Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Errata] [Info page]

INFORMATIONAL
Errata Exist
Network Working Group                                        M. NystroemRequest for Comments: 4758                                  RSA SecurityCategory: Informational                                    November 2006Cryptographic Token Key Initialization Protocol (CT-KIP)Version 1.0 Revision 1Status of This Memo   This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does   not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of this   memo is unlimited.Copyright Notice   Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2006).Abstract   This document constitutes Revision 1 of Cryptographic Token Key   Initialization Protocol (CT-KIP) Version 1.0 from RSA Laboratories'   One-Time Password Specifications (OTPS) series.  The body of this   document, except for the intellectual property considerations   section, is taken from the CT-KIP Version 1.0 document, but comments   received during the IETF review are reflected; hence, the status of a   revised version.  As no "bits-on-the-wire" have changed, the protocol   specified herein is compatible with CT-KIP Version 1.0.   CT-KIP is a client-server protocol for initialization (and   configuration) of cryptographic tokens.  The protocol requires   neither private-key capabilities in the cryptographic tokens, nor an   established public-key infrastructure.  Provisioned (or generated)   secrets will only be available to the server and the cryptographic   token itself.Nystroem                     Informational                      [Page 1]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006Table of Contents1. Introduction ....................................................41.1. Scope ......................................................41.2. Background .................................................41.3. Document Organization ......................................52. Acronyms and Notation ...........................................52.1. Acronyms ...................................................52.2. Notation ...................................................53. CT-KIP ..........................................................63.1. Overview ...................................................63.2. Entities ...................................................73.3. Principles of Operation ....................................73.4. The CT-KIP One-Way Pseudorandom Function, CT-KIP-PRF ......103.4.1. Introduction .......................................103.4.2. Declaration ........................................113.5. Generation of Cryptographic Keys for Tokens ...............11      3.6. Encryption of Pseudorandom Nonces Sent from the           CT-KIP Client .............................................123.7. CT-KIP Schema Basics ......................................133.7.1. Introduction .......................................133.7.2. General XML Schema Requirements ....................133.7.3. The AbstractRequestType Type .......................133.7.4. The AbstractResponseType type ......................143.7.5. The StatusCode Type ................................143.7.6. The IdentifierType Type ............................163.7.7. The NonceType Type .................................16           3.7.8. The ExtensionsType and the                  AbstractExtensionType Types ........................173.8. CT-KIP Messages ...........................................173.8.1. Introduction .......................................173.8.2. CT-KIP Initialization ..............................173.8.3. The CT-KIP Client's Initial PDU ....................183.8.4. The CT-KIP server's initial PDU ....................203.8.5. The CT-KIP Client's Second PDU .....................233.8.6. The CT-KIP Server's Final PDU ......................243.9. Protocol Extensions .......................................273.9.1. The ClientInfoType Type ............................273.9.2. The ServerInfoType Type ............................283.9.3. The OTPKeyConfigurationDataType Type ...............284. Protocol Bindings ..............................................294.1. General Requirement .......................................294.2. HTTP/1.1 binding for CT-KIP ...............................294.2.1. Introduction .......................................294.2.2. Identification of CT-KIP Messages ..................294.2.3. HTTP Headers .......................................294.2.4. HTTP Operations ....................................304.2.5. HTTP Status Codes ..................................30Nystroem                     Informational                      [Page 2]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 20064.2.6. HTTP Authentication ................................314.2.7. Initialization of CT-KIP ...........................314.2.8. Example Messages ...................................315. Security considerations ........................................325.1. General ...................................................325.2. Active Attacks ............................................325.2.1. Introduction .......................................325.2.2. Message Modifications ..............................325.2.3. Message Deletion ...................................345.2.4. Message Insertion ..................................345.2.5. Message Replay .....................................345.2.6. Message Reordering .................................355.2.7. Man in the Middle ..................................355.3. Passive Attacks ...........................................355.4. Cryptographic Attacks .....................................35      5.5. Attacks on the Interaction between CT-KIP and User           Authentication ............................................366. Intellectual Property Considerations ...........................367. References .....................................................377.1. Normative References ......................................377.2. Informative References ....................................37Appendix A. CT-KIP Schema .........................................39Appendix B. Examples of CT-KIP Messages ...........................46B.1. Introduction ..............................................46B.2. Example of a CT-KIP Initialization (Trigger) Message ......46B.3. Example of a <ClientHello> Message ........................46B.4. Example of a <ServerHello> Message ........................47B.5. Example of a <ClientNonce> Message ........................47B.6. Example of a <ServerFinished> Message .....................48Appendix C. Integration with PKCS #11 .............................48Appendix D. Example CT-KIP-PRF Realizations .......................48D.1. Introduction ..............................................48D.2. CT-KIP-PRF-AES ............................................48D.2.1. Identification .....................................48D.2.2. Definition .........................................49D.2.3. Example ............................................50D.3. CT-KIP-PRF-SHA256 .........................................50D.3.1. Identification .....................................50D.3.2. Definition .........................................51D.3.3. Example ............................................52Appendix E. About OTPS ............................................53Nystroem                     Informational                      [Page 3]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 20061.  Introduction   Note: This document is Revision 1 of CT-KIP Version 1.0 [12] from RSA   Laboratories' OTPS series.1.1.  Scope   This document describes a client-server protocol for initialization   (and configuration) of cryptographic tokens.  The protocol requires   neither private-key capabilities in the cryptographic tokens, nor an   established public-key infrastructure.   The objectives of this protocol are:   o  To provide a secure method of initializing cryptographic tokens      with secret keys without exposing generated, secret material to      any other entities than the server and the cryptographic token      itself,   o  To avoid, as much as possible, any impact on existing      cryptographic token manufacturing processes,   o  To provide a solution that is easy to administer and scales well.   The mechanism is intended for general use within computer and   communications systems employing connected cryptographic tokens (or   software emulations thereof).1.2.  Background   A cryptographic token may be a handheld hardware device, a hardware   device connected to a personal computer through an electronic   interface such as USB, or a software module resident on a personal   computer, which offers cryptographic functionality that may be used,   e.g., to authenticate a user towards some service.  Increasingly,   these tokens work in a connected fashion, enabling their programmatic   initialization as well as programmatic retrieval of their output   values.  This document intends to meet the need for an open and   interoperable mechanism to programmatically initialize and configure   connected cryptographic tokens.  A companion document entitled "A   PKCS #11 Mechanism for the Cryptographic Token Key Initialization   Protocol" [2] describes an application-programming interface suitable   for use with this mechanism.Nystroem                     Informational                      [Page 4]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 20061.3.  Document Organization   The organization of this document is as follows:   oSection 1 is an introduction.   oSection 2 defines some notation used in this document.   oSection 3 defines the protocol mechanism in detail.   oSection 4 defines a binding of the protocol to transports.   oSection 5 provides security considerations.   oAppendix A defines the XML schema for the protocol mechanism,Appendix B gives example messages, andAppendix C discusses      integration with PKCS #11 [3].   oAppendix D provides example realizations of an abstract      pseudorandom function defined inSection 3.   oAppendix E provides general information about the One-Time      Password Specifications.2.  Acronyms and Notation2.1.  Acronyms   MAC      Message Authentication Code   PDU      Protocol Data Unit   PRF      Pseudo-Random Function   CT-KIP   Cryptographic Token Key Initialization Protocol (the            protocol mechanism described herein)2.2.  Notation   ||       String concatenation   [x]      Optional element x   A ^ B    Exclusive-or operation on strings A and B (A and B of equal            length)   K_AUTH   Secret key used for authentication purposesNystroem                     Informational                      [Page 5]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006   K_TOKEN  Secret key used for token computations, generated in CT-KIP   K_SERVER Public key of CT-KIP server   K_SHARED Secret key shared between the cryptographic token and the            CT-KIP server   K        Key used to encrypt R_C (either K_SERVER or K_SHARED)   R        Pseudorandom value chosen by the cryptographic token and            used for MAC computations   R_C      Pseudorandom value chosen by the cryptographic token   R_S      Pseudorandom value chosen by the CT-KIP server   The following typographical convention is used in the body of the   text: <XMLElement>.3.  CT-KIP3.1.  Overview   The CT-KIP is a client-server protocol for the secure initialization   of cryptographic tokens.  The protocol is meant to provide high   assurance for both the server and the client (cryptographic token)   that generated keys have been correctly and randomly generated and   not exposed to other entities.  The protocol does not require the   existence of a public-key infrastructure.   +---------------+                            +---------------+   |               |                            |               |   | CT-KIP client |                            | CT-KIP server |   |               |                            |               |   +---------------+                            +---------------+           |                                            |           |        [ <---- CT-KIP trigger ---- ]       |           |                                            |           |        ------- Client Hello ------->       |           |                                            |           |        <------ Server Hello --------       |           |                                            |           |        ------- Client Nonce ------->       |           |                                            |           |        <----- Server Finished ------       |   Figure 1: The 4-pass CT-KIP protocol (with optional preceding   trigger)Nystroem                     Informational                      [Page 6]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 20063.2.  Entities   In principle, the protocol involves a CT-KIP client and a CT-KIP   server.   It is assumed that a desktop/laptop or a wireless device (e.g., a   mobile phone or a PDA) will host an application communicating with   the CT-KIP server as well as the cryptographic token, and   collectively, the cryptographic token and the communicating   application form the CT-KIP client.  When there is a need to point   out if an action is to be performed by the communicating application   or by the token the text will make this explicit.   The manner in which the communicating application will transfer CT-   KIP protocol elements to and from the cryptographic token is   transparent to the CT-KIP server.  One method for this transfer is   described in [2].3.3.  Principles of Operation   To initiate a CT-KIP session, a user may use a browser to connect to   a web server running on some host.  The user may then identify (and   authenticate) herself (through some means that essentially are out of   scope for this document) and possibly indicate how the CT-KIP client   shall contact the CT-KIP server.  There are also other alternatives   for CT-KIP session initiation, such as the CT-KIP client being pre-   configured to contact a certain CT-KIP server, or the user being   informed out-of-band about the location of the CT-KIP server.  In any   event, once the location of the CT-KIP server is known, the CT-KIP   client and the CT-KIP server engage in a 4-pass protocol in which:   a.  The CT-KIP client provides information to the CT-KIP server about       the cryptographic token's identity, supported CT-KIP versions,       cryptographic algorithms supported by the token and for which       keys may be generated using this protocol, and encryption and MAC       algorithms supported by the cryptographic token for the purposes       of this protocol.   b.  Based on this information, the CT-KIP server provides a random       nonce, R_S, to the CT-KIP client, along with information about       the type of key to generate, the encryption algorithm chosen to       protect sensitive data sent in the protocol.  In addition, it       provides either information about a shared secret key to use for       encrypting the cryptographic token's random nonce (see below), or       its own public key.  The length of the nonce R_S may depend on       the selected key type.Nystroem                     Informational                      [Page 7]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006   c.  The cryptographic token generates a random nonce R_C and encrypts       it using the selected encryption algorithm and with a key K that       is either the CT-KIP server's public key K_SERVER, or a shared       secret key K_SHARED as indicated by the CT-KIP server.  The       length of the nonce R_C may depend on the selected key type.  The       CT-KIP client then sends the encrypted random nonce to the CT-KIP       server.  The token also calculates a cryptographic key K_TOKEN of       the selected type from the combination of the two random nonces       R_S and R_C, the encryption key K, and possibly some other data,       using the CT-KIP-PRF function defined herein.   d.  The CT-KIP server decrypts R_C, calculates K_TOKEN from the       combination of the two random nonces R_S and R_C, the encryption       key K, and possibly some other data, using the CT-KIP-PRF       function defined herein.  The server then associates K_TOKEN with       the cryptographic token in a server-side data store.  The intent       is that the data store later on will be used by some service that       needs to verify or decrypt data produced by the cryptographic       token and the key.   e.  Once the association has been made, the CT-KIP server sends a       confirmation message to the CT-KIP client.  The confirmation       message includes an identifier for the generated key and may also       contain additional configuration information, e.g., the identity       of the CT-KIP server.   f.  Upon receipt of the CT-KIP server's confirmation message, the       cryptographic token associates the provided key identifier with       the generated key K_TOKEN, and stores the provided configuration       data, if any.   Note: Conceptually, although R_C is one pseudorandom string, it may   be viewed as consisting of two components, R_C1 and R_C2, where R_C1   is generated during the protocol run, and R_C2 can be generated at   the cryptographic token manufacturing time and stored in the   cryptographic token.  In that case, the latter string, R_C2, should   be unique for each cryptographic token for a given manufacturer.Nystroem                     Informational                      [Page 8]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006   +----------------------+    +-------+     +----------------------+   |    +------------+    |    |       |     |                      |   |    | Server key |    |    |       |     |                      |   | +<-|  Public    |------>------------->-------------+---------+ |   | |  |  Private   |    |    |       |     |          |         | |   | |  +------------+    |    |       |     |          |         | |   | |        |           |    |       |     |          |         | |   | V        V           |    |       |     |          V         V |   | |   +---------+      |    |       |     |        +---------+ | |   | |   | Decrypt |<-------<-------------<-----------| Encrypt | | |   | |   +---------+      |    |       |     |        +---------+ | |   | |      |  +--------+ |    |       |     |            ^       | |   | |      |  | Server | |    |       |     |            |       | |   | |      |  | Random |--->------------->------+  +----------+  | |   | |      |  +--------+ |    |       |     |   |  | Client   |  | |   | |      |      |      |    |       |     |   |  | Random   |  | |   | |      |      |      |    |       |     |   |  +----------+  | |   | |      |      |      |    |       |     |   |        |       | |   | |      V      V      |    |       |     |   V        V       | |   | |   +------------+   |    |       |     | +------------+     | |   | +-->| CT-KIP PRF |   |    |       |     | | CT-KIP PRF |<----+ |   |     +------------+   |    |       |     | +------------+       |   |           |          |    |       |     |       |              |   |           V          |    |       |     |       V              |   |       +-------+      |    |       |     |   +-------+          |   |       |  Key  |      |    |       |     |   |  Key  |          |   |       +-------+      |    |       |     |   +-------+          |   |       +-------+      |    |       |     |   +-------+          |   |       |Key Id |-------->------------->------|Key Id |          |   |       +-------+      |    |       |     |   +-------+          |   +----------------------+    +-------+     +----------------------+        CT-KIP Server        CT-KIP Client     CT-KIP Client (Token)                               (PC Host)   Figure 2: Principal data flow for CT-KIP key generation - using   public server key   The inclusion of the two random nonces R_S and R_C in the key   generation provides assurance to both sides (the token and the CT-KIP   server) that they have contributed to the key's randomness and that   the key is unique.  The inclusion of the encryption key K ensures   that no man-in-the-middle may be present, or else the cryptographic   token will end up with a key different from the one stored by the   legitimate CT-KIP server.   Note: A man-in-the middle (in the form of corrupt client software or   a mistakenly contacted server) may present his own public key to the   token.  This will enable the attacker to learn the client's versionNystroem                     Informational                      [Page 9]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006   of K_TOKEN.  However, the attacker is not able to persuade the   legitimate server to derive the same value for K_TOKEN, since K_TOKEN   is a function of the public key involved, and the attacker's public   key must be different than the correct server's (or else the attacker   would not be able to decrypt the information received from the   client).  Therefore, once the attacker is no longer "in the middle",   the client and server will detect that they are "out of synch" when   they try to use their keys.  Therefore, in the case of encrypting R_C   with K_SERVER, it is important to verify that K_SERVER really is the   legitimate server's key.  One way to do this is to independently   validate a newly generated K_TOKEN against some validation service at   the server (e.g., by using a connection independent from the one used   for the key generation).   The CT-KIP server may couple an initial user authentication to the   CT-KIP execution in several ways to ensure that a generated K_TOKEN   ends up associated with the correct token and user.  One way is to   provide a one-time value to the user or CT-KIP client after   successful user authentication and require this value to be used when   contacting the CT-KIP service (in effect coupling the user   authentication with the subsequent CT-KIP protocol run).  This value   could, for example, be placed in a <TriggerNonce> element of the CT-   KIP initialization trigger (if triggers are used; seeSection 4.2.7).   Another way is for the user to provide a token identifier which will   later be used in the CT-KIP protocol to the server during the   authentication phase.  The server may then include this token   identifier in the CT-KIP initialization trigger.  It is also   legitimate for a CT-KIP client to initiate a CT-KIP protocol run   without having received an initialization message from a server, but   in this case any provided token identifier shall not be accepted by   the server unless the server has access to a unique token key for the   identified token and that key will be used in the protocol.  Whatever   the method, the CT-KIP server must ensure that a generated key is   associated with the correct token and, if applicable, the correct   user.  For a further discussion of this and threats related to man-   in-the-middle attacks in this context, seeSection 5.5.3.4.  The CT-KIP One-Way Pseudorandom Function, CT-KIP-PRF3.4.1.  Introduction   The general requirements on CT-KIP-PRF are the same as on keyed hash   functions: It shall take an arbitrary length input, and be one-way   and collision-free (for a definition of these terms, see, e.g., [4]).   Further, the CT-KIP-PRF function shall be capable of generating a   variable-length output, and its output shall be unpredictable even if   other outputs for the same key are known.Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 10]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006   It is assumed that any realization of CT-KIP-PRF takes three input   parameters: A secret key k, some combination of variable data, and   the desired length of the output.  Examples of the variable data   include, but are not limited to, a current token counter value, the   current token time, and a challenge.  The combination of variable   data can, without loss of generalization, be considered as a salt   value (see PKCS #5 Version 2.0 [5], Section 4), and this   characterization of CT-KIP-PRF should fit all actual PRF algorithms   implemented by tokens.  From the point of view of this specification,   CT-KIP-PRF is a "black-box" function that, given the inputs,   generates a pseudorandom value.   Separate specifications may define the implementation of CT-KIP-PRF   for various types of cryptographic tokens.Appendix D contains two   example realizations of CT-KIP-PRF.3.4.2.  Declaration   CT-KIP-PRF (k, s, dsLen)   Input:   k     secret key in octet string format   s     octet string of varying length consisting of variable data         distinguishing the particular string being derived   dsLen desired length of the output   Output:   DS    pseudorandom string, dsLen-octets long   For the purposes of this document, the secret key k shall be 16   octets long.3.5.  Generation of Cryptographic Keys for Tokens   In CT-KIP, keys are generated using the CT-KIP-PRF function, a secret   random value R_C chosen by the CT-KIP client, a random value R_S   chosen by the CT-KIP server, and the key k used to encrypt R_C.  The   input parameter s of CT-KIP-PRF is set to the concatenation of the   (ASCII) string "Key generation", k, and R_S, and the input parameter   dsLen is set to the desired length of the key, K_TOKEN (the length of   K_TOKEN is given by the key's type):Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 11]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006   dsLen = (desired length of K_TOKEN)   K_TOKEN = CT-KIP-PRF (R_C, "Key generation" || k || R_S, dsLen)   When computing K_TOKEN above, the output of CT-KIP-PRF may be subject   to an algorithm-dependent transform before being adopted as a key of   the selected type.  One example of this is the need for parity in DES   keys.3.6.  Encryption of Pseudorandom Nonces Sent from the CT-KIP Client   CT-KIP client random nonce(s) are either encrypted with the public   key provided by the CT-KIP server or by a shared secret key.  For   example, in the case of a public RSA key, an RSA encryption scheme   from PKCS #1 [6] may be used.   In the case of a shared secret key, to avoid dependence on other   algorithms, the CT-KIP client may use the CT-KIP-PRF function   described herein with the shared secret key K_SHARED as input   parameter k (in this case, K_SHARED should be used solely for this   purpose), the concatenation of the (ASCII) string "Encryption" and   the server's nonce R_S as input parameter s, and dsLen set to the   length of R_C:   dsLen = len(R_C)   DS = CT-KIP-PRF(K_SHARED, "Encryption" || R_S, dsLen)   This will produce a pseudorandom string DS of length equal to R_C.   Encryption of R_C may then be achieved by XOR-ing DS with R_C:   Enc-R_C = DS ^ R_C   The CT-KIP server will then perform the reverse operation to extract   R_C from Enc-R_C.   Note: It may appear that an attacker, who learns a previous value of   R_C, may be able to replay the corresponding R_S and, hence, learn a   new R_C as well.  However, this attack is mitigated by the   requirement for a server to show knowledge of K_AUTH (see below) in   order to successfully complete a key re-generation.Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 12]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 20063.7.  CT-KIP Schema Basics3.7.1.  Introduction   Core parts of the XML schema for CT-KIP, found inAppendix A, are   explained in this section.  Specific protocol message elements are   defined inSection 3.8.  Examples can be found inAppendix B.   The XML format for CT-KIP messages have been designed to be   extensible.  However, it is possible that the use of extensions will   harm interoperability; therefore, any use of extensions should be   carefully considered.  For example, if a particular implementation   relies on the presence of a proprietary extension, then it may not be   able to interoperate with independent implementations that have no   knowledge of this extension.   XML types defined in this sub-section are not CT-KIP messages; rather   they provide building blocks that are used by CT-KIP messages.3.7.2.  General XML Schema Requirements   Some CT-KIP elements rely on the parties being able to compare   received values with stored values.  Unless otherwise noted, all   elements in this document that have the XML Schema "xs:string" type,   or a type derived from it, must be compared using an exact binary   comparison.  In particular, CT-KIP implementations must not depend on   case-insensitive string comparisons, normalization or trimming of   white space, or conversion of locale-specific formats such as   numbers.   Implementations that compare values that are represented using   different character encodings must use a comparison method that   returns the same result as converting both values to the Unicode   character encoding, Normalization Form C [1], and then performing an   exact binary comparison.   No collation or sorting order for attributes or element values is   defined.  Therefore, CT-KIP implementations must not depend on   specific sorting orders for values.3.7.3.  The AbstractRequestType Type   All CT-KIP requests are defined as extensions to the abstract   AbstractRequestType type.  The elements of the AbstractRequestType,   therefore, apply to all CT-KIP requests.  All CT-KIP requests must   contain a Version attribute.  For this version of this specification,   Version shall be set to "1.0".Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 13]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006   <xs:complexType name="AbstractRequestType" abstract="true">     <xs:attribute name="Version" type="VersionType"      use="required"/>   </xs:complexType>3.7.4.  The AbstractResponseType type   All CT-KIP responses are defined as extensions to the abstract   AbstractResponseType type.  The elements of the AbstractResponseType,   therefore, apply to all CT-KIP responses.  All CT-KIP responses   contain a Version attribute indicating the version that was used.  A   Status attribute, which indicates whether the preceding request was   successful or not must also be present.  Finally, all responses may   contain a SessionID attribute identifying the particular CT-KIP   session.  The SessionID attribute needs only be present if more than   one roundtrip is required for a successful protocol run (this is the   case with the protocol version described herein).   <xs:complexType name="AbstractResponseType" abstract="true">     <xs:attribute name="Version" type="VersionType" use="required"/>     <xs:attribute name="SessionID" type="IdentifierType"/>     <xs:attribute name="Status" type="StatusCode" use="required"/>   </xs:complexType>3.7.5.  The StatusCode Type   The StatusCode type enumerates all possible return codes:   <xs:simpleType name="StatusCode">     <xs:restriction base="xs:string">       <xs:enumeration value="Continue"/>       <xs:enumeration value="Success"/>       <xs:enumeration value="Abort"/>       <xs:enumeration value="AccessDenied"/>       <xs:enumeration value="MalformedRequest"/>       <xs:enumeration value="UnknownRequest"/>       <xs:enumeration value="UnknownCriticalExtension"/>       <xs:enumeration value="UnsupportedVersion"/>       <xs:enumeration value="NoSupportedKeyTypes"/>       <xs:enumeration value="NoSupportedEncryptionAlgorithms"/>       <xs:enumeration value="NoSupportedMACAlgorithms"/>       <xs:enumeration value="InitializationFailed"/>     </xs:restriction>   </xs:simpleType>   Upon transmission or receipt of a message for which the Status   attribute's value is not "Success" or "Continue", the default   behavior, unless explicitly stated otherwise below, is that both theNystroem                     Informational                     [Page 14]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006   CT-KIP server and the CT-KIP client shall immediately terminate the   CT-KIP session.  CT-KIP servers and CT-KIP clients must delete any   secret values generated as a result of failed runs of the CT-KIP   protocol.  Session identifiers may be retained from successful or   failed protocol runs for replay detection purposes, but such retained   identifiers shall not be reused for subsequent runs of the protocol.   When possible, the CT-KIP client should present an appropriate error   message to the user.   These status codes are valid in all CT-KIP-Response messages unless   explicitly stated otherwise.   o  "Continue" indicates that the CT-KIP server is ready for a      subsequent request from the CT-KIP client.  It cannot be sent in      the server's final message.   o  "Success" indicates successful completion of the CT-KIP session.      It can only be sent in the server's final message.   o  "Abort" indicates that the CT-KIP server rejected the CT-KIP      client's request for unspecified reasons.   o  "AccessDenied" indicates that the CT-KIP client is not authorized      to contact this CT-KIP server.   o  "MalformedRequest" indicates that the CT-KIP server failed to      parse the CT-KIP client's request.   o  "UnknownRequest" indicates that the CT-KIP client made a request      that is unknown to the CT-KIP server.   o  "UnknownCriticalExtension" indicates that a critical CT-KIP      extension (see below) used by the CT-KIP client was not supported      or recognized by the CT-KIP server.   o  "UnsupportedVersion" indicates that the CT-KIP client used a CT-      KIP protocol version not supported by the CT-KIP server.  This      error is only valid in the CT-KIP server's first response message.   o  "NoSupportedKeyTypes" indicates that the CT-KIP client only      suggested key types that are not supported by the CT-KIP server.      This error is only valid in the CT-KIP server's first response      message.  Note that the error will only occur if the CT-KIP server      does not support any of the CT-KIP client's suggested key types.Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 15]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006   o  "NoSupportedEncryptionAlgorithms" indicates that the CT-KIP client      only suggested encryption algorithms that are not supported by the      CT-KIP server.  This error is only valid in the CT-KIP server's      first response message.  Note that the error will only occur if      the CT-KIP server does not support any of the CT-KIP client's      suggested encryption algorithms.   o  "NoSupportedMACAlgorithms" indicates that the CT-KIP client only      suggested MAC algorithms that are not supported by the CT-KIP      server.  This error is only valid in the CT-KIP server's first      response message.  Note that the error will only occur if the CT-      KIP server does not support any of the CT-KIP client's suggested      MAC algorithms.   o  "InitializationFailed" indicates that the CT-KIP server could not      generate a valid key given the provided data.  When this status      code is received, the CT-KIP client should try to restart CT-KIP,      as it is possible that a new run will succeed.3.7.6.  The IdentifierType Type   The IdentifierType type is used to identify various CT-KIP elements,   such as sessions, users, and services.  Identifiers must not be   longer than 128 octets.   <xs:simpleType name="IdentifierType">     <xs:restriction base="xs:string">       <xs:maxLength value="128"/>     </xs:restriction>   </xs:simpleType>3.7.7.  The NonceType Type   The NonceType type is used to carry pseudorandom values in CT-KIP   messages.  A nonce, as the name implies, must be used only once.  For   each CT-KIP message that requires a nonce element to be sent, a fresh   nonce shall be generated each time.  Nonce values must be at least 16   octets long.   <xs:simpleType name="NonceType">     <xs:restriction base="xs:base64Binary">       <xs:minLength value="16"/>     </xs:restriction>   </xs:simpleType>Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 16]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 20063.7.8.  The ExtensionsType and the AbstractExtensionType Types   The ExtensionsType type is a list of type-value pairs that define   optional CT-KIP features supported by a CT-KIP client or server.   Extensions may be sent with any CT-KIP message.  Please see the   description of individual CT-KIP messages inSection 3.8 of this   document for applicable extensions.  Unless an extension is marked as   Critical, a receiving party need not be able to interpret it.  A   receiving party is always free to disregard any (non-critical)   extensions.   <xs:complexType name="AbstractExtensionsType">     <xs:sequence maxOccurs="unbounded">       <xs:element name="Extension" type="AbstractExtensionType"/>     </xs:sequence>   </xs:complexType>   <xs:complexType name="AbstractExtensionType" abstract="true">     <xs:attribute name="Critical" type="xs:boolean"/>   </xs:complexType>3.8.  CT-KIP Messages3.8.1.  Introduction   In this section, CT-KIP messages, including their parameters,   encodings and semantics are defined.3.8.2.  CT-KIP Initialization   The CT-KIP server may initialize the CT-KIP protocol by sending a   <CT-KIPTrigger> message.  This message may, e.g., be sent in response   to a user requesting token initialization in a browsing session.   <xs:complexType name="InitializationTriggerType">     <xs:sequence>       <xs:element name="TokenID" type="xs:base64Binary" minOccurs="0"/>       <xs:element name="KeyID" type="xs:base64Binary" minOccurs="0"/>       <xs:element name="TokenPlatformInfo"         type="TokenPlatformInfoType" minOccurs="0"/>       <xs:element name="TriggerNonce" type="NonceType"/>       <xs:element name="CT-KIPURL" type="xs:anyURI" minOccurs="0"/>       <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="strict"         minOccurs="0"/>     </xs:sequence>     <xs:attribute name="id" type="xs:ID"/>   </xs:complexType>Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 17]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006   <xs:element name="CT-KIPTrigger" type="CT-KIPTriggerType"/>   <xs:complexType name="CT-KIPTriggerType">     <xs:annotation>       <xs:documentation xml:lang="en">          Message used to trigger the device to initiate a          CT-KIP run.       </xs:documentation>     </xs:annotation>     <xs:sequence>       <xs:choice>         <xs:element name="InitializationTrigger"           type="InitializationTriggerType"/>         <xs:any nameSpace="##other" processContents="strict"/>       </xs:choice>     </xs:sequence>     <xs:attribute name="Version" type="ct-kip:VersionType"/>   </xs:complexType>   The <CT-KIPTrigger> element is intended for the CT-KIP client and may   inform the CT-KIP client about the identifier for the token that is   to be initialized, and, optionally, of the identifier for the key on   that token.  The latter would apply when re-seeding.  The trigger   always contains a nonce to allow the server to couple the trigger   with a later CT-KIP <ClientHello> request.  Finally, the trigger may   contain a URL to use when contacting the CT-KIP server.  The <xs:any>   elements are for future extensibility.  Any provided <TokenID> or   <KeyID> values shall be used by the CT-KIP client in the subsequent   <ClientHello> request.  The optional <TokenPlatformInfo> element   informs the CT-KIP client about the characteristics of the intended   token platform, and applies in the public-key variant of CT-KIP in   situations when the client potentially needs to decide which one of   several tokens to initialize.   The Version attribute shall be set to "1.0" for this version of CT-   KIP.3.8.3.  The CT-KIP Client's Initial PDU   This message is the initial message sent from the CT-KIP client to   the CT-KIP server.   <xs:element name="ClientHello" type="ClientHelloPDU"/>   <xs:complexType name="ClientHelloPDU">     <xs:annotation>       <xs:documentation xml:lang="en">          Message sent from CT-KIP client to CT-KIP server toNystroem                     Informational                     [Page 18]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006          initiate a CT-KIP session.       </xs:documentation>     </xs:annotation>     <xs:complexContent>       <xs:extension base="AbstractRequestType">         <xs:sequence>           <xs:element name="TokenID"             type="xs:base64Binary" minOccurs="0"/>           <xs:element name="KeyID"             type="xs:base64Binary" minOccurs="0"/>           <xs:element name="ClientNonce"             type="NonceType" minOccurs="0"/>           <xs:element name= "TriggerNonce"             type="NonceType" minOccurs="0"/>           <xs:element name="SupportedKeyTypes"             type="AlgorithmsType"/>           <xs:element name="SupportedEncryptionAlgorithms"             type="AlgorithmsType"/>           <xs:element name="SupportedMACAlgorithms"             type="AlgorithmsType"/>           <xs:element name="Extensions"             type="ExtensionsType" minOccurs="0"/>         </xs:sequence>       </xs:extension>     </xs:complexContent>   </xs:complexType>   The components of this message have the following meaning:   o  Version: (attribute inherited from the AbstractRequestType type)      The highest version of this protocol the client supports.  Only      version one ("1.0") is currently specified.   o  <TokenID>: An identifier for the cryptographic token (allows the      server to find, e.g., a correct shared secret for MACing      purposes).  The identifier shall only be present if such shared      secrets exist or if the identifier was provided by the server in a      <CT-KIPTrigger> element (seeSection 4.2.7 below).  In the latter      case, it must have the same value as the identifier provided in      that element.   o  <KeyID>: An identifier for the key that will be overwritten if the      protocol run is successful.  The identifier shall only be present      if the key exists or was provided by the server in a      <CT-KIPTrigger> element (seeSection 4.2.7 below).  In the latter      case, it must have the same value as the identifier provided in      that element.Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 19]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006   o  <ClientNonce>: This is the nonce R, which, when present, shall be      used by the server when calculating MAC values (see below).  It is      recommended that clients include this element whenever the <KeyID>      element is present.   o  <TriggerNonce>: This optional element shall be present if and only      if the CT-KIP run was initialized with a <CT-KIPTrigger> message      (seeSection 4.2.7 below), and shall, in that case, have the same      value as the <TriggerNonce> child of that message.  A server using      nonces in this way must verify that the nonce is valid and that      any token or key identifier values provided in the <CT-KIPTrigger>      message match the corresponding identifier values in the      <ClientHello> message.   o  <SupportedKeyTypes>: A sequence of URIs indicating the key types      for which the token is willing to generate keys through CT-KIP.   o  <SupportedEncryptionAlgorithms>: A sequence of URIs indicating the      encryption algorithms supported by the cryptographic token for the      purposes of CT-KIP.  The CT-KIP client may indicate the same      algorithm both as a supported key type and as an encryption      algorithm.   o  <SupportedMACAlgorithms>: A sequence of URIs indicating the MAC      algorithms supported by the cryptographic token for the purposes      of CT-KIP.  The CT-KIP client may indicate the same algorithm both      as an encryption algorithm and as a MAC algorithm (e.g.,http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/otps/schemas/2005/12/      ct-kip#ct-kip-prf-aes defined inAppendix D)   o  <Extensions>: A sequence of extensions.  One extension is defined      for this message in this version of CT-KIP: the ClientInfoType      (seeSection 3.9.1).3.8.4.  The CT-KIP server's initial PDU   This message is the first message sent from the CT-KIP server to the   CT-KIP client (assuming a trigger message has not been sent to   initiate the protocol, in which case, this message is the second   message sent from the CT-KIP server to the CT-KIP client).  It is   sent upon reception of a <ClientHello> message.   <xs:element name="ServerHello" type="ServerHelloPDU"/>   <xs:complexType name="ServerHelloPDU">     <xs:annotation>       <xs:documentation xml:lang="en">         Message sent from CT-KIP server to CT-KIPNystroem                     Informational                     [Page 20]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006         client in response to a received ClientHello         PDU.       </xs:documentation>     </xs:annotation>     <xs:complexContent>       <xs:extension base="AbstractResponseType">         <xs:sequence minOccurs="0">           <xs:element name="KeyType"             type="AlgorithmType"/>           <xs:element name="EncryptionAlgorithm"             type="AlgorithmType"/>           <xs:element name="MacAlgorithm"             type="AlgorithmType"/>           <xs:element name="EncryptionKey"             type="ds:KeyInfoType"/>           <xs:element name="Payload"             type="PayloadType"/>           <xs:element name="Extensions"             type="ExtensionsType" minOccurs="0"/>           <xs:element name="Mac" type="MacType"             minOccurs="0"/>         </xs:sequence>       </xs:extension>     </xs:complexContent>   </xs:complexType>   <xs:complexType name="PayloadType">     <xs:annotation>       <xs:documentation xml:lang="en">         Currently, only the nonce is defined.  In future versions,         other payloads may be defined, e.g., for one-roundtrip         initialization protocols.       </xs:documentation>     </xs:annotation>     <xs:choice>       <xs:element name="Nonce" type="NonceType"/>       <any namespace="##other" processContents="strict"/>     </xs:choice>   </xs:complexType>   <xs:complexType name="MacType">     <xs:simpleContent>       <xs:extension base="xs:base64Binary">         <xs:attribute name="MacAlgorithm" type="xs:anyURI"/>       </xs:extension>     </xs:simpleContent>   </xs:complexType>Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 21]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006   The components of this message have the following meaning:   o  Version: (attribute inherited from the AbstractResponseType type)      The version selected by the CT-KIP server.  May be lower than the      version indicated by the CT-KIP client, in which case, local      policy at the client will determine whether or not to continue the      session.   o  SessionID: (attribute inherited from the AbstractResponseType      type) An identifier for this session.   o  Status: (attribute inherited from the abstract      AbstractResponseType type) Return code for the <ClientHello>.  If      Status is not "Continue", only the Status and Version attributes      will be present; otherwise, all the other elements must be present      as well.   o  <KeyType>: The type of the key to be generated.   o  <EncryptionAlgorithm>: The encryption algorithm to use when      protecting R_C.   o  <MacAlgorithm>: The MAC algorithm to be used by the CT-KIP server.   o  <EncryptionKey>: Information about the key to use when encrypting      R_C.  It will either be the server's public key (the <ds:KeyValue>      alternative of ds:KeyInfoType) or an identifier for a shared      secret key (the <ds:KeyName> alternative of ds:KeyInfoType).   o  <Payload>: The actual payload.  For this version of the protocol,      only one payload is defined: the pseudorandom string R_S.   o  <Extensions>: A list of server extensions.  Two extensions are      defined for this message in this version of CT-KIP: the      ClientInfoType and the ServerInfoType (seeSection 3.9).   o  <Mac>: The MAC must be present if the CT-KIP run will result in      the replacement of an existing token key with a new one (i.e., if      the <KeyID> element was present in the <ClientHello> message).  In      this case, the CT-KIP server must prove to the cryptographic token      that it is authorized to replace it.  The MAC value shall be      computed on the (ASCII) string "MAC 1 computation", the client's      nonce R (if sent), and the server's nonce R_S using an      authentication key K_AUTH that should be a special authentication      key used only for this purpose but may be the current K_TOKEN.Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 22]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006      The MAC value may be computed by using the CT-KIP-PRF function ofSection 3.4, in which case the input parameter s shall be set to      the concatenation of the (ASCII) string "MAC 1 computation", R (if      sent by the client), and R_S, and k shall be set to K_AUTH.  The      input parameter dsLen shall be set to the length of R_S:      dsLen = len(R_S)      MAC = CT-KIP-PRF (K_AUTH, "MAC 1 computation" || [R ||] R_S,      dsLen)      The CT-KIP client must verify the MAC if the successful execution      of the protocol will result in the replacement of an existing      token key with a newly generated one.  The CT-KIP client must      terminate the CT-KIP session if the MAC does not verify, and must      delete any nonces, keys, and/or secrets associated with the failed      run of the CT-KIP protocol.      The MacType's MacAlgorithm attribute shall, when present, identify      the negotiated MAC algorithm.3.8.5.  The CT-KIP Client's Second PDU   This message contains the nonce chosen by the cryptographic token,   R_C, encrypted by the specified encryption key and encryption   algorithm.   <xs:element name="ClientNonce" type="ClientNoncePDU"/>   <xs:complexType name="ClientNoncePDU">     <xs:annotation>       <xs:documentation xml:lang="en">         Second message sent from CT-KIP client to         CT-KIP server in a CT-KIP session.       </xs:documentation>     </xs:annotation>     <xs:complexContent>       <xs:extension base="AbstractRequestType">         <xs:sequence>           <xs:element name="EncryptedNonce"             type="xs:base64Binary"/>           <xs:element name="Extensions"             type="ExtensionsType" minOccurs="0"/>         </xs:sequence>         <xs:attribute name="SessionID" type="IdentifierType"           use="required"/>       </xs:extension>     </xs:complexContent>Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 23]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006   </xs:complexType>   The components of this message have the following meaning:   o  Version: (inherited from the AbstractRequestType type) Shall be      the same version as in the <ServerHello> message.   o  SessionID: Shall have the same value as the SessionID attribute in      the received <ServerHello> message.   o  <EncryptedNonce>: The nonce generated and encrypted by the token.      The encryption shall be made using the selected encryption      algorithm and identified key, and as specified inSection 3.4.   o  <Extensions>: A list of extensions.  Two extensions are defined      for this message in this version of CT-KIP: the ClientInfoType and      the ServerInfoType (seeSection 3.9).3.8.6.  The CT-KIP Server's Final PDU   This message is the last message of a two roundtrip CT-KIP exchange.   The CT-KIP server sends this message to the CT-KIP client in response   to the <ClientNonce> message.   <xs:element name="ServerFinished" type="ServerFinishedPDU"/>   <xs:complexType name="ServerFinishedPDU">     <xs:annotation>       <xs:documentation xml:lang="en">         Final message sent from CT-KIP server to         CT-KIP client in a CT-KIP session.       </xs:documentation>     </xs:annotation>     <xs:complexContent>       <xs:extension base="AbstractResponseType">         <xs:sequence minOccurs="0">           <xs:element name="TokenID"             type="xs:base64Binary"/>           <xs:element name="KeyID"             type="xs:base64Binary"/>           <xs:element name="KeyExpiryDate"             type="xs:dateTime" minOccurs="0"/>           <xs:element name="ServiceID"             type="IdentifierType" minOccurs="0"/>           <xs:element name="ServiceLogo"             type="LogoType" minOccurs="0"/>           <xs:element name="UserID"             type="IdentifierType" minOccurs="0"/>Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 24]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006           <xs:element name="Extensions"             type="ExtensionsType" minOccurs="0"/>           <xs:element name="Mac"             type="MacType"/>         </xs:sequence>       </xs:extension>     </xs:complexContent>   </xs:complexType>   The components of this message have the following meaning:   o  Version: (inherited from the AbstractResponseType type) The CT-KIP      version used in this session.   o  SessionID: (inherited from the AbstractResponseType type) The      previously established identifier for this session.   o  Status: (inherited from the AbstractResponseType type) Return code      for the <ServerFinished> message.  If Status is not "Success",      only the Status, SessionID, and Version attributes will be present      (the presence of the SessionID attribute is dependent on the type      of reported error); otherwise, all the other elements must be      present as well.  In this latter case, the <ServerFinished>      message can be seen as a "Commit" message, instructing the      cryptographic token to store the generated key and associate the      given key identifier with this key.   o  <TokenID>: An identifier for the token carrying the generated key.      Must have the same value as the <TokenID> element of the      <ClientHello> message, if one was provided.  When assigned by the      CT-KIP server, the <TokenID> element shall be unique within the      domain of the CT-KIP server.   o  <KeyID>: An identifier for the newly generated key.  The      identifier shall be globally unique.  Must have the same value as      any key identifier provided by the CT-KIP client in the      <ClientHello> message.      The reason for requiring globally unique key identifiers is that      it avoids potential conflicts when associating key holders with      key identifiers.  One way of achieving global uniqueness with      reasonable certainty is to hash the combination of the issuer's      fully qualified domain name with an (issuer-specific) serial      number, assuming that each issuer makes sure their serial numbers      never repeat.Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 25]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006      CT-KIP clients must support key identifiers at least 64 octets      long.  CT-KIP servers should not generate key identifiers longer      than 64 octets.   o  <KeyExpiryDate>: This optional element provides the date and time      after which the generated key should be treated as expired and      invalid.   o  <ServiceID>: An optional identifier for the service that has      stored the generated key.  The cryptographic token may store this      identifier associated with the key in order to simplify later      lookups.  The identifier shall be a printable string.   o  <ServiceLogo>: This optional element provides a graphical logo      image for the service that can be displayed in user interfaces,      e.g., to help a user select a certain key.  The logo should      contain an image within the size range of 60 pixels wide by 45      pixels high, and 200 pixels wide by 150 pixels high.  The required      MimeType attribute of this type provides information about the      MIME type of the image.  This specification supports both the JPEG      and GIF image formats (with MIME types of "image/jpeg" and "image/      gif").   o  <UserID>: An optional identifier for the user associated with the      generated key in the authentication service.  The cryptographic      token may store this identifier associated with the generated key      in order to enhance later user experiences.  The identifier shall      be a printable string.   o  <Extensions>: A list of extensions chosen by the CT-KIP server.      For this message, this version of CT-KIP defines two extensions,      the OTPKeyConfigurationDataType and the ClientInfoType (seeSection 3.9).   o  <Mac>: To avoid a false "Commit" message causing the token to end      up in an initialized state for which the server does not know the      stored key, <ServerFinished> messages must always be authenticated      with a MAC.  The MAC shall be made using the already established      MAC algorithm.  The MAC value shall be computed on the (ASCII)      string "MAC 2 computation" and R_C using an authentication key      K_AUTH.  Again, this should be a special authentication key used      only for this purpose, but may also be an existing K_TOKEN.  (In      this case, implementations must protect against attacks where      K_TOKEN is used to pre-compute MAC values.)  If no authentication      key is present in the token, and no K_TOKEN existed before the CT-      KIP run, K_AUTH shall be the newly generated K_TOKEN.Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 26]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006      If CT-KIP-PRF is used as the MAC algorithm, then the input      parameter s shall consist of the concatenation of the (ASCII)      string "MAC 2 computation" and R_C, and the parameter dsLen shall      be set to the length of R_C:      dsLen = len(R_C)      MAC = CT-KIP-PRF (K_AUTH, "MAC 2 computation" || R_C, dsLen)      When receiving a <ServerFinished> message with Status = "Success"      for which the MAC verifies, the CT-KIP client shall associate the      generated key K_TOKEN with the provided key identifier and store      this data permanently.  After this operation, it shall not be      possible to overwrite the key unless knowledge of an authorizing      key is proven through a MAC on a later <ServerHello> (and      <ServerFinished>) message.      The CT-KIP client must verify the MAC.  The CT-KIP client must      terminate the CT-KIP session if the MAC does not verify, and must,      in this case, also delete any nonces, keys, and/or secrets      associated with the failed run of the CT-KIP protocol.      The MacType's MacAlgorithm attribute shall, when present, identify      the negotiated MAC algorithm.3.9.  Protocol Extensions3.9.1.  The ClientInfoType Type   When present in a <ClientHello> or a <ClientNonce> message, the   optional ClientInfoType extension contains CT-KIP client-specific   information.  CT-KIP servers must support this extension.  CT-KIP   servers must not attempt to interpret the data it carries and, if   received, must include it unmodified in the current protocol run's   next server response.  Servers need not retain the ClientInfoType's   data after that response has been generated.   <xs:complexType name="ClientInfoType">     <xs:complexContent>       <xs:extension base="AbstractExtensionType">         <xs:sequence>           <xs:element name="Data"             type="xs:base64Binary"/>         </xs:sequence>       </xs:extension>     </xs:complexContent>   </xs:complexType>Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 27]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 20063.9.2.  The ServerInfoType Type   When present, the optional ServerInfoType extension contains CT-KIP   server-specific information.  This extension is only valid in   <ServerHello> messages for which Status = "Continue".  CT-KIP clients   must support this extension.  CT-KIP clients must not attempt to   interpret the data it carries and, if received, must include it   unmodified in the current protocol run's next client request (i.e.,   the <ClientNonce> message).  CT-KIP clients need not retain the   ServerInfoType's data after that request has been generated.  This   extension may be used, e.g., for state management in the CT-KIP   server.   <xs:complexType name="ServerInfoType">     <xs:complexContent>       <xs:extension base="AbstractExtensionType">         <xs:sequence>           <xs:element name="Data"             type="xs:base64Binary"/>         </xs:sequence>       </xs:extension>     </xs:complexContent>   </xs:complexType>3.9.3.  The OTPKeyConfigurationDataType Type   The optional OTPKeyConfigurationDataType extension contains   additional key configuration data for OTP keys:   <xs:complexType name="OTPKeyConfigurationDataType">     <xs:annotation>       <xs:documentation xml:lang="en">         This extension is only valid in ServerFinished         PDUs.  It carries additional configuration data         that an OTP token should use (subject to local         policy) when generating OTP values with a newly         generated OTP key.       </xs:documentation>     </xs:annotation>     <xs:complexContent>       <xs:extension base="ExtensionType">         <xs:sequence>           <xs:element name="OTPFormat"             type="OTPFormatType"/>           <xs:element name="OTPLength"             type="xs:positiveInteger"/>           <xs:element name="OTPMode"             type="OTPModeType" minOccurs="0"/>Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 28]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006         </xs:sequence>       </xs:extension>     </xs:complexContent>   </xs:complexType>   This extension is only valid in <ServerFinished> messages.  It   carries additional configuration data that the cryptographic token   should use (subject to local policy) when generating OTP values from   the newly generated OTP key.  The components of this extension have   the following meaning:   o  OTPFormat: The default format of OTPs produced with this key.   o  OTPLength: The default length of OTPs produced with this key.   o  OTPMode: The default mode of operation when producing OTPs with      this key.4.  Protocol Bindings4.1.  General Requirement   CT-KIP assumes a reliable transport.4.2.  HTTP/1.1 binding for CT-KIP4.2.1.  Introduction   This section presents a binding of the previous messages to HTTP/1.1   [7].  Note that the HTTP client normally will be different from the   CT-KIP client, i.e., the HTTP client will only exist to "proxy" CT-   KIP messages from the CT-KIP client to the CT-KIP server.  Likewise,   on the HTTP server side, the CT-KIP server may receive CT-KIP PDUs   from a "front-end" HTTP server.4.2.2.  Identification of CT-KIP Messages   The MIME-type for all CT-KIP messages shall be   application/vnd.otps.ct-kip+xml4.2.3.  HTTP Headers   HTTP proxies must not cache responses carrying CT-KIP messages.  For   this reason, the following holds:Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 29]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006   o  When using HTTP/1.1, requesters should:      *  Include a Cache-Control header field set to "no-cache,         no-store".      *  Include a Pragma header field set to "no-cache".   o  When using HTTP/1.1, responders should:      *  Include a Cache-Control header field set to "no-cache,         no-must-revalidate, private".      *  Include a Pragma header field set to "no-cache".      *  NOT include a Validator, such as a Last-Modified or ETag         header.   There are no other restrictions on HTTP headers, besides the   requirement to set the Content-Type header value to application/   vnd.otps.ct-kip+xml.4.2.4.  HTTP Operations   Persistent connections as defined in HTTP/1.1 are assumed but not   required.  CT-KIP requests are mapped to HTTP POST operations.  CT-   KIP responses are mapped to HTTP responses.4.2.5.  HTTP Status Codes   A CT-KIP HTTP responder that refuses to perform a message exchange   with a CT-KIP HTTP requester should return a 403 (Forbidden)   response.  In this case, the content of the HTTP body is not   significant.  In the case of an HTTP error while processing a CT-KIP   request, the HTTP server must return a 500 (Internal Server Error)   response.  This type of error should be returned for HTTP-related   errors detected before control is passed to the CT-KIP processor, or   when the CT-KIP processor reports an internal error (for example, the   CT-KIP XML namespace is incorrect, or the CT-KIP schema cannot be   located).  If the type of a CT-KIP request cannot be determined, the   CT-KIP responder must return a 400 (Bad request) response.   In these cases (i.e., when the HTTP response code is 4xx or 5xx), the   content of the HTTP body is not significant.   Redirection status codes (3xx) apply as usual.Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 30]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006   Whenever the HTTP POST is successfully invoked, the CT-KIP HTTP   responder must use the 200 status code and provide a suitable CT-KIP   message (possibly with CT-KIP error information included) in the HTTP   body.4.2.6.  HTTP Authentication   No support for HTTP/1.1 authentication is assumed.4.2.7.  Initialization of CT-KIP   The CT-KIP server may initialize the CT-KIP protocol by sending an   HTTP response with Content-Type set to application/   vnd.otps.ct-kip+xml and response code set to 200 (OK).  This message   may, e.g., be sent in response to a user requesting token   initialization in a browsing session.  The initialization message may   carry data in its body.  If this is the case, the data shall be a   valid instance of a <CT-KIPTrigger> element.4.2.8.  Example Messages   a.  Initialization from CT-KIP server:   HTTP/1.1 200 OK   Cache-Control: no-store   Content-Type: application/vnd.otps.ct-kip+xml   Content-Length: <some value>   CT-KIP initialization data in XML form...   b.  Initial request from CT-KIP client:   POST http://example.com/cgi-bin/CT-KIP-server HTTP/1.1   Cache-Control: no-store   Pragma: no-cache   Host: example.com   Content-Type: application/vnd.otps.ct-kip+xml   Content-Length: <some value>   CT-KIP data in XML form (supported version, supported algorithms...)Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 31]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006   c.  Initial response from CT-KIP server:   HTTP/1.1 200 OK   Cache-Control: no-store   Content-Type: application/vnd.otps.ct-kip+xml   Content-Length: <some other value>   CT-KIP data in XML form (server random nonce, server public key, ...)5.  Security considerations5.1.  General   CT-KIP is designed to protect generated key material from exposure.   No other entities than the CT-KIP server and the cryptographic token   will have access to a generated K_TOKEN if the cryptographic   algorithms used are of sufficient strength and, on the CT-KIP client   side, generation and encryption of R_C and generation of K_TOKEN take   place as specified and in the token.  This applies even if malicious   software is present in the CT-KIP client.  However, as discussed in   the following, CT-KIP does not protect against certain other threats   resulting from man-in-the-middle attacks and other forms of attacks.   CT-KIP should, therefore, be run over a transport providing privacy   and integrity, such as HTTP over Transport Layer Security (TLS) with   a suitable ciphersuite, when such threats are a concern.  Note that   TLS ciphersuites with anonymous key exchanges are not suitable in   those situations.5.2.  Active Attacks5.2.1.  Introduction   An active attacker may attempt to modify, delete, insert, replay or   reorder messages for a variety of purposes including service denial   and compromise of generated key material.  Sections5.2.2 through   5.2.7 analyze these attack scenarios.5.2.2.  Message Modifications   Modifications to a <CT-KIPTrigger> message will either cause denial-   of-service (modifications of any of the identifiers or the nonce) or   the CT-KIP client to contact the wrong CT-KIP server.  The latter is   in effect a man-in-the-middle attack and is discussed further inSection 5.2.7.   An attacker may modify a <ClientHello> message.  This means that the   attacker could indicate a different key or token than the one   intended by the CT-KIP client, and could also suggest otherNystroem                     Informational                     [Page 32]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006   cryptographic algorithms than the ones preferred by the CT-KIP   client, e.g., cryptographically weaker ones.  The attacker could also   suggest earlier versions of the CT-KIP protocol, in case these   versions have been shown to have vulnerabilities.  These   modifications could lead to an attacker succeeding in initializing or   modifying another token than the one intended (i.e., the server   assigning the generated key to the wrong token), or gaining access to   a generated key through the use of weak cryptographic algorithms or   protocol versions.  CT-KIP implementations may protect against the   latter by having strict policies about what versions and algorithms   they support and accept.  The former threat (assignment of a   generated key to the wrong token) is not possible when the shared-key   variant of CT-KIP is employed (assuming existing shared keys are   unique per token) but is possible in the public-key variant.   Therefore, CT-KIP servers must not accept unilaterally provided token   identifiers in the public-key variant.  This is also indicated in the   protocol description.  In the shared-key variant, however, an   attacker may be able to provide the wrong identifier (possibly also   leading to the incorrect user being associated with the generated   key) if the attacker has real-time access to the token with the   identified key.  In other words, the generated key is associated with   the correct token but the token is associated with the incorrect   user.  See furtherSection 5.5 for a discussion of this threat and   possible countermeasures.   An attacker may also modify a <ServerHello> message.  This means that   the attacker could indicate different key types, algorithms, or   protocol versions than the legitimate server would, e.g.,   cryptographically weaker ones.  The attacker could also provide a   different nonce than the one sent by the legitimate server.  Clients   will protect against the former through strict adherence to policies   regarding permissible algorithms and protocol versions.  The latter   (wrong nonce) will not constitute a security problem, as a generated   key will not match the key generated on the legitimate server.  Also,   whenever the CT-KIP run would result in the replacement of an   existing key, the <Mac> element protects against modifications of   R_S.   Modifications of <ClientNonce> messages are also possible.  If an   attacker modifies the SessionID attribute, then, in effect, a switch   to another session will occur at the server, assuming the new   SessionID is valid at that time on the server.  It still will not   allow the attacker to learn a generated K_TOKEN since R_C has been   wrapped for the legitimate server.  Modifications of the   <EncryptedNonce> element, e.g., replacing it with a value for which   the attacker knows an underlying R'C, will not result in the client   changing its pre-CT-KIP state, since the server will be unable to   provide a valid MAC in its final message to the client.  The serverNystroem                     Informational                     [Page 33]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006   may, however, end up storing K'TOKEN rather than K_TOKEN.  If the   token has been associated with a particular user, then this could   constitute a security problem.  For a further discussion about this   threat, and a possible countermeasure, seeSection 5.5 below.  Note   that use of Secure Socket Layer (SSL) or TLS does not protect against   this attack if the attacker has access to the CT-KIP client (e.g.,   through malicious software, "trojans").   Finally, attackers may also modify the <ServerFinished> message.   Replacing the <Mac> element will only result in denial-of-service.   Replacement of any other element may cause the CT-KIP client to   associate, e.g., the wrong service with the generated key.  CT-KIP   should be run over a transport providing privacy and integrity when   this is a concern.5.2.3.  Message Deletion   Message deletion will not cause any other harm than denial-of-   service, since a token shall not change its state (i.e., "commit" to   a generated key) until it receives the final message from the CT-KIP   server and successfully has processed that message, including   validation of its MAC.  A deleted <ServerFinished> message will not   cause the server to end up in an inconsistent state vis-a-vis the   token if the server implements the suggestions inSection 5.5.5.2.4.  Message Insertion   An active attacker may initiate a CT-KIP run at any time, and suggest   any token identifier.  CT-KIP server implementations may receive some   protection against inadvertently initializing a token or   inadvertently replacing an existing key or assigning a key to a token   by initializing the CT-KIP run by use of the <CT-KIPTrigger>.  The   <TriggerNonce> element allows the server to associate a CT-KIP   protocol run with, e.g., an earlier user-authenticated session.  The   security of this method, therefore, depends on the ability to protect   the <TriggerNonce> element in the CT-KIP initialization message.  If   an eavesdropper is able to capture this message, he may race the   legitimate user for a key initialization.  CT-KIP over a transport   providing privacy and integrity, coupled with the recommendations inSection 5.5, is recommended when this is a concern.   Insertion of other messages into an existing protocol run is seen as   equivalent to modification of legitimately sent messages.5.2.5.  Message Replay   Attempts to replay a previously recorded CT-KIP message will be   detected, as the use of nonces ensures that both parties are live.Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 34]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 20065.2.6.  Message Reordering   An attacker may attempt to re-order messages but this will be   detected, as each message is of a unique type.5.2.7.  Man in the Middle   In addition to other active attacks, an attacker posing as a man in   the middle may be able to provide his own public key to the CT-KIP   client.  This threat and countermeasures to it are discussed inSection 3.3.  An attacker posing as a man-in-the-middle may also be   acting as a proxy and, hence, may not interfere with CT-KIP runs but   still learn valuable information; seeSection 5.3.5.3.  Passive Attacks   Passive attackers may eavesdrop on CT-KIP runs to learn information   that later on may be used to impersonate users, mount active attacks,   etc.   If CT-KIP is not run over a transport providing privacy, a passive   attacker may learn:   o  What tokens a particular user is in possession of;   o  The identifiers of keys on those tokens and other attributes      pertaining to those keys, e.g., the lifetime of the keys; and   o  CT-KIP versions and cryptographic algorithms supported by a      particular CT-KIP client or server.   Whenever the above is a concern, CT-KIP should be run over a   transport providing privacy.  If man-in-the-middle attacks for the   purposes described above are a concern, the transport should also   offer server-side authentication.5.4.  Cryptographic Attacks   An attacker with unlimited access to an initialized token may use the   token as an "oracle" to pre-compute values that later on may be used   to impersonate the CT-KIP server.  Sections3.6 and3.8 contain   discussions of this threat and steps recommended to protect against   it.Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 35]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 20065.5.  Attacks on the Interaction between CT-KIP and User Authentication   If keys generated in CT-KIP will be associated with a particular user   at the CT-KIP server (or a server trusted by, and communicating with   the CT-KIP server), then in order to protect against threats where an   attacker replaces a client-provided encrypted R_C with his own R'C   (regardless of whether the public-key variant or the shared-secret   variant of CT-KIP is employed to encrypt the client nonce), the   server should not commit to associate a generated K_TOKEN with the   given token (user) until the user simultaneously has proven both   possession of a token containing K_TOKEN and some out-of-band   provided authenticating information (e.g., a temporary password).   For example, if the token is a one-time password token, the user   could be required to authenticate with both a one-time password   generated by the token and an out-of-band provided temporary PIN in   order to have the server "commit" to the generated token value for   the given user.  Preferably, the user should perform this operation   from another host than the one used to initialize the token, in order   to minimize the risk of malicious software on the client interfering   with the process.   Another threat arises when an attacker is able to trick a user to   authenticate to the attacker rather than to the legitimate service   before the CT-KIP protocol run.  If successful, the attacker will   then be able to impersonate the user towards the legitimate service,   and subsequently receive a valid CT-KIP trigger.  If the public-key   variant of CT-KIP is used, this may result in the attacker being able   to (after a successful CT-KIP protocol run) impersonate the user.   Ordinary precautions must, therefore, be in place to ensure that   users authenticate only to legitimate services.6.  Intellectual Property Considerations   RSA and SecurID are registered trademarks or trademarks of RSA   Security Inc. in the United States and/or other countries.  The names   of other products and services mentioned may be the trademarks of   their respective owners.Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 36]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 20067.  References7.1.  Normative References   [1]   Davis, M. and M. Duerst, "Unicode Normalization Forms",         March 2001,         <http://www.unicode.org/unicode/reports/tr15/tr15-21.html>.7.2.  Informative References   [2]   RSA Laboratories, "PKCS #11 Mechanisms for the Cryptographic         Token Key Initialization Protocol", PKCS #11 Version 2.20         Amendment 2, December 2005, <ftp://ftp.rsasecurity.com/pub/pkcs/pkcs-11/v2-20/pkcs-11v2-20a2.pdf>.   [3]   RSA Laboratories, "Cryptographic Token Interface Standard",         PKCS #11 Version 2.20, June 2004, <ftp://ftp.rsasecurity.com/pub/pkcs/pkcs-11/v2-20/pkcs-11v2-20.pdf>.   [4]   RSA Laboratories, "Frequently Asked Questions About Today's         Cryptography. Version 4.1", 2000, <http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/faq/files/rsalabs_faq41.pdf>.   [5]   RSA Laboratories, "Password-Based Cryptography Standard",         PKCS #5 Version 2.0, March 1999,         <ftp://ftp.rsasecurity.com/pub/pkcs/pkcs-5v2/pkcs5v2-0.pdf>.   [6]   RSA Laboratories, "RSA Cryptography Standard", PKCS #1 Version         2.1, June 2002,         <ftp://ftp.rsasecurity.com/pub/pkcs/pkcs-1/pkcs-1v2-1.pdf>.   [7]   Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H., Masinter, L.,         Leach, P., and T. Berners-Lee, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol --         HTTP/1.1",RFC 2616, June 1999.   [8]   National Institute of Standards and Technology, "Specification         for the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)", FIPS 197,         November 2001,         <http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips197/fips-197.pdf>.   [9]   Krawzcyk, H., Bellare, M., and R. Canetti, "HMAC: Keyed-Hashing         for Message Authentication",RFC 2104, February 1997.   [10]  Iwata, T. and K. Kurosawa, "OMAC: One-Key CBC MAC.  In Fast         Software Encryption, FSE 2003, pages 129 - 153.         Springer-Verlag", 2003,         <http://crypt.cis.ibaraki.ac.jp/omac/docs/omac.pdf>.Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 37]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006   [11]  National Institute of Standards and Technology, "Secure Hash         Standard", FIPS 197, February 2004, <http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips180-2/fips180-2withchangenotice.pdf>.   [12]  RSA Laboratories, "Cryptographic Token Key Initialization         Protocol", OTPS Version 1.0, December 2005,         <ftp://ftp.rsasecurity.com/pub/otps/ct-kip/ct-kip-v1-0.pdf>.Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 38]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006Appendix A.  CT-KIP Schema   <xs:schema     targetNamespace=     "http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/otps/schemas/2005/12/ct-kip#"     xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"     xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#"     xmlns=     "http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/otps/schemas/2005/12/ct-kip#">   <xs:import namespace="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#"     schemaLocation=     "http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xmldsig-core-20020212/xmldsig-core-schema.xsd"/>   <!-- Basic types -->   <xs:complexType name="AbstractRequestType" abstract="true">     <xs:attribute name="Version" type="VersionType" use="required"/>   </xs:complexType>   <xs:complexType name="AbstractResponseType" abstract="true">     <xs:attribute name="Version" type="VersionType" use="required"/>     <xs:attribute name="SessionID" type="IdentifierType"/>     <xs:attribute name="Status" type="StatusCode" use="required"/>   </xs:complexType>   <xs:simpleType name="StatusCode">     <xs:restriction base="xs:string">       <xs:enumeration value="Continue"/>       <xs:enumeration value="Success"/>       <xs:enumeration value="Abort"/>       <xs:enumeration value="AccessDenied"/>       <xs:enumeration value="MalformedRequest"/>       <xs:enumeration value="UnknownRequest"/>       <xs:enumeration value="UnknownCriticalExtension"/>       <xs:enumeration value="UnsupportedVersion"/>       <xs:enumeration value="NoSupportedKeyTypes"/>       <xs:enumeration value="NoSupportedEncryptionAlgorithms"/>       <xs:enumeration value="NoSupportedMACAlgorithms"/>       <xs:enumeration value="InitializationFailed"/>     </xs:restriction>   </xs:simpleType>   <xs:simpleType name="VersionType">     <xs:restriction base="xs:string">       <xs:pattern value="\d{1,2}\.\d{1,3}"/>     </xs:restriction>Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 39]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006   </xs:simpleType>   <xs:simpleType name="IdentifierType">     <xs:restriction base="xs:string">       <xs:maxLength value="128"/>     </xs:restriction>   </xs:simpleType>   <xs:simpleType name="NonceType">     <xs:restriction base="xs:base64Binary">       <xs:length value="16"/>     </xs:restriction>   </xs:simpleType>   <xs:complexType name="LogoType">     <xs:simpleContent>       <xs:extension base="xs:base64Binary">         <xs:attribute name="MimeType" type="MimeTypeType"         use="required"/>       </xs:extension>     </xs:simpleContent>   </xs:complexType>   <xs:simpleType name="MimeTypeType">     <xs:restriction base="xs:string">       <xs:enumeration value="image/jpeg"/>       <xs:enumeration value="image/gif"/>     </xs:restriction>   </xs:simpleType>   <!-- Algorithms are identified through URIs -->   <xs:complexType name="AlgorithmsType">     <xs:sequence maxOccurs="unbounded">       <xs:element name="Algorithm" type="AlgorithmType"/>     </xs:sequence>   </xs:complexType>   <xs:simpleType name="AlgorithmType">     <xs:restriction base="xs:anyURI"/>   </xs:simpleType>   <xs:complexType name="MacType">     <xs:simpleContent>       <xs:extension base="xs:base64Binary">         <xs:attribute name="MacAlgorithm"         type="xs:anyURI"/>       </xs:extension>     </xs:simpleContent>Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 40]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006   </xs:complexType>   <!-- CT-KIP extensions (for future use) -->   <xs:complexType name="ExtensionsType">     <xs:sequence maxOccurs="unbounded">       <xs:element name="Extension" type="AbstractExtensionType"/>     </xs:sequence>   </xs:complexType>   <xs:complexType name="AbstractExtensionType" abstract="true">     <xs:attribute name="Critical" type="xs:boolean"/>   </xs:complexType>   <xs:complexType name="ClientInfoType">     <xs:complexContent>       <xs:extension base="AbstractExtensionType">         <xs:sequence>           <xs:element name="Data" type="xs:base64Binary"/>         </xs:sequence>       </xs:extension>     </xs:complexContent>   </xs:complexType>   <xs:complexType name="ServerInfoType">     <xs:complexContent>       <xs:extension base="AbstractExtensionType">         <xs:sequence>           <xs:element name="Data" type="xs:base64Binary"/>         </xs:sequence>       </xs:extension>     </xs:complexContent>   </xs:complexType>   <xs:complexType name="OTPKeyConfigurationDataType">     <xs:annotation>       <xs:documentation xml:lang="en">         This extension is only valid in ServerFinished PDUs.  It         carries additional configuration data that an OTP token should         use (subject to local policy) when generating OTP values from a         newly generated OTP key.       </xs:documentation>     </xs:annotation>     <xs:complexContent>       <xs:extension base="AbstractExtensionType">         <xs:sequence>           <xs:element name="OTPFormat" type="OTPFormatType"/>           <xs:element name="OTPLength" type="xs:positiveInteger"/>           <xs:element name="OTPMode" type="OTPModeType" minOccurs="0"/>Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 41]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006         </xs:sequence>       </xs:extension>     </xs:complexContent>   </xs:complexType>   <xs:simpleType name="OTPFormatType">     <xs:restriction base="xs:string">       <xs:enumeration value="Decimal"/>       <xs:enumeration value="Hexadecimal"/>       <xs:enumeration value="Alphanumeric"/>       <xs:enumeration value="Binary"/>     </xs:restriction>   </xs:simpleType>   <xs:complexType name="OTPModeType">     <xs:choice maxOccurs="unbounded">       <xs:element name="Time" type="TimeType"/>       <xs:element name="Counter"/>       <xs:element name="Challenge"/>       <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="strict"/>     </xs:choice>   </xs:complexType>   <xs:complexType name="TimeType">     <xs:complexContent>       <xs:restriction base="xs:anyType">         <xs:attribute name="TimeInterval" type="xs:positiveInteger"/>       </xs:restriction>     </xs:complexContent>   </xs:complexType>   <xs:complexType name="PayloadType">     <xs:annotation>       <xs:documentation xml:lang="en">       </xs:documentation>     </xs:annotation>     <xs:choice>       <xs:element name="Nonce" type="NonceType"/>       <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="strict"/>     </xs:choice>   </xs:complexType>   <xs:simpleType name="PlatformType">     <xs:restriction base="xs:string">       <xs:enumeration value="Hardware"/>       <xs:enumeration value="Software"/>       <xs:enumeration value="Unspecified"/>     </xs:restriction>Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 42]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006   </xs:simpleType>   <xs:complexType name="TokenPlatformInfoType">     <xs:annotation>       <xs:documentation xml:lang="en">         Carries token platform information helping the client to select         a suitable token.       </xs:documentation>     </xs:annotation>     <xs:attribute name="KeyLocation" type="PlatformType"/>     <xs:attribute name="AlgorithmLocation" type="PlatformType"/>   </xs:complexType>   <xs:complexType name="InitializationTriggerType">     <xs:sequence>       <xs:element name="TokenID" type="xs:base64Binary" minOccurs="0"/>       <xs:element name="KeyID" type="xs:base64Binary" minOccurs="0"/>       <xs:element name="TokenPlatformInfo" type="TokenPlatformInfoType"         minOccurs="0"/>       <xs:element name="TriggerNonce" type="NonceType"/>       <xs:element name="CT-KIPURL" type="xs:anyURI" minOccurs="0"/>       <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="strict"         minOccurs="0"/>     </xs:sequence>   </xs:complexType>   <!-- CT-KIP PDUs -->   <!-- CT-KIP trigger -->   <xs:element name="CT-KIPTrigger" type="CT-KIPTriggerType"/>   <xs:complexType name="CT-KIPTriggerType">     <xs:annotation>       <xs:documentation xml:lang="en">         Message used to trigger the device to initiate a CT-KIP run.       </xs:documentation>     </xs:annotation>     <xs:sequence>       <xs:choice>         <xs:element name="InitializationTrigger"         type="InitializationTriggerType"/>         <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="strict"/>       </xs:choice>     </xs:sequence>     <xs:attribute name="Version" type="VersionType"/>   </xs:complexType>   <!-- ClientHello PDU -->Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 43]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006   <xs:element name="ClientHello" type="ClientHelloPDU"/>   <xs:complexType name="ClientHelloPDU">     <xs:annotation>       <xs:documentation xml:lang="en">         Message sent from CT-KIP client to CT-KIP server to initiate an         CT-KIP session.       </xs:documentation>     </xs:annotation>     <xs:complexContent>       <xs:extension base="AbstractRequestType">         <xs:sequence>           <xs:element name="TokenID" type="xs:base64Binary"             minOccurs="0"/>           <xs:element name="KeyID" type="xs:base64Binary"             minOccurs="0"/>           <xs:element name="ClientNonce" type="NonceType"             minOccurs="0"/>           <xs:element name="TriggerNonce" type="NonceType"             minOccurs="0"/>           <xs:element name="SupportedKeyTypes" type="AlgorithmsType"/>           <xs:element name="SupportedEncryptionAlgorithms"             type="AlgorithmsType"/>           <xs:element name="SupportedMACAlgorithms"             type="AlgorithmsType"/>           <xs:element name="Extensions" type="ExtensionsType"             minOccurs="0"/>         </xs:sequence>       </xs:extension>     </xs:complexContent>   </xs:complexType>   <!-- ServerHello PDU -->   <xs:element name="ServerHello" type="ServerHelloPDU"/>   <xs:complexType name="ServerHelloPDU">     <xs:annotation>       <xs:documentation xml:lang="en">         Message sent from CT-KIP server to CT-KIP client in response to         a received ClientHello PDU.       </xs:documentation>     </xs:annotation>     <xs:complexContent>       <xs:extension base="AbstractResponseType">         <xs:sequence minOccurs="0">           <xs:element name="KeyType" type="AlgorithmType"/>           <xs:element name="EncryptionAlgorithm" type="AlgorithmType"/>           <xs:element name="MacAlgorithm" type="AlgorithmType"/>Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 44]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006           <xs:element name="EncryptionKey" type="ds:KeyInfoType"/>           <xs:element name="Payload" type="PayloadType"/>           <xs:element name="Extensions" type="ExtensionsType"             minOccurs="0"/>           <xs:element name="Mac" type="MacType" minOccurs="0"/>         </xs:sequence>       </xs:extension>     </xs:complexContent>   </xs:complexType>   <!-- ClientNonce PDU -->   <xs:element name="ClientNonce" type="ClientNoncePDU"/>   <xs:complexType name="ClientNoncePDU">     <xs:annotation>       <xs:documentation xml:lang="en">         Second message sent from CT-KIP client to CT-KIP server to         convey the client's chosen secret.       </xs:documentation>     </xs:annotation>     <xs:complexContent>       <xs:extension base="AbstractRequestType">         <xs:sequence>           <xs:element name="EncryptedNonce" type="xs:base64Binary"/>           <xs:element name="Extensions" type="ExtensionsType"             minOccurs="0"/>         </xs:sequence>         <xs:attribute name="SessionID" type="IdentifierType"           use="required"/>       </xs:extension>     </xs:complexContent>   </xs:complexType>   <!-- ServerFinished PDU -->   <xs:element name="ServerFinished" type="ServerFinishedPDU"/>   <xs:complexType name="ServerFinishedPDU">     <xs:annotation>       <xs:documentation xml:lang="en">         Final message sent from CT-KIP server to CT-KIP client in an         CT-KIP session.       </xs:documentation>     </xs:annotation>     <xs:complexContent>       <xs:extension base="AbstractResponseType">         <xs:sequence minOccurs="0">           <xs:element name="TokenID" type="xs:base64Binary"/>           <xs:element name="KeyID" type="xs:base64Binary"/>           <xs:element name="KeyExpiryDate" type="xs:dateTime"Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 45]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006             minOccurs="0"/>           <xs:element name="ServiceID" type="IdentifierType"             minOccurs="0"/>           <xs:element name="ServiceLogo" type="LogoType"             minOccurs="0"/>           <xs:element name="UserID" type="IdentifierType"             minOccurs="0"/>           <xs:element name="Extensions" type="ExtensionsType"             minOccurs="0"/>           <xs:element name="Mac" type="MacType"/>         </xs:sequence>       </xs:extension>     </xs:complexContent>   </xs:complexType>   </xs:schema>Appendix B.  Examples of CT-KIP MessagesB.1.  Introduction   All examples are syntactically correct.  MAC and cipher values are   fictitious, however.  The examples illustrate a complete CT-KIP   exchange, starting with an initialization (trigger) message from the   server.B.2.  Example of a CT-KIP Initialization (Trigger) Message   <CT-KIPTrigger     xmlns=     "http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/otps/schemas/2005/12/ct-kip#"     xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"     Version="1.0">     <InitializationTrigger>       <TokenID>12345678</TokenID>       <TriggerNonce>112dsdfwf312asder394jw==</TriggerNonce>     </InitializationTrigger>   </CT-KIPTrigger>B.3.  Example of a <ClientHello> Message   <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>   <ClientHello     xmlns=     "http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/otps/schemas/2005/12/ct-kip#"     xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"     Version="1.0">     <TokenID>12345678</TokenID>Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 46]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006    <TriggerNonce>112dsdfwf312asder394jw==</TriggerNonce>     <SupportedKeyTypes>       <Algorithm>http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/otps/schemas   /2005/09/otps-wst#SecurID-AES</Algorithm>     </SupportedKeyTypes>     <SupportedEncryptionAlgorithms>       <Algorithm>http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#rsa-1_5</Algorithm>       <Algorithm>http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/otps/schemas/   2005/12/ct-kip#ct-kip-prf-aes</Algorithm>     </SupportedEncryptionAlgorithms>     <SupportedMACAlgorithms>       <Algorithm>http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/otps/schemas/   2005/12/ct-kip#ct-kip-prf-aes</Algorithm>     </SupportedMACAlgorithms>   </ClientHello>B.4.  Example of a <ServerHello> Message   <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>   <ServerHello     xmlns=   "http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/otps/schemas/2005/12/ct-kip#"     xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#"     xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"     Version="1.0" SessionID="4114" Status="Success">     <KeyType>http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/otps/schemas/2005/09/   otps-wst#SecurID-AES</KeyType>     <EncryptionAlgorithm>http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/otps/   schemas/2005/12/ct-kip#ct-kip-prf-aes</EncryptionAlgorithm>     <MacAlgorithm>http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/otps/schemas/   2005/12/ct-kip#ct-kip-prf-aes</MacAlgorithm>     <EncryptionKey>       <ds:KeyName>KEY-1</ds:KeyName>     </EncryptionKey>     <Payload>       <Nonce>qw2ewasde312asder394jw==</Nonce>     </Payload>   </ServerHello>B.5.  Example of a <ClientNonce> Message   <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>   <ClientNonce     xmlns="http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/otps/schemas/   2005/12/ct-kip#"     xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"     Version="1.0" SessionID="4114">     <EncryptedNonce>vXENc+Um/9/NvmYKiHDLaErK0gk=</EncryptedNonce>Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 47]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006   </ClientNonce>B.6.  Example of a <ServerFinished> Message   <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>   <ServerFinished     xmlns="http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/otps/schemas/   2005/12/ct-kip#"     xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"     Version="1.0" SessionID="4114" Status="Success">     <TokenID>12345678</TokenID>     <KeyExpiryDate>2009-09-16T03:02:00Z</KeyExpiryDate>     <KeyID>43212093</KeyID>     <ServiceID>Example Enterprise Name</ServiceID>     <UserID>exampleLoginName</UserID>     <Extensions>       <Extension xsi:type="OTPKeyConfigurationDataType">         <OTPFormat>Decimal</OTPFormat>         <OTPLength>6</OTPLength>         <OTPMode><Time/></OTPMode>       </Extension>     </Extensions>     <Mac>miidfasde312asder394jw==</Mac>   </ServerFinished>Appendix C.  Integration with PKCS #11   A CT-KIP client that needs to communicate with a connected   cryptographic token to perform a CT-KIP exchange may use PKCS #11 [3]   as a programming interface.  When performing CT-KIP with a   cryptographic token using the PKCS #11 programming interface, the   procedure described in [2],Appendix B, is recommended.Appendix D.  Example CT-KIP-PRF RealizationsD.1.  Introduction   This example appendix defines CT-KIP-PRF in terms of AES [8] and HMAC   [9].D.2.  CT-KIP-PRF-AESD.2.1.  Identification   For tokens supporting this realization of CT-KIP-PRF, the following   URI may be used to identify this algorithm in CT-KIP:http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/otps/schemas/2005/12/Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 48]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006   ct-kip#ct-kip-prf-aes   When this URI is used to identify the encryption algorithm to use,   the method for encryption of R_C values described inSection 3.6   shall be used.D.2.2.  Definition   CT-KIP-PRF-AES (k, s, dsLen)   Input:   k     encryption key to use   s     octet string consisting of randomizing material.  The length of         the string s is sLen.   dsLen desired length of the output   Output:   DS    a pseudorandom string, dsLen-octets long   Steps:   1.  Let bLen be the output block size of AES in octets:       bLen = (AES output block length in octets)       (normally, bLen = 16)   2.  If dsLen > (2**32 - 1) * bLen, output "derived data too long" and       stop   3.  Let n be the number of bLen-octet blocks in the output data,       rounding up, and let j be the number of octets in the last block:       n = ROUND( dsLen / bLen )       j = dsLen - (n - 1) * bLen   4.  For each block of the pseudorandom string DS, apply the function       F defined below to the key k, the string s and the block index to       compute the block:       B1 = F (k, s, 1) ,       B2 = F (k, s, 2) ,Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 49]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006       ...       Bn = F (k, s, n)   The function F is defined in terms of the OMAC1 construction from   [10], using AES as the block cipher:   F (k, s, i) = OMAC1-AES (k, INT (i) || s)   where INT (i) is a four-octet encoding of the integer i, most   significant octet first, and the output length of OMAC1 is set to   bLen.   Concatenate the blocks and extract the first dsLen octets to produce   the desired data string DS:   DS = B1 || B2 || ... || Bn<0..j-1>   Output the derived data DS.D.2.3.  Example   If we assume that dsLen = 16, then:   n = 16 / 16 = 1   j = 16 - (1 - 1) * 16 = 16   DS = B1 = F (k, s, 1) = OMAC1-AES (k, INT (1) || S)D.3.  CT-KIP-PRF-SHA256D.3.1.  Identification   For tokens supporting this realization of CT-KIP-PRF, the following   URI may be used to identify this algorithm in CT-KIP:http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/otps/schemas/2005/12/ct-kip#ct-kip-prf-sha256   When this URI is used to identify the encryption algorithm to use,   the method for encryption of R_C values described inSection 3.6   shall be used.Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 50]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006D.3.2.  Definition   CT-KIP-PRF-SHA256 (k, s, dsLen)   Input:   k     encryption key to use   s     octet string consisting of randomizing material.  The length of         the string s is sLen   dsLen desired length of the output   Output:   DS    a pseudorandom string, dsLen-octets long   Steps:   1.  Let bLen be the output size in octets of SHA-256 [11] (no       truncation is done on the HMAC output):       bLen = 32   2.  If dsLen > (2**32 - 1) bLen, output "derived data too long" and       stop   3.  Let n be the number of bLen-octet blocks in the output data,       rounding up, and let j be the number of octets in the last block:       n = ROUND ( dsLen / bLen )       j = dsLen - (n - 1) * bLen   4.  For each block of the pseudorandom string DS, apply the function       F defined below to the key k, the string s and the block index to       compute the block:       B1 = F (k, s, 1) ,       B2 = F (k, s, 2) ,       ...       Bn = F (k, s, n)Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 51]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006   The function F is defined in terms of the HMAC construction from [9],   using SHA-256 as the digest algorithm:   F (k, s, i) = HMAC-SHA256 (k, INT (i) || s)   where INT (i) is a four-octet encoding of the integer i, most   significant octet first, and the output length of HMAC is set to   bLen.   Concatenate the blocks and extract the first dsLen octets to produce   the desired data string DS:   DS = B1 || B2 || ... || Bn<0..j-1>   Output the derived data DS.D.3.3.  Example   If we assume that sLen = 256 (two 128-octet long values) and dsLen =   16, then:   n = ROUND ( 16 / 32 ) = 1   j = 16 - (1 - 1) * 32 = 16   B1 = F (k, s, 1) = HMAC-SHA256 (k, INT (1) || s )   DS = B1<0 ... 15>   That is, the result will be the first 16 octets of the HMAC output.Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 52]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006Appendix E.  About OTPS   The One-Time Password Specifications are documents produced by RSA   Laboratories in cooperation with secure systems developers for the   purpose of simplifying integration and management of strong   authentication technology into secure applications, and to enhance   the user experience of this technology.   Further development of the OTPS series will occur through mailing   list discussions and occasional workshops, and suggestions for   improvement are welcome.  As for our PKCS documents, results may also   be submitted to standards forums.  For more information, contact:   OTPS Editor   RSA Laboratories   174 Middlesex Turnpike   Bedford, MA  01730 USA   otps-editor@rsasecurity.comhttp://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/Author's Address   Magnus Nystroem   RSA Security   EMail: magnus@rsasecurity.comNystroem                     Informational                     [Page 53]

RFC 4758             CT-KIP Version 1.0 Revision 1         November 2006Full Copyright Statement   Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2006).   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions   contained inBCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors   retain all their rights.   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST,   AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES,   EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT   THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY   IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR   PURPOSE.Intellectual Property   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be   found inBCP 78 andBCP 79.   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository athttp://www.ietf.org/ipr.   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.Acknowledgement   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the   Internet Society.Nystroem                     Informational                     [Page 54]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp