Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]

Obsoleted by:7805 HISTORIC
Network Working Group                                          M. LottorRequest For Comments: 1078                                       SRI-NIC                                                           November 1988TCP Port Service Multiplexer (TCPMUX)Status of this Memo   This RFC proposes an Internet standard which can be used by future   TCP services instead of using 'well-known ports'.  Distribution of   this memo is unlimited.Overview   Ports are used in the TCP to name the ends of logical connections   which carry long term conversations.  For the purpose of providing   services to unknown callers, a service contact port is defined.  The   contact port is sometimes called the "well-known port".  Standard TCP   services are assigned unique well-known port numbers in the range of   0-255.  These ports are of limited number and are typically only   assigned to official Internet protocols.   This RFC defines a protocol to contact multiple services on a single   well-known TCP port using a service name instead of a well-known   number.  In addition, private protocols can make use of the service   without needing an official TCP port assignment.The Protocol   A TCP client connects to a foreign host on TCP port 1.  It sends the   service name followed by a carriage-return line-feed <CRLF>.  The   service name is never case sensitive.  The server replies with a   single character indicating positive ("+") or negative ("-")   acknowledgment, immediately followed by an optional message of   explanation, terminated with a <CRLF>.  If the reply was positive,   the selected protocol begins; otherwise the connection is closed.Service Names   The name "HELP" is reserved.  If received, the server will output a   multi-line message and then close the connection.  The reply to the   name "HELP" must be a list of the service names of the supported   services, one name per line.   The names listed in the "Protocol and Service Names" section of the   current edition of "Assigned Numbers" (RFC-1010 at this time) are   reserved to have exactly the definitions specified there.  ServicesLottor                                                          [Page 1]

RFC 1078                         TCPMUX                    November 1988   with distinct assigned ports must be available on those ports and may   optionally be available via this port service multiplexer on port 1.   Private protocols should use a service name that has a high chance of   being unique.  A good practice is to prefix the protocol name with   the name of your organization.   Multiple versions of a protocol can suffix the service name with a   protocol version number.Implementation Notes   A negative reply will typically be returned by the port-multiplexing   process when it can't find the requested service.  A positive reply   will typically be returned by the process invoked by the port   multiplexer for the requested service.Lottor                                                          [Page 2]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp