Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]

PROPOSED STANDARD
Network Working Group                                        K. ZeilengaRequest for Comments: 3671                           OpenLDAP FoundationCategory: Standards Track                                  December 2003Collective Attributes inthe Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)Status of this Memo   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.Copyright Notice   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003).  All Rights Reserved.Abstract   X.500 collective attributes allow common characteristics to be shared   between collections of entries.  This document summarizes the X.500   information model for collective attributes and describes use of   collective attributes in LDAP (Lightweight Directory Access   Protocol).  This document provides schema definitions for collective   attributes for use in LDAP.1.  Introduction   In X.500 [X.500], a collective attribute is "a user attribute whose   values are the same for each member of an entry collection" [X.501].   This document details their use in the Lightweight Directory Access   Protocol (LDAP) [RFC3377].1.1.  Entry Collections   A collection of entries is a grouping of object and alias entries   based upon common properties or shared relationship between the   corresponding entries which share certain attributes.  An entry   collection consists of all entries within scope of a collective   attributes subentry [RFC3672].  An entry can belong to several entry   collections.Zeilenga                    Standards Track                     [Page 1]

RFC 3671             Collective Attributes in LDAP         December 20031.2.  Collective Attributes   Attributes shared by the entries comprising an entry collection are   called collective attributes.  Values of collective attributes are   visible but not updateable to clients accessing entries within the   collection.  Collective attributes are updated (i.e., modified) via   their associated collective attributes subentry.   When an entry belongs to multiple entry collections, the entry's   values of each collective attribute are combined such that   independent sources of these values are not manifested to clients.   Entries can specifically exclude a particular collective attribute by   listing the attribute as a value of the collectiveExclusions   attribute.  Like other user attributes, collective attributes are   subject to a variety of controls including access, administrative,   and content controls.1.3.  Conventions   Schema definitions are provided using LDAPv3 [RFC2251] description   formats [RFC2252].  Definitions provided here are formatted (line   wrapped) for readability.   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this   document are to be interpreted as described inBCP 14 [RFC2119].2.  System Schema for Collective Attributes   The following operational attributes are used to manage Collective   Attributes.  LDAP servers [RFC3377] MUST act in accordance with the   X.500 Directory Models [X.501] when providing this service.2.1.  collectiveAttributeSubentry   Subentries of this object class are used to administer collective   attributes and are referred to as collective attribute subentries.      ( 2.5.17.2 NAME 'collectiveAttributeSubentry' AUXILIARY )   A collective attribute subentry SHOULD contain at least one   collective attribute.  The collective attributes contained within a   collective attribute subentry are available for finding, searching,   and comparison at every entry within the scope of the subentry.  The   collective attributes, however, are administered (e.g., modified) via   the subentry.Zeilenga                    Standards Track                     [Page 2]

RFC 3671             Collective Attributes in LDAP         December 2003   Implementations of this specification SHOULD support collective   attribute subentries in both collectiveAttributeSpecificArea   (2.5.23.5) and collectiveAttributeInnerArea (2.5.23.6) administrative   areas [RFC3672][X.501].2.2.  collectiveAttributeSubentries   The collectiveAttributeSubentries operational attribute identifies   all collective attribute subentries that affect the entry.      ( 2.5.18.12 NAME 'collectiveAttributeSubentries'        EQUALITY distinguishedNameMatch        SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12        USAGE directoryOperation NO-USER-MODIFICATION )2.3.  collectiveExclusions   The collectiveExclusions operational attribute allows particular   collective attributes to be excluded from an entry.  It MAY appear in   any entry and MAY have multiple values.      ( 2.5.18.7 NAME 'collectiveExclusions'        EQUALITY objectIdentifierMatch        SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.38        USAGE directoryOperation )   The descriptor excludeAllCollectiveAttributes is associated with the   OID 2.5.18.0.  When this descriptor or OID is present as a value of   the collectiveExclusions attribute, all collective attributes are   excluded from an entry.3.  Collective Attribute Types   A userApplications attribute type can be defined to be COLLECTIVE   [RFC2252].  This indicates that the same attribute values will appear   in the entries of an entry collection subject to the use of the   collectiveExclusions attribute and other administrative controls.   These administrative controls MAY include DIT Content Rules, if   implemented.   Collective attribute types are commonly defined as subtypes of non-   collective attribute types.  By convention, collective attributes are   named by prefixing the name of their non-collective supertype with   "c-".  For example, the collective telephone attribute is named   c-TelephoneNumber after its non-collective supertype telephoneNumber.   Non-collective attributes types SHALL NOT subtype collective   attributes.Zeilenga                    Standards Track                     [Page 3]

RFC 3671             Collective Attributes in LDAP         December 2003   Collective attributes SHALL NOT be SINGLE-VALUED.  Collective   attribute types SHALL NOT appear in the attribute types of an object   class definition.   Operational attributes SHALL NOT be defined to be collective.   The remainder of section provides a summary of collective attributes   derived from those defined in [X.520].  The SUPerior attribute types   are described in [RFC 2256] for use with LDAP.   Implementations of this specification SHOULD support the following   collective attributes and MAY support additional collective   attributes.3.1.  Collective Locality Name   The c-l attribute type specifies a locality name for a collection of   entries.      ( 2.5.4.7.1 NAME 'c-l'        SUP l COLLECTIVE )3.2.  Collective State or Province Name   The c-st attribute type specifies a state or province name for a   collection of entries.      ( 2.5.4.8.1 NAME 'c-st'        SUP st COLLECTIVE )3.3.  Collective Street Address   The c-street attribute type specifies a street address for a   collection of entries.      ( 2.5.4.9.1 NAME 'c-street'        SUP street COLLECTIVE )3.4.  Collective Organization Name   The c-o attribute type specifies an organization name for a   collection of entries.      ( 2.5.4.10.1 NAME 'c-o'        SUP o COLLECTIVE )Zeilenga                    Standards Track                     [Page 4]

RFC 3671             Collective Attributes in LDAP         December 20033.5.  Collective Organizational Unit Name   The c-ou attribute type specifies an organizational unit name for a   collection of entries.      ( 2.5.4.11.1 NAME 'c-ou'        SUP ou COLLECTIVE )3.6.  Collective Postal Address   The c-PostalAddress attribute type specifies a postal address for a   collection of entries.      ( 2.5.4.16.1 NAME 'c-PostalAddress'        SUP postalAddress COLLECTIVE )3.7.  Collective Postal Code   The c-PostalCode attribute type specifies a postal code for a   collection of entries.      ( 2.5.4.17.1 NAME 'c-PostalCode'        SUP postalCode COLLECTIVE )3.8.  Collective Post Office Box   The c-PostOfficeBox attribute type specifies a post office box for a   collection of entries.      ( 2.5.4.18.1 NAME 'c-PostOfficeBox'        SUP postOfficeBox COLLECTIVE )3.9.  Collective Physical Delivery Office Name   The c-PhysicalDeliveryOfficeName attribute type specifies a physical   delivery office name for a collection of entries.      ( 2.5.4.19.1 NAME 'c-PhysicalDeliveryOfficeName'        SUP physicalDeliveryOfficeName COLLECTIVE )3.10.  Collective Telephone Number   The c-TelephoneNumber attribute type specifies a telephone number for   a collection of entries.      ( 2.5.4.20.1 NAME 'c-TelephoneNumber'        SUP telephoneNumber COLLECTIVE )Zeilenga                    Standards Track                     [Page 5]

RFC 3671             Collective Attributes in LDAP         December 20033.11.  Collective Telex Number   The c-TelexNumber attribute type specifies a telex number for a   collection of entries.      ( 2.5.4.21.1 NAME 'c-TelexNumber'        SUP telexNumber COLLECTIVE )3.13.  Collective Facsimile Telephone Number   The c-FacsimileTelephoneNumber attribute type specifies a facsimile   telephone number for a collection of entries.      ( 2.5.4.23.1 NAME 'c-FacsimileTelephoneNumber'   SUP facsimileTelephoneNumber COLLECTIVE )3.14.  Collective International ISDN Number   The c-InternationalISDNNumber attribute type specifies an   international ISDN number for a collection of entries.      ( 2.5.4.25.1 NAME 'c-InternationalISDNNumber'        SUP internationalISDNNumber COLLECTIVE )4.  Security Considerations   Collective attributes, like other attributes, are subject to access   control restrictions and other administrative policy.  Generally   speaking, collective attributes accessed via an entry in a collection   are governed by rules restricting access to attributes of that entry.   And collective attributes access via a subentry are governed by rules   restricting access to attributes of that subentry.  However, as LDAP   does not have a standard access model, the particulars of each   server's access control system may differ.   General LDAP security considerations [RFC3377] also apply.Zeilenga                    Standards Track                     [Page 6]

RFC 3671             Collective Attributes in LDAP         December 20035.  IANA Considerations   The IANA has registered the LDAP descriptors [RFC3383] defined in   this technical specification.  The following registration template is   suggested:      Subject: Request for LDAP Descriptor Registration      Descriptor see comments      Object Identifier: see comment      Person & email address to contact for further information:           Kurt Zeilenga <kurt@OpenLDAP.org>      Usage: see comment      Specification:RFC3671      Author/Change Controller: IESG      Comments:         NAME                           Type OID         ------------------------       ---- -----------------         c-FacsimileTelephoneNumber     A    2.5.4.23.1         c-InternationalISDNNumber      A    2.5.4.25.1         c-PhysicalDeliveryOffice       A    2.5.4.19.1         c-PostOfficeBox                A    2.5.4.18.1         c-PostalAddress                A    2.5.4.16.1         c-PostalCode                   A    2.5.4.17.1         c-TelephoneNumber              A    2.5.4.20.1         c-TelexNumber                  A    2.5.4.21.1         c-l                            A    2.5.4.7.1         c-o                            A    2.5.4.10.1         c-ou                           A    2.5.4.11.1         c-st                           A    2.5.4.8.1         c-street                       A    2.5.4.9.1         collectiveAttributeSubentries  A    2.5.18.12         collectiveAttributeSubentry    O    2.5.17.2         collectiveExclusions           A    2.5.18.7      where Type A is Attribute and Type O is ObjectClass.   The Object Identifiers used in this document were assigned by the   ISO/IEC Joint Technical Committee 1 - Subcommittee 6 to identify   elements of X.500 schema [X.520].  This document make no OID   assignments, it only provides LDAP schema descriptions with existing   elements of X.500 schema.Zeilenga                    Standards Track                     [Page 7]

RFC 3671             Collective Attributes in LDAP         December 20036.  Intellectual Property Statement   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any   intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights   might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it   has made any effort to identify any such rights.  Information on the   IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and   standards-related documentation can be found inBCP-11.  Copies of   claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of   licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to   obtain a general license or permission for the use of such   proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can   be obtained from the IETF Secretariat.   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary   rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF Executive   Director.7.  Acknowledgments   This document is based upon the ITU Recommendations for the Directory   [X.501][X.520].8.  References8.1.  Normative References   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate              Requirement Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119, March 1997.   [RFC2251]  Wahl, M., Howes, T. and S. Kille, "Lightweight Directory              Access Protocol (v3)",RFC 2251, December 1997.   [RFC2252]  Wahl, M., Coulbeck, A., Howes, T. and S. Kille,              "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3):  Attribute              Syntax Definitions",RFC 2252, December 1997.   [RFC2256]  Wahl, M., "A Summary of the X.500(96) User Schema for use              with LDAPv3",RFC 2256, December 1997.   [RFC3377]  Hodges, J. and R. L. Morgan, "Lightweight Directory Access              Protocol (v3): Technical Specification",RFC 3377,              September 2002.Zeilenga                    Standards Track                     [Page 8]

RFC 3671             Collective Attributes in LDAP         December 2003   [RFC3383]  Zeilenga, K., "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA)              Considerations for the Lightweight Directory Access              Protocol (LDAP)",BCP 64,RFC 3383, September 2002.   [RFC3672]  Zeilenga, K. and S. Legg, "Subentries in Lightweight              Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)",RFC 3672, December              2003.   [X.501]    "The Directory: Models", ITU-T Recommendation X.501, 1993.8.2.  Informative References   [X.500]    "The Directory: Overview of Concepts, Models", ITU-T              Recommendation X.500, 1993.   [X.520]    "The Directory: Selected Attribute Types", ITU-T              Recommendation X.520, 1993.9.  Author's Address   Kurt D. Zeilenga   OpenLDAP Foundation   EMail: Kurt@OpenLDAP.orgZeilenga                    Standards Track                     [Page 9]

RFC 3671             Collective Attributes in LDAP         December 200310.  Full Copyright Statement   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003).  All Rights Reserved.   This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to   others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it   or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published   and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any   kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are   included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this   document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing   the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other   Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of   developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for   copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be   followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than   English.   The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be   revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assignees.   This document and the information contained herein is provided on an   "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING   TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING   BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION   HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF   MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.Acknowledgement   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the   Internet Society.Zeilenga                    Standards Track                    [Page 10]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp