Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]

Obsoleted by:4670 INFORMATIONAL
Network Working Group                                             B. AbobaRequest for Comments: 2620                                         G. ZornCategory: Informational                                          Microsoft                                                                 June 1999RADIUS Accounting Client MIBStatus of this Memo   This memo provides information for the Internet community.  This memo   does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of   this memo is unlimited.Copyright Notice   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999).  All Rights Reserved.Abstract   This memo defines a set of extensions which instrument RADIUS   accounting client functions. These extensions represent a portion of   the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management   protocols in the Internet community.  Using these extensions IP-based   management stations can manage RADIUS accounting clients.1.  Introduction   This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)   for use with network management protocols in the Internet community.   In particular, it describes managed objects used for managing RADIUS   accounting clients.   Today a wide range of network devices, including routers and NASes,   act as RADIUS accounting clients in order to provide accounting   services.  As a result, the effective management of RADIUS accounting   clients is of considerable importance.2.  The SNMP Management Framework   The SNMP Management Framework presently consists of five major   components:    o   An overall architecture, described inRFC 2571 [1].    o   Mechanisms for describing and naming objects and events for the        purpose of management. The first version of this Structure of        Management Information (SMI) is called SMIv1 and described inAboba & Zorn                 Informational                      [Page 1]

RFC 2620              RADIUS Accounting Client MIB             June 1999        STD 15,RFC 1155 [2], STD 16,RFC 1212 [3] andRFC 1215 [4].        The second version, called SMIv2, is described in STD 58,RFC2578 [5],RFC 2579 [6] andRFC 2580 [7].    o   Message protocols for transferring management information. The        first version of the SNMP message protocol is called SNMPv1 and        described in STD 15,RFC 1157 [8]. A second version of the        SNMP message protocol, which is not an Internet standards        track protocol, is called SNMPv2c and described inRFC 1901        [9] andRFC 1906 [10].  The third version of the message        protocol is called SNMPv3 and described inRFC 1906 [10],RFC2572 [11] andRFC 2574 [12].    o   Protocol operations for accessing management information. The        first set of protocol operations and associated PDU formats is        described in STD 15,RFC 1157 [8]. A second set of protocol        operations and associated PDU formats is described inRFC 1905        [13].    o   A set of fundamental applications described inRFC 2573 [14] and        the view-based access control mechanism described inRFC 2575        [15].   Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed   the Management Information Base or MIB.  Objects in the MIB are   defined using the mechanisms defined in the SMI.   This memo specifies a MIB module that is compliant to the SMIv2. A   MIB conforming to the SMIv1 can be poduced through the appropriate   translations. The resulting translated MIB must be semantically   equivalent, except where objects or events are omitted because no   translation is possible (use of Counter64). Some machine readable   information in SMIv2 will be converted into textual descriptions in   SMIv1 during the translation process. However, this loss of machine   readable information is not considered to change the semantics of the   MIB.3.  Overview   The RADIUS accounting protocol, described in [16], distinguishes   between the client function and the server function. In RADIUS   accounting, clients send Accounting-Requests, and servers reply with   Accounting-Responses. Typically NAS devices implement the client   function, and thus would be expected to implement the RADIUS   accounting client MIB, while RADIUS accounting servers implement the   server function, and thus would be expected to implement the RADIUS   accounting server MIB.Aboba & Zorn                 Informational                      [Page 2]

RFC 2620              RADIUS Accounting Client MIB             June 1999   However, it is possible for a RADIUS accounting entity to perform   both client and server functions. For example, a RADIUS proxy may act   as a server to one or more RADIUS accounting clients, while   simultaneously acting as an accounting client to one or more   accounting servers.  In such situations, it is expected that RADIUS   entities combining client and server functionality will support both   the client and server MIBs.3.1.  Selected objects   This MIB module contains two scalars as well as a single table:   (1)  the RADIUS Accounting Server Table contains one row for        each RADIUS server that the client shares a secret with.   Each entry in the RADIUS Accounting Server Table includes thirteen   columns presenting a view of the activity of the RADIUS client.4.  DefinitionsRADIUS-ACC-CLIENT-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGINIMPORTS       MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, OBJECT-IDENTITY,       Counter32, Integer32, Gauge32,       IpAddress, TimeTicks, mib-2      FROM SNMPv2-SMI       SnmpAdminString                  FROM SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB       MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP  FROM SNMPv2-CONF;radiusAccClientMIB MODULE-IDENTITY       LAST-UPDATED "9906110000Z" -- 11 Jun 1999       ORGANIZATION "IETF RADIUS Working Group."       CONTACT-INFO          " Bernard Aboba            Microsoft            One Microsoft Way            Redmond, WA  98052            US            Phone: +1 425 936 6605            EMail: bernarda@microsoft.com"       DESCRIPTION             "The MIB module for entities implementing the client side of              the Remote Access Dialin User Service (RADIUS) accounting              protocol."       REVISION "9906110000Z"    -- 11 Jun 1999       DESCRIPTION "Initial version as published inRFC 2620"       ::= { radiusAccounting 2 }Aboba & Zorn                 Informational                      [Page 3]

RFC 2620              RADIUS Accounting Client MIB             June 1999radiusMIB OBJECT-IDENTITY       STATUS  current       DESCRIPTION             "The OID assigned to RADIUS MIB work by the IANA."       ::= { mib-2 67 }radiusAccounting  OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {radiusMIB 2}radiusAccClientMIBObjects     OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=                                              { radiusAccClientMIB 1 }radiusAccClient  OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { radiusAccClientMIBObjects 1 }radiusAccClientInvalidServerAddresses OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX Counter32      MAX-ACCESS read-only      STATUS current      DESCRIPTION            "The number of RADIUS Accounting-Response packets             received from unknown addresses."      ::= { radiusAccClient 1 }radiusAccClientIdentifier OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX SnmpAdminString      MAX-ACCESS read-only      STATUS current      DESCRIPTION            "The NAS-Identifier of the RADIUS accounting client. This             is not necessarily the same as sysName in MIB II."      ::= { radiusAccClient 2 }radiusAccServerTable OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF RadiusAccServerEntry      MAX-ACCESS not-accessible      STATUS     current      DESCRIPTION            "The (conceptual) table listing the RADIUS accounting             servers with which the client shares a secret."      ::= { radiusAccClient 3 }radiusAccServerEntry OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX     RadiusAccServerEntry      MAX-ACCESS not-accessible      STATUS     current      DESCRIPTION            "An entry (conceptual row) representing a RADIUS             accounting server with which the client shares a secret."      INDEX      { radiusAccServerIndex }Aboba & Zorn                 Informational                      [Page 4]

RFC 2620              RADIUS Accounting Client MIB             June 1999      ::= { radiusAccServerTable 1 }RadiusAccServerEntry ::= SEQUENCE {      radiusAccServerIndex                           Integer32,      radiusAccServerAddress                         IpAddress,      radiusAccClientServerPortNumber                Integer32,      radiusAccClientRoundTripTime                   TimeTicks,      radiusAccClientRequests                        Counter32,      radiusAccClientRetransmissions                 Counter32,      radiusAccClientResponses                       Counter32,      radiusAccClientMalformedResponses              Counter32,      radiusAccClientBadAuthenticators               Counter32,      radiusAccClientPendingRequests                   Gauge32,      radiusAccClientTimeouts                        Counter32,      radiusAccClientUnknownTypes                    Counter32,      radiusAccClientPacketsDropped                  Counter32}radiusAccServerIndex OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX     Integer32 (1..2147483647)      MAX-ACCESS not-accessible      STATUS     current      DESCRIPTION            "A number uniquely identifying each RADIUS             Accounting server with which this client             communicates."      ::= { radiusAccServerEntry 1 }radiusAccServerAddress OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX     IpAddress      MAX-ACCESS read-only      STATUS     current      DESCRIPTION            "The IP address of the RADIUS accounting server             referred to in this table entry."      ::= { radiusAccServerEntry 2 }radiusAccClientServerPortNumber  OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX Integer32 (0..65535)      MAX-ACCESS read-only      STATUS current      DESCRIPTION            "The UDP port the client is using to send requests to             this server."      ::= { radiusAccServerEntry 3 }radiusAccClientRoundTripTime  OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX TimeTicksAboba & Zorn                 Informational                      [Page 5]

RFC 2620              RADIUS Accounting Client MIB             June 1999      MAX-ACCESS read-only      STATUS current      DESCRIPTION             "The time interval between the most recent             Accounting-Response and the Accounting-Request that             matched it from this RADIUS accounting server."      ::= { radiusAccServerEntry 4 }-- Request/Response statistics---- Requests = Responses + PendingRequests + ClientTimeouts---- Responses - MalformedResponses - BadAuthenticators --- UnknownTypes - PacketsDropped = Successfully receivedradiusAccClientRequests OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX Counter32      MAX-ACCESS read-only      STATUS current      DESCRIPTION            "The number of RADIUS Accounting-Request packets             sent. This does not include retransmissions."      ::= { radiusAccServerEntry 5 }radiusAccClientRetransmissions OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX Counter32      MAX-ACCESS read-only      STATUS current      DESCRIPTION            "The number of RADIUS Accounting-Request packets             retransmitted to this RADIUS accounting server.             Retransmissions include retries where the             Identifier and Acct-Delay have been updated, as             well as those in which they remain the same."      ::= { radiusAccServerEntry 6 }radiusAccClientResponses OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX Counter32      MAX-ACCESS read-only      STATUS current      DESCRIPTION            "The number of RADIUS packets received on the             accounting port from this server."      ::= { radiusAccServerEntry 7 }radiusAccClientMalformedResponses OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX Counter32      MAX-ACCESS read-onlyAboba & Zorn                 Informational                      [Page 6]

RFC 2620              RADIUS Accounting Client MIB             June 1999      STATUS current      DESCRIPTION             "The number of malformed RADIUS Accounting-Response              packets received from this server. Malformed packets             include packets with an invalid length. Bad             authenticators and unknown types are not included as             malformed accounting responses."      ::= { radiusAccServerEntry 8 }radiusAccClientBadAuthenticators OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX Counter32      MAX-ACCESS read-only      STATUS current      DESCRIPTION            "The number of RADIUS Accounting-Response             packets which contained invalid authenticators             received from this server."      ::= { radiusAccServerEntry 9 }radiusAccClientPendingRequests OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX Gauge32      MAX-ACCESS read-only      STATUS current      DESCRIPTION            "The number of RADIUS Accounting-Request packets             sent to this server that have not yet timed out or             received a response. This variable is incremented when an             Accounting-Request is sent and decremented due to             receipt of an Accounting-Response, a timeout or             a retransmission."      ::= { radiusAccServerEntry 10 }radiusAccClientTimeouts OBJECT-TYPE     SYNTAX Counter32     MAX-ACCESS read-only     STATUS current     DESCRIPTION          "The number of accounting timeouts to this server.           After a timeout the client may retry to the same           server, send to a different server, or give up.           A retry to the same server is counted as a           retransmit as well as a timeout. A send to a different           server is counted as an Accounting-Request as well as           a timeout."      ::= { radiusAccServerEntry  11 }radiusAccClientUnknownTypes OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX Counter32Aboba & Zorn                 Informational                      [Page 7]

RFC 2620              RADIUS Accounting Client MIB             June 1999      MAX-ACCESS read-only      STATUS current      DESCRIPTION            "The number of RADIUS packets of unknown type which             were received from this server on the accounting port."      ::= { radiusAccServerEntry  12 }radiusAccClientPacketsDropped OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX Counter32      MAX-ACCESS read-only      STATUS current      DESCRIPTION            "The number of RADIUS packets which were received from             this server on the accounting port and dropped for some             other reason."      ::= { radiusAccServerEntry  13 }-- conformance informationradiusAccClientMIBConformance          OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { radiusAccClientMIB 2 }radiusAccClientMIBCompliances          OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { radiusAccClientMIBConformance 1 }radiusAccClientMIBGroups          OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { radiusAccClientMIBConformance 2 }-- compliance statementsradiusAccClientMIBCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE     STATUS  current     DESCRIPTION           "The compliance statement for accounting clients            implementing the RADIUS Accounting Client MIB."     MODULE  -- this module         MANDATORY-GROUPS { radiusAccClientMIBGroup }     ::= { radiusAccClientMIBCompliances 1 }-- units of conformanceradiusAccClientMIBGroup OBJECT-GROUP     OBJECTS { radiusAccClientIdentifier,               radiusAccClientInvalidServerAddresses,               radiusAccServerAddress,               radiusAccClientServerPortNumber,               radiusAccClientRoundTripTime,               radiusAccClientRequests,Aboba & Zorn                 Informational                      [Page 8]

RFC 2620              RADIUS Accounting Client MIB             June 1999               radiusAccClientRetransmissions,               radiusAccClientResponses,               radiusAccClientMalformedResponses,               radiusAccClientBadAuthenticators,               radiusAccClientPendingRequests,               radiusAccClientTimeouts,               radiusAccClientUnknownTypes,               radiusAccClientPacketsDropped         }     STATUS  current     DESCRIPTION           "The basic collection of objects providing management of            RADIUS Accounting Clients."     ::= { radiusAccClientMIBGroups 1 }END5.  References   [1]  Harrington, D., Presuhn, R., and B. Wijnen, "An Architecture        for Describing SNMP Management Frameworks",RFC 2571, April        1999.   [2]  Rose, M., and K. McCloghrie, "Structure and Identification of        Management Information for TCP/IP-based Internets", STD 16,RFC1155, May 1990.   [3]  Rose, M., and K. McCloghrie, "Concise MIB Definitions", STD 16,RFC 1212, March 1991.   [4]  Rose, M., "A Convention for Defining Traps for use with the        SNMP",RFC 1215, Performance Systems International, March 1991.   [5]  McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose,        M. and S. Waldbusser, "Structure of Management Information        Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58,RFC 2578, April 1999.   [6]  McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose,        M. and S. Waldbusser, "Textual Conventions for SMIv2", STD 58,RFC 2579, April 1999.   [7]  McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose,        M. and S. Waldbusser, "Conformance Statements for SMIv2", STD        58,RFC 2580, April 1999.   [8]  Case, J., Fedor, M., Schoffstall, M., and J. Davin, "Simple        Network Management Protocol", STD 15,RFC 1157, May 1990.Aboba & Zorn                 Informational                      [Page 9]

RFC 2620              RADIUS Accounting Client MIB             June 1999   [9]  Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser,        "Introduction to Community-based SNMPv2",RFC 1901, January        1996.   [10] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser,        "Transport Mappings for Version 2 of the Simple Network        Management Protocol (SNMPv2)",RFC 1906, January 1996.   [11] Case, J., Harrington D., Presuhn R., and B. Wijnen, "Message        Processing and Dispatching for the Simple Network Management        Protocol (SNMP)",RFC 2572, April 1999.   [12] Blumenthal, U., and B. Wijnen, "User-based Security Model for        Version 3 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv3)",RFC 2574, April 1999.   [13] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser, "Protocol        Operations for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management        Protocol (SNMPv2)",RFC 1905, January 1996.   [14] Levi, D., Meyer, P., and B. Stewart, "SNMP Applications",RFC2573, April 1999.   [15] Wijnen, B., Presuhn, R., and K. McCloghrie, "View-based Access        Control Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol        (SNMP)",RFC 2575, April 1999.   [16] Rigney, C., "RADIUS Accounting",RFC 2139, April 1997.6.  Security Considerations   There are no management objects defined in this MIB that have a MAX-   ACCESS clause of read-write and/or read-create.  So, if this MIB is   implemented correctly, then there is no risk that an intruder can   alter or create any management objects of this MIB via direct SNMP   SET opertions.   There are a number of managed objects in this MIB that may contain   sensitive information. These are:Aboba & Zorn                 Informational                     [Page 10]

RFC 2620              RADIUS Accounting Client MIB             June 1999   radiusAccServerAddress             This can be used to determine the address of the RADIUS             accounting server with which the client is communicating.             This information could be useful in mounting an attack on             the acounting server, which may contain sensitive financial             data.   radiusAccClientServerPortNumber This can be used to determine the             port number on which the RADIUS accounting client is             sending. This information could be useful in impersonating             the client in order to send fraudulent data to the             accounting server.   It is thus important to control even GET access to these objects and   possibly to even encrypt the values of these object when sending them   over the network via SNMP.  Not all versions of SNMP provide features   for such a secure environment.   SNMPv1 by itself is not a secure environment. Even if the network   itself is secure (for example by using IPSec), there is no control as   to who on the secure network is allowed to access and GET/SET   (read/change/create/delete) the objects in this MIB.   It is recommended that the implementers consider the security   features as provided by the SNMPv3 framework. Specifically, the use   of the User-based Security ModelRFC 2574 [12] and the View-based   Access Control ModelRFC 2575 [15] is recommended.  Using these   security features, customer/users can give access to the objects only   to those principals (users) that have legitimate rights to GET or SET   (change/create/delete) them.7.  Acknowledgments   The authors acknowledge the contributions of the RADIUS Working Group   in the development of this MIB.  Thanks to Narendra Gidwani of   Microsoft, Allan C. Rubens of MERIT, Carl Rigney of Livingston and   Peter Heitman of American Internet Corporation for useful discussions   of this problem space.Aboba & Zorn                 Informational                     [Page 11]

RFC 2620              RADIUS Accounting Client MIB             June 19998.  Authors' Addresses   Bernard Aboba   Microsoft Corporation   One Microsoft Way   Redmond, WA 98052   Phone: 425-936-6605   EMail: bernarda@microsoft.com   Glen Zorn   Microsoft Corporation   One Microsoft Way   Redmond, WA 98052   Phone: 425-703-1559   EMail: glennz@microsoft.comAboba & Zorn                 Informational                     [Page 12]

RFC 2620              RADIUS Accounting Client MIB             June 19999.  Full Copyright Statement   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999).  All Rights Reserved.   This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to   others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it   or assist in its implmentation may be prepared, copied, published and   distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind,   provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are   included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this   document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing   the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other   Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of   developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for   copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be   followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than   English.   The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be   revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.   This document and the information contained herein is provided on an   "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING   TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING   BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION   HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF   MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.Acknowledgement   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the   Internet Society.Aboba & Zorn                 Informational                     [Page 13]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp