Series
Part 1

Deuteronomy 32, Aleppo Codex c. 925 C.E.
The Masoretic Text (MT), whether in its consonantal form (Proto-MT) or its full form, is the commonly used version of the Hebrew Bible, considered authoritative by Jews for almost two millenia.[1] From the invention of the printing press, all Hebrew editions of the Hebrew Bible have been based on a text form of MT, with the exception of publications of the Samaritan Pentateuch or eclectic editions.[2]
The roots of MT and its popularity go back to the first century of the Common Era. Before that period, only the proto-rabbinic (Pharisaic) movement made use of MT, while other streams in Judaism used other Hebrew textual traditions.
In other words, before the first century of the Common Era, we witness a textual plurality among Jews, with multiple text forms conceived of as “the Bible,” or Scripture, including the Hebrew source upon which the ancient Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible, the Septuagint (LXX), was built.
Around the turn of the era, the consonantal (proto-)MT text was accepted as an authoritative form of Hebrew Scripture by the proto-rabbinic movement, whereas other forms were accepted as authoritative by other groups.
With the advent of Christianity in the first century C.E., the LXX, which began as the biblical text for Greek speaking Hellenistic Jews, was accepted as holy writ by this new group of early Christians, and was concomitantly dropped by other Greek-speaking Jews and ceased to be considered authoritative scripture by them. Around the same time, the Samaritans adopted the version of the Torah known as the Samaritan Pentateuch, and the Qumran community that had assembled texts of different types ceased to exist.
Thus, since the first century C.E., the consonantal (proto-)MT, and subsequently full MT, version of scripture, including all the books that are contained in it, was accepted as authoritative by all streams of the Jewish people. This text is the only text quoted in rabbinic literature (the small deviations are negligible) and Karaite works, and it is the only text used by organized Judaism for the past two millennia.
In the latter half of the first millennium C.E., groups of Jewish scribes known as the Masoretes, created a system of signs to ensure proper pronunciation and recitation of the biblical text. They also attempted to standardize paragraph divisions and maintain proper reproduction of the text by future scribes by compiling lists of the Bible’s key orthographic and linguistic features. Two main schools (or families) of Masoretes, ben Naftali and ben Asher, created slightly different “Masoretic Texts.” The ben Asher version prevailed and forms the basis of modern biblical texts.
The oldest source of the MT Bible is the Aleppo Codex (Keter Aram Tzova) from approximately 925 C.E. Although it is the closest text to the Ben Asher school of Masoretes, it survived in an incomplete form, as it lacks almost all of the Torah. The oldest complete source for MT is Codex Leningrad B 19A (codex L) from 1009 C.E.
MT includes five elements. Two of these were transmitted from previous generations (the proto-MT).
Three further elements were added by the Masoretes:
The consonantal framework, i.e., the letters themselves, are the focus of this series.
TheTorah.com is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization.
We rely on the support of readers like you. Please support us.
Published
December 8, 2017
|
Last Updated
February 9, 2026
Previous in the Series
Next in the Series
Thank you to all our readers who offered their year-end support.
Please help TheTorah.com get off to a strong start in 2025.
Footnotes
Published
December 8, 2017
|
Last Updated
February 9, 2026
[1] When using the words “Bible” or “Scripture,” we refer to the group of authoritative writings that was accepted by some or all Jews and Christians as authoritative, whether in the form of the Masoretic Text or non-Masoretic forms. Actually, many scholars prefer to speak about Scripture or Scriptures, which is less specific than Bible, because different religions understand different things when referring to the “Bible.”
[2] Eclectic editions are modern Bible editions that reconstruct a scholar's vision of the original text of the Hebrew Bible, such as the series The SacredBooks of the Old Testament, A Critical Edition of the Hebrew Text, Printed in Colors, with Notes;ed. Paul Haupt (Leipzig: J. C. Hinrich, 1893–1904).
[3] Editor’s note: For a brief description of theMasorah is it appears in theBiblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia (BHS), see the the BHS section in"Tools for Studying the Hebrew Bible." It should be noted that whereas in BHS theMasorah Magna appears only in abbreviated form, in the newer, not yet complete, BHQ (Biblia Hebraica Quinta), theMasorah Magna appears in its entirety and each volume even has a section with notes on theMasorah Magna.
[1] When using the words “Bible” or “Scripture,” we refer to the group of authoritative writings that was accepted by some or all Jews and Christians as authoritative, whether in the form of the Masoretic Text or non-Masoretic forms. Actually, many scholars prefer to speak about Scripture or Scriptures, which is less specific than Bible, because different religions understand different things when referring to the “Bible.”
[2] Eclectic editions are modern Bible editions that reconstruct a scholar's vision of the original text of the Hebrew Bible, such as the series The SacredBooks of the Old Testament, A Critical Edition of the Hebrew Text, Printed in Colors, with Notes;ed. Paul Haupt (Leipzig: J. C. Hinrich, 1893–1904).
[3] Editor’s note: For a brief description of theMasorah is it appears in theBiblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia (BHS), see the the BHS section in"Tools for Studying the Hebrew Bible." It should be noted that whereas in BHS theMasorah Magna appears only in abbreviated form, in the newer, not yet complete, BHQ (Biblia Hebraica Quinta), theMasorah Magna appears in its entirety and each volume even has a section with notes on theMasorah Magna.
Prof. Emanuel Tovis J. L. Magnes Professor of Bible (emeritus) in the Dept. of Bible at the Hebrew University, where he received his Ph.D. in Biblical Studies. He was the editor of 33 volumes ofDiscoveries in the Judean Desert. Among his many publications are,Scribal Practices and Approaches Reflected in the Texts Found in the Judean Desert, Textual Criticism of the Bible: An Introduction,The Biblical Encyclopaedia Library31 andThe Text-Critical Use of the Septuagint in Biblical Research.

Prof. Emanuel Tovis J. L. Magnes Professor of Bible (emeritus) in the Dept. of Bible at the Hebrew University, where he received his Ph.D. in Biblical Studies. He was the editor of 33 volumes ofDiscoveries in the Judean Desert. Among his many publications are,Scribal Practices and Approaches Reflected in the Texts Found in the Judean Desert, Textual Criticism of the Bible: An Introduction,The Biblical Encyclopaedia Library31 andThe Text-Critical Use of the Septuagint in Biblical Research.
Essays on Related Topics: