Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Errata] [Info page]

INFORMATIONAL
Errata Exist
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                         S. TurnerRequest for Comments: 7193                                          IECACategory: Informational                                       R. HousleyISSN: 2070-1721                                           Vigil Security                                                               J. Schaad                                                 Soaring Hawk Consulting                                                              April 2014The application/cms Media TypeAbstract   This document registers the application/cms media type for use with   the corresponding CMS (Cryptographic Message Syntax) content types.Status of This Memo   This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is   published for informational purposes.   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has   received public review and has been approved for publication by the   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Not all documents   approved by the IESG are a candidate for any level of Internet   Standard; seeSection 2 of RFC 5741.   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained athttp://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7193.Copyright Notice   Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the   document authors.  All rights reserved.   This document is subject toBCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of   publication of this document.  Please review these documents   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as   described in the Simplified BSD License.Turner, et al.               Informational                      [Page 1]

RFC 7193               application/cms Media Type             April 20141.  Introduction   [RFC5751] registered the application/pkc7-mime media type.  That   document defined five optional smime-type parameters.  The smime-type   parameter originally conveyed details about the security applied to   the data content type, indicating whether it was signed or enveloped,   as well as the name of the data content; it was later expanded to   indicate whether the data content is compressed and whether the data   content contained a certs-only message.  This document does not   affect those registrations as this document places no requirements on   S/MIME (Secure Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) agents.   The registration done by the S/MIME documents was done assuming that   there would be a MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions)   wrapping layer around each of the different enveloping contents;   thus, there was no need to include more than one item in each smime-   type.  This is no longer the case with some of the more advanced   enveloping types.  Some protocols such as the CMC (Certificate   Management over Cryptographic Message Syntax) [RFC5273] have defined   additional S/MIME types.  New protocols that intend to wrap MIME   content should continue to define a smime-type string; however, new   protocols that intend to wrap non-MIME types should use this   mechanism instead.   CMS (Cryptographic Message Syntax) [RFC5652] associates a content   type identifier (OID) with specific content; CMS content types have   been widely used to define contents that can be enveloped using other   CMS content types and to define enveloping content types some of   which provide security services.  CMS protecting content types, those   that provide security services, include: Signed-Data [RFC5652],   Enveloped-Data [RFC5652], Digested-Data [RFC5652], Encrypted-Data   [RFC5652], Authenticated-Data [RFC5652], Authenticated-Enveloped-Data   [RFC5083], and Encrypted Key Package [RFC6032].  CMS non-protecting   content types, those that provide no security services but   encapsulate other CMS content types, include: Content Information   [RFC5652], Compressed Data [RFC3274], Content Collection [RFC4073],   and Content With Attributes [RFC4073].  Then, there are the innermost   content types that include: Data [RFC5652], Asymmetric Key Package   [RFC5958], Symmetric Key Package [RFC6031], Firmware Package   [RFC4108], Firmware Package Load Receipt [RFC4108], Firmware Package   Load Error [RFC4108], Trust Anchor List [RFC5914], TAMP Status Query,   TAMP Status Response, TAMP Update, TAMP Update Confirm, TAMP Apex   Update, TAMP Apex Update Confirmation, TAMP Community Update, TAMP   Community Update Confirm, TAMP Sequence Adjust, TAMP Sequence Adjust   Confirmation, TAMP Error [RFC5934], Key Package Error, and Key   Package Receipt [RFC7191].Turner, et al.               Informational                      [Page 2]

RFC 7193               application/cms Media Type             April 2014   To support conveying CMS content types, this document defines a media   type and parameters that indicate the enveloping and embedded CMS   content types.   New CMS content types should be affirmative in defining the string   that identifies the new content type and should additionally define   if the new content type is expected to appear in the   encapsulatedContent or innerContent parameter.1.1.  Requirements Terminology   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].2.  CMS Media Type Registration Applications   This section provides the media type registration application for the   application/cms media type (see[RFC6838], Section 5.6).   Type name: application   Subtype name: cms   Required parameters: None.   Optional parameters:      encapsulatingContent=y; where y is one or more CMS ECT      (Encapsulating Content Type) identifiers; multiple values are      encapsulated in quotes and separated by a folding-whitespace, a      comma, and folding-whitespace.  ECT values are based on content      types found in [RFC3274], [RFC4073], [RFC5083], [RFC5652], and      [RFC6032].  This list can later be extended; seeSection 4.         authData         compressedData         contentCollection         contentInfo         contentWithAttrs         authEnvelopedData         encryptedKeyPkg         digestData         encryptedData         envelopedData         signedDataTurner, et al.               Informational                      [Page 3]

RFC 7193               application/cms Media Type             April 2014   innerContent=x; where x is one or more CMS ICT (Inner Content Type)   identifiers; multiple values encapsulated in quotes and are separated   by a folding-whitespace, a comma, and folding-whitespace.  ICT values   are based on content types found in [RFC4108], [RFC5914], [RFC5934],   [RFC5958], [RFC6031], and [RFC7191].  This list can later be   extended; seeSection 4.         firmwarePackage         firmwareLoadReceipt         firmwareLoadError         aKeyPackage         sKeyPackage         trustAnchorList         TAMP-statusQuery         TAMP-statusResponse         TAMP-update         TAMP-updateConfirm         TAMP-apexUpdate         TAMP-apexUpdateConfirm         TAMP-communityUpdate         TAMP-communityUpdateConfirm         TAMP-seqNumAdjust         TAMP-seqNumAdjustConfirm         TAMP-error         keyPackageReceipt         keyPackageError   The optional parameters are case sensitive.   Encoding considerations:      Binary.      [RFC5652] requires that the outermost encapsulation be      ContentInfo.Turner, et al.               Informational                      [Page 4]

RFC 7193               application/cms Media Type             April 2014   Security considerations:      The following security considerations apply:      RFC       | CMS Protecting Content Type and Algorithms      ----------+-------------------------------------------      [RFC3370] | signedData, envelopedData,      [RFC5652] | digestedData, encryptedData, and      [RFC5753] | authData      [RFC5754] |      ----------+-------------------------------------------      [RFC5958] | aKeyPackage      [RFC5959] |      [RFC6162] |      ----------+-------------------------------------------      [RFC6031] | sKeyPackage      [RFC6160] |      ----------+-------------------------------------------      [RFC6032] | encryptedKeyPkg      [RFC6033] |      [RFC6161] |      ----------+-------------------------------------------      [RFC5914] | trustAnchorList      ----------+-------------------------------------------      [RFC3274] | compressedData      ----------+-------------------------------------------      [RFC5083] | authEnvelopedData      [RFC5084] |      ----------+-------------------------------------------      [RFC4073] | contentCollection and                | contentWithAttrs      ----------+-------------------------------------------      [RFC4108] | firmwarePackage,                | firmwareLoadReceipt, and                | firmwareLoadError      ----------+-------------------------------------------      [RFC5934] | TAMP-statusQuery, TAMP-statusResponse,                | TAMP-update, TAMP-updateConfirm,                | TAMP-apexUpdate,                | TAMP-apexUpdateConfirm,                | TAMP-communityUpdate,                | TAMP-communityUpdateConfirm,                | TAMP-seqNumAdjust,                | TAMP-seqNumAdjustConfirm, and                | TAMP-error      ----------+-------------------------------------------      [RFC7191] |keyPackageReceipt and keyPackageError      ----------+-------------------------------------------Turner, et al.               Informational                      [Page 5]

RFC 7193               application/cms Media Type             April 2014      In some circumstances, significant information can be leaked by      disclosing what the innermost ASN.1 structure is.  In these cases,      it is acceptable to disclose the wrappers without disclosing the      inner content type.      ASN.1 encoding rules (e.g., DER and BER) have a type-length-value      structure, and it is easy to construct malicious content with      invalid length fields that can cause buffer overrun conditions.      ASN.1 encoding rules allows for arbitrary levels of nesting, which      may make it possible to construct malicious content that will      cause a stack overflow.  Interpreters of ASN.1 structures should      be aware of these issues and should take appropriate measures to      guard against buffer overflows and stack overruns in particular      and malicious content in general.   Interoperability considerations:      See [RFC3274], [RFC4073], [RFC4108], [RFC5083], [RFC5652],      [RFC5914], [RFC5934], [RFC5958], [RFC6031], [RFC6032], and      [RFC7191].      In all cases, CMS content types are encapsulated within      ContentInfo structures [RFC5652]; that is the outermost enveloping      structure is ContentInfo.      CMS [RFC5652] defines slightly different processing rules for      SignedData than does PKCS #7 [RFC2315].  This media type employs      the CMS processing rules.      The Content-Type header field of all application/cms objects      SHOULD include the optional "encapsulatingContent" and      "innerContent" parameters.      The Content-Disposition header field [RFC4021] can also be      included along with Content-Type's optional name parameter.   Published specification: This specification.   Applications that use this media type:      Applications that support CMS (Cryptographic Message Syntax)      content types.   Fragment identifier considerations: N/ATurner, et al.               Informational                      [Page 6]

RFC 7193               application/cms Media Type             April 2014   Additional information:      Magic number(s): None      File extension(s): .cmsc      Macintosh File Type Code(s):   Person & email address to contact for further information:      Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>   Intended usage: COMMON   Restrictions on usage: none   Author: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>   Change controller: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>Turner, et al.               Informational                      [Page 7]

RFC 7193               application/cms Media Type             April 20143.  Example   The following is an example encrypted status response message:      MIME-Version: 1.0      Content-Type: application/cms; encapsulatingContent=encryptedData;                    innerContent=TAMP-statusResponse; name=status.cmsc      Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64      MIIFLQYJKoZIhvcNAQcDoIIFHjCCBRoCAQAxggFhMIIBXQIBADBFMEAxC      zAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMR8wHQYDVQQKExZUZXN0IENlcnRpZmljYXRlcyAyMD      ExMRAwDgYDVQQDEwdHb29kIENBAgEBMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIBAEa      uaXQeVsOyZ7gz0pJikRQ6Jqr64k2dbHBE4SDZL/uErP9FJUIja9LaJrc5      S83EZ7wf3mODUBaDhGfQVKoPrNTsLmw98fE/O+wcdpI2XKaILOR62xDJR      emQQST+EPfMwZmCwgsImmY3AxefAgzp8hVgK7SDiXGXfa9ux9PMdCSjHP      IgcAUFHmTiqxYd72Gl08kLCMIXmn3g5RsYUggxooeFNHiFNR28TV5HctG      i6Ay5++iKUGrUQyXD+GlwakFToGFmFj3FMyZi7+kYV/X00BiBP3kpIgVJ      4jCj+nYtKWh6JXPoEqEsa39GmDEFGq4/58GEu70amWvW1DA++7kDP4gwg      gOuBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHQYJYIZIAWUDBAECBBCH5yTQqZ4KYiTTeYdjoY      4sgIIDgArSpOcengKnZS4SCjfuQkMxB5wfSaud1thlZ+gUFCgzbFtkfYM      Qx/T7gnkneniyj2rwOmZxCQXpPlCDXH6mS83ngfrNN8ay3HrMPpVkEOmW      UMc5jI6oNObwqi8a3ezzhYRxF06jzdD2R/6SAPALz3Q4NU8eX+PnuekgR      oxo/INzhT4iGvokn9xVah6piSbjhPA+QZp1HgQrlWyyM3lG9jn4thchKl      FQqZEy/EBaCWq+sJG7LLxqS5k29CiAVx0JSItqAPvX1ZvLMY2aq//MQMw      0VFEx7Kt5aWNvKHTor9RUuuzwiZ5kwXt2vJt6bFiV7yS+EXofpFEmqyJP      VJzyAFIXJRTv4k007n0M1UpXQpGjywECI6DbIhfBL8CsNskTCjrsfU+Tw      RRkRKAbtJYughs9bDYkDu9UsKd/AE4zXk4prwo8/f1chpmzpHKOXiWzt+      xaCj648I4rOjdI9s4JP8J0qwVKoLEMGeiZlf2UlaiyMzZYzTOxI03PHp1      Whk6TXhnmMVPWGYjjelvE38gq/XynobbQRGEJdnnHzH7SrS27FmgRcnBO      3QQUPJChVn7iBHmdui++GAxpHoGdS6nSo4kQ6d5u5rL/Ctcnwu0k+s0Xi      ZMzOqp7L31xl1jvYUWIswLQYsIFoiejU3UTKzq/Cpd5MK+I8cwCM3aQ2c      D08URTPgu+U92pnYqm3auptywyjGAU/hkZ13XN7YRhLk/kuX8QXo3tZdj      dKA4f/uNf1DURpJK9004uCkxuAtu5HemMv7YPTTx9Ua2pZFW5O+k2Mf2Z      F/geOvtNw7UV8wOT1nokXu9lnIZ9Xcs1cGGmRYE7jW15F07uGnMi1s2Gt      LAST7t/PlTNZU6h0rVExErVa7T+VNidrgwGIke0YqYIwvTINRs+9VeJE3      AJeatDlQs+01jrqqFWWmGmmsEBTTRuoDQHK7YBFFy4xIwQqZGW0EVre39      OU5CL5LHIYiAVoV16YwiGd5WvFF8P1ZJK4ki8GFgYiMcPKmjQgP7DumqG      n7eQtMD5tezTQeC07ntV3bi5pdznZHVcF2Kqg+qHjJQlhUdK7Pew3kq7k      mfCdQV0BmQSYyjEAaTijaw4fAMxAbiw4OU0eNeU//zcpp04AuTFfJorIg      oZ+iCTYei8HMUA9/ysLFXA64wdsuCj0zXmNiYwosisuNg3TXfoBOzohKq      fkeXt4.  IANA Considerations   IANA has registered the media type application/cms in the Standards   tree using the applications provided inSection 2 of this document.Turner, et al.               Informational                      [Page 8]

RFC 7193               application/cms Media Type             April 2014   IANA has established two subtype registries called "CMS Encapsulating   Content Types" and "CMS Inner Content Types".  Entries in these   registries are allocated by Expert Review [RFC5226].  The Expert will   determine whether the content is an ECT or an ICT, where the rule is   that an ICT does not encapsulate another content type while an ECT   does encapsulate another content type.   Initial values are as follows:   CMS Encapsulating Content Types   Name                        | Document | Object Identifier   ----------------------------+----------+---------------------------   authData                    |[RFC5652] | 1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1.2   compressedData              |[RFC3274] | 1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1.9   contentCollection           |[RFC4073] | 1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1.19   contentInfo                 |[RFC5652] | 1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1.6   contentWithAttrs            |[RFC4073] | 1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1.20   authEnvelopedData           |[RFC5083] | 1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1.23   encryptedKeyPkg             |[RFC6032] | 2.16.840.1.101.2.1.2.78.2   digestData                  |[RFC5652] | 1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1.5   encryptedData               |[RFC5652] | 1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1.6   envelopedData               |[RFC5652] | 1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1.3   signedData                  |[RFC5652] | 1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1.2   CMS Inner Content Types   Name                        | Document | Object Identifier   ----------------------------+----------+---------------------------   firmwarePackage             |[RFC4108] | 1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1.16   firmwareLoadReceipt         |[RFC4108] | 1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1.17   firmwareLoadError           |[RFC4108] | 1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1.18   aKeyPackage                 |[RFC5958] | 2.16.840.1.101.2.1.2.78.5   sKeyPackage                 |[RFC6031] | 1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1.25   trustAnchorList             |[RFC5914] | 1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1.34   TAMP-statusQuery            |[RFC5934] | 2.16.840.1.101.2.1.2.77.1   TAMP-statusResponse         |[RFC5934] | 2.16.840.1.101.2.1.2.77.2   TAMP-update                 |[RFC5934] | 2.16.840.1.101.2.1.2.77.3   TAMP-updateConfirm          |[RFC5934] | 2.16.840.1.101.2.1.2.77.4   TAMP-apexUpdate             |[RFC5934] | 2.16.840.1.101.2.1.2.77.5   TAMP-apexUpdateConfirm      |[RFC5934] | 2.16.840.1.101.2.1.2.77.6   TAMP-communityUpdate        |[RFC5934] | 2.16.840.1.101.2.1.2.77.7   TAMP-communityUpdateConfirm |[RFC5934] | 2.16.840.1.101.2.1.2.77.8   TAMP-seqNumAdjust           |[RFC5934] | 2.16.840.1.101.2.1.2.77.10   TAMP-seqNumAdjustConfirm    |[RFC5934] | 2.16.840.1.101.2.1.2.77.11   TAMP-error                  |[RFC5934] | 2.16.840.1.101.2.1.2.77.9   keyPackageReceipt           |[RFC7191] | 2.16.840.1.101.2.1.2.78.3   keyPackageError             |[RFC7191] | 2.16.840.1.101.2.1.2.78.6Turner, et al.               Informational                      [Page 9]

RFC 7193               application/cms Media Type             April 20145.  Security Considerations   See the answer to the Security Considerations template questions inSection 2.6.  Acknowledgments   Special thanks to Carl Wallace for generating the example inSection 3.7.  References7.1.  Normative References   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate              Requirement Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119, March 1997.   [RFC3274]  Gutmann, P., "Compressed Data Content Type for              Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)",RFC 3274, June 2002.   [RFC3370]  Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)              Algorithms",RFC 3370, August 2002.   [RFC4021]  Klyne, G. and J. Palme, "Registration of Mail and MIME              Header Fields",RFC 4021, March 2005.   [RFC4073]  Housley, R., "Protecting Multiple Contents with the              Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)",RFC 4073, May 2005.   [RFC4108]  Housley, R., "Using Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) to              Protect Firmware Packages",RFC 4108, August 2005.   [RFC5083]  Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)              Authenticated-Enveloped-Data Content Type",RFC 5083,              November 2007.   [RFC5084]  Housley, R., "Using AES-CCM and AES-GCM Authenticated              Encryption in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)",RFC5084, November 2007.   [RFC5226]  Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an              IANA Considerations Section in RFCs",BCP 26,RFC 5226,              May 2008.   [RFC5273]  Schaad, J. and M. Myers, "Certificate Management over CMS              (CMC): Transport Protocols",RFC 5273, June 2008.Turner, et al.               Informational                     [Page 10]

RFC 7193               application/cms Media Type             April 2014   [RFC5652]  Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", STD 70,RFC 5652, September 2009.   [RFC5753]  Turner, S. and D. Brown, "Use of Elliptic Curve              Cryptography (ECC) Algorithms in Cryptographic Message              Syntax (CMS)",RFC 5753, January 2010.   [RFC5754]  Turner, S., "Using SHA2 Algorithms with Cryptographic              Message Syntax",RFC 5754, January 2010.   [RFC5914]  Housley, R., Ashmore, S., and C. Wallace, "Trust Anchor              Format",RFC 5914, June 2010.   [RFC5934]  Housley, R., Ashmore, S., and C. Wallace, "Trust Anchor              Management Protocol (TAMP)",RFC 5934, August 2010.   [RFC5958]  Turner, S., "Asymmetric Key Packages",RFC 5958, August              2010.   [RFC5959]  Turner, S., "Algorithms for Asymmetric Key Package Content              Type",RFC 5959, August 2010.   [RFC6031]  Turner, S. and R. Housley, "Cryptographic Message Syntax              (CMS) Symmetric Key Package Content Type",RFC 6031,              December 2010.   [RFC6032]  Turner, S. and R. Housley, "Cryptographic Message Syntax              (CMS) Encrypted Key Package Content Type",RFC 6032,              December 2010.   [RFC6033]  Turner, S., "Algorithms for Cryptographic Message Syntax              (CMS) Encrypted Key Package Content Type",RFC 6033,              December 2010.   [RFC6160]  Turner, S., "Algorithms for Cryptographic Message Syntax              (CMS) Protection of Symmetric Key Package Content Types",RFC 6160, April 2011.   [RFC6161]  Turner, S., "Elliptic Curve Algorithms for Cryptographic              Message Syntax (CMS) Encrypted Key Package Content Type",RFC 6161, April 2011.   [RFC6162]  Turner, S., "Elliptic Curve Algorithms for Cryptographic              Message Syntax (CMS) Asymmetric Key Package Content Type",RFC 6162, April 2011.Turner, et al.               Informational                     [Page 11]

RFC 7193               application/cms Media Type             April 2014   [RFC6838]  Freed, N., Klensin, J., and T. Hansen, "Media Type              Specifications and Registration Procedures",BCP 13,RFC6838, January 2013.   [RFC7191]  Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) Key              Package Receipt and Error Content Types",RFC 7191, April              2014.7.2.  Informative References   [RFC2315]  Kaliski, B., "PKCS #7: Cryptographic Message Syntax              Version 1.5",RFC 2315, March 1998.   [RFC5751]  Ramsdell, B. and S. Turner, "Secure/Multipurpose Internet              Mail Extensions (S/MIME) Version 3.2 Message              Specification",RFC 5751, January 2010.Authors' Addresses   Sean Turner   IECA, Inc.   3057 Nutley Street, Suite 106   Fairfax, VA 22031   USA   EMail: turners@ieca.com   Phone: +1.703.628.3180   Russell Housley   Vigil Security, LLC   918 Spring Knoll Drive   Herndon, VA 20170   USA   EMail: housley@vigilsec.com   Jim Schaad   Soaring Hawk Consulting   EMail: ietf@augustcellars.comTurner, et al.               Informational                     [Page 12]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp