Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Errata] [Info page]

Obsoleted by:4510 PROPOSED STANDARD
Errata Exist
Network Working Group                                          J. HodgesRequest for Comments: 3377                         Sun Microsystems Inc.Category: Standards Track                                      R. Morgan                                                University of Washington                                                          September 2002Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3):Technical SpecificationStatus of this Memo   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.Copyright Notice   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002).  All Rights Reserved.Abstract   This document specifies the set of RFCs comprising the Lightweight   Directory Access Protocol Version 3 (LDAPv3), and addresses the "IESG   Note" attached to RFCs 2251 through 2256.1.  Background and Motivation   The specification for the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol   version 3 (LDAPv3) nominally comprises eight RFCs which were issued   in two distinct subsets at separate times -- RFCs 2251 through 2256   first, then RFCs 2829 and 2830 following later.RFC 2251 through 2256 do not mandate the implementation of any   satisfactory authentication mechanisms and hence were published with   an "IESG Note" discouraging implementation and deployment of LDAPv3   clients or servers implementing update functionality until a Proposed   Standard for mandatory authentication in LDAPv3 is published.RFC 2829 was subsequently published in answer to the IESG Note.   The purpose of this document is to explicitly specify the set of RFCs   comprising LDAPv3, and formally address the IESG Note through   explicit inclusion ofRFC 2829.Hodges & Morgan             Standards Track                     [Page 1]

RFC 3377            LDAPv3: Technical Specification       September 20022.  Specification of LDAPv3   The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol version 3 (LDAPv3) is   specified by this set of nine RFCs:      [RFC2251]  Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) [the                 specification of the LDAP on-the-wire protocol]      [RFC2252]  Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3):  Attribute                 Syntax Definitions      [RFC2253]  Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3):  UTF-8                 String Representation of Distinguished Names      [RFC2254]  The String Representation of LDAP Search Filters      [RFC2255]  The LDAP URL Format      [RFC2256]  A Summary of the X.500(96) User Schema for use with                 LDAPv3      [RFC2829]  Authentication Methods for LDAP      [RFC2830]  Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3):  Extension                 for Transport Layer Security      And, this document (RFC3377).   The term "LDAPv3" is often used informally to refer to the protocol   specified by the above set of RFCs, or subsets thereof.  However, the   LDAPv3 protocol suite, as defined here, should be formally identified   in other documents by a normative reference to this document.3.  Addressing the "IESG Note" in RFCs 2251 through 2256   The IESG approved publishing RFCs 2251 through 2256 with an attendant   IESG Note included in each document.  The Note begins with:      This document describes a directory access protocol that provides      both read and update access.  Update access requires secure      authentication, but this document does not mandate implementation      of any satisfactory authentication mechanisms.Hodges & Morgan             Standards Track                     [Page 2]

RFC 3377            LDAPv3: Technical Specification       September 2002   The Note ends with this statement:      Implementors are hereby discouraged from deploying LDAPv3 clients      or servers which implement the update functionality, until a      Proposed Standard for mandatory authentication in LDAPv3 has been      approved and published as an RFC.   [RFC2829] is expressly the "Proposed Standard for mandatory   authentication in LDAPv3" called for in the Note.  Thus, the IESG   Note in [RFC2251], [RFC2252], [RFC2253], [RFC2254], [RFC2255], and   [RFC2256] is addressed.4.  Security Considerations   This document does not directly discuss security, although the   context of the aforementioned IESG Note is security related, as is   the manner in which it is addressed.   Please refer to the referenced documents, especially [RFC2829],   [RFC2251], and [RFC2830], for further information concerning LDAPv3   security.5.  Acknowledgements   The authors thank Patrik Faltstrom, Leslie Daigle, Thomas Narten, and   Kurt Zeilenga for their contributions to this document.6.  References   [RFC2251]  Wahl, M., Kille, S. and T. Howes, "Lightweight Directory              Access Protocol (v3)",RFC 2251, December 1997.   [RFC2252]  Wahl, M., Coulbeck, A., Howes, T. and S. Kille,              "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3): Attribute              Syntax Definitions",RFC 2252, December 1997.   [RFC2253]  Kille, S., Wahl, M. and T. Howes, "Lightweight Directory              Access Protocol (v3): UTF-8 String Representation of              Distinguished Names",RFC 2253, December 1997.   [RFC2254]  Howes, T., "The String Representation of LDAP Search              Filters",RFC 2254, December 1997.   [RFC2255]  Howes, T. and M. Smith, "The LDAP URL Format",RFC 2255,              December 1997.   [RFC2256]  Wahl, M., "A Summary of the X.500(96) User Schema for use              with LDAPv3",RFC 2256, December 1997.Hodges & Morgan             Standards Track                     [Page 3]

RFC 3377            LDAPv3: Technical Specification       September 2002   [RFC2829]  Wahl, M., Alvestrand, H., Hodges, J. and R. Morgan,              "Authentication Methods for LDAP",RFC 2829, May 2000.   [RFC2830]  Hodges, J., Morgan, R. and M. Wahl, "Lightweight Directory              Access Protocol (v3): Extension for Transport Layer              Security",RFC 2830, May 2000.7.  Intellectual Property Rights Notices   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any   intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights   might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it   has made any effort to identify any such rights.  Information on the   IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and   standards-related documentation can be found inBCP-11.  Copies of   claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of   licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to   obtain a general license or permission for the use of such   proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can   be obtained from the IETF Secretariat.   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary   rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF Executive   Director.Hodges & Morgan             Standards Track                     [Page 4]

RFC 3377            LDAPv3: Technical Specification       September 20028.  Authors' Addresses   Jeff Hodges   Sun Microsystems, Inc.   901 San Antonio Road, USCA22-212   Palo Alto, CA 94303   USA   Phone: +1-408-276-5467   EMail: Jeff.Hodges@sun.com   RL "Bob" Morgan   Computing and Communications   University of Washington   Seattle, WA   USA   Phone: +1-206-221-3307   EMail: rlmorgan@washington.eduHodges & Morgan             Standards Track                     [Page 5]

RFC 3377            LDAPv3: Technical Specification       September 20029.  Full Copyright Statement   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002).  All Rights Reserved.   This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to   others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it   or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published   and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any   kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are   included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this   document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing   the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other   Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of   developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for   copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be   followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than   English.   The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be   revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.   This document and the information contained herein is provided on an   "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING   TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING   BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION   HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF   MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.Acknowledgement   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the   Internet Society.Hodges & Morgan             Standards Track                     [Page 6]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp