Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]

INFORMATIONAL
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                          E. WildeRequest for Comments: 8091                               CA TechnologiesCategory: Informational                                    February 2017ISSN: 2070-1721A Media Type Structured Syntax Suffix for JSON Text SequencesAbstract   Structured syntax suffixes for media types allow other media types to   build on them and make it explicit that they are built on an existing   media type as their foundation.  This specification defines and   registers "+json-seq" as a structured syntax suffix for JSON text   sequences.Status of This Memo   This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is   published for informational purposes.   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has   received public review and has been approved for publication by the   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Not all documents   approved by the IESG are a candidate for any level of Internet   Standard; seeSection 2 of RFC 7841.   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained athttp://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8091.Copyright Notice   Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the   document authors.  All rights reserved.   This document is subject toBCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of   publication of this document.  Please review these documents   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as   described in the Simplified BSD License.Wilde                         Informational                     [Page 1]

RFC 8091      JSON Text Sequences Structured Syntax Suffix February 2017Table of Contents1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22.  Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .23.  The "+json-seq" Structured Syntax Suffix  . . . . . . . . . .24.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .35.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .46.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .46.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .46.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5   Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .51.  Introduction   Media type structured syntax suffixes [RFC6838] were introduced as a   way for a media type to signal that it is based on another media type   as its foundation.  Some structured syntax suffixes were registered   initially [RFC6839], including "+json", for the widely popular JSON   format [RFC7159].   JSON text sequences [RFC7464] is a recent specification in the JSON   space that defines how a sequence of multiple JSON texts can be   represented in one representation.  This document defines and   registers the "+json-seq" structured syntax suffix in the "Structured   Syntax Suffix Registry".2.  Terminology   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].3.  The "+json-seq" Structured Syntax Suffix   The use case for the "+json-seq" structured syntax suffix is the same   as for "+json": It SHOULD be used by media types when parsing the   JSON text sequence of a media type leads to a meaningful result, by   simply using the generic JSON text sequence processing.   Applications encountering such a media type can then either simply   use generic processing if all they need is a generic view of the JSON   text sequence, or they can use generic JSON text sequence tools for   initial parsing and then implement their own specific processing on   top of that generic parsing tool.Wilde                         Informational                     [Page 2]

RFC 8091      JSON Text Sequences Structured Syntax Suffix February 20174.  IANA Considerations   Structured Syntax Suffixes are registered within the "Structured   Syntax Suffix Registry" maintained at   <https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-type-structured-suffix>.   IANA has registered the "+json-seq" structured syntax suffix in   accordance with [RFC6838].      Name: JSON Text Sequence      +suffix: +json-seq      References: [RFC7464],RFC 8091      Encoding considerations: See[RFC7464] Section 2.2      Fragment identifier considerations: The syntax and semantics of      fragment identifiers specified for +json-seq SHOULD be as      specified for "application/json-seq".  (At publication of this      document, there is no fragment identification syntax defined for      "application/json-seq".)         The syntax and semantics for fragment identifiers for a         specific "xxx/yyy+json-seq" SHOULD be processed as follows:            For cases defined in +json-seq, where the fragment            identifier resolves per the +json-seq rules, then process as            specified in +json-seq.            For cases defined in +json-seq, where the fragment            identifier does not resolve per the +json-seq rules, then            process as specified in "xxx/yyy+json-seq".            For cases not defined in +json-seq, then process as            specified in "xxx/yyy+json-seq".      Interoperability considerations: n/a      Security considerations: See[RFC7464] Section 3      Contact: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion      (art@ietf.org), or any IESG-designated successor.      Author/Change controller: The Applications and Real-Time Area      Working Group.  IESG has change control over this registration.Wilde                         Informational                     [Page 3]

RFC 8091      JSON Text Sequences Structured Syntax Suffix February 20175.  Security Considerations   All the security considerations of JSON text sequences [RFC7464]   apply.  They are as follows:   All the security considerations of JSON [RFC7159] apply.  This format   provides no cryptographic integrity protection of any kind.   As usual, parsers must operate on input that is assumed to be   untrusted.  This means that parsers must fail gracefully in the face   of malicious inputs.   Note that incremental JSON text parsers can produce partial results   and later indicate failure to parse the remainder of a text.  A   sequence parser that uses an incremental JSON text parser might treat   a sequence like '<RS>"foo"<LF>456<LF><RS>' as a sequence of one   element ("foo"), while a sequence parser that uses a non-incremental   JSON text parser might treat the same sequence as being empty.  This   effect, and texts that fail to parse and are ignored, can be used to   smuggle data past sequence parsers that don't warn about JSON text   failures.   Repeated parsing and re-encoding of a JSON text sequence can result   in the addition (or stripping) of trailing LF bytes from (to)   individual sequence element JSON texts.  This can break signature   validation.  JSON has no canonical form for JSON texts, therefore   neither does the JSON text sequence format.6.  References6.1.  Normative References   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate              Requirement Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119,              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.   [RFC6838]  Freed, N., Klensin, J., and T. Hansen, "Media Type              Specifications and Registration Procedures",BCP 13,RFC 6838, DOI 10.17487/RFC6838, January 2013,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6838>.   [RFC7464]  Williams, N., "JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Text              Sequences",RFC 7464, DOI 10.17487/RFC7464, February 2015,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7464>.Wilde                         Informational                     [Page 4]

RFC 8091      JSON Text Sequences Structured Syntax Suffix February 20176.2.  Informative References   [RFC6839]  Hansen, T. and A. Melnikov, "Additional Media Type              Structured Syntax Suffixes",RFC 6839,              DOI 10.17487/RFC6839, January 2013,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6839>.   [RFC7159]  Bray, T., Ed., "The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data              Interchange Format",RFC 7159, DOI 10.17487/RFC7159, March              2014, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7159>.Acknowledgements   Thanks for comments and suggestions provided by Ben Campbell, Allan   Doyle, Warren Kumari, Sean Leonard, Alexey Melnikov, Brian Raymor,   and Peter Yee.Author's Address   Erik Wilde   CA Technologies   Email: erik.wilde@dret.net   URI:http://dret.net/netdret/Wilde                         Informational                     [Page 5]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp