Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]

INFORMATIONAL
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                          S. KilleRequest for Comments: 8284                                     Isode LtdCategory: Informational                                    November 2017ISSN: 2070-1721Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Schema for Supportingthe Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) in White PagesAbstract   The Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) identifies   users by use of Jabber IDs (JIDs).  The Lightweight Directory Access   Protocol (LDAP) enables provision of a white pages service with a   schema relating to users and support for Internet protocols.  This   specification defines a schema to enable XMPP JIDs to be associated   with objects in an LDAP directory so that this information can be   used with white pages applications.Status of This Memo   This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is   published for informational purposes.   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has   received public review and has been approved for publication by the   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Not all documents   approved by the IESG are a candidate for any level of Internet   Standard; seeSection 2 of RFC 7841.   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained athttps://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8284.Kille                         Informational                     [Page 1]

RFC 8284                  LDAP Schema for XMPP             November 2017Copyright Notice   Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the   document authors.  All rights reserved.   This document is subject toBCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of   publication of this document.  Please review these documents   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as   described in the Simplified BSD License.Table of Contents1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22.  Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . .33.  Schema Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .33.1.  Object Class  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .33.2.  Attribute . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .34.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .45.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .56.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5   Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .61.  Introduction   Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) [RFC6120]   identifies users by use of Jabber IDs (JIDs).  The Lightweight   Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) [RFC4510] enables provision of a   white pages service with a schema relating to users and support for   Internet protocols defined in [RFC4519].  This specification defines   a schema to enable XMPP JIDs to be associated with LDAP directory   objects so that this information can be used with white pages   applications.   The LDAP schema for storing JIDs is defined to enable JIDs to be   associated with any object stored in the directory.  This is done by   associating the new JID Attribute with a new Auxiliary Object Class   called JIDObject.Kille                         Informational                     [Page 2]

RFC 8284                  LDAP Schema for XMPP             November 20172.  Conventions Used in This Document   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described inBCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all   capitals, as shown here.3.  Schema Definition   This section defines the schema used to store JIDs in the directory.3.1.  Object Class   This section defines a new Auxiliary Object Class called JIDObject,   which MAY be associated with any structural Object Class.  This   Object Class is used to augment entries for objects that act or may   act as an XMPP client.  The JID attribute is optional in order to   enable configuring an object that is allowed to have an associated   JID but does not currently have one.        ( 1.3.6.1.1.23.1 NAME 'JIDObject'        AUXILIARY        MAY jid )3.2.  Attribute   This section defines the JID attribute referenced by the JIDObject   Auxiliary Object Class.  The syntax of the JID attribute MUST follow   the rules of [RFC7622].  The JID stored MUST be a bare JID (e.g., a   JID such as romeo@shakespeare.example.com representing a human user)   and not a full JID (e.g., a JID such as   romeo@shakespare.example.com/AABBCC, which represents a specific XMPP   client used by the human user and is identified by the resource   AABBCC).  Note that the LDAP directory server is not expected to   enforce this syntax.  The syntax rules are for LDAP clients setting   this attribute, noting that human usage is a key target.   Applications using this attribute should format that string in a   manner appropriate to the application, and XMPP applications SHOULD   apply [RFC7622] to the attribute.  The directory service doesn't   enforce the JID syntax, and values are compared according to the   matching rules specified in the attribute definition.   Note that for the convenience of users and administrators as well as   implementers, the Directory String syntax and the caseIgnoreMatch   matching rule are chosen to allow entry and matching of values   according to common rules used within the directory.  As this syntax   and matching rule differ from [RFC7622], false positives and falseKille                         Informational                     [Page 3]

RFC 8284                  LDAP Schema for XMPP             November 2017   negatives can possibly occur.  This is not anticipated to cause   operational issues (based on implementation experience with similar   syntax/matching rule mismatches).         ( 1.3.6.1.1.23.2 NAME 'jid'            EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch            SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch            SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 )   1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 refers to the Directory String syntax   defined in [RFC4517].4.  IANA Considerations   The following registrations have been made in the "Lightweight   Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Parameters" registry   <https://www.iana.org/assignments/ldap-parameters> in line withBCP 64 [RFC4520].   Object Identifier Registration   An object identifier has been assigned to support the registrations   necessary for this specification by an entry in the Internet   Directory Numbers (iso.org.dod.internet.directory [1.3.6.1.1.])   registry:               Decimal: 23               Name: xmpp               Description: LDAP schema for XMPP   Two object identifiers have been assigned:   'JIDObject' Descriptor Registration               Name: JIDObject               Type: O               OID: 1.3.6.1.1.23.1   'jid' Descriptor Registration               Name: jid               Type: A               OID: 1.3.6.1.1.23.2Kille                         Informational                     [Page 4]

RFC 8284                  LDAP Schema for XMPP             November 20175.  Security Considerations   XMPP JIDs are often personal identifiers enabling electronic   communication and have similar considerations to email addresses.   This schema enables publishing of this information in LDAP   directories, which may be corporate or public services.  Care should   be taken to only publish JID information that is acceptable both to   be linked to the LDAP object and to be made accessible to all LDAP   users.  The general LDAP security considerations specified in   [RFC4510] also apply.6.  Normative References   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate              Requirement Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119,              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.   [RFC4510]  Zeilenga, K., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol              (LDAP): Technical Specification Road Map",RFC 4510,              DOI 10.17487/RFC4510, June 2006,              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4510>.   [RFC4517]  Legg, S., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol              (LDAP): Syntaxes and Matching Rules",RFC 4517,              DOI 10.17487/RFC4517, June 2006,              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4517>.   [RFC4519]  Sciberras, A., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol              (LDAP): Schema for User Applications",RFC 4519,              DOI 10.17487/RFC4519, June 2006,              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4519>.   [RFC4520]  Zeilenga, K., "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA)              Considerations for the Lightweight Directory Access              Protocol (LDAP)",BCP 64,RFC 4520, DOI 10.17487/RFC4520,              June 2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4520>.   [RFC6120]  Saint-Andre, P., "Extensible Messaging and Presence              Protocol (XMPP): Core",RFC 6120, DOI 10.17487/RFC6120,              March 2011, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6120>.   [RFC7622]  Saint-Andre, P., "Extensible Messaging and Presence              Protocol (XMPP): Address Format",RFC 7622,              DOI 10.17487/RFC7622, September 2015,              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7622>.Kille                         Informational                     [Page 5]

RFC 8284                  LDAP Schema for XMPP             November 2017   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase inRFC2119 Key Words",BCP 14,RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,              May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.Acknowledgements   Thanks to Alexey Melnikov for suggestions on preparing this document.   Thanks to Alan Murdock, Yoav Nir, Peter Saint-Andre, and Kurt   Zeilenga for their review comments.Author's Address   Steve Kille   Isode Ltd   14 Castle Mews   Hampton, Middlesex  TW12 2NP   United Kingdom   Email: Steve.Kille@isode.comKille                         Informational                     [Page 6]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp