Movatterモバイル変換
[0]ホーム
[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]
PROPOSED STANDARD
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) J. LentiniRequest for Comments: 7532 NetAppCategory: Standards Track R. TewariISSN: 2070-1721 IBM Almaden C. Lever, Ed. Oracle Corporation March 2015Namespace Database (NSDB) Protocol for Federated File SystemsAbstract This document describes a file system federation protocol that enables file access and namespace traversal across collections of independently administered fileservers. The protocol specifies a set of interfaces by which fileservers with different administrators can form a fileserver federation that provides a namespace composed of the file systems physically hosted on and exported by the constituent fileservers.Status of This Memo This is an Internet Standards Track document. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available inSection 2 of RFC 5741. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained athttp://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7532.Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject toBCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF Contributions published or made publicly available before November 10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process. Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other than English.Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015Table of Contents1. Introduction ....................................................41.1. Requirements Language ......................................52. Overview of Features and Concepts ...............................52.1. File-Access Protocol .......................................52.2. File-Access Client .........................................52.3. Fileserver .................................................52.4. Referral ...................................................52.5. Namespace ..................................................62.6. Fileset ....................................................62.7. Fileset Name (FSN) .........................................62.8. Fileset Location (FSL) .....................................72.8.1. The NFS URI Scheme ..................................82.8.2. Mutual Consistency across Fileset Locations ........102.8.3. Caching of Fileset Locations .......................112.8.4. Generating a Referral from Fileset Locations .......122.9. Namespace Database (NSDB) .................................132.9.1. NSDB Client ........................................142.10. Junctions and Referrals ..................................142.11. Unified Namespace and the Root Fileset ...................152.12. UUID Considerations ......................................153. Examples .......................................................163.1. Creating a Fileset and Its FSL(s) .........................163.1.1. Creating a Fileset and an FSN ......................173.1.2. Adding a Replica of a Fileset ......................173.2. Junction Resolution .......................................173.3. Example Use Cases for Fileset Annotations .................184. NSDB Configuration and Schema ..................................194.1. LDAP Configuration ........................................194.2. LDAP Schema ...............................................214.2.1. LDAP Attributes ....................................234.2.2. LDAP Object Classes ................................385. NSDB Operations ................................................425.1. NSDB Operations for Administrators ........................435.1.1. Create an FSN ......................................435.1.2. Delete an FSN ......................................445.1.3. Create an FSL ......................................445.1.4. Delete an FSL ......................................475.1.5. Update an FSL ......................................485.2. NSDB Operations for Fileservers ...........................495.2.1. NSDB Container Entry (NCE) Enumeration .............495.2.2. Lookup FSLs for an FSN .............................495.3. NSDB Operations and LDAP Referrals ........................506. Security Considerations ........................................517. IANA Considerations ............................................527.1. Registry for the fedfsAnnotation Key Namespace ............527.2. Registry for FedFS Object Identifiers .....................52Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 20157.3. LDAP Descriptor Registration ..............................558. Glossary .......................................................589. References .....................................................609.1. Normative References ......................................609.2. Informative References ....................................62 Acknowledgments ...................................................64 Authors' Addresses ................................................651. Introduction A federated file system enables file access and namespace traversal in a uniform, secure, and consistent manner across multiple independent fileservers within an enterprise or across multiple enterprises. This document specifies a set of protocols that allow fileservers, possibly from different vendors and with different administrators, to cooperatively form a federation containing one or more federated file systems. Each federated file system's namespace is composed of the file systems physically hosted on and exported by the federation's fileservers. A federation comprises a common namespace across all its fileservers. A federation can project multiple namespaces and enable clients to traverse each one. A federation can contain an arbitrary number of namespace repositories, each belonging to a different administrative entity and each rendering a part of the namespace. A federation might also have an arbitrary number of administrative entities responsible for administering disjoint subsets of the fileservers. Traditionally, building a namespace that spans multiple fileservers has been difficult for two reasons. First, the fileservers that export pieces of the namespace are often not in the same administrative domain. Second, there is no standard mechanism for the fileservers to cooperatively present the namespace. Fileservers may provide proprietary management tools, and in some cases, an administrator may be able to use the proprietary tools to build a shared namespace out of the exported file systems. However, relying on vendor-specific proprietary tools does not work in larger enterprises or when collaborating across enterprises because the fileservers are likely to be from multiple vendors or use different software versions, each with their own namespace protocols, with no common mechanism to manage the namespace or exchange namespace information.Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 The federated file system protocols in this document define how to construct a namespace accessible by a Network File System (NFS) version 4.0 [RFC7530], NFSv4.1 [RFC5661], or newer client and have been designed to accommodate other file-access protocols in the future. The requirements for federated file systems are described in [RFC5716]. A protocol for administering a fileserver's namespace is described in [RFC7533]. The mechanism for discovering the root of a federated namespace is described in [RFC6641]. In the rest of the document, the term "fileserver" denotes a fileserver that is part of a federation.1.1. Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].2. Overview of Features and Concepts2.1. File-Access Protocol A file-access protocol is a network protocol for accessing data. The NFSv4.0 protocol [RFC7530] is an example of a file-access protocol.2.2. File-Access Client File-access clients are standard, off-the-shelf network-attached storage (NAS) clients that communicate with fileservers using a standard file-access protocol.2.3. Fileserver Fileservers are servers that store physical fileset data or refer file-access clients to other fileservers. A fileserver provides access to its shared file system data via a file-access protocol. A fileserver may be implemented in a number of different ways, including a single system, a cluster of systems, or some other configuration.2.4. Referral A referral is a mechanism by which a fileserver redirects a file- access client to a different fileserver or export. The exact information contained in a referral varies from one file-access protocol to another. The NFSv4.0 protocol, for example, defines theLentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 fs_locations attribute for returning referral information to NFSv4.0 clients. The NFSv4.1 protocol introduces the fs_locations_info attribute that can return richer referral information to its clients. NFSv4.1 fileservers may use either attribute during a referral. Both attributes are defined in [RFC5661].2.5. Namespace The goal of a unified namespace is to make all managed data available to any file-access client via the same path in a common file system namespace. This should be achieved with minimal or zero configuration on file-access clients. In particular, updates to the common namespace should not require configuration changes to any file-access client. Filesets, which are the units of data management, are a set of files and directories. From the perspective of file-access clients, the common namespace is constructed by mounting filesets that are physically located on different fileservers. The namespace, which is defined in terms of fileset names and locations, is stored in a set of namespace repositories, each managed by an administrative entity. The namespace schema defines the model used for populating, modifying, and querying the namespace repositories. It is not required by the federation that the namespace be common across all fileservers. It should be possible to have several independently rooted namespaces.2.6. Fileset A fileset is loosely defined as a set of files and the directory tree that contains them. The fileset abstraction is the basic unit of data management. Depending on the configuration, a fileset may be anything from an individual directory of an exported file system to an entire exported file system on a fileserver.2.7. Fileset Name (FSN) A fileset is uniquely represented by its fileset name (FSN). An FSN is considered unique across a federation. After an FSN is created, it is associated with one or more fileset locations (FSLs) on one or more fileservers.Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 An FSN consists of: NsdbName: the network location of the Namespace Database (NSDB) node that contains authoritative information for this FSN. FsnUuid: a UUID (universally unique identifier), conforming to [RFC4122], that is used to uniquely identify an FSN. FsnTTL: the time-to-live of the FSN's FSL information, in seconds. Fileservers MUST NOT use cached FSL records after the parent FSN's FsnTTL has expired. An FsnTTL value of zero indicates that fileservers MUST NOT cache the results of resolving this FSN. The NsdbName is not physically stored as an attribute of the record. The NsdbName is obvious to any client that accesses an NSDB and is indeed authenticated in cases where Transport Layer Security (TLS) is in effect. The FsnUuid and NsdbName values never change during an FSN's lifetime. However, an FSN's FSL information can change over time and is typically cached on fileservers for performance. More detail on FSL caching is provided inSection 2.8.3. An FSN record may also contain: Annotations: name/value pairs that can be interpreted by a fileserver. The semantics of this field are not defined by this document. These tuples are intended to be used by higher- level protocols. Descriptions: text descriptions. The semantics of this field are not defined by this document.2.8. Fileset Location (FSL) An FSL describes one physical location where a complete copy of the fileset's data resides. An FSL contains generic and type-specific information that together describe how to access the fileset data at this location. An FSL's attributes can be used by a fileserver to decide which locations it will return to a file-access client.Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 An FSL consists of: FslUuid: a UUID, conforming to [RFC4122], that is used to uniquely identify an FSL. FsnUuid: the UUID of the FSL's FSN. NsdbName: the network location of the NSDB node that contains authoritative information for this FSL. The NsdbName is not stored as an attribute of an FSL record for the same reason it is not stored in FSN records. An FSL record may also contain: Annotations: name/value pairs that can be interpreted by a fileserver. The semantics of this field are not defined by this document. These tuples are intended to be used by higher- level protocols. Descriptions: text descriptions. The semantics of this field are not defined by this document. In addition to the attributes defined above, an FSL record contains attributes that allow a fileserver to construct referrals. For each file-access protocol, a corresponding FSL record subtype is defined. This document defines an FSL subtype for NFS. An NFS FSL contains information suitable for use in one of the NFSv4 referral attributes (e.g., fs_locations or fs_locations_info, described in [RFC5661]).Section 4.2.2.4 describes the contents of an NFS FSL record. A fileset may also be accessible by file-access protocols other than NFS. The contents and format of such FSL subtypes are not defined in this document.2.8.1. The NFS URI Scheme To capture the location of an NFSv4 fileset, we extend the NFS URL scheme specified in [RFC2224]. This extension follows rules for defining Uniform Resource Identifier schemes (see [RFC3986]). In the following text, we refer to this extended NFS URL scheme as an NFS URI. An NFS URI MUST contain both an authority and a path component. It MUST NOT contain a query component or a fragment component. Use of the familiar "nfs" scheme name is retained.Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 20152.8.1.1. The NFS URI Authority Component The rules for encoding the authority component of a generic URI are specified insection 3.2 of [RFC3986]. The authority component of an NFS URI MUST contain the host subcomponent. For globally scoped NFS URIs, a hostname used in such URIs SHOULD be a fully qualified domain name. Seesection 3.2.2 of [RFC3986] for rules on encoding non-ASCII characters in hostnames. An NFS URI MAY contain a port subcomponent as described insection3.2.3 of [RFC3986]. If this subcomponent is missing, a port value of 2049 is assumed, as specified in[RFC7530], Section 3.1.2.8.1.2. The NFS URI Path Component The rules for encoding the path component of a generic URI are specified inSection 3.3 of [RFC3986]. According to Sections5 and6 of [RFC2224], NFS URLs specify a pathname relative to an NFS fileserver's public filehandle. However, NFSv4 fileservers do not expose a public filehandle. Instead, NFSv4 pathnames contained in an NFS URI are evaluated relative to the pseudoroot of the fileserver identified in the URI's authority component. Each component of an NFSv4 pathname is represented as a component4 string (seeSection 3.2, "Basic Data Types", of [RFC5661]). The component4 elements of an NFSv4 pathname are encoded as path segments in an NFS URI. NFSv4 pathnames MUST be expressed in an NFS URI as an absolute path. An NFS URI path component MUST NOT be empty. The NFS URI path component starts with a slash ("/") character, followed by one or more path segments that each start with a slash ("/") character [RFC3986]. Therefore, a double slash always follows the authority component of an NFS URI. For example, the NFSv4 pathname "/" is represented by two slash ("/") characters following an NFS URI's authority component. The component names of an NFSv4 pathname MUST be prepared using the component name rules defined inSection 12 ("Internationalization") of [RFC7530] prior to encoding the path component of an NFS URI. As specified in [RFC3986], any non-ASCII characters and any URI-reserved characters, such as the slash ("/") character, contained in a component4 element MUST be represented by URI percent encoding.Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 20152.8.1.3. Encoding an NFS Location in an FSL The path component of an NFS URI encodes the rootpath field of the NFSv4 fs_location4 data type or the "fli_rootpath" of the NFSv4 fs_locations_item4 data type (see [RFC5661]). In its server field, the NFSv4 fs_location4 data type contains a list of universal addresses and DNS labels. Each may optionally include a port number. The exact encoding requirements for this information is found inSection 12.6 of [RFC7530]. The NFSv4 fs_locations_item4 data type encodes the same data in its fli_entries field (see [RFC5661]). This information is encoded in the authority component of an NFS URI. The server and fli_entries fields can encode multiple server hostnames that share the same pathname. An NFS URI, and hence an FSL record, represents only a single hostname and pathname pair. An NFS fileserver MUST NOT combine a set of FSL records into a single fs_location4 or fs_locations_item4 unless each FSL record in the set contains the same rootpath value and extended file system information.2.8.2. Mutual Consistency across Fileset Locations All of the FSLs that have the same FSN (and thereby reference the same fileset) are equivalent from the point of view of access by a file-access client. Different fileset locations for an FSN represent the same data, though potentially at different points in time. Fileset locations are equivalent but not identical. Locations may be either read-only or read-write. Typically, multiple read-write locations are backed by a clustered file system while read-only locations are replicas created by a federation-initiated or external replication operation. Read-only locations may represent consistent point-in-time copies of a read-write location. The federation protocols, however, cannot prevent subsequent changes to a read-only location nor guarantee point-in-time consistency of a read-only location if the read-write location is changing. Regardless of the type, one file-access client may be referred to a location described by one FSL while another client chooses to use a location described by another FSL. Since updates to each fileset location are not controlled by the federation protocol, it is the responsibility of administrators to guarantee the functional equivalence of the data. The federation protocols do not guarantee that different fileset locations are mutually consistent in terms of the currency of their data. However, they provide a means to publish currency informationLentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 so that all fileservers in a federation can convey the same information to file-access clients during referrals. Clients use this information to ensure they do not revert to an out-of-date version of a fileset's data when switching between fileset locations. NFSv4.1 provides guidance on how replication can be handled in such a manner. In particular, seeSection 11.7 of [RFC5661].2.8.3. Caching of Fileset Locations To resolve an FSN to a set of FSL records, a fileserver queries the NSDB node named in the FSN for FSL records associated with this FSN. The parent FSN's FsnTTL attribute (seeSection 2.7) specifies the period of time during which a fileserver may cache these FSL records. The combination of FSL caching and FSL migration presents a challenge. For example, suppose there are three fileservers named A, B, and C. Suppose further that fileserver A contains a junction J to fileset X stored on fileserver B (seeSection 2.10 for a description of junctions). Now suppose that fileset X is migrated from fileserver B to fileserver C, and the corresponding FSL information for fileset X in the authoritative NSDB is updated. If fileserver A has cached FSLs for fileset X, a file-access client traversing junction J on fileserver A will be referred to fileserver B, even though fileset X has migrated to fileserver C. If fileserver A had not cached the FSL records, it would have queried the NSDB and obtained the correct location of fileset X. Typically, the process of fileset migration leaves a redirection on the source fileserver in place of a migrated fileset (without such a redirection, file-access clients would find an empty space where the migrated fileset was, which defeats the purpose of a managed migration). This redirection might be a new junction that targets the same FSN as other junctions referring to the migrated fileset, or it might be some other kind of directive, depending on the fileserver implementation, that simply refers file-access clients to the new location of the migrated fileset.Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 11]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 Back to our example. Suppose, as part of the migration process, a junction replaces fileset X on fileserver B. Later, either: o New file-access clients are referred to fileserver B by stale FSL information cached on fileserver A, or o File-access clients continue to access fileserver B because they cache stale location data for fileset X. In either case, thanks to the redirection, file-access clients are informed by fileserver B that fileset X has moved to fileserver C. Such redirecting junctions (here, on fileserver B) would not be required to be in place forever. They need to stay in place at least until FSL entries cached on fileservers and locations cached on file- access clients for the target fileset are invalidated. The FsnTTL field in the FSL's parent FSN (seeSection 2.7) specifies an upper bound for the lifetime of cached FSL information and thus can act as a lower bound for the lifetime of redirecting junctions. For example, suppose the FsnTTL field contains the value 3600 seconds (one hour). In such a case, administrators SHOULD keep the redirection in place for at least one hour after a fileset migration has taken place because a referring fileserver might cache the FSL data during that time before refreshing it. To get file-access clients to access the destination fileserver more quickly, administrators SHOULD set the FsnTTL field of the migrated fileset to a low number or zero before migration begins. It can be reset to a more reasonable number at a later point. Note that some file-access protocols do not communicate location cache expiry information to file-access clients. In some cases, it may be difficult to determine an appropriate lifetime for redirecting junctions because file-access clients may cache location information indefinitely.2.8.4. Generating a Referral from Fileset Locations After resolving an FSN to a set of FSL records, the fileserver generates a referral to redirect a file-access client to one or more of the FSN's FSLs. The fileserver converts the FSL records to a referral format understood by a particular file-access client, such as an NFSv4 fs_locations or fs_locations_info attribute.Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 12]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 To give file-access clients as many options as possible, the fileserver SHOULD include the maximum possible number of FSL records in a referral. However, the fileserver MAY omit some of the FSL records from the referral. For example, the fileserver might omit an FSL record because of limitations in the file-access protocol's referral format. For a given FSL record, the fileserver MAY convert or reduce the FSL record's contents in a manner appropriate to the referral format. For example, an NFS FSL record contains all the data necessary to construct an fs_locations_info attribute, but an fs_locations_info attribute contains several pieces of information that are not found in the simpler fs_locations attribute. A fileserver constructs entries in an fs_locations attribute using the relevant contents of an NFS FSL record. Whenever the fileserver converts or reduces FSL data, the fileserver SHOULD attempt to maintain the original meaning where possible. For example, an NFS FSL record contains the rank and order information that is included in an fs_locations_info attribute (see NFSv4.1's FSLI4BX_READRANK, FSLI4BX_READORDER, FSLI4BX_WRITERANK, and FSLI4BX_WRITEORDER). While this rank and order information is not explicitly expressible in an fs_locations attribute, the fileserver can arrange the fs_locations attribute's locations list based on the rank and order values. Another example: A single NFS FSL record contains the hostname of one fileserver. A single fs_locations attribute can contain a list of fileserver names. An NFS fileserver MAY combine two or more FSL records into a single entry in an fs_locations or fs_locations_info array only if each FSL record contains the same pathname and extended file system information. Refer to Sections11.9 and11.10 of the NFSv4.1 protocol specification [RFC5661] for further details.2.9. Namespace Database (NSDB) The NSDB service is a federation-wide service that provides interfaces to define, update, and query FSN information, FSL information, and FSN-to-FSL mapping information. An individual repository of namespace information is called an NSDB node. The difference between the NSDB service and an NSDB node is analogous to that between the DNS service and a particular DNS server.Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 13]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 Each NSDB node is managed by a single administrative entity. A single administrative entity can manage multiple NSDB nodes. Each NSDB node stores the definition of the FSNs for which it is authoritative. It also stores the definitions of the FSLs associated with those FSNs. An NSDB node is authoritative for the filesets that it defines. An NSDB MAY be replicated throughout the federation. If an NSDB is replicated, the NSDB MUST exhibit loose, converging consistency as defined in [RFC3254]. The mechanism by which this is achieved is outside the scope of this document. Many Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) implementations support replication. These features MAY be used to replicate the NSDB.2.9.1. NSDB Client Each NSDB node supports an LDAP [RFC4510] interface. An NSDB client is software that uses the LDAP protocol to access or update namespace information stored on an NSDB node. A domain's administrative entity uses NSDB client software to manage information stored on NSDB nodes. Details of these transactions are discussed inSection 5.1. Fileservers act as an NSDB client when contacting a particular NSDB node to resolve an FSN to a set of FSL records. The resulting location information is then transferred to file-access clients via referrals. Therefore, file-access clients never need to access NSDBs directly. These transactions are described inSection 5.2.2.10. Junctions and Referrals A junction is a point in a particular fileset namespace where a specific target fileset may be attached. If a file-access client traverses the path leading from the root of a federated namespace to the junction referring to a target fileset, it should be able to mount and access the data in that target fileset (assuming appropriate permissions). In other words, a junction can be viewed as a reference from a directory in one fileset to the root of the target fileset. A junction can be implemented as a special marker on a directory or by some other mechanism in the fileserver's underlying file system. What data is used by the fileserver to represent junctions is not defined by this document. The essential property is that given a junction, a fileserver must be able to find the FSN for the target fileset.Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 14]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 When a file-access client reaches a junction, the fileserver refers the client to a list of FSLs associated with the FSN targeted by the junction. The client can then mount one of the associated FSLs. The federation protocols do not limit where and how many times a fileset is mounted in the namespace. Filesets can be nested; a fileset can be mounted under another fileset.2.11. Unified Namespace and the Root Fileset The root fileset, when defined, is the top-level fileset of the federation-wide namespace. The root of the unified namespace is the top level directory of this fileset. A set of designated fileservers in the federation can export the root fileset to render the federation-wide unified namespace. When a file-access client mounts the root fileset from any of these designated fileservers, it can view a common federation-wide namespace.2.12. UUID Considerations To ensure FSN and FSL records are unique across a domain, Federated File System (FedFS) employs UUIDs conforming to [RFC4122] to form the distinguished names of LDAP records containing FedFS data (seeSection 4.2.2.2). Because junctions store a tuple containing an FSN UUID and the name and port of an NSDB node, an FSN UUID must be unique only on a single NSDB node. An FSN UUID collision can be detected immediately when an administrator attempts to publish an FSN or FSL by storing it under a specific NSDB Container Entry (NCE) on an authoritative NSDB host. Note that one NSDB node may store multiple NCEs, each under a different namingContext. If an NSDB node must contain more than one NCE, the federation's admin entity SHOULD provide a robust method for preventing FSN UUID collisions between FSNs that reside on the same NSDB node but under different NCEs. Because FSLs are children of FSNs, FSL UUIDs must be unique for just a single FSN. As with FSNs, as soon as an FSL is published, its uniqueness is guaranteed. A fileserver performs the operations described inSection 5.2 as an unauthenticated user. Thus, distinguished names of FSN and FSL records, as well as the FSN and FSL records themselves, are required to be readable by anyone who can bind anonymously to an NSDB node. Therefore, FSN and FSL UUIDs should be considered public information.Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 15]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 Version 1 UUIDs contain a host's Media Access Control (MAC) address and a timestamp in the clear. This gives provenance to each UUID, but attackers can use such details to guess information about the host where the UUID was generated. Security-sensitive installations should be aware that on externally facing NSDBs, UUIDs can reveal information about the hosts where they are generated. In addition, version 1 UUIDs depend on the notion that a hardware MAC address is unique across machines. As virtual machines do not depend on unique physical MAC addresses and, in any event, an administrator can modify the physical MAC address, version 1 UUIDs are no longer considered sufficient. To minimize the probability of UUIDs colliding, a consistent procedure for generating UUIDs should be used throughout a federation. Within a federation, UUIDs SHOULD be generated using the procedure described for version 4 of the UUID variant specified in [RFC4122].3. Examples In this section we provide examples and discussion of the basic operations facilitated by the federated file system protocol: creating a fileset, adding a replica of a fileset, resolving a junction, and creating a junction.3.1. Creating a Fileset and Its FSL(s) A fileset is the abstraction of a set of files and the directory tree that contains them. The fileset abstraction is the fundamental unit of data management in the federation. This abstraction is implemented by an actual directory tree whose root location is specified by a fileset location (FSL). In this section, we describe the basic requirements for starting with a directory tree and creating a fileset that can be used in the federation protocols. Note that we do not assume that the process of creating a fileset requires any transformation of the files or the directory hierarchy. The only thing that is required by this process is assigning the fileset a fileset name (FSN) and expressing the location of the implementation of the fileset as an FSL. There are many possible variations to this procedure, depending on how the FSN that binds the FSL is created and whether other replicas of the fileset exist, are known to the federation, and need to be bound to the same FSN.Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 16]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 It is easiest to describe this in terms of how to create the initial implementation of the fileset and then describe how to add replicas.3.1.1. Creating a Fileset and an FSN The following administrative steps create an FSN, which is used to track all replicas of a single physical dataset. 1. Choose the NSDB node that will keep track of the FSL(s) and related information for the fileset. 2. Create an FSN in the NSDB node. The FSN UUID is chosen by the administrator or generated automatically by administration software. The former case is used if the fileset is being restored, perhaps as part of disaster recovery, and the administrator wishes to specify the FSN UUID in order to permit existing junctions that reference that FSN to work again. At this point, the FSN exists, but its fileset locations are unspecified. 3. For the FSN created above, create an FSL in the NSDB node that describes the physical location of the fileset data.3.1.2. Adding a Replica of a Fileset Adding a replica is straightforward: the NSDB node and the FSN are already known. The only remaining step is to add another FSL. Note that the federation protocols provide only the mechanisms to register and unregister replicas of a fileset. Fileserver-to- fileserver replication protocols are not defined.3.2. Junction Resolution A fileset may contain references to other filesets. These references are represented by junctions. If a file-access client requests access to a fileset object that is a junction, the fileserver resolves the junction to discover one or more FSLs that implement the referenced fileset. There are many possible variations to this procedure, depending on how the junctions are represented by the fileserver and how the fileserver performs junction resolution.Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 17]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 Step 4 is the only step that interacts directly with the federation protocols. The rest of the steps may use platform-specific interfaces. 1. The fileserver determines that the object being accessed is a junction. 2. The fileserver does a local lookup to find the FSN of the target fileset. 3. Using the FSN, the fileserver finds the NSDB node responsible for the target FSN. 4. The fileserver contacts that NSDB node and asks for the set of FSLs that implement the target FSN. The NSDB node responds with a (possibly empty) set of FSLs. 5. The fileserver converts one or more of the FSLs to the location type used by the file-access client (e.g., an NFSv4 fs_locations attribute as described in [RFC5661]). 6. The fileserver redirects (in whatever manner is appropriate for the client) the client to the location(s).3.3. Example Use Cases for Fileset Annotations Fileset annotations can convey additional attributes of a fileset. For example, fileset annotations can be used to define relationships between filesets that can be used by an auxiliary replication protocol. Consider the scenario where a fileset is created and mounted at some point in the namespace. A snapshot of the read-write FSL of that fileset is taken periodically at different frequencies (say, a daily or weekly snapshot). The different snapshots are mounted at different locations in the namespace. The daily snapshots are considered as different filesets from the weekly ones, but both are related to the source fileset. We can define an annotation labeling the filesets as source and replica. The replication protocol can use this information to copy data from one or more FSLs of the source fileset to all the FSLs of the replica fileset. The replica filesets are read-only while the source fileset is read-write. This follows the traditional Andrew File System (AFS) model of mounting the read-only volume at a path in the namespace different from that of the read-write volume [AFS].Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 18]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 The federation protocol does not control or manage the relationship among filesets. It merely enables annotating the filesets with user- defined relationships. Another potential use for annotations is recording references to an FSN. A single annotation containing the number of references could be defined, or multiple annotations, one per reference, could be used to store detailed information on the location of each reference. As with the replication annotation described above, the maintenance of reference information would not be controlled by the federation protocol. The information would most likely be non-authoritative because the ability to create a junction does not require the authority to update the FSN record. In any event, such annotations could be useful to administrators for determining if an FSN is referenced by a junction.4. NSDB Configuration and Schema This section describes how an NSDB is constructed using an LDAP Version 3 [RFC4510] directory.Section 4.1 describes the basic properties of the LDAP configuration that MUST be used in order to ensure compatibility between different implementations.Section 4.2 defines the new LDAP attribute types and the new object types; it also specifies how the distinguished name (DN) of each object instance MUST be constructed.4.1. LDAP Configuration An NSDB is constructed using an LDAP directory. This LDAP directory MAY have multiple naming contexts. The LDAP directory's entry specific to Digital Signature Algorithm (DSA) (its rootDSE) has a multi-valued namingContext attribute. Each value of the namingContext attribute is the DN of a naming context's root entry (see [RFC4512]). For each naming context that contains federation entries (e.g., FSNs and FSLs): 1. There MUST be an LDAP entry that is superior to all of the naming context's federation entries in the Directory Information Tree (DIT). This entry is termed the NSDB Container Entry (NCE). The NCE's children are FSNs. An FSN's children are FSLs. 2. The naming context's root entry MUST include "fedfsNsdbContainerInfo" (defined inSection 4.2.2.1) as one of its object classes. The fedfsNsdbContainerInfo's fedfsNceDN attribute is used to locate the naming context's NCE.Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 19]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 If a naming context does not contain federation entries, it will not contain an NCE, and its root entry will not include a "fedfsNsdbContainerInfo" as one of its object classes. A fedfsNsdbContainerInfo's fedfsNceDN attribute contains the distinguished name (DN) of the NSDB Container Entry residing under this naming context. The fedfsNceDN attribute MUST NOT be empty. For example, an LDAP directory might have the following entries: -+ [root DSE] | namingContext: o=fedfs | namingContext: dc=example,dc=com | namingContext: ou=system | | +---- [o=fedfs] | fedfsNceDN: o=fedfs | | +---- [dc=example,dc=com] | fedfsNceDN: ou=fedfs,ou=corp-it,dc=example,dc=com | | +---- [ou=system] In this case, the "o=fedfs" namingContext has an NSDB Container Entry at "o=fedfs", the "dc=example,dc=com" namingContext has an NSDB Container Entry at "ou=fedfs,ou=corp-it,dc=example,dc=com", and the "ou=system" namingContext has no NSDB Container Entry. The NSDB SHOULD be configured with one or more privileged LDAP users. These users are able to modify the contents of the LDAP database. An administrator that performs the operations described inSection 5.1 SHOULD authenticate using the DN of a privileged LDAP user. It MUST be possible for an unprivileged (unauthenticated) user to perform LDAP queries that access the NSDB data. A fileserver performs the operations described inSection 5.2 as an unprivileged user. All implementations SHOULD use the same schema. At minimum, each MUST use a schema that includes all objects named in the following sections, with all associated attributes. If it is necessary for anLentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 20]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 implementation to extend the schema defined here, consider using one of the following ways to extend the schema: o Define a fedfsAnnotation key and values (seeSection 4.2.1.6). Register the new key and values with IANA (seeSection 7.1). o Define additional attribute types and object classes, then have entries inherit from a class defined in this document and from the implementation-defined ones. Given the above configuration guidelines, an NSDB SHOULD be constructed using a dedicated LDAP server. If LDAP directories are needed for other purposes, such as to store user account information, use of a separate LDAP server for those is RECOMMENDED. By using an LDAP server dedicated to storing NSDB records, there is no need to disturb the configuration of any other LDAP directories that store information unrelated to an NSDB.4.2. LDAP Schema The schema definitions provided in this document use the LDAP schema syntax defined in [RFC4512]. The definitions are formatted to allow the reader to easily extract them from the document. The reader can use the following shell script to extract the definitions: <CODE BEGINS> #!/bin/sh grep '^ *///' | sed 's?^ */// ??' | sed 's?^ *///$??' <CODE ENDS> If the above script is stored in a file called "extract.sh", and this document is in a file called "spec.txt", then the reader can do: <CODE BEGINS> sh extract.sh < spec.txt > fedfs.schema <CODE ENDS> The effect of the script is to remove leading white space from each line, plus a sentinel sequence of "///".Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 21]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 Code components extracted from this document must include the following license: <CODE BEGINS> /// # /// # Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified /// # as authors of the code. All rights reserved. /// # /// # The authors of the code are: /// # J. Lentini, C. Everhart, D. Ellard, R. Tewari, and M. Naik. /// # /// # Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with /// # or without modification, are permitted provided that the /// # following conditions are met: /// # /// # - Redistributions of source code must retain the above /// # copyright notice, this list of conditions and the /// # following disclaimer. /// # /// # - Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above /// # copyright notice, this list of conditions and the /// # following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other /// # materials provided with the distribution. /// # /// # - Neither the name of Internet Society, IETF or IETF /// # Trust, nor the names of specific contributors, may be /// # used to endorse or promote products derived from this /// # software without specific prior written permission. /// # /// # THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS /// # AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED /// # WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE /// # IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS /// # FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO /// # EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE /// # LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, /// # EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT /// # NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR /// # SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS /// # INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF /// # LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, /// # OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING /// # IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF /// # ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. /// # <CODE ENDS>Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 22]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 20154.2.1. LDAP Attributes The following definitions are used in this document: o The name attribute described in [RFC4519]. o The Integer syntax (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27) described in [RFC4517]. o The integerMatch rule described in [RFC4517]. o The Octet String syntax (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.40) described in [RFC4517]. o The octetStringMatch rule described in [RFC4517]. o The Boolean syntax (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.7) described in [RFC4517]. o The booleanMatch rule described in [RFC4517]. o The distinguishedNameMatch rule described in [RFC4517]. o The DN syntax (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12) described in [RFC4517]. o The labeledURI attribute described in [RFC2079]. o The UUID syntax (1.3.6.1.1.16.1) described in [RFC4530]. o The UuidMatch rule described in [RFC4530]. o The UuidOrderingMatch rule described in [RFC4530].Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 23]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 20154.2.1.1. fedfsUuid A fedfsUuid is the base type for all of the universally unique identifiers (UUIDs) used by the federated file system protocols. The fedfsUuid type is based on rules and syntax defined in [RFC4530]. A fedfsUuid is a single-valued LDAP attribute. <CODE BEGINS> /// /// attributetype ( /// 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.1 NAME 'fedfsUuid' /// DESC 'A UUID used by NSDB' /// EQUALITY uuidMatch /// ORDERING uuidOrderingMatch /// SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.1.16.1 /// SINGLE-VALUE /// ) /// <CODE ENDS>4.2.1.2. fedfsFsnUuid A fedfsFsnUuid represents the UUID component of an FSN. An NSDB SHOULD ensure that no two FSNs it stores have the same fedfsFsnUuid. This attribute is single-valued. <CODE BEGINS> /// /// attributetype ( /// 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.4 NAME 'fedfsFsnUuid' /// DESC 'The FSN UUID component of an FSN' /// SUP fedfsUuid /// SINGLE-VALUE /// ) /// <CODE ENDS>Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 24]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 20154.2.1.3. fedfsFsnTTL A fedfsFsnTTL is the time-to-live in seconds of a cached FSN and its child FSL records. It corresponds to the FsnTTL as defined inSection 2.7. See alsoSection 2.8.3 for information about caching FSLs. A fedfsFsnTTL MUST be encoded as an Integer syntax value [RFC4517] in the range [0, 4294967295]. This attribute is single-valued. <CODE BEGINS> /// /// attributetype ( /// 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.11 NAME 'fedfsFsnTTL' /// DESC 'Time to live of an FSN tree' /// EQUALITY integerMatch /// SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 /// SINGLE-VALUE /// ) /// <CODE ENDS> OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 is the Integer syntax [RFC4517].4.2.1.4. fedfsNceDN A fedfsNceDN stores a distinguished name (DN). This attribute is single-valued. <CODE BEGINS> /// /// attributetype ( /// 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.14 NAME 'fedfsNceDN' /// DESC 'NCE Distinguished Name' /// EQUALITY distinguishedNameMatch /// SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12 /// SINGLE-VALUE /// ) /// <CODE ENDS> OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12 is the DN syntax [RFC4517].Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 25]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 20154.2.1.5. fedfsFslUuid A fedfsFslUuid represents the UUID of an FSL. An NSDB SHOULD ensure that no two FSLs it stores have the same fedfsFslUuid. This attribute is single-valued. <CODE BEGINS> /// /// attributetype ( /// 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.8 NAME 'fedfsFslUuid' /// DESC 'UUID of an FSL' /// SUP fedfsUuid /// SINGLE-VALUE /// ) /// <CODE ENDS>4.2.1.6. fedfsAnnotation A fedfsAnnotation contains an object annotation formatted as a key/ value pair. This attribute is multi-valued; an object type that permits annotations may have any number of annotations per instance. A fedfsAnnotation attribute is a human-readable sequence of UTF-8 characters with no non-terminal NUL characters. The value MUST be formatted according to the following ABNF [RFC5234] rules: ANNOTATION = KEY "=" VALUE KEY = ITEM VALUE = ITEM ITEM = *WSP DQUOTE UTF8-octets DQUOTE *WSP DQUOTE and WSP are defined in [RFC5234], and UTF8-octets is defined in [RFC3629]. The following escape sequences are allowed: +-----------------+-------------+ | escape sequence | replacement | +-----------------+-------------+ | \\ | \ | | \" | " | +-----------------+-------------+Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 26]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 A fedfsAnnotation value might be processed as follows: 1. Parse the attribute value according to the ANNOTATION rule, ignoring the escape sequences above. 2. Scan through results of the previous step and replace the escape sequences above. A fedfsAnnotation attribute that does not adhere to this format SHOULD be ignored in its entirety. It MUST NOT prevent further processing of its containing entry. The following are examples of valid fedfsAnnotation attributes: "key1" = "foo" "another key" = "x=3" "key-2" = "A string with \" and \\ characters." "key3"="bar" These correspond to the following key/value pairs: +-------------+-----------------------------------+ | key | value | +-------------+-----------------------------------+ | key1 | foo | | another key | x=3 | | key-2 | A string with " and \ characters. | | key3 | bar | +-------------+-----------------------------------+ <CODE BEGINS> /// /// attributetype ( /// 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.12 NAME 'fedfsAnnotation' /// DESC 'Annotation of an object' /// SUP name /// ) /// <CODE ENDS>Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 27]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 20154.2.1.7. fedfsDescr A fedfsDescr stores an object description. The description MUST be encoded as a UTF-8 string. This attribute is multi-valued, which permits any number of descriptions per entry. <CODE BEGINS> /// /// attributetype ( /// 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.13 NAME 'fedfsDescr' /// DESC 'Description of an object' /// SUP name /// ) /// <CODE ENDS>4.2.1.8. fedfsNfsURI A fedfsNfsURI stores the host and pathname components of an FSL. A fedfsNfsURI MUST be encoded as an NFS URI (seeSection 2.8.1). The fedfsNfsURI is a subtype of the labeledURI type [RFC2079], with the same encoding rules. This attribute is single-valued. <CODE BEGINS> /// /// attributetype ( /// 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.120 NAME 'fedfsNfsURI' /// DESC 'Location of fileset' /// SUP labeledURI /// SINGLE-VALUE /// ) /// <CODE ENDS>Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 28]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 20154.2.1.9. fedfsNfsCurrency A fedfsNfsCurrency stores the NFSv4.1 fs_locations_server's fls_currency value [RFC5661]. A fedfsNfsCurrency MUST be encoded as an Integer syntax value [RFC4517] in the range [-2147483648, 2147483647]. This attribute is single-valued. <CODE BEGINS> /// /// attributetype ( /// 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.103 NAME 'fedfsNfsCurrency' /// DESC 'up-to-date measure of the data' /// EQUALITY integerMatch /// SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 /// SINGLE-VALUE /// ) /// <CODE ENDS> OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 is the Integer syntax [RFC4517].4.2.1.10. fedfsNfsGenFlagWritable A fedfsNfsGenFlagWritable stores the value of an FSL's NFSv4.1 FSLI4GF_WRITABLE bit [RFC5661]. A value of "TRUE" indicates the bit is set. A value of "FALSE" indicates the bit is not set. <CODE BEGINS> /// /// attributetype ( /// 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.104 NAME 'fedfsNfsGenFlagWritable' /// DESC 'Indicates if the file system is writable' /// EQUALITY booleanMatch /// SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.7 /// SINGLE-VALUE /// ) /// <CODE ENDS> OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.7 is the Boolean syntax [RFC4517].Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 29]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 20154.2.1.11. fedfsNfsGenFlagGoing A fedfsNfsGenFlagGoing stores the value of an FSL's NFSv4.1 FSLI4GF_GOING bit [RFC5661]. A value of "TRUE" indicates the bit is set. A value of "FALSE" indicates the bit is not set. <CODE BEGINS> /// /// attributetype ( /// 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.105 NAME 'fedfsNfsGenFlagGoing' /// DESC 'Indicates if the file system is going' /// EQUALITY booleanMatch /// SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.7 /// SINGLE-VALUE /// ) /// <CODE ENDS> OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.7 is the Boolean syntax [RFC4517].4.2.1.12. fedfsNfsGenFlagSplit A fedfsNfsGenFlagSplit stores the value of an FSL's NFSv4.1 FSLI4GF_SPLIT bit [RFC5661]. A value of "TRUE" indicates the bit is set. A value of "FALSE" indicates the bit is not set. <CODE BEGINS> /// /// attributetype ( /// 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.106 NAME 'fedfsNfsGenFlagSplit' /// DESC 'Indicates if there are multiple file systems' /// EQUALITY booleanMatch /// SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.7 /// SINGLE-VALUE /// ) /// <CODE ENDS> OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.7 is the Boolean syntax [RFC4517].Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 30]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 20154.2.1.13. fedfsNfsTransFlagRdma A fedfsNfsTransFlagRdma stores the value of an FSL's NFSv4.1 FSLI4TF_RDMA bit [RFC5661]. A value of "TRUE" indicates the bit is set. A value of "FALSE" indicates the bit is not set. <CODE BEGINS> /// /// attributetype ( /// 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.107 NAME 'fedfsNfsTransFlagRdma' /// DESC 'Indicates if the transport supports RDMA' /// EQUALITY booleanMatch /// SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.7 /// SINGLE-VALUE /// ) /// <CODE ENDS> OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.7 is the Boolean syntax [RFC4517].4.2.1.14. fedfsNfsClassSimul A fedfsNfsClassSimul contains the FSL's NFSv4.1 FSLI4BX_CLSIMUL [RFC5661] value. A fedfsNfsClassSimul MUST be encoded as an Integer syntax value [RFC4517] in the range [0, 255]. <CODE BEGINS> /// /// attributetype ( /// 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.108 NAME 'fedfsNfsClassSimul' /// DESC 'The simultaneous-use class of the file system' /// EQUALITY integerMatch /// SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 /// SINGLE-VALUE /// ) /// <CODE ENDS> OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 is the Integer syntax [RFC4517].Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 31]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 20154.2.1.15. fedfsNfsClassHandle A fedfsNfsClassHandle contains the FSL's NFSv4.1 FSLI4BX_CLHANDLE [RFC5661] value. A fedfsNfsClassHandle MUST be encoded as an Integer syntax value [RFC4517] in the range [0, 255]. <CODE BEGINS> /// /// attributetype ( /// 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.109 NAME 'fedfsNfsClassHandle' /// DESC 'The handle class of the file system' /// EQUALITY integerMatch /// SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 /// SINGLE-VALUE /// ) /// <CODE ENDS> OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 is the Integer syntax [RFC4517].4.2.1.16. fedfsNfsClassFileid A fedfsNfsClassFileid contains the FSL's NFSv4.1 FSLI4BX_CLFILEID [RFC5661] value. A fedfsNfsClassFileid MUST be encoded as an Integer syntax value [RFC4517] in the range [0, 255]. <CODE BEGINS> /// /// attributetype ( /// 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.110 NAME 'fedfsNfsClassFileid' /// DESC 'The fileid class of the file system' /// EQUALITY integerMatch /// SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 /// SINGLE-VALUE /// ) /// <CODE ENDS> OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 is the Integer syntax [RFC4517].Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 32]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 20154.2.1.17. fedfsNfsClassWritever A fedfsNfsClassWritever contains the FSL's NFSv4.1 FSLI4BX_CLWRITEVER [RFC5661] value. A fedfsNfsClassWritever MUST be encoded as an Integer syntax value [RFC4517] in the range [0, 255]. <CODE BEGINS> /// /// attributetype ( /// 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.111 NAME 'fedfsNfsClassWritever' /// DESC 'The write-verifier class of the file system' /// EQUALITY integerMatch /// SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 /// SINGLE-VALUE /// ) /// <CODE ENDS> OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 is the Integer syntax [RFC4517].4.2.1.18. fedfsNfsClassChange A fedfsNfsClassChange contains the FSL's NFSv4.1 FSLI4BX_CLCHANGE [RFC5661] value. A fedfsNfsClassChange MUST be encoded as an Integer syntax value [RFC4517] in the range [0, 255]. <CODE BEGINS> /// /// attributetype ( /// 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.112 NAME 'fedfsNfsClassChange' /// DESC 'The change class of the file system' /// EQUALITY integerMatch /// SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 /// SINGLE-VALUE /// ) /// <CODE ENDS> OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 is the Integer syntax [RFC4517].Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 33]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 20154.2.1.19. fedfsNfsClassReaddir A fedfsNfsClassReaddir contains the FSL's NFSv4.1 FSLI4BX_CLREADDIR [RFC5661] value. A fedfsNfsClassReaddir MUST be encoded as an Integer syntax value [RFC4517] in the range [0, 255]. <CODE BEGINS> /// /// attributetype ( /// 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.113 NAME 'fedfsNfsClassReaddir' /// DESC 'The readdir class of the file system' /// EQUALITY integerMatch /// SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 /// SINGLE-VALUE /// ) /// <CODE ENDS> OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 is the Integer syntax [RFC4517].4.2.1.20. fedfsNfsReadRank A fedfsNfsReadRank contains the FSL's NFSv4.1 FSLI4BX_READRANK [RFC5661] value. A fedfsNfsReadRank MUST be encoded as an Integer syntax value [RFC4517] in the range [0, 255]. <CODE BEGINS> /// /// attributetype ( /// 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.114 NAME 'fedfsNfsReadRank' /// DESC 'The read rank of the file system' /// EQUALITY integerMatch /// SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 /// SINGLE-VALUE /// ) /// <CODE ENDS> OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 is the Integer syntax [RFC4517].Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 34]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 20154.2.1.21. fedfsNfsReadOrder A fedfsNfsReadOrder contains the FSL's NFSv4.1 FSLI4BX_READORDER [RFC5661] value. A fedfsNfsReadOrder MUST be encoded as an Integer syntax value [RFC4517] in the range [0, 255]. <CODE BEGINS> /// /// attributetype ( /// 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.115 NAME 'fedfsNfsReadOrder' /// DESC 'The read order of the file system' /// EQUALITY integerMatch /// SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 /// SINGLE-VALUE /// ) /// <CODE ENDS> OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 is the Integer syntax [RFC4517].4.2.1.22. fedfsNfsWriteRank A fedfsNfsWriteRank contains the FSL's FSLI4BX_WRITERANK [RFC5661] value. A fedfsNfsWriteRank MUST be encoded as an Integer syntax value [RFC4517] in the range [0, 255]. <CODE BEGINS> /// /// attributetype ( /// 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.116 NAME 'fedfsNfsWriteRank' /// DESC 'The write rank of the file system' /// EQUALITY integerMatch /// SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 /// SINGLE-VALUE /// ) /// <CODE ENDS> OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 is the Integer syntax [RFC4517].Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 35]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 20154.2.1.23. fedfsNfsWriteOrder A fedfsNfsWriteOrder contains the FSL's FSLI4BX_WRITEORDER [RFC5661] value. A fedfsNfsWriteOrder MUST be encoded as an Integer syntax value [RFC4517] in the range [0, 255]. <CODE BEGINS> /// /// attributetype ( /// 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.117 NAME 'fedfsNfsWriteOrder' /// DESC 'The write order of the file system' /// EQUALITY integerMatch /// SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 /// SINGLE-VALUE /// ) /// <CODE ENDS> OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 is the Integer syntax [RFC4517].4.2.1.24. fedfsNfsVarSub A fedfsNfsVarSub stores the value of an FSL's NFSv4.1 FSLI4IF_VAR_SUB bit [RFC5661]. A value of "TRUE" indicates the bit is set. A value of "FALSE" indicates the bit is not set. <CODE BEGINS> /// /// attributetype ( /// 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.118 NAME 'fedfsNfsVarSub' /// DESC 'Indicates if variable substitution is present' /// EQUALITY booleanMatch /// SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.7 /// SINGLE-VALUE /// ) /// <CODE ENDS> OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.7 is the Boolean syntax [RFC4517].Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 36]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 20154.2.1.25. fedfsNfsValidFor A fedfsNfsValidFor stores an FSL's NFSv4.1 fs_locations_info fli_valid_for value [RFC5661]. A fedfsNfsValidFor MUST be encoded as an Integer syntax value [RFC4517] in the range [-2147483648, 2147483647]. An FSL's parent's fedfsFsnTTL value and its fedfsNfsValidFor value MAY be different. This attribute is single-valued. <CODE BEGINS> /// /// attributetype ( /// 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.19 NAME 'fedfsNfsValidFor' /// DESC 'Valid for time' /// EQUALITY integerMatch /// SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 /// SINGLE-VALUE /// ) /// OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 is the Integer syntax [RFC4517]. <CODE ENDS>Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 37]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 20154.2.2. LDAP Object Classes4.2.2.1. fedfsNsdbContainerInfo A fedfsNsdbContainerInfo describes the location of the NCE. A fedfsNsdbContainerInfo's fedfsNceDN attribute is REQUIRED. A fedfsNsdbContainerInfo's fedfsAnnotation and fedfsDescr attributes are OPTIONAL. <CODE BEGINS> /// /// objectclass ( /// 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.1001 NAME 'fedfsNsdbContainerInfo' /// DESC 'Describes NCE location' /// SUP top AUXILIARY /// MUST ( /// fedfsNceDN /// ) /// MAY ( /// fedfsAnnotation /// $ fedfsDescr /// )) /// <CODE ENDS>Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 38]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 20154.2.2.2. fedfsFsn A fedfsFsn represents an FSN. A fedfsFsn's fedfsFsnUuid and fedfsFsnTTL attributes are REQUIRED. A fedfsFsn's fedfsAnnotation and fedfsDescr attributes are OPTIONAL. The DN of an FSN is REQUIRED to take the following form: "fedfsFsnUuid=$FSNUUID,$NCE", where $FSNUUID is the UUID of the FSN and $NCE is the DN of the NCE. Since LDAP requires a DN to be unique, this ensures that each FSN entry has a unique UUID value within the LDAP directory. <CODE BEGINS> /// /// objectclass ( /// 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.1002 NAME 'fedfsFsn' /// DESC 'Represents a fileset' /// SUP top STRUCTURAL /// MUST ( /// fedfsFsnUuid /// $ fedfsFsnTTL /// ) /// MAY ( /// fedfsAnnotation /// $ fedfsDescr /// )) /// <CODE ENDS>Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 39]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 20154.2.2.3. fedfsFsl The fedfsFsl object class represents an FSL. The fedfsFsl is an abstract object class. Protocol-specific subtypes of this object class are used to store FSL information. The fedfsNfsFsl object class defined inSection 4.2.2.4 is used to record an NFS FSL's location. Other subtypes MAY be defined for other protocols (e.g., Common Internet File System (CIFS)). A fedfsFsl's fedfsFslUuid and fedfsFsnUuid attributes are REQUIRED. A fedfsFsl's fedfsAnnotation and fedfsDescr attributes are OPTIONAL. The DN of an FSL is REQUIRED to take the following form: "fedfsFslUuid=$FSLUUID,fedfsFsnUuid=$FSNUUID,$NCE", where $FSLUUID is the FSL's UUID, $FSNUUID is the FSN's UUID, and $NCE is the DN of the NCE. Since LDAP requires a DN to be unique, this ensures that each FSL entry has a unique UUID value within the LDAP directory. <CODE BEGINS> /// /// objectclass ( /// 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.1003 NAME 'fedfsFsl' /// DESC 'A physical location of a fileset' /// SUP top ABSTRACT /// MUST ( /// fedfsFslUuid /// $ fedfsFsnUuid /// ) /// MAY ( /// fedfsAnnotation /// $ fedfsDescr /// )) /// <CODE ENDS>Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 40]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 20154.2.2.4. fedfsNfsFsl A fedfsNfsFsl is used to represent an NFS FSL. The fedfsNfsFsl inherits all of the attributes of the fedfsFsl and extends the fedfsFsl with information specific to the NFS protocol. The DN of an NFS FSL is REQUIRED to take the following form: "fedfsFslUuid=$FSLUUID,fedfsFsnUuid=$FSNUUID,$NCE", where $FSLUUID is the FSL's UUID, $FSNUUID is the FSN's UUID, and $NCE is the DN of the NCE. Since LDAP requires a DN to be unique, this ensures that each NFS FSL entry has a unique UUID value within the LDAP directory. <CODE BEGINS> /// /// objectclass ( /// 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.1004 NAME 'fedfsNfsFsl' /// DESC 'An NFS location of a fileset' /// SUP fedfsFsl STRUCTURAL /// MUST ( /// fedfsNfsURI /// $ fedfsNfsCurrency /// $ fedfsNfsGenFlagWritable /// $ fedfsNfsGenFlagGoing /// $ fedfsNfsGenFlagSplit /// $ fedfsNfsTransFlagRdma /// $ fedfsNfsClassSimul /// $ fedfsNfsClassHandle /// $ fedfsNfsClassFileid /// $ fedfsNfsClassWritever /// $ fedfsNfsClassChange /// $ fedfsNfsClassReaddir /// $ fedfsNfsReadRank /// $ fedfsNfsReadOrder /// $ fedfsNfsWriteRank /// $ fedfsNfsWriteOrder /// $ fedfsNfsVarSub /// $ fedfsNfsValidFor /// )) /// <CODE ENDS>Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 41]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 20155. NSDB Operations The operations defined by the protocol can be described as several sub-protocols that are used by entities within a federation to perform different roles. The first of these sub-protocols defines how the state of an NSDB node can be initialized and updated. The primary use of this sub- protocol is by an administrator to add, edit, or delete filesets, their properties, and their fileset locations. The second of these sub-protocols defines the queries that are sent to an NSDB node in order to perform resolution (or to find other information about the data stored within that NSDB node) and the responses returned by the NSDB node. The primary use of this sub- protocol is by a fileserver in order to perform resolution, but it may also be used by an administrator to query the state of the system. The first and second sub-protocols are defined as LDAP operations, using the schema defined in the previous section. If each NSDB node is a standard LDAP server, then, in theory, it is unnecessary to describe the LDAP operations in detail because the operations are ordinary LDAP operations to query and update records. However, we do not require that an NSDB node implement a complete LDAP service. Therefore, we define the minimum level of LDAP functionality required to implement an NSDB node. The NSDB sub-protocols are defined inSection 5.1 andSection 5.2. The descriptions of LDAP messages in these sections use the LDAP Data Interchange Format (LDIF) [RFC2849]. In order to differentiate constant and variable strings in the LDIF specifications, variables are prefixed by a $ character and use all uppercase characters. For example, a variable named FOO would be specified as $FOO. This document uses the term "NSDB client" to refer to an LDAP client that uses either of the NSDB sub-protocols. The third sub-protocol defines the queries and other requests that are sent to a fileserver in order to get information from it or to modify the state of the fileserver in a manner related to the federation protocols. The primary purpose of this protocol is for an administrator to create or delete a junction or discover related information about a particular fileserver. The third sub-protocol is defined as an Open Network Computing (ONC) Remote Procedure Call (RPC) protocol. The reason for using ONC RPCLentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 42]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 instead of LDAP is that all fileservers support ONC RPC, but some do not support an LDAP directory server. The ONC RPC administration protocol is defined in [RFC7533].5.1. NSDB Operations for Administrators The admin entity initiates and controls the commands to manage fileset and namespace information. The protocol used for communicating between the admin entity and each NSDB node MUST be the LDAPv3 [RFC4510] protocol. The names we assign to these operations are entirely for the purpose of exposition in this document and are not part of the LDAP dialogs.5.1.1. Create an FSN This operation creates a new FSN in the NSDB by adding a new fedfsFsn entry in the NSDB's LDAP directory. A fedfsFsn entry contains a fedfsFsnUuid. The administrator chooses the fedfsFsnUuid by the process described inSection 2.12. A fedfsFsn entry also contains a fedfsFsnTTL. The fedfsFsnTTL is chosen by the administrator as described inSection 2.8.3.5.1.1.1. LDAP Request This operation is implemented using the LDAP ADD request described by the LDIF below. dn: fedfsFsnUuid=$FSNUUID,$NCE changeType: add objectClass: fedfsFsn fedfsFsnUuid: $FSNUUID fedfsFsnTTL: $TTL For example, if $FSNUUID is "e8c4761c-eb3b-4307-86fc-f702da197966", $TTL is "300" seconds, and $NCE is "o=fedfs", the operation would be: dn: fedfsFsnUuid=e8c4761c-eb3b-4307-86fc-f702da197966,o=fedfs changeType: add objectClass: fedfsFsn fedfsFsnUuid: e8c4761c-eb3b-4307-86fc-f702da197966 fedfsFsnTTL: 300Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 43]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 20155.1.2. Delete an FSN This operation deletes an FSN by removing a fedfsFsn entry in the NSDB's LDAP directory. If the FSN entry being deleted has child FSL entries, this function MUST return an error. This ensures that the NSDB will not contain any orphaned FSL entries. A compliant LDAP implementation will meet this requirement sinceSection 4.8 of [RFC4511] defines the LDAP delete operation to only be capable of removing leaf entries. Note that the FSN delete function removes the fileset only from a federation namespace (by removing the records for that FSN from the NSDB node that receives this request). The fileset and its data are not deleted. Any junction that has this FSN as its target may continue to point to this non-existent FSN. A dangling reference may be detected when a fileserver tries to resolve a junction that refers to the deleted FSN.5.1.2.1. LDAP Request This operation is implemented using the LDAP DELETE request described by the LDIF below. dn: fedfsFsnUuid=$FSNUUID,$NCE changeType: delete For example, if $FSNUUID is "e8c4761c-eb3b-4307-86fc-f702da197966" and $NCE is "o=fedfs", the operation would be: dn: fedfsFsnUuid=e8c4761c-eb3b-4307-86fc-f702da197966,o=fedfs changeType: delete5.1.3. Create an FSL This operation creates a new FSL for the given FSN by adding a new fedfsFsl entry in the NSDB's LDAP directory. A fedfsFsl entry contains a fedfsFslUuid and fedfsFsnUuid. The administrator chooses the fedfsFslUuid. The process for choosing the fedfsFslUuid is described inSection 2.12. The fedfsFsnUuid is the UUID of the FSL's FSN. The administrator will also set additional attributes depending on the FSL type.Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 44]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 20155.1.3.1. LDAP Request This operation is implemented using the LDAP ADD request described by the LDIF below (Note: the LDIF shows the creation of an NFS FSL.) dn: fedfsFslUuid=$FSLUUID,fedfsFsnUuid=$FSNUUID,$NCE changeType: add objectClass: fedfsNfsFsl fedfsFslUuid: $FSLUUID fedfsFsnUuid: $FSNUUID fedfsNfsURI: nfs://$HOST:$PORT//$PATH fedfsNfsCurrency: $CURRENCY fedfsNfsGenFlagWritable: $WRITABLE fedfsNfsGenFlagGoing: $GOING fedfsNfsGenFlagSplit: $SPLIT fedfsNfsTransFlagRdma: $RDMA fedfsNfsClassSimul: $CLASS_SIMUL fedfsNfsClassHandle:$CLASS_HANDLE fedfsNfsClassFileid:$CLASS_FILEID fedfsNfsClassWritever:$CLASS_WRITEVER fedfsNfsClassChange: $CLASS_CHANGE fedfsNfsClassReaddir: $CLASS_READDIR fedfsNfsReadRank: $READ_RANK fedfsNfsReadOrder: $READ_ORDER fedfsNfsWriteRank: $WRITE_RANK fedfsNfsWriteOrder: $WRITE_ORDER fedfsNfsVarSub: $VAR_SUB fedfsNfsValidFor: $TIME fedfsAnnotation: $ANNOTATION fedfsDescr: $DESCR For example, if $FSNUUID is "e8c4761c-eb3b-4307-86fc-f702da197966", $FSLUUID is "ba89a802-41a9-44cf-8447-dda367590eb3", $HOST is "server.example.com", $PORT is "20049", $PATH is stored in the file "/tmp/fsl_path", $CURRENCY is "0" (an up-to-date copy), the FSL is writable, but not going, split, or accessible via Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA), the simultaneous-use class is "1", the handle class is "0", the fileid class is "1", the write-verifier class is "1", the change class is "1", the readdir class is "9", the read rank is "7", the read order is "8", the write rank is "5", the write order is "6", variable substitution is false, $TIME is "300" seconds, $ANNOTATION is ""foo" = "bar"", $DESC is "This is a description.", and $NCE is "o=fedfs", the operation would be (for readability, the DN is split into two lines):Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 45]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 dn: fedfsFslUuid=ba89a802-41a9-44cf-8447-dda367590eb3, fedfsFsnUuid=e8c4761c-eb3b-4307-86fc-f702da197966,o=fedfs changeType: add objectClass: fedfsNfsFsl fedfsFslUuid: ba89a802-41a9-44cf-8447-dda367590eb3 fedfsFsnUuid: e8c4761c-eb3b-4307-86fc-f702da197966 fedfsNfsURI: nfs://server.example.com:20049//tmp/fsl_path fedfsNfsCurrency: 0 fedfsNfsGenFlagWritable: TRUE fedfsNfsGenFlagGoing: FALSE fedfsNfsGenFlagSplit: FALSE fedfsNfsTransFlagRdma: FALSE fedfsNfsClassSimul: 1 fedfsNfsClassHandle: 0 fedfsNfsClassFileid: 1 fedfsNfsClassWritever: 1 fedfsNfsClassChange: 1 fedfsNfsClassReaddir: 9 fedfsNfsReadRank: 7 fedfsNfsReadOrder: 8 fedfsNfsWriteRank: 5 fedfsNfsWriteOrder: 6 fedfsNfsVarSub: FALSE fedfsNfsValidFor: 300 fedfsAnnotation: "foo" = "bar" fedfsDescr: This is a description.5.1.3.2. Selecting fedfsNfsFsl Values The fedfsNfsFSl object class is used to describe NFSv4-accessible filesets. For the reasons described inSection 2.8.4, administrators SHOULD choose reasonable values for all LDAP attributes of an NFSv4-accessible fedfsNfsFsl even though some of these LDAP attributes are not explicitly contained in an NFSv4 fs_locations attribute. When the administrator is unable to choose reasonable values for the LDAP attributes not explicitly contained in an NFSv4 fs_locations attribute, the values in the following table are RECOMMENDED.Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 46]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 +-------------------------+----------+------------------------------+ | LDAP attribute | LDAP | Notes | | | value | | +-------------------------+----------+------------------------------+ | fedfsNfsCurrency | negative | Indicates that the server | | | value | does not know the currency | | | | (seeSection 11.10.1 of | | | | [RFC5661]). | | fedfsNfsGenFlagWritable | FALSE | Leaving unset is not harmful | | | | (seeSection 11.10.1 of | | | | [RFC5661]). | | fedfsNfsGenFlagGoing | FALSE | NFS client will detect a | | | | migration event if the FSL | | | | becomes unavailable. | | fedfsNfsGenFlagSplit | TRUE | Safe to assume that the FSL | | | | is split. | | fedfsNfsTransFlagRdma | TRUE | NFS client will detect if | | | | RDMA access is available. | | fedfsNfsClassSimul | 0 | 0 is treated as non-matching | | | | (seeSection 11.10.1 of | | | | [RFC5661]). | | fedfsNfsClassHandle | 0 | See fedfsNfsClassSimul note. | | fedfsNfsClassFileid | 0 | See fedfsNfsClassSimul note. | | fedfsNfsClassWritever | 0 | See fedfsNfsClassSimul note. | | fedfsNfsClassChange | 0 | See fedfsNfsClassSimul note. | | fedfsNfsClassReaddir | 0 | See fedfsNfsClassSimul note. | | fedfsNfsReadRank | 0 | Highest value ensures FSL | | | | will be tried. | | fedfsNfsReadOrder | 0 | See fedfsNfsReadRank note. | | fedfsNfsWriteRank | 0 | See fedfsNfsReadRank note. | | fedfsNfsWriteOrder | 0 | See fedfsNfsReadRank note. | | fedfsNfsVarSub | FALSE | NFSv4 does not define | | | | variable substitution in | | | | paths. | | fedfsNfsValidFor | 0 | Indicates no appropriate | | | | refetch interval (see | | | |Section 11.10.2 of | | | | [RFC5661]). | +-------------------------+----------+------------------------------+5.1.4. Delete an FSL This operation deletes an FSL record. The admin requests the NSDB node storing the fedfsFsl to delete it from its database. This operation does not result in fileset data being deleted on any fileserver.Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 47]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 20155.1.4.1. LDAP Request The admin sends an LDAP DELETE request to the NSDB node to remove the FSL. dn: fedfsFslUuid=$FSLUUID,fedfsFsnUuid=$FSNUUID,$NCE changeType: delete For example, if $FSNUUID is "e8c4761c-eb3b-4307-86fc-f702da197966", $FSLUUID is "ba89a802-41a9-44cf-8447-dda367590eb3", and $NCE is "o=fedfs", the operation would be (for readability, the DN is split into two lines): dn: fedfsFslUuid=ba89a802-41a9-44cf-8447-dda367590eb3, fedfsFsnUuid=e8c4761c-eb3b-4307-86fc-f702da197966,o=fedfs changeType: delete5.1.5. Update an FSL This operation updates the attributes of a given FSL. This command results in a change in the attributes of the fedfsFsl at the NSDB node maintaining this FSL. The values of the fedfsFslUuid and fedfsFsnUuid attributes MUST NOT change during an FSL update.5.1.5.1. LDAP Request The admin sends an LDAP MODIFY request to the NSDB node to update the FSL. dn: fedfsFslUuid=$FSLUUID,fedfsFsnUuid=$FSNUUID,$NCE changeType: modify replace: $ATTRIBUTE-TYPE For example, if $FSNUUID is "e8c4761c-eb3b-4307-86fc-f702da197966", $FSLUUID is "ba89a802-41a9-44cf-8447-dda367590eb3", $NCE is "o=fedfs", and the administrator wished to change the NFS read rank to 10, the operation would be (for readability, the DN is split into two lines): dn: fedfsFslUuid=ba89a802-41a9-44cf-8447-dda367590eb3, fedfsFsnUuid=e8c4761c-eb3b-4307-86fc-f702da197966,o=fedfs changeType: modify replace: fedfsNfsReadClass fedfsNfsReadRank: 10Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 48]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 20155.2. NSDB Operations for Fileservers5.2.1. NSDB Container Entry (NCE) Enumeration To find the NCEs for the NSDB nsdb.example.com, a fileserver would do the following: nce_list = empty connect to the LDAP directory at nsdb.example.com for each namingContext value $BAR in the root DSE /* $BAR is a DN */ query for a fedfsNceDN value at $BAR /* * TheRFC 4516 LDAP URL for this search would be * * ldap://nsdb.example.com:389/$BAR?fedfsNceDN?? * (objectClass=fedfsNsdbContainerInfo) * */ if a fedfsNceDN value is found add the value to the nce_list5.2.2. Lookup FSLs for an FSN Using an LDAP search, the fileserver can obtain all of the FSLs for a given FSN. The FSN's fedfsFsnUuid is used as the search key. The following examples use the LDAP Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) format defined in [RFC4516]. To obtain a list of all FSLs for $FSNUUID on the NSDB named $NSDBNAME, the following search can be used (for readability, the URI is split into two lines): for each $NCE in nce_list ldap://$NSDBNAME/fedfsFsnUuid=$FSNUUID,$NCE??one? (objectClass=fedfsFsl) This search is for the children of the object with DN "fedfsFsnUuid=$FSNUUID,$NCE" with a filter for "objectClass=fedfsFsl". The scope value of "one" restricts the search to the entry's children (rather than the entire subtree below the entry), and the filter ensures that only FSL entries are returned. For example, if $NSDBNAME is "nsdb.example.com", $FSNUUID is "e8c4761c-eb3b-4307-86fc-f702da197966", and $NCE is "o=fedfs", the search would be (for readability, the URI is split into three lines):Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 49]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 ldap://nsdb.example.com/ fedfsFsnUuid=e8c4761c-eb3b-4307-86fc-f702da197966,o=fedfs ??one?(objectClass=fedfsFsl) The following search can be used to obtain only the NFS FSLs for $FSNUUID on the NSDB named $NSDBNAME (for readability, the URI is split into two lines): for each $NCE in nce_list ldap://$NSDBNAME/fedfsFsnUuid=$FSNUUID,$NCE??one? (objectClass=fedfsNfsFsl) This also searches for the children of the object with DN "fedfsFsnUuid=$FSNUUID,$NCE", but the filter for "objectClass = fedfsNfsFsl" restricts the results to only NFS FSLs. For example, if $NSDBNAME is nsdb.example.com, $FSNUUID is "e8c4761c- eb3b-4307-86fc-f702da197966", and $NCE is "o=fedfs", the search would be (for readability, the URI is split into three lines): ldap://nsdb.example.com/ fedfsFsnUuid=e8c4761c-eb3b-4307-86fc-f702da197966,o=fedfs ??one?(objectClass=fedfsNfsFsl) The fileserver will generate a referral based on the set of FSLs returned by these queries using the process described inSection 2.8.4.5.3. NSDB Operations and LDAP Referrals The LDAPv3 protocol defines an LDAP referral mechanism that allows an LDAP server to redirect an LDAP client. LDAPv3 defines two types of LDAP referrals: the Referral type defined inSection 4.1.10 of [RFC4511] and the SearchResultReference type defined inSection 4.5.3 of [RFC4511]. In both cases, the LDAP referral lists one or more URIs for services that can be used to complete the operation. In the remainder of this document, the term "LDAP referral" is used to indicate either of these types. If an NSDB operation results in an LDAP referral, the NSDB client MAY follow the LDAP referral. An NSDB client's decision to follow an LDAP referral is implementation and configuration dependent. For example, an NSDB client might be configured to follow only those LDAP referrals that were received over a secure channel or only those that target an NSDB that supports encrypted communication. If an NSDB client chooses to follow an LDAP referral, the NSDB client MUST process the LDAP referral and prevent looping as described inSection 4.1.10 of [RFC4511].Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 50]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 20156. Security Considerations Both the NFSv4 and LDAPv3 protocols provide security mechanisms. When used in conjunction with the federated file system protocols described in this document, the use of these mechanisms is RECOMMENDED. Specifically, the use of RPCSEC_GSS [RFC2203], which is built on the Generic Security Service Application Program Interface (GSS-API) [RFC2743], is RECOMMENDED on all NFS connections between a file-access client and fileserver. The security considerations sections of the NFSv4.0 [RFC7530] and NFSv4.1 [RFC5661] specifications contain special considerations for the handling of GETATTR operations for the fs_locations and fs_locations_info attributes. NSDB nodes and NSDB clients MUST implement support for TLS [RFC5246], as described in [RFC4513]. For all LDAP connections established by the federated file system protocols, the use of TLS is RECOMMENDED. If an NSDB client chooses to follow an LDAP referral, the NSDB client SHOULD authenticate the LDAP referral's target NSDB using the target NSDB's credentials (not the credentials of the NSDB that generated the LDAP referral). The NSDB client SHOULD NOT follow an LDAP referral that targets an NSDB for which it does not know the NSDB's credentials. Within a federation, there are two types of components an attacker may compromise: a fileserver and an NSDB. If an attacker compromises a fileserver, the attacker can interfere with a file-access client's file system input/output (I/O) operations (e.g., by returning fictitious data in the response to a read request) or can fabricate a referral. The attacker's abilities are the same regardless of whether or not the federation protocols are in use. While the federation protocols do not give the attacker additional capabilities, they are additional targets for attack. The LDAP protocol described inSection 5.2 SHOULD be secured using the methods described above to defeat attacks on a fileserver via this channel. If an attacker compromises an NSDB, the attacker will be able to forge FSL information and thus poison the fileserver's referral information. Therefore, an NSDB should be as secure as the fileservers that query it. The LDAP operations described inSection 5 SHOULD be secured using the methods described above to defeat attacks on an NSDB via this channel.Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 51]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 A fileserver binds anonymously when performing NSDB operations. Thus, the contents and distinguished names of FSN and FSL records are required to be readable by anyone who can bind anonymously to an NSDB service.Section 2.12 presents the security considerations in the choice of the type of UUID used in these records. It should be noted that the federation protocols do not directly provide access to file system data. The federation protocols only provide a mechanism for building a namespace. All data transfers occur between a file-access client and fileserver just as they would if the federation protocols were not in use. As a result, the federation protocols do not require new user authentication and authorization mechanisms or require a fileserver to act as a proxy for a client.7. IANA Considerations7.1. Registry for the fedfsAnnotation Key Namespace This document defines the fedfsAnnotation key inSection 4.2.1.6. The fedfsAnnotation key namespace is managed by IANA. IANA has created and now maintains a new registry entitled "FedFS Annotation Keys". The location of this registry is under a new heading called "Federated File System (FedFS) Parameters". The URL address is <http://www.iana.org/assignments/fedfs-parameters>. Future registrations are to be administered by IANA using the "First Come First Served" policy defined in [RFC5226]. Registration requests MUST include the key (a valid UTF-8 string of any length), a brief description of the key's purpose, and an email contact for the registration. For viewing, the registry should be sorted lexicographically by key. There are no initial assignments for this registry.7.2. Registry for FedFS Object Identifiers Using the process described in [RFC2578], one of the authors was assigned the Internet Private Enterprise Numbers range 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.x. Within this range, the subrange 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.x is permanently dedicated for use by the federated file system protocols. Unassigned OIDs in this range MAY be used for Private Use or Experimental Use as defined in [RFC5226]. New permanent FedFS OID assignments MUST NOT be made using OIDs in this range.Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 52]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 IANA has created and now maintains a new registry entitled "FedFS Object Identifiers" for the purpose of recording the allocations of FedFS Object Identifiers (OIDs) specified by this document. No future allocations in this registry are allowed. The location of this registry is under the heading "Federated File System (FedFS) Parameters", created inSection 7.1. The URL address is <http://www.iana.org/assignments/fedfs-parameters>. For viewing, the registry has been sorted numerically by OID value. The contents of the "FedFS Object Identifiers" registry are given in Table 1. Note: A descriptor designated below as "historic" reserves an OID used in a past version of the NSDB protocol. Registering such OIDs retains compatibility among existing implementations of the NSDB protocol. This document does not otherwise refer to historic OIDs.Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 53]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 +---------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ | OID | Description | Reference | +---------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.1 | fedfsUuid |RFC 7532 | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.2 | fedfsNetAddr | historic | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.3 | fedfsNetPort | historic | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.4 | fedfsFsnUuid |RFC 7532 | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.5 | fedfsNsdbName | historic | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.6 | fedfsNsdbPort | historic | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.7 | fedfsNcePrefix | historic | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.8 | fedfsFslUuid |RFC 7532 | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.9 | fedfsFslHost | historic | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.10 | fedfsFslPort | historic | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.11 | fedfsFslTTL | historic | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.12 | fedfsAnnotation |RFC 7532 | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.13 | fedfsDescr |RFC 7532 | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.14 | fedfsNceDN |RFC 7532 | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.15 | fedfsFsnTTL |RFC 7532 | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.100 | fedfsNfsPath | historic | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.101 | fedfsNfsMajorVer | historic | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.102 | fedfsNfsMinorVer | historic | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.103 | fedfsNfsCurrency |RFC 7532 | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.104 | fedfsNfsGenFlagWritable |RFC 7532 | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.105 | fedfsNfsGenFlagGoing |RFC 7532 | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.106 | fedfsNfsGenFlagSplit |RFC 7532 | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.107 | fedfsNfsTransFlagRdma |RFC 7532 | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.108 | fedfsNfsClassSimul |RFC 7532 | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.109 | fedfsNfsClassHandle |RFC 7532 | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.110 | fedfsNfsClassFileid |RFC 7532 | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.111 | fedfsNfsClassWritever |RFC 7532 | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.112 | fedfsNfsClassChange |RFC 7532 | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.113 | fedfsNfsClassReaddir |RFC 7532 | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.114 | fedfsNfsReadRank |RFC 7532 | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.115 | fedfsNfsReadOrder |RFC 7532 | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.116 | fedfsNfsWriteRank |RFC 7532 | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.117 | fedfsNfsWriteOrder |RFC 7532 | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.118 | fedfsNfsVarSub |RFC 7532 | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.119 | fedfsNfsValidFor |RFC 7532 | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.120 | fedfsNfsURI |RFC 7532 | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.1001 | fedfsNsdbContainerInfo |RFC 7532 | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.1002 | fedfsFsn |RFC 7532 | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.1003 | fedfsFsl |RFC 7532 | | 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.1004 | fedfsNfsFsl |RFC 7532 | +---------------------------+--------------------------+-----------+ Table 1Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 54]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 20157.3. LDAP Descriptor Registration In accordance with Sections3.4 and4 of [RFC4520], the object identifier descriptors defined in this document (listed below) have been registered via the Expert Review process. Subject: Request for LDAP Descriptor Registration Person & email address to contact for further information: See "Author/Change Controller" Specification:RFC 7532 Author/Change Controller: IESG (iesg@ietf.org) Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.1 Descriptor (short name): fedfsUuid Usage: attribute type Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.2 Descriptor (short name): fedfsNetAddr Usage: attribute type (historic) Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.3 Descriptor (short name): fedfsNetPort Usage: attribute type (historic) Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.4 Descriptor (short name): fedfsFsnUuid Usage: attribute type Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.5 Descriptor (short name): fedfsNsdbName Usage: attribute type (historic) Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.6 Descriptor (short name): fedfsNsdbPort Usage: attribute type (historic) Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.7 Descriptor (short name): fedfsNcePrefix Usage: attribute type (historic) Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.8 Descriptor (short name): fedfsFslUuid Usage: attribute type Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.9 Descriptor (short name): fedfsFslHost Usage: attribute type (historic)Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 55]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.10 Descriptor (short name): fedfsFslPort Usage: attribute type (historic) Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.11 Descriptor (short name): fedfsFslTTL Usage: attribute type (historic) Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.12 Descriptor (short name): fedfsAnnotation Usage: attribute type Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.13 Descriptor (short name): fedfsDescr Usage: attribute type Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.14 Descriptor (short name): fedfsNceDN Usage: attribute type Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.15 Descriptor (short name): fedfsFsnTTL Usage: attribute type Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.100 Descriptor (short name): fedfsNfsPath Usage: attribute type (historic) Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.101 Descriptor (short name): fedfsNfsMajorVer Usage: attribute type (historic) Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.102 Descriptor (short name): fedfsNfsMinorVer Usage: attribute type (historic) Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.103 Descriptor (short name): fedfsNfsCurrency Usage: attribute type Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.104 Descriptor (short name): fedfsNfsGenFlagWritable Usage: attribute type Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.105 Descriptor (short name): fedfsNfsGenFlagGoing Usage: attribute typeLentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 56]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.106 Descriptor (short name): fedfsNfsGenFlagSplit Usage: attribute type Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.107 Descriptor (short name): fedfsNfsTransFlagRdma Usage: attribute type Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.108 Descriptor (short name): fedfsNfsClassSimul Usage: attribute type Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.109 Descriptor (short name): fedfsNfsClassHandle Usage: attribute type Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.110 Descriptor (short name): fedfsNfsClassFileid Usage: attribute type Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.111 Descriptor (short name): fedfsNfsClassWritever Usage: attribute type Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.112 Descriptor (short name): fedfsNfsClassChange Usage: attribute type Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.113 Descriptor (short name): fedfsNfsClassReaddir Usage: attribute type Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.114 Descriptor (short name): fedfsNfsReadRank Usage: attribute type Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.115 Descriptor (short name): fedfsNfsReadOrder Usage: attribute type Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.116 Descriptor (short name): fedfsNfsWriteRank Usage: attribute type Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.117 Descriptor (short name): fedfsNfsWriteOrder Usage: attribute typeLentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 57]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.118 Descriptor (short name): fedfsNfsVarSub Usage: attribute type Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.119 Descriptor (short name): fedfsNfsValidFor Usage: attribute type Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.120 Descriptor (short name): fedfsNfsURI Usage: attribute type Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.1001 Descriptor (short name): fedfsNsdbContainerInfo Usage: object class Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.1002 Descriptor (short name): fedfsFsn Usage: object class Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.1003 Descriptor (short name): fedfsFsl Usage: object class Object Identifier: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31103.1.1004 Descriptor (short name): fedfsNfsFsl Usage: object class8. Glossary Administrator: A user with the necessary authority to initiate administrative tasks on one or more servers. Admin Entity: A server or agent that administers a collection of fileservers and persistently stores the namespace information. File-Access Client: Standard off-the-shelf, network-attached storage (NAS) client software that communicates with fileservers using a standard file-access protocol. Federation: A set of fileserver collections and singleton fileservers that use a common set of interfaces and protocols in order to provide to file-access clients a federated namespace accessible through a file system access protocol. Fileserver: A server that stores physical fileset data or refers file-access clients to other fileservers. A fileserver provides access to its shared file system data via a file-access protocol.Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 58]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 Fileset: The abstraction of a set of files and the directory tree that contains them. A fileset is the fundamental unit of data management in the federation. Note that all files within a fileset are descendants of one directory and that filesets do not span file systems. File System: A self-contained unit of export for a fileserver and the mechanism used to implement filesets. The fileset does not need to be rooted at the root of the file system, nor at the export point for the file system. A single file system MAY implement more than one fileset, if the file-access protocol and the fileserver permit this. File-Access Protocol: A network file system access protocol such as NFSv3 [RFC1813], NFSv4 [RFC7530], or CIFS (Common Internet File System) [MS-SMB] [MS-SMB2] [MS-CIFS]. FSL (Fileset Location): The location of the implementation of a fileset at a particular moment in time. An FSL MUST be something that can be translated into a protocol-specific description of a resource that a file-access client can access directly, such as an fs_locations attribute (for NFSv4) or a share name (for CIFS). FSN (Fileset Name): A platform-independent and globally unique name for a fileset. Two FSLs that implement replicas of the same fileset MUST have the same FSN, and if a fileset is migrated from one location to another, the FSN of that fileset MUST remain the same. Junction: A file system object used to link a directory name in the current fileset with an object within another fileset. The server-side "link" from a leaf node in one fileset to the root of another fileset. Namespace: A filename/directory tree that a sufficiently authorized file-access client can observe. NSDB (Namespace Database) Service: A service that maps FSNs to FSLs. The NSDB may also be used to store other information, such as annotations for these mappings and their components. NSDB Node: The name or location of a server that implements part of the NSDB service and is responsible for keeping track of the FSLs (and related information) that implement a given partition of the FSNs.Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 59]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 Referral: A server response to a file-access client access that directs the client to evaluate the current object as a reference to an object at a different location (specified by an FSL) in another fileset and possibly hosted on another fileserver. The client re-attempts the access to the object at the new location. Replica: A redundant implementation of a fileset. Each replica shares the same FSN but has a different FSL. Replicas may be used to increase availability or performance. Updates to replicas of the same fileset MUST appear to occur in the same order; therefore, each replica is self-consistent at any moment. We do not assume that updates to each replica occur simultaneously. If a replica is offline or unreachable, the other replicas may be updated. Server Collection: A set of fileservers administered as a unit. A server collection may be administered with vendor-specific software. The namespace provided by a server collection could be part of the federated namespace. Singleton Server: A server collection containing only one server; a stand-alone fileserver.9. References9.1. Normative References [RFC2079] Smith, M., "Definition of an X.500 Attribute Type and an Object Class to Hold Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs)",RFC 2079, January 1997, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2079>. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119, March 1997, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. [RFC2203] Eisler, M., Chiu, A., and L. Ling, "RPCSEC_GSS Protocol Specification",RFC 2203, September 1997, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2203>.Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 60]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 [RFC2578] McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J. Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Structure of Management Information Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58,RFC 2578, April 1999, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2578>. [RFC2743] Linn, J., "Generic Security Service Application Program Interface Version 2, Update 1",RFC 2743, January 2000, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2743>. [RFC2849] Good, G., "The LDAP Data Interchange Format (LDIF) - Technical Specification",RFC 2849, June 2000, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2849>. [RFC3629] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646", STD 63,RFC 3629, November 2003, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3629>. [RFC3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66,RFC3986, January 2005, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3986>. [RFC4122] Leach, P., Mealling, M., and R. Salz, "A Universally Unique IDentifier (UUID) URN Namespace",RFC 4122, July 2005, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4122>. [RFC4510] Zeilenga, K., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Technical Specification Road Map",RFC 4510, June 2006, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4510>. [RFC4511] Sermersheim, J., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): The Protocol",RFC 4511, June 2006, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4511>. [RFC4512] Zeilenga, K., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Directory Information Models",RFC 4512, June 2006, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4512>. [RFC4513] Harrison, R., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Authentication Methods and Security Mechanisms",RFC 4513, June 2006, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4513>. [RFC4516] Smith, M., Ed. and T. Howes, "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Uniform Resource Locator",RFC 4516, June 2006, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4516>.Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 61]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 [RFC4517] Legg, S., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Syntaxes and Matching Rules",RFC 4517, June 2006, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4517>. [RFC4519] Sciberras, A., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Schema for User Applications",RFC 4519, June 2006, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4519>. [RFC4520] Zeilenga, K., "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Considerations for the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)",BCP 64,RFC 4520, June 2006, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4520>. [RFC4530] Zeilenga, K., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) entryUUID Operational Attribute",RFC 4530, June 2006, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4530>. [RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs",BCP 26,RFC 5226, May 2008, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5226>. [RFC5234] Crocker, D., Ed. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF", STD 68,RFC 5234, January 2008, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5234>. [RFC5246] Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2",RFC 5246, August 2008, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5246>. [RFC5661] Shepler, S., Ed., Eisler, M., Ed., and D. Noveck, Ed., "Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 Protocol",RFC 5661, January 2010, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5661>. [RFC7530] Haynes, T., Ed. and D. Noveck, Ed., "Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Protocol",RFC 7530, March 2015, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7530>.9.2. Informative References [AFS] Howard, J., "An Overview of the Andrew File System", Proceedings of the USENIX Winter Technical Conference , 1988. [MS-CIFS] Microsoft Corporation, "Common Internet File System (CIFS) Protocol Specification", MS-CIFS 24.0, May 2014.Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 62]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015 [MS-SMB] Microsoft Corporation, "Server Message Block (SMB) Protocol Specification", MS-SMB 43.0, May 2014. [MS-SMB2] Microsoft Corporation, "Server Message Block (SMB) Version 2 Protocol Specification", MS-SMB2 46.0, May 2014. [RFC1813] Callaghan, B., Pawlowski, B., and P. Staubach, "NFS Version 3 Protocol Specification",RFC 1813, June 1995, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1813>. [RFC2224] Callaghan, B., "NFS URL Scheme",RFC 2224, October 1997, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2224>. [RFC3254] Alvestrand, H., "Definitions for talking about directories",RFC 3254, April 2002, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3254>. [RFC5662] Shepler, S., Ed., Eisler, M., Ed., and D. Noveck, Ed., "Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 External Data Representation Standard (XDR) Description",RFC 5662, January 2010, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5662>. [RFC5716] Lentini, J., Everhart, C., Ellard, D., Tewari, R., and M. Naik, "Requirements for Federated File Systems",RFC 5716, January 2010, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5716>. [RFC6641] Everhart, C., Adamson, W., and J. Zhang, "Using DNS SRV to Specify a Global File Namespace with NFS Version 4",RFC6641, June 2012, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6641>. [RFC7533] Lentini, J., Tewari, R., and C. Lever, Ed., "Administration Protocol for Federated File Systems",RFC7533, March 2015, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7533>.Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 63]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015Acknowledgments Daniel Ellard contributed significant parts of this document. The authors and editor would like to thank Craig Everhart and Manoj Naik, who were co-authors of an earlier draft version of this document. In addition, we would like to thank Andy Adamson, Paul Lemahieu, Mario Wurzl, and Robert Thurlow for helping to author this document. We would like to thank George Amvrosiadis, Trond Myklebust, Howard Chu, and Nicolas Williams for their comments and review. The editor gratefully acknowledges the IESG reviewers, whose constructive comments helped make this a much stronger document. Finally, we would like to thank Andy Adamson, Rob Thurlow, and Tom Haynes for helping to get this document out the door. The extract.sh shell script and formatting conventions were first described by the authors of the NFSv4.1 XDR specification [RFC5662].Lentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 64]
RFC 7532 NSDB Protocol for Federated File Systems March 2015Authors' Addresses James Lentini NetApp 1601 Trapelo Rd, Suite 16 Waltham, MA 02451 United States Phone: +1 781-768-5359 EMail: jlentini@netapp.com Renu Tewari IBM Almaden 650 Harry Rd San Jose, CA 95120 United States EMail: tewarir@us.ibm.com Charles Lever (editor) Oracle Corporation 1015 Granger Avenue Ann Arbor, MI 48104 United States Phone: +1 248-614-5091 EMail: chuck.lever@oracle.comLentini, et al. Standards Track [Page 65]
[8]ページ先頭