Movatterモバイル変換
[0]ホーム
[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Errata] [Info page]
PROPOSED STANDARD
Errata ExistNetwork Working Group S. Leontiev, Ed.Request for Comments: 4491 CRYPTO-PROUpdates:3279 D. Shefanovski, Ed.Category: Standards Track Mobile TeleSystems OJSC May 2006Using the GOST R 34.10-94, GOST R 34.10-2001, andGOST R 34.11-94 Algorithms with theInternet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and CRL ProfileStatus of This Memo This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.Copyright Notice Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).Abstract This document supplementsRFC 3279. It describes encoding formats, identifiers, and parameter formats for the algorithms GOST R 34.10- 94, GOST R 34.10-2001, and GOST R 34.11-94 for use in Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure (PKI).Leontiev & Shefanovski Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 4491 Using GOST with PKIX May 2006Table of Contents1. Introduction ....................................................21.1. Requirement Words ..........................................32. Algorithm Support ...............................................32.1. One-Way Hash Function ......................................32.1.1. One-Way Hash Function GOST R 34.11-94 ...............32.2. Signature Algorithms .......................................42.2.1. Signature Algorithm GOST R 34.10-94 .................42.2.2. Signature Algorithm GOST R 34.10-2001 ...............52.3. Subject Public Key Algorithms ..............................52.3.1. GOST R 34.10-94 Keys ................................62.3.2. GOST R 34.10-2001 Keys ..............................83. Security Considerations .........................................94. Examples .......................................................104.1. GOST R 34.10-94 Certificate ...............................104.2. GOST R 34.10-2001 Certificate .............................125. Acknowledgements ...............................................156. References .....................................................166.1. Normative References ......................................166.2. Informative References ....................................171. Introduction This document supplementsRFC 3279 [PKALGS]. It describes the conventions for using the GOST R 34.10-94 [GOST3431095,GOSTR341094] and GOST R 34.10-2001 [GOST3431004,GOSTR341001] signature algorithms, VKO GOST R 34.10-94 and VKO GOST R 34.10-2001 key derivation algorithms, and GOST R 34.11-94 [GOST3431195,GOSTR341194] one-way hash function in the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) [PROFILE]. This document provides supplemental information and specifications needed by the "Russian Cryptographic Software Compatibility Agreement" community. The algorithm identifiers and associated parameters are specified for subject public keys that employ the GOST R 34.10-94 [GOSTR341094]/VKO GOST R 34.10-94 [CPALGS] or the GOST R 34.10-2001 [GOSTR341001]/VKO GOST R 34.10-2001 [CPALGS] algorithms, as is the encoding format for the signatures produced by these algorithms. Also, the algorithm identifiers for using the GOST R 34.11-94 one-way hash function with the GOST R 34.10-94 and GOST R 34.10-2001 signature algorithms are specified.Leontiev & Shefanovski Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 4491 Using GOST with PKIX May 2006 This specification defines the contents of the signatureAlgorithm, signatureValue, signature, and subjectPublicKeyInfo fields within X.509 Certificates and CRLs. For each algorithm, the appropriate alternatives for the keyUsage certificate extension are provided. ASN.1 modules, including all the definitions used in this document, can be found in [CPALGS].1.1. Requirement Words The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].2. Algorithm Support This section is an overview of cryptographic algorithms that may be used within the Internet X.509 certificates and CRL profile [PROFILE]. It describes one-way hash functions and digital signature algorithms that may be used to sign certificates and CRLs, and it identifies object identifiers (OIDs) and ASN.1 encoding for public keys contained in a certificate. Certification authorities (CAs) and/or applications conforming to this standard MUST support at least one of the specified public key and signature algorithms.2.1. One-Way Hash Function This section describes the use of a one-way, collision-free hash function GOST R 34.11-94, the only one that can be used in the digital signature algorithm GOST R 34.10-94/2001. The data that is hashed for certificates and CRL signing is fully described inRFC3280 [PROFILE].2.1.1. One-Way Hash Function GOST R 34.11-94 GOST R 34.11-94 has been developed by "GUBS of Federal Agency Government Communication and Information" and "All-Russian Scientific and Research Institute of Standardization". The algorithm GOST R 34.11-94 produces a 256-bit hash value of an arbitrary finite bit length input. This document does not contain the full GOST R 34.11- 94 specification, which can be found in [GOSTR341194] (in Russian). [Schneier95], ch. 18.11, p. 454, contains a brief technical description in English. This function MUST always be used with parameter set identified by id-GostR3411-94-CryptoProParamSet (see Section 8.2 of [CPALGS]).Leontiev & Shefanovski Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 4491 Using GOST with PKIX May 20062.2. Signature Algorithms Conforming CAs may use GOST R 34.10-94 or GOST R 34.10-2001 signature algorithms to sign certificates and CRLs. These signature algorithms MUST always be used with a one-way hash function GOST R 34.11-94 as indicated in [GOSTR341094] and [GOSTR341001]. This section defines algorithm identifiers and parameters to be used in the signatureAlgorithm field in a Certificate or CertificateList.2.2.1. Signature Algorithm GOST R 34.10-94 GOST R 34.10-94 has been developed by "GUBS of Federal Agency Government Communication and Information" and "All-Russian Scientific and Research Institute of Standardization". This document does not contain the full GOST R 34.10-94 specification, which can be found in [GOSTR341094] (in Russian). [Schneier95], ch. 20.3, p. 495, contains a brief technical description in English. The ASN.1 object identifier used to identify this signature algorithm is: id-GostR3411-94-with-GostR3410-94 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { iso(1) member-body(2) ru(643) rans(2) cryptopro(2) gostR3411-94-with-gostR3410-94(4) } When the id-GostR3411-94-with-GostR3410-94 algorithm identifier appears as the algorithm field in an AlgorithmIdentifier, the encoding SHALL omit the parameters field. That is, the AlgorithmIdentifier SHALL be a SEQUENCE of one component: the OBJECT IDENTIFIER id-GostR3411-94-with-GostR3410-94. The signature algorithm GOST R 34.10-94 generates a digital signature in the form of two 256-bit numbers, r' and s. Its octet string representation consists of 64 octets, where the first 32 octets contain the big-endian representation of s and the second 32 octets contain the big-endian representation of r'. This definition of a signature value is directly usable in CMS [CMS], where such values are represented as octet strings. However, signature values in certificates and CRLs [PROFILE] are represented as bit strings, and thus the octet string representation must be converted.Leontiev & Shefanovski Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 4491 Using GOST with PKIX May 2006 To convert an octet string signature value to a bit string, the most significant bit of the first octet of the signature value SHALL become the first bit of the bit string, and so on through the least significant bit of the last octet of the signature value, which SHALL become the last bit of the bit string.2.2.2. Signature Algorithm GOST R 34.10-2001 GOST R 34.10-2001 was developed by "GUBS of Federal Agency Government Communication and Information" and "All-Russian Scientific and Research Institute of Standardization". This document does not contain the full GOST R 34.10-2001 specification, which can be found in [GOSTR341001] (in Russian). The ASN.1 object identifier used to identify this signature algorithm is: id-GostR3411-94-with-GostR3410-2001 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { iso(1) member-body(2) ru(643) rans(2) cryptopro(2) gostR3411-94-with-gostR3410-2001(3) } When the id-GostR3411-94-with-GostR3410-2001 algorithm identifier appears as the algorithm field in an AlgorithmIdentifier, the encoding SHALL omit the parameters field. That is, the AlgorithmIdentifier SHALL be a SEQUENCE of one component: the OBJECT IDENTIFIER id-GostR3411-94-with-GostR3410-2001. The signature algorithm GOST R 34.10-2001 generates a digital signature in the form of two 256-bit numbers, r and s. Its octet string representation consists of 64 octets, where the first 32 octets contain the big-endian representation of s and the second 32 octets contain the big-endian representation of r. The process described above (Section 2.2.1) MUST be used to convert this octet string representation to a bit string for use in certificates and CRLs.2.3. Subject Public Key Algorithms This section defines OIDs and public key parameters for public keys that employ the GOST R 34.10-94 [GOSTR341094]/VKO GOST R 34.10-94 [CPALGS] or the GOST R 34.10-2001 [GOSTR341001]/VKO GOST R 34.10-2001 [CPALGS] algorithms. Use of the same key for both signature and key derivation is NOT RECOMMENDED. The intended application for the key MAY be indicated in the keyUsage certificate extension (see [PROFILE],Section4.2.1.3).Leontiev & Shefanovski Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 4491 Using GOST with PKIX May 20062.3.1. GOST R 34.10-94 Keys GOST R 34.10-94 public keys can be used for the signature algorithm GOST R 34.10-94 [GOSTR341094] and for the key derivation algorithm VKO GOST R 34.10-94 [CPALGS]. GOST R 34.10-94 public keys are identified by the following OID: id-GostR3410-94 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { iso(1) member-body(2) ru(643) rans(2) cryptopro(2) gostR3410-94(20) } The SubjectPublicKeyInfo.algorithm.algorithm field (seeRFC 3280 [PROFILE]) for GOST R 34.10-94 keys MUST be set to id-GostR3410-94. When the id-GostR3410-94 algorithm identifier appears as the algorithm field in an AlgorithmIdentifier, the encoding MAY omit the parameters field or set it to NULL. Otherwise, this field MUST have the following structure: GostR3410-94-PublicKeyParameters ::= SEQUENCE { publicKeyParamSet OBJECT IDENTIFIER, digestParamSet OBJECT IDENTIFIER, encryptionParamSet OBJECT IDENTIFIER DEFAULT id-Gost28147-89-CryptoPro-A-ParamSet } where: * publicKeyParamSet - public key parameters identifier for GOST R 34.10-94 (see Section 8.3 of [CPALGS]) * digestParamSet - parameters identifier for GOST R 34.11-94 (see Section 8.2 of [CPALGS]) * encryptionParamSet - parameters identifier for GOST 28147-89 [GOST28147] (see Section 8.1 of [CPALGS]) The absence of parameters SHALL be processed as described inRFC 3280 [PROFILE], Section 6.1; that is, parameters are inherited from the issuer certificate. When the working_public_key_parameters variable is set to null, the certificate and any signature verifiable on this certificate SHALL be rejected.Leontiev & Shefanovski Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 4491 Using GOST with PKIX May 2006 The GOST R 34.10-94 public key MUST be ASN.1 DER encoded as an OCTET STRING; this encoding shall be used as the contents (i.e., the value) of the subjectPublicKey component (a BIT STRING) of the SubjectPublicKeyInfo data element. GostR3410-94-PublicKey ::= OCTET STRING -- public key, Y GostR3410-94-PublicKey MUST contain 128 octets of the little-endian representation of the public key Y = a^x (mod p), where a and p are public key parameters, and x is a private key. Some erroneous applications discard zero bits at the end of BIT STRING containing the public key. It is RECOMMENDED to pad the bit string with zeroes up to 1048 bits (131 octets) on decoding to be able to decode the encapsulated OCTET STRING. If the keyUsage extension is present in an end-entity certificate that contains a GOST R 34.10-94 public key, the following values MAY be present: digitalSignature; nonRepudiation; keyEncipherment; and keyAgreement. If the keyAgreement or keyEnchiperment extension is present in a certificate GOST R 34.10-94 public key, the following values MAY be present as well: encipherOnly; and decipherOnly. The keyUsage extension MUST NOT assert both encipherOnly and decipherOnly. If the keyUsage extension is present in an CA or CRL signer certificate that contains a GOST R 34.10-94 public key, the following values MAY be present: digitalSignature; nonRepudiation; keyCertSign; and cRLSign.Leontiev & Shefanovski Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 4491 Using GOST with PKIX May 20062.3.2. GOST R 34.10-2001 Keys GOST R 34.10-2001 public keys can be used for the signature algorithm GOST R 34.10-2001 [GOSTR341001] and for the key derivation algorithm VKO GOST R 34.10-2001 [CPALGS]. GOST R 34.10-2001 public keys are identified by the following OID: id-GostR3410-2001 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { iso(1) member-body(2) ru(643) rans(2) cryptopro(2) gostR3410-2001(19) } The SubjectPublicKeyInfo.algorithm.algorithm field (seeRFC 3280 [PROFILE]) for GOST R 34.10-2001 keys MUST be set to id-GostR3410- 2001. When the id-GostR3410-2001 algorithm identifier appears as the algorithm field in an AlgorithmIdentifier, the encoding MAY omit the parameters field or set it to NULL. Otherwise, this field MUST have the following structure: GostR3410-2001-PublicKeyParameters ::= SEQUENCE { publicKeyParamSet OBJECT IDENTIFIER, digestParamSet OBJECT IDENTIFIER, encryptionParamSet OBJECT IDENTIFIER DEFAULT id-Gost28147-89-CryptoPro-A-ParamSet } where: * publicKeyParamSet - public key parameters identifier for GOST R 34.10-2001 (see Section 8.4 of [CPALGS]) * digestParamSet - parameters identifier for GOST R 34.11-94 (see Section 8.2 of [CPALGS]) * encryptionParamSet - parameters identifier for GOST 28147-89 [GOST28147] (see Section 8.1 of [CPALGS]) The absence of parameters SHALL be processed as described inRFC 3280 [PROFILE], Section 6.1; that is, parameters are inherited from the issuer certificate. When the working_public_key_parameters variable is set to null, the certificate and any signature verifiable on this certificate SHALL be rejected.Leontiev & Shefanovski Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 4491 Using GOST with PKIX May 2006 The GOST R 34.10-2001 public key MUST be ASN.1 DER encoded as an OCTET STRING; this encoding shall be used as the contents (i.e., the value) of the subjectPublicKey component (a BIT STRING) of the SubjectPublicKeyInfo data element. GostR3410-2001-PublicKey ::= OCTET STRING -- public key vector, Q According to [GOSTR341001], a public key is a point on the elliptic curve Q = (x,y). GostR3410-2001-PublicKey MUST contain 64 octets, where the first 32 octets contain the little-endian representation of x and the second 32 octets contain the little-endian representation of y. This corresponds to the binary representation of (<y>256||<x>256) from [GOSTR341001], ch. 5.3. Some erroneous applications discard zero bits at the end of BIT STRING containing the public key. It is RECOMMENDED to pad the bit string with zeroes up to 528 bits (66 octets) on decoding to be able to decode the encapsulated OCTET STRING. The same keyUsage constraints apply for use of GOST R 34.10-2001 keys as described inSection 2.3.1 for GOST R 34.10-94 keys.3. Security Considerations It is RECOMMENDED that applications verify signature values and subject public keys to conform to [GOSTR341001,GOSTR341094] standards prior to their use. When a certificate is used to support digital signatures as an analogue to manual ("wet") signatures, in the context of Russian Federal Electronic Digital Signature Law [RFEDSL], the certificate MUST contain keyUsage extension, it MUST be critical, and keyUsage MUST NOT include keyEncipherment and keyAgreement. It is RECOMMENDED that CAs and applications make sure that the private key for creating signatures is not used for more than its allowed validity period (typically 15 months for both the GOST R 34.10-94 and GOST R 34.10-2001 algorithms). For security discussion concerning use of algorithm parameters, see the Security Considerations section in [CPALGS].Leontiev & Shefanovski Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 4491 Using GOST with PKIX May 20064. Examples4.1. GOST R 34.10-94 Certificate -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE----- MIICCzCCAboCECMO42BGlSTOxwvklBgufuswCAYGKoUDAgIEMGkxHTAbBgNVBAMM FEdvc3RSMzQxMC05NCBleGFtcGxlMRIwEAYDVQQKDAlDcnlwdG9Qcm8xCzAJBgNV BAYTAlJVMScwJQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhhHb3N0UjM0MTAtOTRAZXhhbXBsZS5jb20w HhcNMDUwODE2MTIzMjUwWhcNMTUwODE2MTIzMjUwWjBpMR0wGwYDVQQDDBRHb3N0 UjM0MTAtOTQgZXhhbXBsZTESMBAGA1UECgwJQ3J5cHRvUHJvMQswCQYDVQQGEwJS VTEnMCUGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYYR29zdFIzNDEwLTk0QGV4YW1wbGUuY29tMIGlMBwG BiqFAwICFDASBgcqhQMCAiACBgcqhQMCAh4BA4GEAASBgLuEZuF5nls02CyAfxOo GWZxV/6MVCUhR28wCyd3RpjG+0dVvrey85NsObVCNyaE4g0QiiQOHwxCTSs7ESuo v2Y5MlyUi8Go/htjEvYJJYfMdRv05YmKCYJo01x3pg+2kBATjeM+fJyR1qwNCCw+ eMG1wra3Gqgqi0WBkzIydvp7MAgGBiqFAwICBANBABHHCH4S3ALxAiMpR3aPRyqB g1DjB8zy5DEjiULIc+HeIveF81W9lOxGkZxnrFjXBSqnjLeFKgF1hffXOAP7zUM= -----END CERTIFICATE----- 0 30 523: SEQUENCE { 4 30 442: SEQUENCE { 8 02 16: INTEGER : 23 0E E3 60 46 95 24 CE C7 0B E4 94 18 2E 7E EB 26 30 8: SEQUENCE { 28 06 6: OBJECT IDENTIFIER : id-GostR3411-94-with-GostR3410-94 (1 2 643 2 2 4) : } 36 30 105: SEQUENCE { 38 31 29: SET { 40 30 27: SEQUENCE { 42 06 3: OBJECT IDENTIFIER commonName (2 5 4 3) 47 0C 20: UTF8String 'GostR3410-94 example' : } : } 69 31 18: SET { 71 30 16: SEQUENCE { 73 06 3: OBJECT IDENTIFIER organizationName (2 5 4 10) 78 0C 9: UTF8String 'CryptoPro' : } : } 89 31 11: SET { 91 30 9: SEQUENCE { 93 06 3: OBJECT IDENTIFIER countryName (2 5 4 6) 98 13 2: PrintableString 'RU' : } : } 102 31 39: SET { 104 30 37: SEQUENCE { 106 06 9: OBJECT IDENTIFIER emailAddress (1 2 840 113549 1 9 1)Leontiev & Shefanovski Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 4491 Using GOST with PKIX May 2006 117 16 24: IA5String 'GostR3410-94@example.com' : } : } : } 143 30 30: SEQUENCE { 145 17 13: UTCTime '050816123250Z' 160 17 13: UTCTime '150816123250Z' : } 175 30 105: SEQUENCE { 177 31 29: SET { 179 30 27: SEQUENCE { 181 06 3: OBJECT IDENTIFIER commonName (2 5 4 3) 186 0C 20: UTF8String 'GostR3410-94 example' : } : } 208 31 18: SET { 210 30 16: SEQUENCE { 212 06 3: OBJECT IDENTIFIER organizationName (2 5 4 10) 217 0C 9: UTF8String 'CryptoPro' : } : } 228 31 11: SET { 230 30 9: SEQUENCE { 232 06 3: OBJECT IDENTIFIER countryName (2 5 4 6) 237 13 2: PrintableString 'RU' : } : } 241 31 39: SET { 243 30 37: SEQUENCE { 245 06 9: OBJECT IDENTIFIER emailAddress (1 2 840 113549 1 9 1) 256 16 24: IA5String 'GostR3410-94@example.com' : } : } : } 282 30 165: SEQUENCE { 285 30 28: SEQUENCE { 287 06 6: OBJECT IDENTIFIER id-GostR3410-94 (1 2 643 2 2 20) 295 30 18: SEQUENCE { 297 06 7: OBJECT IDENTIFIER : id-GostR3410-94-CryptoPro-A-ParamSet : (1 2 643 2 2 32 2) 306 06 7: OBJECT IDENTIFIER : id-GostR3411-94-CryptoProParamSet : (1 2 643 2 2 30 1) : } : } 315 03 132: BIT STRING 0 unused bits, encapsulates { 319 04 128: OCTET STRINGLeontiev & Shefanovski Standards Track [Page 11]
RFC 4491 Using GOST with PKIX May 2006 : BB 84 66 E1 79 9E 5B 34 D8 2C 80 7F 13 A8 19 66 : 71 57 FE 8C 54 25 21 47 6F 30 0B 27 77 46 98 C6 : FB 47 55 BE B7 B2 F3 93 6C 39 B5 42 37 26 84 E2 : 0D 10 8A 24 0E 1F 0C 42 4D 2B 3B 11 2B A8 BF 66 : 39 32 5C 94 8B C1 A8 FE 1B 63 12 F6 09 25 87 CC : 75 1B F4 E5 89 8A 09 82 68 D3 5C 77 A6 0F B6 90 : 10 13 8D E3 3E 7C 9C 91 D6 AC 0D 08 2C 3E 78 C1 : B5 C2 B6 B7 1A A8 2A 8B 45 81 93 32 32 76 FA 7B : } : } : } 450 30 8: SEQUENCE { 452 06 6: OBJECT IDENTIFIER : id-GostR3411-94-with-GostR3410-94 (1 2 643 2 2 4) : } 460 03 65: BIT STRING 0 unused bits : 11 C7 08 7E 12 DC 02 F1 02 23 29 47 76 8F 47 2A : 81 83 50 E3 07 CC F2 E4 31 23 89 42 C8 73 E1 DE : 22 F7 85 F3 55 BD 94 EC 46 91 9C 67 AC 58 D7 05 : 2A A7 8C B7 85 2A 01 75 85 F7 D7 38 03 FB CD 43 : } In the signature of the above certificate, r' equals 0x22F785F355BD94EC46919C67AC58D7052AA78CB7852A017585F7D73803FBCD43 and s equals 0x11C7087E12DC02F102232947768F472A818350E307CCF2E431238942C873E1DE4.2. GOST R 34.10-2001 Certificate -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE----- MIIB0DCCAX8CECv1xh7CEb0Xx9zUYma0LiEwCAYGKoUDAgIDMG0xHzAdBgNVBAMM Fkdvc3RSMzQxMC0yMDAxIGV4YW1wbGUxEjAQBgNVBAoMCUNyeXB0b1BybzELMAkG A1UEBhMCUlUxKTAnBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWGkdvc3RSMzQxMC0yMDAxQGV4YW1wbGUu Y29tMB4XDTA1MDgxNjE0MTgyMFoXDTE1MDgxNjE0MTgyMFowbTEfMB0GA1UEAwwW R29zdFIzNDEwLTIwMDEgZXhhbXBsZTESMBAGA1UECgwJQ3J5cHRvUHJvMQswCQYD VQQGEwJSVTEpMCcGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYaR29zdFIzNDEwLTIwMDFAZXhhbXBsZS5j b20wYzAcBgYqhQMCAhMwEgYHKoUDAgIkAAYHKoUDAgIeAQNDAARAhJVodWACGkB1 CM0TjDGJLP3lBQN6Q1z0bSsP508yfleP68wWuZWIA9CafIWuD+SN6qa7flbHy7Df D2a8yuoaYDAIBgYqhQMCAgMDQQA8L8kJRLcnqeyn1en7U23Sw6pkfEQu3u0xFkVP vFQ/3cHeF26NG+xxtZPz3TaTVXdoiYkXYiD02rEx1bUcM97i -----END CERTIFICATE----- 0 30 464: SEQUENCE { 4 30 383: SEQUENCE { 8 02 16: INTEGER : 2B F5 C6 1E C2 11 BD 17 C7 DC D4 62 66 B4 2E 21 26 30 8: SEQUENCE { 28 06 6: OBJECT IDENTIFIERLeontiev & Shefanovski Standards Track [Page 12]
RFC 4491 Using GOST with PKIX May 2006 : id-GostR3411-94-with-GostR3410-2001 (1 2 643 2 2 3) : } 36 30 109: SEQUENCE { 38 31 31: SET { 40 30 29: SEQUENCE { 42 06 3: OBJECT IDENTIFIER commonName (2 5 4 3) 47 0C 22: UTF8String 'GostR3410-2001 example' : } : } 71 31 18: SET { 73 30 16: SEQUENCE { 75 06 3: OBJECT IDENTIFIER organizationName (2 5 4 10) 80 0C 9: UTF8String 'CryptoPro' : } : } 91 31 11: SET { 93 30 9: SEQUENCE { 95 06 3: OBJECT IDENTIFIER countryName (2 5 4 6) 100 13 2: PrintableString 'RU' : } : } 104 31 41: SET { 106 30 39: SEQUENCE { 108 06 9: OBJECT IDENTIFIER emailAddress (1 2 840 113549 1 9 1) 119 16 26: IA5String 'GostR3410-2001@example.com' : } : } : } 147 30 30: SEQUENCE { 149 17 13: UTCTime '050816141820Z' 164 17 13: UTCTime '150816141820Z' : } 179 30 109: SEQUENCE { 181 31 31: SET { 183 30 29: SEQUENCE { 185 06 3: OBJECT IDENTIFIER commonName (2 5 4 3) 190 0C 22: UTF8String 'GostR3410-2001 example' : } : } 214 31 18: SET { 216 30 16: SEQUENCE { 218 06 3: OBJECT IDENTIFIER organizationName (2 5 4 10) 223 0C 9: UTF8String 'CryptoPro' : } : } 234 31 11: SET { 236 30 9: SEQUENCE { 238 06 3: OBJECT IDENTIFIER countryName (2 5 4 6)Leontiev & Shefanovski Standards Track [Page 13]
RFC 4491 Using GOST with PKIX May 2006 243 13 2: PrintableString 'RU' : } : } 247 31 41: SET { 249 30 39: SEQUENCE { 251 06 9: OBJECT IDENTIFIER emailAddress (1 2 840 113549 1 9 1) 262 16 26: IA5String 'GostR3410-2001@example.com' : } : } : } 290 30 99: SEQUENCE { 292 30 28: SEQUENCE { 294 06 6: OBJECT IDENTIFIER id-GostR3410-2001 (1 2 643 2 2 19) 302 30 18: SEQUENCE { 304 06 7: OBJECT IDENTIFIER : id-GostR3410-2001-CryptoPro-XchA-ParamSet : (1 2 643 2 2 36 0) 313 06 7: OBJECT IDENTIFIER : id-GostR3411-94-CryptoProParamSet : (1 2 643 2 2 30 1) : } : } 322 03 67: BIT STRING 0 unused bits, encapsulates { 325 04 64: OCTET STRING : 84 95 68 75 60 02 1A 40 75 08 CD 13 8C 31 89 2C : FD E5 05 03 7A 43 5C F4 6D 2B 0F E7 4F 32 7E 57 : 8F EB CC 16 B9 95 88 03 D0 9A 7C 85 AE 0F E4 8D : EA A6 BB 7E 56 C7 CB B0 DF 0F 66 BC CA EA 1A 60 : } : } : } 391 30 8: SEQUENCE { 393 06 6: OBJECT IDENTIFIER : id-GostR3411-94-with-GostR3410-2001 (1 2 643 2 2 3) : } 401 03 65: BIT STRING 0 unused bits : 3C 2F C9 09 44 B7 27 A9 EC A7 D5 E9 FB 53 6D D2 : C3 AA 64 7C 44 2E DE ED 31 16 45 4F BC 54 3F DD : C1 DE 17 6E 8D 1B EC 71 B5 93 F3 DD 36 93 55 77 : 68 89 89 17 62 20 F4 DA B1 31 D5 B5 1C 33 DE E2 : } In the public key of the above certificate, x equals 0x577E324FE70F2B6DF45C437A0305E5FD2C89318C13CD0875401A026075689584 and y equals 0x601AEACABC660FDFB0CBC7567EBBA6EA8DE40FAE857C9AD0038895B916CCEB8F The corresponding private key d equals 0x0B293BE050D0082BDAE785631A6BAB68F35B42786D6DDA56AFAF169891040F77Leontiev & Shefanovski Standards Track [Page 14]
RFC 4491 Using GOST with PKIX May 2006 In the signature of the above certificate, r equals 0xC1DE176E8D1BEC71B593F3DD36935577688989176220F4DAB131D5B51C33DEE2 and s equals 0x3C2FC90944B727A9ECA7D5E9FB536DD2C3AA647C442EDEED3116454FBC543FDD5. Acknowledgements This document was created in accordance with "Russian Cryptographic Software Compatibility Agreement", signed by FGUE STC "Atlas", CRYPTO-PRO, Factor-TS, MD PREI, Infotecs GmbH, SPRCIS (SPbRCZI), Cryptocom, R-Alpha. The goal of this agreement is to achieve mutual compatibility of the products and solutions. The authors wish to thank the following: Microsoft Corporation Russia for providing information about company products and solutions, and also for technical consulting in PKI. RSA Security Russia and Demos Co Ltd for active collaboration and critical help in creation of this document. RSA Security Inc for compatibility testing of the proposed data formats while incorporating them into the RSA Keon product. Baltimore Technology plc for compatibility testing of the proposed data formats while incorporating them into their UniCERT product. Peter Gutmann for his helpful "dumpasn1" program. Russ Housley (Vigil Security, LLC, housley@vigilsec.com) and Vasilij Sakharov (DEMOS Co Ltd, svp@dol.ru) for encouraging the authors to create this document. Grigorij Chudov for navigating the IETF process for this document. Prikhodko Dmitriy (VSTU, PrikhodkoDV@volgablob.ru) for invaluable assistance in proofreading this document and verifying the form and the contents of the ASN.1 structures mentioned or used in this document.Leontiev & Shefanovski Standards Track [Page 15]
RFC 4491 Using GOST with PKIX May 20066. References6.1. Normative References [GOST28147] "Cryptographic Protection for Data Processing System", GOST 28147-89, Gosudarstvennyi Standard of USSR, Government Committee of the USSR for Standards, 1989. (In Russian) [GOST3431195] "Information technology. Cryptographic Data Security. Cashing function.", GOST 34.311-95, Council for Standardization, Metrology and Certification of the Commonwealth of Independence States (EASC), Minsk, 1995. (In Russian) [GOST3431095] "Information technology. Cryptographic Data Security. Produce and check procedures of Electronic Digital Signature based on Asymmetric Cryptographic Algorithm.", GOST 34.310-95, Council for Standardization, Metrology and Certification of the Commonwealth of Independence States (EASC), Minsk, 1995. (In Russian) [GOST3431004] "Information technology. Cryptographic Data Security. Formation and verification processes of (electronic) digital signature based on Asymmetric Cryptographic Algorithm.", GOST 34.310-2004, Council for Standardization, Metrology and Certification of the Commonwealth of Independence States (EASC), Minsk, 2004. (In Russian) [GOSTR341094] "Information technology. Cryptographic Data Security. Produce and check procedures of Electronic Digital Signatures based on Asymmetric Cryptographic Algorithm.", GOST R 34.10-94, Gosudarstvennyi Standard of Russian Federation, Government Committee of the Russia for Standards, 1994. (In Russian) [GOSTR341001] "Information technology. Cryptographic data security. Signature and verification processes of [electronic] digital signature.", GOST R 34.10-2001, Gosudarstvennyi Standard of Russian Federation, Government Committee of the Russia for Standards, 2001. (In Russian) [GOSTR341194] "Information technology. Cryptographic Data Security. Hashing function.", GOST R 34.10-94, Gosudarstvennyi Standard of Russian Federation, Government Committee of the Russia for Standards, 1994. (In Russian)Leontiev & Shefanovski Standards Track [Page 16]
RFC 4491 Using GOST with PKIX May 2006 [CPALGS] Popov, V., Kurepkin, I., and S. Leontiev, "Additional Cryptographic Algorithms for Use with GOST 28147-89, GOST R 34.10-94, GOST R 34.10-2001, and GOST R 34.11-94 Algorithms",RFC 4357, January 2006. [PKALGS] Bassham, L., Polk, W., and R. Housley, "Algorithms and Identifiers for the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile",RFC 3279, April 2002. [PROFILE] Housley, R., Polk, W., Ford, W., and D. Solo, "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile",RFC 3280, April 2002. [X.660] ITU-T Recommendation X.660 Information Technology - ASN.1 encoding rules: Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER), Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished Encoding Rules (DER), 1997. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119, March 1997.6.2. Informative References [Schneier95] B. Schneier, Applied Cryptography, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1995. [RFEDSL] Russian Federal Electronic Digital Signature Law, 10 Jan 2002 N 1-FZ. [CMS] Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)",RFC3852, July 2004.Leontiev & Shefanovski Standards Track [Page 17]
RFC 4491 Using GOST with PKIX May 2006Authors' Addresses Serguei Leontiev, Ed. CRYPTO-PRO 38, Obraztsova, Moscow, 127018, Russian Federation EMail: lse@cryptopro.ru Dennis Shefanovski, Ed. Mobile TeleSystems OJSC 4, Marksistskaya Str., Moscow, 109147, Russian Federation EMail: dbs@mts.ru Grigorij Chudov CRYPTO-PRO 38, Obraztsova, Moscow, 127018, Russian Federation EMail: chudov@cryptopro.ru Alexandr Afanasiev Factor-TS office 711, 14, Presnenskij val, Moscow, 123557, Russian Federation EMail: afa1@factor-ts.ru Nikolaj Nikishin Infotecs GmbH p/b 35, 80-5, Leningradskij prospekt, Moscow, 125315, Russian Federation EMail: nikishin@infotecs.ru Boleslav Izotov FGUE STC "Atlas" 38, Obraztsova, Moscow, 127018, Russian Federation EMail: izotov@nii.voskhod.ruLeontiev & Shefanovski Standards Track [Page 18]
RFC 4491 Using GOST with PKIX May 2006 Elena Minaeva MD PREI build 3, 6A, Vtoroj Troitskij per., Moscow, Russian Federation EMail: evminaeva@mail.ru Igor Ovcharenko MD PREI Office 600, 14, B.Novodmitrovskaya, Moscow, Russian Federation EMail: igori@mo.msk.ru Serguei Murugov R-Alpha 4/1, Raspletina, Moscow, 123060, Russian Federation EMail: msm@top-cross.ru Igor Ustinov Cryptocom office 239, 51, Leninskij prospekt, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation EMail: igus@cryptocom.ru Anatolij Erkin SPRCIS (SPbRCZI) 1, Obrucheva, St.Petersburg, 195220, Russian Federation EMail: erkin@nevsky.netLeontiev & Shefanovski Standards Track [Page 19]
RFC 4491 Using GOST with PKIX May 2006Full Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006). This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained inBCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights. This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.Intellectual Property The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found inBCP 78 andBCP 79. Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository athttp://www.ietf.org/ipr. The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org.Acknowledgement Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA).Leontiev & Shefanovski Standards Track [Page 20]
[8]ページ先頭