Movatterモバイル変換

Network Working Group                                   S. CrockerRequest for Comments #73                                UCLA                                                        25 Sept. 70                        Response to NWM/RFC #67Bill's suggestion is a good one; however, my current policy is toencourage the most rapid implementation of the protocol in document#1, and his suggested modification should be delayed.  It seems to memost important to gain experience using the network before makingchanges to the protocol which are not dictated by necessity.  (Ipolled several sites regarding Bill's suggestion.  Sites with NCPimplementations under way tended to agree with this policy, whilesites further behind tended to desire Bill's suggested change.)With respect to changes, in general, I believe that changes arenecessary to improve the efficiency, provide greater flexibility, andguarantee reliability.  Many of us can suggest changes now, but Isuspect that clearer ideas will emerge from usage.       [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]         [ into the online RFC archives by Josh Elliott 1/98 ]                                                                [Page 1]