Movatterモバイル変換
[0]ホーム
[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]
PROPOSED STANDARD
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Y. FuRequest for Comments: 7870 CNNICCategory: Standards Track S. JiangISSN: 2070-1721 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd J. Dong Y. Chen Tsinghua University June 2016Dual-Stack Lite (DS-Lite) Management Information Base (MIB) forAddress Family Transition Routers (AFTRs)Abstract This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in the Internet community. In particular, it defines managed objects for Address Family Transition Routers (AFTRs) of Dual-Stack Lite (DS-Lite).Status of This Memo This is an Internet Standards Track document. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available inSection 2 of RFC 7841. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained athttp://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7870.Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject toBCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.Fu, et al. Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 7870 DS-Lite MIB for AFTRs June 2016Table of Contents1. Introduction ....................................................22. Requirements Language ...........................................23. The Internet-Standard Management Framework ......................34. Relationship to the IF-MIB ......................................35. Difference from the IP Tunnel MIB and NATV2-MIB .................36. Structure of the MIB Module .....................................46.1. The Object Group ...........................................56.1.1. The dsliteTunnel Subtree ............................56.1.2. The dsliteNAT Subtree ...............................56.1.3. The dsliteInfo Subtree ..............................56.2. The Notification Group .....................................56.3. The Conformance Group ......................................57. MIB Modules Required for IMPORTS ................................58. Definitions .....................................................69. Security Considerations ........................................2210. IANA Considerations ...........................................2411. References ....................................................2411.1. Normative References .....................................2411.2. Informative References ...................................26 Acknowledgements ..................................................27 Authors' Addresses ................................................271. Introduction Dual-Stack Lite [RFC6333] is a solution that offers both IPv4 and IPv6 connectivity to customers crossing an IPv6-only infrastructure. One of its key components is an IPv4-over-IPv6 tunnel, which is used to provide IPv4 connectivity across a service provider's IPv6 network. Another key component is a carrier-grade IPv4-IPv4 Network Address Translation (NAT) to share service provider IPv4 addresses among customers. This document defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in the Internet community. This MIB module may be used for configuration and monitoring of Address Family Transition Routers (AFTRs) in a Dual- Stack Lite scenario.2. Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described inBCP14,RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. When these words are not in ALL CAPS (such as "should" or "Should"), they have their usual English meanings and are not to be interpreted as [RFC2119] key words.Fu, et al. Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 7870 DS-Lite MIB for AFTRs June 20163. The Internet-Standard Management Framework For a detailed overview of the documents that describe the current Internet-Standard Management Framework, please refer tosection 7 of [RFC3410]. Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed the Management Information Base or MIB. MIB objects are generally accessed through the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP). Objects in the MIB are defined using the mechanisms defined in the Structure of Management Information (SMI). This memo specifies a MIB module that is compliant to the SMIv2, which is described in STD 58,RFC 2578 [RFC2578], STD 58,RFC 2579 [RFC2579], and STD 58,RFC 2580 [RFC2580].4. Relationship to the IF-MIB The Interfaces MIB [RFC2863] defines generic managed objects for managing interfaces. Each logical interface (physical or virtual) has an ifEntry. Tunnels are handled by creating a logical interface (ifEntry) for each tunnel. Each DS-Lite tunnel endpoint also acts as a virtual interface that has a corresponding entry in the IP Tunnel MIB and Interface MIB. Those corresponding entries are indexed by ifIndex. The ifOperStatus in ifTable is used to represent whether the DS-Lite tunnel function has been triggered. The ifInUcastPkts defined in ifTable will represent the number of IPv4 packets that have been encapsulated into IPv6 packets sent to a Basic Bridging BroadBand (B4). The ifOutUcastPkts defined in ifTable contains the number of IPv6 packets that can be decapsulated to IPv4 in the virtual interface. Also, the IF-MIB defines ifMtu for the MTU of this tunnel interface, so the DS-Lite MIB does not need to define the MTU for the tunnel.5. Difference from the IP Tunnel MIB and NATV2-MIB The key technologies for DS-Lite are IP-in-IP (IPv4-in-IPv6) tunnels and NAT (IPv4-to-IPv4 translation). Notes: According toSection 5.2 of [RFC6333], DS-Lite only defines IPv4 in IPv6 tunnels at this moment, but other types of encapsulation could be defined in the future. So, the DS-Lite MIB only supports IP-in-IP encapsulation. If another RFC defines other tunnel types in the future, the DS-Lite MIB will be updated then.Fu, et al. Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 7870 DS-Lite MIB for AFTRs June 2016 The NATV2-MIB [RFC7659] is designed to carry translation from any address family to any address family; therefore, it supports IPv4-to- IPv4 translation. The IP Tunnel MIB [RFC4087] is designed to manage tunnels of any type over IPv4 and IPv6 networks; therefore, it already supports IP-in-IP tunnels. But in a DS-Lite scenario, the tunnel type is point-to- multipoint IP-in-IP tunnels. The direct(2) defined in the IP Tunnel MIB only supports point-to-point tunnels. So, it needs to define a new tunnel type for DS-Lite. However, the NATV2-MIB and IP Tunnel MIB together are not sufficient to support DS-Lite. This document describes the specific features for the DS-Lite MIB, as below. In the DS-Lite scenario, the Address Family Transition Router (AFTR) is not only the tunnel-end concentrator, but also an IPv4-to-IPv4 NAT. So, as defined in [RFC6333], when the IPv4 packets come back from the Internet to the AFTR, it knows how to reconstruct the IPv6 encapsulation by doing a reverse lookup in the extended IPv4 NAT binding table (Section 6.6 of [RFC6333]). The NAT binding table in the AFTR is extended to include the IPv6 address of the tunnel initiator. However, the NAT binding information defined in the NATV2-MIB as natv2PortMapTable is indexed by the NAT instance, protocol, and external realm and address. Because the tunnelIfTable defined in the TUNNEL-MIB [RFC4087] is indexed by the ifIndex, the DS-Lite MIB needs to define the tunnel objects to extend the NAT binding entry by interface. Therefore, a combined MIB is necessary. An implementation of the IP Tunnel MIB is required for DS-Lite. As the tunnel is not point-to-point in DS-Lite, it needs to define a new tunnel type for DS-Lite. The tunnelIfEncapsMethod in the tunnelIfEntry should be set to dsLite(17), and a corresponding entry in the DS-Lite module will exist for every tunnelIfEntry with this tunnelIfEncapsMethod. The tunnelIfRemoteInetAddress must be set to "::".6. Structure of the MIB Module The DS-Lite MIB provides a way to monitor and manage the devices (AFTRs) in a DS-Lite scenario through SNMP. The DS-Lite MIB is configurable on a per-interface basis. It depends on several parts of the IF-MIB [RFC2863], IP Tunnel MIB [RFC4087], and NATV2-MIB [RFC7659].Fu, et al. Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 7870 DS-Lite MIB for AFTRs June 20166.1. The Object Group This group defines objects that are needed for the DS-Lite MIB.6.1.1. The dsliteTunnel Subtree The dsliteTunnel subtree describes managed objects used for managing tunnels in the DS-Lite scenario. Because the tunnelInetConfigLocalAddress and the tunnelInetConfigRemoteAddress defined in the IP Tunnel MIB are not readable, a few new objects are defined in the DS-Lite MIB.6.1.2. The dsliteNAT Subtree The dsliteNAT subtree describes managed objects used for configuration and monitoring of an AFTR that is capable of a NAT function. Because the NATV2-MIB supports the NAT management function in DS-Lite, we may reuse it in the DS-Lite MIB. The dsliteNAT subtree also provides the mapping information between the tunnel entry (dsliteTunnelEntry) and the NAT entry (dsliteNATBindEntry) by adding the IPv6 address of the B4 to the natv2PortMapEntry in the NATV2-MIB. The mapping behavior, filtering behavior, and pooling behavior described in this subtree are all defined in [RFC4787].6.1.3. The dsliteInfo Subtree The dsliteInfo subtree provides statistical information for DS-Lite.6.2. The Notification Group This group defines some notification objects for a DS-Lite scenario.6.3. The Conformance Group The dsliteConformance subtree provides conformance information of MIB objects.7. MIB Modules Required for IMPORTS This MIB module IMPORTs objects from [RFC2578], [RFC2580], [RFC2863], [RFC3411], [RFC4001], and [RFC7659].Fu, et al. Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 7870 DS-Lite MIB for AFTRs June 20168. Definitions DSLite-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN IMPORTS MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, mib-2, NOTIFICATION-TYPE, Integer32, Counter64, Unsigned32 FROM SNMPv2-SMI OBJECT-GROUP, MODULE-COMPLIANCE, NOTIFICATION-GROUP FROM SNMPv2-CONF SnmpAdminString FROM SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB ifIndex FROM IF-MIB InetAddress, InetAddressType, InetAddressPrefixLength, InetPortNumber FROM INET-ADDRESS-MIB ProtocolNumber, Natv2InstanceIndex, Natv2SubscriberIndex FROM NATV2-MIB; dsliteMIB MODULE-IDENTITY LAST-UPDATED "201605110000Z" -- May 11, 2016 ORGANIZATION "IETF Softwire Working Group" CONTACT-INFO "Yu Fu CNNIC No.4 South 4th Street, Zhongguancun Hai-Dian District, Beijing 100090 China Email: fuyu@cnnic.cn Sheng Jiang Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd Huawei Building, 156 Beiqing Rd. Hai-Dian District, Beijing 100095 China Email: jiangsheng@huawei.comFu, et al. Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 7870 DS-Lite MIB for AFTRs June 2016 Jiang Dong Tsinghua University Department of Computer Science, Tsinghua University Beijing 100084 China Email: knight.dongjiang@gmail.com Yuchi Chen Tsinghua University Department of Computer Science, Tsinghua University Beijing 100084 China Email: flashfoxmx@gmail.com " DESCRIPTION "The MIB module is defined for management of objects in the DS-Lite scenario. Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth inSection 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info)." REVISION "201605110000Z" DESCRIPTION "Initial version. Published asRFC 7870." ::= { mib-2 240 } --Top-level components of this MIB module dsliteMIBObjects OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { dsliteMIB 1 } dsliteTunnel OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { dsliteMIBObjects 1 } dsliteNAT OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { dsliteMIBObjects 2 } dsliteInfo OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { dsliteMIBObjects 3 } --Notifications sectionFu, et al. Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 7870 DS-Lite MIB for AFTRs June 2016 dsliteNotifications OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { dsliteMIB 0 } --dsliteTunnel --dsliteTunnelTable dsliteTunnelTable OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF DsliteTunnelEntry MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The (conceptual) table containing information on configured tunnels. This table can be used to map a B4 address to the associated AFTR address. It can also be used for row creation." REFERENCE "B4, AFTR:RFC 6333." ::= { dsliteTunnel 1 } dsliteTunnelEntry OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX DsliteTunnelEntry MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Each entry in this table contains the information on a particular configured tunnel." INDEX { dsliteTunnelAddressType, dsliteTunnelStartAddress, dsliteTunnelEndAddress, ifIndex } ::= { dsliteTunnelTable 1 } DsliteTunnelEntry ::= SEQUENCE { dsliteTunnelAddressType InetAddressType, dsliteTunnelStartAddress InetAddress, dsliteTunnelEndAddress InetAddress, dsliteTunnelStartAddPreLen InetAddressPrefixLength } dsliteTunnelAddressType OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX InetAddressType MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This object MUST be set to the value of ipv6(2).Fu, et al. Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 7870 DS-Lite MIB for AFTRs June 2016 It describes the address type of the IPv4-in-IPv6 tunnel initiator and endpoint." REFERENCE "ipv6(2):RFC 4001." ::= { dsliteTunnelEntry 1 } dsliteTunnelStartAddress OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX InetAddress (SIZE (0..16)) MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The IPv6 address of the initiator of the tunnel. The address type is given by dsliteTunnelAddressType." ::= { dsliteTunnelEntry 2 } dsliteTunnelEndAddress OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX InetAddress (SIZE (0..16)) MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The IPv6 address of the endpoint of the tunnel. The address type is given by dsliteTunnelAddressType." ::= { dsliteTunnelEntry 3 } dsliteTunnelStartAddPreLen OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX InetAddressPrefixLength MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The IPv6 prefix length of the IP address for the initiator of the tunnel(dsliteTunnelStartAddress)." ::= { dsliteTunnelEntry 4 } --dsliteNATBindTable(according to the NAPT scheme) dsliteNATBindTable OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF DsliteNATBindEntry MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This table contains information about currently active NAT binds in the NAT of the AFTR. This table adds the IPv6 address of a B4 to the natv2PortMapTable defined in NATV2-MIB (RFC 7659)." REFERENCE "NATV2-MIB:Section 4 of RFC 7659." ::= { dsliteNAT 1 }Fu, et al. Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 7870 DS-Lite MIB for AFTRs June 2016 dsliteNATBindEntry OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX DsliteNATBindEntry MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The entry in this table holds the mapping relationship between tunnel information and NAT bind information. Each entry in this table not only needs to match a corresponding entry in the natv2PortMapTable, but also a corresponding entry in the dsliteTunnelTable. So, the INDEX of the entry needs to match a corresponding value in the natv2PortMapTable INDEX and a corresponding value in the dsliteTunnelTable INDEX. These entries are lost upon agent restart." REFERENCE "natv2PortMapTable:Section 4 of RFC 7659." INDEX { dsliteNATBindMappingInstanceIndex, dsliteNATBindMappingProto, dsliteNATBindMappingExtRealm, dsliteNATBindMappingExtAddressType, dsliteNATBindMappingExtAddress, dsliteNATBindMappingExtPort, ifIndex, dsliteTunnelStartAddress } ::= { dsliteNATBindTable 1 } DsliteNATBindEntry ::= SEQUENCE { dsliteNATBindMappingInstanceIndex Natv2InstanceIndex, dsliteNATBindMappingProto ProtocolNumber, dsliteNATBindMappingExtRealm SnmpAdminString, dsliteNATBindMappingExtAddressType InetAddressType, dsliteNATBindMappingExtAddress InetAddress, dsliteNATBindMappingExtPort InetPortNumber, dsliteNATBindMappingIntRealm SnmpAdminString, dsliteNATBindMappingIntAddressType InetAddressType, dsliteNATBindMappingIntAddress InetAddress, dsliteNATBindMappingIntPort InetPortNumber, dsliteNATBindMappingPool Unsigned32, dsliteNATBindMappingMapBehavior INTEGER, dsliteNATBindMappingFilterBehavior INTEGER, dsliteNATBindMappingAddressPooling INTEGER } dsliteNATBindMappingInstanceIndex OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Natv2InstanceIndex MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS currentFu, et al. Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 7870 DS-Lite MIB for AFTRs June 2016 DESCRIPTION "Index of the NAT instance that created this port map entry." ::= { dsliteNATBindEntry 1 } dsliteNATBindMappingProto OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX ProtocolNumber MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This object specifies the mapping's transport protocol number." ::= { dsliteNATBindEntry 2 } dsliteNATBindMappingExtRealm OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SnmpAdminString (SIZE(0..32)) MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The realm to which dsliteNATBindMappingExtAddress belongs." ::= { dsliteNATBindEntry 3 } dsliteNATBindMappingExtAddressType OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX InetAddressType MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Address type for the mapping's external address. This object MUST be set to the value of iPv4(1). The values of ipv6(2), ipv4z(3), and ipv6z(4) are not allowed." REFERENCE "ipv4(1), ipv6(2), iPv4z(3), and ipv6z(4):RFC 4001." ::= { dsliteNATBindEntry 4 } dsliteNATBindMappingExtAddress OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX InetAddress (SIZE (0..4)) MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The mapping's external address. This is the source address for translated outgoing packets. The address type is given by dsliteNATBindMappingExtAddressType." ::= { dsliteNATBindEntry 5 } dsliteNATBindMappingExtPort OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX InetPortNumberFu, et al. Standards Track [Page 11]
RFC 7870 DS-Lite MIB for AFTRs June 2016 MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The mapping's assigned external port number. This is the source port for translated outgoing packets. This MUST be a non-zero value." ::= { dsliteNATBindEntry 6 } dsliteNATBindMappingIntRealm OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SnmpAdminString (SIZE(0..32)) MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The realm to which natMappingIntAddress belongs. This realm defines the IPv6 address space from which the tunnel source address is taken. The realm of the encapsulated IPv4 address is restricted in scope to the tunnel, so there is no point in identifying it separately." ::= { dsliteNATBindEntry 7 } dsliteNATBindMappingIntAddressType OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX InetAddressType MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Address type of the mapping's internal address. This object MUST be set to the value of iPv4z(3). The values of ipv4(1), ipv6(2), and ipv6z(4) are not allowed." REFERENCE "ipv4(1), ipv6(2), iPv4z(3), and ipv6z(4):RFC 4001." ::= { dsliteNATBindEntry 8 } dsliteNATBindMappingIntAddress OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX InetAddress MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The mapping's internal address. It is the IPv6 tunnel source address. The address type is given by dsliteNATBindMappingIntAddressType." ::= { dsliteNATBindEntry 9 } dsliteNATBindMappingIntPort OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX InetPortNumber MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS currentFu, et al. Standards Track [Page 12]
RFC 7870 DS-Lite MIB for AFTRs June 2016 DESCRIPTION "The mapping's internal port number. This MUST be a non-zero value." ::= { dsliteNATBindEntry 10 } dsliteNATBindMappingPool OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Unsigned32 (0|1..4294967295) MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Index of the pool that contains this mapping's external address and port. If zero, no pool is associated with this mapping." ::= { dsliteNATBindEntry 11 } dsliteNATBindMappingMapBehavior OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER{ endpointIndependent (0), addressDependent(1), addressAndPortDependent (2) } MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Mapping behavior as described inSection 4.1 of RFC 4787. endpointIndependent(0), the behavior REQUIRED byRFC 4787, REQ-1 maps the source address and port to the same external address and port for all destination address and port combinations reached through the same external realm and using the given protocol. addressDependent(1) maps to the same external address and port for all destination ports at the same destination address reached through the same external realm and using the given protocol. addressAndPortDependent(2) maps to a separate external address and port combination for each different destination address and port combination reached through the same external realm. For the DS-Lite scenario, it must be addressAndPortDependent(2)." REFERENCE "Mapping behavior:Section 4.1 of RFC 4787. DS-Lite:RFC 6333." ::= { dsliteNATBindEntry 12 }Fu, et al. Standards Track [Page 13]
RFC 7870 DS-Lite MIB for AFTRs June 2016 dsliteNATBindMappingFilterBehavior OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER{ endpointIndependent (0), addressDependent(1), addressAndPortDependent (2) } MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Filtering behavior as described inSection 5 of RFC 4787. endpointIndependent(0) accepts for translation packets from all combinations of remote address and port destined to the mapped external address and port via the given external realm and using the given protocol. addressDependent(1) accepts for translation packets from all remote ports from the same remote source address destined to the mapped external address and port via the given external realm and using the given protocol. addressAndPortDependent(2) accepts for translation only those packets with the same remote source address, port, and protocol incoming from the same external realm as identified when the applicable port map entry was created.RFC 4787, REQ-8 recommends either endpointIndependent(0) or addressDependent(1) filtering behavior, depending on whether application friendliness or security takes priority. For the DS-Lite scenario, it must be addressAndPortDependent(2)." REFERENCE "Filtering behavior:Section 5 of RFC 4787. DS-Lite:RFC 6333." ::= { dsliteNATBindEntry 13 } dsliteNATBindMappingAddressPooling OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER{ arbitrary (0), paired (1) } MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS currentFu, et al. Standards Track [Page 14]
RFC 7870 DS-Lite MIB for AFTRs June 2016 DESCRIPTION "Type of address pooling behavior that was used to create this mapping. arbitrary(0) pooling behavior means that the NAT instance may create the new port mapping using any address in the pool that has a free port for the protocol concerned. paired(1) pooling behavior, the behavior RECOMMENDED byRFC4787, REQ-2 means that once a given internal address has been mapped to a particular address in a particular pool, further mappings of the same internal address to that pool will reuse the previously assigned pool member address." REFERENCE "Pooling behavior:Section 4.1 of RFC 4787." ::= { dsliteNATBindEntry 14 } --dsliteInfo dsliteAFTRAlarmScalar OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { dsliteInfo 1 } dsliteAFTRAlarmB4AddrType OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX InetAddressType MAX-ACCESS accessible-for-notify STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This object indicates the address type of the B4, which will send an alarm." ::= { dsliteAFTRAlarmScalar 1 } dsliteAFTRAlarmB4Addr OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX InetAddress MAX-ACCESS accessible-for-notify STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This object indicates the IP address of B4, which will send an alarm. The address type is given by dsliteAFTRAlarmB4AddrType." ::= { dsliteAFTRAlarmScalar 2 } dsliteAFTRAlarmProtocolType OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER{ tcp (0), udp (1), icmp (2), total (3) }Fu, et al. Standards Track [Page 15]
RFC 7870 DS-Lite MIB for AFTRs June 2016 MAX-ACCESS accessible-for-notify STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This object indicates the transport protocol type of alarm. tcp (0) means that the transport protocol type of alarm is tcp. udp (1) means that the transport protocol type of alarm is udp. icmp (2) means that the transport protocol type of alarm is icmp. total (3) means that the transport protocol type of alarm is total." ::= { dsliteAFTRAlarmScalar 3 } dsliteAFTRAlarmSpecificIPAddrType OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX InetAddressType MAX-ACCESS accessible-for-notify STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This object indicates the address type of the IP address whose port usage has reached the threshold." ::= { dsliteAFTRAlarmScalar 4 } dsliteAFTRAlarmSpecificIP OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX InetAddress MAX-ACCESS accessible-for-notify STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This object indicates the IP address whose port usage has reached the threshold. The address type is given by dsliteAFTRAlarmSpecificIPAddrType." ::= { dsliteAFTRAlarmScalar 5 } dsliteAFTRAlarmConnectNumber OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 (60..90) MAX-ACCESS read-write STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This object indicates the notification threshold of the DS-Lite tunnels that is active in the AFTR device." REFERENCE "AFTR:Section 6 of RFC 6333."Fu, et al. Standards Track [Page 16]
RFC 7870 DS-Lite MIB for AFTRs June 2016 DEFVAL { 60 } ::= { dsliteAFTRAlarmScalar 6 } dsliteAFTRAlarmSessionNumber OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 MAX-ACCESS read-write STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This object indicates the notification threshold of the IPv4 session for the user." REFERENCE "AFTR:Section 6 of RFC 6333 B4:Section 5 of RFC 6333." DEFVAL { -1 } ::= { dsliteAFTRAlarmScalar 7 } dsliteAFTRAlarmPortNumber OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 MAX-ACCESS read-write STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This object indicates the notification threshold of the NAT ports that have been used by the user." DEFVAL { -1 } ::= { dsliteAFTRAlarmScalar 8 } dsliteStatisticsTable OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF DsliteStatisticsEntry MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This table provides statistical information about DS-Lite." ::= { dsliteInfo 2 } dsliteStatisticsEntry OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX DsliteStatisticsEntry MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Each entry in this table provides statistical information about DS-Lite." INDEX { dsliteStatisticsSubscriberIndex } ::= { dsliteStatisticsTable 1 }Fu, et al. Standards Track [Page 17]
RFC 7870 DS-Lite MIB for AFTRs June 2016 DsliteStatisticsEntry ::= SEQUENCE { dsliteStatisticsSubscriberIndex Natv2SubscriberIndex, dsliteStatisticsDiscards Counter64, dsliteStatisticsSends Counter64, dsliteStatisticsReceives Counter64, dsliteStatisticsIpv4Session Counter64, dsliteStatisticsIpv6Session Counter64 } dsliteStatisticsSubscriberIndex OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Natv2SubscriberIndex MAX-ACCESS not-accessible STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Index of the subscriber or host. A unique value, greater than zero, for each subscriber in the managed system." ::= { dsliteStatisticsEntry 1 } dsliteStatisticsDiscards OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Counter64 MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This object indicates the number of packets discarded from this subscriber." ::= { dsliteStatisticsEntry 2 } dsliteStatisticsSends OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Counter64 MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This object indicates the number of packets that is sent to this subscriber." ::= { dsliteStatisticsEntry 3 } dsliteStatisticsReceives OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Counter64 MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This object indicates the number of packets that is received from this subscriber." ::= { dsliteStatisticsEntry 4 }Fu, et al. Standards Track [Page 18]
RFC 7870 DS-Lite MIB for AFTRs June 2016 dsliteStatisticsIpv4Session OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Counter64 MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This object indicates the number of the current IPv4 Sessions." REFERENCE "Session: Paragraph 2 inSection 11 of RFC 6333. (The AFTR should have the capability to log the tunnel-id, protocol, ports/IP addresses, and the creation time of the NAT binding to uniquely identify the user sessions)." ::= { dsliteStatisticsEntry 5 } dsliteStatisticsIpv6Session OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Counter64 MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This object indicates the number of the current IPv6 session. Because the AFTR is also a dual-stack device, it will also forward normal IPv6 packets for the inbound and outbound direction." REFERENCE "Session: Paragraph 2 inSection 11 of RFC 6333. (The AFTR should have the capability to log the tunnel-id, protocol, ports/IP addresses, and the creation time of the NAT binding to uniquely identify the user sessions)." ::= { dsliteStatisticsEntry 6 } ---dslite Notifications dsliteTunnelNumAlarm NOTIFICATION-TYPE OBJECTS { dsliteAFTRAlarmProtocolType, dsliteAFTRAlarmB4AddrType, dsliteAFTRAlarmB4Addr } STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This trap is triggered when the number of current DS-Lite tunnels exceeds the value of the dsliteAFTRAlarmConnectNumber." ::= { dsliteNotifications 1 }Fu, et al. Standards Track [Page 19]
RFC 7870 DS-Lite MIB for AFTRs June 2016 dsliteAFTRUserSessionNumAlarm NOTIFICATION-TYPE OBJECTS { dsliteAFTRAlarmProtocolType, dsliteAFTRAlarmB4AddrType, dsliteAFTRAlarmB4Addr } STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This trap is triggered when user sessions reach the threshold. The threshold is specified by the dsliteAFTRAlarmSessionNumber." REFERENCE "Session: Paragraph 2 inSection 11 of RFC 6333. (The AFTR should have the capability to log the tunnel-id, protocol, ports/IP addresses, and the creation time of the NAT binding to uniquely identify the user sessions)." ::= { dsliteNotifications 2 } dsliteAFTRPortUsageOfSpecificIpAlarm NOTIFICATION-TYPE OBJECTS { dsliteAFTRAlarmSpecificIPAddrType, dsliteAFTRAlarmSpecificIP } STATUS current DESCRIPTION "This trap is triggered when the used NAT ports of map address reach the threshold. The threshold is specified by the dsliteAFTRAlarmPortNumber." ::= { dsliteNotifications 3 } --Module Conformance statement dsliteConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { dsliteMIB 2 } dsliteCompliances OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { dsliteConformance 1 } dsliteGroups OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { dsliteConformance 2 } -- compliance statements dsliteCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Describes the minimal requirements for conformance to the DS-Lite MIB." MODULE -- this module MANDATORY-GROUPS { dsliteNATBindGroup, dsliteTunnelGroup, dsliteStatisticsGroup,Fu, et al. Standards Track [Page 20]
RFC 7870 DS-Lite MIB for AFTRs June 2016 dsliteNotificationsGroup, dsliteAFTRAlarmScalarGroup } ::= { dsliteCompliances 1 } dsliteNATBindGroup OBJECT-GROUP OBJECTS { dsliteNATBindMappingIntRealm, dsliteNATBindMappingIntAddressType, dsliteNATBindMappingIntAddress, dsliteNATBindMappingIntPort, dsliteNATBindMappingPool, dsliteNATBindMappingMapBehavior, dsliteNATBindMappingFilterBehavior, dsliteNATBindMappingAddressPooling } STATUS current DESCRIPTION "A collection of objects to support basic management of NAT binds in the NAT of the AFTR." ::= { dsliteGroups 1 } dsliteTunnelGroup OBJECT-GROUP OBJECTS { dsliteTunnelStartAddPreLen } STATUS current DESCRIPTION "A collection of objects to support management of DS-Lite tunnels." ::= { dsliteGroups 2 } dsliteStatisticsGroup OBJECT-GROUP OBJECTS { dsliteStatisticsDiscards, dsliteStatisticsSends, dsliteStatisticsReceives, dsliteStatisticsIpv4Session, dsliteStatisticsIpv6Session } STATUS current DESCRIPTION " A collection of objects to support management of statistical information for AFTR devices." ::= { dsliteGroups 3 } dsliteNotificationsGroup NOTIFICATION-GROUP NOTIFICATIONS { dsliteTunnelNumAlarm, dsliteAFTRUserSessionNumAlarm, dsliteAFTRPortUsageOfSpecificIpAlarm } STATUS current DESCRIPTION "A collection of objects to support management of trap information for AFTR devices."Fu, et al. Standards Track [Page 21]
RFC 7870 DS-Lite MIB for AFTRs June 2016 ::= { dsliteGroups 4 } dsliteAFTRAlarmScalarGroup OBJECT-GROUP OBJECTS { dsliteAFTRAlarmB4AddrType, dsliteAFTRAlarmB4Addr, dsliteAFTRAlarmProtocolType, dsliteAFTRAlarmSpecificIPAddrType, dsliteAFTRAlarmSpecificIP, dsliteAFTRAlarmConnectNumber, dsliteAFTRAlarmSessionNumber, dsliteAFTRAlarmPortNumber} STATUS current DESCRIPTION "A collection of objects to support management of the information about the AFTR alarming scalar." ::= { dsliteGroups 5 } END9. Security Considerations There are a number of management objects defined in this MIB module with a MAX-ACCESS clause of read-write and/or read-create. Such objects may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. The support for SET operations in a non-secure environment without proper protection opens devices to attack. These are the tables and objects and their sensitivity/vulnerability: dsliteAFTRAlarmConnectNumber dsliteAFTRAlarmSessionNumber dsliteAFTRAlarmPortNumber Notification thresholds: An attacker setting an arbitrarily low threshold can cause many useless notifications to be generated. Setting an arbitrarily high threshold can effectively disable notifications, which could be used to hide another attack. Some of the readable objects in this MIB module (i.e., objects with a MAX-ACCESS other than not-accessible) may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus important to control even GET and/or NOTIFY access to these objects and possibly to even encrypt the values of these objects when sending them over the network via SNMP. These are the tables and objects and their sensitivity/vulnerability:Fu, et al. Standards Track [Page 22]
RFC 7870 DS-Lite MIB for AFTRs June 2016 entries in dsliteTunnelTable entries in dsliteNATBindTable Objects that reveal host identities: Various objects can reveal the identity of private hosts that are engaged in a session with external end nodes. A curious outsider could monitor these to assess the number of private hosts being supported by the AFTR device. Further, a disgruntled former employee of an enterprise could use the information to break into specific private hosts by intercepting the existing sessions or originating new sessions into the host. If nothing else, unauthorized monitoring of these objects will violate individual subscribers' privacy. Unauthorized read access to the dsliteTunnelTable would reveal information about the tunnel topology. SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 did not include adequate security. Even if the network itself is secure (for example by using IPsec), there is no control as to who on the secure network is allowed to access and GET/SET (read/change/create/delete) the objects in this MIB module. Implementations SHOULD provide the security features described by the SNMPv3 framework (see [RFC3410]), and implementations claiming compliance to the SNMPv3 standard MUST include full support for authentication and privacy via the User-based Security Model (USM) [RFC3414] with the AES cipher algorithm [RFC3826]. Implementations MAY also provide support for the Transport Security Model (TSM) [RFC5591] in combination with a secure transport such as SSH [RFC5592] or TLS/DTLS [RFC6353]. Further, deployment of SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 is NOT RECOMMENDED. Instead, it is RECOMMENDED to deploy SNMPv3 and to enable cryptographic security. It is then a customer/operator responsibility to ensure that the SNMP entity giving access to an instance of this MIB module is properly configured to give access to the objects only to those principals (users) that have legitimate rights to indeed GET or SET (change/create/delete) them.Fu, et al. Standards Track [Page 23]
RFC 7870 DS-Lite MIB for AFTRs June 201610. IANA Considerations IANA has allocated the following OBJECT IDENTIFIER value and recorded it in the SMI Numbers registry in the subregistry called "SMI Network Management MGMT Codes Internet-standard MIB" under the mib-2 branch (1.3.6.1.2.1): Descriptor OBJECT IDENTIFIER value ---------- ----------------------- DSLite-MIB { mib-2 240 } IANA has recorded the following IANAtunnelType Textual Convention within the IANAifType-MIB: IANAtunnelType ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION SYNTAX INTEGER { dsLite(17) -- DS-Lite tunnel }11. References11.1. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. [RFC2578] McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J. Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Structure of Management Information Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58,RFC 2578, DOI 10.17487/RFC2578, April 1999, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2578>. [RFC2579] McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J. Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Textual Conventions for SMIv2", STD 58,RFC 2579, DOI 10.17487/RFC2579, April 1999, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2579>. [RFC2580] McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J. Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Conformance Statements for SMIv2", STD 58,RFC 2580, DOI 10.17487/RFC2580, April 1999, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2580>. [RFC2863] McCloghrie, K. and F. Kastenholz, "The Interfaces Group MIB",RFC 2863, DOI 10.17487/RFC2863, June 2000, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2863>.Fu, et al. Standards Track [Page 24]
RFC 7870 DS-Lite MIB for AFTRs June 2016 [RFC3411] Harrington, D., Presuhn, R., and B. Wijnen, "An Architecture for Describing Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Management Frameworks", STD 62,RFC 3411, DOI 10.17487/RFC3411, December 2002, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3411>. [RFC3414] Blumenthal, U. and B. Wijnen, "User-based Security Model (USM) for version 3 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv3)", STD 62,RFC 3414, DOI 10.17487/RFC3414, December 2002, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3414>. [RFC3826] Blumenthal, U., Maino, F., and K. McCloghrie, "The Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Cipher Algorithm in the SNMP User-based Security Model",RFC 3826, DOI 10.17487/RFC3826, June 2004, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3826>. [RFC4001] Daniele, M., Haberman, B., Routhier, S., and J. Schoenwaelder, "Textual Conventions for Internet Network Addresses",RFC 4001, DOI 10.17487/RFC4001, February 2005, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4001>. [RFC4087] Thaler, D., "IP Tunnel MIB",RFC 4087, DOI 10.17487/RFC4087, June 2005, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4087>. [RFC4787] Audet, F., Ed. and C. Jennings, "Network Address Translation (NAT) Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP",BCP 127,RFC 4787, DOI 10.17487/RFC4787, January 2007, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4787>. [RFC5591] Harrington, D. and W. Hardaker, "Transport Security Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 78,RFC 5591, DOI 10.17487/RFC5591, June 2009, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5591>. [RFC5592] Harrington, D., Salowey, J., and W. Hardaker, "Secure Shell Transport Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)",RFC 5592, DOI 10.17487/RFC5592, June 2009, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5592>. [RFC6333] Durand, A., Droms, R., Woodyatt, J., and Y. Lee, "Dual- Stack Lite Broadband Deployments Following IPv4 Exhaustion",RFC 6333, DOI 10.17487/RFC6333, August 2011, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6333>.Fu, et al. Standards Track [Page 25]
RFC 7870 DS-Lite MIB for AFTRs June 2016 [RFC6353] Hardaker, W., "Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 78,RFC 6353, DOI 10.17487/RFC6353, July 2011, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6353>. [RFC7659] Perreault, S., Tsou, T., Sivakumar, S., and T. Taylor, "Definitions of Managed Objects for Network Address Translators (NATs)",RFC 7659, DOI 10.17487/RFC7659, October 2015, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7659>.11.2. Informative References [RFC3410] Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D., and B. Stewart, "Introduction and Applicability Statements for Internet- Standard Management Framework",RFC 3410, DOI 10.17487/RFC3410, December 2002, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3410>.Fu, et al. Standards Track [Page 26]
RFC 7870 DS-Lite MIB for AFTRs June 2016Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the following for their valuable comments: Suresh Krishnan, Ian Farrer, Yiu Lee, Qi Sun, Yong Cui, David Harrington, Dave Thaler, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou, Tom Taylor, Hui Deng, Carlos Pignataro, Matt Miller, Terry Manderson, and other members of the Softwire working group.Authors' Addresses Yu Fu CNNIC No.4 South 4th Street, Zhongguancun Hai-Dian District, Beijing 100190 China Email: fuyu@cnnic.cn Sheng Jiang Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd Q14, Huawei Campus, No.156 Beiqing Road Hai-Dian District, Beijing 100095 China Email: jiangsheng@huawei.com Jiang Dong Tsinghua University Department of Computer Science, Tsinghua University Beijing 100084 China Email: knight.dongjiang@gmail.com Yuchi Chen Tsinghua University Department of Computer Science, Tsinghua University Beijing 100084 China Email: flashfoxmx@gmail.comFu, et al. Standards Track [Page 27]
[8]ページ先頭