Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]

INFORMATIONAL
Network Working Group                                     J. Manner, Ed.Request for Comments: 3753                                  M. Kojo, Ed.Category: Informational                                        June 2004Mobility Related TerminologyStatus of this Memo   This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does   not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of this   memo is unlimited.Copyright Notice   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004).Abstract   There is a need for common definitions of terminology in the work to   be done around IP mobility.  This document defines terms for mobility   related terminology.  The document originated out of work done in the   Seamoby Working Group but has broader applicability for terminology   used in IETF-wide discourse on technology for mobility and IP   networks.  Other working groups dealing with mobility may want to   take advantage of this terminology.Table of Contents1.  Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22.  General Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .23.  Mobile Access Networks and Mobile Networks. . . . . . . . . .104.  Handover Terminology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .154.1.  Scope of Handover . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .164.2.  Handover Control. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .174.3.  Simultaneous connectivity to Access Routers . . . . . .194.4.  Performance and Functional Aspects. . . . . . . . . . .194.5.  Micro Diversity, Macro Diversity, and IP Diversity. . .214.6.  Paging, and Mobile Node States and Modes. . . . . . . .224.7.  Context Transfer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .244.8.  Candidate Access Router Discovery . . . . . . . . . . .244.9.  Types of Mobility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .255.  Specific Terminology for Mobile Ad-Hoc Networking . . . . . .266.  Security-related Terminology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .277.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .288.  Contributors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .289.  Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2910. Informative References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29Manner & Kojo                Informational                      [Page 1]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 200411.Appendix A - Index of Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3112. Authors' Addresses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3513. Full Copyright Statement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .361.  Introduction   This document presents terminology to be used for documents and   discussions within the Seamoby Working Group.  Other mobility related   working groups could take advantage of this terminology, in order to   create a common terminology for the area of mobility in IP networks.   Some terms and their definitions that are not directly related to the   IP world are included for the purpose of harmonizing the terminology.   For example, 'Access Point' and 'base station' refer to the same   component, from the point of view of IP, but 'Access Router' has a   very different meaning.  The presented terminology may also, it is   hoped, be adequate to cover mobile ad-hoc networks.   The proposed terminology is not meant to assert any new terminology.   Rather the authors would welcome discussion on more exact definitions   as well as missing or unnecessary terms.  This work is a   collaborative enterprise between people from many different   engineering backgrounds and so already presents a first step in   harmonizing the terminology.   The terminology in this document is divided into several sections.   First, there is a list of terms for general use and mobile access   networks followed by terms related to handovers, and finally some   terms used within the MANET and NEMO working groups.2.  General Terms   Bandwidth      The total width of the frequency band available to or used by a      communications channel.  Usually measured in Hertz (Hz).  The      bandwidth of a channel limits the available channel capacity.   Bandwidth utilization      The actual rate of information transfer achieved over a link,      expressed as a percentage of the theoretical maximum channel      capacity on that link, according to Shannon's Law.Manner & Kojo                Informational                      [Page 2]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004   Beacon      A control message broadcast by a node (especially, a base station)      informing all the other nodes in its neighborhood of the      continuing presence of the broadcasting node, possibly along with      additional status or configuration information.   Binding Update (BU)      A message indicating a mobile node's current mobility binding, and      in particular its care-of address.   Care-of-Address (CoA)      An IP address associated with a mobile node while visiting a      foreign link; the subnet prefix of this IP address is a foreign      subnet prefix.  A packet addressed to the mobile node which      arrives at the mobile node's home network when the mobile node is      away from home and has registered a Care-of Address will be      forwarded to that address by the Home Agent in the home network.   Channel      A subdivision of the physical medium allowing possibly shared      independent uses of the medium.  Channels may be made available by      subdividing the medium into distinct time slots, or distinct      spectral bands, or decorrelated coding sequences.   Channel access protocol      A protocol for mediating access to, and possibly allocation of,      the various channels available within the physical communications      medium.  Nodes participating in the channel access protocol agree      to communicate only when they have uncontested access to one of      the channels, so that there will be no interference.   Channel capacity      The total capacity of a link to carry information (typically bits)      per unit time.  With a given bandwidth, the theoretical maximum      channel capacity is given by Shannon's Law.  The actual channel      capacity of a channel is determined by the channel bandwidth, the      coding system used, and the signal to noise ratio.Manner & Kojo                Informational                      [Page 3]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004   Control message      Information passed between two or more network nodes for      maintaining protocol state, which may be unrelated to any specific      application.   Distance vector      A characteristic of some routing protocols in which, for each      desired destination, a node maintains information about the      distance to that destination, and a vector (next hop) towards that      destination.   Fairness      A property of channel access protocols whereby a medium is made      fairly available to all eligible nodes on the link.  Fairness does      not strictly imply equality, especially in cases where nodes are      given link access according to unequal priority or classification.   Flooding      The process of delivering data or control messages to every node      within the network under consideration.   Foreign subnet prefix      A bit string that consists of some number of initial bits of an IP      address which identifies a node's foreign link within the Internet      topology.   Forwarding node      A node which performs the function of forwarding datagrams from      one of its neighbors to another.   Home Address (HoA)      An IP address assigned to a mobile node, used as the permanent      address of the mobile node.  This address is within the mobile      node's home link.  Standard IP routing mechanisms will deliver      packets destined for a mobile node's home address to its home link      [9].Manner & Kojo                Informational                      [Page 4]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004   Home Agent (HA)      A router on a mobile node's home link with which the mobile node      has registered its current care-of address.  While the mobile node      is away from home, the home agent intercepts packets on the home      link destined to the mobile node's home address, encapsulates      them, and tunnels them to the mobile node's registered care-of      address.   Home subnet prefix      A bit string that consists of some number of initial bits of an IP      address which identifies a node's home link within the Internet      topology (i.e., the IP subnet prefix corresponding to the mobile      node's home address, as defined in [9]).   Interface      A node's point of attachment to a link.   IP access address      An IP address (often dynamically allocated) which a node uses to      designate its current point of attachment to the local network.      The IP access address is typically to be distinguished from the      mobile node's home address; in fact, while visiting a foreign      network the IP access address may be considered unsuitable for use      as an end-point address by any but the most short-lived      applications.  Instead, the IP access address is typically used as      the care-of address of the node.   Link      A communication facility or physical medium that can sustain data      communications between multiple network nodes, such as an Ethernet      (simple or bridged).  A link is the layer immediately below IP.      In a layered network stack model, the Link Layer (Layer 2) is      normally below the Network (IP) Layer (Layer 3), and above the      Physical Layer (Layer 1).   Asymmetric link      A link with transmission characteristics which are different      depending upon the relative position or design characteristics of      the transmitter and the receiver of data on the link.  For      instance, the range of one transmitter may be much higher than the      range of another transmitter on the same medium.Manner & Kojo                Informational                      [Page 5]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004   Link establishment      The process of establishing a link between the mobile node and the      local network.  This may involve allocating a channel, or other      local wireless resources, possibly including a minimum level of      service or bandwidth.   Link-layer trigger (L2 Trigger)      Information from the link layer that informs the network layer of      the detailed events involved in handover sequencing at the link      layer.  L2 triggers are not specific to any particular link layer,      but rather represent generalizations of link layer information      available from a wide variety of link layer protocols [4].   Link state      A characterization of some routing protocols in which every node      within the network is expected to maintain information about every      link within the network topology.   Link-level acknowledgment      A protocol strategy, typically employed over wireless media,      requiring neighbors to acknowledge receipt of packets (typically      unicast only) from the transmitter.  Such strategies aim to avoid      packet loss or delay resulting from lack of, or unwanted      characteristics of, higher level protocols.  Link-layer      acknowledgments are often used as part of Automatic Repeat-Request      (ARQ) algorithms for increasing link reliability.   Local broadcast      The delivery of data to every node within range of the      transmitter.   Loop-free      A property of routing protocols whereby the path taken by a data      packet from source to destination never traverses through the same      intermediate node twice before arrival at the destination.Manner & Kojo                Informational                      [Page 6]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004   Medium Access Protocol (MAC)      A protocol for mediating access to, and possibly allocation of,      the physical communications medium.  Nodes participating in the      medium access protocol can communicate only when they have      uncontested access to the medium, so that there will be no      interference.  When the physical medium is a radio channel, the      MAC is the same as the Channel Access Protocol.   Mobile network prefix      A bit string that consists of some number of initial bits of an IP      address which identifies the entire mobile network within the      Internet topology.  All nodes in a mobile network necessarily have      an address containing this prefix.   Mobility factor      The relative frequency of node movement, compared to the frequency      of application initiation.   Multipoint relay (MPR)      A node which is selected by its one-hop neighbor to re-transmit      all broadcast messages that it receives.  The message must be new      and the time-to-live field of the message must be greater than      one.  Multipoint relaying is a technique to reduce the number of      redundant re-transmissions while diffusing a broadcast message in      the network.   Neighbor      A "neighbor" is any other node to which data may be propagated      directly over the communications medium without relying on the      assistance of any other forwarding node.   Neighborhood      All the nodes which can receive data on the same link from one      node whenever it transmits data.   Next hop      A neighbor which has been selected to forward packets along the      way to a particular destination.Manner & Kojo                Informational                      [Page 7]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004   Payload      The actual data within a packet, not including network protocol      headers which were not inserted by an application.  Note that      payloads are different between layers:  application data is the      payload of TCP, which are the payload of IP, which three are the      payload of link layer protocols etc.  Thus, it is important to      identify the scope when talking about payloads.   Prefix      A bit string that consists of some number of initial bits of an      address.   Routing table      The table where forwarding nodes keep information (including next      hop) for various destinations.   Route entry      An entry for a specific destination (unicast or multicast) in the      routing table.   Route establishment      The process of determining a route between a source and a      destination.   Route activation      The process of putting a route into use after it has been      determined.   Routing proxy      A node that routes packets by overlays, e.g., by tunneling,      between communicating partners.  The Home Agent and Foreign Agent      are examples of routing proxies, in that they receive packets      destined for the mobile node and tunnel them to the current      address of the mobile node.Manner & Kojo                Informational                      [Page 8]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004   Shannon's Law      A statement defining the theoretical maximum rate at which error-      free digits can be transmitted over a bandwidth-limited channel in      the presence of noise.  No practical error correction coding      system exists that can closely approach the theoretical      performance limit given by Shannon's law.   Signal strength      The detectable power of the signal carrying the data bits, as seen      by the receiver of the signal.   Source route      A source route from node A to node B is an ordered list of IP      addresses, starting with the IP address of node A and ending with      the IP address of the node B.  Between A and B, the source route      includes an ordered list of intermediate hops between A and B, as      well as the interface index of the interface through which the      packet should be transmitted to reach the next hop.  The list of      intermediate hops might not include all visited nodes, some hops      might be omitted for a reason or another.   Spatial re-use      Simultaneous use of channels with identical or close physical      characteristics, but located spatially far enough apart to avoid      interference (i.e., co-channel interference)   System-wide broadcast      Same as flooding, but used in contrast to local broadcast.   Subnet      A subnet is a logical group of connected network nodes.  In IP      networks, nodes in a subnet share a common network mask (in IPV4)      or a network prefix (in IPv6).   Topology (Network Topology)      The interconnection structure of a network: which nodes are      directly connected to each other, and through which links they are      connected.  Some simple topologies have been given names, such as      for instance 'bus topology', 'mesh topology', 'ring topology',      'star topology' and 'tree topology'.Manner & Kojo                Informational                      [Page 9]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004   Triggered update      A solicited route update transmitted by a router along a path to a      destination.3.  Mobile Access Networks and Mobile Networks   In order to support host mobility a set of nodes towards the network   edge may need to have specific functions.  Such a set of nodes forms   a mobile access network that may or may not be part of the global   Internet.  Figure 1 presents two examples of such access network   topologies.  The figure depicts a reference architecture which   illustrates an IP network with components defined in this section.   We intend to define the concept of the Access Network (AN) which may   also support enhanced mobility.  It is possible that to support   routing and QoS for mobile nodes, existing routing protocols (e.g.,   Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) [14]) may not be appropriate to   maintain forwarding information for these mobile nodes as they change   their points of attachment to the Access Network.  These new   functions are implemented in routers with additional capabilities.   We can distinguish three types of Access Network components: Access   Routers (AR) which handle the last hop to the mobile, typically over   a wireless link; Access Network Gateways (ANG) which form the   boundary on the fixed network side and shield the fixed network from   the specialized routing protocols; and (optionally) other internal   Access Network Routers which may also be needed in some cases to   support the functions.  The Access Network consists of the equipment   needed to support this specialized routing, i.e., AR or ANG.  AR and   ANG may be the same physical nodes.   In addition, we present a few basic terms on mobile networks, that   is, mobile network, mobile router (MR), and mobile network node   (MNN).  More terminology for discussing mobile networks can be found   in [13].  A more thorough discussion of mobile networks can be found   in the working group documents of the NEMO Working Group.   Note: this reference architecture is not well suited for people   dealing with Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANET).Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 10]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004                                                                   |                                                                   |                     ---        ------                    -------  |        ---  | <-->  | | -------| AR | -------------------|     |  |        | |--[]      ---        /------          \       /| ANG |--|        ---            AP      /                  \     / |     |  |         MH                   /                    \   /  -------  |   (with wireless     ___    /                    -------          |        device)       | |----                     | ANR |          |                      ---                         -------          |                       AP                          /   \           |                                                  /     \ -------  |                     ---       ------            /       \|     |  |                     | |-------| AR |---------------------| ANG |--|                     ---       ------                     |     |  |                      AP                                  -------  |                                                                   |                          Access Network (AN) 1                    |   - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  -|                          Access Network (AN) 2                    |                                                                   |                                                                   |                     ---        ------                    -------  |       ---  | <-->   | | -------| AR | -------------------|     |  |       | |--[]       ---       /------                   /| ANG |--|       ---            AP      /                         / |     |  |        MH                   /                         /  -------  |   (with wireless    ___    /                         /            |       device)       | |----                         /             |                     ---                            /              |                      AP                           /               |                                                  /                |       |            ---       ------         -------               |   --- |       | <->| |-------| AR |---------| ANR |               |   | |-|      []    ---  \    ------         -------               |   --- |  -----|     AP   \                  /                     |   MNN |--i MR e           \                /                      |       |  ------    ---     \ ------       /                       |   --- | (with      | |-------| AR |-------                        |   | |-| wireless   ---       ------                               |   --- |  device)    AP                                            |   MNN                                 'i': MR ingress interface   |                                       'e': MR egress interface    |                                                                   |                Figure 1: Reference Network ArchitectureManner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 11]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004   Mobile Node (MN)      An IP node capable of changing its point of attachment to the      network.  A Mobile Node may either be a Mobile Host (no forwarding      functionality) or a Mobile Router (forwarding functionality).   Mobile Host (MH)      A mobile node that is an end host and not a router.  A Mobile Host      is capable of sending and receiving packets, that is, being a      source or destination of traffic, but not a forwarder of it.   Fixed Node (FN)      A node, either a host or a router, unable to change its point of      attachment to the network and its IP address without breaking open      sessions.   Mobile network      An entire network, moving as a unit, which dynamically changes its      point of attachment to the Internet and thus its reachability in      the topology.  The mobile network is composed of one or more IP-      subnets and is connected to the global Internet via one or more      Mobile Routers (MR).  The internal configuration of the mobile      network is assumed to be relatively stable with respect to the MR.   Mobile Router (MR)      A router capable of changing its point of attachment to the      network, moving from one link to another link.  The MR is capable      of forwarding packets between two or more interfaces, and possibly      running a dynamic routing protocol modifying the state by which it      does packet forwarding.      A MR acting as a gateway between an entire mobile network and the      rest of the Internet has one or more egress interface(s)  and one      or more ingress interface(s).  Packets forwarded upstream to the      rest of the Internet are transmitted through one of the MR's      egress interface; packets forwarded downstream to the mobile      network are transmitted through one of the MR's ingress interface.   Ingress interface      The interface of a MR attached to a link inside the mobile      network.Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 12]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004   Egress interface      The interface of a MR attached to the home link if the MR is at      home, or attached to a foreign link if the MR is in a foreign      network.   Mobile Network Node (MNN)      Any node (host or router) located within a mobile network, either      permanently or temporarily.  A Mobile Network Node may either be a      mobile node or a fixed node.   Access Link (AL)      A last-hop link between a Mobile Node and an Access Point.  That      is, a facility or medium over which an Access Point and the Mobile      Node can communicate at the link layer, i.e., the layer      immediately below IP.   Access Point (AP)      An Access Point is a layer 2 device which is connected to one or      more Access Routers and offers the wireless link connection to the      Mobile Node.  Access Points are sometimes called base stations or      access point transceivers.  An Access Point may be a separate      entity or co-located with an Access Router.   Radio Cell      The geographical area within which an Access Point provides radio      coverage, i.e., where radio communication between a Mobile Node      and the specific Access Point is possible.   Access Network Router (ANR)      An IP router in the Access Network.  An Access Network Router may      include Access Network specific functionalities, for example,      related to mobility and/or QoS.  This is to distinguish between      ordinary routers and routers that have Access Network-related      special functionality.Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 13]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004   Access Router (AR)      An Access Network Router residing on the edge of an Access Network      and connected to one or more Access Points.  The Access Points may      be of different technology.  An Access Router offers IP      connectivity to Mobile Nodes, acting as a default router to the      Mobile Nodes it is currently serving.  The Access Router may      include intelligence beyond a simple forwarding service offered by      ordinary IP routers.   Access Network Gateway (ANG)      An Access Network Router that separates an Access Network from      other IP networks, much in the same way as an ordinary gateway      router.  The Access Network Gateway looks to the other IP networks      like a standard IP router.  In a small network, an ANG may also      offer the services of an AR, namely offer the IP connectivity to      the mobile nodes.   Access Network (AN)      An IP network which includes one or more Access Network Routers.   Administrative Domain (AD)      A collection of networks under the same administrative control and      grouped together for administrative purposes [5].   Serving Access Router (SAR)      The Access Router currently offering the connectivity to the MN.      This is usually the point of departure for the MN as it makes its      way towards a new Access Router (at which time the Serving Access      Router takes the role of the Previous Access Router).  There may      be several Serving Access Routers serving the Mobile Node at the      same time.   New Access Router (NAR)      The Access Router that offers connectivity to the Mobile Node      after a handover.Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 14]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004   Previous Access Router (PAR)      An Access Router that offered connectivity to the Mobile Node      prior to a handover.  This is the Serving Access Router that will      cease or has ceased to offer connectivity to the Mobile Node.      Often also called Old Access Router (OAR).   Candidate Access Router (CAR)      An Access Router to which the Mobile Node may do a handoff.  SeeSection 4.8.4.  Handover Terminology   These terms refer to different perspectives and approaches to   supporting different aspects of mobility.  Distinctions can be made   according to the scope, range overlap, performance characteristics,   diversity characteristics, state transitions, mobility types, and   control modes of handover techniques.   Roaming      An operator-based term involving formal agreements between      operators that allows a mobile to get connectivity from a foreign      network.  Roaming (a particular aspect of user mobility) includes,      for example, the functionality by which users can communicate      their identity to the local AN so that inter-AN agreements can be      activated and service and applications in the MN's home network      can be made available to the user locally.   Handover      The process by which an active MN (in the Active State, seesection 4.6) changes its point of attachment to the network, or      when such a change is attempted.  The access network may provide      features to minimize the interruption to sessions in progress.      Also called handoff.      There are different types of handover classified according to      different aspects involved in the handover.  Some of this      terminology follows the description in [4].Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 15]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 20044.1.  Scope of Handover   Layer 2 handover      A handover where the MN changes APs (or some other aspect of the      radio channel) connected to the same AR's interface.  This type of      handover is transparent to the routing at the IP layer (or it      appears simply as a link layer reconfiguration without any      mobility implications).   Intra-AR handover      A handover which changes the AR's network interface to the mobile.      That is, the Serving AR remains the same but routing changes      internal to the AR take place.   Intra-AN handover      A handover where the MN changes ARs inside the same AN.  Such a      handover is not necessarily visible outside the AN.  In case the      ANG serving the MN changes, this handover is seen outside the AN      due to a change in the routing paths.  Note that the ANG may      change for only some of the MN's data flows.   Inter-AN handover      A handover where the MN moves to a new AN.  This requires support      for macro mobility.  Note that this would have to involve the      assignment of a new IP access address (e.g., a new care-of      address) to the MN.   Intra-technology handover      A handover between equipment of the same technology.   Inter-technology handover      A handover between equipment of different technologies.   Horizontal handover      This involves MNs moving between access points of the same type      (in terms of coverage, data rate and mobility), such as, UMTS to      UMTS, or WLAN to WLAN.Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 16]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004   Vertical handover      This involves MNs moving between access points of different type,      such as, UMTS to WLAN.   Note that the difference between a horizontal and vertical handover   is vague.  For example, a handover from an AP with 802.11b WLAN link   to an AP with 802.11g WLAN link may be considered as either a   vertical or a horizontal handover, depending on an individual's point   of view.   Note also that the IP layer sees network interfaces and IP addresses,   rather than specific technologies used by those interfaces.  Thus,   horizontal and vertical handovers may or may not be noticed at the IP   layer.  Usually a handover can be noticed if the IP address assigned   to the interface changes, the network interface itself changes (which   can also change the IP address), or there is a link outage, for   example, when the mobile node moves out of coverage for a while.  For   example, in a GPRS network a horizontal handover happens usually   unnoticed by the IP layer.  Similarly, a WLAN horizontal handover may   be noticed if the IP address of the interface changes.  On the other   hand, vertical handovers often change the network interface and are,   therefore, noticed on the IP layer.  Still, some specific network   cards may be able to switch between access technologies (e.g., GPRS   to UMTS) without changing the network interface.  Moreover, either of   the two handovers may or may not result in changing the AR.  For   example, an AR could control WLAN and Bluetooth access points, and   the mobile node could do horizontal and vertical handovers under the   same AR without changing its IP address or even the network   interface.4.2.  Handover Control   A handover must be one of the following two types (a):      Mobile-initiated handover         The MN is the one that makes the initial decision to initiate         the handover.      Network-initiated handover         The network makes the initial decision to initiate the         handover.Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 17]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004   A handover is also one of the following two types (b):      Mobile-controlled handover         The MN has the primary control over the handover process.      Network-controlled handover         The network has the primary control over the handover process.   A handover decision usually involves some sort of measurements about   when and where to handover to.  Therefore, a handover is also either   of these three types (c):      Mobile-assisted handover         Information and measurement from the MN are used by the AR to         decide on the execution of a handover.      Network-assisted handover         A handover where the AN collects information that can be used         by the MN in a handover decision.      Unassisted handover         A handover where no assistance is provided by the MN or the AR         to each other.   Note that it is possible that the MN and the AR both do measurements   and decide on the handover.   A handover is also one of the following two types (d):      Push handover         A handover either initiated by the PAR, or where the MN         initiates a handover via the PAR.      Pull handover         A handover either initiated by the NAR, or where the MN         initiates a handover via the NAR.Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 18]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004   The handover is also either proactive or reactive (e):      Planned handover         A proactive (expected) handover where some signaling can be         done in advance of the MN getting connected to the new AR,         e.g., building a temporary tunnel from the previous AR to the         new AR.      Unplanned handover         A reactive (unexpected) handover where no signaling is done in         advance of the MN's move from the previous AR to the new AR.   The five handover types (a-e) are mostly independent, and every   handover should be classifiable according to each of these types.4.3.  Simultaneous connectivity to Access Routers   Make-before-break (MBB)      During a MBB handover the MN makes the new connection before the      old one is broken.  Thus, the MN can communicate simultaneously      with the old and new AR during the handover.  This should not be      confused with "soft handover" which relies on macro diversity,      described inSection 4.5.   Break-before-make (BBM)      During a BBM handover the MN breaks the old connection before the      new connection is made.  Thus, the MN cannot communicate      simultaneously with the old and the new AR.4.4.  Performance and Functional Aspects   Handover latency      Handover latency is the difference between the time a MN is last      able to send and/or receive an IP packet by way of the PAR, and      the time the MN is able to send and/or receive an IP packet      through the NAR.  Adapted from [4].   Smooth handover      A handover that aims primarily to minimize packet loss, with no      explicit concern for additional delays in packet forwarding.Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 19]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004   Fast handover      A handover that aims primarily to minimize handover latency, with      no explicit interest in packet loss.   Seamless handover      A handover in which there is no change in service capability,      security, or quality.  In practice, some degradation in service is      to be expected.  The definition of a seamless handover in the      practical case should be that other protocols, applications, or      end users do not detect any change in service capability, security      or quality, which would have a bearing on their (normal)      operation.  As a consequence, what would be a seamless handover      for one less demanding application might not be seamless for      another more demanding application.  See [7] for more discussion      on the topic.   Throughput      The amount of data from a source to a destination processed by the      protocol for which throughput is to be measured, for instance, IP,      TCP, or the MAC protocol.  The throughput differs between protocol      layers.   Goodput      The total bandwidth used, less the volume of control messages,      protocol overhead from the data packets, and packets dropped due      to CRC errors.   Pathloss      A reduction in signal strength caused by traversing the physical      medium constituting the link.   Hidden-terminal problem      The problem whereby a transmitting node can fail in its attempt to      transmit data because of destructive interference which is only      detectable at the receiving node, not the transmitting node.   Exposed terminal problem      The problem whereby a transmitting node A prevents another node B      from transmitting, although node B could have safely transmitted      to anyone else but the transmitting node A.Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 20]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 20044.5.  Micro Diversity, Macro Diversity, and IP Diversity   Certain air interfaces (e.g., the Universal Mobile Telephone System   (UMTS) Terrestrial Radio Access Network (UTRAN) running in Frequency   Division Duplex (FDD) mode)  require or at least support macro   diversity combining.  Essentially, this refers to the fact that a   single MN is able to send and receive over two independent radio   channels ('diversity branches') at the same time; the information   received over different branches is compared and that from the better   branch passed to the upper layers.  This can be used both to improve   overall performance, and to provide a seamless type of handover at   layer 2, since a new branch can be added before the old is deleted.   See also [6].   It is necessary to differentiate between combining/diversity that   occurs at the physical and radio link layers, where the relevant unit   of data is the radio frame, and that which occurs at layer 3, the   network layer, where what is considered is the IP packet itself.   In the following definitions micro- and macro diversity refer to   protocol layers below the network layer, and IP diversity refers to   the network layer.   Micro diversity      For example, two antennas on the same transmitter send the same      signal to a receiver over a slightly different path to overcome      fading.   Macro diversity      Duplicating or combining actions taking place over multiple APs,      possibly attached to different ARs.  This may require support from      the network layer to move the radio frames between the base      stations and a central combining point.   IP diversity      Refers to the process of duplicating IP packets and sending them      to the receiver through more than one point of attachment.  This      is semantically allowed by IP because it does not guarantee packet      uniqueness, and higher level protocols are assumed to eliminate      duplicates whenever that is important for the application.Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 21]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 20044.6.  Paging, and Mobile Node States and Modes   Mobile systems may employ the use of MN states in order to operate   more efficiently without degrading the performance of the system.   The term 'mode' is also common and means the same as 'state'.   A MN is always in one of the following three states:   Active state      When the AN knows the MN's SAR and the MN can send and receive IP      packets.  The access link may not be active, but the radio layer      is able to establish one without assistance from the network      layer.  The MN has an IP address assigned.   Dormant state      A state in which the mobile restricts its ability to receive      normal IP traffic by reducing its monitoring of radio channels.      The AN knows the MN's Paging Area, but the MN has no SAR and so      packets cannot be delivered to the MN without the AN initiating      paging.  Often also called Idle state.      Time-slotted dormant mode         A dormant mode implementation in which the mobile alternates         between periods of not listening for any radio traffic and         listening for traffic.  Time-slotted dormant mode         implementations are typically synchronized with the network so         the network can deliver paging messages to the mobile during         listening periods.   Inactive state      the MN is in neither the Active nor Dormant State.  The MN is no      longer listening for any packets, not even periodically, and not      sending packets.  The MN may be in a powered off state, it may      have shut down all interfaces to drastically conserve power, or it      may be out of range of a radio access point.  The MN does not      necessarily have an IP access address from the AN.   Note: in fact, as well as the MN being in one of these three states,   the AN also stores which state it believes the MN is in.  Normally   these are consistent; the definitions above assume so.   Here are some additional definitions for paging, taking into account   the above state definitions.Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 22]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004   Paging      A procedure initiated by the Access Network to move a Dormant MN      into the Active State.  As a result of paging, the MN establishes      a SAR and the IP routes are set up.   Location updating      A procedure initiated by the MN, by which it informs the AN that      it has moved into a new paging area.   Paging area      A part of the Access Network, typically containing a number of      ARs/APs, which corresponds to some geographical area.  The AN      keeps and updates a list of all the Dormant MNs present in the      area.  If the MN is within the radio coverage of the area it will      be able to receive paging messages sent within that Paging Area.   Paging area registrations      Signaling from a dormant mode mobile node to the network, by which      it establishes its presence in a new paging area.  Paging Area      Registrations thus enable the network to maintain a rough idea of      where the mobile is located.   Paging channel      A radio channel dedicated to signaling dormant mode mobiles for      paging purposes.  By current practice, the paging channel carries      only control traffic necessary for the radio link, although some      paging protocols have provision for carrying arbitrary traffic      (and thus could potentially be used to carry IP).   Traffic channel      The radio channel on which IP traffic to an active mobile is      typically sent.  This channel is used by a mobile that is actively      sending and receiving IP traffic, and is not continuously active      in a dormant mode mobile.  For some radio link protocols, this may      be the only channel available.Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 23]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 20044.7.  Context Transfer   Context      The information on the current state of a routing-related service      required to re-establish the routing-related service on a new      subnet without having to perform the entire protocol exchange with      the MN from scratch.   Feature context      The collection of information representing the context for a given      feature.  The full context associated with a MN is the collection      of one or more feature contexts.   Context transfer      The movement of context from one router or other network entity to      another as a means of re-establishing routing-related services on      a new subnet or collection of subnets.   Routing-related service      A modification to the default routing treatment of packets to and      from the MN.  Initially establishing routing-related services      usually requires a protocol exchange with the MN.  An example of a      routing-related service is header compression.  The service may      also be indirectly related to routing, for example, security.      Security may not affect the forwarding decision of all      intermediate routers, but a packet may be dropped if it fails a      security check (can't be encrypted, authentication failed, etc.).      Dropping the packet is basically a routing decision.4.8.  Candidate Access Router Discovery   Capability of an AR      A characteristic of the service offered by an AR that may be of      interest to an MN when the AR is being considered as a handoff      candidate.   Candidate AR (CAR)      An AR to which MN has a choice of performing IP-level handoff.      This means that MN has the right radio interface to connect to an      AP that is served by this AR, as well as the coverage of this AR      overlaps with that of the AR to which MN is currently attached.Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 24]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004   Target AR (TAR)      An AR with which the procedures for the MN's IP-level handoff are      initiated.  TAR is selected after running a TAR Selection      Algorithm that takes into account the capabilities of CARs,      preferences of MN and any local policies.4.9.  Types of Mobility   We can differentiate between host and network mobility, and various   types of network mobility.  Terminology related more to applications   such as the Session Initiation Protocol, such as personal mobility,   is out of scope for this document.      Host mobility support         Refers to the function of allowing a mobile node to change its         point of attachment to the network, without interrupting IP         packet delivery to/from that node.  There may be different sub-         functions depending on what the current level of service is         being provided; in particular, support for host mobility         usually implies active and dormant modes of operation,         depending on whether the node has any current sessions or not.         Access Network procedures are required to keep track of the         current point of attachment of all the MNs or establish it at         will.  Accurate location and routing procedures are required in         order to maintain the integrity of the communication.  Host         mobility is often called 'terminal mobility'.      Network mobility support         Refers to the function of allowing an entire network to change         its point of attachment to the Internet, and, thus, its         reachability in the topology, without interrupting IP packet         delivery to/from that mobile network.   Two subcategories of mobility can be identified within both host   mobility and network mobility:      Global mobility         Same as Macro mobility.      Local mobility         Same as Micro mobility.Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 25]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004      Macro mobility         Mobility over a large area.  This includes mobility support and         associated address registration procedures that are needed when         a MN moves between IP domains.  Inter-AN handovers typically         involve macro-mobility protocols.  Mobile-IP can be seen as a         means to provide macro mobility.      Micro mobility         Mobility over a small area.  Usually this means mobility within         an IP domain with an emphasis on support for active mode using         handover, although it may include idle mode procedures also.         Micro-mobility protocols exploit the locality of movement by         confining movement related changes and signaling to the access         network.      Local mobility management         Local mobility management (LMM) is a generic term for protocols         dealing with IP mobility management confined within the access         network.  LMM messages are not routed outside the access         network, although a handover may trigger Mobile IP messages to         be sent to correspondent nodes and home agents.5.  Specific Terminology for Mobile Ad-Hoc Networking   Cluster      A group of nodes located within close physical proximity,      typically all within range of one another, which can be grouped      together for the purpose of limiting the production and      propagation of routing information.   Cluster head      A cluster head is a node (often elected in the cluster formation      process) that has complete knowledge about group membership and      link state information in the cluster.  Each cluster should have      one and only one cluster head.   Cluster member      All nodes within a cluster except the cluster head are called      members of that cluster.Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 26]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004   Convergence      The process of approaching a state of equilibrium in which all      nodes in the network agree on a consistent collection of state      about the topology of the network, and in which no further control      messages are needed to establish the consistency of the network      topology.   Convergence time      The time which is required for a network to reach convergence      after an event (typically, the movement of a mobile node) which      changes the network topology.   Laydown      The relative physical location of the nodes within the ad hoc      network.   Pathloss matrix      A matrix of coefficients describing the pathloss between any two      nodes in an ad hoc network.  When the links are asymmetric, the      matrix is also asymmetric.   Scenario      The tuple <laydown, pathloss matrix, mobility factor, traffic>      characterizing a class of ad hoc networks.6.  Security-related Terminology   This section includes terminology commonly used around mobile and   wireless networking.  Only a mobility-related subset of the entire   security terminology is presented.      Authorization-enabling extension         An authentication which makes a (registration) message         acceptable to the ultimate recipient of the registration         message.  An authorization-enabling extension must contain an         SPI (see below) [10].      Mobility security association         A collection of security contexts, between a pair of nodes,         which may be applied to mobility-related protocol messages         exchanged between them.  In Mobile IP, each context indicatesManner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 27]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004         an authentication algorithm and mode, a secret (a shared key,         or appropriate public/private key pair), and a style of replay         protection in use.  Mobility security associations may be         stored separately from the node's IPsec Security Policy         Database (SPD) [10].      Registration key         A key used in the Mobility Security Association between a         mobile node and a foreign agent.  A registration key is         typically only used once or a very few times, and only for the         purposes of verifying a small volume of Authentication data         [12].      Security context         A security context between two nodes defines the manner in         which two nodes choose to mutually authenticate each other, and         indicates an authentication algorithm and mode.      Security Parameter Index (SPI)         An index identifying a security context between a pair of         routers among the contexts available in the mobility security         association.   The Mobile IPv6 specification includes more security terminology   related to MIPv6 bindings [9].  Terminology about the MIP   challenge/response mechanism can be found in [11].7.  Security Considerations   This document presents only terminology.  There are no security   issues in this document.8.  Contributors   This document was initially based on the work of Tapio Suihko, Phil   Eardley, Dave Wisely, Robert Hancock, Nikos Georganopoulos, Markku   Kojo, and Jukka Manner.   Charles Perkins has provided input terminology related to ad-hoc   networks.   Thierry Ernst has provided the terminology for discussing mobile   networks.Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 28]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004   Henrik Levkowetz did a final check of the definitions in revision -05   and suggested a number of changes.9.  Acknowledgments   This work has been partially performed in the framework of the IST   project IST-2000-28584 MIND, which is partly funded by the European   Union.  Some of the authors would like to acknowledge the help of   their colleagues in preparing this document.   Randy Presuhn did a very thorough and helpful review of the -02   version of the terminology.   Some definitions of terminology have been adapted from [1], [2], [3],   [4], [7], [8], [9] and [10].10.  Informative References   [1]  Blair, D., Tweedly, A., Thomas, M., Trostle, J. and M. Ramalho,        "Realtime Mobile IPv6 Framework", Work in Progress.   [2]  Calhoun, P., Montenegro, G. and C. Perkins, "Mobile IP        Regionalized Tunnel Management", Work in Progress.   [3]  Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6)        Specification",RFC 2460, December 1998.   [4]   Koodli, R., Ed.,"Fast Handovers for Mobile IPv6", Work in        Progress.   [5]  Yavatkar, R., Pendarakis, D. and R. Guerin, "A Framework for        Policy-based Admission Control",RFC 2753, January 2000.   [6]  Kempf, J., McCann, P. and P. Roberts, "IP Mobility and the CDMA        Radio Access Network:  Applicability Statement for Soft        Handoff", Work in Progress.   [7]  Kempf, J., Ed., "Problem Description:  Reasons For Performing        Context Transfers Between Nodes in an IP Access Network",RFC3374, September 2002.   [8]  Trossen, D., Krishnamurthi, G., Chaskar, H. and J. Kempf,        "Issues in candidate access router discovery for seamless IP-        level handoffs", Work in Progress.   [9]  Johnson, D., Perkins, C. and J. Arkko, "Mobility Support in        IPv6",RFC 3775, June 2004.Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 29]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004   [10] Perkins, C., Ed., "IP Mobility Support for IPv4",RFC 3344,        August 2002.   [11] Perkins, C., Calhoun, P. and J. Bharatia, "Mobile IPv4        Challenge/Response Extensions (revised)", Work in Progress.   [12] Perkins, C. and P. Calhoun, "AAA Registration Keys for Mobile        IP", Work in Progress.   [13] Ernst, T. and H. Lach,"Network Mobility Support Terminology",        Work in Progress.   [14] Moy, J., "OSPF Version 2", STD 54,RFC 2328, April 1998.Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 30]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 200411.Appendix A - Index of Terms   AD .............................................................14   AL .............................................................13   AN .............................................................14   ANG ............................................................14   ANR ............................................................13   AP .............................................................13   AR .............................................................14   Access Link ....................................................13   Access Network .................................................14   Access Network Gateway .........................................14   Access Network Router ..........................................13   Access Point ...................................................13   Access Router ..................................................14   Active state ...................................................22   Administrative Domain ..........................................14   Asymmetric link .................................................5   Authorization-enabling extension ...............................27   BBM ............................................................19   BU ..............................................................3   Bandwidth .......................................................2   Bandwidth utilization ...........................................2   Beacon ..........................................................3   Binding Update ..................................................3   Break-before-make ..............................................19   CAR ............................................................15   CAR ............................................................24   Candidate AR ...................................................24   Candidate Access Router ........................................15   Capability of an AR ............................................24   Care-of-Address .................................................3   Channel .........................................................3   Channel access protocol .........................................3   Channel capacity ................................................3   Cluster ........................................................26   Cluster head ...................................................26   Cluster member .................................................26   CoA .............................................................3   Context ........................................................24   Context transfer ...............................................24   Control message .................................................4   Convergence ....................................................27   Convergence time ...............................................27   Distance vector .................................................4   Dormant state ..................................................22   Egress interface ...............................................13   Exposed terminal problem .......................................20Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 31]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004   FN .............................................................12   Fairness ........................................................4   Fast handover ..................................................20   Feature context ................................................24   Fixed Node .....................................................12   Flooding ........................................................4   Foreign subnet prefix ...........................................4   Forwarding node .................................................4   Global mobility ................................................25   Goodput ........................................................20   HA ..............................................................5   Handoff ........................................................15   Handover .......................................................15   Handover latency ...............................................19   Hidden-terminal problem ........................................20   HoA .............................................................4   Home Address ....................................................4   Home Agent ......................................................5   Home subnet prefix ..............................................5   Horizontal Handover ............................................16   Host mobility support ..........................................25   IP access address ...............................................5   IP diversity ...................................................21   Inactive state .................................................22   Ingress interface ..............................................12   Inter-AN handover ..............................................16   Inter-technology handover ......................................16   Interface .......................................................5   Intra-AN handover ..............................................16   Intra-AR handover ..............................................16   Intra-technology handover ......................................16   L2 Trigger ......................................................6   Laydown ........................................................27   Layer 2 handover ...............................................16   Link ............................................................5   Link establishment ..............................................6   Link state ......................................................6   Link-layer trigger ..............................................6   Link-level acknowledgment .......................................6   Local broadcast .................................................6   Local mobility .................................................25   Local mobility management ......................................26   Location updating ..............................................23   Loop-free .......................................................6   MAC .............................................................7   MBB ............................................................19   MH .............................................................12   MN .............................................................12Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 32]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004   MNN ............................................................13   MPR .............................................................7   MR .............................................................12   Macro diversity ................................................21   Macro mobility .................................................26   Make-before-break ..............................................19   Medium Access Protocol ..........................................7   Micro diversity ................................................21   Micro mobility .................................................26   Mobile Host ....................................................12   Mobile Network Node ............................................13   Mobile Node ....................................................12   Mobile Router ..................................................12   Mobile network .................................................12   Mobile network prefix ...........................................7   Mobile-assisted handover .......................................18   Mobile-controlled handover .....................................18   Mobile-initiated handover ......................................17   Mobility factor .................................................7   Mobility security association ..................................27   Multipoint relay ................................................7   NAR ............................................................14   Neighbor ........................................................7   Neighborhood ....................................................7   Network mobility support .......................................25   Network-assisted handover ......................................18   Network-controlled handover ....................................18   Network-initiated handover .....................................17   New Access Router ..............................................14   Next hop ........................................................7   PAR ............................................................15   Paging .........................................................23   Paging area ....................................................23   Paging area registrations ......................................23   Paging channel .................................................23   Pathloss .......................................................20   Pathloss matrix ................................................27   Payload .........................................................8   Planned handover ...............................................19   Prefix ..........................................................8   Previous Access Router .........................................15   Pull handover ..................................................18   Push handover ..................................................18   Radio Cell .....................................................13   Registration key ...............................................28   Roaming ........................................................15   Route activation ................................................8   Route entry .....................................................8Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 33]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004   Route establishment .............................................8   Routing table ...................................................8   Routing proxy ...................................................8   Routing-related service ........................................24   SAR ............................................................14   SPI ............................................................28   Scenario .......................................................27   Seamless handover ..............................................19   Security Parameter Index .......................................28   Security context ...............................................28   Serving Access Router ..........................................14   Shannon's Law ...................................................9   Signal strength .................................................9   Smooth handover ................................................19   Source route ....................................................9   Spatial re-use ..................................................9   Subnet ..........................................................9   System-wide broadcast ...........................................9   TAR ............................................................25   Target AR ......................................................25   Throughput .....................................................20   Time-slotted dormant mode ......................................22   Topology ........................................................9   Traffic channel ................................................23   Triggered update ................................................10   Unassisted handover ............................................18   Unplanned handover .............................................19   Vertical handover ..............................................17Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 34]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 200412.  Authors' Addresses   Jukka Manner   Department of Computer Science   University of Helsinki   P.O. Box 26 (Teollisuuskatu 23)   FIN-00014 HELSINKI   Finland   Phone: +358-9-191-44210   Fax:   +358-9-191-44441   EMail: jmanner@cs.helsinki.fi   Markku Kojo   Department of Computer Science   University of Helsinki   P.O. Box 26 (Teollisuuskatu 23)   FIN-00014 HELSINKI   Finland   Phone: +358-9-191-44179   Fax:   +358-9-191-44441   EMail: kojo@cs.helsinki.fiManner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 35]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 200413.  Full Copyright Statement   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004).  This document is subject   to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained inBCP 78, and   except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE   REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE   INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR   IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF   THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.Intellectual Property   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed   to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology   described in this document or the extent to which any license   under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it   represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any   such rights.  Information on the procedures with respect to   rights in RFC documents can be found inBCP 78 andBCP 79.   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use   of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository   athttp://www.ietf.org/ipr.   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention   any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other   proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required   to implement this standard.  Please address the information to the   IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org.Acknowledgement   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the   Internet Society.Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 36]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp