Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]

INFORMATIONAL
Internet Architecture Board (IAB)                            H. FlanaganRequest for Comments: 7994                                    RFC EditorCategory: Informational                                    December 2016ISSN: 2070-1721Requirements for Plain-Text RFCsAbstract   In 2013, after a great deal of community discussion, the decision was   made to shift from the plain-text, ASCII-only canonical format for   RFCs to XML as the canonical format with more human-readable formats   rendered from that XML.  The high-level requirements that informed   this change were defined inRFC 6949, "RFC Series Format Requirements   and Future Development".  Plain text remains an important format for   many in the IETF community, and it will be one of the publication   formats rendered from the XML.  This document outlines the rendering   requirements for the plain-text RFC publication format.  These   requirements do not apply to plain-text RFCs published before the   format transition.Status of This Memo   This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is   published for informational purposes.   This document is a product of the Internet Architecture Board (IAB)   and represents information that the IAB has deemed valuable to   provide for permanent record.  It represents the consensus of the   Internet Architecture Board (IAB).  Documents approved for   publication by the IAB are not a candidate for any level of Internet   Standard; seeSection 2 of RFC 7841.   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained athttp://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7994.Flanagan                      Informational                     [Page 1]

RFC 7994                     Plain-Text RFCs               December 2016Copyright Notice   Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the   document authors.  All rights reserved.   This document is subject toBCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of   publication of this document.  Please review these documents   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect   to this document.Table of Contents1. Introduction ....................................................22. Character Encoding ..............................................43. Figures and Artwork .............................................44. General Page Format Layout ......................................44.1. Headers and Footers ........................................54.2. Table of Contents ..........................................54.3. Line Width .................................................54.4. Line Spacing ...............................................54.5. Hyphenation ................................................55. Elements from the xml2rfc v3 Vocabulary .........................56. Security Considerations .........................................67. References ......................................................67.1. Normative References .......................................67.2. Informative References .....................................7   IAB Members at the Time of Approval ................................8   Acknowledgements ...................................................8   Author's Address ...................................................81.  Introduction   In 2013, after a great deal of community discussion, the decision was   made to shift from the plain-text, ASCII-only canonical format for   RFCs to XML as the canonical format [XML-ANNOUNCE].  The high-level   requirements that informed this change were defined in [RFC6949],   "RFC Series Format Requirements and Future Development".  Plain text   remains an important format for many in the IETF community, and it   will be one of the publication formats rendered from the XML.  This   document outlines the rendering requirements for the plain-text RFC   publication format.  These requirements do not apply to plain-text   RFCs published before the format transition.   The Unicode Consortium defines "plain text" as "Computer-encoded text   that consists only of a sequence of code points from a given   standard, with no other formatting or structural information.Flanagan                      Informational                     [Page 2]

RFC 7994                     Plain-Text RFCs               December 2016   Plain-text interchange is commonly used between computer systems that   do not share higher-level protocols." [UNICODE-GLOSSARY].  In other   words, plain-text files cannot include embedded character formatting   or style information.  The actual character encoding, however, is not   limited to any particular sequence of code points.   A plain-text output for RFCs will continue to be required for the   foreseeable future.  The process of converting xml2rfc version 2   (xml2rfc v2) into text documents is well understood [RFC7749].  We   plan to rely on the practice to date to inform the requirements for   converting xml2rfc version 3 (xml2rfc v3) to text [RFC7991].  This   document calls out those requirements that are changed from v2 or   otherwise deserve special attention, such as the requirements around   the character encoding that may be used; changes in the page layout;   and changes in how figures, artwork, and pagination may be handled.   For more details on general style, see "RFC Style Guide" [RFC7322].   The following assumptions drive the changes in the plain-text output   for RFCs:   o  The existing tools used by the RFC Editor and many members of the      author community to create the text file are complicated to change      and support; manual manipulation is often required for the final      output.  In particular, handling page breaks and associated widows      and orphans for paginated output is tricky [WIDOWS].   o  Additional publication formats -- for example, PDF, HTML -- will      be available that will offer features such as markup and pretty      printing.   o  There is an extensive tool chain in existence among the community      to work with plain-text documents.  Similar functionality may be      possible with other publication formats, but the workflow that      uses the existing tool chain should be supported as much as is      considered practical.   Where practical, the original guidance for the structure of a   plain-text RFC has been kept (e.g., with line lengths, with lines   per page [INS2AUTH]).  Other publication formats, such as HTML and   PDF, will include additional features that will not be present in the   plain text (e.g., paragraph numbering, typographical emphasis).   The details described in this document are expected to change based   on experience gained in implementing the new publication toolsets.   Revised documents will be published capturing those changes as the   toolsets are completed.  Other implementers must not expect those   changes to remain backwards-compatible with the details described in   this document.Flanagan                      Informational                     [Page 3]

RFC 7994                     Plain-Text RFCs               December 20162.  Character Encoding   Plain-text files for RFCs will use the UTF-8 [RFC3629] character   encoding.  That said, the use of non-ASCII characters will be only   allowed in a limited and controlled fashion.   Many elements within the xml2rfc v3 vocabulary have an attribute for   the ASCII equivalent to a non-ASCII character string.  The ASCII   equivalent will be rendered within the plain text as per the guidance   in "The Use of Non-ASCII Characters in RFCs" [RFC7997]; please view   the PDF version of that document.   The plain-text file will include a Byte Order Mark (BOM) to provide   text reader software with in-band information about the character   encoding scheme used.3.  Figures and Artwork   Artwork, such as network diagrams or performance graphs, must be   tagged by the XML <artwork> element (seeSection 2.5 of "The   'xml2rfc' Version 3 Vocabulary" [RFC7991].  Where this artwork is   comprised of an ASCII art diagram, it must be tagged as   "type='ascii-art'".  The plain-text format will only include   ASCII art.  If the canonical format includes figures or artwork other   than ASCII art, then the plain-text output must include a pointer to   the relevant figure in the HTML version of the RFC to allow readers   to see the relevant artwork.   Authors who wish to include ASCII art for the plain-text file and   SVG art for the other outputs may do so, but they should be aware of   the potential for confusion to individuals reading the RFC with two   unique diagrams describing the same content.  If there is conflicting   information between the publication formats, please review the XML   and PDF files to resolve the conflict.4.  General Page Format Layout   One plain-text output will be created during the publication process   with basic pagination that includes a form feed instruction every   58 lines at most, including blank lines.  Instructions or a script   will be made available by and for the community to strip out   pagination as per individual preference.Flanagan                      Informational                     [Page 4]

RFC 7994                     Plain-Text RFCs               December 20164.1.  Headers and Footers   The front matter on the front page (such as the RFC number and   category) and the back matter on the last page (the authors' full   names and contact information) will continue with the structure   described inRFC 7841 [RFC7841], "RFC Streams, Headers, and   Boilerplates".  Running headers and footers will no longer be added.4.2.  Table of Contents   In order to retain similar content wherever possible between the   various publication formats, the table of contents will list section   and subsection numbers and titles but will not include page numbers.4.3.  Line Width   Each line must be limited to 72 characters followed by the character   sequence that denotes an end-of-line (EOL).  The EOL sequence used by   the RFC Editor will be the two-character sequence CR LF (Carriage   Return followed by Line Feed).  This limit includes any left-side   indentation.   Note that the EOL used by the RFC Editor may change with different   transports and as displayed in different display software.4.4.  Line Spacing   Use single-spaced text within a paragraph, and one blank line between   paragraphs.4.5.  Hyphenation   Hyphenated words (e.g., "Internet-Draft") should not be split across   successive lines.5.  Elements from the xml2rfc v3 Vocabulary   The plain-text formatter uses the relevant tags from the xml2rfc v3   source file to build a document conforming to the layout and   structure described by the full RFC Style Guide [RFC7322] (including   the updates in the web portion of the Style Guide) [STYLEWEB].Flanagan                      Informational                     [Page 5]

RFC 7994                     Plain-Text RFCs               December 20166.  Security Considerations   The requirements of the plain-text format involve no significant   security considerations.  As part of the larger format project,   however, unintended changes to the text as a result of the   transformation from the base XML file could in turn corrupt a   standard, practice, or critical piece of information about a   protocol.7.  References7.1.  Normative References   [RFC3629]  Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of              ISO 10646", STD 63,RFC 3629, DOI 10.17487/RFC3629,              November 2003, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3629>.   [RFC6949]  Flanagan, H. and N. Brownlee, "RFC Series Format              Requirements and Future Development",RFC 6949,              DOI 10.17487/RFC6949, May 2013,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6949>.   [RFC7322]  Flanagan, H. and S. Ginoza, "RFC Style Guide",RFC 7322,              DOI 10.17487/RFC7322, September 2014,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7322>.   [RFC7749]  Reschke, J., "The "xml2rfc" Version 2 Vocabulary",RFC 7749, DOI 10.17487/RFC7749, February 2016,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7749>.   [RFC7841]  Halpern, J., Ed., Daigle, L., Ed., and O. Kolkman, Ed.,              "RFC Streams, Headers, and Boilerplates",RFC 7841,              DOI 10.17487/RFC7841, May 2016,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7841>.   [RFC7991]  Hoffman, P., "The "xml2rfc" Version 3 Vocabulary",RFC 7991, DOI 10.17487/RFC7991, December 2016,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7991>.   [RFC7997]  Flanagan, H., Ed., "The Use of Non-ASCII Characters in              RFCs",RFC 7997, DOI 10.17487/RFC7997, December 2016,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7997>.Flanagan                      Informational                     [Page 6]

RFC 7994                     Plain-Text RFCs               December 20167.2.  Informative References   [INS2AUTH] RFC Editor, "Instructions to Request for Comments (RFC)              Authors", August 2004, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/instructions2authors.txt>.   [STYLEWEB] RFC Editor, "Web Portion of the Style Guide",              February 2016,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/styleguide/part2/>.   [UNICODE-GLOSSARY]              The Unicode Consortium, "Glossary of Unicode Terms",              September 2016, <http://www.unicode.org/glossary/>.   [WIDOWS]   Wikipedia, "Widows and orphans", September 2016,              <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Widows_and_orphans&oldid=738356204>.   [XML-ANNOUNCE]              Flanagan, H., "Subject: Direction of the RFC Format              Development effort", May 2013,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/2013-May/005584.html>.Flanagan                      Informational                     [Page 7]

RFC 7994                     Plain-Text RFCs               December 2016IAB Members at the Time of Approval   The IAB members at the time this memo was approved were   (in alphabetical order):      Jari Arkko      Ralph Droms      Ted Hardie      Joe Hildebrand      Russ Housley      Lee Howard      Erik Nordmark      Robert Sparks      Andrew Sullivan      Dave Thaler      Martin Thomson      Brian Trammell      Suzanne WoolfAcknowledgements   This document owes a great deal of thanks to the efforts of the RFC   Format Design Team: Nevil Brownlee, Tony Hansen, Joe Hildebrand, Paul   Hoffman, Ted Lemon, Julian Reschke, Adam Roach, Alice Russo, Robert   Sparks, and David Thaler.Author's Address   Heather Flanagan   RFC Editor   Email: rse@rfc-editor.org   URI:http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2647-2220Flanagan                      Informational                     [Page 8]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp