Movatterモバイル変換

[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]

PROPOSED STANDARD

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) K. MurchisonRequest for Comments: 8580 B. GondwanaUpdates:5230,5435 FastMailCategory: Standards Track May 2019ISSN: 2070-1721Sieve Extension: File Carbon Copy (FCC)Abstract The Sieve email filtering language provides a number of action commands, some of which can generate additional messages on behalf of the user. This document defines an extension to such commands to allow a copy of any generated message to be filed into a target mailbox. This document updates RFCs 5230 and 5435 by adding a new tagged argument to the Vacation and Notify actions, respectively.Status of This Memo This is an Internet Standards Track document. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available inSection 2 of RFC 7841. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained athttps://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8580.Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject toBCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.Murchison & Gondwana Standards Track [Page 1]

RFC 8580                  Sieve Extension: FCC                  May 2019Table of Contents1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22.  Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . .33.  Tagged Argument ":fcc"  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .33.1.  Interaction with Extensions to the Fileinto Action  . . .33.1.1.  Imap4flags Extension  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .43.1.2.  Mailbox Extension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .43.1.3.  Special-Use Extension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .43.2.  Collected Grammar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .54.  Format of FCC Messages  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .55.  Interaction with the Vacation Action  . . . . . . . . . . . .66.  Interaction with the Notify Action  . . . . . . . . . . . . .76.1.  Notification-Capability "fcc" . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7   7.  Compatibility with the Reject and Extended Reject       Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .88.  Compatibility with Other Actions  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .89.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .910. Privacy Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .911. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .911.1.  Registration of New Sieve Extension  . . . . . . . . . .9     11.2.  Registration of New Notification-Capability            Parameter  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1012. References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1012.1.  Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1012.2.  Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12   Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .121.  Introduction   The Sieve email filtering language [RFC5228] provides a number of   action commands, some of which can generate additional messages on   behalf of the user.  It is sometimes desirable for a Sieve user to   maintain an archive of the messages generated by these commands.   This extension defines ":fcc", a new optional tagged argument for   action commands that generate additional messages.  This argument   allows a copy of the generated message to be filed into a target   mailbox.   The capability string associated with this extension is "fcc".   Each new action that generates additional messages will need to   specify how it interacts with the FCC extension.  This document   specifies the interaction of the FCC extension with the Vacation   [RFC5230] and Notify [RFC5435] actions.Murchison & Gondwana         Standards Track                    [Page 2]

RFC 8580                  Sieve Extension: FCC                  May 20192.  Conventions Used in This Document   Conventions for notations are as described inSection 1.1 of   [RFC5228], including use of the "Usage:" label for the definition of   the action and the syntax of tagged arguments.   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described inBCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all   capitals, as shown here.3.  Tagged Argument ":fcc"   This document specifies ":fcc", a new optional tagged argument that   alters the behavior of action commands that generate additional   messages on behalf of the user.   Usage: :fcc <mailbox: string>   The ":fcc" tagged argument instructs the Sieve interpreter to file a   copy of the generated message into the mailbox provided in the   subsequent argument.  The semantics and treatment of the mailbox   argument are defined to match those of the mailbox argument to the   fileinto action specified inSection 4.1 of [RFC5228].  Specifically,   use of an invalid mailbox name MAY be treated as an error or result   in delivery to an implementation-defined mailbox, and if the   specified mailbox doesn't exist, the implementation MAY treat it as   an error, create the mailbox, or file the message into an   implementation-defined mailbox.3.1.  Interaction with Extensions to the Fileinto Action   Some tagged arguments defined in extensions to the fileinto action   can be used together with the ":fcc" tagged argument.  The sections   below describe these interactions.  Tagged arguments in future   extensions to the fileinto action need to describe their interaction   with the FCC extension, if any.   When any fileinto extension arguments are used with the FCC   extension, the corresponding extension MUST be enabled, and the   arguments are defined to have the same syntax, semantics, and   treatment as they do with the fileinto action.Murchison & Gondwana         Standards Track                    [Page 3]

RFC 8580                  Sieve Extension: FCC                  May 20193.1.1.  Imap4flags Extension   This document extends the definition of the ":flags" tagged argument   (seeSection 5 of [RFC5232]) so that it can optionally be used with   the ":fcc" tagged argument.   Usage: :fcc <mailbox: string> [:flags <list-of-flags: string-list>]   If the optional ":flags" tagged argument is specified with the ":fcc"   tagged argument, it instructs the Sieve interpreter to set the IMAP4   flags provided in the subsequent argument when the generated message   is filed into the target mailbox.3.1.2.  Mailbox Extension   This document extends the definition of the ":create" tagged argument   (seeSection 3.2 of [RFC5490]) so that it can optionally be used with   the ":fcc" tagged argument.   Usage: :fcc <mailbox: string> [:create]   If the optional ":create" tagged argument is specified with the   ":fcc" tagged argument, it instructs the Sieve interpreter to create   the target mailbox, if needed, before attempting to file the   generated message into the target mailbox.3.1.3.  Special-Use Extension   This document extends the definition of the ":specialuse" tagged   argument (seeSection 4 of [RFC8579]) so that it can optionally be   used with the ":fcc" tagged argument.  Usage: :fcc <mailbox: string> [:specialuse <special-use-flag: string>]   If the optional ":specialuse" tagged argument is specified with the   ":fcc" tagged argument, it instructs the Sieve interpreter to check   whether a mailbox exists with the specific special-use flag assigned   to it.  If such a mailbox exists, the generated message is filed into   the special-use mailbox.  Otherwise, the generated message is filed   into the target mailbox.   If the optional ":specialuse" and ":create" tagged arguments are both   specified with the ":fcc" tagged argument, the Sieve interpreter is   instructed to create the target mailbox perSection 4.1 of [RFC8579],   if needed.Murchison & Gondwana         Standards Track                    [Page 4]

RFC 8580 Sieve Extension: FCC May 20193.2. Collected Grammar For convenience, the "FCC" syntax element is defined here using ABNF [RFC5234] so that it can be augmented by other extensions. Note that the following is the grammar of "FCC" after it has been lexically interpreted. No whitespace or comments appear below. FCC = ":fcc" string *FCC-OPTS ; perSection 2.6.2 of RFC 5228, ; the tagged arguments in FCC may appear in any order FCC-OPTS = CREATE / IMAP-FLAGS / SPECIAL-USE ; each option MUST NOT appear more than once CREATE = ":create" IMAP-FLAGS = ":flags" string-list SPECIAL-USE = ":specialuse" string4. Format of FCC Messages Copies of messages filed into a mailbox via this extension are REQUIRED to be in the Internet Message Format [RFC5322]. Some messages generated by Sieve actions might already conform to this format and MAY be filed without modification. Messages generated in other formats MUST be encapsulated using constructs from the Internet Message Format [RFC5322] and MIME ([RFC2045], [RFC2046], [RFC2047], [RFC2231]). The general requirements for encapsulating the copies of messages to be filed are as follows: o Date: The Date header field is REQUIRED and SHOULD be set to the date and time when the message was generated. o From: The From header field is REQUIRED and SHOULD be set to the email address of the owner of the Sieve script, unless explicitly overridden by rules for encapsulating a particular message type. Per Erratum ID 2035 [Err2035], "Informative advice: Users often have multiple email addresses, and "the email address of the owner of the Sieve script" may offer a choice among several. If the sieve processor recognizes an address belonging to the owner of the Sieve script in the To or Cc fields of the input message, then it'sMurchison & Gondwana Standards Track [Page 5]

RFC 8580                  Sieve Extension: FCC                  May 2019         better to use that address for the From field of the generated         message, rather than any other addresses the script's owner may         also have".   o  To: The To header field is OPTIONAL and MAY be set to the email      address of the recipient of the generated message, if available.   o  Subject: The Subject header field is OPTIONAL and MAY be generated      by setting the subject to the characters "Fcc: " followed by the      subject of the message being processed by the Sieve interpreter.   o  In-Reply-To: The In-Reply-To header field is OPTIONAL and MAY be      set to the Message-ID of the message being processed by the Sieve      interpreter.   o  Message Body: The body of the filed message is REQUIRED and is      composed of one or more MIME parts containing the generated      message and any related metadata.  The Content-Type header      field(s) MUST be set to the appropriate MIME types.  If any of the      MIME parts include 8-bit or binary data, the Content-Transfer-      Encoding header field(s) MUST be set accordingly.5.  Interaction with the Vacation Action   This document extends the Vacation [RFC5230] action (see also   "Seconds" parameter [RFC6131] to optionally store a copy of the auto-   reply messages into a target mailbox.   Usage:   vacation [FCC]                     [":days" number | ":seconds" number]                     [":subject" string]                     [":from" string]                     [":addresses" string-list]                     [":mime"]                     [":handle" string]                     <reason: string>   Example (using fileinto extensions):   require ["vacation", "fcc", "mailbox", "special-use", "imap4flags"];   vacation :days 7            :from "hemingway@example.com" "Gone Fishin'"            :specialuse "\\Sent" :create            :fcc "INBOX.Sent" :flags ["\\Seen"];   Vacation auto-reply messages are compliant with MIME and can be filed   into the target mailbox without modification.Murchison & Gondwana         Standards Track                    [Page 6]

RFC 8580                  Sieve Extension: FCC                  May 20196.  Interaction with the Notify Action   This document extends the Notify [RFC5435] action to optionally store   a copy of the notification messages into a target mailbox.   Usage:   notify [FCC]                   [":from" string]                   [":importance" <"1" / "2" / "3">]                   [":options" string-list]                   [":message" string]                   <method: string>   Example:   require ["enotify", "fcc"];   notify :fcc "INBOX.Sent"          :message "You got mail!"          "mailto:ken@example.com";   Messages generated using the "mailto" [RFC5436] notification method   are compliant with MIME and can be filed into the target mailbox   without modification.   Messages generated by other notification methods (e.g., "xmpp"   [RFC5437]) MUST be encapsulated perSection 4 before being filed.   The body of the filed message MUST include the ":message" tagged   argument and MAY include one or more of the ":from", ":importance",   or ":options" tagged arguments.  The MIME type(s) of the body part(s)   used to encapsulate the parameters is an implementation decision.   An implementation MAY only support the FCC extension in conjunction   with a subset of the notification methods it supports.  An error   occurs if the FCC extension is used with a notification method that   doesn't support it.  Notification methods that support the FCC   extension can be discovered at runtime using the mechanism described   inSection 6.1.6.1.  Notification-Capability "fcc"   This document defines "fcc", a new notification-capability value for   use with the notify_method_capability test (seeSection 5 of   [RFC5435].  For the "fcc" notification-capability, the   notify_method_capability test can match one of the following key-list   values:Murchison & Gondwana         Standards Track                    [Page 7]

RFC 8580 Sieve Extension: FCC May 2019 yes A copy of the notification message sent using the method identified by the notification-uri can be filed into a target mailbox. no A copy of the notification message sent using the method identified by the notification-uri cannot be filed into a target mailbox. Note that the "fcc" notify_method_capability test does not require the notification-uri argument to specify anything other than a scheme. Example: require ["enotify", "fcc"]; if notify_method_capability "xmpp:" "fcc" "yes" { notify :fcc "INBOX.Sent" :message "You got mail" "xmpp:ken@example.com?message;subject=SIEVE"; } else { notify :fcc "INBOX.Sent" :message "You got mail!" "mailto:ken@example.com"; }7. Compatibility with the Reject and Extended Reject Actions Implementations MUST NOT allow use of the FCC extension with the reject and ereject [RFC5429] actions. Allowing use of the FCC extension with these actions would violate the SMTP [RFC5321] principle that a message is either delivered or bounced back to the sender. Namely, the saved copy of the rejection message will contain the original message. It is an error for a script to use the ":fcc" tagged argument with either of the reject or ereject actions.8. Compatibility with Other Actions The FCC extension is not compatible with any Sieve action that does not generate an additional message on behalf of the user. It is an error for a script to use the ":fcc" tagged argument with any such action.Murchison & Gondwana Standards Track [Page 8]

RFC 8580                  Sieve Extension: FCC                  May 2019   Future extensions that define actions that generate additional   messages on behalf of the user need to describe their compatibility   with the FCC extension and describe how to MIME-encapsulate the   message, if required.9.  Security Considerations   In addition to the security considerations in [RFC5228], [RFC5230],   [RFC5435], and [RFC6131], it should be noted that filing copies of   generated messages may cause the Sieve script owner to exceed the   allocated storage (quota) on the mail system, thereby preventing   delivery of future messages destined for the owner.10.  Privacy Considerations   In addition to the privacy considerations in [RFC5228], [RFC5230],   [RFC5435], and [RFC6131], it should be noted that a copy of a   generated message filed into a shared or public mailbox (as opposed   to a private mailbox) could expose private information about the   Sieve script owner to third parties.  For instance, users that have   access to the shared/public mailbox might discover that the Sieve   script owner is on holiday or might discover the owner's physical   location.11.  IANA Considerations11.1.  Registration of New Sieve Extension   IANA has registered the following Sieve extension in the "Sieve   Extensions" registry at   <https://www.iana.org/assignments/sieve-extensions>:      Capability name: fcc      Description: Adds the ":fcc" parameter to Sieve action commands      that generate additional messages.      RFC number:RFC 8580      Contact address: The Sieve discussion list <sieve@ietf.org>Murchison & Gondwana         Standards Track                    [Page 9]

RFC 8580                  Sieve Extension: FCC                  May 201911.2.  Registration of New Notification-Capability Parameter   IANA has registered the following notification-capability parameter   in the "Notification-Capability Parameters" registry at   <https://www.iana.org/assignments/notification-capability-parameters>:      Capability Name: fcc      Description: Returns whether a copy of the notification message      sent using the method identified by the notification-uri parameter      to the notify_method_capability test can be filed into a target      mailbox.      Syntax: Can contain one of two values: "yes" or "no".  Values MUST      be in lowercase.      Reference:RFC 8580      Contact: The Sieve discussion list <sieve@ietf.org>12.  References12.1.  Normative References   [RFC2045]  Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail              Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message              Bodies",RFC 2045, DOI 10.17487/RFC2045, November 1996,              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2045>.   [RFC2046]  Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail              Extensions (MIME) Part Two: Media Types",RFC 2046,              DOI 10.17487/RFC2046, November 1996,              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2046>.   [RFC2047]  Moore, K., "MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions)              Part Three: Message Header Extensions for Non-ASCII Text",RFC 2047, DOI 10.17487/RFC2047, November 1996,              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2047>.   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate              Requirement Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119,              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.Murchison & Gondwana         Standards Track                   [Page 10]

RFC 8580                  Sieve Extension: FCC                  May 2019   [RFC2231]  Freed, N. and K. Moore, "MIME Parameter Value and Encoded              Word Extensions: Character Sets, Languages, and              Continuations",RFC 2231, DOI 10.17487/RFC2231, November              1997, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2231>.   [RFC5228]  Guenther, P., Ed. and T. Showalter, Ed., "Sieve: An Email              Filtering Language",RFC 5228, DOI 10.17487/RFC5228,              January 2008, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5228>.   [RFC5230]  Showalter, T. and N. Freed, Ed., "Sieve Email Filtering:              Vacation Extension",RFC 5230, DOI 10.17487/RFC5230,              January 2008, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5230>.   [RFC5232]  Melnikov, A., "Sieve Email Filtering: Imap4flags              Extension",RFC 5232, DOI 10.17487/RFC5232, January 2008,              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5232>.   [RFC5234]  Crocker, D., Ed. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax              Specifications: ABNF", STD 68,RFC 5234,              DOI 10.17487/RFC5234, January 2008,              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5234>.   [RFC5322]  Resnick, P., Ed., "Internet Message Format",RFC 5322,              DOI 10.17487/RFC5322, October 2008,              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5322>.   [RFC5429]  Stone, A., Ed., "Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and              Extended Reject Extensions",RFC 5429,              DOI 10.17487/RFC5429, March 2009,              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5429>.   [RFC5435]  Melnikov, A., Ed., Leiba, B., Ed., Segmuller, W., and T.              Martin, "Sieve Email Filtering: Extension for              Notifications",RFC 5435, DOI 10.17487/RFC5435, January              2009, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5435>.   [RFC5490]  Melnikov, A., "The Sieve Mail-Filtering Language --              Extensions for Checking Mailbox Status and Accessing              Mailbox Metadata",RFC 5490, DOI 10.17487/RFC5490, March              2009, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5490>.   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase inRFC2119 Key Words",BCP 14,RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,              May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.   [RFC8579]  Bosch, S., "Sieve Email Filtering: Delivering to Special-              Use Mailboxes",RFC 8579, DOI 10.17487/RFC8579, May 2019,              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8579>.Murchison & Gondwana         Standards Track                   [Page 11]

RFC 8580                  Sieve Extension: FCC                  May 201912.2.  Informative References   [Err2035]  RFC Errata, Errata ID 2035,RFC 5230,              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=2035>.   [RFC5321]  Klensin, J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol",RFC 5321,              DOI 10.17487/RFC5321, October 2008,              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5321>.   [RFC5436]  Leiba, B. and M. Haardt, "Sieve Notification Mechanism:              mailto",RFC 5436, DOI 10.17487/RFC5436, January 2009,              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5436>.   [RFC5437]  Saint-Andre, P. and A. Melnikov, "Sieve Notification              Mechanism: Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol              (XMPP)",RFC 5437, DOI 10.17487/RFC5437, January 2009,              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5437>.   [RFC6131]  George, R. and B. Leiba, "Sieve Vacation Extension:              "Seconds" Parameter",RFC 6131, DOI 10.17487/RFC6131, July              2011, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6131>.Acknowledgments   The authors would like to thank the following individuals for   contributing their ideas and supporting this specification: Ned   Freed, Stan Kalisch, and Alexey Melnikov.Authors' Addresses   Kenneth Murchison   FastMail US LLC   1429 Walnut Street, Suite 1201   Philadelphia, PA  19102   United States of America   Email: murch@fastmailteam.com   Bron Gondwana   FastMail Pty Ltd   Level 2, 114 William Street   Melbourne, VIC  3000   Australia   Email: brong@fastmailteam.comMurchison & Gondwana         Standards Track                   [Page 12]

[8]ページ先頭