Movatterモバイル変換
[0]ホーム
[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Errata] [Info page]
PROPOSED STANDARD
Errata ExistInternet Engineering Task Force (IETF) C. HolmbergRequest for Comments: 8599 EricssonCategory: Standards Track M. ArnoldISSN: 2070-1721 Metaswitch Networks May 2019Push Notification with the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)Abstract This document describes how a Push Notification Service (PNS) can be used to wake a suspended Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) User Agent (UA) with push notifications, and it also describes how the UA can send binding-refresh REGISTER requests and receive incoming SIP requests in an environment in which the UA may be suspended. The document defines new SIP URI parameters to exchange PNS information between the UA and the SIP entity that will then request that push notifications be sent to the UA. It also defines the parameters to trigger such push notification requests. The document also defines new feature-capability indicators that can be used to indicate support of this mechanism.Status of This Memo This is an Internet Standards Track document. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available inSection 2 of RFC 7841. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained athttps://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8599.Holmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 2019Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject toBCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.Table of Contents1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .42. Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .83. Push Resource ID (PRID) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .84. SIP User Agent (UA) Behavior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .94.1. REGISTER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .94.1.1. Request Push Notifications . . . . . . . . . . . . .94.1.2. Disable Push Notifications . . . . . . . . . . . . .114.1.3. Receive Push Notifications . . . . . . . . . . . . .11 4.1.4. Sending Binding-Refresh Requests Using Non-push Mechanism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .114.1.5. Query Network PNS Capabilities . . . . . . . . . . .135. SIP Proxy Behavior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .145.1. PNS Provider . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .145.2. SIP Request Push Bucket . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .155.3. SIP URI Comparison Rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .155.4. Indicate Support of Type of PNS . . . . . . . . . . . . .155.5. Trigger Periodic Binding Refresh . . . . . . . . . . . .165.6. SIP Requests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .175.6.1. REGISTER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .175.6.2. Initial Request for Dialog or Standalone Request . .206. Support of Long-Lived SIP Dialogs . . . . . . . . . . . . . .236.1. SIP UA Behavior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .256.1.1. Initial Request for Dialog . . . . . . . . . . . . .256.2. SIP Proxy Behavior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .256.2.1. REGISTER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .256.2.2. Initial Request for Dialog . . . . . . . . . . . . .266.2.3. Mid-dialog Request . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .267. Support of SIP Replaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .278. Grammar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28 8.1. 555 (Push Notification Service Not Supported) Response Code . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28Holmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 20198.2. 'sip.pns' Feature-Capability Indicator . . . . . . . . .288.3. 'sip.vapid' Feature-Capability Indicator . . . . . . . .288.4. 'sip.pnsreg' Feature-Capability Indicator . . . . . . . .288.5. 'sip.pnsreg' Media Feature Tag . . . . . . . . . . . . .298.6. 'sip.pnspurr' Feature-Capability Indicator . . . . . . .298.7. SIP URI Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .299. PNS Registration Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30 10. 'pn-provider', 'pn-param', and 'pn-prid' URI Parameters for Apple Push Notification service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30 11. 'pn-provider', 'pn-param', and 'pn-prid' URI Parameters for Google Firebase Cloud Messaging (FCM) Push Notification Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .31 12. 'pn-provider', 'pn-param', and 'pn-prid' URI Parameters forRFC 8030 (Generic Event Delivery Using HTTP Push) . . . . . .3113. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3214. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3314.1. SIP URI Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3314.1.1. pn-provider . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3314.1.2. pn-param . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3314.1.3. pn-prid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3314.1.4. pn-purr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3314.2. SIP Response Codes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3414.2.1. 555 (Push Notification Service Not Supported) . . .3414.3. SIP Global Feature-Capability Indicator . . . . . . . .3414.3.1. sip.pns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3414.3.2. sip.vapid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3414.3.3. sip.pnsreg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3514.3.4. sip.pnspurr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3514.4. SIP Media Feature Tag . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3614.4.1. sip.pnsreg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3614.5. PNS Subregistry Establishment . . . . . . . . . . . . .3615. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3715.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3715.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .39 Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .40 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .40Holmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 20191. Introduction In order to save resources such as battery life, some devices (especially mobile devices) and operating systems will suspend an application that is not in use. A suspended application might not be able to wake itself with internal timers and might not be awakened by incoming network traffic. In such an environment, a Push Notification Service (PNS) is used to wake the application. A PNS is a service that sends messages requested by other applications to a user application in order to wake the user application. These messages are called push notifications. Push notifications might contain payload data, depending on the application. An application can request that a push notification be sent to a single user application or to multiple user applications. Typically, each operating system uses a dedicated PNS. Different PNSs exist today. Some are based on the standardized mechanism defined in [RFC8030], while others are proprietary. For example, Apple iOS devices use the Apple Push Notification service (APNs) while Android devices use the Firebase Cloud Messaging (FCM) service. Each PNS uses PNS-specific terminology and function names. The terminology in this document is meant to be PNS-independent. If the PNS is based on [RFC8030], the SIP proxy takes the role of the application server. When a Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) User Agent (UA)[RFC3261] is suspended in such an environment, it is unable to send binding- refresh SIP REGISTER requests, unable to receive incoming SIP requests, and might not be able to use internal timers to wake itself. A suspended UA will not be able to maintain connections, e.g., using the SIP Outbound Mechanism [RFC5626], because it cannot send periodic keep-alive messages. A PNS is needed to wake the SIP UA so that the UA can perform these functions. This document describes how a PNS can be used to wake a suspended UA using push notifications, so that the UA can send binding-refresh REGISTER requests and receive incoming SIP requests. The document defines new SIP URI parameters and new feature-capability indicators [RFC6809] that can be used in SIP messages to indicate support of the mechanism defined in this document; be used to exchange PNS information between the UA and the SIP entity (realized as a SIP proxy in this document) that will request that push notifications are sent to the UA; and be used to request such push notification requests.Holmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 2019 NOTE: Even if a UA is able to be awakened by means other than receiving push notifications (e.g., by using internal timers) in order to send periodic binding-refresh REGISTER requests, it might still be useful to suspend the UA between the sending of binding- refresh requests (as it will save battery life) and use push notifications to wake the UA when an incoming SIP request UA arrives. When a UA registers with a PNS (Figure 1), it will receive a unique Push Resource ID (PRID) associated with the push notification registration. The UA will use a REGISTER request to provide the PRID to the SIP proxy, which will then request that push notifications are sent to the UA. When the SIP proxy receives a SIP request for a new dialog or a standalone SIP request addressed towards a UA, or when the SIP proxy determines that the UA needs to send a binding-refresh REGISTER request, the SIP proxy will send a push request containing the PRID of the UA to the PNS, which will then send a push notification to the UA. Once the UA receives the push notification, it will be able to send a binding-refresh REGISTER request. The proxy receives the REGISTER request from the UA and forwards it to the SIP registrar [RFC3261]. After accepting the REGISTER request, the SIP registrar sends a 2xx response to the proxy, which forwards the response to the UA. If the push notification request was triggered by a SIP request addressed towards the UA, the proxy can then forward the SIP request to the UA using normal SIP routing procedures. In some cases, the proxy can forward the SIP request without waiting for the SIP 2xx response to the REGISTER request from the SIP registrar. Note that this mechanism necessarily adds delay to responding to requests requiring push notification. The consequences of that delay are discussed inSection 5.6.2. If there are Network Address Translators (NATs) between the UA and the proxy, the REGISTER request sent by the UA will create NAT bindings that will allow the incoming SIP request that triggered the push notification to reach the UA. NOTE: The lifetime of any NAT binding created by the REGISTER request only needs to be long enough for the SIP request that triggered the push notification to reach the UA. Figure 1 shows the generic push notification architecture supported by the mechanism in this document. The SIP proxy MUST be in the signaling path of REGISTER requests sent by the UA towards the registrar, and of SIP requests (for a new dialog or a standalone) forwarded by the proxy responsible for the UA's domain (sometimes referred to as home proxy, Serving CallHolmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 2019 Session Control Function (S-CSCF), etc.) towards the UA. The proxy can also be co-located with the proxy responsible for the UA's domain. This will also ensure that the Request-URI of SIP requests (for a new dialog or a standalone) can be matched against contacts in REGISTER requests.Holmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 2019 +--------+ +---------+ +-----------+ +-------------+ | | | | | | | SIP | | SIP UA | | Push | | SIP Proxy | | Registrar / | | | | Service | | | | Home Proxy | +--------+ +---------+ +-----------+ +-------------+ | | | | | Subscribe | | | |---------------->| | | | | | | | PRID | | | |<----------------| | | | | | | | SIP REGISTER (PRID) | | |===================================>| | | | |SIP REGISTER (PRID)| | | |==================>| | | | | | | | SIP 200 OK | | | |<==================| | SIP 200 OK | | | |<===================================| | | | | | | | | SIP INVITE (PRID) | | | |<==================| | | | | | |Push Request (PRID) | | |<-----------------| | |Push Message (PRID) | | |<----------------| | | | | | | | SIP REGISTER (PRID) | | |===================================>| | | | |SIP REGISTER (PRID)| | | |==================>| | | | | | | | SIP 200 OK | | | |<==================| | SIP 200 OK | | | |<===================================| | | | | | | SIP INVITE | | | |<===================================| | | | | | ------- Push Notification API ======= SIP Figure 1: SIP Push Information FlowHolmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 2019 Example of a SIP REGISTER request in the flow above: REGISTER sip:alice@example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP alicemobile.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bKnashds7 Max-Forwards: 70 To: Alice <sip:alice@example.com> From: Alice <sip:alice@example.com>;tag=456248 Call-ID: 843817637684230@998sdasdh09 CSeq: 1826 REGISTER Contact: <sip:alice@alicemobile.example.com; pn-provider=acme; pn-param=acme-param; pn-prid=ZTY4ZDJlMzODE1NmUgKi0K> Expires: 7200 Content-Length: 0 Figure 2: SIP REGISTER Example2. Conventions The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described inBCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.3. Push Resource ID (PRID) When a SIP UA registers with a PNS it receives a unique Push Resource ID (PRID), which is a value associated with the registration that can be used to generate push notifications. The format of the PRID varies depending on the PNS. The details regarding discovery of the PNS, and the procedures regarding the push notification registration and maintenance, are outside the scope of this document. The information needed to contact the PNS is typically preconfigured in the operating system of the device.Holmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 20194. SIP User Agent (UA) Behavior4.1. REGISTER This section describes how a SIP UA sends SIP REGISTER requests (either an initial REGISTER request for a binding or a binding- refresh REGISTER request) in order to request and disable push notifications from a SIP network, and to query the types of PNSs supported by the SIP network. Unless specified otherwise, the normal SIP UA registration procedures [RFC3261] apply. The additional procedures described in this section apply when the REGISTER request contains a 'pn-provider' SIP URI parameter in the Contact header field URI (Figure 2). The procedures in this section apply to individual bindings [RFC3261]. If a UA creates multiple bindings (e.g., one for IPv4 and one for IPv6), the UA needs to perform the procedures for each binding. NOTE: Since a push notification will trigger the UA to refresh all bindings, if a SIP UA has created multiple bindings, it is preferable if one can ensure that all bindings expire at the same time to help prevent some bindings from being refreshed earlier than needed. For privacy and security reasons, a UA MUST NOT insert the SIP URI parameters (except for the 'pn-purr' parameter) defined in this specification in non-REGISTER requests in order to prevent the PNS information associated with the UA from reaching the remote peer. For example, the UA MUST NOT insert the 'pn-prid' SIP URI parameter in the Contact header field URI of an INVITE request. REGISTER requests will not reach the remote peer, as they will be terminated by the registrar of the UA. However, the registrar MUST still ensure that the parameters are not sent to other users, e.g., using the mechanism defined by the SIP event package for registrations [RFC3680]. SeeSection 13 for more information.4.1.1. Request Push Notifications This section describes the procedures that a SIP UA follows to request push notifications from the SIP network. The procedures assume that the UA has retrieved a PRID from a PNS. The procedures for retrieving the PRID from the PNS are PNS-specific and outside the scope of this specification. See PNS-specific documentation for more details.Holmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 2019 This specification does not define a mechanism to explicitly request push notifications from the SIP network for usages other than triggering binding-refresh REGISTER requests (e.g., for sending periodic subscription-refresh SUBSCRIBE requests [RFC6665]), nor does it describe how to distinguish push notifications associated with such usages from the push notifications used to trigger binding- refresh REGISTER requests. If a SIP UA wants to use push notifications for other usages, the UA can perform actions associated with such usages (in addition to sending a binding-refresh REGISTER request) whenever it receives a push notification by using the same refresh interval that is used for the binding refreshes. To request push notifications from the SIP network, the UA MUST insert the following SIP URI parameters in the SIP Contact header field URI of the REGISTER request: 'pn-provider', 'pn-prid', and 'pn-param' (if required for the specific PNS). The 'pn-provider' URI parameter indicates the type of PNS to be used for the push notifications. If the UA receives a 2xx response to the REGISTER request that contains a Feature-Caps header field [RFC6809] with a 'sip.pns' feature-capability indicator, with an indicator value identifying the same type of PNS that was identified by the 'pn-provider' URI parameter in the REGISTER request, it indicates that another SIP Proxy in the SIP network will request that push notifications are sent to the UA. In addition, if the same Feature-Caps header field contains a 'sip.vapid' feature-capability indicator, it indicates that the proxy supports use of the Voluntary Application Server Identification (VAPID) mechanism [RFC8292] to restrict push notifications to the UA. NOTE: The VAPID-specific procedures of the SIP UA are outside the scope of this document. If the UA receives a non-2xx response to the REGISTER, or if the UA receives a 2xx response that does not contain a Feature-Caps header field [RFC6809] with a 'sip.pns' feature-capability indicator, the UA MUST NOT assume the proxy will request that push notifications are sent to the UA. The actions taken by the UA in such cases are outside the scope of this document. If the PRID is only valid for a limited time, then the UA is responsible for retrieving a new PRID from the PNS and sending a binding-refresh REGISTER request with the updated 'pn-*' parameters. If a PRID is no longer valid, and the UA is not able to retrieve a new PRID, the UA MUST disable the push notifications associated with the PRID (Section 4.1.2).Holmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 20194.1.2. Disable Push Notifications When a UA wants to disable previously requested push notifications, the UA SHOULD remove the binding [RFC3261], unless the UA is no longer able to perform SIP procedures (e.g., due to a forced shutdown of the UA), in which case the registrar will remove the binding once it expires. When the UA sends the REGISTER request for removing the binding, the UA MUST NOT insert the 'pn-prid' SIP URI parameter in the Contact header field URI of the REGISTER request. The lack of the parameter informs the SIP network that the UA no longer wants to receive push notifications associated with the PRID.4.1.3. Receive Push Notifications When a UA receives a push notification, the UA MUST send a binding- refresh REGISTER request. The UA MUST insert the same set of 'pn-*' SIP URI parameters in the SIP Contact header field URI of the REGISTER request that it inserted when it requested push notifications (Section 4.1.1). Note that, in some cases, the PNS might update the PRID value, in which case the UA will insert the new value in the 'pn-prid' SIP URI parameter of the binding-refresh REGISTER request. Once the UA has received a 2xx response to the REGISTER request, the UA might receive a SIP request for a new dialog (e.g., a SIP INVITE) or a standalone SIP request (e.g., a SIP MESSAGE) if such a SIP request triggered the proxy to request that the push notification was sent to the UA. Note that, depending on which transport protocol is used, the SIP request might reach the UA before the REGISTER response. If the SIP UA has created multiple bindings, the UA MUST send a binding-refresh REGISTER request for each of those bindings when it receives a push notification. This specification does not define any usage of push-notification payload. If a SIP UA receives a push notification that contains a payload, the UA can discard the payload but will still send a binding-refresh REGISTER request.4.1.4. Sending Binding-Refresh Requests Using Non-push Mechanism If a UA is able to send binding-refresh REGISTER requests using a non-push mechanism (e.g., using an internal timer that periodically wakes the UA), the UA MUST insert a 'sip.pnsreg' media feature tag [RFC3840] in the Contact header field of each REGISTER request.Holmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 11]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 2019 If the UA receives a 2xx response to the REGISTER request that contains a Feature-Caps header field with a 'sip.pnsreq' feature- capability indicator, the UA MUST send a binding-refresh REGISTER request prior to binding expiration. The indicator value indicates the minimum time (given in seconds), prior to the binding expiration when the UA needs to send the REGISTER request. If the UA receives a 2xx response to the REGISTER request that does not contain a Feature-Caps header field with a 'sip.pnsreq' feature- capability indicator, the UA SHOULD only send a binding-refresh REGISTER request when it receives a push notification (even if the UA is able to use a non-push mechanism for sending binding-refresh REGISTER requests) or when there are circumstances that require an immediate REGISTER request to be sent (e.g., if the UA is assigned new contact parameters due to a network configuration change). Even if the UA is able to send binding-refresh REGISTER requests using a non-push mechanism, the UA MUST still send a binding-refresh REGISTER request whenever it receives a push notification (Section 4.1.3). NOTE: If the UA uses a non-push mechanism to wake and send binding- refresh REGISTER requests, such REGISTER requests will update the binding expiration timer, and the proxy does not need to request that a push notification be sent to the UA in order to wake the UA. The proxy will still request that a push notification be sent to the UA when the proxy receives a SIP request addressed towards the UA (Section 5.6.2). This allows the UA to, e.g., use timers for sending binding-refresh REGISTER requests but be suspended (in order to save battery resources, etc.) between sending the REGISTER requests and using push notifications to wake the UA to process incoming calls.Holmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 12]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 2019 Example of a SIP REGISTER request including a 'sip.pnsreg' media feature tag: REGISTER sip:alice@example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP alicemobile.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bKnashds7 Max-Forwards: 70 To: Alice <sip:alice@example.com> From: Alice <sip:alice@example.com>;tag=456248 Call-ID: 843817637684230@998sdasdh09 CSeq: 1826 REGISTER Contact: <sip:alice@alicemobile.example.com; pn-provider=acme; pn-param=acme-param; pn-prid=ZTY4ZDJlMzODE1NmUgKi0K>; +sip.pnsreg Expires: 7200 Content-Length: 0 Example of a SIP REGISTER response including a 'sip.pnsreg' media feature tag and a 'sip.pnsreq' feature-capability indicator: SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/TCP alicemobile.example.com:5060;branch=z9hG4bKnashds7 To: Alice <sip:alice@example.com>;tag=123987 From: Alice <sip:alice@example.com>;tag=456248 Call-ID: 843817637684230@998sdasdh09 CSeq: 1826 REGISTER Contact: <sip:alice@alicemobile.example.com; pn-provider=acme; pn-param=acme-param; pn-prid=ZTY4ZDJlMzODE1NmUgKi0K>; +sip.pnsreg Feature-Caps: *;+sip.pns="acme";+sip.pnsreg="121" Expires: 7200 Content-Length: 0 Figure 3: SIP REGISTER When Using Non-push Mechanism Example4.1.5. Query Network PNS Capabilities This section describes how a SIP UA can query the types of PNSs supported by a SIP network, and PNS-related capabilities (e.g., support of the VAPID mechanism). When a UA performs a query, it does not request push notifications from the SIP network. Therefore, the UA can perform the query before it has registered to a PNS and received a PRID.Holmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 13]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 2019 In order to perform a query, the UA MUST insert a 'pn-provider' SIP URI parameter in the Contact header field URI of the REGISTER request: o If the UA inserts a 'pn-provider' parameter value, indicating support of a type of PNS, the SIP network will only inform the UA whether that type of PNS is supported. o If the UA does not insert a 'pn-provider' parameter value (i.e., it inserts an "empty" 'pn-provider' parameter), the SIP network will inform the UA about all types of PNSs supported by the network. This is useful, e.g., if the UA supports more than one type of PNS. Note that it is not possible to insert multiple parameter values in the 'pn-provider' parameter. The UA MUST NOT insert a 'pn-prid' SIP URI parameter in the Contact header field URI of the REGISTER request. If the UA receives a 2xx response to the REGISTER request, the response will contain one or more Feature-Caps header fields with a 'sip.pns' feature-capability indicator, indicating the types of PNSs supported by the SIP network. If the UA inserted a 'pn-provider' SIP URI parameter value in the REGISTER request, the response will only indicate whether the SIP network supports the type of PNS supported by the UA. If the UA receives a 555 (Push Notification Service Not Supported) response to the REGISTER request, and if the UA inserted a 'pn-provider' SIP URI parameter in the REGISTER request, the response indicates that the network does not support the type of PNS that the UA indicated support of. If the UA did not insert a 'pn-provider' parameter in the REGISTER request, the response indicates that the network does not support any type of PNS while still supporting the 555 (Push Notification Service Not Supported) response. NOTE: It is optional for a UA to perform a query before it requests push notifications from the SIP network.5. SIP Proxy Behavior5.1. PNS Provider The type of PNS is identified by the 'pn-provider' SIP URI parameter. In some cases, there might only be one PNS provider for a given type of PNS, while in other cases there might be multiple providers. The 'pn-param' SIP URI parameter will provide more details associated with the actual PNS provider to be used.Holmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 14]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 2019 The protocol and format used for the push notification requests are PNS-specific, and the details for constructing and sending a push notification request are outside the scope of this specification.5.2. SIP Request Push Bucket When a SIP proxy receives a SIP request addressed towards a UA, that will trigger the proxy to request that a push notification be sent to the UA. The proxy will place the request in storage (referred to as the SIP Request Push Bucket) and the proxy will start a timer (referred to as the Bucket Timer) associated with the transaction. A SIP request is removed from the bucket when one of the following has occurred: the proxy forwards the request towards the UA, the proxy sends an error response to the request, or the Bucket Timer times out. The detailed procedures are described in the sections below. Exactly how the SIP Request Push Bucket is implemented is outside the scope of this document. One option is to use the PRID as a key to search for SIP requests in the bucket. Note that mid-dialog requests (Section 6) do not carry the PRID in the SIP request itself.5.3. SIP URI Comparison Rules By default, a SIP proxy uses the URI comparison rules defined in [RFC3261]. However, when a SIP proxy compares the Contact header field URI of a 2xx response to a REGISTER request with a Request-URI of a SIP request in the SIP Request Push Bucket (Section 5.2), the proxy uses the URI comparison rules with the following additions: the 'pn-prid', 'pn-provider', and 'pn-param' SIP URI parameters MUST also match. If a 'pn-*' parameter is present in one of the compared URIs but not in the other URI, there is no match. If only the 'pn-*' SIP URI parameters listed above match, but other parts of the compared URIs do not match, a proxy MAY still consider the comparison successful based on local policy. This can occur in a race condition when the proxy compares the Contact header field URI of a 2xx response to a REGISTER request with a Request-URI of a SIP request in the SIP Request Push Bucket (Section 5.2) if the UA had modified some parts of the Contact header field URI in the REGISTER request but the Request-URI of the SIP request in the SIP Request Push Bucket still contains the old parts.5.4. Indicate Support of Type of PNS A SIP proxy uses feature-capability indicators [RFC6809] to indicate support of types of PNSs and additional features (e.g., VAPID) associated with the type of PNS. A proxy MUST use a separate Feature-Cap header field for each supported type of PNS. A feature-Holmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 15]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 2019 capability indicator that indicates support of an additional feature associated with a given type of PNS MUST be inserted in the same Feature-Caps header field that is used to indicate support of the type of PNS. This specification defines the following feature-capability indicators that a proxy can use to indicate support of additional features associated with a given type of PNS: 'sip.vapid', 'sip.pnsreg', and 'sip.pnspurr'. These feature-capability indicators MUST only be inserted in a Feature-Caps header field that also contains a 'sip.pns' feature-capability indicator.5.5. Trigger Periodic Binding Refresh In order to request that a push notification be sent to a SIP UA, a SIP proxy needs to have information about when a binding will expire. The proxy needs to be able to retrieve the information from the registrar using some mechanism or run its own registration timers. Such mechanisms are outside the scope of this document but could be implemented, e.g., by using the SIP event package for registrations mechanism [RFC3680]. When the proxy receives an indication that the UA needs to send a binding-refresh REGISTER request, the proxy will request that a push notification be sent to the UA. Note that the push notification needs to be requested early enough for the associated binding-refresh REGISTER request to reach the registrar before the binding expires. It is RECOMMENDED that the proxy requests the push notification at least 120 seconds before the binding expires. If the UA has indicated, using the 'sip.pnsreg' media feature tag, that it is able to wake itself using a non-push mechanism in order to send binding-refresh REGISTER requests, and if the proxy does not receive a REGISTER request prior to 120 seconds before the binding expires, the proxy MAY request that a push notification be sent to the UA to trigger the UA to send a binding-refresh REGISTER request. NOTE: As described inSection 4.1.5, a UA might send a REGISTER request without including a 'pn-prid' SIP URI parameter in order to retrieve push notification capabilities from the network before the UA expects to receive push notifications from the network. A proxy will not request that push notifications are sent to a UA that has not provided a 'pn-prid' SIP URI parameter (Section 5.6.2).Holmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 16]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 2019 If the proxy receives information that a binding associated with a PRID has expired, or that a binding has been removed, the proxy MUST NOT request that further push notifications are sent to the UA using that PRID.5.6. SIP Requests5.6.1. REGISTER This section describes how a SIP proxy processes SIP REGISTER requests (initial REGISTER request for a binding or a binding-refresh REGISTER request). The procedures in this section apply when the REGISTER request contains a 'pn-provider' SIP URI parameter in the Contact header field URI. In other cases, the proxy MUST skip the procedures in this section and process the REGISTER request using normal SIP procedures.5.6.1.1. Request Push Notifications This section describes the SIP proxy procedures when a SIP UA requests push notifications from the SIP network. The procedures in this section apply when the SIP REGISTER request contains, in addition to the 'pn-provider' SIP URI parameter, a 'pn-prid' SIP URI parameter in the Contact header field URI of the request. When a proxy receives a REGISTER request that contains a Feature-Caps header field with a 'sip.pns' feature-capability indicator, it indicates that another proxy between this proxy and the UA supports the type of PNS supported by the UA, and will request that push notifications are sent to the UA. In such case, the proxy MUST skip the rest of the procedures in this section and process the REGISTER request using normal SIP procedures. When a proxy receives a REGISTER request that does not contain a Feature-Caps header field with a 'sip.pns' feature-capability indicator, the proxy processes the request according to the procedures below: o If the proxy does not support the type of PNS supported by the UA, or if the REGISTER request does not contain all information required for the type of PNS, the proxy SHOULD forward the request towards the registrar and skip the rest of the procedures in this section. If the proxy knows (by means of local configuration) that no other proxies between itself and the registrar support theHolmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 17]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 2019 type of PNS supported by the UA, the proxy MAY send a SIP 555 (Push Notification Service Not Supported) response instead of forwarding the request. o If the proxy supports the type of PNS supported by the UA, but considers the requested binding expiration interval [RFC3261] to be too short (see below), the proxy MUST either send a 423 (Interval Too Brief) response to the REGISTER request or forward the request towards the registrar and skip the rest of the procedures in this section. o If the proxy supports the type of PNS supported by the UA, the proxy MUST indicate support of that type of PNS (Section 5.4) in the REGISTER request before it forwards the request towards the registrar. This will inform proxies between the proxy and the registrar that the proxy supports the type of PNS supported by the UA, and that the proxy will request that push notifications are sent to the UA. A binding expiration interval MUST be considered too short if the binding would expire before the proxy can request that a push notification be sent to the UA to trigger the UA to send a binding- refresh REGISTER request. The proxy MAY consider the interval too short based on its own policy so as to reduce load on the system. When a proxy receives a 2xx response to the REGISTER request, if the proxy indicated support of a type of PNS in the REGISTER request (see above), the proxy performs the following actions: o If the proxy considers the binding expiration interval indicated by the registrar too short (see above), the proxy forwards the response towards the UA and MUST skip the rest of the procedures in this section. o The proxy MUST indicate support of the same type of PNS in the REGISTER response. In addition: * If the proxy supports the VAPID mechanism [RFC8292], the proxy MUST indicate support of the mechanism, using the 'sip.vapid' feature-capability indicator, in the REGISTER response. The indicator value contains the public key identifying the proxy. The proxy MUST determine whether the PNS provider supports the VAPID mechanism before it indicates support of it.Holmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 18]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 2019 * If the proxy received a 'sip.pnsreg' media feature tag in the REGISTER request, the proxy SHOULD insert a 'sip.pnsreg' feature-capability indicator with an indicator value bigger than 120 in the response, unless the proxy always wants to request that push notifications are sent to the UA in order to trigger the UA to send a binding-refresh REGISTER request.5.6.1.2. Query Network PNS Capabilities This section describes the SIP proxy procedures when a SIP UA queries about the push-notification support in the SIP network (Section 4.1.5). The procedures in this section apply when the REGISTER request contains a 'pn-provider' SIP URI parameter, but does not contain a 'pn-prid' SIP URI parameter in the Contact header field URI of the REGISTER request. When a proxy receives a REGISTER request that contains a 'pn-provider' SIP URI parameter indicating the type of PNS supported by the UA, the proxy MUST perform the following actions: o If the proxy supports the type of PNS supported by the UA, the proxy MUST indicate support of that type of PNS (Section 5.4) in the REGISTER request before it forwards the request towards the registrar. This will inform any other proxies between the proxy and the registrar that the proxy supports the type of PNS supported by the UA. o If the proxy does not support the type of PNS supported by the UA, and if the REGISTER request contains Feature-Caps header fields indicating support of one or more types of PNSs, the proxy forwards the request towards the registrar. o If the proxy does not support the type of PNS supported by the UA, and if the REGISTER request does not contain Feature-Caps header fields indicating support of one or more types of PNSs, the proxy MUST either forward the request towards the registrar or send a SIP 555 (Push Notification Service Not Supported) response towards the UA. The proxy MUST NOT send a SIP 555 (Push Notification Service Not Supported) response unless it knows (by means of local configuration) that no other proxy supports any of the types of PNSs supported by the UA. When a proxy receives a REGISTER request, and the 'pn-provider' SIP URI parameter does not contain a parameter value, the proxy MUST indicate support of each type of PNS supported by the proxy before it forwards the request towards the registrar.Holmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 19]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 2019 When a proxy receives a 2xx response to the REGISTER request, if the proxy had indicated support of one or more types of PNSs in the REGISTER request (see above), the proxy MUST indicate support of the same set of types of PNSs in the response. In addition, if the proxy supports the VAPID mechanism for one or more types of PNSs, the proxy MUST indicate support of the mechanism for those PNSs in the response.5.6.2. Initial Request for Dialog or Standalone Request The procedures in this section apply when a SIP proxy has indicated that it will request that push notifications are sent to the SIP UA. When the proxy receives a SIP request for a new dialog (e.g., a SIP INVITE request) or a standalone SIP request (e.g., a SIP MESSAGE request) addressed towards a SIP UA, if the Request-URI of the request contains a 'pn-provider', a 'pn-prid', and a 'pn-param' (if required for the specific PNS provider) SIP URI parameter, the proxy requests that a push notification be sent to the UA using the information in the 'pn-*' SIP URI parameters. The proxy then places the SIP request in the SIP Request Push Bucket. The push notification will trigger the UA to send a binding-refresh REGISTER request that the proxy will process as described inSection 5.6.1. In addition, the proxy MUST store the Contact URI of the REGISTER request during the lifetime of the REGISTER transaction. NOTE: If the proxy receives a SIP request that does not contain the 'pn-*' SIP URI parameters listed above, the proxy processing of the request is based on local policy. If the proxy also serves requests for UAs that do not use the SIP push mechanism, the proxy can forward the request towards the UA. Otherwise, the proxy can reject the request. When the proxy receives a 2xx response to the REGISTER request, the proxy performs the following actions: o The proxy processes the REGISTER response as described inSection 5.6.1. o The proxy checks whether the SIP Request Push Bucket contains a SIP request associated with the REGISTER transaction by comparing (Section 5.3) the Contact header field URI in the REGISTER response with the Request-URIs of the SIP requests in the bucket. If there is a match, the proxy MUST remove the SIP request from the bucket and forward it towards the UA.Holmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 20]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 2019 The reason the proxy needs to wait for the REGISTER response before forwarding a SIP request towards a UA is to make sure that the REGISTER request has been accepted by the registrar, and that the UA that initiated the REGISTER request is authorized to receive messages for the Request-URI. If the proxy receives a non-2xx response to the REGISTER request, the proxy compares the Contact URI stored from the REGISTER request (see above) with the Request-URIs of the SIP requests in the SIP Request Push Bucket. If there is a match, the proxy SHOULD remove the associated request from the bucket and send an error response to the request. It is RECOMMENDED that the proxy sends either a 404 (Not Found) response or a 480 (Temporarily Unavailable) response to the SIP request, but other response codes can be used as well. However, if the REGISTER response is expected to trigger a new REGISTER request from the UA (e.g., if the registrar is requesting the UA to perform authentication), the proxy MAY keep the SIP request in the bucket. If the push notification request fails (see PNS-specific documentation for details), the proxy MUST remove the SIP request from the bucket and send an error response to the SIP request. It is RECOMMENDED that the proxy sends either a 404 (Not Found) response or a 480 (Temporarily Unavailable) response, but other response codes can be used as well. After the proxy has requested that a push notification be sent to a UA, if the proxy does not receive a REGISTER response with a Contact URI that matches the Request-URI of the SIP request before the Bucket Timer (Section 5.2) associated with the SIP request times out, the proxy MUST remove the SIP request from the SIP Request Push Bucket (Section 5.2) and send a 480 (Temporarily Unavailable) response. The Bucket Timer time-out value is set based on local policy, taking the guidelines below into consideration. As discussed in [RFC4320] and [RFC4321], non-INVITE transactions must complete immediately or risk losing a race, which results in stress on intermediaries and state misalignment at the endpoints. The mechanism defined in this document inherently delays the final response to any non-INVITE request that requires a push notification. In particular, if the proxy forwards the SIP request towards the SIP UA, the SIP UA accepts the request, but the transaction times out at the sender before it receives the successful response, this will cause state misalignment between the endpoints (the sender considers the transaction a failure, while the receiver considers the transaction a success). The SIP proxy needs to take this into account when it sets the value of the Bucket Timer associated with the transaction, to make sure that the error response (triggered by aHolmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 21]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 2019 Bucket Timer time out) reaches the sender before the transaction times out. If the accumulated delay of this mechanism combined with any other mechanisms in the path of processing the non-INVITE transaction cannot be kept short, this mechanism should not be used. For networks encountering such conditions, an alternative (left for possible future work) would be for the proxy to immediately return a new error code meaning "wait at least the number of seconds specified in this response and retry your request" before initiating the push notification. NOTE: While the work on this document was ongoing, implementation test results showed that the time it takes for a proxy to receive the REGISTER request, from when the proxy has requested a push notification, is typically around 2 seconds. However, the time might vary depending on the characteristics and load of the SIP network and the PNS. In addition to the procedures described above, there are two cases where a proxy, as an optimization, can forward a SIP request towards a UA without either waiting for a 2xx response to a REGISTER request or requesting that a push notification be sent to the UA: o If the proxy is able to authenticate the sender of the REGISTER request and verify that it is allowed by authorization policy, the proxy does not need to wait for the 2xx response before it forwards the SIP request towards the UA. In such cases, the proxy will use the Contact URI of the REGISTER request when comparing it against the Request-URIs of the SIP requests in the SIP Request Push Bucket. o If the proxy has knowledge that the UA is awake, and that the UA is able to receive the SIP request without first sending a binding-refresh REGISTER request, the proxy does not need to request that a push notification be sent to the UA (the UA will not send a binding-refresh REGISTER request) before it forwards the SIP request towards the UA. The mechanisms for getting such knowledge might be dependent on implementation or deployment architecture, and are outside the scope of this document. Some PNS providers allow payload in the push notifications. This specification does not define usage of such payload (in addition to any payload that might be required by the PNS itself).Holmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 22]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 20196. Support of Long-Lived SIP Dialogs Some SIP dialogs might have a long lifetime with little activity. For example, when the SIP event notification mechanism [RFC6665] is used, there might be a long period between the sending of mid-dialog requests. Because of this, a SIP UA may be suspended and may need to be awakened in order to be able to receive mid-dialog requests. SIP requests for a new dialog and standalone SIP requests addressed towards a UA with 'pn-*' SIP URI parameters allow the proxy to request that a push notification be sent to the UA (Section 5.6.2). However, 'pn-*' SIP URI parameters will not be present in mid-dialog requests addressed towards the UA. Instead, the proxy needs to support a mechanism to store the information needed to request that a push notification be sent to the UA, and to be able to retrieve that information when it receives a mid-dialog request addressed towards the UA. This section defines such a mechanism. The SIP UA and SIP proxy procedures in this section are applied in addition to the generic procedures defined in this specification. +--------+ +---------+ +-----------+ +-------------+ | | | | | | | SIP | | SIP UA | | Push | | SIP Proxy | | Registrar / | | | | Service | | | | Home Proxy | +--------+ +---------+ +-----------+ +-------------+ | | | | | PNS Register | | | |---------------->| | | | | | | | PRID | | | |<----------------| | | | | | | | SIP REGISTER (PRID) | | |===================================>| | | | |SIP REGISTER (PRID)| | | |==================>| | | | | | | +-----------------------+ | | | | Store PRID (key=PURR) | | | | +-----------------------+ | | | | | | | | SIP 200 OK | | | |<==================| | SIP 200 OK (PURR) | | |<===================================| | | | | | | | | |Holmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 23]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 2019 | SIP INVITE (PURR) | | |===================================>| | | | |SIP INVITE (PURR) | | | |==================>| | | | | | | | SIP 200 OK | | | |<==================| | SIP 200 OK | | | |<===================================| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |SIP UPDATE (PURR) | | | |<==================| | | | | | | +-----------------------+ | | | | Fetch PRID (key=PURR) | | | | +-----------------------+ | | | | | | |Push Request (PRID) | | |<-----------------| | |Push Message (PRID) | | |<----------------| | | | | | | | SIP REGISTER (PRID) | | |===================================>| | | | |SIP REGISTER (PRID)| | | |==================>| | | | | | | | SIP 200 OK | | | |<==================| | SIP 200 OK (PURR) | | |<===================================| | | | | | | SIP UPDATE | | | |<===================================| | | | | | ------- Push Notification API ======= SIP Figure 4: SIP Push Long-Lived Dialog FlowHolmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 24]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 20196.1. SIP UA Behavior6.1.1. Initial Request for Dialog If the UA is willing to receive push notifications when a proxy receives a mid-dialog request addressed towards the UA, the UA MUST insert a 'pn-purr' SIP URI parameter (Section 6.2.1) in the Contact header field URI of the initial request for a dialog or the 2xx response to such requests. The UA MUST insert a parameter value identical to the last 'sip.pnspurr' feature-capability indicator (Section 6.2.1) that it received in a REGISTER response. If the UA has not received a 'sip.pnspurr' feature-capability indicator, the UA MUST NOT insert a 'pn-purr' SIP URI parameter in a request or response. The UA makes the decision to receive push notifications triggered by incoming mid-dialog requests based on local policy. Such policy might be based on the type of SIP dialog, the type of media (if any) negotiated for the dialog [RFC3264], etc. NOTE: As the 'pn-purr' SIP URI parameter only applies to a given dialog, the UA needs to insert a 'pn-purr' parameter in the Contact header field URI of the request or response for each dialog in which the UA is willing to receive push notifications triggered by incoming mid-dialog requests.6.2. SIP Proxy Behavior6.2.1. REGISTER If the proxy supports requesting push notifications triggered by mid- dialog requests being sent to the registered UA, the proxy MUST store the information (the 'pn-*' SIP URI parameters) needed to request that push notifications are sent to the UA when a proxy receives an initial REGISTER request for a binding from the UA. In addition, the proxy MUST generate a unique (within the context of the proxy) value, referred to as the PURR (Proxy Unique Registration Reference), that can be used as a key to retrieve the information. In order to prevent client fingerprinting, the proxy MUST periodically generate a new PURR value (even if 'pn-*'parameters did not change). However, as long as there are ongoing dialogs associated with the old value, the proxy MUST store it so that it can request that push notifications are sent to the UA when it receives a mid-dialog request addressed towards the UA. In addition, the PURR value MUST be generated in such a way so that it is unforgeable, anonymous, and unlinkable to entities other than the proxy. It must not be possible for an attacker to generate a valid PURR, toHolmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 25]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 2019 associate a PURR with a specific user, or to determine when two PURRs correspond to the same user. It can be generated, e.g., by utilizing a cryptographically secure random function with an appropriately large output size. Whenever the proxy receives a 2xx response to a REGISTER request, the proxy MUST insert a 'sip.pnspurr' feature-capability indicator with the latest PURR value (see above) in the response.6.2.2. Initial Request for Dialog When a proxy receives an initial request for a dialog from a UA that contains a 'pn-purr' SIP URI parameter in the Contact header field URI with a PURR value that the proxy has generated (Section 6.2.1), the proxy MUST add a Record-Route header to the request to insert itself in the dialog route [RFC3261] before forwarding the request. When the proxy receives an initial request for a dialog addressed towards the UA, and the proxy has generated a PURR value associated with the 'pn-*' parameters inserted in the SIP URI of the request (Section 6.2.2), the proxy MUST add a Record-Route header to the request to insert itself in the dialog route [RFC3261] before forwarding the request.6.2.3. Mid-dialog Request When the proxy receives a mid-dialog SIP request addressed towards the UA that contains a 'pn-purr' SIP URI parameter, and the proxy is able to retrieve the stored information needed to request that a push notification be sent to the UA (Section 6.2.1), the proxy MUST place the SIP request in the SIP Request Push Bucket and request that a push notification be sent to the UA. NOTE: The 'pn-purr' SIP URI parameter will either be carried in the Request-URI or in a Route header field [RFC3261] of the SIP request depending on how the route set [RFC3261] of the mid-dialog SIP request has been constructed. When the proxy receives a 2xx response to a REGISTER request, the proxy checks whether the SIP Request Push Bucket contains a mid- dialog SIP request associated with the REGISTER transaction. If the bucket contains such a request, the proxy MUST remove the SIP request from the SIP Request Push Bucket and forward it towards the UA. Note that the proxy does not perform a URI comparison (Section 5.3) when processing mid-dialog requests, as a mid-dialog request will not contain the 'pn-prid', 'pn-provider', and 'pn-param' SIP URIHolmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 26]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 2019 parameters. The proxy only checks for a mid-dialog request that contains the PURR value associated with the REGISTER 2xx response. As described inSection 5.6.2, while waiting for the push notification request to succeed, and then for the associated REGISTER request and 2xx response, the proxy needs to take into consideration that the transaction associated with the mid-dialog request will eventually time out at the sender of the request (User Agent Client), and the sender will consider the transaction a failure. When a proxy sends an error response to a mid-dialog request (e.g., due to a transaction time out), the proxy SHOULD select a response code that only impacts the transaction associated with the request [RFC5079].7. Support of SIP Replaces [RFC3891] defines a mechanism that allows a SIP UA to replace a dialog with another dialog. A UA that wants to replace a dialog with another one will send an initial request for the new dialog. The Request-URI of the request will contain the Contact header field URI of the peer. If a SIP proxy wants to be able to request that a push notification be sent to a UA when it receives an initial request for a dialog that replaces an existing dialog, using the mechanism in [RFC3891], the proxy and the UA MUST perform the following actions: o The proxy MUST provide a PURR to the UA during registration (Section 6.2.1). o The UA MUST insert a 'pn-purr' SIP URI parameter in the Contact header field URI of either the initial request for a dialog or a 2xx response to such requests (Section 6.1.1). This includes dialogs replacing other dialogs, as those dialogs might also get replaced. o The proxy MUST apply the mechanism defined inSection 6.2.3 to place and retrieve the request from the SIP Request Push Bucket. In addition, the operator needs to make sure that the initial request for dialogs, addressed towards the UA using the contact of the replaced dialog, will be routed to the SIP proxy (in order to request that a push notification be sent to the UA). The procedures for doing that are operator-specific and are outside the scope of this specification.Holmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 27]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 20198. Grammar8.1. 555 (Push Notification Service Not Supported) Response Code The 555 response code is added to the "Server-Error" Status-Code definition. 555 (Push Notification Service Not Supported) is used to indicate that the server does not support the push notification service identified in a 'pn-provider' SIP URI parameter. The use of the SIP 555 response code is only defined for SIP REGISTER responses.8.2. 'sip.pns' Feature-Capability Indicator The sip.pns feature-capability indicator, when inserted in a Feature- Caps header field of a SIP REGISTER request or a SIP 2xx response to a REGISTER request, indicates that the entity associated with the indicator supports the SIP push mechanism and the type of push notification service indicated by the indicator value. The values defined for the 'pn-provider' SIP URI parameter are used as indicator values. pns-fc = "+sip.pns" EQUAL LDQUOT pns RDQUOT pns = tag-value tag-value = <tag-value defined in [RFC3840]>8.3. 'sip.vapid' Feature-Capability Indicator The sip.vapid feature-capability indicator, when inserted in a SIP 2xx response to a SIP REGISTER request, denotes that the entity associated with the indicator supports the Voluntary Application Server Identification (VAPID) [RFC8292] mechanism when the entity requests that a push notification be sent to a SIP UA. The indicator value is a public key identifying the entity that can be used by a SIP UA to restrict subscriptions to that entity. vapid-fc = "+sip.vapid" EQUAL LDQUOT vapid RDQUOT vapid = tag-value tag-value = <tag-value defined in [RFC3840]>8.4. 'sip.pnsreg' Feature-Capability Indicator The sip.pnsreg feature-capability indicator, when inserted in a SIP 2xx response to a SIP REGISTER request, denotes that the entity associated with the indicator expects to receive binding-refresh REGISTER requests from the SIP UA associated with the binding beforeHolmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 28]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 2019 the binding expires, even if the entity does not request that a push notification be sent to the SIP UA in order to trigger the binding- refresh REGISTER requests. The indicator value conveys the minimum time (given in seconds) prior to the binding expiration when the UA MUST send the REGISTER request. pns-fc = "+sip.pnsreg" EQUAL LDQUOT reg RDQUOT reg = 1*DIGIT DIGIT = <DIGIT defined in [RFC3261]>8.5. 'sip.pnsreg' Media Feature Tag The sip.pnsreg media feature tag, when inserted in the Contact header field of a SIP REGISTER request, indicates that the SIP UA associated with the tag is able to send binding-refresh REGISTER requests for the associated binding without being awakened by push notifications. The media feature tag has no values. pnsreg-mt = "+sip.pnsreg"8.6. 'sip.pnspurr' Feature-Capability Indicator The sip.pnspurr feature-capability indicator, when inserted in a SIP 2xx response to a SIP REGISTER request, denotes that the entity associated with the indicator will store information that can be used to associate a mid-dialog SIP request with the binding information in the REGISTER request. pnspurr-fc = "+sip.pnspurr" EQUAL LDQUOT pnspurr RDQUOT pnspurr = tag-value tag-value = <tag-value defined in [RFC3840]>8.7. SIP URI Parameters This section defines new SIP URI parameters by extending the grammar for "uri-parameter" as defined in [RFC3261]. The ABNF [RFC5234] is as follows: uri-parameter =/ pn-provider / pn-param / pn-prid / pn-purr pn-provider = "pn-provider" [EQUAL pvalue] pn-param = "pn-param" EQUAL pvalue pn-prid = "pn-prid" EQUAL pvalue pn-purr = "pn-purr" EQUAL pvalue pvalue = <pvalue defined in [RFC3261]> EQUAL = <EQUAL defined in [RFC3261]>Holmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 29]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 2019 The format and semantics of pn-prid and pn-param are specific to the pn-provider value. Parameter value characters that are not part of pvalue need to be escaped, as defined inRFC 3261.9. PNS Registration Requirements When a new value is registered to the PNS subregistry, a reference to a specification that describes the usage of the PNS associated with the value is provided. That specification MUST contain the following information: o The value of the 'pn-provider' SIP URI parameter. o How the 'pn-prid' SIP URI parameter value is retrieved and set by the SIP UA. o How the 'pn-param' SIP URI parameter (if required for the specific PNS provider) value is retrieved and set by the SIP UA.10. 'pn-provider', 'pn-param', and 'pn-prid' URI Parameters for Apple Push Notification service When the Apple Push Notification service (APNs) is used, the PNS-related SIP URI parameters are set as described below. For detailed information about the parameter values, see <https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/NetworkingInternet/Conceptual/RemoteNotificationsPG/CommunicatingwithAPNs.html> [pns-apns]. The value of the 'pn-provider' URI parameter is "apns". Example: pn-provider=apns The value of the 'pn-param' URI parameter is a string that is composed of two values separated by a period (.): Team ID and Topic. The Team ID is provided by Apple and is unique to a development team. The Topic consists of the Bundle ID, which uniquely identifies an application, and a service value that identifies a service associated with the application, separated by a period (.). For Voice over IP (VoIP) applications, the service value is "voip". Example: pn-param=DEF123GHIJ.com.example.yourexampleapp.voipHolmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 30]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 2019 NOTE: The Bundle ID might contain one or more periods (.). Hence, within the 'pn-param' value, the first period will be separating the Team ID from the Topic, and within the Topic, the last period will be separating the Bundle ID from the service. The value of the 'pn-prid' URI parameter is the device token, which is a unique identifier assigned by Apple to a specific app on a specific device. Example: pn-prid=00fc13adff7851211. 'pn-provider', 'pn-param', and 'pn-prid' URI Parameters for Google Firebase Cloud Messaging (FCM) Push Notification Service When Firebase Cloud Messaging (FCM) is used, the PNS-related URI parameters are set as described below. For detailed information about the parameter values, see <https://firebase.google.com/docs/cloud-messaging/concept-options> [pns-fcm]. The value of the 'pn-provider' URI parameter is "fcm". The value of the 'pn-param' URI parameter is the Project ID. The value of the 'pn-prid' URI parameter is the Registration token, which is generated by the FCM SDK for each client app instance.12. 'pn-provider', 'pn-param', and 'pn-prid' URI Parameters forRFC8030 (Generic Event Delivery Using HTTP Push) When Generic Event Delivery Using HTTP Push is used, the PNS-related URI parameters are set as described below. The value of the 'pn-provider' URI parameter is "webpush". The value of the 'pn-param' URI parameter MUST NOT be used. The value of the 'pn-prid' URI parameter is the push subscription URI. SeeRFC 8030 [RFC8030] for more details. Note that encryption for web push [RFC8291] is not used; therefore, parameters for message encryption are not defined in this specification. Web push permits the sending of a push message without a payload without encryption.Holmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 31]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 201913. Security Considerations The security considerations for the use and operation of any particular PNS (e.g., how users and devices are authenticated and authorized) are out of scope for this document. [RFC8030] documents the security considerations for the PNS defined in that specification. Security considerations for other PNSs are left to their respective specifications. Typically, the PNS requires the SIP proxy requesting push notifications to be authenticated and authorized by the PNS. In some cases, the PNS also requires the SIP application (or the SIP application developer) to be identified in order for the application to request push notifications. Unless the PNS authenticates and authorizes the PNS, a malicious endpoint or network entity that managed to get access to the parameters transported in the SIP signaling might be able to request that push notifications are sent to a UA. Such push notifications will impact the battery life of the UA and trigger unnecessary SIP traffic. [RFC8292] defines a mechanism that allows a proxy to identify itself to a PNS by signing a JSON Web Token (JWT) sent to the PNS using a key pair. The public key serves as an identifier of the proxy and can be used by devices to restrict push notifications to the proxy associated with the key. Operators MUST ensure that the SIP signaling is properly secured, e.g., using encryption, from malicious network entities. TLS MUST be used unless the operators know that the signaling is secured using some other mechanism that provides strong crypto properties. In addition to the information that needs to be exchanged between a device and the PNS in order to establish a push notification subscription, the mechanism defined in this document does not require any additional information to be exchanged between the device and the PNS. The mechanism defined in this document does not require a proxy to insert any payload (in addition to possible payload used for the PNS itself) when requesting push notifications. Operators MUST ensure that the PNS-related SIP URI parameters conveyed by a user in the Contact URI of a REGISTER request are not sent to other users or to non-trusted network entities. One way to convey contact information is by using the SIP event package for registrations mechanism [RFC3680]. [RFC3680] defines generic security considerations for the SIP event package for registrations. As the PNS-related SIP URI parameters conveyed in the REGISTERHolmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 32]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 2019 request contain sensitive information, operators that support the event package MUST ensure that event package subscriptions are properly authenticated and authorized, and that the SIP URI parameters are not inserted in event notifications sent to other users or to non-trusted network entities.14. IANA Considerations14.1. SIP URI Parameters This section defines new SIP URI Parameters that extend the "SIP/SIPS URI Parameters" subregistry [RFC3969] under the SIP Parameters registry (https://www.iana.org/assignments/sip-parameters).14.1.1. pn-provider Parameter Name: pn-provider Predefined Values: No Reference:RFC 859914.1.2. pn-param Parameter Name: pn-param Predefined Values: No Reference:RFC 859914.1.3. pn-prid Parameter Name: pn-prid Predefined Values: No Reference:RFC 859914.1.4. pn-purr Parameter Name: pn-purr Predefined Values: No Reference:RFC 8599Holmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 33]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 201914.2. SIP Response Codes14.2.1. 555 (Push Notification Service Not Supported) This section defines a new SIP response code that extends the "Response Codes" subregistry [RFC3261] under the SIP Parameters registry (https://www.iana.org/assignments/sip-parameters). Response Code Number: 555 Default Reason Phrase: Push Notification Service Not Supported14.3. SIP Global Feature-Capability Indicator14.3.1. sip.pns This section defines a new feature-capability indicator that extends the "SIP Feature-Capability Indicator Registration Tree" subregistry [RFC6809] under the SIP Parameters registry (https://www.iana.org/assignments/sip-parameters). Name: sip.pns Description: This feature-capability indicator, when inserted in a Feature-Caps header field of a SIP REGISTER request or a SIP 2xx response to a REGISTER request, denotes that the entity associated with the indicator supports the SIP push mechanism and the type of push notification service conveyed by the indicator value. Reference:RFC 8599 Contact: IESG (iesg@ietf.org)14.3.2. sip.vapid This section defines a new feature-capability indicator that extends the "SIP Feature-Capability Indicator Registration Tree" subregistry [RFC6809] under the SIP Parameters registry (https://www.iana.org/assignments/sip-parameters). Name: sip.vapid Description: This feature-capability indicator, when inserted in a SIP 2xx response to a SIP REGISTER request, denotes that the entity associated with the indicator supports the Voluntary Application Server Identification (VAPID) mechanism when the entity requests that a push notification be sent to a SIP UA.Holmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 34]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 2019 The indicator value is a public key identifying the entity, which can be used by a SIP UA to restrict subscriptions to that entity. Reference:RFC 8599 Contact: IESG (iesg@ietf.org)14.3.3. sip.pnsreg This section defines a new feature-capability indicator that extends the "SIP Feature-Capability Indicator Registration Tree" subregistry [RFC6809] under the SIP Parameters registry (https://www.iana.org/assignments/sip-parameters). Name: sip.pnsreg Description: This feature-capability indicator, when inserted in a SIP 2xx response to a SIP REGISTER request, denotes that the entity associated with the indicator expects to receive binding-refresh REGISTER requests for the binding from the SIP UA associated with the binding before the binding expires, even if the entity does not request that a push notification be sent to the SIP UA in order to trigger the binding-refresh REGISTER requests. The indicator value conveys the minimum time (given in seconds) prior to the binding expiration when the UA MUST send the REGISTER request. Reference:RFC 8599 Contact: IESG (iesg@ietf.org)14.3.4. sip.pnspurr This section defines a new feature-capability indicator that extends the "SIP Feature-Capability Indicator Registration Tree" subregistry [RFC6809] under the SIP Parameters registry (https://www.iana.org/assignments/sip-parameters). Name: sip.pnspurr Description: This feature-capability indicator, when inserted in a SIP 2xx response to a SIP REGISTER request, conveys that the entity associated with the indicator will store information that can be used to associate a mid-dialog SIP request with the binding information in the REGISTER request. The indicator value is an identifier that can be used as a key to retrieve the binding information.Holmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 35]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 2019 Reference:RFC 8599 Contact: IESG (iesg@ietf.org)14.4. SIP Media Feature Tag14.4.1. sip.pnsreg This section defines a new media feature tag that extends the "SIP Media Feature Tag Registration Tree" subregistry [RFC3840] under the "Media Feature Tags" registry (https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-feature-tags). Media feature tag name: sip.pnsreg Summary of the media feature indicated by this feature tag: This media feature tag, when inserted in the Contact header field of a SIP REGISTER request, conveys that the SIP UA associated with the tag is able to send binding-refresh REGISTER requests associated with the registration without being awakened by push notifications. Values appropriate for use with this feature tag: none Related standards or documents:RFC 8599 Security considerations: This media feature tag does not introduce new security considerations, as it simply indicates support for a basic SIP feature. If an attacker manages to remove the media feature tag, push notifications will not be requested to be sent to the client. Contact: IESG (iesg@ietf.org)14.5. PNS Subregistry Establishment This section creates a new subregistry, "PNS", under the SIP Parameters registry (https://www.iana.org/assignments/sip-parameters). The purpose of the subregistry is to register SIP URI 'pn-provider' values. When a SIP URI 'pn-provider' value is registered in the subregistry, it needs to meet the "Specification Required" policies defined in [RFC8126].Holmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 36]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 2019 This subregistry is defined as a table that contains the following three columns: Value: The token under registration Description: The name of the Push Notification Service (PNS) Document: A reference to the document defining the registration This specification registers the following values: Value Description Document ------- -------------------------------------- ---------- apns Apple Push Notification serviceRFC 8599 fcm Firebase Cloud MessagingRFC 8599 webpush Generic Event Delivery Using HTTP PushRFC 859915. References15.1. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. [RFC3261] Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston, A., Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M., and E. Schooler, "SIP: Session Initiation Protocol",RFC 3261, DOI 10.17487/RFC3261, June 2002, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3261>. [RFC3840] Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., and P. Kyzivat, "Indicating User Agent Capabilities in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)",RFC 3840, DOI 10.17487/RFC3840, August 2004, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3840>. [RFC3891] Mahy, R., Biggs, B., and R. Dean, "The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) "Replaces" Header",RFC 3891, DOI 10.17487/RFC3891, September 2004, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3891>.Holmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 37]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 2019 [RFC3969] Camarillo, G., "The Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA) Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) Parameter Registry for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)",BCP 99,RFC 3969, DOI 10.17487/RFC3969, December 2004, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3969>. [RFC5079] Rosenberg, J., "Rejecting Anonymous Requests in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)",RFC 5079, DOI 10.17487/RFC5079, December 2007, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5079>. [RFC5234] Crocker, D., Ed. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF", STD 68,RFC 5234, DOI 10.17487/RFC5234, January 2008, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5234>. [RFC6809] Holmberg, C., Sedlacek, I., and H. Kaplan, "Mechanism to Indicate Support of Features and Capabilities in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)",RFC 6809, DOI 10.17487/RFC6809, November 2012, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6809>. [RFC8030] Thomson, M., Damaggio, E., and B. Raymor, Ed., "Generic Event Delivery Using HTTP Push",RFC 8030, DOI 10.17487/RFC8030, December 2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8030>. [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase inRFC2119 Key Words",BCP 14,RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>. [RFC8292] Thomson, M. and P. Beverloo, "Voluntary Application Server Identification (VAPID) for Web Push",RFC 8292, DOI 10.17487/RFC8292, November 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8292>. [pns-apns] Apple Inc., "Local and Remote Notification Programming Guide: Communicating with APNs", <https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/NetworkingInternet/Conceptual/RemoteNotificationsPG/CommunicatingwithAPNs.html>. [pns-fcm] Google Inc., "Firebase Cloud Messaging", <https://firebase.google.com/docs/cloud-messaging/concept-options>.Holmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 38]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 201915.2. Informative References [RFC3264] Rosenberg, J. and H. Schulzrinne, "An Offer/Answer Model with Session Description Protocol (SDP)",RFC 3264, DOI 10.17487/RFC3264, June 2002, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3264>. [RFC3680] Rosenberg, J., "A Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Event Package for Registrations",RFC 3680, DOI 10.17487/RFC3680, March 2004, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3680>. [RFC4320] Sparks, R., "Actions Addressing Identified Issues with the Session Initiation Protocol's (SIP) Non-INVITE Transaction",RFC 4320, DOI 10.17487/RFC4320, January 2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4320>. [RFC4321] Sparks, R., "Problems Identified Associated with the Session Initiation Protocol's (SIP) Non-INVITE Transaction",RFC 4321, DOI 10.17487/RFC4321, January 2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4321>. [RFC5626] Jennings, C., Ed., Mahy, R., Ed., and F. Audet, Ed., "Managing Client-Initiated Connections in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)",RFC 5626, DOI 10.17487/RFC5626, October 2009, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5626>. [RFC6665] Roach, A., "SIP-Specific Event Notification",RFC 6665, DOI 10.17487/RFC6665, July 2012, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6665>. [RFC8126] Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs",BCP 26,RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126>. [RFC8291] Thomson, M., "Message Encryption for Web Push",RFC 8291, DOI 10.17487/RFC8291, November 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8291>.Holmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 39]
RFC 8599 SIP PUSH May 2019Acknowledgements Thanks to Paul Kyzivat, Dale Worley, Ranjit Avasarala, Martin Thomson, Mikael Klein, Susanna Sjoholm, Kari-Pekka Perttula, Liviu Chircu, Roman Shpount, Yehoshua Gev, and Jean Mahoney for reading the text and providing useful feedback.Authors' Addresses Christer Holmberg Ericsson Hirsalantie 11 Jorvas 02420 Finland Email: christer.holmberg@ericsson.com Michael Arnold Metaswitch Networks 100 Church Street Enfield EN2 6BQ United Kingdom Email: Michael.Arnold@metaswitch.comHolmberg & Arnold Standards Track [Page 40]
[8]ページ先頭