Movatterモバイル変換
[0]ホーム
[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]
PROPOSED STANDARD
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) M. BoucadairRequest for Comments: 7371 France TelecomUpdates:3306,3956,4291 S. VenaasCategory: Standards Track CiscoISSN: 2070-1721 September 2014Updates to the IPv6 Multicast Addressing ArchitectureAbstract This document updates the IPv6 multicast addressing architecture by redefining the reserved bits as generic flag bits. The document also provides some clarifications related to the use of these flag bits. This document updates RFCs 3956, 3306, and 4291.Status of This Memo This is an Internet Standards Track document. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available inSection 2 of RFC 5741. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained athttp://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7371.Boucadair & Venaas Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 7371 Multicast Flag Bits September 2014Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject toBCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF Contributions published or made publicly available before November 10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process. Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other than English.Table of Contents1. Introduction ....................................................31.1. Requirements Language ......................................32. Addressing Architecture Update ..................................33. Flag Bits: New Processing Rules .................................44. RFC Updates .....................................................44.1. Updates toRFC 3306 ........................................44.1.1. Update #1 ...........................................44.1.2. Update #2 ...........................................64.2. Updates toRFC 3956 ........................................64.2.1. Update #1 ...........................................64.2.2. Update #2 ...........................................74.2.3. Update #3 ...........................................84.2.4. Update #4 ...........................................95. Security Considerations .........................................96. Acknowledgements ................................................97. References ......................................................97.1. Normative References .......................................97.2. Informative References ....................................10Boucadair & Venaas Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 7371 Multicast Flag Bits September 20141. Introduction This document updates the IPv6 addressing architecture [RFC4291] by redefining reserved bits as generic flag bits (Section 2). The document also provides some clarifications related to the use of these flag bits (Section 3). This document updates [RFC3956], [RFC3306], and [RFC4291]. These updates are logical consequences of the new processing rules inSection 3. Textual representation of IPv6 addresses included in the RFC updates follows the recommendation in [RFC5952].1.1. Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described inRFC 2119 [RFC2119].2. Addressing Architecture Update Bits 17-20 of a multicast address, where bit 1 is the most significant bit, are defined in [RFC3956] and [RFC3306] as reserved bits. This document defines these bits as generic flag bits so that they apply to any multicast address. These bits are referred to as "ff2" (flag field 2), while the "flgs" bits in [RFC4291] [RFC3956] are renamed to "ff1" (flag field 1). Within this document, flag bits denote both ff1 and ff2. Defining the bits 17-20 as flags for all IPv6 multicast addresses allows addresses to be treated in a more uniform and generic way, and allows for these bits to be defined in the future for different purposes, irrespective of the specific type of multicast address. For the record, this design choice was initially triggered by the specification in [ADDR-FORMAT], which proposed associating a meaning with one of the reserved bits. Moreover, [ADDR-FORMAT] also considered the use of the last remaining flag in ff1, but that approach was abandoned because it is not clear at this stage whether there are other usage scenarios of the flag.Section 4 specifies the updated structure of the addressing architecture. Further specification documents may define a meaning for these flag bits.Boucadair & Venaas Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 7371 Multicast Flag Bits September 20143. Flag Bits: New Processing Rules Some implementations and specification documents do not treat the flag bits as separate bits but tend to use their combined value as a 4-bit integer. This practice is a hurdle for assigning a meaning to the remaining flag bits. Below are listed some examples for illustration purposes: o The reading of [RFC3306] may lead one to conclude that ff3x::/32 is the only allowed Source-Specific Multicast (SSM) IPv6 prefix block. o [RFC3956] states that only ff70::/12 applies to Embedded-RP. Particularly, implementations should not treat the fff0::/12 range as Embedded-RP. To avoid such confusion and to unambiguously associate a meaning with the remaining flags, the following requirement is made: Implementations MUST treat flag bits as separate bits.4. RFC Updates4.1. Updates toRFC 33064.1.1. Update #1 This document changesSection 4 of [RFC3306] as follows: OLD: | 8 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 64 | 32 | +--------+----+----+--------+--------+----------------+----------+ |11111111|flgs|scop|reserved| plen | network prefix | group ID | +--------+----+----+--------+--------+----------------+----------+ +-+-+-+-+ flgs is a set of 4 flags: |0|0|P|T| +-+-+-+-+ o P = 0 indicates a multicast address that is not assigned based on the network prefix. This indicates a multicast address as defined in [ADDRARCH]. o P = 1 indicates a multicast address that is assigned based on the network prefix.Boucadair & Venaas Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 7371 Multicast Flag Bits September 2014 o If P = 1, T MUST be set to 1, otherwise the setting of the T bit is defined inSection 2.7 of [ADDRARCH]. The reserved field MUST be zero. Note: [ADDRARCH] is a reference listed in [RFC3306]. [ADDRARCH] has been since obsoleted by [RFC4291]. NEW: | 8 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 64 | 32 | +--------+----+----+----+----+--------+----------------+----------+ |11111111|ff1 |scop|ff2 |rsvd| plen | network prefix | group ID | +--------+----+----+----+----+--------+----------------+----------+ +-+-+-+-+ ff1 (flag field 1) is a set of 4 flags: |X|Y|P|T| +-+-+-+-+ X and Y may each be set to 0 or 1. Note that X is for future assignment, while a meaning is associated with Y inRFC 3956. o P = 0 indicates a multicast address that is not assigned based on the network prefix. This indicates a multicast address as defined in [RFC4291]. o P = 1 indicates a multicast address that is assigned based on the network prefix. o If P = 1, T MUST be set to 1; otherwise, the setting of the T bit is defined inSection 2.7 of [RFC4291]. +-+-+-+-+ ff2 (flag field 2) is a set of 4 flags: |r|r|r|r| +-+-+-+-+ where "rrrr" are for future assignment as additional flag bits. r bits MUST each be sent as zero and MUST be ignored on receipt. Flag bits denote both ff1 and ff2.Boucadair & Venaas Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 7371 Multicast Flag Bits September 20144.1.2. Update #2 This document changesSection 6 of [RFC3306] as follows: OLD: These settings create an SSM range of FF3x::/32 (where 'x' is any valid scope value). The source address field in the IPv6 header identifies the owner of the multicast address. NEW: If the flag bits in ff1 are set to 0011, these settings create an SSM range of ff3x::/32 (where 'x' is any valid scope value). The source address field in the IPv6 header identifies the owner of the multicast address. ff3x::/32 is not the only allowed SSM prefix range. For example, if the most significant flag bit in ff1 is set, then we would get the SSM range ffbx::/32.4.2. Updates toRFC 39564.2.1. Update #1 This document changesSection 2 of [RFC3956] as follows: OLD: As described in [RFC3306], the multicast address format is as follows: | 8 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 64 | 32 | +--------+----+----+--------+----+----------------+----------+ |11111111|flgs|scop|reserved|plen| network prefix | group ID | +--------+----+----+--------+----+----------------+----------+ Where flgs are "0011". (The first two bits are as yet undefined, sent as zero and ignored on receipt.)Boucadair & Venaas Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 7371 Multicast Flag Bits September 2014 NEW: The multicast address format is as follows: | 8 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 64 | 32 | +--------+----+----+----+----+----+----------------+----------+ |11111111|ff1 |scop|ff2 |rsvd|plen| network prefix | group ID | +--------+----+----+----+----+----+----------------+----------+ +-+-+-+-+ ff1 (flag field 1) is a set of four flags: |X|R|P|T| +-+-+-+-+ where X is for future assignment as an additional flag bit. X may be set to 0 or 1. +-+-+-+-+ ff2 (flag field 2) is a set of 4 flags: |r|r|r|r| +-+-+-+-+ where "rrrr" are for future assignment as additional flag bits. r bits MUST each be sent as zero and MUST be ignored on receipt. Flag bits denote both ff1 and ff2.4.2.2. Update #2 This document changesSection 3 of [RFC3956] as follows: OLD: | 8 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 64 | 32 | +--------+----+----+----+----+----+----------------+----------+ |11111111|flgs|scop|rsvd|RIID|plen| network prefix | group ID | +--------+----+----+----+----+----+----------------+----------+ +-+-+-+-+ flgs is a set of four flags: |0|R|P|T| +-+-+-+-+ When the highest-order bit is 0, R = 1 indicates a multicast address that embeds the address on the RP. Then P MUST be set to 1, and consequently T MUST be set to 1, as specified in [RFC3306]. In effect, this implies the prefix FF70::/12. In this case, the last 4 bits of the previously reserved field are interpreted as embedding the RP interface ID, as specified in this memo.Boucadair & Venaas Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 7371 Multicast Flag Bits September 2014 The behavior is unspecified if P or T is not set to 1, as then the prefix would not be FF70::/12. Likewise, the encoding and the protocol mode used when the two high-order bits in "flgs" are set to 11 ("FFF0::/12") is intentionally unspecified until such time that the highest-order bit is defined. Without further IETF specification, implementations SHOULD NOT treat the FFF0::/12 range as Embedded-RP. NEW: | 8 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 64 | 32 | +--------+----+----+----+----+----+----------------+----------+ |11111111|ff1 |scop|ff2 |RIID|plen| network prefix | group ID | +--------+----+----+----+----+----+----------------+----------+ +-+-+-+-+ ff1 is a set of four flags: |X|R|P|T| +-+-+-+-+ where X is for future assignment as an additional flag bit. X may be set to 0 or 1. R = 1 indicates a multicast address that embeds the address of the RP. Then, P MUST be set to 1, and consequently T MUST be set to 1, according to [RFC3306], as this is a special case of unicast-prefix-based addresses. This implies that, for instance, prefixes ff70::/12 and fff0::/12 are embedded RP prefixes. When the R-bit is set, the last 4 bits of the field that were reserved in [RFC3306] are interpreted as embedding the RP interface ID, as specified in this memo.4.2.3. Update #3 This document changesSection 4 of [RFC3956] as follows: OLD: o It MUST be a multicast address with "flgs" set to 0111, that is, to be of the prefix FF70::/12, NEW: o It MUST be a multicast address with the R-bit set to 1. o It MUST have the P-bit and T-bit both set to 1 when using the embedding in this document as it is a prefix-based address.Boucadair & Venaas Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 7371 Multicast Flag Bits September 20144.2.4. Update #4 This document changesSection 7.1 of [RFC3956] as follows: OLD: To avoid loops and inconsistencies, for addresses in the range FF70::/12, the Embedded-RP mapping MUST be considered the longest possible match and higher priority than any other mechanism. NEW: To avoid loops and inconsistencies, for addresses with the R-bit set to 1, the Embedded-RP mapping MUST be considered the longest possible match and higher priority than any other mechanism.5. Security Considerations The same security considerations as those discussed in [RFC3956], [RFC3306], and [RFC4291] are to be taken into account.6. Acknowledgements Special thanks to Brian Haberman for the discussions prior to the publication of this document. Many thanks to Jouni Korhonen, Tatuya Jinmei, Charlie Kaufman, and Ben Campbell for their review.7. References7.1. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC3306] Haberman, B. and D. Thaler, "Unicast-Prefix-based IPv6 Multicast Addresses",RFC 3306, August 2002. [RFC3956] Savola, P. and B. Haberman, "Embedding the Rendezvous Point (RP) Address in an IPv6 Multicast Address",RFC 3956, November 2004. [RFC4291] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture",RFC 4291, February 2006. [RFC5952] Kawamura, S. and M. Kawashima, "A Recommendation for IPv6 Address Text Representation",RFC 5952, August 2010.Boucadair & Venaas Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 7371 Multicast Flag Bits September 20147.2. Informative References [ADDR-FORMAT] Boucadair, M., Qin, J., Lee, Y., Venaas, S., Li, X., and M. Xu, "IPv6 Multicast Address With Embedded IPv4 Multicast Address", Work in Progress, April 2013.Authors' Addresses Mohamed Boucadair France Telecom Rennes 35000 France EMail: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com Stig Venaas Cisco USA EMail: stig@cisco.comBoucadair & Venaas Standards Track [Page 10]
[8]ページ先頭