Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


RFC 8758Deprecating RC4 in SSHApril 2020
VelvindronBest Current Practice[Page]
Stream:
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
RFC:
8758
BCP:
227
Updates:
4253
Category:
Best Current Practice
Published:
ISSN:
2070-1721
Author:
L. Velvindron
cyberstorm.mu

RFC 8758

Deprecating RC4 in Secure Shell (SSH)

Abstract

This document deprecates RC4 in Secure Shell (SSH). Therefore, this document formally moves RFC 4345 to Historic status.

Status of This Memo

This memo documents an Internet Best Current Practice.

This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on BCPs is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.

Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained athttps://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8758.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

1.Introduction

The usage of RC4 suites (also designated as "arcfour") for SSH is specified in[RFC4253] and[RFC4345].[RFC4253] specifies the allocation of the "arcfour" cipher for SSH.[RFC4345] specifies and allocates the "arcfour128" and "arcfour256" ciphers for SSH. RC4 encryption has known weaknesses[RFC7465][RFC8429]; therefore, this document starts the deprecation process for their use in Secure Shell (SSH)[RFC4253]. Accordingly,[RFC4253] is updated to note the deprecation of the RC4 ciphers, and[RFC4345] is moved to Historic status, as all ciphers it specifiesMUST NOT be used.

1.1.Requirements Language

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14[RFC2119][RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

2.Updates to RFC 4253

[RFC4253] is updated to prohibit arcfour's use in SSH.[RFC4253],Section 6.3 allocates the"arcfour" cipher by defining a list of defined ciphers in which the "arcfour"cipher appears as optional, as shown inTable 1.

Table 1
arcfourOPTIONALthe ARCFOUR stream cipher with a 128-bit key

This document updates the status of the "arcfour" ciphers in the listfound in[RFC4253],Section 6.3 by moving itfromOPTIONAL toMUST NOT.

Table 2
arcfourMUST NOT the ARCFOUR stream cipher with a 128-bit key

[RFC4253] defines the "arcfour" ciphers withthe following text:

The "arcfour" cipher is the Arcfour stream cipher with 128-bit keys. The Arcfour cipher is believed to be compatible with the RC4 cipher[SCHNEIER]. Arcfour (and RC4) has problems with weak keys, and should be used with caution.

This document updates[RFC4253],Section 6.3 by replacing the text above with the following text:

The "arcfour" cipher is the Arcfour stream cipher with 128-bit keys. The Arcfour cipher is compatible with the RC4 cipher[SCHNEIER]. Arcfour (and RC4) has known weaknesses[RFC7465][RFC8429] andMUST NOT be used.

3.IANA Considerations

The IANA has updated the "Encryption Algorithm Names" subregistry in the "Secure Shell (SSH) Protocol Parameters" registry[IANA]. The registration procedure is IETF review, which is achieved by this document. The registry has been updated as follows:

Table 3
Encryption Algorithm NameReferenceNote
arcfourRFC 8758HISTORIC
arcfour128RFC 8758HISTORIC
arcfour256RFC 8758HISTORIC

4.Security Considerations

This document only prohibits the use of RC4 in SSH; it introduces no new security considerations.

5.References

5.1.Normative References

[RFC2119]
Bradner, S.,"Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119,DOI 10.17487/RFC2119,,<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC8174]
Leiba, B.,"Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words",BCP 14,RFC 8174,DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,,<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.

5.2.Informative References

[IANA]
"Secure Shell (SSH) Protocol Parameters",<https://www.iana.org/assignments/ssh-parameters>.
[RFC4253]
Ylonen, T. and C. Lonvick, Ed.,"The Secure Shell (SSH) Transport Layer Protocol",RFC 4253,DOI 10.17487/RFC4253,,<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4253>.
[RFC4345]
Harris, B.,"Improved Arcfour Modes for the Secure Shell (SSH) Transport Layer Protocol",RFC 4345,DOI 10.17487/RFC4345,,<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4345>.
[RFC7465]
Popov, A.,"Prohibiting RC4 Cipher Suites",RFC 7465,DOI 10.17487/RFC7465,,<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7465>.
[RFC8429]
Kaduk, B. and M. Short,"Deprecate Triple-DES (3DES) and RC4 in Kerberos",BCP 218,RFC 8429,DOI 10.17487/RFC8429,,<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8429>.
[SCHNEIER]
Schneier, B.,"Applied Cryptography Second Edition: Protocols, Algorithms, and Source in Code in C",John Wiley and Sons New York, NY,.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thankEric Rescorla,Daniel Migault, andRich Salz.

Author's Address

Loganaden Velvindron
cyberstorm.mu
Mauritius
Email:logan@cyberstorm.mu

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp