Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Errata] [Info page]

PROPOSED STANDARD
Errata Exist
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                      K. Lynn, Ed.Request for Comments: 8163                                  Verizon LabsCategory: Standards Track                                    J. MartocciISSN: 2070-1721                                         Johnson Controls                                                              C. Neilson                                                          Delta Controls                                                            S. Donaldson                                                               Honeywell                                                                May 2017Transmission of IPv6 over Master-Slave/Token-Passing (MS/TP) NetworksAbstract   Master-Slave/Token-Passing (MS/TP) is a medium access control method   for the RS-485 physical layer and is used primarily in building   automation networks.  This specification defines the frame format for   transmission of IPv6 packets and the method of forming link-local and   statelessly autoconfigured IPv6 addresses on MS/TP networks.Status of This Memo   This is an Internet Standards Track document.   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has   received public review and has been approved for publication by the   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on   Internet Standards is available inSection 2 of RFC 7841.   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained athttp://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8163.Lynn, et al.                 Standards Track                    [Page 1]

RFC 8163                IPv6 over MS/TP (6LoBAC)                May 2017Copyright Notice   Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the   document authors.  All rights reserved.   This document is subject toBCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of   publication of this document.  Please review these documents   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as   described in the Simplified BSD License.Table of Contents1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .32.  Profile for IPv6 over MS/TP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .63.  Addressing Modes  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .74.  Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .85.  LoBAC Adaptation Layer  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .86.  Stateless Address Autoconfiguration . . . . . . . . . . . . .97.  IPv6 Link-Local Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .108.  Unicast Address Mapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .109.  Multicast Address Mapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1110. Header Compression  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1111. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1112. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1213. References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12Appendix A.  Abstract MAC Interface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15Appendix B.  Consistent Overhead Byte Stuffing (COBS) . . . . . .17Appendix C.  Encoded CRC-32K (CRC32K) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20Appendix D.  Example 6LoBAC Frame Decode  . . . . . . . . . . . .22   Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27Lynn, et al.                 Standards Track                    [Page 2]

RFC 8163                IPv6 over MS/TP (6LoBAC)                May 20171.  Introduction   Master-Slave/Token-Passing (MS/TP) is a Medium Access Control (MAC)   protocol for the RS-485 [TIA-485-A] physical layer and is used   primarily in building automation networks.  This specification   defines the frame format for transmission of IPv6 [RFC2460] packets   and the method of forming link-local and statelessly autoconfigured   IPv6 addresses on MS/TP networks.  The general approach is to adapt   elements of the 6LoWPAN specifications ([RFC4944], [RFC6282], and   [RFC6775]) to constrained wired networks, as noted below.   An MS/TP device is typically based on a low-cost microcontroller with   limited processing power and memory.  These constraints, together   with low data rates and a small MAC address space, are similar to   those faced in 6LoWPAN networks.  MS/TP differs significantly from   6LoWPAN in at least three respects: a) MS/TP devices are typically   mains powered, b) all MS/TP devices on a segment can communicate   directly so there are no hidden node or mesh routing issues, and c)   the latest MS/TP specification provides support for large payloads,   eliminating the need for fragmentation and reassembly below IPv6.   The following sections provide a brief overview of MS/TP and then   describe how to form IPv6 addresses and encapsulate IPv6 packets in   MS/TP frames.  This specification (subsequently referred to as   "6LoBAC") includes a REQUIRED header compression mechanism that is   based on LOWPAN_IPHC [RFC6282] and improves MS/TP link utilization.1.1.  Requirements Language   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].1.2.  Abbreviations Used   ASHRAE:  American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-            Conditioning Engineers <http://www.ashrae.org>   BACnet:  An ISO/ANSI/ASHRAE Standard Data Communication Protocol for            Building Automation and Control Networks   CRC:     Cyclic Redundancy Code   MAC:     Medium Access Control   MSDU:    MAC Service Data Unit (MAC client data)Lynn, et al.                 Standards Track                    [Page 3]

RFC 8163                IPv6 over MS/TP (6LoBAC)                May 2017   MTU:     Maximum Transmission Unit; the size of the largest data unit            at the network-layer protocol that can be communicated in a            single network transaction   UART:    Universal Asynchronous Transmitter/Receiver1.3.  MS/TP Overview   This section provides a brief overview of MS/TP, as specified in   Clause 9 of the ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 135-2016 [BACnet].  The latest   version of [BACnet] integrates changes to legacy MS/TP (approved as   [Addendum_an]) that provide support for larger frame sizes and   improved error handling.  [BACnet], Clause 9 also covers physical-   layer deployment options.   MS/TP is designed to enable multidrop networks over shielded twisted   pair wiring.  It can support network segments up to 1000 meters in   length at a data rate of 115.2 kbit/s or segments up to 1200 meters   in length at lower bit rates.  An MS/TP interface requires only a   UART, an RS-485 [TIA-485-A] transceiver with a driver that can be   disabled, and a 5 ms resolution timer.  The MS/TP MAC is typically   implemented in software.   The differential signaling used by [TIA-485-A] requires a contention-   free MAC.  MS/TP uses a token to control access to a multidrop bus.   Only an MS/TP master node can initiate the unsolicited transfer of   data, and only when it holds the token.  After sending at most a   configured maximum number of data frames, a master node passes the   token to the next master node (as determined by the MAC address).  If   present on the link, legacy MS/TP implementations (including any   slave nodes) ignore the frame format defined in this specification.   [BACnet], Clause 9 defines a range of Frame Type values used to   designate frames that contain Data and Data CRC fields encoded using   Consistent Overhead Byte Stuffing [COBS] (seeAppendix B).  The   purpose of COBS encoding is to eliminate preamble sequences from the   Encoded Data and Encoded CRC-32K fields.  The Encoded Data field is   covered by a 32-bit CRC [CRC32K] (seeAppendix C) that is also COBS   encoded.Lynn, et al.                 Standards Track                    [Page 4]

RFC 8163                IPv6 over MS/TP (6LoBAC)                May 2017   MS/TP COBS-encoded frames have the following format:   0                   1                   2                   3   0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   |      0x55     |      0xFF     |  Frame Type   |      DA       |   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   |      SA       |    Length (MS octet first)    |   Header CRC  |   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   .                                                               .   .                Encoded Data (2 - 1506 octets)                 .   .                                                               .   +                               +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   |                               |  Encoded CRC-32K (5 octets)   |   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+               +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   |                                               | optional 0xFF |   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+                 Figure 1: MS/TP COBS-Encoded Frame Format   MS/TP COBS-encoded frame fields are defined as follows:    Preamble              two octet preamble: 0x55, 0xFF    Frame Type            one octet    Destination Address   one octet address    Source Address        one octet address    Length                two octets, most significant octet first    Header CRC            one octet    Encoded Data          2 - 1506 octets (seeSection 4 andAppendix B)    Encoded CRC-32K       five octets (seeAppendix C)    (pad)                 (optional) at most one octet of trailer: 0xFF   The Frame Type is used to distinguish between different types of MAC   frames.  The types relevant to this specification (in decimal) are:      0  Token      1  Poll For Master      2  Reply To Poll For Master      3  Test_Request      4  Test_Response         ...     34  IPv6 over MS/TP (LoBAC) Encapsulation   Frame Types 8 - 31 and 35 - 127 are reserved for assignment by   ASHRAE.  Frame Types 32 - 127 designate COBS-encoded frames that   convey Encoded Data and Encoded CRC-32K fields.  SeeSection 2 for   additional details.Lynn, et al.                 Standards Track                    [Page 5]

RFC 8163                IPv6 over MS/TP (6LoBAC)                May 2017   The Destination and Source Addresses are each one octet in length.   SeeSection 3 for additional details.   For COBS-encoded frames, the Length field indicates the size of the   [COBS] Encoded Data field in octets, plus three.  (This adjustment is   required in order for legacy MS/TP devices to ignore COBS-encoded   frames.)  SeeSection 4 and the Appendices for additional details.   The Header CRC field covers the Frame Type, Destination Address,   Source Address, and Length fields.  The Header CRC generation and   check procedures are specified in [BACnet], Annex G.1.   Use of the optional 0xFF trailer octet is discussed in [BACnet],   Clause 9.1.4.  Goals and Constraints   The main goals of this specification are a) to enable IPv6 directly   on wired end devices in building automation and control networks by   leveraging existing standards to the greatest extent possible, and b)   to co-exist with legacy MS/TP implementations.  Co-existence allows   MS/TP networks to be incrementally upgraded to support IPv6.   In order to co-exist with legacy devices, no changes are permitted to   the MS/TP addressing modes, frame header format, control frames, or   Master Node state machine as specified in [BACnet], Clause 9.2.  Profile for IPv6 over MS/TP   ASHRAE has assigned an MS/TP Frame Type value of 34 to indicate IPv6   over MS/TP (LoBAC) Encapsulation.  This falls within the range of   values that designate COBS-encoded data frames.2.1.  Mandatory Features   [BACnet], Clause 9 specifies mandatory-to-implement features of MS/TP   devices.  For example, it is mandatory that all MS/TP nodes respond   to a Test_Request with a Test_Response frame.  All MS/TP master nodes   must implement the Master Node state machine and handle Token, Poll   For Master, and Reply To Poll For Master control frames.  6LoBAC   nodes are MS/TP master nodes that implement a Receive Frame state   machine capable of handling COBS-encoded frames.   6LoBAC nodes must support a data rate of 115.2 kbit/s and may support   lower data rates as specified in [BACnet], Clause 9.  The method of   selecting the data rate is outside the scope of this specification.Lynn, et al.                 Standards Track                    [Page 6]

RFC 8163                IPv6 over MS/TP (6LoBAC)                May 20172.2.  Configuration Constants   The following constants are used by the Receive Frame state machine.   Nmin_COBS_length  The minimum valid Length value of any LoBAC-                     encapsulated frame: 5   Nmax_COBS_length  The maximum valid Length value of any LoBAC-                     encapsulated frame: 15092.3.  Configuration Parameters   The following parameters are used by the Master Node state machine.   Nmax_info_frames  The default maximum number of information frames                     the node may send before it must pass the token: 1   Nmax_master       The default highest allowable address for master                     nodes: 127   The mechanisms for setting parameters or monitoring MS/TP performance   are outside the scope of this specification.3.  Addressing Modes   MS/TP node (MAC) addresses are one octet in length and are assigned   dynamically.  The method of assigning MAC addresses is outside the   scope of this specification.  However, each MS/TP node on the link   MUST have a unique address in order to ensure correct MAC operation.   [BACnet], Clause 9 specifies that addresses 0 through 127 are valid   for master nodes.  The method specified inSection 6 for creating a   MAC-address-derived Interface Identifier (IID) ensures that an IID of   all zeros can never be generated.   A Destination Address of 255 (all nodes) indicates a MAC-layer   broadcast.  MS/TP does not support multicast; therefore, all IPv6   multicast packets MUST be broadcast at the MAC layer and filtered at   the IPv6 layer.  A Source Address of 255 MUST NOT be used.   Hosts learn IPv6 prefixes via router advertisements according to   [RFC4861].Lynn, et al.                 Standards Track                    [Page 7]

RFC 8163                IPv6 over MS/TP (6LoBAC)                May 20174.  Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU)   Upon transmission, the network-layer MTU is formatted according toSection 5 and becomes the MAC service data unit (MSDU).  The MSDU is   then COBS encoded by MS/TP.  Upon reception, the steps are reversed.   [BACnet], Clause 9 supports MSDUs up to 2032 octets in length.   IPv6 [RFC2460] requires that every link in an internet have an MTU of   1280 octets or greater.  Additionally, a node must be able to accept   a fragmented packet that, after reassembly, is as large as 1500   octets.  This specification defines an MTU length of at least 1280   octets and at most 1500 octets.  Support for an MTU length of 1500   octets is RECOMMENDED.5.  LoBAC Adaptation Layer   This section specifies an adaptation layer to support compressed IPv6   headers as specified inSection 10.  IPv6 header compression MUST be   implemented on all 6LoBAC nodes.  Implementations MAY also support   Generic Header Compression [RFC7400] for transport layer headers.   The LoBAC encapsulation format defined in this section describes the   MSDU of an IPv6 over MS/TP frame.  The LoBAC payload (i.e., an IPv6   packet) follows an encapsulation header stack.  LoBAC is a subset of   the LoWPAN encapsulation defined in [RFC4944], as updated by   [RFC6282], so the use of "LOWPAN" in literals below is intentional.   The primary difference between LoWPAN and LoBAC encapsulation is   omission of the Mesh, Broadcast, Fragmentation, and LOWPAN_HC1   headers in the latter.   All LoBAC-encapsulated datagrams transmitted over MS/TP are prefixed   by an encapsulation header stack consisting of a Dispatch value   followed by zero or more header fields.  The only sequence currently   defined for LoBAC is the LOWPAN_IPHC header followed by payload, as   shown below:             +---------------+---------------+------...-----+             | IPHC Dispatch |  IPHC Header  |    Payload   |             +---------------+---------------+------...-----+    Figure 2: A LoBAC-Encapsulated LOWPAN_IPHC Compressed IPv6 Datagram   The Dispatch value is treated as an unstructured namespace.  Only a   single pattern is used to represent current LoBAC functionality.Lynn, et al.                 Standards Track                    [Page 8]

RFC 8163                IPv6 over MS/TP (6LoBAC)                May 2017     Pattern      Header Type   +------------+-----------------------------------------------------+   | 01  1xxxxx | LOWPAN_IPHC - LOWPAN_IPHC compressed IPv6 [RFC6282] |   +------------+-----------------------------------------------------+                Figure 3: LoBAC Dispatch Value Bit Pattern   Other IANA-assigned 6LoWPAN Dispatch values do not apply to 6LoBAC   unless otherwise specified.6.  Stateless Address Autoconfiguration   This section defines how to obtain an IPv6 Interface Identifier.   This specification distinguishes between two types of IIDs, MAC-   address-derived and semantically opaque.   A MAC-address-derived IID is the RECOMMENDED type for use in forming   a link-local address, as it affords the most efficient header   compression provided by the LOWPAN_IPHC [RFC6282] format specified inSection 10.  The general procedure for creating a MAC-address-derived   IID is described inAppendix A of [RFC4291], "Creating Modified   EUI-64 Format Interface Identifiers", as updated by [RFC7136].   The Interface Identifier for link-local addresses SHOULD be formed by   concatenating the node's 8-bit MS/TP MAC address to the seven octets   0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0xFF, 0xFE, 0x00, and 0x00.  For example, an MS/TP   MAC address of hexadecimal value 0x4F results in the following IID:   |0              1|1              3|3              4|4              6|   |0              5|6              1|2              7|8              3|   +----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+   |0000000000000000|0000000011111111|1111111000000000|0000000001001111|   +----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+   A semantically opaque IID having 64 bits of entropy is RECOMMENDED   for each globally scoped address and MAY be locally generated   according to one of the methods cited inSection 12.  A node that   generates a 64-bit semantically opaque IID MUST register the IID with   its local router(s) by sending a Neighbor Solicitation (NS) message   with the Address Registration Option (ARO) and process Neighbor   Advertisements (NAs) according to [RFC6775].   An IPv6 address prefix used for stateless autoconfiguration [RFC4862]   of an MS/TP interface MUST have a length of 64 bits.Lynn, et al.                 Standards Track                    [Page 9]

RFC 8163                IPv6 over MS/TP (6LoBAC)                May 20177.  IPv6 Link-Local Address   The IPv6 link-local address [RFC4291] for an MS/TP interface is   formed by appending the Interface Identifier, as defined above, to   the prefix FE80::/64.     10 bits           54 bits                   64 bits   +----------+-----------------------+----------------------------+   |1111111010|        (zeros)        |    Interface Identifier    |   +----------+-----------------------+----------------------------+8.  Unicast Address Mapping   The address resolution procedure for mapping IPv6 non-multicast   addresses into MS/TP MAC-layer addresses follows the general   description inSection 7.2 of [RFC4861], unless otherwise specified.   The Source/Target Link-Layer Address option has the following form   when the addresses are 8-bit MS/TP MAC-layer (node) addresses.    0                   1    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   |     Type      |    Length=1   |   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   |     0x00      | MS/TP Address |   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   |                               |   +      Padding (all zeros)      +   |                               |   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   Option fields:   Type:      1: for Source Link-Layer address.      2: for Target Link-Layer address.   Length:  This is the length of this option (including the Type and         Length fields) in units of 8 octets.  The value of this field         is 1 for 8-bit MS/TP MAC addresses.   MS/TP Address:  The 8-bit address in canonical bit order [RFC2469].         This is the unicast address the interface currently responds         to.Lynn, et al.                 Standards Track                   [Page 10]

RFC 8163                IPv6 over MS/TP (6LoBAC)                May 20179.  Multicast Address Mapping   All IPv6 multicast packets MUST be sent to MS/TP Destination Address   255 (broadcast) and filtered at the IPv6 layer.  When represented as   a 16-bit address in a compressed header (seeSection 10), it MUST be   formed by padding on the left with a zero octet:    0                   1    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   |     0x00      |     0xFF      |   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+---------------+10.  Header Compression   6LoBAC REQUIRES LOWPAN_IPHC IPv6 compression, which is specified in   [RFC6282] and included herein by reference.  This section will simply   identify substitutions that should be made when interpreting the text   of [RFC6282].   In general, the following substitutions should be made:   - Replace instances of "6LoWPAN" with "MS/TP network"   - Replace instances of "IEEE 802.15.4 address" with "MS/TP address"   When a 16-bit address is called for (i.e., an IEEE 802.15.4 "short   address"), it MUST be formed by padding the MS/TP address to the left   with a zero octet:    0                   1    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   |     0x00      | MS/TP address |   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+---------------+   If LOWPAN_IPHC compression [RFC6282] is used with context, the   router(s) directly attached to the MS/TP segment MUST disseminate the   6LoWPAN Context Option (6CO) according toSection 7.2 of [RFC6775].11.  IANA Considerations   This document uses values previously reserved by [RFC4944] and   [RFC6282]; it does not require any IANA actions.Lynn, et al.                 Standards Track                   [Page 11]

RFC 8163                IPv6 over MS/TP (6LoBAC)                May 201712.  Security Considerations   See [RFC8065] for a general discussion of privacy threats faced by   constrained nodes.   [RFC8065] makes a distinction between "stable" and "temporary"   addresses.  The former are long-lived and typically advertised by   servers.  The latter are typically used by clients and SHOULD be   changed frequently to mitigate correlation of activities over time.   Nodes that engage in both activities SHOULD support simultaneous use   of multiple addresses per device.   Globally scoped addresses that contain MAC-address-derived IIDs may   expose a network to address-scanning attacks.  For this reason, it is   RECOMMENDED that a 64-bit semantically opaque IID be generated for   each globally scoped address in use according to, for example,   [RFC3315], [RFC3972], [RFC4941], [RFC5535], or [RFC7217].13.  References13.1.  Normative References   [BACnet]   ASHRAE, "BACnet-A Data Communication Protocol for Building              Automation and Control Networks", ANSI/ASHRAE Standard              135-2016, January 2016,              <http://www.techstreet.com/ashrae/standards/ashrae-135-2016?product_id=1918140#jumps>.   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate              Requirement Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119,              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.   [RFC2460]  Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6              (IPv6) Specification",RFC 2460, DOI 10.17487/RFC2460,              December 1998, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2460>.   [RFC3315]  Droms, R., Ed., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins,              C., and M. Carney, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol              for IPv6 (DHCPv6)",RFC 3315, DOI 10.17487/RFC3315, July              2003, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3315>.   [RFC3972]  Aura, T., "Cryptographically Generated Addresses (CGA)",RFC 3972, DOI 10.17487/RFC3972, March 2005,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3972>.Lynn, et al.                 Standards Track                   [Page 12]

RFC 8163                IPv6 over MS/TP (6LoBAC)                May 2017   [RFC4291]  Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing              Architecture",RFC 4291, DOI 10.17487/RFC4291, February              2006, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4291>.   [RFC4861]  Narten, T., Nordmark, E., Simpson, W., and H. Soliman,              "Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6)",RFC 4861,              DOI 10.17487/RFC4861, September 2007,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4861>.   [RFC4862]  Thomson, S., Narten, T., and T. Jinmei, "IPv6 Stateless              Address Autoconfiguration",RFC 4862,              DOI 10.17487/RFC4862, September 2007,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4862>.   [RFC4941]  Narten, T., Draves, R., and S. Krishnan, "Privacy              Extensions for Stateless Address Autoconfiguration in              IPv6",RFC 4941, DOI 10.17487/RFC4941, September 2007,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4941>.   [RFC4944]  Montenegro, G., Kushalnagar, N., Hui, J., and D. Culler,              "Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IEEE 802.15.4              Networks",RFC 4944, DOI 10.17487/RFC4944, September 2007,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4944>.   [RFC5535]  Bagnulo, M., "Hash-Based Addresses (HBA)",RFC 5535,              DOI 10.17487/RFC5535, June 2009,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5535>.   [RFC6282]  Hui, J., Ed. and P. Thubert, "Compression Format for IPv6              Datagrams over IEEE 802.15.4-Based Networks",RFC 6282,              DOI 10.17487/RFC6282, September 2011,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6282>.   [RFC6775]  Shelby, Z., Ed., Chakrabarti, S., Nordmark, E., and C.              Bormann, "Neighbor Discovery Optimization for IPv6 over              Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPANs)",RFC 6775, DOI 10.17487/RFC6775, November 2012,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6775>.   [RFC7136]  Carpenter, B. and S. Jiang, "Significance of IPv6              Interface Identifiers",RFC 7136, DOI 10.17487/RFC7136,              February 2014, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7136>.   [RFC7217]  Gont, F., "A Method for Generating Semantically Opaque              Interface Identifiers with IPv6 Stateless Address              Autoconfiguration (SLAAC)",RFC 7217,              DOI 10.17487/RFC7217, April 2014,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7217>.Lynn, et al.                 Standards Track                   [Page 13]

RFC 8163                IPv6 over MS/TP (6LoBAC)                May 2017   [RFC7400]  Bormann, C., "6LoWPAN-GHC: Generic Header Compression for              IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Networks              (6LoWPANs)",RFC 7400, DOI 10.17487/RFC7400, November              2014, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7400>.13.2.  Informative References   [Addendum_an]              ANSI/ASHRAE, "Addenda: BACnet -- A Data Communication              Protocol for Building Automation and Control Networks",              ANSI/ASHRAE Addenda an, at, au, av, aw, ax, and az              to ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 135-2012, July 2014,              <https://www.ashrae.org/File%20Library/docLib/StdsAddenda/07-31-2014_135_2012_an_at_au_av_aw_ax_az_Final.pdf>.   [COBS]     Cheshire, S. and M. Baker, "Consistent Overhead Byte              Stuffing", IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Volume 7,              Issue 2, DOI 10.1109/90.769765, April 1999,              <http://www.stuartcheshire.org/papers/COBSforToN.pdf>.   [CRC32K]   Koopman, P., "32-Bit Cyclic Redundancy Codes for Internet              Applications", Proceedings of the International Conference              on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN 2002), June 2002,              <https://users.ece.cmu.edu/~koopman/networks/dsn02/dsn02_koopman.pdf>.   [IEEE.802.3]              IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Ethernet", IEEE 802.3-2015, DOI              10.1109/IEEESTD.2016.7428776,              <http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download/802.3-2015.zip>.   [RFC2469]  Narten, T. and C. Burton, "A Caution On The Canonical              Ordering Of Link-Layer Addresses",RFC 2469,              DOI 10.17487/RFC2469, December 1998,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2469>.   [RFC8065]  Thaler, D., "Privacy Considerations for IPv6 Adaptation-              Layer Mechanisms",RFC 8065, DOI 10.17487/RFC8065,              February 2017, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8065>.   [TIA-485-A]              TIA, "Electrical Characteristics of Generators and              Receivers for Use in Balanced Digital Multipoint Systems",              TIA-485-A (Revision of TIA-485), March 2003,              <https://global.ihs.com/doc_detail.cfm?item_s_key=00032964>.Lynn, et al.                 Standards Track                   [Page 14]

RFC 8163                IPv6 over MS/TP (6LoBAC)                May 2017Appendix A.  Abstract MAC Interface   This Appendix is informative and not part of the standard.   [BACnet], Clause 9 provides support for MAC-layer clients through its   SendFrame and ReceivedDataNoReply procedures.  However, it does not   define a network-protocol independent abstract interface for the MAC.   This is provided below as an aid to implementation.A.1.  MA-DATA.requestA.1.1.  Function   This primitive defines the transfer of data from a MAC client entity   to a single peer entity or multiple peer entities in the case of a   broadcast address.A.1.2.  Semantics of the Service Primitive   The semantics of the primitive are as follows:     MA-DATA.request (                      destination_address,                      source_address,                      data,                      type                     )   The 'destination_address' parameter may specify either an individual   or a broadcast MAC entity address.  It must contain sufficient   information to create the Destination Address field (seeSection 1.3)   that is prepended to the frame by the local MAC sublayer entity.  The   'source_address' parameter, if present, must specify an individual   MAC address.  If the source_address parameter is omitted, the local   MAC sublayer entity will insert a value associated with that entity.   The 'data' parameter specifies the MAC service data unit (MSDU) to be   transferred by the MAC sublayer entity.  There is sufficient   information associated with the MSDU for the MAC sublayer entity to   determine the length of the data unit.   The 'type' parameter specifies the value of the MS/TP Frame Type   field that is prepended to the frame by the local MAC sublayer   entity.Lynn, et al.                 Standards Track                   [Page 15]

RFC 8163                IPv6 over MS/TP (6LoBAC)                May 2017A.1.3.  When Generated   This primitive is generated by the MAC client entity whenever data   shall be transferred to a peer entity or entities.  This can be in   response to a request from higher protocol layers or from data   generated internally to the MAC client, such as a Token frame.A.1.4.  Effect on Receipt   Receipt of this primitive will cause the MAC entity to insert all   MAC-specific fields, including Destination Address, Source Address,   Frame Type, and any fields that are unique to the particular media   access method, and pass the properly formed frame to the lower   protocol layers for transfer to the peer MAC sublayer entity or   entities.A.2.  MA-DATA.indicationA.2.1.  Function   This primitive defines the transfer of data from the MAC sublayer   entity to the MAC client entity or entities in the case of a   broadcast address.A.2.2.  Semantics of the Service Primitive   The semantics of the primitive are as follows:     MA-DATA.indication (                         destination_address,                         source_address,                         data,                         type                        )   The 'destination_address' parameter may be either an individual or a   broadcast address as specified by the Destination Address field of   the incoming frame.  The 'source_address' parameter is an individual   address as specified by the Source Address field of the incoming   frame.   The 'data' parameter specifies the MAC service data unit (MSDU) as   received by the local MAC entity.  There is sufficient information   associated with the MSDU for the MAC sublayer client to determine the   length of the data unit.   The 'type' parameter is the value of the MS/TP Frame Type field of   the incoming frame.Lynn, et al.                 Standards Track                   [Page 16]

RFC 8163                IPv6 over MS/TP (6LoBAC)                May 2017A.2.3.  When Generated   The MA_DATA.indication is passed from the MAC sublayer entity to the   MAC client entity or entities to indicate the arrival of a frame to   the local MAC sublayer entity that is destined for the MAC client.   Such frames are reported only if they are validly formed and received   without error, and their Destination Address designates the local MAC   entity.  Frames destined for the MAC Control sublayer are not passed   to the MAC client.A.2.4.  Effect on Receipt   The effect of receipt of this primitive by the MAC client is   unspecified.Appendix B.  Consistent Overhead Byte Stuffing (COBS)   This Appendix is informative and not part of the standard.   [BACnet], Clause 9 corrects a long-standing issue with the MS/TP   specification, namely that preamble sequences were not escaped   whenever they appeared in the Data or Data CRC fields.  In rare   cases, this resulted in dropped frames due to loss-of-frame   synchronization.  The solution is to encode the Data and 32-bit Data   CRC fields before transmission using Consistent Overhead Byte   Stuffing [COBS] and decode these fields upon reception.   COBS is a run-length encoding method that nominally removes '0x00'   octets from its input.  Any selected octet value may be removed by   XOR'ing that value with each octet of the COBS output.  [BACnet],   Clause 9 specifies the preamble octet '0x55' for removal.   The minimum overhead of COBS is one octet per encoded field.  The   worst-case overhead in long fields is bounded to one octet per 254 as   described in [COBS].   Frame encoding proceeds logically in two passes.  The Encoded Data   field is prepared by passing the MSDU through the COBS encoder and   XOR'ing the preamble octet '0x55' with each octet of the output.  The   Encoded CRC-32K field is then prepared by calculating a CRC-32K over   the Encoded Data field and formatting it for transmission as   described inAppendix C.  The combined length of these fields, minus   two octets for compatibility with legacy MS/TP devices, is placed in   the MS/TP header Length field before transmission.   Example COBS encoder and decoder functions are shown below for   illustration.  Complete examples of use and test vectors are provided   in [BACnet], Annex T.Lynn, et al.                 Standards Track                   [Page 17]

RFC 8163                IPv6 over MS/TP (6LoBAC)                May 2017   <CODE BEGINS>   #include <stddef.h>   #include <stdint.h>   /*    * Encodes 'length' octets of data located at 'from' and    * writes one or more COBS code blocks at 'to', removing any    * 'mask' octets that may be present in the encoded data.    * Returns the length of the encoded data.    */   size_t   cobs_encode (uint8_t *to, const uint8_t *from, size_t length,                uint8_t mask)   {     size_t code_index = 0;     size_t read_index = 0;     size_t write_index = 1;     uint8_t code = 1;     uint8_t data, last_code;     while (read_index < length) {       data = from[read_index++];       /*        * In the case of encountering a non-zero octet in the data,        * simply copy input to output and increment the code octet.        */       if (data != 0) {         to[write_index++] = data ^ mask;         code++;         if (code != 255)           continue;       }       /*        * In the case of encountering a zero in the data or having        * copied the maximum number (254) of non-zero octets, store        * the code octet and reset the encoder state variables.        */       last_code = code;       to[code_index] = code ^ mask;       code_index = write_index++;       code = 1;     }     /*      * If the last chunk contains exactly 254 non-zero octets, then      * this exception is handled above (and the returned length must      * be adjusted). Otherwise, encode the last chunk normally, as ifLynn, et al.                 Standards Track                   [Page 18]

RFC 8163                IPv6 over MS/TP (6LoBAC)                May 2017      * a "phantom zero" is appended to the data.      */     if ((last_code == 255) && (code == 1))       write_index--;     else       to[code_index] = code ^ mask;     return write_index;   }   #include <stddef.h>   #include <stdint.h>   /*    * Decodes 'length' octets of data located at 'from' and    * writes the original client data at 'to', restoring any    * 'mask' octets that may present in the encoded data.    * Returns the length of the encoded data or zero if error.    */   size_t   cobs_decode (uint8_t *to, const uint8_t *from, size_t length,                uint8_t mask)   {     size_t read_index = 0;     size_t write_index = 0;     uint8_t code, last_code;     while (read_index < length) {       code = from[read_index] ^ mask;       last_code = code;       /*        * Sanity check the encoding to prevent the while() loop below        * from overrunning the output buffer.        */       if (read_index + code > length)         return 0;       read_index++;       while (--code > 0)         to[write_index++] = from[read_index++] ^ mask;       /*        * Restore the implicit zero at the end of each decoded block        * except when it contains exactly 254 non-zero octets or the        * end of data has been reached.        */       if ((last_code != 255) && (read_index < length))         to[write_index++] = 0;Lynn, et al.                 Standards Track                   [Page 19]

RFC 8163                IPv6 over MS/TP (6LoBAC)                May 2017     }     return write_index;   }   <CODE ENDS>Appendix C.  Encoded CRC-32K (CRC32K)   This Appendix is informative and not part of the standard.   Extending the payload of MS/TP to 1500 octets requires upgrading the   Data CRC from 16 bits to 32 bits.  P. Koopman has authored several   papers on evaluating CRC polynomials for network applications.  In   [CRC32K], he surveyed the entire 32-bit polynomial space and noted   some that exceed the [IEEE.802.3] polynomial in performance.   [BACnet], Clause 9 specifies one of these, the CRC-32K (Koopman)   polynomial.   The specified use of the calc_crc32K() function is as follows.   Before a frame is transmitted, 'crc_value' is initialized to all   ones.  After passing each octet of the [COBS] Encoded Data field   through the function, the ones complement of the resulting   'crc_value' is arranged in LSB-first order and is itself [COBS]   encoded.  The length of the resulting Encoded CRC-32K field is always   five octets.   Upon reception of a frame, 'crc_value' is initialized to all ones.   The octets of the Encoded Data field are accumulated by the   calc_crc32K() function before decoding.  The Encoded CRC-32K field is   then decoded and the resulting four octets are accumulated by the   calc_crc32K() function.  If the result is the expected residue value   'CRC32K_RESIDUE', then the frame was received correctly.   An example CRC-32K function is shown below for illustration.   Complete examples of use and test vectors are provided in [BACnet],   Annex G.3.Lynn, et al.                 Standards Track                   [Page 20]

RFC 8163                IPv6 over MS/TP (6LoBAC)                May 2017   <CODE BEGINS>   #include <stdint.h>   /* See ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 135-2016 [BACnet], Section G.3.2 */   #define CRC32K_INITIAL_VALUE (0xFFFFFFFF)   #define CRC32K_RESIDUE (0x0843323B)   /* CRC-32K polynomial, 1 + x**1 + ... + x**30 (+ x**32) */   #define CRC32K_POLY (0xEB31D82E)   /*    * Accumulate 'data_value' into the CRC in 'crc_value'.    * Return updated CRC.    *    * Note: crc_value must be set to CRC32K_INITIAL_VALUE    * before initial call.    */   uint32_t   calc_crc32K (uint8_t data_value, uint32_t crc_value)   {     int b;     for (b = 0; b < 8; b++) {       if ((data_value & 1) ^ (crc_value & 1)) {         crc_value >>= 1;         crc_value ^= CRC32K_POLY;       } else {         crc_value >>= 1;       }       data_value >>= 1;     }     return crc_value;   }   <CODE ENDS>Lynn, et al.                 Standards Track                   [Page 21]

RFC 8163                IPv6 over MS/TP (6LoBAC)                May 2017Appendix D.  Example 6LoBAC Frame Decode   This Appendix is informative and not part of the standard.   BACnet MS/TP, Src (2), Dst (1), IPv6 Encapsulation       Preamble 55: 0x55       Preamble FF: 0xff       Frame Type: IPv6 Encapsulation (34)       Destination Address: 1       Source Address: 2       Length: 537       Header CRC: 0x1c [correct]       Extended Data CRC: 0x9e7259e2 [correct]   6LoWPAN       IPHC Header           011. .... = Pattern: IP header compression (0x03)           ...1 1... .... .... = Traffic class and flow label:                                 Version, traffic class, and flow label                                 compressed (0x0003)           .... .0.. .... .... = Next header: Inline           .... ..00 .... .... = Hop limit: Inline (0x0000)           .... .... 1... .... = Context identifier extension: True           .... .... .1.. .... = Source address compression: Stateful           .... .... ..01 .... = Source address mode:                                 64-bits inline (0x0001)           .... .... .... 0... = Multicast address compression: False           .... .... .... .1.. = Destination address compression:                                 Stateful           .... .... .... ..10 = Destination address mode:                                 16-bits inline (0x0002)0000 .... = Source context identifier: 0x00           .... 0000 = Destination context identifier: 0x00           [Source context: aaaa:: (aaaa::)]           [Destination context: aaaa:: (aaaa::)]       Next header: ICMPv6 (0x3a)       Hop limit: 63       Source: aaaa::1 (aaaa::1)       Destination: aaaa::ff:fe00:1 (aaaa::ff:fe00:1)Lynn, et al.                 Standards Track                   [Page 22]

RFC 8163                IPv6 over MS/TP (6LoBAC)                May 2017   Internet Protocol Version 6, Src: aaaa::1 (aaaa::1),                                Dst: aaaa::ff:fe00:1 (aaaa::ff:fe00:1)       0110 .... .... .... .... .... .... .... = Version: 6       .... 0000 0000 .... .... .... .... .... = Traffic class:                                                 0x00000000       .... 0000 00.. .... .... .... .... .... = Differentiated                                                 Services Field:                                                 Default (0x00000000)       .... .... ..0. .... .... .... .... .... = ECN-Capable Transport                                                 (ECT): Not set       .... .... ...0 .... .... .... .... .... = ECN-CE: Not set       .... .... .... 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 = Flowlabel: 0x00000000       Payload length: 518       Next header: ICMPv6 (58)       Hop limit: 63       Source: aaaa::1 (aaaa::1)       Destination: aaaa::ff:fe00:1 (aaaa::ff:fe00:1)   Internet Control Message Protocol v6       Type: Echo (ping) request (128)       Code: 0       Checksum: 0x783f [correct]       Identifier: 0x2ee5       Sequence: 2       [Response In: 5165]       Data (510 bytes)           Data: e4dbe8553ba0040008090a0b0c0d0e0f1011121314151617...           [Length: 510]Lynn, et al.                 Standards Track                   [Page 23]

RFC 8163                IPv6 over MS/TP (6LoBAC)                May 2017   Frame (547 bytes):   55 ff 22 01 02 02 19 1c 56 2d 83 56 6f 6a 54 54   U.".....V-.VojTT   54 54 54 54 57 54 56 54 d5 50 2d 6a 7b b0 5c 57   TTTTWTVT.P-j{.\W   b1 8e bd 00 6e f5 51 ac 5d 5c 5f 5e 59 58 5b 5a   ....n.Q.]\_^YX[Z   45 44 47 46 41 40 43 42 4d 4c 4f 4e 49 48 4b 4a   EDGFA@CBMLONIHKJ   75 74 77 76 71 70 73 72 7d 7c 7f 7e 79 78 7b 7a   utwvqpsr}|.~yx{z   65 64 67 66 61 60 63 62 6d 6c 6f 6e 69 68 6b 6a   edgfa`cbmlonihkj   15 14 17 16 11 10 13 12 1d 1c 1f 1e 19 18 1b 1a   ................   05 04 07 06 01 00 03 02 0d 0c 0f 0e 09 08 0b 0a   ................   35 34 37 36 31 30 33 32 3d 3c 3f 3e 39 38 3b 3a   54761032=<?>98;:   25 24 27 26 21 20 23 22 2d 2c 2f 2e 29 28 2b 2a   %$'&! #"-,/.)(+*   d5 d4 d7 d6 d1 d0 d3 d2 dd dc df de d9 d8 db da   ................   c5 c4 c7 c6 c1 c0 c3 c2 cd cc cf ce c9 c8 cb ca   ................   f5 f4 f7 f6 f1 f0 f3 f2 fd fc ff fe f9 f8 fb fa   ................   e5 e4 e7 e6 e1 e0 e3 e2 ed ec ef ee e9 e8 eb ea   ................   95 94 97 96 91 90 93 92 9d 9c 9f 9e 99 98 9b 9a   ................   85 84 87 86 81 80 83 82 8d 8c 8f 8e 89 88 8b 8a   ................   b5 b4 b7 b6 b1 b0 b3 b2 bd bc bf be b9 b8 bb ba   ................   a5 a4 a7 a6 a1 a0 a3 a2 ad ac af ae a9 a8 ab aa   ................   ab 54 57 56 51 50 53 52 5d 5c 5f 5e 59 58 5b 5a   .TWVQPSR]\_^YX[Z   45 44 47 46 41 40 43 42 4d 4c 4f 4e 49 48 4b 4a   EDGFA@CBMLONIHKJ   75 74 77 76 71 70 73 72 7d 7c 7f 7e 79 78 7b 7a   utwvqpsr}|.~yx{z   65 64 67 66 61 60 63 62 6d 6c 6f 6e 69 68 6b 6a   edgfa`cbmlonihkj   15 14 17 16 11 10 13 12 1d 1c 1f 1e 19 18 1b 1a   ................   05 04 07 06 01 00 03 02 0d 0c 0f 0e 09 08 0b 0a   ................   35 34 37 36 31 30 33 32 3d 3c 3f 3e 39 38 3b 3a   54761032=<?>98;:   25 24 27 26 21 20 23 22 2d 2c 2f 2e 29 28 2b 2a   %$'&! #"-,/.)(+*   d5 d4 d7 d6 d1 d0 d3 d2 dd dc df de d9 d8 db da   ................   c5 c4 c7 c6 c1 c0 c3 c2 cd cc cf ce c9 c8 cb ca   ................   f5 f4 f7 f6 f1 f0 f3 f2 fd fc ff fe f9 f8 fb fa   ................   e5 e4 e7 e6 e1 e0 e3 e2 ed ec ef ee e9 e8 eb ea   ................   95 94 97 96 91 90 93 92 9d 9c 9f 9e 99 98 9b 9a   ................   85 84 87 86 81 80 83 82 8d 8c 8f 8e 89 88 8b 8a   ................   b5 b4 b7 b6 b1 b0 b3 b2 bd bc bf be b9 b8 bb ba   ................   a5 a4 a7 a6 a1 a0 a3 a2 ad ac af ae a9 a8 50 cb   ..............P.   27 0c b7                                          '..Lynn, et al.                 Standards Track                   [Page 24]

RFC 8163                IPv6 over MS/TP (6LoBAC)                May 2017   Decoded Data and CRC32K (537 bytes):   78 d6 00 3a 3f 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 01 80   x..:?...........   00 78 3f 2e e5 00 02 e4 db e8 55 3b a0 04 00 08   .x?.......U;....   09 0a 0b 0c 0d 0e 0f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18   ................   19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28   ....... !"#$%&'(   29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38   )*+,-./012345678   39 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48   9:;<=>?@ABCDEFGH   49 4a 4b 4c 4d 4e 4f 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58   IJKLMNOPQRSTUVWX   59 5a 5b 5c 5d 5e 5f 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68   YZ[\]^_`abcdefgh   69 6a 6b 6c 6d 6e 6f 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78   ijklmnopqrstuvwx   79 7a 7b 7c 7d 7e 7f 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88   yz{|}~..........   89 8a 8b 8c 8d 8e 8f 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98   ................   99 9a 9b 9c 9d 9e 9f a0 a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 a7 a8   ................   a9 aa ab ac ad ae af b0 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 b7 b8   ................   b9 ba bb bc bd be bf c0 c1 c2 c3 c4 c5 c6 c7 c8   ................   c9 ca cb cc cd ce cf d0 d1 d2 d3 d4 d5 d6 d7 d8   ................   d9 da db dc dd de df e0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5 e6 e7 e8   ................   e9 ea eb ec ed ee ef f0 f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 f6 f7 f8   ................   f9 fa fb fc fd fe ff 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08   ................   09 0a 0b 0c 0d 0e 0f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18   ................   19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28   ....... !"#$%&'(   29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38   )*+,-./012345678   39 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48   9:;<=>?@ABCDEFGH   49 4a 4b 4c 4d 4e 4f 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58   IJKLMNOPQRSTUVWX   59 5a 5b 5c 5d 5e 5f 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68   YZ[\]^_`abcdefgh   69 6a 6b 6c 6d 6e 6f 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78   ijklmnopqrstuvwx   79 7a 7b 7c 7d 7e 7f 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88   yz{|}~..........   89 8a 8b 8c 8d 8e 8f 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98   ................   99 9a 9b 9c 9d 9e 9f a0 a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 a7 a8   ................   a9 aa ab ac ad ae af b0 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 b7 b8   ................   b9 ba bb bc bd be bf c0 c1 c2 c3 c4 c5 c6 c7 c8   ................   c9 ca cb cc cd ce cf d0 d1 d2 d3 d4 d5 d6 d7 d8   ................   d9 da db dc dd de df e0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5 e6 e7 e8   ................   e9 ea eb ec ed ee ef f0 f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 f6 f7 f8   ................   f9 fa fb fc fd 9e 72 59 e2                        ......rY.Lynn, et al.                 Standards Track                   [Page 25]

RFC 8163                IPv6 over MS/TP (6LoBAC)                May 2017   Decompressed 6LoWPAN IPHC (558 bytes):   60 00 00 00 02 06 3a 3f aa aa 00 00 00 00 00 00   `.....:?........   00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 aa aa 00 00 00 00 00 00   ................   00 00 00 ff fe 00 00 01 80 00 78 3f 2e e5 00 02   ..........x?....   e4 db e8 55 3b a0 04 00 08 09 0a 0b 0c 0d 0e 0f   ...U;...........   10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f   ................   20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f    !"#$%&'()*+,-./   30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f   0123456789:;<=>?   40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 4a 4b 4c 4d 4e 4f   @ABCDEFGHIJKLMNO   50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 5a 5b 5c 5d 5e 5f   PQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_   60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 6a 6b 6c 6d 6e 6f   `abcdefghijklmno   70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 7a 7b 7c 7d 7e 7f   pqrstuvwxyz{|}~.   80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 8a 8b 8c 8d 8e 8f   ................   90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 9a 9b 9c 9d 9e 9f   ................   a0 a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 a7 a8 a9 aa ab ac ad ae af   ................   b0 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 b7 b8 b9 ba bb bc bd be bf   ................   c0 c1 c2 c3 c4 c5 c6 c7 c8 c9 ca cb cc cd ce cf   ................   d0 d1 d2 d3 d4 d5 d6 d7 d8 d9 da db dc dd de df   ................   e0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5 e6 e7 e8 e9 ea eb ec ed ee ef   ................   f0 f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 f6 f7 f8 f9 fa fb fc fd fe ff   ................   00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0a 0b 0c 0d 0e 0f   ................   10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f   ................   20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f    !"#$%&'()*+,-./   30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f   0123456789:;<=>?   40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 4a 4b 4c 4d 4e 4f   @ABCDEFGHIJKLMNO   50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 5a 5b 5c 5d 5e 5f   PQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_   60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 6a 6b 6c 6d 6e 6f   `abcdefghijklmno   70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 7a 7b 7c 7d 7e 7f   pqrstuvwxyz{|}~.   80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 8a 8b 8c 8d 8e 8f   ................   90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 9a 9b 9c 9d 9e 9f   ................   a0 a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 a7 a8 a9 aa ab ac ad ae af   ................   b0 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 b7 b8 b9 ba bb bc bd be bf   ................   c0 c1 c2 c3 c4 c5 c6 c7 c8 c9 ca cb cc cd ce cf   ................   d0 d1 d2 d3 d4 d5 d6 d7 d8 d9 da db dc dd de df   ................   e0 e1 e2 e3 e4 e5 e6 e7 e8 e9 ea eb ec ed ee ef   ................   f0 f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 f6 f7 f8 f9 fa fb fc fd         ..............Lynn, et al.                 Standards Track                   [Page 26]

RFC 8163                IPv6 over MS/TP (6LoBAC)                May 2017Acknowledgements   We are grateful to the authors of [RFC4944] and members of the IETF   6LoWPAN working group; this document borrows liberally from their   work.  Ralph Droms and Brian Haberman provided indispensable guidance   and support from the outset.  Peter van der Stok, James Woodyatt,   Carsten Bormann, and Dale Worley provided detailed reviews.  Stuart   Cheshire invented the very clever COBS encoding.  Michael Osborne   made the critical observation that encoding the data and CRC32K   fields separately would allow the CRC to be calculated on the fly.   Alexandru Petrescu, Brian Frank, Geoff Mulligan, and Don Sturek   offered valuable comments.Authors' Addresses   Kerry Lynn (editor)   Verizon Labs   50 Sylvan Rd   Waltham, MA  02451   United States of America   Phone: +1 781 296 9722   Email: kerlyn@ieee.org   Jerry Martocci   Johnson Controls, Inc.   507 E. Michigan St   Milwaukee, WI  53202   United States of America   Email: jpmartocci@sbcglobal.net   Carl Neilson   Delta Controls, Inc.   17850 56th Ave   Surrey, BC  V3S 1C7   Canada   Phone: +1 604 575 5913   Email: cneilson@deltacontrols.com   Stuart Donaldson   Honeywell Automation & Control Solutions   6670 185th Ave NE   Redmond, WA  98052   United States of America   Email: stuart.donaldson@honeywell.comLynn, et al.                 Standards Track                   [Page 27]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp