Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]

DRAFT STANDARD
Network Working Group                                            D. KatzRequest for Comments: 1188                                  Merit/NSFNETObsoletes:  RFC1103                                        October 1990A Proposed Standard for the Transmission ofIP Datagrams over FDDI NetworksStatus of this Memo   This memo defines a method of encapsulating the Internet Protocol   (IP) datagrams and Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) requests and   replies on Fiber Distributed Data Interface (FDDI) Networks.  This   RFC specifies a protocol on the IAB Standards Track for the Internet   community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.   Please refer to the current edition of the "IAB Official Protocol   Standards" for the standardization state and status of this protocol.   This proposal is the product of the IP over FDDI Working Group of the   Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).  Comments on this memo should   be submitted to the IETF IP over FDDI Working Group Chair.   Distribution of this memo is unlimited.Abstract   This document specifies a method for the use of IP and ARP on FDDI   networks.  The encapsulation method used is described, as well as   various media-specific issues.Acknowledgments   This memo draws heavily in both concept and text fromRFC 1042 [3],   written by Jon Postel and Joyce K. Reynolds of USC/Information   Sciences Institute.  The author would also like to acknowledge the   contributions of the IP Over FDDI Working Group of the IETF, members   of ANSI ASC X3T9.5, and others in the FDDI community.Conventions   The following language conventions are used in the items of   specification in this document:      "Must," "Shall," or "Mandatory"--the item is an absolute      requirement of the specification.      "Should" or "Recommended"--the item should generally be followed      for all but exceptional circumstances.Katz                                                            [Page 1]

RFC 1188              IP and ARP on FDDI Networks           October 1990      "May" or "Optional"--the item is truly optional and may be      followed or ignored according to the needs of the implementor.Introduction   The goal of this specification is to allow compatible and   interoperable implementations for transmitting IP datagrams [1] and   ARP requests and replies [2].   The Fiber Distributed Data Interface (FDDI) specifications define a   family of standards for Local Area Networks (LANs) that provides the   Physical Layer and Media Access Control Sublayer of the Data Link   Layer as defined by the ISO Open System Interconnection Reference   Model (ISO/OSI).  Documents are in various stages of progression   toward International Standardization for Media Access Control (MAC)   [4], Physical Layer Protocol (PHY) [5], Physical Layer Medium   Dependent (PMD) [6], and Station Management (SMT) [7].  The family   of FDDI standards corresponds to the IEEE 802 MAC layer standards   [8,9,10].   The remainder of the Data Link Service is provided by the IEEE 802.2   Logical Link Control (LLC) service [11].  The resulting stack of   services appears as follows:        +-------------+        |   IP/ARP    |        +-------------+        |  802.2 LLC  |        +-------------+-----+        |  FDDI MAC   | F   |        +-------------+ D S |        |  FDDI PHY   | D M |        +-------------+ I T |        |  FDDI PMD   |     |        +-------------+-----+   This memo describes the use of IP and ARP in this environment.  At   this time, it is not necessary that the use of IP and ARP be   consistent between FDDI and IEEE 802 networks, but it is the intent   of this memo not to preclude Data Link Layer interoperability at such   time as the standards define it.   The FDDI standards define both single and dual MAC stations.  This   document describes the use of IP and ARP on single MAC stations   (single-attach or dual-attach) only.  Operation on dual MAC stations   will be described in a forthcoming document.Katz                                                            [Page 2]

RFC 1188              IP and ARP on FDDI Networks           October 1990Packet Format   IP datagrams and ARP requests and replies sent on FDDI networks shall   be encapsulated within the 802.2 LLC and Sub-Network Access Protocol   (SNAP) [12] data link layers and the FDDI MAC and physical layers.   The SNAP must be used with an Organization Code indicating that the   SNAP header contains the EtherType code (as listed in Assigned   Numbers [13]).   802.2 LLC Type 1 communication (which must be implemented by all   conforming 802.2 stations) is used exclusively.  All frames must be   transmitted in standard 802.2 LLC Type 1 Unnumbered Information   format, with the DSAP and the SSAP fields of the 802.2 header set to   the assigned global SAP value for SNAP [11].  The 24-bit Organization   Code in the SNAP must be zero, and the remaining 16 bits are the   EtherType from Assigned Numbers [13] (IP = 2048, ARP = 2054).      ...--------+--------+--------+                 MAC Header        |                           FDDI MAC      ...--------+--------+--------+      +--------+--------+--------+      | DSAP=K1| SSAP=K1| Control|                            802.2 LLC      +--------+--------+--------+      +--------+--------+---------+--------+--------+      |Protocol Id or Org Code =K2|    EtherType    |        802.2 SNAP      +--------+--------+---------+--------+--------+      The total length of the LLC Header and the SNAP header is 8      octets.      The K1 value is 170 (decimal).      The K2 value is 0 (zero).      The control value is 3 (Unnumbered Information).Address Resolution   The mapping of 32-bit Internet addresses to 48-bit FDDI addresses   shall be done via the dynamic discovery procedure of the Address   Resolution Protocol (ARP) [2].   Internet addresses are assigned arbitrarily on Internet networks.   Each host's implementation must know its own Internet address and   respond to Address Resolution requests appropriately.  It must also   use ARP to translate Internet addresses to FDDI addresses whenKatz                                                            [Page 3]

RFC 1188              IP and ARP on FDDI Networks           October 1990   needed.   The ARP protocol has several fields that parameterize its use in any   specific context [2].  These fields are:      hrd   16 - bits     The Hardware Type Code      pro   16 - bits     The Protocol Type Code      hln    8 - bits     Octets in each hardware address      pln    8 - bits     Octets in each protocol address      op    16 - bits     Operation Code   The hardware type code assigned for IEEE 802 networks is 6 [13].  The   hardware type code assigned for Ethernet networks is 1 [13].   Unfortunately, differing values between Ethernet and IEEE 802   networks cause interoperability problems in bridged environments.  In   order to not preclude interoperability with Ethernets in a bridged   environment, ARP packets shall be transmitted with a hardware type   code of 1.  Furthermore, ARP packets shall be accepted if received   with hardware type codes of either 1 or 6.   The protocol type code for IP is 2048 [13].   The hardware address length is 6.   The protocol address length (for IP) is 4.   The operation code is 1 for request and 2 for reply.   In order to not preclude interoperability in a bridged environment,   the hardware addresses in ARP packets (ar$sha, ar$tha) must be   carried in "canonical" bit order, with the Group bit positioned as   the low order bit of the first octet.  As FDDI addresses are normally   expressed with the Group bit in the high order bit position, the   addresses must be bit-reversed within each octet.   Although outside the scope of this document, it is recommended that   MAC addresses be represented in canonical order in all Network Layer   protocols carried within the information field of an FDDI frame.Broadcast Address   The broadcast Internet address (the address on that network with a   host part of all binary ones) must be mapped to the broadcast FDDI   address (of all binary ones) (see [14]).Multicast Support   A method of supporting IP multicasting is specified in [15].  ThisKatz                                                            [Page 4]

RFC 1188              IP and ARP on FDDI Networks           October 1990   method shall be used in FDDI networks if IP multicasting is to be   supported.  The use of this method may require the ability to copy   frames addressed to any one of an arbitrary number of multicast   (group) addresses.   An IP multicast address is mapped to an FDDI group address by placing   the low order 23 bits of the IP address into the low order 23 bits of   the FDDI group address 01-00-5E-00-00-00 (in "canonical" order).   [See 13, page 20.]   For example, the IP multicast address:         224.255.0.2   maps to the FDDI group address:         01-00-5E-7F-00-02   in which the multicast (group) bit is the low order bit of the first   octet (canonical order).  When bit-reversed for transmission in the   destination MAC address field of an FDDI frame (native order), it   becomes:         80-00-7A-FE-00-40   that is, with the multicast (group) bit as the high order bit of the   first octet, that being the first bit transmitted on the medium.Trailer Formats   Some versions of Unix 4.x bsd use a different encapsulation method in   order to get better network performance with the VAX virtual memory   architecture.  Hosts directly connected to FDDI networks shall not   use trailers.Byte Order   As described inAppendix B of the Internet Protocol specification   [1], the IP datagram is transmitted over FDDI networks as a series of   8-bit bytes.  This byte transmission order has been called "big-   endian" [16].MAC Layer Details   Packet Size      The FDDI MAC specification [4] defines a maximum frame size of      9000 symbols (4500 octets) for all frame fields, including fourKatz                                                            [Page 5]

RFC 1188              IP and ARP on FDDI Networks           October 1990      symbols (two octets) of preamble.  This leaves roughly 4470 octets      for data after the LLC/SNAP header is taken into account.      However, in order to allow future extensions to the MAC header and      frame status fields, it is desirable to reserve additional space      for MAC overhead.      Therefore, the MTU of FDDI networks shall be 4352 octets.  This      provides for 4096 octets of data and 256 octets of headers at the      network layer and above.  Implementations must not send packets      larger than the MTU.      Gateway implementations must be prepared to accept packets as      large as the MTU and fragment them when necessary.  Gateway      implementations should be able to accept packets as large as can      be carried within a maximum size FDDI frame and fragment them.      Host implementations should be prepared to accept packets as large      as the MTU; however, hosts must not send datagrams longer than 576      octets unless they have explicit knowledge that the destination is      prepared to accept them.  Host implementations may accept packets      as large as can be carried within a maximum size FDDI frame.  A      host may communicate its size preference in TCP- based      applications via the TCP Maximum Segment Size option [17].      Datagrams on FDDI networks may be longer than the general Internet      default maximum packet size of 576 octets.  Hosts connected to an      FDDI network should keep this in mind when sending datagrams to      hosts that are not on the same local network.  It may be      appropriate to send smaller datagrams to avoid unnecessary      fragmentation at intermediate gateways.  Please see [17] for      further information.      There is no minimum packet size restriction on FDDI networks.      In order to not preclude interoperability with Ethernet in a      bridged environment, FDDI implementations must be prepared to      receive (and ignore) trailing pad octets.   Other MAC Layer Issues      The FDDI MAC specification does not require that 16-bit and 48-      bit address stations be able to interwork fully.  It does,      however, require that 16-bit stations have full 48-bit      functionality, and that both types of stations be able to receive      frames sent to either size broadcast address.  In order to avoid      interoperability problems, only 48-bit addresses shall be used      with IP and ARP.Katz                                                            [Page 6]

RFC 1188              IP and ARP on FDDI Networks           October 1990      The FDDI MAC specification defines two classes of LLC frames,      Asynchronous and Synchronous.  Asynchronous frames are further      controlled by a priority mechanism and two classes of token,      Restricted and Unrestricted.  Only the use of Unrestricted tokens      and Asynchronous frames are required by the standard for FDDI      interoperability.      All IP and ARP frames shall be transmitted as Asynchronous LLC      frames using Unrestricted tokens, and the Priority value is a      matter of local convention.  Implementations should make the      priority a tunable parameter for future use.  It is recommended      that implementations provide for the reception of IP and ARP      packets in Synchronous frames, as well as Restricted Asynchronous      frames.      After packet transmission, FDDI provides Frame Copied (C) and      Address Recognized (A) indicators.  The use of these indicators is      a local implementation decision.  Implementations may choose to      perform link-level retransmission, ARP cache entry invalidation,      etc., based on the values of these indicators and other      information.  The semantics of these indicators, especially in the      presence of bridges, are not well defined as of this writing.      Implementors are urged to follow the work of ANSI ASC X3T9.5 in      regard to this issue in order to avoid interoperability problems.IEEE 802.2 Details   While not necessary for supporting IP and ARP, all implementations   must support IEEE 802.2 standard Class I service in order to be   compliant with 802.2.  Described below is the minimum functionality   necessary for a conformant station.  Some of the functions are not   related directly to the support of the SNAP SAP (e.g., responding to   XID and TEST commands directed to the null or global SAP addresses),   but are part of a general LLC implementation.  Implementors should   consult IEEE Std. 802.2 [11] for details.   802.2 Class I LLC requires the support of Unnumbered Information (UI)   Commands, eXchange IDentification (XID) Commands and Responses, and   TEST link (TEST) Commands and Responses.  Stations need not be able   to transmit XID and TEST commands, but must be able to transmit   responses.   Encodings      Command frames are identified by having the low order bit of the      SSAP address reset to zero.  Response frames have the low order      bit of the SSAP address set to one.Katz                                                            [Page 7]

RFC 1188              IP and ARP on FDDI Networks           October 1990      The UI command has an LLC control field value of 3.      The XID command/response has an LLC control field value of 175      (decimal) if the Poll/Final bit is off or 191 (decimal) if the      Poll/Final bit is on.      The TEST command/response has an LLC control field value of 227      (decimal) if the Poll/Final bit is off or 243 (decimal) if the      Poll/Final bit is on.   Elements of Procedure      UI responses and UI commands with the Poll bit set shall be      ignored.  UI commands having other than the SNAP SAP in the DSAP      or SSAP fields shall not be processed as IP or ARP packets.      When an XID or TEST command is received, an appropriate response      must be returned.  XID and TEST commands must be responded to only      if the DSAP is the SNAP SAP (170 decimal), the Null SAP (0      decimal), or the Global SAP (255 decimal).  XID and TEST commands      received with other DSAP values must not be responded to unless      the station supports the addressed service.  Responses to XID and      TEST frames shall be constructed as follows:         Destination MAC:  Copied from Source MAC of the command         Source MAC:  Set to the address of the MAC receiving the                command         DSAP:  Copied from SSAP of the command         SSAP:  Set to 171 decimal (SNAP SAP + Response bit) if the                DSAP in the command was the SNAP SAP or the Global SAP;                set to 1 decimal (Null SAP + Response bit) if the DSAP                in the command was the Null SAP      When responding to an XID or a TEST command, the value of the      Final bit in the response must be copied from the value of the      Poll bit in the command.      XID response frames must include an 802.2 XID Information field of      129.1.0 indicating Class I (connectionless) service.      TEST response frames must echo the information field received in      the corresponding TEST command frame.Katz                                                            [Page 8]

RFC 1188              IP and ARP on FDDI Networks           October 1990Appendix on Numbers   The IEEE specifies numbers as bit strings with the least significant   bit first, or bit-wise little-endian order.  The Internet protocols   are documented in bit-wise big-endian order.  This may cause some   confusion about the proper values to use for numbers.  Here are the   conversions for some numbers of interest.       Number           IEEE        Internet    Internet                        Binary      Binary      Decimal       UI               11000000    00000011    3       SAP for SNAP     01010101    10101010    170       Global SAP       11111111    11111111    255       Null SAP         00000000    00000000    0       XID              11110101    10101111    175       XID Poll/Final   11111101    10111111    191       XID Info                                 129.1.0       TEST             11000111    11100011    227       TEST Poll/Final  11001111    11110011    243References   [1] Postel, J., "Internet Protocol",RFC 791, USC/Information       Sciences Institute, September 1981.   [2] Plummer, D., "An Ethernet Address Resolution Protocol - or -       Converting Network Protocol Addresses to 48.bit Ethernet Address       for Transmission on Ethernet Hardware",RFC 826, MIT, November       1982.   [3] Postel, J., and Reynolds, J., "A Standard for the Transmission of       IP Datagrams over IEEE 802 Networks",RFC 1042, USC/Information       Sciences Institute, February 1988.   [4] ISO, "Fiber Distributed Data Interface (FDDI) - Media Access       Control", ISO 9314-2, 1989.  See also ANSI X3.139-1987.   [5] ISO, "Fiber Distributed Data Interface (FDDI) - Token Ring       Physical Layer Protocol", ISO 9314-1, 1989.  See also ANSI       X3.148-1988.   [6] ISO, "Fiber Distributed Data Interface (FDDI) - Physical Layer       Medium Dependent", ISO DIS 9314-3, 1989.  See also ANSI X3.166-       199x.   [7] ANSI, "FDDI Station Management", ANSI X3T9.5/84-49 Rev 6.0, 1990.Katz                                                            [Page 9]

RFC 1188              IP and ARP on FDDI Networks           October 1990   [8] IEEE, "IEEE Standards for Local Area Networks: Carrier Sense       Multiple Access with Collision Detection (CSMA/CD) Access Method       and Physical Layer Specifications", IEEE, New York, New York,       1985.   [9] IEEE, "IEEE Standards for Local Area Networks: Token-Passing Bus       Access Method and Physical Layer Specification", IEEE, New York,       New York, 1985.  [10] IEEE, "IEEE Standards for Local Area Networks: Token Ring Access       Method and Physical Layer Specifications", IEEE, New York, New       York, 1985.  [11] IEEE, "IEEE Standards for Local Area Networks: Logical Link       Control", IEEE, New York, New York, 1985.  [12] IEEE, "Draft Standard P802.1A--Overview and Architecture", 1989.  [13] Reynolds, J.K., and J.  Postel, "Assigned Numbers",RFC 1060,       USC/Information Sciences Institute, March 1990.  [14] Braden, R., and J.  Postel, "Requirements for Internet Gateways",RFC 1009, USC/Information Sciences Institute, June 1987.  [15] Deering, S., "Host Extensions for IP Multicasting",RFC 1112,       Stanford University, August 1989.  [16] Cohen, D., "On Holy Wars and a Plea for Peace", Computer, IEEE,       October 1981.  [17] Postel, J., "The TCP Maximum Segment Size Option and Related       Topics",RFC 879, USC/Information Sciences Institute, November       1983.Security Considerations   Security issues are not discussed in this memo.Author's Address   Dave Katz   Merit/NSFNET   1075 Beal Ave.   Ann Arbor, MI  48109   Phone: (313) 763-4898   EMail: dkatz@merit.eduKatz                                                           [Page 10]

RFC 1188              IP and ARP on FDDI Networks           October 1990Katz                                                           [Page 11]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp