| RFC 9934 | PEM File Format for ECH | February 2026 |
| Farrell | Standards Track | [Page] |
Encrypted ClientHello (ECH) key pairs need to be configured into TLS servers, which can be built using different TLS libraries. This document specifies a standard file format for this purpose, similar to how RFC 7468 defines other Privacy-Enhanced Mail (PEM) file formats.¶
This is an Internet Standards Track document.¶
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.¶
Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained athttps://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9934.¶
Copyright (c) 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.¶
Encrypted ClientHello (ECH)[RFC9849] for TLS1.3[RFC8446] defines a confidentiality mechanism for server names and other ClientHello content in TLS. That requires publication of an ECHConfigList data structure in an HTTPS or SVCB RR[RFC9460] in the DNS. An ECHConfigList can contain one or more ECHConfig values. An ECHConfig structure contains the public component of a key pair that will typically be periodically (re-)generated by some key manager for a TLS server. TLS servers then need to be configured to use these key pairs, and given that various TLS servers can be built with different TLS libraries, there is a benefit in having a standard format for ECH key pairs and configs, just as was done with[RFC7468].¶
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14[RFC2119][RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.¶
A PEM ECH file contains zero or one private key and one encoded ECHConfigList.¶
The public and private keysMUST both be PEM encoded[RFC7468]. The file contains the concatenation of the PEM encoding of the private key (if present) followed by the PEM encoding of the public key(s) as an ECHConfigList. When a private key is present, the ECHConfigListMUST contain an ECHConfig that matches the private key. The private keyMUST be encoded as a PKCS#8 PrivateKey[RFC7468]. The public key(s)MUST be the base64-encoded form (seeSection 4 of [RFC4648]) of an ECHConfigList value that can be published in the DNS using an HTTPS RR as described in[RFC9848]. The string "ECHCONFIG"MUST be used in the PEM file delimiter for the public key.¶
Any content after the PEM encoded ECHConfigListSHOULD be ignored.¶
Figure 1 shows an example ECHConfig PEM File¶
-----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY-----MC4CAQAwBQYDK2VuBCIEICjd4yGRdsoP9gU7YT7My8DHx1Tjme8GYDXrOMCi8v1V-----END PRIVATE KEY----------BEGIN ECHCONFIG-----AD7+DQA65wAgACA8wVN2BtscOl3vQheUzHeIkVmKIiydUhDCliA4iyQRCwAEAAEAAQALZXhhbXBsZS5jb20AAA==-----END ECHCONFIG-----
If the above ECHConfigList were published in the DNS for foo.example.com, then one could access that as shown inFigure 2.¶
$ dig +short HTTPS foo.example.com1 . ech=AD7+DQA65wAgACA8wVN2BtscOl3vQheUzHeIkVmKIiydUhDCliA4iyQRwAEAAEAAQALZXhhbXBsZS5jb20AAA==
TLS servers using this file format might configure multiple file names as part of their overall configuration, if, for example, only the ECHConfigList values from a subset of those files are to be used as the value for retry_configs in the ECH fallback scenario.¶
The ECHConfigList in a PEM file might contain more than one ECHConfig if, for example, those ECHConfig values contain different extensions or different public_name values. Consistent with[RFC9849], the ECHConfig values within an ECHConfigList appear in decreasing order of preference. If the ECHConfigList value is to be used as the retry_configs value, then that might contain different public keys. (Nonetheless, when a private key is present, thatMUST match the public key from one of the ECHConfig values.)¶
Storing cryptographic keys in files leaves them vulnerable should anyone get read access to the filesystem on which they are stored. The same protection mechanisms that would be used for a server's PEM-encoded HTTPS certificate private key should be used for the PEM ECH configuration.¶
The security considerations of[RFC9848] apply when retrieving an ECHConfigList from the DNS.¶
For clarity, only the ECHConfigList is to be published in the DNS - the private key from an ECH PEM fileMUST NOT be published in the DNS.¶
This document has no IANA actions.¶
Thanks toDaniel McCarney,Jim Reid, andPeter Yee for comments.¶