| RFC 9321 | Signature Validation Token | October 2022 |
| Santesson & Housley | Informational | [Page] |
Electronic signatures have a limited lifespan with respect to the time period that theycan be validated and determined to be authentic. The Signature Validation Token (SVT)defined in this specification provides evidence that asserts the validity of anelectronic signature. The SVT is provided by a trusted authority, which asserts thata particular signature was successfully validated according to defined procedures ata certain time. Any future validation of that electronic signature can be satisfied byvalidating the SVT without any need to also validate the original electronic signature orthe associated digital certificates. The SVT supports electronic signatures in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS), XML,PDF, and JSON documents.¶
This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.¶
This is a contribution to the RFC Series, independently of any other RFC stream. The RFC Editor has chosen to publish this document at its discretion and makes no statement about its value for implementation or deployment. Documents approved for publication by the RFC Editor are not candidates for any level of Internet Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 7841.¶
Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained athttps://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9321.¶
Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document.¶
Electronic signatures have a limited lifespan regarding when they can be validatedand determined to be authentic. Many factors make it more difficult to validateelectronic signatures over time. For example:¶
The challenges to validation of an electronic signature increaseover time, and eventually it may simply be impossible to verify thesignature with a sufficient level of assurance.¶
Existing standards, such as the ETSI XAdES[XADES] profile for XMLsignatures[XMLDSIG11], ETSI PAdES[PADES] profile for PDF signatures[ISOPDF2], and ETSI CAdES[CADES] profile for CMS signatures[RFC5652], can be used to extend the time within which a signature can bevalidated at the cost of significant complexity, which involves storing andvalidating significant amounts of external evidence data such as revocation data,signature time stamps, and archival time stamps.¶
The Signature Validation Token (SVT) defined in this specification takes atrusted signature validation process as an input and preserves the validation resultfor the associated signature and signed document. The SVT asserts that a particularelectronic signature was successfully validated by a trusted authority according todefined procedures at a certain time. Those proceduresMUST include checksthat the signature match the signed document, checks that the signature can be validated bythe signing certificate, and checks that the signing certificate pass certificatepath validation[RFC5280].Those proceduresMAY also include checks associated with a particular trust policy such asthat an acceptable certificate policy[RFC5280][RFC3647] was used to issue thesigner's certificate and checks that an acceptable signature policy was used bythe signer[RFC3125].¶
Once the SVT is issued by a trustedauthority, any future validation of that electronic signature can be satisfied by validatingthe SVT without any need to also revalidate the original electronic signature.¶
As the SVT is used to preserve validation results obtained through applying existingstandards for signature validation, it is complementary to and not a replacement for such standards,including the ETSI standards for long-term validation listed above.The SVT does, however, have the potentially positive effect that it may significantly reduce the need toapply complex long-term validation and preservation techniques for signature validationif an SVT is issued and applied to the signed document at an early stage where the signaturecan be validated without support of large amounts of external evidence.The use of SVTs may therefore drastically reduce the complexity of revalidation of oldarchived electronic signatures.¶
The SVT can be signed with private keys and algorithms thatprovide confidence for a considerable time period. In fact, multiple SVTs can be usedto offer greater assurance. For example, one SVT could be produced with a large RSAprivate key, a second one with a strong elliptic curve, and a third one with a quantumsafe digital signature algorithm to protect against advances in computing power andcryptanalytic capabilities. Further, the trusted authority can add additional SVTsin the future using fresh private keys and signatures to extend the lifetime of the SVTs if necessary.¶
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14[RFC2119][RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.¶
This document use the following terms:¶
When these terms are used as defined in this section, they appear with acapitalized first letter.¶
The Signature Validation Token (SVT) is created by a trusted service to assertevidence of successful electronic signature validation using a well-defined andtrustworthy signature validation process. The SVT binds the validation result tothe validated signature, the document signed by the signature, and the certificate of the signer.This allows a relying party to verify the validity of a signed documentwithout having to revalidate the original signature or to reuse any of its associatedcryptographic algorithms for as long as the SVT itself can be validated.The SVT achieves this by binding the following information toa specific electronic signature:¶
The SVT aims to support long-term validation that can be further extended into the future by applying the following strategies:¶
The SVT is carried in a JSON Web Token (JWT) as defined in[RFC7519].¶
The contents of claims in an SVT are specified using the following data types:¶
The SVTMUST contain only JWT claims in the following list:¶
Note: An SVT asserts that a particular validation process was undertaken at a statedtime. This fact never changes and never expires. However, some other aspectsof the SVT such as liability for false claims or service provision related to a specificSVT may expire after a certain period of time, such as a service where an old SVT can beupgraded to a new SVT signed with fresh keys and algorithms.¶
The sig_val_claims JWT claim uses the SigValidation object class. A SigValidation objectholds all custom claims, and a SigValidation object contains the following parameters:¶
The sig parameter in the SigValidation object class uses the Signature objectclass. The Signature object contains claims related to signature validationevidence for one signature, and it contains the following parameters:¶
The sig_ref parameter in the Signature object class uses the SigReference objectclass. The SigReference object provides information used to match the Signatureclaims object to a specific target electronic signature and to verify the integrityof the target signature value and Signed Bytes, and it contains the following parameters:¶
The sig_data_ref parameter in the Signature object class uses the SignedDataReference objectclass. The SignedDataReference object provides information used to verify the target electronicsignature references to Signed Data as well as to verify the integrity of all data thatis signed by the target signature, and it contains the following parameters:¶
The sig_val parameter in the Signature object class uses the PolicyValidation objectclass. The PolicyValidation object provides information about the result of a validationprocess according to a specific policy, and it contains the following parameters:¶
The time_val parameter in the Signature object class uses the TimeValidation objectclass. The TimeValidation claims object provides information about the result ofvalidating evidence of time asserting that the target signature existed at a particulartime in the past. Evidence of time is typically a timestamp according to[RFC3161], but other types of evidence may be used such as a previously issued SVT for this signature. The TimeValidation claims object contains the following parameters:¶
The signer_cert_ref parameter in the Signature object class uses the CertReference objectclass. The CertReference object references a single X.509 certificate or a X.509certification path either by providing the certificate data or by providing hashreferences for certificates that can be located in the target electronic signature, andit contains the following parameters:¶
The following type identifiers are defined:¶
Note: All certificates referenced using the identifiers above are X.509 certificates.Profiles of this specificationMAY define alternative types of public key containers;however, a major function of these referenced certificates is not just to referencethe public key but also to provide the subject name of the signer. It is thereforeimportant for the full function of an SVT that the referenced public key container alsoprovides the means to identify the signer.¶
The SVT JWTMUST contain the following JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE) header parameters in accordance withSection 5 of [RFC7519]:¶
The SVT headerMUST contain a public key or a reference to a public key used to verify the signature on the SVT in accordance with[RFC7515]. Each profile, as discussed inSection 4,MUST define the requirements for how the key or key reference is included in the header.¶
Each signed document and signature type will have to define the precise content anduse of several claims in the SVT.¶
At a minimum, each profileMUST define:¶
A profileMAY also define:¶
The following profiles are defined in appendixes of this document:¶
Other documentsMAY define other profiles thatMAY complement, amend, or supersede these profiles.¶
Signature verification based on an SVTMUST follow these steps:¶
After successfully performing these steps, signature validity is established as well asthe trusted signer certificate binding the identity of the signer to the electronicsignature.¶
IANA has registered the "sig_val_claims" claim name in the "JSON Web Token Claims" registry established bySection 10.1 of [RFC7519].¶
IANA has registered the "svt" Header Parameter in the "JSON Web Signature and Encryption Header Parameters" registry established by[RFC7515].¶
An SVT allows a signature verifier to still validate the original signature usingthe original signature data and to use the information in the SVT selectively toconfirm the validity and integrity of the original data, such as confirming the integrity of Signed Data or the validity of the signer's certificate, etc.¶
Another way to use an SVT is to completely rely on the validation conclusion providedby the SVT and to omit revalidation of the original signature value and originalcertificate status checking data.¶
This choice is a decision made by the verifier according to its own policy and risk assessment.¶
However, even when relying on the SVT validation conclusion of an SVT, it is vital to still verify thatthe present SVT is correctly associated with the document and signature that is being validated byvalidating the hashed reference data in the SVT of the signature, signing certificate chain,Signed Data, and the Signed Bytes.¶
Even if the SVT provides protection against algorithms becoming weakened or broken over time, this protection is only valid for as long as the algorithms used to sign the SVT are still considered secure. It is advisable to reissue SVTs in cases where an algorithm protecting the SVT is getting close to its end of life.¶
One way to increase the resistance of algorithms becoming insecure, is to issue multiple SVTs for the same signature with different algorithms and key lengths where one algorithm could still be secure even if the corresponding algorithm used in the alternative SVT is broken.¶
This appendix defines a profile for implementing SVTs with a signed XML document and defines the following aspects of SVT usage:¶
XML documents can have any number of signature elements, signing an arbitrary number of fragments of XML documents. The actual signature element may be included in the signed XML document (enveloped), include the Signed Data (enveloping), or may be separate from the signed content (detached).¶
To provide a generic solution for any type of XML signature, an SVT is added to each XML signature element within the XML signature <ds:Object> element.¶
When referring to elements from the W3C XML Signature namespace(https://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#), the following syntax is used:¶
When referring to elements from the ETSI XAdES XML Signature namespace(https://uri.etsi.org/01903/v1.3.2#), the following syntax is used:¶
When referring to elements defined in this specification (http://id.swedenconnect.se/svt/1.0/sig-prop/ns), the following syntax is used:¶
When SVTs are provided for XML signatures, then one SVTMUST be provided for each XML signature.¶
An SVT embedded within the XML signature elementMUST be placed in a <svt:SignatureValidationToken> element as defined inAppendix A.2.1.¶
The <svt:SignatureValidationToken> elementMUST be placed in a <ds:SignatureProperty> element in accordance with[XMLDSIG11]. The <ds:SignatureProperty> elementMUST be placed inside a <ds:SignatureProperties> element inside a <ds:Object> element inside a <ds:Signature> element.¶
Note:[XMLDSIG11] requires the Target attribute to be present in <ds:SignatureProperty>, referencing the signature targeted by this signature property. If an SVT is added to a signature that does not have an Id attribute, implementationsSHOULD add an Id attribute to the <ds:Signature> element and reference that Id in the Target attribute. This Id attribute and Target attribute value matching is required by the[XMLDSIG11] standard, but it is redundant in the context of SVT validation as the SVT already contains information that uniquely identifies the target signature. Validation applicationsSHOULD NOT reject an SVT token because of Id and Target attribute mismatch andMUST rely on matching against a signature using signed information in the SVT itself.¶
The <svt:SignatureValidationToken> element is defined by the following XML Schema:¶
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" elementFormDefault="qualified" targetNamespace="http://id.swedenconnect.se/svt/1.0/sig-prop/ns" xmlns:svt="http://id.swedenconnect.se/svt/1.0/sig-prop/ns"> <xs:element name="SignatureValidationToken" type="svt:SignatureValidationTokenType" /> <xs:complexType name="SignatureValidationTokenType"> <xs:simpleContent> <xs:extension base="xs:string"> </xs:extension> </xs:simpleContent> </xs:complexType></xs:schema>¶
The SVT tokenMUST be included as a string representation of the SVT JWT. Note that this is the string representation of the JWT without further encoding. The SVTMUST NOT be represented by the Base64-encoded bytes of the JWT string.¶
Example:¶
<ds:Signature> ... <ds:Object> <ds:SignatureProperties> <ds:SignatureProperty> <svt:SignatureValidationToken> eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhb...2aNZ </svt:SignatureValidationToken> </ds:SignatureProperty> </ds:SignatureProperties> </ds:Object></ds:Signature>¶
If a new SVT is stored in a signature that already contains a previously issued SVT, implementations can choose either to replace the existing SVT or to store the new SVT in addition to the existing SVT.¶
If the new SVT is stored in addition to the old SVT, itSHOULD be stored in a new <ds:SignatureProperty> element inside the existing <ds:SignatureProperties> element where the old SVT is located.¶
For interoperability robustness, signature validation applicationsMUST be able to handle signatures where the new SVT is located in a new <ds:Object> element.¶
When this profile is used, the SigValidation objectMUST contain a "profile" claim with the value "XML".¶
The SVT Signature objectMUST contain a "sig_ref" claim (SigReference object) with the following elements:¶
The SVT Signature objectMUST contain one instance of the "sig_data" claim (SignedData object) for each <ds:Reference> element in the <ds:SignedInfo> element. The "sig_data" claimMUST contain the following elements:¶
The SVT Signature objectMUST contain a "signer_cert_ref" claim (CertReference object). The "type" parameter of the "signer_cert_ref" claimMUST be either "chain" or "chain_hash".¶
The SVT JOSE header for XML signatures must contain one of the following header parameters in accordance with[RFC7515] for storing a reference to the public key used to verify the signature on the SVT:¶
alg" Header Parameter.¶This appendix defines a profile for implementing SVTs with a signed PDF document, and it defines the following aspects of SVT usage:¶
PDF document signatures are added as incremental updates to the signed PDF document and signs all data of the PDF document up until the current signature. When more than one signature is added to a PDF document the previous signature is signed by the next signature and can not be updated with additional data after this event.¶
To minimize the impact on PDF documents with multiple signatures and to stay backwards compatible with PDF software that does not understand SVTs, PDF documents add one SVT token for all signatures of the PDF as an extension to a document timestamp added to the signed PDF as an incremental update. This SVT covers all signatures of the signed PDF.¶
The SVT for a signed PDF documentMAY provide signature validation information about any of the present signatures in the PDF. The SVTMUST contain a separate "sig" claim (Signature object) for each signature on the PDF that is covered by the SVT.¶
An SVT added to a signed PDF documentMUST be added to a document timestamp in accordance with ISO 32000-2:2020[ISOPDF2].¶
The document timestamp contains an[RFC3161] timestamp token (TSTInfo) in EncapsulatedContentInfo of the CMS signature. The SVTMUST be added to the timestamp token (TSTInfo) as an Extension object as defined inAppendix B.1.1.¶
The SVT extension is an Extension suitable to be included in TSTInfo as defined by[RFC3161].¶
The SVT extension is identified by the Object Identifier (OID) 1.2.752.201.5.2.¶
This extension data (OCTET STRING) holds the bytes of SVT JWT, represented as a UTF-8-encoded string.¶
This extensionMUST NOT be marked critical.¶
Note: Extensions in timestamp tokens according to[RFC3161] are imported from the definition of the X.509 certificate extensions defined in[RFC5280].¶
When this profile is used, the SigValidation objectMUST contain a "profile" claim with the value "PDF".¶
The SVT Signature objectMUST contain a "sig_ref" claim (SigReference object) with the following elements:¶
The SVT Signature objectMUST contain one instance of the "sig_data" claim (SignedData object) with the following elements:¶
The SVT Signature objectMUST contain a "signer_cert_ref" claim (CertReference object). The "type" parameter of the "signer_cert_ref" claimMUST be either "chain" or "chain_hash".¶
Note: The referenced signer certificateMUST match any certificates referenced using ESSCertID or ESSCertIDv2 from[RFC5035].¶
The SVT JOSE header must contain one of the following header parameters in accordance with[RFC7515] for storing a reference to the public key used to verify the signature on the SVT:¶
alg" Header Parameter. The referenced certificateSHOULD be the same certificate that was used to sign the document timestamp that contains the SVT.¶This appendix defines a profile for implementing SVTs with a JWS signed payload according to[RFC7515], and it defines the following aspects of SVT usage:¶
A JWS may have one or more signatures, depending on its serialization format, signing the same payload data. A JWS either contains the data to be signed (enveloping) or may sign any externally associated payload data (detached).¶
To provide a generic solution for JWS, an SVT is added to each present signature as a JWS Unprotected Header. If a JWS includes multiple signatures, then each signature includes its own SVT.¶
An SVT tokenMAY be added to any signature of a JWS to support validation of that signature. If more than one signature is present, then each present SVTMUST provide information exclusively related to one associated signature andMUST NOT include information about any other signature in the JWS.¶
Each SVT is stored in its associated signature's "svt" header as defined inAppendix C.1.1.¶
The "svt" (Signature Validation Token) Header Parameter is used to contain an array of SVT tokens to support validation of the associated signature. Each SVT token in the array has the format of a JWT as defined in[RFC7519] and is stored using its natural string representation without further wrapping or encoding.¶
The "svt" Header Parameter, when used,MUST be included as a JWS Unprotected Header.¶
Note: A JWS Unprotected Header is not supported with JWS Compact Serialization. A consequence of adding an SVT token to a JWS is therefore that JWS JSON SerializationMUST be used either in the form of general JWS JSON Serialization (for one or more signatures) or in the form of flattened JWS JSON Serialization (optionally used when only one signature is present in the JWS).¶
If a new SVT is stored in a signature that already contains a previously issued SVT, implementations can choose either to replace the existing SVT or to store the new SVT in addition to the existing SVT.¶
If a JWS signature already contains an array of SVTs and a new SVT is to be added, then the new SVTMUST be added to the array of SVT tokens in the existing "svt" Header Parameter.¶
When this profile is used, the SigValidation objectMUST contain a "profile" claim with the value "JWS".¶
The SVT Signature objectMUST contain a "sig_ref" claim (SigReference object) with the following elements:¶
The SVT Signature objectMUST contain one instance of the "sig_data" claim (SignedData object) with the following elements:¶
This parameterMUST hold one of the following three possible values:¶
The SVT Signature objectMUST contain a "signer_cert_ref" claim (CertReference object). The "type" parameter of the "signer_cert_ref" claimMUST be either "chain" or "chain_hash".¶
The SVT JOSE header must contain one of the following header parameters in accordance with[RFC7515] for storing a reference to the public key used to verify the signature on the SVT:¶
alg" Header Parameter.¶The following informative CDDL[RFC8610] expresses the structure of an SVT token:¶
svt = { jti: text iss: text iat: uint ? aud: text / [* text] ? exp: uint sig_val_claims: SigValClaims}SigValClaims = { ver: text profile: text hash_algo: text sig: [+ Signature] ? ext: Extension}Signature = { sig_ref: SigReference sig_data_ref: [+ SignedDataReference] signer_cert_ref: CertReference sig_val: [+ PolicyValidation] ? time_val: [* TimeValidation] ? ext: Extension}SigReference = { ? id: text / null sig_hash: binary-value sb_hash: binary-value}SignedDataReference = { ref: text hash: binary-value}CertReference = { type: "chain" / "chain_hash" ref: [+ text]}PolicyValidation = { pol: text res: "PASSED" / "FAILED" / "INDETERMINATE" ? msg: text / null ? ext: Extension}TimeValidation = { "time": uint type: text iss: text ? id: text / null ? hash: binary-value / null ? val: [* PolicyValidation] ? ext: Extension}Extension = { + text => text} / nullbinary-value = text ; base64 classic with padding¶The following informative JSON schema describes the syntax of the SVT token payload.¶
{ "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema", "title": "Signature Validation Token JSON Schema", "description": "Schema defining the payload format for SVTs", "type": "object", "required": [ "jti", "iss", "iat", "sig_val_claims" ], "properties": { "jti": { "description": "JWT ID", "type": "string" }, "iss": { "description": "Issuer", "type": "string" }, "iat": { "description": "Issued At", "type": "integer" }, "aud": { "description": "Audience", "type": [ "string", "array" ], "items": {"type": "string"} }, "exp": { "description": "Expiration time (seconds since epoch)", "type": "integer" }, "sig_val_claims": { "description": "Signature validation claims", "type": "object", "required": [ "ver", "profile", "hash_algo", "sig" ], "properties": { "ver": { "description": "Version", "type": "string" }, "profile": { "description": "Implementation profile", "type": "string" }, "hash_algo": { "description": "Hash algorithm URI", "type": "string" }, "sig": { "description": "Validated signatures", "type": "array", "items": { "$ref": "#/$def/Signature" }, "minItems": 1 }, "ext": { "description": "Extension map", "$ref": "#/$def/Extension" } }, "additionalProperties": false } },"additionalProperties": false,"$def": { "Signature":{ "type": "object", "required": [ "sig_ref", "sig_data_ref", "signer_cert_ref", "sig_val" ], "properties": { "sig_ref": { "description": "Signature Reference", "$ref": "#/$def/SigReference" }, "sig_data_ref": { "description": "Signed data array", "type": "array", "items": { "$ref" : "#/$def/SignedDataReference" }, "minItems": 1 }, "signer_cert_ref": { "description": "Signer certificate reference", "$ref": "#/$def/CertReference" }, "sig_val": { "description": "Signature validation results", "type": "array", "items": { "$ref": "#/$def/PolicyValidation" }, "minItems": 1 }, "time_val": { "description": "Time validations", "type": "array", "items": { "$ref": "#/$def/TimeValidation" } }, "ext": { "description": "Extension map", "$ref": "#/$def/Extension" } }, "additionalProperties": false }, "SigReference":{ "type": "object", "required": [ "sig_hash", "sb_hash" ], "properties": { "sig_hash": { "description": "Hash of the signature value", "type": "string", "format": "base64" }, "sb_hash": { "description": "Hash of the Signed Bytes", "type": "string", "format": "base64" }, "id": { "description": "Signature ID reference", "type": ["string","null"] } }, "additionalProperties": false }, "SignedDataReference": { "type": "object", "required": [ "ref", "hash" ], "properties": { "ref": { "description": "Reference to the signed data", "type": "string" }, "hash": { "description": "Signed data hash", "type": "string", "format": "base64" } }, "additionalProperties": false }, "CertReference":{ "type": "object", "required": [ "type", "ref" ], "properties": { "type": { "description": "Type of certificate reference", "type": "string", "enum": ["chain","chain_hash"] }, "ref": { "description": "Certificate reference data", "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string", "format": "base64" }, "minItems": 1 } }, "additionalProperties": false }, "PolicyValidation":{ "type": "object", "required": [ "pol", "res" ], "properties": { "pol": { "description": "Policy identifier", "type": "string" }, "res": { "description": "Signature validation result", "type": "string", "enum": ["PASSED","FAILED","INDETERMINATE"] }, "msg": { "description": "Message", "type": ["string","null"] }, "ext": { "description": "Extension map", "$ref": "#/$def/Extension" } }, "additionalProperties": false }, "TimeValidation":{ "type": "object", "required": [ "time", "type", "iss" ], "properties": { "time": { "description": "Verified time", "type": "integer" }, "type": { "description": "Type of time validation proof", "type": "string" }, "iss": { "description": "Issuer of the time proof", "type": "string" }, "id": { "description": "Time evidence identifier", "type": ["string","null"] }, "hash": { "description": "Hash of time evidence", "type": ["string","null"], "format": "base64" }, "val": { "description": "Validation result", "type": "array", "items": { "$ref": "#/$def/PolicyValidation" } }, "ext": { "description": "Extension map", "$ref": "#/$def/Extension" } }, "additionalProperties": false }, "Extension": { "description": "Extension map", "type": ["object","null"], "required": [], "additionalProperties": { "type": "string" } } }}¶The following example illustrates a basic SVT according to this specificationissued for a signed PDF document.¶
Note: Line breaks in the decoded example are inserted for readability. Linebreaks are not allowed in valid JSON data.¶
Signature validation token JWT:¶
eyJraWQiOiJPZW5JKzQzNEpoYnZmRG50ZlZcLzhyT3hHN0ZrdnlqYUtWSmFWcUlGQlhvaFZoQWU1Zks4YW5vdjFTNjg4cjdLYmFsK2Z2cGFIMWo4aWJnNTJRQnkxUFE9PSIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCIsImFsZyI6IlJTNTEyIn0.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.TdHCoIUSZj2zMINKg7E44-8VE_mJq6TG1OoPwnYSs_hyUbuXmrLJpuk8GR5YrndeOucPUYAwPxHt_f68JIQyFTi0agO9VJjn1R7Pj3Jt6WG9pYVNn5LH-D1maxD11ZxxbcYeHbsstd2Sy2uMa3BdpsstGdPymSmc6GxY5uJoL0-5vwo_3l-4Bb3LCTiuxYPcmztKIbDy2hEgJ3Hx1K4HF0SHgn3InpqBev3hm2SLw3hH5BCMrywBAhHYE6OGE0aOJ6ktA5UP0jIIHfaw9i1wIiJtHTaGuvtyWSLk5cshmun9HkdkkRTA75bzuq0Iyd0qh070rA8Gje-s4Tw4xzttgKx1KSkvy8n5FqvzWdsZvclCG2mYY9rMxh_7607NXcxajAP4yDOoKNs5nm937ULe0vCN8a7WTrFuiaGjry7HhzRM4C5AqxbDOBXPLyoMr4qn4LRJCHxOeLZ6o3ugvDOOWsyjk3eliyBwDu8qJH7UmyicLxDcCr0hUK_kvREqjD2Z¶
Decoded JWT Header:¶
{ "kid":"OenI+434JhbvfDntfV\/8rOxG7FkvyjaKVJaVqIFBXohVhAe5fK8anov 1S688r7Kbal+fvpaH1j8ibg52QBy1PQ==", "typ":"JWT", "alg":"RS512"}¶Decoded JWT Claims:¶
{ "aud" : "http://example.com/audience1", "iss" : "https://swedenconnect.se/validator", "iat" : 1603458421, "jti" : "4d1396f1ff728f40d52403b61c574486", "sig_val_claims" : { "sig" : [ { "ext" : null, "sig_val" : [ { "msg" : "OK", "ext" : null, "res" : "PASSED", "pol" : "http://id.swedenconnect.se/svt/sigval-policy/ ts-pkix/01" } ], "sig_ref" : { "sig_hash" : "ycePVLIzdcpK97IYOhFIf1ny79HmICbSVzIeZNbizo7rGIw HNN0zXISyKGjCvnonOaQGfL/P3vDtB88yKSWeXg==", "id" : "id-73989c6fc063636ab5e753f10f757467", "sb_hash" : "BoPV4WCA9sAIahjK1HajfFxi+AzC4JGTuf39W3ZWjczDCURx dc9YeteHtcxGVeggpxHJ75/cQ7HN1dDdliyIwg==" }, "signer_cert_ref" : { "ref" : [ "1+aaJetg7relERlUDYEiU4ZIZhT4RUviIQZuK7o1GFKaTPQ6y+ kx/PNtDrpuqQ6XfrkH9wYDK4ey0y4WrNErnw==", "h4PDxb5ZKmx1eTSqvVvYG8g33s05JzwB+NgEHFU4gc9tqG0kgH kf6W3oLzkTwwurIh6Y9AafZYqc2zP2pE2p4Q==", "Dd2C5sB0IOQeMVnEBkM5Q9W96mBHNwwa2tzXMs+LwuYcOUvPkr yGR0aPG8O9nIP3lbw6KjQ1hDmRk6zC8x2jdg==" ], "type" : "chain_hash" }, "sig_data_ref" : [ { "ref" : "", "hash" : "FcGpOOf8ilcPt21GDd2cGnLGDxRS5j7svM4app2H41dDELm2Czc eTY02ndeJfWjintmQ376IlXTOAr31yzYzsg==" }, { "ref" : "#xades-11a155d92bf55774613bb7b661477cfd", "hash" : "KRkgbZ6P/nhU63IMk0GiUfU/DTwveYiteQkwGeJqC5BzTNV8bQb pedTTuWJPxqvJ0RY84hwm7eY/g0HrAOegKw==" } ], "time_val" : [ ] } ], "ext" : null, "ver" : "1.0", "profile" : "XML", "hash_algo" : "http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#sha512" }}¶