Movatterモバイル変換
[0]ホーム
[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Errata] [Info page]
PROPOSED STANDARD
Errata ExistInternet Engineering Task Force (IETF) B. Niven-JenkinsRequest for Comments: 8006 R. MurrayCategory: Standards Track NokiaISSN: 2070-1721 M. Caulfield Cisco Systems K. Ma Ericsson December 2016Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI) MetadataAbstract The Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI) Metadata interface enables interconnected Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) to exchange content distribution metadata in order to enable content acquisition and delivery. The CDNI Metadata associated with a piece of content provides a downstream CDN with sufficient information for the downstream CDN to service content requests on behalf of an upstream CDN. This document describes both a base set of CDNI Metadata and the protocol for exchanging that metadata.Status of This Memo This is an Internet Standards Track document. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available inSection 2 of RFC 7841. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained athttp://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8006.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject toBCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016Table of Contents1. Introduction ....................................................51.1. Terminology ................................................51.2. Supported Metadata Capabilities ............................62. Design Principles ...............................................73. CDNI Metadata Object Model ......................................8 3.1. HostIndex, HostMatch, HostMetadata, PathMatch, PatternMatch, and PathMetadata Objects .....................93.2. Generic CDNI Metadata Objects .............................113.3. Metadata Inheritance and Override .........................144. CDNI Metadata Objects ..........................................154.1. Definitions of the CDNI Structural Metadata Objects .......164.1.1. HostIndex ..........................................164.1.2. HostMatch ..........................................174.1.3. HostMetadata .......................................184.1.4. PathMatch ..........................................194.1.5. PatternMatch .......................................204.1.6. PathMetadata .......................................214.1.7. GenericMetadata ....................................23 4.2. Definitions of the Initial Set of CDNI GenericMetadata Objects ...................................244.2.1. SourceMetadata .....................................244.2.1.1. Source ....................................254.2.2. LocationACL Metadata ...............................264.2.2.1. LocationRule ..............................284.2.2.2. Footprint .................................294.2.3. TimeWindowACL ......................................304.2.3.1. TimeWindowRule ............................314.2.3.2. TimeWindow ................................324.2.4. ProtocolACL Metadata ...............................334.2.4.1. ProtocolRule ..............................344.2.5. DeliveryAuthorization Metadata .....................354.2.6. Cache ..............................................354.2.7. Auth ...............................................374.2.8. Grouping ...........................................384.3. CDNI Metadata Simple Data Type Descriptions ...............394.3.1. Link ...............................................394.3.1.1. Link Loop Prevention ......................404.3.2. Protocol ...........................................404.3.3. Endpoint ...........................................404.3.4. Time ...............................................414.3.5. IPv4CIDR ...........................................414.3.6. IPv6CIDR ...........................................424.3.7. ASN ................................................424.3.8. Country Code .......................................425. CDNI Metadata Capabilities .....................................42Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 20166. CDNI Metadata Interface ........................................436.1. Transport .................................................446.2. Retrieval of CDNI Metadata Resources ......................446.3. Bootstrapping .............................................456.4. Encoding ..................................................466.5. Extensibility .............................................466.6. Metadata Enforcement ......................................476.7. Metadata Conflicts ........................................476.8. Versioning ................................................486.9. Media Types ...............................................496.10. Complete CDNI Metadata Example ...........................507. IANA Considerations ............................................547.1. CDNI Payload Types ........................................547.1.1. CDNI MI HostIndex Payload Type .....................547.1.2. CDNI MI HostMatch Payload Type .....................557.1.3. CDNI MI HostMetadata Payload Type ..................557.1.4. CDNI MI PathMatch Payload Type .....................557.1.5. CDNI MI PatternMatch Payload Type ..................557.1.6. CDNI MI PathMetadata Payload Type ..................557.1.7. CDNI MI SourceMetadata Payload Type ................567.1.8. CDNI MI Source Payload Type ........................567.1.9. CDNI MI LocationACL Payload Type ...................567.1.10. CDNI MI LocationRule Payload Type .................567.1.11. CDNI MI Footprint Payload Type ....................567.1.12. CDNI MI TimeWindowACL Payload Type ................577.1.13. CDNI MI TimeWindowRule Payload Type ...............577.1.14. CDNI MI TimeWindow Payload Type ...................577.1.15. CDNI MI ProtocolACL Payload Type ..................577.1.16. CDNI MI ProtocolRule Payload Type .................577.1.17. CDNI MI DeliveryAuthorization Payload Type ........587.1.18. CDNI MI Cache Payload Type ........................587.1.19. CDNI MI Auth Payload Type .........................587.1.20. CDNI MI Grouping Payload Type .....................587.2. "CDNI Metadata Footprint Types" Registry ..................587.3. "CDNI Metadata Protocol Types" Registry ...................598. Security Considerations ........................................608.1. Authentication and Integrity ..............................608.2. Confidentiality and Privacy ...............................608.3. Securing the CDNI Metadata Interface ......................619. References .....................................................629.1. Normative References ......................................629.2. Informative References ....................................63 Acknowledgments ...................................................65 Contributors ......................................................65 Authors' Addresses ................................................66Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 20161. Introduction Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI) [RFC6707] enables a downstream Content Delivery Network (dCDN) to service content requests on behalf of an upstream CDN (uCDN). The CDNI Metadata interface (MI) is discussed in [RFC7336] along with four other interfaces that can be used to compose a CDNI solution (the CDNI Control interface, the CDNI Request Routing Redirection interface, the CDNI Footprint & Capabilities Advertisement interface (FCI), and the CDNI Logging interface). [RFC7336] describes each interface and the relationships between them. The requirements for the CDNI Metadata interface are specified in [RFC7337]. The CDNI Metadata associated with a piece of content (or with a set of content) provides a dCDN with sufficient information for servicing content requests on behalf of a uCDN, in accordance with the policies defined by the uCDN. This document defines a CDNI Metadata interface that enables a dCDN to obtain CDNI Metadata from a uCDN so that the dCDN can properly process and respond to: o Redirection requests received over the CDNI Request Routing Redirection interface [RFC7975]. o Content requests received directly from User Agents. Specifically, this document defines: o A data structure for mapping content requests and redirection requests to CDNI Metadata objects (Sections3 and4.1). o An initial set of CDNI GenericMetadata objects (Section 4.2). o An HTTP web service for the transfer of CDNI Metadata (Section 6).1.1. Terminology This document reuses the terminology defined in [RFC6707]. Additionally, the following terms are used throughout this document and are defined as follows: o Object - a collection of properties. o Property - a key and value pair where the key is a property name and the value is the property value or another object.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 This document uses the phrase "[Object] A contains [Object] B" for simplicity when a strictly accurate phrase would be "[Object] A contains or references (via a Link object) [Object] B". The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].1.2. Supported Metadata Capabilities Only the metadata for a small set of initial capabilities is specified in this document. This set provides the minimum amount of metadata for basic CDN interoperability while still meeting the requirements set forth by [RFC7337]. The following high-level functionality can be configured via the CDNI Metadata objects specified inSection 4: o Acquisition Source: Metadata for allowing a dCDN to fetch content from a uCDN. o Delivery Access Control: Metadata for restricting (or permitting) access to content based on any of the following factors: * Location * Time window * Delivery protocol o Delivery Authorization: Metadata for authorizing dCDN User Agent requests. o Cache Control: Metadata for controlling cache behavior of the dCDN. The metadata encoding described by this document is extensible in order to allow for future additions to this list. The set of metadata specified in this document covers the initial capabilities above. It is only intended to support CDNI for the delivery of content by a dCDN using HTTP/1.1 [RFC7230] and for a dCDN to be able to acquire content from a uCDN using either HTTP/1.1 or HTTP/1.1 over Transport Layer Security (TLS) [RFC2818].Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 Supporting CDNI for the delivery of content using unencrypted HTTP/2 [RFC7540] (as well as for a dCDN to acquire content using unencrypted HTTP/2 or HTTP/2 over TLS) requires the registration of these protocol names in the "CDNI Metadata Protocol Types" registry (Section 7.3). Delivery of content using HTTP/1.1 over TLS or HTTP/2 over TLS SHOULD follow the guidelines set forth in [RFC7525]. Offline configuration of TLS parameters between CDNs is beyond the scope of this document.2. Design Principles The CDNI Metadata interface was designed to achieve the following objectives: 1. Cacheability of CDNI Metadata objects; 2. Deterministic mapping from redirection requests and content requests to CDNI Metadata properties; 3. Support for DNS redirection as well as application-specific redirection (for example, HTTP redirection); 4. Minimal duplication of CDNI Metadata; and 5. Leveraging of existing protocols. Cacheability can decrease the latency of acquiring metadata while maintaining its freshness and can therefore decrease the latency of serving content requests and redirection requests, without sacrificing accuracy. The CDNI Metadata interface uses HTTP and its existing caching mechanisms to achieve CDNI Metadata cacheability. Deterministic mapping from content to metadata properties eliminates ambiguity and ensures that policies are applied consistently by all dCDNs. Support for both HTTP and DNS redirection ensures that the CDNI Metadata meets the same design principles for both HTTP-based and DNS-based redirection schemes. Minimal duplication of CDNI Metadata improves storage efficiency in the CDNs. Leveraging existing protocols avoids reinventing common mechanisms such as data structure encoding (by leveraging I-JSON (Internet JSON) [RFC7493]) and data transport (by leveraging HTTP [RFC7230]).Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 20163. CDNI Metadata Object Model The CDNI Metadata object model describes a data structure for mapping redirection requests and content requests to metadata properties. Metadata properties describe how to acquire content from a uCDN, authorize access to content, and deliver content from a dCDN. The object model relies on the assumption that these metadata properties can be grouped based on the hostname of the content and subsequently on the resource path (URI) of the content. The object model associates a set of CDNI Metadata properties with a hostname to form a default set of metadata properties for content delivered on behalf of that hostname. That default set of metadata properties can be overridden by properties that apply to specific paths within a URI. Different hostnames and URI paths will be associated with different sets of CDNI Metadata properties in order to describe the required behavior when a dCDN Surrogate or request router is processing User Agent requests for content at that hostname and URI path. As a result of this structure, significant commonality could exist between the CDNI Metadata properties specified for different hostnames, different URI paths within a hostname, and different URI paths on different hostnames. For example, the definition of which User Agent IP addresses should be grouped together into a single network or geographic location is likely to be common for a number of different hostnames; although a uCDN is likely to have several different policies configured to express geo-blocking rules, it is likely that a single geo-blocking policy could be applied to multiple hostnames delivered through the CDN. In order to enable the CDNI Metadata for a given hostname and URI path to be decomposed into reusable sets of CDNI Metadata properties, the CDNI Metadata interface splits the CDNI Metadata into separate objects. Efficiency is improved by enabling a single CDNI Metadata object (that is shared across hostnames and/or URI paths) to be retrieved and stored by a dCDN once, even if it is referenced by the CDNI Metadata for multiple hostnames and/or URI paths. Important Note: Any CDNI Metadata object A that contains another CDNI Metadata object B can include a Link object specifying a URI that can be used to retrieve object B, instead of embedding object B within object A. The remainder of this document uses the phrase "[Object] A contains [Object] B" for simplicity when a strictly accurate phrase would be "[Object] A contains or references (via a Link object) [Object] B". It is generally a deployment choice for the uCDN implementation to decide when to embed CDNI Metadata objects and when to reference separate resources via Link objects.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016Section 3.1 introduces a high-level description of the HostIndex, HostMatch, HostMetadata, PathMatch, PatternMatch, and PathMetadata objects, and describes the relationships between them.Section 3.2 introduces a high-level description of the CDNI GenericMetadata object, which represents the level at which CDNI Metadata override occurs between HostMetadata and PathMetadata objects.Section 4 describes in detail the specific CDNI Metadata objects and properties specified by this document that can be contained within a CDNI GenericMetadata object.3.1. HostIndex, HostMatch, HostMetadata, PathMatch, PatternMatch, and PathMetadata Objects The relationships between the HostIndex, HostMatch, HostMetadata, PathMatch, PatternMatch, and PathMetadata objects are described in Figure 1. +---------+ +---------+ +------------+ |HostIndex+-(*)->|HostMatch+-(1)->|HostMetadata+-------(*)------+ +---------+ +---------+ +------+-----+ | | | (*) | | V --> Contains or references V ***************** (1) One and only one +---------+ *GenericMetadata* (*) Zero or more +--->|PathMatch| * Objects * | +----+---++ ***************** | | | ^ (*) (1) (1) +------------+ | | | +->|PatternMatch| | | V +------------+ | | +------------+ | +--+PathMetadata+-------(*)------+ +------------+ Figure 1: Relationships between CDNI Metadata Objects (Diagram Representation) A HostIndex object (seeSection 4.1.1) contains an array of HostMatch objects (seeSection 4.1.2) that contain hostnames (and/or IP addresses) for which content requests might be delegated to the dCDN. The HostIndex is the starting point for accessing the uCDN CDNI Metadata data store. It enables the dCDN to deterministically discover which CDNI Metadata objects it requires in order to deliver a given piece of content.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 The HostIndex links hostnames (and/or IP addresses) to HostMetadata objects (seeSection 4.1.3) via HostMatch objects. A HostMatch object defines a hostname (or IP address) to match against a requested host and contains a HostMetadata object. HostMetadata objects contain the default GenericMetadata objects (seeSection 4.1.7) required to serve content for that host. When looking up CDNI Metadata, the dCDN looks up the requested hostname (or IP address) against the HostMatch entries in the HostIndex; from there, it can find HostMetadata, which describes the default metadata properties for each host as well as PathMetadata objects (seeSection 4.1.6), via PathMatch objects (seeSection 4.1.4). PathMatch objects define patterns, contained inside PatternMatch objects (seeSection 4.1.5), to match against the requested URI path. PatternMatch objects contain the pattern strings and flags that describe the URI path to which a PathMatch applies. PathMetadata objects contain the GenericMetadata objects that apply to content requests matching the defined URI path pattern. PathMetadata properties override properties previously defined in HostMetadata or less-specific PathMatch paths. PathMetadata objects can contain additional PathMatch objects to recursively define more-specific URI paths to which GenericMetadata properties might be applied. A GenericMetadata object contains individual CDNI Metadata objects that define the specific policies and attributes needed to properly deliver the associated content. For example, a GenericMetadata object could describe the source from which a CDN can acquire a piece of content. The GenericMetadata object is an atomic unit that can be referenced by HostMetadata or PathMetadata objects. For example, if "example.com" is a content provider, a HostMatch object could include an entry for "example.com" with the URI of the associated HostMetadata object. The HostMetadata object for "example.com" describes the metadata properties that apply to "example.com" and could contain PathMatches for "example.com/movies/*" and "example.com/music/*", which in turn reference corresponding PathMetadata objects that contain the properties for those more-specific URI paths. The PathMetadata object for "example.com/movies/*" describes the properties that apply to that URI path. It could also contain a PathMatch object for "example.com/movies/hd/*", which would reference the corresponding PathMetadata object for the "example.com/movies/hd/" path prefix.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 The relationships in Figure 1 are also represented in tabular format in Table 1 below. +--------------+----------------------------------------------------+ | Data Object | Objects it contains or references | +--------------+----------------------------------------------------+ | HostIndex | 0 or more HostMatch objects. | | | | | HostMatch | 1 HostMetadata object. | | | | | HostMetadata | 0 or more PathMatch objects. 0 or more | | | GenericMetadata objects. | | | | | PathMatch | 1 PatternMatch object. 1 PathMetadata object. | | | | | PatternMatch | Does not contain or reference any other objects. | | | | | PathMetadata | 0 or more PathMatch objects. 0 or more | | | GenericMetadata objects. | +--------------+----------------------------------------------------+ Table 1: Relationships between CDNI Metadata Objects (Table Representation)3.2. Generic CDNI Metadata Objects The HostMetadata and PathMetadata objects contain other CDNI Metadata objects that contain properties that describe how User Agent requests for content should be processed -- for example, where to acquire the content from, authorization rules that should be applied, geo-blocking restrictions, and so on. Each such CDNI Metadata object is a specialization of a CDNI GenericMetadata object. The GenericMetadata object abstracts the basic information required for metadata override and metadata distribution, from the specifics of any given property (i.e., property semantics, enforcement options, etc.). The GenericMetadata object defines the properties contained within it as well as whether or not the properties are "mandatory-to-enforce". If the dCDN does not understand or support a mandatory-to-enforce property, the dCDN MUST NOT serve the content. If the property is not mandatory-to-enforce, then that GenericMetadata object can be safely ignored and the content request can be processed in accordance with the rest of the CDNI Metadata.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 11]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 Although a CDN MUST NOT serve content to a User Agent if a mandatory-to-enforce property cannot be enforced, it could still be safe to redistribute that metadata (the "safe-to-redistribute" property) to another CDN without modification. For example, in the cascaded CDN case, a transit CDN (tCDN) could convey mandatory-to-enforce metadata to a dCDN. For metadata that does not require customization or translation (i.e., metadata that is safe-to-redistribute), the data representation received off the wire MAY be stored and redistributed without being understood or supported by the tCDN. However, for metadata that requires translation, transparent redistribution of the uCDN metadata values might not be appropriate. Certain metadata can be safely, though perhaps not optimally, redistributed unmodified. For example, a source acquisition address might not be optimal if transparently redistributed, but it might still work. Redistribution safety MUST be specified for each GenericMetadata property. If a CDN does not understand or support a given GenericMetadata property that is not safe-to-redistribute, the CDN MUST set the "incomprehensible" flag to true for that GenericMetadata object before redistributing the metadata. The "incomprehensible" flag signals to a dCDN that the metadata was not properly transformed by the tCDN. A CDN MUST NOT attempt to use metadata that has been marked as "incomprehensible" by a uCDN. tCDNs MUST NOT change the value of mandatory-to-enforce or safe-to-redistribute when propagating metadata to a dCDN. Although a tCDN can set the value of "incomprehensible" to true, a tCDN MUST NOT change the value of "incomprehensible" from true to false.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 12]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 Table 2 describes the action to be taken by a tCDN for the different combinations of mandatory-to-enforce ("MtE") and safe-to-redistribute ("StR") properties when the tCDN either does or does not understand the metadata in question: +-------+-------+------------+--------------------------------------+ | MtE | StR | Metadata | Action | | | | Understood | | | | | by tCDN | | +-------+-------+------------+--------------------------------------+ | False | True | True | Can serve and redistribute. | | | | | | | False | True | False | Can serve and redistribute. | | | | | | | False | False | False | Can serve. MUST set | | | | | "incomprehensible" to true when | | | | | redistributing. | | | | | | | False | False | True | Can serve. Can redistribute after | | | | | transforming the metadata (if the | | | | | CDN knows how to do so safely); | | | | | otherwise, MUST set | | | | | "incomprehensible" to true when | | | | | redistributing. | | | | | | | True | True | True | Can serve and redistribute. | | | | | | | True | True | False | MUST NOT serve but can redistribute. | | | | | | | True | False | True | Can serve. Can redistribute after | | | | | transforming the metadata (if the | | | | | CDN knows how to do so safely); | | | | | otherwise, MUST set | | | | | "incomprehensible" to true when | | | | | redistributing. | | | | | | | True | False | False | MUST NOT serve. MUST set | | | | | "incomprehensible" to true when | | | | | redistributing. | +-------+-------+------------+--------------------------------------+ Table 2: Action to Be Taken by a tCDN for the Different Combinations of MtE and StR PropertiesNiven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 13]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 Table 3 describes the action to be taken by a dCDN for the different combinations of mandatory-to-enforce and "incomprehensible" (Incomp) properties, when the dCDN either does or does not understand the metadata in question: +-------+--------+--------------+-----------------------------------+ | MtE | Incomp | Metadata | Action | | | | Understood | | | | | by dCDN | | +-------+--------+--------------+-----------------------------------+ | False | False | True | Can serve. | | | | | | | False | True | True | Can serve but MUST NOT | | | | | interpret/apply any metadata | | | | | marked as "incomprehensible". | | | | | | | False | False | False | Can serve. | | | | | | | False | True | False | Can serve but MUST NOT | | | | | interpret/apply any metadata | | | | | marked as "incomprehensible". | | | | | | | True | False | True | Can serve. | | | | | | | True | True | True | MUST NOT serve. | | | | | | | True | False | False | MUST NOT serve. | | | | | | | True | True | False | MUST NOT serve. | +-------+--------+--------------+-----------------------------------+ Table 3: Action to Be Taken by a dCDN for the Different Combinations of MtE and Incomp Properties3.3. Metadata Inheritance and Override In the metadata object model, a HostMetadata object can contain multiple PathMetadata objects (via PathMatch objects). Each PathMetadata object can in turn contain other PathMetadata objects. HostMetadata and PathMetadata objects form an inheritance tree where each node in the tree inherits or overrides the property values set by its parent. GenericMetadata objects of a given type override all GenericMetadata objects of the same type previously defined by any parent object in the tree. GenericMetadata objects of a given type previously defined by a parent object in the tree are inherited when no object of the same type is defined by the child object. For example, ifNiven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 14]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 HostMetadata for the host "example.com" contains GenericMetadata objects of types LocationACL and TimeWindowACL (where "ACL" means "Access Control List") while a PathMetadata object that applies to "example.com/movies/*" defines an alternate GenericMetadata object of type TimeWindowACL, then: o The TimeWindowACL defined in the PathMetadata would override the TimeWindowACL defined in the HostMetadata for all User Agent requests for content under "example.com/movies/", and o The LocationACL defined in the HostMetadata would be inherited for all User Agent requests for content under "example.com/movies/". A single HostMetadata or PathMetadata object MUST NOT contain multiple GenericMetadata objects of the same type. If an array of GenericMetadata contains objects of duplicate types, the receiver MUST ignore all but the first object of each type.4. CDNI Metadata ObjectsSection 4.1 provides the definitions of each metadata object type introduced inSection 3. These metadata objects are described as structural metadata objects, as they provide the structure for host and URI path-based inheritance and identify which GenericMetadata objects apply to a given User Agent content request.Section 4.2 provides the definitions for a base set of core metadata objects that can be contained within a GenericMetadata object. These metadata objects govern how User Agent requests for content are handled. GenericMetadata objects can contain other GenericMetadata objects as properties; these can be referred to as sub-objects. As with all CDNI Metadata objects, the value of the GenericMetadata sub-objects can be either a complete serialized representation of the sub-object or a Link object that contains a URI that can be dereferenced to retrieve the complete serialized representation of the property sub-object.Section 6.5 discusses the ability to extend the base set of GenericMetadata objects specified in this document with additional standards-based or vendor-specific GenericMetadata objects that might be defined in the future in separate documents. dCDNs and tCDNs MUST support the parsing of all CDNI Metadata objects specified in this document. A dCDN does not have to implement the underlying functionality represented by non-structural GenericMetadata objects (though that might restrict the content that a given dCDN will be able to serve). uCDNs as generators of CDNI Metadata only need to support generating the CDNI Metadata that theyNiven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 15]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 need in order to express the policies required by the content they are describing. SeeSection 6.4 for more details on the specific encoding rules for CDNI Metadata objects. Note: In the following sections, the term "mandatory-to-specify" is used to convey which properties MUST be included for a given structural or GenericMetadata object. When mandatory-to-specify is specified as "Yes" for an individual property, it means that if the object containing that property is included in a metadata response, then the mandatory-to-specify property MUST also be included (directly or by reference) in the response. For example, a HostMatch property object without a host to match against does not make sense; therefore, the "host" property is mandatory-to-specify inside a HostMatch object.4.1. Definitions of the CDNI Structural Metadata Objects The subsections below describe the structural objects introduced inSection 3.1.4.1.1. HostIndex The HostIndex object is the entry point into the CDNI Metadata hierarchy. It contains an array of HostMatch objects. An incoming content request is checked against the hostname (or IP address) specified by each of the listed HostMatch objects to find the HostMatch object that applies to the request. Property: hosts Description: Array of HostMatch objects. Hosts (HostMatch objects) MUST be evaluated in the order they appear, and the first HostMatch object that matches the content request being processed MUST be used. Type: Array of HostMatch objects Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 16]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 Example HostIndex object containing two HostMatch objects, where the first HostMatch object is embedded and the second HostMatch object is referenced: { "hosts": [ { <Properties of embedded HostMatch object> }, { "type": "MI.HostMatch", "href": "https://metadata.ucdn.example/hostmatch1234" } ] }4.1.2. HostMatch The HostMatch object contains a hostname or IP address to match against content requests. The HostMatch object also contains a HostMetadata object to apply if a match is found. Property: host Description: Hostname or IP address and optional port to match against the requested host, i.e., the host and port as described in [RFC3986]. In order for a hostname or IP address in a content request to match the hostname or IP address in the "host" property, the value from the content request when converted to lowercase MUST be identical to the value of the "host" property when converted to lowercase. All implementations MUST support IPv4 addresses encoded as specified by the "IPv4address" rule inSection 3.2.2 of [RFC3986]. IPv6 addresses MUST be encoded in one of the IPv6 address formats specified in [RFC5952], although receivers MUST support all IPv6 address formats specified in [RFC4291]. Hostnames MUST conform to the Domain Name System (DNS) syntax defined in [RFC1034] and [RFC1123]. Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) must first be transformed to the A-label form [RFC5890] as per [RFC5891]. Type: Endpoint Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 17]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 Property: host-metadata Description: CDNI Metadata to apply when delivering content that matches this host. Type: HostMetadata Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes. Example HostMatch object with an embedded HostMetadata object: { "host": "video.example.com", "host-metadata": { <Properties of embedded HostMetadata object> } } Example HostMatch object referencing (via a Link object; seeSection 4.3.1) a HostMetadata object: { "host": "video.example.com", "host-metadata": { "type": "MI.HostMetadata", "href": "https://metadata.ucdn.example/host1234" } }4.1.3. HostMetadata A HostMetadata object contains the CDNI Metadata properties for content served for a particular host (defined in the HostMatch object) and possibly child PathMatch objects. Property: metadata Description: Array of host-related metadata. Type: Array of GenericMetadata objects Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 18]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 Property: paths Description: Path-specific rules. Path patterns (PathMatch objects) MUST be evaluated in the order they appear, and the first (and only the first) PathMatch object that matches the content request being processed MUST be used. Type: Array of PathMatch objects Mandatory-to-Specify: No. Default is that there are no more-specific paths to evaluate (i.e., an empty list). Example HostMetadata object containing a number of embedded GenericMetadata objects that will describe the default metadata for the host and an embedded PathMatch object that contains a path for which metadata exists that overrides the default metadata for the host: { "metadata": [ { <Properties of first embedded GenericMetadata object> }, { <Properties of second embedded GenericMetadata object> }, ... { <Properties of Nth embedded GenericMetadata object> } ], "paths": [ { <Properties of embedded PathMatch object> } ] }4.1.4. PathMatch A PathMatch object contains a PatternMatch object with a path to match against a resource's URI path, as well as how to handle URI query parameters. The PathMatch object also contains a PathMetadata object with GenericMetadata to apply if the resource's URI matches the pattern within the PatternMatch object.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 19]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 Property: path-pattern Description: Pattern to match against the requested resource's URI. Type: PatternMatch Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes. Property: path-metadata Description: CDNI Metadata to apply when delivering content that matches the associated PatternMatch. Type: PathMetadata Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes. Example PathMatch object referencing the PathMetadata object to use for URIs that match the case-sensitive URI path pattern "/movies/*" (contained within an embedded PatternMatch object): { "path-pattern": { "pattern": "/movies/*", "case-sensitive": true }, "path-metadata": { "type": "MI.PathMetadata", "href": "https://metadata.ucdn.example/host1234/pathDCE" } }4.1.5. PatternMatch A PatternMatch object contains the pattern string and flags that describe the pattern expression. Property: pattern Description: A pattern for matching against the URI path, i.e., against the path-absolute [RFC3986]. The pattern can contain the wildcards "*" and "?", where "*" matches any sequence of pchar [RFC3986] or "/" characters (including the empty string) and "?" matches exactly one pchar character. The three literals "$", "*", and "?" MUST be escaped as "$$", "$*", and "$?" (where "$" is the designated escape character). All other characters are treated as literals.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 20]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 Type: String Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes. Property: case-sensitive Description: Flag indicating whether or not case-sensitive matching should be used. Note: Case insensitivity applies to ALPHA characters in the URI path prior to percent-decoding [RFC3986]. Type: Boolean Mandatory-to-Specify: No. Default is case-insensitive match (i.e., a value of False). Example PatternMatch object that matches the case-sensitive URI path pattern "/movies/*": { "pattern": "/movies/*", "case-sensitive": true }4.1.6. PathMetadata A PathMetadata object contains the CDNI Metadata properties for content requests that match against the associated URI path (defined in a PathMatch object). Note that if DNS-based redirection is employed, then a dCDN will be unable to evaluate any metadata at the PathMetadata level or below because only the hostname of the content request is available at Request Routing time. dCDNs SHOULD still process all PathMetadata for the host before responding to the redirection request to detect if any unsupported metadata is specified. If any metadata not supported by the dCDN is marked as mandatory-to-enforce, the dCDN SHOULD NOT accept the content redirection request, in order to avoid receiving content requests that it will not be able to satisfy/serve. Property: metadata Description: Array of path-related metadata. Type: Array of GenericMetadata objects Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 21]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 Property: paths Description: Path-specific rules. Path patterns (PathMatch objects) MUST be evaluated in the order they appear, and the first (and only the first) PathMatch object that matches the content request being processed MUST be used. Type: Array of PathMatch objects Mandatory-to-Specify: No. Default is that there are no more-specific paths to evaluate (i.e., an empty list). Example PathMetadata object containing a number of embedded GenericMetadata objects that describe the metadata to apply for the URI path defined in the parent PathMatch object, as well as a more-specific PathMatch object. { "metadata": [ { <Properties of first embedded GenericMetadata object> }, { <Properties of second embedded GenericMetadata object> }, ... { <Properties of Nth embedded GenericMetadata object> } ], "paths": [ { <Properties of embedded PathMatch object> } ] }Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 22]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 20164.1.7. GenericMetadata A GenericMetadata object is a wrapper for managing individual CDNI Metadata properties in an opaque manner. Property: generic-metadata-type Description: Case-insensitive CDNI Metadata object type. Type: String containing the CDNI Payload Type [RFC7736] of the object contained in the generic-metadata-value property (see Table 4). Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes. Property: generic-metadata-value Description: CDNI Metadata object. Type: Format/Type is defined by the value of the generic-metadata-type property above. Note: generic-metadata-values MUST NOT name any properties "href" (seeSection 4.3.1). Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes. Property: mandatory-to-enforce Description: Flag identifying whether or not the enforcement of the property metadata is required. Type: Boolean Mandatory-to-Specify: No. Default is to treat metadata as mandatory-to-enforce (i.e., a value of True). Property: safe-to-redistribute Description: Flag identifying whether or not the property metadata can be safely redistributed without modification. Type: Boolean Mandatory-to-Specify: No. Default is to allow transparent redistribution (i.e., a value of True).Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 23]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 Property: incomprehensible Description: Flag identifying whether or not any CDN in the chain of delegation has failed to understand and/or failed to properly transform this metadata object. Note: This flag only applies to metadata objects whose safe-to-redistribute property has a value of False. Type: Boolean Mandatory-to-Specify: No. Default is comprehensible (i.e., a value of False). Example GenericMetadata object containing a metadata object that applies to the applicable URI path and/or host (within a parent PathMetadata and/or HostMetadata object, respectively): { "mandatory-to-enforce": true, "safe-to-redistribute": true, "incomprehensible": false, "generic-metadata-type": <CDNI Payload Type of this metadata object>, "generic-metadata-value": { <Properties of this metadata object> } }4.2. Definitions of the Initial Set of CDNI GenericMetadata Objects The objects defined below are intended to be used in the GenericMetadata object's generic-metadata-value field as defined inSection 4.1.7, and their generic-metadata-type property MUST be set to the appropriate CDNI Payload Type as defined in Table 4.4.2.1. SourceMetadata Source metadata provides the dCDN with information about content acquisition, i.e., how to contact a uCDN Surrogate or an origin server to obtain the content to be served. The sources are not necessarily the actual origin servers operated by the Content Service Provider (CSP) but might be a set of Surrogates in the uCDN. Property: sources Description: Sources from which the dCDN can acquire content, listed in order of preference.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 24]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 Type: Array of Source objects (seeSection 4.2.1.1) Mandatory-to-Specify: No. Default is to use static configuration, out-of-band from the CDNI Metadata interface. Example SourceMetadata object (which contains two Source objects) that describes which servers the dCDN should use for acquiring content for the applicable URI path and/or host: { "generic-metadata-type": "MI.SourceMetadata", "generic-metadata-value": { "sources": [ { "endpoints": [ "a.service123.ucdn.example", "b.service123.ucdn.example" ], "protocol": "http/1.1" }, { "endpoints": ["origin.service123.example"], "protocol": "http/1.1" } ] } }4.2.1.1. Source A Source object describes the source to be used by the dCDN for content acquisition (e.g., a Surrogate within the uCDN or an alternate origin server), the protocol to be used, and any authentication method to be used when contacting that source. Endpoints within a Source object MUST be treated as equivalent/equal. A uCDN can specify an array of sources, ordered by preference, within a SourceMetadata object. Then, for each Source object ranked by preference, a uCDN can specify an array of endpoints that are equivalent (e.g., a pool of servers that are not behind a load balancer). Property: acquisition-auth Description: Authentication method to use when requesting content from this source.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 25]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 Type: Auth (seeSection 4.2.7) Mandatory-to-Specify: No. Default is no authentication required. Property: endpoints Description: Origins from which the dCDN can acquire content. If multiple endpoints are specified, they are all equal, i.e., the list is not ordered by preference. Type: Array of Endpoint objects (seeSection 4.3.3) Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes. Property: protocol Description: Network retrieval protocol to use when requesting content from this source. Type: Protocol (seeSection 4.3.2) Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes. Example Source object that describes a pair of endpoints (servers) the dCDN can use for acquiring content for the applicable host and/or URI path: { "endpoints": [ "a.service123.ucdn.example", "b.service123.ucdn.example" ], "protocol": "http/1.1" }4.2.2. LocationACL Metadata LocationACL metadata defines which locations a User Agent needs to be in, in order to be able to receive the associated content. A LocationACL that does not include a "locations" property results in an action of "allow all", meaning that delivery can be performed regardless of the User Agent's location; otherwise, a CDN MUST take the action from the first footprint to match against the User Agent's location. If two or more footprints overlap, the first footprint that matches against the User Agent's location determines the actionNiven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 26]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 a CDN MUST take. If the "locations" property is included but is empty or if none of the listed footprints match the User Agent's location, then the result is an action of "deny". Although the LocationACL, TimeWindowACL (seeSection 4.2.3), and ProtocolACL (seeSection 4.2.4) are independent GenericMetadata objects, they can provide conflicting information to a dCDN, e.g., a content request that is simultaneously allowed based on the LocationACL and denied based on the TimeWindowACL. The dCDN MUST use the logical AND of all ACLs (where "allow" is true and "deny" is false) to determine whether or not a request should be allowed. Property: locations Description: ACL that allows or denies (blocks) delivery based on the User Agent's location. Type: Array of LocationRule objects (seeSection 4.2.2.1) Mandatory-to-Specify: No. Default is to allow all locations. Example LocationACL object that allows the dCDN to deliver content to any location / IP address: { "generic-metadata-type": "MI.LocationACL", "generic-metadata-value": { } }Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 27]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 Example LocationACL object (which contains a LocationRule object that in turn contains a Footprint object) that only allows the dCDN to deliver content to User Agents in the USA: { "generic-metadata-type": "MI.LocationACL", "generic-metadata-value": { "locations": [ { "action": "allow", "footprints": [ { "footprint-type": "countrycode", "footprint-value": ["us"] } ] } ] } }4.2.2.1. LocationRule A LocationRule contains or references an array of Footprint objects and the corresponding action. Property: footprints Description: Array of footprints to which the rule applies. Type: Array of Footprint objects (seeSection 4.2.2.2) Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes. Property: action Description: Defines whether the rule specifies locations to allow or deny. Type: Enumeration [allow|deny] encoded as a lowercase string Mandatory-to-Specify: No. Default is "deny".Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 28]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 Example LocationRule object (which contains a Footprint object) that allows the dCDN to deliver content to clients in the USA: { "action": "allow", "footprints": [ { "footprint-type": "countrycode", "footprint-value": ["us"] } ] }4.2.2.2. Footprint A Footprint object describes the footprint to which a LocationRule can be applied, e.g., an IPv4 address range or a geographic location. Property: footprint-type Description: Registered footprint type (seeSection 7.2). The footprint types specified by this document are "ipv4cidr" (IPv4CIDR; seeSection 4.3.5), "ipv6cidr" (IPv6CIDR; seeSection 4.3.6), "asn" (Autonomous System Number; seeSection 4.3.7), and "countrycode" (Country Code; seeSection 4.3.8). Type: Lowercase string Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes. Property: footprint-value Description: Array of footprint values conforming to the specification associated with the registered footprint type. Footprint values can be simple strings (e.g., IPv4CIDR, IPv6CIDR, ASN, and Country Code); however, other Footprint objects can be defined in the future, along with a more complex encoding (e.g., GPS coordinate tuples). Type: Array of footprints Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 29]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 Example Footprint object describing a footprint covering the USA: { "footprint-type": "countrycode", "footprint-value": ["us"] } Example Footprint object describing a footprint covering the IP address ranges 192.0.2.0/24 and 198.51.100.0/24: { "footprint-type": "ipv4cidr", "footprint-value": ["192.0.2.0/24", "198.51.100.0/24"] } Example Footprint object describing a footprint covering the IP address ranges 2001:db8::/32: { "footprint-type": "ipv6cidr", "footprint-value": ["2001:db8::/32"] } Example Footprint object describing a footprint covering the autonomous system 64496: { "footprint-type": "asn", "footprint-value": ["as64496"] }4.2.3. TimeWindowACL TimeWindowACL metadata defines time-based restrictions. A TimeWindowACL that does not include a "times" property results in an action of "allow all", meaning that delivery can be performed regardless of the time of the User Agent's request; otherwise, a CDN MUST take the action from the first window to match against the current time. If two or more windows overlap, the first window that matches against the current time determines the action a CDN MUST take. If the "times" property is included but is empty or if none of the listed windows match the current time, then the result is an action of "deny". Although the LocationACL (seeSection 4.2.2), TimeWindowACL, and ProtocolACL (seeSection 4.2.4) are independent GenericMetadata objects, they can provide conflicting information to a dCDN, e.g.,Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 30]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 a content request that is simultaneously allowed based on the LocationACL and denied based on the TimeWindowACL. The dCDN MUST use the logical AND of all ACLs (where "allow" is true and "deny" is false) to determine whether or not a request should be allowed. Property: times Description: ACL that allows or denies (blocks) delivery based on the time of a User Agent's request. Type: Array of TimeWindowRule objects (seeSection 4.2.3.1) Mandatory-to-Specify: No. Default is to allow all time windows. Example TimeWindowACL object (which contains a TimeWindowRule object that in turn contains a TimeWindow object) that only allows the dCDN to deliver content to clients between 09:00 01/01/2000 UTC and 17:00 01/01/2000 UTC: { "generic-metadata-type": "MI.TimeWindowACL", "generic-metadata-value": { "times": [ { "action": "allow", "windows": [ { "start": 946717200, "end": 946746000 } ] } ] } }4.2.3.1. TimeWindowRule A TimeWindowRule contains or references an array of TimeWindow objects and the corresponding action. Property: windows Description: Array of time windows to which the rule applies. Type: Array of TimeWindow objects (seeSection 4.2.3.2)Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 31]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes. Property: action Description: Defines whether the rule specifies time windows to allow or deny. Type: Enumeration [allow|deny] encoded as a lowercase string Mandatory-to-Specify: No. Default is "deny". Example TimeWindowRule object (which contains a TimeWindow object) that only allows the dCDN to deliver content to clients between 09:00 01/01/2000 UTC and 17:00 01/01/2000 UTC: { "action": "allow", "windows": [ { "start": 946717200, "end": 946746000 } ] }4.2.3.2. TimeWindow A TimeWindow object describes a time range that can be applied by a TimeWindowACL, e.g., start 946717200 (i.e., 09:00 01/01/2000 UTC), end: 946746000 (i.e., 17:00 01/01/2000 UTC). Property: start Description: The start time of the window. Type: Time (seeSection 4.3.4) Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes. Property: end Description: The end time of the window. Type: Time (seeSection 4.3.4) Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 32]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 Example TimeWindow object that describes a time window from 09:00 01/01/2000 UTC to 17:00 01/01/2000 UTC: { "start": 946717200, "end": 946746000 }4.2.4. ProtocolACL Metadata ProtocolACL metadata defines delivery protocol restrictions. A ProtocolACL that does not include a protocol-acl property results in an action of "allow all", meaning that delivery can be performed regardless of the protocol in the User Agent's request; otherwise, a CDN MUST take the action from the first protocol to match against the request protocol. If two or more request protocols overlap, the first protocol that matches the request protocol determines the action a CDN MUST take. If the protocol-acl property is included but is empty or if none of the listed protocols match the request protocol, then the result is an action of "deny". Although the LocationACL (seeSection 4.2.2), TimeWindowACL (seeSection 4.2.3), and ProtocolACL are independent GenericMetadata objects, they can provide conflicting information to a dCDN, e.g., a content request that is simultaneously allowed based on the ProtocolACL and denied based on the TimeWindowACL. The dCDN MUST use the logical AND of all ACLs (where "allow" is true and "deny" is false) to determine whether or not a request should be allowed. Property: protocol-acl Description: ACL that allows or denies (blocks) delivery based on delivery protocol. Type: Array of ProtocolRule objects (seeSection 4.2.4.1) Mandatory-to-Specify: No. Default is to allow all protocols.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 33]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 Example ProtocolACL object (which contains a ProtocolRule object) that only allows the dCDN to deliver content using HTTP/1.1: { "generic-metadata-type": "MI.ProtocolACL", "generic-metadata-value": { "protocol-acl": [ { "action": "allow", "protocols": ["http/1.1"] } ] } }4.2.4.1. ProtocolRule A ProtocolRule contains or references an array of Protocol objects and the corresponding action. Property: protocols Description: Array of protocols to which the rule applies. Type: Array of Protocol objects (seeSection 4.3.2) Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes. Property: action Description: Defines whether the rule specifies protocols to allow or deny. Type: Enumeration [allow|deny] encoded as a lowercase string Mandatory-to-Specify: No. Default is "deny". Example ProtocolRule object (which contains a Protocol object) that allows the dCDN to deliver content using HTTP/1.1: { "action": "allow", "protocols": ["http/1.1"] }Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 34]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 20164.2.5. DeliveryAuthorization Metadata Delivery authorization defines authorization methods for the delivery of content to User Agents. Property: delivery-auth-methods Description: Options for authorizing content requests. Delivery for a content request is authorized if any one of the authorization methods in the list is satisfied for that request. Type: Array of Auth objects (seeSection 4.2.7) Mandatory-to-Specify: No. Default is no authorization required. Example DeliveryAuthorization object (which contains an Auth object): { "generic-metadata-type": "MI.DeliveryAuthorization", "generic-metadata-value": { "delivery-auth-methods": [ { "auth-type": <CDNI Payload Type of this Auth object>, "auth-value": { <Properties of this Auth object> } } ] } }4.2.6. Cache A Cache object describes the cache control parameters to be applied to the content by intermediate caches. Cache keys are generated from the URI of the content request [RFC7234]. In some cases, a CDN or content provider might want certain path segments or query parameters to be excluded from the cache key generation. The Cache object provides guidance on what parts of the path and query string to include.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 35]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 Property: exclude-path-pattern Description: A pattern for matching against the URI path, i.e., against the path-absolute [RFC3986]. The pattern can contain the wildcards "*" and "?", where "*" matches any sequence of pchar [RFC3986] or "/" characters (including the empty string) and "?" matches exactly one pchar character. The three literals "$", "*", and "?" MUST be escaped as "$$", "$*", and "$?" (where "$" is the designated escape character). All other characters are treated as literals. Cache key generation MUST only include the portion of the path-absolute that matches the wildcard portions of the pattern. Note: Inconsistency between the PatternMatch pattern (Section 4.1.5) and the exclude-path-pattern can result in inefficient caching. Type: String Mandatory-to-Specify: No. Default is to use the full URI path-absolute to generate the cache key. Property: include-query-strings Description: Allows a Surrogate to specify the URI query string parameters [RFC3986] to include when comparing the requested URI against the URIs in its cache for equivalence. Matching query parameters MUST be case insensitive. If all query parameters should be ignored, then the list MUST be specified and MUST be empty. If a query parameter appears multiple times in the query string, each instance value MUST be aggregated prior to comparison. For consistent cache key generation, query parameters SHOULD be evaluated in the order specified in this array. Type: Array of strings Mandatory-to-Specify: No. Default is to consider all query string parameters when comparing URIs. Example Cache object that instructs the dCDN to use the full URI path and ignore all query parameters: { "generic-metadata-type": "MI.Cache", "generic-metadata-value": { "include-query-strings": [] } }Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 36]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 Example Cache object that instructs the dCDN to exclude the "CDNX" path prefix and only include the (case-insensitive) query parameters named "mediaid" and "providerid": { "generic-metadata-type": "MI.Cache", "generic-metadata-value": { "exclude-path-pattern": "/CDNX/*", "include-query-strings": ["mediaid", "providerid"] } } Example Cache object that instructs the dCDN to exclude the "CDNX" path prefix but includes all query parameters: { "generic-metadata-type": "MI.Cache", "generic-metadata-value": { "exclude-path-pattern": "/CDNX/*" } }4.2.7. Auth An Auth object defines authentication and authorization methods to be used during content acquisition and content delivery, respectively. Note: This document does not define any Auth methods. Individual Auth methods are being defined separately (e.g., URI Signing [CDNI-URI-SIGNING]). The GenericMetadata object that contains Auth objects is defined herein for convenience and so as not to be specific to any particular Auth method. Property: auth-type Description: Auth type (The CDNI Payload Type [RFC7736] of the GenericMetadata object contained in the auth-value property). Type: String Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes. Property: auth-value Description: An object conforming to the specification associated with the Auth type.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 37]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 Type: GenericMetadata object Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes. Example Auth object: { "generic-metadata-type": "MI.Auth", "generic-metadata-value": { "auth-type": <CDNI Payload Type of this Auth object>, "auth-value": { <Properties of this Auth object> } } }4.2.8. Grouping A Grouping object identifies a group of content to which a given asset belongs. Property: ccid Description: Content Collection IDentifier for an application- specific purpose such as logging aggregation. Type: String Mandatory-to-Specify: No. Default is not to apply any grouping. Example Grouping object that specifies a Content Collection IDentifier for the content associated with the Grouping object's parent HostMetadata and PathMetadata: { "generic-metadata-type": "MI.Grouping", "generic-metadata-value": { "ccid": "ABCD" } }Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 38]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 20164.3. CDNI Metadata Simple Data Type Descriptions This section describes the simple data types that are used for properties of CDNI Metadata objects.4.3.1. Link A Link object can be used in place of any of the objects described above. Link objects can be used to avoid duplication if the same metadata information is repeated within the metadata tree. When a Link object replaces another object, its "href" property is set to the URI of the resource and its "type" property is set to the CDNI Payload Type of the object it is replacing. dCDNs can detect the presence of a Link object by detecting the presence of a property named "href" within the object. This means that GenericMetadata types MUST NOT contain a property named "href" because doing so would conflict with the ability for dCDNs to detect Link objects being used to reference a GenericMetadata object. Property: href Description: The URI of the addressable object being referenced. Type: String Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes. Property: type Description: The CDNI Payload Type of the object being referenced. Type: String Mandatory-to-Specify: No. If the container specifies the type (e.g., the HostIndex object contains an array of HostMatch objects, so a Link object in the list of HostMatch objects must reference a HostMatch), then it is not necessary to explicitly specify a type. Example Link object referencing a HostMatch object: { "type": "MI.HostMatch", "href": "https://metadata.ucdn.example/hostmatch1234" }Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 39]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 Example Link object referencing a HostMatch object, without an explicit type, inside a HostIndex object: { "hosts": [ { <Properties of embedded HostMatch object> }, { "href": "https://metadata.ucdn.example/hostmatch1234" } ] }4.3.1.1. Link Loop Prevention When following a link, CDNI Metadata clients SHOULD verify that the CDNI Payload Type of the object retrieved matches the expected CDNI Payload Type, as indicated by the Link object or containing property. For GenericMetadata objects, type checks will prevent self- references; however, incorrect linking can result in circular references for structural metadata objects, specifically PathMatch and PathMetadata objects (Figure 1). To prevent circular references, CDNI Metadata clients SHOULD verify that no duplicate links occur for PathMatch or PathMetadata objects.4.3.2. Protocol Protocol objects are used to specify protocols (from the "CDNI Metadata Protocol Types" registry; seeSection 7.3) for content acquisition or delivery. Type: String Example: "http/1.1"4.3.3. Endpoint A hostname (with optional port) or an IP address (with optional port). All implementations MUST support IPv4 addresses encoded as specified by the "IPv4address" rule inSection 3.2.2 of [RFC3986]. IPv6 addresses MUST be encoded in one of the IPv6 address formats specified in [RFC5952], although receivers MUST support all IPv6 address formats specified in [RFC4291]. Hostnames MUST conform toNiven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 40]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 the Domain Name System (DNS) syntax defined in [RFC1034] and [RFC1123]. Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) must first be transformed to the A-label form [RFC5890] as per [RFC5891]. Type: String Example hostname: "metadata.ucdn.example" Example IPv4 address: "192.0.2.1" Example IPv6 address (with port number): "[2001:db8::1]:81"4.3.4. Time A time value expressed in seconds since the UNIX epoch (i.e., zero hours, zero minutes, zero seconds, on January 1, 1970) Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) [POSIX]. Type: Integer Example time representing 09:00:00 01/01/2000 UTC: 9467172004.3.5. IPv4CIDR An IPv4address Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR) block encoded as specified by the "IPv4address" rule inSection 3.2.2 of [RFC3986] followed by a "/" followed by an unsigned integer representing the leading bits of the routing prefix (i.e., IPv4 CIDR notation). Single IP addresses can be expressed as /32. Type: String Example IPv4CIDR: "192.0.2.0/24"Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 41]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 20164.3.6. IPv6CIDR An IPv6address CIDR block encoded in one of the IPv6 address formats specified in [RFC5952] followed by a "/" followed by an unsigned integer representing the leading bits of the routing prefix (i.e., IPv6 CIDR notation). Single IP addresses can be expressed as /128. Type: String Example IPv6CIDR: "2001:db8::/32"4.3.7. ASN An ASN value encoded as a string consisting of the characters "as" (in lowercase) followed by the ASN [RFC6793]. Type: String Example ASN: "as64496"4.3.8. Country Code An ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 code [ISO3166-1] in lowercase. Type: String Example Country Code representing the USA: "us"5. CDNI Metadata Capabilities CDNI Metadata is used to convey information pertaining to content delivery from the uCDN to the dCDN. For optional metadata, it can be useful for the uCDN to know, prior to delegating any content requests to a given dCDN, if that dCDN supports the underlying functionality described by the metadata. If some metadata is mandatory-to-enforce and the dCDN does not support it, any delegated requests for content that requires that metadata will fail. The uCDN will likely want to avoid delegating those requests to that dCDN. Likewise, for any metadata that might be assigned optional values, it could be useful for the uCDN to know, prior to delegating any content requests to a given dCDN, which values that dCDN supports. If the optional value assigned to a given piece of content's metadata is not supported byNiven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 42]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 the dCDN, any delegated requests for that content can fail, so again the uCDN is likely to want to avoid delegating those requests to that dCDN. The CDNI Footprint & Capabilities Advertisement interface (FCI) provides a means of advertising capabilities from the dCDN to the uCDN [RFC8008]. Support for optional metadata types and values can be advertised using the FCI.6. CDNI Metadata Interface This section specifies an interface to enable a dCDN to retrieve CDNI Metadata objects from a uCDN. The interface can be used by a dCDN to retrieve CDNI Metadata objects in either of two ways: o Dynamically, as required by the dCDN to process received requests -- for example, in response to a query from a uCDN over the CDNI Request Routing Redirection interface (RI) [RFC7975] or in response to receiving a request for content from a User Agent. o In advance of being required -- for example, in the case of pre-positioned CDNI Metadata acquisition, initiated through the "CDNI Control interface / Triggers" (CI/T) interface [RFC8007]. The CDNI Metadata interface is built on the principles of HTTP web services. In particular, this means that requests and responses over the interface are built around the transfer of representations of hyperlinked resources. A resource in the context of the CDNI Metadata interface is any object in the object model (as described in Sections3 and4). CDNI Metadata servers (i.e., servers in the uCDN) are free to assign whatever structure they desire to the URIs for CDNI Metadata objects, and CDNI Metadata clients MUST NOT make any assumptions regarding the structure of CDNI Metadata URIs or the mapping between CDNI Metadata objects and their associated URIs. Any URIs present in the examples in this document are purely illustrative and are not intended to impose a definitive structure on CDNI Metadata interface implementations.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 43]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 20166.1. Transport The CDNI Metadata interface uses HTTP as the underlying protocol transport [RFC7230]. The HTTP method in the request defines the operation the request would like to perform. A server implementation of the CDNI Metadata interface MUST support the HTTP GET and HEAD methods. The corresponding HTTP response returns the status of the operation in the HTTP status code and returns the current representation of the resource (if appropriate) in the response body. HTTP responses that contain a response body SHOULD include an entity-tag (ETag) to enable validation of cached versions of returned resources. As the CDNI Metadata interface builds on top of HTTP, CDNI Metadata server implementations MAY make use of any HTTP feature when implementing the CDNI Metadata interface; for example, a CDNI Metadata server MAY make use of HTTP's caching mechanisms to indicate that the returned response/representation can be reused without re-contacting the CDNI Metadata server.6.2. Retrieval of CDNI Metadata Resources In the general case, a CDNI Metadata server makes CDNI Metadata objects available via unique URIs; thus, in order to retrieve CDNI Metadata, a CDNI Metadata client (i.e., a client in the dCDN) first makes an HTTP GET request for the URI of the HostIndex, which provides an array of hostnames for which the uCDN can delegate content delivery to the dCDN. In order to retrieve the CDNI Metadata for a particular request, the CDNI Metadata client processes the received HostIndex object and finds the corresponding HostMetadata entry (by matching the hostname in the request against the hostnames listed in the HostMatch objects). If the HostMetadata is linked (rather than embedded), the CDNI Metadata client then makes an HTTP GET request for the URI specified in the "href" property of the Link object, which points to the HostMetadata object itself. In order to retrieve the most specific metadata for a particular request, the CDNI Metadata client inspects the HostMetadata for references to more-specific PathMetadata objects (by matching the URI path in the request against the path-pattern property items in any PathMatch objects listed in the HostMetadata object). If a PathMetadata object is found to match (and is linked rather than embedded), the CDNI Metadata client makes another HTTP GET request for the PathMetadata. Each PathMetadata object can also includeNiven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 44]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 references to additional more-specific metadata. If this is the case, the CDNI Metadata client continues requesting PathMatch and PathMetadata objects recursively. The CDNI Metadata client repeats this approach of processing metadata objects and retrieving (via HTTP GETs) any linked objects until it has all the metadata objects it requires in order to process the redirection request from the uCDN or the content request from a User Agent. In cases where a dCDN is not able to retrieve the entire set of CDNI Metadata associated with a User Agent request, or it has retrieved that metadata but it is stale according to standard HTTP caching rules and cannot be revalidated -- for example, because the uCDN is unreachable or returns an HTTP 4xx or 5xx status in response to some or all of the dCDN's CDNI Metadata requests -- the dCDN MUST NOT serve the requested content. Where a dCDN is interconnected with multiple uCDNs, the dCDN needs to determine which uCDN's CDNI Metadata interface should be used to handle a particular User Agent request. When HTTP redirection (e.g., HTTP 302 redirects) is being used between CDNs, it is expected that the dCDN will be able to determine the uCDN that redirected a particular request from information contained in the received request (e.g., via the URI). With knowledge of which uCDN routed the request, the dCDN can choose the correct uCDN from which to obtain the HostIndex. Note that the HostIndexes served by each uCDN can be unique. In the case of DNS redirection, there is not always sufficient information carried in the DNS request from User Agents to determine the uCDN that redirected a particular request (e.g., when content from a given host is redirected to a given dCDN by more than one uCDN); therefore, dCDNs will have to apply local policy when deciding which uCDN's CDNI Metadata interface to use.6.3. Bootstrapping The URI for the HostIndex object of a given uCDN needs to be configured in the dCDN. All other objects/resources are then discoverable from the HostIndex object by following any links in the HostIndex object, and through the referenced HostMetadata and PathMetadata objects and their GenericMetadata sub-objects. Manual configuration of the URI for the HostIndex object is outside the scope of this document.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 45]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 20166.4. Encoding CDNI Metadata objects MUST be encoded as I-JSON objects [RFC7493] containing a dictionary of (key,value) pairs where the keys are the property names and the values are the associated property values. The keys of the dictionary are the names of the properties associated with the object and are therefore dependent on the specific object being encoded (i.e., dependent on the CDNI Payload Type of the returned resource). Likewise, the values associated with each property (dictionary key) are dependent on the specific object being encoded (i.e., dependent on the CDNI Payload Type of the returned resource). Dictionary keys (properties) in I-JSON are case sensitive. By convention, any dictionary key (property) defined by this document (for example, the names of CDNI Metadata object properties) MUST be lowercase.6.5. Extensibility The set of GenericMetadata objects can be extended with additional (standards-based or vendor-specific) metadata objects through the specification of new GenericMetadata objects. The GenericMetadata object defined inSection 4.1.7 specifies a type field and a type- specific value field that allow any metadata to be included in either the HostMetadata or PathMetadata arrays. As with the initial GenericMetadata types defined inSection 4.2, future GenericMetadata types MUST specify the information necessary for constructing and decoding the GenericMetadata object. Any document that defines a new GenericMetadata type MUST: 1. Register the CDNI Payload Type [RFC7736] used to identify the new GenericMetadata type being specified. 2. Define the set of properties associated with the new GenericMetadata object. GenericMetadata MUST NOT contain a property named "href" because doing so would conflict with the ability to detect Link objects (seeSection 4.3.1). 3. For each property, define a name, description, type, and whether or not the property is mandatory-to-specify. 4. Describe the semantics of the new type, including its purpose, and provide a use case to which it applies, including an example encoded in I-JSON.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 46]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 5. Describe the security and privacy consequences, for both the User Agent and the CDNs, of the new GenericMetadata object. 6. Describe any relation to, conflict with, or obsolescence of other existing CDNI Metadata objects. Note: In the case of vendor-specific extensions, vendor-identifying CDNI Payload Type names will decrease the possibility of GenericMetadata type collisions. It is RECOMMENDED that any vendor-specific extensions use vendor-identifying CDNI Payload Type names.6.6. Metadata Enforcement At any given time, the set of GenericMetadata types supported by the uCDN might not match the set of GenericMetadata types supported by the dCDN. In cases where a uCDN sends metadata containing a GenericMetadata type that a dCDN does not support, the dCDN MUST enforce the semantics of the mandatory-to-enforce property. If a dCDN does not understand or is unable to perform the functions associated with any mandatory-to-enforce metadata, the dCDN MUST NOT service any requests for the corresponding content. Note: Ideally, uCDNs would not delegate content requests to a dCDN that does not support the mandatory-to-enforce metadata associated with the content being requested. However, even if the uCDN has a priori knowledge of the metadata supported by the dCDN (e.g., via the FCI or through out-of-band negotiation between CDN operators), metadata support can fluctuate or be inconsistent (e.g., due to miscommunication, misconfiguration, or temporary outage). Thus, the dCDN MUST always evaluate all metadata associated with redirection and content requests and reject any requests where mandatory-to-enforce metadata associated with the content cannot be enforced.6.7. Metadata Conflicts It is possible that new metadata definitions will obsolete or conflict with existing GenericMetadata (e.g., a future revision of the CDNI Metadata interface could redefine the Auth GenericMetadata object or a custom vendor extension could implement an alternate Auth metadata option). If multiple metadata (e.g., MI.Auth.v2, vendor1.Auth, and vendor2.Auth) all conflict with an existing GenericMetadata object (i.e., MI.Auth) and all are marked asNiven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 47]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 mandatory-to-enforce, it could be ambiguous as to which metadata should be applied, especially in the case of overlapping functionality. As described inSection 3.3, metadata override only applies to metadata objects of the same exact type found in HostMetadata and nested PathMetadata structures. The CDNI Metadata interface does not support enforcement of dependencies between different GenericMetadata types. It is the responsibility of the CSP and the CDN operators to ensure that metadata assigned to a given piece of content do not conflict. Note: Because metadata is inherently ordered in HostMetadata and PathMetadata arrays, as well as in the PathMatch hierarchy, multiple conflicting metadata types MAY be used; however, metadata hierarchies SHOULD ensure that independent PathMatch root objects are used to prevent ambiguous or conflicting metadata definitions.6.8. Versioning The version of CDNI Metadata objects is conveyed inside the CDNI Payload Type that is included in either (1) the HTTP Content-Type header (for example, "Content-Type: application/cdni; ptype=MI.HostIndex" when retrieved via a link) or (2) in the link type (Section 4.3.1), generic-metadata-type (Section 4.1.7), or auth-type (Section 4.2.7) properties in the JSON payload. The CDNI Payload Type uniquely identifies the specification defining that object, including any relation to, conflicts with, or obsolescence of other metadata. There is no explicit version mapping requirement; however, for ease of understanding, metadata creators SHOULD make new versions of metadata easily visible via the CDNI Payload Type, e.g., by appending a version string. Note: A version string is optional on the first version (e.g., MI.HostIndex) but could be added for subsequent versions (MI.HostIndex.v2, MI.HostIndex.v3, etc.). Except when referenced by a Link object, nested metadata objects (i.e., structural metadata below the HostIndex; and Source, LocationRule, TimeWindowRule, ProtocolRule, Footprint, and TimeWindow objects) can be serialized into a JSON payload without explicit CDNI Payload Type information. The type is inferred from the outer structural metadata, GenericMetadata, or Auth object CDNI Payload Type. To avoid ambiguity when revising nestable metadata objects, any outer metadata object(s) MUST be reversioned and allocated new CDNI Payload Type(s) at the same time. For example, the MI.HostIndex object defined in this document contains an array of MI.HostMatch objects, each of which in turn contains a MI.HostMetadata object. If a new MI.HostMetadata.v2 object were required, the outer MI.HostIndex and MI.HostMatch objects would need to be revised, e.g., toNiven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 48]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 MI.HostIndex.v2 and MI.HostMatch.v2, respectively. Similarly, if a new MI.TimeWindowRule.v2 object were required, the outer MI.TimeWindowACL object would need to be revised, e.g., to MI.TimeWindowACL.v2; however, the MI.TimeWindowRule.v2 object could still contain MI.TimeWindow objects, if so specified. HTTP requests sent to a metadata server SHOULD include an Accept header with the CDNI Payload Type of the expected object. Metadata clients can specify multiple CDNI Payload Types in the Accept header; for example, if a metadata client is capable of processing two different versions of the same type of object (defined by different CDNI Payload Types), it might decide to include both in the Accept header.6.9. Media Types All CDNI Metadata objects use the media type "application/cdni". The CDNI Payload Type for each object then contains the object name of that object as defined by this document, prefixed with "MI.". Table 4 lists the CDNI Payload Types for the metadata objects (resources) specified in this document. +-----------------------+--------------------------+ | Data Object | CDNI Payload Type | +-----------------------+--------------------------+ | HostIndex | MI.HostIndex | | HostMatch | MI.HostMatch | | HostMetadata | MI.HostMetadata | | PathMatch | MI.PathMatch | | PatternMatch | MI.PatternMatch | | PathMetadata | MI.PathMetadata | | SourceMetadata | MI.SourceMetadata | | Source | MI.Source | | LocationACL | MI.LocationACL | | LocationRule | MI.LocationRule | | Footprint | MI.Footprint | | TimeWindowACL | MI.TimeWindowACL | | TimeWindowRule | MI.TimeWindowRule | | TimeWindow | MI.TimeWindow | | ProtocolACL | MI.ProtocolACL | | ProtocolRule | MI.ProtocolRule | | DeliveryAuthorization | MI.DeliveryAuthorization | | Cache | MI.Cache | | Auth | MI.Auth | | Grouping | MI.Grouping | +-----------------------+--------------------------+ Table 4: CDNI Payload Types for CDNI Metadata ObjectsNiven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 49]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 20166.10. Complete CDNI Metadata Example A dCDN requests the HostIndex and receives the following object with a CDNI Payload Type of "MI.HostIndex": { "hosts": [ { "host": "video.example.com", "host-metadata": { "type": "MI.HostMetadata", "href": "https://metadata.ucdn.example/host1234" } }, { "host": "images.example.com", "host-metadata": { "type": "MI.HostMetadata", "href": "https://metadata.ucdn.example/host5678" } } ] } If the incoming request has a Host header with "video.example.com", then the dCDN would fetch the HostMetadata object from "https://metadata.ucdn.example/host1234" expecting a CDNI Payload Type of "MI.HostMetadata": { "metadata": [ { "generic-metadata-type": "MI.SourceMetadata", "generic-metadata-value": { "sources": [ { "endpoint": ["acq1.ucdn.example"], "protocol": "http/1.1" }, { "endpoint": ["acq2.ucdn.example"], "protocol": "http/1.1" } ] } },Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 50]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 { "generic-metadata-type": "MI.LocationACL", "generic-metadata-value": { "locations": [ { "footprints": [ { "footprint-type": "ipv4cidr", "footprint-value": ["192.0.2.0/24"] }, { "footprint-type": "ipv6cidr", "footprint-value": ["2001:db8::/32"] }, { "footprint-type": "countrycode", "footprint-value": ["us"] }, { "footprint-type": "asn", "footprint-value": ["as64496"] } ], "action": "deny" } ] } }, { "generic-metadata-type": "MI.ProtocolACL", "generic-metadata-value": { "protocol-acl": [ { "protocols": [ "http/1.1" ], "action": "allow" } ] } } ],Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 51]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 "paths": [ { "path-pattern": { "pattern": "/videos/trailers/*" }, "path-metadata": { "type": "MI.PathMetadata", "href": "https://metadata.ucdn.example/host1234/pathABC" } }, { "path-pattern": { "pattern": "/videos/movies/*" }, "path-metadata": { "type": "MI.PathMetadata", "href": "https://metadata.ucdn.example/host1234/pathDEF" } } ] } Suppose that the path of the requested resource matches the "/videos/movies/*" pattern; the next metadata requested would be for "https://metadata.ucdn.example/host1234/pathDEF" with an expected CDNI Payload Type of "MI.PathMetadata": { "metadata": [], "paths": [ { "path-pattern": { "pattern": "/videos/movies/hd/*" }, "path-metadata": { "type": "MI.PathMetadata", "href": "https://metadata.ucdn.example/host1234/pathDEF/path123" } } ] }Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 52]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 Finally, if the path of the requested resource also matches the "/videos/movies/hd/*" pattern, the dCDN would also fetch the following object from "https://metadata.ucdn.example/host1234/pathDEF/path123" with a CDNI Payload Type of "MI.PathMetadata": { "metadata": [ { "generic-metadata-type": "MI.TimeWindowACL", "generic-metadata-value": { "times": [ "windows": [ { "start": "1213948800", "end": "1478047392" } ], "action": "allow" ] } } ] } The final set of metadata that applies to the requested resource includes a SourceMetadata, a LocationACL, a ProtocolACL, and a TimeWindowACL.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 53]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 20167. IANA Considerations7.1. CDNI Payload Types This document requests the registration of the following entries under the "CDNI Payload Types" registry hosted by IANA: +--------------------------+---------------+ | Payload Type | Specification | +--------------------------+---------------+ | MI.HostIndex |RFC 8006 | | MI.HostMatch |RFC 8006 | | MI.HostMetadata |RFC 8006 | | MI.PathMatch |RFC 8006 | | MI.PatternMatch |RFC 8006 | | MI.PathMetadata |RFC 8006 | | MI.SourceMetadata |RFC 8006 | | MI.Source |RFC 8006 | | MI.LocationACL |RFC 8006 | | MI.LocationRule |RFC 8006 | | MI.Footprint |RFC 8006 | | MI.TimeWindowACL |RFC 8006 | | MI.TimeWindowRule |RFC 8006 | | MI.TimeWindow |RFC 8006 | | MI.ProtocolACL |RFC 8006 | | MI.ProtocolRule |RFC 8006 | | MI.DeliveryAuthorization |RFC 8006 | | MI.Cache |RFC 8006 | | MI.Auth |RFC 8006 | | MI.Grouping |RFC 8006 | +--------------------------+---------------+7.1.1. CDNI MI HostIndex Payload Type Purpose: The purpose of this Payload Type is to distinguish HostIndex MI objects (and any associated capability advertisement) Interface: MI/FCI Encoding: seeSection 4.1.1Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 54]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 20167.1.2. CDNI MI HostMatch Payload Type Purpose: The purpose of this Payload Type is to distinguish HostMatch MI objects (and any associated capability advertisement) Interface: MI/FCI Encoding: seeSection 4.1.27.1.3. CDNI MI HostMetadata Payload Type Purpose: The purpose of this Payload Type is to distinguish HostMetadata MI objects (and any associated capability advertisement) Interface: MI/FCI Encoding: seeSection 4.1.37.1.4. CDNI MI PathMatch Payload Type Purpose: The purpose of this Payload Type is to distinguish PathMatch MI objects (and any associated capability advertisement) Interface: MI/FCI Encoding: seeSection 4.1.47.1.5. CDNI MI PatternMatch Payload Type Purpose: The purpose of this Payload Type is to distinguish PatternMatch MI objects (and any associated capability advertisement) Interface: MI/FCI Encoding: seeSection 4.1.57.1.6. CDNI MI PathMetadata Payload Type Purpose: The purpose of this Payload Type is to distinguish PathMetadata MI objects (and any associated capability advertisement) Interface: MI/FCI Encoding: seeSection 4.1.6Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 55]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 20167.1.7. CDNI MI SourceMetadata Payload Type Purpose: The purpose of this Payload Type is to distinguish SourceMetadata MI objects (and any associated capability advertisement) Interface: MI/FCI Encoding: seeSection 4.2.17.1.8. CDNI MI Source Payload Type Purpose: The purpose of this Payload Type is to distinguish Source MI objects (and any associated capability advertisement) Interface: MI/FCI Encoding: seeSection 4.2.1.17.1.9. CDNI MI LocationACL Payload Type Purpose: The purpose of this Payload Type is to distinguish LocationACL MI objects (and any associated capability advertisement) Interface: MI/FCI Encoding: seeSection 4.2.27.1.10. CDNI MI LocationRule Payload Type Purpose: The purpose of this Payload Type is to distinguish LocationRule MI objects (and any associated capability advertisement) Interface: MI/FCI Encoding: seeSection 4.2.2.17.1.11. CDNI MI Footprint Payload Type Purpose: The purpose of this Payload Type is to distinguish Footprint MI objects (and any associated capability advertisement) Interface: MI/FCI Encoding: seeSection 4.2.2.2Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 56]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 20167.1.12. CDNI MI TimeWindowACL Payload Type Purpose: The purpose of this Payload Type is to distinguish TimeWindowACL MI objects (and any associated capability advertisement) Interface: MI/FCI Encoding: seeSection 4.2.37.1.13. CDNI MI TimeWindowRule Payload Type Purpose: The purpose of this Payload Type is to distinguish TimeWindowRule MI objects (and any associated capability advertisement) Interface: MI/FCI Encoding: seeSection 4.2.3.17.1.14. CDNI MI TimeWindow Payload Type Purpose: The purpose of this Payload Type is to distinguish TimeWindow MI objects (and any associated capability advertisement) Interface: MI/FCI Encoding: seeSection 4.2.3.27.1.15. CDNI MI ProtocolACL Payload Type Purpose: The purpose of this Payload Type is to distinguish ProtocolACL MI objects (and any associated capability advertisement) Interface: MI/FCI Encoding: seeSection 4.2.47.1.16. CDNI MI ProtocolRule Payload Type Purpose: The purpose of this Payload Type is to distinguish ProtocolRule MI objects (and any associated capability advertisement) Interface: MI/FCI Encoding: seeSection 4.2.4.1Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 57]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 20167.1.17. CDNI MI DeliveryAuthorization Payload Type Purpose: The purpose of this Payload Type is to distinguish DeliveryAuthorization MI objects (and any associated capability advertisement) Interface: MI/FCI Encoding: seeSection 4.2.57.1.18. CDNI MI Cache Payload Type Purpose: The purpose of this Payload Type is to distinguish Cache MI objects (and any associated capability advertisement) Interface: MI/FCI Encoding: seeSection 4.2.67.1.19. CDNI MI Auth Payload Type Purpose: The purpose of this Payload Type is to distinguish Auth MI objects (and any associated capability advertisement) Interface: MI/FCI Encoding: seeSection 4.2.77.1.20. CDNI MI Grouping Payload Type Purpose: The purpose of this Payload Type is to distinguish Grouping MI objects (and any associated capability advertisement) Interface: MI/FCI Encoding: seeSection 4.2.87.2. "CDNI Metadata Footprint Types" Registry IANA has created a new "CDNI Metadata Footprint Types" subregistry in the "Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI) Parameters" registry. The "CDNI Metadata Footprint Types" namespace defines the valid Footprint object type values used by the Footprint object described inSection 4.2.2.2. Additions to the "CDNI Metadata Footprint Types" namespace conform to the Specification Required policy as defined in [RFC5226]. The Designated Expert will verify that new type definitions do not duplicate existing type definitionsNiven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 58]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 and prevent gratuitous additions to the namespace. New registrations are required to provide a clear description of how to interpret new footprint types. The following table defines the initial values for the "CDNI Metadata Footprint Types" registry: +----------------+--------------------------------+---------------+ | Footprint Type | Description | Specification | +----------------+--------------------------------+---------------+ | ipv4cidr | IPv4 CIDR address block |RFC 8006 | | ipv6cidr | IPv6 CIDR address block |RFC 8006 | | asn | Autonomous System Number (ASN) |RFC 8006 | | countrycode | ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 code |RFC 8006 | +----------------+--------------------------------+---------------+7.3. "CDNI Metadata Protocol Types" Registry IANA has created a new "CDNI Metadata Protocol Types" subregistry in the "Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI) Parameters" registry. The "CDNI Metadata Protocol Types" namespace defines the valid Protocol object values (Section 4.3.2) used by the SourceMetadata and ProtocolACL objects. Additions to the Protocol namespace conform to the Specification Required policy as defined in [RFC5226], where the specification defines the Protocol Type and the protocol to which it is associated. The Designated Expert will verify that new protocol definitions do not duplicate existing protocol definitions and prevent gratuitous additions to the namespace. The following table defines the initial Protocol values corresponding to the HTTP and HTTPS protocols: +-----------+----------------------+---------------+----------------+ | Protocol | Description | Type | Protocol | | Type | | Specification | Specifications | +-----------+----------------------+---------------+----------------+ | http/1.1 | Hypertext Transfer |RFC 8006 |RFC 7230 | | | Protocol -- HTTP/1.1 | | | | | | | | | https/1.1 | HTTP/1.1 over TLS |RFC 8006 |RFC 7230, | | | | |RFC 2818 | +-----------+----------------------+---------------+----------------+Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 59]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 20168. Security Considerations8.1. Authentication and Integrity A malicious metadata server, proxy server, or attacker impersonating an authentic uCDN CDNI Metadata interface without being detected could provide false metadata to a dCDN that either: o Denies service for one or more pieces of content to one or more User Agents; o Directs dCDNs to contact malicious origin servers instead of the actual origin servers, so that malware or slanderous alternate content may be substituted for legitimate content; or o Removes delivery restrictions (e.g., LocationACL, TimeWindowACL, ProtocolACL, or Auth metadata), allowing access to content that would otherwise be denied and thus possibly violating license restrictions and incurring unwarranted delivery costs. Unauthorized access to metadata could also enable a malicious metadata client to continuously issue metadata requests in order to overload a uCDN's metadata server or servers. Unauthorized access to metadata could further result in leakage of private information. A malicious metadata client could request metadata in order to gain access to origin servers, as well as information pertaining to content restrictions. An implementation of the CDNI Metadata interface MUST use mutual authentication and message authentication codes to prevent unauthorized access to, and undetected modification of, metadata (seeSection 8.3).8.2. Confidentiality and Privacy Unauthorized viewing of metadata could result in leakage of private information. Content provider origin and policy information is conveyed through the CDNI Metadata interface. A third party could intercept metadata transactions in order to gain access to origin servers, as well as information pertaining to content restrictions and usage patterns.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 60]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 Note: The distribution of metadata by a uCDN to dCDNs could introduce privacy concerns for some content providers, e.g., dCDNs accepting content requests for a content provider's content might be able to obtain additional information and usage patterns relating to the users of a content provider's services. Content providers with concerns about divulging information to dCDNs can instruct their uCDN partners not to use CDNI when delivering their content. An implementation of the CDNI Metadata interface MUST use strong encryption to prevent unauthorized interception or monitoring of metadata (seeSection 8.3).8.3. Securing the CDNI Metadata Interface An implementation of the CDNI Metadata interface MUST support TLS transport as per [RFC2818] and [RFC7230]. TLS MUST be used by the server side (uCDN) and the client side (dCDN) of the CDNI Metadata interface, including authentication of the remote end, unless alternate methods are used for ensuring the security of the information in the CDNI Metadata interface requests and responses (such as setting up an IPsec tunnel between the two CDNs or using a physically secured internal network between two CDNs that are owned by the same corporate entity). The use of TLS for transport of the CDNI Metadata interface messages allows the dCDN and uCDN to authenticate each other. Once the dCDN and uCDN have mutually authenticated each other, TLS allows: o The dCDN and uCDN to authorize each other (to ensure that they are transmitting/receiving CDNI Metadata requests and responses from an authorized CDN); o CDNI Metadata interface requests and responses to be transmitted with confidentiality; and o The integrity of the CDNI Metadata interface requests and responses to be protected during the exchange. When TLS is used, the general TLS usage guidance in [RFC7525] MUST be followed.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 61]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 20169. References9.1. Normative References [ISO3166-1] The International Organization for Standardization, "Codes for the representation of names of countries and their subdivisions -- Part 1: Country codes", ISO 3166-1:2013, 2013. [POSIX] Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, "Information Technology Portable Operating System Interface (POSIX) Part 1: System Application Program Interface (API) [C Language]", IEEE P1003.1, 1990. [RFC1034] Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - concepts and facilities", STD 13,RFC 1034, DOI 10.17487/RFC1034, November 1987, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1034>. [RFC1123] Braden, R., Ed., "Requirements for Internet Hosts - Application and Support", STD 3,RFC 1123, DOI 10.17487/RFC1123, October 1989, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1123>. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. [RFC3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66,RFC 3986, DOI 10.17487/RFC3986, January 2005, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3986>. [RFC4291] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture",RFC 4291, DOI 10.17487/RFC4291, February 2006, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4291>. [RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs",BCP 26,RFC 5226, DOI 10.17487/RFC5226, May 2008, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5226>. [RFC5890] Klensin, J., "Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA): Definitions and Document Framework",RFC 5890, DOI 10.17487/RFC5890, August 2010, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5890>.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 62]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 [RFC5891] Klensin, J., "Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA): Protocol",RFC 5891, DOI 10.17487/RFC5891, August 2010, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5891>. [RFC5952] Kawamura, S. and M. Kawashima, "A Recommendation for IPv6 Address Text Representation",RFC 5952, DOI 10.17487/RFC5952, August 2010, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5952>. [RFC6707] Niven-Jenkins, B., Le Faucheur, F., and N. Bitar, "Content Distribution Network Interconnection (CDNI) Problem Statement",RFC 6707, DOI 10.17487/RFC6707, September 2012, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6707>. [RFC7230] Fielding, R., Ed., and J. Reschke, Ed., "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing",RFC 7230, DOI 10.17487/RFC7230, June 2014, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7230>. [RFC7493] Bray, T., Ed., "The I-JSON Message Format",RFC 7493, DOI 10.17487/RFC7493, March 2015, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7493>. [RFC7525] Sheffer, Y., Holz, R., and P. Saint-Andre, "Recommendations for Secure Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS)",BCP 195,RFC 7525, DOI 10.17487/RFC7525, May 2015, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7525>.9.2. Informative References [CDNI-URI-SIGNING] van Brandenburg, R., Leung, K., Sorber, P., and M. Miller, "URI Signing for CDN Interconnection (CDNI)", Work in Progress,draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing-10, October 2016. [RFC2818] Rescorla, E., "HTTP Over TLS",RFC 2818, DOI 10.17487/RFC2818, May 2000, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2818>. [RFC6793] Vohra, Q. and E. Chen, "BGP Support for Four-Octet Autonomous System (AS) Number Space",RFC 6793, DOI 10.17487/RFC6793, December 2012, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6793>.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 63]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016 [RFC7234] Fielding, R., Ed., Nottingham, M., Ed., and J. Reschke, Ed., "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Caching",RFC 7234, DOI 10.17487/RFC7234, June 2014, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7234>. [RFC7336] Peterson, L., Davie, B., and R. van Brandenburg, Ed., "Framework for Content Distribution Network Interconnection (CDNI)",RFC 7336, DOI 10.17487/RFC7336, August 2014, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7336>. [RFC7337] Leung, K., Ed., and Y. Lee, Ed., "Content Distribution Network Interconnection (CDNI) Requirements",RFC 7337, DOI 10.17487/RFC7337, August 2014, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7337>. [RFC7540] Belshe, M., Peon, R., and M. Thomson, Ed., "Hypertext Transfer Protocol Version 2 (HTTP/2)",RFC 7540, DOI 10.17487/RFC7540, May 2015, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7540>. [RFC7736] Ma, K., "Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI) Media Type Registration",RFC 7736, DOI 10.17487/RFC7736, December 2015, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7736>. [RFC7975] Niven-Jenkins, B., Ed., and R. van Brandenburg, Ed., "Request Routing Redirection Interface for Content Delivery Network (CDN) Interconnection",RFC 7975, DOI 10.17487/RFC7975, October 2016, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7975>. [RFC8007] Murray, R. and B. Niven-Jenkins, "Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI) Control Interface / Triggers",RFC 8007, DOI 10.17487/RFC8007, December 2016, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8007>. [RFC8008] Seedorf, J., Peterson, J., Previdi, S., van Brandenburg, R., and K. Ma, "Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI) Request Routing: Footprint and Capabilities Semantics",RFC 8008, DOI 10.17487/RFC8008, December 2016, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8008>.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 64]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank David Ferguson, Francois Le Faucheur, Jan Seedorf, and Matt Miller for their valuable comments and input to this document.Contributors The authors would also like to thank Grant Watson and Kent Leung for their contributions to this document.Niven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 65]
RFC 8006 CDN Interconnection Metadata December 2016Authors' Addresses Ben Niven-Jenkins Nokia 3 Ely Road Milton, Cambridge CB24 6DD United Kingdom Email: ben.niven-jenkins@nokia.com Rob Murray Nokia 3 Ely Road Milton, Cambridge CB24 6DD United Kingdom Email: rob.murray@nokia.com Matt Caulfield Cisco Systems 1414 Massachusetts Avenue Boxborough, MA 01719 United States of America Phone: +1-978-936-9307 Email: mcaulfie@cisco.com Kevin J. Ma Ericsson 43 Nagog Park Acton, MA 01720 United States of America Phone: +1 978-844-5100 Email: kevin.j.ma@ericsson.comNiven-Jenkins, et al. Standards Track [Page 66]
[8]ページ先頭