Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]

BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Network Working Group                                         P. HoffmanRequest for Comments: 3233                      Internet Mail ConsortiumBCP: 58                                                       S. BradnerCategory: Best Current Practice                       Harvard University                                                           February 2002Defining the IETFStatus of this Memo   This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the   Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for   improvements.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.Copyright Notice   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002).  All Rights Reserved.Abstract   This document gives a more concrete definition of "the IETF" as it   understood today.  Many RFCs refer to "the IETF".  Many important   IETF documents speak of the IETF as if it were an already-defined   entity.  However, no IETF document correctly defines what the IETF   is.1. Introduction   Many RFCs refer to "the IETF".  Many important IETF documents speak   of the IETF as if it were an already-defined entity.  However, no   IETF document correctly defines what the IETF is.  This document   gives a more concrete definition of "the IETF" as it understood   today.2. Defining the IETFBCP 9 ("The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 3") [BCP 9], the   primary document that describes the Internet standards process, never   defines the IETF.  As described inBCP 11 ("The Organizations   Involved in the IETF Standards Process") [BCP 11], the Internet   Engineering Task Force (IETF) is an open global community of network   designers, operators, vendors, and researchers producing technical   specifications for the evolution of the Internet architecture and the   smooth operation of the Internet.Hoffman & Bradner        Best Current Practice                  [Page 1]

RFC 3233                   Defining the IETF               February 2002   It is important to note that the IETF is not a corporation: it is an   unincorporated, freestanding organization.  The IETF is partially   supported by the Internet Society (ISOC).  ISOC is an international   non-profit organization incorporated in the US with thousands of   individual and corporate members throughout the world who pay   membership fees to join.  The Internet Society provides many services   to the IETF, including insurance and some financial and logistical   support.   As described inBCP 11, Internet standardization is an organized   activity of the ISOC, with the ISOC Board of Trustees being   responsible for ratifying the procedures and rules of the Internet   standards process.  However, the IETF is not a formal subset of ISOC;   for example, one does not have to join ISOC to be a member of the   IETF.   There is no board of directors for the IETF, no formally signed   bylaws, no treasurer, and so on.  The structure of the IETF (its   leadership, its working groups, the definition of IETF membership,   and so on) are described in detail inBCP 11.  Procedures for   choosing leadership are described in detail inBCP 10.   Thus, when RFCs say "the IETF", they are describing the group that   acts in accordance withBCP 9,BCP 10, andBCP 11.3. Security Considerations   All IETF protocols must describe the security aspects of the   environment in which they will be used.  Also, the IETF has a   Security Area which discusses the security aspects of IETF protocols.   However, descriptive documents such as this one do not affect the   security of the Internet.Hoffman & Bradner        Best Current Practice                  [Page 2]

RFC 3233                   Defining the IETF               February 2002A. References   [BCP 9]  Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 3",BCP 9,RFC 2026, October 1996.   [BCP 10] Galvin, J., "IAB and IESG Selection, Confirmation, and            Recall Process: Operation of the Nominating and Recall            Committees",BCP 10,RFC 2727, February 2000.   [BCP 11] Hovey, R. and S. Bradner, "The Organizations Involved in the            IETF Standards Process",BCP 11,RFC 2028, October 1996.B. Editors' Addresses   Paul Hoffman   Internet Mail Consortium   127 Segre Place   Santa Cruz, CA  95060  USA   EMail: phoffman@imc.org   Scott Bradner   Harvard University   29 Oxford St   Cambridge MA 02138   EMail: sob@harvard.eduHoffman & Bradner        Best Current Practice                  [Page 3]

RFC 3233                   Defining the IETF               February 2002Full Copyright Statement   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002).  All Rights Reserved.   This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to   others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it   or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published   and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any   kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are   included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this   document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing   the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other   Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of   developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for   copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be   followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than   English.   The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be   revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.   This document and the information contained herein is provided on an   "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING   TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING   BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION   HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF   MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.Acknowledgement   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the   Internet Society.Hoffman & Bradner        Best Current Practice                  [Page 4]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp