Movatterモバイル変換
[0]ホーム
[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]
PROPOSED STANDARD
Updated by:9141Network Working Group K. RehbehnRequest for Comments: 2955 Megisto SystemsCategory: Standards Track O. Nicklass RAD Data Communications, Ltd. G. Mouradian AT&T Labs October 2000Definitions of Managed Objectsfor Monitoring and Controlling theFrame Relay/ATM PVC Service Interworking FunctionStatus of this Memo This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.Copyright Notice Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000). All Rights Reserved.Abstract This memo defines a Management Information Base (MIB) to configure, monitor, and control a service interworking function (IWF) for Permanent Virtual Connections (PVC) between Frame Relay and Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) technologies.Table of Contents1. The SNMP Management Framework ...............................22. Conventions .................................................33. Overview ....................................................33.1 Frame Relay/ATM Service Interworking Background ............43.2 Structure of the MIB .......................................43.3 Relationship to Other MIBs .................................53.3.1 Frame Relay Service MIB ..................................63.3.2 Frame Relay DTE MIB ......................................63.3.3 ATM MIB ..................................................63.3.4 IF MIB ...................................................73.4 Point to Multipoint Considerations .........................73.5 Theory of Operation ........................................73.5.1 Creation Process .........................................73.5.2 Destruction Process ......................................10Rehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 20003.5.3 Modification Process .....................................114. Object Definitions ..........................................114.1 The FR/ATM PVC Service IWF Connection Group ................134.2 The FR/ATM PVC Service IWF Connection Descriptor Group .....215. Augmentation of ATM MIB VCL Endpoint Entry (atmVclEntry) ....276. Frame Relay/ATM PVC Service Interworking NOTIFICATION .......297. Conformance Information .....................................297.1 Compliance Statement For Equipment .........................297.2 Compliance Statement For Service (CNM Interface) ...........307.3 Units of Conformance .......................................327.3.1 Basic FR/ATM IWF PVC Connection Group ....................327.3.2 FR/ATM IWF PVC Connection Descriptor Group ...............327.3.3 ATM MIB VCL Endpoint Table Augmentation ..................337.3.4 Notification Group .......................................338. Acknowledgments .............................................349. References ..................................................3410. Security Considerations ....................................3611. Authors' Addresses .........................................3712. Intellectual Property Rights ...............................3813. Full Copyright Statement ...................................391. The SNMP Management Framework The SNMP Management Framework presently consists of five major components: o An overall architecture, described inRFC 2571 [1]. o Mechanisms for describing and naming objects and events for the purpose of management. The first version of this Structure of Management Information (SMI) is called SMIv1 and described in STD 16,RFC 1155 [2], STD 16,RFC 1212 [3] andRFC 1215 [4]. The second version, called SMIv2, is described in STD 58,RFC 2578 [5], STD 58,RFC 2579 [6] and STD 58,RFC 2580 [7]. o Message protocols for transferring management information. The first version of the SNMP message protocol is called SNMPv1 and described in STD 15,RFC 1157 [8]. A second version of the SNMP message protocol, which is not an Internet standards track protocol, is called SNMPv2c and described inRFC 1901 [9] andRFC1906 [10]. The third version of the message protocol is called SNMPv3 and described inRFC 1906 [10],RFC 2572 [11] andRFC 2574 [12].Rehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 o Protocol operations for accessing management information. The first set of protocol operations and associated PDU formats is described in STD 15,RFC 1157 [8]. A second set of protocol operations and associated PDU formats is described inRFC 1905 [13]. o A set of fundamental applications described inRFC 2573 [14] and the view-based access control mechanism described inRFC 2575 [15]. A more detailed introduction to the current SNMP Management Framework can be found inRFC 2570 [16]. Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed the Management Information Base or MIB. Objects in the MIB are defined using the mechanisms defined in the SMI. This memo specifies a MIB module that is compliant to the SMIv2. A MIB conforming to the SMIv1 can be produced through the appropriate translations. The resulting translated MIB must be semantically equivalent, except where objects or events are omitted because no translation is possible (use of Counter64). Some machine readable information in SMIv2 will be converted into textual descriptions in SMIv1 during the translation process. However, this loss of machine readable information is not considered to change the semantics of the MIB.2. Conventions The keywords MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHALL, SHALL NOT, SHOULD, SHOULD NOT, RECOMMENDED, NOT RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL, when they appear in this document, are to be interpreted as described inRFC 2119 [23].3. Overview This document defines a Management Information Base (MIB) for monitoring and controlling a service interworking function (IWF) for Permanent Virtual Connections (PVC) between Frame Relay and Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) technologies. The agreements on which this MIB is based were reached jointly by the Frame Relay Forum and the ATM Forum and are documented in the Frame Relay Forum Document FRF.8 [17].Rehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 20003.1. Frame Relay/ATM Service Interworking Background Frame relay to ATM interworking is a function that exchanges Protocol Data Units (PDU) between a frame relay service user and an ATM service user. Two types of interworking functions are specified for frame relay and ATM permanent virtual connection (PVC) service users: network interworking and service interworking. Network interworking provides PDU forwarding between frame relay service users inter-connected by an ATM service. Both endpoints are frame relay PVCs. Frame Relay to ATM PVC Network Interworking is defined in [20]. Service interworking provides PDU forwarding so that the ATM service user performs no frame relaying service-specific functions and the frame relay service user performs no ATM service-specific functions. Optionally, the service IWF translates particular higher layer protocols to satisfy the requirements of end-systems. Frame Relay to ATM PVC Service Interworking is defined in [17]. This MIB describes management objects used to provision, monitor, and control a Frame Relay/ATM PVC Service IWF. FRF.8 [17] does not address point-to-multipoint applications of the IWF. Implementations MAY provide support for point-to-multipoint capability using this MIB. Consult FRF.8 [17] for more details on the operation of a Frame Relay/ATM PVC Service IWF.3.2. Structure of the MIB The Frame Relay/ATM PVC Service IWF managed objects are organized as follows: (1) FR/ATM PVC Service IWF cross-connect table, (2) Connection description table, and (3) Notification object The IWF cross-connect table contains one or more rows for each inter-worked connection. Each inter-worked connection is uniquely identified by the frAtmIwfConnIndex object. In the case of point-to- point, a single row is present. In the case of point-to-multipoint, one row exists for each multipoint destination. Index objects for the ATM port, VPI, VCI, frame relay port, and frame relay DLCI distinguish the constituent rows used in a point-to-multipoint case.Rehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 Each inter-worked connection has attributes governing behavior of the IWF. These attributes describe how the IWF should transform a PDU during the forwarding process and provide rules for: (1) Mapping the ATM CLP bit to frame relay DE bit (2) Mapping the ATM congestion notification bit to frame relay congestion bits (3) Mapping higher protocol encapsulations between ATM and frame relay (4) Performing fragmentation and reassembly (5) Performing ARP translation between ATM and frame relay Typically, most connections share the same attributes. The attributes are represented in this MIB by the connection description table. Each row of the connection description table contains the attribute settings common to one or more inter-worked connections. One example would be full mapping and translation. All cross-connect table entries that require full mapping and translation services set the frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptor object to the index value for the connection description table row that contains objects set to values that provide full mapping and translation services. A notification object provides cross-connect status change alerts.3.3. Relationship to Other MIBs The Frame Relay/ATM PVC Service IWF MIB describes the cross- connections between frame relay and ATM service users. Each PVC endpoint is provisioned and managed with a technology-specific MIB as described below. Each technology-specific MIB has a table of PVC endpoints (indexed by ifIndex and logical link address such as the DLCI or VPI/VCI). In the absence of interworking, two endpoints are cross-connected via a technology-specific cross connect table (e.g., the atmVcCrossConnectTable in the ATM MIB). However, a connection between a frame relay endpoint and an ATM endpoint requires a cross- connect in the ATM IWF MIB. The following sections describe the relationship between the technology-specific MIBs and the FR/ATM PVC Service IWF MIB.Rehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 20003.3.1. Frame Relay Service MIB Frame relay PVC endpoints are provisioned as rows in the Frame Relay Services MIB [19] endpoint table. Each frame relay PVC endpoint is described in the frPVCEndptTable. A connection between two frame relay endpoints is described by an entry in the frame relay PVC cross-connect table frPVCConnectTable. The frPVCEndptConnectIdentifier object of each endpoint points to the frPVCConnectTable cross-connect table row for the connection. In the case of an inter-worked connection, the frPVCEndptConnectIdentifier object is set to zero. Instead, the frPVCEndptAtmIwfConnIndex object is set to the index of the FR/ATM IWF cross-connect table row. The frame relay PVC cross-connect table (frPVCConnectTable) does not contain an entry for the FR/ATM inter-worked connection. Note that the frPVCEndptConnectIdentifier and frPVCEndptAtmIwfConnIndex objects are set by the system as a side- effect of cross-connect establishment. Consequently, these objects are read-only.3.3.2. Frame Relay DTE MIB The Frame Relay DTE MIB described in [24] has no relevance to the FR/ATM PVC Service IWF MIB.3.3.3. ATM MIB ATM PVC endpoints are provisioned as rows in the ATM MIB [21] virtual connection link table. Each ATM connection endpoint is described in the atmVclTable. A connection between two ATM endpoints is described by an entry in the ATM VCL cross-connect table atmVcCrossConnectTable. The atmVclCrossConnectIdentifier object of each endpoint points to the atmVcCrossConnectTable row for the connection. In the case of an inter-worked connection, the atmVclCrossConnectIdentifier object is set to zero. Instead, the frAtmIwfVclCrossConnectIdentifier object in the frAtmIwfVclEntry is set to the index of the applicable FR/ATM IWF cross-connect table row.Rehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 Note that the frAtmIwfVclCrossConnectIdentifier object is defined not in the ATM MIB but inSection 5 of this MIB. Specifically, the object is defined as a column object in a table that AUGMENTs the ATM MIB VCL table. The ATM VCL cross-connect table (atmVcCrossConnectTable) does not contain an entry for the inter-worked connection. Note that the atmVclCrossConnectIdentifier and frAtmIwfVclCrossConnectIdentifier objects are set by the system as a side-effect of cross-connect establishment. Consequently, these objects are read-only.3.3.4. IF MIB The ifIndex defined in the IF MIB [22] identifies the specific frame relay and ATM endpoint interfaces. The values frAtmIwfConnAtmPort and frAtmIwfConnFrPort are used in this MIB as components in the index list for the frAtmIwfConnectionTable rows.3.4. Point to Multipoint Considerations This MIB supports IWF implementations providing point-to-multipoint functionality. All rows of the cross-connect table indexed by the same frAtmIwfConnIndex MUST utilize the same frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptor value. A group of cross-connect table entries indexed by the same frAtmIwfConnIndex value MUST agree on which service the multipoint operation is offered. Two cases are possible: (1) Many frame relay PVCs cross-connected to one ATM PVC, or (2) One frame relay PVC cross-connected to many ATM PVCs3.5. Theory of Operation3.5.1. Creation Process Multiple steps are required to create a frame relay to ATM cross- connection. First, rows must be created in the following tables: (1) The Frame Relay Service MIB frPVCEndptTable (2) The ATM MIB atmVclTable (3) The FR/ATM Service IWF MIB frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorTableRehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 (4) The FR/ATM Service IWF MIB frAtmIwfConnectionTable Second, the newly created rows are cross-linked. Finally, the administrative and operational status objects are set to 'up(1)'. A step-by-step example is provided to illustrate the creation process. In this example, the term "Manager" refers to a network management system that issues SNMP protocol actions to an "Agent". The agent is integrated with the system that implements the frame relay to ATM service IWF. In this example, the following cross- connection is created: +-----------------------------------+ +---------+ | FR/ATM PVC Service IWF | | Frame | | ------------------------------ | +-----------+ | Relay | +--------> frAtmIwfConnIndex K <--------+ | ATM | |Endpoint | | | V | | | Endpoint | | ------- | | | | | | | --------- | | DLCI X | | | +------------+ | | |VPI.VCI Q.R| | on |<-+ | | | +->| on | |ifIndex Y| | V | | ifIndex S | +---------+ |frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorIndex L| +-----------+ +-----------------------------------+ Step 1 - Create the frame relay PVC endpoint a) Manager requests creation of a new row in the frPVCEndptTable b) Agent receives management request to create a row in frPVCEndptTable for the frame relay side c) A new row is created in frPVCEndptTable as follows: - frPVCEndptConnectIdentifier initialized to zero - frPVCEndptAtmIwfConnIndex initialized to zero - remaining row objects initialized as needed for DLCI X on ifIndex Y Step 2 - Create the ATM PVC endpoint a) Agent receives management request to create a row in atmVclTable for the ATM sideRehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 b) A new row is created in atmVclTable and frAtmIwfVclTable (the AUGMENT to the atmVclTable) as follows: - atmVclCrossConnectIdentifier initialized to zero - frAtmIwfVclCrossConnectIdentifier initialized to zero - atmVclConnKind initialized to pvc(1) - remaining row objects initialized as needed for VPI.VCI Q.R on ifIndex S Step 3 - Create the FR/ATM connection descriptor a) If an existing connection descriptor is appropriate for the new connection, go to Step 4 using the selected connection descriptor index value L b) Manager requests a new connection descriptor index value by reading frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorIndexNext from the agent c) Agent receives GET request for frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorIndexNext and responds with the next available value L d) Manager requests a new connection descriptor row entry using the value L as the index e) Agent receives SET request to create the frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorTable row entry causes the system to create a row in the table. Step 4 - Create the FR/ATM cross-connect a) Manager requests a new cross-connect index value by reading frAtmIwfConnIndexNext from the agent b) Agent receives GET request for frAtmIwfConnIndexNext and responds with the next available value K c) Manager requests a new cross-connect row entry using the value K as the index d) Agent receives SET request to create the frAtmIwfConnectionTable row entry (note: the frame relay and ATM PVC endpoints MUST exist and be specified as part of the index fields for the row 'K.S.Q.R.Y.X')Rehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 e) System creates a row in frAtmIwfConnectionTable for the following indices: - frAtmIwfConnIndex of K - frAtmIwfConnAtmPort of S - frAtmIwfConnVpi of Q - frAtmIwfConnVci of R - frAtmIwfConnFrPort of Y - frAtmIwfConnDlci of X - frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptor of L Step 5 - The system sets the frame relay PVC endpoint and ATM VCL endpoint to point to the FR/ATM cross-connect row (as a side-effect of Step 4). a) System sets frPVCEndptAtmIwfConnIndex to K b) System sets frAtmIwfVclCrossConnectIdentifier to K Step 6 - Manager signals activation by issuing a SET for the frAtmIwfConnAdminStatus object using the value of 'up(1)' Step 7 - Agent receives SET request for frAtmIwfConnAdminStatus and executes internal system mechanisms to activate each PVC segment and the IWF cross-connect. The successful activation permits the agent to respond with 'up(1)' when a GET request is received for the following fields: - frAtmIwfConnAtm2FrOperStatus - frAtmIwfConnFr2AtmOperStatus - atmVclOperStatus (Note: there is no comparable FRS MIB object)3.5.2. Destruction Process Destruction of the frame relay to ATM cross-connection is initiated by the network management system. The agent's processing of the request stimulates implementation-specific system clean-up actions. Following removal of the row in the cross-connection table, the frAtmIwfVclCrossConnectIdentifier in the frAtmIwfVclTable (AUGMENT ofRehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 the ATM MIB endpoint table) and frPVCEndptAtmIwfConnIndex in the Frame Relay Service MIB endpoint table are both re-initialized to zero. A step-by-step example is provided to illustrate the destruction process. Step 1 - Manager requests destruction of an existing row in the frAtmIwfConnectionTable by setting frAtmIwfConnRowStatus to destroy(6) Step 2 - Agent receives the SET request and performs implementation- specific system clean-up actions for the cross-connection row Step 3 - System updates the relevant cross connect information for the frame relay PVC endpoint by setting frPVCEndptAtmIwfConnIndex to 0 Step 4 - System updates the relevant cross connect information for the ATM PVC endpoint as follows: a) System sets frAtmIwfVclCrossConnectIdentifier to 0 b) System sets atmVclOperStatus to 'down(2)' (Note: there is no comparable FRS MIB object) Following the destruction of the FR/ATM cross-connection entry, the manager MAY set the frPVCConnectRowStatus and/or atmVclRowStatus to destroy(6) the associated endpoint entries.3.5.3. Modification Process At the discretion of the agent, a FR/ATM cross-connect may be reconfigured by adding and/or deleting leafs to/from the IWF topology as per the FR/ATM IWF cross-connect creation/destruction procedures. Reconfiguration of traffic/service category parameter values requires release of the FR/ATM IWF cross-connect before those parameter values may be changed for individual frame relay or ATM endpoint segments.4. Object DefinitionsFR-ATM-PVC-SERVICE-IWF-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGINIMPORTS MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, NOTIFICATION-TYPE, mib-2, Integer32, Counter32 FROM SNMPv2-SMIRehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 11]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 RowStatus, TimeStamp FROM SNMPv2-TC MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP, NOTIFICATION-GROUP FROM SNMPv2-CONF AtmVpIdentifier, AtmVcIdentifier FROM ATM-TC-MIB atmVclEntry FROM ATM-MIB InterfaceIndex FROM IF-MIB; frAtmIwfMIB MODULE-IDENTITY LAST-UPDATED "200009280000Z" -- September 28, 2000 ORGANIZATION "IETF Frame Relay Service MIB Working Group" CONTACT-INFO "WG Charter:http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/frnetmib-charter WG-email: frnetmib@sunroof.eng.sun.com Subscribe: frnetmib-request@sunroof.eng.sun.com Email Archive:ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/frnetmib Chair: Andy Malis Vivace Networks, Inc. Email: Andy.Malis@vivacenetworks.com WG editor: Kenneth Rehbehn Megisto Systems, Inc. Email: krehbehn@megisto.com Co-author: Orly Nicklass RAD Data Communications Ltd. EMail: orly_n@rad.co.il Co-author: George Mouradian AT&T Labs EMail: gvm@att.com" DESCRIPTION "The MIB module for monitoring and controlling the Frame Relay/ATM PVC Service Interworking Function." -- -- Revision History --Rehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 12]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 REVISION "200009280000Z" DESCRIPTION "Published asRFC 2955" ::= { mib-2 86 } -- -- Object Identifiers -- frAtmIwfMIBObjects OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { frAtmIwfMIB 1 } frAtmIwfTraps OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { frAtmIwfMIB 2 } frAtmIwfTrapsPrefix OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { frAtmIwfTraps 0 } frAtmIwfConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { frAtmIwfMIB 3 } frAtmIwfGroups OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { frAtmIwfConformance 1 } frAtmIwfCompliances OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { frAtmIwfConformance 2 } -- -- The FR/ATM PVC Service IWF Group -- -- The Frame Relay/ATM PVC Service Interworking Function -- Connection Table contains all connections utilizing -- the interworking function. -- frAtmIwfConnIndexNext OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 (0..2147483647) MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This object contains an appropriate value to be used for frAtmIwfConnIndex when creating entries in the frAtmIwfConnectionTable. The value 0 indicates that no unassigned entries are available. To obtain the frAtmIwfConnIndexNext value for a new entry, the manager issues a management protocol retrieval operation to obtain the current value of this object. After each retrieval, the agent should modify the value to the next unassigned index." ::= { frAtmIwfMIBObjects 1 }Rehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 13]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 frAtmIwfConnectionTable OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF FrAtmIwfConnectionEntry MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "A table in which each row represents a Frame Relay/ATM interworking connection." ::= { frAtmIwfMIBObjects 2 } frAtmIwfConnectionEntry OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX FrAtmIwfConnectionEntry MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The FrAtmIwfConnectionEntry provides an entry for an interworking connection between a frame relay PVC and one or more ATM PVCs, or an ATM PVC and one or more frame relay PVCs. A single frame relay PVC connected to a single ATM PVC is referred to as a `point-to-point' connection and is represented by a single row in the FR/ATM IWF Connection Table. The case of a single frame relay PVC connected to multiple ATM PVCs (or single ATM PVC connected to multiple frame relay PVCs) is referred to as a `point-to-multipoint' connection and is represented by multiple rows in the FR/ATM IWF Connection Table. The object frAtmIwfConnIndex uniquely identifies each point-to-point or point-to-multipoint connection. The manager obtains the frAtmIwfConnIndex value by reading the frAtmIwfConnIndexNext object. After a frAtmIwfConnIndex is assigned for the connection, the manager creates one or more rows in the Cross Connect Table; one for each cross- connection between the frame relay PVC and an ATM PVC. In the case of `point-to-multipoint' connections, all rows are indexed by the same frAtmIwfConnIndex value and MUST refer to the same frame relay PVC or ATM PVC respectively. An entry can be created only when at least one pair of frame relay and ATM PVCs exist. A row can be established by one-step set-request with all required parameter values and frAtmIwfConnRowStatus set to createAndGo(4). TheRehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 14]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 Agent should perform all error checking as needed. A pair of cross-connected PVCs, as identified by a particular value of the indexes, is released by setting frAtmIwfConnRowStatus to destroy(6). The Agent may release all associated resources. The manager may remove the related PVCs thereafter. Indexes are persistent across reboots of the system." INDEX { frAtmIwfConnIndex, frAtmIwfConnAtmPort, frAtmIwfConnVpi, frAtmIwfConnVci, frAtmIwfConnFrPort, frAtmIwfConnDlci } ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionTable 1 } FrAtmIwfConnectionEntry ::= SEQUENCE { frAtmIwfConnIndex Integer32, frAtmIwfConnAtmPort InterfaceIndex, frAtmIwfConnVpi AtmVpIdentifier, frAtmIwfConnVci AtmVcIdentifier, frAtmIwfConnFrPort InterfaceIndex, frAtmIwfConnDlci Integer32, frAtmIwfConnRowStatus RowStatus, frAtmIwfConnAdminStatus INTEGER, frAtmIwfConnAtm2FrOperStatus INTEGER, frAtmIwfConnAtm2FrLastChange TimeStamp, frAtmIwfConnFr2AtmOperStatus INTEGER, frAtmIwfConnFr2AtmLastChange TimeStamp, frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptor Integer32, frAtmIwfConnFailedFrameTranslate Counter32, frAtmIwfConnOverSizedFrames Counter32, frAtmIwfConnFailedAal5PduTranslate Counter32, frAtmIwfConnOverSizedSDUs Counter32, frAtmIwfConnCrcErrors Counter32, frAtmIwfConnSarTimeOuts Counter32 } frAtmIwfConnIndex OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 (1..2147483647) MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "A unique value for each point-to-point or point- to-multipoint connection. The manager obtains the frAtmIwfConnIndex value by reading theRehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 15]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 frAtmIwfConnIndexNext object. A point-to- multipoint connection will be represented in the frAtmIwfConnectionTable with multiple entries that share the same frAtmIwfConnIndex value." ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionEntry 1 } frAtmIwfConnAtmPort OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX InterfaceIndex MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The index in the ifTable that identifies the ATM port for this interworking connection." ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionEntry 2 } frAtmIwfConnVpi OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX AtmVpIdentifier MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The VPI of the ATM PVC end point for this interworking connection." ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionEntry 3 } frAtmIwfConnVci OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX AtmVcIdentifier MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The VCI of the ATM PVC end point for this interworking connection." ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionEntry 4 } frAtmIwfConnFrPort OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX InterfaceIndex MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The index in the ifTable that identifies the frame relay port for this interworking connection." ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionEntry 5 } frAtmIwfConnDlci OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 (16..4194303) MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS currentRehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 16]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 DESCRIPTION "The DLCI that identifies the frame relay PVC end point for this interworking connection." ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionEntry 6 } frAtmIwfConnRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX RowStatus MAX-ACCESS read-create STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The table row may be created with 'createAndWait(5)' or 'createAndGo(4)'. To activate a connection entry, a valid connection descriptor MUST be established in the frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptor object. This object is set to 'destroy(6)' to delete the table row. Before the table row is destroyed, the OperStatus/AdminStatus of the corresponding endpoints MUST be 'down(2)'. The deactivation of the ATM endpoint MAY occur as a side-effect of deleting the FR/ATM IWF cross-connection table row. Otherwise, 'destroy(6)' operation MUST fail (error code 'inconsistentValue')." ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionEntry 7 } frAtmIwfConnAdminStatus OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER { up(1), down(2) } MAX-ACCESS read-create STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The desired operational state for this FR/ATM interworked connection. up(1) = Activate the connection. Before the activation can be completed, the OperStatus/AdminStatus of the corresponding endpoints MUST be 'up(1)'. The activation of the corresponding endpoints MAY occur as a side-effect of activating the FR/ATM IWF cross-connection. down(2) = Deactivate the connection. Before the deactivation can be completed, the atmVclAdminStatus of the corresponding ATM endpoint MUST be 'down(2)'. The deactivation of theRehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 17]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 ATM endpoint MAY occur as a side-effect of deactivating the FR/ATM IWF cross-connection." ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionEntry 8 } frAtmIwfConnAtm2FrOperStatus OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER { up(1), down(2) } MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The current operational state of this interworking connection in the ATM to frame relay direction." ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionEntry 9 } frAtmIwfConnAtm2FrLastChange OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX TimeStamp MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The value of sysUpTime at the time this interworking connection entered its current operational state in the ATM to FR direction. If the current state was entered prior to the last re-initialization of the local network management subsystem, then this object contains a zero value." ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionEntry 10 } frAtmIwfConnFr2AtmOperStatus OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER { up(1), down(2) } MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The current operational state of this interworking connection in the frame relay to ATM direction." ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionEntry 11 } frAtmIwfConnFr2AtmLastChange OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX TimeStamp MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The value of sysUpTime at the time this interworking connection entered its current operational state in the FR to ATM direction. If the current state was entered prior to the lastRehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 18]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 re-initialization of the local network management subsystem, then this object contains a zero value." ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionEntry 12 } frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptor OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 MAX-ACCESS read-create STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The value represents a pointer to the relevant descriptor in the IWF descriptor table. An attempt to set this value to an inactive or non- existent row in the Connection Descriptor Table MUST fail (error code 'inconsistentValue')." ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionEntry 13 } frAtmIwfConnFailedFrameTranslate OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Counter32 UNITS "Frames" MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This object counts the number of frames discarded by the IWF because, while operating in Translation Mode, the IWF is unable to decode the incoming frame payload header according to the mapping rules. (i.e., payload header not recognized by the IWF). Frame relay frames are received in the frame relay to ATM direction of the PVC. When operating in Transparent Mode, the IWF MUST return noSuchInstance." REFERENCE "FRF.8 [17], Section 5.3.1" ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionEntry 14 } frAtmIwfConnOverSizedFrames OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Counter32 UNITS "Frames" MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Count of frames discarded by the IWF because the frame is too large to be processed by the AAL5 segmentation procedure. Specifically, the frameRehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 19]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 does not conform to the size specified in the atmVccAal5CpcsTransmitSduSize object associated with the atmVclEntry at the ATM endpoint. Frame relay frames are received in the frame relay to ATM direction of the PVC." REFERENCE "ATM MIB [21], atmVclTable FRF.8 [17], 5.3.1.4" ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionEntry 15 } frAtmIwfConnFailedAal5PduTranslate OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Counter32 UNITS "PDUs" MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This attribute counts the number of AAL5 PDUs discarded by the IWF because, while operating in Translation Mode, the IWF is unable to decode the incoming AAL5 PDU payload header according to the mapping rules. (i.e., payload header not recognized by the IWF). AAL5 PDUs are received in the ATM to frame relay direction of the PVC. When operating in Transparent Mode, the IWF MUST return noSuchInstance." REFERENCE "FRF.8 [17], Section 5.3.1" ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionEntry 16 } frAtmIwfConnOverSizedSDUs OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Counter32 UNITS "SDUs" MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Count of AAL5 SDUs discarded by the IWF because the SDU is too large to be forwarded on the frame relay segment of the connection. Specifically, the frame does not conform to the size specified in the frLportFragSize object of the FRS MIB [19]. AAL5 PDUs are received in the ATM to frame relay direction of the PVC." REFERENCE "FRS MIB [19], frLportTableRehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 20]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 FRF.8 [17], 5.3.1.4" ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionEntry 17 } frAtmIwfConnCrcErrors OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Counter32 UNITS "PDUs" MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The number of AAL5 CPCS PDUs received with CRC-32 errors on this AAL5 VCC at the IWF. AAL5 PDUs are received in the ATM to frame relay direction of the PVC." REFERENCE "ATM MIB [21], atmVclTable" ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionEntry 18 } frAtmIwfConnSarTimeOuts OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Counter32 UNITS "PDUs" MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The number of partially re-assembled AAL5 CPCS PDUs which were discarded on this AAL5 VCC at the IWF because they were not fully re-assembled within the required time period. If the re- assembly timer is not supported, then this object contains a zero value. AAL5 PDUs are received in the ATM to frame relay direction of the PVC." REFERENCE "ATM MIB [21], atmVclTable" ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionEntry 19 } -- -- The FR/ATM PVC Service IWF Connection Descriptor Group -- -- The Frame Relay/ATM PVC Service Interworking Function -- Connection Descriptor table. A descriptor provides the -- attributes for a type of interworked connection. -- frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorIndexNext OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 (0..2147483647) MAX-ACCESS read-onlyRehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 21]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This object contains an appropriate value to be used for frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorIndex when creating entries in the frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorTable. The value 0 indicates that no unassigned entries are available. To obtain the frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorIndexNext value for a new entry, the manager issues a management protocol retrieval operation to obtain the current value of this object. After each retrieval, the agent should modify the value to the next unassigned index." ::= { frAtmIwfMIBObjects 3 } frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorTable OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF FrAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorEntry MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "A table in which each row represents a descriptor for one type of Frame Relay/ATM interworking connection. A descriptor may be assigned to zero or more FR/ATM PVC service IWF connections." ::= { frAtmIwfMIBObjects 4 } frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorEntry OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX FrAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorEntry MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "An entry for a descriptor in an interworking connection between a frame relay PVC and an ATM PVC." INDEX { frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorIndex } ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorTable 1 } FrAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorEntry ::= SEQUENCE { frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorIndex Integer32, frAtmIwfConnDescriptorRowStatus RowStatus, frAtmIwfConnDeToClpMappingMode INTEGER, frAtmIwfConnClpToDeMappingMode INTEGER, frAtmIwfConnCongestionMappingMode INTEGER, frAtmIwfConnEncapsulationMappingMode INTEGER, frAtmIwfConnEncapsulationMappings BITS, frAtmIwfConnFragAndReassEnabled INTEGER,Rehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 22]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 frAtmIwfConnArpTranslationEnabled INTEGER } frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorIndex OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 (1..2147483647) MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "A unique value to identify a descriptor in the table " ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorEntry 1 } frAtmIwfConnDescriptorRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX RowStatus MAX-ACCESS read-create STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The status of this table row. This object is used to create or delete an entry in the descriptor table. Creation of the row requires a row index (see frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorIndexNext). If not explicitly set or in existence, all other columns of the row will be created and initialized to the default value. During creation, this object MAY be set to 'createAndGo(4)' or 'createAndWait(5)'. The object MUST contain the value 'active(1)' before any connection table entry references the row. To destroy a row in this table, this object is set to the 'destroy(6)' action. Row destruction MUST fail (error code 'inconsistentValue') if any connection references the row." ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorEntry 2 } frAtmIwfConnDeToClpMappingMode OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER { mode1(1), mode2Const0(2), mode2Const1(3) } MAX-ACCESS read-create STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This object describes which mode of translation is in use for loss priority mapping in the frameRehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 23]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 relay to ATM direction. mode1(1) = the DE field in the Q.922 core frame shall be mapped to the ATM CLP field of every cell generated by the segmentation process of the AAL5 PDU containing the information of that frame. mode2Contst0(2) = the ATM CLP field of every cell generated by the segmentation process of the AAL5 PDU containing the information of that frame shall be set to constant 0. mode2Contst1(3) = the ATM CLP field of every cell generated by the segmentation process of the AAL5 PDU containing the information of that frame shall be set to constant 1." REFERENCE "FRF.8 [17], Section 4.2.1" DEFVAL { mode1 } ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorEntry 3 } frAtmIwfConnClpToDeMappingMode OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER { mode1(1), mode2Const0(2), mode2Const1(3) } MAX-ACCESS read-create STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This object describes which mode of translation is in use for loss priority mapping in the ATM to frame relay direction. mode1(1) = if one or more cells in a frame has its CLP field set, the DE field of the Q.922 core frame should be set. mode2Const0(2) = the DE field of the Q.922 core frame should be set to theRehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 24]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 constant 0. mode2Const1(3) = the DE field of the Q.922 core frame should be set to the constant 1." REFERENCE "FRF.8 [17], Section 4.2.2" DEFVAL { mode1 } ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorEntry 4 } frAtmIwfConnCongestionMappingMode OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER { mode1(1), mode2(2) } MAX-ACCESS read-create STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This object describes which mode of translation is in use for forward congestion indication mapping in the frame relay to ATM direction. mode1(1) = The FECN field in the Q.922 core frame shall be mapped to the ATM EFCI field of every cell generated by the segmentation process of the AAL5 PDU containing the information of that frame. mode2(2) = The FECN field in the Q.922 core frame shall not be mapped to the ATM EFCI field of cells generated by the segmentation process of the AAL5 PDU containing the information of that frame. The EFCI field is always set to 'congestion not experienced'. In both of the modes above, if there is congestion in the forward direction in the ATM layer within the IWF, then the IWF can set the EFCI field to 'congestion experienced'." REFERENCE "FRF.8 [17], Section 4.3.1.1" DEFVAL { mode1 } ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorEntry 5 } frAtmIwfConnEncapsulationMappingMode OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER {Rehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 25]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 transparentMode(1), translationMode(2), translationModeAll(3) } MAX-ACCESS read-create STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This object indicates whether the mapping of upper layer protocol encapsulation is enabled on this interworking connection. transparentMode(1) = Forward the encapsulations unaltered. translationMode(2) = Perform mapping between the two encapsulations due to the incompatibilities of the two methods. Mapping is provided for a subset of the potential encapsulations as itemized in frAtmIwfConnEncapsulationMapp ings. translationModeAll(3) = Perform mapping between the two encapsulations due to the incompatibilities of the two methods. All encapsulations are translated." REFERENCE "FRF.8 [17], Section 5.3" DEFVAL { transparentMode } ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorEntry 6 } frAtmIwfConnEncapsulationMappings OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX BITS { none (0), bridgedPdus(1), bridged802dot6(2), bPdus(3), routedIp(4), routedOsi(5), otherRouted(6), x25Iso8202(7), q933q2931(8) } MAX-ACCESS read-create STATUS current DESCRIPTIONRehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 26]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 "If upper layer protocol encapsulation mapping is enabled on this interworking connection, then this attribute enumerates which of the encapsulation mappings are supported. none(0) = Transparent mode operation bridgedPdus(1) = PID: 0x00-01,-07,-02 or -08 bridged802dot6(2) = PID: 0x00-0B bPdus(3) = PID: 0x00-0E or -0F routedIp(4) = NLPID: OxCC routedOsi(5) = NLPID: Ox81, 0x82 or 0x83 otherRouted(6) = Other routed protocols x25Iso8202(7) = X25 q933q2931(8) = Q.933 and Q.2931" REFERENCE "FRF.8 [17], Section 5.3.1" DEFVAL { { none } } ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorEntry 7 } frAtmIwfConnFragAndReassEnabled OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER { enabled(1), disabled(2)} MAX-ACCESS read-create STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The attribute indicates whether fragmentation and reassembly is enabled for this connection." REFERENCE "FRF.8 [17], Section 5.3.1.4" DEFVAL { disabled } ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorEntry 8 } frAtmIwfConnArpTranslationEnabled OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER { enabled(1), disabled(2)} MAX-ACCESS read-create STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The attribute indicates whether ARP translation is enabled for this connection." REFERENCE "FRF.8 [17], Section 5.4" DEFVAL { disabled } ::= { frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorEntry 9 } -- -- Augmentation of ATM MIB VCL Endpoint Table (atmVclTable) -- frAtmIwfVclTable OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF FrAtmIwfVclEntryRehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 27]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The FR/ATM IWF VCL Table augments the ATM MIB VCL Endpoint table." ::= { frAtmIwfMIBObjects 5 } frAtmIwfVclEntry OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX FrAtmIwfVclEntry MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Entries in this table are created only by the agent. One entry exists for each ATM VCL managed by the agent." AUGMENTS { atmVclEntry } ::= { frAtmIwfVclTable 1 } FrAtmIwfVclEntry ::= SEQUENCE { frAtmIwfVclCrossConnectIdentifier Integer32 } frAtmIwfVclCrossConnectIdentifier OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 (1..2147483647) MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This object contains the index value of the FR/ATM cross-connect table entry used to link the ATM VCL with a frame relay PVC. Each row of the atmVclTable that is not cross- connected with a frame relay PVC MUST return the value zero when this object is read. In the case of (frame relay) point to (ATM) multipoint, multiple ATM VCLs will have the same value of this object, and all their cross- connections are identified by entries that are indexed by the same value of frAtmIwfVclCrossConnectIdentifier in the frAtmIwfConnectionTable of this MIB module. The value of this object is initialized by the agent after the associated entries in the frAtmIwfConnectionTable have been created." ::= { frAtmIwfVclEntry 1 }Rehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 28]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 -- -- Frame Relay/ATM PVC Service Interworking NOTIFICATION -- frAtmIwfConnStatusChange NOTIFICATION-TYPE OBJECTS { frAtmIwfConnAdminStatus, frAtmIwfConnAtm2FrOperStatus, frAtmIwfConnFr2AtmOperStatus } STATUS current DESCRIPTION "An indication that the status of this interworking connection has changed." ::= { frAtmIwfTrapsPrefix 1 } -- -- Conformance Information -- -- -- Compliance Statement For Equipment -- frAtmIwfEquipmentCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The compliance statement for equipment that implements the FR/ATM Interworking MIB." MODULE -- this module MANDATORY-GROUPS { frAtmIwfBasicGroup, frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorGroup, frAtmIwfAtmVclTableAugmentGroup, frAtmIwfNotificationsGroup } OBJECT frAtmIwfConnDeToClpMappingMode SYNTAX INTEGER { mode1(1) } DESCRIPTION "Only support for Mode 1 is REQUIRED." OBJECT frAtmIwfConnClpToDeMappingMode SYNTAX INTEGER { mode1(1) } DESCRIPTION "Only support for Mode 1 is REQUIRED." OBJECT frAtmIwfConnCongestionMappingMode SYNTAX INTEGER { mode1(1) } DESCRIPTIONRehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 29]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 "Only support for Mode 1 is REQUIRED." OBJECT frAtmIwfConnEncapsulationMappingMode SYNTAX INTEGER { transparentMode(1) } DESCRIPTION "Support for Translation Mode is OPTIONAL." OBJECT frAtmIwfConnEncapsulationMappings SYNTAX BITS { none(0) } DESCRIPTION "The IWF may provide one, some or none of the encapsulation translations defined insection5.3.1 of FRF.8 [17]." OBJECT frAtmIwfConnFragAndReassEnabled SYNTAX INTEGER { disabled(2) } DESCRIPTION "Only support for Mode 1 is REQUIRED." OBJECT frAtmIwfConnArpTranslationEnabled SYNTAX INTEGER { disabled(2) } DESCRIPTION "Support for ARP Translation is NOT REQUIRED." ::= { frAtmIwfCompliances 1 } -- -- Compliance Statement For Service (CNM Interface) -- frAtmIwfServiceCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The compliance statement for a CNM interface that implements the FR/ATM Interworking MIB." MODULE -- this module MANDATORY-GROUPS { frAtmIwfBasicGroup, frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorGroup, frAtmIwfAtmVclTableAugmentGroup, frAtmIwfNotificationsGroup } -- -- Exceptions for each object type implemented for a -- CNM view of the FR/ATM Interworking MIB -- OBJECT frAtmIwfConnAdminStatus MIN-ACCESS read-onlyRehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 30]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 DESCRIPTION "Write access is not REQUIRED." OBJECT frAtmIwfConnDeToClpMappingMode SYNTAX INTEGER { mode1(1) } MIN-ACCESS read-only DESCRIPTION "Support for Mode 1 is REQUIRED. Other modes are OPTIONAL. Write access is NOT REQUIRED." OBJECT frAtmIwfConnClpToDeMappingMode SYNTAX INTEGER { mode1(1) } MIN-ACCESS read-only DESCRIPTION "Support for Mode 1 is REQUIRED. Other modes are OPTIONAL. Write access is NOT REQUIRED." OBJECT frAtmIwfConnCongestionMappingMode SYNTAX INTEGER { mode1(1) } MIN-ACCESS read-only DESCRIPTION "Support for Mode 1 is REQUIRED. Other modes are OPTIONAL. Write access is NOT REQUIRED." OBJECT frAtmIwfConnEncapsulationMappingMode SYNTAX INTEGER { transparentMode(1) } MIN-ACCESS read-only DESCRIPTION "Support for Transparent Mode is REQUIRED. Translation Mode is OPTIONAL. Write access is not required." OBJECT frAtmIwfConnEncapsulationMappings SYNTAX BITS { none(0) } MIN-ACCESS read-only DESCRIPTION "The IWF may provide one, some or none of the encapsulation translations defined insection5.3.1 of FRF.8 [17]. Write access is not required." OBJECT frAtmIwfConnFragAndReassEnabled SYNTAX INTEGER { disabled(2) } MIN-ACCESS read-only DESCRIPTION "Support for Fragmentation and Reassembly is NOT REQUIRED. Write access is not required."Rehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 31]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 OBJECT frAtmIwfConnArpTranslationEnabled SYNTAX INTEGER { disabled(2) } MIN-ACCESS read-only DESCRIPTION "Support for ARP Translation is not required. Write access is not required." OBJECT frAtmIwfConnRowStatus MIN-ACCESS read-only DESCRIPTION "Write access is not required." ::= { frAtmIwfCompliances 2 } -- -- Units of Conformance -- -- -- Basic FR/ATM IWF PVC Connection Group -- frAtmIwfBasicGroup OBJECT-GROUP OBJECTS { frAtmIwfConnIndexNext, frAtmIwfConnAdminStatus, frAtmIwfConnAtm2FrOperStatus, frAtmIwfConnAtm2FrLastChange, frAtmIwfConnFr2AtmOperStatus, frAtmIwfConnFr2AtmLastChange, frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptor, frAtmIwfConnFailedFrameTranslate, frAtmIwfConnOverSizedFrames, frAtmIwfConnFailedAal5PduTranslate, frAtmIwfConnOverSizedSDUs, frAtmIwfConnCrcErrors, frAtmIwfConnSarTimeOuts, frAtmIwfConnRowStatus } STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The collection of basic objects for configuration and control of FR/ATM interworking connections." ::= { frAtmIwfGroups 1 } -- -- FR/ATM IWF PVC Connection Descriptor Group -- frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorGroup OBJECT-GROUP OBJECTS {Rehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 32]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 frAtmIwfConnectionDescriptorIndexNext, frAtmIwfConnDeToClpMappingMode, frAtmIwfConnClpToDeMappingMode, frAtmIwfConnCongestionMappingMode, frAtmIwfConnEncapsulationMappingMode, frAtmIwfConnEncapsulationMappings, frAtmIwfConnFragAndReassEnabled, frAtmIwfConnArpTranslationEnabled, frAtmIwfConnDescriptorRowStatus } STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The collection of basic objects for specification of FR/ATM interworking connection descriptors." ::= { frAtmIwfGroups 2 } -- -- ATM MIB VCL Endpoint Table Augmentation Group -- frAtmIwfAtmVclTableAugmentGroup OBJECT-GROUP OBJECTS { frAtmIwfVclCrossConnectIdentifier } STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The ATM MIB VCL Endpoint Table AUGMENT object contained in the FR/ATM PVC Service Interworking MIB." ::= { frAtmIwfGroups 3 } -- -- Notification Group -- frAtmIwfNotificationsGroup NOTIFICATION-GROUP NOTIFICATIONS { frAtmIwfConnStatusChange } STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The notification for FR/ATM interworking status change." ::= { frAtmIwfGroups 4 } ENDRehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 33]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 20008. Acknowledgments This document was produced by the Frame Relay Service MIB Working Group. The Editors thank Bert Wijnen, Kaj Tesink, Keith McCloghrie, and David Perkins for providing many helpful comments and suggestions.9. References [1] Harrington, D., Presuhn, R. and B. Wijnen, "An Architecture for Describing SNMP Management Frameworks",RFC 2571, April 1999. [2] Rose, M. and K. McCloghrie, "Structure and Identification of Management Information for TCP/IP-based Internets", STD 16,RFC1155, May 1990. [3] Rose, M. and K. McCloghrie, "Concise MIB Definitions", STD 16,RFC 1212, March 1991. [4] Rose, M., "A Convention for Defining Traps for use with the SNMP",RFC 1215, March 1991. [5] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Structure of Management Information Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58,RFC 2578, April 1999. [6] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Textual Conventions for SMIv2", STD 58,RFC 2579, April 1999. [7] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Conformance Statements for SMIv2", STD 58,RFC 2580, April 1999. [8] Case, J., Fedor, M., Schoffstall, M. and J. Davin, "Simple Network Management Protocol", STD 15,RFC 1157, May 1990. [9] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Introduction to Community-based SNMPv2",RFC 1901, January 1996. [10] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Transport Mappings for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)",RFC 1906, January 1996.Rehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 34]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 [11] Case, J., Harrington D., Presuhn R. and B. Wijnen, "Message Processing and Dispatching for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)",RFC 2572, April 1999. [12] Blumenthal, U. and B. Wijnen, "User-based Security Model (USM) for version 3 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv3)",RFC 2574, April 1999. [13] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Protocol Operations for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)",RFC 1905, January 1996. [14] Levi, D., Meyer, P. and B. Stewart, "SNMPv3 Applications",RFC2573, April 1999. [15] Wijnen, B., Presuhn, R. and K. McCloghrie, "View-based Access Control Model (VACM) for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)",RFC 2575, April 1999. [16] Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D. and B. Stewart, "Introduction to Version 3 of the Internet-standard Network Management Framework",RFC 2570, April 1999. [17] Frame Relay/ATM PVC Service Interworking Implementation Agreement, Frame Relay Forum, Document Number FRF.8.1, March, 2000. [18] Noto, M., Spiegel, E. and K. Tesink, "Definitions of Textual Conventions and OBJECT-IDENTITIES for ATM Management",RFC 2514, February 1999. [19] Rehbehn, K. and D. Fowler, "Definitions of Managed Objects for Frame Relay Service",RFC 2954, October 2000. [20] Frame Relay/ATM PVC Network Interworking Implementation Agreement, Frame Relay Forum, Document Number FRF.5, December 20, 1994. [21] Tesink, K., "Definitions of Managed Objects for ATM Management",RFC 2515, February 1999. [22] McCloghrie, K. and F. Kastenholz, "The Interfaces Group MIB",RFC 2863, June 2000. [23] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119, March 1997.Rehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 35]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 2000 [24] Brown, C. and F. Baker, "Management Information Base for Frame Relay DTEs Using SMIv2",RFC 2115, September 1997.10. Security Considerations There are a number of management objects defined in this MIB that have a MAX-ACCESS clause of read-write and/or read-create. Such objects may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. The support for SET operations in a non-secure environment without proper protection can have a negative effect on network operations. No managed objects in this MIB contain sensitive information. SNMPv1 by itself is not a secure environment. Even if the network itself is secure (for example by using IPSec), even then, there is no control as to who on the secure network is allowed to access and GET/SET (read/change/create/delete) the objects in this MIB. It is recommended that the implementers consider the security features as provided by the SNMPv3 framework. Specifically, the use of the User-based Security ModelRFC 2574 [12] and the View-based Access Control ModelRFC 2575 [15] is recommended. It is then a customer/user responsibility to ensure that the SNMP entity giving access to an instance of this MIB, is properly configured to give access to the objects only to those principals (users) that have legitimate rights to indeed GET or SET (change/create/delete) them.Rehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 36]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 200011. Authors' Addresses Kenneth Rehbehn Megisto Systems, Inc. 20251 Century Boulevard Germantown, MD, USA 20874 Phone: +1 (301) 515-3672 EMail: krehbehn@megisto.com Orly Nicklass RAD Data Communications, Ltd. 12 Hanechoshet St. Tel Aviv 69710 Israel Phone: +972 (3) 6459588 EMail: orly_n@rad.co.il George Mouradian AT&T Labs, Room 1G-325 101 Crawfords Corner Road Holmdel, NJ USA 07733 Phone: +1 908 949 7671 EMail: gvm@att.comRehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 37]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 200012. Intellectual Property Rights The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on the IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and standards-related documentation can be found inBCP-11. Copies of claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF Secretariat. The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice this standard. Please address the information to the IETF Executive Director.Rehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 38]
RFC 2955 FR to ATM Service Interworking MIB October 200013. Full Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000). All Rights Reserved. This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than English. The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns. This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.Acknowledgement Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the Internet Society.Rehbehn, et al. Standards Track [Page 39]
[8]ページ先頭