Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]

PROPOSED STANDARD
Network Working Group                                     H. SchulzrinneRequest for Comments: 4482                                   Columbia U.Category: Standards Track                                      July 2006CIPID: Contact Information for the Presence Information Data FormatStatus of This Memo   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.Copyright Notice   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).Abstract   The Presence Information Data Format (PIDF) defines a basic XML   format for presenting presence information for a presentity.  The   Contact Information for the Presence Information Data format (CIPID)   is an extension that adds elements to PIDF that provide additional   contact information about a presentity and its contacts, including   references to address book entries and icons.Schulzrinne                 Standards Track                     [Page 1]

RFC 4482                         CIPID                         July 2006Table of Contents1. Introduction ....................................................22. Terminology and Conventions .....................................33. CIPID Elements ..................................................33.1. Card Element ...............................................33.2. Display-Name Element .......................................33.3. Homepage Element ...........................................33.4. Icon Element ...............................................43.5. Map Element ................................................43.6. Sound Element ..............................................44. Example .........................................................45. The XML Schema Definition .......................................66. IANA Considerations .............................................76.1. URN Sub-Namespace Registration for .........................7           'urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid'      6.2. Schema Registration for Schema           'urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid' ........................77. Internationalization Considerations .............................88. Security Considerations .........................................89. References ......................................................99.1. Normative References .......................................99.2. Informative References ....................................101.  Introduction   Presence information facilitates communication; its usefulness can be   enhanced by providing basic information about a presentity or   contact.  This specification describes a basic set of information   elements that allow a watcher to retrieve additional information   about a presentity or contact.   This specification defines extensions to the PIDF [9] Extensible   Markup Language [7][8][10] (XML) document format.   We describe elements for providing a "business card", references to   the homepage, map, representative sound, display name, and an icon.   This additional presence information can be used in PIDF [9]   documents, together with Rich Presence Information Data format [11]   (RPID), future-status [12], and other PIDF extensions.   All elements extend the <person> or, less commonly, <tuple> element   in the presence data model [13].  The <tuple> element is only   extended with Contact Information for the Presence Information Data   format (CIPID) elements if the information describes a service   referring to another person that is marked by an RPID <relationship>   element with a value other than 'self'.  All elements described in   this document are optional.Schulzrinne                 Standards Track                     [Page 2]

RFC 4482                         CIPID                         July 2006   RPID and CIPID both provide "rich" presence that goes beyond the   basic 'open' and 'closed' status information in PIDF.  The presence   information described in these two documents can be supplied   independently, although in practice, both will often appear in the   same PIDF document.  CIPID elements describe the more static aspects   of somebody's presence information, while RPID focuses on elements   that will likely change throughout the day.  Thus, CIPID information   can often be statically configured by the user through the graphical   user interface of a presence client; this is less likely to be   sufficient for RPID.   The namespace URI for these elements defined by this specification is   a URN [2], using the namespace identifier 'ietf' defined by [4] and   extended by [6]:      urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid2.  Terminology and Conventions   The key words MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHOULD, SHOULD NOT,   RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL in this document are to be interpreted   as described inBCP 14,RFC 2119 [1].3.  CIPID Elements   Unless otherwise noted below, each element may only appear at most   once.3.1.  Card Element   The <card> element includes a URI pointing to a business card, e.g.,   in LDAP Data Interchange Format [15] (LDIF) or vCard [14] format.3.2.  Display-Name Element   The <display-name> element includes the name identifying the tuple or   person that the presentity suggests should be shown by the watcher   user interface.  It is left to the watcher user interface design to   choose whether to heed this suggestion or to use some other suitable   string.  The CIPID information MAY contain multiple display names,   but only if they are labeled with different 'xml:lang' attributes.   This allows a Korean-speaking presentity to convey its display name   in different languages, Latin and Hangul, for example.3.3.  Homepage Element   The <homepage> element provides a URI pointing to general information   about the tuple or person, typically a web home page.Schulzrinne                 Standards Track                     [Page 3]

RFC 4482                         CIPID                         July 20063.4.  Icon Element   The <icon> element provides a URI pointing to an image (icon)   representing the tuple or person.  The watcher can use this   information to represent the tuple or person in a graphical user   interface.  Presentities SHOULD provide images of sizes and aspect   ratios that are appropriate for rendering as an icon.  Support for   JPEG, PNG, and GIF formats is REQUIRED.3.5.  Map Element   The <map> element provides a URI pointing to a map related to the   tuple or person.  The watcher can use this information to represent   the tuple or person in a graphical user interface.  The map may be   either an image, an HTML client-side image map, or a geographical   information system (GIS) document, e.g., encoded as GML.  Support for   images formatted as PNG and GIF is REQUIRED.3.6.  Sound Element   The <sound> element provides a URI pointing to a sound related to the   tuple or person.  The watcher MAY use the sound object, such as a   MIDI or MP3 file, referenced by the URL to inform the watcher that   the presentity has assumed the status OPEN.  Implementors are advised   to create user interfaces that provide the watcher with the   opportunity to choose whether to play such sounds.  Support for   sounds coded as MPEG-2 Layer 3 (MP3) is RECOMMENDED.  The sound   object might also be used to indicate how to pronounce the   presentity's name.4.  Example   An example using CIPID only is shown below:   <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>   <presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf"        xmlns:dm="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model"        xmlns:c="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid"        entity="pres:someone@example.com">     <tuple>       <status>         <basic>open</basic>       </status>       <contact priority="0.8">im:alice@example.net</contact>       <timestamp>2005-11-21T16:14:29Z</timestamp>     </tuple>Schulzrinne                 Standards Track                     [Page 4]

RFC 4482                         CIPID                         July 2006     <dm:person>       <c:card>http://example.com/~alice/card.vcd</c:card>       <c:display-name>Alice Lewis</c:card>       <c:homepage>http://example.com/~alice</c:homepage>       <c:icon>http://example.com/~alice/me.png</c:icon>       <c:map>http://example.com/~alice/gml-map.xml</c:map>       <c:sound>http://example.com/~alice/hello.wav</c:sound>       <dm:timestamp>2005-11-21T09:00:00+05:00</dm:timestamp>     </dm:person>   </presence>   An example combining RPID and CIPID is shown below:   <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>   <presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf"   xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"   xmlns:dm="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model"   xmlns:c="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid"   xmlns:r="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid"   xsi:schemaLocation="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf pidf.xsd   urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model data-model.xsd   urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid cipid.xsd   urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid rpid.xsd"   entity="pres:someone@example.com">     <tuple>       <status>         <basic>open</basic>       </status>       <contact priority="0.8">im:someone@mobile.example.net</contact>       <timestamp>2005-05-30T22:00:29Z</timestamp>     </tuple>     <tuple>       <status>          <basic>closed</basic>       </status>       <r:relationship><r:assistant/></r:relationship>       <c:card>http://example.com/~assistant/card.vcd</c:card>       <c:homepage>http://example.com/~assistant</c:homepage>       <contact priority="0.1">im:assistant@example.com</contact>       <timestamp>2005-05-30T22:00:29Z</timestamp>     </tuple>     <dm:person>       <c:card>http://example.com/~someone/card.vcd</c:card>       <c:homepage>http://example.com/~someone</c:homepage>       <c:icon>http://example.com/~someone/icon.gif</c:icon>Schulzrinne                 Standards Track                     [Page 5]

RFC 4482                         CIPID                         July 2006       <c:map>http://example.com/~someone/gml-map.xml</c:map>       <c:sound>http://example.com/~someone/whoosh.wav</c:sound>       <dm:timestamp>2005-05-30T22:02:44+05:00</dm:timestamp>     </dm:person>   </presence>5.  The XML Schema Definition   The schema is shown below.   <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>   <xs:schema targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid"       xmlns:cipid="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid"       xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"       elementFormDefault="qualified"       attributeFormDefault="unqualified">     <xs:annotation>       <xs:documentation>         Describes CIPID tuple extensions for PIDF.       </xs:documentation>     </xs:annotation>     <xs:element name="card" type="xs:anyURI"/>     <xs:element name="display-name" type="xs:string"/>     <xs:element name="homepage" type="xs:anyURI"/>     <xs:element name="icon" type="xs:anyURI"/>     <xs:element name="map" type="xs:anyURI"/>     <xs:element name="sound" type="xs:anyURI"/>   </xs:schema>                          Figure 1: CIPID schemaSchulzrinne                 Standards Track                     [Page 6]

RFC 4482                         CIPID                         July 20066.  IANA Considerations   This document calls for IANA to register a new XML namespace URN and   schema per [6].6.1.  URN Sub-Namespace Registration for      'urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid'   URI:  urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid   Description:  This is the XML namespace for XML elements defined byRFC 4482 to describe contact information presence information      extensions for the status element in the PIDF presence document      format in the application/pidf+xml content type.   Registrant Contact:  IETF, SIMPLE working group, simple@ietf.org;      Henning Schulzrinne, hgs@cs.columbia.edu   XML:    BEGIN    <?xml version="1.0"?>    <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML Basic 1.0//EN"    "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-basic/xhtml-basic10.dtd">    <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml    <head>       <meta http-equiv="content-type"       content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1"/>       <title>CIPID: Contact Information for the Presence Information         Data Format</title>    </head>    <body>      <h1>Namespace for contact information presence extension          (status)</h1>      <h2>urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid</h2>      <p>See <a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4482.txt">RFC4482</a>.</p>    </body>    </html>    END6.2.  Schema Registration for Schema 'urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid'   URI:  urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid   Registrant Contact:  IESG   XML:  See Figure 1Schulzrinne                 Standards Track                     [Page 7]

RFC 4482                         CIPID                         July 20067.  Internationalization Considerations   CIPID delivers only URLs, except for the <display-name> element.  The   resolution of the URLs can negotiate appropriate language and   character sets within the URL-designated protocol.   For the display name and to handle Internationalized Resource   Identifiers (IRIs) [16], since CIPID is represented in XML, it   provides native support for encoding information using the Unicode   character set and its more compact representations including UTF-8.   Conformant XML processors recognize both UTF-8 and UTF-16.  Though   XML includes provisions to identify and use other character encodings   through use of an "encoding" attribute in an <?xml?> declaration, use   of UTF-8 is RECOMMENDED in environments where parser encoding support   incompatibility exists.   The XML 'xml:lang' attribute can be used to identify the language and   script for the <display-name> element.  The specification allows   multiple occurrences of this element so that the presentity can   convey display names in multiple scripts and languages.  If no 'xml:   lang' attribute is provided, the default value is "i-default" [3].8.  Security Considerations   The security issues are similar to those for RPID [11].  Watchers   need to restrict which content types of content pointed to by <icon>,   <homepage>, <map>, <sound>, and <vcard> elements they render.   Also, when a watcher accesses these URIs, the presentity may deduce   that the watcher is currently using the presence application.  Thus,   a presence application concerned about leaking this information may   want to cache these objects for later use.  (A presentity could   easily customize the URLs for each watcher, so that it can tell who   is referencing the objects.)  This caching behavior may cause the   information to become stale, out-of-sync with the current data until   the cache is refreshed.  Fortunately, the elements in CIPID are   expected to retain the same content for periods measured in days, so   that privacy-conscious applications may well decide to perform   caching over durations that reveal little current activity   information.  Presentities need to keep in mind that clients may   cache the content referenced by URIs for long periods as they use   their presence system to construct presence documents using this   extension.  If the referenced content needs to change frequently, the   presentity could, for example, update the presence document with a   new URI to encourage clients to notice.Schulzrinne                 Standards Track                     [Page 8]

RFC 4482                         CIPID                         July 2006   Icons and other URIs in this document could be used as a covert   channel to convey messages to the watcher, outside the content   monitoring that might be in place for instant messages or other   communications channels.  Thus, entities that worry about such   channels may want to prohibit the usage of URLs pointing to resources   outside their domain, for example.   Implementors must take care to adhere to the mechanisms for verifying   the identity in the referenced server's certificate against the URI.   For instance, if the URI scheme is https, the requirements ofRFC2818 [5], section 3.1, must be met.  In particular, the domain   represented in the URI must match the subjectAltName in the   certificate presented by the referenced server.  If this identity   check fails, the referenced content SHOULD NOT be retrieved and MUST   NOT be used.9.  References9.1.  Normative References   [1]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement        Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119, March 1997.   [2]  Moats, R., "URN Syntax",RFC 2141, May 1997.   [3]  Alvestrand, H., "IETF Policy on Character Sets and Languages",BCP 18,RFC 2277, January 1998.   [4]  Moats, R., "A URN Namespace for IETF Documents",RFC 2648,        August 1999.   [5]  Rescorla, E., "HTTP Over TLS",RFC 2818, May 2000.   [6]  Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry",BCP 81,RFC 3688, January        2004.   [7]  Maloney, M., Beech, D., Thompson, H., and N. Mendelsohn, "XML        Schema Part 1: Structures Second Edition", W3C REC REC-        xmlschema-1-20041028, October 2004.   [8]  Malhotra, A. and P. Biron, "XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes Second        Edition", W3C REC REC-xmlschema-2-20041028, October 2004.   [9]  Sugano, H., Fujimoto, S., Klyne, G., Bateman, A., Carr, W., and        J. Peterson, "Presence Information Data Format (PIDF)",RFC3863, August 2004.Schulzrinne                 Standards Track                     [Page 9]

RFC 4482                         CIPID                         July 2006   [10] Yergeau, F., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, C., Bray, T., and E.        Maler, "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Third Edition)",        W3C REC REC-xml-20040204, February 2004.9.2.  Informative References   [11] Schulzrinne, H., Gurbani, V., Kyzivat, P., and J. Rosenberg,        "RPID: Rich Presence Extensions to the Presence Information Data        Format (PIDF)",RFC 4480, July 2006.   [12] Schulzrinne, H., "Timed Presence Extensions to the Presence        Information Data Format (PIDF) to Indicate Status Information        for Past and Future Time Intervals",RFC 4481, July 2006.   [13] Rosenberg, J., "A Data Model for Presence",RFC 4479, July 2006.   [14] Dawson, F. and T. Howes, "vCard MIME Directory Profile",RFC2426, September 1998.   [15] Good, G., "The LDAP Data Interchange Format (LDIF) - Technical        Specification",RFC 2849, June 2000.   [16] Duerst, M. and M. Suignard, "Internationalized Resource        Identifiers (IRIs)",RFC 3987, January 2005.Acknowledgements   This document is based on discussions within the IETF SIMPLE working   group.  Spencer Dawkins, Vijay Gurbani, Avshalom Houri, Hisham   Khartabil, Paul Kyzivat, Eva Leppanen, Mikko Lonnfors, Aki Niemi, Jon   Peterson, Jonathan Rosenberg, and Robert Sparks provided helpful   comments.Author's Address   Henning Schulzrinne   Columbia University   Department of Computer Science   450 Computer Science Building   New York, NY  10027   US   Phone: +1 212 939 7004   EMail: hgs+simple@cs.columbia.edu   URI:http://www.cs.columbia.eduSchulzrinne                 Standards Track                    [Page 10]

RFC 4482                         CIPID                         July 2006Full Copyright Statement   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions   contained inBCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors   retain all their rights.   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET   ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,   INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE   INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.Intellectual Property   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be   found inBCP 78 andBCP 79.   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository athttp://www.ietf.org/ipr.   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.Acknowledgement   Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF   Administrative Support Activity (IASA).Schulzrinne                 Standards Track                    [Page 11]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp