Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Errata] [Info page]

Obsoleted by:8343 PROPOSED STANDARD
Errata Exist
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                      M. BjorklundRequest for Comments: 7223                                Tail-f SystemsCategory: Standards Track                                       May 2014ISSN: 2070-1721A YANG Data Model for Interface ManagementAbstract   This document defines a YANG data model for the management of network   interfaces.  It is expected that interface-type-specific data models   augment the generic interfaces data model defined in this document.   The data model includes configuration data and state data (status   information and counters for the collection of statistics).Status of This Memo   This is an Internet Standards Track document.   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has   received public review and has been approved for publication by the   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on   Internet Standards is available inSection 2 of RFC 5741.   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained athttp://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7223.Copyright Notice   Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the   document authors.  All rights reserved.   This document is subject toBCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of   publication of this document.  Please review these documents   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as   described in the Simplified BSD License.Bjorklund                    Standards Track                    [Page 1]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014Table of Contents1. Introduction ....................................................21.1. Terminology ................................................31.2. Tree Diagrams ..............................................42. Objectives ......................................................43. Interfaces Data Model ...........................................53.1. The Interface Lists ........................................63.2. Interface References .......................................73.3. Interface Layering .........................................74. Relationship to the IF-MIB ......................................85. Interfaces YANG Module .........................................116. IANA Considerations ............................................267. Security Considerations ........................................268. Acknowledgments ................................................279. References .....................................................279.1. Normative References ......................................279.2. Informative References ....................................28Appendix A. Example: Ethernet Interface Module ....................29Appendix B. Example: Ethernet Bonding Interface Module ............30Appendix C. Example: VLAN Interface Module ........................31Appendix D. Example: NETCONF <get> Reply ..........................32Appendix E. Examples: Interface Naming Schemes ....................35E.1. Router with Restricted Interface Names .....................35E.2. Router with Arbitrary Interface Names ......................36E.3. Ethernet Switch with Restricted Interface Names ............37E.4. Generic Host with Restricted Interface Names ...............38E.5. Generic Host with Arbitrary Interface Names ................391.  Introduction   This document defines a YANG [RFC6020] data model for the management   of network interfaces.  It is expected that interface-type-specific   data models augment the generic interfaces data model defined in this   document.   Network interfaces are central to the management of many Internet   protocols.  Thus, it is important to establish a common data model   for how interfaces are identified, configured, and monitored.   The data model includes configuration data and state data (status   information and counters for the collection of statistics).Bjorklund                    Standards Track                    [Page 2]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 20141.1.  Terminology   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described inBCP 14 [RFC2119].   The following terms are used within this document:   o  system-controlled interface: An interface is said to be system-      controlled if the system creates and deletes the interface      independently of what has been explicitly configured.  Examples      are interfaces representing physical hardware that appear and      disappear when hardware (e.g., a line card or hot-pluggable      wireless interface) is added or removed.  System-controlled      interfaces may also appear if a certain functionality is enabled      (e.g., a loopback interface might appear if the IP protocol stack      is enabled).   o  user-controlled interface: An interface is said to be user-      controlled if the creation of the interface is controlled by      adding explicit interface configuration to the running      configuration datastore and the removal of the interface is      controlled by removing explicit interface configuration from the      running configuration datastore.  Examples are VLAN interfaces      configured on a system-controlled Ethernet interface.   The following terms are defined in [RFC6241] and are not redefined   here:   o  client   o  configuration data   o  server   o  state data   The following terms are defined in [RFC6020] and are not redefined   here:   o  augment   o  data model   o  data node   o  presence containerBjorklund                    Standards Track                    [Page 3]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 20141.2.  Tree Diagrams   A simplified graphical representation of the data model is used in   this document.  The meaning of the symbols in these diagrams is as   follows:   o  Brackets "[" and "]" enclose list keys.   o  Abbreviations before data node names: "rw" means configuration      (read-write), and "ro" means state data (read-only).   o  Symbols after data node names: "?" means an optional node, "!"      means a presence container, and "*" denotes a list and leaf-list.   o  Parentheses enclose choice and case nodes, and case nodes are also      marked with a colon (":").   o  Ellipsis ("...") stands for contents of subtrees that are not      shown.2.  Objectives   This section describes some of the design objectives for the model   presented inSection 5.   o  It is recognized that existing implementations will have to map      the interface data model defined in this memo to their proprietary      native data model.  To facilitate such mappings, the data model      should be simple.   o  The data model should be suitable for new implementations to use      as is, without requiring a mapping to a different native model.   o  References to interfaces should be as simple as possible,      preferably by using a single leafref.   o  The mapping to ifIndex [RFC2863] used by the Simple Network      Management Protocol (SNMP) to identify interfaces must be clear.   o  The model must support interface layering: both (1) simple      layering, where one interface is layered on top of exactly one      other interface, and (2) more complex scenarios, where one      interface results from the aggregation of N other interfaces or      when N interfaces are multiplexed over one other interface.Bjorklund                    Standards Track                    [Page 4]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014   o  The data model should support the pre-provisioning of interface      configuration, i.e., it should be possible to configure an      interface whose physical interface hardware is not present on the      device.  It is recommended that devices that support dynamic      addition and removal of physical interfaces also support      pre-provisioning.   o  The data model should support physical interfaces as well as      logical interfaces.   o  The data model should include read-only counters in order to      gather statistics for sent and received octets and packets,      received packets with errors, and packets that could not be sent      due to errors.3.  Interfaces Data Model   This document defines the YANG module "ietf-interfaces", which has   the following structure:      +--rw interfaces      |  +--rw interface* [name]      |     +--rw name                        string      |     +--rw description?                string      |     +--rw type                        identityref      |     +--rw enabled?                    boolean      |     +--rw link-up-down-trap-enable?   enumeration      +--ro interfaces-state         +--ro interface* [name]            +--ro name               string            +--ro type               identityref            +--ro admin-status       enumeration            +--ro oper-status        enumeration            +--ro last-change?       yang:date-and-time            +--ro if-index           int32            +--ro phys-address?      yang:phys-address            +--ro higher-layer-if*   interface-state-ref            +--ro lower-layer-if*    interface-state-ref            +--ro speed?             yang:gauge64            +--ro statistics               +--ro discontinuity-time    yang:date-and-time               +--ro in-octets?            yang:counter64               +--ro in-unicast-pkts?      yang:counter64               +--ro in-broadcast-pkts?    yang:counter64               +--ro in-multicast-pkts?    yang:counter64               +--ro in-discards?          yang:counter32               +--ro in-errors?            yang:counter32               +--ro in-unknown-protos?    yang:counter32Bjorklund                    Standards Track                    [Page 5]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014               +--ro out-octets?           yang:counter64               +--ro out-unicast-pkts?     yang:counter64               +--ro out-broadcast-pkts?   yang:counter64               +--ro out-multicast-pkts?   yang:counter64               +--ro out-discards?         yang:counter32               +--ro out-errors?           yang:counter323.1.  The Interface Lists   The data model for interfaces presented in this document uses a flat   list of interfaces.  Each interface in the list is identified by its   name.  Furthermore, each interface has a mandatory "type" leaf.   The "iana-if-type" module [RFC7224] defines YANG identities for the   interface types in the IANA-maintained "ifType definitions" registry.   There is one list of configured interfaces ("/interfaces/interface"),   and a separate list for the operational state of all interfaces   ("/interfaces-state/interface").   It is expected that interface-type-specific data models augment the   interface lists and possibly use the "type" leaf to make the   augmentation conditional.   As an example of such an interface-type-specific augmentation,   consider this YANG snippet.  For a more complete example, seeAppendix A.     import interfaces {         prefix "if";     }     import iana-if-type {       prefix ianaift;     }     augment "/if:interfaces/if:interface" {         when "if:type = 'ianaift:ethernetCsmacd'";         container ethernet {             leaf duplex {                 ...             }         }     }Bjorklund                    Standards Track                    [Page 6]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014   For system-controlled interfaces, the "name" is the device-specific   name of the interface.  The 'config false' list   "/interfaces-state/interface" contains all existing interfaces on the   device.   If the device supports arbitrarily named user-controlled interfaces,   the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) server advertises the   "arbitrary-names" feature.  If the device does not advertise this   feature, the names of user-controlled interfaces MUST match the   device's naming scheme.  How a client can learn the naming scheme of   such devices is outside the scope of this document.  See Appendices   E.1 and E.2 for examples.   When a system-controlled interface is created by the system, the   system tries to apply the interface configuration in "/interfaces/   interface" with the same name as the new interface.  If no such   interface configuration is found, or if the configured type does not   match the real interface type, the system creates the interface   without applying explicit configuration.   When a user-controlled interface is created, the configuration   determines the name of the interface.   Depending on the operating system and the physical attachment point   to which a network interface may be attached or removed, it may be   impossible for an implementation to provide predictable and   consistent names for system-controlled interfaces across insertion/   removal cycles as well as in anticipation of initial insertion.  The   ability to provide configurations for such interfaces is therefore   dependent on the implementation and cannot be assumed in all cases.3.2.  Interface References   An interface is identified by its name, which is unique within the   server.  This property is captured in the "interface-ref" and   "interface-state-ref" typedefs, which other YANG modules SHOULD use   when they need to reference a configured interface or operationally   used interface, respectively.3.3.  Interface Layering   There is no generic mechanism for how an interface is configured to   be layered on top of some other interface.  It is expected that   interface-type-specific models define their own data nodes for   interface layering by using "interface-ref" types to reference   lower layers.Bjorklund                    Standards Track                    [Page 7]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014   Below is an example of a model with such nodes.  For a more complete   example, seeAppendix B.     import interfaces {         prefix "if";     }     import iana-if-type {       prefix ianaift;     }     augment "/if:interfaces/if:interface" {         when "if:type = 'ianaift:ieee8023adLag'";         leaf-list slave-if {             type if:interface-ref;             must "/if:interfaces/if:interface[if:name = current()]"                + "/if:type = 'ianaift:ethernetCsmacd'" {                 description                     "The type of a slave interface must be                      'ethernetCsmacd'.";             }         }         // other bonding config params, failover times, etc.     }   While the interface layering is configured in interface-type-specific   models, two generic state data leaf-lists, "higher-layer-if" and   "lower-layer-if", represent a read-only view of the interface   layering hierarchy.4.  Relationship to the IF-MIB   If the device implements the IF-MIB [RFC2863], each entry in the "/   interfaces-state/interface" list is typically mapped to one ifEntry.   The "if-index" leaf MUST contain the value of the corresponding   ifEntry's ifIndex.   In most cases, the "name" of an "/interfaces-state/interface" entry   is mapped to ifName.  The IF-MIB allows two different ifEntries to   have the same ifName.  Devices that support this feature and also   support the data model defined in this document cannot have a 1-1   mapping between the "name" leaf and ifName.   The configured "description" of an "interface" has traditionally been   mapped to ifAlias in some implementations.  This document allows this   mapping, but implementers should be aware of the differences in the   value space and persistence for these objects.  See the YANG module   definition of the leaf "description" inSection 5 for details.Bjorklund                    Standards Track                    [Page 8]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014   The IF-MIB also defines the writable object ifPromiscuousMode.  Since   this object typically is not implemented as a configuration object by   SNMP agents, it is not mapped to the "ietf-interfaces" module.   The ifMtu object from the IF-MIB is not mapped to the   "ietf-interfaces" module.  It is expected that interface-type-   specific YANG modules provide interface-type-specific MTU leafs by   augmenting the "ietf-interfaces" model.   There are a number of counters in the IF-MIB that exist in two   versions: one with 32 bits and one with 64 bits.  The 64-bit versions   were added to support high-speed interfaces with a data rate greater   than 20,000,000 bits/second.  Today's implementations generally   support such high-speed interfaces, and hence only 64-bit counters   are provided in this data model.  Note that NETCONF and SNMP may   differ in the time granularity in which they provide access to the   counters.  For example, it is common that SNMP implementations cache   counter values for some time.   The objects ifDescr and ifConnectorPresent from the IF-MIB are not   mapped to the "ietf-interfaces" module.Bjorklund                    Standards Track                    [Page 9]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014   The following tables list the YANG data nodes with corresponding   objects in the IF-MIB.   +--------------------------------------+----------------------------+   | YANG data node in /interfaces-       | IF-MIB object              |   | state/interface                      |                            |   +--------------------------------------+----------------------------+   | name                                 | ifName                     |   | type                                 | ifType                     |   | admin-status                         | ifAdminStatus              |   | oper-status                          | ifOperStatus               |   | last-change                          | ifLastChange               |   | if-index                             | ifIndex                    |   | link-up-down-trap-enable             | ifLinkUpDownTrapEnable     |   | phys-address                         | ifPhysAddress              |   | higher-layer-if and lower-layer-if   | ifStackTable               |   | speed                                | ifSpeed and ifHighSpeed    |   | discontinuity-time                   | ifCounterDiscontinuityTime |   | in-octets                            | ifHCInOctets               |   | in-unicast-pkts                      | ifHCInUcastPkts            |   | in-broadcast-pkts                    | ifHCInBroadcastPkts        |   | in-multicast-pkts                    | ifHCInMulticastPkts        |   | in-discards                          | ifInDiscards               |   | in-errors                            | ifInErrors                 |   | in-unknown-protos                    | ifInUnknownProtos          |   | out-octets                           | ifHCOutOctets              |   | out-unicast-pkts                     | ifHCOutUcastPkts           |   | out-broadcast-pkts                   | ifHCOutBroadcastPkts       |   | out-multicast-pkts                   | ifHCOutMulticastPkts       |   | out-discards                         | ifOutDiscards              |   | out-errors                           | ifOutErrors                |   +--------------------------------------+----------------------------+             YANG State Data Nodes and Related IF-MIB Objects        +-----------------------------------------+---------------+        | YANG data node in /interfaces/interface | IF-MIB object |        +-----------------------------------------+---------------+        | description                             | ifAlias       |        +-----------------------------------------+---------------+             YANG Config Data Nodes and Related IF-MIB ObjectsBjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 10]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 20145.  Interfaces YANG Module   This YANG module imports typedefs from [RFC6991].   <CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-interfaces@2014-05-08.yang"   module ietf-interfaces {     namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-interfaces";     prefix if;     import ietf-yang-types {       prefix yang;     }     organization       "IETF NETMOD (NETCONF Data Modeling Language) Working Group";     contact       "WG Web:   <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/netmod/>        WG List:  <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>        WG Chair: Thomas Nadeau                  <mailto:tnadeau@lucidvision.com>        WG Chair: Juergen Schoenwaelder                  <mailto:j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>        Editor:   Martin Bjorklund                  <mailto:mbj@tail-f.com>";     description       "This module contains a collection of YANG definitions for        managing network interfaces.        Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as        authors of the code.  All rights reserved.        Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or        without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject        to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License        set forth inSection 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions        Relating to IETF Documents        (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).        This version of this YANG module is part ofRFC 7223; see        the RFC itself for full legal notices.";Bjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 11]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014     revision 2014-05-08 {       description         "Initial revision.";       reference         "RFC 7223: A YANG Data Model for Interface Management";     }     /*      * Typedefs      */     typedef interface-ref {       type leafref {         path "/if:interfaces/if:interface/if:name";       }       description         "This type is used by data models that need to reference          configured interfaces.";     }     typedef interface-state-ref {       type leafref {         path "/if:interfaces-state/if:interface/if:name";       }       description         "This type is used by data models that need to reference          the operationally present interfaces.";     }     /*      * Identities      */     identity interface-type {       description         "Base identity from which specific interface types are          derived.";     }     /*      * Features      */     feature arbitrary-names {       description         "This feature indicates that the device allows user-controlled          interfaces to be named arbitrarily.";     }Bjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 12]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014     feature pre-provisioning {       description         "This feature indicates that the device supports          pre-provisioning of interface configuration, i.e., it is          possible to configure an interface whose physical interface          hardware is not present on the device.";     }     feature if-mib {       description         "This feature indicates that the device implements          the IF-MIB.";       reference         "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB";     }     /*      * Configuration data nodes      */     container interfaces {       description         "Interface configuration parameters.";       list interface {         key "name";         description           "The list of configured interfaces on the device.            The operational state of an interface is available in the            /interfaces-state/interface list.  If the configuration of a            system-controlled interface cannot be used by the system            (e.g., the interface hardware present does not match the            interface type), then the configuration is not applied to            the system-controlled interface shown in the            /interfaces-state/interface list.  If the configuration            of a user-controlled interface cannot be used by the system,            the configured interface is not instantiated in the            /interfaces-state/interface list.";        leaf name {           type string;           description             "The name of the interface.              A device MAY restrict the allowed values for this leaf,              possibly depending on the type of the interface.Bjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 13]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014              For system-controlled interfaces, this leaf is the              device-specific name of the interface.  The 'config false'              list /interfaces-state/interface contains the currently              existing interfaces on the device.              If a client tries to create configuration for a              system-controlled interface that is not present in the              /interfaces-state/interface list, the server MAY reject              the request if the implementation does not support              pre-provisioning of interfaces or if the name refers to              an interface that can never exist in the system.  A              NETCONF server MUST reply with an rpc-error with the              error-tag 'invalid-value' in this case.              If the device supports pre-provisioning of interface              configuration, the 'pre-provisioning' feature is              advertised.              If the device allows arbitrarily named user-controlled              interfaces, the 'arbitrary-names' feature is advertised.              When a configured user-controlled interface is created by              the system, it is instantiated with the same name in the              /interface-state/interface list.";         }         leaf description {           type string;           description             "A textual description of the interface.              A server implementation MAY map this leaf to the ifAlias              MIB object.  Such an implementation needs to use some              mechanism to handle the differences in size and characters              allowed between this leaf and ifAlias.  The definition of              such a mechanism is outside the scope of this document.              Since ifAlias is defined to be stored in non-volatile              storage, the MIB implementation MUST map ifAlias to the              value of 'description' in the persistently stored              datastore.              Specifically, if the device supports ':startup', when              ifAlias is read the device MUST return the value of              'description' in the 'startup' datastore, and when it is              written, it MUST be written to the 'running' and 'startup'              datastores.  Note that it is up to the implementation toBjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 14]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014              decide whether to modify this single leaf in 'startup' or              perform an implicit copy-config from 'running' to              'startup'.              If the device does not support ':startup', ifAlias MUST              be mapped to the 'description' leaf in the 'running'              datastore.";           reference             "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB - ifAlias";         }         leaf type {           type identityref {             base interface-type;           }           mandatory true;           description             "The type of the interface.              When an interface entry is created, a server MAY              initialize the type leaf with a valid value, e.g., if it              is possible to derive the type from the name of the              interface.              If a client tries to set the type of an interface to a              value that can never be used by the system, e.g., if the              type is not supported or if the type does not match the              name of the interface, the server MUST reject the request.              A NETCONF server MUST reply with an rpc-error with the              error-tag 'invalid-value' in this case.";           reference             "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB - ifType";         }         leaf enabled {           type boolean;           default "true";           description             "This leaf contains the configured, desired state of the              interface.              Systems that implement the IF-MIB use the value of this              leaf in the 'running' datastore to set              IF-MIB.ifAdminStatus to 'up' or 'down' after an ifEntry              has been initialized, as described inRFC 2863.Bjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 15]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014              Changes in this leaf in the 'running' datastore are              reflected in ifAdminStatus, but if ifAdminStatus is              changed over SNMP, this leaf is not affected.";           reference             "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB - ifAdminStatus";         }         leaf link-up-down-trap-enable {           if-feature if-mib;           type enumeration {             enum enabled {               value 1;             }             enum disabled {               value 2;             }           }           description             "Controls whether linkUp/linkDown SNMP notifications              should be generated for this interface.              If this node is not configured, the value 'enabled' is              operationally used by the server for interfaces that do              not operate on top of any other interface (i.e., there are              no 'lower-layer-if' entries), and 'disabled' otherwise.";           reference             "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB -                        ifLinkUpDownTrapEnable";         }       }     }     /*      * Operational state data nodes      */     container interfaces-state {       config false;       description         "Data nodes for the operational state of interfaces.";       list interface {         key "name";Bjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 16]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014         description           "The list of interfaces on the device.            System-controlled interfaces created by the system are            always present in this list, whether they are configured or            not.";         leaf name {           type string;           description             "The name of the interface.              A server implementation MAY map this leaf to the ifName              MIB object.  Such an implementation needs to use some              mechanism to handle the differences in size and characters              allowed between this leaf and ifName.  The definition of              such a mechanism is outside the scope of this document.";           reference             "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB - ifName";         }         leaf type {           type identityref {             base interface-type;           }           mandatory true;           description             "The type of the interface.";           reference             "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB - ifType";         }         leaf admin-status {           if-feature if-mib;           type enumeration {             enum up {               value 1;               description                 "Ready to pass packets.";             }             enum down {               value 2;               description                 "Not ready to pass packets and not in some test mode.";             }Bjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 17]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014             enum testing {               value 3;               description                 "In some test mode.";             }           }           mandatory true;           description             "The desired state of the interface.              This leaf has the same read semantics as ifAdminStatus.";           reference             "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB - ifAdminStatus";         }         leaf oper-status {           type enumeration {             enum up {               value 1;               description                 "Ready to pass packets.";             }             enum down {               value 2;               description                 "The interface does not pass any packets.";             }             enum testing {               value 3;               description                 "In some test mode.  No operational packets can                  be passed.";             }             enum unknown {               value 4;               description                 "Status cannot be determined for some reason.";             }             enum dormant {               value 5;               description                 "Waiting for some external event.";             }             enum not-present {               value 6;               description                 "Some component (typically hardware) is missing.";             }Bjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 18]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014             enum lower-layer-down {               value 7;               description                 "Down due to state of lower-layer interface(s).";             }           }           mandatory true;           description             "The current operational state of the interface.              This leaf has the same semantics as ifOperStatus.";           reference             "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB - ifOperStatus";         }         leaf last-change {           type yang:date-and-time;           description             "The time the interface entered its current operational              state.  If the current state was entered prior to the              last re-initialization of the local network management              subsystem, then this node is not present.";           reference             "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB - ifLastChange";         }         leaf if-index {           if-feature if-mib;           type int32 {             range "1..2147483647";           }           mandatory true;           description             "The ifIndex value for the ifEntry represented by this              interface.";           reference             "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB - ifIndex";         }         leaf phys-address {           type yang:phys-address;           description             "The interface's address at its protocol sub-layer.  For              example, for an 802.x interface, this object normally              contains a Media Access Control (MAC) address.  The              interface's media-specific modules must define the bitBjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 19]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014              and byte ordering and the format of the value of this              object.  For interfaces that do not have such an address              (e.g., a serial line), this node is not present.";           reference             "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB - ifPhysAddress";         }         leaf-list higher-layer-if {           type interface-state-ref;           description             "A list of references to interfaces layered on top of this              interface.";           reference             "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB - ifStackTable";         }         leaf-list lower-layer-if {           type interface-state-ref;           description             "A list of references to interfaces layered underneath this              interface.";           reference             "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB - ifStackTable";         }         leaf speed {           type yang:gauge64;           units "bits/second";           description               "An estimate of the interface's current bandwidth in bits                per second.  For interfaces that do not vary in                bandwidth or for those where no accurate estimation can                be made, this node should contain the nominal bandwidth.                For interfaces that have no concept of bandwidth, this                node is not present.";           reference             "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB -                        ifSpeed, ifHighSpeed";         }Bjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 20]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014         container statistics {           description             "A collection of interface-related statistics objects.";           leaf discontinuity-time {             type yang:date-and-time;             mandatory true;             description               "The time on the most recent occasion at which any one or                more of this interface's counters suffered a                discontinuity.  If no such discontinuities have occurred                since the last re-initialization of the local management                subsystem, then this node contains the time the local                management subsystem re-initialized itself.";           }           leaf in-octets {             type yang:counter64;             description               "The total number of octets received on the interface,                including framing characters.                Discontinuities in the value of this counter can occur                at re-initialization of the management system, and at                other times as indicated by the value of                'discontinuity-time'.";             reference               "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB - ifHCInOctets";           }           leaf in-unicast-pkts {             type yang:counter64;             description               "The number of packets, delivered by this sub-layer to a                higher (sub-)layer, that were not addressed to a                multicast or broadcast address at this sub-layer.                Discontinuities in the value of this counter can occur                at re-initialization of the management system, and at                other times as indicated by the value of                'discontinuity-time'.";             reference               "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB - ifHCInUcastPkts";           }Bjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 21]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014           leaf in-broadcast-pkts {             type yang:counter64;             description               "The number of packets, delivered by this sub-layer to a                higher (sub-)layer, that were addressed to a broadcast                address at this sub-layer.                Discontinuities in the value of this counter can occur                at re-initialization of the management system, and at                other times as indicated by the value of                'discontinuity-time'.";             reference               "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB -                          ifHCInBroadcastPkts";           }           leaf in-multicast-pkts {             type yang:counter64;             description               "The number of packets, delivered by this sub-layer to a                higher (sub-)layer, that were addressed to a multicast                address at this sub-layer.  For a MAC-layer protocol,                this includes both Group and Functional addresses.                Discontinuities in the value of this counter can occur                at re-initialization of the management system, and at                other times as indicated by the value of                'discontinuity-time'.";             reference               "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB -                          ifHCInMulticastPkts";           }           leaf in-discards {             type yang:counter32;             description               "The number of inbound packets that were chosen to be                discarded even though no errors had been detected to                prevent their being deliverable to a higher-layer                protocol.  One possible reason for discarding such a                packet could be to free up buffer space.                Discontinuities in the value of this counter can occur                at re-initialization of the management system, and at                other times as indicated by the value of                'discontinuity-time'.";Bjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 22]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014             reference               "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB - ifInDiscards";           }           leaf in-errors {             type yang:counter32;             description               "For packet-oriented interfaces, the number of inbound                packets that contained errors preventing them from being                deliverable to a higher-layer protocol.  For character-                oriented or fixed-length interfaces, the number of                inbound transmission units that contained errors                preventing them from being deliverable to a higher-layer                protocol.                Discontinuities in the value of this counter can occur                at re-initialization of the management system, and at                other times as indicated by the value of                'discontinuity-time'.";             reference               "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB - ifInErrors";           }           leaf in-unknown-protos {             type yang:counter32;             description               "For packet-oriented interfaces, the number of packets                received via the interface that were discarded because                of an unknown or unsupported protocol.  For                character-oriented or fixed-length interfaces that                support protocol multiplexing, the number of                transmission units received via the interface that were                discarded because of an unknown or unsupported protocol.                For any interface that does not support protocol                multiplexing, this counter is not present.                Discontinuities in the value of this counter can occur                at re-initialization of the management system, and at                other times as indicated by the value of                'discontinuity-time'.";             reference               "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB - ifInUnknownProtos";           }Bjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 23]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014           leaf out-octets {             type yang:counter64;             description               "The total number of octets transmitted out of the                interface, including framing characters.                Discontinuities in the value of this counter can occur                at re-initialization of the management system, and at                other times as indicated by the value of                'discontinuity-time'.";             reference               "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB - ifHCOutOctets";           }           leaf out-unicast-pkts {             type yang:counter64;             description               "The total number of packets that higher-level protocols                requested be transmitted, and that were not addressed                to a multicast or broadcast address at this sub-layer,                including those that were discarded or not sent.                Discontinuities in the value of this counter can occur                at re-initialization of the management system, and at                other times as indicated by the value of                'discontinuity-time'.";             reference               "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB - ifHCOutUcastPkts";           }           leaf out-broadcast-pkts {             type yang:counter64;             description               "The total number of packets that higher-level protocols                requested be transmitted, and that were addressed to a                broadcast address at this sub-layer, including those                that were discarded or not sent.                Discontinuities in the value of this counter can occur                at re-initialization of the management system, and at                other times as indicated by the value of                'discontinuity-time'.";             reference               "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB -                          ifHCOutBroadcastPkts";           }Bjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 24]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014           leaf out-multicast-pkts {             type yang:counter64;             description               "The total number of packets that higher-level protocols                requested be transmitted, and that were addressed to a                multicast address at this sub-layer, including those                that were discarded or not sent.  For a MAC-layer                protocol, this includes both Group and Functional                addresses.                Discontinuities in the value of this counter can occur                at re-initialization of the management system, and at                other times as indicated by the value of                'discontinuity-time'.";             reference               "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB -                          ifHCOutMulticastPkts";           }           leaf out-discards {             type yang:counter32;             description               "The number of outbound packets that were chosen to be                discarded even though no errors had been detected to                prevent their being transmitted.  One possible reason                for discarding such a packet could be to free up buffer                space.                Discontinuities in the value of this counter can occur                at re-initialization of the management system, and at                other times as indicated by the value of                'discontinuity-time'.";             reference               "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB - ifOutDiscards";           }           leaf out-errors {             type yang:counter32;             description               "For packet-oriented interfaces, the number of outbound                packets that could not be transmitted because of errors.                For character-oriented or fixed-length interfaces, the                number of outbound transmission units that could not be                transmitted because of errors.Bjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 25]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014                Discontinuities in the value of this counter can occur                at re-initialization of the management system, and at                other times as indicated by the value of                'discontinuity-time'.";             reference               "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB - ifOutErrors";           }         }       }     }   }   <CODE ENDS>6.  IANA Considerations   This document registers a URI in the "IETF XML Registry" [RFC3688].   Following the format inRFC 3688, the following registration has been   made.      URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-interfaces      Registrant Contact: The IESG.      XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.   This document registers a YANG module in the "YANG Module Names"   registry [RFC6020].      name:         ietf-interfaces      namespace:    urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-interfaces      prefix:       if      reference:RFC 72237.  Security Considerations   The YANG module defined in this memo is designed to be accessed via   the NETCONF protocol [RFC6241].  The lowest NETCONF layer is the   secure transport layer and the mandatory-to-implement secure   transport is SSH [RFC6242].  The NETCONF access control model   [RFC6536] provides the means to restrict access for particular   NETCONF users to a pre-configured subset of all available NETCONF   protocol operations and content.   There are a number of data nodes defined in the YANG module which are   writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., config true, which is the   default).  These data nodes may be considered sensitive or vulnerable   in some network environments.  Write operations (e.g., <edit-config>)Bjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 26]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014   to these data nodes without proper protection can have a negative   effect on network operations.  These are the subtrees and data nodes   and their sensitivity/vulnerability:   /interfaces/interface:  This list specifies the configured interfaces      on a device.  Unauthorized access to this list could cause the      device to ignore packets it should receive and process.   /interfaces/interface/enabled:  This leaf controls whether an      interface is enabled or not.  Unauthorized access to this leaf      could cause the device to ignore packets it should receive and      process.8.  Acknowledgments   The author wishes to thank Alexander Clemm, Per Hedeland, Ladislav   Lhotka, and Juergen Schoenwaelder for their helpful comments.9.  References9.1.  Normative References   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate              Requirement Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119, March 1997.   [RFC2863]  McCloghrie, K. and F. Kastenholz, "The Interfaces Group              MIB",RFC 2863, June 2000.   [RFC3688]  Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry",BCP 81,RFC 3688,              January 2004.   [RFC6020]  Bjorklund, M., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the              Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)",RFC 6020,              October 2010.   [RFC6991]  Schoenwaelder, J., "Common YANG Data Types",RFC 6991,              July 2013.Bjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 27]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 20149.2.  Informative References   [RFC6241]  Enns, R., Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., and A.              Bierman, "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)",RFC 6241, June 2011.   [RFC6242]  Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure              Shell (SSH)",RFC 6242, June 2011.   [RFC6536]  Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration              Protocol (NETCONF) Access Control Model",RFC 6536,              March 2012.   [RFC7224]  Bjorklund, M., "IANA Interface Type YANG Module",RFC 7224, May 2014.Bjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 28]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014Appendix A.  Example: Ethernet Interface Module   This section gives a simple example of how an Ethernet interface   module could be defined.  It demonstrates how media-specific   configuration parameters can be conditionally augmented to the   generic interface list.  It also shows how operational state   parameters can be conditionally augmented to the operational   interface list.  The example is not intended as a complete module for   Ethernet configuration.   module ex-ethernet {     namespace "http://example.com/ethernet";     prefix "eth";     import ietf-interfaces {       prefix if;     }     import iana-if-type {       prefix ianaift;     }     // configuration parameters for Ethernet interfaces     augment "/if:interfaces/if:interface" {       when "if:type = 'ianaift:ethernetCsmacd'";       container ethernet {         choice transmission-params {           case auto {             leaf auto-negotiate {               type empty;             }           }           case manual {             leaf duplex {               type enumeration {                 enum "half";                 enum "full";               }             }Bjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 29]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014             leaf speed {               type enumeration {                 enum "10Mb";                 enum "100Mb";                 enum "1Gb";                 enum "10Gb";               }             }           }         }         // other Ethernet-specific params...       }     }     // operational state parameters for Ethernet interfaces     augment "/if:interfaces-state/if:interface" {       when "if:type = 'ianaift:ethernetCsmacd'";       container ethernet {         leaf duplex {           type enumeration {             enum "half";             enum "full";           }         }         // other Ethernet-specific params...       }     }   }Appendix B.  Example: Ethernet Bonding Interface Module   This section gives an example of how interface layering can be   defined.  An Ethernet bonding interface that bonds several Ethernet   interfaces into one logical interface is defined.   module ex-ethernet-bonding {     namespace "http://example.com/ethernet-bonding";     prefix "bond";     import ietf-interfaces {       prefix if;     }     import iana-if-type {       prefix ianaift;     }Bjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 30]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014     augment "/if:interfaces/if:interface" {       when "if:type = 'ianaift:ieee8023adLag'";       leaf-list slave-if {         type if:interface-ref;         must "/if:interfaces/if:interface[if:name = current()]"            + "/if:type = 'ianaift:ethernetCsmacd'" {           description             "The type of a slave interface must be 'ethernetCsmacd'.";         }       }       leaf bonding-mode {         type enumeration {           enum round-robin;           enum active-backup;           enum broadcast;         }       }       // other bonding config params, failover times, etc.     }   }Appendix C.  Example: VLAN Interface Module   This section gives an example of how a VLAN interface module can be   defined.   module ex-vlan {     namespace "http://example.com/vlan";     prefix "vlan";     import ietf-interfaces {       prefix if;     }     import iana-if-type {       prefix ianaift;     }     augment "/if:interfaces/if:interface" {       when "if:type = 'ianaift:ethernetCsmacd' or             if:type = 'ianaift:ieee8023adLag'";       leaf vlan-tagging {         type boolean;         default false;       }     }Bjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 31]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014     augment "/if:interfaces/if:interface" {       when "if:type = 'ianaift:l2vlan'";       leaf base-interface {         type if:interface-ref;         must "/if:interfaces/if:interface[if:name = current()]"            + "/vlan:vlan-tagging = 'true'" {           description             "The base interface must have VLAN tagging enabled.";         }       }       leaf vlan-id {         type uint16 {           range "1..4094";         }         must "../base-interface" {           description             "If a vlan-id is defined, a base-interface must              be specified.";         }       }     }   }Appendix D.  Example: NETCONF <get> Reply   This section gives an example of a reply to the NETCONF <get> request   for a device that implements the example data models above.   <rpc-reply       xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"       message-id="101">     <data>       <interfaces           xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-interfaces"           xmlns:ianaift="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:iana-if-type"           xmlns:vlan="http://example.com/vlan">         <interface>           <name>eth0</name>           <type>ianaift:ethernetCsmacd</type>           <enabled>false</enabled>         </interface>Bjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 32]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014         <interface>           <name>eth1</name>           <type>ianaift:ethernetCsmacd</type>           <enabled>true</enabled>           <vlan:vlan-tagging>true</vlan:vlan-tagging>         </interface>         <interface>           <name>eth1.10</name>           <type>ianaift:l2vlan</type>           <enabled>true</enabled>           <vlan:base-interface>eth1</vlan:base-interface>           <vlan:vlan-id>10</vlan:vlan-id>         </interface>         <interface>           <name>lo1</name>           <type>ianaift:softwareLoopback</type>           <enabled>true</enabled>         </interface>       </interfaces>       <interfaces-state           xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-interfaces"           xmlns:ianaift="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:iana-if-type">         <interface>           <name>eth0</name>           <type>ianaift:ethernetCsmacd</type>           <admin-status>down</admin-status>           <oper-status>down</oper-status>           <if-index>2</if-index>           <phys-address>00:01:02:03:04:05</phys-address>           <statistics>             <discontinuity-time>               2013-04-01T03:00:00+00:00             </discontinuity-time>             <!-- counters now shown here -->           </statistics>         </interface>         <interface>           <name>eth1</name>           <type>ianaift:ethernetCsmacd</type>           <admin-status>up</admin-status>           <oper-status>up</oper-status>           <if-index>7</if-index>Bjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 33]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014           <phys-address>00:01:02:03:04:06</phys-address>           <higher-layer-if>eth1.10</higher-layer-if>           <statistics>             <discontinuity-time>               2013-04-01T03:00:00+00:00             </discontinuity-time>             <!-- counters now shown here -->           </statistics>         </interface>         <interface>           <name>eth1.10</name>           <type>ianaift:l2vlan</type>           <admin-status>up</admin-status>           <oper-status>up</oper-status>           <if-index>9</if-index>           <lower-layer-if>eth1</lower-layer-if>           <statistics>             <discontinuity-time>               2013-04-01T03:00:00+00:00             </discontinuity-time>             <!-- counters now shown here -->           </statistics>         </interface>         <!-- This interface is not configured -->         <interface>           <name>eth2</name>           <type>ianaift:ethernetCsmacd</type>           <admin-status>down</admin-status>           <oper-status>down</oper-status>           <if-index>8</if-index>           <phys-address>00:01:02:03:04:07</phys-address>           <statistics>             <discontinuity-time>               2013-04-01T03:00:00+00:00             </discontinuity-time>             <!-- counters now shown here -->           </statistics>         </interface>         <interface>           <name>lo1</name>           <type>ianaift:softwareLoopback</type>           <admin-status>up</admin-status>           <oper-status>up</oper-status>           <if-index>1</if-index>           <statistics>Bjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 34]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014             <discontinuity-time>               2013-04-01T03:00:00+00:00             </discontinuity-time>             <!-- counters now shown here -->           </statistics>         </interface>       </interfaces-state>     </data>   </rpc-reply>Appendix E.  Examples: Interface Naming Schemes   This section gives examples of some implementation strategies.   The examples make use of the example data model "ex-vlan" (seeAppendix C) to show how user-controlled interfaces can be configured.E.1.  Router with Restricted Interface Names   In this example, a router has support for 4 line cards, each with 8   ports.  The slots for the cards are physically numbered from 0 to 3,   and the ports on each card from 0 to 7.  Each card has Fast Ethernet   or Gigabit Ethernet ports.   The device-specific names for these physical interfaces are   "fastethernet-N/M" or "gigabitethernet-N/M".   The name of a VLAN interface is restricted to the form   "<physical-interface-name>.<subinterface-number>".   It is assumed that the operator is aware of this naming scheme.  The   implementation auto-initializes the value for "type" based on the   interface name.   The NETCONF server does not advertise the "arbitrary-names" feature   in the <hello> message.   An operator can configure a physical interface by sending an   <edit-config> containing:     <interface nc:operation="create">       <name>fastethernet-1/0</name>     </interface>Bjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 35]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014   When the server processes this request, it will set the leaf "type"   to "ianaift:ethernetCsmacd".  Thus, if the client performs a   <get-config> right after the <edit-config> above, it will get:     <interface>       <name>fastethernet-1/0</name>       <type>ianaift:ethernetCsmacd</type>     </interface>   The client can configure a VLAN interface by sending an <edit-config>   containing:     <interface nc:operation="create">       <name>fastethernet-1/0.10005</name>       <type>ianaift:l2vlan</type>       <vlan:base-interface>fastethernet-1/0</vlan:base-interface>       <vlan:vlan-id>5</vlan:vlan-id>     </interface>   If the client tries to change the type of the physical interface with   an <edit-config> containing:     <interface nc:operation="merge">       <name>fastethernet-1/0</name>       <type>ianaift:tunnel</type>     </interface>   then the server will reply with an "invalid-value" error, since the   new type does not match the name.E.2.  Router with Arbitrary Interface Names   In this example, a router has support for 4 line cards, each with 8   ports.  The slots for the cards are physically numbered from 0 to 3,   and the ports on each card from 0 to 7.  Each card has Fast Ethernet   or Gigabit Ethernet ports.   The device-specific names for these physical interfaces are   "fastethernet-N/M" or "gigabitethernet-N/M".   The implementation does not restrict the user-controlled interface   names.  This allows an operator to more easily apply the interface   configuration to a different interface.  However, the additional   level of indirection also makes it a bit more complex to map   interface names found in other protocols to configuration entries.   The NETCONF server advertises the "arbitrary-names" feature in the   <hello> message.Bjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 36]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014   Physical interfaces are configured as inAppendix E.1.   An operator can configure a VLAN interface by sending an   <edit-config> containing:     <interface nc:operation="create">       <name>acme-interface</name>       <type>ianaift:l2vlan</type>       <vlan:base-interface>fastethernet-1/0</vlan:base-interface>       <vlan:vlan-id>5</vlan:vlan-id>     </interface>   If necessary, the operator can move the configuration named   "acme-interface" over to a different physical interface with an   <edit-config> containing:     <interface nc:operation="merge">       <name>acme-interface</name>       <vlan:base-interface>fastethernet-1/1</vlan:base-interface>     </interface>E.3.  Ethernet Switch with Restricted Interface Names   In this example, an Ethernet switch has a number of ports, each   identified by a simple port number.   The device-specific names for the physical interfaces are numbers   that match the physical port number.   An operator can configure a physical interface by sending an   <edit-config> containing:     <interface nc:operation="create">       <name>6</name>     </interface>   When the server processes this request, it will set the leaf "type"   to "ianaift:ethernetCsmacd".  Thus, if the client performs a   <get-config> right after the <edit-config> above, it will get:     <interface>       <name>6</name>       <type>ianaift:ethernetCsmacd</type>     </interface>Bjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 37]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014E.4.  Generic Host with Restricted Interface Names   In this example, a generic host has interfaces named by the kernel.   The system identifies the physical interface by the name assigned by   the operating system to the interface.   The name of a VLAN interface is restricted to the form   "<physical-interface-name>:<vlan-number>".   The NETCONF server does not advertise the "arbitrary-names" feature   in the <hello> message.   An operator can configure an interface by sending an <edit-config>   containing:     <interface nc:operation="create">       <name>eth8</name>     </interface>   When the server processes this request, it will set the leaf "type"   to "ianaift:ethernetCsmacd".  Thus, if the client performs a   <get-config> right after the <edit-config> above, it will get:     <interface>       <name>eth8</name>       <type>ianaift:ethernetCsmacd</type>     </interface>   The client can configure a VLAN interface by sending an <edit-config>   containing:     <interface nc:operation="create">       <name>eth8:5</name>       <type>ianaift:l2vlan</type>       <vlan:base-interface>eth8</vlan:base-interface>       <vlan:vlan-id>5</vlan:vlan-id>     </interface>Bjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 38]

RFC 7223                YANG Interface Management               May 2014E.5.  Generic Host with Arbitrary Interface Names   In this example, a generic host has interfaces named by the kernel.   The system identifies the physical interface by the name assigned by   the operating system to the interface.   The implementation does not restrict the user-controlled interface   names.  This allows an operator to more easily apply the interface   configuration to a different interface.  However, the additional   level of indirection also makes it a bit more complex to map   interface names found in other protocols to configuration entries.   The NETCONF server advertises the "arbitrary-names" feature in the   <hello> message.   Physical interfaces are configured as inAppendix E.4.   An operator can configure a VLAN interface by sending an   <edit-config> containing:     <interface nc:operation="create">       <name>acme-interface</name>       <type>ianaift:l2vlan</type>       <vlan:base-interface>eth8</vlan:base-interface>       <vlan:vlan-id>5</vlan:vlan-id>     </interface>   If necessary, the operator can move the configuration named   "acme-interface" over to a different physical interface with an   <edit-config> containing:     <interface nc:operation="merge">       <name>acme-interface</name>       <vlan:base-interface>eth3</vlan:base-interface>     </interface>Author's Address   Martin Bjorklund   Tail-f Systems   EMail: mbj@tail-f.comBjorklund                    Standards Track                   [Page 39]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp