physics has never caught up to it.

Not just today, but at every single time in all ofpast history.

[Emphasis added by me, Loup-Bouc.] I apologize, contritely. I neglected to note that your phrase ” in all of past history” is redundant (except to those who live in a time-warp-world where history can occur in immediate-present time, even in the future).

….you are almost certainly suggesting that vastly more than half the World’s population should be consigned to the nut-house….

Yes. The only problem is that not enough nut-house space is available.

…based on what you’ve written above. Not just today, but at every single time in all of past history.

I am an old man. But I have not lived “in all of past history” (the lunatic belief “reincarnation” notwithstanding).

There are many different kinds of nuts…

(1) Where is “There”? (2) I do not eat nuts (the kind that trees produce). Nuts bear much too much fat and an unhealthful fatty acid constellation.

Perhaps you derived your <> psychotic fantasy here:https://satirev.org/us/study-finds-humans-share-more-dna-lima-beans-chimpanzees#.X2_kZrjXBXQ
If THAT is your source, you must not have noticed that the journal’s name is “Satire V” and that the article’s closing paragraph is:

As of press time, the FDA had released a report that the Venter Institute’s lima beans had been contaminated with horsemeat.

you need to be committed to a nut house, like the rest of religious humanity

Umm, you are presumably aware, Loopy, that you are almost certainly suggesting that vastly more than half the World’s population should be consigned to the nut-house, based on what you’ve written above. Not just today, but at every single time in all of past history.

There are many different kinds of nuts…

I think this is the third time you’ve repeated the same thing. Apparently it’s all you know and all you can say

Then I’ll say it for the fourth time – Hitler was a disaster for Germany.

Are historical events simple and straightforward, without context, setting and nuance of the times they took place in? Of course not. But weighed on the scales, Hitler was a disaster for Germany – and most of Europe too.

You have a no holds barred crush on the Führer.

Fran, I’m not sure I’d ever normally agree with you – but in this case I think you might be onto something!

From the little I’ve read of Carolyn, she seems to believe in reincarnation, past lives etc. Could it be that she thinks she was once Aunty Eva??

LOL!!

Why is it most always, that the anti-god/anti-Christians, have the biggest know it all egos?

Egos do not “know”anything. I suggest you read the works of Sigmund Freud and Wilhelm Reich, especially Wilhelm Reich’s “CHARACTER ANALYSIS (Farrar, Straus, and Giroux 1972, paperback 1990), Paperback ISBN-13: 978-0-374-50!J8IJ–l, Paperback ISBN-lO: 0-:374-50980-8,excerpted here:https://wilhelmreichtrust.org/character_analysis.pdf.

Trashing old previous scientific thoughts….

I guess you refer to my treatment of Aristotle’s idiotic “physics” and Pythagoras’s lunatic notion that beans were sentient creatures akin to humans. From your defending such dross, one must deduce that you are a God-fearing Christian or a follower of some other hallucination-filled immensely dangerous insanity called religion.

…the nature of the growth of knowledge, that parallels the advancement ofobservational discovery.

* [Emphasis added by me, Loup-Bouc] *

If you haveobserved a God, or a transubstantiation of bread and wine into the flesh and blood of some guy called Jesus, or a bean’s having a brain and other organs and DNA of a human or other sentient animal, you need to be committed to a nut house, like the rest of religious humanity.

Please submit proof.

How were you born such an idiot?

Pythagoras believed humans and beans were spawned from the same source.

By the way — beans and humans do share some of the same biological structure and and I believe DNA.

Why is it most always, that the anti-god/anti-Christians, have the biggest know it all egos? Trashing old previous scientific thoughts is the sign of a loser.

They show themselves to have zero understanding about the nature of the growth of knowledge, that parallels the advancement of observational discovery.

Loopy regularly talks to animals.

Non-human animals do very well without inventing or hallucinating “higher powers,” deities, “intelligent design” of the universe…….(except to the extent that humans intrude, much on the premise that some human-invented God authorizes, or commands, the intrusion.)

How did you determine the truth of your claim?

Let’s not mince words. All religions are suspect, but Islam is a pest.

Video Link

For decades ,US ,Europe ,and Arab have talked non – stop about 2 state solutions while Israel has pushed the boundaries of the lands ,resettled the land with usurpers, has stolen US technologies ,bribed the US congress and Senate to get more free money,military gadgets, doles ,and suppress Palestinian voice , US knowingly has marched behind Israel. That’s the natural consequence of the corruption and bribes . Arab and Europe have figured out that they should join the open conspiracy to survive .

PLO did, Arafat did, and Abu Mazen did . They lie in ruins , destroyed . USA is on its way of destruction, Europe willl follow . These Arabs will be told by Israel , just as Israel has told Bush Cheney that they didn’t follow all the advices given to White House through the neoconservative resulting into failures ,that to survive Arab dynastic leaders should toe each move and directives of Israel . They would be destroyed also by very Israel like the Palestine leaders .

To understand the Jews ,we need to look into how Israel burrows into and destroys from inside .

Peace project. – Oslo , 2 state solution is a good way to start .

Are you going to tell me that Israel (Jews) aren’t fomenting wars and genocide against non Jews? Didn’t the crusades murder lots of non Christians, all in the name of their BS religion? Didn’t Yugoslavia break up along ethnic / religious lines? Didn’t the Muslims move to Pakistan from India to form that country? Wash, rinse, repeat.

Religion is a dividing force in the world. It’s all bullshit, but people appear to prefer their brand of bullshit as opposed to the other guy’s and are more than willing to kill for it.

I’m not claiming religion is the only or even main consideration today. It is however a consideration. The very idea of religion – believe in some fictitious entity – leads directly to government – belief in some nonexistent benefit to the masses of imbeciles that vote to keep that bogus system alive.

What should take religions place is atheism and scientific knowledge about nature. Once the mysticism is removed and common sense is applied, there’s no need for sky gods.

Throne and alter were twins–two vultures from the same egg.
To attack the king was treason; to dispute the priest, blasphemy.
The sword and cross were allies.
Together they attacked the rights of men; they defended each other.
The king owned the bodies of men, the priests the souls.
One lived on taxes collected by force, the other on alms collected by fear.
Both robbers, both beggars.
The king made laws, the priest made creeds.
With bowed backs the people carried the burdens of one, with open-mouthed wonder received the dogmas of the other.
The king said rags and hovels for you, robes and palaces for me.
The priest said God made you ignorant and immoral; He made me holy and wise; you are the sheep, I am the shepherd; your fleeces belong to me.
You must not reason, you must not contradict, you must believe.
Robert G. Ingersoll

Men will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest.
Denis Diderot

What considerations are you following in taking your cheap shots at these momentous and grave decisions for humanity and posterity? I do not hold silly or caricature views of Adolf Hitler; I hold respectful views. Your arrogance is based on ignorance.

Caroline you need to come clean. You have a no holds barred crush on the Führer. If could transport back in time to be Eva Braun you would in a heart beat. You are in love with him. Admit it. Whenever anyone gets close to proving that Hitler was (a) mad as a hatter. (b) a murderous psychopath that had such a narcissistic personality disorder he refused to listen to his top military advisors even in the face of defeat. (c) left starving 12 year old boys defending Berlin, while cities burned while he was holed up in his bunker planing his exit. Why didn’t he go out fighting?
You are just in love with him, beyond rationality. Thats what love is a suspension of reality.

When anyone challenges you, you challenge them on their intelligence, which is just silly. Neo Nazis are not the sharpest knives in the drawer.

Did Ron ever publish your revised population data showing that the population of Jews actually increased after the war because there was a statistical boo boo? No? I guess it was not very sound statistically hey?
Listen it takes a women, even a Jewess like me to see that another woman is hopelessly in love. Maybe you will see him oneway and you can make up for lost time. You always say he was such a gentlemen around women. LOL. Just the generals he murdered on the spot.

Very courteous of you to anglicize the ”Ya vol herr kapitan!” for Carolyn the Foxhunter. Although she is a cheerleader of Hitler, she speaks no German. I do not know what you actually wanted to say, but you are, perhaps deliberately, confusing the Foxhunter. ”Kapitän” was not a rank in the Wehrmacht or the SS. The phrase in fact comes from the song ”Das ist die Liebe der Matrosen” sang by the great Comedian Harmonists. Fine singing. I can warmly recommend the following clip to the young and old.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5muTYpJuzzk
Video Link

I agree with your asssesment of Muslims. I, too, have found many of them to be friendly. I think a lot of anti-Muslim hatred is scapegoating. Normie conservatives know that things are amiss, so they instinctively know something needs to be attacked, but they clobber the wrong target.

Your defense of Judaism is something that I cannot agree with. According to a Gallup poll something like 95% of Jews have a favorable view of Israel. Another commenter on this website said that the number of American Jews who serve in the Israeli army every year is now in excess of those serving in the American army. Israel is, like it or not, the political expression of Judaism. Most of the Jews who claim non-observance still practice Judaism in their own way because ethnic supremacism and hatred of gentiles is, in fact, what inhabits Judaism’s dark heart. (Hatred of others and in-group chauvinism is not dependent on belief in any god or cosmological order.) The notion that only a few Jews are bad apples is rediculous. The opposite is the case. Only a few are good apples. Ron Unz is one of them for instance. He provides this website where non status-quo conformant points of view are allowed, even if he and I might vote differently on important issues. I suspect that he gets a lot of dirty looks in his synagogue, or treatment that is far worse. I think that Michael Levin’s retreat from conservative advocacy was because of social pressure from other Jews. He complained that it was all about David Duke’s presence at AR conferences, but one suspects that that was just a deflection.

Here is an excerpt from jewish author Theodore N. Kaufman’s book“Germany Must Perish”: This vile tome advocated the complete destruction of German culture, music, society, architecture, and everything German. In other words, total genocide of Germany and the German people.
Germany has lost its war. She sues for peace. The imperative demands of the victor people that Germany must perish forever makes it obligatory for the leaders to select mass sterilization of the Germans as the best means of wiping them out permanently. They proceed to:
1. Immediately and completely disarm the German army and have all armaments removed from German territory.
2. Place all German utility and heavy industrial plants under heavy guard, and replace German workers by those of Allied nationality.
3. Segregate the German army into groups, concentrate them in severely restricted areas, and summarily sterilize them.
4. Organize the civilian population, both male and female, within territorial sectors, and effect their sterilization.
5. Divide the German army (after its sterilization has been completed) into labor battalions, and allocate their services toward the rebuilding of those cities which they ruined.
6. Partition Germany and apportion its lands. The accompanying map gives some idea of possible land adjustments which might be made in connection with Germany’s extinction.
7. Restrict all German civilian travel beyond established borders until all sterilization has been completed.
8. Compel the German population of the apportioned territories to learn the language of its area, and within one year to cease the publication of all books, newspapers and notices in the German language, as well as to restrict German-language broadcasts and discontinue the maintenance of German-language schools.
9. Make one exception to an otherwise severely strict enforcement of total sterilization, by exempting from such treatment only those Germans whose relatives, being citizens of various victor nations, assume financial responsibility for their emigration and maintenance and moral responsibility for their actions.
Thus, into an oblivion which she would have visited upon the world, exits Germany.
Now if you were a German living at that time, what would you think about jews?