Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Errata] [Info page]

EXPERIMENTAL
Errata Exist
Independent Submission                                      M. DanielsonRequest for Comments: 8135                                Net Insight ABCategory: Experimental                                        M. NilssonISSN: 2070-1721                                    Besserwisser Networks                                                            1 April 2017Complex Addressing in IPv6Abstract   The 128-bit length of IPv6 addresses (RFC 4291) allows for new and   innovative address schemes that can adapt to the challenges of   today's complex network world.  It also allows for new and improved   security measures and supports advanced cloud computing challenges.Status of This Memo   This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is   published for examination, experimental implementation, and   evaluation.   This document defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet   community.  This is a contribution to the RFC Series, independently   of any other RFC stream.  The RFC Editor has chosen to publish this   document at its discretion and makes no statement about its value for   implementation or deployment.  Documents approved for publication by   the RFC Editor are not a candidate for any level of Internet   Standard; seeSection 2 of RFC 7841.   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained athttp://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8135.Copyright Notice   Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the   document authors.  All rights reserved.   This document is subject toBCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of   publication of this document.  Please review these documents   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect   to this document.Danielson & Nilsson           Experimental                      [Page 1]

RFC 8135               Complex Addressing in IPv6           1 April 2017Table of Contents1. Introduction ....................................................32. Requirements Language ...........................................33. Natural Addresses ...............................................33.1. Integer Addresses ..........................................33.2. Prime Addresses ............................................33.3. Composite Addresses ........................................44. Complex Addresses ...............................................44.1. Floating Addresses .........................................44.2. Real Addresses .............................................54.3. Imaginary Addresses ........................................54.4. Flying Addresses ...........................................54.5. Complex Addresses ..........................................65. Supported Addressing Schemes ....................................65.1. Absolute Addresses .........................................65.2. Address Argument ...........................................65.3. Safe Addresses .............................................65.4. Virtual Addresses ..........................................75.5. Rational Addresses .........................................75.6. Irrational Addresses .......................................75.7. Transcendent Addresses .....................................86. Geometric Addresses .............................................86.1. Round Addresses ............................................86.2. Square Addresses ...........................................86.3. Polar Addresses ............................................96.4. Root Server ................................................96.5. Implementation Considerations ..............................97. IPv6 Address Mapping ...........................................108. IANA Considerations ............................................109. Security Considerations ........................................1010. References ....................................................1110.1. Normative References .....................................1110.2. Informative References ...................................12Appendix A.  Square Pi ............................................13Appendix B.  Implementation Example ...............................14   Authors' Addresses ................................................16Danielson & Nilsson           Experimental                      [Page 2]

RFC 8135               Complex Addressing in IPv6           1 April 20171.  Introduction   This document introduces the fundamental concepts of complex   addressing in IPv6, allowing for a wide range of complex addressing   schemes to be supported and further developed.   Traditional network addressing schemes such as those used in IPv4   [RFC791] and IPv6 [RFC4291] have been confined to unsigned or integer   numbers, representing fixed-point numbers.  This has provided natural   numbers for early implementations but is not well adapted to the   challenges of future networks.  Further, these fixed addresses have   been proven unsuitable for mobility and virtualization in today's   world, where cloud computing defies the traditional fixed addressing   model.  The increased size of addresses as allowed in IPv6, the   significant drop in price of floating-point hardware, and the   availability of a well-established floating-point format in IEEE 754   [IEEE754] allow for taking not only the step to floating-point   addressing but also the step to complex addressing.2.  Requirements Language   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this   document are to be interpreted as described inRFC 2119 [RFC2119].3.  Natural Addresses3.1.  Integer Addresses   Traditional addresses are integer addresses and can be expressed in a   three-dot format, for example, 113.129.213.11 for the integer   1904334091, a rare IPv4 double-palindromic address.  These fixed-   point addresses were well adapted to early network usage where each   computer on the Internet had a fixed location and thus a fixed   address.  These addresses are also known as natural addresses.  As   computers have become more powerful and able to handle larger numbers   and thus larger addresses, they have also become more transportable   (e.g., laptops and mobile phones).  The transportable aspect of   computers makes fixed-point addresses moot, as machines can move   around rather than be confined to a relatively fixed point.3.2.  Prime Addresses   The prime address (that is, the primary address of a recipient) is an   important subclass of integer addresses.  Such an address is not   divisible by anything but the recipient itself, which means it must   be regarded as a unique address.  While many prime addresses have   been experimentally identified, it has proven to be quite hard toDanielson & Nilsson           Experimental                      [Page 3]

RFC 8135               Complex Addressing in IPv6           1 April 2017   identify a prime address amongst other addresses without resorting to   time-consuming computations.  Current use includes security and   intelligence, where post boxes are obscured amongst others using   large prime addresses.3.3.  Composite Addresses   Composite addresses are formed by two or more prime addresses and   thus constitute a shared address, allowing the address to be home for   multiple prime addresses.  Large composite addresses can be difficult   to distinguish from prime addresses, which can be a factor to   consider.  Composite addresses have also become quite important in   addressing new light structures and are used in airplanes to make   them lightweight and durable.  This is important in connecting to the   cloud.4.  Complex Addresses4.1.  Floating Addresses   Floating-point addresses allow for a more flexible addressing scheme   better adapted for today's mobile computers, thus allowing for mobile   IP [RFC5944].  Support for floating-point numbers is well established   in the form of floating numbers as described in IEEE 754 [IEEE754],   which allows both 32-bit and 64-bit floating-point numbers to be   represented; this is well matched to the requirements of fitting into   a 128-bit IPv6 address.   The use of floating addresses does not, however, imply that devices   will be watertight.  Please download the watertight app from your app   store or distribution server.  Also, keep your device well patched,   as long-term durability of duct tape is limited, particularly if   exposure to salt water is expected.  Apply suitable environmentally   sound lubricants for best sliding performance.   Duct tape can be used to affix a floating address to a fixed address,   such as a physical address.  For long-term outdoor adhesion, please   use UV-stable, nuclear-grade duct tape in layers: Layer 1 [OSI], the   physical layer, for affixing the floating address to the physical   address and then final layer, called Layer 7, for the application of   UV protection.  Intermediate layers can be applied depending on the   complexity needed.Danielson & Nilsson           Experimental                      [Page 4]

RFC 8135               Complex Addressing in IPv6           1 April 20174.2.  Real Addresses   An important aspect of floating-point addresses is that one needs to   establish the real address of a device that has a floating address,   such that IP packets can be routed to it through the network.   Letting part of the address act as the real floating-point value   allows means to express real addresses within this address scheme,   thus solving a complex addressing problem.   Real addresses are typically assigned to real estate.  Multi-homing   is supported when the real estate connects to two or more road   networks over individual road interfaces.  Each road interface can   often handle multiple real addresses.  Mobile homes are assigned   their current real address.4.3.  Imaginary Addresses   Another important aspect of floating-point addresses is that they can   be in several possible locations; thus, one must be able to imagine   the address as being somewhere other than where the real address   would make you believe.  The imaginary address provides this   orthogonal property.  When the imaginary address is found to be 0,   then the imaginary address and the real address are considered equal,   and the real address has been found.   Imaginary addresses are important in handling home locations above   the normal real estate, that is, for cloud computing.  The cloud can   be identified using the imaginary address, whose floating address is   adapted to a real address as the cloud gently floats by.  During   windy conditions, this may be difficult to achieve; during network   storms, the real address of a cloud can become very unstable.  Such   storms can occasionally become so strong that they impact real estate   and rearrange homes, making the real address quite surreal.4.4.  Flying Addresses   An extension to the imaginary address is the flying address format,   which is adapted to the mobility of avian carriers.  Avian carriers   and their datagrams, as described in [RFC6214], are best addressed   with flying addresses, which typically take up ICAO Class G   [ICAO-A11] airspace, below the cloud, as can be expected from a   lower-layer technology.Danielson & Nilsson           Experimental                      [Page 5]

RFC 8135               Complex Addressing in IPv6           1 April 20174.5.  Complex Addresses   With the introduction of the real address and imaginary address   parts, the full width of complex addresses can be realized.  Both the   real and imaginary parts are represented in 64-bit floating-point   numbers as described in [IEEE754], thus allowing for the floating-   point aspect of addresses.  The real address part provides for the   real address of a device, whereas the imaginary part allows for the   orthogonal addressing of the floating-point address.  This allows for   complex addressing schemes where both the real and imaginary   addresses can be found.   Complex addresses allow for address arithmetic in the usual way but   can now go beyond the fixed-point limitations.  Adding imaginary   parts to the address has not been possible before due to the high   cost of early floating-point hardware, which hampered imagination.5.  Supported Addressing Schemes5.1.  Absolute Addresses   It has become increasingly important to establish the absolute   address of a device for many purposes, including but not limited to,   use by law enforcement.  This was manageable with fixed-point   addresses but has become increasingly difficult with increased   address mobility and floating-point addresses.  The complex address   scheme provides a method for getting the absolute address by   performing the absolute function on the complex address.5.2.  Address Argument   It has become increasingly obvious that there is debate about the   address of certain services or functions, leading to address   arguments.  This is another difficulty with fixed-point addresses, as   their one-dimensional form does not allow for an argument to be   resolved.  The complex addressing scheme provides an elegant solution   to these address arguments, as the result of the address argument can   trivially be found by taking the argument (i.e., arctan or atan)   function of the complex address.  Using the appropriate function,   full argument resolution can be found without signs of ambiguity.5.3.  Safe Addresses   A safe address is the address of a safe house.  This is used in   various security scenarios -- the safety lies in that those in need   can reach the safe house at the safe address but there is no   indication that the address has this role.  By use of the   imagination, this address can be made less real, simply by making theDanielson & Nilsson           Experimental                      [Page 6]

RFC 8135               Complex Addressing in IPv6           1 April 2017   imaginary part large enough not to be taken as a real address.  Since   it is a floating address, the real address can be made 0, thus making   it completely imaginary, and the address argument will be orthogonal   to any real address, providing it is hard to establish its real   address.  It is naturally still possible to establish the absolute   address when needed.5.4.  Virtual Addresses   Virtual addresses, where the same network interface can have multiple   addresses, have traditionally been an important concept.  With the   complex addressing scheme, the imaginary part allows for a much wider   range of virtualization than just normal multiple real addresses for   a particular interface.  This goes beyond normal cloud computing,   where virtualization just allows you to operate somebody else's   computer.  The new imaginative address capabilities and higher   altitude addresses due to the increased range allow you to operate a   cloud within a cloud, so that you just run on top of somebody else's   cloud.  This high altitude allows for supersonic cruise speed for   high-performance computing.5.5.  Rational Addresses   Engineers tend to always look at problems rationally, including the   problem of addressing.  The traditional fixed-point address has,   however, only supported a subset of rational addresses, but with the   new complex addressing scheme, a larger subset of rational addresses   can be reached or approximated, allowing for a larger rationale to be   found.   The rationale for this is that with the use of floating addresses,   the power of 2 now can perfectly divide.  Further, approximations for   other dividends can often be sufficiently precise.  The full scope of   rational numbers has not been reached, however, as the committee was   quite imprecise on the use of floating addresses but agreed that this   initial support of rational addresses could be acknowledged and   helpful while its usage is TBD.5.6.  Irrational Addresses   Support for irrational addresses has been very poor in the   traditional addressing scheme, since fixed-point addresses did not   support any irrational behavior by design, even if proofs for   irrational addresses have been known to be jotted down.  The new   scheme allows for approximations of irrational addresses to be   supported; even though no rationale for why this would be needed   could be found, it is a neat feature to handle the irrationality of   the world today.Danielson & Nilsson           Experimental                      [Page 7]

RFC 8135               Complex Addressing in IPv6           1 April 20175.7.  Transcendent Addresses   As a natural extension to irrational addresses, one can include   approximation to the transcendent addresses, which transcend beyond   the physical address or even the real address.  While only   approximated due to limited precision, they can still be used to   locate the floating address for the life of Pi [PI], as Pi's life   floats by.6.  Geometric Addresses6.1.  Round Addresses   In order to cope with the complexity of the real world, real   addresses (both rational or irrational) have always needed to be   rounded up for them to be represented.  This rounding provides what   is known as round addresses and is achieved using a rounding   function.  This practice is maintained in the complex addressing   scheme and is a necessity for support of rational and irrational   addresses.   Round addresses are needed to efficiently forward packets around   ring-type networks like Token Ring [IEEE-802.5] or Resilient Packet   Ring (RPR) [IEEE-802.17].   Common round words include "ring", "circle", and "sphere"; other   round words are discouraged, especially when using the network.6.2.  Square Addresses   As is well established, some addresses regularly in use cannot be   directly used on the Internet.  Addresses in text form are often   referred to as square addresses, because the characters traditionally   take up a square on the screen and because they act as a square peg   in the round hole of Internet addresses.  In order to convert these   square addresses into round floating-point numbers, the Domain Name   Service (DNS) was introduced to replace the host tables.   Host tables are the old-school way of looking up a square number and   converting it to round form.  Such tables were published for all   known square numbers, but they where inherently out of date as new   square numbers kept occurring -- new round numbers had to be   calculated from these square numbers and then had to be tabulated and   published.   Square addresses often use square pi (seeAppendix A).Danielson & Nilsson           Experimental                      [Page 8]

RFC 8135               Complex Addressing in IPv6           1 April 20176.3.  Polar Addresses   A misconception on square addresses is that they would represent the   world as being a flat earth.  While the complex addressing scheme   supports Cartesian coordinates, alternative polar addresses can be   formed.  Since a flat earth would not have poles through which the   rotation axis would fit, this proves that the earth is not flat in   terms of square addresses but only has a square address   representation.  Polar addresses are trivially achieved using the   absolute address and address argument methods.  Recovering the   complex address is trivially achieved using the exponential function   on the complex polar address.   The polar address also has a use for addressing Santa Claus, who is   well known for living at the North Pole.  This address can only be   reached by use of the imaginary address, as it takes a certain amount   of imagination in order to address Santa Claus.  Traditional integer   and fixed addressing schemes do not allow for such imaginative   addresses, but the complex addressing scheme trivially handles it.   The North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) Santa Tracker   would not have been possible without imaginative use of polar   addresses when their secret phone address was revealed.6.4.  Root Server   The DNS system uses a small set of known root servers, which provides   the root service in order to attain the address of a node.  The   complex address provides a solution such that each client can in   itself act as a root server as they now can use built-in floating-   point hardware or software to get the root address from the squared   address.  This offloads the root servers for common benefits, but the   traditional root servers can operate in parallel, easing the   transition to the complex address system.6.5.  Implementation Considerations   Implementation of floating-point addresses and complex addresses, as   needed for complex addressing schemes, is trivial in today's context.   IEEE 754 [IEEE754] allows for a common and agreed-upon format for   representing floating-point numbers.  The 64-bit floating-point   representation is well established and supported throughout a wide   range of devices.  Support also exists in a wide range of computer   languages, including C and FORTRAN.  The C standard library (or libc)   essentially makes all modern languages support it in a consistent   manner.  An independent implementation exists for Intercal.  With ISO   C99 [C99], the <complex.h> include provides even more direct support   for complex numbers, enabling efficient handling of all aspects of   complex addressing with minimal implementation effort.Danielson & Nilsson           Experimental                      [Page 9]

RFC 8135               Complex Addressing in IPv6           1 April 20177.  IPv6 Address Mapping   In order to convey complex addresses in the IPv6 address format, the   following mapping is provided:    3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1    1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   |6                                                             3|   |3               complex address (real part)                   2|   +---------------------------------------------------------------+   |3                                                              |   |1               complex address (real part)                   0|   +---------------------------------------------------------------+   |6                                                             3|   |3            complex address (imaginary part)                 2|   +---------------------------------------------------------------+   |3                                                              |   |1            complex address (imaginary part)                 0|   +---------------------------------------------------------------+   The 128-bit IPv6 address is divided into two 64-bit parts, where the   upper half holds the real part of the address while the lower half   holds the imaginary part of the complex address.  These are   represented as 64-bit floating-point numbers as defined in [IEEE754];   therefore, the real and imaginary address MUST be in the format   described in IEEE 754.   Since the real address is held in the real part of the complex   address and the imaginary address is held in the imaginary part of   the complex address, the proposed representation allows for compiler   optimization such that these operations can be performed without   performance hits, as could otherwise be expected with any real or   complex addressing scheme.8.  IANA Considerations   This document does not require any IANA actions, though IANA may find   it mildly amusing.9.  Security Considerations   Complex addressing is considered unsafe, as division by 0 still   provides Not a Number (NaN) values.  Users will have to be careful to   identify the NaN as they can indicate infinity addresses, which are   unrealistic as one needs to confine the address length to the address   space.  Many other traditional unsafe operations for fixed-point   addresses have, however, been resolved.  For example, the errorDanielson & Nilsson           Experimental                     [Page 10]

RFC 8135               Complex Addressing in IPv6           1 April 2017   condition of having the square address of -1 is readily resolved as   the root address becomes the complex address i.  Thus, it has the   real part of 0, which is reasonable for an address that is not real,   and an imaginary part of 1, which is in itself reasonable since one   can imagine this error to occur.   Division by 0 and other floating-point address calculations can cause   a floating-point interrupt, which causes the execution address to   deviate; it is typically pushed on a stack and replaced by the   interrupt handler address.  Recovery from such interrupts may require   further recursive calls; hence, the overall computation time is   unpredictable.  It can cause a complete core dump, and dumping the   core can have significant effects on the propulsion system and the   time to reach anywhere in the address space.  Care must be taken to   avoid such measures, or engineering will be quite upset.  Dumping the   core also widely breaks security protocols, as leaks can have   widespread consequences.  NaN is also known as "No Agency Number", to   mark the importance of keeping things secure.10.  References10.1.  Normative References   [C99]      ISO, "Information technology -- Programming Languages --              C", ISO/IEC 9899, 1999.   [IEEE754]  IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Floating-Point Arithmetic",              IEEE 754, DOI 10.1109/IEEESTD.2008.4610935.   [OSI]      ISO, "Information technology -- Open Systems              Interconnection -- Basic Reference Model: The Basic              Model", ISO/IEC 7498-1, 1994.   [RFC791]   Postel, J., "Internet Protocol", STD 5,RFC 791,              DOI 10.17487/RFC0791, September 1981,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc791>.   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate              Requirement Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119,              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.   [RFC4291]  Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing              Architecture",RFC 4291, DOI 10.17487/RFC4291, February              2006, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4291>.Danielson & Nilsson           Experimental                     [Page 11]

RFC 8135               Complex Addressing in IPv6           1 April 2017   [RFC6214]  Carpenter, B. and R. Hinden, "Adaptation ofRFC 1149 for              IPv6",RFC 6214, DOI 10.17487/RFC6214, April 2011,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6214>.10.2.  Informative References   [ICAO-A11] ICAO, "Air Traffic Services, Annex 11 to the Convention on              International Civil Aviation", July 2001,              <http://www.icao.int/secretariat/PostalHistory/annex_11_air_traffic_services.htm>.   [IEEE-802.17]              IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Information Technology -              Telecommunications and Information Exchange between              Systems - Local and Metropolitan Area Networks - Specific              Requirements Part 17: Resilient Packet Ring (RPR) Access              Method and Physical Layer Specifications", IEEE 802.17,              DOI 10.1109/IEEESTD.2011.6026209.   [IEEE-802.5]              IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Information Technology -              Telecommunications and Information Exchange between              Systems - Local and Metropolitan Area Networks - Part 5:              Token Ring Access Method and Physical Layer              Specifications", IEEE 802.5,              DOI 10.1109/IEEESTD.1992.7438701.   [PI]       "Life of Pi", 20th Century Fox, 2012.   [pibill]   Wikipedia, "Indiana Pi Bill", March 2017,              <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indiana_Pi_Bill&oldid=770393894>.   [RFC5944]  Perkins, C., Ed., "IP Mobility Support for IPv4, Revised",RFC 5944, DOI 10.17487/RFC5944, November 2010,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5944>.Danielson & Nilsson           Experimental                     [Page 12]

RFC 8135               Complex Addressing in IPv6           1 April 2017Appendix A.  Square Pi   When using square numbers, it is customary to use square pi, a number   that has seen limited exposure in traditional texts but is widely   used in computer science.  It is thus appropriate to publish a few   related notes on square pi in order to assist users of square   addresses on its correct usage.   While traditional pi or round pi is an irrational number, it can be   rounded off to 3.14 or 3.14159; it has an incomprehensible number of   decimals, which is quite inappropriate for a round number, but as we   keep rounding it to fit our needs, we keep rationalizing it from its   irrational behavior.   The radius of an object is the closest to the center of the object   you get.  The circumference is the radius times 2 pi.  The diameter   is the shortest distance across the object, which is thus the radius   times 2.  The area is pi times the square of radius.   For a round circle, the radius is from the center to anywhere on the   circumference.  For a square circle, the radius only reaches the   circumference on the four points located closest to the center.   These are typically oriented such that the real and imaginary axis   goes through them, which is helpful in calculations, and no rotation   symmetries need to be considered.   The square pi fills the same purpose as the round pi, but rather than   being adapted to round objects, it is adapted to square objects.  For   a square circle, the math is exactly the same as for round circles,   provided that the square pi is used with square circles and that   round pi is used with round circles.   The value of square pi is 4.   The value of square pi adapts really well to the way that computers   calculate, which is also why computer results often are represented   in square numbers, providing a bit of a square feeling.  It should be   noted that the square root of pi is often used, and the square root   of square pi is naturally 2, which is very easy to handle in   calculations and effectively reduces the risk of irrational numbers.   Please note that the square pi should not be confused with the   Indiana Pi Bill [pibill], which does not discuss the square pi but a   failed attempt to do square calculation of the area and circumference   of a round circle using traditional tools like rulers and compasses.Danielson & Nilsson           Experimental                     [Page 13]

RFC 8135               Complex Addressing in IPv6           1 April 2017Appendix B.  Implementation Example   The following is a simple implementation example to illustrate how   some core concepts can be implemented in <complex.h> (as defined in   ISO C99 [C99]).   #include <complex.h>   #include <math.h>   #include <stdio.h>   // Define type for complex address   typedef complex ca;   // Create complex address   ca ca_create_complex_address(double real_address,           double imaginary_address)   {           return real_address + I * imaginary_address;   }   // Get real address   double  ca_get_real_address(ca ca_val)   {           return creal(ca_val);   }   // Get imaginary address   double  ca_get_imaginary_address(ca ca_val)   {           return cimag(ca_val);   }   // Get complex address   complex ca_get_complex_address(ca ca_val)   {           return ca_val;   }   // Get floating address   double  ca_get_floating_address(ca ca_val)   {           return creal(ca_val);   }   // Get physical address   double  ca_get_physical_address(ca ca_val)   {           return cimag(ca_val);Danielson & Nilsson           Experimental                     [Page 14]

RFC 8135               Complex Addressing in IPv6           1 April 2017   }   // Get absolute address   double  ca_get_absolute_address(ca ca_val)   {           return cabs(ca_val);   }   // Get address argument   double  ca_get_address_argument(ca ca_val)   {           return carg(ca_val)*360/(2*M_PI);   }   int main()   {           ca ca1, ca2;           ca1 = ca_create_complex_address(1.0, 0.0);           printf("The complex address (%f,%f)\n",                   creal(ca1), cimag(ca1));           printf("has the real address %f and imaginary address %f\n",                   ca_get_real_address(ca1),                   ca_get_imaginary_address(ca1));           printf("This represents the floating address %e and \   physical address %f\n", \                   ca_get_floating_address(ca1),                   ca_get_physical_address(ca1));           ca2 = ca_create_complex_address(0.0, 1.0);           printf("The complex address (%f,%f)\n",                   creal(ca2), cimag(ca2));           printf("This represents the absolute address %f\n",                   ca_get_absolute_address(ca2));           printf("The address argument resolution is %f\n",                   ca_get_address_argument(ca2));           return 0;   }Danielson & Nilsson           Experimental                     [Page 15]

RFC 8135               Complex Addressing in IPv6           1 April 2017Authors' Addresses   Magnus Danielson   Net Insight AB   Vastberga Alle 9   Hagersten  12630   Sweden   Email: magda@netinsight.net   Mans Nilsson   Besserwisser Networks   Email: mansaxel@besserwisser.orgDanielson & Nilsson           Experimental                     [Page 16]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp