Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]

EXPERIMENTAL
Network Working Group                                        K. ZeilengaRequest for Comments: 4533                           OpenLDAP FoundationCategory: Experimental                                         J.H. Choi                                                         IBM Corporation                                                               June 2006The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)Content Synchronization OperationStatus of This Memo   This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet   community.  It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.   Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.   Distribution of this memo is unlimited.Copyright Notice   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).IESG Note   The IESG notes that this work was originally discussed in the LDUP   working group.  The group came to consensus on a different approach,   documented inRFC 3928; that document is on the standards track and   should be reviewed by those considering implementation of this   proposal.Abstract   This specification describes the Lightweight Directory Access   Protocol (LDAP) Content Synchronization Operation.  The operation   allows a client to maintain a copy of a fragment of the Directory   Information Tree (DIT).  It supports both polling for changes and   listening for changes.  The operation is defined as an extension of   the LDAP Search Operation.Zeilenga & Choi               Experimental                      [Page 1]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 2006Table of Contents1. Introduction ....................................................31.1. Background .................................................31.2. Intended Usage .............................................41.3. Overview ...................................................51.4. Conventions ................................................82. Elements of the Sync Operation ..................................82.1. Common ASN.1 Elements ......................................92.2. Sync Request Control .......................................92.3. Sync State Control ........................................102.4. Sync Done Control .........................................102.5. Sync Info Message .........................................112.6. Sync Result Codes .........................................113. Content Synchronization ........................................113.1. Synchronization Session ...................................123.2. Content Determination .....................................123.3. refreshOnly Mode ..........................................133.4. refreshAndPersist Mode ....................................163.5. Search Request Parameters .................................173.6. objectName ................................................183.7. Canceling the Sync Operation ..............................193.8. Refresh Required ..........................................193.9. Chattiness Considerations .................................203.10. Operation Multiplexing ...................................214. Meta Information Considerations ................................224.1. Entry DN ..................................................224.2. Operational Attributes ....................................224.3. Collective Attributes .....................................234.4. Access and Other Administrative Controls ..................235. Interaction with Other Controls ................................235.1. ManageDsaIT Control .......................................245.2. Subentries Control ........................................246. Shadowing Considerations .......................................247. Security Considerations ........................................258. IANA Considerations ............................................268.1. Object Identifier .........................................268.2. LDAP Protocol Mechanism ...................................268.3. LDAP Result Codes .........................................269. Acknowledgements ...............................................2610. Normative References ..........................................2711. Informative References ........................................28Appendix A.  CSN-based Implementation Considerations ..............29Zeilenga & Choi               Experimental                      [Page 2]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 20061.  Introduction   The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) [RFC4510] provides a   mechanism, the search operation [RFC4511], that allows a client to   request directory content matching a complex set of assertions and to   request that the server return this content, subject to access   control and other restrictions, to the client.  However, LDAP does   not provide (despite the introduction of numerous extensions in this   area) an effective and efficient mechanism for maintaining   synchronized copies of directory content.  This document introduces a   new mechanism specifically designed to meet the content   synchronization requirements of sophisticated directory applications.   This document defines the LDAP Content Synchronization Operation, or   Sync Operation for short, which allows a client to maintain a   synchronized copy of a fragment of a Directory Information Tree   (DIT).  The Sync Operation is defined as a set of controls and other   protocol elements that extend the Search Operation.1.1.  Background   Over the years, a number of content synchronization approaches have   been suggested for use in LDAP directory services.  These approaches   are inadequate for one or more of the following reasons:      -  failure to ensure a reasonable level of convergence;      -  failure to detect that convergence cannot be achieved (without         reload);      -  require pre-arranged synchronization agreements;      -  require the server to maintain histories of past changes to DIT         content and/or meta information;      -  require the server to maintain synchronization state on a per-         client basis; and/or      -  are overly chatty.   The Sync Operation provides eventual convergence of synchronized   content when possible and, when not, notification that a full reload   is required.   The Sync Operation does not require pre-arranged synchronization   agreements.Zeilenga & Choi               Experimental                      [Page 3]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 2006   The Sync Operation does not require that servers maintain or use any   history of past changes to the DIT or to meta information.  However,   servers may maintain and use histories (e.g., change logs,   tombstones, DIT snapshots) to reduce the number of messages generated   and to reduce their size.  As it is not always feasible to maintain   and use histories, the operation may be implemented using purely   (current) state-based approaches.  The Sync Operation allows use of   either the state-based approach or the history-based approach on an   operation-by-operation basis to balance the size of history and the   amount of traffic.  The Sync Operation also allows the combined use   of the state-based and the history-based approaches.   The Sync Operation does not require that servers maintain   synchronization state on a per-client basis.  However, servers may   maintain and use per-client state information to reduce the number of   messages generated and the size of such messages.   A synchronization mechanism can be considered overly chatty when   synchronization traffic is not reasonably bounded.  The Sync   Operation traffic is bounded by the size of updated (or new) entries   and the number of unchanged entries in the content.  The operation is   designed to avoid full content exchanges, even when the history   information available to the server is insufficient to determine the   client's state.  The operation is also designed to avoid transmission   of out-of-content history information, as its size is not bounded by   the content and it is not always feasible to transmit such history   information due to security reasons.   This document includes a number of non-normative appendices providing   additional information to server implementors.1.2.  Intended Usage   The Sync Operation is intended to be used in applications requiring   eventually-convergent content synchronization.  Upon completion of   each synchronization stage of the operation, all information to   construct a synchronized client copy of the content has been provided   to the client or the client has been notified that a complete content   reload is necessary.  Except for transient inconsistencies due to   concurrent operation (or other) processing at the server, the client   copy is an accurate reflection of the content held by the server.   Transient inconsistencies will be resolved by subsequent   synchronization operations.Zeilenga & Choi               Experimental                      [Page 4]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 2006   Possible uses include the following:      -  White page service applications may use the Sync Operation to         maintain a current copy of a DIT fragment, for example, a mail         user agent that uses the sync operation to maintain a local         copy of an enterprise address book.      -  Meta-information engines may use the Sync Operation to maintain         a copy of a DIT fragment.      -  Caching proxy services may use the Sync Operation to maintain a         coherent content cache.      -  Lightweight master-slave replication between heterogeneous         directory servers.  For example, the Sync Operation can be used         by a slave server to maintain a shadow copy of a DIT fragment.         (Note: The International Telephone Union (ITU) has defined the         X.500 Directory [X.500] Information Shadowing Protocol (DISP)         [X.525], which may be used for master-slave replication between         directory servers.  Other experimental LDAP replication         protocols also exist.)   This protocol is not intended to be used in applications requiring   transactional data consistency.   As this protocol transfers all visible values of entries belonging to   the content upon change instead of change deltas, this protocol is   not appropriate for bandwidth-challenged applications or deployments.1.3.  Overview   This section provides an overview of basic ways the Sync Operation   can be used to maintain a synchronized client copy of a DIT fragment.      -  Polling for changes: refreshOnly mode      -  Listening for changes: refreshAndPersist mode1.3.1.  Polling for Changes (refreshOnly)   To obtain its initial client copy, the client issues a Sync request:   a search request with the Sync Request Control with mode set to   refreshOnly.  The server, much like it would with a normal search   operation, returns (subject to access controls and other   restrictions) the content matching the search criteria (baseObject,   scope, filter, attributes).  Additionally, with each entry returned,   the server provides a Sync State Control indicating state add.  This   control contains the Universally Unique Identifier (UUID) [UUID] ofZeilenga & Choi               Experimental                      [Page 5]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 2006   the entry [RFC4530].  Unlike the Distinguished Name (DN), which may   change over time, an entry's UUID is stable.  The initial content is   followed by a SearchResultDone with a Sync Done Control.  The Sync   Done Control provides a syncCookie.  The syncCookie represents   session state.   To poll for updates to the client copy, the client reissues the Sync   Operation with the syncCookie previously returned.  The server, much   as it would with a normal search operation, determines which content   would be returned as if the operation were a normal search operation.   However, using the syncCookie as an indicator of what content the   client was sent previously, the server sends copies of entries that   have changed with a Sync State Control indicating state add.  For   each changed entry, all (modified or unmodified) attributes belonging   to the content are sent.   The server may perform either or both of the two distinct   synchronization phases that are distinguished by how to synchronize   entries deleted from the content: the present and the delete phases.   When the server uses a single phase for the refresh stage, each phase   is marked as ended by a SearchResultDone with a Sync Done Control.  A   present phase is identified by a FALSE refreshDeletes value in the   Sync Done Control.  A delete phase is identified by a TRUE   refreshDeletes value.  The present phase may be followed by a delete   phase.  The two phases are delimited by a refreshPresent Sync Info   Message having a FALSE refreshDone value.  In the case that both the   phases are used, the present phase is used to bring the client copy   up to the state at which the subsequent delete phase can begin.   In the present phase, the server sends an empty entry (i.e., no   attributes) with a Sync State Control indicating state present for   each unchanged entry.   The delete phase may be used when the server can reliably determine   which entries in the prior client copy are no longer present in the   content and the number of such entries is less than or equal to the   number of unchanged entries.  In the delete mode, the server sends an   empty entry with a Sync State Control indicating state delete for   each entry that is no longer in the content, instead of returning an   empty entry with state present for each present entry.   The server may send syncIdSet Sync Info Messages containing the set   of UUIDs of either unchanged present entries or deleted entries,   instead of sending multiple individual messages.  If refreshDeletes   of syncIdSet is set to FALSE, the UUIDs of unchanged present entries   are contained in the syncUUIDs set; if refreshDeletes of syncIdSet is   set to TRUE, the UUIDs of the entries no longer present in the   content are contained in the syncUUIDs set.  An optional cookie canZeilenga & Choi               Experimental                      [Page 6]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 2006   be included in the syncIdSet to represent the state of the content   after synchronizing the presence or the absence of the entries   contained in the syncUUIDs set.   The synchronized copy of the DIT fragment is constructed by the   client.   If refreshDeletes of syncDoneValue is FALSE, the new copy includes   all changed entries returned by the reissued Sync Operation, as well   as all unchanged entries identified as being present by the reissued   Sync Operation, but whose content is provided by the previous Sync   Operation.  The unchanged entries not identified as being present are   deleted from the client content.  They had been either deleted,   moved, or otherwise scoped-out from the content.   If refreshDeletes of syncDoneValue is TRUE, the new copy includes all   changed entries returned by the reissued Sync Operation, as well as   all other entries of the previous copy except for those that are   identified as having been deleted from the content.   The client can, at some later time, re-poll for changes to this   synchronized client copy.1.3.2.  Listening for Changes (refreshAndPersist)   Polling for changes can be expensive in terms of server, client, and   network resources.  The refreshAndPersist mode allows for active   updates of changed entries in the content.   By selecting the refreshAndPersist mode, the client requests that the   server send updates of entries that are changed after the initial   refresh content is determined.  Instead of sending a SearchResultDone   Message as in polling, the server sends a Sync Info Message to the   client indicating that the refresh stage is complete and then enters   the persist stage.  After receipt of this Sync Info Message, the   client will construct a synchronized copy as described inSection1.3.1.   The server may then send change notifications as the result of the   original Sync search request, which now remains persistent in the   server.  For entries to be added to the returned content, the server   sends a SearchResultEntry (with attributes) with a Sync State Control   indicating state add.  For entries to be deleted from the content,   the server sends a SearchResultEntry containing no attributes and a   Sync State Control indicating state delete.  For entries to be   modified in the return content, the server sends a SearchResultEntry   (with attributes) with a Sync State Control indicating state modify.Zeilenga & Choi               Experimental                      [Page 7]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 2006   Upon modification of an entry, all (modified or unmodified)   attributes belonging to the content are sent.   Note that renaming an entry of the DIT may cause an add state change   where the entry is renamed into the content, a delete state change   where the entry is renamed out of the content, and a modify state   change where the entry remains in the content.  Also note that a   modification of an entry of the DIT may cause an add, delete, or   modify state change to the content.   Upon receipt of a change notification, the client updates its copy of   the content.   If the server desires to update the syncCookie during the persist   stage, it may include the syncCookie in any Sync State Control or   Sync Info Message returned.   The operation persists until canceled [RFC3909] by the client or   terminated by the server.  A Sync Done Control shall be attached to   SearchResultDone Message to provide a new syncCookie.1.4.  Conventions   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this   document are to be interpreted as described inBCP 14 [RFC2119].   Protocol elements are described using ASN.1 [X.680] with implicit   tags.  The term "BER-encoded" means the element is to be encoded   using the Basic Encoding Rules [X.690] under the restrictions   detailed inSection 5.1 of [RFC4511].2.  Elements of the Sync Operation   The Sync Operation is defined as an extension to the LDAP Search   Operation [RFC4511] where the directory user agent (DUA or client)   submits a SearchRequest Message with a Sync Request Control and the   directory system agent (DSA or server) responds with zero or more   SearchResultEntry Messages, each with a Sync State Control; zero or   more SearchResultReference Messages, each with a Sync State Control;   zero or more Sync Info Intermediate Response Messages; and a   SearchResultDone Message with a Sync Done Control.   To allow clients to discover support for this operation, servers   implementing this operation SHOULD publish 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.1.9.1.1   as a value of the 'supportedControl' attribute [RFC4512] of the root   DSA-specific entry (DSE).  A server MAY choose to advertise this   extension only when the client is authorized to use it.Zeilenga & Choi               Experimental                      [Page 8]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 20062.1.  Common ASN.1 Elements2.1.1.  syncUUID   The syncUUID data type is an OCTET STRING holding a 128-bit   (16-octet) Universally Unique Identifier (UUID) [UUID].      syncUUID ::= OCTET STRING (SIZE(16))           -- constrained to UUID2.1.2.  syncCookie   The syncCookie is a notational convenience to indicate that, while   the syncCookie type is encoded as an OCTET STRING, its value is an   opaque value containing information about the synchronization session   and its state.  Generally, the session information would include a   hash of the operation parameters that the server requires not be   changed and the synchronization state information would include a   commit (log) sequence number, a change sequence number, or a time   stamp.  For convenience of description, the term "no cookie" refers   either to a null cookie or to a cookie with pre-initialized   synchronization state.      syncCookie ::= OCTET STRING2.2.  Sync Request Control   The Sync Request Control is an LDAP Control [RFC4511] where the   controlType is the object identifier 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.1.9.1.1 and the   controlValue, an OCTET STRING, contains a BER-encoded   syncRequestValue.  The criticality field is either TRUE or FALSE.      syncRequestValue ::= SEQUENCE {          mode ENUMERATED {              -- 0 unused              refreshOnly       (1),              -- 2 reserved              refreshAndPersist (3)          },          cookie     syncCookie OPTIONAL,          reloadHint BOOLEAN DEFAULT FALSE      }   The Sync Request Control is only applicable to the SearchRequest   Message.Zeilenga & Choi               Experimental                      [Page 9]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 20062.3.  Sync State Control   The Sync State Control is an LDAP Control [RFC4511] where the   controlType is the object identifier 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.1.9.1.2 and the   controlValue, an OCTET STRING, contains a BER-encoded syncStateValue.   The criticality is FALSE.      syncStateValue ::= SEQUENCE {          state ENUMERATED {              present (0),              add (1),              modify (2),              delete (3)          },          entryUUID syncUUID,          cookie    syncCookie OPTIONAL      }   The Sync State Control is only applicable to SearchResultEntry and   SearchResultReference Messages.2.4.  Sync Done Control   The Sync Done Control is an LDAP Control [RFC4511] where the   controlType is the object identifier 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.1.9.1.3 and the   controlValue contains a BER-encoded syncDoneValue.  The criticality   is FALSE (and hence absent).      syncDoneValue ::= SEQUENCE {          cookie          syncCookie OPTIONAL,          refreshDeletes  BOOLEAN DEFAULT FALSE      }   The Sync Done Control is only applicable to the SearchResultDone   Message.Zeilenga & Choi               Experimental                     [Page 10]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 20062.5.  Sync Info Message   The Sync Info Message is an LDAP Intermediate Response Message   [RFC4511] where responseName is the object identifier   1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.1.9.1.4 and responseValue contains a BER-encoded   syncInfoValue.  The criticality is FALSE (and hence absent).      syncInfoValue ::= CHOICE {          newcookie      [0] syncCookie,          refreshDelete  [1] SEQUENCE {              cookie         syncCookie OPTIONAL,              refreshDone    BOOLEAN DEFAULT TRUE          },          refreshPresent [2] SEQUENCE {              cookie         syncCookie OPTIONAL,              refreshDone    BOOLEAN DEFAULT TRUE          },          syncIdSet      [3] SEQUENCE {              cookie         syncCookie OPTIONAL,              refreshDeletes BOOLEAN DEFAULT FALSE,              syncUUIDs      SET OF syncUUID          }      }2.6.  Sync Result Codes   The following LDAP resultCode [RFC4511] is defined:      e-syncRefreshRequired (4096)3.  Content Synchronization   The Sync Operation is invoked when the client sends a SearchRequest   Message with a Sync Request Control.   The absence of a cookie or an initialized synchronization state in a   cookie indicates a request for initial content, while the presence of   a cookie representing a state of a client copy indicates a request   for a content update.  Synchronization Sessions are discussed inSection 3.1.  Content Determination is discussed inSection 3.2.   The mode is either refreshOnly or refreshAndPersist.  The refreshOnly   and refreshAndPersist modes are discussed in Sections3.3 and3.4,   respectively.  The refreshOnly mode consists only of a refresh stage,   while the refreshAndPersist mode consists of a refresh stage and a   subsequent persist stage.Zeilenga & Choi               Experimental                     [Page 11]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 20063.1.  Synchronization Session   A sequence of Sync Operations where the last cookie returned by the   server for one operation is provided by the client in the next   operation is said to belong to the same Synchronization Session.   The client MUST specify the same content-controlling parameters (seeSection 3.5) in each Search Request of the session.  The client   SHOULD also issue each Sync request of a session under the same   authentication and authorization associations with equivalent   integrity and protections.  If the server does not recognize the   request cookie or the request is made under different associations or   non-equivalent protections, the server SHALL return the initial   content as if no cookie had been provided or return an empty content   with the e-syncRefreshRequired LDAP result code.  The decision   between the return of the initial content and the return of the empty   content with the e-syncRefreshRequired result code MAY be based on   reloadHint in the Sync Request Control from the client.  If the   server recognizes the request cookie as representing empty or initial   synchronization state of the client copy, the server SHALL return the   initial content.   A Synchronization Session may span multiple LDAP sessions between the   client and the server.  The client SHOULD issue each Sync request of   a session to the same server.  (Note: Shadowing considerations are   discussed inSection 6.)3.2.  Content Determination   The content to be provided is determined by parameters of the Search   Request, as described in [RFC4511], and possibly other controls.  The   same content parameters SHOULD be used in each Sync request of a   session.  If different content is requested and the server is   unwilling or unable to process the request, the server SHALL return   the initial content as if no cookie had been provided or return an   empty content with the e-syncRefreshRequired LDAP result code.  The   decision between the return of the initial content and the return of   the empty content with the e-syncRefreshRequired result code MAY be   based on reloadHint in the Sync Request Control from the client.   The content may not necessarily include all entries or references   that would be returned by a normal search operation, nor, for those   entries included, all attributes returned by a normal search.  When   the server is unwilling or unable to provide synchronization for any   attribute for a set of entries, the server MUST treat all filter   components matching against these attributes as Undefined and MUST   NOT return these attributes in SearchResultEntry responses.Zeilenga & Choi               Experimental                     [Page 12]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 2006   Servers SHOULD support synchronization for all non-collective user-   application attributes for all entries.   The server may also return continuation references to other servers   or to itself.  The latter is allowed as the server may partition the   entries it holds into separate synchronization contexts.   The client may chase all or some of these continuations, each as a   separate content synchronization session.3.3.  refreshOnly Mode   A Sync request with mode refreshOnly and with no cookie is a poll for   initial content.  A Sync request with mode refreshOnly and with a   cookie representing a synchronization state is a poll for content   update.3.3.1.  Initial Content Poll   Upon receipt of the request, the server provides the initial content   using a set of zero or more SearchResultEntry and   SearchResultReference Messages followed by a SearchResultDone   Message.   Each SearchResultEntry Message SHALL include a Sync State Control of   state add, an entryUUID containing the entry's UUID, and no cookie.   Each SearchResultReference Message SHALL include a Sync State Control   of state add, an entryUUID containing the UUID associated with the   reference (normally the UUID of the associated named referral   [RFC3296] object), and no cookie.  The SearchResultDone Message SHALL   include a Sync Done Control having refreshDeletes set to FALSE.   A resultCode value of success indicates that the operation   successfully completed.  Otherwise, the result code indicates the   nature of the failure.  The server may return e-syncRefreshRequired   result code on the initial content poll if it is safe to do so when   it is unable to perform the operation due to various reasons.   reloadHint is set to FALSE in the SearchRequest Message requesting   the initial content poll.   If the operation is successful, a cookie representing the   synchronization state of the current client copy SHOULD be returned   for use in subsequent Sync Operations.3.3.2.  Content Update Poll   Upon receipt of the request, the server provides the content refresh   using a set of zero or more SearchResultEntry andZeilenga & Choi               Experimental                     [Page 13]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 2006   SearchResultReference Messages followed by a SearchResultDone   Message.   The server is REQUIRED to:      a) provide the sequence of messages necessary for eventual         convergence of the client's copy of the content to the server's         copy,      b) treat the request as an initial content request (e.g., ignore         the cookie or the synchronization state represented in the         cookie),      c) indicate that the incremental convergence is not possible by         returning e-syncRefreshRequired,      d) return a resultCode other than success or e-         syncRefreshRequired.   A Sync Operation may consist of a single present phase, a single   delete phase, or a present phase followed by a delete phase.   In each phase, for each entry or reference that has been added to the   content or been changed since the previous Sync Operation indicated   by the cookie, the server returns a SearchResultEntry or   SearchResultReference Message, respectively, each with a Sync State   Control consisting of state add, an entryUUID containing the UUID of   the entry or reference, and no cookie.  Each SearchResultEntry   Message represents the current state of a changed entry.  Each   SearchResultReference Message represents the current state of a   changed reference.   In the present phase, for each entry that has not been changed since   the previous Sync Operation, an empty SearchResultEntry is returned   whose objectName reflects the entry's current DN, whose attributes   field is empty, and whose Sync State Control consists of state   present, an entryUUID containing the UUID of the entry, and no   cookie.  For each reference that has not been changed since the   previous Sync Operation, an empty SearchResultReference containing an   empty SEQUENCE OF LDAPURL is returned with a Sync State Control   consisting of state present, an entryUUID containing the UUID of the   entry, and no cookie.  No messages are sent for entries or references   that are no longer in the content.   Multiple empty entries with a Sync State Control of state present   SHOULD be coalesced into one or more Sync Info Messages of syncIdSet   value with refreshDeletes set to FALSE.  syncUUIDs contain a set of   UUIDs of the entries and references unchanged since the last SyncZeilenga & Choi               Experimental                     [Page 14]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 2006   Operation.  syncUUIDs may be empty.  The Sync Info Message of   syncIdSet may contain a cookie to represent the state of the content   after performing the synchronization of the entries in the set.   In the delete phase, for each entry no longer in the content, the   server returns a SearchResultEntry whose objectName reflects a past   DN of the entry or is empty, whose attributes field is empty, and   whose Sync State Control consists of state delete, an entryUUID   containing the UUID of the deleted entry, and no cookie.  For each   reference no longer in the content, a SearchResultReference   containing an empty SEQUENCE OF LDAPURL is returned with a Sync State   Control consisting of state delete, an entryUUID containing the UUID   of the deleted reference, and no cookie.   Multiple empty entries with a Sync State Control of state delete   SHOULD be coalesced into one or more Sync Info Messages of syncIdSet   value with refreshDeletes set to TRUE.  syncUUIDs contain a set of   UUIDs of the entries and references that have been deleted from the   content since the last Sync Operation.  syncUUIDs may be empty.  The   Sync Info Message of syncIdSet may contain a cookie to represent the   state of the content after performing the synchronization of the   entries in the set.   When a present phase is followed by a delete phase, the two phases   are delimited by a Sync Info Message containing syncInfoValue of   refreshPresent, which may contain a cookie representing the state   after completing the present phase.  The refreshPresent contains   refreshDone, which is always FALSE in the refreshOnly mode of Sync   Operation because it is followed by a delete phase.   If a Sync Operation consists of a single phase, each phase and hence   the Sync Operation are marked as ended by a SearchResultDone Message   with Sync Done Control, which SHOULD contain a cookie representing   the state of the content after completing the Sync Operation.  The   Sync Done Control contains refreshDeletes, which is set to FALSE for   the present phase and set to TRUE for the delete phase.   If a Sync Operation consists of a present phase followed by a delete   phase, the Sync Operation is marked as ended at the end of the delete   phase by a SearchResultDone Message with Sync Done Control, which   SHOULD contain a cookie representing the state of the content after   completing the Sync Operation.  The Sync Done Control contains   refreshDeletes, which is set to TRUE.   The client can specify whether it prefers to receive an initial   content by supplying reloadHint of TRUE or to receive a e-   syncRefreshRequired resultCode by supplying reloadHint of FALSE   (hence absent), in the case that the server determines that it isZeilenga & Choi               Experimental                     [Page 15]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 2006   impossible or inefficient to achieve the eventual convergence by   continuing the current incremental synchronization thread.   A resultCode value of success indicates that the operation is   successfully completed.  A resultCode value of e-syncRefreshRequired   indicates that a full or partial refresh is needed.  Otherwise, the   result code indicates the nature of failure.  A cookie is provided in   the Sync Done Control for use in subsequent Sync Operations for   incremental synchronization.3.4.  refreshAndPersist Mode   A Sync request with mode refreshAndPersist asks for initial content   or content update (during the refresh stage) followed by change   notifications (during the persist stage).3.4.1.  refresh Stage   The content refresh is provided as described inSection 3.3, except   that the successful completion of content refresh is indicated by   sending a Sync Info Message of refreshDelete or refreshPresent with a   refreshDone value set to TRUE instead of a SearchResultDone Message   with resultCode success.  A cookie SHOULD be returned in the Sync   Info Message to represent the state of the content after finishing   the refresh stage of the Sync Operation.3.4.2.  persist Stage   Change notifications are provided during the persist stage.   As updates are made to the DIT, the server notifies the client of   changes to the content.  DIT updates may cause entries and references   to be added to the content, deleted from the content, or modified   within the content.  DIT updates may also cause references to be   added, deleted, or modified within the content.   Where DIT updates cause an entry to be added to the content, the   server provides a SearchResultEntry Message that represents the entry   as it appears in the content.  The message SHALL include a Sync State   Control with state of add, an entryUUID containing the entry's UUID,   and an optional cookie.   Where DIT updates cause a reference to be added to the content, the   server provides a SearchResultReference Message that represents the   reference in the content.  The message SHALL include a Sync State   Control with state of add, an entryUUID containing the UUID   associated with the reference, and an optional cookie.Zeilenga & Choi               Experimental                     [Page 16]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 2006   Where DIT updates cause an entry to be modified within the content,   the server provides a SearchResultEntry Message that represents the   entry as it appears in the content.  The message SHALL include a Sync   State Control with state of modify, an entryUUID containing the   entry's UUID, and an optional cookie.   Where DIT updates cause a reference to be modified within the   content, the server provides a SearchResultReference Message that   represents the reference in the content.  The message SHALL include a   Sync State Control with state of modify, an entryUUID containing the   UUID associated with the reference, and an optional cookie.   Where DIT updates cause an entry to be deleted from the content, the   server provides a SearchResultEntry Message with no attributes.  The   message SHALL include a Sync State Control with state of delete, an   entryUUID containing the entry's UUID, and an optional cookie.   Where DIT updates cause a reference to be deleted from the content,   the server provides a SearchResultReference Message with an empty   SEQUENCE OF LDAPURL.  The message SHALL include a Sync State Control   with state of delete, an entryUUID containing the UUID associated   with the reference, and an optional cookie.   Multiple empty entries with a Sync State Control of state delete   SHOULD be coalesced into one or more Sync Info Messages of syncIdSet   value with refreshDeletes set to TRUE. syncUUIDs contain a set of   UUIDs of the entries and references that have been deleted from the   content.  The Sync Info Message of syncIdSet may contain a cookie to   represent the state of the content after performing the   synchronization of the entries in the set.   With each of these messages, the server may provide a new cookie to   be used in subsequent Sync Operations.  Additionally, the server may   also return Sync Info Messages of choice newCookie to provide a new   cookie.  The client SHOULD use the newest (last) cookie it received   from the server in subsequent Sync Operations.3.5.  Search Request Parameters   As stated inSection 3.1, the client SHOULD specify the same   content-controlling parameters in each Search Request of the session.   All fields of the SearchRequest Message are considered content-   controlling parameters except for sizeLimit and timeLimit.Zeilenga & Choi               Experimental                     [Page 17]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 20063.5.1.  baseObject   As with the normal search operation, the refresh and persist stages   are not isolated from DIT changes.  It is possible that the entry   referred to by the baseObject is deleted, renamed, or moved.  It is   also possible that the alias object used in finding the entry   referred to by the baseObject is changed such that the baseObject   refers to a different entry.   If the DIT is updated during processing of the Sync Operation in a   manner that causes the baseObject no longer to refer to any entry or   in a manner that changes the entry the baseObject refers to, the   server SHALL return an appropriate non-success result code, such as   noSuchObject, aliasProblem, aliasDereferencingProblem, referral, or   e-syncRefreshRequired.3.5.2.  derefAliases   This operation does not support alias dereferencing during searching.   The client SHALL specify neverDerefAliases or derefFindingBaseObj for   the SearchRequest derefAliases parameter.  The server SHALL treat   other values (e.g., derefInSearching, derefAlways) as protocol   errors.3.5.3.  sizeLimit   The sizeLimit applies only to entries (regardless of their state in   Sync State Control) returned during the refreshOnly operation or the   refresh stage of the refreshAndPersist operation.3.5.4.  timeLimit   For a refreshOnly Sync Operation, the timeLimit applies to the whole   operation.  For a refreshAndPersist operation, the timeLimit applies   only to the refresh stage including the generation of the Sync Info   Message with a refreshDone value of TRUE.3.5.5.  filter   The client SHOULD avoid filter assertions that apply to the values of   the attributes likely to be considered by the server as ones holding   meta-information.  SeeSection 4.3.6.  objectName   The Sync Operation uses entryUUID values provided in the Sync State   Control as the primary keys to entries.  The client MUST use these   entryUUIDs to correlate synchronization messages.Zeilenga & Choi               Experimental                     [Page 18]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 2006   In some circumstances, the DN returned may not reflect the entry's   current DN.  In particular, when the entry is being deleted from the   content, the server may provide an empty DN if the server does not   wish to disclose the entry's current DN (or, if deleted from the DIT,   the entry's last DN).   Also note that the entry's DN may be viewed as meta information (seeSection 4.1).3.7.  Canceling the Sync Operation   Servers MUST implement the LDAP Cancel [RFC3909] Operation and   support cancellation of outstanding Sync Operations as described   here.   To cancel an outstanding Sync Operation, the client issues an LDAP   Cancel [RFC3909] Operation.   If at any time the server becomes unwilling or unable to continue   processing a Sync Operation, the server SHALL return a   SearchResultDone with a non-success resultCode indicating the reason   for the termination of the operation.   Whether the client or the server initiated the termination, the   server may provide a cookie in the Sync Done Control for use in   subsequent Sync Operations.3.8.  Refresh Required   In order to achieve the eventually-convergent synchronization, the   server may terminate the Sync Operation in the refresh or persist   stages by returning an e-syncRefreshRequired resultCode to the   client.  If no cookie is provided, a full refresh is needed.  If a   cookie representing a synchronization state is provided in this   response, an incremental refresh is needed.   To obtain a full refresh, the client then issues a new   synchronization request with no cookie.  To obtain an incremental   reload, the client issues a new synchronization with the provided   cookie.   The server may choose to provide a full copy in the refresh stage   (e.g., ignore the cookie or the synchronization state represented in   the cookie) instead of providing an incremental refresh in order to   achieve the eventual convergence.Zeilenga & Choi               Experimental                     [Page 19]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 2006   The decision between the return of the initial content and the return   of the e-syncRefreshRequired result code may be based on reloadHint   in the Sync Request Control from the client.   In the case of persist stage Sync, the server returns the resultCode   of e-syncRefreshRequired to the client to indicate that the client   needs to issue a new Sync Operation in order to obtain a synchronized   copy of the content.  If no cookie is provided, a full refresh is   needed.  If a cookie representing a synchronization state is   provided, an incremental refresh is needed.   The server may also return e-syncRefreshRequired if it determines   that a refresh would be more efficient than sending all the messages   required for convergence.   Note that the client may receive one or more of SearchResultEntry,   SearchResultReference, and/or Sync Info Messages before it receives a   SearchResultDone Message with the e-syncRefreshRequired result code.3.9.  Chattiness Considerations   The server MUST ensure that the number of entry messages generated to   refresh the client content does not exceed the number of entries   presently in the content.  While there is no requirement for servers   to maintain history information, if the server has sufficient history   to allow it to reliably determine which entries in the prior client   copy are no longer present in the content and the number of such   entries is less than or equal to the number of unchanged entries, the   server SHOULD generate delete entry messages instead of present entry   messages (seeSection 3.3.2).   When the amount of history information maintained in the server is   not enough for the clients to perform infrequent refreshOnly Sync   Operations, it is likely that the server has incomplete history   information (e.g., due to truncation) by the time those clients   connect again.   The server SHOULD NOT resort to full reload when the history   information is not enough to generate delete entry messages.  The   server SHOULD generate either present entry messages only or present   entry messages followed by delete entry messages to bring the client   copy to the current state.  In the latter case, the present entry   messages bring the client copy to a state covered by the history   information maintained in the server.   The server SHOULD maintain enough (current or historical) state   information (such as a context-wide last modify time stamp) to   determine if no changes were made in the context since the contentZeilenga & Choi               Experimental                     [Page 20]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 2006   refresh was provided and, when no changes were made, generate zero   delete entry messages instead of present messages.   The server SHOULD NOT use the history information when its use does   not reduce the synchronization traffic or when its use can expose   sensitive information not allowed to be received by the client.   The server implementor should also consider chattiness issues that   span multiple Sync Operations of a session.  As noted inSection 3.8,   the server may return e-syncRefreshRequired if it determines that a   reload would be more efficient than continuing under the current   operation.  If reloadHint in the Sync Request is TRUE, the server may   initiate a reload without directing the client to request a reload.   The server SHOULD transfer a new cookie frequently to avoid having to   transfer information already provided to the client.  Even where DIT   changes do not cause content synchronization changes to be   transferred, it may be advantageous to provide a new cookie using a   Sync Info Message.  However, the server SHOULD avoid overloading the   client or network with Sync Info Messages.   During persist mode, the server SHOULD coalesce multiple outstanding   messages updating the same entry.  The server MAY delay generation of   an entry update in anticipation of subsequent changes to that entry   that could be coalesced.  The length of the delay should be long   enough to allow coalescing of update requests issued back to back but   short enough that the transient inconsistency induced by the delay is   corrected in a timely manner.   The server SHOULD use the syncIdSet Sync Info Message when there are   multiple delete or present messages to reduce the amount of   synchronization traffic.   Also note that there may be many clients interested in a particular   directory change, and that servers attempting to service all of these   at once may cause congestion on the network.  The congestion issues   are magnified when the change requires a large transfer to each   interested client.  Implementors and deployers of servers should take   steps to prevent and manage network congestion.3.10.  Operation Multiplexing   The LDAP protocol model [RFC4511] allows operations to be multiplexed   over a single LDAP session.  Clients SHOULD NOT maintain multiple   LDAP sessions with the same server.  Servers SHOULD ensure that   responses from concurrently processed operations are interleaved   fairly.Zeilenga & Choi               Experimental                     [Page 21]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 2006   Clients SHOULD combine Sync Operations whose result set is largely   overlapping.  This avoids having to return multiple messages, once   for each overlapping session, for changes to entries in the overlap.   Clients SHOULD NOT combine Sync Operations whose result sets are   largely non-overlapping.  This ensures that an event requiring an   e-syncRefreshRequired response can be limited to as few result sets   as possible.4.  Meta Information Considerations4.1.  Entry DN   As an entry's DN is constructed from its relative DN (RDN) and the   entry's parent's DN, it is often viewed as meta information.   While renaming or moving to a new superior causes the entry's DN to   change, that change SHOULD NOT, by itself, cause synchronization   messages to be sent for that entry.  However, if the renaming or the   moving could cause the entry to be added or deleted from the content,   appropriate synchronization messages should be generated to indicate   this to the client.   When a server treats the entry's DN as meta information, the server   SHALL either      -  evaluate all MatchingRuleAssertions [RFC4511] to TRUE if         matching a value of an attribute of the entry, otherwise         Undefined, or      -  evaluate all MatchingRuleAssertion with dnAttributes of TRUE as         Undefined.   The latter choice is offered for ease of server implementation.4.2.  Operational Attributes   Where values of an operational attribute are determined by values not   held as part of the entry it appears in, the operational attribute   SHOULD NOT support synchronization of that operational attribute.   For example, in servers that implement the X.501 subschema model   [X.501], servers should not support synchronization of the   subschemaSubentry attribute as its value is determined by values held   and administrated in subschema subentries.Zeilenga & Choi               Experimental                     [Page 22]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 2006   As a counter example, servers that implement aliases [RFC4512][X.501]   can support synchronization of the aliasedObjectName attribute as its   values are held and administrated as part of the alias entries.   Servers SHOULD support synchronization of the following operational   attributes: createTimestamp, modifyTimestamp, creatorsName,   modifiersName [RFC4512].  Servers MAY support synchronization of   other operational attributes.4.3.  Collective Attributes   A collective attribute is "a user attribute whose values are the same   for each member of an entry collection" [X.501].  Use of collective   attributes in LDAP is discussed in [RFC3671].   Modification of a collective attribute generally affects the content   of multiple entries, which are the members of the collection.  It is   inefficient to include values of collective attributes visible in   entries of the collection, as a single modification of a collective   attribute requires transmission of multiple SearchResultEntry (one   for each entry of the collection that the modification affected).   Servers SHOULD NOT synchronize collective attributes appearing in   entries of any collection.  Servers MAY support synchronization of   collective attributes appearing in collective attribute subentries.4.4.  Access and Other Administrative Controls   Entries are commonly subject to access and other administrative   Controls.  While portions of the policy information governing a   particular entry may be held in the entry, policy information is   often held elsewhere (in superior entries, in subentries, in the root   DSE, in configuration files, etc.).  Because of this, changes to   policy information make it difficult to ensure eventual convergence   during incremental synchronization.   Where it is impractical or infeasible to generate content changes   resulting from a change to policy information, servers may opt to   return e-syncRefreshRequired or to treat the Sync Operation as an   initial content request (e.g., ignore the cookie or the   synchronization state represented in the cookie).5.  Interaction with Other Controls   The Sync Operation may be used with:      - ManageDsaIT Control [RFC3296]Zeilenga & Choi               Experimental                     [Page 23]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 2006      - Subentries Control [RFC3672]   as described below.  The Sync Operation may be used with other LDAP   extensions as detailed in other documents.5.1.  ManageDsaIT Control   The ManageDsaIT Control [RFC3296] indicates that the operation acts   upon the DSA Information Tree and causes referral and other special   entries to be treated as object entries with respect to the   operation.5.2.  Subentries Control   The Subentries Control is used with the search operation "to control   the visibility of entries and subentries which are within scope"   [RFC3672].  When used with the Sync Operation, the subentries control   and other factors (search scope, filter, etc.) are used to determine   whether an entry or subentry appears in the content.6.  Shadowing Considerations   As noted in [RFC4511], some servers may hold shadow copies of entries   that can be used to answer search and comparison queries.  Such   servers may also support content synchronization requests.  This   section discusses considerations for implementors and deployers for   the implementation and deployment of the Sync operation in shadowed   directories.   While a client may know of multiple servers that are equally capable   of being used to obtain particular directory content from, a client   SHOULD NOT assume that each of these servers is equally capable of   continuing a content synchronization session.  As stated inSection3.1, the client SHOULD issue each Sync request of a Sync session to   the same server.   However, through domain naming or IP address redirection or other   techniques, multiple physical servers can be made to appear as one   logical server to a client.  Only servers that are equally capable in   regards to their support for the Sync operation and that hold equally   complete copies of the entries should be made to appear as one   logical server.  In particular, each physical server acting as one   logical server SHOULD be equally capable of continuing a content   synchronization based upon cookies provided by any of the other   physical servers without requiring a full reload.  Because there is   no standard LDAP shadowing mechanism, the specification of how to   independently implement equally capable servers (as well as the   precise definition of "equally capable") is left to future documents.Zeilenga & Choi               Experimental                     [Page 24]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 2006   Note that it may be difficult for the server to reliably determine   what content was provided to the client by another server, especially   in the shadowing environments that allow shadowing events to be   coalesced.  For these servers, the use of the delete phase discussed   inSection 3.3.2 may not be applicable.7.  Security Considerations   In order to maintain a synchronized copy of the content, a client is   to delete information from its copy of the content as described   above.  However, the client may maintain knowledge of information   disclosed to it by the server separate from its copy of the content   used for synchronization.  Management of this knowledge is beyond the   scope of this document.  Servers should be careful not to disclose   information for content the client is not authorized to have   knowledge of and/or about.   While the information provided by a series of refreshOnly Sync   Operations is similar to that provided by a series of Search   Operations, persist stage may disclose additional information.  A   client may be able to discern information about the particular   sequence of update operations that caused content change.   Implementors should take precautions against malicious cookie   content, including malformed cookies or valid cookies used with   different security associations and/or protections in an attempt to   obtain unauthorized access to information.  Servers may include a   digital signature in the cookie to detect tampering.   The operation may be the target of direct denial-of-service attacks.   Implementors should provide safeguards to ensure the operation is not   abused.  Servers may place access control or other restrictions upon   the use of this operation.   Note that even small updates to the directory may cause a significant   amount of traffic to be generated to clients using this operation.  A   user could abuse its update privileges to mount an indirect denial of   service to these clients, other clients, and/or portions of the   network.  Servers should provide safeguards to ensure that update   operations are not abused.   Implementors of this (or any) LDAP extension should be familiar with   general LDAP security considerations [RFC4510].Zeilenga & Choi               Experimental                     [Page 25]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 20068.  IANA Considerations   Registration of the following values have been completed by the IANA   [RFC4520].8.1.  Object Identifier   The OID arc 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.1.9.1 was assigned [ASSIGN] by the   OpenLDAP Foundation, under its IANA-assigned private enterprise   allocation [PRIVATE], for use in this specification.8.2.  LDAP Protocol Mechanism   The IANA has registered the LDAP Protocol Mechanism described in this   document.      Subject: Request for LDAP Protocol Mechanism Registration      Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.1.9.1.1      Description: LDAP Content Synchronization Control      Person & email address to contact for further information:          Kurt Zeilenga <kurt@openldap.org>      Usage: Control      Specification:RFC 4533      Author/Change Controller: Kurt D. Zeilenga, Jong Hyuk Choi      Comments: none8.3.  LDAP Result Codes   The IANA has registered the LDAP Result Code described in this   document.      Subject: LDAP Result Code Registration      Person & email address to contact for further information:          Kurt Zeilenga <kurt@OpenLDAP.org>      Result Code Name: e-syncRefreshRequired (4096)      Specification:RFC 4533      Author/Change Controller: Kurt D. Zeilenga, Jong Hyuk Choi      Comments:  none9.  Acknowledgements   This document borrows significantly from the LDAP Client Update   Protocol [RFC3928], a product of the IETF LDUP working group.  This   document also benefited from Persistent Search [PSEARCH], Triggered   Search [TSEARCH], and Directory Synchronization [DIRSYNC] works.   This document also borrows from "Lightweight Directory Access   Protocol (v3)" [RFC2251].Zeilenga & Choi               Experimental                     [Page 26]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 200610.  Normative References   [RFC2119]   Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate               Requirement Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119, March 1997.   [RFC3296]   Zeilenga, K., "Named Subordinate References in               Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)               Directories",RFC 3296, July 2002.   [RFC3671]   Zeilenga, K., "Collective Attributes in the Lightweight               Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)",RFC 3671, December               2003.   [RFC3672]   Zeilenga, K., "Subentries in the Lightweight Directory               Access Protocol (LDAP)",RFC 3672, December 2003.   [RFC3909]   Zeilenga, K., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol               (LDAP) Cancel Operation",RFC 3909, October 2004.   [RFC4510]   Zeilenga, K., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol               (LDAP): Technical Specification Road Map",RFC 4510, June               2006.   [RFC4511]   Sermersheim, J., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access               Protocol (LDAP): The Protocol",RFC 4511, June 2006.   [RFC4512]   Zeilenga, K., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol               (LDAP): Directory Information Models",RFC 4512, June               2006.   [RFC4530]   Zeilenga, K., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol               (LDAP) entryUUID Operational Attribute",RFC 4530, June               2006.   [UUID]      International Organization for Standardization (ISO),               "Information technology - Open Systems Interconnection -               Remote Procedure Call", ISO/IEC 11578:1996   [X.501]     International Telecommunication Union - Telecommunication               Standardization Sector, "The Directory -- Models,"               X.501(1993) (also ISO/IEC 9594-2:1994).   [X.680]     International Telecommunication Union - Telecommunication               Standardization Sector, "Abstract Syntax Notation One               (ASN.1) - Specification of Basic Notation", X.680(1997)               (also ISO/IEC 8824-1:1998).Zeilenga & Choi               Experimental                     [Page 27]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 2006   [X.690]     International Telecommunication Union - Telecommunication               Standardization Sector, "Specification of ASN.1 encoding               rules: Basic Encoding Rules (BER), Canonical Encoding               Rules (CER), and Distinguished Encoding Rules (DER)",               X.690(1997) (also ISO/IEC 8825-1:1998).11.  Informative References   [RFC2251]   Wahl, M., Howes, T., and S. Kille, "Lightweight Directory               Access Protocol (v3)",RFC 2251, December 1997.   [RFC3928]   Megginson, R., Ed., Smith, M., Natkovich, O., and J.               Parham, "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)               Client Update Protocol (LCUP)",RFC 3928, October 2004.   [RFC4520]   Zeilenga, K., "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA)               Considerations for the Lightweight Directory Access               Protocol (LDAP)",BCP 64,RFC 4520, June 2006.   [PRIVATE]   IANA, "Private Enterprise Numbers",http://www.iana.org/assignments/enterprise-numbers.   [ASSIGN]    OpenLDAP Foundation, "OpenLDAP OID Delegations",http://www.openldap.org/foundation/oid-delegate.txt.   [X.500]     International Telecommunication Union - Telecommunication               Standardization Sector, "The Directory -- Overview of               concepts, models and services," X.500(1993) (also ISO/IEC               9594-1:1994).   [X.525]     International Telecommunication Union - Telecommunication               Standardization Sector, "The Directory: Replication",               X.525(1993).   [DIRSYNC]   Armijo, M., "Microsoft LDAP Control for Directory               Synchronization", Work in Progress.   [PSEARCH]   Smith, M., et al., "Persistent Search: A Simple LDAP               Change Notification Mechanism", Work in Progress.   [TSEARCH]   Wahl, M.,"LDAPv3 Triggered Search Control", Work in               Progress.Zeilenga & Choi               Experimental                     [Page 28]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 2006Appendix A.  CSN-based Implementation Considerations   This appendix is provided for informational purposes only; it is not   a normative part of the LDAP Content Synchronization Operation's   technical specification.   This appendix discusses LDAP Content Synchronization Operation server   implementation considerations associated with Change Sequence Number   based approaches.   Change Sequence Number based approaches are targeted for use in   servers that do not maintain history information (e.g., change logs,   state snapshots) about changes made to the Directory and hence, must   rely on current directory state and minimal synchronization state   information embedded in Sync Cookie.  Servers that maintain history   information should consider other approaches that exploit the history   information.   A Change Sequence Number is effectively a time stamp that has   sufficient granularity to ensure that the precedence relationship in   time of two updates to the same object can be determined.  Change   Sequence Numbers are not to be confused with Commit Sequence Numbers   or Commit Log Record Numbers.  A Commit Sequence Number allows one to   determine how two commits (to the same object or different objects)   relate to each other in time.  A Change Sequence Number associated   with different entries may be committed out of order.  In the   remainder of this Appendix, the term CSN refers to a Change Sequence   Number.   In these approaches, the server not only maintains a CSN for each   directory entry (the entry CSN) but also maintains a value that we   will call the context CSN.  The context CSN is the greatest committed   entry CSN that is not greater than any outstanding (uncommitted)   entry CSNs for all entries in a directory context.  The values of   context CSN are used in syncCookie values as synchronization state   indicators.   As search operations are not isolated from individual directory   update operations and individual update operations cannot be assumed   to be serialized, one cannot assume that the returned content   incorporates each relevant change whose change sequence number is   less than or equal to the greatest entry CSN in the content.  The   content incorporates all the relevant changes whose change sequence   numbers are less than or equal to context CSN before search   processing.  The content may also incorporate any subset of the   changes whose change sequence number is greater than context CSN   before search processing but less than or equal to the context CSN   after search processing.  The content does not incorporate any of theZeilenga & Choi               Experimental                     [Page 29]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 2006   changes whose CSN is greater than the context CSN after search   processing.   A simple server implementation could use the value of the context CSN   before search processing to indicate state.  Such an implementation   would embed this value into each SyncCookie returned.  We'll call   this the cookie CSN.  When a refresh was requested, the server would   simply generate "update" messages for all entries in the content   whose CSN is greater than the supplied cookie CSN and generate   "present" messages for all other entries in the content.  However, if   the current context CSN is the same as the cookie CSN, the server   should instead generate zero "updates" and zero "delete" messages and   indicate a refreshDeletes of TRUE, as the directory has not changed.   The implementation should also consider the impact of changes to meta   information, such as access controls, that affect content   determination.  One approach is for the server to maintain a   context-wide meta information CSN or meta CSN.  This meta CSN would   be updated whenever meta information affecting content determination   was changed.  If the value of the meta CSN is greater than the cookie   CSN, the server should ignore the cookie and treat the request as an   initial request for content.   Additionally, servers may want to consider maintaining some per-   session history information to reduce the number of messages needed   to be transferred during incremental refreshes.  Specifically, a   server could record information about entries as they leave the scope   of a disconnected sync session and later use this information to   generate delete messages instead of present messages.   When the history information is truncated, the CSN of the latest   truncated history information entry may be recorded as the truncated   CSN of the history information.  The truncated CSN may be used to   determine whether a client copy can be covered by the history   information by comparing it to the synchronization state contained in   the cookie supplied by the client.   When there is a large number of sessions, it may make sense to   maintain such history only for the selected clients.  Also, servers   taking this approach need to consider resource consumption issues to   ensure reasonable server operation and to protect against abuse.  It   may be appropriate to restrict this mode of operation by policy.Zeilenga & Choi               Experimental                     [Page 30]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 2006Authors' Addresses   Kurt D. Zeilenga   OpenLDAP Foundation   EMail: Kurt@OpenLDAP.org   Jong Hyuk Choi   IBM Corporation   EMail: jongchoi@us.ibm.comZeilenga & Choi               Experimental                     [Page 31]

RFC 4533         LDAP Content Synchronization Operation        June 2006Full Copyright Statement   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions   contained inBCP 78 and at www.rfc-editor.org/copyright.html, and   except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET   ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,   INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE   INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.Intellectual Property   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be   found inBCP 78 andBCP 79.   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository athttp://www.ietf.org/ipr.   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.Acknowledgement   Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF   Administrative Support Activity (IASA).Zeilenga & Choi               Experimental                     [Page 32]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp