Movatterモバイル変換
[0]ホーム
[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]
HISTORIC
Network Working Group S. KilleRequest for Comments: 1137 University College LondonUpdates: RFC976 December 1989Mapping Between FullRFC 822 andRFC 822 withRestricted EncodingStatus of this Memo This RFC suggests an electronic mail protocol mapping for the Internet community and UK Academic Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. This memo does not specify an Internet standard. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This document describes a set of address mappings which will enable interworking between systems operatingRFC 822 protocols in a general manner, and those environments where transfer ofRFC 822 messages restricts the character set which can be used in addresses. UUCP transfer ofRFC 822 messages is an important case of this [Crocker82a,Horton86a].Specification This document specifies a mapping between two protocols. This specification should be used when this mapping is performed on the Internet or in the UK Academic Community. This specification may be modified in the light of implementation experience, but no substantial changes are expected.1. Introduction Some mail networks which useRFC 822 cannot support the full character set required by all aspects ofRFC 822. This document describes a symmetrical mapping between fullRFC 822 addressing, and a form for use on these networks. Any addresses within the networks will not use the fullRFC 822 addressing, and so any addresses encoded according to this standard will always represent remote addresses. This document derives from a mapping originally specified inRFC 987 [Kille86a], where the domain of application was more restricted. Two terms are now defined: FullRFC 822 This implies full support for transfer to and from any legalRFC822 address. In particular, the quoted-string form of local-part must be supported (e.g., <"Joe Soap"@foo.bar>).Kille [Page 1]
RFC 1137 E-Mail Address and Quoted Strings December 1989 RestrictedRFC 822 This implies a subset ofRFC 822 addressing. The quoted-string form of local-part need not be supported. Standard UUCP mail transfer falls into this category. RestrictedRFC 822 is undesirable, but in practice it exists in many places. When a message is transferred from fullRFC 822 to restrictedRFC822, and address forms used in fullRFC 822 are involved, message loss may occur (e.g., it may not be possible to return an error message). This RFC describes a quoting mechanism which may be used to map between fullRFC 822 and restrictedRFC 822, in order to alleviate this problem.2. Encoding TheRFC 822 EBNF meta notation is used. Any EBNF definitions taken fromRFC 822 are prefixed by the string "822.". The following EBNF is specified. atom-encoded = *( a-char / a-encoded-char ) a-char = <any CHAR except specials (other than "@" and "."), SPACE, CTL, "_", and "#"> a-encoded-char = "_" ; (space) / "#u#" ; (_) / "#l#" ; <(> / "#r#" ; <)> / "#m#" ; (,) / "#c#" ; (:) / "#b#" ; (\) / "#h#" ; (#) / "#e#" ; (=) / "#s#" ; (/) / "#" 3DIGIT "#" The 822.3DIGIT in EBNF.a-encoded-char must have range 0-127, and is interpreted in decimal as the corresponding ASCII character. The choice of special abbreviations (as opposed to decimal encoding) provided is based on the manner in which this mapping is most frequently used. There are special encodings for each of the PrintableString characters not in EBNF.a-char, except ".". Space is given a single character encoding, due to its (expected) frequency of use, and backslash as theRFC 822 single quote character. This mapping is used to transform between the two forms of 822.word: 822.quoted-string (restrictedRFC 822) and 822.atom (restricted RFCKille [Page 2]
RFC 1137 E-Mail Address and Quoted Strings December 1989 822). To encode (fullRFC 822 -> restrictedRFC 822), first remove any quoting from any 822.quoted-string. Then, all EBNF.a-char are used directly and all other CHAR are encoded as EBNF.a-encoded-char. To decode (restrictedRFC 822 -> fullRFC 822): if the address can be parsed as EBNF.encoded-atom reverse the previous mapping. If it cannot be so parsed, map the characters directly.3. Application This mapping should be used for all addresses, at the MTS or Header level. It is applied to the 822.local-part of the addresses. For example: FullRFC 822 RestrictedRFC 822 Steve.Kille@cs.ucl.ac.uk <-> Steve.Kille@cs.ucl.ac.uk "Steve Kille"@cs.ucl.ac.uk <-> Steve_Kille@cs.ucl.ac.uk "argle#~"@blargle <-> argle#h##126#@blargleReferences [Crocker82a] Crocker, D., "Standard of the Format of ARPA Internet Text Messages",RFC 822, August 1982. [Horton86a] Horton, M., "UUCP Mail Interchange Format Standard",RFC 976, February 1986. [Kille86a] Kille, S., "Mapping Between X.400 andRFC 822", UK Academic Community Report (MG.19),RFC 987, June 1986.Security Considerations Security issues are not discussed in this memo.Author's Address Steve Kille University College London Gower Street WC1E 6BT England Phone: +44-1-380-7294 EMail: S.Kille@Cs.Ucl.AC.UKKille [Page 3]
[8]ページ先頭