As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 27, 2014
Registration No. 333-
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
Under
theSecurities Act of 1933
LendingClub Corporation
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 6199 | 51-0605731 | ||
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization | (Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
LendingClub Corporation
71 Stevenson Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, California 94105
(415) 632-5600
(Address,including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Registrants principal executive offices)
RenaudLaplanche
Chief Executive Officer
LendingClub Corporation
71Stevenson Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, California 94105
(415) 632-5600
(Name,address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)
Please sendcopies of all communications to:
Cynthia C. Hess, Esq. Jeffrey R. Vetter, Esq. James D. Evans, Esq. Fenwick & West LLP 801California Street Mountain View, California 94041 (650) 988-8500 | Jason Altieri, Esq. General Counsel and Compliance Officer LendingClubCorporation 71 Stevenson Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, California 94105 (415) 632-5600 | Kurt J. Berney, Esq. Eric C. Sibbitt, Esq. OMelveny & Myers LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 (415) 984-8700 |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of thisRegistration Statement.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant toRule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, check the following box.
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check thefollowing box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list theSecurities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list theSecurities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smallerreporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer | Accelerated filer | |||||
Non-accelerated filer | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company |
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
| ||||
Title of Each Class of Securities to be Registered | Proposed Maximum | Amount of Registration Fee | ||
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share | $500,000,000 | $64,400 | ||
| ||||
|
(1) | Estimated solely for the purpose of computing the amount of the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act. |
(2) | Includes the aggregate offering price of additional shares that the underwriters have the option to purchase from the Registrant, if any. |
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until theRegistrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act or until the Registration Statement shall becomeeffective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
Shares
COMMON STOCK
LendingClub Corporation isoffering shares of its common stock. This is our initial public offering and no public market currently exists for our shares of common stock. We anticipate that the initialpublic offering price will be between $ and $ per share.
We intend to apply to list ourcommon stock on the under the symbol .
Investing in our commonstock involves risks. See Risk Factors beginning on page 12.
PRICE A SHARE
Per share | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
Total | $ | $ | $ |
(1) | See Underwriters for a description of the compensation payable to the underwriters. |
Wehave granted the underwriters the option to purchase up to an additional shares of common stock.
The Securities and Exchange Commission and state regulators have not approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus istruthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
The underwriters expect to deliver the shares of common stock topurchasers on , 2014.
MORGAN STANLEY | GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO. |
CITIGROUP |
ALLEN & COMPANY LLC
STIFEL | BMO CAPITAL MARKETS | WILLIAM BLAIR | WELLS FARGO SECURITIES |
,2014
Page | ||||
1 | ||||
12 | ||||
37 | ||||
38 | ||||
38 | ||||
39 | ||||
41 | ||||
43 | ||||
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 46 | |||
81 | ||||
83 |
Page | ||||
101 | ||||
108 | ||||
126 | ||||
129 | ||||
131 | ||||
137 | ||||
Material U.S. Federal Tax Consequences to Non-U.S. Holders of Our Common Stock | 139 | |||
143 | ||||
148 | ||||
148 | ||||
148 | ||||
F-1 |
Neither we northe underwriters have authorized anyone to provide any information or to make any representations other than those contained in this prospectus or in any free writing prospectuses we have prepared. We take no responsibility for, and can provide noassurance as to the reliability of, any other information that others may give you. We are offering to sell, and seeking offers to buy, shares of our common stock only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted. The information in thisprospectus is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or any sale of shares of our common stock. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changedsince that date.
Until , 2014(25 days after the commencement of our initial public offering), all dealers that buy, sell or trade shares of our common stock, whether or not participating in our initial public offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This deliveryrequirement is in addition to the obligation of dealers to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.
For investors outside the United States: Neither we nor the underwriters have done anything that would permit our initial public offering orpossession or distribution of this prospectus in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required, other than in the United States. Persons outside the United States who come into possession of this prospectus must inform themselves about,and observe any restrictions relating to, the offering of the shares of our common stock and the distribution of this prospectus outside of the United States.
i
This summary highlights selected information that is presented in greater detail elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary does notcontain all of the information you should consider before investing in our common stock. You should read this entire prospectus carefully, including the sections titled Risk Factors and Managements Discussion and Analysis ofFinancial Condition and Results of Operations and the consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus, before making an investment decision.
LENDINGCLUB CORPORATION
Our Mission
Transforming the banking system to make credit more affordable and investing more rewarding.
Overview
Lending Club is theworlds largest online marketplace connecting borrowers and investors. Our platform has facilitated over $5 billion in loans since it first launched in 2007, including over $1 billion in the second quarter of 2014. We believe atechnology-powered online marketplace is a more efficient mechanism to allocate capital between borrowers and investors than the traditional banking system. Consumers and small business owners borrow through Lending Club to lower the cost of theircredit and enjoy a better experience than traditional bank lending. Investors use Lending Club to earn attractive risk-adjusted returns from an asset class that has historically been closed to individual investors and only available on a limitedbasis to institutional investors. We have built a trusted brand with a track record of delivering exceptional value and satisfaction to both borrowers and investors.
Key advantages we have relative to traditional banks include:
| an innovative marketplace model that efficiently connects the supply and demand of capital; |
| online operations that substantially reduce the need for physical infrastructure and improve convenience; and |
| automation that increases efficiency, reduces manual processes and improves borrower and investor experience. |
For consumers and small business borrowers, we leverage our cost advantages and marketplace model to provide borrowers with affordable credit.We utilize our technology to provide a better experience, offering borrowers a convenient, simple and fast online application that improves the often time-consuming and frustrating loan application process. We design our products to be fair,transparent and borrower-friendly. All of the loans offered through our marketplace feature fixed rates, fixed monthly payments, no hidden fees and no prepayment penalties.
For individual and institutional investors, we deliver value by providing them with the opportunity to earn attractive risk-adjusted returnsthrough equal access to loans offered to all investors through our marketplace. Our platform provides investors with the transparency and flexibility to quickly and easily tailor or modify their portfolio by utilizing specific investment criteria,such as credit attributes, financial data and loan characteristics. We use proprietary credit decisioning and scoring models and extensive historical loan performance data to provide investors with tools to construct loan portfolios confidently andmodel targeted returns. Our platform enables broad diversification by allowing investors to invest in individual loans in increments as low as $25.
Our technology platform powers our online marketplace and enables us to deliver innovative solutions to borrowers and investors. Ourproprietary technology automates key aspects of our operations, including the
1
borrower application process, data gathering, credit decisioning and scoring, loan funding, investing and servicing, regulatory compliance and fraud detection. Our extensible technology platformhas allowed us to expand our offerings from personal loans to include small business loans, and to expand investor classes from individuals to institutions and create various investment vehicles.
To further enhance our offering, we make our platform available to complementary partners, such as banks, asset managers, insurance companiesand technology companies, to offer new investment and borrower products and develop new tools for use on our platform. These ecosystem partners can transact directly with our marketplace or leverage our tools to build loan portfolios to suit theiror their clients investing needs. We believe that the opportunities provided by these ecosystem partners will help expand the attractiveness and availability of our platform.
We generate revenue from transaction fees from our platforms role in matching borrowers with investors to enable loan originations,servicing fees from investors and management fees for investment funds and other managed accounts. We do not assume credit risk or use our own capital to invest in loans facilitated by our platform. The capital to invest in the loans enabled throughour platform comes directly from a wide range of investors, including retail investors, high-net-worth individuals and family offices, banks and finance companies, insurance companies, hedge funds, foundations, pension plans and universityendowments, and through a variety of channels, such as borrower payment dependent investment securities and whole loan purchases.
We haveexperienced significant growth since our marketplace launched in 2007. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013, we facilitated loan originations through our platform of $717.9 million and $2.1 billion, respectively, representing anincrease of 188%. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2014, we facilitated loan originations through our platform of $799.1 million and $1.8 billion, respectively, representing an increase of 125%. For the years ended December 31,2012 and 2013, our total net revenue was $33.8 million and $98.0 million, respectively, representing an increase of 190%. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2014, our total net revenue was $37.1 million and $86.9 million, respectively,representing an increase of 134%. As our business has grown, we have achieved increasing levels of operational efficiency while continuing to invest in our business. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013, our adjusted EBITDA was $(4.9)million and $15.2 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2014, our adjusted EBITDA was $3.8 million and $5.9 million, respectively. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition andResults of OperationsReconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures for a description of adjusted EBITDA and its limitations.
IndustryBackground and Trends
There is an opportunity for the online marketplace model to transform the traditional banking system. We believea transparent and open marketplace where borrowers and investors have access to information, complemented by technology and tools, can make credit more affordable, redirect existing pools of capital trapped inside the banking system and attract newsources of capital to a new asset class. We believe online marketplaces have the power to facilitate more efficient deployment of capital and improve the global economy.
| Personal and Small Business Lending Is Essential to the Economy. The ability of individuals and small businesses to access affordable credit is essential to stimulating and sustaining a healthy, diverseand innovative economy. According to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, as of June 2014, the balance of outstanding consumer credit in the United States totaled $3.2 trillion. This amount included $873 billion of revolvingconsumer credit, which many consumers seek to refinance. According to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), as of March 31, 2014, there were $292 billion of commercial and industrial loans outstanding under $1 million. |
2
| Borrowers Are Inadequately Served by the Current Banking System. Due to its high fixed cost of underwriting and servicing, the traditional banking system is ill-suited to meet personal and small businessdemand for small balance loans and has instead relied heavily on issuing credit cards, which require less personalized underwriting and have higher interest rates. While credit cards are convenient as a payment mechanism, they are an expensivelong-term financing solution. Borrowers who carry a balance on their cards are often subject to high, variable interest rates and the possibility of incurring additional fees and penalties. |
| Investors Have Limited Options to Participate in Personal and Small Business Lending. As individual investors generally lack the size and access to invest in structured products directly, they are unableto invest in personal and small business credit. While institutional investors have had some access to this market, most have lacked the tools to customize portfolios to their specific risk tolerance, and banks accessing this market generally holdthe loans they generate on their balance sheet. As a result, we believe additional capital that could be invested in personal and small business loans has largely been locked out of the market. |
Our Solution
We are the worldslargest online marketplace connecting borrowers and investors. Our technology platform supports this innovative marketplace model to efficiently connect the supply and demand of capital. Our marketplace also substantially reduces the need forphysical infrastructure and improves convenience and automation, increasing efficiency, reducing manual processes and improving the overall borrower and investor experience.
Benefits to Borrowers
| Access to Affordable Credit. Our innovative marketplace model, online delivery and process automation enable us to offer borrowers interest rates that are generally lower on average than the rates charged bytraditional banks on credit cards or installment loans. |
| Superior Borrower Experience. We offer a fast and easy-to-use online application process and provide borrowers with access to live support and online tools throughout the process and for the lifetime of the loan.Our goal is to form long-term relationships with borrowers, facilitating their access to an array of financial products that meet their evolving needs over time. |
| Transparency and Fairness. All of the loans offered through our marketplace feature a fixed rate that is clearly disclosed to the borrower during the application process, with fixed monthly payments, no hiddenfees and the ability to prepay the balance at any time without penalty. We utilize our rules-based engine for credit decisioning. |
| Fast and Efficient Decisioning. We leverage online data and technology to quickly assess risk, determine a credit rating and assign appropriate interest rates. Qualified applicants receive offers in just minutesand can evaluate loan options without impacting their credit score. |
Benefits to Investors
| Access to a New Asset Class. Investors can invest in personal and small business loans, an asset class that has historically been entirely funded and held by financial institutions or large institutionalinvestors on a limited basis. |
| Attractive Risk-Adjusted Returns. We have historically offered investors attractive risk-adjusted returns across all loan grades offered through our marketplace. We screen loan applicants based on proprietarycredit decisioning and scoring models and also factor in historical borrower performance in setting interest rates. |
3
| Transparency. We provide investors with transparency and choice in building their loan portfolios. Investors can examine each loan at a granular level prior to investing in a loan and continue to monitor ongoingloan performance. We also provide access to credit profile data on each approved loan as well as all of the historical performance data for every loan ever invested in through our platform. |
| Easy-to-Use Tools. We provide investors with tools to easily build or modify customized and diversified portfolios by selecting loans tailored to their investment objectives to assess the returns on theirportfolios and, if desired, to enroll in automated investing. |
Our Competitive Strengths
We believe the following strengths differentiate us from our competitors and provide us with competitive advantages in realizing the potentialof our market opportunity:
| Leading Online Marketplace. We are the worlds largest online marketplace connecting borrowers and investors, based on over $5 billion in loan originations through our platform. We believe that ourbrand, reputation and scale allow us to attract top talent, quickly develop and deploy new products, attract marketplace participants and leverage a lower cost structure to benefit borrowers and investors. |
| Robust Network Effects. Our online marketplace exhibits network effects that are driven by the number of participants and investments enabled through our platform. Additionally, increased participationalso results in the generation of substantial data that is used to improve the effectiveness of our credit decisioning and scoring models, enhancing our performance record and generating increasing trust in our marketplace. As trust increases, webelieve investors will continue to demonstrate a willingness to accept lower risk premiums that will allow us to offer lower interest rates and attract additional high-quality borrowers. We believe that these network effects reinforce our marketleadership position. |
| High Borrower and Investor Satisfaction. Borrowers have validated our approach with a net promoter score (NPS)(1) in the 70s since we began surveyingborrowers in January 2013, which places us at the upper end of customer satisfaction ratings for traditional financial services companies. Additionally, investors are confident transacting on our marketplace, as evidenced by their high reinvestmentrates. |
| Technology Platform. Our technology platform automates our operations and, we believe, provides a significant time and cost advantage over traditional banks that run on legacy systems that are inflexibleand slow to evolve. |
| Sophisticated Risk Assessment. We use proprietary algorithms that leverage behavioral data, transactional data and employment information to supplement traditional risk assessment tools. We have builtour technology platform to automate the application of these proprietary algorithms to each individual borrowers application profile at scale. This approach allows us to evaluate and segment each potential borrowers risk profile andprice it accordingly. |
| Efficient and Attractive Financial Model. We generate revenue from transaction fees from our platforms role in matching borrowers with investors to enable loan originations, servicing fees frominvestors and management fees for investment funds and other managed accounts. We do not assume credit risk or use our own capital to invest in loans facilitated by our platform. Our technology platform significantly reduces the need for physicalinfrastructure and lowers our costs, which provides us with significant operating leverage. |
(1) | NPS is a commonly used measure of customer loyalty and satisfaction, ranging from negative 100 to positive 100, based on direct questions to borrowers. |
4
Our Strategy for Growth
Key elements of our growth strategy include:
| Execute in Our Core Markets.Since we launched our marketplace in 2007, our platform has facilitated over $5 billion in loan originations. We believe we have substantial opportunities for future growth,and we estimate that in June 2014 approximately $380 billion in outstanding consumer credit would meet our marketplaces credit policy. |
| Broaden Our Loan Product Offerings. We intend to continue to enhance our platforms existing loan products and add new loan products to attract a greater number and broader variety of consumers andsmall business owners. |
| Widen the Spectrum of Borrowers Served. We have investors that are actively seeking to invest in loans that are above or below the current borrower profiles listed on our platform. Because our technologycan efficiently assess risk and set efficient pricing for individual borrowers, we plan to extend our platform to widen the spectrum of borrowers to meet this investor demand. |
| Increase Supply of Capital Available to Borrowers. As confidence in our marketplaces performance increases, we are able to attract additional investors with different thresholds for risk, yieldand maturity. We plan to leverage this increasing confidence to increase our depth and breadth within each investor category, capture a larger proportion of total investible capital by introducing new products, offer our products in additionalstates and expand the channels through which our platform is available. |
| Grow Our Ecosystem. We plan to foster existing relationships and develop new relationships with complementary partners to our platform in order to create, or help create, new tools and products forinvestors and borrowers. |
| Continue to Invest in Our Innovative Technology Platform. We believe that investing in our technology platform and continuing to build our data sources will enable us to connect an increasing number ofborrowers and investors, continue to identify new borrowers, detect and prevent fraud and maintain the security of our platform. |
| Enter New Geographies.While we believe our largest near-term growth opportunity is domestic, over time we intend to expand our platform to address similar banking system inefficiencies, marketdislocations, investor needs and borrower dissatisfaction globally. |
Selected Risks Related to Our Business
Our business is subject to numerous risks described in the section titled Risk Factors and elsewhere in this prospectus. You shouldcarefully consider these risks before making an investment. Some of these risks include:
| We have a relatively limited operating history at our current scale. |
| We may continue to incur net losses. |
| We may be unable to maintain or increase loan originations facilitated through our marketplace. |
| We may be unable to maintain a relationship with an issuing bank. |
| Our quarterly results may fluctuate significantly. |
| We may not compete effectively in our target markets. |
| We may be subject to negative publicity. |
| We may fail to promote and maintain our brand in a cost-effective manner. |
| Our marketing efforts may be unsuccessful. |
5
| Our new loan products and platform enhancements may not achieve sufficient market acceptance. |
| We and our issuing bank partners may fail to comply with federal and state consumer protection laws. |
See Risk Factors beginning on page 12.
Corporate Information
We wereincorporated in Delaware as SocBank Corporation in October 2006 and changed our name to LendingClub Corporation in November 2006. Unless expressly indicated or the context requires otherwise, the terms Lending Club, company,we, us, and our in this prospectus refer to LendingClub Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and, where appropriate, its wholly owned subsidiaries. Our principal executive offices are located at 71 StevensonStreet, Suite 300, San Francisco, California 94105, and our telephone number is (415) 632-5600. Our website address is www.lendingclub.com. The information on or that can be accessed through our website is not part of this prospectus.
LendingClub Corporation, the Lending Club logo and other Lending Club formative marks are trademarks of LendingClub Corporation in the UnitedStates. This prospectus also includes other trademarks of Lending Club and trademarks of other persons. Other trademarks, service marks or trade names appearing in this prospectus are the property of their respective owners.
6
The Offering
Common stock offered | shares | |
Common stock to be outstanding after our initial public | shares | |
Option to purchase additional shares | ||
Use of proceeds | We estimate that the net proceeds from the sale of common stock in this offering will be approximately $ , based upon the assumed initial public offering priceof $ per share, which is the midpoint of the offering price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimatedoffering expenses. | |
The principal purposes of this offering are to increase our capitalization and financial flexibility, create a public market for our common stock and enable access to the public equity markets for us and our stockholders. We intendto use the net proceeds from this offering for general corporate purposes, including working capital, operating expenses and capital expenditures. We may also use a portion of the net proceeds from this offering to repay indebtedness outstandingunder our term loan. Additionally, we may use a portion of the net proceeds to acquire businesses, products, services or assets. See Use of Proceeds. | ||
Proposed symbol | |
The number of shares of common stock to be outstanding after this offering is based on 154,189,702 shares ofcommon outstanding as of June 30, 2014 and includes (i) shares that we expect to issue upon the automatic net exerciseof warrants upon the completion of this offering, based upon the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the offering price range set forth on the cover pageof this prospectus, and (ii) an additional 204,948 shares that we expect to issue upon the exercise of warrants immediately prior to the completion of this offering that would otherwise expire, and excludes:
| 27,401,307 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options outstanding as of June 30, 2014, with a weighted-average exercise price of $4.80 per share; |
| 730,100 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options granted after June 30, 2014, with an exercise price of $17.88 per share; |
| 900,292 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants outstanding as of June 30, 2014, with a weighted-average exercise price of $0.55 per share, reduced by shares that we expect to issue upon the automatic net exercise of warrants upon the completion of this offering, based upon the assumed initial public offering price of$ per share, which is the midpoint of the offering price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and an additional 204,948 shares that we expect to issue upon the exercise ofwarrants immediately prior to the completion of this offering that would otherwise expire; and |
7
| shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our equity compensation plans,consisting of (i) 2,335,498 shares of common stock available for issuance under our 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (2007 Plan) as of June 30, 2014, which shares will be added to the shares to be reserved under our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan(2014 Plan) upon its effectiveness, (ii) shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our 2014 Plan, which willbecome effective on the date immediately prior to the date of this prospectus, and (iii) shares of common stock reserved forfuture issuance under our 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP), which will become effective on the date of this prospectus. |
Our 2014 Plan and ESPP each provide for annual automatic increases in the number of shares reserved under such plans. In addition, our 2014Plan provides for increases in the number of shares that may be granted under the plan based on shares granted under our 2007 Plan that expire, are forfeited or otherwise repurchased by us at cost. On the date of this prospectus, any remainingshares available for issuance under our 2007 Plan will be added to the shares reserved under our 2014 Plan, and we will cease granting awards under our 2007 Plan. See Executive CompensationEmployee Benefit Plans.
Except as otherwise indicated, all information in this prospectus assumes:
| the conversion of all outstanding shares of our convertible preferred stock as of June 30, 2014 into an aggregate of 124,514,637 shares of common stock in connection with this offering; |
| the filing and effectiveness of our restated certificate of incorporation in Delaware and the adoption of our restated bylaws, each of which will occur upon the completion of this offering; |
| no exercise by the underwriters of their option to purchase up to an additional shares of ourcommon stock; and |
| no exercise of options or warrants outstanding on the date of this prospectus, except for sharesthat we expect to issue upon the automatic net exercise of warrants upon the completion of this offering, based upon the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpointof the offering price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and an additional 204,948 shares that we expect to issue upon the exercise of warrants immediately prior to the completion of this offering that would otherwise expire. |
8
Summary Consolidated Financial and Other Data
We have derived the selected consolidated statement of operations data for the year ended December 31, 2013 from the audited consolidatedfinancial statements included in this prospectus. We have derived the selected consolidated statement of operations data for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2014, and our selected consolidated balance sheet data as of June 30, 2014,from the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus. We have derived the selected consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 from unaudited consolidatedfinancial statements not included in this prospectus. In December 2012, we changed our fiscal year end from March 31 to December 31. The change was effective as of December 31, 2012, and the nine months ended December 31, 2012represent the transition period. The historical financial information presented for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 (i) combines the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31and the nine months ended December 31 in each year and (ii) is unaudited and has been prepared by management for illustrative purposes only. The unaudited consolidated financial statements and unaudited historical financial informationhave been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements and reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal, recurring nature that are necessary for a fair statement of the unaudited interimconsolidated financial statements. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected in the future and the results in the six months ended June 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to beexpected for the full year or any other period. The following selected consolidated financial and other data should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operationsand the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this prospectus.
Years Ended December 31, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except share and per share data and percentages) | ||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | (audited) | (unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Transaction fees(1) | $ | 10,981 | $ | 30,576 | $ | 85,830 | $ | 29,975 | $ | 81,213 | ||||||||||
Servicing fees | 951 | 1,929 | 3,951 | 1,597 | 3,248 | |||||||||||||||
Management fees | 103 | 824 | 3,083 | 1,214 | 2,555 | |||||||||||||||
Other revenue | 495 | 716 | 5,111 | 4,299 | 307 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total operating revenue | 12,530 | 34,045 | 97,975 | 37,085 | 87,323 | |||||||||||||||
Net interest income (expense) and other adjustments | 222 | (238 | ) | 27 | 5 | (380 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total net revenue | 12,752 | 33,807 | 98,002 | 37,090 | 86,943 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Operating expenses(2): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 11,402 | 18,201 | 39,037 | 16,117 | 39,807 | |||||||||||||||
Origination and servicing | 4,758 | 7,589 | 17,217 | 6,048 | 15,968 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Engineering and product development(3) | 2,289 | 4,855 | 13,922 | 5,291 | 13,752 | |||||||||||||||
Other | 6,572 | 10,024 | 20,518 | 7,812 | 33,262 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 25,021 | 40,669 | 90,694 | 35,268 | 102,789 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes | (12,269 | ) | (6,862 | ) | 7,308 | 1,822 | (15,846 | ) | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | | | | 85 | 640 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (12,269 | ) | $ | (6,862 | ) | $ | 7,308 | $ | 1,737 | $ | (16,486 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
Years Ended December 31, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except share and per share data and percentages) | ||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | (audited) | (unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders(4): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | (0.71 | ) | $ | (0.34 | ) | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.58 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Diluted | $ | (0.71 | ) | $ | (0.34 | ) | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.58 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Weighted-average shares of common stock used in computing net income (loss) per common share | ||||||||||||||||||||
Basic | 17,372,430 | 19,992,438 | 25,778,568 | 24,471,528 | 28,451,564 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Diluted | 17,372,430 | 19,992,438 | 40,713,488 | 37,908,644 | 28,451,564 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Pro forma net income (loss) per share(4) (unaudited): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.11 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.11 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding used to calculate pro forma net income (loss) per common share | ||||||||||||||||||||
Basic | 145,883,096 | 150,572,503 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Diluted | 161,665,775 | 150,572,503 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Other Data(5) (unaudited): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Loan originations | $ | 257,364 | $ | 717,943 | $ | 2,064,626 | $ | 799,110 | $ | 1,797,294 | ||||||||||
Contribution margin | (28.7 | )% | 25.4 | % | 44.4 | % | 41.1 | % | 41.8 | % | ||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | (12,067 | ) | $ | (4,924 | ) | $ | 15,227 | $ | 3,786 | $ | 5,868 | ||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA margin | (96.3 | )% | (14.5 | )% | 15.5 | % | 10.2 | % | 6.7 | % |
(1) | Previously referred to as Origination Fees. |
(2) | Includes stock-based compensation expense as follows: |
Years Ended December 31, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-Based Compensation Expense: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | $ | 30 | $ | 302 | $ | 1,313 | $ | 260 | $ | 4,117 | ||||||||||
Origination and servicing | 9 | 75 | 424 | 65 | 828 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Engineering and product development | 71 | 449 | 2,171 | 501 | 1,995 | |||||||||||||||
Other | 181 | 586 | 2,375 | 648 | 8,412 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense | $ | 291 | $ | 1,412 | $ | 6,283 | $ | 1,474 | $ | 15,352 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) | Previously referred to as Technology. |
(4) | In April 2014, our board of directors approved a two-for-one stock split of our outstanding capital stock. All share and per share data in this table has been adjusted to reflect this stock split. See Note 3 toconsolidated financial statements included in this prospectus for a description of how we compute basic and diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders and pro forma basic and diluted net income (loss) per share. |
(5) | For more information regarding loan originations, contribution margin, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin, see ManagementsDiscussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsKey Operating and Financial Metrics. Contribution margin, |
10
adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin are non-GAAP financial measures. For more information regarding our use of these measures and a reconciliation of these measures to the most comparableGAAP measure, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsReconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures. |
As of June 30, 2014 | ||||||||
Actual | As Adjusted(1)(2) | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 68,958 | $ | |||||
Loans(3) | 2,326,202 | |||||||
Total assets | 2,580,624 | |||||||
Notes and certificates(3) | 2,336,595 | |||||||
Total liabilities | 2,443,486 | |||||||
Total stockholders equity | 137,138 |
(1) | The as adjusted consolidated balance sheet data gives effect to (i) the conversion of all of our outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock into 124,514,637 shares of common stock, (ii) the saleand issuance of shares of common stock in this offering at the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, which isthe midpoint of the offering price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses, (iii) the issuance of shares of common stock upon the automatic net exercise of warrants upon the completion of this offering, based upon the assumed initial public offering price of$ per share, which is the midpoint of the offering price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and (iv) the issuance of 204,948 shares of common stock that we expect to issue uponthe exercise of warrants that would expire if not exercised prior to the completion of this offering. |
(2) | Each $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the offering price range set forth on the coverpage of this prospectus, would increase (decrease) our as adjusted cash and cash equivalents total assets and total stockholders equity by approximately $ million, assuming that the numberof shares, as set forth on the front cover page of this prospectus, remains the same, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions. |
(3) | Loans represent unsecured obligations of borrowers originated through our platform. Notes and certificates are issued to investors and represent repayment obligations dependent upon receipt of borrower payments as to acorresponding loan. Period-end differences between the two line items are largely driven by timing of applying and distributing loan payments to investors. |
11
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below,together with all of the other information in this prospectus, including the section titled Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the consolidated financial statements and relatednotes, before making a decision to invest in our common stock. The risks and uncertainties described below may not be the only ones we face. If any of the risks actually occur, our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects couldbe materially and adversely affected. In that event, the market price of our common stock could decline, and you could lose part or all of your investment.
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry
As arapidly growing company with a relatively limited operating history at our current scale, we face increased risks, uncertainties, expenses and difficulties.
We have a limited operating history at our current scale, and we have encountered and will continue to encounter risks, uncertainties, expensesand difficulties, including:
| navigating complex and evolving regulatory and competitive environments; |
| increasing the number of borrowers and investors utilizing our platform; |
| increasing the volume of loans facilitated through our platform and transaction fees received for matching borrowers and investors through our platform; |
| entering into new markets and introducing new loan products; |
| continuing to revise our platforms proprietary credit decisioning and scoring models; |
| continuing to develop, maintain and scale our platform; |
| effectively using limited personnel and technology resources; |
| effectively maintaining and scaling our financial and risk management controls and procedures; |
| maintaining the security of our platform and the confidentiality of the information provided and utilized across our platform; and |
| attracting, integrating and retaining an appropriate number of qualified employees. |
If we arenot able to timely and effectively address these requirements, our business and results of operations may be harmed.
We have incurred net losses inthe past and may incur net losses in the future.
As of June 30, 2014, our accumulated deficit was $66.8 million. Weanticipate that our operating expenses will increase in the foreseeable future as we seek to continue to grow our business, attract borrowers, investors and partners and further enhance and develop our loan products and platform. These efforts mayprove more expensive than we currently anticipate, and we may not succeed in increasing our revenue sufficiently to offset these higher expenses. We may incur additional net losses in the future and may not maintain profitability on a quarterly orannual basis.
If we are unable to maintain or increase loan originations facilitated through our marketplace or if existing borrowers or investorsdo not continue to participate on our marketplace, our business and results of operations will be adversely affected.
We haveexperienced rapid revenue and origination growth through our platform in recent periods, with loan originations through our marketplace more than doubling each year from 2008 through 2013 and with originations totaling $2.1 billion for the yearended December 31, 2013 and $1.8 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2014. To continue to grow our business, we must continue to increase loan originations through our
12
marketplace by attracting a large number of new borrowers who meet our platforms lending standards and new and existing investors interested in investing in these loans. We have experienceda high number of inquiries from potential borrowers who do not meet the criteria for loan application approval. If there are not sufficient qualified loan requests, investors may be unable to deploy their capital in a timely or efficient manner andmay seek other investment opportunities. If there are not sufficient investor commitments, borrowers may be unable to obtain investment capital for their loans and stop using our marketplace for their borrowing needs. Additionally, existingborrowers and investors must also continue to participate in our marketplace. Further, although we have a wide variety of types of investors, a relatively small number of investors account for a large dollar amount of investment in loans fundedthrough our platform. The degree of overall transaction volume may be affected by several factors, including the interest rates offered to borrowers and investors relative to market rates, the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of our platform, themacroeconomic environment and other factors, or by a large number of investors ceasing at the same time to use our platform over a short period of time. If we are unable to attract qualified borrowers and sufficient investor commitments or borrowersand investors do not continue to participate in our marketplace at the current rates, we will be unable to increase our loan originations and our revenue may grow more slowly than expected or decline.
If we are unable to maintain a relationship with an issuing bank, our business will suffer.
We rely on issuing banks to originate all loans and to comply with various federal, state and other laws. For loans originated through ourmarketplace, our issuing bank is WebBank, a Utah-chartered industrial bank that handles a variety of consumer and commercial financing programs. In addition, Springstone Financial, LLC (Springstone), which we acquired in April 2014, relies on NBTBank and Comenity Bank as issuing banks for its education and patient finance loans.
Our agreements with WebBank are non-exclusive and donot prohibit WebBank from working with our competitors or from offering competing services. Our current agreements with WebBank have initial terms ending in November 2018, with the possibility of two, one-year renewal terms, subject to certain earlytermination provisions as set forth in the agreements. WebBank currently offers loan programs through another online marketplace. WebBank could decide that working with us is not in its interest, could make working with it cost prohibitive or coulddecide to enter into exclusive or more favorable relationships with our competitors. In addition, WebBank may not perform as expected under our agreements. We could in the future have disagreements or disputes with WebBank, which could negativelyimpact or threaten our relationship.
If WebBank were to suspend or cease its operations or our relationship with WebBank were tootherwise terminate, we would need to implement a substantially similar arrangement with another issuing bank, obtain additional state licenses or curtail our operations. Although we currently have a non-exclusive arrangement with Cross River Bank,another issuing bank, to date Cross River Bank has not originated any loans through our platform. If we need to enter into alternative arrangements with a different issuing bank to replace our existing arrangements, we may not be able to negotiate acomparable alternative arrangement. Transitioning loan originations to a new issuing bank is untested and may result in delays in the issuance of loans or, if our platform becomes inoperable, may result in our inability to facilitate loans throughour platform. If we were unable to enter in an alternative arrangement with a different issuing bank, we would need to obtain a state license in each state in which we operate in order to enable us to originate loans, as well as comply with otherstate and federal laws, which would be costly and time-consuming. If we are unsuccessful in maintaining our relationships with WebBank or other issuing banks, our ability to provide loan products could be materially impaired and our operatingresults would suffer.
Our quarterly results may fluctuate significantly and may not fully reflect the underlying performance of our business.
Our quarterly results of operations, including the levels of our operating revenue, expenses, contribution margin and other keymetrics, may vary significantly in the future and period-to-period comparisons of our operating results may not be meaningful. Accordingly, the results for any one quarter are not necessarily an
13
indication of future performance. Our quarterly financial results may fluctuate due to a variety of factors, some of which are outside of our control and, as a result, may not fully reflect theunderlying performance of our business. Fluctuation in quarterly results may adversely affect the price of our common stock. Factors that may cause fluctuations in our quarterly financial results include:
| our ability to attract new investors or borrowers and maintain relationships with existing borrowers and investors; |
| loan volumes, loan grades, loan mix and the channels through which the loans and corresponding investors are sourced; |
| the amount and timing of operating expenses related to acquiring borrowers and investors and the maintenance and expansion of our business, operations and infrastructure; |
| network outages or security breaches; |
| general economic, industry and market conditions; |
| our emphasis on borrower and investor experience instead of near-term growth; and |
| the timing of expenses related to the development or acquisition of technologies or businesses and potential future charges for impairment of goodwill from acquired technologies or businesses. |
In addition, we experience some seasonality in demand for personal loans, which is generally lower in the first and fourth quarters. While ourgrowth has somewhat masked this seasonality, our operating results could be affected by such seasonality in the future.
If we do not competeeffectively in our target markets, our operating results could be harmed.
The personal and small business lending market iscompetitive and evolving. We compete with financial products and companies that attract borrowers, investors or both. With respect to borrowers, we primarily compete with traditional financial institutions, such as banks, credit unions, credit cardissuers and other consumer finance companies. With respect to investors, we primarily compete with other investment vehicles and asset classes, such as equities, bonds and short-term fixed income securities. We also compete with other online creditmarketplaces.
Many of our competitors operate with different business models, have different cost structures or participate selectivelyin different market segments. They may ultimately prove more successful or more adaptable to new regulatory, technological and other developments. Some of our current or potential competitors have significantly more financial, technical, marketingand other resources than we do and may be able to devote greater resources to the development, promotion, sale and support of their platforms and distribution channels. Our potential competitors may also have longer operating histories, moreextensive customer bases, greater brand recognition and brand loyalty and broader customer and partner relationships than we have. For example, more established Internet companies that possess large, existing customer bases, substantial financialresources and established distribution channels could enter the market. Additionally, a current or potential competitor may acquire one of our existing competitors or form a strategic alliance with one of our competitors. Our competitors may bebetter at developing new products, responding quickly to new technologies and undertaking more extensive marketing campaigns. If we are unable to compete with such companies and meet the need for innovation in our industry, the demand for ourplatform could stagnate or substantially decline, we could experience reduced revenue or our marketplace could fail to achieve or maintain more widespread market acceptance, any of which could harm our business.
Negative publicity could adversely affect our business and operating results.
Negative publicity about our industry or our company, including the quality and reliability of our platform, effectiveness of theplatforms credit decisioning and scoring models, changes to our platform, our ability to
14
effectively manage and resolve borrower and investor complaints, privacy and security practices, litigation, regulatory activity and the experience of borrowers and investors with our platform orservices, even if inaccurate, could adversely affect our reputation and the confidence in, and the use of, our platform, which could harm our business and operating results. Harm to our reputation can arise from many sources, including employeemisconduct, misconduct by our partners, outsourced service providers or other counterparties, failure by us or our partners to meet minimum standards of service and quality, inadequate protection of borrower and investor information and compliancefailures and claims.
If we fail to promote and maintain our brand in a cost-effective manner, we may lose market share and our revenue maydecrease.
We believe that developing and maintaining awareness of our brand in a cost-effective manner is critical to attractingnew and retaining existing borrowers and investors to our marketplace. Successful promotion of our brand will depend largely on the effectiveness of our marketing efforts and the experience of borrowers and investors in our marketplace. Our effortsto build our brand have involved significant expense, and it is likely that our future marketing efforts will require us to incur significant additional expense. These brand promotion activities may not result in increased revenue and, even if theydo, any increases may not offset the expenses incurred. If we fail to successfully promote and maintain our brand or if we incur substantial expenses in an unsuccessful attempt to promote and maintain our brand, we may lose our existing borrowersand investors to our competitors or be unable to attract new borrowers and investors.
Our success and future growth depend significantly on oursuccessful marketing efforts, and if we are unable to attract borrowers and investors to our platform, our business and financial results may be harmed.
We intend to continue to dedicate significant resources to our marketing efforts, particularly as we continue to grow our marketplace,introduce new loan products and expand into new states. Our ability to attract qualified borrowers and sufficient investors depends in large part on the success of these marketing efforts and the success of the marketing channels we use to promoteour platform. Our marketing channels include social media and the press, online partnerships, search engine optimization, search engine marketing, offline partnerships, mail-to-web and radio and television advertising. If any of our currentmarketing channels become less effective, if we are unable to continue to use any of these channels, if the cost of using these channels were to significantly increase or if we are not successful in generating new channels, we may not be able toattract new borrowers and investors in a cost-effective manner or convert potential borrowers and investors into active borrowers and investors in our marketplace. As a result, our revenue and results of operations would be adversely affected, whichmay impair our ability to grow our business.
If new loan products and platform enhancements do not achieve sufficient market acceptance, ourfinancial results and competitive position will be harmed.
We incur expenses and expend resources upfront to develop, acquire andmarket new loan products and platform enhancements to incorporate additional features, improve functionality or otherwise make our platform more desirable to borrowers and investors. New loan products or platform enhancements must achieve highlevels of market acceptance in order for us to recoup our investment in developing and bringing them to market.
Any new loan products andchanges to our platform could fail to attain sufficient market acceptance for many reasons, including:
| our failure to predict market demand accurately and supply loan products that meet this demand in a timely fashion; |
| borrowers and investors using our platform may not like, find useful or agree with any changes; |
15
| defects, errors or failures in our platform; |
| negative publicity about our loan products or our platforms performance or effectiveness; |
| delays in releasing to the market new loan products or platform enhancements; and |
| the introduction or anticipated introduction of competing products by our competitors. |
If ournew loan products or platform enhancements do not achieve adequate acceptance in the market, our competitive position, revenue and operating results could be harmed. The adverse effect on our financial results may be particularly acute because ofthe significant development, marketing, sales and other expenses we will have incurred in connection with the new loan products or enhancements.
Ifwe are unable to successfully expand our platform to new markets, we may not succeed in growing our business.
Althoughhistorically we have focused on the personal loan market, we recently expanded our platform to include small business borrowers and have also introduced patient and education financing through our acquisition of Springstone. We plan to addressadditional markets and loan products and expand the types of borrowers and investors to further grow our business. Any failure to successfully address additional market segments and loan products or develop a broader base of borrowers and investorscould result in loss of market share or slower growth, which would harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Successfulstrategic relationships with ecosystem partners are important for our future success.
We anticipate that we will continue todepend on relationships with ecosystem partners to grow our business. We continue to pursue additional relationships with ecosystem partners, such as banks, asset managers and insurance companies. For example, we intend to enter into strategicrelationships with community banks and other financial partners to facilitate co-branded loan offerings to their customers through our platform. Identifying, negotiating and documenting relationships with ecosystem partners require significant timeand resources as does integrating third-party data and services. Our current agreements with ecosystem partners often do not prohibit them from working with our competitors or from offering competing services. Our competitors may be effective inproviding incentives to ecosystem partners to favor their products or services or in reducing the volume of loans facilitated through our platform. In addition, these ecosystem partners may not perform as expected under our agreements with them, andwe may have disagreements or disputes with such partners, which could adversely affect our brand and reputation. If we cannot successfully enter into and maintain effective strategic relationships with ecosystem partners, our business will beharmed.
If the credit decisioning and scoring models we use contain errors or are otherwise ineffective, our reputation and relationships withborrowers and investors could be harmed and our market share could decline.
Our ability to attract borrowers and investors to, andbuild trust in, our platform is significantly dependent on our ability to effectively evaluate a borrowers credit profile and likelihood of default. To conduct this evaluation, we utilize credit decisioning and scoring models that assign eachloan offered on our marketplace a grade and a corresponding interest rate. Our platforms credit decisioning and scoring models are based on algorithms that evaluate a number of factors, including behavioral data, transactional data andemployment information, which may not effectively predict future loan losses. If we are unable to effectively segment borrowers into relative risk profiles, we may be unable to offer attractive interests rates for borrowers and returns forinvestors. We seek to continue to refine these algorithms based on new data and changing macro and economic conditions. If the credit decisioning and scoring models contain errors or otherwise are ineffective and the data provided to borrowers andinvestors is incorrect, our loan pricing and approval process could be negatively affected, resulting in mispriced or misclassified loans or incorrect approvals or denials of loans. If these errors were to occur, investors may try to rescind theiraffected investments or decide not to invest in loans or borrowers may reduce the use of our platform for loans.
16
Credit and other information that we receive from third parties about a borrower may be inaccurate or maynot accurately reflect the borrowers creditworthiness, which may cause us to inaccurately price loans facilitated through our platform.
We obtain borrower credit information from consumer reporting agencies, such as TransUnion, Experian or Equifax, and assign loan grades to loanrequests based on the platforms credit decisioning and scoring models that take into account reported credit score, other information reported by the consumer reporting agencies and the requested loan amount, in addition to a variety of otherfactors. A credit score or loan grade assigned to a borrower may not reflect that borrowers actual creditworthiness because the credit score may be based on outdated, incomplete or inaccurate consumer reporting data, and we do not verify theinformation obtained from the borrowers credit report. Additionally, there is a risk that, following the date of the credit report that we obtain and review, a borrower may have:
| become delinquent in the payment of an outstanding obligation; |
| defaulted on a pre-existing debt obligation; |
| taken on additional debt; or |
| sustained other adverse financial events. |
If borrowers default on loans that are not pricedcorrectly, investors may try to rescind their affected investments in these loans and our reputation may be harmed.
Our reputation may be harmed ifinformation supplied by borrowers is inaccurate, misleading or incomplete.
Borrowers supply a variety of information that isincluded in the loan listings on our marketplace. Other than as described below, we do not verify this information, and it may be inaccurate or incomplete. For example, we often do not verify a borrowers stated tenure, job title, homeownership status or intention for the use of loan proceeds. Moreover, investors do not, and will not, have access to financial statements of borrowers or to other detailed financial information about borrowers. If investors invest in loans throughour platform based on information supplied by borrowers that is inaccurate, misleading or incomplete, those investors may not receive their expected returns and our reputation may be harmed.
Fraudulent activity associated with our platform could negatively impact our operating results, brand and reputation and cause the use of our loanproducts and services to decrease and our fraud losses to increase.
We are subject to the risk of fraudulent activity associatedwith our platform, issuing banks, borrowers, investors and third parties handling borrower and investor information. Our resources, technologies and fraud prevention tools may be insufficient to accurately detect and prevent fraud. Under ouragreements with investors, we are obligated to repurchase loans in cases of confirmed identity theft. The level of our fraud charge-offs and results of operations could be materially adversely affected if fraudulent activity were to significantlyincrease. High profile fraudulent activity or significant increases in fraudulent activity could lead to regulatory intervention, negatively impact our operating results, brand and reputation and lead us to take steps to reduce fraud risk, whichcould increase our costs.
We rely on data from third parties for the successful operation of our platform.
Our ability to review and select qualified borrowers and sufficient investors depends on credit, identification, employment and other relevantinformation that we receive from third parties, including credit bureaus. If this information becomes unavailable or becomes more expensive to access, it could increase our costs as we seek alternative sources of information. If this third-partydata is incorrect, our ability to identify qualified borrowers and investors or approve and price loans may suffer and our business may be harmed.
17
Fluctuations in interest rates could negatively affect transaction volume.
All personal and small business loans facilitated through our marketplace are issued with fixed interest rates, and education and patientfinancing loans facilitated by Springstone are issued with fixed or variable rates, depending on the type of loan. If interest rates rise, investors who have already committed capital may lose the opportunity to take advantage of the higher rates.Additionally, potential borrowers could seek to defer loans as they wait for interest rates to settle, and borrowers of variable rate loans through Springstones platform may be subject to increased interest rates. If interest rates decreaseafter a loan is made, borrowers through our platform may prepay their loans to take advantage of the lower rates. Investors through our platform would lose the opportunity to collect the above-market interest rate payable on the corresponding loanand may delay or reduce future loan investments. As a result, fluctuations in the interest rate environment may discourage investors and borrowers from participating in our marketplace, which may adversely affect our business.
If loan default rates are in excess of the expected default rates, we may be unable to collect our entire servicing fee.
Personal loans facilitated through our platform are not secured by any collateral, not guaranteed or insured by any third party and not backedby any governmental authority in any way. We are therefore limited in our ability to collect on the loans if a borrower is unwilling or unable to repay. A borrowers ability to repay us can be negatively impacted by increases in their paymentobligations to other lenders under mortgage, credit card and other loans, including student loans and home equity lines of credit. These changes can result from increases in base lending rates or structured increases in payment obligations and couldreduce the ability of our borrowers to meet their payment obligations to other lenders and to us. If a borrower defaults on a loan, we typically outsource subsequent servicing efforts to third-party collection agencies, which may be unsuccessful intheir efforts to collect the amount of the loan. Because our servicing fees depend on the collectability of the loans, if we experience an unexpected significant increase in the number of borrowers who fail to repay their loans or an increase in theprincipal amount of the loans that are not repaid, we will be unable to collect our entire servicing fee for such loans and our revenue could be adversely affected.
If we experience an increase in defaults on loans facilitated through our platform, the return on investment for investors in those loans would beadversely affected and investors may not find investing through our platform desirable.
We make payments ratably on aninvestors investment only if we receive the borrowers payments on the corresponding loan. If we do not receive payments on the corresponding loan related to an investment, the investor will not be entitled to any payments under the termsof the investment. Further, investors may have to pay us an additional servicing fee of up to 35% of any amount recovered by our third-party collection agencies assigned to collect on the loan. An investor may become dissatisfied with our platformif a loan underlying its investment is not repaid and it does not receive full payment. As a result, our reputation may suffer and we may lose investor confidence, which could adversely affect investor participation on our platform.
Our business and operating results may be impacted by adverse economic conditions.
General economic factors and conditions in the United States or worldwide, including the general interest rate environment, unemployment ratesand residential home values, may affect borrower willingness to seek loans and investor ability and desire to invest in loans. For example, during the 2008 financial crisis, banks severely constrained lending activities, which caused a decline inloan issuances. A similar crisis could negatively impact the willingness of investors and borrowers to participate on our platform. Although the U.S. and global economies have shown improvement, the recovery remains modest and uncertain. If presentU.S. and global economic uncertainties persist, many of our investors may delay or reduce their investment in the loans facilitated through our platform. Adverse economic conditions could also reduce the number of qualified borrowers seeking loanson our platform, as well as their ability to make payments. Should any of these situations occur, our revenue and transactions on our platform would decline and our business would be negatively impacted.
18
Limited liquidity of platform investments may make these investments less attractive to investors.
No trading market currently exists for certificates, which are privately placed. Note investors can only sell their notes throughthe resale trading platform operated by FOLIOfn Investments, Inc. (FOLIOfn), an unaffiliated registered broker-dealer. During 2013, it took an average of approximately four days to sell a note on FOLIOfn with an offer price at or below par. Wecannot assure you that FOLIOfn will continue to have a market for the trading of notes or that another market may arise. Given the lack of liquidity for certificates and the limited liquidity for notes, investors and potential investors may considerthese investments to be less appealing and demand for these investments may decrease, which may adversely affect our business.
Borrowers may prepaya loan at any time without penalty and investors may stop investing in loans, which could reduce our servicing or management fees.
A borrower may decide to prepay all or a portion of the remaining principal amount on a loan at any time without penalty. If the entireremaining unpaid principal amount of a loan is prepaid, we will not receive a servicing fee on the anticipated future loan payments and investors will not receive related payments. If a significant volume of prepayments occurs, investors may stopinvesting in loans and the amount of our servicing or management fees would decline, either of which could harm our business.
Our ability toprotect the confidential information of our borrowers and investors may be adversely affected by cyber-attacks, computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins or similar disruptions.
The highly automated nature of our platform may make it an attractive target and potentially vulnerable to cyber attacks, computer viruses,physical or electronic break-ins or similar disruptions. Our platform processes certain sensitive data from our borrowers and investors. While we have taken steps to protect confidential information that we have access to, our security measurescould be breached. Any accidental or willful security breaches or other unauthorized access to our platform could cause confidential borrower and investor information to be stolen and used for criminal purposes. Security breaches or unauthorizedaccess to confidential information could also expose us to liability related to the loss of the information, time-consuming and expensive litigation and negative publicity. If security measures are breached because of third-party action, employeeerror, malfeasance or otherwise, or if design flaws in our software are exposed and exploited, our relationships with borrowers and investors could be severely damaged, and we could incur significant liability.
Because techniques used to sabotage or obtain unauthorized access to systems change frequently and generally are not recognized until they arelaunched against a target, we and our third-party hosting facilities may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. In addition, federal regulators and many federal and state laws and regulations requirecompanies to notify individuals of data security breaches involving their personal data. These mandatory disclosures regarding a security breach are costly to implement and often lead to widespread negative publicity, which may cause borrowers andinvestors to lose confidence in the effectiveness of our data security measures. Any security breach, whether actual or perceived, would harm our reputation, we could lose borrowers, investors and ecosystem partners and our business and operationscould be adversely affected.
Any significant disruption in service on our platform or in our computer systems, including events beyond our control,could prevent us from processing or posting payments on loans, reduce the attractiveness of our platform and result in a loss of borrowers or investors.
In the event of a platform outage and physical data loss, our ability to perform our servicing obligations, process applications or make loansavailable on our platform would be materially and adversely affected. The satisfactory performance, reliability and availability of our technology and our underlying network infrastructure are critical to our operations, customer service, reputationand our ability to attract new and retain existing borrowers and investors. Much of our system hardware is hosted in a facility located in Las Vegas, Nevada that is owned and operated by SwitchNet. We also maintain a real-time backup system at athird-party owned and
19
operated facility located in Santa Clara, California. Our operations depend on SwitchNets ability to protect its and our systems in their facilities against damage or interruption fromnatural disasters, power or telecommunications failures, air quality issues, environmental conditions, computer viruses or attempts to harm our systems, criminal acts and similar events. If our arrangement with SwitchNet is terminated or if there isa lapse of service or damage to SwitchNet facilities, we could experience interruptions in our service as well as delays and additional expense in arranging new facilities.
Any interruptions or delays in our service, whether as a result of third-party error, our error, natural disasters or security breaches,whether accidental or willful, could harm our relationships with our borrowers and investors and our reputation. Additionally, in the event of damage or interruption, our insurance policies may not adequately compensate us for any losses that we mayincur. Our disaster recovery plan has not been tested under actual disaster conditions, and we may not have sufficient capacity to recover all data and services in the event of an outage. These factors could prevent us from processing or postingpayments on the loans, damage our brand and reputation, divert our employees attention, reduce our revenue, subject us to liability and cause borrowers and investors to abandon our platform, any of which could adversely affect our business,financial condition and results of operations.
Our business is subject to the risks of earthquakes, fire, power outages, floods and othercatastrophic events, and to interruption by man-made problems such as strikes and terrorism.
A significant natural disaster, suchas an earthquake, fire, power outage, flood or other catastrophic event, or interruptions by strikes, terrorism or other made-made problems, could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. Ourheadquarters and our real-time disaster recovery data center are located in the San Francisco Bay Area, a region known for seismic activity. Despite any precautions we may take, the occurrence of a natural disaster or other unanticipated problems atour data centers could result in lengthy interruptions in our services. In addition, acts of strikes, terrorism and other geo-political unrest could cause disruptions in our business and lead to interruptions, delays or loss of critical data. All ofthe aforementioned risks may be further increased if our disaster recovery plans prove to be inadequate. We have implemented a disaster recovery program that allows us to move production to a back-up data center in the event of a catastrophe.Although this program is functional, we do not currently serve network traffic equally from each data center. If our primary data center shuts down, there will be a period of time that our loan products or services, or certain of our loan productsor services, will remain inaccessible to our users or our users may experience severe issues accessing our loan products and services.
Wedo not currently maintain business interruption insurance to compensate us for potentially significant losses, including potential harm to our business that may result from interruptions in our ability to provide our loan products and services.
Our platform and internal systems rely on software that is highly technical, and if it contains undetected errors, our business could be adverselyaffected.
Our platform and internal systems rely on software that is highly technical and complex. In addition, our platform andinternal systems depend on the ability of such software to store, retrieve, process and manage immense amounts of data. The software on which we rely has contained, and may now or in the future contain, undetected errors or bugs. Some errors mayonly be discovered after the code has been released for external or internal use. Errors or other design defects within the software on which we rely may result in a negative experience for borrowers and investors who use our platform, delayintroductions of new features or enhancements, result in errors or compromise our ability to protect borrower or investor data or our intellectual property. Any errors, bugs or defects discovered in the software on which we rely could result in harmto our reputation, loss of borrowers or investors, loss of revenue or liability for damages, any of which could adversely affect our business and financial results.
20
Misconduct and errors by our employees and third-party service providers could harm our business andreputation.
We are exposed to many types of operational risk, including the risk of misconduct and errors by our employees andother third-party service providers. Our business depends on our employees and third-party service providers to process a large number of increasingly complex transactions, including treasury transactions that involve significant dollar amounts andloan transactions that involve the use and disclosure of personal and business information. We could be materially adversely affected if treasury transactions were redirected, misappropriated or otherwise improperly executed, personal and businessinformation was disclosed to unintended recipients or an operational breakdown or failure in the processing of other transactions occurred, whether as a result of human error, a purposeful sabotage or a fraudulent manipulation of our operations orsystems. In addition, the manner in which we store and use certain personal information and interact with borrowers and investors through our platform is governed by various federal and state laws. If any of our employees or third-party serviceproviders take, convert or misuse funds, documents or data or fail to follow protocol when interacting with borrowers and investors, we could be liable for damages and subject to regulatory actions and penalties. We could also be perceived to havefacilitated or participated in the illegal misappropriation of funds, documents or data, or the failure to follow protocol, and therefore be subject to civil or criminal liability. It is not always possible to identify and deter misconduct or errorsby employees or third-party service providers, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses. Any of these occurrences could result in our diminished abilityto operate our business, potential liability to borrowers and investors, inability to attract future borrowers and investors, reputational damage, regulatory intervention and financial harm, which could negatively impact our business, financialcondition and results of operations.
We may be sued by third parties for alleged infringement of their proprietary rights, which could harm ourbusiness.
Our success depends on not infringing on the intellectual property rights of others. Our competitors, as well as anumber of other entities and individuals, may own or claim to own intellectual property relating to our industry. From time to time, third parties may claim that we are infringing on their intellectual property rights, and we may be found to beinfringing on such rights. In the future, others may claim that our applications and underlying technology infringe or violate their intellectual property rights. We may, however, be unaware of the intellectual property rights that others may claimcover some or all of our technology or services. Any claims or litigation could cause us to incur significant expenses and, if successfully asserted against us, could require that we pay substantial damages or ongoing royalty payments, prevent usfrom offering our loan products or operating our platform or require that we comply with other unfavorable terms. We may also be obligated to indemnify parties or pay substantial settlement costs, including royalty payments, in connection with anysuch claim or litigation and to obtain licenses, modify applications or refund fees, which could be costly. Even if we were to prevail in such a dispute, any litigation regarding our intellectual property could be costly and time-consuming anddivert the attention of our management and key personnel from our business operations.
Any failure to protect our own intellectual property rightscould impair our brand, negatively impact our business or both.
Our success and ability to compete also depend in part onprotecting our own intellectual property. We rely on a combination of copyright, trade secret, trademark and other rights, as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect our proprietary technology, processes and otherintellectual property. However, the steps we take to protect our intellectual property rights may be inadequate. Third parties may seek to challenge, invalidate or circumvent our copyright, trade secret, trademark and other rights or applicationsfor any of the foregoing. In order to protect our intellectual property rights, we may be required to spend significant resources. Litigation brought to protect and enforce our intellectual property rights could be costly, time-consuming anddistracting to management and could result in the impairment or loss of portions of our intellectual property. Our failure to secure, protect and enforce our intellectual property rights could seriously adversely affect our brand and adverselyimpact our business.
21
Some aspects of our platform include open source software, and any failure to comply with the terms of oneor more of these open source licenses could negatively affect our business.
Aspects of our platform include software covered byopen source licenses, which may include, by way of example, GNU General Public License and the Apache License. The terms of various open source licenses have not been interpreted by U.S. courts, and there is a risk that such licenses could beconstrued in a manner that imposes unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our platform. If portions of our proprietary software are determined to be subject to an open source license, we could be required to publicly release the affectedportions of our source code, re-engineer all or a portion of our technologies or otherwise be limited in the licensing of our technologies, each of which could reduce or eliminate the value of our technologies and loan products. In addition to risksrelated to license requirements, usage of open source software can lead to greater risks than use of third-party commercial software, as open source licensors generally do not provide warranties or controls on the origin of the software. Many of therisks associated with use of open source software cannot be eliminated, and could adversely affect our business.
If we fail to manage theintegration of Springstone effectively, our results of operations and business could be harmed.
We are in the process ofintegrating Springstone into our business. Risks associated with any such integration include:
| our inability to integrate smoothly Springstones technologies and loan products with our current technologies and products; |
| possible changes to Springstones loan products and sales and operational processes; and |
| our inability to assimilate and retain the management and other personnel, culture and operations of Springstone, including back-office functions and systems, such as accounting, human resources, internal controls andothers. |
This integration may be difficult and unpredictable. We may invest resources in the acquisition and integrationefforts would have been better utilized developing technology and loan products for our platform or on other strategic development initiatives.
Further, this acquisition may disrupt our ongoing operations, divert managements attention from their primary responsibilities and ourother strategic initiatives, subject us to additional liabilities, increase our expenses and otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.
From time to time we may evaluate and potentially consummate acquisitions, which could require significant management attention, disrupt our businessand adversely affect our financial results.
We may evaluate and consider strategic transactions, combinations, acquisitions oralliances to enhance our existing business or develop new loan products and services. These transactions could be material to our financial condition and results of operations if consummated. If we are able to identify an appropriate businessopportunity, we may not be able to successfully consummate the transaction and, even if we do consummate such a transaction, we may be unable to obtain the benefits or avoid the difficulties and risks of such transaction.
Any acquisition will involve risks commonly encountered in business relationships, including:
| difficulties in assimilating and integrating the operations, personnel, systems, data, technologies, products and services of the acquired business; |
| inability of the acquired technologies, products or businesses to achieve expected levels of revenue, profitability, productivity or other benefits; |
| difficulties in retaining, training, motivating and integrating key personnel; |
22
| diversion of managements time and resources from our normal daily operations; |
| difficulties in successfully incorporating licensed or acquired technology and rights into our platform and loan products; |
| difficulties in maintaining uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies within the combined organizations; |
| difficulties in retaining relationships with customers, employees and suppliers of the acquired business; |
| risks of entering markets in which we have no or limited direct prior experience; |
| regulatory risks, including remaining in good standing with existing regulatory bodies or receiving any necessary pre-closing or post-closing approvals, as well as being subject to new regulators with oversight over anacquired business; |
| assumption of contractual obligations that contain terms that are not beneficial to us, require us to license or waive intellectual property rights or increase our risk for liability; |
| failure to successfully further develop the acquired technology; |
| liability for activities of the acquired business before the acquisition, including patent and trademark infringement claims, violations of laws, commercial disputes, tax liabilities and other known and unknownliabilities; |
| potential disruptions to our ongoing businesses; and |
| unexpected costs and unknown risks and liabilities associated with the acquisition. |
We maynot make any acquisitions, or any future acquisitions may not be successful, may not benefit our business strategy, may not generate sufficient revenue to offset the associated acquisition costs or may not otherwise result in the intended benefits.In addition, we cannot assure you that any future acquisition of new businesses or technology will lead to the successful development of new or enhanced loan products and services or that any new or enhanced loan products and services, if developed,will achieve market acceptance or prove to be profitable.
Expanding our operations internationally could subject us to new challenges andrisks.
Although we currently only operate in the United States, we may seek to expand our business internationally. Managing anyinternational expansion will require additional resources and controls. Any expansion internationally could subject our business to risks associated with international operations, including:
| adjusting the proprietary risk algorithms that we use to account for the differences in information available on borrowers; |
| conformity of our platform with applicable business customs, including translation into foreign languages and associated expenses; |
| potential changes to our established business model; |
| the need to support and integrate with local third-party service providers; |
| competition with service providers that have greater experience in the local markets than we do or that have pre-existing relationships with potential borrowers and investors in those markets; |
| difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations in an environment of diverse culture, laws and customers, and the increased travel, infrastructure and legal and compliance costs associated with internationaloperations; |
| compliance with multiple, potentially conflicting and changing governmental laws and regulations, including banking, securities, employment, tax, privacy and data protection laws and regulations, such as the EU DataPrivacy Directive; |
23
| compliance with U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the U.K. Anti-Bribery Act; |
| difficulties in collecting payments in foreign currencies and associated foreign currency exposure; |
| restrictions on repatriation of earnings; |
| compliance with potentially conflicting and changing laws of taxing jurisdictions where we conduct business and applicable U.S. tax laws as they relate to international operations, the complexity and adverseconsequences of such tax laws and potentially adverse tax consequences due to changes in such tax laws; and |
| regional economic and political conditions. |
As a result of these risks, any potential futureinternational expansion efforts that we may undertake may not be successful.
We have incurred substantial debt and may issue debt securities orotherwise incur substantial debt in the future, which may adversely affect our financial condition and negatively impact our operations.
We have in the past incurred, and may in the future incur, substantial debt. The incurrence of debt could have a variety of negative effects,including:
| default and foreclosure on our assets if our operating revenue is insufficient to repay debt obligations; |
| acceleration of obligations to repay the indebtedness (or other outstanding indebtedness), even if we make all principal and interest payments when due, if we breach any covenants that require the maintenance of certainfinancial ratios or reserves without a waiver or renegotiation of that covenant; |
| our inability to obtain necessary additional financing if the debt security contains covenants restricting our ability to obtain such financing while the debt security is outstanding; |
| diverting a substantial portion of cash flow to pay principal and interest on such debt, which would reduce the funds available for expenses, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes; and |
| creating potential limitations on our flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes in our business and in the industry in which we operate. |
The occurrence of any of these risks could adversely affect our operations or financial condition.
Competition for our employees is intense, and we may not be able to attract and retain the highly skilled employees needed to support our business.
We believe our success depends on the efforts and talents of our employees, including software engineers, financial personnel andmarketing professionals. Our future success depends on our continued ability to attract, develop, motivate and retain highly qualified and skilled employees. Competition for highly skilled technical and financial personnel, particularly in the SanFrancisco Bay Area, is extremely intense. We may not be able to hire and retain these personnel at compensation levels consistent with our existing compensation and salary structure. Many of the companies with which we compete for experiencedemployees have greater resources than we have and may be able to offer more attractive terms of employment.
In addition, we investsignificant time and expense in training our employees, which increases their value to competitors who may seek to recruit them. If we fail to retain our employees, we could incur significant expenses in hiring and training their replacements, andthe quality of our services and our ability to serve borrowers and investors could diminish, resulting in a material adverse effect on our business.
24
If we fail to retain our key personnel, we may not be able to achieve our anticipated level of growth andour business could suffer.
In addition to attracting and retaining highly skilled employees in general, our future performancedepends, in part, on our ability to attract and retain key personnel, including our executive officers, senior management team and other key personnel, all of whom would be difficult to replace. In particular, Mr. Laplanche, our founder andChief Executive Officer, is critical to the management of our business and operations and the development of our strategic direction. The loss of the services of Mr. Laplanche, our other executive officers or members of our senior managementteam, and the process to replace any of them, would involve significant time and expense and may significantly delay or prevent the achievement of our business objectives.
If we cannot maintain our corporate culture as we grow, we could lose the innovation, collaboration and focus that contribute to our business.
We believe that a critical component of our success is our corporate culture, which we believe fosters innovation, encouragesteamwork and cultivates creativity. As we develop the infrastructure of a public company and continue to grow, we may find it difficult to maintain these valuable aspects of our corporate culture. Any failure to preserve our culture could negativelyimpact our future success, including our ability to attract and retain employees, encourage innovation and teamwork and effectively focus on and pursue our corporate objectives.
If we discover a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting that we are unable to remedy or otherwise fail to maintain effectiveinternal control over financial reporting or disclosure controls and procedures, our ability to report our financial results on a timely and accurate basis and the market price of our common stock may be adversely affected.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Sarbanes-Oxley Act) requires, among other things, that we maintain effective internal control over financialreporting and disclosure controls and procedures. Although we did not discover any material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting at December 31, 2013, subsequent testing by us or our independent registered public accountingfirm, which has not performed an audit of our internal control over financial reporting, may reveal deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses. To comply with Section 404A, we mayincur substantial cost, expend significant management time on compliance-related issues and hire additional accounting, financial and internal audit staff with appropriate public company experience and technical accounting knowledge. Moreover, if weare not able to comply with the requirements of Section 404A in a timely manner or if we or our independent registered public accounting firm identify deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that are deemed to be materialweaknesses, we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or other regulatory authorities, which would require additional financial and management resources. Any failure to maintain effectivedisclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results, and cause a decline in the price of our common stock.
Our ability to use our deferred tax assets to offset future taxable income may be subject to certain limitations that could subject our business tohigher tax liability.
We may be limited in the portion of net operating loss carryforwards that we can use in the future to offsettaxable income for U.S. federal and state income tax purposes. At December 31, 2013, we had federal and state net operating loss carry-forwards (NOLs) of approximately $43.9 million and $40.7 million, respectively, to offset future taxableincome. These federal and state net operating loss carry-forwards will begin expiring in 2027 and 2016, respectively. A lack of future taxable income would adversely affect our ability to utilize these NOLs. In addition, under Section 382 ofthe Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (Code), a corporation that undergoes an ownership change is subject to limitations on its ability to utilize its NOLs to offset future taxable income. Future changes in our stock ownership,including this or future offerings, as well as other changes that may be outside of our control, could result in additional ownership changes under Section 382 of the Code. Our NOLs may also be impaired under similar provisions of state law.Additionally, at December 31,
25
2013, we had federal and state research and development tax credit carry-forwards of approximately $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively. We assess the available positive and negativeevidence to estimate if sufficient future taxable income will be generated to utilize the existing deferred tax assets. On the basis of this evaluation, a full valuation allowance has historically been recorded to recognize only deferred tax assetsthat are more likely than not to be realized. Our deferred tax assets may expire unutilized or underutilized, which could prevent us from offsetting future taxable income.
Risks Related to Compliance and Regulation
We andour issuing bank partners are subject to borrower protection laws and federal and state consumer protection laws.
We and ourissuing bank partners must comply with regulatory regimes, including those applicable to consumer credit transactions, various aspects of which are untested as applied to our platform. Certain state laws generally regulate interest rates and othercharges and require certain disclosures. In addition, other federal and state laws may apply to the origination and servicing of loans originated through our platform. In particular, through our platform, we may be subject to laws, such as:
| state laws and regulations that impose requirements related to loan disclosures and terms, credit discrimination, credit reporting, debt collection and unfair or deceptive business practices; |
| the Truth-in-Lending Act and Regulation Z promulgated thereunder, and similar state laws, which require certain disclosures to borrowers regarding the terms and conditions of their loans and credit transactions; |
| the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B promulgated thereunder, which prohibit creditors from discriminating against credit applicants on the basis of race, color, sex, age, religion, national origin, maritalstatus, the fact that all or part of the applicants income derives from any public assistance program or the fact that the applicant has in good faith exercised any right under the federal Consumer Credit Protection Act or any applicable statelaw; |
| the Fair Credit Reporting Act, which promotes the accuracy, fairness and privacy of information in the files of consumer reporting agencies; |
| the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and similar state debt collection laws, which provide guidelines and limitations on the conduct of third-party debt collectors in connection with the collection of consumer debts; |
| the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which includes limitations on financial institutions disclosure of nonpublic personal information about a consumer to nonaffiliated third parties, in certain circumstances requiresfinancial institutions to limit the use and further disclosure of nonpublic personal information by nonaffiliated third parties to whom they disclose such information and requires financial institutions to disclose certain privacy policies andpractices with respect to information sharing with affiliated and nonaffiliated entities as well as to safeguard personal customer information, and other privacy laws and regulations; |
| the Bankruptcy Code, which limits the extent to which creditors may seek to enforce debts against parties who have filed for bankruptcy protection; |
| the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, which allows military members to suspend or postpone certain civil obligations so that the military member can devote his or her full attention to military duties; |
| the Electronic Fund Transfer Act and Regulation E promulgated thereunder, which provide guidelines and restrictions on the electronic transfer of funds from consumers bank accounts; |
| the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act and similar state laws, particularly the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, which authorize the creation of legally binding and enforceable agreementsutilizing electronic records and signatures; and |
| the Bank Secrecy Act, which relates to compliance with anti-money laundering policies and procedures. |
26
We may not always have been, and may not always be, in compliance with these laws. Compliancewith these laws is also costly, time-consuming and limits our operational flexibility.
Failure to comply with these laws and regulatoryrequirements applicable to our business may, among other things, limit our or a collection agencys ability to collect all or part of the principal of or interest on loans. As a result, we may not be able to collect our servicing fee withrespect to the uncollected principal or interest, and investors may be discouraged from investing in loans. In addition, non-compliance could subject us to damages, revocation of required licenses, class action lawsuits, administrative enforcementactions, rescission rights held by investors in securities offerings and civil and criminal liability, which may harm our business and our ability to maintain our platform and may result in borrowers rescinding their loans.
Where applicable, we seek to comply with state small loan, loan broker, servicing and similar statutes. Currently, we do not facilitate loansto borrowers in Idaho, Iowa, Maine, Nebraska and North Dakota. In all other U.S. jurisdictions with licensing or other requirements we believe may be applicable to us, we have obtained such licenses or comply with the relevant requirements throughthe operation of our platform with issuing banks. Nevertheless, if we are found to not comply with applicable laws, we could lose one or more of our licenses or authorizations or face other sanctions or be required to obtain a license in suchjurisdiction, which may have an adverse effect on our ability to continue to facilitate loans through our platform, perform our servicing obligations or make our platform available to borrowers in particular states, which may harm our business.
If our platform was found to violate a states usury laws, we may have to alter our business model and our business could be harmed.
The interest rates that are charged to borrowers and that form the basis of payments to investors through our platform are based upon theability under federal law of the issuing bank that originates the loan to export the interest rates of its jurisdiction of incorporation to provide uniform rates to all borrowers in all states that have not opted out. WebBank, our primary issuingbank, exports the interest rates of Utah, which allows parties to generally agree by contract to any interest rate. The current annual percentage rates offered by WebBank though our platform range from approximately 6.78% to 29.99%, which equate tointerest rates for notes that range from approximately 6.03% to 26.06%. Of the forty-six jurisdictions whose residents may obtain loans (including the District of Columbia), certain states, including Utah, have no statutory interest rate limitationson personal loans, while other jurisdictions have a maximum rate less than the current maximum rate offered by WebBank through our platform. If a borrower were to successfully bring claims against us for state usury law violations, and the rate onthat borrowers loan was greater than that allowed under applicable state law, we could be subject to fines and penalties. Further, if we were unable to partner with another issuing bank, we would have to substantially modify our businessoperations from the manner currently contemplated and would be required to maintain state-specific licenses and only provide a limited range of interest rates, all of which would substantially reduce our operating efficiency and attractiveness toinvestors and possibly result in a decline in our operating results.
Several lawsuits have sought to re-characterize certain loan marketers andother originators as lenders. If litigation on similar theories were successful against us, loans facilitated through our platform could be subject to state consumer protection laws in a greater number of states.
Several lawsuits have brought under scrutiny the association between high-interest payday loan marketers and out-of-state banks.These lawsuits assert that payday loan marketers use out-of-state lenders in order to evade the consumer protection laws imposed by the states where they do business. Such litigation has sought to re-characterize the loan marketer as the lender forpurposes of state consumer protection law and usury restrictions. Similar civil actions have been brought in the context of gift cards and retail purchase finance. Although we believe that our activities are generally distinguishable from theactivities involved in these cases, a court or regulatory authority could disagree.
27
Additional state consumer protection laws would be applicable to the loans facilitated throughour platform if we were re-characterized as a lender, and the loans could be voidable or unenforceable. In addition, we could be subject to claims by borrowers, as well as enforcement actions by regulators. Even if we were not required to ceasedoing business with residents of certain states or to change our business practices to comply with applicable laws and regulations, we could be required to register or obtain licenses or regulatory approvals that could impose a substantial cost onus.
The increased scrutiny of third-party medical financing by governmental agencies may lead to increased regulatory burdens on Springstone andadversely affect our consolidated revenue or results of operations.
Springstone, through its issuing bank partners, provideseducation and patient financing options, including for elective medical procedures. Recently, regulators increased scrutiny of third-party providers of financing for medical procedures that are generally not covered by health insurance. For example,in December 2013, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) fined GE Capital Retail Bank $34.1 million for insufficient training, disclosures and practices related to their medical financing services. In addition, attorneys general in New Yorkand Minnesota have conducted investigations on alleged abusive lending practices or exploitation regarding third-party medical financing services.
In June 2014, Springstone received a civil investigative demand from the CFPB for documents and other tangible items related to its programsthat provide healthcare financing. If Springstones practices are ultimately found to be deficient, resulting in fines, penalties or increased burdens on Springstones activities, our consolidated operating costs could increase.Additionally, such regulatory inquiries or actions could damage Springstones and our reputations and limit Springstones ability to conduct operations, which could adversely affect our consolidated financial statements.
The adoption of any law, rule or regulation affecting this industry may also increase Springstones administrative costs, modify itspractices to comply with applicable requirements and reduce its ability to participate competitively, which could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated revenue or results of operations.
The CFPB is a new agency, and there continues to be uncertainty as to how the agencys actions or the actions of any other new agency could impactour business or that of our issuing banks.
The CFPB, which commenced operations in July 2011, has broad authority over thebusinesses in which we engage. This includes authority to write regulations under federal consumer financial protection laws and regulations, such as Regulation Z, the Truth in Lending Act and Regulation B, and to enforce those lawsagainst and examine large financial institutions, such as our issuing banks, for compliance. The CFPB is authorized to prevent unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices through its regulatory, supervisory and enforcement authority.To assist in its enforcement, the CFPB maintains an online complaint system that allows consumers to log complaints with respect to various consumer finance products, including the loan products we facilitate. This system could inform future CFPBdecisions with respect to its regulatory, enforcement or examination focus.
There continues to be uncertainty as to how the CFPBsstrategies and priorities, including in both its examination and enforcement processes, will impact our businesses and our results of operations going forward. Actions by the CFPB could result in requirements to alter or cease offering affected loanproducts and services, making them less attractive and restricting our ability to offer them.
Although we have committed resources toenhancing our compliance programs, actions by the CFPB or other regulators against us, our issuing banks or our competitors that discourage the use of the marketplace model or suggest to consumers the desirability of other loan products or servicescould result in reputational harm and a loss of borrowers or investors. Our compliance costs and litigation exposure could increase materially if the CFPB or other regulators enact new regulations, change regulations that were previously adopted,modify, through supervision or enforcement, past regulatory guidance, or interpret existing regulations in a manner different or stricter than have been previously interpreted.
28
The collection, processing, storage, use and disclosure of personal data could give rise to liabilities asa result of governmental regulation, conflicting legal requirements or differing views of personal privacy rights.
We receive,transmit and store a large volume of personally identifiable information and other user data. There are federal, state and foreign laws regarding privacy and the storing, sharing, use, disclosure and protection of personally identifiable informationand user data. Specifically, personally identifiable information is increasingly subject to legislation and regulations in numerous U.S. and international jurisdictions, the intent of which is to protect the privacy of personal information that iscollected, processed and transmitted in or from the governing jurisdiction. This regulatory framework for privacy issues worldwide is currently evolving and is likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future. We could be adversely affected iflegislation or regulations are expanded to require changes in business practices or privacy policies, or if governing jurisdictions interpret or implement their legislation or regulations in ways that negatively affect our business, financialcondition and results of operations.
Our failure to comply with applicable privacy policies or federal, state or foreign laws andregulations or any compromise of security that results in the unauthorized release of personally identifiable information or other user data could damage our reputation, discourage potential borrowers or investors from using our platform or resultin fines or proceedings brought against us, our issuing banks or other third parties by governmental agencies, borrowers, investors or other third parties, one or all of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results ofoperations. In addition to laws, regulations and other applicable common law rules regarding privacy and privacy advocacy, industry groups or other private parties may propose new and different privacy standards. We could also be subject toliability for the inappropriate use of information made available by us. Because the interpretation and application of privacy and data protection laws and privacy standards are still uncertain, it is possible that these laws or privacy standardsmay be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our practices. Any inability to adequately address privacy concerns, even if unfounded, or to comply with applicable privacy or data protection laws, regulations and privacystandards, could result in additional cost and liability for us, damage our reputation, inhibit use of our platform and harm our business.
We willincur significantly increased costs and devote substantial management time as a result of the listing of our common stock.
Although we have been a reporting company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), since 2008, we will incuradditional legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private reporting company. For example, we will be required to comply with additional requirements of the rules and regulations of the SEC and requirements of the , including applicable corporate governance practices. We expect that compliance with these requirements will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will makesome activities more time consuming and costly. In addition, we expect that our management and other personnel will need to divert attention from operational and other business matters to devote substantial time to these public company requirements.We cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we may incur as a result of becoming a public company or the timing of such costs.
In addition, changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure are creating uncertainty forpublic companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs and making some activities more time-consuming. These laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as aresult, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions todisclosure and governance practices. We intend to invest resources to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of managements time andattention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. If our efforts to comply with new laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to theirapplication and practice, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us and our business may be adversely affected.
29
Our ability to offer our notes depends upon our compliance with requirements under federal or statesecurities laws.
All notes publicly offered through our marketplace are offered and sold pursuant to a registration statementfiled with the SEC. We also qualify as a well-known seasoned issuer, which allows us to file automatically effective registration statements with the SEC. Under SEC rules, for certain material updates, we must file post-effectiveamendments, which, if we do not qualify as a well-known seasoned issuer, do not become effective until declared effective by the SEC. We may fail to maintain our well-known seasoned issuer status if we do not file SEC reportson a timely manner or for other reasons. In addition, if we fail to file our annual reports on Form 10-K or quarterly reports on Form 10-Q on a timely basis or are otherwise required to suspend use of a registration statement for thenotes, we could be required to suspend offering of our notes until such deficiency is resolved. Because we offer notes on a continuous basis, securities law restrictions may also limit our ability to market or advertise to potential investors.
We are also currently required to register or qualify for an exemption in every state in which we offer securities. Qualification in a statecan be a time-consuming process, often requiring periodic renewals. Failure to timely renew these registrations may require us to pay penalties, suspend further offerings until we regain compliance and make rescission offers in connection withpreviously completed investments. Certain states also impose special suitability standards and other conditions for operation in their states, restricting the persons and conditions under which we may make offerings in these states. We do not offerour notes in all states due to the restrictions of certain states. While we believe that upon the completion of this offering we may rely on federal preemption of state registration and qualification requirements, states may interpret federal law asapplied to our notes differently, possibly requiring us to continue to make filings in or limit operations in those states. Regardless of any such registration, qualification or preemption, we are subject to both state and federal antifraud rules ofeach state in which we operate. Although we seek to verify information provided to us by borrowers, we cannot verify all such information and may be liable for any material misstatements or omissions in such information received from borrowers orfrom other third parties.
As a result of these requirements, actual or alleged non-compliance with federal or state laws or changes infederal or state law or regulatory policy or could limit our ability to offer notes in certain states, require us to pay fines or penalties, or curtail our operations.
We may have to constrain our business activities to avoid being deemed an investment company under the Investment Company Act.
In general, a company that is or holds itself out as being engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securitiesmay be deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (Investment Company Act). The Investment Company Act contains substantive legal requirements that regulate the manner in which investmentcompanies are permitted to conduct their business activities. We believe we have conducted, and we intend to continue to conduct, our business in a manner that does not result in our company being characterized as an investment company. Toavoid being deemed an investment company, we may not be able to broaden our offerings, which could require us to forego attractive opportunities. We also plan to apply for formal exemptive relief to provide additional clarity on our status under theInvestment Company Act. We may not receive such relief on a timely basis, if at all, and such relief may require us to modify or curtail our operations. If we are deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, we may berequired to institute burdensome compliance requirements and our activities may be restricted, which would materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If our registered investment advisor, LC Advisors, LLC, were found to have violated the Investment Advisers Act, our ability to raise sufficientinvestor commitments to meet borrower demand could be impaired.
Our subsidiary, LC Advisors, LLC (LCA), acts as an advisor tocertain private funds and accredited investors, including those that invest in managed accounts that rely on a third-party adviser or manager to
30
manage their investment through our platform. Registered investment advisers are subject to a number of regulatory and legal requirements, including conflicts of interest, advertisingrestrictions and custody requirements. We believe we have conducted, and we intend to continue to conduct, the business of LCA in substantial compliance with the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (Investment Advisers Act) and applicablefiduciary duties. If, however, we are deemed to have breached any of our obligations under the Investment Advisers Act, the activities of LCA could be restricted, suspended or even terminated. If this were to occur, our ability to provide investorswith the opportunity to invest through managed accounts could be severely curtailed, and we may not be able to sufficiently meet borrower and investor demand for loans, which could harm our business.
If we were required to register as a broker-dealer under federal or state law, our costs could significantly increase or our operations could beimpaired.
The securities offered to investors are offered directly by us. We do not operate as a registered broker-dealer in anyjurisdiction. Although we do not believe we are obligated to do so, if a regulatory body were to find that our activities require us to register as a broker-dealer or to sell the investment securities only through a registered broker-dealer, wecould be subject to fines, rescission offers or other penalties, and our compliance costs and other costs of operation could increase significantly. Further, our ability to issue and distribute the securities could be significantly impaired orcurtailed.
Because we may have issued stock options and underlying shares of common stock in violation of federal and state securities laws, we maybe required to offer to repurchase those securities and incur other costs.
We have been a reporting company under the Exchange Actsince October 2008. As a result, subsequent to that time, we were no longer entitled to rely on the exemption provided under Rule 701 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (Securities Act), and other exemptions from state securities laws forgrants of certain equity awards to, and exercises of such awards by, some of our employees, directors and consultants. Therefore, it is possible that some current or former employees, directors and consultants could assert that the options andissuance of shares prior to filing our Form S-8 in July 2014 may have violated U.S. federal and state securities laws, and that such persons could have the right to require us to repurchase those securities. Although we believe that our issuancesdid not violate applicable securities law, regulators may disagree.
If it is determined that we offered or sold securities in violationof federal or state law, regulators could impose monetary fines or other sanctions and require us to offer to repurchase such shares. Even if we make a rescission offer, eligible participants might opt not to accept our offer. As it is unclear if arescission offer under federal securities laws will terminate a purchasers right to rescind a sale of stock that was not registered or exempt from such registration requirements, we may be required to honor such rescission rights in futureperiods. Our liability may be equal to the value of all options and common stock granted or issued without registration or an exemption therefrom plus any statutory interest we may be required to pay. We believe that any remedies a person might haveafter the rescission offer expired would not be greater than the amount that person would have received in the rescission offer.
We have notreviewed our compliance with foreign laws regarding the participation of non-U.S. residents on our platform.
From time to time,non-U.S. residents invest in loans directly through our platform. Through June 30, 2014, the percentage of notes purchased (based upon dollar amounts) by such persons since inception was less than 2% of all loans issued. We are not experts withrespect to all applicable laws in the various foreign jurisdictions, and we cannot be sure that we are complying with applicable foreign laws. Failure to comply with such laws could result in fines and penalties payable by us.
31
Recent legislative and regulatory initiatives have imposed restrictions and requirements on financialinstitutions that could have an adverse effect on our business.
The Dodd-Frank Act and other legislation and regulations relatingto financial institutions and markets, including alternative asset management funds, has resulted in increased oversight and taxation. There has been, and may continue to be, a related increase in regulatory investigations of the trading and otherinvestment activities of alternative investment funds. Such investigations may impose additional expenses by us, may require the attention of senior management and may result in fines if any of our funds are deemed to have violated any regulations.
The Dodd-Frank Act is extensive and significant legislation that, among other things:
| created a liquidation framework under which the FDIC may be appointed as receiver following a systemic risk determination by the Secretary of Treasury (in consultation with the President) for the resolutionof certain nonbank financial companies and other entities, defined as covered financial companies, and commonly referred to as systemically important entities, in the event such a company is in default or in danger of defaultand the resolution of such a company under other applicable law would have serious adverse effects on financial stability in the United States, and also for the resolution of certain of their subsidiaries; |
| strengthened the regulatory oversight of securities and capital markets activities by the SEC; and |
| increased regulation of the securitization markets through, among other things, a mandated risk retention requirement for securitizers, which, if applied to our business, would change our business model, and a directionto the SEC to regulate credit rating agencies and adopt regulations governing these organizations and their activities. |
With respect to the new liquidation framework for systemically important entities, we cannot assure you that such framework would not apply tous. Guidance from the FDIC indicates that such new framework will largely be exercised in a manner consistent with the existing bankruptcy laws, which is the insolvency regime that would otherwise apply to us. The SEC has proposed significantchanges to the rules applicable to issuers and sponsors of asset-backed securities under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act. With the proposed changes, our access to the asset-backed securities capital markets could be affected and ourfinancing programs could be less effective. We will at some point become subject to the oversight of the CFPB. Compliance with such legislation or regulation may significantly increase our costs, limit our product offerings and operatingflexibility, require significant adjustments in our internal business processes and potentially require us to maintain our regulatory capital at levels above historical practices.
As the regulatory framework for our business evolves, federal and state governments may draft and propose new laws to regulate online marketplaces suchas our platform, which may negatively affect our business.
The regulatory framework for Internet commerce, including onlinemarketplaces such as our platform, is evolving, and it is possible that new laws and regulations will be adopted in the United States and internationally, or existing laws and regulations may be interpreted in new ways, that would affect theoperation of our platform and the way in which we interact with borrowers and investors. The cost to comply with such laws or regulations could be significant and would increase our operating expenses, and we may be unable to pass those costs on toour borrowers and investors in the form of increased fees. In addition, federal and state governmental or regulatory agencies may decide to impose taxes on services provided over the Internet or by online marketplaces. These taxes could discouragethe use of our platform, which would adversely affect the viability of our platform.
32
Risks Related to Our Initial Public Offering and Ownership of Our Common Stock
The stock price of our common stock may be volatile or may decline regardless of our operating performance.
The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly in response to numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control,including:
| overall performance of the equity markets; |
| our operating performance and the performance of other similar companies; |
| changes in the estimates of our operating results that we provide to the public, our failure to meet these projections or changes in recommendations by securities analysts that elect to follow our common stock; |
| regulatory developments; |
| announcements of innovations, new loan products or acquisitions, strategic alliances or significant agreements by our competitors; |
| disruptions in our platform due to computer hardware, software or network problems; |
| recruitment or departure of key personnel; |
| the economy as a whole or market conditions in our industry; |
| trading activity by stockholders who beneficially own large amounts of our outstanding common stock; |
| the expiration of market standoff or contractual lock-up agreements; and |
| the size of our market float. |
In the past, stockholders have filed securities class actionlitigation following periods of market volatility. If we were to become involved in securities litigation, it could subject us to substantial costs, divert resources and the attention of management from our business and adversely affect ourbusiness.
Substantial blocks of our total outstanding shares may be sold into the market when lock-up or market standoffperiods end. If there are substantial sales of shares of our common stock, the price of our common stock could decline.
The priceof our common stock could decline if there are substantial sales of our common stock, particularly sales by our directors, executive officers and significant stockholders, or if there is a large number of shares of our common stock available forsale. Upon completion of this offering, we will have outstanding shares of common stock, based on the number of shares outstanding as of June 30, 2014. All of the sharesof common stock sold in this offering will be available for sale in the public market. Substantially all of our security holders have entered into market standoff agreements with us restricting the sale of any shares of our common stock or willenter into lock-up agreements with the underwriters under which they will agree, subject to certain exceptions, not to sell any shares of our common stock until at least daysafter the date of this prospectus, as described in Shares Eligible for Future Sale. Shares held by directors, executive officers and other affiliates will be subject to volume limitations under Rule 144 under the Securities Act andvarious vesting agreements. Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC may, in its discretion, permit our stockholders to sell shares prior to the expiration of the restrictive provisions contained in these lock-up agreements.
After our initial public offering, certain of our stockholders will have rights, subject to some conditions, to require us to fileregistration statements covering their shares that we may file for ourselves or our stockholders. All of these shares are subject to market standoff or lock-up agreements restricting their sale until at least days after the date of this prospectus. In addition, shares issued or issuable upon exercise of options or warrants vested as of the expiration of the lock-up agreements willbe eligible for sale at that time.
33
The price of our common stock could decline as a result of the sale of a substantial number ofshares of common stock in the public market or the perception in the market that the holders of a large number of shares intend to sell their shares.
There has been no prior market for our common stock and an active market may not develop or be sustained, and you may notbe able to resell your shares at or above the initial public offering price, if at all.
There has been no public market for ourcommon stock prior to this offering. The initial public offering price for our common stock will be determined through negotiations between the underwriters and us and may vary from the market price of our common stock following this offering. Ifyou purchase shares of our common stock in this offering, you may not be able to resell those shares at or above the initial public offering price. An active or liquid market in our common stock may not develop upon completion of this offering or,if it does develop, it may not be sustainable, which could adversely affect your ability to sell your shares and could depress the market price of our common stock.
We may invest or spend the net proceeds of this offering in ways with which you may not agree or in ways which may not yield a return or increase theprice of our common stock.
We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering for general corporate purposes, including workingcapital, operating expenses and capital expenditures. We may also use a portion of the net proceeds to repay indebtedness outstanding under our term loan. Additionally, we may use a portion of the net proceeds to acquire businesses, products,services or assets. We do not, however, have agreements or commitments for any material acquisitions at this time. Our management will have discretion in the application of the net proceeds from this offering, and you will not have theopportunity, as part of your investment decision, to assess whether the net proceeds are being used appropriately. Until the net proceeds are used, they may be placed in investments that do not yield a favorable return. See Use ofProceeds.
Our directors, executive officers and principal stockholders will continue to have substantial control over us after this offeringand could delay or prevent a change in corporate control.
Upon the completion of this offering, our directors, executive officersand holders of more than 5% of our common stock, together with their affiliates, will beneficially own, in the aggregate, % of our outstanding common stock. As a result, these stockholders, acting together, would have theability to control the outcome of matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including the election of directors and any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. In addition, these stockholders, actingtogether, would have the ability to control the management and affairs of our company.
If you purchase shares of our common stock in this offering,you will experience substantial and immediate dilution.
If you purchase shares of our common stock in this offering, you willexperience substantial and immediate dilution of $ per share, based on the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint ofthe offering price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses, because the price that you pay will be substantially greater than the proforma net tangible book value per share of the common stock that you acquire. This dilution is due in large part to the fact that our earlier investors paid substantially less than the initial public offering price when they purchased their sharesof capital stock. You will experience additional dilution upon exercise of options to purchase common stock under our equity incentive plans or if we otherwise issue additional shares of our common stock. See Dilution.
34
We may require additional capital to support business growth, and this capital might not be available onacceptable terms, if at all.
We intend to continue to make investments to support our business growth and may require additionalfunds to respond to business challenges, including the need to develop new loan products or enhance our platform, improve our operating infrastructure or acquire complementary businesses and technologies. Accordingly, we may need to engage in equityor debt financings to secure additional funds. If we raise additional funds through future issuances of equity or convertible debt securities, our existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution, and any new equity securities we issue couldhave rights, preferences and privileges superior to those of our common stock. Any debt financing we secure in the future could involve restrictive covenants relating to our capital raising activities and other financial and operational matters,which may make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital and to pursue business opportunities, including potential acquisitions. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to us when we require it,our ability to continue to support our business growth and to respond to business challenges could be impaired and our business may be harmed.
Wedo not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable future.
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our capital stock. Wecurrently intend to retain any future earnings to finance the operation and expansion of our business, and we do not expect to declare or pay any dividends for the foreseeable future.
Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law may delay or prevent an acquisition of our company.
Our restated certificate of incorporation and restated bylaws, as we expect they will be in effect upon the completion of this offering,contain provisions that may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of us or changes in our management. The provisions, among other things:
| establish a classified board of directors so that not all members of our board of directors are elected at one time; |
| permit only our board of directors to establish the number of directors and fill vacancies on the board; |
| provide that directors may only be removed for cause and only with the approval of two-thirds of our stockholders; |
| require two-thirds vote to amend some provisions in our restated certificate of incorporation and restated bylaws; |
| authorize the issuance of blank check preferred stock that our board of directors could use to implement a stockholder rights plan (also known as a poison pill); |
| eliminate the ability of our stockholders to call special meetings of stockholders; |
| prohibit stockholder action by written consent, which will require that all stockholder actions must be taken at a stockholder meeting; |
| prohibit cumulative voting; and |
| establish advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at annual stockholder meetings. |
These provisions, alone or together, could delay or prevent hostile takeovers and changes in control or changes in our management.
In addition, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware GeneralCorporation Law, which limits the ability of stockholders owning in excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock to merge or combine with us in certain circumstances.
35
Any provision of our restated certificate of incorporation or restated bylaws, as we expect theywill be in effect upon the completion of this offering, or Delaware law that has the effect of delaying or deterring a change in control could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our common stock, andcould also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our common stock.
In making your investment decision, you should not rely oninformation in public media that is published by third parties. You should rely only on statements made in this prospectus in determining whether to purchase our shares.
You should carefully evaluate all of the information in this prospectus. We have in the past received, and may continue to receive, a highdegree of media coverage, including coverage that is not directly attributable to statements made by our officers and employees. We cannot confirm the accuracy of such coverage. You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus indetermining whether to purchase our shares of common stock.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about ourbusiness or publish negative reports about our business, our share price and trading volume could decline, or if they change their recommendations regarding our stock adversely, our stock price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock will depend, to some extent, on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publishabout us or our business. We do not have any control over these analysts. If one or more of the analysts who may in the future cover us downgrade our shares or change their opinion of our shares, our share price would likely decline. If one or moreof these analysts cease coverage of us or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause our share price or trading volume to decline.
If we were to become subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, the right of payment of investors in our notes may be senior to the right of paymentof our stockholders and there may not be value recoverable by our stockholders.
Under the terms of the notes offered through ourmarketplace, we are obligated to pay principal and interest on each note on a non-recourse basis only if and to the extent that we receive principal, interest or late fee payments from the borrower on the corresponding loan, but the notes becomefully recourse to us if we fail to pay such obligation, which would include being prohibited from making such payments as a result of a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, or if we breach a covenant under the indenture governing the notes. In abankruptcy or similar proceeding due to a default under current or future indebtedness, an action for repurchase or rescission of securities or other event, there is uncertainty regarding whether a holder of a note has any right of payment from ourassets other than the corresponding loan. It is possible that a note holder could be deemed to have a right of payment from both the corresponding loan and from some or all of our other assets, in which case the note holder would have a claim to theproceeds of our assets that is senior to any right of payment of the holders of our common stock, regardless of whether we have received any payments from the underlying borrower, making it highly unlikely that there would be any value recoverableby our stockholders.
36
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus, including statements regarding our future operating results, future growth and statements other than statements of historicalfact, in the sections titled Prospectus Summary, Risk Factors, Use of Proceeds, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Business,contains forward-looking statements. The words believe, may, will, potentially, estimate, continue, anticipate, intend, could,would, predict, plan and expect, and similar expressions that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes, are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those described in RiskFactors and elsewhere in this prospectus. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment, and new risks emerge from time to time. It is not possible for our management to predict all risks, nor can we assess theimpact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements we may make. In light of these risks,uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this prospectus may not occur and actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements.
You should not rely on forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in theforward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee that the future results, levels of activity, performance or events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or occur. We undertake no obligation toupdate publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason after the date of this prospectus to conform these statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations, except as required by law.
You should read this prospectus and the documents that we reference in this prospectus and have filed with the SEC as exhibits to theregistration statement, of which this prospectus is a part, with the understanding that our actual future results, levels of activity, performance and events and circumstances may be materially different from what we expect.
37
We estimate that the net proceeds from the sale of common stock in this offering will be approximately$ million, based upon the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the offering price range set forth on thecover page of this prospectus, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses. If the underwriters option to purchase additional shares of common stock is exercised in full, we estimatethat the net proceeds to us would be approximately $ million, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses.
Each $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share,which is the midpoint of the offering price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, would increase or decrease, as applicable, the net proceeds that we receive from this offering by approximately$ million, assuming that the number of shares, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions. Similarly, eachincrease or decrease of 1,000,000 shares in the number of shares of common stock offered would increase or decrease, as applicable, the net proceeds from this offering by approximately $ million,assuming the assumed initial public offering price remains the same, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions.
The principal purposes of this offering are to increase our capitalization and financial flexibility, create a public market for our commonstock and enable access to the public equity markets for us and our stockholders. As of the date of this prospectus, we cannot specify with certainty all of the particular uses for the net proceeds to us from this offering. Currently, we intend touse the net proceeds from this offering for general corporate purposes, including working capital, operating expenses and capital expenditures. We may also use a portion of the net proceeds to repay indebtedness outstanding under our term loan withseveral lenders led by Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., which we entered into to fund a portion of the cash purchase price of Springstone. The term loan accrued interest at a weighted-average rate of 2.75% per annum for the six months endedJune 30, 2014 and matures on April 16, 2017. For additional information, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsLiquidity and Capital ResourcesTerm Loan.
Additionally, we may use a portion of the net proceeds to acquire businesses, products, services or assets. We do not, however, haveagreements or commitments for any material acquisitions at this time. Our management will have discretion in the application of the net proceeds from this offering. Pending the use of the net proceeds as described above, we plan to invest thenet proceeds in short-term and long-term interest-bearing obligations, including government and investment-grade debt securities and money market funds. We cannot predict whether the proceeds invested will yield a favorable return.
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain any future earnings for use in the operationof our business and do not intend to declare or pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any further determination to pay dividends on our capital stock will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our financialcondition, operating results, capital requirements, general business conditions, contractual restrictions and other factors that our board of directors considers relevant. In addition, the agreements governing our term loan contain restrictions onour ability to declare and pay cash dividends on our capital stock.
38
The following table sets forth cash and cash equivalents, as well as our capitalization, as of June 30, 2014 as follows:
| on an actual basis; |
| on a pro forma basis to give effect to (i) the conversion of all of our outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock into 124,514,637 shares of common stock, (ii) the automatic conversion and exercise ofwarrants to purchase a maximum of 165,808 shares of Series A convertible preferred stock and the automatic exercise of warrants to purchase a maximum of 27,288 shares of common stock, which, based on an assumed initial public offering price of$ per share, the midpoint of the offering price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, will result in the issuance of an aggregate of shares of common stock upon the automatic net exercise of these warrants upon completion of this offering, and (iii) the filing of our restated certificate ofincorporation; and |
| on a pro forma as adjusted basis, giving effect to (i) the pro forma adjustments set forth above, (ii) the sale and issuance of shares ofcommon stock in this offering at the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the offering price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and afterdeducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses, and (iii) the issuance of 204,948 shares of common stock that we expect to issue upon the exercise of warrants that would expire if not exercised priorto the completion of this offering. |
You should read this table together with the consolidated financial statements andrelated notes, and the sections titled Selected Consolidated Financial and Other Data and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations that are included in this prospectus.
As of June 30, 2014 | ||||||||||||
Actual | Pro Forma | Pro Forma As Adjusted(1)(2) | ||||||||||
(in thousands, except share data) | ||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 68,958 | $ | 68,958 | $ | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Term loan | $ | 49,516 | $ | 49,516 | $ | |||||||
Stockholders equity: | ||||||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 125,307,087 shares authorized, 124,514,637 shares issued and outstanding, actual; no sharesauthorized, issued or outstanding, pro forma; shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding, pro forma as adjusted | 173,674 | | | |||||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 186,000,000 shares authorized, 29,675,065 shares issued and outstanding, actual; shares authorized, 154,189,702 shares issued and outstanding, pro forma; shares authorized, shares issued and outstanding, pro forma as adjusted | 297 | 1,542 | ||||||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 29,982 | 202,411 | ||||||||||
Accumulated deficit | (66,815 | ) | (66,815 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total stockholders equity | 137,138 | 137,138 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total capitalization | $ | 186,654 | $ | 186,654 | $ | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Each $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the offering price range set forth on the coverpage of this prospectus, would increase (decrease) each of cash and cash equivalents, additional paid-in capital, total stockholders equity and total capitalization by $ million, assumingthat the number of shares, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions. |
39
(2) | The pro forma as adjusted information discussed above is illustrative only and will be adjusted based on the actual initial public offering price and other terms of this offering determined at pricing. |
The table above excludes the following shares:
| 27,401,307 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options outstanding as of June 30, 2014, with a weighted-average exercise price of $4.80 per share; |
| 730,100 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options granted after June 30, 2014, with an exercise price of $17.88 per share; |
| 900,292 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants outstanding as of June 30, 2014, with a weighted-average exercise price of $0.55 per share, reduced by shares that we expect to issue upon the automatic net exercise of warrants upon the completion of this offering, based upon the assumed initial public offering price of$ per share, which is the midpoint of the offering price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and an additional 204,948 shares that we expect to issue upon the exercise ofwarrants immediately prior to the completion of this offering that would otherwise expire; and |
| shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our equity compensation plans, consisting of (i) 2,335,498 shares of common stockavailable for issuance under our 2007 Plan as of June 30, 2014, which shares will be added to the shares to be reserved under our 2014 Plan upon its effectiveness,(ii) shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our 2014 Plan, which will become effective on the date immediately prior to the date of this prospectus, and(iii) shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our ESPP, which will become effective on the date of this prospectus. |
40
If you invest in our common stock in this offering, your ownership interest will be diluted to the extent of the difference between theinitial public offering price per share of common stock and the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share of our common stock immediately after this offering. Net tangible book value dilution per share to new investors represents thedifference between the amount per share paid by purchasers of shares of common stock in this offering and the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share of common stock.
Net tangible book value per share is determined by dividing our total tangible assets less our total liabilities by the number of shares ofcommon stock outstanding. Our historical net tangible book value as of June 30, 2014 was $ million, or $ pershare. Our pro forma net tangible book value as of June 30, 2014 was $ million, or $ per share, based on thetotal number of shares of common stock outstanding as of June 30, 2014, after giving effect to the conversion of all outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock into 124,514,637 shares of common stock.
After giving effect to (i) the sale and issuance of shares ofcommon stock in this offering at the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the offering price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and afterdeducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses, (ii) the issuance of shares of common stock upon the automatic net exercise ofwarrants upon the completion of this offering, based upon the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the offering price range set forth on the cover page of thisprospectus, and (iii) the issuance of 204,948 shares of common stock that we expect to issue upon the exercise of warrants that would expire if not exercised prior to the completion of this offering, our pro forma as adjusted net tangiblebook value as of June 30, 2014 would have been $ , or $ per share. This represents an immediate increase in pro forma net tangible book value of$ per share to our existing stockholders and an immediate dilution in pro forma net tangible book value of $ per share to investors purchasing shares ofour common stock in this offering at the assumed initial public offering price. The following table illustrates this per share dilution:
Assumed initial public offering price per share | $ | |||||||
Pro forma net tangible book value per share as of June 30, 2014 | $ | |||||||
Increase in pro forma net tangible book value per share attributable to new investors in this offering | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share immediately after this offering | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Dilution in pro forma net tangible book value per share to new investors in this offering | $ | |||||||
|
|
Each $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public offering price of$ per share, which is the midpoint of the offering price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, would increase or decrease, as applicable, our pro forma as adjusted net tangible bookvalue per share to new investors by $ , and would increase or decrease, as applicable, dilution per share to new investors in this offering by $ , assumingthat the number of shares offered, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions. Similarly, each increase or decrease of 1,000,000 shares in the number ofshares of common stock offered would increase or decrease, as applicable, our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value by approximately $ per share and increase or decrease, as applicable, thedilution to new investors by $ per share, assuming the assumed initial public offering price remains the same, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions.
If the underwriters option to purchase additional shares of common stock is exercised in full, the pro forma as adjusted net tangiblebook value per share of our common stock, as adjusted to give effect to this offering, would be $ per share, and the dilution in pro forma net tangible book value per share to new investors in thisoffering would be $ per share.
41
The following table presents, as of June 30, 2014, after giving effect to the conversion ofall outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock into common stock, the differences between the existing stockholders and the new investors purchasing shares of common stock in this offering with respect to the number of shares purchased fromus, the total consideration paid or to be paid to us, which includes net proceeds received from the issuance of our common stock and preferred stock, cash received from the exercise of stock options and warrants and the average price per share paidor to be paid to us at the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the offering price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, before deductingestimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses:
Shares Purchased | Total Consideration | Average Price Per Share | ||||||||||||||||
Number | Percent | Amount | Percent | |||||||||||||||
Existing stockholders | % | $ | % | $ | ||||||||||||||
New investors | $ | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Total | 100 | % | $ | 100 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public offering price of$ per share, which is the midpoint of the offering price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, would increase or decrease, as applicable, the total consideration paid by new investorsand total consideration paid by all stockholders by approximately $ million, assuming that the number of shares, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same, and after deductingestimated underwriting discounts and commissions.
Except as otherwise indicated, the above discussion and tables assume no exercise ofthe underwriters option to purchase additional shares of common stock. If the underwriters option to purchase additional shares of common stock were exercised in full, our existing stockholders would own %and our new investors would own % of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding upon completion of this offering.
The number of shares of our common stock outstanding at June 30, 2014 excludes:
| 27,401,307 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options outstanding as of June 30, 2014, with a weighted-average exercise price of $4.80 per share; |
| 730,100 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options granted after June 30, 2014, with an exercise price of $17.88 per share; |
| 900,292 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants outstanding as of June 30, 2014, with a weighted-average exercise price of $0.55 per share, reduced by shares that we expect to issue upon the automatic net exercise of warrants upon the completion of this offering, based upon the assumed initial public offering price of$ per share, which is the midpoint of the offering price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and an additional 204,948 shares that we expect to issue upon the exercise ofwarrants immediately prior to the completion of this offering that would otherwise expire; and |
| shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our equity compensation plans, consisting of (i) 2,335,498 shares of common stockavailable for issuance under our 2007 Plan as of June 30, 2014, which shares will be added to the shares to be reserved under our 2014 Plan upon its effectiveness,(ii) shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our 2014 Plan, which will become effective on the date immediately prior to the date of this prospectus, and(iii) shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our ESPP, which will become effective on the date of this prospectus. |
To the extent that any outstanding options or other outstanding warrants are exercised or new awards are granted under our equity compensationplans, there will be further dilution to investors.
42
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA
We have derived the selected consolidated statement of operations data for the year ended December 31, 2013 and the consolidated balancesheet data as of December 31, 2012 and 2013 from the audited consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus. We have derived the selected consolidated statement of operations data for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and2014, and our selected consolidated balance sheet data as of June 30, 2014, from the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus. We have derived the selected consolidated statement of operations data for thecalendar years ended December 31, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 from unaudited consolidated financial statements not included in this prospectus. In December 2012,we changed our fiscal year end from March 31 to December 31. The change was effective as of December 31, 2012, and the nine months ended December 31, 2012 represent the transition period. The historical financial informationpresented for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 (i) combines the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31 and the nine months ended December 31 in each year and(ii) is unaudited and has been prepared by management for illustrative purposes only. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and unaudited historical financial information have been prepared on the same basis as the auditedconsolidated financial statements and reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal, recurring nature that are necessary for a fair statement of the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements. Our historical results arenot necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected in the future and the results in the six months ended June 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year or any other period. The followingselected consolidated financial and other data should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the consolidated financial statements and related notesincluded in this prospectus.
Years Ended December 31, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except share and per share data) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | (audited) | (unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transaction fees | $ | 1,307 | $ | 4,975 | $ | 10,981 | $ | 30,576 | $ | 85,830 | $ | 29,975 | $ | 81,213 | ||||||||||||||
Servicing fees | 31 | 459 | 951 | 1,929 | 3,951 | 1,597 | 3,248 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Management fees | | | 103 | 824 | 3,083 | 1,214 | 2,555 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other revenue | 34 | 289 | 495 | 716 | 5,111 | 4,299 | 307 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Total operating revenue | 1,372 | 5,723 | 12,530 | 34,045 | 97,975 | 37,085 | 87,323 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income (expense) and other adjustments | (1,550 | ) | (708 | ) | 222 | (238 | ) | 27 | 5 | (380 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Total net revenue | (178 | ) | 5,015 | 12,752 | 33,807 | 98,002 | 37,090 | 86,943 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Operating expenses(1): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 3,561 | 7,751 | 11,402 | 18,201 | 39,037 | 16,117 | 39,807 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Origination and servicing | 1,320 | 2,790 | 4,758 | 7,589 | 17,217 | 6,048 | 15,968 | |||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engineering and product development | 1,766 | 1,951 | 2,289 | 4,855 | 13,922 | 5,291 | 13,752 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other | 3,430 | 3,330 | 6,572 | 10,024 | 20,518 | 7,812 | 33,262 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 10,077 | 15,822 | 25,021 | 40,669 | 90,694 | 35,268 | 102,789 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes | (10,255 | ) | (10,807 | ) | (12,269 | ) | (6,862 | ) | 7,308 | 1,822 | (15,846 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | | | | | | 85 | 640 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (10,255 | ) | $ | (10,807 | ) | $ | (12,269 | ) | $ | (6,862 | ) | $ | 7,308 | $ | 1,737 | $ | (16,486 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
Years Ended December 31, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except share and per share data) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | (audited) | (unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders(2): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | (0.62 | ) | $ | (0.63 | ) | $ | (0.71 | ) | $ | (0.34 | ) | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.58 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Diluted | $ | (0.62 | ) | $ | (0.63 | ) | $ | (0.71 | ) | $ | (0.34 | ) | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.58 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Weighted-average shares of common stock used in computing net income (loss) per common share | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic | 16,546,648 | 17,100,150 | 17,372,430 | 19,992,438 | 25,778,568 | 24,471,528 | 28,451,564 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Diluted | 16,546,648 | 17,100,150 | 17,372,430 | 19,992,438 | 40,713,488 | 37,908,644 | 28,451,564 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Pro forma net income (loss) per share(2) (unaudited): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.11 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.11 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding used to calculate pro forma net income (loss) per common share | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic | 145,883,096 | 150,572,503 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted | 161,665,775 | 150,572,503 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Includes stock-based compensation expense as follows: |
Years Ended December 31, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-Based Compensation Expense: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | $ | 28 | $ | 94 | $ | 30 | $ | 302 | $ | 1,313 | $ | 260 | $ | 4,117 | ||||||||||||||
Origination and servicing | 5 | 15 | 9 | 75 | 424 | 65 | 828 | |||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engineering and product development | 51 | 60 | 71 | 449 | 2,171 | 501 | 1,995 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other | 50 | 150 | 181 | 586 | 2,375 | 648 | 8,412 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense | $ | 134 | $ | 319 | $ | 291 | $ | 1,412 | $ | 6,283 | $ | 1,474 | $ | 15,352 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
(2) | In April 2014, our board of directors approved a two-for-one stock split of our outstanding capital stock. All share and per share data in this table has been adjusted to reflect this stock split. See Note 3 toconsolidated financial statements included in this prospectus for a description of how we compute basic and diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders and pro forma basic and diluted net income (loss) per share. |
As of December 31, | As of June 30, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | (audited) | (unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 4,730 | $ | 17,265 | $ | 24,712 | $ | 52,551 | $ | 49,299 | $ | 68,958 | ||||||||||||
Loans(1) | 48,797 | 128,241 | 296,100 | 781,215 | 1,829,042 | 2,326,202 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | 55,304 | 146,743 | 326,797 | 850,830 | 1,943,395 | 2,580,624 | ||||||||||||||||||
Notes and certificates(1) | 39,718 | 122,532 | 290,768 | 785,316 | 1,839,990 | 2,336,595 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities | 50,698 | 128,221 | 294,262 | 798,620 | 1,875,301 | 2,443,486 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total stockholders equity | 4,606 | 18,522 | 32,535 | 52,210 | 68,094 | 137,138 |
(1) | Loans represent unsecured obligations of borrowers originated through our platform. Notes and certificates are issued to investors and represent repayment obligations dependent upon receipt of borrower payments as to acorresponding loan. Period-end differences between the two line items are largely driven by timing of applying and distributing loan payments to investors. |
Key Operating and Financial Metrics
Weregularly review a number of metrics to evaluate our business, measure our performance, identify trends, formulate financial projections and make strategic decisions.
Years Ended December 31, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loan originations | $ | 51,815 | $ | 126,351 | $ | 257,364 | $ | 717,943 | $ | 2,064,626 | $ | 799,110 | $ | 1,797,294 | ||||||||||||||
Contribution margin | (253.4 | )% | (82.3 | )% | (28.7 | )% | 25.4 | % | 44.4 | % | 41.1 | % | 41.8 | % | ||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | (8,498 | ) | $ | (9,693 | ) | $ | (12,067 | ) | $ | (4,924 | ) | $ | 15,227 | $ | 3,786 | $ | 5,868 | ||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA margin | (619.4 | )% | (169.4 | )% | (96.3 | )% | (14.5 | )% | 15.5 | % | 10.2 | % | 6.7 | % |
For more information regarding loan originations, contribution margin, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDAmargin, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsKey Operating and Financial Metrics. Contribution margin, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin are non-GAAP financialmeasures. For more information regarding our use of these measures and a reconciliation of these measures to the most comparable GAAP measure, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results ofOperationsReconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
45
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with theconsolidated financial statements and related notes that appear in this prospectus. In addition to historical consolidated financial information, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates andbeliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include those discussed below and in this prospectus, particularly in the sectiontitled Risk Factors.
Overview
Lending Club is the worlds largest online marketplace connecting borrowers and investors. We believe a technology-powered marketplace isa more efficient mechanism to allocate capital between borrowers and investors than the traditional banking system. Consumers and small business owners borrow through Lending Club to lower the cost of their credit and enjoy a better experience thantraditional bank lending. Investors use Lending Club to earn attractive risk-adjusted returns from an asset class that has historically been closed to individual investors and only available on a limited basis to institutional investors.
Since beginning operations in 2007, our platform has facilitated over $5 billion in loans with over $1 billion of loans facilitated during thesecond quarter of 2014. The following graphic highlights key milestones in our history and illustrates the total amount of loans originated through our platform cumulatively on a quarterly basis.
46
Our trusted brand, scale and network effect drives significant borrowing and investing activityon our platform. We generate revenue from transaction fees from our platforms role in matching borrowers with investors to enable loan originations, servicing fees from investors and management fees for investment funds and other managedaccounts. We do not assume credit risk or use our own capital to invest in loans facilitated by our platform. The capital to invest in the loans enabled through our platform comes directly from investors. From time to time, we may make limitedinvestments in loans; however, such amounts have been, and we expect to continue to be, immaterial. Our proprietary technology automates key aspects of our operations, including the borrower application process, data gathering, credit decisioningand scoring, loan funding, investing and servicing, regulatory compliance and fraud detection. We operate with a lower cost structure than traditional banks due to our innovative model, online delivery and process automation, without the physicalbranches, legacy technology or high overhead associated with the traditional banking system.
Our online marketplace offers personalloans, which are unsecured obligations of individual borrowers that are issued in amounts ranging from $1,000 to $35,000, with fixed interest rates and original maturities of three or five years. In addition, in March 2014, we launched a programfocused on loans to small businesses that are issued in amounts ranging from $15,000 to $100,000, with fixed interest rates and various maturities between one and five years. We also recently acquired Springstone, which facilitates education andpatient financing in amounts ranging from $499 to $40,000. We plan to incorporate these education and patient financing products into our platform over time.
The transaction fees we receive from issuing banks in connection with our platforms role in enabling loan originations range from 1% to6% of the initial principal amount of the loan as of June 30, 2014. In addition, with our acquisition of Springstone, transaction fees include fees earned from issuing banks and service providers for education and patient financing products.Investors typically pay us a servicing fee of 1% of each payment amount received from the borrower, a servicing fee of up to 1.3% per year of the month-end balance of sold loans outstanding or a management fee typically ranging from 0.70% to 1.25%of the assets under management.
Loans to qualified borrowers are originated by our issuing banks. Investors can invest in loans that areoffered through our platform in one or all of the following channels:
| Notes. Pursuant to an effective shelf registration statement, investors may purchase unsecured, borrower payment dependent notes issued by us that correspond to payments received on an underlyingloan selected by the investor. |
| Certificates and Funds. Qualified investors can purchase trust certificates or interests in limited partnerships that purchase a trust certificate. The trust certificates are settled with cash flows fromunderlying loans selected by investors in a manner similar to the notes. |
| Whole Loan Purchases. Certain investors seek to hold the actual loan on their balance sheet. To meet this need, we sell entire loans selected by investors and retain the servicing rights. |
Our unit economics are attractive given our low cost of borrower and investor acquisition, low capital costs and highoperational leverage from automation. We optimize borrower acquisition channels by understanding risk profiles to maximize conversion of potential loan applicants. Investor acquisitions come mostly from referrals, due to our historical ability toprovide attractive risk-adjusted returns. We measure contribution margin as a way to evaluate the unit economics of loans originated through our platform. As our platform has become more efficient, our contribution margin has generally increasedover time and, for the six months ended June 30, 2014, was 41.8%.
We have experienced significant growth since our marketplacelaunched in 2007. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013, we facilitated loan originations through our platform of $717.9 million and $2.1 billion, respectively, representing an increase of 188%. For the six months endedJune 30, 2013 and 2014, we facilitated loan originations through our platform of $799.1 million and $1.8 billion, respectively, representing an increase of 125%. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013, our total net revenue was$33.8 million and
47
$98.0 million, respectively, representing an increase of 190%. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2014, our total net revenue was $37.1 million and $86.9 million, respectively,representing an increase of 134%. Our historical growth rates in facilitating loan originations through our platform reflect a deliberate strategy that allowed us to build and develop the various enterprise functions to support our scale, includingcustomer support, operations, risk controls, compliance and technology. Borrower and investor demand will continue to inform our business and loan product decisions, but we will not compromise the long-term viability of our marketplace to pursueexcessive near-term growth rates that we believe would result in borrower or investor experiences below our standards.
Change in Fiscal Year
In December 2012, we changed our fiscal year end from March 31 to December 31. The change was effective as of December 31,2012, and the nine months ended December 31, 2012 represent the transition period.
Springstone
In April 2014, we acquired Springstone, a company that facilitates education and patient financing through two issuing banks. For its rolein loan facilitation, Springstone earns transaction fees paid by the issuing bank or service provider at the time of origination, which averaged 4.9% of the initial loan balance in 2013. Currently, Springstone does not earn any servicing fees,as loans are originated, retained and serviced by the respective issuing bank. While we plan to integrate these loans into our platform over time, we currently intend to continue to have these loans funded and serviced through existing issuingbanks for the foreseeable future.
Key Operating and Financial Metrics
We regularly review a number of metrics to evaluate our business, measure our performance, identify trends, formulate financial projections andmake strategic decisions.
Year Ended March 31, 2012 | Nine Months Ended December 31, 2012 | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Loan originations | $ | 321,010 | $ | 608,348 | $ | 2,064,626 | $ | 799,110 | $ | 1,797,294 | ||||||||||
Contribution margin(1) | (12.6 | )% | 28.9 | % | 44.4 | % | 41.1 | % | 41.8 | % | ||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA(1) | $ | (11,395 | ) | $ | (2,557 | ) | $ | 15,227 | $ | 3,786 | $ | 5,868 | ||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA margin(1) | (73.3 | )% | (8.8 | )% | 15.5 | % | 10.2 | % | 6.7 | % |
(1) | Contribution margin, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin are non-GAAP financial measures. For more information regarding our use of these measures and a reconciliation of these measures to the most comparableGAAP measure, see Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures. |
Loan Originations
Loans to qualified borrowers are originated by our issuing bank partners. We generate revenue from transaction fees from our role in matchingborrowers with investors to enable loan originations. We believe originations are a key indicator of the adoption rate of our platform, growth of our brand, scale of our business, strength of our network effect, economic competitiveness of ourproducts and future growth. Loan originations have increased significantly over time due to the increased awareness of our brand, our high borrower and investor satisfaction rates, the effectiveness of our borrower acquisition channels, a strongtrack record of loan performance and the expansion of our capital sources. Factors that could affect loan originations include the interest rate and economic environment, the competitiveness of our products, our ability to develop new products orenhance existing products for borrowers and investors and the success of borrower and investor acquisition and retention.
48
Contribution Margin
Contribution margin is a non-GAAP financial measure that we calculate as net income (loss), excluding net interest income (expense) and otheradjustments, general and administrative expense, stock-based compensation expense and provision (benefit) for income taxes, divided by total operating revenue. Contribution margin is a measure used by our management and board of directors tounderstand and evaluate our core operating performance and trends. Contribution margin has varied from period to period and has generally increased over time. Factors that affect our contribution margin include revenue mix, variable marketingexpenses and origination and servicing expenses. For more information regarding the limitations of contribution margin and a reconciliation of net income (loss) to contribution margin, see Reconciliations of Non-GAAP FinancialMeasures.
Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin
Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that we calculate as net income (loss), excluding net interest income (expense) and otheradjustments, acquisition and related expense, depreciation and amortization, amortization of intangible assets, stock-based compensation expense and provision (benefit) for income taxes. Adjusted EBITDA margin is calculated as adjusted EBITDAdivided by total operating revenue. Adjusted EBITDA is a measure used by our management and board of directors to understand and evaluate our core operating performance and trends. Adjusted EBITDA has generally improved over time due to ourincreased revenue and efficiencies in the scale of our operations. For more information regarding the limitations of adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin and a reconciliation of net income (loss) to adjusted EBITDA, seeReconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
Factors Affecting Our Results
Economic Environment
The demand for our loan products from borrowers and investors is dependent upon interest rates offered and the return earned relative to othercomparable or substitute products. While borrower appetite for consumer and small business credit has typically remained strong in most economic environments, general economic factors and conditions, including the general interest rate environmentand unemployment rates, may affect borrower willingness to seek loans and investor ability and desire to invest in loans. For example, a significant interest rate increase could cause potential borrowers to defer seeking loans as they wait for ratesto settle. Additionally, if weakness in the economy emerges and actual or expected default rates increase, our investors may delay or reduce their loan investments. However, we believe our marketplace will continue to offer an attractive valueproposition to borrowers and investors in all economic and interest rate environments relative to other alternatives.
Effectivenessof Scoring Models
Our ability to attract borrowers and investors to our platform is significantly dependent on our ability toeffectively evaluate a borrowers credit profile and likelihood of default. Our ability to effectively segment borrowers into relative risk profiles impacts our ability to offer attractive interest rates for borrowers as well as our ability tooffer investors attractive returns, both of which directly relate to our users confidence in our marketplace. We utilize credit decisioning and scoring models that assign each loan offered on our marketplace a corresponding interest rate andorigination fee. Our investors returns are a function of the assigned interest rates for each particular loan invested in less any defaults over the term of the applicable loan. We believe we have a history of effectively evaluatingborrowers credit profiles and likelihood of defaults, as evidenced by the performance of various loan vintages facilitated through our marketplace. The following charts display the historical lifetime cumulative net charge-off rates, bybooking year, for all grades and 36- and 60-month terms of standard program loans for each of the years shown.
49
We evaluate our platforms credit decisioning and scoring models on a regular basis and leverage theadditional data on loan history experience, borrower behavior, economic factors and prepayment trends that we accumulate to continually improve the models. If we are unable to effectively evaluate borrowers credit profiles, borrowers andinvestors may lose confidence in our platform.
Product Innovation
We have made and intend to continue to make substantial investments and incur expenses to research and develop or otherwise acquire newfinancial products for borrowers and investors. Our revenue growth to date has been a function of, and our future success will depend in part on, successfully meeting borrower and investor demand with new and innovative loan and investment options.For example, in early 2014, we began offering small business loans to qualified investors in private transactions, bringing the benefit of our innovative marketplace model, online delivery and process automation to small business owners. Forinvestors, we have introduced automated investing, an application programming interface (API), investment funds and other separately managed accounts that make investing in loans easier. We also recently acquired Springstone and plan to incorporateits education and patient financing products into our platform over time. Failure to successfully develop and offer innovative products could adversely affect our operating results and we may not recoup the costs of new products.
50
Marketing Effectiveness and Strategic Relationships
We intend to continue to dedicate significant resources to our marketing and brand advertising efforts and strategic relationships. Ourmarketing efforts are designed to build awareness of Lending Club and attract borrowers and investors to our marketplace. We use a diverse array of marketing channels and are constantly seeking to improve and optimize our experience both on- andoffline to achieve efficiency and a high level of borrower and investor satisfaction. We also continue to invest in our strategic relationships to raise awareness of our platform and attract borrowers and investors to our platform. Our operatingresults and ability to sustain and grow loan volume will depend, in part, on our ability to continue to make effective investments in marketing and the effectiveness of our strategic relationships.
Regulatory Environment
The regulatory environment for credit is complex and evolving, creating both challenges and opportunities that could affect our financialperformance. We expect to continue to spend significant resources to comply with various federal and state laws and various licensing requirements designed to, among other things, protect borrowers (such as truth in lending, equal creditopportunity, fair credit reporting and fair debt collections practices) and investors. Our platform incorporates a number of automated features to help comply with these laws in an efficient and cost effective manner. While new laws and regulationsor changes under existing laws and regulations could make facilitating loans or investment opportunities more difficult to achieve on acceptable terms, or at all, these events could also provide new product and market opportunities. To the extent weseek to grow internationally, we would become subject to additional foreign regulation and related compliance requirements and expense.
Components ofResults of Operations
Total Net Revenue
Our primary sources of revenue consist of fees charged for transactions through or related to our platform. Our fees include transaction,servicing and management fees.
Transaction Fees
Transaction fees are fees paid by the issuing banks to us for the work we perform through our platform in facilitating originations. The amountof these fees is based upon the terms of the loan, including grade, rate, term and other factors. As of June 30, 2014, these fees ranged from 1% to 6% of the initial principal amount of a loan. In addition, with our acquisition of Springstone,transaction fees include fees earned from issuing banks and service providers for education and patient financing products. These fees are recognized as a component of operating revenue at the time of loan issuance.
Effective July 1, 2013, we elected to account for loans we intended to sell to whole loan purchasers at fair value. Under this election, thepurchase of such loans is recorded at fair value and all related transaction fees and costs are recorded when earned or incurred, respectively. Prior to this change, from December 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013, transaction fees and costs wereincluded in the computation of the gain or loss on the sale of the loan, which was recorded in other revenue on the statement of operations. As such, transaction fees are now reflected in transaction fees and not in other revenue on the statement ofoperations. In accordance with GAAP for this type of accounting change, we are not permitted to reclassify the prior period amounts to conform to this current presentation.
Servicing Fees
Investorstypically pay us a servicing fee on each payment received from a borrower or on the investors month-end balance of sold loans and certain other facilitated loans outstanding. The servicing fee compensates us for the costs we incur in servicingthe related loan, including managing payments from borrowers, payments to investors and maintaining investors account portfolios. These fees are typically 1% of each loan payment received from the borrower or up to 1.3% per year of themonth-end balance of sold loans outstanding.
51
The following table provides the outstanding principal balance of loans that we serviced at theend of the periods indicated, broken out by the method that the loans were financed.
Loans Serviced by Method Financed | March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | December 31, 2013 | June 30, 2014 | ||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Notes | $ | 273.7 | $ | 397.1 | $ | 688.3 | $ | 880.8 | ||||||||
Certificates | 93.2 | 398.7 | 1,171.7 | 1,481.1 | ||||||||||||
Whole loans sold | | 9.6 | 406.5 | 980.7 | ||||||||||||
Financed by Lending Club | 5.2 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total | $ | 372.1 | $ | 805.9 | $ | 2,266.9 | $ | 3,343.1 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management Fees
Accredited investors and qualified purchasers can invest in limited partner interests in investment funds managed by LC Advisors, LLC (LCA), aregistered investment advisor and our wholly owned subsidiary. LCA typically charges certificate holders a management fee based on their assets under management, ranging from 0.70% to 1.25% per year. This fee may be waived or reduced for individuallimited partners at the discretion of the general partner. LCA does not earn any carried interest on the funds.
Other Revenue
Other revenue consists of revenue from gains and losses on sales of whole loans and referral revenue. Certain investors investing through ourplatform acquire loans in their entirety. In connection with these whole loan sales, in addition to the transaction fee earned in respect of the corresponding loan, we recognize a small gain or loss on the sale of that loan (loans are typically soldat par). From December 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013, we included in the gain calculation on whole loan sales the amount of the transaction fees earned in respect of those loans, resulting in higher gains on sale and lower transactionfees.
Net Interest Income (Expense) and Other Adjustments
Net Interest Income (Expense). We do not assume principal or interest risk on loans originated through our platform as it matchesborrowers and investors. We are obligated to make principal and interest payments on notes and certificates related to the corresponding loans only to the extent we receive borrower payments. As a result, on our statement of operations for anyperiod and balance sheet as of any date (i) interest income on loans corresponds to the interest expense on notes and certificates and (ii) loan balances correspond to note and certificate balances, with any variations largely resultingfrom timing differences between the crediting of principal and interest payments on loans versus the disbursement of those payments to investors.
From time to time, however, we may make limited loan investments without issuing a corresponding note or certificate to investors, resultingin differences between total interest income and expense amounts on our statement of operations and total loan and notes and certificates balances on our balance sheets. These loan investments have been related primarily to customer accommodationsand have been insignificant. We do not anticipate that such investments will be material in the foreseeable future.
Additionally,interest income (expense) includes interest income earned on cash and cash equivalents and interest expense incurred on the term loan.
Other Adjustments: Fair Value Adjustments on Loans, Notes and Certificates and Benefit (Provision) for Losses on Loans at AmortizedCost. We estimate the fair value of loans and their related notes and certificates using a discounted cash flow valuation methodology. The discounted cash flow valuation methodology uses the historical defaults and losses and recoveries on ourloans over the past several years to project future losses and
52
net cash flows on loans. The changes in the fair values of loans, notes and certificates are shown on our consolidated statement of operations on a gross basis. Due to the payment dependentfeature of the notes and certificates, fair value adjustments on the loans offset the effect of fair value adjustments on the notes and certificates, resulting in no net effect on our earnings. As discussed above, we invest in a limited amount ofloans for customer accommodation purposes. These loans are included on our balance sheet with no corresponding note or certificate, and as such the change in fair value of these loans are recorded through the statement of operations with nooffsetting affect. These fair value adjustments have been immaterial for the periods presented, and we do not anticipate that such investments will be material in the foreseeable future.
We previously financed certain loans using sources of funds other than notes and certificates and accounted for those loans at amortized cost,reduced by a valuation allowance for loan losses incurred as of the balance sheet date. All loans acquired and held after September 2011 have been accounted for at fair value. The balance of loans at amortized cost declined to zero during thequarter ended December 31, 2012.
Operating Expenses
Our primary operating expenses consist of sales and marketing expense, origination and servicing expense and general and administrativeexpense, including engineering and product development and other general and administrative expense.
Sales and Marketing
Sales and marketing expense consists primarily of variable marketing expenses, including those related to borrower and investor acquisition andretention and general brand and awareness building, and salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation expense related to our sales and marketing staff.
Origination and Servicing
Origination and servicing expense consists primarily of salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation expense related to our credit,collections, customer support and payment processing staff and vendor costs associated with facilitating and servicing loans.
Generaland Administrative
Engineering and Product Development. Engineering and product development expense consists primarily ofsalaries, benefits and stock-based compensation expense for our engineering and product development team and the cost of subcontractors who work on the development and maintenance of our platform. Engineering and product development expense alsoincludes non-capitalized hardware and software costs and depreciation and amortization of technology assets.
Other. Other generaland administrative expense consists primarily of salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation expense for our accounting and finance, business development, legal, human resources and facilities staff, professional fees related to legal andaccounting, facilities expense and compensation expense related to the acquisition of Springstone. The amount of this compensation expense that we expect to record during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 is $10.8 million,$10.6 million, $3.7 million and $0.5 million, respectively, which assumes satisfaction of vesting and other obligations.
Income Tax
Provision for income taxes consists of federal and state income taxes in the United States and deferred income taxes and changesin the related valuation allowance reflecting the net tax effects of temporary difference between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purpose and the amounts used for income tax purposes.
53
At December 31, 2013, we had federal and state net operating loss carry-forwards ofapproximately $43.9 million and $40.7 million, respectively, to offset future taxable income. These federal and state net operating loss carry-forwards will begin expiring in 2027 and 2016, respectively. Additionally, at December 31, 2013, wehad federal and state research and development tax credit carry-forwards of approximately $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively. The federal credit carry-forwards will begin expiring in 2016 and the state credits may be carried forwardindefinitely. We assess the available positive and negative evidence to estimate if sufficient future taxable income will be generated to utilize the existing deferred tax assets. On the basis of this evaluation, a full valuation allowance hashistorically been recorded to recognize only deferred tax assets that are more likely than not to be realized.
Results of Operations
The following tables set forth the consolidated statement of operations data for each of the periods presented:
Year Ended March 31, 2012 | Nine Months Ended December 31, 2012 | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
(audited) | (unaudited) | |||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Transaction fees | $ | 13,701 | $ | 26,013 | $ | 85,830 | $ | 29,975 | $ | 81,213 | ||||||||||
Servicing fees | 1,222 | 1,474 | 3,951 | 1,597 | 3,248 | |||||||||||||||
Management fees | 206 | 720 | 3,083 | 1,214 | 2,555 | |||||||||||||||
Other revenue | 407 | 720 | 5,111 | 4,299 | 307 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total operating revenue | 15,536 | 28,927 | 97,975 | 37,085 | 87,323 | |||||||||||||||
Net interest income (expense) and other adjustments | 261 | (334 | ) | 27 | 5 | (380 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total net revenue | 15,797 | 28,593 | 98,002 | 37,090 | 86,943 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Operating expenses(1): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 12,571 | 14,723 | 39,037 | 16,117 | 39,807 | |||||||||||||||
Origination and servicing | 5,099 | 6,134 | 17,217 | 6,048 | 15,968 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Engineering and product development | 2,712 | 3,994 | 13,922 | 5,291 | 13,752 | |||||||||||||||
Other | 7,359 | 7,980 | 20,518 | 7,812 | 33,262 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 27,741 | 32,831 | 90,694 | 35,268 | 102,789 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes | (11,944 | ) | (4,238 | ) | 7,308 | 1,822 | (15,846 | ) | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | | | | 85 | 640 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (11,944 | ) | $ | (4,238 | ) | $ | 7,308 | $ | 1,737 | $ | (16,486 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Includes stock-based compensation expense as follows: |
Year Ended March 31, 2012 | Nine Months Ended December 31, 2012 | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-Based Compensation Expense: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | $ | 152 | $ | 216 | $ | 1,313 | $ | 260 | $ | 4,117 | ||||||||||
Origination and servicing | 31 | 60 | 424 | 65 | 828 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Engineering and product development | 95 | 406 | 2,171 | 501 | 1,995 | |||||||||||||||
Other | 382 | 428 | 2,375 | 648 | 8,412 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense | $ | 660 | $ | 1,110 | $ | 6,283 | $ | 1,474 | $ | 15,352 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
The following table sets forth the consolidated statement of operations data for each of theperiods presented as a percentage of total net revenue:
Year Ended March 31, 2012 | Nine Months Ended December 31, 2012 | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Transaction fees | 87 | % | 91 | % | 88 | % | 81 | % | 93 | % | ||||||||||
Servicing fees | 8 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||||||
Management fees | 1 | 2.5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
Other revenue | 2 | 2.5 | 5 | 12 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total operating revenue | 98 | 101 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||||||
Net interest income (expense) and other adjustments | 2 | (1 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total net revenue | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Operating expenses(1): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 80 | 52 | 40 | 44 | 46 | |||||||||||||||
Origination and servicing | 32 | 21 | 18 | 16 | 18 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Engineering and product development | 17 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 16 | |||||||||||||||
Other | 47 | 28 | 21 | 21 | 38 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 176 | 115 | 93 | 95 | 118 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes | (76 | ) | (15 | ) | 7 | 5 | (18 | ) | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net income (loss) | (76 | )% | (15 | )% | 7 | % | 5 | % | (19 | )% | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Include stock-based compensation expense as follows: |
Year Ended March 31, 2012 | Nine Months Ended December 31, 2012 | Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock-Based Compensation Expense: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 1 | % | 1 | % | 1 | % | 1 | % | 5 | % | ||||||||||
Origination and servicing | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Engineering and product development | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
Other | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense | 4 | % | 4 | % | 6 | % | 4 | % | 18 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
Six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2014
Total Net Revenue
Six Months Ended June 30, | Change ($) | Change (%) | ||||||||||||||
2013 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands, expect percentages) | ||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Transaction fees | $ | 29,975 | $ | 81,213 | $ | 51,238 | 171 | % | ||||||||
Servicing fees | 1,597 | 3,248 | 1,651 | 103 | ||||||||||||
Management fees | 1,214 | 2,555 | 1,341 | 110 | ||||||||||||
Other revenue | 4,299 | 307 | (3,992 | ) | (93 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total operating revenue | 37,085 | 87,323 | 50,238 | 135 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Net interest income (expense) and other adjustments | 5 | (380 | ) | (385 | ) | N/M | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total net revenue | $ | 37,090 | $ | 86,943 | $ | 49,853 | 134 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction Fees. Transaction fees were $81.2 million and $30.0 million for the six months endedJune 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, an increase of 171%. This increase was primarily due to an increase in loan originations through our platform. Originations were $1,797 million and $799 million for the 6 months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013respectively, an increase of 125%. In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2013, $4.9 million in transaction fees were included in the gain on sale of whole loans, which was included in other revenue. Average transaction fees,including the $4.9 million in other revenue, were 4.5% and 4.4% of the principal amount of loan originations for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. This increase was primarily due to higher percentages of loans and loans with higher risk grades, each of which have higher corresponding transaction fees.
Servicing Fees. Servicing fees were $3.2 million and $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively,an increase of 103%. The increase was primarily due to increased balances of notes and certain certificates and sold loans outstanding serviced by us for the six months ended June 30, 2014, as compared to the six months ended June 30,2013, partially offset by changes in the fair value of servicing assets and liabilities. Growth in loan originations, which increases the aggregate amount of outstanding loan balances, continued to grow faster than loan payments and charge-offs.
Management Fees. Management fees were $2.6 million and $1.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013,respectively, an increase of 110%. The increase in management fees was primarily due to an increase in the total assets under management and outstanding certificate balances.
Other Revenue. Other revenue was $0.3 million and $4.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, adecrease of 93%. The decrease was primarily due to a $4.6 million decrease in gain on sale of whole loans to unrelated purchasers, as the transaction fees for the loans sold during the six months ended June 30, 2014 are included in transactionfees revenue.
56
Components of Net Interest Income (Expense) and Other Adjustments
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2013 | 2014 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Interest income: | ||||||||
Loans | $ | 73,375 | $ | 158,257 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 10 | 3 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total interest income | 73,385 | 158,260 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Interest expense: | ||||||||
Notes and certificates | (73,357 | ) | (158,193 | ) | ||||
Term loan | | (401 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total interest expense | (73,357 | ) | (158,594 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net interest income (expense) | 28 | (334 | ) | |||||
Fair value adjustments on loans, notes and certificates, net | (23 | ) | (46 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net interest income (expense) and other adjustments | $ | 5 | $ | (380 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
Interest Income on Loans.Interest income from loans was $158.3 million and $73.4 million for the sixmonths ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase in interest income was primarily due to the increase in the outstanding balances of loans.
Interest Expense on Notes and Certificates. Interest expense for notes and certificates was $158.2 million and $73.4 million for thesix months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase in interest expense was primarily due to the increase in the outstanding balances of notes and certificates.
Interest Expense onTermLoan. Interest expense for loans payable was $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30,2014, which was related to the borrowing incurred in April 2014 related to the Springstone acquisition. We did not have any loans payable outstanding during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and did not incur any interest expense for that period.
Fair Value Adjustments on Loans, Notes and Certificates. The net fair value adjustment losses for loans and notes and certificateswere $46,000 and $23,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The fair value adjustments for loans were largely offset by the fair value adjustments of the notes and certificates at fair value due to the borrowerpayment dependent design of the notes and certificates and to the principal balances of the loans being similar to the combined principal balances of the notes and certificates.
Net Interest Income (Expense)and Other Adjustments.Net interest income (expense) and other adjustments were$(0.4) million and $5,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The decrease in net interest income (expense) and other adjustments was primarily due to interest expense on the term loan related to the Springstoneacquisition.
57
Operating Expenses
Six Months Ended June 30, | Change ($) | Change (%) | ||||||||||||||
2013 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | $ | 16,117 | $ | 39,807 | $ | 23,690 | 147 | % | ||||||||
Origination and servicing | 6,048 | 15,968 | 9,920 | 164 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative: | ||||||||||||||||
Engineering and product development | 5,291 | 13,752 | 8,461 | 160 | ||||||||||||
Other | 7,812 | 33,262 | 25,450 | 326 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 35,268 | $ | 102,789 | $ | 67,521 | 191 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expense was $39.8 million and $16.1 million for thesix months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, an increase of 147%. The increase was due to a $20.3 million increase in variable marketing expenses and a $3.6 million increase in personnel-related expenses, which includestock-based compensation expense.
Origination and Servicing. Origination and servicing expense was $16.0 million and$6.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, an increase of 164%. The increase was primarily due to a $7.0 million increase in compensation expense as we expanded our credit and customer support teamsdue to increasing loan applications and a $2.5 million increase in consumer reporting agency and loan processing costs, which was driven by higher loan volume.
General and Administrative
Engineering and Product Development. Engineering and product development expense was $13.8 million and $5.3 million for thesix months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, an increase of 160%. The increase was primarily due to a $6.1 million increase in personnel-related expenses resulting from increased headcount and contract labor expense as weenhanced our website tools and functionality and a $1.9 million increase in expensed equipment and software and depreciation expense reflecting our continued investment in technology infrastructure.
We capitalized $4.7 million and $1.0 million of software development costs for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013,respectively. These costs generally are amortized over a three year period.
Other. Other general and administrative expense was$33.3 million and $7.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, an increase of 326%. The increase was primarily due to a $15.0 million increase in compensation expense, $3.1 million of which wasthe amortization of the compensation arrangement related to certain key continuing employees of Springstone, with the remainder primarily related to an increase in headcount and stock-based compensation expense, which included retention stock optiongrants for key employees. The increase also included a $3.4 million increase in acquisition-related expenses and amortization of intangibles related to the acquisition of Springstone, a $1.8 million increase in audit and legal fees and a$1.9 million increase in contingent legal liabilities.
Income Taxes
For the six months ended June 30, 2014, we recorded $0.6 million of provision for income taxes. The $0.6 million of tax expenserelated to the amortization of tax-deductible goodwill from the acquisition of Springstone, which gives rise to an indefinite-lived deferred tax liability. There was no income tax benefit recorded on the pretax loss due to an increase in thedeferred tax asset valuation allowance. We recorded a net provision of $0.1 million for income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2013.
58
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2012, Nine Months Ended December 31, 2012 and Fiscal Year EndedDecember 31, 2013
Total Net Revenue
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2012 | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | Change ($) | Change (%) | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||
Transaction fees | $ | 26,013 | $ | 85,830 | $ | 59,817 | 230 | % | ||||||||
Servicing fees | 1,474 | 3,951 | 2,477 | 168 | ||||||||||||
Management fees | 720 | 3,083 | 2,363 | 328 | ||||||||||||
Other revenue | 720 | 5,111 | 4,391 | 610 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total operating revenue | 28,927 | 97,975 | 69,048 | 239 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Net interest income (expense) and other adjustments | (334 | ) | 27 | 361 | 108 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total net revenue | $ | 28,593 | $ | 98,002 | $ | 69,409 | 243 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2012 | Nine Months Ended December 31, 2012 | Change ($) | Change (%) | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||
Transaction fees | $ | 13,701 | $ | 26,013 | $ | 12,312 | 90 | % | ||||||||
Servicing fees | 1,222 | 1,474 | 252 | 21 | ||||||||||||
Management fees | 206 | 720 | 514 | 250 | ||||||||||||
Other revenue | 407 | 720 | 313 | 77 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total operating revenue | 15,536 | 28,927 | 13,391 | 86 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Net interest income (expense) and other adjustments | 261 | (334 | ) | (595 | ) | (228 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Net revenue | $ | 15,797 | $ | 28,593 | $ | 12,796 | 81 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction Fees. Transaction fees were $85.8 million and $26.0 million for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2013 and the nine months ended December 31, 2012, respectively, an increase of 230%. The increase in these fees was primarily due to an increase in loans originated through our platform from $608.2 million for the nine monthsended December 31, 2012 to $2,064.6 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of 239%. In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2013, $4.9 million in transaction fees were included in the gain on sale ofwhole loans, which was included in other revenue. Average transaction fees, including the $4.9 million in other revenue, were 4.4% and 4.3% of the principal amount of loan originations for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 and the ninemonths ended December 31, 2012, respectively. The increase was primarily due to a higher percentage of 60-month loans and loans with higher risk grades, each of which have higher corresponding transaction fees.
Transaction fees were $26.0 million and $13.7 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2012 and fiscal year ended March 31,2012, respectively, an increase of 90%. The increase in these fees was primarily due to an increase in loans originated through our platform from $321.1 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 to $608.2 million for the nine monthsended December 31, 2012, an increase of 90%.
Servicing Fees. Servicing fees were $4.0 million and $1.5 million for the fiscalyear ended December 31, 2013 and the nine months ended December 31, 2012, respectively, an increase of 168%. The increase in servicing fees was primarily due to increased balances of notes and certain certificates and sold loansoutstanding serviced by us for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the nine months ended December 31, 2012.
Servicing fees were $1.5 million and $1.2 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2012 and fiscal year ended March 31, 2012,respectively, an increase of 21%. The increase in servicing fees was primarily due to
59
an increase in the aggregate amount of outstanding note and certain certificate balances for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012.
Management Fees. Management fees were $3.1 million and $0.7 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 and the ninemonths ended December 31, 2012, respectively, an increase of 328%. The increase in management fees was due primarily to an increase in the total assets under management and outstanding certificate balances.
Management fees were $0.7 million and $0.2 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2012 and fiscal year ended March 31, 2012,respectively. The increase in management fees was due primarily to an increase in the total assets under management and outstanding certificate balances.
Other Revenue. Other revenue was $5.1 million and $0.7 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 and the nine monthsended December 31, 2012, respectively, an increase of 610%. The increase in other revenue was primarily due to a $3.5 million increase in gain on sale of whole loans to unrelated purchasers. The $3.5 million increase included$4.9 million in transaction fees, which are included in the gain on sale of whole loans from January 1, 2013 to June 30, 2013.
Other revenue was $0.7 million and $0.4 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2012 and the fiscal year ended March 31,2012, respectively, an increase of 77%. The increase in other revenue was primarily due to an increase in gain on sale of whole loans to unrelated purchasers.
Components of Net Interest Income (Expense) and Other Adjustments
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2012 | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | Change ($) | Change (%) | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest income: | ||||||||||||||||
Loans | $ | 56,829 | $ | 187,495 | $ | 130,666 | 230 | % | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 32 | 12 | (20 | ) | (63 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total interest income | 56,861 | 187,507 | 130,646 | 230 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Interest expense: | ||||||||||||||||
Notes and certificates | (56,631 | ) | (187,447 | ) | (130,816 | ) | 231 | |||||||||
Loans payable | (11 | ) | | 11 | (100 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total interest expense | (56,642 | ) | (187,447 | ) | (130,805 | ) | 231 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Net interest income (expense) | 219 | 60 | (159 | ) | (73 | ) | ||||||||||
Fair value adjustments on loans, notes and certificates, net | (595 | ) | (33 | ) | 562 | (94 | ) | |||||||||
Benefit from loss reversal on loans at amortized cost | 42 | | (42 | ) | (100 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Net interest income (expense) and other adjustments | $ | (334 | ) | $ | 27 | $ | 361 | (108 | %) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
Year Ended March 31, 2012 | Nine Months Ended December 31, 2012 | Change ($) | Change (%) | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest income: | ||||||||||||||||
Loans | $ | 32,636 | $ | 56,829 | $ | 24,193 | 74 | % | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 24 | 32 | 8 | 33 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total interest income | 32,660 | 56,861 | 24,201 | 74 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Interest expense: | ||||||||||||||||
Notes and certificates | (31,777 | ) | (56,631 | ) | (24,854 | ) | 78 | |||||||||
Loans payable | (253 | ) | (11 | ) | 242 | (96 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total interest expense | (32,030 | ) | (56,642 | ) | (24,612 | ) | 77 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Net interest income (expense) | 630 | 219 | (411 | ) | (65 | ) | ||||||||||
Fair value adjustments on loans, notes and certificates, net | (1 | ) | (595 | ) | (594 | ) | N/M | |||||||||
Benefit (provision) for losses on loans at amortized cost | (368 | ) | 42 | 410 | (111 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Net interest income (expense) and other adjustments | $ | 261 | $ | (334 | ) | $ | (595 | ) | (228 | %) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income on Loans. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 and the nine months endedDecember 31, 2012, interest income from loans was $187.5 million and $56.8 million, respectively. The increase in interest income was primarily due to the increase in the outstanding balances of loans.
For the nine months ended December 31, 2012 and the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, interest income from loans was $56.8 millionand $32.6 million, respectively. The increase in interest income was primarily due to the increase in the outstanding balances of loans.
Interest Expense on Notes and Certificates. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 and the nine month period endedDecember 31, 2012, we recorded interest expense for notes and certificates of $187.4 million and $56.6 million, respectively. The increase in interest expense was primarily due to the increase in the outstanding balances of notes andcertificates.
For the nine months ended December 31, 2012 and fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, we recorded interest expensefor notes and certificates of $56.6 million and $31.8 million, respectively. The increase in interest expense was primarily due to the increase in the outstanding balances of notes and certificates.
Interest Expense on Loans Payable. We did not incur any interest expense for loans payable for the fiscal year ended December 31,2013. For loans payable that were paid in full in July 2012, we recorded interest expense for loans payable of $11,000 and $0.3 million, for the nine months ended December 31, 2012 and the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, respectively.
Fair Value Adjustments on Loans, Notes and Certificates. The net fair value adjustment losses for loans, notes and certificateswere $33,000, $0.6 million and $1,000 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, the nine months ended December 31, 2012 and the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, respectively. The fair value adjustment losses for loans were largelyoffset by the fair value adjustment gains of the notes and certificates at fair value due to the borrower payment dependent design of the notes and certificates and due to the principal balances of the loans being similar to the combined principalbalances of the notes and certificates.
Benefit (Provision) for Losses on Loans at Amortized Cost. We formerly financed certainloans using sources of funds other than notes and certificates and accounted for those loans at amortized cost, reduced by a
61
valuation allowance for loan losses incurred as of the balance sheet date. All loans acquired and held after September 2011 have been accounted for at fair value. The balance of loans atamortized cost declined to zero during the quarter ended December 31, 2012.
There was no provision or benefit related to loans atamortized cost for the year ended December 31, 2013 because there were no such loans outstanding during that period. We recorded provisions (benefits) for losses on loans at amortized cost of $(42,000) and $0.4 million during the nine months endedDecember 31, 2012 and the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, respectively. The reduction in the loan loss provision was due to the roll-off of the remaining balance of loans at amortized cost.
Net Interest Income (Expense) and Other Adjustments. Net interest income (expense) and other adjustments were $27,000 and $(0.3)million for the year ended December 31, 2013 and nine months ended December 31, 2012, respectively. The increase was primarily due to a reduction in the net fair value adjustment losses on loans, notes and certificates of $0.6 million,which was partially offset by a decline in net interest income of $0.2 million.
Net interest income (expense) and other adjustments were$(0.3) million and $0.3 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2012 and fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, respectively. The net decline was primarily due to a decline in net interest income of $0.4 million and an increase in thenet fair value adjustment losses on loans, notes and certificates of $0.6 million, which was partially offset by a decline in provision for losses on loans at amortized cost of $0.4 million.
Operating Expenses
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2012 | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | Change ($) | Change (%) | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | $ | 14,723 | $ | 39,037 | $ | 24,314 | 165 | % | ||||||||
Origination and servicing | 6,134 | 17,217 | 11,083 | 181 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative: | ||||||||||||||||
Engineering and product development | 3,994 | 13,922 | 9,928 | 249 | ||||||||||||
Other | 7,980 | 20,518 | 12,538 | 157 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 32,831 | $ | 90,694 | $ | 57,863 | 176 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Year Ended March 31, 2012 | Nine Months Ended December 31, 2012 | Change ($) | Change (%) | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | $ | 12,571 | $ | 14,723 | $ | 2,152 | 17 | % | ||||||||
Origination and servicing | 5,099 | 6,134 | 1,035 | 20 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative: | ||||||||||||||||
Engineering and product development | 2,712 | 3,994 | 1,282 | 47 | ||||||||||||
Other | 7,359 | 7,980 | 621 | 8 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 27,741 | $ | 32,831 | $ | 5,090 | 18 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expense was $39.0 million and $14.7 million for the fiscalyear ended December 31, 2013 and nine months ended December 31, 2012, respectively, an increase of 165%. The increase was primarily due to an $18.7 million increase in variable marketing expenses driven by higher loan originations and a$5.1 million increase in personnel-related expenses.
Sales and marketing expense was $14.7 million and $12.6 million for the ninemonths ended December 31, 2012 and fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, respectively, an increase of 17%. The increase was primarily due to
62
a $1.4 million increase in variable marketing expenses driven by higher loan originations and a $1.3 million increase in personnel-related expenses.
Origination and Servicing. Origination and servicing expense was $17.2 million and $6.1 million for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2013 and nine months ended December 31, 2012, respectively, an increase of 181%. The increase was primarily due to a $7.3 million increase in personnel-related expenses and a $3.9 million increase in consumer reporting agencyand loan processing costs, both driven by higher loan volumes.
Origination and servicing expense was $6.1 million and $5.1 million forthe nine months ended December 31, 2012 and fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, respectively, an increase of 20%. The increase was primarily due to a $0.6 million increase in personnel-related expenses.
General and Administrative
Engineering and Product Development. Engineering and product development expense was $13.9 million and $4.0 million for the fiscal yearended December 31, 2013 and the nine months ended December 31, 2012, respectively, an increase of 249%. The increase was primarily driven by continued investment in our platform, which included a $7.1 million increase in personnel-relatedexpenses resulting from increased headcount and contract labor expense and a $2.1 million increase in expensed equipment and software and depreciation expense.
Engineering and product development expense was $4.0 million and $2.7 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2012 and fiscal yearended March 31, 2012, respectively, an increase of 47%. The increase was primarily driven by continued investment in our platform, which included an $0.8 million increase in personnel-related expenses resulting from increased headcount andcontract labor expense and a $0.2 million increase in expensed equipment and software and depreciation expense.
We capitalized $3.8million and $0.4 million in software development costs for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 and the nine months ended December 31, 2012, respectively.
Other. Other general and administrative expense was $20.5 million and $8.0 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 andthe nine months ended December 31, 2012, respectively, an increase of 157%. The increase was primarily due to a $7.3 million increase in personnel-related expenses from increased headcount and a $2.3 million increase in rent and facilitiesexpenses.
Other general and administrative expense was $8.0 million and $7.4 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2012 andfiscal year ended March 31, 2012, respectively, an increase of 8%. The increase was primarily due to a $0.3 million increase in personnel-related expenses from increased headcount.
Income Taxes
Werecorded no provision for income taxes related to the pre-tax income for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 due to the availability of deferred tax assets subject to a full valuation to offset current year income. We recorded no taxbenefits related to our pre-tax losses for the nine month period ended December 31, 2012 and the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 because the tax benefits on such losses were offset by increases in the valuation allowance. Deferred taxassets, such as the future benefit of net operating loss deductions against future taxable income, can be recognized if realization of such tax-related assets is more likely than not. Given our history of operating losses, it is difficult toaccurately forecast when and in what amounts future results will be affected by the realization, if any, of the tax benefits of future deductions for our net operating loss carry-forwards. Based upon the weight of available evidence, which includesour historical operating performance and the reported cumulative net losses in all prior years, we have provided a full valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets.
63
Quarterly Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our unaudited consolidated statement of operations data for each of the six quarters ended June 30, 2014.The unaudited quarterly statement of operations data set forth below have been prepared on the same basis as our audited consolidated financial statements and reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal, recurring nature thatare necessary for a fair statement of the unaudited quarterly statement of operations data. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected in the future. The following quarterly consolidated financial datashould be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mar. 31, 2013 | Jun. 30, 2013 | Sep. 30, 2013 | Dec. 31, 2013 | Mar. 31, 2014 | Jun. 30, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transaction fees | $ | 13,582 | $ | 16,393 | $ | 25,239 | $ | 30,616 | $ | 35,412 | $ | 45,801 | ||||||||||||
Servicing fees | 715 | 882 | 888 | 1,466 | 1,780 | 1,468 | ||||||||||||||||||
Management fees | 494 | 720 | 869 | 1,000 | 1,094 | 1,461 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other revenue, net | 1,452 | 2,847 | 409 | 403 | 416 | (109 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total operating revenue | 16,243 | 20,842 | 27,405 | 33,485 | 38,702 | 48,621 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income (expense) and other adjustments | 8 | (3 | ) | 10 | 12 | 16 | (396 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total net revenue | 16,251 | 20,839 | 27,415 | 33,497 | 38,718 | 48,225 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Operating expenses(1): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 7,707 | 8,410 | 10,460 | 12,460 | 20,582 | 19,225 | ||||||||||||||||||
Origination and servicing | 2,634 | 3,414 | 4,996 | 6,173 | 7,402 | 8,566 | ||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engineering and product development | 2,248 | 3,043 | 3,849 | 4,782 | 5,722 | 8,030 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other | 3,622 | 4,190 | 5,482 | 7,224 | 12,311 | 20,951 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 16,211 | 19,057 | 24,787 | 30,639 | 46,017 | 56,772 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes | 40 | 1,782 | 2,628 | 2,858 | (7,299 | ) | (8,547 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | | 85 | (85 | ) | | | 640 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 40 | $ | 1,697 | $ | 2,713 | $ | 2,858 | $ | (7,299 | ) | $ | (9,187 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Other Data(2): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loan originations | $ | 352,885 | $ | 446,225 | $ | 567,142 | $ | 698,373 | $ | 791,348 | $ | 1,005,946 | ||||||||||||
Contribution margin(3) | 37.0 | % | 44.3 | % | 45.8 | % | 46.8 | % | 37.7 | % | 45.1 | % | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA(3) | $ | 732 | $ | 3,054 | $ | 4,927 | $ | 6,514 | $ | 1,866 | $ | 4,002 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA margin(3) | 4.5 | % | 14.7 | % | 18.0 | % | 19.5 | % | 4.8 | % | 8.2 | % |
64
(1) | Includes stock-based compensation as follows: |
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mar. 31, 2013 | Jun. 30, 2013 | Sep. 30, 2013 | Dec. 31, 2013 | Mar. 31, 2014 | Jun. 30, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-Based Compensation Expense: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | $ | 87 | $ | 174 | $ | 506 | $ | 547 | $ | 3,502 | $ | 615 | ||||||||||||
Origination and servicing | 26 | 39 | 105 | 255 | 358 | 470 | ||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engineering and product development | 174 | 326 | 519 | 1,151 | 737 | 1,258 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other | 239 | 410 | 741 | 983 | 2,436 | 5,976 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense | $ | 526 | $ | 949 | $ | 1,871 | $ | 2,936 | $ | 7,033 | $ | 8,319 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) | For more information about loan originations, contribution margin, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin, see Key Operating and Financial Metrics. |
(3) | Contribution margin, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin are non-GAAP financial measures. For more information regarding our use of these measures and a reconciliation of these measures to the most comparableGAAP measure, see Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures. |
Quarterly Trends
Our total net revenue has generally increased since our inception, including the six quarters ended June 30, 2014. This increase has beendriven primarily from an increase in loan originations and an increase in the outstanding principal loan balance that we service. There is some seasonality in demand for personal loans, which is generally lower in the first and fourth quarters.While our growth has somewhat masked this seasonality, our operating results could be affected by such seasonality in the future.
Beyondgrowth in originations, revenues have also fluctuated due to changes in mix. Historically, mix changes within our loan grades, which have differing transaction fees by loan grade, have driven some variability within transaction fees when measured asa percentage of originations. Mix changes in notes, certificates and loan sales drive changes in servicing fees and management fees. Revenue for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 included $4.7 million in revenue from the acquisition of Springstone inApril 2014. Effective July 1, 2013, we changed our accounting for loans sold, which resulted in transaction fees associated with loans sold being recorded in transactions fees in the statement of operations. In the future, we expect grade mixchanges, product mix changes and loan funding methods to continue to drive variability in our revenues.
Operating expenses have increasedin the last six quarters primarily due to an increase in loan originations and an increase in the outstanding principal loan balance that we service. Sales and marketing expenses have generally increased sequentially from quarter-to-quarter,primarily due to increases in originations and headcount-related growth, which includes stock-based compensation expense. Specifically in the quarter ended March 31, 2014, sales and marketing expense increased due to higher marketingexpenditures on a new product, sales and marketing channel testing and seasonality. Origination and servicing expenses have increased sequentially from quarter-to-quarter, primarily due to increases in originations, in the total outstandingprincipal balance of loans that we service and in headcount-related growth, which includes stock-based compensation expense.
As a resultof these quarterly trends and fluctuations in revenue, sales and marketing and origination and servicing expenses, our contribution margin has fluctuated over the periods and will continue to fluctuate quarterly based on continued investment in thebusiness.
Engineering and product development expenses have increased quarterly due to headcount-related growth, which includesstock-based compensation expense, and increases in hardware and software investments,
65
including amortization of capitalized software. Specifically, we increased hiring in 2014, which increased our personnel-related expenses in the quarter ended June 30, 2014.
Other general and administrative expense has increased quarterly primarily due to headcount-related expenses, including accounting, finance,risk management, business development, legal, human resources and facilities staff as well as external legal, audit and facilities expenses. In addition, expenses increased in 2014 due to the acquisition of Springstone, which increased compensationexpense, acquisition-related expenses and amortization of intangibles. Stock-based compensation expense also increased in 2014 due to increased hiring and as a result of retention stock option grants to key employees.
Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Contribution margin is a non-GAAP financial measure that we calculate as net income (loss), excluding net interest income (expense) and otheradjustments, general and administrative expense, stock-based compensation expense and provision (benefit) for income taxes, divided by total operating revenue. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that we calculate as net income (loss),excluding net interest income (expense) and other adjustments, acquisition and related expense, depreciation and amortization, amortization of intangible assets, stock-based compensation expense and provision (benefit) for income taxes. AdjustedEBITDA margin is calculated as adjusted EBITDA divided by total operating revenue.
Our non-GAAP measures have limitations as analyticaltools and you should not consider them in isolation or as a substitute for an analysis of our results under GAAP. There are a number of limitations related to the use of these non-GAAP financial measures versus their nearest GAAP equivalents.Contribution margin, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin should not be viewed as substitutes for, or superior to, net income (loss) as prepared in accordance with GAAP. Other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate thesemeasures differently, which may reduce their usefulness as a comparative measure. Contribution margin, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin do not consider the potentially dilutive impact of stock-based compensation. Although depreciation andamortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized may have to be replaced in the future and adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin do not reflect cash capital expenditure requirements for such replacements or for newcapital expenditure requirements. Adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin do not reflect tax payments that may represent a reduction in cash available to us.
In evaluating contribution margin, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin, you should be aware that in the future we will incur expensessimilar to the adjustments in this presentation.
66
The following tables present a reconciliation of net income (loss) to contribution margin foreach of the periods indicated:
Years Ended December 31, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Contribution Margin: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (10,255 | ) | $ | (10,807 | ) | $ | (12,269 | ) | $ | (6,862 | ) | $ | 7,308 | $ | 1,737 | $ | (16,486 | ) | |||||||||
Net interest income (expense) and other adjustments. | 1,550 | 708 | (222 | ) | 238 | (27 | ) | (5 | ) | 380 | ||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expense: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engineering and product development | 1,766 | 1,951 | 2,289 | 4,855 | 13,922 | 5,291 | 13,752 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other | 3,430 | 3,330 | 6,572 | 10,024 | 20,518 | 7,812 | 33,262 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense(1) | 33 | 109 | 39 | 377 | 1,737 | 325 | 4,945 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | | | | | | 85 | 640 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Total contribution | $ | (3,476 | ) | $ | (4,709 | ) | $ | (3,591 | ) | $ | 8,632 | $ | 43,458 | $ | 15,245 | $ | 36,493 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Total operating revenue | 1,372 | 5,723 | 12,530 | 34,045 | 97,975 | 37,085 | 87,323 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Contribution margin | (253.4 | )% | (82.3 | )% | (28.7 | )% | 25.4 | % | 44.4 | % | 41.1 | % | 41.8 | % |
(1) | Consists of stock-based compensation expense not included in general and administrative expense as follows: |
Years Ended December 31, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-Based Compensation Expense: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | $ | 28 | $ | 94 | $ | 30 | $ | 302 | $ | 1,313 | $ | 260 | $ | 4,117 | ||||||||||||||
Origination and servicing | 5 | 15 | 9 | 75 | 424 | 65 | 828 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 33 | $ | 109 | $ | 39 | $ | 377 | $ | 1,737 | $ | 325 | $ | 4,945 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
Year Ended March 31, 2012 | Nine Months Ended December 31, 2012 | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Contribution Margin: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (11,944 | ) | $ | (4,238 | ) | $ | 7,308 | $ | 1,737 | $ | (16,486 | ) | |||||||
Net interest income (expense) and other adjustments | (261 | ) | 334 | (27 | ) | (5 | ) | 380 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expense: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Engineering and product development | 2,712 | 3,994 | 13,922 | 5,291 | 13,752 | |||||||||||||||
Other | 7,359 | 7,980 | 20,518 | 7,812 | 33,262 | |||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense(1) | 183 | 276 | 1,737 | 325 | 4,945 | |||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | | | | 85 | 640 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total contribution | $ | (1,951 | ) | $ | 8,346 | $ | 43,458 | $ | 15,245 | $ | 36,493 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total operating revenue | $ | 15,536 | $ | 28,927 | $ | 97,975 | $ | 37,085 | $ | 87,323 | ||||||||||
Contribution margin | (12.6 | )% | 28.9 | % | 44.4 | % | 41.1 | % | 41.8 | % |
(1) | Consists of stock-based compensation expense not included in general and administrative expense as follows: |
Year Ended March 31, 2012 | Nine Months Ended December 31, 2012 | Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-Based Compensation Expense: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | $ | 152 | $ | 216 | $ | 1,313 | $ | 260 | $ | 4,117 | ||||||||||
Origination and servicing | 31 | 60 | 424 | 65 | 828 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total | $ | 183 | $ | 276 | $ | 1,737 | $ | 325 | $ | 4,945 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mar. 31, 2013 | Jun. 30, 2013 | Sep. 30, 2013 | Dec. 31, 2013 | Mar. 31, 2014 | Jun. 30, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Contribution Margin: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 40 | $ | 1,697 | $ | 2,713 | $ | 2,858 | $ | (7,299 | ) | $ | (9,187 | ) | ||||||||||
Net interest income (expense) and other adjustments. | (8 | ) | 3 | (10 | ) | (12 | ) | (16 | ) | 396 | ||||||||||||||
General and administrative expense: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Engineering and product development | 2,248 | 3,043 | 3,849 | 4,782 | 5,722 | 8,030 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other | 3,622 | 4,190 | 5,482 | 7,224 | 12,311 | 20,951 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense(1) | 113 | 213 | 611 | 802 | 3,860 | 1,085 | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | | 85 | (85 | ) | | | 640 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total contribution | $ | 6,015 | $ | 9,231 | $ | 12,560 | $ | 15,654 | $ | 14,578 | $ | 21,915 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total operating revenue | 16,243 | 20,842 | 27,405 | 33,485 | 38,702 | 48,621 | ||||||||||||||||||
Contribution margin | 37.0 | % | 44.3 | % | 45.8 | % | 46.7 | % | 37.7 | % | 45.1 | % |
(1) | Consists of stock-based compensation expense not included in general and administrative expense as follows: |
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mar. 31, 2013 | Jun. 30, 2013 | Sep. 30, 2013 | Dec. 31, 2013 | Mar. 31, 2014 | Jun. 30, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-Based Compensation Expense: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | $ | 87 | $ | 174 | $ | 506 | $ | 547 | $ | 3,502 | $ | 615 | ||||||||||||
Origination and servicing | 26 | 39 | 105 | 255 | 358 | 470 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 113 | $ | 213 | $ | 611 | $ | 802 | $ | 3,860 | $ | 1,085 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables present a reconciliation of net income (loss) to adjusted EBITDA for each of the periodsindicated:
Years Ended December 31, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Adjusted EBITDA: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (10,255 | ) | $ | (10,807 | ) | $ | (12,269 | ) | $ | (6,862 | ) | $ | 7,308 | $ | 1,737 | $ | (16,486 | ) | |||||||||
Net interest income (expense) and other adjustments. | 1,550 | 708 | (222 | ) | 238 | (27 | ) | (5 | ) | 380 | ||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition and related expense | | | | | | | 2,519 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 73 | 87 | 133 | 288 | 1,663 | 495 | 2,340 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | | | | | | | 1,123 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 134 | 319 | 291 | 1,412 | 6,283 | 1,474 | 15,352 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | | | | | | 85 | 640 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | (8,498 | ) | $ | (9,693 | ) | $ | (12,067 | ) | $ | (4,924 | ) | $ | 15,227 | $ | 3,786 | $ | 5,868 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Total operating revenue | 1,372 | 5,723 | 12,530 | 34,045 | 97,975 | 37,085 | 87,323 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA margin | (619.4 | )% | (169.4 | )% | (96.3 | )% | (14.5 | )% | 15.5 | % | 10.2 | % | 6.7 | % |
69
Year Ended March 31, 2012 | Nine Months Ended December 31, 2012 | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Adjusted EBITDA: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (11,944 | ) | $ | (4,238 | ) | $ | 7,308 | $ | 1,737 | $ | (16,486 | ) | |||||||
Net interest income (expense) and other adjustments. | (261 | ) | 334 | (27 | ) | (5 | ) | 380 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition and related expense | | | | | 2,519 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 150 | 237 | 1,663 | 495 | 2,340 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | | | | | 1,123 | |||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 660 | 1,110 | 6,283 | 1,474 | 15,352 | |||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | | | | 85 | 640 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | (11,395 | ) | $ | (2,557 | ) | $ | 15,227 | $ | 3,786 | $ | 5,868 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total operating revenue | $ | 15,536 | $ | 28,927 | $ | 97,975 | $ | 37,085 | $ | 87,323 | ||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA margin | (73.3 | )% | (8.8 | )% | 15.5 | % | 10.2 | % | 6.7 | % |
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mar. 31, 2013 | Jun. 30, 2013 | Sep. 30, 2013 | Dec. 31, 2013 | Mar. 31, 2014 | Jun. 30, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Adjusted EBITDA: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 40 | $ | 1,697 | $ | 2,713 | $ | 2,858 | $ | (7,299 | ) | $ | (9,187 | ) | ||||||||||
Net interest income (expense) and other adjustments. | (8 | ) | 3 | (10 | ) | (12 | ) | (16 | ) | 396 | ||||||||||||||
Acquisition and related expense | | | | | 1,141 | 1,378 | ||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 174 | 320 | 438 | 732 | 1,007 | 1,333 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | | | | | | 1,123 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 526 | 949 | 1,871 | 2,936 | 7,033 | 8,319 | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | | 85 | (85 | ) | | | 640 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 732 | $ | 3,054 | $ | 4,927 | $ | 6,514 | $ | 1,866 | $ | 4,002 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total operating revenue | 16,243 | 20,842 | 27,405 | 33,485 | 38,702 | 48,621 | ||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA margin | 4.5 | % | 14.7 | % | 18.0 | % | 19.5 | % | 4.8 | % | 8.2 | % |
Springstone Acquisition
In April 2014, we acquired Springstone, which offers education and patient financing options. Springstone utilizes two issuing banks and anetwork of providers. The financial results of Springstone are included in our consolidated financial statements from April 17, 2014, the date of acquisition.
Under the terms of the purchase agreement, the sellers received at the closing an aggregate of $113 million in cash and $25 millionworth of shares of our Series F convertible preferred stock. In connection with the acquisition, we also paid $2.4 million for transaction costs incurred by Springstone. For accounting purposes, the purchase price was $111.9 million,which was comprised of $109.1 million in cash and shares of Series F convertible preferred stock with an aggregate value of $2.8 million. To secure the retention of certain key employees, a total of $25.6 million comprised of$22.1 million of shares of Series F convertible preferred stock (Escrow Shares) and $3.5 million of cash were placed in a third-party escrow and are subject to certain vesting and forfeiture conditions applicable to these employeescontinuing employment over a three-year period from the closing. These amounts will be accounted for as a compensation arrangement and expensed over the three-year
70
vesting period. Additionally, $19.3 million of the cash consideration and certain Escrow Shares were placed in a third-party escrow for 15 months from the closing date to secure, in part,the indemnification obligations of the sellers under the purchase agreement. We funded the cash portion of the purchase price with proceeds from our Series F convertible preferred stock financing and a $50.0 million term loan with a syndicateof lenders led by Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
From inception through June 30, 2014, we have raised approximately $168.0 million, net of issuance costs, through preferred stockfinancings. Historically, we have funded our operations with proceeds from debt financing, preferred stock issuances and common stock issuances. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 and the six months ended June 30, 2014, wegenerated positive cash flows from operations.
At June 30, 2014, we had $69.0 million in available cash and cash equivalents. Weprimarily hold our excess unrestricted cash in short-term interest-bearing money market funds at highly-rated financial institutions. We believe that our current cash position is sufficient to meet our current liquidity needs for at least the next12 months.
At June 30, 2014, we also had $20.4 million in restricted cash. Restricted cash at June 30, 2014 consistedprimarily of pledges of $3.0 million as security for an issuing bank, $3.4 million for an investor as part of a credit support agreement, $12.0 million of investor cash and $1.7 million as security for a correspondent bank thatclears our borrowers and investors cash transactions.
The following table sets forth certain cash flow information for theperiods presented:
Year Ended March 31, 2012 | Nine Months Ended December 31, 2012 | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
(audited) | (unaudited) | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash provided by (used in) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating activities | $ | (11,086 | ) | $ | (393 | ) | $ | 1,139 | $ | 6,532 | $ | 22,137 | ||||||||
Investing activities(1) | (218,806 | ) | (441,145 | ) | (1,120,615 | ) | (483,398 | ) | (673,817 | ) | ||||||||||
Financing activities(1) | 247,800 | 462,845 | 1,116,224 | 478,909 | 671,339 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash | $ | 17,908 | $ | 21,307 | $ | (3,252 | ) | $ | 2,043 | $ | 19,659 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Cash used in investing activities includes the purchase of loans and repayment of loans originated through our platform. Cash provided by financing activities includes the issuance of notes and certificates to investorsand the repayment of those notes and certificates. These amounts generally correspond to each other. |
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was $22.1 million. Cash flow provided by operatingactivities was primarily driven by changes in certain components of our working capital, including a decrease in other assets of $14.1 million that was primarily related to payments of receivables due from investors, and an increase in accruedexpenses and other liabilities of $4.0 million. Additionally, $3.7 million of net cash provided by operating activities was generated by the net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2014 of $16.5 million, adjusted for non-cashstock-based compensation and warrant expense of $15.4 million, depreciation and amortization expense of $3.5 million and non-cash changes in the fair values of servicing assets and liabilities of $1.3 million, net. Also included incash flows from operations were the purchases and sales of loans that we intended to sell, along with the gain or loss on such sales, and changes in accrued interest receivable and payable, which largely offset one another.
71
Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2013 was$1.1 million. Cash flow from operating activities was generated primarily by net income for the year ended December 31, 2013 of $7.3 million, adjusted for non-cash stock-based compensation and warrant expense of $6.5 million,depreciation and amortization expense of $1.7 million and net non-cash changes in the fair values of servicing assets and liabilities of $0.4 million. Additionally, operating cash flows were generated due to changes in certain componentsof our working capital, including increases in accrued expenses and other liabilities of $4.1 million and accounts payable of $1.8 million. These cash inflows were largely offset by increases in other assets of $21.1 million that wererelated to increases in receivables due from investors. Also included in cash flows from operations were the purchases and sales of loans that we intended to sell, along with the gain or loss on such sales, and changes in accrued interest receivableand payable, which largely offset one another.
Net cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended December 31, 2012 was$0.4 million. The cash used in operating activities primarily related to the net loss for the nine months ended December 31, 2012 of $4.2 million, adjusted for non-cash stock-based compensation and warrant expense of$1.1 million, depreciation and amortization expense of $0.2 million and net non-cash changes in the fair values of loans, note and certificates of $0.6 million, as well as an increase in other assets of $0.6 million. This cashoutflow was partially offset by net operating cash inflows from changes in certain components of our working capital, including an increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities of $1.6 million and a net increase in accrued interestreceivable and accrued interest payable of $0.9 million. Also included in cash flows from operations were the purchases and sales of loans that we intended sell along, with the gain or loss on such sales, which largely offset one another.
Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended March 31, 2012 was $11.1 million. The cash used in operating activitiesprimarily related to the net loss for the year ended March 31, 2012 of $11.9 million, adjusted for non-cash stock-based compensation and warrant expense of $0.7 million, depreciation and amortization expense of $0.2 million and anon-cash provision for losses on loans at amortized cost of $0.4 million. Additionally, net uses of operating cash flow resulted in changes in certain components of our working capital, including an increase in other assets of$1.5 million, which was partially offset by increases in accounts payable of $0.6 million and accrued expenses and other liabilities of $0.4 million.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was $673.8 million. Cash used in investing activitiesprimarily resulted from $1.0 billion of cash used to purchase loans at fair value, $109.5 million for the Springstone acquisition, $9.4 million of purchases of property, equipment and software and a $6.7 million increase inrestricted cash, partially offset by $451.4 million of principal payments received on loans at fair value.
Net cash used ininvesting activities for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $1.1 billion, which primarily resulted from $1.6 billion of cash used to purchase loans at fair value, $10.4 million of purchases of property, equipment and software and a$4.7 million increase in restricted cash, partially offset by $511.2 million of principal payments received on loans at fair value.
Net cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended December 31, 2012 was $441.1 million, which primarily resulted from$598.6 million of cash used to purchase loans at fair value, a $2.6 million increase in restricted cash and $1.3 million of purchases of property, equipment and software, partially offset by $160.8 million of principal paymentsreceived on loans at fair value.
Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended March 31, 2012 was $218.8 million,which primarily resulted from $320.0 million of cash used to purchase loans at fair value and a $4.0 million increase in restricted cash, partially offset by $105.3 million of cash received as principal payments on loans at fairvalue.
72
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was $671.3 million. Cash provided by financingactivities primarily resulted from $1.0 billion of proceeds from issuance of notes and certificates, $64.8 million net proceeds from our sale of Series F convertible preferred stock in connection with the Springstone acquisition,$49.8 million of net proceeds from the issuance of a term loan and an $8.2 million increase in the amount payable to investors, partially offset by $451.7 million in principal payments made on notes and certificates.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $1.1 billion, which primarily resulted from$1.6 billion of proceeds from issuance of notes and certificates, which was partially offset by $504.3 million of principal payments made on notes and certificates.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended December 31, 2012 was $462.8 million, which primarily resultedfrom $606.9 million of proceeds from issuance of notes and certificates and $17.3 million net proceeds from our sale of Series E convertible preferred stock, partially offset by $163.9 of principal payments made on notes and certificates.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended March 31, 2012 was $247.8 million, which primarily resulted from$319.7 million in proceeds from issuance of notes and certificates and $31.9 million in net proceeds from our sale of Series D convertible preferred stock, partially offset by $101.9 million of principal payments made on notesand certificates and $2.6 million of payments on loans payable.
Term Loan
In connection with the Springstone acquisition, we entered into a Credit and Guaranty Agreement with several lenders in April 2014, under whichthe lenders made a $50.0 million term loan to us. In connection with our entry into the credit agreement, we entered into a Pledge and Security Agreement with Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc.
The term loan matures in April 2017 and requires principal payments of $312,500 per quarter plus interest, with the remaining then-unpaidprincipal amount payable at maturity. The term loan can be prepaid at any time without premium or penalty, subject to a minimum prepayment of $1.0 million. The term loan is required to be prepaid in certain circumstances, including upon sales ofassets other than loans and upon the issuance of debt or redeemable capital stock. Borrowings under the credit agreement accrued interest at a weighted-average rate of 2.75% per annum for the six months ended June 30, 2014.
The term loan is also guaranteed by Springstone and LCA and is secured by a first priority lien and security interest in substantially all ofour and our subsidiaries assets, not otherwise pledged or restricted, subject to certain exceptions.
The credit and pledgeagreements contain certain affirmative and negative covenants applicable to us and our subsidiaries. These include restrictions on our ability to make certain restricted payments, including restrictions on our ability to pay dividends, incurindebtedness, place liens on assets, merge or consolidate, make investments and enter into certain transactions with our affiliates. The credit agreement also requires us to maintain a maximum total leverage ratio (as defined in the creditagreement) of 5.50:1 initially, and decreasing to 3.50:1 after September 30, 2015 (on a consolidated basis). The total leverage ratio as of June 30, 2014 was 2.59:1.
The credit agreement also contains customary events of default, including nonpayment of principal when due, nonpayment of interest, fees orother amounts after a grace period, material inaccuracies of representations and warranties and breaches of covenants, subject in certain cases to a grace period, cross-default to defaults in indebtedness in excess of $25.0 million, bankruptcy,judgments, change in control and other material events. The credit agreement and ancillary agreements provide customary remedies upon an event of default.
73
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, the nine months ended December 31, 2012,the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 or the six months ended June 30, 2014.
Contingencies
Loan Funding Commitments
For loans listed on the platform as a result of direct marketing efforts, we have committed to invest in such loans if investors do not providefunding for all or a portion of such loans. At June 30, 2014, there were 427 such loans on the platform with an unfunded balance of $4.4 million. All of these loans were fully funded by investors by July 3, 2014.
In connection with transitional activities following our acquisition of Springstone, in June 2014, we entered into a contingent loan purchaseagreement with an issuing bank that originates loans facilitated by Springstone and a third-party investor that has agreed to purchase certain of those loans from such bank. The contingent loan purchase commitment provides that we will purchase suchloans from the bank if the third-party investor defaults on its loan purchase obligations through December 31, 2014. The contingent loan purchase commitment limits the aggregate amount of such loan originations from inception of thecontingent loan purchase commitment through December 31, 2014 to a maximum of $5.0 million. As of June 30, 2014, the amount remaining under the overall limit on the cumulative amount of such loan originations through December 31,2014 was $3.6 million. We were not required to purchase any such loans pursuant to the contingent loan purchase commitment in the quarter ended June 30, 2014. We do not expect we will be required to purchase any such loans underthe contingent loan purchase commitment through its expiration on December 31, 2014.
Credit Support Agreement
We are subject to a credit support agreement with a certificate investor. The credit support agreement requires us to pledge and restrict cashin support of its contingent obligation to reimburse the investor for credit losses on loans underlying the investors certificate that are in excess of a specified aggregate loss threshold. We are contingently obligated to pledge cash, not toexceed $5.0 million, to support this contingent obligation, which cash balance is premised upon the investors certificate purchase volume. As of June 30, 2014, approximately $3.4 million was pledged and restricted to support this contingentobligation.
As of June 30, 2014, the credit losses pertaining to the investors certificate have not exceeded the specifiedthreshold, nor are future credit losses expected to exceed the specified threshold, and no expense or liability has been recorded. We currently do not anticipate recording losses resulting from our contingent obligation under this credit supportagreement. If losses related to the credit support agreement are later determined to be likely to occur and are estimable, our results of operations could be affected in the period in which such losses are recorded.
74
Commitments
Our principal commitments consist of obligations under our loan funding operation in connection with direct marketing efforts, operating leasesfor office space and contractual commitments for other support services. The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2013:
Payments Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less Than 1 Year | 1 to 3 Years | 3 to 5 Years | More than 5 Years | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations | $ | 2,267 | $ | 546 | $ | | $ | | $ | 2,813 | ||||||||||
Loan funding obligations(1) | 1,188 | | | | 1,188 | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations | 2,748 | 6,672 | 7,406 | 1,925 | 18,751 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total contractual obligations(2) | $ | 6,203 | $ | 7,218 | $ | 7,406 | $ | 1,925 | $ | 22,752 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | For loans listed on our platform as a result of direct marketing efforts, we have committed to invest in such loans if investors do not provide funding for all or a portion of such loans. At December 31, 2013,there were 145 of such loans listed on our platform with an unfunded balance of $1.2 million. All of these loans were fully invested in by investors as of January 4, 2014. |
(2) | The notes and certificates, special purpose limited obligations of us and the trust, a consolidated variable-interest entity, have been excluded from the table of contractual obligations shown above because payments onthose liabilities are only required to be made by us if and when we receive the related loan payments from borrowers. Our own liquidity resources are not required to make any contractual payments on the notes or certificates, except in limitedinstances of proven identity fraud on a related loan. |
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The accounting policies which are more fully described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements reflect our most significantjudgments, assumptions and estimates which we believe are critical in understanding and evaluating our reported financial results, including (i) fair value estimates for loans, notes and certificates; (ii) stock-based compensation expense;(iii) provision for income taxes, net of valuation allowance for deferred tax assets; (iv) consolidation of variable interest entities; and (v) fair value estimates for servicing assets and liabilities. These judgments, estimates andassumptions are inherently subjective in nature and actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions, and the differences could be material.
Fair Value of Loans, Notes and Certificates
We have elected fair value accounting for loans and related notes and certificates. The fair value election for these loans, notes andcertificates allows symmetrical accounting for the timing and amounts recognized for both expected unrealized losses and charge-off losses on the loans and the related notes and certificates, consistent with the borrower payment dependent design ofthe notes and certificates.
We estimate the fair values of loans and their related notes and certificates using a discounted cash flowvaluation methodology. The fair valuation methodology considers projected prepayments, if significant, and uses the historical actual defaults, losses and recoveries on our loans over the past several years to project future losses and net cashflows on loans.
We include in earnings the estimated unrealized fair value gains or losses during the period of loans, and the offsettingestimated fair value losses or gains attributable to the expected changes in future payments on notes and certificates. See Note 4 to consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus.
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense, net of estimatedforfeitures, over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period of the respective award. As a result, we are required to estimate the amount of stock-based compensation we expect to be forfeited based on our historicalexperience. If actual forfeitures differ significantly from our estimates, stock-based compensation expense and our results of operations could be materially impacted.
75
Determining the fair value of stock-based awards at the grant date requires judgment. We use theBlack-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options. The determination of the grant date fair value of options using an option-pricing model is affected by our estimated common stock fair value as well as assumptionsregarding a number of variables. These variables include the fair value of our common stock, our expected common stock price volatility over the expected life of the options, expected term of the stock option, risk-free interest rates and expecteddividends, which are estimated as follows:
| Fair Value of Our Common Stock. The fair value of the shares of common stock underlying stock options has historically been established by our board of directors primarily based upon a valuation providedby an independent third-party valuation firm. Because there has been no public market for our common stock, our board of directors has relied upon this independent valuation and other factors, including, but not limited to, the current status of thetechnical and commercial success of our operations, our financial condition, the stage of our development and competition to establish the fair value of our common stock at the time of grant of the option. |
| Expected Life. The expected term was estimated using the simplified method allowed under SEC guidance. |
| Volatility. The expected stock price volatility for our common stock was estimated by taking the average historical price volatility for industry peers based on daily price observations. Industry peersconsist of several public companies in the technology industry similar in size, stage of life cycle and financial leverage. |
| Risk-Free Rate. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yields of U.S. Treasury securities with maturities similar to the expected term of the options for each option group. |
| Dividend Yield. We have never declared or paid any cash dividends and do not presently plan to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Consequently, we used an expected dividend yield of zero. |
The following table presents the range of assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock-based awards granted duringthe periods presented:
Year Ended March 31, 2012 | Nine Months Ended December 31, 2012 | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
(audited) | (unaudited) | |||||||||||||||||||
Assumed forfeiture rate (annual %) | 8.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 5.00 | % | ||||||||||
Expected dividend yield | | | | | | |||||||||||||||
Weighted-average assumed stock price volatility | 63.5 | % | 63.5 | % | 59.1 | % | 63.5 | % | 54.3 | % | ||||||||||
Weighted-average risk-free rate | 1.15 | % | 1.01 | % | 1.46 | % | 1.10 | % | 1.91 | % | ||||||||||
Weighted-average expected life (years) | 6.26 | 6.28 | 6.30 | 6.25 | 6.37 |
Given the absence of a public trading market of our common stock, and in accordance with the AmericanInstitute of Certified Public Accountants Practice Guide, Valuation of Privately Held Company Equity Securities Issued as Compensation, our board of directors exercised reasonable judgment and considered numerous and subjective factors to determinethe best estimate of fair value of our common stock, including the following:
| unrelated third party valuations of our common stock; |
| the prices at which we sold shares of our convertible preferred stock to outside investors in arms-length transactions; |
| the rights, preferences and privileges of our convertible preferred stock relative to those of our common stock; |
| our results of operations, financial position and capital resources; |
76
| current business conditions and projections; |
| the lack of marketability of our common stock; |
| the hiring of key personnel and the experience of our management; |
| the introduction of new products; |
| the risk inherent in the development and expansion of our loan products; |
| our stage of development and material risks related to our business; |
| the fact that the option grants involve illiquid securities in a private company; |
| the likelihood of achieving a liquidity event, such as an initial public offering or a sale of our company given the prevailing market conditions and the nature and history of our business; |
| industry trends and competitive environment; |
| trends in consumer spending, including consumer confidence; |
| overall economic indicators, including gross domestic product, employment, inflation and interest rates; and |
| the general economic outlook. |
We performed valuations of our common stock that took intoaccount the factors described above and used a combination of financial and market-based methodologies to determine our business enterprise value (BEV) including the following approaches:
| Public Traded Company Method (PTCM). PTCM is a market approach methodology and assumes that businesses operating in the same industry will share similar characteristics and that the subject businesss valuewill correlate to those characteristics. Therefore, by comparing the subject business to similar businesses whose financial information and public market value are available may provide a reasonable basis to estimate the subject businesssvalue. The PTCM provides an estimate of BEV using financial multiples derived from the stock prices of publicly traded companies. In selecting guideline public companies for this analysis, we focused primarily on size, business model and industry.In the selection of the appropriate multiples to apply to our financial metrics, we incorporated any differences between us and the comparable companies around certain characteristics, such as differences in growth, profitability and risk. |
| Market Transaction Method (MTM). MTM is a market approach methodology and considers transactions in the equity securities of the business being valued. Preferred stock issuances by us and private preferred andcommon stock sale transactions were considered if they occurred with or among willing and unrelated parties. We evaluated these transactions with particular focus on whether the transaction was relatively close to the valuation date. We choose theweighting for the MTM at each valuation date based on factors such as the volume of transactions, the timing of these transactions and whether the transactions involved investors with access to our financial information. |
We used both of these valuation methodologies at each valuation date and weighted the methodologies based on the facts and circumstances onsuch date. The resulting value was then allocated to shares of preferred stock, common stock, warrants and options using an option pricing model (OPM) or a probability weighted expected return model (PWERM). Additionally, we have applied a discountfor lack of marketability to the value of the common stock to account for a lack of access to an active public market.
Based on anassumed initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the offering price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, the intrinsic value of stock options outstandingas of June 30, 2014 was $ million, of which $ million and $ million related to stock options thatwere vested and unvested, respectively.
77
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the fair value of acquired businesses in excess of the fair value of the individually identified net assets acquired.Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment annually or whenever indications of impairment exist. Our annual impairment testing date is April 1. We can elect to qualitatively assess goodwill for impairment if it is more likely thannot that the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value. A qualitative assessment may consider macroeconomic and other industry-specific factors, such as trends in short-term and long-term interest rates and the ability to accesscapital or company-specific factors, such as market capitalization in excess of net assets, trends in revenue generating activities and merger or acquisition activity.
If we elect to bypass qualitatively assessing goodwill or it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds itscarrying value, we estimate the fair values of each of our reporting units (defined as our businesses for which financial information is available and reviewed regularly by our management) and compare it to their carrying values. The estimated fairvalues of the reporting units are generally established using an income approach based on a discounted cash flow model that includes significant assumptions about the future operating results and cash flows of each reporting unit, a market approach,which compares each reporting unit to comparable companies in its respective industry, and a market capitalization analysis.
Intangibleassets are amortized over their useful lives in a manner that best reflects their economic benefit. Intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not berecoverable. We do not have any indefinite-lived intangible assets.
Provision for Income Taxes
We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for thefuture tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amount of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. A valuation allowance is recordedto reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.
Consolidation of Variable InterestEntities
The determination of whether to consolidate a variable interest entity (VIE) in which we have a variable interestrequires a significant amount of analysis and judgment whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE via a controlling financial interest in the VIE. A controlling financial interest in a VIE exists if we have both the power to direct theVIEs activities that most significantly affect the VIEs economic performance and a potentially significant economic interest in the VIE. The determination of whether an entity is a VIE considers factors, such as (i) whether theentitys equity investment at risk is insufficient to allow the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or (ii) when a holders equity investment at risk lacks any of the followingcharacteristics of a controlling financial interest: the direct or indirect ability through voting rights or similar rights to make decisions about a legal entitys activities that have a significant effect on the entitys success, theobligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity or the right to receive the expected residual returns of the legal entity.
Weestablished the trust in February 2011 to acquire and hold loans for the benefit of investors that purchase certificates issued by the trust. The trust conducts no other business other than purchasing and retaining loans or portions thereof for thebenefit of the funds and their underlying limited partners. The trust holds loans, the cash flows of which are used to repay obligations under the certificates invested in by the funds, but does not hold any portions of loans that are financed by usdirectly or through the purchase and sale of notes.
In the event of our insolvency, it is anticipated that the assets of the trust wouldnot become part of the bankruptcy estate, but that outcome is uncertain. As a result of this risk and uncertainty and in connection with the formation of the funds, it was determined that in order to achieve any reasonable success in raisinginvestment capital, the assets to be invested in by the funds must be held by an entity that was separate and distinct from us (i.e. bankruptcy remote) in order to reduce this risk and uncertainty.
78
Our capital contributions have been insufficient to allow the trust to finance its purchase ofany significant amount of loans without the issuance of certificates to investors. The trusts capitalization levels and structure, wherein investors have beneficial interests in loans via the certificates, qualifies the trust as a VIE.That is, the trusts equity investment at risk is not sufficient. We believe we are the primary beneficiary of the trust because of our controlling financial interest in the trust. Further the trust is designed to pass along interest rate riskand credit risk to investors in the certificates. Our exposure to the trust includes our servicing fee revenue from the trust, the trusts right to a portion of default collections and our obligation to repurchase loans from the trust incertain instances. We perform or direct activities that significantly affect the trusts economic performance through (i) operation of the platform that enables borrowers to apply for loans purchased by the trust; (ii) creditunderwriting and servicing of loans purchased by the trust; and (iii) LCAs role to source investors that ultimately purchase certificates that supply the funds for the trust to purchase loans. Collectively, the activities described aboveallow us to fund more loans, and to collect the related loan transaction fees, and for LCA to collect the management fees on the investors capital used to purchase trust certificates, than would be the case without the existence of the trust.Therefore, we receive significant economic benefits from the existence and activities conducted by the trust. Accordingly, because we have concluded that capital contributions to the trust qualify as equity investments in a VIE in which we are theprimary beneficiary, we have consolidated the trusts operations and all intercompany accounts have been eliminated.
We reviewed ourrelationship with the funds in which LCA is the general partner but in which neither we nor LCA has contributed capital. We concluded that LCAs contractual relationship to the funds does not meet the requirements for consolidation of the fundsinto the consolidated financial statements. Further we determined that our interest as general partner does not represent a variable interest in the funds. As of June 30, 2014, we did not have any controlling interests in funds, other than ourinterest in the trust discussed above, that would require inclusion in the consolidated financial statements. Management regularly reviews and reconsiders its previous conclusion regarding the status of an entity as a VIE and whether we are requiredto consolidate such VIE in the consolidated financial statements.
Servicing Asset and Liability
For whole loans sold to unrelated third-party purchasers with servicing retained, we use a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fairvalue of the loan servicing asset or liability, which considers the contractual servicing fee revenue we earn on the sold loans, an estimated market servicing rate to service such loans, the current principal balances of the loans and projectedservicing revenues over the remaining terms of the loans. We record servicing assets and liabilities at fair value at the time the loan is sold. Changes in the fair value of servicing assets and liabilities are reported in servicing fees in theperiod in which the change occurs. Servicing assets and liabilities are recorded in other assets and accrued expenses and other liabilities, respectively, on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our financial position due to adverse changes in financial market prices and interestrates.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
We had cash and cash equivalents of $49.3 million as of December 31, 2013. These amounts were held primarily in cash on deposit with banks andinterest-bearing money market accounts, which are short-term. Cash and cash equivalents are held for working capital purposes. Due to their short-term nature, we believe that we do not have any material exposure to changes in the fair value of theseliquid investments as a result of changes in interest rates. Changes in short-term interest rates will affect future interest income from these investments in an asymmetric way, as reductions in short-term interest rates will not reduce interestincome because of the low rates currently earned on the liquid investments but increases in short-term interest rates would modestly increase the interest income earned on the investments.
79
Because the amounts, interest rates and maturities of loans are almost completely matched andoffset by an equal amount of notes and certificates with the exact same interest rates and maturities, we believe that we do not have any material exposure to changes in the net fair value of our combined loan, note and certificate portfolios as aresult of changes in interest rates.
We do not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
We use fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to loans and the related notes and certificates that are recorded at fair valueon a recurring basis. Loans and the related notes and certificates do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices. Accordingly, the fair value of loans and the related notes and certificates are determined using a discounted cashflow methodology utilizing assumptions market participants use for credit losses, changes in the interest rate environment and other factors. The fair value adjustments for loans are largely offset by the fair value adjustments of the notes andcertificates due to the borrower payment dependent design of the notes and certificates and due to the total principal balances of the loans being very close to the combined principal balances of the notes and certificates. Accordingly, we do nothave material exposure to market risk with respect to the fair value of these financial instruments.
We use fair value measurements torecord fair value adjustments to loan servicing rights that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Loan servicing rights do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices. Accordingly, the fair value of loan servicing assetsand liabilities are determined using a discounted cash flow methodology utilizing assumptions market participants use for adequate servicing compensation, credit losses, discount rates and contractual fee income. We do not have a material exposureto market risk with respect to the fair value of these financial instruments.
80
I believe Lending Club has the potential to profoundly improve peoples financial lives over the coming decades. Our mission oftransforming the banking system is both audacious and achievable. Technology has successfully disrupted many industries to the benefit of society at large, and I believe banking is next.
It all started in the summer of 2006 when I opened a credit card statement charging me a 16.99% interest rate, and a savings account statementfrom the same bank where I was earning a 0.48% interest rate on my deposits. The extreme difference between these two rates one paid by me to the bank and the other paid by the bank to me made me wonder whether the existing bankingsystem was indeed the most efficient mechanism to allocate capital from savers and depositors into the hands of people and businesses looking for affordable credit. At that point, I considered the idea that an online marketplace could be a far morecost-efficient solution. Now, with a seven-year track record and billions of dollars of credit extended, we have clear evidence that our platform delivers extraordinary value and a considerably better experience to borrowers and investors thantraditional banks.
Affordable capital provides more financial flexibility to consumers and gives small businesses an opportunity to drivegrowth and create jobs. Our model furthermore lowers systemic risk, because our marketplace has at all times a perfect match of assets and liabilities: loans and investments are in equal amount and identical terms at any point in time.
I believe we can transform the current banking system into a frictionless, transparent and highly efficient online marketplace that providesaffordable credit to borrowers and creates great investment opportunities for investors, helping millions of people achieve their financial goals.
Cutting out the Middleman
To understandthe transformation we are proposing, it is useful to understand the way banks operate today. A bank can be summarized as a combination of operations and capital. Operations are performed through thousands of branches staffed by tens of thousands ofemployees, while capital comes from deposits and borrowed money. When a bank takes deposits and then later extends a loan using those deposits, it acts as an intermediary. An online marketplace directly and simultaneously accessible to bothborrowers and investors essentially cuts out the middleman and lowers intermediation costs.
Building Confidence
We are not only bringing cost efficiency to the credit markets but also a more transparent and customer-friendly experience. Unlike traditionalbanks, we do not build confidence by establishing a branch at every street corner. Instead, we earn the trust of our customers by offering maximum transparency into our products terms and performance.
We offer responsible credit products with a fixed rate, fixed monthly payment, no prepayment penalty and no hidden fees, at a lower interestrate than prevailing alternatives, and disclose all terms upfront in a manner that is easy for borrowers to understand.
We haveestablished investor confidence by demonstrating the effectiveness of our risk ranking technology, as well as through the accuracy, transparency and granularity of our reporting. We post on our platform the detailed performance of every single loanoffered publicly to investors since inception, along with more aggregated performance statistics.
We are continuing to earn investorconfidence every day by providing equal access and with a level playing field with the same tools, data and access for all investors, small and large, within a fair and efficient marketplace.
81
People and Technology Matter
The idea of people lending money to other people is not new it goes back thousands of years and predates the banks. We are now able toadvance that idea and implement it at scale given technological innovation, processing capabilities, the evolution of consumer behavior and the greater availability of online data. Our platform allows investors to diversify their investment acrosshundreds or thousands of loans within seconds. That same technology enables us to service loans at a lower cost and distribute millions of payments each day to borrowers and investors in a seamless manner.
While we build highly sophisticated and complex products, we strive to shelter our customers from that complexity and make our productsintuitive and easy to use.
As important and sophisticated as our technology is, Lending Club would not be what it is today without thehundreds of team members and their devotion to delivering a great customer experience. Our team is passionate about innovation and energized by our mission. We have created a culture that fosters learning and innovation, and encourages team membersto constantly question thestatus quo and relentlessly drive improvements. Everything from our recruiting process to our operating mechanisms and the way our workspace is designed encourages open communication, collaboration and innovation.
It Feels Good to Share
The sharingeconomy that emerged after the 2008 financial crisis was initially motivated by financial considerations and the economic efficiency derived from putting underutilized assets to better use. I believe the sharing economy has now given birth to asocially desirable way of life that is gaining ground in every aspect of our lives from transportation and hospitality to financial transactions, with money being one of the most underutilized assets. I believe the reason our users choose LendingClub goes beyond the desire to obtain a better deal or a better experience than theyre getting from their bank. There is strong satisfaction in investing in people and having them invest in you.
The Long Run
Over time we plan toaddress a wide range of credit needs for a broad population of consumers and businesses globally. We are building a very big company and its going to take a very long time.
Transforming the banking system will not happen overnight, and we will not do it alone. We are building a large ecosystem of partners andmarketplace participants and are planning to lead the transformation over the span of a decade or two. There are over 6,000 banks in the United States; I believe many of them will join our ecosystem and participate in the transformation, guided by adesire to operate more efficiently and better serve their customers. Some may resist but the history of technology-powered innovation has shown how unlikely it is for incumbents to successfully lower their cost structure and enhance their customerexperience to the level of a technology disruptor like Lending Club.
As we go through the important milestone of offering our shares tothe public, I am hoping to build long term relationships with shareholders who believe in our mission, share our long term perspective, and are excited at the prospect of transforming an industry in dire need of transformation. As a public company,I believe we will be even better positioned to continue to deliver great value to both investors and borrowers, make credit more affordable and fuel economic growth and prosperity.
82
Our Mission
Transforming the bankingsystem to make credit more affordable and investing more rewarding.
Overview
Lending Club is the worlds largest online marketplace connecting borrowers and investors. Our platform has facilitated over $5 billion inloans since it first launched in 2007, including over $1 billion in the second quarter of 2014. We believe a technology-powered online marketplace is a more efficient mechanism to allocate capital between borrowers and investors than the traditionalbanking system. Consumers and small business owners borrow through Lending Club to lower the cost of their credit and enjoy a better experience than traditional bank lending. Investors use Lending Club to earn attractive risk-adjusted returns froman asset class that has historically been closed to individual investors and only available on a limited basis to institutional investors. We have built a trusted brand with a track record of delivering exceptional value and satisfaction to bothborrowers and investors.
Key advantages we have relative to traditional banks include:
| an innovative marketplace model that efficiently connects the supply and demand of capital; |
| online operations that substantially reduce the need for physical infrastructure and improve convenience; and |
| automation that increases efficiency, reduces manual processes and improves borrower and investor experience. |
For consumers and small business borrowers, we leverage our cost advantages and marketplace model to provide borrowers with affordable credit.We utilize our technology to provide a better experience, offering borrowers a convenient, simple and fast online application that improves the often time-consuming and frustrating loan application process. We design our products to be fair,transparent and borrower-friendly. All of the loans offered through our marketplace feature fixed rates, fixed monthly payments, no hidden fees and no prepayment penalties.
For individual and institutional investors, we deliver value by providing them with the opportunity to earn attractive risk-adjusted returns.We offer all investors equal access to standard program loans through our marketplace. Standard program loans are three- to five-year personal loans made to borrowers with a FICO score of at least 660 and that meet other strict credit criteria. Wealso provide access to custom program loans that do not meet the requirements of the standard program loans in terms of credit criteria, maturity or longevity of track record. Custom program loans are only available in private transactions withqualified investors. Our platform provides investors with the transparency and flexibility to quickly and easily tailor or modify their portfolio by utilizing specific investment criteria, such as credit attributes, financial data and loancharacteristics. We use proprietary credit decisioning and scoring models and extensive historical loan performance data to provide investors with tools to construct loan portfolios confidently and model targeted returns. We provide investors accessto data on each listed loan and all of the historical performance data for every loan ever invested in through our platform. Our platform enables broad diversification by allowing investors to invest in individual loans in increments as low as $25.Investors can be as active as they wish to be in loan selection and investment decisions. For less active investors, we provide investment funds, managed accounts and automated investment tools that offer the same access and diversification but donot require any active involvement beyond the initial account setup, review and ongoing reporting.
Our technology platform powers ouronline marketplace and enables us to deliver innovative solutions to borrowers and investors. Our proprietary technology automates key aspects of our operations, including the
83
borrower application process, data gathering, credit decisioning and scoring, loan funding, investing and servicing, regulatory compliance and fraud detection. Our platform offers sophisticatedanalytical tools and data to enable investors to make informed decisions and assess their portfolios. Our extensible technology platform has allowed us to expand our offerings from personal loans to include small business loans, and to expandinvestor classes from individuals to institutions and create various investment vehicles. Our API provides investors and partners access to publicly available loan attributes and allows them to analyze the data and place orders meeting theircriteria without visiting our website.
To further enhance our offering, we make our platform available to complementary partners, such asbanks, asset managers, insurance companies and technology companies, to offer new investment and borrower products and develop new tools for use on our platform. These ecosystem partners can transact directly with our marketplace or leverage ourtools to build loan portfolios to suit their or their clients investing needs. We believe that the opportunities provided by these ecosystem partners will help expand the attractiveness and availability of our platform.
We generate revenue from transaction fees from our platforms role in matching borrowers with investors to enable loan originations,servicing fees from investors and management fees for investment funds and other managed accounts. We do not assume credit risk or use our own capital to invest in loans facilitated by our platform. The capital to invest in the loans enabled throughour platform comes directly from a wide range of investors, including retail investors, high-net-worth individuals and family offices, banks and finance companies, insurance companies, hedge funds, foundations, pension plans and universityendowments.
We have experienced significant growth since our marketplace launched in 2007. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and2013, we facilitated loan originations through our platform of $717.9 million and $2.1 billion, respectively, representing an increase of 188%. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2014, we facilitated loan originations through ourplatform of $799.1 million and $1.8 billion, respectively, representing an increase of 125%. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013, our total net revenue was $33.8 million and $98.0 million, respectively, representing an increaseof 190%. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2014, our total net revenue was $37.1 million and $86.9 million, respectively, representing an increase of 134%. As our business has grown, we have achieved increasing levels of operationalefficiency while continuing to invest in our business. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013, our adjusted EBITDA was $(4.9) million and $15.2 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2014, our adjustedEBITDA was $3.8 million and $5.9 million, respectively. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsReconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures for a description of adjustedEBITDA and its limitations.
Industry Background and Trends
There is an opportunity for the online marketplace model to transform the traditional banking system. We believe a transparent and openmarketplace where borrowers and investors have access to information, complemented by technology and tools, can make credit more affordable, redirect existing pools of capital trapped inside the banking system and attract new sources of capital to anew asset class. We believe that online marketplaces have the power to facilitate more efficient deployment of capital and improve the global economy.
Personal and Small Business Lending Is Essential to the Economy
The ability of individuals and small businesses to access affordable credit is essential to stimulating and sustaining a healthy, diverse andinnovative economy. Lending to consumers provides them financial flexibility and gives households better control over when and how to purchase goods and services. While borrower appetite for consumer and small business credit has typically remainedstrong in most economic environments, general economic factors and conditions, including the general interest rate environment and unemployment rates, may affect borrower willingness to seek loans and investor ability and desire to invest in loans.According to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, as of June 2014, the balance of outstanding consumer credit
84
in the United States totaled $3.2 trillion. This amount included $873 billion of revolving consumer credit, which many consumers seek to refinance. Small businesses generated 63% of net new jobsin the United States between 1993 and the first quarter of 2014 according to the U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy. According to the FDIC, as of March 31, 2014, there were $292 billion of commercial and industrial loansoutstanding under $1 million. The market for personal and small business credit in the United States also includes an additional several trillion dollars in mortgages and other categories of secured and unsecured loans, such as those foreducation and motor vehicles. International markets offer similarly large opportunities.
Borrowers Are Inadequately Served by theCurrent Banking System
The traditional banking system generally is burdened by its high fixed cost of underwriting and services,in part due to its physical infrastructure and labor- and paper-intensive business processes, compounded by an increasingly complex regulatory environment. As a result, the traditional banking system is ill-suited to meet personal and small businessdemand for small balance loans and has instead relied heavily on issuing credit cards, which require less personalized underwriting and have higher interest rates. While credit cards are convenient as a payment mechanism, they are an expensivelong-term financing solution. Borrowers who carry a balance on their cards are often subject to high, variable interest rates and the possibility of incurring additional fees and penalties. Additionally, many borrowers are charged the same highinterest rates on their balances, regardless of an individuals specific risk profile, so lower risk borrowers often subsidize higher risk borrowers. In the limited instances when traditional banks make personal loans available, the loanapplication process is often opaque, frustrating and time consuming.
Investors Have Limited Options to Participate in Personal andSmall Business Lending
Historically, access to most personal and small business loans as an investment product was limited to thebanks that hold loans on their balance sheet or to structured securitized products that were syndicated to large institutional investors. Depositors effectively fund the loans made by the banking system, but they share little in the direct returnsof these loans as evidenced by the low yields on various fixed income investment or deposit products offered by banks. As individual investors generally lack the size and access to invest in structured products directly, they are unable to invest inpersonal and small business credit. While institutional investors have had some access to this market, most have lacked the tools to customize portfolios to their specific risk tolerance. As a result, we believe additional capital that could beinvested in personal and small business loans has largely been locked out of the market.
Online Marketplaces Have ProliferatedThroughout the Economy
Online marketplaces have emerged to connect buyers and sellers across many industries to increase choice,improve quality, accelerate the speed of decision making and lower costs. A successful online marketplace must act as a trusted intermediary providing transparency, security, supply and demand balance and ease of use to give marketplace participantsan incentive to interact and the confidence to do business together. Initial online marketplaces connected buyers and sellers of goods and servicesprimarily moving demand from offline to online and making the transaction process moreefficient. Online marketplaces have more recently evolved to unlock supply and demand that could not previously be matched in an efficient manner offline. The sharing economy, a term that describes this new marketplace trend, enables abetter use of resources by allowing owners of underutilized assets to offer them to people who want them while capturing an economic benefit.
OurSolution
We are the worlds largest online marketplace connecting borrowers and investors. Our technology platform supports thisinnovative marketplace model to efficiently connect the supply and demand of capital. Our marketplace also substantially reduces the need for physical infrastructure and improves convenience and automation, increasing efficiency, reducing manualprocesses and improving the overall borrower and investor experience.
85
Our borrowers consist of consumers and small businesses seeking to obtain loans for one of themany uses allowed under our product offerings. Our goal is to form long-term relationships with consumers and small businesses, facilitating their access to an array of financial products that meet their evolving needs over time.
Benefits to Borrowers
| Access to Affordable Credit. Our innovative marketplace model, online delivery and process automation enable us to offer borrowers interest rates that are generally lower on average than the rates chargedby traditional banks on credit cards or installment loans. |
| Superior Borrower Experience. We offer a fast and easy-to-use online application process and provide borrowers with access to live support and online tools throughout the process and for the lifetime of the loan.Our goal is to form long-term relationships with borrowers, facilitating their access to an array of financial products that meet their evolving needs over time. |
| Transparency and Fairness. All of the loans offered through our marketplace feature a fixed rate that is clearly disclosed to the borrower during the application process, with fixed monthly payments, no hiddenfees and the ability to prepay the balance at any time without penalty. We utilize our rules-based engine for credit decisioning, and we keep borrowers informed throughout the process. |
| Fast and Efficient Decisioning. We leverage online data and technology to quickly assess risk, determine a credit rating and assign appropriate interest rates. Qualified applicants receive offers in just minutesand can evaluate loan options without impacting their credit score. |
Benefits to Investors
| Access to a New Asset Class. Investors can invest in individual personal and small business loans, an asset class that has historically been entirely funded and held by financial institutions or largeinstitutional investors on a limited basis. We offer all investors equal access to standard program loans through our marketplace and offer qualified private investors access to custom program loans through our platform. |
| Attractive Risk-Adjusted Returns. We have historically offered investors attractive risk-adjusted returns across all loan grades offered through our marketplace. We screen loan applicants based on proprietarycredit decisioning and scoring models and also factor in historical borrower performance in setting interest rates. We also segment loans into $25 increments to enable diversification across different borrowers and investment criteria. |
| Transparency. We provide investors with transparency and choice in building their loan portfolios. Investors can examine each loan at a granular level prior to investing in a loan and continue to monitorongoing loan performance. We also provide access to credit profile data on each approved loan as well as all of the historical performance data for every loan ever invested in through our platform to enable investors to review historical andcomparative metrics across credit ratings and different risk portfolios over time. |
| Easy-to-Use Tools. We provide investors with tools to easily build or modify customized and diversified portfolios by selecting loans tailored to their investment objectives and assess the returns on theirportfolios. Additionally, investors can enroll in automated investing, a free service that automatically invests any available cash in loans according to investor-specified criteria and allocation targets. |
Our Competitive Strengths
We believe thefollowing strengths differentiate us from our competitors and provide us with competitive advantages in realizing the potential of our market opportunity:
| Leading Online Marketplace. We are the worlds largest online marketplace connecting borrowers and investors, based on over $5billion in loan originations through our platform through June 30, 2014 and over $1 billion in loan originations through our platform during the three months ended June 30, 2014. |
86
We have built a trusted brand with a track record of delivering exceptional satisfaction and value to both borrowers and investors. We believe that our brand, reputation and scale allow us toattract top talent, quickly develop and deploy new products, attract marketplace participants and leverage a lower cost structure to benefit borrowers and investors. |
| Robust Network Effects. Our online marketplace exhibits network effects that are driven by the number of participants and investments enabled through our platform. More participation leads to greaterpotential to match borrowers with investors. Additionally, increased participation also results in the generation of substantial data that is used to improve the effectiveness of our credit decisioning and scoring models, enhancing our performancerecord and generating increasing trust in our marketplace. As trust increases, we believe investors will continue to demonstrate a willingness to accept lower risk premiums that will allow us to offer lower interest rates and attract additionalhigh-quality borrowers, thereby reinforcing our track record and fueling a virtuous cycle for our business. We believe that these network effects reinforce our market leadership position. |
| High Borrower and Investor Satisfaction. Our online marketplace is designed to eliminate the customary pain points a borrower encounters while applying for a loan and provides investorsaccess to a new asset class with attractive risk-adjusted returns. Borrowers have validated our approach with an NPS in the 70s since we began surveying borrowers in January 2013, which places us at the upper end of customer satisfaction ratings fortraditional financial services companies. Additionally, investors are confident transacting on our marketplace, as evidenced by their high reinvestment rates. |
| Technology Platform. Our technology platform powers our online marketplace and enables us to deliver innovative solutions to borrowers and investors. Our technology platform automates our operations and,we believe, provides a significant time and cost advantage over traditional banks that run on legacy systems that are inflexible and slow to evolve. |
| Sophisticated Risk Assessment. We use proprietary algorithms that leverage behavioral data, transactional data and employment information to supplement traditional risk assessment tools, such as FICOscores. We have built our technology platform to automate the application of these proprietary algorithms to each individual borrowers application profile at scale. This approach allows us to evaluate and segment each potentialborrowers risk profile and price it accordingly. In contrast, traditional lenders aggregate borrowers into large pools of risk profiles, which for some borrowers results in higher interest rates despite a more favorable credit profile. |
| Efficient and Attractive Financial Model. Our trusted brand, scale and network effect drives significant borrowing and investing activity on our platform. We generate revenue from transaction fees from ourplatforms role in matching borrowers with investors to enable loan originations, servicing fees from investors and management fees for investment funds and other managed accounts. We do not assume credit risk or use our own capital to investin loans facilitated by our platform. Our technology platform significantly reduces the need for physical infrastructure and lowers our costs, which provides us with significant operating leverage. |
Our Strategy for Growth
Our historicalgrowth rates reflect a deliberate strategy of balancing loan originations in a manner that allowed us to build and develop the various enterprise functions to support our scale, including customer support, operations, risk controls, compliance andtechnology. Borrower and investor demand will continue to inform our business and loan product decisions, but we will not compromise the long-term viability of our marketplace to pursue excessive near-term growth rates that we believe would resultin borrower or investor experiences below our standards.
Key elements of our growth strategy include:
| Execute in Our Core Markets.Since we launched our marketplace in 2007, our platform has facilitated over $5 billion in loanoriginations. According to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, |
87
as of June 2014, the balance of outstanding consumer credit in the United States totaled $3.2 trillion. This amount included $873 billion of revolving consumer credit, which many consumers areseeking to refinance. We estimate that in June 2014 approximately $380 billion in outstanding consumer credit would meet our marketplaces credit policy based on proprietary models. We believe we have opportunities for substantial future growthin our core market. |
| Broaden Our Loan Product Offerings. We believe that the introduction of new products will increase our ability to attract new and repeat borrowers by providing them with more options and increasedfinancial flexibility over time. For example, in 2010, we broadened our personal loan offering to include five-year terms, in 2011, we increased the size of our maximum loan amount to $35,000 and, in 2014, we introduced small business loans andbegan offering education and patient financing options as a result of our acquisition of Springstone. We intend to continue to enhance our platforms existing loan products and add new loan products to attract a greater number and broadervariety of consumers and small business owners. |
| Widen the Spectrum of Borrowers Served. We have investors that are actively seeking to invest in loans that are above or below the current borrower profiles listed on our platform. Because our technologycan efficiently assess risk across a wide range of borrower classes and assign interest rates tailored to each individual borrower, we plan to extend our platform to widen the spectrum of borrowers to meet this investor demand. |
| Increase Supply of Capital Available to Borrowers. We have attracted a diverse set of investors having a wide range of investment strategies and thresholds for risk, yield and maturity,including retail investors, high-net-worth individuals and family offices, bank and finance companies, and institutional investors, such as insurance companies, hedge funds, foundations, pension plans and university endowments, to participatethrough our marketplace. As confidence in our marketplaces performance increases, we are able to attract additional investors with different risk thresholds. We plan to leverage this increasing confidence to increase our depth andbreadth within these categories, capture a larger proportion of total investable capital by introducing new products, offer our products in additional states and expand the channels through which our platform is available. |
| Grow Our Ecosystem. To continue to grow our marketplace, we need to create a vibrant ecosystem to further drive innovation and deepen supply and demand on our platform. We plan to foster existingrelationships and develop new relationships with complementary partners to our platform in order to create, or help create, new tools and products for investors and borrowers. |
| Continue to Invest in Our Innovative Technology Platform. We have made, and will continue to make, significant investments in our proprietary technologies, algorithms and data sources to increase theprecision, speed and scale at which we can make capital and investments available to the market. We believe that these investments will enable us to connect an increasing number of borrowers and investors, continue to identify new borrowers, detectand prevent fraud and maintain the security of our platform. |
| Enter New Geographies.Since launching our marketplace in 2007, we have focused on developing an online marketplace and growing our business in the United States. While we believe our largestnear-term growth opportunity is domestic, over time we intend to expand our platform to address similar banking system inefficiencies, market dislocations, investor needs and borrower dissatisfaction globally. |
Products
Borrowers
Our platform facilitates several types of loan products for consumers and small businesses.
Personal Loans. Our platform enables personal loans that can be used to make major purchases, refinance credit card balances or otheruses, at generally lower rates than other alternatives. Personal loan terms include amounts from $1,000 to $35,000, terms of three or five years and no prepayment penalties or fees. We believe
88
that these loans are simple, fair and responsible credit products that make it easier for consumers to budget for monthly repayment and meet their financial goals.
Simple Application Process
To apply for a loan, a consumer completes a short application that allows us to obtain a credit report froma credit bureau. The application and report data is then analyzed with the platforms proprietary credit decisioning and scoring models to decide whether to approve the applicant based upon the issuing banks underwriting guidelines. Anapproved applicant then sees loan offers with a variety of amounts, terms and rates. After selecting an offer, the applicant completes one more page of information, submits bank account information and then is able to list the loan on ourmarketplace. While the loan is listed and attracting investment interest, we have verification processes and teams to verify an applicants identity, income or employment. Once the verification and fraud checks are completed and sufficientinvestor commitments are received, the issuing bank issues the loan and pays us a transaction fee. We also service the loans and earn a management fee or a servicing fee.
Personal loans that are approved through the standard program are offered to all investors on our marketplace. These loans must meet certainminimum credit requirements, including a FICO score of at least 660, satisfactory debt-to-income ratios, 36 months of credit history and a limited number of credit inquiries in the last six months. These and many other elements contribute to ourproprietary credit decisioning and scoring models that process over 50 data points. Loans that do not meet the requirements in terms of credit criteria, maturity or longevity of track record might qualify as a custom program loan. Custom programloans are offered to private investors only and are not made available to all investors on the marketplace. These custom program loans include new offerings, such as small business and education and patient finance, loans that fall outside of thecredit criteria of the standard program or loans with a longer maturity than we believe to be attractive to most investors. We expect to migrate some of these custom program loans into our standard program over time as they gain a longer performancerecord.
Small Business Loans. In March 2014, we began facilitating small business loans through our platform. These loans enablesmall business owners to expand their business, purchase equipment or inventory, or meet other obligations at an affordable rate. Small business loan terms include amounts from $15,000 to $100,000, terms of one, two, three or five years and noprepayment penalties or fees. To apply for a small business loan, a company completes a short application that allows us to obtain a credit report from a credit bureau. The application and report data is then analyzed with the platformsproprietary small business credit decisioning and scoring models to decide whether to approve the applicant based upon the issuing banks underwriting guidelines. An approved applicant then sees offers with a variety of amounts, terms andrates. After selecting an offer, the applicant completes one more page of information, submits bank account information and then is able to list the loan through our platform for investment or purchase in a private transaction. Similar to personalloans, we perform verification of revenue, good standing and other matters, as well as fraud checks. Once the
89
verification and fraud checks are completed and sufficient investor interest is received, the issuing bank issues the loan and pays us a transaction fee. We also service the loan and earn amanagement fee or a servicing fee.
Investors
Through our marketplace, investors have the opportunity to invest in a wide range of loans based on term and credit characteristics. Investorsreceive monthly cash flow and attractive risk-adjusted returns. Investors are provided with a proprietary credit grade and access to credit profile data on each approved loan as well as access to data on each listed loan and all of the historicalperformance data for every loan ever invested in through our platform. The platform enables broad diversification by allowing distribution of investments in loans in increments as small as $25.
We provide several investment options depending on investor type.
Self-Directed Accounts. Self-directed investors use tools provided on our website to help them conduct research and make ongoinginvestments:
| Filters. The platform provides filters based on credit and application data, such as credit rating, interest rate, term, verified income, debt-to-income ratio and other data. These filters create a subset ofloans that the investor can then further review for potential investment. Filters can be combined to create a custom, savable query that can be used repeatedly. |
| Portfolio Tool. This tool allows an investor to input a variety of individualized investment criteria, including aggregate amount to invest, amount per note, grade, term, debt-to-income ratio and other factors,which are used to quickly sort the platforms existing inventory and create a subset of available loans matching the criteria. After the list is generated, the investor can modify the list as the investor sees fit and then continue on to investin those loans. |
90
| Automated Investing. Investors can enroll in automated investing, a free service that automatically invests any available cash in loans according to investor-specified criteria and allocation targets. Thisservice enables the investor to speed reinvestment of cash flows without having to continually revisit the site. Investors may update their investing criteria, pause or cancel this service at any time. |
Funds and Managed Accounts.Our platform offers investors several fund and managed account options.
| LCA Investment Funds. Accredited investors and qualified purchasers can invest in limited partner interests in funds managed by LCA, a registered investment advisor and our wholly owned subsidiary. Each fundprovides a passive investment strategy around loan grade and term allocation and allows investors to more easily deploy large investment amounts and reinvest returns through the platform. |
| Separately Managed Accounts. Accredited investors may also invest through LCAs separately managed accounts (SMAs). Investors who utilize SMAs often have investment criteria that differ from the LCAfunds investment strategies and desire more control over their investment strategies. |
In addition, external partiescan access our platform to provide fund and managed account services to their clients.
91
In connection with the creation of LCA, in February 2011, we established a Delaware businesstrust and entered into a purchase and servicing agreement for loans. The trust purchases loans from us as directed by the funds, SMAs or third-party advisors. The trust funds these purchases by using investment proceeds from its issuance of a globalmaster certificate to each separate investor.
Whole Loan Purchases. We or our issuing banks also sell loans in their entirety tocertain investors. After the sale of the asset, we continue to service the loan. Whole loan purchases are attractive for some banks as it enables them to account for the loan as an asset, which can offer favorable financial reporting and capitalreserve treatment.
Platform Mechanics
Technology
Keyelements of our technology include:
| Highly Automated. Our borrower and investor acquisition process, registration, credit decisioning and scoring, servicing and payment systems are highly automated using our internally developed software. Wedeveloped our own cash management software to process electronic cash movements, record book entries and calculate cash balances in our borrower and investor funding accounts. In nearly all payment transactions, Automated Clearing House (ACH) isused to disburse loan proceeds, pull borrower payments on outstanding loans, receive funds from investors and disburse payments to investors. |
| Scalable Platform. Our scalable infrastructure utilizes standard techniques, such as virtualization, load-balancing and high-availability platforms. Our application and database tiers are designed to bescaled horizontally by adding servers as needed. |
| Proprietary Fraud Detection. We use a combination of third-party data, sophisticated analytical tools and current and historical data obtained during the application process to help determine anapplications fraud risk. High-risk applications are subject to further investigation. In cases where we confirm fraud, the application is cancelled, and we identify and flag characteristics of the loan to help refine our fraud detectionefforts. |
| Data Integrity and Security. We maintain an effective information security program based on well-established security standards and best practices, such as ISO2700x and NIST 800 series. The programestablishes policies and procedures to safeguard the confidentiality, integrity and availability of borrower and investor information. The program also addresses risk assessment, training, access control, encryption, service provider oversight, anincident response program and continuous monitoring and review. |
| Application Programming Interface. Our API provides investors and partners access to publicly available loan attributes and allows them to analyze the data and place orders meeting their criteria withoutvisiting our website. Investors and partners may create their own software that uses the API or they may use a variety of third-party services that invest via our API on behalf of their members. |
Our engineering and product development expense was $2.7 million, $4.0 million, $13.9 million and $13.8 million for the year endedMarch 31, 2012, the nine months ended December 31, 2012, the year ended December 31, 2013 and the six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively.
Credit Decisioning and Scoring Process
Our platform provides an integrated and automated application and credit decisioning and scoring process that is extensible to a variety ofloan products. Borrowers come to our marketplace to apply online for a loan. During the simple application process, our platform uses proprietary risk algorithms that leverage behavioral data, transactional data and employment information tosupplement traditional risk assessment tools, such as FICO scores, to assess the borrowers risk profile. The platform then presents an approved borrower with various
92
loan options, including term, rate and amount, for which they qualify. After the borrower selects their desired loan terms and the rest of the application is completed, our verification processesand teams verify an applicants identity, income or employment to ultimately approve the loan request.
Regulatory andCompliance Framework
Our platform provides a compliance framework that allows investors to participate in consumer and commercialcredit as an asset class. We believe that our relationship with an issuing bank is a key component of the compliance framework that we provide to investors. The bank issues loans to borrowers that apply on our platform, and we subsequently purchasethese loans with funds provided by investors through a variety of investment channels, thereby enabling investors to capture the interest rate return on each loan. Our primary issuing bank is WebBank, a Utah-chartered industrial bank that handles avariety of consumer and commercial financing programs. We also executed an agreement with Cross River Bank, a New Jersey chartered bank, to operate as our back-up issuing bank in the event WebBank can no longer be an issuing bank.
We have entered into a loan account program agreement with WebBank that governs the terms and conditions between us and WebBank with respectto loans facilitated through our platform and issued by WebBank, including our obligations for servicing the loans during the period of time that the loans are owned by WebBank. Under the terms of the loan account program agreement, we payWebBank a monthly service fee based on the amount of loans issued by WebBank in each month, subject to a minimum monthly fee. WebBank pays us a transaction fee for our platforms role in processing loan applications. Under a loan saleagreement that we entered into with WebBank, once a loan is closed, WebBank sells the loan to us, including all rights related to the loan, without recourse. The loan sale agreement prohibits us from securitizing the loans without prior writtenconsent of WebBank. The initial terms of the loan account program agreement and the loan sale agreement end in November 2018, with the possibility of two, one-year renewal terms, subject to certain early termination provisions as set forth in theagreements.
As part of our ongoing compliance program, we also have customer identification processes in place to enable us toidentify user identification fraud and compare user identity against applicable governmental lists, such as the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. We compare all users identities against theselists at least twice a month for continued compliance and oversight. If a user were to appear on a list, we would take appropriate action to resolve the issue. In addition to our continued identification compliance program, we use our robusttechnology to assist in identifying and stopping potential money laundering schemes. See Regulations and Licensing for more information regarding our regulatory framework.
Loan Issuance Mechanism
93
We have developed an extensible, automated platform that allows us to work with issuing banks tooriginate and issue a variety of loan products to an array of applicants. Our service is provided in a seamless fashion to the applicant. A borrower comes to our website and completes a simple application for a loan product. We then use proprietaryrisk algorithms to analyze an applicants risk profile based upon the issuing banks underwriting guidelines. Once an application is approved, we present the borrower with various loan options. After the applicant selects its personalizedfinancing option and completes the application process, the loan is then listed on our marketplace to attract investor commitments. Simultaneously to listing the loan on our marketplace, we perform additional verifications on the borrower. Once theverifications are completed and sufficient investor commitments are received, the issuing bank originates and issues the loan to the borrower, net of the origination fee. After the loan is issued, we use the proceeds from these investors to purchasethe loan. Investor cash balances (excluding payments in process) are held in a segregated bank or custodial accounts and are not commingled with our monies. We receive a transaction fee from the issuing bank for our platforms role inoriginating the loan. We also earn a recurring servicing or management fee from the investors for the subsequent servicing of loans.
Loan Servicing
Weservice all personal and small business loans originated through our platform. Servicing is comprised of account maintenance, collections, processing payments from borrowers and distributions to investors.
For May 2014, approximately 99% of loan payments were made through an ACH withdrawal from the borrowers bank account. Loan repaymentsare remitted utilizing ACH to segregated bank accounts maintained for the benefit of investors or custodial or other accounts designated by our investors. This automated process allows us to avoid the time and expense of processing a significantvolume of mailed payments and provides a higher degree of certainty for timely payments. This process also provides us with prompt notice in the event of a missed payment, which allows us to react quickly to resolve the issue with the borrower.Generally, in the first 30 days that a loan is delinquent, our in-house collection team works to bring the account current. After that time, we typically outsource subsequent servicing efforts to third-party collection agencies.
The servicing fee paid by investors is designed to cover the day-to-day processing costs of loans. If a loan needs more intensive collectionfocus, whether internal or external, we may charge investors an additional fee to compensate for the costs of this collection activity. This fee varies, with a maximum of up to 35% of the amount recovered. There is no fee charged if there is norecovery, and the fee cannot exceed the proceeds collected. For loans that are ultimately charged-off, we may sell the account to a third party. All proceeds received on this sale are subject to the standard servicing fee, and the net balance goesto investors.
Springstone Acquisition
In April 2014, we acquired Springstone, which offers education and patient financing options. Springstone utilizes two issuing banks and anetwork of providers. Springstone facilitates two loan products:
| An installment loan with amounts ranging from $2,000 to $40,000, terms from 24 to 84 months, fixed rates from 3.99% to 17.99%, fixed monthly payments and no prepayment penalties. |
| A deferred interest loan with amounts ranging from $499 to $25,000 that provides for no interest if the balance is paid in full during the promotional period, which can be six, 12, 18 or 24 months. If the loan is notpaid in full during the promotional period, interest is imposed from the issuance date at variable rate based upon the prime rate. There is no prepayment penalty and borrowers have the flexibility to pay as much or as little, subject to applicableminimums, of the outstanding balance per month during the promotional period as they chose. |
Currently, each ofSpringstones issuing banks originates, holds and services each issued loan. For its role in loan facilitation, Springstone earns transaction fees paid by the issuing bank and service provider at the time of origination, which averaged 4.9% ofthe initial loan balance in 2013. We plan to incorporate these education and patient financing products into our platform over time.
94
Competition
We compete with financial products and companies that attract borrowers, investors or both. With respect to borrowers, we primarily competewith traditional financial institutions, such as banks, credit unions, credit card issuers and other consumer finance companies. We believe our innovative marketplace model, online delivery and process automation enable us to operate moreefficiently and with more competitive rates and higher borrower satisfaction than these competitors.
With respect to investors, weprimarily compete with other investment vehicles and asset classes, such as equities, bonds and short-term fixed income securities. We believe that our diverse and customizable investment options give us the flexibility to offer attractiverisk-adjusted returns that are uncorrelated with other asset classes.
We compete with other online credit marketplaces, such as ProsperMarketplace, Inc. and Funding Circle Limited. We are the worlds largest online marketplace connecting borrowers to investors, which we believe provides us with a major competitive advantage. We believe that our network effects and marketplacedynamics at play make us more attractive and efficient to both borrowers and investors. We anticipate that more established internet, technology and financial services companies that possess large, existing customer bases, substantial financialresources and established distribution channels may enter the market in the future. We believe that our brand, scale, network effect, historical data and performance record provide us with significant competitive advantages over current and futurecompetitors.
Sales and Marketing
Our marketing efforts are designed to attract and retain borrowers and investors and build brand awareness and reputation. Currently, webelieve reputation and word of mouth drives continued organic growth in our investor base. We believe most marketplace investors are satisfied with their experience, often adding funds to their account and referring their friends and colleagues tous.
We use a diverse array of online and offline marketing channels to attract borrowers, including:
| Social Media and Press. We leverage social media outlets and the press to help drive brand awareness. |
| Online Partnerships. We work with companies that sell products or services that are suitable for financing or that help potential borrowers manage their finances, manage their credit or find the bestlending options. |
| Search Engine Optimization. We seek to ensure that our marketplace is optimized to achieve meaningful organic traffic from search engines. |
| Search Engine Marketing. We also use paid placement on major online search engines. |
| Offline Partnerships. We work with companies that sell products offline that often require affordable financing, such as pools, home improvement providers and furniture sellers. |
| Mail-to-Web. We have developed a highly-targeted direct marketing program that selects from a given population of consumers and small business owners who would benefit from our products. |
| Radio and Television Advertising. We utilize radio and television advertising to enhance the impact of our other marketing channels. |
Regulations and Licensing
The lendingand securities industries are highly regulated. However, we are regulated very differently than a bank. While a bank has capital risk from both credit and interest rate risk, investor capital and borrower loans through our platform are almostcompletely matched. Additionally, we do not take deposits and are therefore not regulated by the FDIC in that respect. An issuing bank originates all the loans offered through our marketplace and is subject to regulation by the FDIC.
95
However, we and the loans made through our platform are subject to extensive and complex rulesand regulations, licensing and examination by various federal, state and local government authorities. For example, our primary issuing bank, WebBank, is subject to oversight by the FDIC and the State of Utah. These authorities impose obligationsand restrictions on our activities and the loans made through our platform. In particular, these rules limit the fees that may be assessed on the loans, require extensive disclosure to, and consents from, the borrowers and lenders, prohibitdiscrimination and may impose multiple qualification and licensing obligations on platform activities. Failure to comply with any of these requirements may result in, among other things, revocation of required licenses or registration, loss ofapproved status, voiding of the loan contracts, class action lawsuits, administrative enforcement actions and civil and criminal liability. While compliance with such requirements is at times complicated by our novel business model, we believe weare in substantial compliance with these rules and regulations.
State Licensing Requirements
We hold licenses in a number of states and are otherwise authorized to conduct activities on a uniform basis in all other states and theDistrict of Columbia, with the exceptions of Idaho, Iowa, Maine, Nebraska and North Dakota. State licensing statutes impose a variety of requirements and restrictions, including:
| recordkeeping requirements; |
| restrictions on loan origination and servicing practices, including limits on finance charges and fees; |
| disclosure requirements; |
| examination requirements; |
| surety bond and minimum net worth requirements; |
| financial reporting requirements; |
| notification requirements for changes in principal officers, stock ownership or corporate control; |
| restrictions on advertising; and |
| review requirements for loan forms. |
The statutes also subject us to the supervisory andexamination authority of state regulators in certain cases.
Consumer Protection Laws
State Usury Limitations. Section 521 of the Depository Institution Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (DIDA) andSection 85 of the National Bank Act (NBA), federal case law interpreting the NBA such as Tiffany v. National Bank of Missouri and Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. First Omaha Service Corporation and FDIC advisory opinion 92-47 permitFDIC-insured depository institutions, such as WebBank, to export the interest rate permitted under the laws of the state or U.S. territory where the bank is located, regardless of the usury limitations imposed by the state law of theborrowers residence unless the state has chosen to opt out of the exportation regime. WebBank is located in Utah, and Title 70C of the Utah Code does not limit the amount of fees or interest that may be charged by WebBank on loans of the typeoffered through our marketplace. Only Iowa and Puerto Rico have opted out of the exportation regime under Section 525 of DIDA and we do not operate in either jurisdiction. We believe, however, if a state or U.S. territory in which we operateopted out of rate exportation, judicial interpretations support the view that such opt outs would apply only to loans made in those states. We believe that the opt-out of any state would not affect the ability of our platformto benefit from the exportation of rates. If a loan made through our platform were deemed to be subject to the usury laws of a state or U.S. territory that had opted-out of the exportation regime, we could become subject to fines, penalties andpossible forfeiture of amounts charged to borrowers, and we could decide not to originate loans in that jurisdiction, which could adversely impact our growth.
96
State Disclosure Requirements and Other Substantive Lending Regulations. We are subject tostate laws and regulations that impose requirements related to loan disclosures and terms, credit discrimination, credit reporting, debt collection and unfair or deceptive business practices. Our ongoing compliance program seeks to comply with theserequirements.
Truth in Lending Act. The Truth in Lending Act (TILA), and Regulation Z, which implements it, require lenders toprovide consumers with uniform, understandable information concerning certain terms and conditions of their loan and credit transactions. These rules apply to WebBank as the creditor for loans facilitated through our platform, but because thetransactions are carried out on our hosted website, we facilitate compliance. For closed-end credit transactions of the type provided through our platform, these disclosures include providing the annual percentage rate, the finance charge, theamount financed, the number of payments and the amount of the monthly payment. The creditor must provide the disclosures before the loan is closed. TILA also regulates the advertising of credit and gives borrowers, among other things, certain rightsregarding updated disclosures and the treatment of credit balances. Our platform provides borrowers with a TILA disclosure at the time a borrower posts a loan request on the platform. If the borrowers request is not fully funded and theborrower chooses to accept a lesser amount offered, we provide an updated TILA disclosure. We also seek to comply with TILAs disclosure requirements related to credit advertising.
Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) prohibits creditors from discriminating against creditapplicants on the basis of race, color, sex, age, religion, national origin, marital status, the fact that all or part of the applicants income derives from any public assistance program or the fact that the applicant has in good faithexercised any right under the federal Consumer Credit Protection Act or any applicable state law. Regulation B, which implements ECOA, restricts creditors from requesting certain types of information from loan applicants and from making statementsthat would discourage on a prohibited basis a reasonable person from making or pursuing an application. These requirements apply both to a lender such as WebBank as the creditor for loans facilitated through our platform as well as to a party suchas ourselves that regularly participates in a credit decision. Investors may also be subject to the ECOA in their capacity as purchasers of notes if they are deemed to regularly participate in credit decisions. In the underwriting of loans offeredthrough our marketplace, and in all aspects of operations, both WebBank and we seek to comply with ECOAs provisions prohibiting discouragement and discrimination. ECOA also requires creditors to provide consumers with timely notices of adverseaction taken on credit applications. WebBank and we provide prospective borrowers who apply for a Loan through the platform but are denied credit with an adverse action notice in compliance with applicable requirements.
Fair Credit Reporting Act. The federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), administered by the CFPB, promotes the accuracy, fairness andprivacy of information in the files of consumer reporting agencies. FCRA requires a permissible purpose to obtain a consumer credit report and requires persons to report loan payment information to credit bureaus accurately. FCRA also imposesdisclosure requirements on creditors who take adverse action on credit applications based on information contained in a credit report. WebBank and we have a permissible purpose for obtaining credit reports on potential borrowers, and we also obtainexplicit consent from borrowers to obtain such reports. As the servicer for the loan, we accurately report loan payment and delinquency information to appropriate consumer reporting agencies. We provide an adverse action notice to a rejectedborrower on WebBanks behalf at the time the borrower is rejected that includes all the required disclosures. We also have processes in place to ensure that consumers are given opt-out opportunities, as required by the FCRA,regarding the sharing of their personal information. We have implemented an identity theft prevention program.
Fair Debt CollectionPractices Act. The federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) provides guidelines and limitations on the conduct of third-party debt collectors in connection with the collection of consumer debts. The FDCPA limits certain communicationswith third parties, imposes notice and debt validation requirements, and prohibits threatening, harassing or abusive conduct in the course of debt collection. While the FDCPA applies to third-party debt collectors, debt collection laws of certainstates impose similar requirements on creditors who collect their own debts. Our agreement with its investors prohibits investors from attempting to collect directly on the loan. Actual collection efforts in violation of this agreement are unlikely
97
given that investors do not learn the identity of borrowers. We use our internal collection team and a professional third-party debt collection agent to collect delinquent accounts. They arerequired to comply with the FDCPA and all other applicable laws in collecting delinquent accounts of our borrowers.
Privacy and DataSecurity Laws. The federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) includes limitations on financial institutions disclosure of nonpublic personal information about a consumer to nonaffiliated third parties, in certain circumstances requiresfinancial institutions to limit the use and further disclosure of nonpublic personal information by nonaffiliated third parties to whom they disclose such information and requires financial institutions to disclose certain privacy policies andpractices with respect to information sharing with affiliated and nonaffiliated entities as well as to safeguard personal customer information. We have a detailed privacy policy, which complies with GLBA and is accessible from every page of ourwebsite. We maintain consumers personal information securely, and we do not sell, rent or share such information with third parties for marketing purposes unless previously agreed to by the consumer. In addition, we take measures to safeguardthe personal information of our borrowers and investors and protect against unauthorized access to this information.
ServicemembersCivil Relief Act. The federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) allows military members to suspend or postpone certain civil obligations so that the military member can devote his or her full attention to military duties. The SCRA requiresus to adjust the interest rate of borrowers who qualify for and request relief. If a borrower with an outstanding loan qualifies for SCRA protection, we will reduce the interest rate on the loan to 6% for the duration of the borrowers activeduty. During this period, the investors who have invested in such a loan will not receive the difference between 6% and the loans original interest rate. For a borrower to obtain an interest rate reduction on a loan due to military service, werequire the borrower to send us a written request and a copy of the borrowers mobilization orders. We do not take military service into account in assigning loan grades to borrower loan requests and we do not disclose the military status ofborrowers to investors.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. In July 2010, the Dodd-Frank Act was signedinto law. The Dodd-Frank Act is extensive and significant legislation that, among other things:
| created a liquidation framework under which the FDIC may be appointed as receiver following a systemic risk determination by the Secretary of Treasury (in consultation with the President) for the resolutionof certain nonbank financial companies and other entities, defined as covered financial companies, and commonly referred to as systemically important entities, in the event such a company is in default or in danger of defaultand the resolution of such a company under other applicable law would have serious adverse effects on financial stability in the United States, and also for the resolution of certain of their subsidiaries; |
| strengthened the regulatory oversight of securities and capital markets activities by the SEC; and |
| increased regulation of the securitization markets through, among other things, a mandated risk retention requirement for securitizers, which, if applied to our business, would change our business model, and a directionto the SEC to regulate credit rating agencies and adopt regulations governing these organizations and their activities. |
With respect to the new liquidation framework for systemically important entities, no assurances can be given that such framework would notapply to us. Guidance from the FDIC indicates that such new framework will largely be exercised in a manner consistent with the existing bankruptcy laws, which is the insolvency regime which would otherwise apply to us.
Other Regulations
Electronic Fund Transfer Act and NACHA Rules. The federal Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA) and Regulation E that implements itprovide guidelines and restrictions on the electronic transfer of funds from consumers bank accounts. In addition transfers performed by ACH electronic transfers are subject to detailed timing and notification rules and guidelines administeredby the National Automated Clearinghouse Association
98
(NACHA). Most transfers of funds in connection with the origination and repayment of loans are performed by ACH. We obtain necessary electronic authorization from borrowers and investors for suchtransfers in compliance with such rules. We also comply with the requirement that a loan cannot be conditioned on the borrowers agreement to repay the loan through automatic fund transfers. Transfers of funds through our platform are executedby Wells Fargo and conform to the EFTA, its regulations and NACHA guidelines.
Electronic Signatures in Global and National CommerceAct/Uniform Electronic Transactions Act. The federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (ESIGN) and similar state laws, particularly the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA), authorize the creation of legally bindingand enforceable agreements utilizing electronic records and signatures. ESIGN and UETA require businesses that want to use electronic records or signatures in consumer transactions and provide disclosures to consumers, to obtain the consumersconsent to receive information electronically. When a borrower or investor registers on our platform, we obtain his or her consent to transact business electronically, receive electronic disclosures and maintain electronic records in compliance withESIGN and UETA requirements.
Bank Secrecy Act. In cooperation with WebBank, we have implemented various anti-money launderingpolicy and procedures to comply with applicable federal law. With respect to new borrowers, we apply the customer identification and verification program rules and screen names against the list of specially designated nationals maintained by theU.S. Department of the Treasury and OFAC pursuant to the USA PATRIOT Act amendments to the Bank Secrecy Act and its implementing regulation.
New Laws and Regulations. From time to time, various types of federal and state legislation are proposed and new regulations areintroduced that could result in additional regulation of, and restrictions on, the business of consumer lending. We cannot predict whether any such legislation or regulations will be adopted or how this would affect our business or our importantrelationships with third parties. In addition, the interpretation of existing legislation may change or may prove different than anticipated when applied to our novel business model. Compliance with such requirements could involve additional costs,which could have a material adverse effect on our business. As a consequence of the extensive regulation of commercial lending in the United States, our business is particularly susceptible to being affected by federal and state legislation andregulations that may increase the cost of doing business.
In addition, see Risk FactorsRisks Related to Compliance andRegulation.
Foreign Laws and Regulations. We do not permit non-U.S. based individuals to register as borrowers on theplatform and the lending platform does not operate outside the United States. It is, therefore, not subject to foreign laws or regulations for borrowers.
Intellectual Property
We rely on acombination of copyright, trade secret and other rights, as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect our proprietary technology, processes and other intellectual property. Although the protection afforded bycopyright, trade secret and trademark law, written agreements and common law may provide some advantages, we believe that the following factors help us to maintain a competitive advantage: technological skills and focus on innovation of our softwaredevelopment team and other team members across the organization; frequent enhancements to our platform; and borrower and investor satisfaction. Our competitors may develop products that are similar to our technology. We enter into agreements withour employees, consultants and partners and through these agreements we attempt to control access to and distribution of our other proprietary technology and information. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, third parties may, inan authorized or unauthorized manner, attempt to use, copy or otherwise obtain and market or distribute our intellectual property rights or technology or otherwise develop a product with the same functionality as our solution. Policing allunauthorized use of our intellectual property rights is nearly impossible. Therefore, we cannot be certain that the steps we have taken or will take in the future will prevent misappropriations of our technology or intellectual property rights.
99
Employees
At June 30, 2014, we had 628 employees and contractors. None of our employees are represented by a labor union. We have not experiencedany work stoppages, and we consider our relations with our employees to be good.
Legal Proceedings
In the second quarter of 2014, we offered to settle a dispute with a consultant that previously performed work for us. We offered the claimanta certain number of shares of our common stock and cash consideration. Since part of this offer was in the form of shares of our common stock, we valued the liability based on an estimated price of our common stock at June 30, 2014. If suchoffer is accepted by the claimant, the shares of common stock will be valued on the date of such agreement.
During the second quarter of2014, we also received notice from the California Employment Development Department (EDD) that it had commenced an examination of our records concerning the employment relationship of certain individuals who performed services for us from 2011through 2014. Based on the EDDs preliminary determination, certain of these individuals should have been classified as employees with appropriate tax withholding and employer-related taxes incurred and paid. We continue to evaluate whether tosubmit a settlement offer to the EDD or to pursue an appeal of any final notice of assessment that the EDD may levy against us with respect to any misclassified individuals. We have received a proposed notice of assessment from the EDD and areworking to resolve the matter promptly.
We received a Civil Investigative Demand from the CFPB dated June 5, 2014 related to theoperations of Springstone. The purpose of the investigation is to determine whether the Springstone is engaging in unlawful acts or practices in connection with the marketing, issuance and servicing of installment loans for healthcare relatedfinancing. We are continuing to evaluate this matter. As of June 30, 2014, there are no probable or estimable losses related to this matter.
In addition to the foregoing, we may be subject to legal proceedings and regulatory actions in the ordinary course of business. We do notanticipate that the ultimate liability, if any, arising out of any such matter will have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Facilities
Our corporate headquarters islocated in San Francisco, California and consists of approximately 115,043 square feet of space under lease agreements that expire in June 2019 and June 2022. Under these lease agreements, we have an option to extend the leases for five years. Wehave additional office space in Westborough, Massachusetts that consists of approximately 11,089 square feet. We also have data centers located in Las Vegas, Nevada and Santa Clara, California. We believe that our facilities are adequate for ourcurrent needs.
100
Executive Officers, Key Employees and Directors
The following table sets forth information regarding our executive officers, key employees and directors as of June 30, 2014:
Name | Age | Position | ||
Renaud Laplanche | 43 | Founder, Chief Executive Officer and Director | ||
Chaomei Chen | 55 | Chief Risk Officer | ||
Carrie Dolan | 49 | Chief Financial Officer | ||
John MacIlwaine | 45 | Chief Technology Officer | ||
Scott Sanborn | 44 | Chief Operating and Marketing Officer | ||
Jason Altieri | 48 | General Counsel and Compliance Officer | ||
Jeff Bogan | 34 | Head of Institutional Group | ||
Angela Loeffler | 37 | Chief People Officer | ||
Daniel Ciporin(1)(4) | 56 | Director | ||
Jeffrey Crowe(1) | 57 | Director | ||
Rebecca Lynn(1)(3) | 41 | Director | ||
John J. Mack(1)(2) | 69 | Director | ||
Mary Meeker(2)(3) | 57 | Director | ||
John C. (Hans) Morris(3)(4) | 55 | Director | ||
Lawrence Summers(2)(4) | 59 | Director |
(1) | Member of the Compensation Committee. |
(2) | Member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. |
(3) | Member of the Audit Committee. |
(4) | Member of the Risk Committee. |
Executive Officers and Key Employees
Renaud Laplanche is our founder and has served as our Chief Executive Officer and as a member of our board of directors since October2006. From June 2005 to October 2006, Mr. Laplanche served as Head of Product Management, Search Technologies, for Oracle Corporation, a computer technology corporation. From September 1999 to June 2005, Mr. Laplanche served as the founderand Chief Executive Officer of TripleHop Technologies, an enterprise software company, the assets of which were acquired by Oracle Corporation in June 2005. Mr. Laplanche holds a post-graduate DESS-DJCE degree (tax and corporate law) from theUniversité de Montpellier, Montpellier, France and an M.B.A. from HEC Business School, Paris, France. Mr. Laplanche was chosen to serve on our board of directors because of the perspective and experience he brings as our founder andChief Executive Officer and his experience with high growth technology companies.
Chaomei Chen has served as our Chief RiskOfficer since June 2011. From September 2008 to August 2009, Ms. Chen served as the Chief Risk Officer at JP Morgan Chase Card Services, a credit card company, where she was responsible for business and credit risk in the Washington Mutualportfolio. Ms. Chen holds a B.S. in mathematics from Southwestern Jiaotong University in China and an M.S.E. in mathematical science from The Johns Hopkins University.
Carrie Dolan has served as our Chief Financial Officer since August 2010. From May 2007 to January 2010, Ms. Dolan served asTreasurer for The Charles Schwab Corporation, a financial advisory company, where she also served as Schwab Bank Chief Financial Officer from January 2008 to January 2010. Ms. Dolan holds a B.S. in finance and accounting and an M.B.A. from theUniversity of California, Berkeleys Haas School of Business.
John MacIlwaine has served as our Chief Technology Officersince July 2012. From December 2011 to July 2012, Mr. MacIlwaine served as the Chief Information Officer at Green Dot Corporation, a provider of prepaid financial services. From April 2007 to November 2011, Mr. MacIlwaine served as head ofglobal development at
101
Visa, Inc., a credit card company, where he led program management and information services, including web application development, data warehousing, business intelligence and mobile development,and oversaw all new technology initiatives. Mr. MacIlwaine holds a B.S.E. in computer engineering from the University of Michigan.
Scott Sanborn has served as our Chief Operating and Marketing Officer since April 2013 and served as our Chief Marketing Officer fromMay 2010 to March 2013. From November 2008 to February 2010, Mr. Sanborn served as the Chief Marketing and Revenue Officer for eHealthInsurance, an e-commerce company. Mr. Sanborn holds a B.A. in literature from Tufts University.
Jason Altieri has served as our General Counsel and Compliance Officer since October 2009. From October 2008 to October 2009,Mr. Altieri served as the General Counsel and VP, Partnerships for Corefino, Inc., an outsourced accounting solution and technology provider. Mr. Altieri has also been a corporate partner for the international law firms of Mintz, Levin,Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo P.C. and Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal, LLP (now Dentons) and an associate with Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, PC. Mr. Altieri holds a B.A. (with honors) in economics from the University ofCalifornia, Davis, an M.A. in international relations and public policy (China emphasis) from the University of California, San Diego and a J.D. (magna cum laude) from the University of San Francisco School of Law.
Jeff Bogan has served as our Head of Institutional Group since April 2013 and served as our Vice President of Corporate Developmentfrom April 2012 to March 2013. From January 2011 to February 2012, Mr. Bogan served as Vice President, and from June 2010 to January 2011 as an associate, at Morgan Stanley, a financial services company. Mr. Bogan has also served infinancial advisory roles at Greenhill & Co. and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey. Mr. Bogan holds a B.B.A. in information systems and finance and management from the University of Georgia and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.
Angela Loeffler has served as our Chief People Officer since November 2012. From February 2004 to May 2012, Ms. Loefflerserved in various roles, including as the Chief Administrative Officer at Ask.com, an online brand for questions and answers. Ms. Loeffler has also served as the Senior Compensation Analyst at Openwave Systems Inc. and as a compensation analystfor William M. Mercer Human Resources Consulting. Ms. Loeffler holds an A.B. in psychology from the University of California, Berkeley.
Non-Employee Directors
DanielCiporin has been a member of our board of directors since August 2007. Mr. Ciporin joined Canaan Partners, an investment firm, in March 2007 and is currently a general partner specializing in digital media, financial technology ande-commerce investments. From March 2006 to March 2007, Mr. Ciporin served as Chairman of the Internet Lab. From January 1999 to June 2005, Mr. Ciporin served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Shopping.com. Mr. Ciporin holdsan A.B. from Princeton Universitys Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs and an M.B.A. from Yale University. Mr. Ciporin was chosen to serve on our board of directors because of his extensive experience in thetechnology and e-commerce industries and his investment and operational expertise.
Jeffrey Crowe has been a member of our board ofdirectors since August 2007. Mr. Crowe joined Norwest Venture Partners, an investment firm, in 2004 and became managing partner in 2013. Mr. Crowe focuses on investments in the internet, consumer and software arenas and currently serves onthe board of directors of RetailMeNot, Inc. and several privately held companies. From December 1999 to April 2001, Mr. Crowe served as President, Chief Operating Officer and Director of DoveBid. From May 1990 to November 1999, Mr. Croweserved as the Chief Executive Officer and director of Edify Corporation. Mr. Crowe holds a B.A. in history from Dartmouth College and an M.B.A. from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. Mr. Crowe was chosen to serve on ourboard of directors because of his extensive experience advising internet and consumer companies.
102
Rebecca Lynn has been a member of our board of directors since March 2009. Ms. Lynnjoined Morgenthaler Ventures, a venture capital firm, in 2007 and became a partner in 2010. She is also a partner at Canvas Venture Fund, a venture capital firm she co-founded in 2013. From 2003 to 2007, Ms. Lynn ran her own consultingbusiness, Marengo Marketing. From 1998 to 2002, Ms. Lynn served as the Vice President of Marketing at NextCard, Inc., after beginning her career at Procter and Gamble. Ms. Lynn also serves on the board of directors of several privatecompanies. Ms. Lynn holds a B.S. in chemical engineering from the University of Missouri and a J.D./M.B.A. from the Haas School of Business and the University of California, Berkeley School of Law at the University of California, Berkeley.Ms. Lynn was chosen to serve on our board of directors because of her extensive experience advising financial services and internet companies and her investment expertise.
John J. Mack joined our board of directors in April 2012. Mr. Mack served as Chairman of the Board of Morgan Stanley, a financialservices company, from 2005 to 2011, and served as the Chief Executive Officer of Morgan Stanley from June 2005 until December 2009, during which time he oversaw the firms conversion into a bank holding company. Mr. Mack was Co-ChiefExecutive Officer of Credit Suisse Group from 2003 to 2004 and the President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Credit Suisse First Boston from 2001 to 2004. He became the President, Chief Operating Officer and a director of Morgan StanleyDean Witter & Co. in 1997 and served in that position until 2001. Mr. Mack joined Morgan Stanley in 1972 in the bond department and served as head of the Worldwide Taxable Fixed Income Division from 1985 to 1992, became Chairman of theOperating Committee in 1992 and became President in 1993. Mr. Mack is a senior advisor of both Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and KKR & Co. L.P. Mr. Mack holds a B.A. in history from Duke University. Mr. Mack was chosen toserve on our board of directors because of his extensive experience advising and managing banking and financial services companies.
Mary Meeker joined our board of directors in June 2012. Ms. Meeker is a general partner at Kleiner Perkins Caulfield and Byers(KPCB), a venture capital firm. Ms. Meeker joined KPCB in December 2010. She focuses on investments in KPCBs digital practice and helps lead KPCBs Digital Growth Fund. From 1991 to 2010, Ms. Meeker worked at Morgan Stanley,where she served as a managing director and research analyst. Ms. Meeker holds a B.A. in psychology and Honorary Doctor of Letters degree from DePauw University and an M.B.A. from Cornell University. Ms. Meeker was chosen to serve onour board of directors because of her extensive experience advising and analyzing technology companies.
John C. (Hans) Morrisjoined our board of directors in February 2013. Mr. Morris founded Nyca Partners, a venture capital and advisory company, in 2014 and is the managing partner. From January 2010 until January 2014, he also served as a managing director andspecial advisor at General Atlantic, a growth equity firm. Mr. Morris previously served as the President of Visa, Inc. from 2007 to 2009. Prior to Visa, Mr. Morris spent 27 years at Citigroup, a banking and financial services company, andits predecessor companies in various leadership positions, with his final position as Chief Financial Officer and Head of Finance, Technology and Operations for Citi Markets and Banking. Mr. Morris also serves as on the board of directors ofKCG Holdings, Inc. and a privately held company. Mr. Morris holds a B.A. in government from Dartmouth College. Mr. Morris was chosen to serve on our board of directors because of his extensive experience in the banking and financialservices industry and his financial expertise.
Lawrence Summers joined our board of directors in December 2012. Mr. Summersis the Charles W. Eliot University Professor & President Emeritus of Harvard University and the Weil Director of the Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business & Government at Harvards Kennedy School. He became a tenured member ofHarvard Universitys faculty in 1983, served as President from 2001 to 2006 and returned to Harvard in 2011. He has served in various senior policy positions in Washington, D.C., including Secretary of the Treasury from 1999 to 2001, Directorof the National Economic Council for President Obama from 2009 to 2011 and Vice President of Development Economics and Chief Economist of the World Bank from 1991 to 1993. He holds a B.S. in economics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technologyand a Ph.D. in economics from Harvard University. Mr. Summers was chosen to serve on our board of directors because of his extensive economic, financial and business experience.
103
Election of Officers
Each executive officer serves at the discretion of our board of directors and holds office until his or her successor is duly appointed oruntil his or her earlier resignation or removal. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.
Board Compositionand Election of Directors
Our board of directors consists of eight members, all of whom were elected as directors pursuant to theterms of the amended and restated voting agreement, dated April 16, 2014, among us and certain of our stockholders and investors.
Our amended and restated voting agreement will terminate and the provisions of our current certificate of incorporation by which our directorswere elected will be restated in connection with this offering. After this offering, the number of directors will be fixed by our board of directors, subject to the terms of our restated certificate of incorporation and restated bylaws that weexpect to be in effect upon the completion of this offering. Each of our current directors will continue to serve as a director until the election and qualification of his or her successor or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal.
Classified Board of Directors
Ourrestated certificate of incorporation and restated bylaws that we expect to be in effect upon the completion of this offering provide for a classified board of directors consisting of three classes of directors, each serving staggered three-yearterms. Our directors will be divided among the three classes as follows:
| Class I directors, whose initial term will expire at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2015, will consist of and ; |
| Class II directors, whose initial term will expire at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2016, will consist of , and ; and |
| Class III directors, whose initial term will expire at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2017, will consist of , and . |
Directors in a particular class will be elected for three-year terms at the annual meeting of stockholders in the year in which their termsexpire. As a result, only one class of directors will be elected at each annual meeting of our stockholders, with the other classes continuing for the remainder of their respective three-year terms. Each directors term continues until theelection and qualification of his or her successor or his or her earlier death, resignation or removal.
The classification of our boardof directors may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in our control or management. See Description of Capital StockAnti-Takeover ProvisionsRestated Certificate of Incorporation and Restated Bylaws Provisions.
Director Independence
In connectionwith this offering, we have applied to list our common stock on . Under the rules of , independentdirectors must comprise a majority of a listed companys board of directors within a specified period of the completion of this offering. In addition, the rules of requirethat, subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed companys audit, compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees be independent. Under the rules of , a director will only qualify as an independent director if, in the opinion of that companys board of directors, that person does not have a relationship thatwould interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.
104
Our board of directors has undertaken a review of its composition, the composition of itscommittees and the independence of each director. Based upon information requested from and provided by each director concerning his or her background, employment and affiliations, including family relationships, our board of directors hasdetermined that Daniel Ciporin, Jeffrey Crowe, Rebecca Lynn, John J. Mack, Mary Meeker, John C. (Hans) Morris and Lawrence Summers, representing seven of our eight directors, do not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise ofindependent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that each of these directors is independent as that term is defined under the listing requirements and rulesof . In making this determination, our board of directors considered the current and prior relationships that each non-employee director has with our company and all otherfacts and circumstances our board of directors deemed relevant in determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each non-employee director.
In addition, audit committee members must also satisfy the independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. In order tobe considered independent for purposes of Rule 10A-3, a member of an audit committee of a listed company may not, other than in his or her capacity as a member of the audit committee, the board of directors or any other committee of the board ofdirectors (i) accept, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from the listed company or any of its subsidiaries or (ii) be an affiliated person of the listed company or any of its subsidiaries.Additionally, compensation committee members must not have a relationship with us that is material to the directors ability to be independent from management in connection with the duties of a compensation committee member.
Board of Directors Role in Risk Management
Our board of directors oversees an enterprise-wide approach to risk management designed to support the achievement of organizationalobjectives, including strategic objectives, improving long-term organizational performance and enhancing stockholder value. Risk management includes not only understanding our specific risks and the steps management implements to manage those risks,but also what level of risk is acceptable and appropriate for us. Management is responsible for establishing our business strategy, identifying and assessing the related risks and implementing appropriate risk management practices. Our board ofdirectors and our Risk Committee review our business strategy and managements assessment of the related risk and discuss with management our appropriate level of risk.
Our board of directors and our Audit Committee also oversee financial risk exposures, including monitoring the integrity of the consolidatedfinancial statements, internal control over financial reporting and the independence of our independent registered public accounting firm. Our board of directors, through our Audit Committee, receives periodic internal controls and relatedassessments from our finance department. In fulfilling its oversight responsibility with respect to compliance matters, our board of directors, through our Audit Committee, meets at least quarterly with our finance department, independent registeredpublic accounting firm and internal or external legal counsel to discuss risks related to our financial reporting function.
Board Leadership
Our board of directors has no formal chair and the duties are performed by our Chief Executive Officer who (i) works with our board ofdirectors to schedule meetings and set meeting agendas; (ii) presides as the chair at executive sessions of directors; (iii) serves as the principal liaison between our board of directors and our executive officers; (iv) briefs ourboard of directors on issues or concerns arising between meetings of our board of directors, which are generally held monthly; (v) participates actively in corporate governance; and (vi) performs such other duties as our board of directorsmay, from time to time, delegate. Our board of directors believes that the performance of these duties by our Chief Executive Officer provides more consistent communication and coordination throughout the organization, which results in a moreeffective and efficient implementation of corporate strategy. Our board of directors further believes that this combination is important in unifying our strategy behind a single vision. We believe this structure provides consistent and effectiveoversight of our management and is optimal for us, our operations, stockholders and investors.
105
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
In connection with this offering, our board of directors will adopt a new code of business conduct and ethics that applies to all of ouremployees, officers and directors, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other executive and senior financial officers. The full text of the code of business conduct and ethics will be posted on the investor relationssection of our website. We intend to disclose future amendments to certain provisions of our code of business conduct and ethics, or waivers of these provisions, on our website or in public filings.
Board Committees
Audit Committee
The members of our Audit Committee are Rebecca Lynn, Mary Meeker and John C. (Hans) Morris (chair). All of the members of ourAudit Committee meet the requirements for financial literacy under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and . Our board of directors has determined thatMr. Morris is an audit committee financial expert as defined under the applicable rules of the SEC and has the requisite financial sophistication as defined under the applicable rules and regulationsof . All of the members of our Audit Committee are independent directors as defined under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and .
Our Audit Committee oversees financial risk exposures,including monitoring the integrity of our consolidated financial statements, internal controls over financial reporting and the independence of our independent registered public accounting firm. Our Audit Committee receives internal control-relatedassessments and reviews and discusses our annual and quarterly consolidated financial statements with management. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to compliance matters, our Audit Committee meets at least quarterly withmanagement, our independent registered public accounting firm and our internal legal counsel to discuss risks related to our financial reporting function.
Compensation Committee
The members of our Compensation Committee are Daniel Ciporin, Jeffrey Crowe (chair), Rebecca Lynn and John J. Mack. All of the members of ourCompensation Committee are independent under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and .
Our Compensation Committee oversees our executive officer and director compensation arrangements, plans, policies and programs and administersour cash-based and equity-based compensation plans and arrangements for employees generally, including issuance of stock options and other equity-based awards granted other than pursuant to a plan.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are John J. Mack (chair), Mary Meeker and Lawrence Summers. All of the membersof our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are independent under the applicable rules and regulations of .
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee ensures that our board of directors is properly constituted to meet its statutory, fiduciaryand corporate governance oversight. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will advise our board of directors on corporate governance matters and board performance matters, including making recommendations regarding the structure andcomposition of our board of directors and board committees and developing, recommending and monitoring compliance with corporate governance guidelines and policies and our code of business conduct and ethics.
Risk Committee
The members of our Risk Committee are Daniel Ciporin, John C. (Hans) Morris (chair) and Lawrence Summers.
106
Our Risk Committee assists our board of directors in its oversight of our key risks, includingcredit, technology and security, strategic, legal and compliance and operational risks, as well as the guidelines, policies and processes for monitoring and mitigating such risks. The chair of our Risk Committee assists our Audit Committee in itsreview of the risks that have been delegated to our Audit Committee in its charter. The chair of our Risk Committee also coordinates with the chair of our Compensation Committee to assist our Compensation Committee in its consideration of therelationship between risk management policies and practices, corporate strategy and senior executive compensation.
CompensationCommittee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of the members of our Compensation Committee is or has at any time during thepast fiscal year been one of our officers or employees. None of our executive officers currently serves or in the past fiscal year has served as a member of our board of directors or Compensation Committee of any entity that has one or moreexecutive officers serving on our board of directors or our Compensation Committee.
Director Compensation
The non-employee members of our board of directors who are not affiliated with our significant stockholders generally receive a stock optionaward upon commencement of their service as a director. During the year ended December 31, 2013, none of our directors received any cash compensation for services as a member of our board of directors. From time to time, we reimburse certain ofour non-employee directors for travel and other expenses incurred in connection with attending our board and committee meetings.
Thefollowing table presents the total compensation for Mr. Morris in the year ended December 31, 2013. None of the other non-employee members of our board of directors earned any compensation in the year ended December 31, 2013.Mr. Laplanche, our Chief Executive Officer, receives no compensation for his service as a director.
Name of Director(1) | Option Awards(2) | Total | ||||||
John C. (Hans) Morris | $ | 1,251,593 | (3) | $ | 1,251,593 |
(1) | As of December 31, 2013, Mr. Mack held outstanding options to purchase 792,766 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.355 per share, Mr. Morris held outstanding options to purchase 330,000shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.39 per share and Mr. Summers held outstanding options to purchase 666,212 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.39 per share. As of December 31, 2013, Messrs. Ciporinand Crowe and Mses. Lynn and Meeker did not hold any options to purchase shares of common stock. |
(2) | The amounts reported in this column do not reflect the amounts actually received by our non-employee directors. Instead, these amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of each stock option granted to ournon-employee directors during 2013, as computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 13 to consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus. As required by SEC rules,the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. Our non-employee directors who have received options will only realize compensation with regard to these options to the extent the price ofour common stock is greater than the exercise price of such options. |
(3) | Based on options to purchase 330,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.39 per share, granted on February 22, 2013. The options will vest in equal quarterly installments over sixteen quartersfrom the grant date, subject to continued service on our board of directors. |
In July 2014, our Compensation Committeeapproved a non-employee director compensation policy, which will take effect following the completion of this offering. Pursuant to this policy, our non-employee directors will receive (i) an annual retainer of $40,000, (ii) an equityaward upon initial election to our board of directors having a value equal to $574,000 and a four-year term, of which 25% will vest on the one-year anniversary of the grant date and the remaining will vest in equal monthly installments over theremaining three years and (iii) and an annual equity award having a value of $200,000 and a one-year term, of which 100% will vest on the one-year anniversary of the grant date. The first annual retainer payment and first annual equity awardwill be made following our 2015 annual meeting of stockholders. In the event of a change in control, the equity awards granted under our non-employee director compensation policy will immediately vest in full.
107
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Overview
Thissection explains our executive compensation philosophy, objectives and design, our compensation-setting process, our executive compensation program components and the decisions made in 2013 and in the first half of 2014 for our named executiveofficers (NEOs), who were the following executive officers for the year ended December 31, 2013:
| Renaud Laplanche, our founder and Chief Executive Officer; |
| Carrie Dolan, our Chief Financial Officer; |
| Scott Sanborn, our Chief Operating and Marketing Officer; |
| John MacIlwaine, our Chief Technology Officer; and |
| Chaomei Chen, our Chief Risk Officer. |
The compensation provided to our NEOs for 2013 is setforth in detail in the Summary Compensation Table and other tables and the accompanying footnotes and narrative that follow this section.
Executive Compensation Philosophy, Objectives and Design
Philosophy. Our mission is to transform the banking system. To succeed, we must develop new products, update existing products, attractborrowers and investors, operate within an efficient cost structure and deliver a great borrower and investor experience. To achieve these objectives, we need a highly talented team of engineering, product, marketing and general and administrativeprofessionals. We also expect our team to possess and demonstrate strong leadership and management capabilities.
We believe thatto attract, retain and motivate highly talented employees, including our executives, we must foster our company culture and continue to review and, when necessary, make changes to our executive compensation program, which serves as the basis onwhich we hire, evaluate and reward the performance of our employees.
Objectives. The objectives of our executive compensationprogram are to:
| recruit an exceptional executive team; |
| incentivize and reward the achievement of strategic and financial goals of the company, with an emphasis on long-term goals; |
| ensure each of our executive officers receives a total compensation package that encourages his or her long-term retention; and |
| align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders. |
Design. Ourexecutive compensation has been principally weighted toward equity, in the form of stock options. Our board of directors believes that this form of compensation focuses our executives on achieving our strategic and financial goals. Our board ofdirectors also believes that making equity awards a key component of executive compensation aligns the executive team with the long-term interests of our stockholders. To maintain a competitive compensation program, we also offer cash compensationin the form of (i) base salaries to reward individual contributions and compensate our employees for their day-to-day responsibilities and (ii) annual bonuses to drive leadership and incentivize achievement of our shorter-term objectives.
As part of our planning for the transition to being a publicly-traded company, our management and board of directors engaged Compensia, anational compensation consulting firm, in October 2013 to assess our executive
108
pay levels relative to public company market norms and, in December 2013, our board of directors formed a Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee, with the assistance of Compensia,evaluated our executive compensation program, including our mix of cash and equity compensation in 2014 and approved changes to our program.
We will continue to evaluate our executive compensation program at least annually or as circumstances require based on our business objectivesand the competitive environment for talent. We anticipate continuing our emphasis on pay-for-performance and long-term incentive compensation for our executive officers. Our Compensation Committee has retained Compensia to provide executivecompensation advisory services for 2014.
Compensation-Setting Process
Role of Our Board of Directors. Prior to the formation of our Compensation Committee in December 2013, our board of directors oversawour executive officer (including our NEO) and director compensation arrangements, plans, policies and programs and administered our cash-based and equity-based compensation plans and arrangements for employees generally.
Role of Management. In setting compensation for 2013, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief People Officerworked closely with our board of directors in managing our executive compensation program. Our Chief Executive Officer made recommendations to our board of directors regarding compensation for our executive officers other than himself because of hisdaily involvement with our executive team. No executive officer participated directly in the final deliberations or determinations regarding his or her own compensation package.
Role of Our Compensation Committee.Our Compensation Committee, which was formed in December 2013, currently oversees our executiveofficer and director compensation. Our Compensation Committee is expected to meet at least twice a year or more frequently, as determined appropriate by our Compensation Committee.
Role of Compensation Consultant. Our board of directors selected Compensia to advise on executive compensation matters given itsexpertise in the technology industry and its knowledge of our peer companies. During the year ended December 31, 2013 and in the first half of 2014, Compensia provided the following services:
| advised on our transitioning of executive pay from private company practices to those of a publicly-traded company compensation program; |
| assisted in the development of the peer group of companies we use to understand market competitive compensation practices; |
| reviewed and assessed our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officer base salaries, cash bonuses and equity compensation levels and plan structures relative to the market and our peers; |
| reviewed and assessed market and best practice with respect to executive severance and change in control arrangements; |
| assisted in the development of our equity compensation strategy, including the development of award guidelines and an aggregate spending budget; and |
| reviewed and assessed board of director compensation market practices. |
Compensia does notprovide any services to us other than the services described above. Our board of directors believes that Compensia does not have any conflicts of interest in advising our board of directors under applicable rules and regulations.
109
Use of Comparative Market Data. Prior to 2014, our management and board of directors usedpublicly available data on the compensation policies and practices of comparable publicly-traded companies as a reference to understand our competitive market for executive talent, but they did not specifically identify a peer group or seek tobenchmark our executive compensation to any particular level.
In connection with our retention of Compensia, our board of directorsdirected management to conduct a market analysis for purposes of understanding the competitive market for executive talent and making executive compensation comparisons. As part of this undertaking, we formalized our process of identifying a peergroup for comparative purposes. Following discussions with our management team, our board of directors and Compensia identified comparative peer group companies that they believed would be useful in determining a reference point for what we shouldconsider to be market levels of cash and equity compensation.
In developing our compensation peer group, we focused primarilyon public technology companies whose shares are listed in the United States. We considered the revenue, revenue growth, net income and market capitalization of these companies, and determined that selecting peer companies with levels both above andbelow our own financial metrics was appropriate. Our management, board of directors and Compensation Committee believed that including companies with higher revenues, an income and market capitalization was appropriate due to our historical andrecent rapid growth. The compensation peer group includes a combination of internet and technology companies where, as a result of rapid growth, the scope and complexity of the peer companies senior executive positions were comparable to thescope and complexity of our executive positions.
In February 2014, our Compensation Committee determined to use the following peer groupof companies:
Angies List | Pandora Media | |
CoStar Group | ServiceNow | |
Financial Engines | Splunk | |
HomeAway | Trulia | |
Workday | ||
MarketAxess Holdings | Yelp | |
MercadoLibre | Zillow | |
OpenTable |
Our Compensation Committee expects to periodically review and update this peer group.
Our management and our Compensation Committee also reviewed compensation data from a group of technology companies headquartered in the SanFrancisco Bay Area with revenues between $200 million and $1 billion in the Radford Global Technology and Global Sales Survey published by AON (Radford Survey).
In 2014, our Compensation Committee reviewed our executive compensation against our peer group and the Radford Survey to ensure that ourexecutive officer compensation program is sufficient to achieve its objectives. Management provided our Compensation Committee with total compensation data at various percentiles within both the peer group and the Radford Survey. Overall, based onour peer group analysis, total cash compensation for each of our NEOs was generally below the median of similarly situated executives in both our peer group and the Radford Survey.
Our Compensation Committee also reviewed the in-the-money value of current equity holdings of our executive officers against a reference groupof recent technology company initial public offerings with post-offering market capitalizations of greater than $500 million.
While ourCompensation Committee considered this data in determining executive officer compensation, it did not seek to benchmark our executive compensation to any particular level. The total compensation for our NEOs was not determined based on any pre-settarget percentile of market. Rather, we sought to compensate
110
our executive officers at a level that would allow us to successfully recruit and retain the best possible talent for our executive team. We relied heavily on the knowledge and experience of ourCompensation Committee and management in determining the appropriate compensation levels for our executive officers.
ExecutiveCompensation Program Components
Elements of Executive Compensation. Our executive officer compensation packages generallyinclude:
| equity-based compensation in the form of stock options; |
| base salary; and |
| cash bonuses. |
We believe that our compensation mix supports our objective of focusing onat-risk compensation having significant financial upside based on company and individual performance. We expect to continue to emphasize equity awards because of the direct link that equity compensation provides between stockholder interests and theinterests of our executive officers, thereby motivating our executive officers to focus on increasing our value over the long term.
Equity Compensation. We have used stock options as the principal component of our executive compensation program. Consistent with ourcompensation objectives, we believe this approach aligns our executive teams contributions with our long-term interests and allows our executive team to participate in any future appreciation in our common stock. We believe that stock optionsalso serve as an effective retention tool due to vesting requirements that are based on continued service with us and help create an ownership culture. In granting stock options, we customarily considered, among other things, the executiveofficers cash compensation, the need to create a meaningful opportunity for reward predicated on the creation of long-term stockholder value, our financial results, an evaluation of the expected and actual performance of each executiveofficer, his or her individual contributions and responsibilities and market conditions.
In 2013, our board of directors did not grantany stock options to our NEOs. In making this determination, our board of directors reviewed our historical stock option grants and the number of shares subject to outstanding stock options held by each of our NEOs and concurred with our ChiefExecutive Officers recommendation that the stock options held by our NEOs, taking into consideration the unvested portion and the value of such stock options, appropriately met our retention and incentive goals, and that no additional stockoptions were necessary.
In 2014, our Compensation Committee undertook a review of the aggregate stock options held by each NEO. Thisreview involved a comparison of the aggregate equity awards held by our NEOs compared to our peer group, as well as an analysis of each NEOs total equity holdings in light of the objective of long-term retention. A review of the stock optionsheld by our NEOs showed that a significant portion of the stock options would become vested in 2015 and the remaining unvested portion would be almost entirely vested in 2016. As a result, in February 2014, at the recommendation of our CompensationCommittee, our board of directors granted stock options to our NEOs. Our Compensation Committee reviewed the aggregate number of shares subject to stock options held by each of our NEOs, taking into consideration the unvested portion and the valueof such stock options, as well as the need to maintain the retention value of unvested stock options. Based on such review, our Compensation Committee recommend, and our board of directors approved, the grant of stock options to purchase 1,350,942,675,472, 332,694, 241,960 and 163,322 shares of our common stock to Mr. Laplanche, Mr. Sanborn, Ms. Dolan, Mr. MacIlwaine and Ms. Chen, respectively. These new awards will vest in 16 quarterly increments beginning oneyear after the date of grant, for a total vesting period of five years.
Base Salary. In determining base salaries for 2013, ourboard of directors considered the overall compensation package of our executives and, in particular, the fact that we have assigned greater emphasis on providing compensation in the form of stock options in order to motivate our executive team andfoster long-term
111
growth for the benefit of our stockholders. Historically, our executive officers have received base salaries within a very narrow range that was established when we were a smaller company andthat was based on our desire to maintain internal pay equity between executive officers. As we have grown, we have gradually increased base salaries for our executive officers with the goal of bringing salaries closer to market over time. In June2013, our board of directors reviewed executive salaries, including the salaries of our NEOs, and approved a base salary increase from $300,000 per year to $325,000 per year for each Mr. Laplanche, Mr. Sanborn and Ms. Dolan.Ms. Chens and Mr. MacIlwaines salaries of $270,000 and $300,000 per year, respectively, did not change.
In March2014, our Compensation Committee reviewed executive salaries. Our Compensation Committee approved base salaries of $461,500, $350,000, $330,000 and $300,000 for Mr. Laplanche, Mr. Sanborn, Ms. Dolan and Ms. Chen, respectively.Mr. MacIlwaines base salary did not change. The changes were made in order to bring salaries of each of our NEOs closer to the median of similarly situated executives in our peer group.
Cash Bonuses. Our board of directors approved bonuses for 2013 for our executive officers, including our NEOs, in order to reward ourexecutive officers for achieving our financial and operational goals. Historically, target cash bonuses for executive officers, which had been established as target dollar amounts, varied based on specific negotiations with the individual, usuallyin connection with the individuals hiring. In August 2013, our board of directors reviewed and approved an increased bonus target for each of Mr. Sanborn and Ms. Dolan from $100,000 to $125,000. The change was made in order to bringbonus targets more in line with market, which included technology companies headquartered in the San Francisco Bay Area noted in the Radford Survey.
In 2012, we changed our fiscal year end from March 31 to December 31. However, during the 2012 transition year, we still awarded bonuses on aMarch 31 year-end basis and, therefore, awarded 2012 bonuses based on performance from April 1, 2012 to March 31, 2013 and awarded 2013 bonuses based on performance from April 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013.
Executive bonuses during each of these periods were based on the achievement of corporate performance metrics during such period, withpro-rata payout between 25% and 150% of the target performance level established for each metric. For each of these periods, 100% of our Chief Executive Officers bonus was based on the achievement of performance metrics, while 75% of eachother executives bonus was based on the achievement of performance metrics and 25% of the bonus target was based on individual performance as determined by our Chief Executive Officer.
Corporate Performance Metrics. Our board of directors established total revenue and adjusted EBITDA as the two financial measures to beused as our corporate performance metrics for bonuses. Our total revenue target for the period from April 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013 was $94 million, which was weighted at 60%, and our adjusted EBITDA target was $10 million, which was weighted at40%. Our total revenue target for the period from April 1, 2012 to March 31, 2013 was $32 million, which was weighted at 60%, and our adjusted EBITDA target was $5 million, which was weighted at 40%. For additional information about adjusted EBITDA,see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsReconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
At the time these performance metrics were set, our board of directors believed that the corporate performance metrics were challenging andaggressive. In order to reach target payouts, we would have had to achieve an exceptional year-over-year increase in our annual total revenue and adjusted EBITDA. Our board of directors believed that the achievement of the performance metrics at thetarget levels would require excellent leadership, effective leveraging of our competencies and a clear focus on driving and achieving results throughout the period.
Individual Performance Measures. We expect a high level of performance from each of our executive officers in carrying out his or herrespective responsibilities to achieve results effectively. As a result, each executive officer is evaluated based on his or her overall performance. Our Chief Executive Officer evaluates
112
each executive officers individual performance (other than his own) and, for purposes of determining bonuses, made a recommendation to our board of directors or Compensation Committee.
Bonus Payments for the April 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013 Period. In early 2014, our Compensation Committee reviewed ourApril 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013 corporate performance against our performance metrics and determined that we exceeded our two performance metrics, yielding an aggregate of 131% achievement. This percentage was used to establish the sizeof the bonuses available to executives, including our NEOs, for the noted period.
The following table summarizes the calculations thatwere used in determining the cash bonus paid to each of our NEOs for the April 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013 performance period:
12 Month Bonus Target ($) | Individual Bonus Component (%) | Individual Bonus Achievement (%) | Company Bonus Component (%) | Company Bonus Achievement (%) | Individual Bonus Payout ($) | |||||||||||||||||||
Renaud Laplanche | 150,000 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 131 | 147,375 | ||||||||||||||||||
Carrie Dolan | 125,000 | 25 | 110 | 75 | 131 | 117,891 | ||||||||||||||||||
Scott Sanborn | 125,000 | 25 | 150 | 75 | 131 | 127,266 | ||||||||||||||||||
John MacIlwaine | 100,000 | 25 | 110 | 75 | 131 | 94,313 | ||||||||||||||||||
Chaomei Chen | 50,000 | 25 | 347 | 75 | 131 | 69,328 |
Bonus Payments for the April 1, 2012 to March 31, 2013 Period. In mid-2013, our board ofdirectors reviewed our April 1, 2102 to March 31, 2013 corporate performance against our performance metrics and determined that we exceeded our two performance metrics, yielding an aggregate of 150% achievement. This percentage was usedto establish the size of the bonuses available to executives, including our NEOs, for the noted period.
The following table summarizesthe calculations that were used in determining the cash bonus paid to each of our NEOs for the April 1, 2012 to March 31, 2013 performance period:
12 Month Bonus Target ($) | Individual Bonus Component (%) | Individual Bonus Achievement (%) | Company Bonus Component (%) | Company Bonus Achievement (%) | Individual Bonus Payout ($) | |||||||||||||||||||
Renaud Laplanche | 150,000 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 150 | 225,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Carrie Dolan | 100,000 | 25 | 100 | 75 | 150 | 137,500 | ||||||||||||||||||
Scott Sanborn | 100,000 | 25 | 114 | 75 | 150 | 141,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
John MacIlwaine(1) | 100,000 | 25 | 100 | 75 | 150 | 91,541 | ||||||||||||||||||
Chaomei Chen | 50,000 | 25 | 100 | 75 | 150 | 68,750 |
(1) | Mr. MacIlwaine began serving as our Chief Technology Officer on July 31, 2012. |
Compensation Governance
Our Compensation Committee seeks to ensure sound executive compensation practices to adhere to our pay-for-performance philosophy whileappropriately managing risk and aligning our compensation programs with long-term stockholder interests. We expect the following practices to be in effect following the completion of this offering:
| our Compensation Committee will be comprised solely of independent directors under the standards of the exchange on which our common stock is listed; |
| our Compensation Committee will conduct an annual review and approval of our compensation strategy; and |
| our Compensation Committee will retain discretion on bonus payouts to enable it to respond to unforeseen events and adjust bonus payouts as appropriate. |
113
Benefits Programs
Our employee benefit programs, including our 401(k) plan, our ESPP, which will become effective on the date of this prospectus, and health andwelfare programs, are designed to provide a competitive level of benefits to our employees generally, including our executive officers and their families. We adjust our employee benefit programs as needed based on regular monitoring of applicablelaws and practices and the competitive market. Our executive officers are entitled to participate in the same employee benefit plans, and on the same terms and conditions, as all other U.S. full-time employees.
Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits
Currently, we do not view perquisites or other personal benefits as a significant component of our executive compensation program. Accordingly,we do not generally provide perquisites to our executive team. In the future, we may provide perquisites or other personal benefits in limited circumstances, such as where we believe it is appropriate to assist an individual executive in theperformance of his or her duties, to make our executive team more efficient and effective and for recruitment, motivation or retention purposes. All future practices with respect to perquisites or other personal benefits will be subject to reviewand approval by our Compensation Committee.
Post-Employment Compensation
We intend to enter into new employment agreements with each of our NEOs in connection with this offering. For additional information regardingthese employment agreements, see Employment Agreements.
In hiring our executive officers, we recognized that it wouldbe necessary to recruit candidates from outside our company with the requisite experience and skills. Accordingly, we sought to develop competitive compensation packages to attract qualified candidates who could fill our most critical positions. Atthe same time, we were sensitive to the need to integrate new executive officers into our existing executive compensation structure, balancing both competitive and internal equity considerations.
The new employment agreements that we intend to enter into with our NEOs will also provide for certain protection in the event of theirtermination of employment under specified circumstances, including following a change in control. We believe that these protections are necessary to induce these individuals to forego other opportunities. We also believe that entering into thesearrangements will help our executives maintain continued focus and dedication to their responsibilities to help maximize stockholder value if there is a potential transaction that could involve a change in control of our company.
For additional information regarding these severance and change in control arrangements, see Potential Payments Upon Terminationor Change in Control.
162(m) Tax Deductibility
Section 162(m) of the Code limits the amount that we may deduct from our federal income taxes for remuneration paid to our NEOs to $1million per executive officer per year, unless certain requirements are met. Section 162(m) provides an exception from this deduction limitation for certain forms of performance-based compensation, as well as for the gain recognizedby covered executive officers on the exercise of qualifying compensatory stock options. In addition, grandfather provisions may apply to certain compensation arrangements that were entered into by a corporation before it was publiclyheld. We believe that, to date, all of our compensation that has been granted has been exempt from the Section 162(m) deduction limitation. While our Compensation Committee is mindful of the benefit to us of the full deductibility ofcompensation, our Compensation Committee believes that it should not be constrained by the requirements of Section 162(m) where those requirements would impair flexibility in compensating our executive officers in a manner that can best promoteour corporate objectives. Therefore, our Compensation Committee has not adopted a policy that requires that all compensation be deductible. Our Compensation Committee intends to continue to compensate our executive officers in a manner consistentwith the best interests of our company and stockholders.
114
Summary Compensation Table
The following table provides information regarding the compensation earned during the year ended December 31, 2013 (FY 2013), the ninemonths ended December 31, 2012, the year ended March 31, 2012 (FY 2012) and the year ended March 31, 2011 (FY 2011) by each of our NEOs:
Name and Principal Position | Year(1) | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(2) | Option Awards ($)(3) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||||||
Renaud Laplanche | FY 2013 | 314,583 | | 203,625 | | 518,208 | ||||||||||||||||
Chief Executive Officer | 9 Months 2012 | 216,667 | | 168,750 | 813,738 | 1,199,155 | ||||||||||||||||
FY 2012 | 250,000 | | 100,000 | | 350,000 | |||||||||||||||||
FY 2011 | 218,750 | | 93,750 | 327,394 | 639,894 | |||||||||||||||||
Carrie Dolan | FY 2013 | 314,583 | | 152,266 | | 466,849 | ||||||||||||||||
Chief Financial Officer(4) | 9 Months 2012 | 220,833 | | 103,125 | 325,495 | 649,453 | ||||||||||||||||
FY 2012 | 275,000 | | 87,500 | | 362,500 | |||||||||||||||||
FY 2011 | 171,875 | | 44,100 | 131,683 | 347,658 | |||||||||||||||||
Scott Sanborn | FY 2013 | 314,583 | | 162,516 | | 477,099 | ||||||||||||||||
Chief Operating Officer(5) | 9 Months 2012 | 220,833 | | 105,750 | 406,869 | 733,452 | ||||||||||||||||
FY 2012 | 275,000 | | 90,000 | | 365,000 | |||||||||||||||||
FY 2011 | 235,513 | | 68,685 | 198,391 | 502,589 | |||||||||||||||||
John MacIlwaine | FY 2013 | 300,000 | 87,500 | (7) | 117,198 | | 504,698 | |||||||||||||||
Chief Technology Officer(6) | 9 Months 2012 | 126,154 | 87,500 | (7) | 68,656 | 598,901 | 881,211 | |||||||||||||||
Chaomei Chen | FY 2013 | 270,000 | | 86,516 | | 356,516 | ||||||||||||||||
Chief Risk Officer(8) | 9 Months 2012 | 199,167 | | 51,563 | | 250,730 | ||||||||||||||||
FY 2012 | 208,333 | | 34,356 | 306,786 | 549,475 |
(1) | Effective December 31, 2012, we changed our fiscal year end from March 31 to December 31. Amounts in the FY 2013 row reflect compensation earned from January 1, 2013 to December 31,2013. Amounts in the 9 Months 2012 row reflect compensation earned from April 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012. Amounts in the FY 2012 row reflect compensation earned from April 1, 2011 to March 31, 2012.Amounts in the FY 2011 row reflect compensation earned from April 1, 2010 to March 31, 2011. |
(2) | For more information regarding our non-equity incentive plan awards, see Compensation Discussion and AnalysisExecutive Compensation Program ComponentsCash Bonuses. |
(3) | The amounts reported in this column do not reflect the amounts actually received by our NEOs. These amounts instead reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of each stock option granted to our NEOs during the periodpresented, as computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 13 to consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus. As required by SEC rules, the amounts shownexclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. Our NEOs who have received options will only realize compensation with regard to these options to the extent the trading price of our common stock is greaterthan the exercise price of such options. |
(4) | Ms. Dolan began serving as our Chief Financial Officer in August 2010. |
(5) | Mr. Sanborn began serving as our Chief Marketing Officer in May 2010 and as our Chief Operating Officer in April 2013. |
(6) | Mr. MacIlwaine began serving as our Chief Technology Officer in July 2012. |
(7) | Includes two installments of $43,750 each for Mr. MacIlwaines starting bonus. |
(8) | Ms. Chen began serving as our Chief Risk Officer in June 2011. |
115
Grants of Plan-Based Awards In 2013
The following table sets forth certain information regarding grants of plan-based awards to our NEOs during 2013. Our NEOs did not receive anyequity awards in 2013.
Name | Grant Date | Threshold | Target | Maximum | ||||||||||
Renaud Laplanche | 8/13/2013 | $ | 37,500 | $ | 150,000 | $ | 225,000 | |||||||
Carrie Dolan | 8/13/2013 | 31,250 | 125,000 | 187,500 | ||||||||||
Scott Sanborn | 8/13/2013 | 31,250 | 125,000 | 187,500 | ||||||||||
John MacIlwaine | 8/13/2013 | 25,000 | 100,000 | 150,000 | ||||||||||
Chaomei Chen | 8/13/2013 | 12,500 | 50,000 | 75,000 |
(1) | For more information regarding the achievement of these non-equity incentive plan awards, see Compensation Discussion and AnalysisExecutive Compensation Program ComponentsCash Bonuses. |
2013 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
The following table sets forth certain information regarding outstanding equity awards held by our NEOs that remained outstanding as ofDecember 31, 2013.
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | |||||||||||||||||
Name | Grant Date | |||||||||||||||||||
Renaud Laplanche | 10/16/2012 | (1) | 250,000 | 750,000 | 1.39 | 10/16/2022 | ||||||||||||||
5/28/2010 | (2) | 2,310,000 | 330,000 | 0.205 | 5/28/2020 | |||||||||||||||
Carrie Dolan | 10/16/2012 | (1) | 60,532 | 300,000 | 1.39 | 10/16/2022 | ||||||||||||||
2/23/2011 | (3) | 83,320 | 249,964 | 0.205 | 2/23/2021 | |||||||||||||||
Scott Sanborn | 10/16/2012 | (1) | 125,000 | 375,000 | 1.39 | 10/16/2022 | ||||||||||||||
5/28/2010 | (4) | 483,560 | 199,970 | 0.205 | 5/28/2020 | |||||||||||||||
John MacIlwaine | 10/16/2012 | (5) | 174,612 | 436,258 | 1.39 | 10/16/2022 | ||||||||||||||
Chaomei Chen | 2/16/2012 | (6) | 91,868 | 551,200 | 0.355 | 2/16/2022 |
(1) | The holders right to purchase the shares subject to the option vests ratably over 16 calendar quarters beginning October 1, 2012. |
(2) | The holders right to purchase 25% of the shares subject to the options vested on April 1, 2011, and the holders right to purchase the remaining shares subject to the option vests ratably over thefollowing 12 calendar quarters. |
(3) | The holders right to purchase 25% of the shares subject to the options vested on August 16, 2011, and the holders right to purchase the remaining shares subject to the option vests ratably over thefollowing 12 calendar quarters. |
(4) | The holders right to purchase 25% of the shares subject to the options vested on May 24, 2011, and the holders right to purchase the remaining shares subject to the option vests ratably over thefollowing 12 calendar quarters. |
(5) | The holders right to purchase 25% of the shares subject to the options vested on July 31, 2013, and the holders right to purchase the remaining shares subject to the option vests ratably over the following12 calendar quarters. |
(6) | The holders right to purchase 25% of the shares subject to the options vested on June 1, 2012, and the holders right to purchase the remaining shares subject to the option vests ratably over thefollowing 12 calendar quarters. |
116
2013 Option Exercises
The following table sets forth for each of our NEOs the number of shares of our common stock acquired upon the exercise of stock options during2013 and the aggregate value realized upon exercise.
Option Awards | ||||||||
Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise | Value Realized on Exercise(1) | ||||||
Renaud Laplanche | | $ | | |||||
Carrie Dolan | 809,318 | $ | 2,069,050 | |||||
Scott Sanborn | 716,260 | $ | 1,702,820 | |||||
John MacIlwaine | 36,800 | $ | 204,650 | |||||
Chaomei Chen | 275,600 | $ | 1,384,423 |
(1) | The value realized on exercise was calculated as the difference between the actual sales price to a third party of the shares underlying the options exercised and the applicable exercise price of those options. |
Employment Agreements
We intend to enter into new employment agreements with each of our NEOs in connection with this offering. We expect that each of theseagreements will provide for at-will employment and include each NEOs base salary, a discretionary annual incentive bonus opportunity and standard employee benefit plan participation. Each of our NEOs has also executed our standard form ofconfidential information and invention assignment agreement.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
Under the terms of the new employment agreements that we intend to enter into with each of our NEOs in connection with this offering, we expectthat our NEOs will be eligible to receive certain benefits in connection with the termination of their employment, depending on the circumstances, including following a change in control of our company.
The actual amounts that would be paid or distributed to our NEOs as a result of a termination event occurring in the future may be differentthan those set forth below as many factors will affect the amount of any payments and benefits upon a termination of employment. For example, some of the factors that could affect the amounts payable include the NEOs base salary and the marketprice of our common stock at the time of the termination event. Additionally, we or an acquirer may mutually agree with the NEOs on severance terms that vary from those provided in pre-existing agreements.
The tables below set forth the value of the benefits that each of our NEOs would be entitled to receive upon a qualifying termination event asof December 31, 2013.
Renaud Laplanche
No Change in Control | Change in Control | |||||||||||
Benefit | Involuntary Termination | No Termination | Involuntary Termination | |||||||||
Cash severance | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
Equity vesting acceleration(1) | ||||||||||||
Total severance and equity vesting acceleration |
(1) | Calculated based on the amount by which the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the offering price range set forth on thecover page of this prospectus, exceeds the per share exercise price of the applicable stock option. |
117
Carrie Dolan
No Change in Control | Change in Control | |||||||||||
Benefit | Involuntary Termination | No Termination | Involuntary Termination | |||||||||
Cash severance | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
Equity vesting acceleration(1) | ||||||||||||
Total severance and equity vesting acceleration |
(1) | Calculated based on the amount by which the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the offering price range set forth on thecover page of this prospectus, exceeds the per share exercise price of the applicable stock option. |
Scott Sanborn
No Change in Control | Change in Control | |||||||||||
Benefit | Involuntary Termination | No Termination | Involuntary Termination | |||||||||
Cash severance | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
Equity vesting acceleration(1) | ||||||||||||
Total severance and equity vesting acceleration |
(1) | Calculated based on the amount by which the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the offering price range set forth on thecover page of this prospectus, exceeds the per share exercise price of the applicable stock option. |
John MacIlwaine
No Change in Control | Change in Control | |||||||||||
Benefit | Involuntary Termination | No Termination | Involuntary Termination | |||||||||
Cash severance | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
Equity vesting acceleration(1) | ||||||||||||
Total severance and equity vesting acceleration |
(1) | Calculated based on the amount by which the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the offering price range set forth on thecover page of this prospectus, exceeds the per share exercise price of the applicable stock option. |
Chaomei Chen
No Change in Control | Change in Control | |||||||||||
Benefit | Involuntary Termination | No Termination | Involuntary Termination | |||||||||
Cash severance | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
Equity vesting acceleration(1) | ||||||||||||
Total severance and equity vesting acceleration |
(1) | Calculated based on the amount by which the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the offering price range set forth on thecover page of this prospectus, exceeds the per share exercise price of the applicable stock option. |
118
Employee Benefit Plans
2007 Stock Incentive Plan
We previously adopted the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (2007 Plan). The 2007 Plan provides for the grant of both incentive stock options, whichqualify for favorable tax treatment to their recipients under Section 422 of the Code, and non-statutory stock options, as well as for the issuance of shares of restricted stock and other stock-based awards. We may grant incentive stock optionsonly to our employees. We may grant non-statutory stock options to our employees, directors and consultants. The exercise price of each stock option must be at least equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. Theexercise price of incentive stock options granted to 10% stockholders must be at least equal to 110% of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. The maximum permitted term of options granted under our 2007 Plan is 10 years,except that the maximum permitted term of incentive stock options granted to 10% stockholders is five years. In the event of our merger or consolidation, the 2007 Plan provides that, unless the applicable option agreement provides otherwise, optionsheld by current employees, directors and consultants will vest in full if they are not assumed or substituted and all unexercised options shall expire on the consummation of the merger or consolidation.
As of June 30, 2014, we had reserved 41,977,268 shares of our common stock for issuance under our 2007 Plan, of which 2,335,498 were unissuedand remained available for future grant. We will cease issuing awards under our 2007 Plan upon the implementation of our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (2014 Plan). Our 2014 Plan will be effective on the date immediately prior to the date of thisprospectus. As a result, we will not grant any additional options under the 2007 Plan following that date, and the 2007 Plan will terminate at that time. However, any outstanding options granted under the 2007 Plan will remain outstanding, subjectto the terms of our 2007 Plan and stock option agreements, until such outstanding options are exercised or until they terminate or expire by their terms. Options granted under the 2007 Plan have terms similar to those described below with respect tooptions to be granted under our 2014 Plan.
All shares of our common stock reserved but not issued or subject to outstanding grants underour 2007 Plan on the date of this prospectus will become available for grant and issuance under our 2014 Plan. In addition, shares issued under the 2007 Plan will become available for grant and issuance under our 2014 Plan if they are(i) subject to stock options or other awards that cease to be subject to those options or other awards by forfeiture or otherwise, (ii) issued pursuant to the exercise of options that are forfeited after the date of this prospectus,(iii) repurchased by us at the original issue price or (iv) used to pay the exercise price of an option or withheld to satisfy the tax withholding obligations related to any award.
2014 Equity Incentive Plan
We expect our board of directors to adopt the 2014 Plan, subject to stockholder approval, to become effective on the date immediately prior tothe date of this prospectus. The 2014 Plan will terminate in 2024, unless sooner terminated by our board of directors. The purpose of the 2014 Plan is to attract, retain and motivate selected employees, consultants and directors through the grantingof stock-based compensation awards and cash-based performance bonus awards. The 2014 Plan is also designed to permit us to make cash-based awards and equity-based awards intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section162(m) of the Code.
Stock Awards. The 2014 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options, non-statutory stock options,stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units (RSUs), performance-based stock awards and other forms of equity compensation. In addition, the 2014 Plan provides for the grant of performance cash awards. Incentive stockoptions may be granted only to employees, subject to certain limitation described below. All other awards may be granted to employees, as well as directors and consultants.
119
The principal features of the 2014 Plan are summarized below. This summary is qualified in itsentirety by reference to the text of the 2014 Plan, which is filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.
Share Reserve. We reserved shares of our common stock to beissued under our 2014 Plan. The number of shares reserved for issuance under our 2014 Plan will automatically increase on January 1 of each year beginning January 1, 2016 through the termination of the plan by the lesser of 5% of the totaloutstanding shares of our common stock as of the immediately preceding December 31 or a number determined by our board of directors or Compensation Committee. In addition, shares reserved but not issued or subject to outstanding awards underour 2007 Plan on the date of this prospectus will be available for grant and issuance under our 2014 Plan and the following shares will again be available for grant and issuance under our 2014 Plan:
| shares subject to options or stock appreciation rights granted under our 2014 Plan that cease to be subject to the option or stock appreciation right for any reason other than exercise of the option or stockappreciation right; |
| shares subject to awards granted under our 2014 Plan that are subsequently forfeited or repurchased by us at the original issue price; |
| shares subject to awards granted under our 2014 Plan that otherwise terminate without shares being issued; |
| shares surrendered, cancelled or exchanged for cash or a different award (or combination thereof); |
| shares subject to stock options or other awards under our 2007 Plan that cease to be subject to those options or other awards by forfeiture or otherwise; |
| shares issued pursuant to the exercise of options under our 2007 Plan that are forfeited after the date of this prospectus; |
| shares issued under our 2007 Plan that are repurchased by us at the original issue price; and |
| shares subject to awards under our 2007 Plan that are used to pay the exercise price of an option or withheld to satisfy the tax withholding obligations related to any award. |
As of the date of this prospectus, no shares of our common stock have been issued under the 2014 Plan. No person may be granted stock awardscovering more than shares of our common stock under the 2014 Plan during any calendar year pursuant to stock options or stock appreciation rights other than a new employee ofours, who will be eligible to receive no more than shares of common stock under the 2014 Plan in the calendar year in which the employee commences employment. Such limitations are designed to help ensure that any deductions to which we wouldotherwise be entitled with respect to such stock awards will not be subject to the $1,000,000 limitation on the income tax deductibility of compensation paid per covered executive officer imposed by Section 162(m) of the Code. The aggregatenumber of shares of our common stock that may be subject to awards granted to any one non-employee director pursuant to the 2014 Plan in any calendar year shall not exceed 1,500,000.
Administration. Our 2014 Plan will be administered by our Compensation Committee, all of the members of which are outside directors asdefined under applicable federal tax laws, or by our board of directors acting in place of our Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee will have the authority to construe and interpret our 2014 Plan, grant awards and make all otherdeterminations necessary or advisable for the administration of the 2014 Plan.
Our Compensation Committee has the authority to repriceany outstanding stock award (by reducing the exercise price of any outstanding option, canceling an option in exchange for cash or another equity award or any other action that may be deemed a repricing under generally accepted accountingprovisions) under the 2014 Plan without the approval of our stockholders.
120
Stock Options. Incentive and non-statutory stock options are granted pursuant to incentiveand non-statutory stock option agreements. Our Compensation Committee determines the exercise price for a stock option, within the terms and conditions of the 2014 Plan, provided that the exercise price of a stock option cannot be less than 100% ofthe fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant, except where a higher exercise price is required in the case of certain incentive stock options, as described below.
We anticipate that in general, options will vest over a four-year period. Options may vest based on time or achievement of performanceconditions. Our Compensation Committee may provide for options to be exercised only as they vest or to be immediately exercisable with any shares issued on exercise being subject to our right of repurchase that lapses as the shares vest. The maximumterm of options granted under our 2014 Plan will be 10 years. Our Compensation Committee will determine the term of stock options granted under the 2014 Plan, up to a maximum of 10 years, except in the case of certain incentive stock options,as described below. Unless the terms of an optionholders stock option agreement provide otherwise, if an optionholders relationship with us, or any of our affiliates, ceases for any reason other than for cause, disability or death, theoptionholder may exercise any vested options for a period of three months following the cessation of service. If an optionholders service relationship with us is terminated for cause, then the option terminates immediately. If anoptionholders service relationship with us or any of our affiliates ceases due to disability or death, or an optionholder dies within the period (if any) specified in the award agreement following cessation of service, the optionholder or abeneficiary may exercise any vested options for a period of at least six months in the event of disability or death. The option term may be extended in the event that exercise of the option following termination of service is prohibited byapplicable securities laws. In no event, however, may an option be exercised beyond the expiration of its maximum term.
Acceptableconsideration for the purchase of common stock issued upon the exercise of a stock option will be determined by the Compensation Committee and may include (i) cash, check, bank draft or money order, (ii) a broker-assisted cashlessexercise, (iii) the tender of common stock or common stock previously owned by the optionholder, (iv) cancellation of our indebtedness to the optionholder, (v) waiver of compensation due to the optionholder for services rendered and(vi) other legal consideration approved by our Compensation Committee.
Unless our Compensation Committee provides otherwise, optionsgenerally are not transferable except by will, the laws of descent and distribution, or pursuant to a domestic relations order. An optionholder may, however, designate a beneficiary who may exercise the option following the optionholdersdeath.
Limitations on Incentive Stock Options. Incentive stock options may be granted only to our employees. The aggregate fairmarket value, determined at the time of grant, of shares of our common stock with respect to incentive stock options that are exercisable for the first time by an optionholder during any calendar year under all of our stock plans may not exceed$100,000. No incentive stock option may be granted to any person who, at the time of the grant, owns or is deemed to own stock comprising more than 10% of our total combined voting power or that of any of our affiliates unless (i) the optionexercise price is at least 110% of the fair market value of the stock subject to the option on the date of grant and (ii) the term of the incentive stock option does not exceed five years from the date of grant.
Restricted Stock Awards. Restricted stock awards are granted pursuant to restricted stock award agreements. A restricted stock award isan offer by us to sell shares of our common stock subject to restrictions. The price, if any, of a restricted stock award will be determined by our Compensation Committee. Restricted stock awards may be granted in consideration for (i) cash,check, bank draft or money order, (ii) past or future services rendered to us or our affiliates or (iii) any other form of legal consideration determined by our Compensation Committee. Shares of common stock acquired under a restrictedstock award may, but need not, be subject to a share repurchase option or forfeiture restriction in our favor in accordance with a vesting schedule to be determined by our Compensation Committee. Rights to acquire shares under a restricted stockaward may be transferred only upon such terms and conditions as set by our Compensation Committee. Except as otherwise provided in the applicable award agreement, restricted stock awards that have not vested will be forfeited or subject torepurchase upon the participants cessation of continuous service for any reason.
121
Restricted Stock Unit Awards. RSU awards are granted pursuant to RSU award agreements.RSUs represent the right to receive shares of our common stock at a specified date in the future, subject to forfeiture of that right because of termination of the holders services to us or the holders failure to achieve certainperformance conditions. If a RSU has not been forfeited, then on the date specified in the RSU agreement, we may deliver to the holder of the RSU whole shares of our common stock, which may be subject to additional restrictions, cash or acombination of our common stock and cash. Our Compensation Committee may also permit the holder of a RSU to defer payment to a date or dates after the RSU is earned, provided that the terms of the RSU and any deferral satisfy the requirements ofSection 409A of the Code.
Stock Appreciation Rights. Stock appreciation rights are granted pursuant to stockappreciation rights agreements. Stock appreciation rights provide for a payment, or payments, in cash or shares of our common stock, to the holder based upon the increase in the fair market value of our common stock on the date of exercise from thestated exercise price (subject to any maximum number of shares as may be specified in the award agreement). The payment may occur upon the exercise of a stock appreciation right or deferred with such interest or dividend equivalent, if any, as ourCompensation Committee determines, provided that the terms of the stock appreciation right and any deferral satisfy the requirements of Section 409A of the Code. Our Compensation Committee will determine the exercise price for a stockappreciation right, which generally cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. Stock appreciation rights may vest based on time or achievement of performance conditions. Stock appreciation rightsexpire under the same rules that apply to stock options.
Performance Awards. The 2014 Plan permits the grant of performancestock awards and performance cash awards that may qualify as performance-based compensation that is not subject to the $1,000,000 limitation on the income tax deductibility of compensation paid per covered executive officer imposed bySection 162(m) of the Code (performance awards). To help ensure that the compensation attributable to performance awards will so qualify, our committee can structure such awards so that stock will be issued or paid pursuant to such award onlyupon the achievement of certain pre-established performance goals during a designated performance period. Awards may be made under the 2014 Plan that are based on performance criteria but are not performance awards under this paragraph. The maximumbenefit that may be granted to a participant in any calendar year pursuant to a performance award described in this paragraph may not exceed $1,000,000.
Other Stock Awards. Our Compensation Committee may grant other stock awards based in whole or in part on our common stock. OurCompensation Committee will set the number of shares under the stock award and all other terms and conditions of such stock awards.
Changes to Capital Structure. In the event that there is a specified type of change in our capital structure, such as a stocksplit, appropriate adjustments will be made to (i) the maximum number of shares reserved under the 2014 Plan, (ii) the maximum number of shares subject to options, stock appreciation rights and performance stock awards that can be grantedin a calendar year, (iii) the maximum number of shares that may be issued upon exercise of incentive stock options, (iv) the maximum number of shares that may be awarded to a member of our board of directors and (v) the number ofshares and exercise price, if applicable, of all outstanding stock awards.
Corporate Transactions. The 2014 Plan providesthat, in the event of a sale, lease or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets or specified types of mergers or consolidations (corporate transaction), outstanding awards under our 2014 Plan may be assumed or replaced by anysurviving or acquiring corporation; the surviving or acquiring corporation may substitute similar awards for those outstanding under the 2014 Plan; outstanding awards may be settled for the full value of such outstanding award (whether or not thenvested or exercisable) in cash or securities of the successor entity with payment deferred until the date or dates the award would have become exercisable or vested; or outstanding awards may be terminated for no consideration. Our board ofdirectors has the discretion to provide that a stock award under the 2014 Plan will immediately vest as to all or any portion of the shares subject to the stock award at the time of a corporate transaction or in the event a participantsservice with us or a successor entity is terminated actually or constructively within a designated
122
period following the occurrence of the corporate transaction. Stock awards held by participants under the 2014 Plan will not vest automatically on such an accelerated basis unless specificallyprovided in the participants applicable award agreement. In the event of a corporate transaction, the vesting of all awards granted to non-employee directors shall accelerate and such awards shall become exercisable (as applicable) in fullupon the consummation of the corporate transaction.
Plan Suspension or Termination. Our board of directors has the authorityto suspend or terminate the 2014 Plan at any time provided that such action does not impair the existing rights of any participant.
2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
We expect our board of directors to adopt the 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP), subject to stockholder approval, which will becomeeffective on the date of this prospectus. The purpose of the ESPP is to assist us in retaining the services of new employees and securing the services of new and existing employees while providing incentives for such individuals to exert maximumefforts toward our success. When effective, the ESPP will enable eligible employees to purchase shares of our common stock at a discount following this offering. Purchases will be accomplished through participation in discrete offering periods. TheESPP is intended to qualify as an employee stock purchase plan within the meaning of Section 423 of the Code.
ShareReserve. Following this offering, the ESPP authorizes the issuance of shares of our common stock pursuant to purchase rights granted to our employees or to employees ofour subsidiaries. The number of shares of our common stock reserved for issuance will automatically increase on January 1 of each year beginning January 1, 2016 through the termination of the plan by the lesser of 1% of the totaloutstanding shares of our common stock as of the immediately preceding December 31 or a number determined by our board of directors or Compensation Committee. As of the date hereof, no shares of our common stock have been purchased under theESPP. The aggregate number of shares issued over the term of our ESPP will not exceed shares of our common stock, and no other shares may be added to the ESPP without theapproval of our stockholders.
Administration. The ESPP will be administered by our Compensation Committee. The ESPP isimplemented through a series of offerings of purchase rights to eligible employees. Under the ESPP, we may specify offerings with durations of not more than 27 months, and may specify shorter purchase periods within each offering. Each offeringwill have one or more purchase dates on which not more than 5,000 shares of our common stock may be purchased by any employee participating in the offering. The first offering period will begin on the date of this prospectus and will endapproximately six months following the date of this prospectus. Each purchase period will be for six months. An offering may be terminated under certain circumstances. When the initial offering period commences, our employees who meet theeligibility requirements for participation in that offering period will automatically be granted a nontransferable option to purchase shares in that offering period. For subsequent offering periods, new participants will be required to enroll in atimely manner. Once an employee is enrolled, participation will be automatic in subsequent offering periods. An employees participation automatically ends upon termination of employment for any reason.
Payroll Deductions. Our employees generally are eligible to participate in our ESPP if they are employed by us for at least 20hours per week and more than five months in a calendar year. Employees who are 5% stockholders, or would become 5% stockholders as a result of their participation in our ESPP, are ineligible to participate in our ESPP. We may impose additionalrestrictions on eligibility. Under our ESPP, eligible employees will be able to acquire shares of our common stock by accumulating funds through payroll deductions. Our eligible employees will be able to select a rate of payroll deduction between 1%and 15% of their eligible cash compensation. Unless otherwise determined by our board of directors or Compensation Committee, common stock will be purchased for employees participating in the ESPP at a price per share equal to the lower of(i) 85% of the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the first date of an offering or (ii) 85% of the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date of purchase.
123
Limitations. No holder will have the right to purchase our shares at a rate that,when aggregated with purchase rights under all our employee stock purchase plans that are also outstanding in the same calendar year(s), would have a fair market value of more than $25,000, determined in accordance with Section 423 of the Code,for each calendar year in which that right is outstanding. Finally, no employee will be eligible for the grant of any purchase rights under the ESPP, if immediately after such rights are granted, such employee has voting power over 5% or more of ouroutstanding capital stock measured by vote or value pursuant to Section 424(d) of the Code.
If we experience a change in controltransaction, any offering period that commenced prior to the closing of the change in control transaction will be shortened and terminated on a new purchase date. The new purchase date will occur prior to the closing of the proposed change incontrol transaction and our ESPP will then terminate on the closing of the proposed change in control.
401(k) Plan
We maintain a retirement plan for the benefit of our employees. The plan is intended to qualify as a tax-qualified plan underSection 401(k) of the Code, so that contributions to the 401(k) plan, and income earned on such contributions, are not taxable to participants until withdrawn or distributed from the 401(k) plan (except in the case of contributions under the401(k) plan designated as Roth contributions). The 401(k) plan provides that each participant may contribute up to 100% of his or her pre-tax compensation, up to a statutory limit, which is $17,500 for 2014. Participants who are at least 50 yearsold can also make catch-up contributions of up to an additional $5,500 above the statutory limit. Under the 401(k) plan, each employee is fully vested in his or her deferred salary contributions. Employee contributions are held andinvested by the plans trustee as directed by participants. Our 401(k) plan provides for discretionary matching of employee contributions.
Limitations on Liability and Indemnification Matters
Our restated certificate of incorporation that we expect be in effect upon the completion of this offering contains provisions that will limitthe liability of our directors for monetary damages to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law. Consequently, our directors will not be personally liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages for any breach offiduciary duties as directors, except liability for:
| any breach of the directors duty of loyalty to us or our stockholders; |
| any act or omission not in good faith or that involves intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law; |
| unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or redemptions as provided in Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law; or |
| any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit. |
Our restatedcertificate of incorporation and restated bylaws that we expect to be in effect upon the completion of this offering will require us to indemnify our directors and officers to the maximum extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law andallow us to indemnify other employees and agents as provided for in the Delaware General Corporation Law. Our restated bylaws will also require us to advance expenses incurred by our directors and officers for the defense of any action for whichindemnification is required or permitted, subject to very limited exceptions.
We also intend to enter into new indemnification agreementswith our directors and executive officers and certain key employees that may be broader than the specific indemnification provisions contained in the Delaware General Corporation Law. These indemnification agreements will require us, among otherthings, to indemnify our directors, executive officers and key employees against liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service. These indemnification agreements will also require us to advance all expenses incurred by thedirectors, executive officers and key employees in investigating or defending any such action, suit or proceeding. We believe that these
124
agreements are necessary to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve as directors, executive officers and key employees. Prior to the completion of this offering, we also intend toobtain directors and officers liability insurance.
The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions in our restatedcertificate of incorporation and restated bylaws that we expect to be in effect upon completion of this offering may discourage stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against our directors and officers for breaches of their fiduciary duties. Suchprovisions may also reduce the likelihood of derivative litigation against our directors and officers, even though an action, if successful, might benefit us and other stockholders. Further, a stockholders investment may be adversely affectedto the extent that we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against directors and officers as required by these indemnification provisions.
At present, we are not aware of any pending litigation or proceeding involving any person who is or was one of our directors, officers,employees or other agents or is or was serving at our request as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise for which indemnification is sought, and we are not aware of anythreatened litigation that may result in claims for indemnification.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under theSecurities Act may be permitted to directors, executive officers or persons controlling us, we have been informed that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is thereforeunenforceable.
125
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In addition to the compensation arrangements, including employment, termination of employment and change in control arrangements, discussed inthe sections titled Management and Executive Compensation and the registration rights described in the section titled Description of Capital StockRegistration Rights, the following is a description of eachtransaction since April 1, 2010 and each currently proposed transaction in which:
| we have been or are to be a participant; |
| the amount involved exceeded or exceeds $120,000; and |
| any of our directors, executive officers or holders of more than 5% of our outstanding capital stock, or any immediate family member of, or person sharing the household with, any of these individuals or entities, had orwill have a direct or indirect material interest. |
Transactions on Our Platform
Our executive officers, directors and certain affiliates (including immediate family members) have opened investor accounts with us, madedeposits to and withdrawals from their accounts and funded portions of loans. All of these transactions were conducted on terms and conditions that were not more favorable than those obtained by investors not related to us.
The following tables summarize deposits and withdrawals made by our directors and executive officers for the periods indicated. No otherrelated party has made deposits or withdrawals exceeding $120,000.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 | ||||||||
Deposits | Withdrawals | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Daniel Ciporin | $ | 500,000 | $ | 40,958 | ||||
John J. Mack | 450,000 | 69,317 | ||||||
Larry Summers | 200,000 | | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total | $ | 1,150,000 | $ | 110,275 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2013 | ||||||||
Deposits | Withdrawals | |||||||
Daniel Ciporin | $ | 600,000 | $ | 128,288 | ||||
Jeffrey Crowe | 800,000 | 444,227 | ||||||
John J. Mack | 405,118 | 617,779 | ||||||
Larry Summers | 530,898 | | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total | $ | 2,336,016 | $ | 1,190,294 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2012 | ||||||||
Deposits | Withdrawals | |||||||
Daniel Ciporin | $ | 500,000 | $ | 129,698 | ||||
Jeffrey Crowe | 150,000 | | ||||||
John J. Mack | 529,540 | 451,617 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total | $ | 1,179,540 | $ | 581,315 | ||||
|
|
|
|
126
Year Ended March 31, 2012 | ||||||||
Deposits | Withdrawals | |||||||
Daniel Ciporin | $ | 209,500 | $ | 158,113 | ||||
John J. Mack | 1,700,000 | 199,265 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total | $ | 1,909,500 | $ | 357,378 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2011 | ||||||||
Deposits | Withdrawals | |||||||
Daniel Ciporin | $ | 400,902 | $ | 118,331 | ||||
Jeffrey Crowe | 446,000 | 100,000 | ||||||
Scott Sanborn | 134,710 | 137,861 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total | $ | 981,612 | $ | 356,192 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Financing Arrangements With Directors and Significant Stockholders
In April 2010, we issued 31,243,218 shares of Series C convertible preferred stock to investors for aggregate gross cash consideration of$24.5 million. In 2011 and 2012, we issued and sold 18,015,356 shares of Series D convertible preferred stock to investors for aggregate gross cash consideration of $32.0 million. In June 2012, we issued and sold 5,000,000 shares of Series Econvertible preferred stock to investors for aggregate gross cash consideration of $17.5 million.
The participants in these convertiblepreferred stock financings included the following directors and holders of more than 5% of our voting securities or entities affiliated with them.
Participants | Series C Convertible Preferred Stock | Aggregate Consideration | Series D Convertible Preferred Stock | Aggregate Consideration | Series E Convertible Preferred Stock | Aggregate Consideration | ||||||||||||||||||
Norwest Venture Partners X, L.P.(1) | | $ | | 1,817,632 | $ | 3,233,022 | | $ | | |||||||||||||||
Canaan VII L.P. | 6,019,200 | 4,718,150 | 1,900,022 | 3,379,569 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Morgenthaler Venture Partners IX, L.P.(2) | 3,827,262 | 2,999,999 | 843,312 | 1,499,999 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Entities affiliated with Foundation Capital(3) | 13,331,632 | 10,450,000 | 1,502,396 | 2,672,312 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
John J. Mack | | | | | 714,286 | 2,500,001 |
(1) | Jeffrey Crowe, a member of our board of directors, is an officer of NVP Associates, LLC, the managing member of the general partner of Norwest Venture Partners X, L.P. |
(2) | Rebecca Lynn, a member of our board of directors, is a managing member of the general partner of Morgenthaler Venture Partners IX, L.P. |
(3) | Represents 147,314 shares of Series C convertible preferred stock and 16,602 shares of Series D convertible preferred stock purchased by Foundation Capital VI Principals Fund, LLC and 13,184,318 shares ofSeries C convertible preferred stock and 1,485,794 shares of Series D convertible preferred stock purchased by Foundation Capital VI, L.P. |
Registration Rights
We have entered intoan investor rights agreement with certain holders of our convertible preferred stock, including entities with which certain of our directors are affiliated. These stockholders are entitled to rights with
127
respect to the registration of their shares following our initial public offering under the Securities Act. For a description of these registration rights, see Description of CapitalStockRegistration Rights.
Indemnification Agreements
We also intend to enter into new indemnification agreements with our directors and executive officers and certain key employees that may bebroader than the specific indemnification provisions contained in the Delaware General Corporation Law. The indemnification agreements and our restated certificate of incorporation and restated bylaws that we expect to be in effect upon thecompletion of this offering will require us to indemnify our directors and officers to the maximum extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law. Subject to certain very limited exceptions, our restated bylaws will also require us toadvance expenses incurred by our directors and officers. For more information regarding these agreements, see Executive CompensationLimitations on Liability and Indemnification Matters.
Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Parties
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter and our Audit Committee Charter require that any transaction with a related partythat must be reported under applicable rules of the SEC, other than compensation-related matters, must be reviewed and approved or ratified by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, unless the related party is, or is associated with, amember of that committee, in which event the transaction must be reviewed and approved by our Audit Committee.
In connection with thisoffering, we intend to adopt a formal written related-party transaction policy that provides that our executive officers, directors, nominees for election as a director, beneficial owners of more than 5% of our common stock, and any of theirimmediate family members or affiliates, are not permitted to enter into a material related-party transaction with us without the review and approval of our Audit Committee, or a committee composed solely of independent directors in the event it isinappropriate for our Audit Committee to review such transaction due to a conflict of interest. The policy will provide that any request for us to enter into a transaction with an executive officer, director, director nominee, beneficial owner ofmore than 5% of our common stock or with any of their immediate family members or affiliates, in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000 will be presented to our Audit Committee for review, consideration and approval. In approving or rejectingany such proposal, we expect that our Audit Committee will consider the relevant facts and circumstances available and deemed relevant to our Audit Committee, including, but not limited to, whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable thanterms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related persons interest in the transaction.
128
The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of June 30, 2014, by:
| each of our directors; |
| each of our named executive officers; |
| each person, or group of affiliated persons, who is known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock; and |
| all of our directors and executive officers as a group. |
Beneficial ownership is determined inaccordance with the rules of the SEC. These rules generally attribute beneficial ownership of securities to persons who possess sole or shared voting power or investment power with respect to those securities and include shares of common stockissuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants that are exercisable within 60 days after June 30, 2014. Except as otherwise indicated in the footnotes to the table below, all of the shares reflected in the table are shares of commonstock and all persons listed below have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned by them, subject to applicable community property laws. The information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership forany other purpose.
Percentage ownership calculations are based on 154,189,702 shares of common stock outstanding as of June 30,2014, assuming the conversion of all of our outstanding convertible preferred stock upon completion of this offering.
In computing thenumber of shares of common stock beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, we deemed outstanding shares of capital stock subject to options and warrants held by that person that are exercisable within 60 days ofJune 30, 2014. We did not deem these shares outstanding, however, for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Except as otherwise indicated in the footnotes to the table below, addresses of named beneficial ownersare in care of LendingClub Corporation, 71 Stevenson Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California 94105.
Name of Beneficial Owner | Shares Beneficially Owned | Percentage Before this Offering | Percentage After this Offering | |||||||
Named Executive Officers and Directors: | ||||||||||
Renaud Laplanche(1) | 8,784,581 | 5.6 | % | |||||||
Carrie Dolan(2) | 1,180,133 | * | ||||||||
Scott Sanborn(3) | 1,223,258 | * | ||||||||
John MacIlwaine(4) | 171,034 | * | ||||||||
Chaomei Chen(5) | 555,412 | * | ||||||||
Daniel Ciporin | 500,340 | * | ||||||||
Jeffrey Crowe(6) | 25,411,010 | 16.5 | ||||||||
Rebecca Lynn(7) | 14,245,752 | 9.2 | ||||||||
John J. Mack(8) | 1,160,216 | * | ||||||||
Mary Meeker(9) | 7,142,856 | 4.6 | ||||||||
John C. (Hans) Morris(10) | 103,124 | * | ||||||||
Lawrence Summers(11) | 666,212 | * | ||||||||
All executive officers and directors as a group (12 persons)(12) | 61,143,928 | 39.5 | ||||||||
5% Stockholders: | ||||||||||
Entities Affiliated with Norwest Venture Partners X, L.P.(6) | 25,411,010 | 16.5 | ||||||||
Entities Affiliated with Canaan VII L.P.(13) | 24,525,256 | 15.9 | ||||||||
Entities Affiliated with Foundation Capital VI, L.P. (14) | 19,683,576 | 12.8 | ||||||||
Entities Affiliated with Morgenthaler Venture Partners IX, L.P.(7) | 14,245,752 | 9.2 |
129
* | Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1%. |
(1) | Represents (i) 3,707,081 shares held by Mr. Laplanche, (ii) 2,000,000 shares held by Laplanche Dmitrieva Family 2012 Irrevocable Trust U/A DTD December 17, 2012 and (iii) 3,077,500 shares underlyingstock options exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2014 held by Mr. Laplanche. |
(2) | Represents (i) 799,318 shares held by Dolan Family Trust U/A DTD 1/27/2003, (ii) 60,000 shares held by Dolan Family 2014 Irrevocable GST Exempt Trust and (iii) 320,815 shares underlying stock optionsexercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2014 held by Ms. Dolan. |
(3) | Represents (i) 332,978 shares and (ii) 890,280 shares underlying stock options exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2014 held by Mr. Sanborn. |
(4) | Represents shares underlying stock options exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2014 held by Mr. MacIlwaine. |
(5) | Represents (i) 279,812 shares and (ii) 275,600 shares underlying stock options exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2014 held by Ms. Chen. |
(6) | Represents (i) 25,176,268 shares and (ii) 234,742 shares underlying warrants that are exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2014 held by Norwest Venture Partners X, L.P. The general partner of NorwestVenture Partners X, L.P. is Genesis VC Partners X, LLC. The managing member of Genesis VC Partners X, LLC is NVP Associates, LLC. Promod Haque, Matthew Howard and Jeffrey Crowe, a member of our board of directors, are officers of NVP Associates,LLC. Each of these individuals has shared voting and investment power over the shares held by Norwest Venture Partners X, L.P. The address of Norwest Venture Partners X, L.P. is 525 University Avenue, Suite 800, Palo Alto, CA 94301-1922. |
(7) | Represents 14,245,752 shares held by Morgenthaler Venture Partners IX, L.P. The general partner of Morgenthaler Venture Partners IX, L.P. is Morgenthaler Management Partners IX, LLC. The managing members of MorgenthalerManagement Partners IX, LLC are Robert Bellas, James Broderick, Ralph Christoffersen, Rebecca Lynn, a member of our board of directors, Gary Morgenthaler, Scott Watters, Gary Little, Robert Pavey and Henry Plain. Each of these individuals has sharedvoting and investment power over the shares held by Morgenthaler Venture Partners IX, L.P. The address of Morgenthaler Venture Partners IX, L.P. is 2710 Sand Hill Road, Suite 100, Menlo Park, CA 94025. |
(8) | Represents (i) 714,286 shares and (ii) 445,930 shares underlying stock options exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2014 held by Mr. Mack. |
(9) | Represents 7,142,856 shares held by KPCB Holdings, Inc., as nominee. The shares are held in the name of KPCB Holdings, Inc., as nominee for the account of KPCB Digital Growth Fund, LLC and KPCB DGF FoundersFund, LLC (collectively, Funds). Ms. Meeker is a managing member of KPCB DGF Associates, LLC, the managing member of the Funds and, therefore, has shared voting and investment power over the shares held by the Funds. |
(10) | Represents shares underlying stock options exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2014 held by Mr. Morris. |
(11) | Represents (i) 198,106 shares held by Mr. Summers, (ii) 90,000 shares held by Lawrence H. Summers 2012 Irrevocable Trust No. 1, (iii) 45,000 shares held by Lawrence H. Summers 2012Irrevocable Trust No. 2 and (iv) 333,106 shares underlying stock options exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2014 held by Mr. Summers. |
(12) | Represents (i) 55,291,797 shares, (ii) 5,617,389 shares underlying stock options exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2014 and (iii) 234,742 shares underlying warrants exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2014held by our executive officers and directors as a group. |
(13) | Represents (i) 24,290,514 shares and (ii) 234,742 shares underlying warrants exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2014 held by Canaan VII L.P. The general partner of Canaan VII L.P. is Canaan PartnersVII LLC. The managers of Canaan Partners VII LLC are Brenton Ahrens, John Balen, Stephen Bloch, Wende Hutton, Maha Ibrahim, Deepak Kamra, Gregory Kopchinsky, Guy Russo and Eric Young. Investment and voting decisions with respect to the shares heldby Canaan VII L.P. are made by the managers of Canaan Partners VII LLC, collectively. The address of Canaan VII, L.P. is 285 Riverside Avenue, Suite 250, Westport, CT 06880. |
(14) | Represents (i) 19,466,072 shares held by Foundation Capital VI, L.P. and (ii) 217,504 shares held by Foundation Capital VI Principals Fund, LLC. The general partner of Foundation Capital VI, L.P. andFoundation Capital VI Principals Fund, LLC is Foundation Capital Management Co. VI, LLC. The managing members of Foundation Capital Management Co. VI, LLC are William Elmore, Paul Koontz, Michael Schuh, Paul Holland, Richard Redelfs, Steve Vassallo,Charles Moldow and Warren Weiss. Each of these individuals has shared voting and investment power over the shares held by Foundation Capital VI, L.P. and Foundation Capital VI Principals Fund, LLC. The address of Foundation Capital Management Co.VI, LLC is 250 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025. |
130
A description of our capital stock and the material terms and provisions of our restated certificate of incorporation and restated bylaws thatwe expect to be in effect upon the completion of this offering is set forth below. This description is only a summary and does not contain all the information that may be important to you. For a complete description, you should refer to our restatedcertificate of incorporation and restated bylaws that we expect to be in effect upon the completion of this offering, which are included as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, and to the applicableprovisions of Delaware law.
Upon the completion of this offering, our authorized capital stock will consist of shares, with a par value of $0.01 per share, of which:
| shares are designated common stock; and |
| shares are designated preferred stock. |
As ofJune 30, 2014, and after giving effect to the conversion of all of our outstanding convertible preferred stock into 124,514,637 shares of common stock upon completion of this offering, there were outstanding:
| 154,189,702 shares of our common stock held by approximately 250 stockholders; |
| 27,401,307 shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options; and |
| 900,292 shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding warrants. |
Common Stock
Dividend Rights
Subject to preferences that may apply to shares of preferred stock outstanding at the time, the holders of outstanding shares of our commonstock are entitled to receive dividends out of funds legally available if our board of directors, in its discretion, determines to issue dividends and then only at the times and in the amounts that our board of directors may determine. SeeDividend Policy.
Voting Rights
Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. We have notprovided for cumulative voting for the election of directors in our restated certificate of incorporation that we expect to be in effect upon the completion of this offering. Accordingly, holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock willbe able to elect all of our directors. Our restated certificate of incorporation that we expect to be in effect upon the completion of this offering establishes a classified board of directors, to be divided into three classes with staggeredthree-year terms. Only one class of directors will be elected at each annual meeting of our stockholders, with the other classes continuing for the remainder of their respective three-year terms.
No Preemptive or Similar Rights
Our common stock is not entitled to preemptive rights and is not subject to conversion, redemption or sinking fund provisions.
Right to Receive Liquidation Distributions
Upon our dissolution, liquidation or winding-up, the assets legally available for distribution to our stockholders are distributable ratablyamong the holders of our common stock, subject to prior satisfaction of all outstanding debt and liabilities and the preferential rights and payment of liquidation preferences, if any, on any outstanding shares of preferred stock.
131
Preferred Stock
Pursuant to the provisions of our restated certificate of incorporation that we expect to be in effect upon completion of this offering, all ofour outstanding convertible preferred stock will convert into common stock, effective upon the completion of this offering. As a result, each currently outstanding share of convertible preferred stock will be converted into common stock. All seriesof convertible preferred stock will convert at a ratio of one share of common stock for each share of convertible preferred stock.
Following the completion of this offering, our board of directors will be authorized, subject to limitations prescribed by Delaware law, toissue convertible preferred stock in one or more series, to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in each series and to fix the designation, powers, preferences and rights of the shares of each series and any of itsqualifications, limitations or restrictions, in each case without further vote or action by our stockholders. Our board of directors may increase or decrease the number of shares of any series of convertible preferred stock, but not below the numberof shares of that series then outstanding, without any further vote or action by our stockholders. Our board of directors may authorize the issuance of convertible preferred stock with voting or conversion rights that could adversely affect thevoting power or other rights of the holders of our common stock. The issuance of preferred stock, while providing flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could, among other things, have the effect ofdelaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of our company and might adversely affect the market price of our common stock and the voting and other rights of the holders of our common stock. We have no current plan to issue any shares ofconvertible preferred stock.
Options
As of June 30, 2014, we had outstanding options to purchase 27,401,307 shares of our common stock, with a weighted-average exercise priceof $4.80 per share.
Warrants
As ofJune 30, 2014, we had five warrants outstanding to purchase an aggregate of 760,504 shares of our Series A preferred stock with an exercise price of $0.5325 per share. The warrants have a net exercise provision under which the holder, in lieuof paying the exercise price in cash, can surrender the warrant and receive a net number of shares of Series A preferred stock based on the fair market value of such stock at the time of exercise, after deducting the aggregate exercise price. Ofsuch warrants:
| Warrants to purchase 469,484 shares of our Series A preferred stock would, unless earlier exercised, expire on January 24, 2015. If these warrants are not exercised prior to the completion of this offering, theywill become exercisable for an equivalent number of shares of our common stock. |
| Warrants to purchase 291,020 shares of our Series A preferred stock would, unless earlier exercised, automatically expire immediately prior to the completion of this offering. We expect warrants to purchase 125,212shares of our Series A preferred stock will be exercised prior to the completion of this offering and that shares of our Series A preferred stock will be issued uponthe automatic net exercise of the remainder of these warrants upon the completion of this offering, based upon the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the offering price rangeset forth on the cover page of this prospectus. |
As of June 30, 2014, we had 13 warrants outstanding to purchase139,788 shares of our common stock, with a weighted-average exercise price of $0.6676 per share. The warrants have a net exercise provision under which the holder, in lieu of paying the exercise price in cash, can surrender the warrant and receive anet number of shares of common stock based on the fair market value of such stock at the time of exercise, after deducting the aggregate exercise price. Of such warrants:
| Warrants to purchase 32,764 shares of our common stock would, unless earlier exercised, expire on the tenth anniversary of their respective issue dates. |
132
| Warrants to purchase 107,024 shares of our common stock would, unless earlier exercised, automatically expire immediately prior to the completion of this offering. We expect that 79,736 shares of our commonstock will be issued upon the exercise of these warrants and that shares of our common stock will be issued upon the automatic net exercise of the remainder of these warrantsupon the completion of this offering, based upon the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the offering price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus. |
Registration Rights
Following the completion of this offering, holders of 132,102,967 shares of our common stock, based on the number of shares outstanding as ofJune 30, 2014, will be entitled to certain registration rights with respect to the sale of such shares under the Securities Act. We refer to these shares as registrable securities. The holders of these registrable securities possess registrationrights pursuant to the terms of our investor rights agreement.
Demand Registration Rights
Under our investor rights agreement, upon the written request of the holders of registrable securities that we file a registration statementunder the Securities Act with an anticipated aggregate price to the public of at least $10.0 million, we will be obligated to notify all holders of registrable securities of the written request and use our reasonable best efforts to effect, asexpeditiously as reasonably possible, the registration of all registrable securities that holders request to be registered. We are not required to effect a registration statement until 180 days after our initial public offering (or such longerperiod, not to exceed 198 days after our initial public offering, as the underwriters may request) or April 16, 2017, whichever is earlier. We are required to effect no more than two registration statements that are declared or orderedeffective, subject to certain exceptions. We may postpone the filing of a registration statement for up to 90 days once in a 12-month period if in the good-faith judgment of our board of directors such registration would be detrimental to us, and weare not required to effect the filing of a registration statement during the period beginning on the date of the filing of, and ending on a date 180 days following the effective date of, a registration related to an initial public offering initiatedby us.
Piggyback Registration Rights
If we register any of our securities for public sale, we are required to afford each holder of registrable securities an opportunity to includein the registration statement all or part of the holders registrable securities. Each holder desiring to include all or any part of the registrable securities held by it in any such registration statement is required to notify us within 15days of being notified by us of the registration. This right does not apply to registration statements relating to demand registrations, for Form S-3 registrations, employee benefit plans, a corporate reorganization or other transaction underRule 145 of the Securities Act, stock issued upon conversion of debt securities or any registration statements related to the issuance of our notes. The underwriter of any underwritten offering will have the right to limit, due to marketingreasons, the number of shares registered by these holders to 30% of the total shares covered by the registration statement, unless the offering is our initial public offering and the registration statement does not include shares of any otherselling stockholders, in which event any or all of the registrable securities of the holders may be excluded by the underwriter.
Form S-3 Registration Rights
The holders of registrable securities can request that we register all or a portion of their shares on Form S-3 if we are eligible to file aregistration statement on Form S-3 and the aggregate price to the public of the shares offered is at least $1.0 million. We may postpone the filing of a registration statement for up to 90 days once in a 12-month period if in the good-faith judgmentof our board of directors such registration would be detrimental to us or if we notify holders within 30 days of making the Form S-3 registration request that we intend to make a public offering within 90 days.
133
Registration Expenses
We will pay all expenses incurred in connection with each of the registrations described above, except for underwriting discounts andcommissions. We will not, however, pay for any expenses of any demand or registration if the request is subsequently withdrawn by the participating holders of the registrable securities to beregistered, subject to limited exceptions.
Expiration of Registration Rights
The registration rights described above will survive our initial public offering and will terminate after our initial public offering on theearlier of:
| the three-year anniversary of our initial public offering; and |
| as to each holder of registrable securities, at the time the holder holds less than 1% of our then-outstanding common stock and all of such holders registrable securities may be sold pursuant to Rule 144 under theSecurities Act during any 90-day period. |
Anti-Takeover Provisions
The provisions of Delaware law and our restated certificate of incorporation and restated bylaws that we expect to be in effect upon thecompletion of this offering could have the effect of delaying, deferring or discouraging another person from acquiring control of our company. These provisions, which are summarized below, may have the effect of discouraging takeover bids. They arealso designed, in part, to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of us to negotiate first with our board of directors. We believe that the benefits of increased protection of our potential ability to negotiate with an unfriendly orunsolicited acquirer outweigh the disadvantages of discouraging a proposal to acquire us because negotiation of these proposals could result in an improvement of their terms.
Delaware Law
Weare governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law regulating corporate takeovers. This section prevents some Delaware corporations from engaging, under some circumstances, in a business combination, whichincludes a merger or sale of at least 10% of the corporations assets with any interested stockholder, meaning a stockholder who, together with affiliates and associates, owns or, within three years prior to the determination of interestedstockholder status, did own 15% or more of the corporations outstanding voting stock, unless:
| the transaction is approved by the board of directors prior to the time that the interested stockholder became an interested stockholder; |
| upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in the stockholders becoming an interested stockholder, the interested stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the corporation outstanding at thetime the transaction commenced; or |
| subsequent to such time that the stockholder became an interested stockholder, the business combination is approved by the board of directors and authorized at an annual or special meeting of stockholders by at leasttwo-thirds of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the interested stockholder. |
A Delaware corporation mayopt out of these provisions with an express provision in its original certificate of incorporation or an express provision in its certificate of incorporation or bylaws resulting from a stockholders amendment approved by at least amajority of the outstanding voting shares. We have not opted out of these provisions. As a result, mergers or other takeover or change in control attempts may be discouraged or prevented. We also anticipate that Section 203 may discourageattempts that might result in a premium over the market price for the shares of outstanding common stock.
134
Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Restated Bylaws Provisions
Our restated certificate of incorporation and our restated bylaws that we expect to be in effect upon the completion of this offering include anumber of provisions that may have the effect of deterring hostile takeovers or delaying or preventing changes in control of our management team, including the following:
| Board of Directors Vacancies. Our restated certificate of incorporation and restated bylaws will authorize only our board of directors to fill vacant directorships, including newly created seats. Inaddition, the number of directors constituting our board of directors will be permitted to be set only by a resolution adopted by a majority vote of our entire board of directors. These provisions would prevent a stockholder from increasing the sizeof our board of directors and then gaining control of our board of directors by filling the resulting vacancies with its own nominees. This makes it more difficult to change the composition of our board of directors but promotes continuity ofmanagement. |
| Classified Board. Our restated certificate of incorporation and restated bylaws will provide that our board of directors will be classified into three classes of directors, each with staggered three-yearterms. A third party may be discouraged from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us as it is more difficult and time consuming for stockholders to replace a majority of the directors on a classified board of directors.See ManagementClassified Board of Directors. |
| Stockholder Action; Special Meetings of Stockholders. Our restated certificate of incorporation will provide that our stockholders may not take action by written consent, but may only take action at annualor special meetings of our stockholders. As a result, a holder controlling a majority of our capital stock would be unable to amend our restated bylaws or remove directors without holding a meeting of our stockholders called in accordance with ourrestated bylaws. Further, our restated bylaws and restated certificate of incorporation will provide that special meetings of our stockholders may be called only by a majority of our board of directors, the chairman of our board of directors, ourChief Executive Officer or our President, thus prohibiting a stockholder from calling a special meeting. These provisions could delay the ability of our stockholders to force consideration of a proposal or for stockholders controlling a majority ofour capital stock to take any action, including the removal of directors. |
| Advance Notice Requirements for Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations. Our restated bylaws will provide advance notice procedures for stockholders seeking to bring business before our annual meetingof stockholders or to nominate candidates for election as directors at our annual meeting of stockholders. Our restated bylaws also will specify certain requirements regarding the form and content of a stockholders notice. These provisionsmight preclude our stockholders from bringing matters before our annual meeting of stockholders or from nominating directors at our annual meeting of stockholders if the proper procedures are not followed. We expect that these provisions might alsodiscourage or deter a potential acquirer from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect the acquirers own slate of directors or otherwise attempting to obtain control of our company. |
| No Cumulative Voting. The Delaware General Corporation Law provides that stockholders are not entitled to the right to cumulate votes in the election of directors unless a corporations certificate ofincorporation provides otherwise. Neither our restated certificate of incorporation nor our restated bylaws will provide for cumulative voting. |
| Directors Removed Only for Cause. Our restated certificate of incorporation will provide that stockholders may remove directors only for cause and only by the affirmative vote of the holders of at leasttwo-thirds of our outstanding common stock. |
| Amendment of Charter Provisions. Any amendment of the provisions in our restated certificate of incorporation described above would require approval by holders of at least two-thirds of our outstandingcommon stock. |
135
| Issuance of Undesignated Preferred Stock. Our board of directors has the authority, without further action by the stockholders, to issue up to shares of undesignated preferred stock with rights and preferences, including voting rights, designated from time to time by our board of directors. The existence of authorizedbut unissued shares of preferred stock would enable our board of directors to render more difficult or to discourage an attempt to obtain control of us by means of a merger, tender offer, proxy contest or other means. |
Choice of Forum
Our restated certificateof incorporation will provide that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the exclusive forum for any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf; any action asserting a breach of fiduciary duty; any action asserting aclaim against us arising pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law, our restated certificate of incorporation or our restated bylaws; or any action asserting a claim against us that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine. Theenforceability of similar choice of forum provisions in other companies certificates of incorporation has been challenged in legal proceedings, and it is possible that a court could find these types of provisions to be inapplicable orunenforceable.
Listing
We intend toapply to list our common stock on the under the symbol .
Transfer Agent and Registrar
Upon thecompletion of this offering, the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock will be . The transfer agentsaddress is .
136
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
Prior to this offering, there has not been a public market for shares of our common stock. Future sales of substantial amounts of shares ofour common stock, including shares issued upon the exercise of outstanding options or warrants, in the public market after this offering, or the possibility of these sales occurring, could cause the prevailing market price for our common stock tofall or impair our ability to raise equity capital in the future.
Upon the completion of this offering, we will have shares of common stock outstanding, based on the number of shares of outstanding capital stock as of June 30, 2014. Thisincludes shares of common stock that we are selling in this offering, which shares may be resold in the public market immediately after the completion of this offering, andassumes no additional exercise of outstanding options or warrants other than as described in this prospectus.
The remaining shares of common stock that are not sold in this offering will be restricted securities, as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. Theserestricted securities are eligible for public sale only if they are registered under the Securities Act or if they qualify for an exemption from registration under Rule 144 of the Securities Act, which is summarized below.
In addition, substantially all of our security holders have entered into market standoff agreements with us restricting the sale of any sharesof our common stock for days after the date of this prospectus or will enter into lock-up agreements with the underwriters under which they will agree, subject to certain exceptions, not to sell anyshares of our common stock until at least days after the date of this prospectus, as further described below. As a result of these agreements and the provisions of our investors rights agreementdescribed in Description of Capital StockRegistration Rights, subject to the provisions of Rule 144, based on an assumed offering dateof 2014, shares will be available for sale in the publicmarket as follows:
| beginning on the date of this prospectus, the shares sold in this offering will be immediately available for sale in the public market; and |
| beginning days after the date of this prospectus, subject to extension as described in Underwriters, additional shares will become eligible for sale in the public market, of which shares will be held byaffiliates and subject to the volume and other restrictions of Rule 144, as described below. |
Rule 144
In general, under Rule 144, a person who is not deemed to have been one of our affiliates for purposes of the Securities Act at any time duringthe 90 days preceding a sale and who has beneficially owned the shares proposed to be sold for at least six months, including the holding period of any prior owner other than our affiliates, is entitled to sell those shares without complying withthe manner of sale, volume limitation or notice provisions of Rule 144, subject to compliance with the public information requirements of Rule 144. If such a person has beneficially owned the shares proposed to be sold for at least one year,including the holding period of any prior owner other than our affiliates, then such person is entitled to sell those shares without complying with any of the requirements of Rule 144.
In general, under Rule 144, our affiliates or persons selling shares on behalf of our affiliates are entitled to sell, upon the expiration ofthe lock-up agreements described below, within any three-month period beginning 90 days after the date of this prospectus, a number of shares that does not exceed the greater of:
| 1% of the number of shares of common stock then outstanding, which will equal approximately shares immediately after the completion of thisoffering, or |
| the average weekly trading volume of the common stock during the four calendar weeks preceding the filing of a notice on Form 144 with respect to such sale. |
137
Sales under Rule 144 by our affiliates or persons selling shares on behalf of our affiliates arealso subject to certain manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the availability of current public information about us.
Lock-UpAgreements and Market Stand-Off Provisions
Our officers, directors and the holders of substantially all of our outstanding equitysecurities will agree with the underwriters not to dispose of any of our common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares of our common stock for days following the date of thisprospectus, except with the prior written consent of Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC. In addition, substantially all holders of our common stock, options and warrants have previously entered into market stand-off agreements with us that similarlyrestrict their ability to sell or otherwise transfer any of their common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for common stock.
Additionally, our employees, including our executive officers and directors, may enter into written trading plans that are intendedto comply with Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act. Sales under these trading plans would not be permitted until the expiration of the lock-up agreements relating to this offering described above.
See Underwriters for a more complete description of the lock-up agreements with the underwriters.
Registration Rights
Following thecompletion of this offering, holders of 132,102,967 shares of our common stock, based on the number of shares outstanding as of June 30, 2014, will be entitled to certain registration rights with respect to the sale of such shares under theSecurities Act. Registration of the sale of these shares would result in these shares becoming fully tradable without restriction under the Securities Act immediately upon the effectiveness of the registration, except for shares purchased byaffiliates. See Description of Capital StockRegistration Rights for additional information.
Registration Statement
In July 2014, we filed a registration statement on Form S-8 under the Securities Act covering all of the shares of common stock subject tooptions outstanding, as well as reserved for future issuance, under our 2007 Plan. We intend to file a registration statement on Form S-8 under the Securities Act covering all of the shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our 2014Plan as soon as practicable after the completion of this offering. None of the shares registered on the Form S-8 will, however, be eligible for resale until the expiration of the lock-up agreements to which they are subject.
138
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL TAX CONSEQUENCES TO NON-U.S. HOLDERS OF OURCOMMON STOCK
This section summarizes the material U.S. federal income tax considerations relating to the acquisition, ownership anddisposition of our common stock by non-U.S. holders (defined below) pursuant to this offering. This summary does not provide a complete analysis of all potential U.S. federal income tax considerations relating thereto. The informationprovided below is based upon provisions of the Code, Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, administrative rulings, and judicial decisions currently in effect. These authorities may change at any time, possibly retroactively, or the InternalRevenue Service (IRS), might interpret the existing authorities differently. In either case, the tax considerations of owning or disposing of our common stock could differ from those described below.
For purposes of this summary, a non-U.S. holder is any holder of our common stock, other than an entity classified as apartnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, that is not:
| an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States; |
| a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation, created or organized under the laws of the United States, any state therein or the District of Columbia; |
| a trust if it (i) is subject to the primary supervision of a U.S. court and one of more U.S. persons have authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (ii) has a valid election in effectunder applicable U.S. Treasury regulations to be treated as a U.S. person; or |
| an estate whose income is subject to U.S. income tax regardless of source. |
If a partnershipor other pass-through entity is a beneficial owner of our common stock, the tax treatment of a partner in the partnership or an owner of the entity will depend upon the status of the partner or other owner and the activities of the partnership orother entity. Accordingly, this summary does not address tax consequences applicable to partnerships that hold our common stock, and any partner in a partnership or owner of a pass-through entity holding shares of our common stock should consult itsown tax advisor.
This discussion assumes that a non-U.S. holder will hold our common stock as a capital asset (generally, property heldfor investment). The summary generally does not address tax considerations that may be relevant to particular investors because of their specific circumstances, or because they are subject to special rules, including, without limitation, if theinvestor is a former citizen or long-term resident of the United States, controlled foreign corporation, passive foreign investment company, corporation that accumulates earnings to avoid U.S. federal income tax, real estateinvestment trust, regulated investment company, dealer in securities or currencies, financial institution, tax-exempt entity, insurance company, person holding our common stock as part of a hedging, integrated, conversion or constructive saletransaction or a straddle, trader in securities that elects to use a mark-to-market method of accounting, person liable for the alternative minimum tax, person who acquired our common stock as compensation for services, or partner in a partnershipor beneficial owner of a pass-through entity that holds our common stock. Finally, the summary does not describe the Medicare tax imposed on certain investment income, the effects of any applicable foreign, state or local laws, or except to thelimited extent set forth below, the effects of any applicable gift or estate tax laws.
INVESTORS CONSIDERING THE PURCHASE OF OURCOMMON STOCK SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX LAWS TO THEIR PARTICULAR SITUATIONS AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF FOREIGN, STATE OR LOCAL LAWS, AND TAX TREATIES.
139
Distributions
We do not expect to declare or make any distributions on our common stock in the foreseeable future. If we do make distributions on shares ofour common stock, however, such distributions will constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent paid from our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles.Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits will constitute a return of capital that is applied against and reduces, but not below zero, a non-U.S. holders adjusted tax basis in shares of our common stock.Any remaining excess will be treated as gain realized on the sale or other disposition of our common stock. See Sale of Common Stock.
Any dividend paid to a non-U.S. holder on our common stock that is not effectively connected with a non-U.S. holders conduct of aU.S. trade or business will generally be subject to U.S. withholding tax at a 30% rate. The withholding tax might apply at a reduced rate under the terms of an applicable income tax treaty. You should consult your tax advisors regarding yourentitlement to benefits under a relevant income tax treaty. Generally, in order for us or our paying agent to withhold tax at a lower treaty rate, a non-U.S. holder must certify its entitlement to treaty benefits. A non-U.S. holdergenerally can meet this certification requirement by providing a properly executed Form W-8BEN (or other appropriate version of IRS From W-8 or applicable successor form) to us or our paying agent certifying qualification for the reduced rate.If the non-U.S. holder holds the stock through a financial institution or other agent acting on the holders behalf, the holder will be required to provide appropriate documentation to the agent. The holders agent will then be required toprovide certification to us or our paying agent, either directly or through other intermediaries. If you are eligible for a reduced rate of U.S. federal withholding tax under an income tax treaty, you may obtain a refund or credit of any excessamounts withheld by filing an appropriate claim for a refund with the IRS in a timely manner.
Dividends received by a non-U.S. holderthat are effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business conducted by the non-U.S. holder (and, if an income tax treaty is applicable, are attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by the non-U.S. holder in the United States) are notsubject to U.S. withholding tax. To obtain this exemption, a non-U.S. holder must provide us or our paying agent with an IRS Form W-8ECI properly certifying such exemption. Such effectively connected dividends, although not subject towithholding tax, are taxed at the same graduated rates applicable to U.S. persons, net of certain deductions and credits. In addition to being taxed at the graduated tax rates described above, dividends received by corporate non-U.S. holders thatare effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business of the corporate non-U.S. holder may also be subject to a branch profits tax at a rate of 30% or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable tax treaty.
Sale of Common Stock
Non-U.S. holders will generally not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on any gains realized on the sale or other taxable dispositionof our common stock unless:
| the non-U.S. holder is an individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of the sale or other taxable disposition of our common stock, and certain other requirementsare met (in which case the gain would be subject to a flat 30% tax, or such reduced rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty, which may be offset by U.S. source capital losses, even though the individual is not considered aresident of the United States); |
| the rules of the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA) treat the gain as effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business; or |
| the gain (i) is effectively connected with the conduct by the non-U.S. holder of a U.S. trade or business and (ii) if required by an applicable income tax treaty between the United States and the non-U.S.holders country of residence, is attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by the non-U.S. holder in the United States (in which case the special rules described below apply). |
The FIRPTA rules may apply to a sale, exchange or other disposition of our common stock if we are, or were within the shorter of the five-yearperiod preceding the disposition and the non-U.S. holders holding
140
period, as a U.S. real property holding corporation (USRPHC). In general, we would be a USRPHC if interests in U.S. real estate comprised at least half of the value of ourbusiness assets. We do not believe that we are a USRPHC and we do not anticipate becoming one in the future. Even if we become a USRPHC, as long as our common stock is regularly traded on an established securities market, such common stock will betreated as U.S. real property interests only if beneficially owned by a non-U.S. holder that actually or constructively owned more than 5% of our outstanding common stock at any time within the five-year period preceding thedisposition.
If any gain from the sale, exchange or other disposition of our common stock, (i) is effectively connected with a U.S.trade or business conducted by a non-U.S. holder and (ii) if required by an applicable income tax treaty, is attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by such non-U.S. holder in the United States, then the gain generallywill be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the same graduated rates applicable to U.S. persons, net of certain deductions and credits. If the non-U.S. holder is a corporation, under certain circumstances, that portion of its earnings andprofits that is effectively connected with its U.S. trade or business, subject to certain adjustments, generally would be subject also to a branch profits tax. The branch profits tax rate is generally 30%, although an applicable incometax treaty might provide for a lower rate.
U.S. Federal Estate Tax
The estate of a nonresident alien individual is generally subject to U.S. federal estate tax on property having a U.S. situs. Because we are aU.S. corporation, our common stock will be U.S. situs property and therefore will be included in the taxable estate of a nonresident alien decedent, unless an applicable estate tax treaty between the United States and the decedents country ofresidence provides otherwise.
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting
The amount of dividends paid to each non-U.S. holder, and the tax withheld with respect to such dividends generally will be reported annuallyto the IRS and to each such holder, regardless of whether no withholding was required because such dividends were effectively connected with the non-U.S. holders conduct of a U.S. trade or business or withholding was reduced or eliminated byan applicable tax treaty. Copies of the information returns reporting such dividends and withholding may also be made available to the tax authorities in the country in which the non-U.S. holder resides or is established under the provisions of anapplicable income tax treaty or agreement.
A non-U.S. holder generally will be subject to backup withholding for dividends paid to suchholder unless such holder certifies under penalty of perjury (usually on an IRS Form W-8BEN or applicable successor form) that it is a non-U.S. holder (and the payor does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that such holder is a U.S. personas defined under the Code), or such holder otherwise establishes an exemption. Information reporting and, depending on the circumstances, backup withholding will apply to the proceeds of a sale of shares of our common stock within the United Statesor conducted through certain U.S.-related financial intermediaries, unless the beneficial owner certifies under penalty of perjury that it is a non-U.S. holder (and the payor does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that the beneficial owneris a United States person as defined under the Code), or such owner otherwise establishes an exemption.
Backup withholding is not anadditional tax. Any amounts withheld from a payment to a holder of common stock under the backup withholding rules can be credited against any U.S. federal income tax liability of the holder and may entitle the holder to a refund, provided that therequired information is furnished to the IRS in a timely manner.
141
Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act
The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act will impose a U.S. federal withholding tax at a rate of 30% on payments to certain foreign entities ofdividends on and the gross proceeds of dispositions of our common stock, unless such entity satisfies various U.S. information reporting and due diligence requirements (generally relating to ownership by U.S. persons of interests in or accounts withthose entities). Final Treasury regulations provide for certain transition rules under which these withholding requirements will only apply for dividend payments made on or after July 1, 2014, and for payments of gross proceeds of dispositionsof our common stock made on or after January 1, 2017. Non-U.S. holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the possible implications of this legislation on their investment in our common stock.
EACH PROSPECTIVE INVESTOR SHOULD CONSULT ITS OWN TAX ADVISOR REGARDING THE PARTICULAR U.S. FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL AND FOREIGN TAXCONSEQUENCES OF PURCHASING, HOLDING AND DISPOSING OF OUR COMMON STOCK, INCLUDING THE CONSEQUENCES OF ANY PROPOSED CHANGE IN APPLICABLE LAWS.
142
Under the terms and subject to the conditions in an underwriting agreement dated the date of this prospectus, the underwriters named below,for whom Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and Goldman, Sachs & Co. are acting as representatives, have severally agreed to purchase, and we have agreed to sell to them, severally, the number of shares indicated below:
Name | Number of | |
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC | ||
Goldman, Sachs & Co. | ||
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. | ||
Allen & Company LLC | ||
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated | ||
BMO Capital Markets Corp. | ||
William Blair & Company, L.L.C. | ||
Wells Fargo Securities, LLC | ||
| ||
Total | ||
|
The underwriters are offering the shares of common stock subject to their acceptance of the shares from us andsubject to prior sale. The underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the several underwriters to pay for and accept delivery of the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus are subject to the approval of certain legal mattersby their counsel and to certain other conditions. The offering of the shares of common stock by the underwriters is subject to the receipt and acceptance and subject to the underwriters right to reject any order in whole or in part. Theunderwriters are obligated to take and pay for all of the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus if any such shares are taken. However, the underwriters are not required to take or pay for the shares covered by the underwritersoption to purchase additional shares of common stock.
The underwriters initially propose to offer part of the shares of common stockdirectly to the public at the offering price listed on the cover page of this prospectus and part to certain dealers. After the initial offering of the shares of common stock, the offering price and other selling terms may from time to time bevaried by the representatives.
We have granted to the underwriters an option, exercisable for 30 days from the date of this prospectus,to purchase up to additional shares of common stock at the public offering price listed on the cover page of this prospectus, less underwriting discounts and commissions. To theextent the option is exercised, each underwriter will become obligated, subject to certain conditions, to purchase about the same percentage of the additional shares of common stock as the number listed next to the underwriters name in thepreceding table bears to the total number of shares of common stock listed next to the names of all underwriters in the preceding table.
The following table shows the per share and total public offering price, underwriting discounts and commissions and proceeds before expenses.These amounts are shown assuming both no exercise and full exercise of the underwriters option to purchase up to an additional shares ofcommon stock.
Total | ||||||||||||
Per Share | No Exercise | Full Exercise | ||||||||||
Public offering price | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
Underwriting discounts and commissions | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
Proceeds, before expenses | $ | $ | $ |
143
The estimated offering expenses, exclusive of the underwriting discounts and commissions, areapproximately $ . We have agreed to reimburse the underwriters for expenses relating to clearance of this offering with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. up to$ .
The underwriters have informed us that they do not intend sales to discretionaryaccounts to exceed 5% of the total number of shares of common stock offered by them.
We intend to apply to list our common stock on the under the trading symbol .
We, all of our directors and officers and the holders of substantially all of our outstanding equity securities will agree that, without theprior written consent of Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC on behalf of the underwriters, we and they will not, for days after the date of this prospectus:
| offer, pledge, sell, contract to sell, sell any option or contract to purchase, purchase any option or contract to sell, grant any option, right or warrant to purchase, lend or otherwise transfer or dispose of, directlyor indirectly, any shares of common stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for shares of common stock; |
| file any registration statement with the SEC relating to the offering of any shares of common stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for common stock; or |
| enter into any swap or other arrangement that transfers to another, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences of ownership of the common stock; |
whether any such transaction described above is to be settled by delivery of common stock or such other securities, in cash or otherwise, subject to certainexceptions. In addition, we and each such person will agree that, without the prior written consent of Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC on behalf of the underwriters, we or such other person will not, during the restricted period, make any demandfor, or exercise any right with respect to, the registration of any shares of common stock or any security convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for common stock.
The restricted period described in the preceding paragraph will be extended if:
| during the last 17 days of the restricted period, we issue an earnings release or material news event relating to us occurs, or |
| prior to the expiration of the restricted period, we announce that we will release earnings results during the 16-day period beginning on the last day of the restricted period or provide notification to MorganStanley & Co. LLC of any earnings release or material news or material event that may give rise to an extension of the initial restricted period, |
in which case the restrictions described in the preceding paragraph will continue to apply until the expiration of the 18-day period beginning on the issuanceof the earnings release or the occurrence of the material news or material event.
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, in its solediscretion, may release the common stock and other securities subject to the lock-up agreements described above in whole or in part at any time.
In order to facilitate the offering of the common stock, the underwriters may engage in transactions that stabilize, maintain or otherwiseaffect the price of the common stock. Specifically, the underwriters may sell more shares than they are obligated to purchase under the underwriting agreement, creating a short position. A short sale is covered if the short position is no greaterthan the number of shares available for purchase by the underwriters under their option to purchase additional shares. The underwriters can close out a covered short sale by exercising the option to purchase additional shares or purchasing shares inthe open market. In determining the source of shares to close out a covered short sale, the underwriters will consider, among other things, the
144
open market price of shares compared to the price available under the option to purchase additional shares of common stock. The underwriters may also sell shares in excess of their option topurchase additional shares of common stock, creating a naked short position. The underwriters must close out any naked short position by purchasing shares in the open market. A naked short position is more likely to be created if the underwritersare concerned that there may be downward pressure on the price of the common stock in the open market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who purchase in this offering. As an additional means of facilitating this offering, theunderwriters may bid for, and purchase, shares of common stock in the open market to stabilize the price of the common stock. These activities may raise or maintain the market price of the common stock above independent market levels or prevent orretard a decline in the market price of the common stock. The underwriters are not required to engage in these activities and may end any of these activities at any time.
We and the underwriters have agreed to indemnify each other against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.
A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on websites maintained by one or more underwriters, or selling group members, if any,participating in this offering. The representatives may agree to allocate a number of shares of common stock to underwriters for sale to their online brokerage account holders. Internet distributions will be allocated by the representatives tounderwriters that may make Internet distributions on the same basis as other allocations.
The underwriters and their respectiveaffiliates are full service financial institutions engaged in various activities, which may include securities trading, commercial and investment banking, financial advisory, investment management, investment research, principal investment, hedging,financing and brokerage activities. Certain of the underwriters and their respective affiliates have, from time to time, performed, and may in the future perform, various financial advisory and investment banking services for us, for which theyreceived or will receive customary fees and expenses. Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. and CitiCorp North America Inc., which are affiliates of Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., respectively, are joint leadarrangers, joint bookrunners, agents and lenders under our credit and guaranty agreement.
In addition, in the ordinary course of theirvarious business activities, the underwriters and their respective affiliates may make or hold a broad array of investments and actively trade debt and equity securities (or related derivative securities) and financial instruments (including bankloans) for their own account and for the accounts of their customers and may at any time hold long and short positions in such securities and instruments. Such investment and securities activities may involve our securities and instruments,including loans originated through our platform. The underwriters and their respective affiliates may also make investment recommendations or publish or express independent research views in respect of such securities or instruments and may at anytime hold, or recommend to clients that they acquire, long or short positions in such securities and instruments.
Pricing of the Offering
Prior to the completion of this offering, there will be no public market for our common stock. The initial public offering price will bedetermined by negotiations between us and the representatives. Among the factors we intend to consider in determining the initial public offering price are prevailing market conditions, our financial information, market valuations of other companiesthat we and the underwriters believe to be comparable to us, estimates of our business potential, the present state of our development and other factors deemed relevant.
145
Selling Restrictions
European Economic Area
In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area which has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a Relevant Member State)an offer to the public of any shares of our common stock may not be made in that Relevant Member State, except that an offer to the public in that Relevant Member State of any shares of our common stock may be made at any time under the followingexemptions under the Prospectus Directive, if they have been implemented in that Relevant Member State:
(i) | to any legal entity which is a qualified investor as defined in the Prospectus Directive; |
(ii) | to fewer than 100 or, if the Relevant Member State has implemented the relevant provision of the 2010 PD Amending Directive, 150, natural or legal persons (other than qualified investors as defined in the ProspectusDirective), as permitted under the Prospectus Directive, subject to obtaining the prior consent of the representatives for any such offer; or |
(iii) | in any other circumstances falling within Article 3(2) of the Prospectus Directive, provided that no such offer of shares of our common stock shall result in a requirement for the publication by us or any underwriter ofa prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive. |
For the purposes of this provision, the expression anoffer to the public in relation to any shares of our common stock in any Relevant Member State means the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms of the offer and any shares of our common stock tobe offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase any shares of our common stock, as the same may be varied in that Member State by any measure implementing the Prospectus Directive in that Member State, the expression ProspectusDirective means Directive 2003/71/EC (and amendments thereto, including the 2010 PD Amending Directive, to the extent implemented in the Relevant Member State), and includes any relevant implementing measure in the Relevant Member State, andthe expression 2010 PD Amending Directive means Directive 2010/73/EU.
United Kingdom
Each underwriter has represented and agreed that:
(i) | it has only communicated or caused to be communicated and will only communicate or cause to be communicated an invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity (within the meaning of Section 21 of theFinancial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA)) received by it in connection with the issue or sale of the shares of our common stock in circumstances in which Section 21(1) of the FSMA does not apply to us; and |
(ii) | it has complied and will comply with all applicable provisions of the FSMA with respect to anything done by it in relation to the shares of our common stock in, from or otherwise involving the United Kingdom. |
Hong Kong
Shares of our common stock may not be offered or sold by means of any document other than (i) in circumstances which do not constitute anoffer to the public within the meaning of the Companies Ordinance (Cap.32, Laws of Hong Kong), (ii) to professional investors within the meaning of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap.571, Laws of Hong Kong) and any rules madethereunder, or (iii) in other circumstances which do not result in the document being a prospectus within the meaning of the Companies Ordinance (Cap.32, Laws of Hong Kong), and no advertisement, invitation or document relating toshares of our common stock may be issued or may be in the possession of any person for the purpose of issue (in each case whether in Hong Kong or elsewhere), which is directed at, or the contents of which are likely to be accessed or read by, thepublic in Hong Kong (except if permitted to do so under the laws of Hong Kong) other than with respect to shares of our
146
common stock which are or are intended to be disposed of only to persons outside Hong Kong or only to professional investors within the meaning of the Securities and Futures Ordinance(Cap. 571, Laws of Hong Kong) and any rules made thereunder.
Singapore
This prospectus has not been registered as a prospectus with the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Accordingly, this prospectus and any otherdocument or material in connection with the offer or sale, or invitation for subscription or purchase, of shares of our common stock may not be circulated or distributed, nor may the shares of our common stock be offered or sold, or be made thesubject of an invitation for subscription or purchase, whether directly or indirectly, to persons in Singapore other than (i) to an institutional investor under Section 274 of the Securities and Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore (SFA),(ii) to a relevant person, or any person pursuant to Section 275(1A), and in accordance with the conditions, specified in Section 275 of the SFA or (iii) otherwise pursuant to, and in accordance with the conditions of, any otherapplicable provision of the SFA.
Where shares of our common stock are subscribed or purchased under Section 275 by a relevant personwhich is: (i) a corporation (which is not an accredited investor) the sole business of which is to hold investments and the entire share capital of which is owned by one or more individuals, each of whom is an accredited investor; or(ii) a trust (where the trustee is not an accredited investor) whose sole purpose is to hold investments and each beneficiary is an accredited investor, shares, debentures and units of shares and debentures of that corporation or thebeneficiaries rights and interest in that trust shall not be transferable for 6 months after that corporation or that trust has acquired shares of our common stock under Section 275 except: (i) to an institutional investor underSection 274 of the SFA or to a relevant person, or any person pursuant to Section 275(1A), and in accordance with the conditions, specified in Section 275 of the SFA; (ii) where no consideration is given for the transfer; or(iii) by operation of law.
Japan
Shares of our common stock have not been and will not be registered under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law of Japan (FinancialInstruments and Exchange Law) and each underwriter has agreed that it will not offer or sell any shares of our common stock, directly or indirectly, in Japan or to, or for the benefit of, any resident of Japan (which term as used herein means anyperson resident in Japan, including any corporation or other entity organized under the laws of Japan), or to others for re-offering or resale, directly or indirectly, in Japan or to a resident of Japan, except pursuant to an exemption from theregistration requirements of, and otherwise in compliance with, the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law and any other applicable laws, regulations and ministerial guidelines of Japan.
147
The validity of the shares of common stock offered hereby will be passed upon for us by Fenwick & West LLP, Mountain View,California. OMelveny & Myers LLP, San Francisco, California is acting as counsel to the underwriters. An investment fund affiliated with Fenwick & West LLP owns shares of our convertible preferred stock that will convert uponcompletion of this offering into shares of common stock representing less than 0.1% of our outstanding common stock as of June 30, 2014.
The consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013 included in this prospectus have been audited by Deloitte& Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing herein. Such consolidated financial statements have been included in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon their authority as expertsin accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements as of and for the nine months ended December 31, 2012 and fiscalyear ended March 31, 2012, have been included in this prospectus in reliance on the reports of Grant Thornton LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, given on their authority as experts in auditing and accounting.
The financial statements of Springstone Financial, LLC as of and for the years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013, havebeen included in this prospectus in reliance on the reports of Auerr, Zajac & Associates, LLP, independent auditors, given on their authority as experts in auditing and accounting.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act with respect to the shares of common stockoffered hereby. This prospectus, which constitutes a part of the registration statement, does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement or the exhibits filed with the registration statements. For further informationabout us and the common stock offered hereby, reference is made to the registration statement and the exhibits filed with it. Statements contained in this prospectus regarding the contents of any contract or any other document that is filed as anexhibit to the registration statement are not necessarily complete, and in each instance we refer you to the copy of such contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement. A copy of the registration statement and theexhibits filed with it may be inspected without charge at the public reference room maintained by the SEC, located at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549, and copies of all or any part of the registration statement may be obtainedfrom that office. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information about the public reference room. The SEC also maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrantsthat file electronically with the SEC. The address of the website is www.sec.gov.
We are subject to the information and periodicreporting requirements of the Exchange Act, and we file periodic reports and other information with the SEC. Such periodic reports and other information are available for inspection and copying at the Public Reference Room and website of the SECreferred to above. We maintain a website at www.lendingclub.com. You may access our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed pursuant to Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Exchange Act with the SEC free of charge at our website as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. Our website and the information contained on that site, or connectedto that site, are not incorporated into and are not a part of this prospectus.
148
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page | ||||
Financial Statements of LendingClub Corporation | ||||
F-2 | ||||
F-3 | ||||
F-4 | ||||
F-5 | ||||
F-6 | ||||
F-7 | ||||
F-8 | ||||
Financial Statements of Springstone Financial, LLC (as of and for the periods ended December 31, 2012 and2013) | ||||
F-41 | ||||
F-42 | ||||
F-43 | ||||
F-44 | ||||
F-45 | ||||
F-46 | ||||
F-51 | ||||
F-52 | ||||
Financial Statements of Springstone Financial, LLC (as of and for the periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2014) | ||||
F-53 | ||||
F-54 | ||||
F-55 | ||||
F-56 | ||||
F-57 | ||||
F-58 | ||||
F-63 | ||||
F-64 | ||||
Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements | ||||
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statements of Operations | F-65 | |||
Notes to the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statements of Operations | F-68 |
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
LendingClubCorporation
San Francisco, California
Wehave audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of LendingClub Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2013, and the related consolidated statement of operations, statement of stockholdersequity, and statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2013. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on ouraudit.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Thosestandards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of itsinternal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing anopinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in thefinancial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of LendingClubCorporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
SanFrancisco, CA
March 31, 2014
F-2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
LendingClub Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of LendingClub Corporation (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries (theCompany) as of December 31, 2012 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity and cash flows for the nine months ended December 31, 2012 and the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012. Thesefinancial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standardsrequire that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of itsinternal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing anopinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in theconsolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management as well, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis forour opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, thefinancial position of LendingClub Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the nine months ended December 31, 2012 and the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, inconformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
San Francisco, California
April 1, 2013
F-3
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
December 31, | June 30, 2014 | Pro Forma Balance Sheet June 30, 2014 | ||||||||||||||
2012 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||
(audited) | (unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 52,551 | $ | 49,299 | $ | 68,958 | $ | 68,958 | ||||||||
Restricted cash | 7,484 | 12,208 | 20,448 | 20,448 | ||||||||||||
Loans at fair value (includes $396,081, $1,158,302, and $1,465,090 from consolidated Trust, respectively) | 781,215 | 1,829,042 | 2,326,202 | 2,326,202 | ||||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable (includes $2,765, $10,061, and $13,336 from consolidated Trust, respectively) | 5,521 | 15,975 | 21,244 | 21,244 | ||||||||||||
Property, equipment and software, net | 1,578 | 12,595 | 19,420 | 19,420 | ||||||||||||
Intangible assets, net | | | 39,077 | 39,077 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill | | | 72,679 | 72,679 | ||||||||||||
Other assets | 2,366 | 23,921 | 12,185 | 12,185 | ||||||||||||
Due from related parties | 115 | 355 | 411 | 411 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total assets | $ | 850,830 | $ | 1,943,395 | $ | 2,580,624 | $ | 2,580,624 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 1,210 | $ | 4,524 | $ | 3,969 | $ | 3,969 | ||||||||
Accrued interest payable (includes $3,347, $11,176, and $14,587 from consolidated Trust, respectively) | 6,678 | 17,741 | 23,232 | 23,232 | ||||||||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 3,366 | 9,128 | 17,515 | 17,515 | ||||||||||||
Payable to investors | 2,050 | 3,918 | 12,659 | 12,659 | ||||||||||||
Notes and certificates, at fair value (includes $396,081, $1,158,302, and $1,465,090 from consolidated Trust, respectively) | 785,316 | 1,839,990 | 2,336,595 | 2,336,595 | ||||||||||||
Term loan | | | 49,516 | 49,516 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total liabilities | 798,620 | 1,875,301 | 2,443,486 | 2,443,486 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 16) | ||||||||||||||||
Stockholders Equity: | ||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock | $ | 103,023 | $ | 103,244 | $ | 173,674 | $ | | ||||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 180,000,000, 180,000,000 and 186,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2012, December 31,2013 and June 30, 2014 (unaudited), respectively; 22,583,724, and 27,493,320 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013, respectively, and 29,675,065 and 154,189,702 shares issued and outstanding as ofJune 30, 2014 (unaudited), actual and pro forma (unaudited), respectively | 123 | 138 | 297 | 1,542 | ||||||||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 6,713 | 15,041 | 29,982 | 202,411 | ||||||||||||
Treasury stock (35,280 shares of common stock held at December 31, 2012) | (12 | ) | | | | |||||||||||
Accumulated deficit | (57,637 | ) | (50,329 | ) | (66,815 | ) | (66,815 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total stockholders equity | 52,210 | 68,094 | 137,138 | 137,138 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity | $ | 850,830 | $ | 1,943,395 | $ | 2,580,624 | $ | 2,580,624 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-4
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
Year Ended March 31, 2012 | Nine Months Ended December 31, 2012 | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
(audited) | (unaudited) | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating Revenue: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Transaction fees | $ | 13,701 | $ | 26,013 | $ | 85,830 | $ | 29,975 | $ | 81,213 | ||||||||||
Servicing fees | 1,222 | 1,474 | 3,951 | 1,597 | 3,248 | |||||||||||||||
Management fees | 206 | 720 | 3,083 | 1,214 | 2,555 | |||||||||||||||
Other revenue | 407 | 720 | 5,111 | 4,299 | 307 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total operating revenue | 15,536 | 28,927 | 97,975 | 37,085 | 87,323 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net Interest Income (Expense): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest income | 32,660 | 56,861 | 187,507 | 73,385 | 158,260 | |||||||||||||||
Total interest expense | (32,030 | ) | (56,642 | ) | (187,447 | ) | (73,357 | ) | (158,594 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net interest (expense) income | 630 | 219 | 60 | 28 | (334 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Benefit/(provision) for losses on loans at amortized cost | (368 | ) | 42 | | | | ||||||||||||||
Fair valuation adjustments, loans | (6,732 | ) | (18,775 | ) | (57,629 | ) | (22,264 | ) | (51,154 | ) | ||||||||||
Fair valuation adjustments, notes and certificates | 6,731 | 18,180 | 57,596 | 22,241 | 51,108 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net interest income (expense) after loss provision and fair value adjustments | 261 | (334 | ) | 27 | 5 | (380 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total net revenue | 15,797 | 28,593 | 98,002 | 37,090 | 86,943 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Operating Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 12,571 | 14,723 | 39,037 | 16,117 | 39,807 | |||||||||||||||
Origination and servicing | 5,099 | 6,134 | 17,217 | 6,048 | 15,968 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative | 10,071 | 11,974 | 34,440 | 13,103 | 47,014 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 27,741 | 32,831 | 90,694 | 35,268 | 102,789 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes | (11,944 | ) | (4,238 | ) | 7,308 | 1,822 | (15,846 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | | | | 85 | 640 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (11,944 | ) | $ | (4,238 | ) | $ | 7,308 | $ | 1,737 | $ | (16,486 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders | $ | (0.68 | ) | $ | (0.20 | ) | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.58 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders | $ | (0.68 | ) | $ | (0.20 | ) | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.58 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Weighted-average shares of common stock used in computing basic net income (loss) per common share | 17,562,814 | 20,679,838 | 25,778,568 | 24,471,528 | 28,451,564 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Weighted-average shares of common stock used in computing diluted net income (loss) per common share | 17,562,814 | 20,679,838 | 40,713,488 | 37,908,644 | 28,451,564 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Basic pro forma net income (loss) per share (unaudited) | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.11 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding used to calculate basic pro forma net income (loss) per common share (unaudited) | 145,883,096 | 150,572,503 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Diluted pro forma net income (loss) per share (unaudited) | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.11 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding used to calculate diluted pro forma net income (loss) per common share (unaudited) | 161,665,775 | 150,572,503 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-5
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(in thousands, except share data)
Convertible Preferred Stock | Common Stock | Additional Paid-in Capital | Treasury Stock | Accumulated Deficit | Total Stockholders Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances, March 31, 2012 | 112,830,614 | $ | 84,806 | 18,222,492 | $ | 91 | $ | 4,839 | | $ | | $ | (53,399 | ) | $ | 36,337 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of warrants to purchase Series A convertible preferred stock | 1,136,146 | 606 | | | | | | | 606 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of warrants to purchase Series B convertible preferred stock | 715,956 | 267 | | | (102 | ) | | | | 165 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of warrants to purchase common stock | | | 43,376 | 10 | 24 | | | | 34 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of Series E convertible preferred stock for cash (net of issuance costs of $153) | 5,000,000 | 17,344 | | | | | | | 17,344 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | | | | | 1,110 | | | | 1,110 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options | | | 4,317,856 | 22 | 842 | | | | 864 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | | | | | | (35,280 | ) | (12 | ) | | (12 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | | | | | | | | (4,238 | ) | (4,238 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Balances, December 31, 2012 | 119,682,716 | $ | 103,023 | 22,583,724 | $ | 123 | $ | 6,713 | (35,280 | ) | $ | (12 | ) | $ | (57,637 | ) | $ | 52,210 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of warrants to purchase Series A convertible preferred stock | 414,678 | 221 | | | | | | | 221 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of warrants to purchase common stock | | | 478,938 | 2 | 148 | | | | 150 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation and warrant expense | | | | | 6,490 | | | | 6,490 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options | | | 4,465,938 | 23 | 1,692 | | | | 1,715 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | | | (35,280 | ) | (10 | ) | (2 | ) | 35,280 | 12 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | | | | | | | | 7,308 | 7,308 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Balances, December 31, 2013 | 120,097,394 | $ | 103,244 | 27,493,320 | $ | 138 | $ | 15,041 | | $ | | $ | (50,329 | ) | $ | 68,094 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of warrants to purchase common stock (unaudited) | | | 125,568 | 1 | 89 | | | | 90 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation and warrant expense (unaudited) | | 2,865 | | | 13,091 | | | | 15,956 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of Series F convertible preferred stock for cash (net of issuance costs of $197) (unaudited) | 3,195,278 | 64,803 | | | | | | | 64,803 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of Series F preferred stock for the acquisition of Springstone (unaudited) | 1,221,965 | 2,762 | | | | | | | 2,762 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options (unaudited) | | | 2,056,177 | 20 | 2,177 | | | | 2,197 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification of early exercise liability related to stock options (unaudited) | | | | | (393 | ) | | | | (393 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vesting of early exercise stock options (unaudited) | | | | | 115 | | | | 115 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Par value adjustment for stock split (unaudited) | | | | 138 | (138 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss (unaudited) | | | | | | | | (16,486 | ) | (16,486 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Balances, June 30, 2014 (unaudited) | 124,514,637 | $ | 173,674 | 29,675,065 | $ | 297 | $ | 29,982 | | $ | | $ | (66,815 | ) | $ | 137,138 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-6
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
Year Ended March 31, 2012 | Nine Months Ended December 31, 2012 | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (11,944 | ) | $ | (4,238 | ) | $ | 7,308 | $ | 1,737 | $ | (16,486 | ) | |||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for loan losses | 368 | (42 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||
Fair value adjustments of loans, notes and certificates, net | 1 | 595 | 33 | 23 | 46 | |||||||||||||||
Change in loan servicing liability carried at fair value | | | 936 | 454 | 1,800 | |||||||||||||||
Change in loan servicing asset carried at fair value | | | (534 | ) | (6 | ) | (500 | ) | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation and warrant expense, net | 660 | 1,110 | 6,490 | 1,474 | 15,352 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 150 | 236 | 1,663 | 495 | 3,463 | |||||||||||||||
Loss (Gain) on sales of loans at fair value | | (329 | ) | (3,862 | ) | (3,862 | ) | 781 | ||||||||||||
Other, net | (43 | ) | (118 | ) | 30 | (68 | ) | 123 | ||||||||||||
Purchase of whole loans sold at fair value | | (9,290 | ) | (442,362 | ) | (114,902 | ) | (632,740 | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds from sales of whole loans at fair value | | 9,619 | 446,224 | 118,764 | 631,959 | |||||||||||||||
Net change in operating assets and liabilities excluding the effects of the acquisition: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable | (2,351 | ) | (3,170 | ) | (10,454 | ) | (3,772 | ) | (5,269 | ) | ||||||||||
Other assets | (1,468 | ) | (649 | ) | (21,021 | ) | (1,137 | ) | 14,057 | |||||||||||
Due from related parties | (40 | ) | (75 | ) | (240 | ) | (138 | ) | (56 | ) | ||||||||||
Accounts payable | 620 | 330 | 1,788 | 1,874 | 68 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued interest payable | 2,604 | 4,070 | 11,063 | 4,903 | 5,491 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 357 | 1,558 | 4,077 | 693 | 4,048 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | (11,086 | ) | (393 | ) | 1,139 | 6,532 | 22,137 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of loans at fair value | (320,014 | ) | (598,622 | ) | (1,618,404 | ) | (680,262 | ) | (1,002,301 | ) | ||||||||||
Purchase of loans at amortized cost | (1,064 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||
Principal payments of loans at fair value | 105,306 | 160,787 | 511,232 | 201,100 | 451,403 | |||||||||||||||
Principal payments of loans at amortized cost | 1,349 | 345 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from recoveries and sales of charged-off loans at fair value | | 247 | 1,716 | 645 | 2,584 | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from recoveries and sales of charged-off loans at amortized cost | | 22 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Payments for business acquisition, net of cash acquired | | | | | (109,464 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net change in restricted cash | (4,000 | ) | (2,622 | ) | (4,724 | ) | (926 | ) | (6,659 | ) | ||||||||||
Purchase of property, equipment and software | (383 | ) | (1,302 | ) | (10,435 | ) | (3,955 | ) | (9,380 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (218,806 | ) | (441,145 | ) | (1,120,615 | ) | (483,398 | ) | (673,817 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Payable to investors | 533 | 1,517 | 1,868 | (1,502 | ) | 8,227 | ||||||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of notes and certificates | 319,704 | 606,862 | 1,618,269 | 680,205 | 1,001,976 | |||||||||||||||
Payments on notes and certificates | (101,950 | ) | (163,946 | ) | (504,330 | ) | (199,999 | ) | (451,699 | ) | ||||||||||
Payments on charged-off notes and certificates from recoveries/sales of related charged off loans at fair value | | (219 | ) | (1,669 | ) | (613 | ) | (2,564 | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds from term loan, net of discount | | | | | 49,813 | |||||||||||||||
Payment for debt issuance cost | | | | | (1,192 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Principal payments on term loan | | | | | (313 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Payments on loans payable | (2,601 | ) | (370 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of warrants to acquire Series A convertible preferred stock | 10 | 606 | 221 | | | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of warrants to acquire Series B convertible preferred stock | | 165 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of warrants to acquire common stock | | 34 | 150 | 247 | 90 | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of Series D convertible preferred stock, net of issuance costs | 31,946 | | | | | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of Series E convertible preferred stock, net of issuance costs | | 17,344 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of Series F convertible preferred stock, net of issuance costs | | | | | 64,803 | |||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | | (12 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||
Proceeds from stock options exercised | 158 | 864 | 1,715 | 571 | 2,198 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 247,800 | 462,845 | 1,116,224 | 478,909 | 671,339 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | 17,908 | 21,307 | (3,252 | ) | 2,043 | 19,659 | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 13,336 | 31,244 | 52,551 | 52,551 | 49,299 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 31,244 | $ | 52,551 | $ | 49,299 | $ | 54,594 | $ | 68,958 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | 28,063 | $ | 52,511 | $ | 176,195 | $ | 68,398 | $ | 152,679 | ||||||||||
Non-cash exercise of common stock warrants | $ | 2,345 | $ | | $ | 137 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
Non-cash exercise of preferred stock B warrants | $ | | $ | 102 | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
Reclassification of loans at amortized cost to loans held at fair value | $ | | $ | 2,109 | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
Non-cash investing activityaccrual of property, equipment and software, net | $ | | $ | | $ | 2,275 | $ | | $ | 1,094 | ||||||||||
Non-cash investing and financing activityissuance of Series F convertible preferred stock for business acquisition | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 2,762 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-7
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Basis of Presentation and Consolidation
Our consolidated financial statements include LendingClub Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries; SpringstoneFinancial, LLC (Springstone) and LC Advisors, LLC, (LCA). Trust refers to LC Trust I, an independent Delaware business trust that acquires and holds loans for the sole benefit of certain investors that purchase trust certificates(Certificates) issued by the Trust and that are related to underlying loans. The accompanying consolidated financial statements, have been prepared by LendingClub Corporation (LendingClub, we, our, theCompany and us) in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for financial information.
We did not have any items of other comprehensive income (loss) during any of the periods presented in the consolidated financial statementsand therefore, we are not required to report comprehensive income (loss).
Subsequent to the issuance of our December 31, 2012consolidated financial statements, we corrected the classification of our preferred stock to present the preferred stock within permanent stockholders equity rather than temporary equity as previously presented. This revision is in accordancewith ASC 480Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (ASC 480) and resulted in a change to stockholders deficit from $50.8 million to stockholders equity of $52.2 million as of December 31, 2012. The revision had no effect onour consolidated statements of operations, reported assets and liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet, or the consolidated statements of cash flows.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, we changed the definitions used to classify operating expenses. Operating expenses were formerlyclassified as sales, marketing and customer service, engineering, and general and administrative. Our new categories of operating expenses are: sales and marketing; origination and servicing; and general and administrative. As a result of the newclassification, loan origination and servicing costs which were previously included in sales, marketing and customer service are now included as a separate financial statement line and engineering costs which represent engineering and productdevelopment related expenses are categorized within general and administrative expenses. The changes had no impact to the total operating expenses or net income. Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. Wepreviously referred to Transaction Fees as Origination Fees and General and AdministrativeEngineering and Product Development as General and AdministrativeTechnology.
On April 15, 2014, a 2-for-1 equity stock split approved by our board of directors became effective, in which each outstanding share ofeach series or class of equity capital stock was split into two outstanding shares of such series or class of equity capital stock. All share and per share data has been adjusted to reflect this stock split.
On April 17, 2014, we acquired all the outstanding limited liability company interests of Springstone. As such, our interim consolidatedfinancial statements include Springstones results of operations and financial position from this date. See Note 7Springstone Acquisition.
Unaudited interim consolidated financial information
The accompanying interim consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2014, the interim consolidated statements of operations, and cash flowsfor the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2014, the interim consolidated statement of stockholders equity for the six months ended June 30, 2014, and the related footnote disclosures are unaudited. These unaudited interimconsolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurringadjustments, considered
F-8
necessary to present fairly our financial position as of June 30, 2014 and our results of operations and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2014. The results ofoperations for the six months ended June 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2014.
Unaudited pro forma balance sheet
Immediately prior to the closing of a qualifying initial public offering as defined in Note 12Stockholders Equity, all of theoutstanding shares of convertible preferred stock will automatically convert into shares of common stock. In addition, the outstanding preferred stock warrants will automatically be converted into warrants to purchase common stock upon effectivenessof a qualified initial public offering, and certain of these warrants will automatically be net exercised for shares of common stock upon the completion of our initial public offering. The unaudited pro forma balance sheet information, as set forthin the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, gives effect to the automatic conversion of all outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock as of June 30, 2014. The shares of common stock issuable and the proceeds expected to be receivedin a qualified initial public offering are excluded from such pro forma information.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Change in Fiscal Year
On December 19, 2012, our board of directors approved a change in our fiscal year-end from March 31 to December 31. The changewas effective as of December 31, 2012.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue primarily results from fees earned. Fees include loan transaction fees paid by issuing banks and service providers, servicing fees paidby investors and management fees paid by certain certificate holders. We also have other smaller sources of revenue reported as other revenue.
Transaction Fees
Transaction fees are paid by the issuing banks to us for the work we perform through our platform in facilitating originations. The amount ofthese fees is based upon the terms of the loan, including grade, rate, term and other factors. As of March 31, 2012, December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013, these fees ranged from 1.11% to 5.00% and, as of June 30, 2014, rangedfrom 1.00% to 6.00% of the initial principal amount of a loan. In addition, with our acquisition of Springstone, transaction fees include fees earned from issuing banks and service providers for education and patient financing products. Whereapplicable, the transaction fees are included in the annual percentage rate calculation provided to the borrower and is subtracted from the gross loan proceeds prior to disbursement of the loan funds to the borrower. A loan is considered issued whenwe record the transfer of funds to the borrowers account on our platform and we initiate an ACH transaction to transfer funds from our platforms correspondent bank account to the borrowers bank account.
Servicing Fees
Investorstypically pay us a servicing fee on each payment received from a borrower or on the investors month-end balance of sold loans and certain other facilitated loans outstanding. The servicing fee compensates us for the costs we incur in servicingthe related loan, including managing payments from borrowers, payments to investors and maintaining investors account portfolios. We record servicing fees paid by note holders and certain certificate holders as a component of operating revenuewhen received. Servicing fees can be, and have been, modified or waived at managements discretion.
Management Fees
Accredited investors and qualified purchasers can invest in limited partner interests in funds managed by LCA, a registered investment advisorand our wholly-owned subsidiary. LCA acts as the general partner for five
F-9
private funds (Funds) in which it has made no capital contributions and does not receive any allocation of the Funds income, expenses, gains, losses or any carried interest. Each Fundinvests in a certificate pursuant to a set investment strategy. LCA charges limited partners in the Funds a management fee payable monthly in arrears, based on a limited partners capital account balance at month end.
LCA also earns management fees on separately managed accounts (SMA), payable monthly in arrears, based on the month-end balances in the SMAaccounts.
Management fees are a component of operating revenue in the consolidated statements of operations and are recorded as earned.Management fees can be, and have been, modified or waived at the discretion of LCA.
Other Revenue
Other revenue consists primarily of revenue from gains and losses on sales of whole loans.
Fair Valuation Adjustments of Loans at Fair Value and Notes and Certificates at Fair Value
We include in earnings the estimated unrealized fair value gains or losses during the period on loans, and the offsetting estimated unrealizedfair value gains or losses on related notes and certificates. At each reporting period, we recognize fair valuation adjustments for the loans and the related notes and certificates. The fair valuation adjustment for a given principal amount of aloan will be approximately equal to the corresponding estimated fair valuation adjustment on the combined principal amounts of related notes and certificates because the same net cash flows of the loans and the related notes and/or certificates areused in the discounted cash flow valuation calculations.
Whole Loan Sales
From January 1, 2013 through June 30, 2013, transaction fees and direct loan origination and acquisition costs for loans that weresubsequently sold to unrelated third-party purchasers and met the accounting requirements for a sale of loans were deferred and included in the overall net investment in the loans purchased. Accordingly, the transaction fees for such loans were notincluded in transaction fee revenue and the direct loan origination costs for such loans were not included in operating expenses. A gain or loss on the whole loan sales was recorded on the sale date.
Effective July 1, 2013, we elected the fair value option for whole loans acquired and subsequently sold to unrelated third-partypurchasers. Under this election, all transaction fees and all direct costs incurred in the origination process are recognized in earnings as earned or incurred and are not deferred. Beginning July 1, 2013, transaction fees for whole loans soldto unrelated third-party purchasers are included in Transaction Fees and direct loan origination costs are included in Origination and Servicing operating expense on the consolidated statement of operations. Gains and lossesfrom whole loan sales are recorded in Other Revenue in the consolidated statements of operations.
As part of the saleagreements, we retained the rights to service these sold whole loans. We calculate a gain or loss on the whole loan sale with servicing retained based on the net proceeds from the whole loan sale, minus the net investment in the loans being sold.The net investment in the loans sold has been reduced or increased by the recording of any applicable net servicing asset or liability respectively. Gains on whole loan sales were previously reported in Gain from Sales of Loan and havebeen reclassified to Other Revenue in the consolidated statement of operations.
Additionally, as needed, we will record aliability for significant estimated post-sale obligations or contingent obligations to the purchasers of the loans. No such liability was recorded at December 31, 2012, December 31, 2013 or June 30, 2014.
F-10
Servicing Assets and Liabilities at Fair Value
For whole loans sold to unrelated third-party purchasers with servicing retained, we estimate the fair value of the loan servicing asset orliability, using a discounted cash flow methodology, considering the contractual servicing fee revenue, adequate compensation for our servicing obligation, the current principal balances of the loans and projected servicing revenues over theremaining lives of the loans. We initially record servicing assets and liabilities at fair value with subsequent changes in fair values reported in servicing fees in the period in which the change occurs. Servicing assets and liabilities arerecorded in Other Assets and Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities, respectively, on the consolidated balance sheets.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include unrestricted deposits with financial institutions in checking, money market and short-term certificate ofdeposit accounts. We consider all highly liquid investments with stated maturity dates of three months or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash consists primarily of our funds in certain checking, money market and certificate of deposit accounts that are:(i) pledged to or held in escrow by our correspondent banks as security for transactions processed on or related to our platform; (ii) pledged through a credit support agreement with a certificate holder or (iii) received frominvestors but not yet applied to their accounts on the platform and transferred to segregated bank accounts that hold investors funds.
Loans at Fair Value and Notes and Certificates at Fair Value
We use fair value measurements to record loans, notes and certificates at fair value on a recurring basis and in our fair value disclosures.Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between marketparticipants on the measurement date. Changes in the fair value of the loans and notes and certificates are recognized, on a gross basis, in earnings.
We determine the fair value of the loans, notes and certificates in accordance with the fair value hierarchy that requires an entity tomaximize the use of observable inputs. The fair value hierarchy includes the following three levels based on the objectivity of the inputs, which were used for categorizing the assets or liabilities for which fair value is being measured andreported:
Level 1 | | Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. | ||
Level 2 | | Significant other observable inputs (e.g., quoted prices for similar items in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar items in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable such asinterest rate and yield curves, and market-corroborated inputs). | ||
Level 3 | | Valuation generated from model-based techniques that use inputs that are significant and unobservable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of inputs that market participants would use in pricing the assetor liability. Valuation techniques include use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques, which incorporate managements own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing theinstrument or valuations that require significant management judgment or estimation. The fair value election for loans, notes and certificates allows for symmetrical accounting of the timing and amounts recognized for both expected unrealized lossesand charge-offs on the loans and the related notes and certificates, consistent with the member payment dependent design of the notes and certificates. |
F-11
Our and the Trusts obligation to pay principal and interest on any note or certificate isequal to the pro-rata portion of the payments, if any, received on the related loan subject to applicable fees. The gross effective interest rate associated with notes or certificates is the same as the interest rate earned on the underlying loan.The discounted cash flow methodology used to estimate the notes and certificates fair values uses the same projected net cash flows as their related loan. The discount rates for the projected net cash flows of the notes and certificatesare our estimates of the rates of return, including risk premiums (if significant) that investors in unsecured consumer credit obligations would require when investing in notes issued by us and certificates issued by the Trust with cash flowsdependent on specific credit grades of loans.
For additional discussion on this topic, including the adjustments to the estimated fairvalues of loans, notes and certificates, as discussed above, see Note 4Fair Value of Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value.
Accrued Interest and Other Receivables
Interest income on loans is calculated based on the contractual interest rate of the loan and recorded as interest income as earned. Loansreaching 120 days delinquent are classified as non-accrual loans, and we stop accruing interest and reverse all accrued but unpaid interest as of such date.
Property, Equipment and Software, Net
Property, equipment and software consists of computer equipment and software, office furniture and equipment, construction in progress,leasehold improvements and internal use software and website development costs which are recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization.
Computer equipment and software and furniture and fixtures are depreciated or amortized on a straight line basis over two to five years. Costsassociated with construction projects are transferred to the leasehold improvement account upon project completion. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the lease term or estimated useful life.
Internal use software and website development costs are capitalized when preliminary development efforts are successfully completed and it isprobable that the project will be completed and the software will be used as intended. Internal use software and website development costs are amortized on a straight line basis over the projects estimated useful life, generally three years.Capitalized internal use software development costs consist of salaries and payroll related costs for employees and fees paid to third-party consultants who are directly involved in development efforts. Costs related to preliminary projectactivities and post implementation activities including training and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Costs incurred for upgrades and enhancements that are considered to be probable to result in additional functionality are capitalized. Weevaluate potential impairments of our long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. Events or changes in circumstances that could result in impairment include,but are not limited to, underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in the manner of use of the assets or the strategy for our overall business and significant negative industry or economictrends. Determination of recoverability of long-lived assets is based on an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. Measurement of an impairment loss for long-lived assets thatmanagement expects to hold and use is based on the fair value of the asset. When an impairment loss is recognized, the carrying amount of the asset is reduced to its estimated fair value. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the nine monthsended December 31, 2012 the year ended March 31, 2012 and for the six months ended June 30, 2014, there was no impairment of long-lived assets.
Consolidation Policies
Our policy is to consolidate the financial statements of entities in which we have a controlling financial interest. We determine whether wehave a controlling financial interest in an entity by evaluating whether the entity is a voting interest entity or variable interest entity (VIE) and if the accounting guidance requires consolidation.
F-12
Voting interest entities are entities that have sufficient equity and provide the equityinvestors voting rights that enable them to make significant decisions relating to the entities operations. For these types of entities, our determination of whether we have a controlling financial interest is based on ownership of a majorityof the entities voting equity interest or through control of management of the entities.
VIEs are entities that, by design, either(i) lack sufficient equity to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties, or (ii) have equity investors that do not have the ability to make significant decisionsrelating to the entitys operations through voting rights, or do not have the obligation to absorb the expected losses, or do not have the right to receive the residual returns of the entity. We determine whether we have a controlling financialinterest in a VIE by considering whether our involvement with the VIE is significant and whether we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE based on the following:
| we have the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance; |
| the aggregate indirect and direct variable interests held by us have the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could be significant to the VIE; and |
| qualitative and quantitative factors regarding the nature, size, and form of our involvement with the VIE. |
We believe our beneficial ownership of a controlling financial interest in the trust has qualified and continues to qualify as an equityinvestment in a VIE that should be consolidated for financial accounting and reporting purposes. We perform on-going reassessments on the status of the entities and whether facts or circumstances have changed in relation to our involvement in VIEswhich could cause our conclusion to change.
All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
Business Combination (Unaudited)
We use our best estimates and assumptions to accurately assign fair value to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilitiesassumed at the acquisition date. Our estimates are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. During the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, we may record adjustments to the fair value of these tangibleand intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to goodwill. In addition, uncertain tax positions and tax-related valuation allowances are initially established in connection with a business combination as ofthe acquisition date. We continue to collect information and reevaluate these estimates and assumptions quarterly and record any adjustments to our preliminary estimates to goodwill provided that we are within the measurement period. Upon theconclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the fair value of assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to our consolidated statements of operations.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Unaudited)
Goodwill represents the fair value of acquired businesses in excess of the fair value of the individually identified net assets acquired.Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment annually or whenever indications of impairment exist. Our annual impairment testing date is April 1. We can elect to qualitatively assess goodwill for impairment if it is more likely thannot that the fair value of a reporting unit (defined as business for which financial information is available and reviewed regularly by management) exceeds its carrying value. A qualitative assessment may consider macroeconomic and otherindustry-specific factors, such as trends in short-term and long-term interest rates and the ability to access capital or company-specific factors, such as market capitalization in excess of net assets, trends in revenue generating activities andmerger or acquisition activity.
If we elect to bypass qualitatively assessing goodwill or it is not more likely than not that the fairvalue of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, we estimate the fair values of our reporting units and compare them to
F-13
their carrying values. The estimated fair values of the reporting units are generally established using an income approach based on a discounted cash flow model or a market approach whichcompares each reporting unit to comparable companies in their respective industries.
Intangible assets are amortized over their usefullives in a manner that best reflects their economic benefit. Intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. We do not have anyindefinite-lived intangible assets.
Due from Related Parties
Due from related parties represents asset management fees due to LCA from investors in the Funds.
Payable to Investors
Payable to investors primarily represents payments-in-process received from investors and payments on notes, certificates and loan paymentsthat, as of the last day of the period, have not been credited to investors accounts on the platform or transferred to the investors separate bank accounts.
Sales and Marketing Expense
Sales and marketing costs, including borrower and investor acquisition costs, are expensed as incurred and included in Sales andMarketing on the consolidated statement of operations.
Stock-Based Compensation
All stock-based awards made to employees are recognized in the consolidated financial statements based on their respective grant date fairvalues. Any benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost are reported as a financing cash inflow and cash outflow from operating activities. The stock-based compensation related to awards that are expected to vest isamortized using the straight-line method over the awards vesting term, which is generally four years.
The fair value ofshare-option awards is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes option pricing model considers, among other factors, the underlying fair value of common stock, the expected term of the optionaward, expected volatility of our common stock and expected future dividends, if any.
Forfeitures of awards are estimated at the time ofgrant and revised, as necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from initial estimates or if future forfeitures are expected to differ from recent actual or previously expected forfeitures. Stock-based compensation expense isrecorded net of estimated forfeitures, such that expense is recorded only for those stock-based awards that are expected to vest.
Shareoption awards issued to non-employees are recorded at their fair value on the awards vesting date. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of share options granted to non-employees at each vesting date todetermine the appropriate charge to stock-based compensation.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for theexpected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined on the basis of the differences between the financial statement and tax bases ofassets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includesthe enactment date.
F-14
We recognize deferred tax assets to the extent that we believe these assets are more likely thannot to be realized. In making such a determination, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax-planning strategies, and resultsof recent operations. If we determine that we would be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, we would make an adjustment to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance, which would reduce theprovision for income taxes.
We account for uncertain tax positions using a two-step process whereby (i) we determine whether it ismore likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained on the basis of the technical merits of the position and (ii) for those tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, we recognize the largest amount of taxbenefit that is more than 50 percent likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority.
We recognize interestand penalties accrued on any unrecognized tax benefits as a component of provision for income tax in the consolidated statement of operations.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with GAAP requires management to make judgments,assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other factors we believe to be reasonable under thecircumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of certain assets and liabilities. These judgments, assumptions and estimates include but are not limited to the following: (i) fair valuedeterminations for loans, notes and certificates; (ii) stock-based compensation expense; (iii) provision for income taxes, net of valuation allowance for deferred tax assets; (iv) consolidation of variable interest entities; and (v)fair value determinations for servicing assets and liabilities. These judgments, estimates and assumptions are inherently subjective in nature and actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions, and the differences could be material.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cashequivalents, restricted cash, loans financed directly by us and the related accrued interest receivable, and deposits with service providers. We hold our cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash in accounts at regulated domestic financialinstitutions. We are exposed to credit risk in the event of default by these institutions to the extent the amount recorded on the balance sheet exceeds the FDIC insured amounts.
Impact of New Accounting Standards (Unaudited)
On May 28, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued AccountingStandards Update 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers which provides a single comprehensive revenue recognition model for all contracts with customers. The standard contains principles that an entity will apply to determine themeasurement of revenue and timing of when it is recognized. We are still evaluating the impact of the new guidance and its impact on our financial statements.
3. Net Income (Loss) Per Share and Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Stockholders
Basic net income (loss) per share (EPS) is the amount of net income (loss) available to each share of common stock outstanding during thereporting period. Diluted EPS is the amount of net income (loss) available to each share of common stock outstanding during the reporting period adjusted to include the effect of potentially dilutive common shares. Potentially dilutive common sharesinclude incremental shares issued for stock options, convertible preferred stock and warrants. Potentially dilutive common shares are excluded from the computation of dilutive EPS in periods in which the effect would be antidilutive.
F-15
We calculate EPS using the two-class method. The two-class method allocates net income thatotherwise would have been available to common shareholders to holders of participating securities. We consider all series of our convertible preferred stock to be participating securities due to their non-cumulative dividend rights. As such, netincome allocated to these participating securities, which include participation rights in undistributed earnings (see Note 12Stockholders Equity), are subtracted from net income to determine total undistributed net income tobe allocated to common stockholders. All participating securities are excluded from basic weighted-average common shares outstanding.
Thefollowing table details the computation of the basic and diluted net income (loss) per share (dollars in thousands, except shares and per share data):
Year Ended March 31, 2012 | Nine Months Ended December 31, 2012 | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (11,944 | ) | $ | (4,238 | ) | $ | 7,308 | $ | 1,737 | $ | (16,486 | ) | |||||||
Less: Net income allocated to participating securities(1) | | | (7,117 | ) | $ | (1,737 | ) | $ | | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders after required adjustments for the calculation of basic and diluted net income percommon share | $ | (11,944 | ) | $ | (4,238 | ) | $ | 191 | $ | | $ | (16,486 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding | $ | 17,562,814 | $ | 20,679,838 | $ | 25,778,568 | 24,471,528 | 28,451,564 | ||||||||||||
Weighted-average effect of dilutive securities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Options | | | 14,271,202 | 12,574,948 | | |||||||||||||||
Warrants | | | 663,718 | 862,168 | | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding | 17,562,814 | 20,679,838 | 40,713,488 | 37,908,644 | 28,451,564 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) per common share | ||||||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | (0.68 | ) | $ | (0.20 | ) | $ | 0.01 | $ | | $ | (0.58 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Diluted | $ | (0.68 | ) | $ | (0.20 | ) | $ | 0.00 | $ | | $ | (0.58 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | In a period with net income, both earnings and dividends (if any) are allocated to participating securities. In a period with a net loss, only dividends (if any) are allocated to participating securities. |
Unaudited Pro Forma Net Income (Loss) per Share
Pro forma basic and diluted net income (loss) per share were computed to give effect to the automatic conversion of Series A convertiblepreferred stock, Series B convertible preferred stock, Series C convertible preferred stock, Series D convertible preferred stock, Series E convertible preferred stock and Series F convertible preferred stock using the ifconverted method as though the conversion had occurred as of the beginning of the period presented or the original date of issuance, if later, and the issuance of shares of common stock upon the automatic conversion and exercise of certain warrantsto purchase shares of Series A convertible preferred stock and the automatic exercise of certain warrants to purchase common stock upon the completion of our initial public offering.
F-16
The unaudited basic and diluted pro forma per common share calculations are presented below (inthousands except share and per share amounts):
Year Ended December 31, 2013 | Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 | |||||||
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders, as reported | $ | 7,308 | $ | (16,486 | ) | |||
Weighted-average shares used to compute net income (loss) per share available to common stockholders, basic | 25,778,568 | 28,451,564 | ||||||
Pro forma adjustments to reflect conversion of convertible preferred stock | 119,911,432 | 121,927,843 | ||||||
Pro forma adjustments to reflect conversion of convertible preferred stock warrants and certain common stock warrants | 193,096 | 193,096 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Weighted-average shares to compute proforma net income (loss) per share available to common stockholders, basic | 145,883,096 | 150,572,503 | ||||||
Dilutive effect of stock options | 14,271,202 | | ||||||
Dilutive effect of warrants | 1,511,477 | | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Weighted-average shares to compute proforma net income (loss) per share available to common stockholders, diluted | 161,665,775 | 150,572,503 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Proforma net income (loss) per common share: | ||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.11 | ) | |||
Diluted | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.11 | ) |
(1) | Assumes the automatic conversion and exercise of warrants to purchase a maximum of 165,808 shares of Series A convertible preferred stock and automatic exercise of warrants to purchase a maximum of 27,288 shares ofcommon stock. Upon the completion of our initial public offering, these warrants will automatically be net exercised for common stock, resulting in the issuance of fewer shares. |
4. Fair Value of Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value
We use fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to loans and the related notes and certificates that arerecorded at fair value on a recurring basis.
Loans and the related notes and certificates do not trade in an active market with readilyobservable prices. Accordingly, the fair value of loans and the related notes and certificates are determined using a discounted cash flow model utilizing assumptions market participants use for credit losses, changes in the interest rateenvironment, and other factors. Fair value measurements of our loans and the related notes and certificates use significant unobservable inputs and, accordingly, we classify them as Level 3.
We have ongoing monitoring procedures in place for our Level 3 assets and liabilities that use such internal valuation models. Theseprocedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that models continue to perform as expected after approved. All internal valuation models are subject to ongoing review by business-unit-level management and the executive management team.
At December 31, 2012, December 31, 2013, and June 30, 2014, loans, notes and certificates measured at fair value on a recurringbasis were (in thousands):
Loans at Fair Value | Notes and Certificates at Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, | June 30, 2014 | December 31, | June 30, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Aggregate principal balance outstanding | $ | 791,774 | $ | 1,849,042 | $ | 2,351,515 | $ | 795,842 | $ | 1,859,982 | $ | 2,361,902 | ||||||||||||
Fair valuation adjustments | (10,559 | ) | (20,000 | ) | (25,313 | ) | (10,526 | ) | (19,992 | ) | (25,307 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Fair value | $ | 781,215 | $ | 1,829,042 | $ | 2,326,202 | $ | 785,316 | $ | 1,839,990 | $ | 2,336,595 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-17
We determined the fair values of loans, notes and certificates and servicing assets using inputsand methods that are categorized in the fair value hierarchy, as follows (in thousands):
Level 1 Inputs | Level 2 Inputs | Level 3 Inputs | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Loans at fair value | $ | | $ | | $ | 781,215 | $ | 781,215 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total assets | $ | | $ | | $ | 781,215 | $ | 781,215 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
Notes and certificates | $ | | $ | | $ | 785,316 | $ | 785,316 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | | $ | | $ | 785,316 | $ | 785,316 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
December 31, 2013 | ||||||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Loans at fair value | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,829,042 | $ | 1,829,042 | ||||||||
Servicing asset | 534 | 534 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total assets | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,829,576 | $ | 1,829,576 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
Notes and certificates | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,839,990 | $ | 1,839,990 | ||||||||
Servicing liability | 936 | 936 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,840,926 | $ | 1,840,926 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
June 30, 2014 (unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Loans at fair value | $ | | $ | | $ | 2,326,202 | $ | 2,326,202 | ||||||||
Servicing asset | 1,034 | 1,034 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total assets | $ | | $ | | $ | 2,327,236 | $ | 2,327,236 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
Notes and certificates | $ | | $ | | $ | 2,336,595 | $ | 2,336,595 | ||||||||
Servicing liability | 2,736 | 2,736 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | | $ | | $ | 2,339,331 | $ | 2,339,331 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instruments are categorized in the Level 3 valuation hierarchy based on the significance of unobservablefactors in the overall fair value measurement. Our fair value approach for Level 3 instruments primarily uses unobservable inputs, but may also include observable, actively quoted components derived from external sources. As a result, the realizedand unrealized gains and losses for assets and liabilities within the Level 3 category presented in the tables below may include changes in fair value that were attributable to both observable and unobservable inputs.
F-18
The following table presents additional information about Level 3 assets and liabilities measuredat fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2012, December 31, 2013 and June 30, 2014 (in thousands):
Loans | Notes and Certificates | |||||||
Fair value at December 31, 2012 | $ | 781,215 | $ | 785,316 | ||||
Purchases of loans | 2,064,628 | | ||||||
Issuances of notes and certificates | | 1,618,269 | ||||||
Principal payments | (511,232 | ) | (504,330 | ) | ||||
Whole loan sales | (446,224 | ) | | |||||
Recoveries from sale and collection of charged-off loans | (1,716 | ) | (1,669 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Carrying value before fair value adjustments | 1,886,671 | 1,897,586 | ||||||
Fair valuation adjustments, included in earnings | (57,629 | ) | (57,596 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Fair value at December 31, 2013 | 1,829,042 | 1,839,990 | ||||||
Purchases of loans (unaudited) | 1,634,260 | | ||||||
Issuances of notes and certificates (unaudited) | | 1,001,976 | ||||||
Principal payments (unaudited) | (451,403 | ) | (451,699 | ) | ||||
Whole loan sales (unaudited) | (631,959 | ) | | |||||
Recoveries from sale and collection of charged-off loans (unaudited) | (2,584 | ) | (2,564 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Carrying value before fair value adjustments (unaudited) | 2,377,356 | 2,387,703 | ||||||
Fair valuation adjustments, included in earnings (unaudited) | (51,154 | ) | (51,108 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Fair value at June 30, 2014 (unaudited) | $ | 2,326,202 | $ | 2,336,595 | ||||
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2013, loans underlying notes and certificates had original terms of 36 months or 60months, were paid monthly with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.42% to 26.06% and had various maturity dates through December 2018. At June 30, 2014, loans underlying notes and certificates had original terms of 12, 24, 36 and 60 months,were paid monthly with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.42% to 29.90% and had various maturity dates through June 2019.
The fairvalues of loans and the related notes and certificates are determined using a discounted cash flow model utilizing estimates for credit losses, changes in the interest rate environment, and other factors. For notes and certificates, we also considerrisk factors such as our continued profitability, ability to operate on a cash-flow positive basis and liquidity position. The majority of fair valuation adjustments included in earnings is attributable to changes in estimated instrument-specificfuture credit losses. All fair valuation adjustments were related to Level 3 instruments for the year ended December 31, 2013 and for the six months ended June 30, 2014 (unaudited). A specific loan that is projected to have higher futuredefault losses than previously estimated has lower expected future cash flows over its remaining life, which reduces its estimated fair value. Conversely, a specific loan that is projected to have lower future default losses than previouslyestimated has increased expected future cash flows over its remaining life, which increases its fair value. Because the payments to holders of notes and certificates directly reflect the payments received on loans, a reduction or increase of theexpected future payments on loans will decrease or increase the estimated fair values of the related notes and certificates. Expected losses and actual loan charge-offs on loans are offset to the extent that the loans are financed by notes andcertificates that absorb the related loan losses.
The fair value adjustments for loans were largely offset by the fair value adjustmentsof the notes and certificates due to the member payment dependent design of the notes and certificates and because the principal balances of the loans were very close to the combined principal balances of the notes and certificates. Accordingly, thenet fair value adjustment losses for loans, notes and certificates were $0.001 million, $0.6 million, $0.03 million and $0.05 million for the year ended March 31, 2012, the nine months ended December 31, 2012, the year endedDecember 31, 2013 and the six months ended June 30, 2014 (unaudited), respectively.
F-19
At December 31, 2012, we had 576 loans that were 90 days or more past due includingnon-accrual loans and loans where the borrower has filed for bankruptcy or is deceased, which had a total outstanding principal balance of $6.4 million, aggregate adverse fair value adjustments totaling $5.7 million and an aggregate fair value of$0.7 million. At December 31, 2013, we had 1,464 loans that were 90 days or more past due including non-accrual loans and loans where the borrower has filed for bankruptcy or is deceased, which had a total outstanding principal balance of $15.6million, aggregate adverse fair value adjustments totaling $13.8 million and an aggregate fair value of $1.8 million. At June 30, 2014, we had 1,032 loans that were 90 days or more past due, including non-accrual loans and loans wherethe borrower has filed for bankruptcy or is deceased, which had a total outstanding principal balance of $11.9 million, aggregate adverse fair value adjustments of $10.9 million and an aggregate fair value of $1.0 million. (Unaudited.)
We place loans on non-accrual status upon becoming 120 days past due or if the borrower has filed for bankruptcy or is deceased. AtDecember 31, 2013, we had 111 loans that were over 120 days past due and classified as non-accrual loans, which had a total outstanding principal balance of $1.1 million, aggregate adverse fair value adjustments totaling $0.9 million and anaggregate fair value of $0.2 million. At June 30, 2014, we had 42 loans that were over 120 days past due and classified as non-accrual loans, which had a total outstanding principal balance of $0.5 million, aggregate adverse fair valueadjustments of $0.4 million and an aggregate fair value of $0.1 million. (Unaudited.)
Significant Unobservable Inputs
The following table presents quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used for our Level 3 fair value measurements atDecember 31, 2013 and June 30, 2014:
December 31, 2013 | June 30, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||
Range of Inputs | Range of Inputs | |||||||||||||||||
Unobservable Input | Minimum | Maximum | Minimum | Maximum | ||||||||||||||
Loans, notes and certificates and servicing asset/liability | Discount rate | 5.9 | % | 15.9 | % | 5.6 | % | 17.0 | % | |||||||||
Loans, notes and certificates and servicing asset/liability | Net cumulative expected loss | 2.1 | % | 23.7 | % | 2.0 | % | 21.9 | % | |||||||||
Servicing asset/liability | Market servicing rate (% per annum on loan balance) | 0.4 | % | 0.4 | % | 0.5 | % | 0.5 | % |
The valuation technique used for our Level 3 assets and liabilities, as presented in the previous table, isdescribed as follows:
Loans, Notes and Certificates
Discounted Cash Flow. Discounted cash flow valuation techniques generally consist of developing an estimate of future cash flows thatare expected to occur over the life of a financial instrument and then discounting those cash flows at a rate of return that results in the fair value amount.
Significant unobservable inputs presented in the previous table are those we consider significant to the estimated fair values of the Level 3assets and liabilities. We consider unobservable inputs to be significant, if by their exclusion, the estimated fair value of the Level 3 asset or liability would be impacted by a significant percentage change, or based on qualitative factors suchas the nature of the instrument and significance of the unobservable inputs relative to other inputs used within the valuation. Following is a description of the significant unobservable inputs provided in the table.
F-20
Discount Rate. Discount rate is a rate of return used to discount future expected cashflows to arrive at a present value, the fair value, of the loans, notes and certificates. The discount rates for the projected net cash flows of loans are our estimates of the rates of return that investors in unsecured consumer credit obligationswould require when investing in the various credit grades of loans. The discount rates for the projected net cash flows of the notes and certificates are our estimates of the rates of return that investors in unsecured consumer credit obligationswould require when investing in notes issued by us and certificates issued by the Trust with cash flows dependent on specific grades of loans. Discount rates for existing loans, notes and certificates are adjusted to reflect the time value of money.A risk premium component is implicitly included in the discount rates to reflect the amount of compensation market participants require due to the uncertainty inherent in the instruments cash flows resulting from risks such as credit andliquidity.
Net Cumulative Expected Loss.Net cumulative expected loss is an estimate of the net cumulative principal payments thatwill not be repaid over the entire life of a new loans, note or certificate, expressed as a percentage of the original principal amount of the loans, note or certificate. The estimated net cumulative loss is the sum of the net losses estimated tooccur each month of the life of a new loans, note or certificate. Therefore, the total net losses estimated to occur over the remaining maturity of existing loans, notes and certificates are less than the estimated net cumulative losses ofcomparable new loans, notes and certificates. A given months estimated net losses are a function of two variables:
(i) | estimated default rate, which is an estimate of the probability of not collecting the remaining contractual principal amounts owed and, |
(ii) | estimated net loss severity, which is the percentage of contractual principal cash flows lost in the event of a default, net of the average net recovery, expected to be received on a defaulted loans, note orcertificate. |
Loan Servicing Rights
Discounted Cash Flow. Discounted cash flow valuation techniques generally consist of developing an estimate of futurecash flows that are expected to occur over the life of a financial instrument and then discounting those cash flows at a rate of return that results in the fair value amount.
Significant unobservable inputs presented in the table above are those we consider significant to the estimated fair values of the Level 3assets and liabilities. We consider unobservable inputs to be significant, if by their exclusion, the estimated fair value of the Level 3 asset or liability would be impacted by a significant percentage change, or based on qualitative factors suchas the nature of the instrument and significance of the unobservable inputs relative to other inputs used within the valuation.
Thefollowing is a description of the significant unobservable inputs provided in the table.
Market Servicing Rate. We estimatean adequate servicing compensation assumption as a measure of what a market participant would earn to service the loans that we sell to third parties. We estimated this market servicing rate based on observable market rates for other loan types inthe industry, adjusted for the unique loan attributes that are present in such loans we sell (i.e., unsecured fixed rate fully amortizing loans, ACH loan payments, intermediate terms, prime credit grades and sizes) and a market servicingbenchmarking analysis performed by an independent valuation firm.
Discount Rate. Discount rate is a rate of return used todiscount future expected cash flows to arrive at a present value, the fair value, of the loan servicing rights. The discount rates for the projected net cash flows of loan servicing rights are our estimates of the rates of return that investors inservicing rights for unsecured consumer credit obligations would require for the various credit grades of the underlying loans. Discount rates for servicing rights on existing loans are adjusted to reflect the time value of money. A risk premiumcomponent is implicitly included in the discount rates to reflect the amount of compensation market participants require due to the uncertainty inherent in the instruments cash flows resulting from risks such as credit and liquidity.
F-21
Net Cumulative Expected Loss. Net cumulative expected loss is an estimate of thenet cumulative principal payments that will not be repaid over the entire life of a loan expressed as a percentage of the original principal amount of the loan. The estimated net cumulative loss is the sum of the net losses estimated to occur eachmonth of the life of a new loan. A given months estimated net losses are a function of two variables:
(i) | estimated default rate, which is an estimate of the probability of not collecting the remaining contractual principal amounts owed, and |
(ii) | estimated net loss severity, which is the percentage of contractual principal cash flows lost in the event of a default, net of the average net recovery, expected to be received on a defaulted loan. |
The following table presents additional information about Level 3 servicing assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basisfor the six months ended June 30, 2014 (unaudited) (in thousands):
Servicing Assets | Servicing Liabilities | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Fair value at December 31, 2012 | $ | | $ | | ||||
Additions | 587 | 1,273 | ||||||
Changes in fair value due to: | ||||||||
Realization of expected cash flows | (53 | ) | (337 | ) | ||||
Changes in market inputs or assumptions used in the valuation model | | | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Fair value at December 31, 2013 | 534 | 936 | ||||||
Additions (unaudited) | 1,159 | 1,655 | ||||||
Changes in fair value due to: | ||||||||
Realization of expected cash flows (unaudited) | (286 | ) | (560 | ) | ||||
Changes in market inputs or assumptions used in the valuation model (unaudited) | (373 | ) | 705 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Fair value at June 30, 2014 (unaudited) | $ | 1,034 | $ | 2,736 | ||||
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2014, outstanding loans underlying loan servicing rights had original terms of 36 and60 months, were paid monthly with fixed interest rates ranging from 6.00% to 26.06% and had various maturity dates through June 2019 (unaudited).
Our and the Trusts obligation to pay principal and interest on any note or certificate is equal to the pro-rata portion of the payments,if any, received on the related loan subject to applicable fees. The gross effective interest rate associated with notes or certificates is the same as the interest rate earned on the underlying loan. At December 31, 2013 and June 30,2014, the discounted cash flow methodology used to estimate the notes and certificates fair values uses the same projected net cash flows as their related loan. The discount rates for the projected net cash flows of the notes andcertificates are our estimates of the rates of return, including risk premiums (if significant) that investors in unsecured consumer credit obligations would require when investing in notes issued by us and certificates issued by the Trust with cashflows dependent on specific credit grades of loans.
Significant Recurring Level 3 Fair Value Asset and Liability Input Sensitivity
The discounted cash flow technique that we use to determine the fair value of our Level 3 loans, notes and certificates valuerequires determination of relevant inputs and assumptions, some of which represent significant unobservable inputs as indicated in the preceding table. Accordingly, changes in these unobservable inputs may have a significant impact on fair value.Certain of these unobservable inputs will (in isolation) have a directionally consistent impact on the fair value of the instrument for a given change in that input. Alternatively, the fair value of the instrument may move in an opposite directionfor a given change in another input. For example, increases in the discount rates and estimated net cumulative loss rates each will reduce the estimated fair value of loans, notes and certificates. When multiple inputs are used within the valuationtechnique of a loan, note or certificate, a change in one input in a certain direction may be offset by an opposite change in another input.
F-22
The discounted cash flow valuation technique we use determine the fair value of Level 3 loanservicing rights requires certain significant unobservable inputs including adequate servicing compensation, net cumulative loss rates, and discount rates. An increase in any of these unobservable inputs will reduce the fair value of the loanservicing rights and alternatively, a decrease in any one of these inputs would result in the loan servicing rights increasing in value.
5. Other Assets
Other assets consist of the following (in thousands):
December 31, | ||||||||||||
2012 | 2013 | June 30, 2014 | ||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||
Receivable from investors | $ | | $ | 18,116 | $ | 536 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses | 1,538 | 3,546 | 3,666 | |||||||||
Prepaid compensation | | | 3,281 | |||||||||
Loan servicing asset at fair value | | 534 | 1,034 | |||||||||
Tenant improvement receivable | | 504 | 376 | |||||||||
Accounts receivable | 79 | 439 | 1,496 | |||||||||
Debt issuance costs, net | | | 1,092 | |||||||||
Deposits | 696 | 193 | 216 | |||||||||
Other | 53 | 589 | 488 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total other assets | $ | 2,366 | $ | 23,921 | $ | 12,185 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Property, Equipment and Software, net
Property, equipment and software consist of the following (in thousands):
December 31, | ||||||||||||
2012 | 2013 | June 30, 2014 | ||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||
Internally developed software | $ | 358 | $ | 4,188 | $ | 8,926 | ||||||
Computer equipment | 1,104 | 4,019 | 6,291 | |||||||||
Leasehold improvements | 33 | 2,700 | 3,931 | |||||||||
Construction in progress | 35 | 1,978 | 493 | |||||||||
Software | 453 | 913 | 2,262 | |||||||||
Furniture and fixtures | 65 | 836 | 1,912 | |||||||||
Other | 21 | 26 | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total property and equipment | 2,069 | 14,660 | 23,815 | |||||||||
Accumulated depreciation and amortization | (491 | ) | (2,065 | ) | (4,395 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Property, equipment and software, net | $ | 1,578 | $ | 12,595 | $ | 19,420 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense on property, equipment and software for the year ended March 31,2012, the nine months ended December 31, 2012 and year ended December 31, 2013 was $0.2 million, $0.2 million and $1.7 million, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense on property, equipment and software for the sixmonths ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013 was $2.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively (unaudited).
7. Springstone Acquisition (unaudited)
On April 17, 2014, we acquired all of the outstanding limited liability company interests of Springstone Financial, LLC(Springstone). As a result of the closing of the acquisition, Springstone became our wholly owned subsidiary.
F-23
Springstone facilitates education and patient financing loans through a network of providersutilizing two issuing banks. Springstone earns fee revenue from providers for facilitating loans to their customers. The acquisition of Springstone expands the services we offer. We have included the financial results of Springstone in theconsolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.
Under the terms of the purchase agreement, the sellers received at theclosing an aggregate of $113 million in cash and $25 million worth of shares of our Series F convertible preferred stock. In connection with the acquisition, we also paid $2.4 million for transaction costs incurred bySpringstone. For accounting purposes, the purchase price was $111.9 million, which was comprised of $109.1 million in cash and shares of Series F convertible preferred stock with an aggregate value of $2.8 million. To secure theretention of certain key employees, a total of $25.6 million comprised of $22.1 million of shares of Series F convertible preferred stock (Escrow Shares) and $3.5 million of cash were placed in a third-party escrow and aresubject to certain vesting and forfeiture conditions applicable to these employees continuing employment over a three-year period from the closing. These amounts will be accounted for as a compensation arrangement and expensed over the three-yearvesting period. Additionally, $19.3 million of the cash consideration and certain Escrow Shares were placed in a third-party escrow for 15 months from the closing date to secure, in part, the indemnification obligations of the sellersunder the purchase agreement.
The cash portion of the consideration was funded by a combination of cash from us and proceeds from a debtfinancing and Series F convertible preferred stock financing (see Note 10Term Loan and Note 12Stockholders Equity).
We have completed the allocation of the purchase price to acquired assets and liabilities with the exception of finalizing the determinationof certain contingent liabilities and the finalization of a revenue refund liability, any deferred tax asset or liability and the net working capital balance as of the acquisition date. The preliminary purchase price allocation as of the acquisitiondate is as follows (in thousands):
Fair Value | ||||
Assets: | ||||
Cash | $ | 2,256 | ||
Restricted cash | 1,581 | |||
Property, equipment and software | 367 | |||
Other assets | 512 | |||
Identified intangible assets | 40,200 | |||
Goodwill | 72,679 | |||
Liabilities: | ||||
Accounts payable | 239 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 5,449 | |||
|
| |||
Total purchase consideration | $ | 111,907 | ||
|
|
The goodwill balance is primarily attributed to the expected operational synergies, the combined workforce andthe future development initiative of the combined workforce. Goodwill is expected to be deductible for U.S. income tax purposes.
Theamounts of revenue and earnings (losses) of Springstone included in our consolidated statement of operations from the acquisition date of April 17, 2014 to June 30, 2014 were $4.7 million and $(1.7) million, respectively. We haverecognized acquisition-related costs of $2.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and have reported this in general and administrative expense. We did not recognize acquisition-related costs for the six months ended June 30,2013.
The following pro forma financial information summarizes the combined results of operations for us and Springstone, as though thecompanies were combined as of January 1, 2013. These pro forma results have been
F-24
prepared for comparative purposes only and do not purport to be indicative of the results of operations which would have resulted had the acquisition occurred as of January 1, 2013, nor isit indicative of future operating results. The pro forma results presented include interest expense on the debt financing, amortization of acquired intangible assets and compensation expense related to the post-acquisition compensation arrangementsentered into with the continuing employees (in thousands):
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2014 | 2013 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Total net revenue | $ | 92,234 | $ | 44,662 | ||||
Net loss(1) | $ | (15,178 | ) | $ | (14,766 | ) | ||
Basic net loss per share attributable to common stockholders | $ | (0.53 | ) | $ | (0.60 | ) | ||
Diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders | $ | (0.53 | ) | $ | (0.60 | ) |
(1) | Net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2013 includes $8.6 million of one-time acquisition-related costs and compensation expenses. |
8. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (Unaudited)
Goodwill
Goodwill consisted of the following (in thousands):
Balance at December 31, 2013. | $ | | ||
Acquisition of Springstone | 72,679 | |||
|
| |||
Balance at June 30, 2014 | $ | 72,679 | ||
|
|
There was no impairment of goodwill during the six months ended June 30, 2014.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets acquired are as follows as of June 30, 2014 (unaudited) (dollars in thousands):
Gross Carrying Value | Accumulated Amortization | Net Carrying Value | Remaining Useful Life | |||||||||||||
Customer relationships | $ | 39,500 | $ | (1,066 | ) | $ | 38,434 | 13.8 | ||||||||
Technology | 400 | (27 | ) | 373 | 2.8 | |||||||||||
Brand name | 300 | (30 | ) | 270 | 1.8 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total intangible assets subject to amortization | $ | 40,200 | $ | (1,123 | ) | $ | 39,077 | 13.6 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The customer relationships intangible asset is being amortized on an accelerated basis over a 14 yearperiod. The technology and brand name intangible assets are being amortized straight line over three and two years, respectively. Amortization expense associated with other intangible assets for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was$1.1 million.
F-25
The expected future amortization expense for intangible assets as of June 30, 2014 is asfollows (unaudited) (in thousands):
Remainder of 2014 | $ | 1,652 | ||
2015 | 5,533 | |||
2016 | 4,779 | |||
2017 | 4,265 | |||
2018 | 3,856 | |||
Thereafter | 18,992 | |||
|
| |||
Total | $ | 39,077 | ||
|
|
9. Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):
December 31, | June 30, | |||||||||||
2012 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||
Accrued compensation | $ | 2,414 | $ | 5,243 | $ | 5,741 | ||||||
Accrued service fees | 952 | 2,057 | 4,441 | |||||||||
Loan servicing liability at fair value | | 936 | 2,736 | |||||||||
Contingent liabilities | | | 1,830 | |||||||||
Deferred rent | | 653 | 959 | |||||||||
Deferred tax liability | | | 640 | |||||||||
Transaction fee refund reserve | | | 522 | |||||||||
Other accrued expenses | | 239 | 646 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total accrued expenses and other liabilities | $ | 3,366 | $ | 9,128 | $ | 17,515 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Term Loan (Unaudited)
In connection with the acquisition of Springstone, we entered into a Credit and Guaranty Agreement with several lenders onApril 16, 2014, under which the lenders made a $50.0 million term loan to us. In connection with our entry into the credit agreement, we entered into a Pledge and Security Agreement with Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. as Collateral Agent.
The term loan matures on April 16, 2017 and requires principal payments of $312,500 per quarter plus interest, with the remainingthen-unpaid principal amount payable at maturity. The term loan can be prepaid at any time without premium or penalty, subject to a minimum prepayment of $1.0 million. The term loan is required to be prepaid in certain circumstances, including uponsales of assets other than loans and upon the issuance of debt or redeemable capital stock.
Borrowings under the credit agreement bearinterest, which at our option may be either (i) a floating base rate tied to an underlying index plus an additional 1.25% per annum or (ii) a Eurocurrency rate (for an interest period of one, two, three or six months) plus anadditional 2.25% per annum. If a Eurocurrency Rate loan is selected, customary breakage costs are payable in the case of any prepayment on a date other than the last day of an interest period. The weighted-average interest rate on the term loanwas 2.75% for the six months ended June 30, 2014.
The term loan is also guaranteed by Springstone and LCA and is secured by a firstpriority lien and security interest in substantially all of our and our subsidiaries assets, not otherwise pledged or restricted, subject to certain exceptions.
F-26
The credit agreement and pledge and security agreement contain certain affirmative and negativecovenants applicable to us and our subsidiaries. These include restrictions on our ability to make certain restricted payments, including restrictions on our ability to pay dividends, incur additional indebtedness, place liens on assets, merge orconsolidate, make investments and enter into certain transactions with our affiliates. The credit agreement also requires us to maintain a maximum total leverage ratio (as defined in the credit agreement) of less than 5.50:1 initially, anddecreasing to 3.50:1 after September 30, 2015 (on a consolidated basis). The total leverage ratio as of June 30, 2014 was 2.59:1.
As of June 30, 2014, the carrying value of the term loan was $49.5 million. At June 30, 2014, the current portion of the term loanwas $1.2 million and the noncurrent portion outstanding was $48.3 million. We did not have a term loan outstanding balance at December 31, 2013.
In connection with the term loan, we capitalized $1.2 million of debt issuance costs. As of June 30, 2014, the net balance of debtissuance costs was $1.1 million. Interest expense on the term loan, including amortization of debt issuance cost, was $0.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2014. We did not have interest on the term loan for the six months endedJune 30, 2013.
Future principal payments on the term loan are payable as follows (unaudited, in thousands):
Remainder of 2014 | $ | 625 | ||
2015 | 1,250 | |||
2016 | 1,250 | |||
2017 | 46,563 | |||
|
| |||
Total principal payments | $ | 49,688 | ||
|
| |||
Unamortized discounts, net | (172 | ) | ||
|
| |||
Total | $ | 49,516 | ||
|
|
11. Related-Party Transactions
Several of our executive officers and directors (including immediate family members) have opened investor accounts with us,made deposits and withdrawals to their accounts and funded portions of loans via purchases of notes and certificates. All note and certificate purchases made by related parties were conducted on terms and conditions that were not more favorable thanthose obtained by other investors.
The following table summarizes deposits and withdrawals made by related parties whose transactionstotaled $120,000 or more for the year ended March 31, 2012, the nine months ended December 31, 2012, the year ended December 31, 2013 and for the six months ended June 30, 2014.
Role | Year Ended March 31, 2012 | |||||||||||
Related Party | Deposits | Withdrawals | ||||||||||
Daniel Ciporin | Director | $ | 209,500 | $ | 158,113 | |||||||
John J. Mack | Director | 1,700,000 | 199,265 | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total | $ | 1,909,500 | $ | 357,378 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
F-27
Role | Nine Months Ended December 31, 2012 | |||||||||||
Related Party | Deposits | Withdrawals | ||||||||||
Daniel Ciporin | Director | $ | 500,000 | $ | 129,698 | |||||||
Jeffrey Crowe | Director | 150,000 | | |||||||||
John J. Mack | Director | 529,540 | 451,617 | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total | $ | 1,179,540 | $ | 581,315 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
Role | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | |||||||||||
Related Party | Deposits | Withdrawals | ||||||||||
Daniel Ciporin | Director | $ | 600,000 | $ | 128,288 | |||||||
Jeffrey Crowe | Director | 800,000 | 444,227 | |||||||||
John J. Mack | Director | 405,118 | 617,779 | |||||||||
Larry Summers | Director | 530,898 | | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total | $ | 2,336,016 | $ | 1,190,294 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
Role | Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 | |||||||||||
Related Party | Deposits | Withdrawals | ||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||
Daniel Ciporin | Director | $ | 500,000 | $ | 40,958 | |||||||
John J. Mack | Director | 450,000 | 69,317 | |||||||||
Larry Summers | Director | 200,000 | | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total | $ | 1,150,000 | $ | 110,275 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
F-28
12. Stockholders Equity
Convertible Preferred Stock (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) (June 30, 2014 amounts unaudited)
We have shares of preferred stock authorized and outstanding as follows:
December 31, | June 30, 2014 | |||||||||||
2012 | 2013 | |||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 123,235,032 total shares authorized at December 31, 2012, December 31, 2013 and 125,307,087total shares authorized at June 30, 2014: | ||||||||||||
Series A convertible preferred stock, 34,012,550 shares designated at December 31, 2012, December 31, 2013 and 33,825,798shares designated at June 30, 2014; 32,635,494, 33,050,170 and 33,050,170 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012, December 31, 2013 and June 30, 2014; aggregate liquidation preference of $17,371, $17,599 and $17,599at December 31, 2012, December 31, 2013 and June 30, 2014 | $ | 17,181 | $ | 17,402 | $ | 17,402 | ||||||
Series B convertible preferred stock, 32,821,052 shares designated at December 31, 2012, December 31, 2013 and 32,788,650shares designated at June 30, 2014; 32,788,650 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012, December 31, 2013 and June 30, 2014; aggregate liquidation preference of $12,268 at December 31, 2012, December 31, 2013and June 30, 2014 | 12,164 | 12,164 | 12,164 | |||||||||
Series C convertible preferred stock, 31,243,218 shares designated at December 31, 2012, December 31, 2013 and June 30,2104; 31,243,218 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012, December 31, 2013 and June 30, 2014; aggregate liquidation preference of $24,490 at December 31, 2012, December 31, 2013 and June 30, 2014 | 24,388 | 24,388 | 24,388 | |||||||||
Series D convertible preferred stock, 18,015,356 shares designated at December 31, 2012, December 31, 2013 and June 30,2014; 18,015,356 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012, December 31, 2013 and June 30, 2014; aggregate liquidation preference of $32,044 at December 31, 2012, December 31, 2013 and June 30, 2014 | 31,943 | 31,943 | 31,943 | |||||||||
Series E convertible preferred stock, 7,142,856 shares designated at December 31, 2012, December 31, 2013 and5,000,000 shares designated at June 30, 2014; 5,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012, December 31, 2013 and June 30, 2014; aggregate liquidation preference of $17,500 at December 31, 2012,December 31, 2013 and June 30, 2014 | 17,347 | 17,347 | 17,347 | |||||||||
Series F convertible preferred stock, 0, 0 and 4,434,065 shares designated at December 31, 2012, December 31, 2013 andJune 30, 2014; 0, 0 and 4,417,243 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012, December 31, 2013 and June 30, 2014; aggregate liquidation preference of $0, $0 and $89,858 at December 31, 2012, December 31, 2013and June 30, 2014 | | | 89,661 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Subtotal | $ | 103,023 | $ | 103,244 | $ | 192,905 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Unamortized compensation associated with Series F convertible preferred stock | | | (19,231 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total preferred stock | $ | 103,023 | $ | 103,244 | $ | 173,674 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-29
At December 31, 2013 and June 30, 2014, we had 817,880 and 761,376 shares ofSeries A convertible preferred stock subject to outstanding warrants and reserved for future issuance, respectively. Warrants to purchase Series A convertible preferred stock are fully exercisable with an exercise price of $0.5325 pershare. The warrants expire in 2018.
In June 2012, we issued 5.0 million shares of Series E convertible at $3.50 per share foraggregate gross cash consideration of $17.5 million. The shares are convertible into shares of our common stock, par value $0.01 per share, initially on a one-for-one basis, as adjusted from time to time pursuant to the anti-dilutionprovisions of the our certificate of incorporation. The two investors in the Series E convertible preferred stock were KPCB Holdings, Inc., as nominee (KPCB), and John J. Mack, a member of the our board of directors. In conjunction with theSeries E financing, our board of directors appointed Mary Meeker, General Partner of KPCB, as a director. In connection with our private placement of Series E convertible preferred stock, we incurred transaction expenses of $0.2 million that wererecorded as a reduction to gross proceeds.
In connection with the sale of Series E convertible preferred stock in June 2012, we filed anAmended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the State of Delaware, which reduced the total number of shares that we were authorized to issue from 316,092,176 shares to 303,235,032 shares, 180,000,000 shares of which were designated ascommon stock, and 123,235,032 shares of which were designated as preferred stock. Of the total shares of preferred stock, 34,012,550 shares were designated as Series A Preferred Stock, 32,821,052 shares were designated as Series B Preferred Stock,31,243,218 shares were designated as Series C Preferred Stock, 18,015,356 shares were designated as Series D Preferred Stock and 7,142,856 shares were designated as Series E Preferred Stock. The number of authorized shares of common stock may beincreased or decreased (but not below the number of shares of common stock then outstanding) by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our preferred stock and common stock (voting together as a single class on an as-converted to commonstock basis).
In connection with the Springstone acquisition, we sold an aggregate of 3,195,278 shares of our Series F convertiblepreferred stock, par value $0.01 per share (Financing Shares) for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $65.0 million, pursuant to a Series F Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement. We sold the Financing Shares pursuant to an exemption fromregistration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended; all investors in the financing were accredited investors (as defined under Rule 501 of Regulation D) and we made no general solicitation for the saleof the Financing Shares. The Financing Shares are convertible into shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, on a one-for-one basis, as adjusted from time to time pursuant to the anti-dilution provisions of our Restated Certificate ofIncorporation. (Unaudited.)
In connection with the sale of Series F convertible preferred stock in April 2014, we filed a RestatedCertificate of Incorporation with the State of Delaware, which increased the total number of shares that we were authorized to issue from 303,235,032 shares to 311,307,087, 186,000,000 shares of which were designated as common stock and 125,307,087shares of which were designated as preferred stock. Of the total shares of preferred stock, 33,825,798 shares were designated as Series A Preferred Stock, 32,788,650 shares were designated as Series B Preferred Stock, 31,243,218 shares weredesignated as Series C Preferred Stock, 18,015,356 shares were designated as Series D Preferred Stock, 5,000,000 shares were designated as Series E Preferred Stock and 4,434,065 were designated as Series F Preferred Stock. (Unaudited.)
As part of the Springstone acquisition, the sellers received shares of our Series F convertible preferred stock having an aggregate value of$25 million (Share Consideration). A portion of the Share Consideration ($22.1 million) is subject to certain vesting and forfeiture conditions over a three-year period for key continuing employees. This is accounted for as a compensationarrangement and expensed over the three-year vesting period. For the six months ended June 30, 2014, we recognized $2.9 million of compensation expense, which is reported in general and administrative expenses related to this arrangement.(Unaudited.)
F-30
The outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock are not mandatorily or otherwiseredeemable. The sale of all, or substantially all, of our assets, a consolidation or merger with another company, or a transfer of voting control in excess of 50% our voting power are all events that are deemed to be a liquidation and wouldtrigger the payment of liquidation preferences under the preferred stock agreements. All such events require approval of our board of directors. However, in such events all holders of equal or more subordinate equity instruments would also beentitled to also receive the same form of consideration after any liquidation preferences. Therefore, based on the guidance of ASC 480-10-S99, the non-redeemable convertible preferred stock has been classified within stockholders equity on theconsolidated balance sheet. See further discussion of the revision to the classification of our preferred stock from temporary equity to permanent stockholders equity in Note 2Summary of Significant AccountingPoliciesReclassifications. The significant terms of outstanding Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D, Series E and Series F convertible preferred stock are as follows:
ConversionEach share of convertible preferred stock is convertible, at the option of the holder, initially, into one share ofcommon stock (subject to adjustments for events of dilution). Each share of convertible preferred stock will automatically be converted upon the earlier of: (i) the closing of an underwritten public offering of our common stock with aggregategross proceeds that are at least $30.0 million; or (ii) the consent of the holders of a 55% majority of outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock, voting together as a single class, on an as-converted to common stock basis. Ourpreferred stock agreements contain certain anti-dilution provisions, whereby if we issue additional shares of capital stock for an effective price lower than the conversion price for a series of preferred stock immediately prior to such issue, thenthe existing conversion price of such series of preferred stock will be reduced. We determined that while our convertible preferred stock contains certain anti-dilution features, the conversion feature embedded within its convertible preferred stockdoes not require bifurcation under the guidance of ASC 815,Derivatives and Hedging Activities.
LiquidationpreferenceUpon any liquidation, winding up or dissolution of us, whether voluntary or involuntary (Liquidation Event), before any distribution or payment shall be made to the holders of any common stock, the holders of convertiblepreferred stock shall, on a pari passu basis, be entitled to receive by reason of their ownership of such stock, an amount per share of Series A convertible preferred stock equal to $0.5325 (as adjusted for stock splits, recapitalizations and thelike) plus all declared and unpaid dividends (Series A Preferred Liquidation Preference), an amount per share of Series B convertible preferred stock equal to $0.37415 (as adjusted for stock splits, recapitalizations and the like) plus all declaredand unpaid dividends (Series B Preferred Liquidation Preference), an amount per share of Series C convertible preferred stock equal to $0.78385 (as adjusted for stock splits, recapitalizations and the like), an amount per share of Series Dconvertible preferred stock equal to $1.7787, an amount per share of Series E convertible preferred stock equal to $3.50 and an amount per share of Series F convertible preferred stock equal to $20.34 (unaudited) (as adjusted for stock splits,recapitalizations and the like). However, if upon any such Liquidation Event, our assets shall be insufficient to make payment in full to all holders of convertible preferred stock of their respective liquidation preferences, then the entire assetsof ours legally available for distribution shall be distributed with equal priority between the preferred holders based upon the amounts such series was to receive. Any excess assets, after payment in full of the liquidation preferences to theconvertible preferred stockholders, are then allocated to the holders of common and preferred stockholders, pro-rata, on an as-if-converted to common stock basis.
DividendsIf and when declared by the Board, the holders of Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D and Series E convertiblepreferred stock, on a pari passu basis, will be entitled to receive non-cumulative dividends at a rate of 6% per annum in preference to any dividends on common stock (subject to adjustment for certain events). The holders of Series A, Series B,Series C, Series D, Series E and Series F convertible preferred stock are also entitled to receive with common stockholders, on an as-if-converted basis, any additional dividends issued by us. As of December 31, 2013 and June 30,2014, we have not declared any dividends.
Voting rightsGenerally, preferred stockholders had one vote for each share ofcommon stock that would have been issuable upon conversion of preferred stock. Voting as a separate class, and on an as-converted to common stock basis, the Series A convertible preferred stockholders were entitled to elect two members of our
F-31
board of directors and the holders of Series B convertible preferred stockholders were entitled to elect one member of our board of directors. The Series C and Series D convertiblepreferred stockholders were not entitled to elect any members of our board of directors. The Series E convertible preferred stockholders were entitled to nominate members to our board of directors, and any nominee was subject to the vote of allconvertible preferred stockholders. The holders of common stock, voting as a separate class, were entitled to elect one member of our board directors. The remaining directors were elected by the convertible preferred stockholders and commonstockholders voting together as a single class on an as-converted to common stock basis.
In connection with the filing our RestatedCertificate of Incorporation in April 2014, the Series A convertible preferred stockholders, voting together as a separate class on an as-converted to common stock basis, are entitled to elect two members of our board of directors and theholders of Series B convertible preferred stockholders, voting together as a separate class on an as-converted to common stock basis, are entitled to elect one member of our board of directors. The Series C, Series D, Series Eand Series F convertible preferred stockholders are not entitled to elect any members of our board of directors. The holders of preferred stock, voting together as a separate class on an as-converted to common stock basis, are entitled to electone member of our board of directors. The holders of common stock, voting together as a separate class, are entitled to elect one member of our board of directors. The remaining directors are elected by the convertible preferred stockholders andcommon stockholders voting together as a single class on an as-converted to common stock basis. (Unaudited.)
Common Stock
We have shares of common stock authorized and reserved for future issuance as follows as of:
December 31, 2013 | June 30, 2014 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Options to purchase common stock | 21,657,364 | 27,401,307 | ||||||
Options available for future issuance | 3,878,246 | 2,335,498 | ||||||
Common stock warrants | 390,470 | 139,788 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total common stock authorized and reserved for future issuance | 25,926,080 | 29,876,593 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2013, we issued 4,465,938 shares of common stock in exchange forproceeds of $1.7 million upon the exercise of employee stock options. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we issued 2,056,177 shares of common stock in exchange for proceeds of $2.2 million upon the exercise of employee stockoptions (unaudited). During the year ended December 31, 2013, we issued 478,938 shares of common stock for proceeds of $0.2 million upon the exercise of warrants to purchase common stock. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, weissued 125,568 common shares for proceeds of $0.1 million upon the exercise of common stock warrants (unaudited).
Warrants to purchasecommon stock are fully exercisable with exercise prices of $0.005 and $0.785 per share. The warrants may be exercised at any time on or before February 2021.
13. Stock-Based Compensation and Other Employee Benefit Plans
Stock Incentive Plan
Under our 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (Option Plan), we may grant options to purchase shares of common stock to employees, executives, directorsand consultants at exercise prices not less than the fair market value on the date of grant for incentive stock options and not less than 85% of the fair market value on the date of grant for non-statutory options. An aggregate of 35,719,896 shareshave been authorized for issuance under the Option Plan. The options granted through June 30, 2014 are stock options that generally expire ten years from the date of grant and generally vest 25% 12 months from the date of grant, and quarterlythereafter, provided the grantee
F-32
remains continuously employed by us through each vesting date (service-based options); however, our board of directors retains the authority to grant options with different terms. As discussedfurther below, certain stock options with ten year terms vest immediately upon achievement of specified performance goals provided the grantee remains continuously employed by us through each performance measurement date (performance-based options).As of December 31, 2013 and June 30, 2014 (unaudited), there were no performance-based options outstanding.
For the year endedMarch 31, 2012, we granted stock options to purchase a total of 7,166,838 shares of common stock with a weighted-average exercise price of $0.36 per share, a weighted-average grant date fair value of $0.21 per share and a total estimated fairvalue of approximately $1.5 million. Of the total stock option granted, 6,003,174 were service-based stock options and 1,163,664 were performance-based stock options.
For the nine months ended December 31, 2012, we granted stock options to purchase a total of 7,622,472 shares of common stock with aweighted-average exercise price of $1.20 per share, a weighted-average grant date fair value of $0.70 per share and a total estimated fair value of approximately $10.6 million. All of these stock options were service-based stock options.
For the year ended December 31, 2013, we granted stock options to purchase a total of 6,353,500 shares of common stock with aweighted-average exercise price of $4.88 per share, a weighted-average grant date fair value of $5.42 per share and a total estimated fair value of approximately $34.4 million. All of these stock options were service-based stock options.
For the six months ended June 30, 2014, we granted service-based stock options to purchase 8,525,686 shares of common stock with aweighted-average exercise price of $11.29 per share, a weighted-average grant date fair value of $8.19 per share and a total estimated fair value of approximately $73.5 million (unaudited).
The fair value of the shares of common stock underlying stock options has historically been established by the board of directors primarilybased upon a valuation provided by an independent third-party valuation firm. Because there is no public market for our common stock, our board of directors has relied upon this independent valuation and other factors, including, but not limited to,the current status of the technical and commercial success of our operations, our financial condition, the stage of our product design and development, and competition to establish the fair value of our common stock at the time of grant of theoption.
We used the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock options granted with the followingassumptions:
Year Ended March 31, 2012 | Nine Months Ended December 31, 2012 | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Assumed forfeiture rate (annual %) | 8.0 | % | 5.0 | % | 5.0 | % | 5.0 | % | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||
Expected dividend yield | | | | | | |||||||||||||||
Weighted-average assumed stock price volatility | 63.5 | % | 63.5 | % | 59.1 | % | 63.5 | % | 54.3 | % | ||||||||||
Weighted-average risk-free rate | 1.15 | % | 1.01 | % | 1.46 | % | 1.10 | % | 1.91 | % | ||||||||||
Weighted-average expected life (years) | 6.26 | 6.28 | 6.30 | 6.25 | 6.37 |
The assumed forfeiture rate is the annual percentage of unvested stock options that are assumed to beforfeited or cancelled due to grantees discontinuing employment with us. Because service-based stock options normally vest over a four year period, the forfeiture assumption is used to estimate the number of stock options that are expected to vestin future periods, which affects the estimate of the forfeiture-adjusted aggregate stock-based compensation expense related to the stock options. The forfeiture assumption was developed considering our actual annual forfeiture rates for unvestedstock options over the past four years and analyzing the
F-33
distribution of unvested stock options held by executive officers, senior managers and other employees as of December 31, 2013 and June 30, 2014 (unaudited). Holding other assumptionsconstant, a higher forfeiture rate reduces the number of options expected to vest in future periods, which lowers the estimated forfeiture-adjusted aggregate stock-based compensation expense related to any affected stock options.
We have paid no cash dividends and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future and, therefore, used an expecteddividend yield of 0.0% in our option-pricing model.
The stock price volatility assumption is derived using a set of peer group publiccompanies. For the year ended March 31, 2012 and the nine months ended December 31, 2012, the peer group companies were small- or micro-capitalization companies that conduct business in the consumer finance or investment managementsectors. For the year ended December 31, 2013, we updated the set of peer group public companies used to derive the stock price volatility assumption. The new peer group included small-, mid- and large-capitalization companies that conductbusiness in the consumer finance, investment management and technology sectors. The weighted-average historical stock price volatility of the set of peer companies used in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 was substantially the same asthe weighted-average historical stock price volatility, measured over the same time periods, as the peer companies used in the nine months ended December 31, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2012. The change in this option valuationassumption did not have a material impact on the valuation of the stock options granted during the year ended December 31, 2013.
Theexpected life represents the period of time that stock options are estimated to be outstanding, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the awards, vesting schedules and expectations of future exercise patterns and post-vesting employeetermination behavior. Given our limited operating history, the simplified method was applied to calculate the expected term. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. treasury yield for a term consistent with the expected life of the awardsin effect at the time of grant.
Options activity under the Option Plan is summarized as follows:
Stock Options Issued and Outstanding | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | |||||||
Balances, December 31, 2012 | 20,510,444 | $ | 0.60 | |||||
Shares subject to options: | ||||||||
Granted | 6,353,500 | 4.88 | ||||||
Exercised | (4,465,938 | ) | 0.39 | |||||
Forfeited or expired | (740,642 | ) | 0.95 | |||||
|
| |||||||
Balances, December 31, 2013 | 21,657,364 | $ | 1.88 | |||||
|
| |||||||
Shares subject to options: | ||||||||
Granted (unaudited) | 8,525,686 | 11.29 | ||||||
Exercised (unaudited) | (2,056,177 | ) | 1.07 | |||||
Forfeited or expired (unaudited) | (725,566 | ) | 4.49 | |||||
|
| |||||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2014 (unaudited) | 27,401,307 | $ | 4.80 | |||||
|
|
Options to purchase 4,465,938 shares with a total intrinsic value (fair value less exercise price) of $26.2million were exercised during the year ended December 31, 2013. The total fair value of stock options vested during the six months ended June 30, 2014 was $9.3 million (unaudited).
F-34
A summary of outstanding options, vested options and options vested and expected to vest atDecember 31, 2013, is as follows:
Shares Subject to Stock Options Issued and Outstanding | Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | ||||||||||
Shares subject to: | ||||||||||||
Options outstanding | 21,657,364 | 8.07 | $ | 1.88 | ||||||||
Vested options | 7,751,468 | 6.93 | $ | 0.48 | ||||||||
Options vested and expected to vest | 20,725,774 | 8.03 | $ | 1.82 |
A summary of outstanding options, vested options and options vested and expected to vest at June 30,2014, is as follows:
Shares Subject to Stock Options Issued and Outstanding | Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | ||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||
Shares subject to: | ||||||||||||
Options outstanding | 27,401,307 | 8.33 | $ | 4.80 | ||||||||
Vested options | 9,164,318 | 6.84 | $ | 0.82 | ||||||||
Options vested and expected to vest | 25,890,428 | | 8.28 | | $ | 4.60 | |
We recognized $1.1 million and $6.4 million of stock-based compensation expense related to stock options forthe nine months ended December 31, 2012, the year ended December 31, 2013, respectively. We recognized $12.5 million and $1.4 million of stock-based compensation expense related to stock options for the six months ended June 30, 2014and 2013, respectively (unaudited). In the six months ended June 30, 2014, stock-based compensation included $3.0 million of expense for the accelerated vesting of stock options for a terminated employee that was accounted for as a stock optionmodification (unaudited).
As of December 31, 2013 and June 30, 2014, total unrecognized compensation cost was $35.1 million and$96.7 million (unaudited), and these costs are expected to be recognized over the next 3.4 years and 3.8 years, respectively.
No netincome tax benefit has been recognized relating to stock-based compensation expense and no tax benefits have been realized from exercised stock options.
401(k) Plan
Wemaintain a 401(k) defined contribution plan that covers substantially all of our employees. Participants may elect to contribute their annual compensation up to the maximum limit allowed by federal tax law. In the second quarter of 2014, we approvedan employer 401(k) match of up to 3% of an employees eligible compensation with a maximum annual match of $5,000 per employee. Total 401(k) match expense for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was $0.4 million (unaudited). For the fiscalyear 2014 401(k) match, the match will be retroactively applied to employees eligible contributions from January 1, 2014.
14. Income Taxes
For the year ended March 31, 2012 and the nine months ended December 31, 2012, we recorded no benefit for incometaxes on the taxable losses due to the full valuation allowance. For the year ended December 31, 2013, we recorded no provision for income taxes related to pre-tax income due to the availability of deferred tax assets subject to a fullvaluation allowance to offset current year income.
F-35
Our effective tax rate differs from the statutory federal rate for the year ended March 31,2012, the nine months ended December 31, 2012, and year ended December 31, 2013, as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended March 31, 2012 | Nine Months Ended December 31, 2012 | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Pretax Income (Loss) | $ | (11,944 | ) | $ | (4,238 | ) | $ | 7,308 | ||||||||||||||||
Tax at federal statutory rate | $ | (4,061 | ) | 34.00 | % | $ | (1,441 | ) | 34.00 | % | $ | 2,485 | 34.00 | % | ||||||||||
State tax, net of federal tax benefit | (855 | ) | 7.16 | % | (151 | ) | 3.56 | % | 563 | 7.70 | % | |||||||||||||
Share-based compensation expense | 181 | (1.52 | )% | (314 | ) | 7.41 | % | (593 | ) | (8.11 | )% | |||||||||||||
Tax credits | (140 | ) | 1.17 | % | | 0.00 | % | (459 | ) | (6.28 | )% | |||||||||||||
Change in valuation allowance | 5,409 | (45.28 | )% | 1,934 | (45.63 | )% | (2,534 | ) | (34.67 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Change in unrecognized tax benefit | | 0.00 | % | 150 | (3.54 | )% | 518 | 7.09 | % | |||||||||||||||
Other | (534 | ) | 4.47 | % | (178 | ) | 4.20 | % | 20 | 0.27 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
$ | | 0.00 | % | $ | | 0.00 | % | $ | | 0.00 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2012 and 2013 areas follows (in thousands):
December 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2013 | |||||||
Deferred tax assets | ||||||||
Net operating loss carryforwards | $ | 21,856 | $ | 18,818 | ||||
Reserves and accruals | 1,365 | 2,804 | ||||||
Organizational and start-up costs | 529 | 516 | ||||||
Credits & California incentives | 254 | 216 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Gross deferred tax asset | 24,004 | 22,354 | ||||||
Valuation allowance | (23,939 | ) | (22,338 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net deferred tax assets | $ | 65 | $ | 16 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Deferred tax liability | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | $ | (65 | ) | $ | (16 | ) | ||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net deferred tax liability | $ | (65 | ) | $ | (16 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
Our management assesses the available positive and negative evidence to estimate if sufficient future taxableincome will be generated to utilize the existing deferred tax assets. On the basis of this evaluation, as of December 31, 2013, a full valuation allowance of $22.3 million has been recorded to recognize only deferred tax assets that are morelikely than not to be realized.
At December 31, 2013, we had federal and state net operating loss (NOL) carry-forwards ofapproximately $43.9 million and $40.7 million, respectively, to offset future taxable income. Our federal and state net operating loss carry-forwards will begin expiring in 2027 and 2016, respectively. Additionally, at December 31, 2013, we hadfederal and state research and development (R&D) tax credit carry-forwards of approximately $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively. The federal credit carry-forwards will begin expiring in 2016 and the state credits may be carried forwardindefinitely.
In general, a corporations ability to utilize its NOL and R&D carry-forwards may be substantially limited due toownership changes that may have occurred or that could occur in the future, as required by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (Code), as well as similar state provisions. These ownership changes may limit the amount ofNOL and R&D credit carry-forwards that can be utilized annually to offset future taxable income and tax, respectively. In general, an ownership change, as defined by Section 382 of the
F-36
Code, results from a transaction or series of transactions over a three-year period resulting in an ownership change of more than 50% of the capital (as defined) of a company by certainstockholders or public groups.
The following is a reconciliation of our unrecognized tax benefits (in thousands):
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2012 | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | |||||||
Balance as of the beginning of the calendar/fiscal year | $ | 240 | $ | 367 | ||||
Additions for tax positions related to the prior year | | 523 | ||||||
Additions for tax positions related to the current year | 127 | 190 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Balance as of the end of the calendar/fiscal year | $ | 367 | $ | 1,080 | ||||
|
|
|
|
If the cumulative unrecognized tax benefit is recognized, there will be no effect on our effective tax ratedue to the full valuation allowance.
Due to the nature of the unrecognized tax benefits and the existence of tax attributes, we have notaccrued any interest or penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits in the consolidated statement of operations nor have we recognized a liability in the consolidated balance sheet.
We do not believe the total amount of unrecognized benefit as of December 31, 2013 will increase or decrease significantly in the next 12months.
We file income tax returns in the United States and various state jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2013, our federal taxreturns for 2009 and earlier and our state tax returns for 2008 and earlier were no longer subject to examination by the taxing authorities. However, our tax attribute carry-forwards from closed tax years may be subject to examination to the extentutilized in an open tax year.
For the six months ended June 30, 2014, we recorded $0.6 million of provision for income taxes.The $0.6 million of tax expense relates to the amortization of tax deductible goodwill from the acquisition of Springstone, which gives rise to an indefinite-lived deferred tax liability. There was no income tax benefit recorded on the pre-tax lossdue to an increase in deferred tax asset valuation allowance. We recorded a net provision of $0.1 million for income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2013. (Unaudited.)
15. Fair Value of Financial Instruments Not Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis in the Balance Sheet
Following are descriptions of the valuation methodologies used for estimating the fair values of financial instruments notrecorded at fair value on a recurring basis in the balance sheet; these financial instruments are carried at historical cost or amortized cost in the balance sheets.
Short-term financial assets: Short-term financial assets include cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accrued interest, and otherassets. These assets are carried at historical cost. The carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short term nature of the financial instruments.
Short-term financial liabilities: Short-term financial liabilities include accounts payable, accrued interest payable, other accrued expensesand payables to investors. These liabilities are carried at historical cost. The carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short term nature of the financial instruments.
Term loan: Based on the frequent interest reset features of the term loan, we consider the carrying value of the term loan to be approximatelyits fair value as of June 30, 2014. (Unaudited.)
F-37
16. Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
Operating Leases
Corporate Headquarters. We have several lease agreements for space at 71 Stevenson Street in San Francisco, California, where ourcorporate headquarters is located. These leases commenced in April 2011, September 2012, June 2013, December 2013 and August 2014. These leases expire in June 2019 and June 2022 with a renewal option that would extend the lease for fiveyears.
Other Real Estate. In December 2012, we renewed the lease for a New York City office for a one year term that expires onJanuary 31, 2014. We also have an operating lease agreement for space in Westborough, Massachusetts where Springstone is headquartered. This lease expires in January 31, 2020 with a renewal option that would extend the lease for fiveyears.
Total facilities rental expense for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was $1.6 million. Total facilities rental expensefor the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $0.8 million. We did not have any sublease rental expense for the six months ended June 30, 2014. Sublease rental expense for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $0.4 million. Minimumrental expense for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013 were $1.4 million and $0.6 million, respectively. (Unaudited.)
Total facilities rental expense for the year ended December 31, 2013, the nine month period ended December 31, 2012 and the yearended March 31, 2012 was $1.9 million, $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively. Sublease rental expense for the year ended December 31, 2013, the nine month period ended December 31, 2012 and the year ended March 31, 2012 was$0.6 million, $0.5 million and $0.4 million, respectively. Minimum rental expense for the for the year ended December 31, 2013, the nine month period ended December 31, 2012 and the year ended March 31, 2012 was $1.3 million, $0.1million and $0.1 million, respectively. As part of these lease agreements, we currently have pledged $0.2 million of cash and arranged for a $0.2 million letter of credit as security deposits.
At December 31, 2013, the future minimum lease payments payable under the contracts for leased premises is as follows (in thousands):
Year-Ended December 31, | Future Minimum Lease Payments | |||
2014 | $ | 2,748 | ||
2015 | 3,293 | |||
2016 | 3,379 | |||
2017 | 3,598 | |||
2018 | 3,808 | |||
Thereafter | 1,925 | |||
|
| |||
Total | $ | 18,751 | ||
|
|
Contingencies
Loan Funding Commitments
For loans listed on the platform as a result of direct marketing efforts, we have committed to invest in such loans if investors do not providefunding for all or a portion of such loans. At June 30, 2014, there were 427 such loans on the platform with an unfunded balance of $4.4 million. All of these loans were fully funded by investors by July 3, 2014 (unaudited).
F-38
In connection with transitional activities related to the acquisition of Springstone, in June2014, we entered into a contingent loan purchase agreement with an issuing bank that originates loans facilitated by Springstone and a third-party investor that has agreed to purchase certain of those loans from such bank. The contingent loanpurchase commitment provides that we will purchase such loans from the bank if the third-party investor defaults on its loan purchase obligations to the bank through December 31, 2014. The contingent loan purchase commitment limits theaggregate amount of such loan originations from inception of the contingent loan purchase commitment through December 31, 2014 to a maximum of $5.0 million. As of June 30, 2014, the amount remaining under the overall limit on thecumulative amount of such loan originations through December 31, 2014 was $3.6 million. We were not required to purchase any such loans pursuant to the contingent loan purchase commitment in the quarter ended June 30, 2014.We do not expect we will be required to purchase any such loans under the contingent loan purchase commitment through its expiration on December 31, 2014. (Unaudited.)
Credit Support Agreement
We are subject to a credit support agreement with a certificate investor. The credit support agreement requires us to pledge and restrict cashin support of its contingent obligation to reimburse the investor for credit losses on loans underlying the investors certificate that are in excess of a specified aggregate loss threshold. We are contingently obligated to pledge cash, not toexceed $5.0 million, to support this contingent obligation and which cash balance is premised upon the investors certificate purchase volume. As of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013, approximately $2.3 million and$3.4 million, respectively, was pledged and restricted to support this contingent obligation. As of June 30, 2014, approximately $3.4 million was pledged and restricted to support this contingent obligation (unaudited).
As of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013 and as of June 30, 2014 (unaudited), the credit losses pertaining to theinvestors certificate have not exceeded the specified threshold, nor are future credit losses expected to exceed the specified threshold, and thus no expense or liability has been recorded. We currently do not anticipate recording lossesresulting from our contingent obligation under this credit support agreement. If losses related to the credit support agreement are later determined to be likely to occur and are estimable, our results of operations could be affected in the periodin which such losses are recorded.
Legal (2014 amounts unaudited)
In the second quarter of 2014, we offered to settle a dispute with a consultant that previously performed work for us. The dispute arose overhow much compensation was provided for the work performed. We offered the claimant a certain number of our common shares and cash consideration. Since part of this offer was in the form of our common shares, we valued the liability based on anestimated price of the common shares at June 30, 2014. If such offer is accepted by the claimant, the shares will be valued on the date of such agreement.
Separately, during the second quarter of 2014, we received notice from the California Employment Development Department (EDD) that it hadcommenced an examination of our records concerning the employment relationship of certain individuals who performed services for us from 2011 through 2014. Based on the EDDs preliminary determination, certain of these individuals should havebeen classified as employees with appropriate tax withholding and employer related taxes incurred and paid. We continue to evaluate a submission of a settlement offer to the EDD or whether we will pursue an appeal of any final notice of assessmentthat the EDD may levy against us with respect to misclassified individuals.
Additionally, during the second quarter of 2014, a formeremployee asserted a claim of wrongful termination. We offered to settle this claim during the second quarter of 2014.
In connection withthese matters, we recorded a charge to operations in the aggregate amount of $1.8 million to establish a liability. This aggregate amount represents the probable estimate of tax and settlement
F-39
liabilities. The ultimate liability for such matters could differ from the accrued liability at June 30, 2014. As of June 30, 2014, we estimate the aggregate range of reasonablypossible losses in excess of any amounts accrued for these matters is up to $0.7 million.
We received a Civil Investigative Demand fromthe Consumer Financial Protection Bureau dated June 5, 2014 related to the operations of Springstone. The purpose of the investigation is to determine whether the Springstone is engaging in unlawful acts or practices in connection with themarketing, issuance and servicing of installment loans for healthcare related financing. We continue to be in the fact-finding stage related to this matter, and as such, we have concluded that as of June 30, 2014, there are no probable orestimable losses related to this matter.
In addition to the foregoing, we may be subject to legal proceedings and regulatory actions inthe ordinary course of business. After consultation with legal counsel, we do not anticipate that the ultimate liability, if any, arising out of any such matter will have a material effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cashflows.
17. Segment Reporting
We report segment information using the management approach. Under this approach, operating segments areidentified in substantially the same manner as they are reported internally and used by us for purposes of evaluating performance and allocating resources. Based on this approach, we have one reportable segment. Our management reporting process isbased on our internal operating structure, which is subject to change and is not necessarily similar to that of other comparable companies.
18. Subsequent Events (Unaudited)
On August 12, 2014, we entered into a lease agreement to lease additional office space at our corporate headquarters.The lease agreement commences over time starting in the third quarter of 2014. However, the lease commencement date for the majority of the space is expected to be in the third quarter of 2015. The lease has a term of seven years. The annual leasepayments for this additional lease are approximately $1.7 million.
F-40
To the Members
Springstone Financial, LLC
Westborough, MA 01581
We have audited theaccompanying financial statements of Springstone Financial, LLC which comprise the balance sheets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related statements of operations, changes in members equity, and cash flows for the years thenended, and the related notes to the financial statements.
Managements Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principlesgenerally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement,whether due to fraud or error.
Auditors Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance withauditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The proceduresselected depend on the auditors judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal controlrelevant to the entitys preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of theentitys internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well asevaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient andappropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of SpringstoneFinancial, LLC as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Emphasis of Matter
As discussed in Note2 to the financial statements, the 2012 financial statements have been restated to correct misstatements. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter.
/s/ Auerr, Zajac & Associates, LLP
Certified PublicAccountants
March 28, 2014
F-41
BALANCE SHEETS
(See Notes to Financial Statements)
December 31, 2012 | December 31, 2013 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current Assets | ||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents | $ | 7,385,889 | $ | 7,804,060 | ||||
Loan Origination Fees Receivable | 590,843 | 414,121 | ||||||
Prepaid Expenses | 62,135 | 105,977 | ||||||
Due From Officers | 85,930 | 171,860 | ||||||
Other Receivables | 149,391 | 625 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total Current Assets | 8,274,188 | 8,496,643 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Property and Equipment | ||||||||
Property and EquipmentCost | 597,910 | 953,225 | ||||||
Less Accumulated Depreciation | 445,950 | 550,473 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Property and Equipment | 151,960 | 402,752 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Other Assets | ||||||||
Intangible Assets | 6,731 | 6,731 | ||||||
Less Accumulated Amortization | 3,142 | 3,590 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Intangibles | 3,589 | 3,141 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Restricted CashSee Note 5 | 1,312,358 | 1,399,732 | ||||||
Security Deposits | 27,378 | 57,378 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total Other Assets | 1,343,325 | 1,460,251 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total Assets | $ | 9,769,473 | $ | 10,359,646 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS EQUITY | ||||||||
Current Liabilities | ||||||||
Accounts Payable | $ | 149,072 | $ | 345,138 | ||||
Alliance Rebate Payable | 221,829 | 494,416 | ||||||
Accrued Expenses | 107,929 | 106,063 | ||||||
Accrued Salaries and Payroll Taxes | 415,021 | 551,098 | ||||||
Loan Funding Payables | 178,399 | 323,299 | ||||||
Current Portion of Deferred Rent | | 4,725 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total Current Liabilities | 1,072,250 | 1,824,739 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Long Term Liabilities | ||||||||
Loan Loss ContingencySee Note 6 | 1,189,681 | 1,189,681 | ||||||
Deferred Rent | | 22,839 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total Long Term Liabilities | 1,189,681 | 1,212,520 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total Liabilities | 2,261,931 | 3,037,259 | ||||||
Members Equity | 7,507,542 | 7,322,387 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total Liabilities and Members Equity | $ | 9,769,473 | $ | 10,359,646 | ||||
|
|
|
|
F-42
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(See Notes to Financial Statements)
For Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2013 | |||||||
Fee Income | $ | 14,840,780 | $ | 19,401,918 | ||||
Fee Refunds | 428,658 | 916,198 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Fee Income | 14,412,122 | 18,485,720 | ||||||
Operating Expenses | 7,380,232 | 9,861,710 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Income From Operations | 7,031,890 | 8,624,010 | ||||||
Other Income | ||||||||
Interest Income | 3,077 | 2,543 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Income | $ | 7,034,967 | $ | 8,626,553 | ||||
|
|
|
|
F-43
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEMBERS EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012
(See Notes to Financial Statements)
NBT Capital Corp | Premier Payment Solutions | Total | ||||||||||
Balance Beginning of the Period | $ | 3,056,958 | $ | 302,509 | $ | 3,359,467 | ||||||
Net Income | 1,434,173 | 5,736,693 | 7,034,967 | |||||||||
Distributions To Members | (577,378 | ) | (2,309,514 | ) | (2,886,892 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Members Equity December 31, 2012 | $ | 3,913,753 | $ | 3,729,688 | $ | 7,507,542 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net Income | 1,725,311 | 6,901,242 | 8,626,553 | |||||||||
Distributions To Members | (1,762,342 | ) | (7,049,366 | ) | (8,811,708 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Members Equity December 31, 2013 | $ | 3,876,722 | $ | 3,581,564 | $ | 7,322,387 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-44
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(See Notes to Financial Statements)
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2013 | |||||||
Cash Provided By (Used In) | ||||||||
Operating Activities | ||||||||
Net Income | $ | 7,034,967 | $ | 8,626,553 | ||||
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Cash Provided by Operating Activities | ||||||||
Depreciation and Amortization | 102,864 | 123,421 | ||||||
Assets Abandoned In Office Relocation | | 26,246 | ||||||
Security Deposits | | (30,000 | ) | |||||
(Increase) Decrease In | ||||||||
Loan Origination Fees Receivable | (402,337 | ) | 176,722 | |||||
Prepaid Expenses | 17,662 | (43,842 | ) | |||||
Due From Officers | (85,930 | ) | (85,930 | ) | ||||
Other Receivables | (143,852 | ) | 148,766 | |||||
(Decrease) Increase In | ||||||||
Accounts Payable | 22,519 | 196,066 | ||||||
Alliance Rebate Payable | 221,829 | 272,587 | ||||||
Accrued Expenses | 12,498 | (1,866 | ) | |||||
Accrued Salaries and Payroll Taxes | 197,159 | 136,077 | ||||||
Loan Funding Payables | 58,111 | 144,900 | ||||||
Loan Loss Contingency | (33,253 | ) | | |||||
Deferred Rent | | 27,564 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total Adjustments | (32,730 | ) | 1,090,711 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities | 7,002,237 | 9,717,264 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Investing Activities | ||||||||
Restricted Cash | (89,424 | ) | (87,374 | ) | ||||
Purchase of Equipment and Software | (81,383 | ) | (400,011 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities | (170,807 | ) | (487,385 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Financing Activities | ||||||||
Distributions to Members | (2,886,892 | ) | (8,811,708 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities | (2,886,892 | ) | (8,811,708 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Increase in Cash | 3,944,538 | 418,171 | ||||||
CashBeginning of the Period | 3,441,351 | 7,385,889 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
CashEnd of the Period | $ | 7,385,889 | $ | 7,804,060 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See Note 7 for supplemental disclosures of noncash transactions.
F-45
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012
Note 1Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Operations
The Company provides services related to the origination and processing of personal loans. The loans are used to fund elective medical,fertility and dental procedures, as well as tuition at private educational institutions and tutoring at learning centers for pre-post secondary age students.
Revenues and Expenses
The Company earns revenue by originating and placing personal loans with funding institutions. Revenue consists of fees from service providersand loan origination fees from the funding institutions. Revenue is recognized when the loans are funded.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to makeestimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities and disclosures. Accordingly, the actual results could differ from those estimates.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment additions are recorded at cost. Maintenance, repairs, and renewals are expensed, and additions and improvements arecapitalized. Depreciation is computed using both straight-line and accelerated methods over useful lives of 5 - 7 years.
Depreciationexpense for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $122,973 and $102,416, respectively.
The Components of Property andEquipment are as follows:
December 31, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | |||||||
Computers and office equipment | $ | 148,696 | $ | 118,465 | ||||
Furniture and fixtures | 237,540 | 56,543 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements | 110,259 | 24,775 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
496,495 | 199,783 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation | 179,354 | 146,496 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
$ | 317,141 | $ | 53,287 | |||||
|
|
|
|
Software and Website Costs
Computer software and web site development costs include packaged software, customized software for website operations, and costs related tomajor website enhancements. These costs are amortized using the straight-line method over three year lives. Operating expenses related to web site hosting and routine maintenance are expensed as incurred.
F-46
The components of capitalized software and website costs are as follows:
December 31, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | |||||||
Software | $ | 136,865 | $ | 131,095 | ||||
Website Costs | 319,865 | 267,032 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
456,730 | 398,127 | |||||||
Less Accumulated Depreciation | 371,119 | 299,454 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
$ | 85,611 | $ | 98,673 | |||||
|
|
|
|
Marketing and Advertising
The Company currently markets loans to the following demographic markets: (1) high quality medical and dental professional serviceproviders for funding of elective medical, fertility and dental procedures, and (2) private educational institutions and learning centers for funding of private K-12 school tuition and tutoring.
The Company expenses advertising as incurred. Advertising expense for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $190,112 and$109,141, respectively.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
The Company maintains demand deposits with several high quality financial institutions. Periodically, cash balances exceed the federallyinsured bank deposit limits. The Company had approximately $9,068,000 and $9,818,000 in uninsured cash, as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Credit Policies
The Company follows practices standard in the consumer lending/loan servicing industries. Loan applications are processed through various fraudshield databases and credit checks are run for all loan applicants. Loan proceeds are sent directly to the medical or dental service provider or educational institution, and not to the borrower.
Limited Liability Company/Income Taxes
As a limited liability company, each members liability is limited to amounts reflected in their respective member accounts.
The Company files its income tax returns as a partnership for federal and state income tax purposes. As such, the Company will not pay anyfederal or state income taxes, because any income or loss will be passed through to the federal and state tax returns of the members of the Company. Accordingly, no provision is made for federal or state income taxes in the financial statements.
Following are the differences between the financial statements and how the Company reports in its income tax returns: The financialstatements include a provision for loss reserves based on managements estimate of its exposure to potential loan defaults whereas the tax reporting allows deductions only when losses are realized. Organizational expenses were expensed in fullon the financial statements, whereas for income tax reporting organizational costs are amortized over five years. Meals and entertainment are expensed in full on the financial statements, whereas for income tax reporting these costs are only 50%deductible.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and the states of Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, NewJersey and Ohio. Management believes that all positions taken in its tax returns would be sustained in the event of review. The Companys tax returns are no longer subject to review for years before 2010.
F-47
Note 2Correction of Error
The Company has restated the 2012 financial statements in order to reflect the following corrections:
In 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with World Financial Capital Bank (now known as Comenity Bank) under which itwould refund excess margin earned from provider fees, as calculated in accordance with the terms of the agreement. In 2012, the margin specified in the agreement was exceeded which resulted in the accrual of a rebate in the amount of $221,829 andreferred to in the financial statements as Alliance Rebate.
The Company has been providing supplemental lifeinsurance and disability benefits to its officers. It was subsequently determined that the cost of the benefits should be reimbursed by the officers. As a result, the Company has accrued a receivable from the officers in the amount of $85,930.
Note 3Lease Commitments
Operating Lease
In 2013, the Company entered into a lease for new office space. The lease is for a period of 73 months beginning February, 2014, with an optionto renew for an additional five years.
The Company occupied the new space on October 1, 2013, and paid rent of $1,848 for the monthsof October through December under the early occupancy provision in the lease. The difference between the rent paid for these months and the fair value of the rent as determined from the lease terms has been recorded as rent expense and a liabilityfor deferred rent, which will be amortized over the term of the lease. Rent expense for office space for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $172,532 and $134,085, respectively.
Future minimum annual payments under the lease are as follows:
2014 | $ | 154,057 | ||
2015 | 213,463 | |||
2016 | 221,780 | |||
2017 | 230,097 | |||
2018 | 238,413 | |||
Thereafter | 266,598 | |||
|
| |||
$ | 1,324,408 | |||
|
|
Note 4Related-Party Transactions
One of the Companys funding sources, NBT Bank, N.A. (an FDIC insured banking institution) is a subsidiary of a memberof the Company, NBT Capital Corp. NBT Bank, N.A. (NBT) takes the risk of loss on default for a large majority of the loans that it funds.
In addition, the Company also has several bank accounts on deposit with NBT.
Three of the Companys senior managers are stockholders of Premier Payment Solutions, Inc., the other member of the Company.
Note 5Restricted Cash
Restricted cash represents reserves set aside by NBT to cover potential defaults on selected loan portfolios. No withdrawalsmay be made from these accounts without written approval from NBT.
F-48
Note 6Loan Loss Contingency
Loan loss contingency represents managements estimate of the potential contingent liability to cover losses on thefollowing loan portfolios:
Pool BThis portfolio consists of loans, funded by the primary banking partner, madeto borrowers with credit scores lower than normally required by the bank, but high enough to satisfy the Companys credit worthiness requirements, based on senior managements previous experience in the consumer loan market.
The total amount of loans outstanding in this portfolio as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 was approximately $6,240,000 and $5,624,000,respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the total amount of loan defaults realized from this portfolio was $468,358 and $356,595, respectively.
Over $25KThe 2nd portfolio consists of loans over $25,000,made to individuals with higher than normal credit scores. The Company bears the burden of risk of loss on such loans that were made before September 1, 2012. The Companys potential liability is based on the ratio of the amount of theoriginal loan balance over $35,000 to the total original loan amount. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Companys exposure on this portfolio was approximately $2,986,000 and $5,402,000, respectively. For the years ended December 31,2013 and 2012, actual defaults realized from this portfolio were $44,008 and $31,602, respectively.
ClearChoice ReserveProgramLoans in this portfolio commenced in July, 2012 and are used to pay for the cost of dental and orthodontic procedures. The Company bears the risk of loss at 1.54% of the outstanding loan balance. At December 31, 2013 and2012, the Companys exposure on this portfolio was approximately $62,000 and $32,000, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, actual defaults realized from this portfolio were $29 and none, respectively.
Management believes that the loan loss contingency balance is sufficient to cover any future loan defaults on these portfolios.
Note 7Statement of Cash FlowsSummary of Non-Cash and Other Items
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cashequivalents.
There were no income taxes paid for the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
There were no payments of interest for the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
In the year ended December 31, 2013 fully depreciated property and equipment in the amount $18,465 of was written off.
Note 8Retirement Plan
The Company has a 401(k) profit sharing plan which covers substantially all employees. Participating employees maycontribute, on a tax-deferred basis, a portion of their compensation in accordance with section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The plan provides for a safe harbor matching contribution by the Company. For the years ended December 31, 2013and 2012, the Companys matching contributions were $95,086 and $80,727, respectively.
Note 9Compensated Absences
Employees of the Company are entitled to paid time off (PTO) which accrues up to a maximum of 160 hours. Paid time off canbe used as vacation time, sick time, or personal time. Employees cannot carry over more than 40 hours of PTO into the next calendar year. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, there were no accrued compensated absences.
F-49
Note 10Significant Concentrations
The Company is fully dependent on third party funding sources such as banks or private placement financing organizations. Asof December 31, 2013, there were two banks with which the Company has an arrangement to fund the loans it originates. Until those loan portfolios grow significantly, the Company is unlikely to pursue other major lending sources, and thereforehas a concentration in terms of readily available lenders.
The loan origination industry is subject to certain economic factors such asinterest rates, and the overall health of the economy.
Note 11Regulatory Matters
The Company is subject to various regulations common in the financing industry and continually monitors its responsibilitieswith regard to regulatory and licensing requirements. The Company is satisfied that it is fully compliant with all requirements
Additionally, each of the Companys banking partners has a contractual right to review its policies and procedures related to regulatorymatters to insure that the Company is in compliance.
Note 12Subsequent Events
In late 2013 the Company entered into negotiations with LendingClub Corporation (LendingClub) to be acquired. Thediscussions have continued into 2014, with no definitive terms yet set. Management expects that the Company and LendingClub will agree to terms and that the acquisition will be completed early in the second quarter of 2014.
The Company has evaluated all subsequent events through March 28, 2014, the date the financial statements were available to be issued.
Note 13Subsequent Events
Certain amounts in the 2012 financial statements and schedules have been reclassified to conform to the 2013 statementpresentation.
F-50
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT ON SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
To the Members
Springstone Financial, LLC
Westborough, MA 01581
We have audited thefinancial statements of Springstone Financial, LLC as of and for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, and our report thereon dated March 28, 2014, which expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements, appears on pagethree. Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements as a whole. The schedule of operating expenses is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the financial statements.Such information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing proceduresapplied in the audit of the financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statements or to thefinancial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the information is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to thefinancial statements as a whole.
/s/ Auerr, Zajac & Associates, LLP
Certified Public Accountants
March 28, 2014
F-51
SCHEDULE OF OPERATING EXPENSES
(See auditors report on supplemental information and notes to financial statements)
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2013 | 2012 | |||||||
Salaries and Payroll Taxes | $ | 4,524,719 | $ | 3,602,641 | ||||
Advertising and Marketing Expense | 799,862 | 499,375 | ||||||
Consultants | 297,784 | 347,254 | ||||||
Printing and Reproduction | 115,204 | 223,984 | ||||||
Information Technology and Website Hosting | 272,064 | 202,584 | ||||||
Rent Expense | 172,532 | 134,085 | ||||||
Professional Fees | 441,534 | 150,484 | ||||||
Travel and Entertainment | 39,661 | 14,004 | ||||||
Depreciation and Amortization | 123,421 | 102,864 | ||||||
Postage and Delivery | 142,294 | 129,061 | ||||||
Insurance | 148,137 | 86,671 | ||||||
Office Supplies and Expense | 27,243 | 34,745 | ||||||
Telephone and Utilities | 96,001 | 80,924 | ||||||
Training and Education | 67,252 | 50,332 | ||||||
Charitable Contributions | 2,139 | 4,470 | ||||||
Employee Retirement Benefits | 95,086 | 80,727 | ||||||
Credit Reports | 270,047 | 194,735 | ||||||
Alliance Rebate | 272,587 | 221,829 | ||||||
Provider Rebates and Chargebacks | 1,187,734 | 716,660 | ||||||
Provision for Loss Contingency | 525,605 | 388,197 | ||||||
Fraud Losses | 121,243 | 93,109 | ||||||
Bank Service Charges | 18,727 | 11,947 | ||||||
Office Relocation Expense | 78,184 | | ||||||
Miscellaneous | 22,650 | 9,550 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total Operating Expenses | $ | 9,861,710 | $ | 7,380,232 | ||||
|
|
|
|
F-52
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS REVIEW REPORT
To the Members
Springstone Financial, LLC
Westborough, MA 01581
We have reviewed theaccompanying balance sheets of Springstone Financial, LLC as of March 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related statements of operations, changes in members equity, and cash flows for the three months then ended. A review includes primarilyapplying analytical procedures to managements financial data and making inquiries of Company management. A review is substantially less in scope than an audit, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financialstatements as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Management is responsible for the preparation and fairpresentation of the financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and for designing, implementing, and maintaining internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentationof the financial statements.
Our responsibility is to conduct the reviews in accordance with Statements on Standards for Accounting andReview Services issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Those standards require us to perform procedures to obtain limited assurance that there are no material modifications that should be made to the financial statements.We believe that the results of our procedures provide a reasonable basis for our report.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of anymaterial modifications that should be made to the accompanying financial statements in order for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ Auerr, Zajac & Associates, LLP |
Certified Public Accountants |
June 17, 2014 |
F-53
BALANCE SHEETS
(See Notesto Financial Statements)
March 31, 2014 | March 31, 2013 | |||||||
ASSETS |
| |||||||
Current Assets | ||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents | $ | 10,019,977 | $ | 3,720,276 | ||||
Loan Origination Fees Receivable | 661,051 | 340,175 | ||||||
Prepaid Expenses | 174,068 | 109,695 | ||||||
Due From Officers | 171,860 | 101,997 | ||||||
Other Receivables | 490 | 490 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total Current Assets | 11,027,446 | 4,272,633 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Property and Equipment | ||||||||
Property and EquipmentCost | 1,002,101 | 632,470 | ||||||
Accumulated Depreciation | (584,990 | ) | (467,217 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Property and Equipment | 417,111 | 165,253 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Other Assets | ||||||||
Intangible Assets | 6,731 | 6,731 | ||||||
Accumulated Amortization | (3,702 | ) | (3,254 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Intangibles | 3,029 | 3,477 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Restricted CashSee Notes 4 and 11 | 1,535,538 | 1,393,790 | ||||||
Security Deposits | 49,901 | 27,378 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total Other Assets | 1,588,468 | 1,424,645 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total Assets | $ | 13,033,025 | $ | 5,862,531 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS EQUITY |
| |||||||
Current Liabilities | ||||||||
Accounts Payable | $ | 735,654 | $ | 945,164 | ||||
Alliance Rebate Payable | 60,559 | 286,856 | ||||||
Accrued Expenses | 53,374 | 101,771 | ||||||
Accrued Salaries and Payroll Taxes | 276,107 | 169,357 | ||||||
Distributions Payable To Members | 767,150 | | ||||||
Loan Funding Payables | 937,491 | 360,656 | ||||||
Current Portion of Deferred Rent | 6,410 | | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total Current Liabilities | 2,836,745 | 1,863,804 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Long Term Liabilities | ||||||||
Loan Loss ContingencySee Notes 5 and 11 | 1,189,681 | 1,189,681 | ||||||
Deferred Rent | 30,981 | | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total Long Term Liabilities | 1,220,662 | 1,189,681 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total Liabilities | 4,057,407 | 3,053,485 | ||||||
Members Equity | 8,975,618 | 2,809,046 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total Liabilities and Members Equity | $ | 13,033,025 | $ | 5,862,531 | ||||
|
|
|
|
F-54
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(See Notes to Financial Statements)
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2014 | 2013 | |||||||
Fee Income | $ | 5,970,113 | $ | 4,418,804 | ||||
Fee Refunds | 271,578 | 179,606 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Fee Income | 5,698,535 | 4,239,198 | ||||||
Operating Expenses | 2,879,268 | 2,428,442 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Income From Operations | 2,819,267 | 1,810,756 | ||||||
Other Income | ||||||||
Interest Income | 1,114 | 1,006 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Income | $ | 2,820,381 | $ | 1,811,762 | ||||
|
|
|
|
F-55
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEMBERS EQUITY
(See Notes to Financial Statements)
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2014 | 2013 | |||||||
Balance Beginning of the Period | $ | 7,322,387 | $ | 7,507,542 | ||||
Net Income | 2,820,381 | 1,811,762 | ||||||
Distributions To MembersSee Note 6 | (1,167,150 | ) | (6,510,258 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Balance End of the Period | $ | 8,975,618 | $ | 2,809,046 | ||||
|
|
|
|
F-56
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(See Notes to Financial Statements)
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2014 | 2013 | |||||||
Cash Provided By (Used In) | ||||||||
Operating Activities | ||||||||
Net Income | $ | 2,820,381 | $ | 1,811,762 | ||||
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Cash Provided by Operating Activities | ||||||||
Depreciation and Amortization | 34,629 | 21,379 | ||||||
Security Deposits | 7,477 | | ||||||
(Increase) Decrease In | ||||||||
Loan Origination Fees Receivable | (246,930 | ) | 250,668 | |||||
Prepaid Expenses | (68,091 | ) | (47,560 | ) | ||||
Due From Officers | | (16,067 | ) | |||||
Other Receivables | 135 | 148,901 | ||||||
(Decrease) Increase In | ||||||||
Accounts Payable | 390,516 | 796,092 | ||||||
Alliance Rebate Payable | (433,857 | ) | 65,027 | |||||
Accrued Expenses | (52,689 | ) | (6,158 | ) | ||||
Accrued Salaries and Payroll Taxes | (274,991 | ) | (245,664 | ) | ||||
Loan Funding Payables | 614,192 | 182,257 | ||||||
Deferred Rent | 9,827 | | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total Adjustments | (19,782 | ) | 1,148,875 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities | 2,800,599 | 2,960,637 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Investing Activities | ||||||||
Restricted Cash | (135,806 | ) | (81,432 | ) | ||||
Purchase of Equipment and Software | (48,876 | ) | (34,560 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities | (184,682 | ) | (115,992 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Financing Activities | ||||||||
Distributions to Members | (400,000 | ) | (6,510,258 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities | (400,000 | ) | (6,510,258 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Increase in Cash | 2,215,917 | (3,665,613 | ) | |||||
CashBeginning of the Period | 7,804,060 | 7,385,889 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
CashEnd of the Period | $ | 10,019,977 | $ | 3,720,276 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See Note 6 for supplemental disclosures of noncash transactions.
F-57
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2014 AND 2013
NOTE1SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Operations
The Company provides services related to the origination and processing of consumer loans. The loans are used to fund elective medical,fertility and dental procedures, as well as tuition at private educational institutions and tutoring at learning centers for pre-post secondary age students.
Revenues and Expenses
The Company earns revenue by originating and placing consumer loans with funding institutions. Revenue consists of fees from service providersand loan origination fees from the funding institutions. Revenue is recognized when the loans are funded.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to makeestimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities and disclosures. Accordingly, the actual results could differ from those estimates.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment additions are recorded at cost. Maintenance, repairs, and renewals are expensed, and additions and improvements arecapitalized. Depreciation is computed using both straight-line and accelerated methods over useful lives of years.
Depreciation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was $34,517 and $21,267, respectively.
The Components of Property and Equipment are as follows:
March 31, 2014 | March 31, 2013 | |||||||
Computers and Office Equipment | $ | 167,793 | $ | 121,341 | ||||
Furniture and Fixtures | 238,935 | 62,852 | ||||||
Leasehold Improvements | 110,259 | 24,775 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
516,987 | 208,968 | |||||||
Accumulated Depreciation | (199,354 | ) | (151,009 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
$ | 317,633 | $ | 57,959 | |||||
|
|
|
|
Software and Website Costs
Computer software and web site development costs include packaged software, customized software for website operations, and costs related tomajor website enhancements. These costs are amortized using the straight-line method over three year lives. Operating expenses related to web site hosting and routine maintenance are expensed as incurred.
F-58
The components of capitalized software and website costs are as follows:
March 31, 2014 | March 31, 2013 | |||||||
Software | $ | 145,024 | $ | 136,345 | ||||
Website Costs | 340,090 | 287,157 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
485,114 | 423,502 | |||||||
Accumulated Depreciation | (385,636 | ) | (316,208 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
$ | 99,478 | $ | 107,294 | |||||
|
|
|
|
Marketing and Advertising
The Company currently markets loans to the following demographic markets: (1) high quality medical and dental professional serviceproviders for funding of elective medical, fertility and dental procedures, and (2) private educational institutions and learning centers for funding of private K-12 school tuition and tutoring.
The Company expenses advertising as incurred. Advertising expense for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was $102,984 and$27,548, respectively.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
The Company maintains demand deposits with several high quality financial institutions. Periodically, cash balances exceed the federallyinsured bank deposit limits. The Company had approximately $11,687,000 and $4,897,000 in uninsured cash, as of March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Credit Policies
The Company follows practices standard in the consumer lending/loan servicing industries. Loan applications are processed through various fraudshield databases and credit checks are run for all loan applicants. Loan proceeds are sent directly to the medical or dental service provider or educational institution, and not to the borrower.
Limited Liability Company/Income Taxes
As a limited liability company, each members liability is limited to amounts reflected in their respective member accounts.
The Company files its income tax returns as a partnership for federal and state income tax purposes. As such, the Company will not pay anyfederal or state income taxes, because any income or loss will be passed through to the federal and state tax returns of the members of the Company. Accordingly, no provision is made for federal or state income taxes in the financial statements.
Following are the differences between the financial statements and how the Company reports in its income tax returns: The financialstatements include a provision for loss reserves based on managements estimate of its exposure to potential loan defaults whereas the tax reporting allows deductions only when losses are realized. Organizational expenses were expensed in fullon the financial statements, whereas for income tax reporting organizational costs are amortized over five years. Meals and entertainment are expensed in full on the financial statements, whereas for income tax reporting these costs are only 50%deductible.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and the states of Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, NewJersey and Ohio. Management believes that all positions taken in its tax returns would be sustained in the event of review. The Companys tax returns are no longer subject to review for years before 2010.
F-59
NOTE 2LEASE COMMITMENTS
Operating Lease
In2013, the Company entered into a lease for new office space. The lease is for a period of 73 months beginning January, 2014, with an option to renew for an additional five years.
The Company occupied the new space on October 1, 2013, and paid rent of $1,848 for the months of October through December under the earlyoccupancy provision in the lease and paid no rent for the month of January, 2014. The difference between the rent paid for these four months and the fair value of the rent as determined from the lease terms has been recorded as rent expense in theapplicable periods and a liability for deferred rent, which is being amortized over the term of the lease. Rent expense for office space for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was $32,687 and $32,918, respectively.
Future minimum annual payments under the lease for the 12 month periods ending March 31, are as follows:
2015 | $ | 184,563 | ||
2016 | 215,542 | |||
2017 | 223,859 | |||
2018 | 232,176 | |||
2019 | 239,800 | |||
Thereafter | 205,609 | |||
|
| |||
$ | 1,301,549 | |||
|
|
NOTE 3RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
One of the Companys funding sources, NBT Bank, N.A. (an FDIC insured banking institution) is a subsidiary of a member of the Company, NBTCapital Corp. NBT Bank, N.A. (NBT) takes the risk of loss on default for a large majority of the loans that it funds.
In addition, theCompany also has several bank accounts on deposit with NBT.
Three of the Companys senior managers are stockholders of PremierPayment Solutions, Inc., the other member of the Company.
NOTE 4RESTRICTED CASH
Restricted cash represents reserves set aside by NBT to cover potential defaults on selected loan portfolios. No withdrawals may be made fromthese accounts without written approval from NBT. See Note 11.
NOTE 5LOAN LOSS CONTINGENCY
Loan loss contingency represents managements estimate of the potential contingent liability to cover losses on the following loanportfolios. See Note 11:
Pool BThis portfolio consists of loans, funded by the primary banking partner, made toborrowers with credit scores lower than normally required by the bank, but high enough to satisfy the Companys credit worthiness requirements, based on senior managements previous experience in the consumer loan market.
The total amount of loans outstanding in this portfolio as of March 31, 2014 and 2013 was approximately $6,677,000 and $5,620,000,respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the total amount of loan defaults realized from this portfolio was $117,558 and $140,366, respectively.
F-60
Over $25KThe 2ndportfolio consists of loans over $25,000, made to individuals with higher than normal credit scores. The Company bears the burden of risk of loss on such loans that were made before September 1, 2012. The Companys potential liability isbased on the ratio of the amount of the original loan balance over $25,000 to the total original loan amount. At March 31, 2014 and 2013, the Companys exposure on this portfolio was approximately $2,604,000 and $4,532,000, respectively.For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, actual defaults realized from this portfolio were $20,209 and $15,574, respectively.
ClearChoice Reserve ProgramLoans in this portfolio commenced in July, 2012 and are used to pay for the cost of dentaland orthodontic procedures. The Company bears the risk of loss at 1.54% of the outstanding loan balance. At March 31, 2014 and 2013, the Companys exposure on this portfolio was approximately $71,000 and $39,000, respectively. For thethree months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, actual defaults realized from this portfolio were none and $29, respectively.
Managementbelieves that the loan loss contingency balance is sufficient to cover any future loan defaults on these portfolios.
NOTE 6STATEMENT OF CASHFLOWS SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES AND OTHER ITEMS
Cash used in investing activities for the threemonths ended March 31, 2014, does not include distributions payable to members at March 31, 2014, in the amount of $767,150 as it did not have an impact on cash flows for the period.
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
There were no income taxes paid for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.
There were no payments of interest for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.
NOTE 7RETIREMENT PLAN
The Companyhas a 401(k) profit sharing plan which covers substantially all employees. Participating employees may contribute, on a tax-deferred basis, a portion of their compensation in accordance with section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The planprovides for a safe harbor matching contribution by the Company. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the Companys matching contributions were $26,389 and $27,940, respectively.
NOTE 8COMPENSATED ABSENCES
Employees of the Company are entitled to paid time off (PTO) which accrues up to a maximum of 160 hours. Paid time off can be used as vacationtime, sick time, or personal time. Employees cannot carry over more than 40 hours of PTO into the next calendar year. Accrued PTO in the amounts of $51,600 and $34,400 are included in accrued salaries and payroll taxes at March 31, 2014 and2013, respectively.
NOTE 9SIGNIFICANT CONCENTRATIONS
The Company is fully dependent on third party funding sources such as banks or private placement financing organizations. As of March 31,2014, there were two banks with which the Company has an arrangement to fund the loans it originates. Until those loan portfolios grow significantly, the Company is unlikely to pursue other major lending sources, and therefore has a concentration interms of readily available lenders.
F-61
The loan origination industry is subject to certain economic factors such as interest rates, andthe overall health of the economy.
NOTE 10REGULATORY MATTERS
The Company is subject to various regulations common in the financing industry and continually monitors its responsibilities with regard toregulatory and licensing requirements. The Company is satisfied that it is fully compliant with all requirements.
Additionally, each ofthe Companys banking partners has a contractual right to review its policies and procedures related to regulatory matters to insure that the Company is in compliance.
NOTE 11SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
OnApril 17, 2014, the Company was acquired by LendingClub Corporation for a total consideration of $140 million in cash and stock.
TheCompany has entered into an agreement with NBT which provides that it will return to NBT the balances as of April 17, 2014, in the restricted cash accounts which are meant to cover potential loan defaults in the Pool B and Over 25K loanportfolios. The agreement also provides that the Company will have no liability for any losses arising from loans in these portfolios in existence on April 17, 2014. The combined balances for restricted cash and for the loan loss contingencyfor these loan portfolios at April 17, 2014, were $1,523,598 and $1,189,681, respectively. The Company will incur a charge to expense equal to the excess of the combined restricted cash balance over the loan loss contingency balances in theamount of $333,917.
The Company has evaluated all subsequent events through June 17, 2014, the date the financial statements wereavailable to be issued.
F-62
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS REVIEW REPORT
ON SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
To theMembers
Springstone Financial, LLC
Westborough, MA 01581
Our report on our review of the basic financial statements of Springstone Financial, LLC for the three months ended March 31, 2014and 2013 appears on page 3. That review was made primarily for the purpose of expressing a conclusion that there are no material modifications that should be made to the financial statements in order for them to be in conformity with accountingprinciples generally accepted in the United States of America. The supplementary information included in the accompanying schedule of operating expenses is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basicfinancial statements. Such information has been subjected to the inquiry and analytical procedures applied in the review of the basic financial statements, and we did not become aware of any material modifications that should be made to suchinformation.
/s/ Auerr, Zajac & Associates, LLP |
Certified Public Accountants |
June 17, 2014 |
F-63
SCHEDULE OF OPERATING EXPENSES
(See auditors report on supplemental information and notes to financial statements)
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2014 | 2013 | |||||||
Salaries and Payroll Taxes | $ | 1,305,663 | $ | 1,033,275 | ||||
Advertising and Marketing Expense | 323,023 | 153,847 | ||||||
Consultants | 86,425 | 97,570 | ||||||
Printing and Reproduction | 979 | 3,958 | ||||||
Information Technology and Website Hosting | 67,067 | 70,469 | ||||||
Rent Expense | 32,687 | 32,918 | ||||||
Professional Fees | 70,715 | 105,650 | ||||||
Travel and Entertainment | 15,673 | 7,536 | ||||||
Depreciation and Amortization | 34,629 | 21,379 | ||||||
Postage and Delivery | 75,353 | 37,558 | ||||||
Insurance | 1,794 | 667 | ||||||
Office Supplies and Expense | 9,426 | 8,084 | ||||||
Telephone and Utilities | 35,985 | 17,606 | ||||||
Training and Education | 14,711 | 14,259 | ||||||
Charitable Contributions | 454 | 350 | ||||||
Employee Fringe Benefits | 95,118 | 67,926 | ||||||
Employee Retirement Benefits | 26,389 | 27,940 | ||||||
Credit Reports | 62,030 | 77,484 | ||||||
Alliance Rebate | 89,240 | 65,027 | ||||||
Provider Rebates and Chargebacks | 386,799 | 360,183 | ||||||
Provision for Loss Contingency | 135,393 | 155,968 | ||||||
Fraud Losses | | 45,683 | ||||||
Bank Service Charges | 6,537 | 4,070 | ||||||
Office Relocation Expense | | 7,500 | ||||||
Miscellaneous | 3,178 | 11,535 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total Operating Expenses | $ | 2,879,268 | $ | 2,428,442 | ||||
|
|
|
|
F-64
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
On April 17, 2014 (Closing Date), LendingClub Corporation (Lending Club or Company) entered into an Interest Purchase Agreement(Purchase Agreement) with Springstone Financial, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (Springstone), Premier Payment Solutions, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (PPS), NBT Capital Corp., a New York corporation (together with PPS, the Sellers),and James P. Donovan, as the Sellers representative thereunder, pursuant to which Lending Club acquired all of the outstanding limited liability company interests of Springstone from the Sellers in a simultaneous signing and closing.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2013 and for the six months endedJune 30, 2013 give effect to the acquisition as if it had occurred on January 1, 2013. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations are derived from the audited historical statements of operations of LendingClub andSpringstone for the year ended December 31, 2013 and the six months ended June 30, 2014.
The purchase was accounted for underthe acquisition method of accounting. Under the acquisition method of accounting, the total purchase price, as described in Note 3 to the unaudited pro forma condensed statements of operations, is allocated to the tangible and intangible assetsacquired and liabilities assumed in connection with the acquisition, based on their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The areas of the purchase price allocation that are not yet finalized relate to the determination of certaincontingent liabilities and a revenue refund liability, deferred tax asset or liability and the net working capital balance as of the acquisition date.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations are not intended to represent or be indicative of the consolidated resultsof operations of LendingClub that would have been reported had the acquisition been completed as of the dates presented, and should not be construed as representative of the future consolidated results of operations of the combined entity.
F-65
LendingClub Corporation
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2013
(In thousands, except for share and per share data)
Historical | ||||||||||||||||||
LendingClub Corporation | Springstone Financial, LLC | Pro Forma Adjustments | Notes | Pro Forma Combined | ||||||||||||||
Operating Revenue: | ||||||||||||||||||
Transaction fees | $ | 85,830 | $ | 17,316 | | $ | 103,146 | |||||||||||
Servicing fees | 3,951 | | | 3,951 | ||||||||||||||
Management fees | 3,083 | | | 3,083 | ||||||||||||||
Other revenue | 5,111 | | | 5,111 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total Operating Revenue | 97,975 | 17,316 | | 115,291 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net Interest Income (Expense): | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest income | 187,507 | 3 | | 187,510 | ||||||||||||||
Total interest expense | (187,447 | ) | | $ | (1,749 | ) | a) | (189,196 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net Interest Income (Expense) | 60 | 3 | (1,749 | ) | (1,686 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Fair valuation adjustments, loans | (57,629 | ) | | | (57,629 | ) | ||||||||||||
Fair valuation adjustments, notes and certificates | 57,596 | | | 57,596 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net Interest Income (Expense) after Fair Value Adjustments | 27 | 3 | (1,749 | ) | (1,719 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total Net Revenue | 98,002 | 17,319 | (1,749 | ) | 113,572 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Operating Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 39,037 | 3,484 | | 42,521 | ||||||||||||||
Origination and servicing | 17,217 | 2,331 | | 19,548 | ||||||||||||||
General and administrative | 34,440 | 2,877 | 15,335 | d) | 58,202 | |||||||||||||
| | 5,550 | e) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total Operating Expenses | 90,694 | 8,692 | 20,885 | 120,271 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Income (Loss) before Provision for Income Taxes | 7,308 | 8,627 | (22,634 | ) | (6,699 | ) | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | | | 2,021 | f) | 2,021 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) | $ | 7,308 | $ | 8,627 | $ | (24,655 | ) | $ | (8,720 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) per share: | ||||||||||||||||||
Basic net loss per share attributable to common shareholders | $ | 0.01 | $ | (0.34 | ) | |||||||||||||
Diluted net loss per share attributable to common shareholders | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.34 | ) | |||||||||||||
Weighted-average shares of common stock used in computing net loss per share: | ||||||||||||||||||
Basic | 25,778,568 | 25,778,568 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Diluted | 40,713,488 | 25,778,568 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
F-66
LendingClub Corporation
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Operations
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
(In thousands, except for share and per share data)
Historical | ||||||||||||||||||
LendingClub Corporation (1) | Springstone Financial, LLC (2) | Pro Forma Adjustments | Notes | Pro Forma Combined | ||||||||||||||
Operating Revenue: | ||||||||||||||||||
Transaction fees | $ | 81,213 | $ | 5,895 | | $ | 87,108 | |||||||||||
Servicing fees | 3,248 | | | 3,248 | ||||||||||||||
Management fees | 2,555 | | | 2,555 | ||||||||||||||
Other revenue | 307 | | | 307 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total Operating Revenue | 87,323 | 5,895 | | 93,218 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net Interest Income (Expense): | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest income | 158,260 | 1 | | 158,261 | ||||||||||||||
Total interest expense | (158,594 | ) | | $ | (453 | ) | a) | (159,047 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net Interest Income (Expense) | (334 | ) | 1 | (453 | ) | (786 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Fair valuation adjustments, loans | (51,154 | ) | (152 | ) | | (51,306 | ) | |||||||||||
Fair valuation adjustments, notes and certificates | 51,108 | | | 51,108 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net Interest Income (Expense) after Fair Value Adjustments | (380 | ) | (151 | ) | (453 | ) | (984 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total Net Revenue | 86,943 | 5,744 | (453 | ) | 92,234 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Operating Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 39,807 | 1,027 | (358 | ) | c) | 40,476 | ||||||||||||
Origination and servicing | 15,968 | 735 | (384 | ) | c) | 16,319 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative | 47,014 | 1,168 | (2,281 | ) | b) | 49,606 | ||||||||||||
(3,168 | ) | c) | ||||||||||||||||
4,286 | d) | |||||||||||||||||
| | 2,587 | e) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total Operating Expenses | 102,789 | 2,930 | 682 | 106,401 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Income (Loss) before Provision for Income Taxes | (15,846 | ) | 2,814 | (1,135 | ) | (14,167 | ) | |||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 640 | | 370 | f) | 1,010 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) | $ | (16,486 | ) | $ | 2,814 | $ | (1,505 | ) | $ | (15,177 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) per share: | ||||||||||||||||||
Basic net loss per share attributable to common shareholders | $ | (0.58 | ) | $ | (0.53 | ) | ||||||||||||
Diluted net loss per share attributable to common shareholders | $ | (0.58 | ) | $ | (0.53 | ) | ||||||||||||
Weighted-average shares of common stock used in computing net loss per share: | ||||||||||||||||||
Basic | 28,451,564 | 28,451,564 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Diluted | 28,451,564 | 28,451,564 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Includes the results of operations of Springstone Financial, LLC for the period from April 18, 2014 to June 30, 2014. |
(2) | Includes the results of operations of Springstone Financial, LLC for the period from January 1, 2014 through April 17, 2014. |
F-67
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENTS OFOPERATIONS
Note 1 Description of Transactions
Springstone Acquisition
On April 17, 2014 (Closing Date), LendingClub Corporation (Lending Club or Company) entered into an Interest Purchase Agreement (PurchaseAgreement) with Springstone Financial, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (Springstone), Premier Payment Solutions, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (PPS), NBT Capital Corp., a New York corporation (together with PPS, Sellers), and James P.Donovan, as the Sellers representative thereunder, pursuant to which Lending Club acquired all of the outstanding limited liability company interests of Springstone from the Sellers in a simultaneous signing and closing. We refer to thepurchase by Lending Club and the sale by the Sellers pursuant to the Purchase Agreement as the Acquisition. As a result of the closing of the Acquisition, Springstone became a wholly owned subsidiary of Lending Club.
Under the terms of the purchase agreement, the sellers received at the closing an aggregate of $113 million in cash and $25 millionworth of shares of our Series F convertible preferred stock. In connection with the acquisition, we also paid $2.4 million for transaction costs incurred by Springstone. For accounting purposes, the purchase price was $111.9 million,which was comprised of $109.1 million in cash and shares of Series F convertible preferred stock with an aggregate value of $2.8 million. To secure the retention of certain key employees, a total of $25.6 million comprised of$22.1 million of shares of Series F convertible preferred stock (Escrow Shares) and $3.5 million of cash were placed in a third-party escrow and are subject to certain vesting and forfeiture conditions applicable to these employeescontinuing employment over a three-year period from the closing. These amounts will be accounted for as a compensation arrangement and expensed over the three-year vesting period. Additionally, $19.3 million of the cash consideration andcertain Escrow Shares were placed in a third-party escrow for 15 months from the closing date to secure, in part, the indemnification obligations of the sellers under the purchase agreement. The cash portion of the consideration was funded by acombination of cash from Lending Club and proceeds of the Debt Financing and Preferred Stock Financing (each as described below). Both the Debt Financing and the Preferred Stock Financing closed just prior to the Acquisition.
The Purchase Agreement contains representations, warranties and covenants of the Company, Springstone and the Sellers. The Purchase Agreementalso contains customary indemnification provisions whereby the Sellers will indemnify Lending Club and affiliated parties for certain losses arising out of any inaccuracy in the representations and warranties, or breaches of the covenants, ofSpringstone or the Sellers under the Purchase Agreement and certain other matters.
The Debt Financing
In connection with the Acquisition, on April 16, 2014, Lending Club entered into a Credit and Guaranty Agreement (Credit Agreement) withjoint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners led by Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., along with Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Silicon Valley Bank, Citicorp North America Inc., and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Lenders), under which the Lendersagreed to make a $50.0 million term loan to Lending Club (Term Loan).
Also in connection with the Credit Agreement, on April 16,2014, Lending Club entered into a Pledge and Security Agreement with Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. as Collateral Agent (Pledge and Security Agreement).
The Term Loan is to be drawn in a single borrowing to finance the Acquisition and pay related fees and expenses, including fees and expensesrelated to the Credit Agreement. The Company may request that the Lenders establish new term loan facilities, provided that the aggregate principal amount of all new term loan facilities do not exceed $75.0 million. No additional amounts areavailable for borrowing. We refer to the borrowing by Lending Club and the lending by the Lenders pursuant to the Credit Agreement as the Debt Financing.
F-68
The Term Loan matures three years after the Closing Date, or April 16, 2017 and amortizes atthe rate of $312,500 per quarter, with the remaining principal amount payable at maturity. The Term Loan can be prepaid at any time at the Companys option without premium or penalty, subject to a minimum prepayment of $1.0 million. If aEurodollar Rate loan is selected (as defined below), customary breakage costs are payable in the case of any prepayment on a date other than the last day of an interest period. The Term Loan is required to be prepaid in certain circumstances,including upon sales of assets other than loans and upon the issuance of debt or redeemable capital stock.
Borrowings under the CreditAgreement bear interest, which at the option of the Company may be either (a) a floating base rate tied to an underlying index plus an additional 1.25% per annum (Base Rate Loan) or (b) a Eurodollar rate (for an interest period ofone, two, three or six months) plus an additional 2.25% per annum (Eurodollar Rate Loan).
The Preferred Stock Financing
In connection with the Acquisition, on April 16, 2014, Lending Club sold an aggregate of 3,195,278 shares of its Series FPreferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (Financing Shares) to certain new investors for an aggregate gross proceeds to Lending Club of approximately $65.0 million, pursuant to a Series F Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement dated April 16,2014 (Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement). Lending Club sold the Financing Shares pursuant to an exemption from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended; all investors in the Preferred Stock Financing wereaccredited investors (as defined under Rule 501 of Regulation D) and Lending Club made no general solicitation for the sale of the Financing Shares. The Financing Shares are convertible into shares of Lending Club common stock, parvalue $0.01 per share, on a one-for-one basis, as adjusted from time to time pursuant to the anti-dilution provisions of the Lending Club Restated Certificate of Incorporation. We refer to the sale by Lending Club and the purchase by the investorsof the Financing Shares pursuant to the Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement as the Preferred Stock Financing.
Note 2 Basis of ProForma Presentation
The historical financial information has been adjusted to give pro forma effect to events that are(i) directly attributable to the transaction, (ii) factually supportable, and (iii) with respect to the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of income, expected to have a continuing impact on the combined results. We havecompleted the allocation of the purchase price to acquired assets and liabilities with the exception of finalizing the determination of certain contingent liabilities and the finalization of a revenue refund liability, and deferred tax asset orliability and the net working capital balance as of the acquisition date. Accordingly, the pro forma adjustments are preliminary and have been prepared to illustrate the estimated effect of the transactions.
Note 3 Purchase Price Allocation
Under the acquisition method of accounting, the total purchase price is allocated to Springstones tangible and intangible assets acquiredand liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as of April 17, 2014, the acquisition date.
F-69
We have completed the allocation of the purchase price to acquired assets and liabilities withthe exception of finalizing the determination of certain contingent liabilities and the finalization of a revenue refund liability, and deferred tax asset or liability and the net working capital balance as of the acquisition date. The preliminarypurchase price allocation is as follows (in thousands):
Fair Value | ||||
Assets: | ||||
Cash | $ | 2,256 | ||
Restricted cash | 1,581 | |||
Property, equipment and software | 367 | |||
Other assets | 512 | |||
Identified intangible assets | 40,200 | |||
Goodwill | 72,679 | |||
Liabilities: | ||||
Accounts payable | 239 | |||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 5,449 | |||
|
| |||
Total purchase consideration | $ | 111,907 | ||
|
|
Note 4 Acquired Intangible Assets
The identified intangible assets include customer relationship, technology and brand name intangible assets with estimated fair values of $39.5million, $0.4 million and $0.3 million, respectively. The customer relationship intangible asset is being amortized on an accelerated basis over a 14 year period. The brand name and technology intangible assets are being amortized on a straight linebasis over 2 and 3 year periods, respectively.
Note 5 Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statements of Operations
The pro forma condensed combined statements of operations assume that the Acquisition occurred on January 1, 2013. The specific pro formaadjustments include in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations are as follows:
a) | Represents the estimated interest expense based on the weighted-average interest rate of 2.57% on the $50 million ($49.8 million net of discount) Term Loan entered into in connection with the acquisition and quarterlyprincipal payments of $0.3 million made on regular basis. Additionally, this amount includes the amortization of debt issuance costs related to the Term Loan. |
b) | Includes $2.3 million of acquisition of acquisition-related expenses which were incurred during the first six months of 2014. As these are non-recurring charges directly related to the Acquisition, we excluded thesecharges for the six months ended June 30, 2014. |
c) | Includes $3.9 million of compensation expenses which were incurred during the first six months of 2014. As these are non-recurring charges directly related to the Acquisition, we excluded these charges for the sixmonths ended June 30, 2014. |
d) | Includes the amortization of stock based compensation in the amount of $22.1 million and $3.5 million in a cash compensation arrangement for the year ended December 31, 2013 and six month period ended June 30,2014, respectively. This compensation is subject to forfeiture and vesting conditions of key continuing employees over a three year service performance period on a graded vesting basis. |
e) | Represents the amortization of intangible assets acquired. The estimated fair value of the customer relationship intangible assets of $39.5 millionhas a useful life of 14 years and will be amortized on an accelerated basis. The estimated fair value of the technology and brand name intangible assets totaling $0.7 million have a useful life of 2 to 3 years and will be amortized on straight-linebasis. The annual |
F-70
amortization expense for the customer relationship intangible assets for the five years following the acquisition date will be approximately $5.3 million, $4.9 million, $4.5 million, $4.1 millionand $3.8 million, respectively. |
f) | Represents the tax expense related to the recognition of a deferred tax liability created from to the tax amortization of the goodwill from the Acquisition. This goodwill is deductible for tax purposes but not amortizedfor book purposes. |
Note 6 Pro Forma Net Loss Per Common Share
The pro forma basic and diluted net loss per common share is based on the weighted-average number of common shares of LendingClubs commonstock outstanding during the period. No shares of common stock were issued as consideration in the acquisition. The diluted weighted-average number of common shares does not include outstanding stock options or the assumed conversion of preferredstock as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
F-71
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
Item 13. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution
The following table sets forth all expenses to be paid by the Registrant, other than underwriting discounts and commissions, upon completion ofthis offering. All amounts shown are estimates except for the SEC registration fee, the FINRA filing fee and the stock exchange listing fee.
SEC registration fee | $ | 64,400 | ||
FINRA filing fee | 75,500 | |||
Stock exchange listing fee | * | |||
Printing and engraving expenses | * | |||
Legal fees and expenses | * | |||
Accounting fees and expenses | * | |||
Transfer agent and registrar fees | * | |||
Miscellaneous expenses | * | |||
|
| |||
Total | $ | * | ||
|
|
* | To be completed by amendment. |
Item 14. Indemnification of Directors and Officers
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law authorizes a court to award, or a corporations board of directors to grant,indemnity to directors and officers under certain circumstances and subject to certain limitations. The terms of Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law are sufficiently broad to permit indemnification under certain circumstancesfor liabilities, including reimbursement of expenses incurred, arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (Securities Act).
Aspermitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, the Registrants restated certificate of incorporation to be effective upon the completion of this offering contains provisions that eliminate the personal liability of its directors formonetary damages for any breach of fiduciary duties as a director, except liability:
| for any breach of the directors duty of loyalty to the Registrant or its stockholders; |
| for acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law; |
| under Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (regarding unlawful dividends and stock repurchases or redemptions); or |
| for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit. |
Aspermitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, the Registrants restated bylaws to be effective upon the completion of this offering provide that:
| the Registrant is required to indemnify its directors and executive officers to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, subject to very limited exceptions; |
| the Registrant may indemnify its other employees and agents as set forth in the Delaware General Corporation Law; |
| the Registrant is required to advance expenses, as incurred, to its directors and executive officers in connection with a legal proceeding to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, subjectto very limited exceptions; and |
| the rights conferred in the restated bylaws are not exclusive. |
II-1
The Registrant intends to enter into amended and restated indemnification agreements with each ofits current directors and executive officers to provide these directors and executive officers additional contractual assurances regarding indemnification. There is no pending litigation or proceeding involving a director or executive officer of theRegistrant for which indemnification is sought. Reference is also made to the underwriting agreement to be filed as Exhibit 1.1 to this registration statement, which provides for the indemnification of the Registrant and controlling persons ofthe Registrant against certain liabilities.
Item 15. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
From August 25, 2011 through August 25, 2014, the Registrant issued the following unregistered securities:
In January 2012, the Registrant issued 3,960,148 shares of Series D convertible preferred stock for aggregate cash consideration ofapproximately $7.0 million to 15 accredited investors. These securities were sold in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements set forth in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.
In June 2012, the Registrant issued 5,000,000 shares of Series E convertible preferred stock for aggregate cash consideration ofapproximately $17.5 million to two accredited investors. These securities were sold in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements set forth in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.
In April 2014, the Registrant issued 3,195,278 shares of Series F convertible preferred stock for aggregate cash consideration ofapproximately $65.0 million to five accredited investors and 1,221,965 shares of Series F convertible preferred stock as consideration for the acquisition of Springstone Financial, LLC worth approximately $25.0 million to twoaccredited investors. These securities were issued in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements set forth in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.
From August 25, 2011 to August 25, 2014, the Registrant issued an aggregate of 11,833,055 shares of common stock to employeesand consultants upon the exercise of stock options for aggregate consideration of approximately $5.2 million. The shares of common stock issued upon the exercise of the options were issued in reliance on the exemption from the registrationrequirements set forth in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D under the Securities Act.
From August 25,2011 to August 25, 2014, the Registrant issued an aggregate of 664,004 shares of common stock upon the exercise of warrants for aggregate consideration of approximately $0.4 million. The shares of common stock were issued in relianceon the exemption from the registration requirements set forth in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D under the Securities Act.
From August 25, 2011 to August 25, 2014, the Registrant issued an aggregate of 1,550,822 shares of Series A convertiblepreferred stock upon the exercise of warrants for aggregate consideration of approximately $0.8 million. The shares of Series A convertible preferred stock were issued in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements setforth in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D under the Securities Act.
From August 25, 2011 toAugust 25, 2014, the Registrant issued an aggregate of 748,360 shares of Series B convertible preferred stock upon the exercise of warrants for aggregate consideration of approximately $0.3 million. The shares of Series B convertiblepreferred stock were issued in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements set forth in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.
II-2
Item 16. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits.
Exhibit | Incorporated by Reference | Filed Herewith | ||||||||||
Description | Form | File No. | Exhibit | Filing Date | ||||||||
1.1* | Form of Underwriting Agreement | |||||||||||
2.1 | Interest Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 17, 2014, by and among LendingClub Corporation, Springstone Financial, LLC, Premier Payment Solutions, Inc., NBT Capital Corp. and James P. Donovan | 8-K | 000-54752 | 2.1 | April 17, 2014 | |||||||
3.1 | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of LendingClub Corporation | 8-K | 000-54752 | 3.1 | April 17, 2014 | |||||||
3.2* | Form of Restated Certificate of Incorporation of LendingClub Corporation, to be in effect upon the completion of this offering | |||||||||||
3.3 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of LendingClub Corporation | 10-K | 333-151827 | 3.2 | June 17, 2009 | |||||||
3.4* | Form of Restated Bylaws of LendingClub Corporation, to be in effect upon the completion of this offering | |||||||||||
4.1 | Form of Three-Year Member Payment Dependent Note (included as Exhibit A to Exhibit 4.5) | S-1, Post- Effective Amendment No. 5 | 333-151827 | 4.5 | May 6, 2010 | |||||||
4.2 | Form of Five-Year Member Payment Dependent Note (included as Exhibit B to Exhibit 4.5) | S-1, Post- Effective Amendment No. 5 | 333-151827 | 4.5 | May 6, 2010 | |||||||
4.3 | Form of Indenture by and between LendingClub Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association | S-1, Amendment No. 3 | 333-151827 | 4.2 | October 9, 2008 | |||||||
4.4 | First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 10, 2009, by and between LendingClub Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association | S-1, Post- Effective Amendment No. 3 | 333-151827 | 4.3 | July 23, 2009 | |||||||
4.5 | Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 5, 2010, by and between LendingClub Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association | S-1, Post- Effective Amendment No. 5 | 333-151827 | 4.5 | May 6, 2010 | |||||||
4.6 | Form of Investor Agreement | S-1 | 333-177230 | 4.4 | October 7, 2011 |
II-3
Exhibit | Incorporated by Reference | Filed Herewith | ||||||||||
Description | Form | File No. | Exhibit | Filing Date | ||||||||
4.7 | Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement, dated as of April 16, 2014, by and among LendingClub Corporation and the investors named therein | 8-K | 000-54752 | 4.1 | April 17, 2014 | |||||||
4.8* | Form of Common Stock Certificate of LendingClub Corporation | |||||||||||
4.9* | Forms of Warrants to Purchase Common Stock | |||||||||||
4.10* | Forms of Warrants to Purchase Series A Convertible Preferred Stock | |||||||||||
5.1* | Opinion of Fenwick & West LLP | |||||||||||
10.1* | Form of Indemnity Agreement | |||||||||||
10.2 | Form of Loan Agreement | S-1 | 333-177230 | 10.1 | October 7, 2011 | |||||||
10.3 | Form of Borrower Membership Agreement | S-1 | 333-177230 | 10.2 | October 7, 2011 | |||||||
10.4 | LendingClub Corporation 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended | S-1 | 333-151827 | 10.5 | June 20, 2008 | |||||||
10.5 | Amendment No. 3 to LendingClub Corporation 2007 Stock Incentive Plan | 10-K | 333-151827 | 10.8 | June 17, 2009 | |||||||
10.6* | 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, to become effective upon the completion of this offering, and forms of stock option award agreement, restricted stock agreement and restricted stock unit award agreement thereunder | |||||||||||
10.7* | 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, to become effective upon the completion of this offering, and form of enrollment agreement thereunder | |||||||||||
10.8 | Seconded Amended and Restated Loan Sale Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2014, by and between LendingClub Corporation and WebBank | 10-K | 000-54752 | 10.6 | March 31, 2014 | |||||||
10.9 | Amended and Restated Loan Account Program Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2014, by and between LendingClub Corporation and WebBank | 10-K | 000-54752 | 10.7 | March 31, 2014 |
II-4
Exhibit | Incorporated by Reference | Filed Herewith | ||||||||||
Description | Form | File No. | Exhibit | Filing Date | ||||||||
10.10 | Hosting Services Agreement, dated as of October 6, 2008, by and between LendingClub Corporation and FOLIOfn Investments, Inc. | 10-K | 333-151827 | 10.15 | June 17, 2009 | |||||||
10.11 | Services Agreement, dated as of October 6, 2008, by and between LendingClub Corporation and FOLIOfn Investments, Inc. | 10-K | 333-151827 | 10.16 | June 17, 2009 | |||||||
10.12 | License Agreement, dated as of October 6, 2008, by and between LendingClub Corporation and FOLIOfn Investments, Inc. | 10-K | 333-151827 | 10.17 | June 17, 2009 | |||||||
10.13 | Backup and Successor Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 15, 2011, by and between Portfolio Financial Servicing Company and LendingClub Corporation | S-1/A | 333-177230 | 10.26 | March 19, 2012 | |||||||
10.14 | Form of Partner Agreement | S-1/A | 333-177230 | 10.28 | March 19, 2012 | |||||||
10.15* | Employment Agreement between LendingClub Corporation and Renaud Laplanche, dated , 2014 | |||||||||||
10.16* | Employment Agreement between LendingClub Corporation and Carrie Dolan, dated , 2014 | |||||||||||
10.17* | Employment Agreement between LendingClub Corporation and Scott Sanborn, dated , 2014 | |||||||||||
10.18* | Employment Agreement between LendingClub Corporation and John MacIlwaine, dated , 2014 | |||||||||||
10.19* | Employment Agreement between LendingClub Corporation and Chaomei Chen, dated , 2014 | |||||||||||
10.20 | Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of April 16, 2014, among LendingClub Corporation, the guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. | S-1, Post- Effective Amendment No. 4 | 333-177230 | 10.23 | April 29, 2014 |
II-5
Exhibit | Incorporated by Reference | Filed Herewith | ||||||||||
Description | Form | File No. | Exhibit | Filing Date | ||||||||
10.21 | Pledge and Security Agreement, dated April 16, 2014, by and among LendingClub Corporation, the guarantors referred to therein and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. | S-1, Post- Effective Amendment No. 4 | 333-177230 | 10.24 | April 29, 2014 | |||||||
10.22 | Lease Agreement, dated as of May 17, 2013, by and between LendingClub Corporation and Forward One, LLC, as amended | X | ||||||||||
10.23 | Sublease, dated as of April 15, 2011, by and between LendingClub Corporation and H5, as amended | X | ||||||||||
21.1 | List of Subsidiaries | X | ||||||||||
23.1 | Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP | X | ||||||||||
23.2 | Consent of Grant Thornton LLP | X | ||||||||||
23.3 | Consent of Auerr, Zajac & Associates, LLP | X | ||||||||||
23.4* | Consent of Fenwick & West LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1) | |||||||||||
24.1 | Power of Attorney (included on signature page to this Registration Statement on Form S-1). | X | ||||||||||
101.INS* | XBRL Instance Document | |||||||||||
101.SCH* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | |||||||||||
101.CAL* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase | |||||||||||
101.DEF* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase | |||||||||||
101.LAB* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase | |||||||||||
101.PRE* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase |
| Confidential treatment has been granted as to certain portions, which portions have been omitted and filed separately with the SEC. |
* | To be filed by amendment. |
(b) Financial Statement Schedules.
No financial statement schedules have been provided because the information called for is not required or is shown either in the financialstatements or notes thereto.
II-6
Item 17. Undertakings
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons ofthe registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore,unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense ofany action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controllingprecedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes that:
(1) | For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form ofprospectus filed by the Registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared effective. |
(2) | For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securitiesoffered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof. |
II-7
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the Registrant has duly caused this Registration Statement to be signed on itsbehalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in San Francisco, California, on the 27th day of August 2014.
LENDINGCLUB CORPORATION | ||
By: | /s/ Renaud Laplanche | |
Renaud Laplanche | ||
Chief Executive Officer |
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Renaud Laplanche and Carrie Dolan, andeach of them, his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments (includingpost-effective amendments or any abbreviated registration statement and any amendments thereto filed pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933 increasing the number of securities for which registration is sought) and to file the same,with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act andthing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorney-in-fact or his or her substitute orsubstitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, thisRegistration Statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature | Title | Date | ||
/s/ Renaud Laplanche Renaud Laplanche | Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) | August 27, 2014 | ||
/s/ Carrie Dolan Carrie Dolan | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | August 27, 2014 | ||
/s/ Jeffrey Crowe Jeffrey Crowe | Director | August 27, 2014 | ||
/s/ Daniel Ciporin Daniel Ciporin | Director | August 27, 2014 | ||
/s/ Rebecca Lynn Rebecca Lynn | Director | August 27, 2014 | ||
/s/ John J. Mack John J. Mack | Director | August 27, 2014 | ||
/s/ Mary Meeker Mary Meeker | Director | August 27, 2014 |
II-8
Signature | Title | Date | ||
/s/ John C. (Hans) Morris John C. (Hans) Morris | Director | August 27, 2014 | ||
/s/ Lawrence Summers Lawrence Summers | Director | August 27, 2014 |
II-9
Exhibit Index
Exhibit | Incorporated by Reference | Filed Herewith | ||||||||||
Description | Form | File No. | Exhibit | Filing Date | ||||||||
1.1* | Form of Underwriting Agreement | |||||||||||
2.1 | Interest Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 17, 2014, by and among LendingClub Corporation, Springstone Financial, LLC, Premier Payment Solutions, Inc., NBT Capital Corp. and James P. Donovan | 8-K | 000-54752 | 2.1 | April 17, 2014 | |||||||
3.1 | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of LendingClub Corporation | 8-K | 000-54752 | 3.1 | April 17, 2014 | |||||||
3.2* | Form of Restated Certificate of Incorporation of LendingClub Corporation, to be in effect upon the completion of this offering | |||||||||||
3.3 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of LendingClub Corporation | 10-K | 333-151827 | 3.2 | June 17, 2009 | |||||||
3.4* | Form of Restated Bylaws of LendingClub Corporation, to be in effect upon the completion of this offering | |||||||||||
4.1 | Form of Three-Year Member Payment Dependent Note (included as Exhibit A to Exhibit 4.5) | S-1, Post- Effective Amendment No. 5 | 333-151827 | 4.5 | May 6, 2010 | |||||||
4.2 | Form of Five-Year Member Payment Dependent Note (included as Exhibit B to Exhibit 4.5) | S-1, Post- Effective Amendment No. 5 | 333-151827 | 4.5 | May 6, 2010 | |||||||
4.3 | Form of Indenture by and between LendingClub Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association | S-1, Amendment No. 3 | 333-151827 | 4.2 | October 9, 2008 | |||||||
4.4 | First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 10, 2009, by and between LendingClub Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association | S-1, Post- Effective Amendment No. 3 | 333-151827 | 4.3 | July 23, 2009 | |||||||
4.5 | Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 5, 2010, by and between LendingClub Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association | S-1, Post- Effective Amendment No. 5 | 333-151827 | 4.5 | May 6, 2010 | |||||||
4.6 | Form of Investor Agreement | S-1 | 333-177230 | 4.4 | October 7, 2011 |
Exhibit | Incorporated by Reference | Filed Herewith | ||||||||||
Description | Form | File No. | Exhibit | Filing Date | ||||||||
4.7 | Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement, dated as of April 16, 2014, by and among LendingClub Corporation and the investors named therein | 8-K | 000-54752 | 4.1 | April 17, 2014 | |||||||
4.8* | Form of Common Stock Certificate of LendingClub Corporation | |||||||||||
4.9* | Forms of Warrants to Purchase Common Stock | |||||||||||
4.10* | Forms of Warrants to Purchase Series A Convertible Preferred Stock | |||||||||||
5.1* | Opinion of Fenwick & West LLP | |||||||||||
10.1* | Form of Indemnity Agreement | |||||||||||
10.2 | Form of Loan Agreement | S-1 | 333-177230 | 10.1 | October 7, 2011 | |||||||
10.3 | Form of Borrower Membership Agreement | S-1 | 333-177230 | 10.2 | October 7, 2011 | |||||||
10.4 | LendingClub Corporation 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended | S-1 | 333-151827 | 10.5 | June 20, 2008 | |||||||
10.5 | Amendment No. 3 to LendingClub Corporation 2007 Stock Incentive Plan | 10-K | 333-151827 | 10.8 | June 17, 2009 | |||||||
10.6* | 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, to become effective upon the completion of this offering, and forms of stock option award agreement, restricted stock agreement and restricted stock unit award agreement thereunder | |||||||||||
10.7* | 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, to become effective upon the completion of this offering, and form of enrollment agreement thereunder | |||||||||||
10.8 | Seconded Amended and Restated Loan Sale Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2014, by and between LendingClub Corporation and WebBank | 10-K | 000-54752 | 10.6 | March 31, 2014 | |||||||
10.9 | Amended and Restated Loan Account Program Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2014, by and between LendingClub Corporation and WebBank | 10-K | 000-54752 | 10.7 | March 31, 2014 |
Exhibit | Incorporated by Reference | Filed Herewith | ||||||||||
Description | Form | File No. | Exhibit | Filing Date | ||||||||
10.10 | Hosting Services Agreement, dated as of October 6, 2008, by and between LendingClub Corporation and FOLIOfn Investments, Inc. | 10-K | 333-151827 | 10.15 | June 17, 2009 | |||||||
10.11 | Services Agreement, dated as of October 6, 2008, by and between LendingClub Corporation and FOLIOfn Investments, Inc. | 10-K | 333-151827 | 10.16 | June 17, 2009 | |||||||
10.12 | License Agreement, dated as of October 6, 2008, by and between LendingClub Corporation and FOLIOfn Investments, Inc. | 10-K | 333-151827 | 10.17 | June 17, 2009 | |||||||
10.13 | Backup and Successor Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 15, 2011, by and between Portfolio Financial Servicing Company and LendingClub Corporation | S-1/A | 333-177230 | 10.26 | March 19, 2012 | |||||||
10.14 | Form of Partner Agreement | S-1/A | 333-177230 | 10.28 | March 19, 2012 | |||||||
10.15* | Employment Agreement between LendingClub Corporation and Renaud Laplanche, dated , 2014 | |||||||||||
10.16* | Employment Agreement between LendingClub Corporation and Carrie Dolan, dated , 2014 | |||||||||||
10.17* | Employment Agreement between LendingClub Corporation and Scott Sanborn, dated , 2014 | |||||||||||
10.18* | Employment Agreement between LendingClub Corporation and John MacIlwaine, dated , 2014 | |||||||||||
10.19* | Employment Agreement between LendingClub Corporation and Chaomei Chen, dated , 2014 | |||||||||||
10.20 | Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of April 16, 2014, among LendingClub Corporation, the guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. | S-1, Post- Effective Amendment No. 4 | 333-177230 | 10.23 | April 29, 2014 |
Exhibit | Incorporated by Reference | Filed Herewith | ||||||||||
Description | Form | File No. | Exhibit | Filing Date | ||||||||
10.21 | Pledge and Security Agreement, dated April 16, 2014, by and among LendingClub Corporation, the guarantors referred to therein and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. | S-1, Post- Effective Amendment No. 4 | 333-177230 | 10.24 | April 29, 2014 | |||||||
10.22 | Lease Agreement, dated as of May 17, 2013, by and between LendingClub Corporation and Forward One, LLC, as amended | X | ||||||||||
10.23 | Sublease, dated as of April 15, 2011, by and between LendingClub Corporation and H5, as amended | X | ||||||||||
21.1 | List of Subsidiaries | X | ||||||||||
23.1 | Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP | X | ||||||||||
23.2 | Consent of Grant Thornton LLP | X | ||||||||||
23.3 | Consent of Auerr, Zajac & Associates, LLP | X | ||||||||||
23.4* | Consent of Fenwick & West LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1) | |||||||||||
24.1 | Power of Attorney (included on signature page to this Registration Statement on Form S-1). | X | ||||||||||
101.INS* | XBRL Instance Document | |||||||||||
101.SCH* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | |||||||||||
101.CAL* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase | |||||||||||
101.DEF* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase | |||||||||||
101.LAB* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase | |||||||||||
101.PRE* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase |
| Confidential treatment has been granted as to certain portions, which portions have been omitted and filed separately with the SEC. |
* | To be filed by amendment. |