Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]

EXPERIMENTAL
Network Working Group                                             J. MoyRequest for Comments: 1765                                       CascadeCategory: Experimental                                        March 1995OSPF Database OverflowStatus of this Memo   This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet   community.  This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any   kind.  Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.   Distribution of this memo is unlimited.Abstract   Proper operation of the OSPF protocol requires that all OSPF routers   maintain an identical copy of the OSPF link-state database.  However,   when the size of the link-state database becomes very large, some   routers may be unable to keep the entire database due to resource   shortages; we term this "database overflow". When database overflow   is anticipated, the routers with limited resources can be   accommodated by configuring OSPF stub areas and NSSAs. This memo   details a way of gracefully handling unanticipated database   overflows.   This memo is a product of the OSPF Working Group. Please send   comments to ospf@gated.cornell.edu.Table of Contents1.       Overview ...............................................22.       Implementation details .................................32.1      Configuration ..........................................32.2      Entering OverflowState .................................42.3      Operation while in OverflowState .......................52.3.1    Modifications to Flooding ..............................52.3.2    Originating AS-external-LSAs ...........................62.3.3    Receiving self-originated LSAs .........................62.4      Leaving OverflowState ..................................63.       An example .............................................64.       Administrative response to database overflow ...........75.       Operational experience .................................86.       Possible enhancements ..................................8A.       Related MIB parameters ................................8            References ............................................9            Security Considerations ...............................9            Author's Address ......................................9Moy                                                             [Page 1]

RFC 1765                 OSPF Database Overflow               March 19951.  Overview   OSPF requires that all OSPF routers within a single area maintain an   identical copy of the OSPF link-state database.  However, when the   size of the link-state database becomes very large, some routers may   be unable to keep the entire database due to resource shortages; we   term this "database overflow". For example, a regional network may   have a very large OSPF database because it is importing a large   number of external routes into OSPF. Unless database overflow is   handled correctly, routers will end up with inconsistent views of the   network, possibly leading to incorrect routing.   One way of handling database overflow is to encase routers having   limited resources within OSPF stub areas (see Section 3.6 of [1]) or   NSSAs ([2]).  AS-external-LSAs are omitted from these areas' link-   state databases, thereby controlling database size.   However, unexpected database overflows cannot be handled in the above   manner.  This memo describes a way of dynamically limiting database   size under overflow conditions. The basic mechanism is as follows:    (1) A parameter, ospfExtLsdbLimit, is configured in each router        indicating the maximum number of AS-external-LSAs (excluding        those describing the default route) that are allowed in the        link-state database. This parameter must be the same in all        routers in the routing domain (seeSection 2.1); synchronization        of the parameter is achieved via network management.    (2) In any router's database, the number of AS-external-LSAs        (excluding default) is never allowed to exceed ospfExtLsdbLimit.        If a router receives a non-default AS-external-LSA that would        cause the limit of ospfExtLsdbLimit to be exceeded, it drops the        LSA and does NOT acknowledge it.    (3) If the number of non-default AS-external-LSAs in a router's        database hits ospfExtLsdbLimit, the router a) flushes all non-        default AS-external-LSAs that it has itself originated (seeSection 2.2) and b) goes into "OverflowState".    (4) While in OverflowState, the router refuses to originate any        non-default AS-external-LSAs (seeSection 2.3.2).    (5) Optionally, the router can attempt to leave OverflowState after        the configurable parameter ospfExitOverflowInterval has elapsed        since entering OverflowState (seeSection 2.4). Only at this        point can the router resume originating non-default AS-        external-LSAs.Moy                                                             [Page 2]

RFC 1765                 OSPF Database Overflow               March 1995   The reason for limiting non-default AS-external-LSAs, but not other   LSA types, is twofold. First of all, the non-default AS-external LSAs   are the most likely to dominate database size in those networks with   huge databases (e.g., regional networks; see [5]). Second, the non-   default AS-external-LSAs can be viewed as "optional" in the following   sense: the router can probably be monitored/reconfigured without   them. (However, using similar strategies, other LSA types can also be   limited; seeSection 5.)   The method of dealing with database overflow described herein has the   following desirable properties:    o   After a short period of convergence, all routers will have        identical link-state databases. This database will contain less        than ospfExtLsdbLimit non-default AS-external-LSAs.    o   At all times, routing WITHIN the OSPF Autonomous System will        remain intact. Among other things, this means that the routers        will continue to be manageable.    o   Default routing to external destinations will also remain        intact. This hopefully will mean that a large amount of external        connectivity will be preserved, although possibly taking less        efficient routes.    o   If parameter ospfExitOverflowInterval is configured, the OSPF        system will recover fully and automatically (i.e., without        network management intervention) from transient database        overflow conditions (seeSection 2.4).2.  Implementation details   This section describes the mechanism for dealing with database   overflow in more detail. The section is organized around the concept   OverflowState, describing how routers enter the OverflowState, the   operation of the router while in OverflowState, and when the router   leaves OverflowState.   2.1.  Configuration      The following configuration parameters are added to support the      database overflow functionality. These parameters are set by      network management.        ospfExtLsdbLimit            When the number of non-default AS-external-LSAs in a            router's link-state database reaches ospfExtLsdbLimit, the            router enters OverflowState. The router never holds moreMoy                                                             [Page 3]

RFC 1765                 OSPF Database Overflow               March 1995            than ospfExtLsdbLimit non-default AS-external-LSAs in its            database.            ospfExtLsdbLimit MUST be set identically in all routers            attached to the OSPF backbone and/or any "regular" OSPF            area. (This memo does not pertain to routers contained            within OSPF stub areas nor NSSAs, since such routers do not            receive AS-external-LSAs.) If ospfExtLsdbLimit is not set            identically in all routers, then when the database            overflows: 1) the routers will NOT converge on a common            link-state database, 2) incorrect routing, possibly            including routing loops, will result and 3) constant            retransmission of AS-external-LSAs will occur. Identical            setting of ospfExtLsdbLimit is achieved/ensured by network            management.            When ospfExtLsdbLimit is set in a router, the router must            have some way to guarantee that it can hold that many non-            default AS-external-LSAs in its link-state database. One way            of doing this is to preallocate resources (e.g., memory) for            the configured number of LSAs.        ospfExitOverflowInterval            The number of seconds that, after entering OverflowState, a            router will attempt to leave OverflowState. This allows the            router to again originate non-default AS-external-LSAs. When            set to 0, the router will not leave OverflowState until            restarted. The default setting for ospfExitOverflowInterval            is 0.            It is not necessary for ospfExitOverflowInterval to be            configured the same in all routers. A smaller value may be            configured in those routers that originate the "more            important" AS-external-LSAs. In fact, setting            ospfExitOverflowInterval the same may cause problems, as            multiple routers attempt to leave OverflowState            simultaneously. For this reason, the value of            ospfExitOverflowInterval must be "jittered" by randomly            varying its value within the range of plus or minus 10            percent before using.   2.2.  Entering OverflowState      The router enters OverflowState when the number of non-default      AS-external-LSAs in the database hits ospfExtLsdbLimit. There are      two cases when this can occur. First, when receiving an LSA during      flooding. In this case, an LSA which does not already have a      database instance is added in Step 5 of Section 13 of [1].  TheMoy                                                             [Page 4]

RFC 1765                 OSPF Database Overflow               March 1995      second case is when the router originates a non-default AS-      external-LSA itself.      Whenever the router enters OverflowState it flushes all non-      default AS-external-LSAs that it itself had originated. Flushing      is accomplished through the premature aging scheme described in      Section 14.1 of [1].  Only self-originated LSAs are flushed; those      originated by other routers are kept in the link-state database.   2.3.  Operation while in OverflowState      While in OverflowState, the flooding and origination of non-      default AS-external-LSAs are modified in the following fashion.      2.3.1.  Modifications to Flooding         Flooding while in OverflowState is modified as follows. If in         Step 5 of Section 13 of [1], a non-default AS-external-LSA has         been received that a) has no current database instance and b)         would cause the count of non-default AS-external-LSAs to exceed         ospfExtLsdbLimit, then that LSA is discarded. Such an LSA is         not installed in the link-state database, nor is it         acknowledged.         When all routers have identical values for ospfExtLsdbLimit (as         required), the above flooding modification will only be invoked         during a short period of convergence. During convergence, there         will be retransmissions of LSAs. However, after convergence the         retransmissions will cease, as the routers settle on a database         having less than ospfExtLsdbLimit non-default As-external-LSAs.         In OverflowState, non-default AS-external-LSAs ARE still         accepted in the following conditions:            (1) If the LSA updates an LSA that currently exists in the                router's link-state database.            (2) LSAs having LS age of MaxAge are always accepted. The                processing of these LSAs follows the procedures                described in Sections13 and14 of [1].            (3) If adding the LSA to the router's database would keep                the number of non-default AS-external-LSAs less than or                equal to ospfExtLsdbLimit, the LSA is accepted.Moy                                                             [Page 5]

RFC 1765                 OSPF Database Overflow               March 1995      2.3.2.  Originating AS-external-LSAs         Originating AS-external-LSAs is described in Section 12.4.5 of         [1].  When a router is in OverflowState, it does not originate         non-default AS-external-LSAs. In other words, the only AS-         external-LSAs originated by a router in OverflowState have Link         State ID 0.0.0.0.      2.3.3.  Receiving self-originated LSAs         Receiving self-originated LSAs is described in Section 13.4 of         [1].  When in OverflowState, a router receiving a self-         originated non-default AS-external-LSA responds by flushing it         from the routing domain using the premature aging scheme         described in Section 14.1 of [1].   2.4.  Leaving OverflowState      If ospfExitOverflowInterval is non-zero, then as soon as a router      enters OverflowState, it sets a timer equal to the value of      ospfExitOverflowInterval (plus or minus a random value in the      range of 10 percent). When this timer fires, the router leaves      OverflowState and begins originating non-default AS-external-LSAs      again.      This allows a router to automatically recover from transient      overflow conditions. For example, an AS boundary router that      imports a great many AS-external-LSAs may crash. Other routers may      then start importing the routes, but until the crashed AS boundary      router is either a) restarted or b) its AS-external-LSAs age out,      there will be a much larger database than usual.  Since such an      overflow is guaranteed to go away in MaxAge seconds (1 hour),      automatic recovery may be appropriate (and fast enough) if the      overflow happens off-hours.      As soon as the router leaves OverflowState, it is again eligible      to reenter OverflowState according to the text ofSection 2.2.3.  An example   As an example, suppose that a router implements the database overflow   logic, and that its ospfExtLsdbLimit is 10,000 and its   ospfExitOverflowInterval is set to 600 seconds. Suppose further that   the router itself is originating 400 non-default AS-external-LSAs,   and that the current number of non-default AS-external-LSAs in the   router's database is equal to 9,997.Moy                                                             [Page 6]

RFC 1765                 OSPF Database Overflow               March 1995   Next, it receives a Link State Update packet from a neighbor,   containing 6 non-default AS-external-LSAs, none of which have current   database copies.  The first two LSAs are then installed in the   database. The third LSA is also installed in the database, but causes   the router to go into OverflowState.  Going into OverflowState causes   the router to flush (via premature aging) its 400 self-originated   non-default LSAs. However, these 400 LSAs are still considered to be   part of the link-state database until their re-flooding (with age set   to MaxAge) is acknowledged (see Section 14 of [1]); for this reason,   the last three LSAs in the received update are discarded without   being acknowledged.   After some small period of time all routers will converge on a common   database, having less than 10,000 non-default AS-external-LSAs.   During this convergence period there may be some link-state   retransmissions; for example, the sender of the above Link State   Update packet may retransmit the three LSAs that were discarded. If   this retransmission happens after the flushing of the 400 self-   originated LSAs is acknowledged, the 3 LSAs will then be accepted.   Going into OverflowState also causes the router to set a timer that   will fire some time between 540 and 660 seconds later. When this   timer fires, the router will leave OverflowState and re-originate its   400 non-default AS-external-LSAs, provided that the current database   has less than 9600 (10,000 - 400) non-default AS-external-LSAs. If   there are more than 9600, the timer is simply restarted.4.  Administrative response to database overflow   Once the link-state database has overflowed, it may take intervention   by network management before all routing is restored.  (If the   overflow condition is transient, routing may be restored   automatically; seeSection 2.4 for details.) An overflow condition is   indicated by SNMP traps (seeAppendix B). Possible responses by a   network manager may include:    o   Increasing the value of ospfExtLsdbLimit. Perhaps it had been        set too conservatively, and the routers are able to support        larger databases than they are currently configured for.    o   Isolating routers having limited resources within OSPF stub        areas or NSSAs.  This would allow increasing the value of        ospfExtLsdbLimit in the remaining routers.    o   Reevaluating the need to import certain external routes. If        ospfExtLsdbLimit cannot be increased, the network manager will        want to make sure that the more important routes continue to be        imported; this is accomplished by turning off the importing ofMoy                                                             [Page 7]

RFC 1765                 OSPF Database Overflow               March 1995        less important routes.5.  Operational experience   The database overflow scheme described in this memo has been   implemented in the Proteon router for a number of years, with the   following differences. First, the router did not leave OverflowState   until it was restarted (i.e., ospfExitOverflowInterval was always 0).   Second, default AS-external-LSAs were not separated from non-default   AS-external-LSAs. Operationally the scheme performed as expected:   during overflow conditions, the routers converged on a common   database having less than a configured number of AS-external-LSAs.6.  Possible enhancements   Possible enhancements to the overflow scheme include the following:    o   Other LSA types, with the exception of the transit LSAs        (router-LSAs and network-LSAs), could be limited in a similar        fashion. For example, one could limit the number of summary-        LSAs, or group-membership-LSAs (see [6]).    o   Rather than flushing all of its non-default AS-external-LSAs        when entering OverflowState, a router could flush a fixed number        whenever the database size hits ospfExtLsdbLimit. This would        allow the router to prioritize its AS-external-LSAs, flushing        the least important ones first.A. Related MIB parameters   The following OSPF MIB variables have been defined to support the   database overflow procedure described in this memo (see [4] for more   information):    ospfExtLsdbLimit        As inSection 2.1 of this memo, the maximum number of non-        default AS-external-LSAs that can be stored within the database.        If set to -1, there is no limit.    ospfExitOverflowInterval        As inSection 2.1 of this memo, the number of seconds that,        after entering OverflowState, a router will attempt to leave        OverflowState. This allows the router to again originate non-        default AS-external-LSAs.  When set to 0, the router will not        leave OverflowState until restarted.Moy                                                             [Page 8]

RFC 1765                 OSPF Database Overflow               March 1995    ospfLsdbOverflow        A trap indicating that the number of non-default AS-external-        LSAs has exceeded or equaled ospfExtLsdbLimit. In other words,        this trap indicates that the router is entering OverflowState.    ospfLsdbApproachingOverflow        A trap indicating that the number of non-default AS-external-        LSAs has exceeded ninety percent of "ospfExtLsdbLimit".References   [1] Moy, J., "OSPF Version 2",RFC 1583, Proteon, Inc., March 1994.   [2] Coltun, R., and V. Fuller, "The OSPF NSSA Option",RFC 1587,       RainbowBridge Communications, Stanford University, March 1994.   [3] Moy, J., Editor, "OSPF Protocol Analysis",RFC 1245, Proteon,       Inc., July 1991.   [4] Baker F., and R. Coltun, "OSPF Version 2 Management Information       Base", Work in Progress.   [5] Moy, J., Editor, "Experience with the OSPF Protocol",RFC 1246,       Proteon, Inc., July 1991.   [6] Moy, J., "Multicast Extensions to OSPF",RFC 1584, Proteon, Inc.,       March 1994.Security Considerations   Security issues are not discussed in this memo.Author's Address   John Moy   Cascade Communications Corp.   5 Carlisle Road   Westford, MA 01886   Phone: 508-692-2600 Ext. 394   Fax:   508-692-9214   EMail: jmoy@casc.comMoy                                                             [Page 9]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp