Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]

BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                       M. BlanchetRequest for Comments: 7720                                      ViagenieBCP: 40                                                       L-J. LimanObsoletes:2870                                                   NetnodCategory: Best Current Practice                            December 2015ISSN: 2070-1721DNS Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment RequirementsAbstract   The DNS root name service is a critical part of the Internet   architecture.  The protocol and deployment requirements for the DNS   root name service are defined in this document.  Operational   requirements are out of scope.Status of This Memo   This memo documents an Internet Best Current Practice.   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has   received public review and has been approved for publication by the   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on   BCPs is available inSection 2 of RFC 5741.   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained athttp://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7720.Copyright Notice   Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the   document authors.  All rights reserved.   This document is subject toBCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of   publication of this document.  Please review these documents   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as   described in the Simplified BSD License.Blanchet & Liman          Best Current Practice                 [Page 1]

RFC 7720             Root Name Service Requirements        December 2015Table of Contents1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21.1.  Relationship toRFC 2870  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22.  Protocol Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .33.  Deployment Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .34.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .35.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4   Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .61.  Introduction   [RFC2870] discusses protocol and operational requirements for root   name servers for the Internet's domain name system (DNS) protocol   [RFC1035].  Since its publication, both protocol and operational   requirements have evolved.  It makes more sense now to separate the   two sets of requirements into two separate documents.  This document   only defines the protocol requirements and some deployment   requirements.  The operational requirements that were defined inRFC2870 have been removed.  Operational requirements are now defined by   the Root Server System Advisory Committee of ICANN and are documented   in [RSSAC-001].   The root servers are authoritative servers of the unique [RFC2826]   root zone (".") [ROOTZONE].  They currently also serve the root-   servers.net zone.  Some also serve the zone for the .arpa top-level   domain [ARPAZONE] [RFC3172].  This document describes the external   interface of the root name servers from a protocol viewpoint of the   service.  It specifies basic requirements for the Internet that DNS   clients meet when interacting with a root name service over the   public Internet.   The keywords MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHALL, SHALL NOT, SHOULD,   SHOULD NOT, RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL, when they appear in this   document, are to be interpreted as described inBCP 14, [RFC2119].1.1.  Relationship toRFC 2870   This document obsoletes [RFC2870].   This document and [RSSAC-001] together functionally replace   [RFC2870].Blanchet & Liman          Best Current Practice                 [Page 2]

RFC 7720             Root Name Service Requirements        December 20152.  Protocol Requirements   This section describes the minimum high-level protocol requirements.   Operative details are documented in [RSSAC-001].   The root name service:   o  MUST implement core DNS [RFC1035] and clarifications to the DNS      [RFC2181].   o  MUST support IPv4 [RFC791] and IPv6 [RFC2460] transport of DNS      queries and responses.   o  MUST support UDP [RFC768] and TCP [RFC793] transport of DNS      queries and responses.   o  MUST generate checksums when sending UDP datagrams and MUST verify      checksums when receiving UDP datagrams containing a non-zero      checksum.   o  MUST implement DNSSEC [RFC4035] as an authoritative name service.   o  MUST implement extension mechanisms for DNS (EDNS(0)) [RFC6891].3.  Deployment Requirements   The root name service:   o  MUST answer queries from any entity conforming to [RFC1122] with a      valid IP address.   o  MUST serve the unique [RFC2826] root zone [ROOTZONE].4.  Security Considerations   This document does not specify a new protocol.  However, the root   name service is a key component of the Internet architecture and play   a key role into the overall security of the Internet [RFC2826].   Specific security considerations on the DNS protocols are discussed   in their respective specifications.  The security considerations on   the operational side of the root name servers are discussed in   [RSSAC-001].Blanchet & Liman          Best Current Practice                 [Page 3]

RFC 7720             Root Name Service Requirements        December 20155.  Informative References   [ARPAZONE]  IANA, ".ARPA Zone Management",               <http://www.iana.org/domains/arpa>.   [RFC768]    Postel, J., "User Datagram Protocol", STD 6,RFC 768,               DOI 10.17487/RFC0768, August 1980,               <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc768>.   [RFC791]    Postel, J., "Internet Protocol", STD 5,RFC 791,               DOI 10.17487/RFC0791, September 1981,               <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc791>.   [RFC793]    Postel, J., "Transmission Control Protocol", STD 7,RFC 793, DOI 10.17487/RFC0793, September 1981,               <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc793>.   [RFC1035]   Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - implementation and               specification", STD 13,RFC 1035, DOI 10.17487/RFC1035,               November 1987, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1035>.   [RFC1122]   Braden, R., Ed., "Requirements for Internet Hosts -               Communication Layers", STD 3,RFC 1122,               DOI 10.17487/RFC1122, October 1989,               <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1122>.   [RFC2119]   Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate               Requirement Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119,               DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,               <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.   [RFC2181]   Elz, R. and R. Bush, "Clarifications to the DNS               Specification",RFC 2181, DOI 10.17487/RFC2181, July               1997, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2181>.   [RFC2460]   Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6               (IPv6) Specification",RFC 2460, DOI 10.17487/RFC2460,               December 1998, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2460>.   [RFC2826]   Internet Architecture Board, "IAB Technical Comment on               the Unique DNS Root",RFC 2826, DOI 10.17487/RFC2826, May               2000, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2826>.   [RFC2870]   Bush, R., Karrenberg, D., Kosters, M., and R. Plzak,               "Root Name Server Operational Requirements",BCP 40,RFC 2870, DOI 10.17487/RFC2870, June 2000,               <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2870>.Blanchet & Liman          Best Current Practice                 [Page 4]

RFC 7720             Root Name Service Requirements        December 2015   [RFC3172]   Huston, G., Ed., "Management Guidelines & Operational               Requirements for the Address and Routing Parameter Area               Domain ("arpa")",BCP 52,RFC 3172, DOI 10.17487/RFC3172,               September 2001, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3172>.   [RFC4035]   Arends, R., Austein, R., Larson, M., Massey, D., and S.               Rose, "Protocol Modifications for the DNS Security               Extensions",RFC 4035, DOI 10.17487/RFC4035, March 2005,               <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4035>.   [RFC6891]   Damas, J., Graff, M., and P. Vixie, "Extension Mechanisms               for DNS (EDNS(0))", STD 75,RFC 6891,               DOI 10.17487/RFC6891, April 2013,               <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6891>.   [ROOTZONE]  "Root Zone", <ftp://rs.internic.net/domain/root.zone>.   [RSSAC-001] Root Server System Advisory Committee (RSSAC), "Service               Expectations of Root Servers", November 2014,               <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/rssac-001-root-service-expectations-04dec15-en.pdf>.Acknowledgements   Some text was taken from [RFC2870].  The editors of this document   would like to sincerely thank the following individuals for valuable   contributions to the text: Andrew Sullivan, Simon Perreault,   Jean-Philippe Dionne, Dave Thaler, Russ Housley, Alissa Cooper, Joe   Abley, Joao Damas, Daniel Karrenberg, Jacques Latour, Eliot Lear,   Bill Manning, David Conrad, Paul Hoffman, Terry Manderson, Jari   Arkko, and Mark Andrews.Blanchet & Liman          Best Current Practice                 [Page 5]

RFC 7720             Root Name Service Requirements        December 2015Authors' Addresses   Marc Blanchet   Viagenie   246 Aberdeen   Quebec, QC  G1R 2E1   Canada   Email: Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.ca   URI:http://viagenie.ca   Lars-Johan Liman   Netnod Internet Exchange   Box 30194   SE-104 25 Stockholm   Sweden   Email: liman@netnod.se   URI:http://www.netnod.se/Blanchet & Liman          Best Current Practice                 [Page 6]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp