Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]

Obsoleted by:7534 INFORMATIONAL
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                          J. AbleyRequest for Comments: 6304                                         ICANNCategory: Informational                                         W. MatonISSN: 2070-1721                                                 NRC-CNRC                                                               July 2011AS112 Nameserver OperationsAbstract   Many sites connected to the Internet make use of IPv4 addresses that   are not globally unique.  Examples are the addresses designated inRFC 1918 for private use within individual sites.   Devices in such environments may occasionally originate Domain Name   System (DNS) queries (so-called "reverse lookups") corresponding to   those private-use addresses.  Since the addresses concerned have only   local significance, it is good practice for site administrators to   ensure that such queries are answered locally.  However, it is not   uncommon for such queries to follow the normal delegation path in the   public DNS instead of being answered within the site.   It is not possible for public DNS servers to give useful answers to   such queries.  In addition, due to the wide deployment of private-use   addresses and the continuing growth of the Internet, the volume of   such queries is large and growing.  The AS112 project aims to provide   a distributed sink for such queries in order to reduce the load on   the IN-ADDR.ARPA authoritative servers.  The AS112 project is named   after the Autonomous System Number (ASN) that was assigned to it.   This document describes the steps required to install a new AS112   node and offers advice relating to such a node's operation.Status of This Memo   This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is   published for informational purposes.   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has   received public review and has been approved for publication by the   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Not all documents   approved by the IESG are a candidate for any level of Internet   Standard; seeSection 2 of RFC 5741.Abley & Maton                 Informational                     [Page 1]

RFC 6304               AS112 Nameserver Operations             July 2011   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained athttp://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6304.Copyright Notice   Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the   document authors.  All rights reserved.   This document is subject toBCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of   publication of this document.  Please review these documents   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as   described in the Simplified BSD License.   This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF   Contributions published or made publicly available before November   10, 2008.  The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this   material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow   modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process.   Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling   the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified   outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may   not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format   it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other   than English.Abley & Maton                 Informational                     [Page 2]

RFC 6304               AS112 Nameserver Operations             July 2011Table of Contents1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .32.  AS112 DNS Service  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .42.1.  Zones  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .42.2.  Nameservers  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .43.  Installation of a New Node . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .53.1.  Useful Background Knowledge  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .53.2.  Topological Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .53.3.  Operating System and Host Considerations . . . . . . . . .53.4.  Routing Software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .63.5.  DNS Software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .83.6.  Testing a Newly Installed Node . . . . . . . . . . . . . .114.  Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .124.1.  Monitoring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .124.2.  Downtime . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .124.3.  Statistics and Measurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .125.  Communications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .126.  On the Future of AS112 Nodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .137.  IANA Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .138.  Security Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .149.  Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1410. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1510.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1510.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15Appendix A.  History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .171.  Introduction   Many sites connected to the Internet make use of IPv4 addresses that   are not globally unique.  Examples are the addresses designated in   [RFC1918] for private use within individual sites.   Devices in such environments may occasionally originate Domain Name   System (DNS) [RFC1034] queries (so-called "reverse lookups")   corresponding to those private-use addresses.  Since the addresses   concerned have only local significance, it is good practice for site   administrators to ensure that such queries are answered locally   [RFC6303].  However, it is not uncommon for such queries to follow   the normal delegation path in the public DNS instead of being   answered within the site.   It is not possible for public DNS servers to give useful answers to   such queries.  In addition, due to the wide deployment of private-use   addresses and the continuing growth of the Internet, the volume of   such queries is large and growing.  The AS112 project aims to provide   a distributed sink for such queries in order to reduce the load on   the IN-ADDR.ARPA authoritative servers [RFC5855].Abley & Maton                 Informational                     [Page 3]

RFC 6304               AS112 Nameserver Operations             July 2011   The AS112 project encompasses a loosely coordinated collection of   independently operated nameservers.  Each nameserver functions as a   single node in an AS112 anycast cloud [RFC4786] and is configured to   answer authoritatively for a particular set of nominated zones.   The AS112 project is named after the Autonomous System Number (ASN)   that was assigned to it.2.  AS112 DNS Service2.1.  Zones   AS112 nameservers answer authoritatively for the following zones,   corresponding to [RFC1918] private-use netblocks:   o  10.IN-ADDR.ARPA   o  16.172.IN-ADDR.ARPA, 17.172.IN-ADDR.ARPA, ..., 31.172.IN-ADDR.ARPA   o  168.192.IN-ADDR.ARPA   and the following zone, corresponding to the "link local" netblock   169.254.0.0/16 listed in [RFC5735]:   o  254.169.IN-ADDR.ARPA   To aid identification of AS112 anycast nodes, each node also answers   authoritatively for the zone HOSTNAME.AS112.NET.   SeeSection 3.5 for the recommended contents of all these zones.   It is possible that other zones corresponding to private-use   infrastructure will be delegated to AS112 servers in the future.  A   list of zones for which AS112 servers answer authoritatively is   maintained at <http://www.as112.net/>.2.2.  Nameservers   The zones listed inSection 2.1 are delegated to the two nameservers   BLACKHOLE-1.IANA.ORG (192.175.48.6) and BLACKHOLE-2.IANA.ORG   (192.175.48.42).   Additionally, the server PRISONER.IANA.ORG (192.175.48.1) is listed   in the MNAME field of the SOA records of the IN-ADDR.ARPA zones   served by AS112 nameservers.  PRISONER.IANA.ORG receives mainly   dynamic update queries.Abley & Maton                 Informational                     [Page 4]

RFC 6304               AS112 Nameserver Operations             July 2011   The addresses of all these nameservers are covered by the single IPv4   prefix 192.175.48.0/24.3.  Installation of a New Node3.1.  Useful Background Knowledge   Installation of an AS112 node is relatively straightforward.   However, experience in the following general areas may prove useful:   o  inter-domain routing with BGP [RFC4271];   o  DNS authoritative server operations; and   o  anycast [RFC4786] distribution of DNS services.3.2.  Topological Location   AS112 nodes may be located anywhere on the Internet.  For nodes that   are intended to provide a public service to the Internet community   (as opposed to private use), it may well be advantageous to choose a   location that is easily (and cheaply) reachable by multiple   providers, such as an Internet Exchange Point.   AS112 nodes may advertise their service prefix to BGP peers for local   use (analogous to a conventional peering relationship between two   providers) or for global use (analogous to a customer relationship   with one or more providers).   It is good operational practice to notify the community of users that   may fall within the reach of a new AS112 node before it is installed.   At an Internet Exchange, local mailing lists usually exist to   facilitate such announcements.  For nodes that are intended to be   globally reachable, coordination with other AS112 operators is highly   recommended.  See alsoSection 5.3.3.  Operating System and Host Considerations   Examples in this document are based on UNIX and UNIX-like operating   systems, but other operating systems exist that are suitable for use   in construction of an AS112 node.   The chosen platform should include either support for cloned loopback   interfaces or the capability to bind multiple addresses to a single   loopback interface.  The addresses of the nameservers listed inSection 2.2 will be configured on these interfaces in order that the   DNS software can respond to queries properly.Abley & Maton                 Informational                     [Page 5]

RFC 6304               AS112 Nameserver Operations             July 2011   A host that is configured to act as an AS112 anycast node should be   dedicated to that purpose and should not be used to simultaneously   provide other services.  This guidance is provided due to the   unpredictable (and occasionally high) traffic levels that AS112 nodes   have been seen to attract.   System startup scripts should be arranged such that the various   AS112-related components start automatically following a system   reboot.  The order in which interfaces are configured and software   components started should be arranged such that routing software   startup follows DNS software startup, and DNS software startup   follows loopback interface configuration.   Wrapper scripts or other arrangements should be employed to ensure   that the anycast service prefix for AS112 is not advertised while   either the anycast addresses are not configured or the DNS software   is not running.3.4.  Routing Software   AS112 nodes signal the availability of AS112 nameservers to the   Internet using BGP [RFC4271]: each AS112 node is a BGP speaker and   announces the prefix 192.175.48.0/24 to the Internet with origin AS   112 (see alsoSection 2.2).   The examples in this document are based on the Quagga Routing Suite   [QUAGGA] running on Linux, but other software packages exist that   also provide suitable BGP support for AS112 nodes.   The "bgpd.conf" file is used by Quagga's bgpd daemon, which provides   BGP support.  The router ID in this example is 203.0.113.1; the AS112   node peers with external peers 192.0.2.1 and 192.0.2.2.  Note the   local AS number is 112, and the service prefix originated from the   AS112 node is 192.175.48.0/24.Abley & Maton                 Informational                     [Page 6]

RFC 6304               AS112 Nameserver Operations             July 2011   ! bgpd.conf   !   hostname as112-bgpd   password <something>   enable password <supersomething>   !   ! Note that all AS112 nodes use the local Autonomous System   ! Number 112, and originate the IPv4 prefix 192.175.48.0/24.   ! All other addresses shown below are illustrative, and   ! actual numbers will depend on local circumstances.   !   router bgp 112    bgp router-id 203.0.113.1    network 192.175.48.0    neighbor 192.0.2.1 remote-as 64496    neighbor 192.0.2.1 next-hop-self    neighbor 192.0.2.1 prefix-list AS112 out    neighbor 192.0.2.1 filter-list 1 out    neighbor 192.0.2.2 remote-as 64497    neighbor 192.0.2.2 next-hop-self    neighbor 192.0.2.2 prefix-list AS112 out    neighbor 192.0.2.2 filter-list 1 out   !   ip prefix-list AS112 permit 192.175.48.0/24   !   ip as-path access-list 1 permit ^$   The configuration above includes a double-blinded restriction on what   the AS112 node shall advertise to the pair of BGP neighbors.   Firstly, that prefix-list "AS112" only containing the service prefix   192.175.48.0/24 shall be advertised.  Secondly, the "ip as-path   access-list 1" statement contains a one-line regular expression that   permits only the local AS number (112 in this case) and no other to   be advertised as well.  Both statements prevent the node from   becoming a transit router.  Equivalent restrictions using other BGP   implementations should be utilised.   The "zebra.conf" file is required to provide integration between   protocol daemons (bgpd, in this case) and the kernel.Abley & Maton                 Informational                     [Page 7]

RFC 6304               AS112 Nameserver Operations             July 2011   ! zebra.conf   !   hostname as112   password <something>   enable password <supersomething>   !   interface lo   !   interface eth0   !3.5.  DNS Software   Although the queries received by AS112 nodes are definitively   misdirected, it is important that they be answered in a manner that   is accurate and consistent.  For this reason, AS112 nodes operate as   fully functional and standards-compliant DNS authoritative servers   [RFC1034], and hence require DNS software.   Examples in this document are based on ISC BIND9 [BIND], but other   DNS software exists that is suitable for use in construction of an   AS112 node.   The following is a sample BIND9 "named.conf" file for a dedicated   AS112 server.  Note that the nameserver is configured to act as an   authoritative-only server (i.e., recursion is disabled).  The   nameserver is also configured to listen on the various AS112 anycast   nameserver addresses, as well as its local addresses.   // named.conf   // global options   options {     listen-on {       127.0.0.1;         // localhost     // The following address is node-dependent and should be set to     // something appropriate for the new AS112 node.       203.0.113.1;       // local address (globally unique, unicast)     // the following addresses correspond to AS112 addresses, and     // are the same for all AS112 nodes       192.175.48.1;      // prisoner.iana.org (anycast)       192.175.48.6;      // blackhole-1.iana.org (anycast)       192.175.48.42;     // blackhole-2.iana.org (anycast)Abley & Maton                 Informational                     [Page 8]

RFC 6304               AS112 Nameserver Operations             July 2011     };     directory "/var/named";     recursion no;        // authoritative-only server     query-source address *;   };   // Log queries, so that when people call us about unexpected   // answers to queries they didn't realise they had sent, we   // have something to talk about.  Note that activating this   // has the potential to create high CPU load and consume   // enormous amounts of disk space.   logging {     channel "querylog" {       file "/var/log/query.log" versions 2 size 500m;       print-time yes;     };     category queries { querylog; };   };   //RFC 1918   zone "10.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };   zone "16.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };   zone "17.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };   zone "18.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };   zone "19.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };   zone "20.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };   zone "21.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };   zone "22.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };   zone "23.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };   zone "24.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };   zone "25.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };   zone "26.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };   zone "27.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };   zone "28.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };   zone "29.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };   zone "30.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };   zone "31.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };   zone "168.192.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };   //RFC 5735   zone "254.169.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };   // Also answer authoritatively for the HOSTNAME.AS112.NET zone,   // which contains data of operational relevance.Abley & Maton                 Informational                     [Page 9]

RFC 6304               AS112 Nameserver Operations             July 2011   zone "hostname.as112.net" {     type master;     file "db.hostname.as112.net";   };   The "db.empty" file follows, below.  This is the source data used to   populate all the IN-ADDR.ARPA zones listed inSection 2.1.  Note that   the RNAME specified in the SOA record corresponds to   hostmaster@root-servers.org, a suitable email address for receiving   technical queries about these zones.   ; db.empty   ;   ; Empty zone for AS112 server.   ;   $TTL    1W   @  IN  SOA  prisoner.iana.org. hostmaster.root-servers.org. (                                  1       ; serial number                                  1W      ; refresh                                  1M      ; retry                                  1W      ; expire                                  1W )    ; negative caching TTL   ;          NS     blackhole-1.iana.org.          NS     blackhole-2.iana.org.   ;   ; There should be no other resource records included in this zone.   ;   ; Records that relate toRFC 1918-numbered resources within the   ; site hosting this AS112 node should not be hosted on this   ; nameserver.   The "db.hostname.as112.net" file follows, below.  This zone contains   various resource records that provide operational data to users for   troubleshooting or measurement purposes; the data should be edited to   suit local circumstances.  Note that the response to the query   "HOSTNAME.AS112.NET IN TXT" should fit within a 512-octet DNS/UDP   datagram: i.e., it should be available over UDP transport without   requiring EDNS0 support.   The optional LOC record [RFC1876] included in the zone apex provides   information about the geospatial location of the node.Abley & Maton                 Informational                    [Page 10]

RFC 6304               AS112 Nameserver Operations             July 2011   ; db.hostname.as112.net   ;   $TTL    1W   @       SOA     server.example.net. admin.example.net. (                           1               ; serial number                           1W              ; refresh                           1M              ; retry                           1W              ; expire                           1W )            ; negative caching TTL   ;           NS      blackhole-2.iana.org.           NS      blackhole-1.iana.org.   ;           TXT     "Name of Facility or similar" "City, Country"           TXT     "Seehttp://www.as112.net/ for more information."   ;           LOC     45 25 0.000 N 75 42 0.000 W 80.00m 1m 10000m 10m3.6.  Testing a Newly Installed Node   The BIND9 tool "dig" can be used to retrieve the TXT resource records   associated with the domain "HOSTNAME.AS112.NET", directed at one of   the AS112 anycast nameserver addresses.  Continuing the example from   above, the response received should indicate the identity of the   AS112 node that responded to the query.  SeeSection 3.5 for more   details about the resource records associated with   "HOSTNAME.AS112.NET".       % dig @prisoner.iana.org hostname.as112.net txt +short +norec       "Name of Facility or similar" "City, Country"       "Seehttp://www.as112.net/ for more information."       %   If the response received indicates a different node is being used,   then there is probably a routing problem to solve.  If there is no   response received at all, there might be a host or nameserver   problem.  Judicious use of tools such as traceroute and consultation   of BGP looking glasses might be useful in troubleshooting.   Note that an appropriate set of tests for a new server will include   queries sent from many different places within the expected service   area of the node, using both UDP and TCP transport, and exercising   all three AS112 anycast nameserver addresses.Abley & Maton                 Informational                    [Page 11]

RFC 6304               AS112 Nameserver Operations             July 20114.  Operations4.1.  Monitoring   AS112 nodes should be monitored to ensure they are functioning   correctly, just as with any other production service.  An AS112 node   that stops answering queries correctly can cause failures and   timeouts in unexpected places and can lead to failures in dependent   systems that can be difficult to troubleshoot.4.2.  Downtime   An AS112 node that needs to go off-line (e.g., for planned   maintenance or as part of the diagnosis of some problem) should stop   advertising the AS112 service prefix to its BGP peers.  This can be   done by shutting down the routing software on the node altogether or   by causing the routing system to withdraw the route.   Withdrawing the service prefix is important in order to avoid   blackholing query traffic in the event that the DNS software on the   node is not functioning normally.4.3.  Statistics and Measurement   Use of the AS112 node should be measured in order to track long-term   trends, identify anomalous conditions, and ensure that the   configuration of the AS112 node is sufficient to handle the query   load.   Examples of free monitoring tools that might be useful to operators   of AS112 nodes include:   o  bindgraph [BINDGRAPH]   o  dnstop [DNSTOP]   o  DSC [DSC]5.  Communications   It is good operational practice to notify the community of users that   may fall within the reach of a new AS112 node before it is installed.   At Internet Exchanges, local mailing lists usually exist to   facilitate such announcements.   For nodes that are intended to be globally reachable, coordination   with other AS112 operators is especially recommended.  The mailing   list <as112-ops@lists.dns-oarc.net> is operated for this purpose.Abley & Maton                 Informational                    [Page 12]

RFC 6304               AS112 Nameserver Operations             July 2011   Information pertinent to AS112 operations is maintained at   <http://www.as112.net/>.   Information about an AS112 node should also be published within the   DNS, within the "HOSTNAME.AS112.NET" zone.  SeeSection 3.5 for more   details.6.  On the Future of AS112 Nodes   It is recommended practice for the operators of recursive nameservers   to answer queries for zones served by AS112 nodes locally, such that   queries never have an opportunity to reach AS112 servers [RFC6303].   Operational experience with AS112 nodes does not currently indicate   an observable trend towards compliance with those recommendations,   however.   It is expected that some DNS software vendors will include default   configuration that will implement measures such as those described in   [RFC6303].  If such software is widely deployed, it is reasonable to   assume that the query load received by AS112 nodes will decrease;   however, it is safe to assume that the query load will not decrease   to zero, and consequently that AS112 nodes will continue to provide a   useful service for the foreseeable future.   There may be a requirement in the future for AS112 nodes to answer   for their current set of zones over IPv6 transport.  Such a   requirement would necessitate the assignment of a corresponding IPv6   netblock for use as an anycast service prefix.   There may be a requirement in the future for AS112 nodes to serve   additional zones or to stop serving particular zones that are   currently served.  Such changes would be widely announced in   operational forums and published at <http://www.as112.net/>.7.  IANA Considerations   The AS112 nameservers are all named under the domain IANA.ORG (seeSection 2.2).  However, the anycast infrastructure itself is operated   by a loosely coordinated, diverse mix of organisations across the   Internet, and is not an IANA function.   The Autonomous System Number 112 and the IPv4 prefix 192.175.48.0/24   were assigned by ARIN.Abley & Maton                 Informational                    [Page 13]

RFC 6304               AS112 Nameserver Operations             July 20118.  Security Considerations   Hosts should never normally send queries to AS112 servers; queries   relating to private-use addresses should be answered locally within a   site.  Hosts that send queries to AS112 servers may well leak   information relating to private infrastructure to the public network,   and this could present a security risk.  This risk is orthogonal to   the presence or absence of authoritative servers for these zones in   the public DNS infrastructure, however.   Queries that are answered by AS112 servers are usually unintentional;   it follows that the responses from AS112 servers are usually   unexpected.  Unexpected inbound traffic can trigger intrusion   detection systems or alerts by firewalls.  Operators of AS112 servers   should be prepared to be contacted by operators of remote   infrastructure who believe their security has been violated.  Advice   to those who mistakenly believe that responses from AS112 nodes   constitute an attack on their infrastructure can be found in   [RFC6305].   The deployment of AS112 nodes is very loosely coordinated compared to   other services distributed using anycast.  The malicious compromise   of an AS112 node and subversion of the data served by the node are   hence more difficult to detect due to the lack of central management.   Since it is conceivable that changing the responses to queries   received by AS112 nodes might influence the behaviour of the hosts   sending the queries, such a compromise might be used as an attack   vector against private infrastructure.   Operators of AS112 should take appropriate measures to ensure that   AS112 nodes are appropriately protected from compromise, such as   would normally be employed for production nameserver or network   infrastructure.  The guidance provided for root nameservers in   [RFC2870] may be instructive.   The zones hosted by AS112 servers are not signed with DNSSEC   [RFC4033].  Given the distributed and loosely coordinated structure   of the AS112 service, the zones concerned could only be signed if the   private key material used was effectively public, obviating any   security benefit resulting from the use of those keys.9.  Acknowledgements   The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance of Bill Manning, John   Brown, Marco D'Itri, Daniele Arena, Stephane Bortzmeyer, Frank   Habicht, Chris Thompson, Peter Losher, Peter Koch, Alfred Hoenes, S.   Moonesamy, and Mehmet Akcin in the preparation of this document.Abley & Maton                 Informational                    [Page 14]

RFC 6304               AS112 Nameserver Operations             July 201110.  References10.1.  Normative References   [RFC1034]    Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - concepts and                facilities", STD 13,RFC 1034, November 1987.   [RFC1918]    Rekhter, Y., Moskowitz, R., Karrenberg, D., Groot, G.,                and E. Lear, "Address Allocation for Private Internets",BCP 5,RFC 1918, February 1996.   [RFC2870]    Bush, R., Karrenberg, D., Kosters, M., and R. Plzak,                "Root Name Server Operational Requirements",BCP 40,RFC 2870, June 2000.   [RFC4033]    Arends, R., Austein, R., Larson, M., Massey, D., and S.                Rose, "DNS Security Introduction and Requirements",RFC 4033, March 2005.   [RFC4271]    Rekhter, Y., Li, T., and S. Hares, "A Border Gateway                Protocol 4 (BGP-4)",RFC 4271, January 2006.   [RFC4786]    Abley, J. and K. Lindqvist, "Operation of Anycast                Services",BCP 126,RFC 4786, December 2006.10.2.  Informative References   [BIND]       Internet Systems Consortium, "BIND",                <http://www.isc.org/software/BIND/>.   [BINDGRAPH]  Delaurenti, M. and M. d'Itri, "bindgraph",                <http://www.linux.it/~md/software/>.   [DNSTOP]     The Measurement Factory, "Dnstop: Stay on Top of Your                DNS Traffic",                <http://dns.measurement-factory.com/tools/dnstop/>.   [DSC]        The Measurement Factory, "Dsc: A DNS Statistics                Collector",                <http://dns.measurement-factory.com/tools/dsc/>.   [QUAGGA]     "Quagga Software Routing Suite",                <http://www.quagga.net>.   [RFC1876]    Davis, C., Vixie, P., Goodwin, T., and I. Dickinson, "A                Means for Expressing Location Information in the Domain                Name System",RFC 1876, January 1996.Abley & Maton                 Informational                    [Page 15]

RFC 6304               AS112 Nameserver Operations             July 2011   [RFC5735]    Cotton, M. and L. Vegoda, "Special Use IPv4 Addresses",BCP 153,RFC 5735, January 2010.   [RFC5855]    Abley, J. and T. Manderson, "Nameservers for IPv4 and                IPv6 Reverse Zones",BCP 155,RFC 5855, May 2010.   [RFC6303]    Andrews, M., "Locally Served DNS Zones",BCP 163,RFC 6303, July 2011.   [RFC6305]    Abley, J. and W. Maton, "I'm Being Attacked by                PRISONER.IANA.ORG!",RFC 6305, July 2011.Abley & Maton                 Informational                    [Page 16]

RFC 6304               AS112 Nameserver Operations             July 2011Appendix A.  History   Widespread use of the private address blocks listed in [RFC1918]   followed that document's publication in 1996.  At that time the   IN-ADDR.ARPA zone was served by root servers.   The idea of off-loading IN-ADDR.ARPA queries relating to [RFC1918]   addresses from the root nameservers was first proposed by Bill   Manning and John Brown.   The use of anycast for distributing authoritative DNS service for   [RFC1918] IN-ADDR.ARPA zones was subsequently proposed at a private   meeting of root server operators.   ARIN provided an IPv4 prefix for the anycast service and also the   autonomous system number 112 for use in originating that prefix.   This assignment gave the project its name.   In 2002, the first AS112 anycast nodes were deployed.   In 2011, the IN-ADDR.ARPA zone was redelegated from the root servers   to a new set of servers operated independently by AfriNIC, APNIC,   ARIN, ICANN, LACNIC, and the RIPE NCC and named according to   [RFC5855].   The use of anycast nameservers in the AS112 project contributed to   the operational experience of anycast DNS services, and it can be   seen as a precursor to the anycast distribution of other   authoritative DNS servers in subsequent years (e.g., various root   servers).Abley & Maton                 Informational                    [Page 17]

RFC 6304               AS112 Nameserver Operations             July 2011Authors' Addresses   Joe Abley   ICANN   4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330   Marina del Rey, CA  90292   US   Phone: +1 519 670 9327   EMail: joe.abley@icann.org   William F. Maton Sotomayor   National Research Council of Canada   1200 Montreal Road   Ottawa, ON  K1A 0R6   Canada   Phone: +1 613 993 0880   EMail: wmaton@ryouko.imsb.nrc.caAbley & Maton                 Informational                    [Page 18]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp