Movatterモバイル変換
[0]ホーム
[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Errata] [Info page]
PROPOSED STANDARD
Errata ExistInternet Engineering Task Force (IETF) A. BiermanRequest for Comments: 6933 YumaWorks, Inc.Obsoletes:4133 D. RomascanuCategory: Standards Track AvayaISSN: 2070-1721 J. Quittek NEC Europe Ltd. M. Chandramouli Cisco Systems, Inc. May 2013Entity MIB (Version 4)Abstract This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in the Internet community. In particular, it describes managed objects used for managing multiple logical and physical entities managed by a single Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) agent. This document specifies version 4 of the Entity MIB. This memo obsoletes version 3 of the Entity MIB module published asRFC 4133.Status of This Memo This is an Internet Standards Track document. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available inSection 2 of RFC 5741. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained athttp://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6933.Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject toBCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document mustBierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.Table of Contents1. The SNMP Management Framework ...................................32. Overview ........................................................32.1. Terms ......................................................52.2. Relationship to Community Strings ..........................62.3. Relationship to SNMP Contexts ..............................62.4. Relationship to Proxy Mechanisms ...........................62.5. Relationship to a Chassis MIB ..............................72.6. Relationship to the Interfaces MIB .........................72.7. Relationship to the Other MIB Modules ......................72.8. Relationship to Naming Scopes ..............................72.9. Multiple Instances of the Entity MIB .......................82.10. Re-Configuration of Entities ..............................92.11. Textual Convention Change .................................92.12. MIB Structure .............................................92.12.1. entityPhysical Group ..............................102.12.2. entityLogical Group ...............................122.12.3. entityMapping Group ...............................122.12.4. entityGeneral Group ...............................132.12.5. entityNotifications Group .........................132.13. Multiple Agents ..........................................132.14. Changes SinceRFC 2037 ...................................142.14.1. Textual Conventions ...............................142.14.2. New entPhysicalTable Objects ......................142.14.3. New entLogicalTable Objects .......................142.14.4. Bug Fixes .........................................142.15. Changes SinceRFC 2737 ...................................152.15.1. Textual Conventions ...............................152.15.2. New Objects .......................................152.15.3. Bug Fixes .........................................152.16. Changes SinceRFC 4133 ...................................152.16.1. MIB Module Addition ...............................152.16.2. Modification to Some of the MIB Objects ...........152.16.3. New TC for Universally Unique Identifier ..........163. MIB Definitions ................................................163.1. ENTITY-MIB ................................................163.2. IANA-ENTITY-MIB ...........................................503.3. UUID-TC-MIB ...............................................534. Usage Examples .................................................554.1. Router/Bridge .............................................554.2. Repeaters .................................................624.3. EMAN Example ..............................................695. Security Considerations ........................................70Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 20136. IANA Considerations ............................................727. Acknowledgements ...............................................738. References .....................................................738.1. Normative References ......................................738.2. Informative References ....................................741. The SNMP Management Framework For a detailed overview of the documents that describe the current Internet-Standard Management Framework, please refer tosection 7 of RFC 3410 [RFC3410]. Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed the Management Information Base or MIB. MIB objects are generally accessed through the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP). Objects in the MIB are defined using the mechanisms defined in the Structure of Management Information (SMI). This memo specifies a MIB module that is compliant to the SMIv2, which is described in STD 58,RFC 2578 [RFC2578], STD 58,RFC 2579 [RFC2579] and STD 58,RFC 2580 [RFC2580]. The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described inRFC2119 [RFC2119].2. Overview There is a need for a standardized way of representing a single agent, which supports multiple instances of one MIB module. This is presently true for at least 3 standard MIB modules and is likely to become true for more and more MIB modules as time passes. For example: - multiple instances of a bridge supported within a single device that has a single agent; - multiple repeaters supported by a single agent; and - multiple OSPF backbone areas, each operating as part of its own Autonomous System and each identified by the same area-id (e.g., 0.0.0.0), supported inside a single router with one agent. The single agent present in each of these cases implies a relationship binds these entities. Effectively, there is some "overall" physical entity that houses the sum of the things managed by that one agent, i.e., there are multiple "logical" entities within a single physical entity. Sometimes, the overall physical entityBierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 contains multiple (smaller) physical entities, and each logical entity is associated with a particular physical entity. Sometimes, the overall physical entity is a "compound" of multiple physical entities (e.g., a stack of stackable hubs). What is needed is a way to determine exactly which logical entities are managed by the agent (with some version of SNMP) in order to communicate with the agent about a particular logical entity. When different logical entities are associated with different physical entities within the overall physical entity, it is also useful to be able to use this information to distinguish between logical entities. In these situations, there is no need for varbinds for multiple logical entities to be referenced in the same SNMP message (although that might be useful in the future). Rather, it is sufficient, and in some situations preferable, to have the context/community in the message identify the logical entity to which the varbinds apply. Version 2 of this MIB addresses new requirements that have emerged since the publication of the first Entity MIB [RFC2037]. There is a need for a standardized way of providing non-volatile, administratively assigned identifiers for physical components represented with the Entity MIB. There is also a need to align the Entity MIB with the SNMPv3 administrative framework (STD 62, [RFC3411]). Implementation experience has shown that additional physical component attributes are also desirable. Version 3 of this MIB addresses new requirements that have emerged since the publication of the second Entity MIB [RFC2737]. There is a need to identify physical entities that are central processing units (CPUs) and a need to provide a Textual Convention (TC) that identifies an entPhysicalIndex value or zero, where the value zero has application-specific semantics. Two new objects have been added to the entPhysicalTable to identify the manufacturing date and provide additional URIs for a particular physical entity. Version 4 of this MIB addresses new requirements that have emerged since the publication of the third version of the Entity MIB [RFC4133]. There is a need to add new enumerated values for entity physical classes, a need to provide identification information for physical entities using a Universally Unique Identifier (UUID) format, and a need to have compliant implementations of the Entity MIB with a smaller subsets of MIB objects for devices with constrained resources. The PhysicalClass TEXTUAL-CONVENTION was deprecated, and a new IANAPhysicalClass TC (maintained by IANA) was created. A new TC, UUIDorZero, was created to represent a UUID, and a new MIB object wasBierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 added to the entPhysicalTable to identify an entity. A new compliance statement, entity4CRCompliance, has been added for possible implementation of a selected subset of MIB objects by entities with constrained resources.2.1. Terms The following terms are used throughout this document: - Naming Scope A "naming scope" represents the set of information that may be potentially accessed through a single SNMP operation. All instances within the naming scope share the same unique identifier space. For SNMPv1, a naming scope is identified by the value of the associated entLogicalCommunity instance. For SNMPv3, the term "context" is used instead of "naming scope". The complete definition of an SNMP context can be found in Section 3.3.1 ofRFC3411 [RFC3411]. - Multi-Scoped Object A MIB object for which identical instance values identify different managed information in different naming scopes is called a "multi- scoped" MIB object. - Single-Scoped Object A MIB object for which identical instance values identify the same managed information in different naming scopes is called a "single- scoped" MIB object. - Logical Entity A managed system contains one or more "logical entities", each represented by at most one instantiation of each of a particular set of MIB objects. A set of management functions is associated with each logical entity. Examples of logical entities include routers, bridges, print-servers, etc. - Physical Entity A "physical entity" or "physical component" represents an identifiable physical resource within a managed system. Zero or more logical entities may utilize a physical resource at any given time. Determining which physical components are represented by an agent in the EntPhysicalTable is an implementation-specific matter. Typically, physical resources (e.g., communications ports, backplanes, sensors, daughter-cards, power supplies, and the overall chassis), which can be managed via functions associated with one or more logical entities, are included in the MIB.Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 - Containment Tree Each physical component may be modeled as 'contained' within another physical component. A "containment-tree" is the conceptual sequence of entPhysicalIndex values that uniquely specifies the exact physical location of a physical component within the managed system. It is generated by 'following and recording' each entPhysicalContainedIn instance 'up the tree towards the root' until a value of zero, indicating no further containment, is found.2.2. Relationship to Community Strings For community-based SNMP, differentiating logical entities is one (but not the only) purpose of the community string [RFC1157]. This is accommodated by representing each community string as a logical entity. Note that different logical entities may share the same naming scope and, therefore, the same values of entLogicalCommunity. This is possible, providing they have no need for the same instance of a MIB object to represent different managed information.2.3. Relationship to SNMP Contexts Version 2 of the Entity MIB contains support for associating SNMPv3 contexts with logical entities. Two new MIB objects, defining an SnmpEngineID and ContextName pair, are used together to identify an SNMP context associated with a logical entity. This context can be used (in conjunction with the entLogicalTAddress and entLogicalTDomain MIB objects) to send SNMPv3 messages on behalf of a particular logical entity.2.4. Relationship to Proxy Mechanisms The Entity MIB is designed to allow functional component discovery. The administrative relationships between different logical entities are not visible in any Entity MIB tables. A Network Management System (NMS) cannot determine whether MIB instances in different naming scopes are realized locally or remotely (e.g., via some proxy mechanism) by examining any particular Entity MIB objects. The management of administrative framework functions is not an explicit goal of the Entity MIB WG at this time. This new area of functionality may be revisited after some operational experience with the Entity MIB is gained.Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 Note that for community-based versions of SNMP, a network administrator will likely be able to associate community strings with naming scopes that have proprietary mechanisms, as a matter of configuration. There are no mechanisms for managing naming scopes defined in this MIB.2.5. Relationship to a Chassis MIB Some readers may recall that a previous IETF working group attempted to define a Chassis MIB. No consensus was reached by that working group, possibly because its scope was too broad. As such, it is not the purpose of the ENTITY-MIB module to be a "Chassis MIB replacement", nor is it within the scope of the ENTITY-MIB module to contain all the information that might be necessary to manage a "chassis". On the other hand, the entities represented by an implementation of the ENTITY-MIB module might well be contained in a chassis.2.6. Relationship to the Interfaces MIB The Entity MIB contains a mapping table identifying physical components that have 'external values' (e.g., ifIndex) associated with them within a given naming scope. This table can be used to identify the physical location of each interface in the ifTable [RFC2863]. Because ifIndex values in different contexts are not related to one another, the interface-to-physical-component associations are relative to the same logical entity within the agent. The Entity MIB also contains entPhysicalName and entPhysicalAlias objects, which approximate the semantics of the ifName and ifAlias objects (respectively) from the Interfaces MIB [RFC2863] for all types of physical components.2.7. Relationship to the Other MIB Modules The Entity MIB contains a mapping table identifying physical components that have identifiers from other standard MIB modules associated with them. For example, this table can be used along with the physical mapping table to identify the physical location of each repeater port in the rptrPortTable or each interface in the ifTable.2.8. Relationship to Naming Scopes There is some question as to which MIB objects may be returned within a given naming scope. MIB objects that are not multi-scoped within a managed system are likely to ignore context information inBierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 implementation. In such a case, it is likely such objects will be returned in all naming scopes (e.g., not just the 'default' naming scope or the SNMPv3 default context). For example, a community string used to access the management information for logical device 'bridge2' may allow access to all the non-bridge-related objects in the 'default' naming scope, as well as a second instance of the Bridge MIB [RFC4188]. The isolation of single-scoped MIB objects by the agent is an implementation-specific matter. An agent may wish to limit the objects returned in a particular naming scope to only the multi- scoped objects in that naming scope (e.g., system group and the Bridge MIB). In this case, all single-scoped management information would belong to a common naming scope (e.g., 'default'), which itself may contain some multi-scoped objects (e.g., system group).2.9. Multiple Instances of the Entity MIB It is possible that more than one agent may exist in a managed system. In such cases, multiple instances of the Entity MIB (representing the same managed objects) may be available to an NMS. In order to reduce complexity for agent implementation, multiple instances of the Entity MIB are not required to be equivalent or even consistent. An NMS may be able to 'align' instances returned by different agents by examining the columns of each table, but vendor- specific identifiers and (especially) index values are likely to be different. Each agent may be managing different subsets of the entire chassis as well. When all of a physically modular device is represented by a single agent, the entry (for which entPhysicalContainedIn has the value zero) would likely have 'chassis' as the value of its entPhysicalClass. Alternatively, for an agent on a module where the agent represents only the physical entities on that module (not those on other modules), the entry (for which entPhysicalContainedIn has the value zero) would likely have 'module' as the value of its entPhysicalClass. An agent implementation of the entLogicalTable is not required to contain information about logical entities managed primarily by other agents. That is, the entLogicalTAddress and entLogicalTDomain objects in the entLogicalTable are provided to support a historical multiplexing mechanism, not to identify other SNMP agents. Note that the Entity MIB is a single-scoped MIB, in the event an agent represents the MIB in different naming scopes.Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 20132.10. Re-Configuration of Entities Most of the MIB objects defined in this MIB have, at most, a read- only MAX-ACCESS clause. This is a conscious decision by the working group to limit this MIB's scope. The second version of the Entity MIB allows a network administrator to configure some common attributes of physical components.2.11. Textual Convention Change Version 1 of the Entity MIB contains three MIB objects defined with the (now obsolete) DisplayString TEXTUAL-CONVENTION. In version 2 of the Entity MIB, the syntax for these objects has been updated to use the (now preferred) SnmpAdminString TEXTUAL-CONVENTION. The ENTMIB working group (which was in charge of the document at that point) realized that this change is not strictly supported by SMIv2. In their judgment, the alternative of deprecating the old objects and defining new objects would have had a more adverse impact on backward compatibility and interoperability, given the particular semantics of these objects.2.12. MIB Structure The Entity MIB contains five groups of MIB objects: - entityPhysical group Describes the physical entities managed by a single agent. - entityLogical group Describes the logical entities managed by a single agent. - entityMapping group Describes the associations between the physical entities, logical entities, interfaces, and non-interface ports managed by a single agent. - entityGeneral group Describes general system attributes shared by potentially all types of entities managed by a single agent. - entityNotifications group Contains status indication notifications.Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 20132.12.1. entityPhysical Group This group contains a single table to identify physical system components, called the entPhysicalTable. The entPhysicalTable contains one row per physical entity and must always contain at least one row for an "overall" physical entity, which should have an entPhysicalClass value of 'stack(11)', 'chassis(3)', or 'module(9)'. Each row is indexed by an arbitrary, small integer and contains a description and type of the physical entity. It also optionally contains the index number of another entPhysicalEntry, indicating a containment relationship between the two. Version 2 of the Entity MIB provides additional MIB objects for each physical entity. Some common read-only attributes have been added, as well as three writable string objects. - entPhysicalAlias This string can be used by an NMS as a non-volatile identifier for the physical component. Maintaining a non-volatile string for every physical component represented in the entPhysicalTable can be costly and unnecessary. An agent may algorithmically generate entPhysicalAlias strings for particular entries (e.g., based on the entPhysicalClass value). - entPhysicalAssetID This string is provided to store a user-specific asset identifier for removable physical components. In order to reduce the non- volatile storage needed by a particular agent, a network administrator should only assign asset identifiers to physical entities that are field-replaceable (i.e., not permanently contained within another physical entity). - entPhysicalSerialNum This string is provided to store a vendor-specific serial number string for physical components. This writable object is used when an agent cannot identify the serial numbers of all installed physical entities and a network administrator wishes to configure the non-volatile serial number strings manually (via an NMS application).Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 Version 3 of the Entity MIB provides two additional MIB objects for each physical entity: - entPhysicalMfgDate This object contains the date of manufacturing of the managed entity. If the manufacturing date is unknown or not supported the object is not instantiated. The special value '0000000000000000'H may also be returned in this case. - entPhysicalUris This object provides additional identification information about the physical entity. This object contains one or more Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs); therefore, the syntax of this object must conform to[RFC3986], Section 3. Uniform Resource Names (URNs) [RFC3406] are resource identifiers with the specific requirements for enabling location-independent identification of a resource, as well as longevity of reference. URNs are part of the larger URI family with the specific goal of providing persistent naming of resources. URI schemes and URN namespaces are registered by IANA (seehttp://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes andhttp://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces). For example, the entPhysicalUris object may be used to encode a URI containing a Common Language Equipment Identifier (CLEI) URN for the managed physical entity. The URN namespace for CLEIs is defined in [RFC4152], and the CLEI format is defined in [T1.213] and [T1.213a]. For example, an entPhysicalUris instance may have the value of: URN:CLEI:D4CE18B7AA [RFC3986] and [RFC4152] identify this as a URI in the CLEI URN namespace. The specific CLEI code, D4CE18B7AA, is based on the example provided in [T1.213a]. Multiple URIs may be present and are separated by white space characters. Leading and trailing white space characters are ignored. If no additional identification information is known about the physical entity or supported, the object is not instantiated. Version 4 of the Entity MIB module provides an additional MIB object for each physical entity.Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 11]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 - entPhysicalUUID This object provides an unique identification about the physical entity. This object contains a globally unique identifier for the physical entity with the format defined inRFC 4122 [RFC4122]. To support the existing implementations of ENTITY-MIB version 3 [RFC4133], entPhysicalUris object should be used to store the UUID value of the physical entity as well in URN format. This duplication of information enables backward compatibility. Note that entPhysicalUris allows write access while entPhysicalUUID is read-only.2.12.2. entityLogical Group This group contains a single table to identify logical entities, called the entLogicalTable. The entLogicalTable contains one row per logical entity. Each row is indexed by an arbitrary, small integer and contains a name, description, and type of the logical entity. It also contains information to allow access to the MIB information for the logical entity. This includes SNMP versions that use a community name (with some form of implied context representation) and SNMP versions that use the SNMP ARCH [RFC3411] method of context identification. If an agent represents multiple logical entities with this MIB, then this group must be implemented for all logical entities known to the agent. If an agent represents a single logical entity, or multiple logical entities within a single naming scope, then implementation of this group may be omitted by the agent.2.12.3. entityMapping Group This group contains three tables to identify associations between different system components. - entLPMappingTable This table contains mappings between entLogicalIndex values (logical entities) and entPhysicalIndex values (the physical components supporting that entity). A logical entity can map to more than one physical component, and more than one logical entity can map to (share) the same physical component. If an agent represents a single logical entity, or multiple logical entities within a single naming scope, then implementation of this table may be omitted by the agent.Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 12]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 - entAliasMappingTable This table contains mappings between entLogicalIndex, entPhysicalIndex pairs, and 'alias' object identifier values. This allows resources managed with other MIB modules (e.g., repeater ports, bridge ports, physical and logical interfaces) to be identified in the physical entity hierarchy. Note that each alias identifier is only relevant in a particular naming scope. If an agent represents a single logical entity, or multiple logical entities within a single naming scope, then implementation of this table may be omitted by the agent. - entPhysicalContainsTable This table contains simple mappings between entPhysicalContainedIn values for each container/'containee' relationship in the managed system. The indexing of this table allows an NMS to quickly discover the entPhysicalIndex values for all children of a given physical entity.2.12.4. entityGeneral Group This group contains general information relating to the other object groups. At this time, the entGeneral group contains a single scalar object (entLastChangeTime), which represents the value of sysUpTime when any part of the Entity MIB configuration last changed.2.12.5. entityNotifications Group This group contains notification definitions relating to the overall status of the Entity MIB instantiation.2.13. Multiple Agents Even though a primary motivation for this MIB is to represent the multiple logical entities supported by a single agent, another motivation is to represent multiple logical entities supported by multiple agents (in the same "overall" physical entity). Indeed, it is implicit in the SNMP architecture that the number of agents is transparent to a network management station. However, there is no agreement at this time as to the degree of cooperation that should be expected for agent implementations. Therefore, multiple agents within the same managed system are free to implement the Entity MIB independently. (For more information, refer toSection 2.9, "Multiple Instances of the Entity MIB".)Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 13]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 20132.14. Changes SinceRFC 20372.14.1. Textual Conventions The PhysicalClass TC text has been clarified, and a new enumeration to support 'stackable' components has been added. The SnmpEngineIdOrNone TC has been added to support SNMPv3.2.14.2. New entPhysicalTable Objects The entPhysicalHardwareRev, entPhysicalFirmwareRev, and entPhysicalSoftwareRev objects have been added for revision identification. The entPhysicalSerialNum, entPhysicalMfgName, entPhysicalModelName, and entPhysicalIsFRU objects have been added for better vendor identification for physical components. In the event the agent cannot identify this information, the entPhysicalSerialNum object can be set by a management station. The entPhysicalAlias and entPhysicalAssetID objects have been added for better user component identification. These objects are intended to be set by a management station and preserved by the agent across restarts.2.14.3. New entLogicalTable Objects The entLogicalContextEngineID and entLogicalContextName objects have been added to provide an SNMP context for SNMPv3 access on behalf of a logical entity.2.14.4. Bug Fixes A bug was fixed in the entLogicalCommunity object. The subrange was incorrect (1..255) and is now correct (0..255). The description clause has also been clarified. This object is now deprecated. The entLastChangeTime object description has been changed to generalize the events that cause an update to the last change timestamp. The syntax was changed from DisplayString to SnmpAdminString for the entPhysicalDescr, entPhysicalName, and entLogicalDescr objects.Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 14]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 20132.15. Changes SinceRFC 27372.15.1. Textual Conventions The PhysicalIndexOrZero TC has been added to allow objects to reference an entPhysicalIndex value or zero. The PhysicalClass TC has been extended to support a new enumeration for central processing units.2.15.2. New Objects The entPhysicalMfgDate object has been added to the entPhysicalTable to provide the date of manufacturing of the managed entity. The entPhysicalUris object has been added to the entPhysicalTable to provide additional identification information about the physical entity, such as a Common Language Equipment Identifier (CLEI) URN.2.15.3. Bug Fixes The syntax was changed from INTEGER to Integer32 for the entPhysicalParentRelPos, entLogicalIndex, and entAliasLogicalIndexOrZero objects, and from INTEGER to PhysicalIndexOrZero for the entPhysicalContainedIn object.2.16. Changes SinceRFC 41332.16.1. MIB Module Addition Over time, there may be the need to add new enumerated values to the PhysicalClass TEXTUAL-CONVENTION. To allow for such additions without requiring re-issuing of this MIB module, a new MIB module called IANA-ENTITY-MIB that provides the IANA-maintained TEXTUAL- CONVENTION IANAPhysicalClass has been created. The PhysicalClass TC has been deprecated.2.16.2. Modification to Some of the MIB Objects A new MIB object has been added to the entPhysicalTable, entPhysicalUUID. In comparison to entPhysicalUris, the new object is read-only and restricted to a fixed size to allow only forRFC 4122 [RFC4122] compliant values. The PhysicalClass TEXTUAL-CONVENTION was deprecated, and a new IANAPhysicalClass TC (maintained by IANA) has been created.Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 15]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 Two new MODULE-COMPLIANCE modules have been created: entity4Compliance for full compliance with version 4 of the Entity MIB, and entity4CRCompliance for devices with constrained resources like batteries that might require a limited number of objects to be supported (entPhysicalClass, entPhysicalName, and entPhysicalUUID).2.16.3. New TC for Universally Unique Identifier A new TEXTUAL-CONVENTION, UUIDorZero, was created to represent a Universally Unique Identifier (UUID) with a syntax that conforms to[RFC4122], Section 4.1. Defining it as a TC will allow for future reuse in other MIB modules that will import the TC. This Textual Convention is included in the UUID-TC-MIB module.3. MIB Definitions3.1. ENTITY-MIBENTITY-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGINIMPORTS MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, mib-2, NOTIFICATION-TYPE, Integer32 FROM SNMPv2-SMI --RFC 2578 TDomain, TAddress, TEXTUAL-CONVENTION, AutonomousType, RowPointer, TimeStamp, TruthValue, DateAndTime FROM SNMPv2-TC --RFC 2579 MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP, NOTIFICATION-GROUP FROM SNMPv2-CONF --RFC 2580 SnmpAdminString FROM SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB --RFC 3411 UUIDorZero FROM UUID-TC-MIB --RFC 6933 IANAPhysicalClass FROM IANA-ENTITY-MIB; --RFC 6933entityMIB MODULE-IDENTITY LAST-UPDATED "201304050000Z" -- April 5, 2013 ORGANIZATION "IETF Energy Management Working Group" CONTACT-INFO "WG Email: eman@ietf.org Mailing list subscription info:http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emanBierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 16]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 Andy Bierman YumaWorks, Inc. 274 Redwood Shores Parkway, #133 Redwood City, CA 94065 USA Phone: +1 408-716-0466 Email: andy@yumaworks.com Dan Romascanu Avaya Park Atidim, Bldg. #3 Tel Aviv, 61581 Israel Phone: +972-3-6458414 Email: dromasca@avaya.com Juergen Quittek NEC Europe Ltd. Network Research Division Kurfuersten-Anlage 36 Heidelberg 69115 Germany Phone: +49 6221 4342-115 Email: quittek@neclab.eu Mouli Chandramouli Cisco Systems, Inc. Sarjapur Outer Ring Road Bangalore 560103 India Phone: +91 80 4429 2409 Email: moulchan@cisco.com" DESCRIPTION "The MIB module for representing multiple logical entities supported by a single SNMP agent. Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth inSection 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info)." REVISION "201304050000Z" -- April 5, 2013Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 17]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 DESCRIPTION "Entity MIB (Version 4). This revision obsoletesRFC 4133. - Creation of a new MIB module, IANA-ENTITY-MIB, which makes the PhysicalIndex TC an IANA-maintained TEXTUAL- CONVENTION. IANAPhysicalClass is now imported from the IANA-ENTITY-MIB. - Addition of a new MIB object to the entPhysicalTable, entPhysicalUUID. UUIDorZero is imported from the UUID-TC-MIB. - Addition of two new MODULE-COMPLIANCE modules- entity4Compliance and entity4CRCompliance. This version is published asRFC 6933." REVISION "200508100000Z" DESCRIPTION "Initial Version of Entity MIB (Version 3). This revision obsoletesRFC 2737. Additions: - cpu(12) enumeration added to IANAPhysicalClass TC - DISPLAY-HINT clause to PhysicalIndex TC - PhysicalIndexOrZero TC - entPhysicalMfgDate object - entPhysicalUris object Changes: - entPhysicalContainedIn SYNTAX changed from INTEGER to PhysicalIndexOrZero This version was published asRFC 4133." REVISION "199912070000Z" DESCRIPTION "Initial Version of Entity MIB (Version 2). This revision obsoletesRFC 2037. This version was published asRFC 2737." REVISION "199610310000Z" DESCRIPTION "Initial version (version 1), published asRFC 2037." ::= { mib-2 47 }entityMIBObjects OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entityMIB 1 }Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 18]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013-- MIB contains four groupsentityPhysical OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entityMIBObjects 1 }entityLogical OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entityMIBObjects 2 }entityMapping OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entityMIBObjects 3 }entityGeneral OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entityMIBObjects 4 }-- Textual ConventionsPhysicalIndex ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION DISPLAY-HINT "d" STATUS current DESCRIPTION "An arbitrary value that uniquely identifies the physical entity. The value should be a small positive integer. Index values for different physical entities are not necessarily contiguous." SYNTAX Integer32 (1..2147483647)PhysicalIndexOrZero ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION DISPLAY-HINT "d" STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This TEXTUAL-CONVENTION is an extension of the PhysicalIndex convention, which defines a greater than zero value used to identify a physical entity. This extension permits the additional value of zero. The semantics of the value zero are object-specific and must, therefore, be defined as part of the description of any object that uses this syntax. Examples of the usage of this extension are situations where none or all physical entities need to be referenced." SYNTAX Integer32 (0..2147483647)SnmpEngineIdOrNone ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION STATUS current DESCRIPTION "A specially formatted SnmpEngineID string for use with the Entity MIB. If an instance of an object of SYNTAX SnmpEngineIdOrNone has a non-zero length, then the object encoding and semantics are defined by the SnmpEngineID TEXTUAL-CONVENTION (see STD 62,RFC 3411).Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 19]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 If an instance of an object of SYNTAX SnmpEngineIdOrNone contains a zero-length string, then no appropriate SnmpEngineID is associated with the logical entity (i.e., SNMPv3 is not supported)." SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE(0..32)) -- empty string or SnmpEngineIDPhysicalClass ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION STATUS deprecated DESCRIPTION "Starting with version 4 of the ENTITY-MIB, this TC is deprecated, and the usage of the IANAPhysicalClass TC from the IANA-ENTITY-MIB is recommended instead. An enumerated value that provides an indication of the general hardware type of a particular physical entity. There are no restrictions as to the number of entPhysicalEntries of each entPhysicalClass, which must be instantiated by an agent. The enumeration 'other' is applicable if the physical entity class is known but does not match any of the supported values. The enumeration 'unknown' is applicable if the physical entity class is unknown to the agent. The enumeration 'chassis' is applicable if the physical entity class is an overall container for networking equipment. Any class of physical entity, except a stack, may be contained within a chassis; a chassis may only be contained within a stack. The enumeration 'backplane' is applicable if the physical entity class is some sort of device for aggregating and forwarding networking traffic, such as a shared backplane in a modular ethernet switch. Note that an agent may model a backplane as a single physical entity, which is actually implemented as multiple discrete physical components (within a chassis or stack). The enumeration 'container' is applicable if the physical entity class is capable of containing one or more removable physical entities, possibly of different types. For example, each (empty or full) slot in a chassis will be modeled as a container. Note that all removable physical entities should be modeled within a container entity, suchBierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 20]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 as field-replaceable modules, fans, or power supplies. Note that all known containers should be modeled by the agent, including empty containers. The enumeration 'powerSupply' is applicable if the physical entity class is a power-supplying component. The enumeration 'fan' is applicable if the physical entity class is a fan or other heat-reduction component. The enumeration 'sensor' is applicable if the physical entity class is some sort of sensor, such as a temperature sensor within a router chassis. The enumeration 'module' is applicable if the physical entity class is some sort of self-contained sub-system. If the enumeration 'module' is removable, then it should be modeled within a container entity; otherwise, it should be modeled directly within another physical entity (e.g., a chassis or another module). The enumeration 'port' is applicable if the physical entity class is some sort of networking port capable of receiving and/or transmitting networking traffic. The enumeration 'stack' is applicable if the physical entity class is some sort of super-container (possibly virtual) intended to group together multiple chassis entities. A stack may be realized by a 'virtual' cable, a real interconnect cable, attached to multiple chassis, or may in fact be comprised of multiple interconnect cables. A stack should not be modeled within any other physical entities, but a stack may be contained within another stack. Only chassis entities should be contained within a stack. The enumeration 'cpu' is applicable if the physical entity class is some sort of central processing unit." SYNTAX INTEGER { other(1), unknown(2), chassis(3), backplane(4), container(5), -- e.g., chassis slot or daughter-card holder powerSupply(6), fan(7), sensor(8), module(9), -- e.g., plug-in card or daughter-card port(10),Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 21]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 stack(11), -- e.g., stack of multiple chassis entities cpu(12) }-- The Physical Entity TableentPhysicalTable OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF EntPhysicalEntry MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This table contains one row per physical entity. There is always at least one row for an 'overall' physical entity." ::= { entityPhysical 1 }entPhysicalEntry OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX EntPhysicalEntry MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Information about a particular physical entity. Each entry provides objects (entPhysicalDescr, entPhysicalVendorType, and entPhysicalClass) to help an NMS identify and characterize the entry and objects (entPhysicalContainedIn and entPhysicalParentRelPos) to help an NMS relate the particular entry to other entries in this table." INDEX { entPhysicalIndex } ::= { entPhysicalTable 1 }EntPhysicalEntry ::= SEQUENCE { entPhysicalIndex PhysicalIndex, entPhysicalDescr SnmpAdminString, entPhysicalVendorType AutonomousType, entPhysicalContainedIn PhysicalIndexOrZero, entPhysicalClass IANAPhysicalClass, entPhysicalParentRelPos Integer32, entPhysicalName SnmpAdminString, entPhysicalHardwareRev SnmpAdminString, entPhysicalFirmwareRev SnmpAdminString, entPhysicalSoftwareRev SnmpAdminString, entPhysicalSerialNum SnmpAdminString, entPhysicalMfgName SnmpAdminString, entPhysicalModelName SnmpAdminString, entPhysicalAlias SnmpAdminString, entPhysicalAssetID SnmpAdminString, entPhysicalIsFRU TruthValue,Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 22]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 entPhysicalMfgDate DateAndTime, entPhysicalUris OCTET STRING, entPhysicalUUID UUIDorZero}entPhysicalIndex OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX PhysicalIndex MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The index for this entry." ::= { entPhysicalEntry 1 }entPhysicalDescr OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SnmpAdminString MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "A textual description of physical entity. This object should contain a string that identifies the manufacturer's name for the physical entity and should be set to a distinct value for each version or model of the physical entity." ::= { entPhysicalEntry 2 }entPhysicalVendorType OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX AutonomousType MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "An indication of the vendor-specific hardware type of the physical entity. Note that this is different from the definition of MIB-II's sysObjectID. An agent should set this object to an enterprise-specific registration identifier value indicating the specific equipment type in detail. The associated instance of entPhysicalClass is used to indicate the general type of hardware device. If no vendor-specific registration identifier exists for this physical entity, or the value is unknown by this agent, then the value { 0 0 } is returned." ::= { entPhysicalEntry 3 }Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 23]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013entPhysicalContainedIn OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX PhysicalIndexOrZero MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The value of entPhysicalIndex for the physical entity that 'contains' this physical entity. A value of zero indicates this physical entity is not contained in any other physical entity. Note that the set of 'containment' relationships define a strict hierarchy; that is, recursion is not allowed. In the event that a physical entity is contained by more than one physical entity (e.g., double-wide modules), this object should identify the containing entity with the lowest value of entPhysicalIndex." ::= { entPhysicalEntry 4 }entPhysicalClass OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX IANAPhysicalClass MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "An indication of the general hardware type of the physical entity. An agent should set this object to the standard enumeration value that most accurately indicates the general class of the physical entity, or the primary class if there is more than one entity. If no appropriate standard registration identifier exists for this physical entity, then the value 'other(1)' is returned. If the value is unknown by this agent, then the value 'unknown(2)' is returned." ::= { entPhysicalEntry 5 }entPhysicalParentRelPos OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 (-1..2147483647) MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "An indication of the relative position of this 'child' component among all its 'sibling' components. Sibling components are defined as entPhysicalEntries that share the same instance values of each of the entPhysicalContainedIn and entPhysicalClass objects.Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 24]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 An NMS can use this object to identify the relative ordering for all sibling components of a particular parent (identified by the entPhysicalContainedIn instance in each sibling entry). If possible, this value should match any external labeling of the physical component. For example, for a container (e.g., card slot) labeled as 'slot #3', entPhysicalParentRelPos should have the value '3'. Note that the entPhysicalEntry for the module plugged in slot 3 should have an entPhysicalParentRelPos value of '1'. If the physical position of this component does not match any external numbering or clearly visible ordering, then user documentation or other external reference material should be used to determine the parent-relative position. If this is not possible, then the agent should assign a consistent (but possibly arbitrary) ordering to a given set of 'sibling' components, perhaps based on internal representation of the components. If the agent cannot determine the parent-relative position for some reason, or if the associated value of entPhysicalContainedIn is '0', then the value '-1' is returned. Otherwise, a non-negative integer is returned, indicating the parent-relative position of this physical entity. Parent-relative ordering normally starts from '1' and continues to 'N', where 'N' represents the highest positioned child entity. However, if the physical entities (e.g., slots) are labeled from a starting position of zero, then the first sibling should be associated with an entPhysicalParentRelPos value of '0'. Note that this ordering may be sparse or dense, depending on agent implementation. The actual values returned are not globally meaningful, as each 'parent' component may use different numbering algorithms. The ordering is only meaningful among siblings of the same parent component. The agent should retain parent-relative position values across reboots, either through algorithmic assignment or use of non-volatile storage." ::= { entPhysicalEntry 6 }entPhysicalName OBJECT-TYPEBierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 25]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 SYNTAX SnmpAdminString MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The textual name of the physical entity. The value of this object should be the name of the component as assigned by the local device and should be suitable for use in commands entered at the device's 'console'. This might be a text name (e.g., 'console') or a simple component number (e.g., port or module number, such as '1'), depending on the physical component naming syntax of the device. If there is no local name, or if this object is otherwise not applicable, then this object contains a zero-length string. Note that the value of entPhysicalName for two physical entities will be the same in the event that the console interface does not distinguish between them, e.g., slot-1 and the card in slot-1." ::= { entPhysicalEntry 7 }entPhysicalHardwareRev OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SnmpAdminString MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The vendor-specific hardware revision string for the physical entity. The preferred value is the hardware revision identifier actually printed on the component itself (if present). Note that if revision information is stored internally in a non-printable (e.g., binary) format, then the agent must convert such information to a printable format in an implementation-specific manner. If no specific hardware revision string is associated with the physical component, or if this information is unknown to the agent, then this object will contain a zero-length string." ::= { entPhysicalEntry 8 }entPhysicalFirmwareRev OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SnmpAdminString MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS currentBierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 26]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 DESCRIPTION "The vendor-specific firmware revision string for the physical entity. Note that if revision information is stored internally in a non-printable (e.g., binary) format, then the agent must convert such information to a printable format in an implementation-specific manner. If no specific firmware programs are associated with the physical component, or if this information is unknown to the agent, then this object will contain a zero-length string." ::= { entPhysicalEntry 9 }entPhysicalSoftwareRev OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SnmpAdminString MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The vendor-specific software revision string for the physical entity. Note that if revision information is stored internally in a non-printable (e.g., binary) format, then the agent must convert such information to a printable format in an implementation-specific manner. If no specific software programs are associated with the physical component, or if this information is unknown to the agent, then this object will contain a zero-length string." ::= { entPhysicalEntry 10 }entPhysicalSerialNum OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SnmpAdminString (SIZE (0..32)) MAX-ACCESS read-write STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The vendor-specific serial number string for the physical entity. The preferred value is the serial number string actually printed on the component itself (if present). On the first instantiation of a physical entity, the value of entPhysicalSerialNum associated with that entity is set to the correct vendor-assigned serial number, if this information is available to the agent. If a serial number is unknown or non-existent, the entPhysicalSerialNum will be set to a zero-length string instead.Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 27]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 Note that implementations that can correctly identify the serial numbers of all installed physical entities do not need to provide write access to the entPhysicalSerialNum object. Agents that cannot provide non-volatile storage for the entPhysicalSerialNum strings are not required to implement write access for this object. Not every physical component will have a serial number, or even need one. Physical entities for which the associated value of the entPhysicalIsFRU object is equal to 'false(2)' (e.g., the repeater ports within a repeater module) do not need their own unique serial numbers. An agent does not have to provide write access for such entities and may return a zero-length string. If write access is implemented for an instance of entPhysicalSerialNum and a value is written into the instance, the agent must retain the supplied value in the entPhysicalSerialNum instance (associated with the same physical entity) for as long as that entity remains instantiated. This includes instantiations across all re-initializations/reboots of the network management system, including those resulting in a change of the physical entity's entPhysicalIndex value." ::= { entPhysicalEntry 11 }entPhysicalMfgName OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SnmpAdminString MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The name of the manufacturer of this physical component. The preferred value is the manufacturer name string actually printed on the component itself (if present). Note that comparisons between instances of the entPhysicalModelName, entPhysicalFirmwareRev, entPhysicalSoftwareRev, and the entPhysicalSerialNum objects are only meaningful amongst entPhysicalEntries with the same value of entPhysicalMfgName. If the manufacturer name string associated with the physical component is unknown to the agent, then this object will contain a zero-length string." ::= { entPhysicalEntry 12 }Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 28]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013entPhysicalModelName OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SnmpAdminString MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The vendor-specific model name identifier string associated with this physical component. The preferred value is the customer-visible part number, which may be printed on the component itself. If the model name string associated with the physical component is unknown to the agent, then this object will contain a zero-length string." ::= { entPhysicalEntry 13 }entPhysicalAlias OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SnmpAdminString (SIZE (0..32)) MAX-ACCESS read-write STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This object is an 'alias' name for the physical entity, as specified by a network manager, and provides a non-volatile 'handle' for the physical entity. On the first instantiation of a physical entity, the value of entPhysicalAlias associated with that entity is set to the zero-length string. However, the agent may set the value to a locally unique default value, instead of a zero-length string. If write access is implemented for an instance of entPhysicalAlias and a value is written into the instance, the agent must retain the supplied value in the entPhysicalAlias instance (associated with the same physical entity) for as long as that entity remains instantiated. This includes instantiations across all re-initializations/reboots of the network management system, including those resulting in a change of the physical entity's entPhysicalIndex value." ::= { entPhysicalEntry 14 }entPhysicalAssetID OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SnmpAdminString (SIZE (0..32)) MAX-ACCESS read-write STATUS currentBierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 29]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 DESCRIPTION "This object is a user-assigned asset tracking identifier (as specified by a network manager) for the physical entity and provides non-volatile storage of this information. On the first instantiation of a physical entity, the value of entPhysicalAssetID associated with that entity is set to the zero-length string. Not every physical component will have an asset tracking identifier or even need one. Physical entities for which the associated value of the entPhysicalIsFRU object is equal to 'false(2)' (e.g., the repeater ports within a repeater module) do not need their own unique asset tracking identifier. An agent does not have to provide write access for such entities and may instead return a zero-length string. If write access is implemented for an instance of entPhysicalAssetID and a value is written into the instance, the agent must retain the supplied value in the entPhysicalAssetID instance (associated with the same physical entity) for as long as that entity remains instantiated. This includes instantiations across all re-initializations/reboots of the network management system, including those resulting in a change of the physical entity's entPhysicalIndex value. If no asset tracking information is associated with the physical component, then this object will contain a zero-length string." ::= { entPhysicalEntry 15 }entPhysicalIsFRU OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX TruthValue MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This object indicates whether or not this physical entity is considered a 'field replaceable unit' by the vendor. If this object contains the value 'true(1)', then this entPhysicalEntry identifies a field replaceable unit. For all entPhysicalEntries that represent components permanently contained within a field replaceable unit, the value 'false(2)' should be returned for this object." ::= { entPhysicalEntry 16 }Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 30]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013entPhysicalMfgDate OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX DateAndTime MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This object contains the date of manufacturing of the managed entity. If the manufacturing date is unknown or not supported, the object is not instantiated. The special value '0000000000000000'H may also be returned in this case." ::= { entPhysicalEntry 17 }entPhysicalUris OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX OCTET STRING MAX-ACCESS read-write STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This object contains identification information about the physical entity. The object contains URIs; therefore, the syntax of this object must conform toRFC 3986, Section 3. Multiple URIs may be present and are separated by white space characters. Leading and trailing white space characters are ignored. If no URI identification information is known about the physical entity, the object is not instantiated. A zero-length octet string may also be returned in this case." REFERENCE "RFC 3986, Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax,Section 2, August 1998." ::= { entPhysicalEntry 18 }entPhysicalUUID OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX UUIDorZero MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This object contains identification information about the physical entity. The object contains a Universally Unique Identifier, the syntax of this object must conform toRFC 4122, Section 4.1. A zero-length octet string is returned if no UUID information is known."Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 31]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 REFERENCE "RFC 4122, A Universally Unique IDentifier (UUID) URN Namespace,Section 4.1, July 2005." ::= { entPhysicalEntry 19 }-- The Logical Entity TableentLogicalTable OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF EntLogicalEntry MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This table contains one row per logical entity. For agents that implement more than one naming scope, at least one entry must exist. Agents that instantiate all MIB objects within a single naming scope are not required to implement this table." ::= { entityLogical 1 }entLogicalEntry OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX EntLogicalEntry MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Information about a particular logical entity. Entities may be managed by this agent or other SNMP agents (possibly) in the same chassis." INDEX { entLogicalIndex } ::= { entLogicalTable 1 }EntLogicalEntry ::= SEQUENCE { entLogicalIndex Integer32, entLogicalDescr SnmpAdminString, entLogicalType AutonomousType, entLogicalCommunity OCTET STRING, entLogicalTAddress TAddress, entLogicalTDomain TDomain, entLogicalContextEngineID SnmpEngineIdOrNone, entLogicalContextName SnmpAdminString}entLogicalIndex OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 (1..2147483647) MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS currentBierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 32]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 DESCRIPTION "The value of this object uniquely identifies the logical entity. The value should be a small positive integer; index values for different logical entities are not necessarily contiguous." ::= { entLogicalEntry 1 }entLogicalDescr OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SnmpAdminString MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "A textual description of the logical entity. This object should contain a string that identifies the manufacturer's name for the logical entity and should be set to a distinct value for each version of the logical entity." ::= { entLogicalEntry 2 }entLogicalType OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX AutonomousType MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "An indication of the type of logical entity. This will typically be the OBJECT IDENTIFIER name of the node in the SMI's naming hierarchy that represents the major MIB module, or the majority of the MIB modules, supported by the logical entity. For example: a logical entity of a regular host/router -> mib-2 a logical entity of a 802.1d bridge -> dot1dBridge a logical entity of a 802.3 repeater -> snmpDot3RptrMgmt If an appropriate node in the SMI's naming hierarchy cannot be identified, the value 'mib-2' should be used." ::= { entLogicalEntry 3 }entLogicalCommunity OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (0..255)) MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS deprecated DESCRIPTION "An SNMPv1 or SNMPv2c community string, which can be used to access detailed management information for this logical entity. The agent should allow read access with this community string (to an appropriate subset of all managed objects) and may also return a community string based on the privileges of the request used to read this object. Note that an agent may return a community string with read-only privileges, even if this object is accessed with aBierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 33]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 read-write community string. However, the agent must take care not to return a community string that allows more privileges than the community string used to access this object. A compliant SNMP agent may wish to conserve naming scopes by representing multiple logical entities in a single 'default' naming scope. This is possible when the logical entities, represented by the same value of entLogicalCommunity, have no object instances in common. For example, 'bridge1' and 'repeater1' may be part of the main naming scope, but at least one additional community string is needed to represent 'bridge2' and 'repeater2'. Logical entities 'bridge1' and 'repeater1' would be represented by sysOREntries associated with the 'default' naming scope. For agents not accessible via SNMPv1 or SNMPv2c, the value of this object is the empty string. This object may also contain an empty string if a community string has not yet been assigned by the agent or if no community string with suitable access rights can be returned for a particular SNMP request. Note that this object is deprecated. Agents that implement SNMPv3 access should use the entLogicalContextEngineID and entLogicalContextName objects to identify the context associated with each logical entity. SNMPv3 agents may return a zero-length string for this object or may continue to return a community string (e.g., tri-lingual agent support)." ::= { entLogicalEntry 4 }entLogicalTAddress OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX TAddress MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The transport service address by which the logical entity receives network management traffic, formatted according to the corresponding value of entLogicalTDomain. For snmpUDPDomain, a TAddress is 6 octets long: the initial 4 octets contain the IP-address in network-byte order, and the last 2 contain the UDP port in network-byte order. ConsultRFC 3417 for further information on snmpUDPDomain."Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 34]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 REFERENCE "Transport Mappings for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP), STD 62,RFC 3417." ::= { entLogicalEntry 5 }entLogicalTDomain OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX TDomain MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Indicates the kind of transport service by which the logical entity receives network management traffic. Possible values for this object are presently found inRFC 3417." REFERENCE "Transport Mappings for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP), STD 62,RFC 3417." ::= { entLogicalEntry 6 }entLogicalContextEngineID OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SnmpEngineIdOrNone MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The authoritative contextEngineID that can be used to send an SNMP message concerning information held by this logical entity to the address specified by the associated 'entLogicalTAddress/entLogicalTDomain' pair. This object, together with the associated entLogicalContextName object, defines the context associated with a particular logical entity and allows access to SNMP engines identified by a contextEngineID and contextName pair. If no value has been configured by the agent, a zero-length string is returned, or the agent may choose not to instantiate this object at all." ::= { entLogicalEntry 7 }entLogicalContextName OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SnmpAdminString MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS currentBierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 35]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 DESCRIPTION "The contextName that can be used to send an SNMP message concerning information held by this logical entity to the address specified by the associated 'entLogicalTAddress/entLogicalTDomain' pair. This object, together with the associated entLogicalContextEngineID object, defines the context associated with a particular logical entity and allows access to SNMP engines identified by a contextEngineID and contextName pair. If no value has been configured by the agent, a zero-length string is returned, or the agent may choose not to instantiate this object at all." ::= { entLogicalEntry 8 }entLPMappingTable OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF EntLPMappingEntry MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This table contains zero or more rows of logical entity to physical equipment associations. For each logical entity known by this agent, there are zero or more mappings to the physical resources, which are used to realize that logical entity. An agent should limit the number and nature of entries in this table such that only meaningful and non-redundant information is returned. For example, in a system that contains a single power supply, mappings between logical entities and the power supply are not useful and should not be included. Also, only the most appropriate physical component, which is closest to the root of a particular containment tree, should be identified in an entLPMapping entry. For example, suppose a bridge is realized on a particular module, and all ports on that module are ports on this bridge. A mapping between the bridge and the module would be useful, but additional mappings between the bridge and each of the ports on that module would be redundant (because the entPhysicalContainedIn hierarchy can provide the same information). On the other hand, if more than one bridge were utilizing ports on this module, then mappings between each bridge and the ports it used would be appropriate.Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 36]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 Also, in the case of a single backplane repeater, a mapping for the backplane to the single repeater entity is not necessary." ::= { entityMapping 1 }entLPMappingEntry OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX EntLPMappingEntry MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Information about a particular logical-entity-to-physical- equipment association. Note that the nature of the association is not specifically identified in this entry. It is expected that sufficient information exists in the MIB modules used to manage a particular logical entity to infer how physical component information is utilized." INDEX { entLogicalIndex, entLPPhysicalIndex } ::= { entLPMappingTable 1 }EntLPMappingEntry ::= SEQUENCE { entLPPhysicalIndex PhysicalIndex}entLPPhysicalIndex OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX PhysicalIndex MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The value of this object identifies the index value of a particular entPhysicalEntry associated with the indicated entLogicalEntity." ::= { entLPMappingEntry 1 }-- logical entity/component to alias tableentAliasMappingTable OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF EntAliasMappingEntry MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This table contains zero or more rows, representing mappings of logical entities and physical components to external MIB identifiers. Each physical port in the system may be associated with a mapping to an external identifier, which itself is associated with a particular logicalBierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 37]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 entity's naming scope. A 'wildcard' mechanism is provided to indicate that an identifier is associated with more than one logical entity." ::= { entityMapping 2 }entAliasMappingEntry OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX EntAliasMappingEntry MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Information about a particular binding between a logical entity/physical component pair and an external identifier. Each logical entity/physical component pair may be associated with one alias mapping. The logical entity index may also be used as a 'wildcard' (refer to the entAliasLogicalIndexOrZero object DESCRIPTION clause for details.) Note that only entPhysicalIndex values that represent physical ports (i.e., associated entPhysicalClass value is 'port(10)') are permitted to exist in this table." INDEX { entPhysicalIndex, entAliasLogicalIndexOrZero } ::= { entAliasMappingTable 1 }EntAliasMappingEntry ::= SEQUENCE { entAliasLogicalIndexOrZero Integer32, entAliasMappingIdentifier RowPointer}entAliasLogicalIndexOrZero OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 (0..2147483647) MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The value of this object identifies the logical entity that defines the naming scope for the associated instance of the entAliasMappingIdentifier object. If this object has a non-zero value, then it identifies the logical entity named by the same value of entLogicalIndex. If this object has a value of zero, then the mapping between the physical component and the alias identifier for this entAliasMapping entry is associated with all unspecified logical entities. That is, a value of zero (the default mapping) identifies any logical entity that does not have an explicit entry in this table for a particular entPhysicalIndex/entAliasMappingIdentifier pair.Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 38]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 For example, to indicate that a particular interface (e.g., physical component 33) is identified by the same value of ifIndex for all logical entities, the following instance might exist: entAliasMappingIdentifier.33.0 = ifIndex.5 In the event an entPhysicalEntry is associated differently for some logical entities, additional entAliasMapping entries may exist, e.g.: entAliasMappingIdentifier.33.0 = ifIndex.6 entAliasMappingIdentifier.33.4 = ifIndex.1 entAliasMappingIdentifier.33.5 = ifIndex.1 entAliasMappingIdentifier.33.10 = ifIndex.12 Note that entries with non-zero entAliasLogicalIndexOrZero index values have precedence over zero-indexed entries. In this example, all logical entities except 4, 5, and 10 associate physical entity 33 with ifIndex.6." ::= { entAliasMappingEntry 1 }entAliasMappingIdentifier OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX RowPointer MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The value of this object identifies a particular conceptual row associated with the indicated entPhysicalIndex and entLogicalIndex pair. Because only physical ports are modeled in this table, only entries that represent interfaces or ports are allowed. If an ifEntry exists on behalf of a particular physical port, then this object should identify the associated ifEntry. For repeater ports, the appropriate row in the 'rptrPortGroupTable' should be identified instead. For example, suppose a physical port was represented by entPhysicalEntry.3, entLogicalEntry.15 existed for a repeater, and entLogicalEntry.22 existed for a bridge. Then there might be two related instances of entAliasMappingIdentifier: entAliasMappingIdentifier.3.15 == rptrPortGroupIndex.5.2 entAliasMappingIdentifier.3.22 == ifIndex.17Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 39]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 It is possible that other mappings (besides interfaces and repeater ports) may be defined in the future, as required. Bridge ports are identified by examining the Bridge MIB and appropriate ifEntries associated with each 'dot1dBasePort' and are thus not represented in this table." ::= { entAliasMappingEntry 2 }-- physical mapping tableentPhysicalContainsTable OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF EntPhysicalContainsEntry MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "A table that exposes the container/'containee' relationships between physical entities. This table provides all the information found by constructing the virtual containment tree for a given entPhysicalTable, but in a more direct format. In the event a physical entity is contained by more than one other physical entity (e.g., double-wide modules), this table should include these additional mappings, which cannot be represented in the entPhysicalTable virtual containment tree." ::= { entityMapping 3 }entPhysicalContainsEntry OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX EntPhysicalContainsEntry MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "A single container/'containee' relationship." INDEX { entPhysicalIndex, entPhysicalChildIndex } ::= { entPhysicalContainsTable 1 }EntPhysicalContainsEntry ::= SEQUENCE { entPhysicalChildIndex PhysicalIndex}entPhysicalChildIndex OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX PhysicalIndex MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The value of entPhysicalIndex for the contained physical entity."Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 40]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 ::= { entPhysicalContainsEntry 1 }-- last change time stamp for the whole MIBentLastChangeTime OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX TimeStamp MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The value of sysUpTime at the time a conceptual row is created, modified, or deleted in any of these tables: - entPhysicalTable - entLogicalTable - entLPMappingTable - entAliasMappingTable - entPhysicalContainsTable " ::= { entityGeneral 1 }-- Entity MIB Trap DefinitionsentityMIBTraps OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entityMIB 2 }entityMIBTrapPrefix OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entityMIBTraps 0 }entConfigChange NOTIFICATION-TYPE STATUS current DESCRIPTION "An entConfigChange notification is generated when the value of entLastChangeTime changes. It can be utilized by an NMS to trigger logical/physical entity table maintenance polls. An agent should not generate more than one entConfigChange 'notification-event' in a given time interval (five seconds is the suggested default). A 'notification-event' is the transmission of a single trap or inform PDU to a list of notification destinations. If additional configuration changes occur within the throttling period, then notification-events for these changes should be suppressed by the agent until the current throttling period expires. At the end of a throttling period, one notification-event should be generated if any configuration changes occurred since the start of the throttling period. In such a case, another throttling period is started right away.Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 41]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 An NMS should periodically check the value of entLastChangeTime to detect any missed entConfigChange notification-events, e.g., due to throttling or transmission loss." ::= { entityMIBTrapPrefix 1 }-- conformance informationentityConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entityMIB 3 }entityCompliances OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entityConformance 1 }entityGroups OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entityConformance 2 }-- compliance statementsentityCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE STATUS deprecated DESCRIPTION "The compliance statement for SNMP entities that implement version 1 of the Entity MIB." MODULE -- this module MANDATORY-GROUPS { entityPhysicalGroup, entityLogicalGroup, entityMappingGroup, entityGeneralGroup, entityNotificationsGroup } ::= { entityCompliances 1 }entity2Compliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE STATUS deprecated DESCRIPTION "The compliance statement for SNMP entities that implement version 2 of the Entity MIB." MODULE -- this module MANDATORY-GROUPS { entityPhysicalGroup, entityPhysical2Group, entityGeneralGroup, entityNotificationsGroup } GROUP entityLogical2Group DESCRIPTION "Implementation of this group is not mandatory for agents that model all MIB object instances within a single naming scope."Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 42]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 GROUP entityMappingGroup DESCRIPTION "Implementation of the entPhysicalContainsTable is mandatory for all agents. Implementation of the entLPMappingTable and entAliasMappingTables are not mandatory for agents that model all MIB object instances within a single naming scope. Note that the entAliasMappingTable may be useful for all agents; however, implementation of the entityLogicalGroup or entityLogical2Group is required to support this table." OBJECT entPhysicalSerialNum MIN-ACCESS not-accessible DESCRIPTION "Read and write access is not required for agents that cannot identify serial number information for physical entities and/or cannot provide non-volatile storage for NMS-assigned serial numbers. Write access is not required for agents that can identify serial number information for physical entities but cannot provide non-volatile storage for NMS-assigned serial numbers. Write access is not required for physical entities for which the associated value of the entPhysicalIsFRU object is equal to 'false(2)'." OBJECT entPhysicalAlias MIN-ACCESS read-only DESCRIPTION "Write access is required only if the associated entPhysicalClass value is equal to 'chassis(3)'." OBJECT entPhysicalAssetID MIN-ACCESS not-accessible DESCRIPTION "Read and write access is not required for agents that cannot provide non-volatile storage for NMS-assigned asset identifiers. Write access is not required for physical entities for which the associated value of the entPhysicalIsFRU object is equal to 'false(2)'." OBJECT entPhysicalClass SYNTAX INTEGER { other(1),Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 43]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 unknown(2), chassis(3), backplane(4), container(5), powerSupply(6), fan(7), sensor(8), module(9), port(10), stack(11) } DESCRIPTION "Implementation of the 'cpu(12)' enumeration is not required." ::= { entityCompliances 2 }entity3Compliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE STATUS deprecated DESCRIPTION "The compliance statement for SNMP entities that implement version 3 of the Entity MIB." MODULE -- this module MANDATORY-GROUPS { entityPhysicalGroup, entityPhysical2Group, entityPhysical3Group, entityGeneralGroup, entityNotificationsGroup } GROUP entityLogical2Group DESCRIPTION "Implementation of this group is not mandatory for agents that model all MIB object instances within a single naming scope." GROUP entityMappingGroup DESCRIPTION "Implementation of the entPhysicalContainsTable is mandatory for all agents. Implementation of the entLPMappingTable and entAliasMappingTables are not mandatory for agents that model all MIB object instances within a single naming scope. Note that the entAliasMappingTable may be useful for all agents; however, implementation of the entityLogicalGroup or entityLogical2Group is required to support this table." OBJECT entPhysicalSerialNum MIN-ACCESS not-accessibleBierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 44]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 DESCRIPTION "Read and write access is not required for agents that cannot identify serial number information for physical entities and/or cannot provide non-volatile storage for NMS-assigned serial numbers. Write access is not required for agents that can identify serial number information for physical entities but cannot provide non-volatile storage for NMS-assigned serial numbers. Write access is not required for physical entities for which the associated value of the entPhysicalIsFRU object is equal to 'false(2)'." OBJECT entPhysicalAlias MIN-ACCESS read-only DESCRIPTION "Write access is required only if the associated entPhysicalClass value is equal to 'chassis(3)'." OBJECT entPhysicalAssetID MIN-ACCESS not-accessible DESCRIPTION "Read and write access is not required for agents that cannot provide non-volatile storage for NMS-assigned asset identifiers. Write access is not required for physical entities for which the associated value of entPhysicalIsFRU is equal to 'false(2)'." ::= { entityCompliances 3 }entity4Compliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The compliance statement for SNMP entities that implement the full version 4 (full compliance) of the Entity MIB." MODULE -- this module MANDATORY-GROUPS { entityPhysicalGroup, entityPhysical2Group, entityPhysical3Group, entityGeneralGroup, entityNotificationsGroup, entityPhysical4Group } GROUP entityLogical2GroupBierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 45]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 DESCRIPTION "Implementation of this group is not mandatory for agents that model all MIB object instances within a single naming scope." GROUP entityMappingGroup DESCRIPTION "Implementation of the entPhysicalContainsTable is mandatory for all agents. Implementation of the entLPMappingTable and entAliasMappingTables are not mandatory for agents that model all MIB object instances within a single naming scope. Note that the entAliasMappingTable may be useful for all agents; however, implementation of the entityLogicalGroup or entityLogical2Group is required to support this table." OBJECT entPhysicalSerialNum MIN-ACCESS not-accessible DESCRIPTION "Read and write access is not required for agents that cannot identify serial number information for physical entities and/or cannot provide non-volatile storage for NMS-assigned serial numbers. Write access is not required for agents that can identify serial number information for physical entities but cannot provide non-volatile storage for NMS-assigned serial numbers. Write access is not required for physical entities for which the associated value of the entPhysicalIsFRU object is equal to 'false(2)'." OBJECT entPhysicalAlias MIN-ACCESS read-only DESCRIPTION "Write access is required only if the associated entPhysicalClass value is equal to 'chassis(3)'." OBJECT entPhysicalAssetID MIN-ACCESS not-accessible DESCRIPTION "Read and write access is not required for agents that cannot provide non-volatile storage for NMS-assigned asset identifiers.Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 46]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 Write access is not required for physical entities for which the associated value of entPhysicalIsFRU is equal to 'false(2)'." ::= { entityCompliances 4 }entity4CRCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The compliance statement for SNMP entities that implement version 4 of the Entity MIB on devices with constrained resources." MODULE -- this module MANDATORY-GROUPS { entityPhysicalCRGroup, entityPhysical4Group } ::= { entityCompliances 5 }-- MIB groupingsentityPhysicalGroup OBJECT-GROUP OBJECTS { entPhysicalDescr, entPhysicalVendorType, entPhysicalContainedIn, entPhysicalClass, entPhysicalParentRelPos, entPhysicalName } STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The collection of objects used to represent physical system components for which a single agent provides management information." ::= { entityGroups 1 }entityLogicalGroup OBJECT-GROUP OBJECTS { entLogicalDescr, entLogicalType, entLogicalCommunity, entLogicalTAddress, entLogicalTDomain } STATUS deprecatedBierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 47]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 DESCRIPTION "The collection of objects used to represent the list of logical entities for which a single agent provides management information." ::= { entityGroups 2 }entityMappingGroup OBJECT-GROUP OBJECTS { entLPPhysicalIndex, entAliasMappingIdentifier, entPhysicalChildIndex } STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The collection of objects used to represent the associations between multiple logical entities, physical components, interfaces, and port identifiers for which a single agent provides management information." ::= { entityGroups 3 }entityGeneralGroup OBJECT-GROUP OBJECTS { entLastChangeTime } STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The collection of objects used to represent general entity information for which a single agent provides management information." ::= { entityGroups 4 }entityNotificationsGroup NOTIFICATION-GROUP NOTIFICATIONS { entConfigChange } STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The collection of notifications used to indicate Entity MIB data consistency and general status information." ::= { entityGroups 5 }entityPhysical2Group OBJECT-GROUP OBJECTS { entPhysicalHardwareRev, entPhysicalFirmwareRev, entPhysicalSoftwareRev, entPhysicalSerialNum, entPhysicalMfgName, entPhysicalModelName, entPhysicalAlias,Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 48]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 entPhysicalAssetID, entPhysicalIsFRU } STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The collection of objects used to represent physical system components for which a single agent provides management information. This group augments the objects contained in the entityPhysicalGroup." ::= { entityGroups 6 }entityLogical2Group OBJECT-GROUP OBJECTS { entLogicalDescr, entLogicalType, entLogicalTAddress, entLogicalTDomain, entLogicalContextEngineID, entLogicalContextName } STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The collection of objects used to represent the list of logical entities for which a single SNMP entity provides management information." ::= { entityGroups 7 }entityPhysical3Group OBJECT-GROUP OBJECTS { entPhysicalMfgDate, entPhysicalUris } STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The collection of objects used to represent physical system components for which a single agent provides management information. This group augments the objects contained in the entityPhysicalGroup." ::= { entityGroups 8 }entityPhysical4Group OBJECT-GROUP OBJECTS { entPhysicalUUID } STATUS currentBierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 49]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 DESCRIPTION "The collection of objects used to represent physical system components for which a single agent provides management information. This group augments the objects contained in the entityPhysicalGroup and entityPhysicalCRGroup." ::= { entityGroups 9 }entityPhysicalCRGroup OBJECT-GROUP OBJECTS { entPhysicalClass, entPhysicalName } STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The collection of objects used to represent physical system components for constrained resourced devices, for which a single agent provides management information." ::= { entityGroups 10 }END3.2. IANA-ENTITY-MIB IANA-ENTITY-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN IMPORTS MODULE-IDENTITY, mib-2 FROM SNMPv2-SMI --RFC 2578 TEXTUAL-CONVENTION FROM SNMPv2-TC --RFC 2579 ; ianaEntityMIB MODULE-IDENTITY LAST-UPDATED "201304050000Z" -- April 5, 2013 ORGANIZATION "IANA" CONTACT-INFO "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority Postal: ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Phone: +1-310-301-5800 EMail: iana@iana.org"Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 50]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 DESCRIPTION "This MIB module defines a TEXTUAL-CONVENTION that provides an indication of the general hardware type of a particular physical entity. Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth inSection 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). The initial version of this MIB module was published inRFC 6933; for full legal notices see the RFC itself." REVISION "201304050000Z" -- April 5, 2013 DESCRIPTION "Initial version of this MIB as published inRFC 6933." ::= { mib-2 216 } -- Textual Conventions IANAPhysicalClass ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION STATUS current DESCRIPTION "An enumerated value that provides an indication of the general hardware type of a particular physical entity. There are no restrictions as to the number of entPhysicalEntries of each entPhysicalClass, which must be instantiated by an agent. The enumeration 'other' is applicable if the physical entity class is known but does not match any of the supported values. The enumeration 'unknown' is applicable if the physical entity class is unknown to the agent. The enumeration 'chassis' is applicable if the physical entity class is an overall container for networking equipment. Any class of physical entity, except a stack, may be contained within a chassis; a chassis may only be contained within a stack.Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 51]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 The enumeration 'backplane' is applicable if the physical entity class is some sort of device for aggregating and forwarding networking traffic, such as a shared backplane in a modular ethernet switch. Note that an agent may model a backplane as a single physical entity, which is actually implemented as multiple discrete physical components (within a chassis or stack). The enumeration 'container' is applicable if the physical entity class is capable of containing one or more removable physical entities, possibly of different types. For example, each (empty or full) slot in a chassis will be modeled as a container. Note that all removable physical entities should be modeled within a container entity, such as field-replaceable modules, fans, or power supplies. Note that all known containers should be modeled by the agent, including empty containers. The enumeration 'powerSupply' is applicable if the physical entity class is a power-supplying component. The enumeration 'fan' is applicable if the physical entity class is a fan or other heat-reduction component. The enumeration 'sensor' is applicable if the physical entity class is some sort of sensor, such as a temperature sensor within a router chassis. The enumeration 'module' is applicable if the physical entity class is some sort of self-contained sub-system. If the enumeration 'module' is removable, then it should be modeled within a container entity; otherwise, it should be modeled directly within another physical entity (e.g., a chassis or another module). The enumeration 'port' is applicable if the physical entity class is some sort of networking port, capable of receiving and/or transmitting networking traffic. The enumeration 'stack' is applicable if the physical entity class is some sort of super-container (possibly virtual) intended to group together multiple chassis entities. A stack may be realized by a 'virtual' cable, a real interconnect cable attached to multiple chassis, or multiple interconnect cables. A stack should not beBierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 52]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 modeled within any other physical entities, but a stack may be contained within another stack. Only chassis entities should be contained within a stack. The enumeration 'cpu' is applicable if the physical entity class is some sort of central processing unit. The enumeration 'energyObject' is applicable if the physical entity is some sort of energy object, i.e., a piece of equipment that is part of or attached to a communications network that is monitored, controlled, or aids in the management of another device for Energy Management. The enumeration 'battery' is applicable if the physical entity class is some sort of battery." SYNTAX INTEGER { other(1), unknown(2), chassis(3), backplane(4), container(5), -- e.g., chassis slot or daughter-card holder powerSupply(6), fan(7), sensor(8), module(9), -- e.g., plug-in card or daughter-card port(10), stack(11), -- e.g., stack of multiple chassis entities cpu(12), energyObject(13), battery (14) } END3.3. UUID-TC-MIB UUID-TC-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN IMPORTS MODULE-IDENTITY, mib-2 FROM SNMPv2-SMI --RFC 2578 TEXTUAL-CONVENTION FROM SNMPv2-TC --RFC 2579 ; uuidTCMIB MODULE-IDENTITYBierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 53]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 LAST-UPDATED "201304050000Z" -- April 5, 2013 ORGANIZATION "IETF Energy Management Working Group" CONTACT-INFO "WG Email: eman@ietf.org Mailing list subscription info:http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman Dan Romascanu Avaya Park Atidim, Bldg. #3 Tel Aviv, 61581 Israel Phone: +972-3-6458414 Email: dromasca@avaya.com Juergen Quittek NEC Europe Ltd. Network Research Division Kurfuersten-Anlage 36 Heidelberg 69115 Germany Phone: +49 6221 4342-115 Email: quittek@neclab.eu Mouli Chandramouli Cisco Systems, Inc. Sarjapur Outer Ring Road Bangalore 560103 India Phone: +91 80 4429 2409 Email: moulchan@cisco.com" DESCRIPTION "This MIB module defines TEXTUAL-CONVENTIONs representing Universally Unique IDentifiers (UUIDs). Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth inSection 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info)."Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 54]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 REVISION "201304050000Z" -- April 5, 2013 DESCRIPTION "Initial version of this MIB as published inRFC 6933." ::= { mib-2 217 } -- Textual Conventions UUID ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION DISPLAY-HINT "4x-2x-2x-1x1x-6x" STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Universally Unique Identifier information. The syntax must conform toRFC 4122, Section 4.1." SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (16)) UUIDorZero ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION DISPLAY-HINT "4x-2x-2x-1x1x-6x" STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Universally Unique Identifier information. The syntax must conform toRFC 4122, Section 4.1. The semantics of the value zero-length OCTET STRING are object-specific and must therefore be defined as part of the description of any object that uses this syntax." SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (0|16)) END4. Usage Examples The following sections iterate the instance values for two example networking devices. These examples are kept simple to make them more understandable. Auxiliary components such as fans, sensors, empty slots, and sub-modules are not shown but might be modeled in real implementations.4.1. Router/Bridge The first example is a router containing two slots. Each slot contains a 3-port router/bridge module. Each port is represented in the ifTable. There are two logical instances of OSPF running and two logical bridges:Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 55]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 Physical entities -- entPhysicalTable: 1 Field-replaceable physical chassis: entPhysicalDescr.1 == 'Acme Chassis Model 100' entPhysicalVendorType.1 == acmeProducts.chassisTypes.1 entPhysicalContainedIn.1 == 0 entPhysicalClass.1 == chassis(3) entPhysicalParentRelPos.1 == 0 entPhysicalName.1 == '100-A' entPhysicalHardwareRev.1 == 'A(1.00.02)' entPhysicalSoftwareRev.1 == '' entPhysicalFirmwareRev.1 == '' entPhysicalSerialNum.1 == 'C100076544' entPhysicalMfgName.1 == 'Acme' entPhysicalModelName.1 == '100' entPhysicalAlias.1 == 'cl-SJ17-3-006:rack1:rtr-U3' entPhysicalAssetID.1 == '0007372293' entPhysicalIsFRU.1 == true(1) entPhysicalMfgDate.1 == '2002-5-26,13:30:30.0,-4:0' entPhysicalUris.1 == 'URN:CLEI:CNME120ARA' 2 slots within the chassis: entPhysicalDescr.2 == 'Acme Chassis Slot Type AA' entPhysicalVendorType.2 == acmeProducts.slotTypes.1 entPhysicalContainedIn.2 == 1 entPhysicalClass.2 == container(5) entPhysicalParentRelPos.2 == 1 entPhysicalName.2 == 'S1' entPhysicalHardwareRev.2 == 'B(1.00.01)' entPhysicalSoftwareRev.2 == '' entPhysicalFirmwareRev.2 == '' entPhysicalSerialNum.2 == '' entPhysicalMfgName.2 == 'Acme' entPhysicalModelName.2 == 'AA' entPhysicalAlias.2 == '' entPhysicalAssetID.2 == '' entPhysicalIsFRU.2 == false(2) entPhysicalMfgDate.2 == '2002-7-26,12:22:12.0,-4:0' entPhysicalUris.2 == 'URN:CLEI:CNME123ARA' entPhysicalDescr.3 == 'Acme Chassis Slot Type AA' entPhysicalVendorType.3 = acmeProducts.slotTypes.1 entPhysicalContainedIn.3 == 1 entPhysicalClass.3 == container(5) entPhysicalParentRelPos.3 == 2 entPhysicalName.3 == 'S2' entPhysicalHardwareRev.3 == '1.00.07' entPhysicalSoftwareRev.3 == '' entPhysicalFirmwareRev.3 == '' entPhysicalSerialNum.3 == ''Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 56]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 entPhysicalMfgName.3 == 'Acme' entPhysicalModelName.3 == 'AA' entPhysicalAlias.3 == '' entPhysicalAssetID.3 == '' entPhysicalIsFRU.3 == false(2) entPhysicalMfgDate.3 == '2002-7-26,12:12:12.0,-4:0' entPhysicalUris.3 == 'URN:CLEI:CNME123ARA' 2 Field-replaceable modules: Slot 1 contains a module with 3 ports: entPhysicalDescr.4 == 'Acme Router-100' entPhysicalVendorType.4 == acmeProducts.moduleTypes.14 entPhysicalContainedIn.4 == 2 entPhysicalClass.4 == module(9) entPhysicalParentRelPos.4 == 1 entPhysicalName.4 == 'M1' entPhysicalHardwareRev.4 == '1.00.07' entPhysicalSoftwareRev.4 == '1.4.1' entPhysicalFirmwareRev.4 == 'A(1.1)' entPhysicalSerialNum.4 == 'C100087363' entPhysicalMfgName.4 == 'Acme' entPhysicalModelName.4 == 'R100-FE' entPhysicalAlias.4 == 'rtr-U3:m1:SJ17-3-eng' entPhysicalAssetID.4 == '0007372462' entPhysicalIsFRU.4 == true(1) entPhysicalMfgDate.4 == '2003-7-18,13:30:30.0,-4:0' entPhysicalUris.4 == 'URN:CLEI:CNRU123CAA' entPhysicalDescr.5 == 'Acme Ethernet-100 Port' entPhysicalVendorType.5 == acmeProducts.portTypes.2 entPhysicalContainedIn.5 == 4 entPhysicalClass.5 == port(10) entPhysicalParentRelPos.5 == 1 entPhysicalName.5 == 'P1' entPhysicalHardwareRev.5 == 'G(1.02)' entPhysicalSoftwareRev.5 == '' entPhysicalFirmwareRev.5 == '1.1' entPhysicalSerialNum.5 == '' entPhysicalMfgName.5 == 'Acme' entPhysicalModelName.5 == 'FE-100' entPhysicalAlias.5 == '' entPhysicalAssetID.5 == '' entPhysicalIsFRU.5 == false(2) entPhysicalMfgDate.5 == '2003-7-18,14:20:22.0,-4:0' entPhysicalUris.5 == 'URN:CLEI:CNMES23ARA' entPhysicalDescr.6 == 'Acme Ethernet-100 Port' entPhysicalVendorType.6 == acmeProducts.portTypes.2Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 57]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 entPhysicalContainedIn.6 == 4 entPhysicalClass.6 == port(10) entPhysicalParentRelPos.6 == 2 entPhysicalName.6 == 'P2' entPhysicalHardwareRev.6 == 'G(1.02)' entPhysicalSoftwareRev.6 == '' entPhysicalFirmwareRev.6 == '1.1' entPhysicalSerialNum.6 == '' entPhysicalMfgName.6 == 'Acme' entPhysicalModelName.6 == 'FE-100' entPhysicalAlias.6 == '' entPhysicalAssetID.6 == '' entPhysicalIsFRU.6 == false(2) entPhysicalMfgDate.6 == '2003-7-19,10:15:15.0,-4:0' entPhysicalUris.6 == 'URN:CLEI:CNMES23ARA' entPhysicalDescr.7 == 'Acme Router-100 FDDI-Port' entPhysicalVendorType.7 == acmeProducts.portTypes.3 entPhysicalContainedIn.7 == 4 entPhysicalClass.7 == port(10) entPhysicalParentRelPos.7 == 3 entPhysicalName.7 == 'P3' entPhysicalHardwareRev.7 == 'B(1.03)' entPhysicalSoftwareRev.7 == '2.5.1' entPhysicalFirmwareRev.7 == '2.5F' entPhysicalSerialNum.7 == '' entPhysicalMfgName.7 == 'Acme' entPhysicalModelName.7 == 'FDDI-100' entPhysicalAlias.7 == '' entPhysicalAssetID.7 == '' entPhysicalIsFRU.7 == false(2) Slot 2 contains another 3-port module: entPhysicalDescr.8 == 'Acme Router-100 Comm Module' entPhysicalVendorType.8 == acmeProducts.moduleTypes.15 entPhysicalContainedIn.8 == 3 entPhysicalClass.8 == module(9) entPhysicalParentRelPos.8 == 1 entPhysicalName.8 == 'M2' entPhysicalHardwareRev.8 == '2.01.00' entPhysicalSoftwareRev.8 == '3.0.7' entPhysicalFirmwareRev.8 == 'A(1.2)' entPhysicalSerialNum.8 == 'C100098732' entPhysicalMfgName.8 == 'Acme' entPhysicalModelName.8 == 'C100' entPhysicalAlias.8 == 'rtr-U3:m2:SJ17-2-eng' entPhysicalAssetID.8 == '0007373982' entPhysicalIsFRU.8 == true(1)Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 58]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 entPhysicalMfgDate.8 == '2002-5-26,13:30:15.0,-4:0' entPhysicalUris.8 == 'URN:CLEI:CNRT321MAA' entPhysicalDescr.9 == 'Acme Fddi-100 Port' entPhysicalVendorType.9 == acmeProducts.portTypes.5 entPhysicalContainedIn.9 == 8 entPhysicalClass.9 == port(10) entPhysicalParentRelPos.9 == 1 entPhysicalName.9 == 'FDDI Primary' entPhysicalHardwareRev.9 == 'CC(1.07)' entPhysicalSoftwareRev.9 == '2.0.34' entPhysicalFirmwareRev.9 == '1.1' entPhysicalSerialNum.9 == '' entPhysicalMfgName.9 == 'Acme' entPhysicalModelName.9 == 'FDDI-100' entPhysicalAlias.9 == '' entPhysicalAssetID.9 == '' entPhysicalIsFRU.9 == false(2) entPhysicalDescr.10 == 'Acme Ethernet-100 Port' entPhysicalVendorType.10 == acmeProducts.portTypes.2 entPhysicalContainedIn.10 == 8 entPhysicalClass.10 == port(10) entPhysicalParentRelPos.10 == 2 entPhysicalName.10 == 'Ethernet A' entPhysicalHardwareRev.10 == 'G(1.04)' entPhysicalSoftwareRev.10 == '' entPhysicalFirmwareRev.10 == '1.3' entPhysicalSerialNum.10 == '' entPhysicalMfgName.10 == 'Acme' entPhysicalModelName.10 == 'FE-100' entPhysicalAlias.10 == '' entPhysicalAssetID.10 == '' entPhysicalIsFRU.10 == false(2) entPhysicalMfgDate.10 == '2002-7-26,13:30:15.0,-4:0' entPhysicalUris.10 == 'URN:CLEI:CNMES23ARA' entPhysicalDescr.11 == 'Acme Ethernet-100 Port' entPhysicalVendorType.11 == acmeProducts.portTypes.2 entPhysicalContainedIn.11 == 8 entPhysicalClass.11 == port(10) entPhysicalParentRelPos.11 == 3 entPhysicalName.11 == 'Ethernet B' entPhysicalHardwareRev.11 == 'G(1.04)' entPhysicalSoftwareRev.11 == '' entPhysicalFirmwareRev.11 == '1.3' entPhysicalSerialNum.11 == '' entPhysicalMfgName.11 == 'Acme'Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 59]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 entPhysicalModelName.11 == 'FE-100' entPhysicalAlias.11 == '' entPhysicalAssetID.11 == '' entPhysicalIsFRU.11 == false(2) entPhysicalMfgDate.11 == '2002-8-16,15:35:15.0,-4:0' entPhysicalUris.11 == 'URN:CLEI:CNMES23ARA' Logical entities -- entLogicalTable; no SNMPv3 support 2 OSPF instances: entLogicalDescr.1 == 'Acme OSPF v1.1' entLogicalType.1 == ospf entLogicalCommunity.1 == 'public-ospf1' entLogicalTAddress.1 == 192.0.2.1:161 entLogicalTDomain.1 == snmpUDPDomain entLogicalContextEngineID.1 == '' entLogicalContextName.1 == '' entLogicalDescr.2 == 'Acme OSPF v1.1' entLogicalType.2 == ospf entLogicalCommunity.2 == 'public-ospf2' entLogicalTAddress.2 == 192.0.2.1:161 entLogicalTDomain.2 == snmpUDPDomain entLogicalContextEngineID.2 == '' entLogicalContextName.2 == '' 2 logical bridges: entLogicalDescr.3 == 'Acme Bridge v2.1.1' entLogicalType.3 == dot1dBridge entLogicalCommunity.3 == 'public-bridge1' entLogicalTAddress.3 == 192.0.2.1:161 entLogicalTDomain.3 == snmpUDPDomain entLogicalContextEngineID.3 == '' entLogicalContextName.3 == '' entLogicalDescr.4 == 'Acme Bridge v2.1.1' entLogicalType.4 == dot1dBridge entLogicalCommunity.4 == 'public-bridge2' entLogicalTAddress.4 == 192.0.2.1:161 entLogicalTDomain.4 == snmpUDPDomain entLogicalContextEngineID.4 == '' entLogicalContextName.4 == '' Logical to Physical Mappings: 1st OSPF instance: uses module 1-port 1 entLPPhysicalIndex.1.5 == 5Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 60]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 2nd OSPF instance: uses module 2-port 1 entLPPhysicalIndex.2.9 == 9 1st bridge group: uses module 1, all ports Note that these mappings are included in the table because another logical entity (1st OSPF) utilizes one of the ports. If this were not the case, then a single mapping to the module (e.g., entLPPhysicalIndex.3.4) would be present instead. entLPPhysicalIndex.3.5 == 5 entLPPhysicalIndex.3.6 == 6 entLPPhysicalIndex.3.7 == 7 2nd bridge group: uses module 2, all ports entLPPhysicalIndex.4.9 == 9 entLPPhysicalIndex.4.10 == 10 entLPPhysicalIndex.4.11 == 11 Physical to Logical to MIB Alias Mappings -- entAliasMappingTable: Example 1: ifIndex values are global to all logical entities entAliasMappingIdentifier.5.0 == ifIndex.1 entAliasMappingIdentifier.6.0 == ifIndex.2 entAliasMappingIdentifier.7.0 == ifIndex.3 entAliasMappingIdentifier.9.0 == ifIndex.4 entAliasMappingIdentifier.10.0 == ifIndex.5 entAliasMappingIdentifier.11.0 == ifIndex.6 Example 2: ifIndex values are not shared by all logical entities; (Bridge-1 uses ifIndex values 101 - 103 and Bridge-2 uses ifIndex values 204-206.) entAliasMappingIdentifier.5.0 == ifIndex.1 entAliasMappingIdentifier.5.3 == ifIndex.101 entAliasMappingIdentifier.6.0 == ifIndex.2 entAliasMappingIdentifier.6.3 == ifIndex.102 entAliasMappingIdentifier.7.0 == ifIndex.3 entAliasMappingIdentifier.7.3 == ifIndex.103 entAliasMappingIdentifier.9.0 == ifIndex.4 entAliasMappingIdentifier.9.4 == ifIndex.204 entAliasMappingIdentifier.10.0 == ifIndex.5 entAliasMappingIdentifier.10.4 == ifIndex.205 entAliasMappingIdentifier.11.0 == ifIndex.6 entAliasMappingIdentifier.11.4 == ifIndex.206Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 61]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 Physical Containment Tree -- entPhysicalContainsTable chassis has two containers: entPhysicalChildIndex.1.2 == 2 entPhysicalChildIndex.1.3 == 3 container 1 has a module: entPhysicalChildIndex.2.4 == 4 container 2 has a module: entPhysicalChildIndex.3.8 == 8 module 1 has 3 ports: entPhysicalChildIndex.4.5 == 5 entPhysicalChildIndex.4.6 == 6 entPhysicalChildIndex.4.7 == 7 module 2 has 3 ports: entPhysicalChildIndex.8.9 == 9 entPhysicalChildIndex.8.10 == 10 entPhysicalChildIndex.8.11 == 114.2. Repeaters The second example is a 3-slot hub with 2 backplane ethernet segments. Slot three is empty, and the remaining slots contain ethernet repeater modules. Note that this example assumes an older Repeater MIB implementation [RFC1516] rather than the new Repeater MIB [RFC2108]. The new version contains an object called 'rptrPortRptrId', which should be used to identify repeater port groupings, rather than using community strings or contexts. Physical entities -- entPhysicalTable: 1 Field-replaceable physical chassis: entPhysicalDescr.1 == 'Acme Chassis Model 110' entPhysicalVendorType.1 == acmeProducts.chassisTypes.2 entPhysicalContainedIn.1 == 0 entPhysicalClass.1 == chassis(3) entPhysicalParentRelPos.1 ==0 entPhysicalName.1 == '110-B' entPhysicalHardwareRev.1 == 'A(1.02.00)' entPhysicalSoftwareRev.1 == '' entPhysicalFirmwareRev.1 == '' entPhysicalSerialNum.1 == 'C100079294' entPhysicalMfgName.1 == 'Acme' entPhysicalModelName.1 == '110' entPhysicalAlias.1 == 'bldg09:floor1:rptr18:0067eea0229f'Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 62]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 entPhysicalAssetID.1 == '0007386327' entPhysicalIsFRU.1 == true(1) 2 Chassis Ethernet Backplanes: entPhysicalDescr.2 == 'Acme Ethernet Backplane Type A' entPhysicalVendorType.2 == acmeProducts.backplaneTypes.1 entPhysicalContainedIn.2 == 1 entPhysicalClass.2 == backplane(4) entPhysicalParentRelPos.2 == 1 entPhysicalName.2 == 'B1' entPhysicalHardwareRev.2 == 'A(2.04.01)' entPhysicalSoftwareRev.2 == '' entPhysicalFirmwareRev.2 == '' entPhysicalSerialNum.2 == '' entPhysicalMfgName.2 == 'Acme' entPhysicalModelName.2 == 'BK-A' entPhysicalAlias.2 == '' entPhysicalAssetID.2 == '' entPhysicalIsFRU.2 == false(2) entPhysicalDescr.3 == 'Acme Ethernet Backplane Type A' entPhysicalVendorType.3 == acmeProducts.backplaneTypes.1 entPhysicalContainedIn.3 == 1 entPhysicalClass.3 == backplane(4) entPhysicalParentRelPos.3 == 2 entPhysicalName.3 == 'B2' entPhysicalHardwareRev.3 == 'A(2.04.01)' entPhysicalSoftwareRev.3 == '' entPhysicalFirmwareRev.3 == '' entPhysicalSerialNum.3 == '' entPhysicalMfgName.3 == 'Acme' entPhysicalModelName.3 == 'BK-A' entPhysicalAlias.3 == '' entPhysicalAssetID.3 == '' entPhysicalIsFRU.3 == false(2) 3 slots within the chassis: entPhysicalDescr.4 == 'Acme Hub Slot Type RB' entPhysicalVendorType.4 == acmeProducts.slotTypes.5 entPhysicalContainedIn.4 == 1 entPhysicalClass.4 == container(5) entPhysicalParentRelPos.4 == 1 entPhysicalName.4 == 'Slot 1' entPhysicalHardwareRev.4 == 'B(1.00.03)' entPhysicalSoftwareRev.4 == '' entPhysicalFirmwareRev.4 == '' entPhysicalSerialNum.4 == '' entPhysicalMfgName.4 == 'Acme'Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 63]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 entPhysicalModelName.4 == 'RB' entPhysicalAlias.4 == '' entPhysicalAssetID.4 == '' entPhysicalIsFRU.4 == false(2) entPhysicalDescr.5 == 'Acme Hub Slot Type RB' entPhysicalVendorType.5 == acmeProducts.slotTypes.5 entPhysicalContainedIn.5 == 1 entPhysicalClass.5 == container(5) entPhysicalParentRelPos.5 == 2 entPhysicalName.5 == 'Slot 2' entPhysicalHardwareRev.5 == 'B(1.00.03)' entPhysicalSoftwareRev.5 == '' entPhysicalFirmwareRev.5 == '' entPhysicalSerialNum.5 == '' entPhysicalMfgName.5 == 'Acme' entPhysicalModelName.5 == 'RB' entPhysicalAlias.5 == '' entPhysicalAssetID.5 == '' entPhysicalIsFRU.5 == false(2) entPhysicalDescr.6 == 'Acme Hub Slot Type RB' entPhysicalVendorType.6 == acmeProducts.slotTypes.5 entPhysicalContainedIn.6 == 1 entPhysicalClass.6 == container(5) entPhysicalParentRelPos.6 == 3 entPhysicalName.6 == 'Slot 3' entPhysicalHardwareRev.6 == 'B(1.00.03)' entPhysicalSoftwareRev.6 == '' entPhysicalFirmwareRev.6 == '' entPhysicalSerialNum.6 == '' entPhysicalMfgName.6 == 'Acme' entPhysicalModelName.6 == 'RB' entPhysicalAlias.6 == '' entPhysicalAssetID.6 == '' entPhysicalIsFRU.6 == false(2) Slot 1 contains a plug-in module with 4 10-BaseT ports: entPhysicalDescr.7 == 'Acme 10Base-T Module 114' entPhysicalVendorType.7 == acmeProducts.moduleTypes.32 entPhysicalContainedIn.7 == 4 entPhysicalClass.7 == module(9) entPhysicalParentRelPos.7 == 1 entPhysicalName.7 == 'M1' entPhysicalHardwareRev.7 == 'A(1.02.01)' entPhysicalSoftwareRev.7 == '1.7.2' entPhysicalFirmwareRev.7 == 'A(1.5)' entPhysicalSerialNum.7 == 'C100096244'Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 64]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 entPhysicalMfgName.7 == 'Acme' entPhysicalModelName.7 = '114' entPhysicalAlias.7 == 'bldg09:floor1:eng' entPhysicalAssetID.7 == '0007962951' entPhysicalIsFRU.7 == true(1) entPhysicalDescr.8 == 'Acme 10Base-T Port RB' entPhysicalVendorType.8 == acmeProducts.portTypes.10 entPhysicalContainedIn.8 == 7 entPhysicalClass.8 == port(10) entPhysicalParentRelPos.8 == 1 entPhysicalName.8 == 'Ethernet-A' entPhysicalHardwareRev.8 == 'A(1.04F)' entPhysicalSoftwareRev.8 == '' entPhysicalFirmwareRev.8 == '1.4' entPhysicalSerialNum.8 == '' entPhysicalMfgName.8 == 'Acme' entPhysicalModelName.8 == 'RB' entPhysicalAlias.8 == '' entPhysicalAssetID.8 == '' entPhysicalIsFRU.8 == false(2) entPhysicalDescr.9 == 'Acme 10Base-T Port RB' entPhysicalVendorType.9 == acmeProducts.portTypes.10 entPhysicalContainedIn.9 == 7 entPhysicalClass.9 == port(10) entPhysicalParentRelPos.9 == 2 entPhysicalName.9 == 'Ethernet-B' entPhysicalHardwareRev.9 == 'A(1.04F)' entPhysicalSoftwareRev.9 == '' entPhysicalFirmwareRev.9 == '1.4' entPhysicalSerialNum.9 == '' entPhysicalMfgName.9 == 'Acme' entPhysicalModelName.9 = 'RB' entPhysicalAlias.9 == '' entPhysicalAssetID.9 == '' entPhysicalIsFRU.9 == false(2) entPhysicalDescr.10 == 'Acme 10Base-T Port RB' entPhysicalVendorType.10 == acmeProducts.portTypes.10 entPhysicalContainedIn.10 == 7 entPhysicalClass.10 == port(10) entPhysicalParentRelPos.10 == 3 entPhysicalName.10 == 'Ethernet-C' entPhysicalHardwareRev.10 == 'B(1.02.07)' entPhysicalSoftwareRev.10 == '' entPhysicalFirmwareRev.10 == '1.4' entPhysicalSerialNum.10 == ''Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 65]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 entPhysicalMfgName.10 == 'Acme' entPhysicalModelName.10 == 'RB' entPhysicalAlias.10 == '' entPhysicalAssetID.10 == '' entPhysicalIsFRU.10 == false(2) entPhysicalDescr.11 == 'Acme 10Base-T Port RB' entPhysicalVendorType.11 == acmeProducts.portTypes.10 entPhysicalContainedIn.11 == 7 entPhysicalClass.11 == port(10) entPhysicalParentRelPos.11 == 4 entPhysicalName.11 == 'Ethernet-D' entPhysicalHardwareRev.11 == 'B(1.02.07)' entPhysicalSoftwareRev.11 == '' entPhysicalFirmwareRev.11 == '1.4' entPhysicalSerialNum.11 == '' entPhysicalMfgName.11 == 'Acme' entPhysicalModelName.11 == 'RB' entPhysicalAlias.11 == '' entPhysicalAssetID.11 == '' entPhysicalIsFRU.11 == false(2) Slot 2 contains another ethernet module with 2 ports. entPhysicalDescr.12 == 'Acme 10Base-T Module Model 4' entPhysicalVendorType.12 == acmeProducts.moduleTypes.30 entPhysicalContainedIn.12 = 5 entPhysicalClass.12 == module(9) entPhysicalParentRelPos.12 == 1 entPhysicalName.12 == 'M2' entPhysicalHardwareRev.12 == 'A(1.01.07)' entPhysicalSoftwareRev.12 == '1.8.4' entPhysicalFirmwareRev.12 == 'A(1.8)' entPhysicalSerialNum.12 == 'C100102384' entPhysicalMfgName.12 == 'Acme' entPhysicalModelName.12 == '4' entPhysicalAlias.12 == 'bldg09:floor1:devtest' entPhysicalAssetID.12 == '0007968462' entPhysicalIsFRU.12 == true(1) entPhysicalDescr.13 == 'Acme 802.3 AUI Port' entPhysicalVendorType.13 == acmeProducts.portTypes.11 entPhysicalContainedIn.13 == 12 entPhysicalClass.13 == port(10) entPhysicalParentRelPos.13 == 1 entPhysicalName.13 == 'AUI' entPhysicalHardwareRev.13 == 'A(1.06F)' entPhysicalSoftwareRev.13 == '' entPhysicalFirmwareRev.13 == '1.5'Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 66]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 entPhysicalSerialNum.13 == '' entPhysicalMfgName.13 == 'Acme' entPhysicalModelName.13 == '' entPhysicalAlias.13 == '' entPhysicalAssetID.13 == '' entPhysicalIsFRU.13 == false(2) entPhysicalDescr.14 == 'Acme 10Base-T Port RD' entPhysicalVendorType.14 == acmeProducts.portTypes.14 entPhysicalContainedIn.14 == 12 entPhysicalClass.14 == port(10) entPhysicalParentRelPos.14 == 2 entPhysicalName.14 == 'E2' entPhysicalHardwareRev.14 == 'B(1.01.02)' entPhysicalSoftwareRev.14 == '' entPhysicalFirmwareRev.14 == '2.1' entPhysicalSerialNum.14 == '' entPhysicalMfgName.14 == 'Acme' entPhysicalModelName.14 == '' entPhysicalAlias.14 == '' entPhysicalAssetID.14 == '' entPhysicalIsFRU.14 == false(2) Logical entities -- entLogicalTable; with SNMPv3 support Repeater 1--comprised of any ports attached to backplane 1 entLogicalDescr.1 == 'Acme repeater v3.1' entLogicalType.1 == snmpDot3RptrMgt entLogicalCommunity.1 'public-repeater1' entLogicalTAddress.1 == 192.0.2.1:161 entLogicalTDomain.1 == snmpUDPDomain entLogicalContextEngineID.1 == '80000777017c7d7e7f'H entLogicalContextName.1 == 'repeater1' Repeater 2--comprised of any ports attached to backplane 2: entLogicalDescr.2 == 'Acme repeater v3.1' entLogicalType.2 == snmpDot3RptrMgt entLogicalCommunity.2 == 'public-repeater2' entLogicalTAddress.2 == 192.0.2.1:161 entLogicalTDomain.2 == snmpUDPDomain entLogicalContextEngineID.2 == '80000777017c7d7e7f'H entLogicalContextName.2 == 'repeater2' Logical to Physical Mappings -- entLPMappingTable: repeater1 uses backplane 1, slot 1-ports 1 & 2, slot 2-port 1Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 67]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 Note that a mapping to the module is not included, because this example represents a port-switchable hub. Even though all ports on the module could belong to the same repeater as a matter of configuration, the LP port mappings should not be replaced dynamically with a single mapping for the module (e.g., entLPPhysicalIndex.1.7). If all ports on the module shared a single backplane connection, then a single mapping for the module would be more appropriate. entLPPhysicalIndex.1.2 == 2 entLPPhysicalIndex.1.8 == 8 entLPPhysicalIndex.1.9 == 9 entLPPhysicalIndex.1.13 == 13 repeater2 uses backplane 2, slot 1-ports 3 & 4, slot 2-port 2 entLPPhysicalIndex.2.3 == 3 entLPPhysicalIndex.2.10 == 10 entLPPhysicalIndex.2.11 == 11 entLPPhysicalIndex.2.14 == 14 Physical to Logical to MIB Alias Mappings -- entAliasMappingTable: Repeater Port Identifier values are shared by both repeaters: entAliasMappingIdentifier.8.0 == rptrPortGroupIndex.1.1 entAliasMappingIdentifier.9.0 == rptrPortGroupIndex.1.2 entAliasMappingIdentifier.10.0 == rptrPortGroupIndex.1.3 entAliasMappingIdentifier.11.0 == rptrPortGroupIndex.1.4 entAliasMappingIdentifier.13.0 == rptrPortGroupIndex.2.1 entAliasMappingIdentifier.14.0 == rptrPortGroupIndex.2.2 Physical Containment Tree -- entPhysicalContainsTable chassis has two backplanes and three containers: entPhysicalChildIndex.1.2 == 2 entPhysicalChildIndex.1.3 == 3 entPhysicalChildIndex.1.4 == 4 entPhysicalChildIndex.1.5 == 5 entPhysicalChildIndex.1.6 == 6 container 1 has a module: entPhysicalChildIndex.4.7 == 7 container 2 has a module entPhysicalChildIndex.5.12 == 12 Note that in this example, container 3 is empty. module 1 has 4 ports: entPhysicalChildIndex.7.8 == 8 entPhysicalChildIndex.7.9 == 9Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 68]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 entPhysicalChildIndex.7.10 == 10 entPhysicalChildIndex.7.11 == 11 module 2 has 2 ports: entPhysicalChildIndex.12.13 == 13 entPhysicalChildIndex.12.14 == 144.3. EMAN Example As an example, to illustrate the use of the MIB objects introduced with Energy Management (EMAN) applications, consider a router that has 16 slots with line cards. An example of the entPhysicalTable is given for 3 components of the router, a chassis, a slot, and a line card in that slot. The chassis contains the slot, and the slot contains the line card. entPhysicalDescr.1 == 'ACME Series 16 Slots' entPhysicalVendorType.1 == acmeProducts.chassisTypes.1 entPhysicalContainedIn.1 == 0 entPhysicalClass.1 == chassis(3) entPhysicalParentRelPos.1 == -1 entPhysicalName.1 == 'Router 0 Chassis' entPhysicalHardwareRev.1 == '' entPhysicalSoftwareRev.1 == '' entPhysicalFirmwareRev.1 == '' entPhysicalSerialNum.1 == 'abcd1234' entPhysicalMfgName.1 == 'ACME' entPhysicalModelName.1 == 'ACME-16-LCC' entPhysicalAlias.1 == '' entPhysicalAssetID.1 == '' entPhysicalIsFRU.1 == true(1) entPhysicalMfgDate.1 == '2008-7-28,13:30:30.0,-4:0' entPhysicalUris.1 == 'urn:f81d4fae-7dec-11d0-a765-00a0c91e6bf6' entPhysicalUUID.1 == 'f81d4fae-7dec-11d0-a765-00a0c91e6bf6' entPhysicalDescr.2 == 'ACME Line Card Slot' entPhysicalVendorType.2 == acmeProducts.slotTypes.1 entPhysicalContainedIn.2 == 1 entPhysicalClass.2 = container(5) entPhysicalParentRelPos.2 == 6 entPhysicalName.2 == 'Slot 6' entPhysicalHardwareRev.2 == '' entPhysicalFirmwareRev.2 == '' entPhysicalSoftwareRev.2 == '' entPhysicalSerialNum.2 == '' entPhysicalMfgName.2 == 'ACME' entPhysicalModelName.2 == ''Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 69]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 entPhysicalAlias.2 == '' entPhysicalAssetID.2 == '' entPhysicalIsFRU.2 == false(2) entPhysicalUris.2 == ''urn:7dc53df5-703e-49b3-8670-b1c468f47f1f' entPhysicalUUID.2 == '7dc53df5-703e-49b3-8670-b1c468f47f1f' entPhysicalDescr.4 == 'ACME Series1 Line Card' entPhysicalVendorType.4 == acmeProducts.moduleTypes.14 entPhysicalContainedIn.4 == 2 entPhysicalClass.4 == module(9) entPhysicalParentRelPos.4 == 0 entPhysicalName.4 == 'Series1 Linecard' entPhysicalHardwareRev.4 == '' entPhysicalFirmwareRev.4 == '' entPhysicalSoftwareRev.4 == '' entPhysicalSerialNum.4 == '' entPhysicalMfgName.4 == 'ACME' entPhysicalModelName.4 == '' entPhysicalAlias.4 == '' entPhysicalAssetID.4 == '' entPhysicalIsFRU.4 == true(1) entPhysicalUris.4 == 'urn:01c47915-4777-11d8-bc70-0090272ff725' entPhysicalUUID.4 == '01c47915-4777-11d8-bc70-0090272ff725'5. Security Considerations There are a number of management objects defined in these MIB modules with a MAX-ACCESS clause of read-write and/or read-create. Such objects may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. The support for SET operations in a non-secure environment without proper protection can have a negative effect on network operations. These are the tables and objects and their sensitivity/vulnerability: entPhysicalSerialNum entPhysicalAlias entPhysicalAssetID entPhysicalUris These objects contain information about the physical entities within a managed system, which may be used to identify the serial number, identification of assets and managed components, and handling of the managed objects. Their mis-configuration or disclosure may reveal sensitive information on assets, perturb the management of entities, or cause privacy issues if they allow tracking of values that are personally identifying.Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 70]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 Some of the readable objects in these MIB modules (i.e., objects with a MAX-ACCESS other than not-accessible) may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus important to control even GET and/or NOTIFY access to these objects and possibly to even encrypt the values of these objects when sending them over the network via SNMP. These are the tables and objects and their sensitivity/vulnerability: entPhysicalDescr entPhysicalVendorType entPhysicalHardwareRev entPhysicalFirmwareRev entPhysicalSoftwareRev entPhysicalMfgName entPhysicalModelName entPhysicalUUID These objects expose information about the physical entities within a managed system, which may be used to identify the vendor, model, version, and specific device-identification information of each system component. entLogicalDescr entLogicalType These objects expose the type of logical entities present in the managed system. entLogicalCommunity This object exposes community names associated with particular logical entities within the system. entLogicalTAddress entLogicalTDomain These objects expose network addresses that can be used to communicate with an SNMP agent on behalf of particular logical entities within the system. entLogicalContextEngineID entLogicalContextName These objects identify the authoritative SNMP engine that contains information on behalf of particular logical entities within the system.Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 71]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 did not include adequate security. Even if the network itself is secure (for example by using IPsec), there is no control as to who on the secure network is allowed to access and GET/SET (read/change/create/delete) the objects in these MIB modules. Implementations SHOULD provide the security features described by the SNMPv3 framework (see [RFC3410]), and implementations claiming compliance to the SNMPv3 standard MUST include full support for authentication and privacy via the User-based Security Model (USM) [RFC3414] with the AES cipher algorithm [RFC3826]. Implementations MAY also provide support for the Transport Security Model (TSM) [RFC5591] in combination with a secure transport such as SSH [RFC5592] or TLS/DTLS [RFC6353]. Further, deployment of SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 is NOT RECOMMENDED. Instead, it is RECOMMENDED to deploy SNMPv3 and to enable cryptographic security. It is then a customer/operator responsibility to ensure that the SNMP entity giving access to an instance of these MIB modules is properly configured to give access to the objects only to those principals (users) that have legitimate rights to indeed GET or SET (change/create/delete) them.6. IANA Considerations This document defines the first version of the IANA-maintained IANA-ENTITY-MIB module, which allows new physical classes to be added to the enumeration in IANAPhysicalClass. An Expert Review, as defined inRFC 5226 [RFC5226], is REQUIRED for each modification. The MIB module in this document uses the following IANA-assigned OBJECT IDENTIFIER values recorded in the SMI Numbers registry: Descriptor OBJECT IDENTIFIER value ---------- ----------------------- entityMIB { mib-2 47 } IANA has allocated two OBJECT IDENTIFIERS under mib-2 for: Descriptor OBJECT IDENTIFIER value ---------- ----------------------- ianaEntityMIB { mib-2 216 } uuidTCMIB { mib-2 217 }Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 72]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 20137. Acknowledgements The first three versions of RFCs on the ENTITY MIB modules were authored by A. Bierman and K. McCloghrie. The authors would like to thank A. Bierman and K. McCloghrie for the earlier versions of the ENTITY MIB. The motivation for the extension toRFC 4133 stems from the requirements of the EMAN WG of the IETF. The authors also thank Juergen Schoenwaelder for his review and comments for improving this document.8. References8.1. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC2578] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., and J. Schoenwaelder, "Structure of Management Information Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58,RFC 2578, April 1999. [RFC2579] McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J. Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Textual Conventions for SMIv2", STD 58,RFC 2579, April 1999. [RFC2580] McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J. Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Conformance Statements for SMIv2", STD 58,RFC 2580, April 1999. [RFC3411] Harrington, D., Presuhn, R., and B. Wijnen, "An Architecture for Describing Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Management Frameworks", STD 62,RFC3411, December 2002. [RFC3414] Blumenthal, U. and B. Wijnen, "User-based Security Model (USM) for version 3 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv3)", STD 62,RFC 3414, December 2002. [RFC3826] Blumenthal, U., Maino, F., and K. McCloghrie, "The Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Cipher Algorithm in the SNMP User-based Security Model",RFC 3826, June 2004.Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 73]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 [RFC3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66,RFC 3986, January 2005. [RFC4122] Leach, P., Mealling, M., and R. Salz, "A Universally Unique IDentifier (UUID) URN Namespace",RFC 4122, July 2005. [RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs",BCP 26,RFC5226, May 2008. [RFC5591] Harrington, D. and W. Hardaker, "Transport Security Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)",RFC 5591, June 2009. [RFC5592] Harrington, D., Salowey, J., and W. Hardaker, "Secure Shell Transport Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)",RFC 5592, June 2009. [RFC6353] Hardaker, W., "Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)",RFC 6353, July 2011.8.2. Informative References [RFC1157] Case, J., Fedor, M., Schoffstall, M., and J. Davin, "Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)",RFC 1157, May 1990. [RFC1516] McMaster, D. and K. McCloghrie, "Definitions of Managed Objects for IEEE 802.3 Repeater Devices",RFC 1516, September 1993. [RFC2108] de Graaf, K., Romascanu, D., McMaster, D., and K. McCloghrie, "Definitions of Managed Objects for IEEE 802.3 Repeater Devices using SMIv2",RFC 2108, February 1997. [RFC2037] McCloghrie, K. and A. Bierman, "Entity MIB using SMIv2",RFC 2037, October 1996. [RFC2737] McCloghrie, K. and A. Bierman, "Entity MIB (Version 2)",RFC 2737, December 1999. [RFC2863] McCloghrie, K. and F. Kastenholz, "The Interfaces Group MIB",RFC 2863, June 2000.Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 74]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013 [RFC3406] Daigle, L., van Gulik, D., Iannella, R., and P. Faltstrom, "Uniform Resource Names (URN) Namespace Definition Mechanisms",BCP 66,RFC 3406, October 2002. [RFC3410] Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D., and B. Stewart, "Introduction and Applicability Statements for Internet-Standard Management Framework",RFC 3410, December 2002. [RFC4133] Bierman, A. and K. McCloghrie, "Entity MIB (Version 3)",RFC 4133, August 2005. [RFC4152] Tesink, K. and R. Fox, "A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for the Common Language Equipment Identifier (CLEI) Code",RFC 4152, August 2005. [RFC4188] Norseth, K., Ed., and E. Bell, Ed., "Definitions of Managed Objects for Bridges",RFC 4188, September 2005. [T1.213] ATIS T1.213-2001, "Coded Identification of Equipment Entities in the North American Telecommunications System for Information Exchange", 2001, <www.ansi.org>. [T1.213a] ATIS T1.213a, "Supplement to T1.213-2001, Coded Identification of Equipment Entities in the North American Telecommunications System for Information Exchange, to Correct the Representation of the Basic Code in Figure B.1", 2001, <www.ansi.org>.Bierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 75]
RFC 6933 Entity MIB (Version 4) May 2013Authors' Addresses Andy Bierman YumaWorks, Inc. 274 Redwood Shores Parkway, #133 Redwood City, CA 94065 USA Phone: +1 408-716-0466 EMail: andy@yumaworks.com Dan Romascanu Avaya Park Atidim, Bldg. #3 Tel Aviv, 61581 Israel Phone: +972-3-6458414 EMail: dromasca@avaya.com Juergen Quittek NEC Europe Ltd. Network Research Division Kurfuersten-Anlage 36 Heidelberg 69115 Germany Phone: +49 6221 4342-115 EMail: quittek@neclab.eu Mouli Chandramouli Cisco Systems, Inc. Sarjapur Outer Ring Road Bangalore 560103 India Phone: +91 80 4429 2409 EMail: moulchan@cisco.comBierman, et al. Standards Track [Page 76]
[8]ページ先頭