Movatterモバイル変換
[0]ホーム
[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]
PROPOSED STANDARD
Network Working Group F. KastenholzRequest for Comments: 1471 FTP Software, Inc. June 1993The Definitions of Managed Objects forthe Link Control Protocol ofthe Point-to-Point ProtocolStatus of this Memo This RFC specifies an IAB standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "IAB Official Protocol Standards" for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.Abstract This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP-based internets. In particular, it describes managed objects used for managing the Link Control Protocol and Link Quality Monitoring on subnetwork interfaces that use the family of Point-to-Point Protocols [8, 9, 10, 11, & 12].Table of Contents1. The Network Management Framework ......................22. Objects ...............................................22.1 Format of Definitions ................................23. Overview ..............................................23.1 Object Selection Criteria ............................23.2 Structure of the PPP .................................33.3 MIB Groups ...........................................4 3.4 Relationship to Interface and Interface Extensions Groups ...............................................54. Definitions ...........................................64.1 PPP Link Group .......................................74.2 PPP LQR Group ........................................164.3 PPP LQR Extensions Group .............................214.4 PPP Tests ............................................224.4.1 PPP Echo Test ......................................224.4.2 PPP Discard Test ...................................235. Acknowledgements ......................................236. Security Considerations ...............................237. References ............................................248. Author's Address ......................................25Kastenholz [Page 1]
RFC 1471 PPP/LCP MIB June 19931. The Network Management Framework The Internet-standard Network Management Framework consists of three components. They are: STD 16/RFC 1155 which defines the SMI, the mechanisms used for describing and naming objects for the purpose of management. STD 16/RFC 1212 defines a more concise description mechanism, which is wholly consistent with the SMI. STD 17/RFC 1213 which defines MIB-II, the core set of managed objects for the Internet suite of protocols. STD 15/RFC 1157 which defines the SNMP, the protocol used for network access to managed objects. The Framework permits new objects to be defined for the purpose of experimentation and evaluation.2. Objects Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed the Management Information Base or MIB. Objects in the MIB are defined using the subset of Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) [3] defined in the SMI. In particular, each object type is named by an OBJECT IDENTIFIER, an administratively assigned name. The object type together with an object instance serves to uniquely identify a specific instantiation of the object. For human convenience, we often use a textual string, termed the descriptor, to refer to the object type.2.1. Format of DefinitionsSection 4 contains the specification of all object types contained in this MIB module. The object types are defined using the conventions defined in the SMI, as amended by the extensions specified in [5,6].3. Overview3.1. Object Selection Criteria To be consistent with IAB directives and good engineering practice, an explicit attempt was made to keep this MIB as simple as possible. This was accomplished by applying the following criteria to objects proposed for inclusion: (1) Require objects be essential for either fault or configuration management. In particular, objects forKastenholz [Page 2]
RFC 1471 PPP/LCP MIB June 1993 which the sole purpose was to debug implementations were explicitly excluded from the MIB. (2) Consider evidence of current use and/or utility. (3) Limit the total number of objects. (4) Exclude objects which are simply derivable from others in this or other MIBs.3.2. Structure of the PPP This section describes the basic model of PPP used in developing the PPP MIB. This information should be useful to the implementor in understanding some of the basic design decisions of the MIB. The PPP is not one single protocol but a large family of protocols. Each of these is, in itself, a fairly complex protocol. The PPP protocols may be divided into three rough categories: Control Protocols The Control Protocols are used to control the operation of the PPP. The Control Protocols include the Link Control Protocol (LCP), the Password Authentication Protocol (PAP), the Link Quality Report (LQR), and the Challenge Handshake Authentication Protocol (CHAP). Network Protocols The Network Protocols are used to move the network traffic over the PPP interface. A Network Protocol encapsulates the datagrams of a specific higher-layer protocol that is using the PPP as a data link. Note that within the context of PPP, the term "Network Protocol" does not imply an OSI Layer-3 protocol; for instance, there is a Bridging network protocol. Network Control Protocols (NCPs) The NCPs are used to control the operation of the Network Protocols. Generally, each Network Protocol has its own Network Control Protocol; thus, the IP Network Protocol has its IP Control Protocol, the Bridging Network Protocol has its Bridging Network Control Protocol and so on. This document specifies the objects used in managing one of these protocols, namely the Link Control Protocol and Link Quality Monitoring Protocol.Kastenholz [Page 3]
RFC 1471 PPP/LCP MIB June 19933.3. MIB Groups Objects in this MIB are arranged into several MIB groups. Each group is organized as a set of related objects. These groups are the basic unit of conformance: if the semantics of a group are applicable to an implementation then all objects in the group must be implemented. The PPP MIB is organized into several MIB Groups, including, but not limited to, the following groups: o The PPP Link Group o The PPP LQR Group o The PPP LQR Extensions Group o The PPP IP Group o The PPP Bridge Group o The PPP Security Group This document specifies the following groups: The PPP Link Group This group represents the lowest "level" of the PPP protocol. This group contains two tables, one containing status information and the other configuration information. The configuration table is split off of the status so that it may be placed in a separate MIB View for security purposes. Implementation of this group is mandatory for all PPP implementations. The PPP LQR Group This group provides the basic MIB variables that apply to the PPP LQR Protocol. This group provides MIB access to the information required for LQR processing. This group contains two tables, one containing status information and the other configuration information. The configuration table is split off of the status so that it may be placed in a separate MIB View for security purposes. Implementation of the PPP LQR Group is mandatory for all PPP implementations that implement LQR. The PPP LQR Extensions Group The PPP LQR Extensions group contains the most recently received LQR packet, as well as the "save" fields that are "logically appended" [12] to received LQR packets. This is done in order toKastenholz [Page 4]
RFC 1471 PPP/LCP MIB June 1993 facilitate external implementations of the Link Quality Monitoring policies. It is not practical to examine the relevant MIB objects which are used to generate LQR packets since LQR policies may require synchronization of the values of all data used to determine Link Quality; i.e., the values of the relevant counters must all be taken at the same instant in time. Thus, by recording the last received LQR packet, a synchronized record of the relevant data is available. As this information may not be efficiently maintained on all PPP implementations, implementation of this group is optional.3.4. Relationship to Interface and Interface Extensions Groups The PPP Mib is a medium-specific extension to the standard MIB-2 interface group [2] and to the Interface Extensions MIB [7]. This section discusses certain components of these groups when the interface is a PPP interface. The PPP interface represents a single interface in the sense used in [2] and thus has a single entry in the ifTable. Furthermore, the PPP interface may be operating over a lower layer hardware interface (such as an RS-232 port). It is important to capture the relationship between the PPP interface and the lower- layer interface over which it operates. This MIB presumes that the lower-layer interface has an ifEntry associated with it. The lower- layer ifEntry is identified via the pppLinkStatusPhysicalIndex object, which contains the value of ifIndex for the lower-layer ifEntry. For example, suppose that you run PPP over a RS-232 port. This would use two entries in the ifTable. Let's suppose that entry number 123 is for the PPP "interface" and entry number 987 is for the RS-232 port. So, ifSpecific.123 would contain the ppp OBJECT IDENTIFIER, pppLinkStatusPhysicalIndex.123 would contain 987, and ifSpecific.987 would contain the rs_232 OBJECT IDENTIFIER (or whatever it is). All PPP packets are defined in [8] as being broadcast packets. Thus, the packets are counted as non-unicast packets in the ifTable (ifInNUcastPkts and ifOutNUCastPkts) and as broadcasts in the ifExtnsTable (ifExtnsBroadcastsReceivedOks and ifExtnsBroadcastsTransmittedOks).Kastenholz [Page 5]
RFC 1471 PPP/LCP MIB June 1993 ifSpecific Contains the OBJECT IDENTIFIER ppp. ifAdminStatus Setting this object to up will inject an administrative open event into the LCP's finite state machine. Setting this object to down will inject an administrative close event into the LCP's finite state machine. The use of the testing value is beyond the scope of this document. ifOperStatus Represents the state of the LCP Finite State Machine. If the Finite State Machine is in the Opened state then the value of ifOperStatus is up, otherwise the value of ifOperStatus is down. The meaning of the testing value is beyond the scope of this document. Per the SNMP Protocol Specification [13], the linkUp and linkDown traps apply to the PPP Protocol entity. When the LCP's Finite State Machine attains the Opened state, a linkUp trap should be sent. When the Finite State Machine leaves the Opened state, a linkDown trap should be sent. Some tests for the link are defined in this document. Execution of these tests does not place the link's ifOperStatus in the testing state as these tests do not prevent normal data transmission from occuring over the link.4. Definitions PPP-LCP-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN IMPORTS Counter FROMRFC1155-SMI ifIndex, transmission FROMRFC1213-MIB OBJECT-TYPE FROMRFC-1212; -- PPP MIB ppp OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { transmission 23 } pppLcp OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { ppp 1 }Kastenholz [Page 6]
RFC 1471 PPP/LCP MIB June 1993 -- The individual groups within the PPP-LCP-MIB pppLink OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { pppLcp 1 } pppLqr OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { pppLcp 2 } pppTests OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { pppLcp 3 } -- 4.1. PPP Link Group -- -- The PPP Link Group. Implementation of this -- group is mandatory for all PPP entities. -- -- The following object reflect the values of the option -- parameters used in the PPP Link Control Protocol -- pppLinkStatusLocalMRU -- pppLinkStatusRemoteMRU -- pppLinkStatusLocalToPeerACCMap -- pppLinkStatusPeerToLocalACCMap -- pppLinkStatusLocalToRemoteProtocolCompression -- pppLinkStatusRemoteToLocalProtocolCompression -- pppLinkStatusLocalToRemoteACCompression -- pppLinkStatusRemoteToLocalACCompression -- pppLinkStatusTransmitFcsSize -- pppLinkStatusReceiveFcsSize -- -- These values are not available until after the PPP Option -- negotiation has completed, which is indicated by the link -- reaching the open state (i.e., ifOperStatus is set to -- up). -- -- Therefore, when ifOperStatus is not up -- the contents of these objects is undefined. The value -- returned when accessing the objects is an implementation -- dependent issue. pppLinkStatusTable OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF PppLinkStatusEntry ACCESS not-accessible STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "A table containing PPP-link specific variables for this PPP implementation." ::= { pppLink 1 }Kastenholz [Page 7]
RFC 1471 PPP/LCP MIB June 1993 pppLinkStatusEntry OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX PppLinkStatusEntry ACCESS not-accessible STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "Management information about a particular PPP Link." INDEX { ifIndex } ::= { pppLinkStatusTable 1 } PppLinkStatusEntry ::= SEQUENCE { pppLinkStatusPhysicalIndex INTEGER, pppLinkStatusBadAddresses Counter, pppLinkStatusBadControls Counter, pppLinkStatusPacketTooLongs Counter, pppLinkStatusBadFCSs Counter, pppLinkStatusLocalMRU INTEGER, pppLinkStatusRemoteMRU INTEGER, pppLinkStatusLocalToPeerACCMap OCTET STRING, pppLinkStatusPeerToLocalACCMap OCTET STRING, pppLinkStatusLocalToRemoteProtocolCompression INTEGER, pppLinkStatusRemoteToLocalProtocolCompression INTEGER, pppLinkStatusLocalToRemoteACCompression INTEGER, pppLinkStatusRemoteToLocalACCompression INTEGER, pppLinkStatusTransmitFcsSize INTEGER, pppLinkStatusReceiveFcsSize INTEGER } pppLinkStatusPhysicalIndex OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER(0..2147483647) ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTIONKastenholz [Page 8]
RFC 1471 PPP/LCP MIB June 1993 "The value of ifIndex that identifies the lower-level interface over which this PPP Link is operating. This interface would usually be an HDLC or RS-232 type of interface. If there is no lower-layer interface element, or there is no ifEntry for the element, or the element can not be identified, then the value of this object is 0. For example, suppose that PPP is operating over a serial port. This would use two entries in the ifTable. The PPP could be running over `interface' number 123 and the serial port could be running over `interface' number 987. Therefore, ifSpecific.123 would contain the OBJECT IDENTIFIER ppp pppLinkStatusPhysicalIndex.123 would contain 987, and ifSpecific.987 would contain the OBJECT IDENTIFIER for the serial-port's media- specific MIB." ::= { pppLinkStatusEntry 1 } pppLinkStatusBadAddresses OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Counter ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The number of packets received with an incorrect Address Field. This counter is a component of the ifInErrors variable that is associated with the interface that represents this PPP Link." REFERENCE "Section 3.1, Address Field, ofRFC1331." ::= { pppLinkStatusEntry 2 } pppLinkStatusBadControls OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Counter ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The number of packets received on this link with an incorrect Control Field. This counter is a component of the ifInErrors variable that is associated with the interface that represents this PPP Link." REFERENCE "Section 3.1, Control Field, ofRFC1331."Kastenholz [Page 9]
RFC 1471 PPP/LCP MIB June 1993 ::= { pppLinkStatusEntry 3 } pppLinkStatusPacketTooLongs OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Counter ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The number of received packets that have been discarded because their length exceeded the MRU. This counter is a component of the ifInErrors variable that is associated with the interface that represents this PPP Link. NOTE, packets which are longer than the MRU but which are successfully received and processed are NOT included in this count." ::= { pppLinkStatusEntry 4 } pppLinkStatusBadFCSs OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Counter ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The number of received packets that have been discarded due to having an incorrect FCS. This counter is a component of the ifInErrors variable that is associated with the interface that represents this PPP Link." ::= { pppLinkStatusEntry 5 } pppLinkStatusLocalMRU OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER(1..2147483648) ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The current value of the MRU for the local PPP Entity. This value is the MRU that the remote entity is using when sending packets to the local PPP entity. The value of this object is meaningful only when the link has reached the open state (ifOperStatus is up)." ::= { pppLinkStatusEntry 6 } pppLinkStatusRemoteMRU OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER(1..2147483648)Kastenholz [Page 10]
RFC 1471 PPP/LCP MIB June 1993 ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The current value of the MRU for the remote PPP Entity. This value is the MRU that the local entity is using when sending packets to the remote PPP entity. The value of this object is meaningful only when the link has reached the open state (ifOperStatus is up)." ::= { pppLinkStatusEntry 7 } pppLinkStatusLocalToPeerACCMap OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (4)) ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The current value of the ACC Map used for sending packets from the local PPP entity to the remote PPP entity. The value of this object is meaningful only when the link has reached the open state (ifOperStatus is up)." ::= { pppLinkStatusEntry 8 } pppLinkStatusPeerToLocalACCMap OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (4)) ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The ACC Map used by the remote PPP entity when transmitting packets to the local PPP entity. The value of this object is meaningful only when the link has reached the open state (ifOperStatus is up)." ::= { pppLinkStatusEntry 9 } pppLinkStatusLocalToRemoteProtocolCompression OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER { enabled(1), disabled(2) } ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "Indicates whether the local PPP entity willKastenholz [Page 11]
RFC 1471 PPP/LCP MIB June 1993 use Protocol Compression when transmitting packets to the remote PPP entity. The value of this object is meaningful only when the link has reached the open state (ifOperStatus is up)." ::= { pppLinkStatusEntry 10 } pppLinkStatusRemoteToLocalProtocolCompression OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER { enabled(1), disabled(2) } ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "Indicates whether the remote PPP entity will use Protocol Compression when transmitting packets to the local PPP entity. The value of this object is meaningful only when the link has reached the open state (ifOperStatus is up)." ::= { pppLinkStatusEntry 11 } pppLinkStatusLocalToRemoteACCompression OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER { enabled(1), disabled(2) } ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "Indicates whether the local PPP entity will use Address and Control Compression when transmitting packets to the remote PPP entity. The value of this object is meaningful only when the link has reached the open state (ifOperStatus is up)." ::= { pppLinkStatusEntry 12 } pppLinkStatusRemoteToLocalACCompression OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER { enabled(1), disabled(2) }Kastenholz [Page 12]
RFC 1471 PPP/LCP MIB June 1993 ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "Indicates whether the remote PPP entity will use Address and Control Compression when transmitting packets to the local PPP entity. The value of this object is meaningful only when the link has reached the open state (ifOperStatus is up)." ::= { pppLinkStatusEntry 13 } pppLinkStatusTransmitFcsSize OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER (0..128) ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The size of the Frame Check Sequence (FCS) in bits that the local node will generate when sending packets to the remote node. The value of this object is meaningful only when the link has reached the open state (ifOperStatus is up)." ::= { pppLinkStatusEntry 14 } pppLinkStatusReceiveFcsSize OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER (0..128) ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The size of the Frame Check Sequence (FCS) in bits that the remote node will generate when sending packets to the local node. The value of this object is meaningful only when the link has reached the open state (ifOperStatus is up)." ::= { pppLinkStatusEntry 15 } pppLinkConfigTable OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF PppLinkConfigEntry ACCESS not-accessible STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "A table containing the LCP configuration parameters for this PPP Link. These variables represent the initial configuration of the PPPKastenholz [Page 13]
RFC 1471 PPP/LCP MIB June 1993 Link. The actual values of the parameters may be changed when the link is brought up via the LCP options negotiation mechanism." ::= { pppLink 2 } pppLinkConfigEntry OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX PppLinkConfigEntry ACCESS not-accessible STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "Configuration information about a particular PPP Link." INDEX { ifIndex } ::= { pppLinkConfigTable 1 } PppLinkConfigEntry ::= SEQUENCE { pppLinkConfigInitialMRU INTEGER, pppLinkConfigReceiveACCMap OCTET STRING, pppLinkConfigTransmitACCMap OCTET STRING, pppLinkConfigMagicNumber INTEGER, pppLinkConfigFcsSize INTEGER } pppLinkConfigInitialMRU OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER(0..2147483647) ACCESS read-write STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The initial Maximum Receive Unit (MRU) that the local PPP entity will advertise to the remote entity. If the value of this variable is 0 then the local PPP entity will not advertise any MRU to the remote entity and the default MRU will be assumed. Changing this object will have effect when the link is next restarted." REFERENCE "Section 7.2, Maximum Receive Unit ofRFC1331." DEFVAL { 1500 } ::= { pppLinkConfigEntry 1 }Kastenholz [Page 14]
RFC 1471 PPP/LCP MIB June 1993 pppLinkConfigReceiveACCMap OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (4)) ACCESS read-write STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The Asynchronous-Control-Character-Map (ACC) that the local PPP entity requires for use on its receive side. In effect, this is the ACC Map that is required in order to ensure that the local modem will successfully receive all characters. The actual ACC map used on the receive side of the link will be a combination of the local node's pppLinkConfigReceiveACCMap and the remote node's pppLinkConfigTransmitACCMap. Changing this object will have effect when the link is next restarted." REFERENCE "Section 7.3, page 4, Async-Control-Character- Map ofRFC1331." DEFVAL { 'ffffffff'h } ::= { pppLinkConfigEntry 2 } pppLinkConfigTransmitACCMap OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (4)) ACCESS read-write STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The Asynchronous-Control-Character-Map (ACC) that the local PPP entity requires for use on its transmit side. In effect, this is the ACC Map that is required in order to ensure that all characters can be successfully transmitted through the local modem. The actual ACC map used on the transmit side of the link will be a combination of the local node's pppLinkConfigTransmitACCMap and the remote node's pppLinkConfigReceiveACCMap. Changing this object will have effect when the link is next restarted." REFERENCE "Section 7.3, page 4, Async-Control-Character- Map ofRFC1331." DEFVAL { 'ffffffff'h } ::= { pppLinkConfigEntry 3 }Kastenholz [Page 15]
RFC 1471 PPP/LCP MIB June 1993 pppLinkConfigMagicNumber OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER {false (1), true (2)} ACCESS read-write STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "If true(2) then the local node will attempt to perform Magic Number negotiation with the remote node. If false(1) then this negotiation is not performed. In any event, the local node will comply with any magic number negotiations attempted by the remote node, per the PPP specification. Changing this object will have effect when the link is next restarted." REFERENCE "Section 7.6, Magic Number, ofRFC1331." DEFVAL { false } ::= { pppLinkConfigEntry 4 } pppLinkConfigFcsSize OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER (0..128) ACCESS read-write STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The size of the FCS, in bits, the local node will attempt to negotiate for use with the remote node. Regardless of the value of this object, the local node will comply with any FCS size negotiations initiated by the remote node, per the PPP specification. Changing this object will have effect when the link is next restarted." DEFVAL { 16 } ::= { pppLinkConfigEntry 5 } -- 4.2. PPP LQR Group -- -- The PPP LQR Group. -- Implementation of this group is mandatory for all -- PPP implementations that implement LQR. -- pppLqrTable OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF PppLqrEntry ACCESS not-accessibleKastenholz [Page 16]
RFC 1471 PPP/LCP MIB June 1993 STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "Table containing the LQR parameters and statistics for the local PPP entity." ::= { pppLqr 1 } pppLqrEntry OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX PppLqrEntry ACCESS not-accessible STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "LQR information for a particular PPP link. A PPP link will have an entry in this table if and only if LQR Quality Monitoring has been successfully negotiated for said link." INDEX { ifIndex } ::= { pppLqrTable 1 } PppLqrEntry ::= SEQUENCE { pppLqrQuality INTEGER, pppLqrInGoodOctets Counter, pppLqrLocalPeriod INTEGER, pppLqrRemotePeriod INTEGER, pppLqrOutLQRs Counter, pppLqrInLQRs Counter } pppLqrQuality OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER { good(1), bad(2), not-determined(3) } ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The current quality of the link as declared by the local PPP entity's Link-Quality Management modules. No effort is made to define good or bad, nor the policy used to determine it. TheKastenholz [Page 17]
RFC 1471 PPP/LCP MIB June 1993 not-determined value indicates that the entity does not actually evaluate the link's quality. This value is used to disambiguate the `determined to be good' case from the `no determination made and presumed to be good' case." ::= { pppLqrEntry 1 } pppLqrInGoodOctets OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Counter ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The LQR InGoodOctets counter for this link." REFERENCE "Section 2.2, Counters, ofRFC1333." ::= { pppLqrEntry 2 } pppLqrLocalPeriod OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER(1..2147483648) ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The LQR reporting period, in hundredths of a second that is in effect for the local PPP entity." REFERENCE "Section 2.5, Configuration Option Format, ofRFC1333." ::= { pppLqrEntry 3 } pppLqrRemotePeriod OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER(1..2147483648) ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The LQR reporting period, in hundredths of a second, that is in effect for the remote PPP entity." REFERENCE "Section 2.5, Configuration Option Format, ofRFC1333." ::= { pppLqrEntry 4 }Kastenholz [Page 18]
RFC 1471 PPP/LCP MIB June 1993 pppLqrOutLQRs OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Counter ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The value of the OutLQRs counter on the local node for the link identified by ifIndex." REFERENCE "Section 2.2, Counters, ofRFC1333." ::= { pppLqrEntry 5 } pppLqrInLQRs OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Counter ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The value of the InLQRs counter on the local node for the link identified by ifIndex." REFERENCE "Section 2.2, Counters, ofRFC1333." ::= { pppLqrEntry 6 } -- -- The PPP LQR Configuration table. -- pppLqrConfigTable OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF PppLqrConfigEntry ACCESS not-accessible STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "Table containing the LQR Configuration parameters for the local PPP entity." ::= { pppLqr 2 } pppLqrConfigEntry OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX PppLqrConfigEntry ACCESS not-accessible STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "LQR configuration information for a particular PPP link." INDEX { ifIndex } ::= { pppLqrConfigTable 1 }Kastenholz [Page 19]
RFC 1471 PPP/LCP MIB June 1993 PppLqrConfigEntry ::= SEQUENCE { pppLqrConfigPeriod INTEGER, pppLqrConfigStatus INTEGER } pppLqrConfigPeriod OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER(0..2147483647) ACCESS read-write STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The LQR Reporting Period that the local PPP entity will attempt to negotiate with the remote entity, in units of hundredths of a second. Changing this object will have effect when the link is next restarted." REFERENCE "Section 2.5, Configuration Option Format, ofRFC1333." DEFVAL { 0 } ::= { pppLqrConfigEntry 1 } pppLqrConfigStatus OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER {disabled (1), enabled (2)} ACCESS read-write STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "If enabled(2) then the local node will attempt to perform LQR negotiation with the remote node. If disabled(1) then this negotiation is not performed. In any event, the local node will comply with any magic number negotiations attempted by the remote node, per the PPP specification. Changing this object will have effect when the link is next restarted. Setting this object to the value disabled(1) has the effect of invalidating the corresponding entry in the pppLqrConfigTable object. It is an implementation-specific matter as to whether the agent removes an invalidated entry from the table. Accordingly, management stations must be prepared to receive tabular information from agents that corresponds to entries not currently in use." REFERENCE "Section 7.6, Magic Number, ofRFC1331."Kastenholz [Page 20]
RFC 1471 PPP/LCP MIB June 1993 DEFVAL { enabled } ::= { pppLqrConfigEntry 2 } -- 4.3. PPP LQR Extensions Group -- -- The PPP LQR Extensions Group. -- Implementation of this group is optional. -- -- The intent of this group is to allow external -- implementation of the policy mechanisms that -- are used to declare a link to be "bad" or not. -- -- It is not practical to examine the MIB objects -- which are used to generate LQR packets since -- LQR policies tend to require synchronization of -- the values of all data used to determine Link -- Quality; i.e. the values of the relevant counters -- must all be taken at the same instant in time. -- pppLqrExtnsTable OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF PppLqrExtnsEntry ACCESS not-accessible STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "Table containing additional LQR information for the local PPP entity." ::= { pppLqr 3 } pppLqrExtnsEntry OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX PppLqrExtnsEntry ACCESS not-accessible STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "Extended LQR information for a particular PPP link. Assuming that this group has been implemented, a PPP link will have an entry in this table if and only if LQR Quality Monitoring has been successfully negotiated for said link." INDEX { ifIndex } ::= { pppLqrExtnsTable 1 } PppLqrExtnsEntry ::= SEQUENCE {Kastenholz [Page 21]
RFC 1471 PPP/LCP MIB June 1993 pppLqrExtnsLastReceivedLqrPacket OCTET STRING(SIZE(68)) } pppLqrExtnsLastReceivedLqrPacket OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX OCTET STRING(SIZE(68)) ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "This object contains the most recently received LQR packet. The format of the packet is as described in the LQM Protocol specificiation. All fields of the packet, including the `save' fields, are stored in this object. The LQR packet is stored in network byte order. The LAP-B and PPP headers are not stored in this object; the first four octets of this variable contain the Magic-Number field, the second four octets contain the LastOutLQRs field and so on. The last four octets of this object contain the SaveInOctets field of the LQR packet." REFERENCE "Section 2.6, Packet Format, ofRFC1333" ::= { pppLqrExtnsEntry 1 } -- 4.4. PPP Tests -- The extensions to the interface table inRFC1229 define a -- table through which the network manager can instruct the -- managed object to perform various tests of the interface. This -- is the ifExtnsTestTable. -- The PPP MIB defines two such tests. -- 4.4.1. PPP Echo Test -- The PPP Echo Test is defined as pppEchoTest OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { pppTests 1 } -- Invoking this test causes a PPP Echo Packet to be sent on the -- line. ifExtnsTestResult returns success(2) if the echo -- response came back properly. It returns failed(7) if the -- response did not properly return. The definition of "proper"Kastenholz [Page 22]
RFC 1471 PPP/LCP MIB June 1993 -- in this context is left to the discretion of the implementor. -- 4.4.2. PPP Discard Test -- The PPP Discard Test is defined as pppDiscardTest OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { pppTests 2 } -- Invoking this test causes a PPP Discard Packet to be sent on -- the line. ifExtnsTestResult returns success(2) if the discard -- packet was successfully transmitted and failed(7) if an error -- was detected on transmission. The definition of "transmission -- error" in this context is left to the discretion of the -- implementor. END5. Acknowledgements This document was produced by the PPP working group. In addition to the working group, the author wishes to thank the following individuals for their comments and contributions: Bill Simpson -- Daydreamer Glenn McGregor -- Merit Jesse Walker -- DEC Chris Gunner -- DEC6. Security Considerations The PPP MIB affords the network operator the ability to configure and control the PPP links of a particular system. This represents a security risk. These risks are addressed in the following manners: (1) All variables which represent a significant security risk are placed in separate, optional, MIB Groups. As the MIB Group is the quantum of implementation within a MIB, the implementor of the MIB may elect not to implement these groups. (2) The implementor may choose to implement the variables which present a security risk so that they may not be written, i.e., the variables are READ-ONLY. This method still presents a security risk, and is not recommended, in that the variables, specifically the PPP Authentication Protocols' variables, may be easily read.Kastenholz [Page 23]
RFC 1471 PPP/LCP MIB June 1993 (3) Using SNMPv2, the operator can place the variables into MIB views which are protected in that the parties which have access to those MIB views use authentication and privacy protocols, or the operator may elect to make these views not accessible to any party. In order to facilitate this placement, all security-related variables are placed in separate MIB Tables. This eases the identification of the necessary MIB View Subtree.7. References [1] Rose M., and K. McCloghrie, "Structure and Identification of Management Information for TCP/IP-based internets", STD 16,RFC1155, Performance Systems International, Hughes LAN Systems, May 1990. [2] McCloghrie K., and M. Rose, Editors, "Management Information Base for Network Management of TCP/IP-based internets", STD 17,RFC1213, Performance Systems International, March 1991. [3] Information processing systems - Open Systems Interconnection - Specification of Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1), International Organization for Standardization, International Standard 8824, December 1987. [4] Information processing systems - Open Systems Interconnection - Specification of Basic Encoding Rules for Abstract Notation One (ASN.1), International Organization for Standardization, International Standard 8825, December 1987. [5] Rose, M., and K. McCloghrie, Editors, "Concise MIB Definitions", STD 16,RFC 1212, Performance Systems International, Hughes LAN Systems, March 1991. [6] Rose, M., Editor, "A Convention for Defining Traps for use with the SNMP",RFC 1215, Performance Systems International, March 1991. [7] McCloghrie, K., "Extensions to the Generic-Interface MIB",RFC1229, Hughes LAN Systems, Inc., May 1991. [8] Simpson, W., "The Point-to-Point Protocol for the Transmission of Multi-protocol Datagrams over Point-to-Point Links,RFC 1331, Daydreamer, May 1992. [9] McGregor, G., "The PPP Internet Protocol Control Protocol",RFC1332, Merit, May 1992.Kastenholz [Page 24]
RFC 1471 PPP/LCP MIB June 1993 [10] Baker, F., "Point-to-Point Protocol Extensions for Bridging",RFC1220, ACC, April 1991. [11] Lloyd, B., and W. Simpson, "PPP Authentication Protocols",RFC1334, L&A, Daydreamer, October 1992. [12] Simpson, W., "PPP Link Quality Monitoring",RFC 1333, Daydreamer, May 1992. [13] Case, J., Fedor, M., Schoffstall, M., and J. Davin, "Simple Network Management Protocol", STD 15,RFC 1157, SNMP Research, Performance Systems International, Performance Systems International, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science, May 1990.8. Author's Address Frank Kastenholz FTP Software, Inc. 2 High Street North Andover, Mass 01845 USA Phone: (508) 685-4000 EMail: kasten@ftp.comKastenholz [Page 25]
[8]ページ先頭