Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]

PROPOSED STANDARD
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                        M. ThomsonRequest for Comments: 7035                                     MicrosoftCategory: Standards Track                                       B. RosenISSN: 2070-1721                                                  Neustar                                                              D. Stanley                                                          Aruba Networks                                                                G. Bajko                                                                   Nokia                                                              A. Thomson                                                            Lookingglass                                                            October 2013Relative Location RepresentationAbstract   This document defines an extension to the Presence Information Data   Format Location Object (PIDF-LO) (RFC 4119) for the expression of   location information that is defined relative to a reference point.   The reference point may be expressed as a geodetic or civic location,   and the relative offset may be one of several shapes.  An alternative   binary representation is described.   Optionally, a reference to a secondary document (such as a map image)   can be included, along with the relationship of the map coordinate   system to the reference/offset coordinate system, to allow display of   the map with the reference point and the relative offset.Status of This Memo   This is an Internet Standards Track document.   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has   received public review and has been approved for publication by the   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on   Internet Standards is available inSection 2 of RFC 5741.   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained athttp://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7035.Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                    [Page 1]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 2013Copyright Notice   Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the   document authors.  All rights reserved.   This document is subject toBCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of   publication of this document.  Please review these documents   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as   described in the Simplified BSD License.Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                    [Page 2]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 2013Table of Contents1. Introduction ....................................................42. Conventions Used in This Document ...............................43. Overview ........................................................44. Relative Location ...............................................74.1. Relative Coordinate System .................................84.2. Placement of XML Elements ..................................84.3. Binary Format ..............................................94.4. Distances and Angles .......................................94.5. Value Encoding ............................................104.6. Relative Location Restrictions ............................104.7. Baseline TLVs .............................................104.8. Reference TLVs ............................................104.9. Shapes ....................................................114.9.1. Point ..............................................114.9.2. Circle or Sphere Shape .............................124.9.3. Ellipse or Ellipsoid Shape .........................134.9.4. Polygon or Prism Shape .............................154.9.5. Arc-Band Shape .....................................184.10. Dynamic Location TLVs ....................................204.10.1. Orientation .......................................204.10.2. Speed .............................................204.10.3. Heading ...........................................204.11. Secondary Map Metadata ...................................214.11.1. Map URL ...........................................214.11.2. Map Coordinate Reference System ...................214.11.3. Map Example .......................................245. Examples .......................................................245.1. Civic PIDF with Polygon Offset ............................245.2. Geo PIDF with Circle Offset ...............................265.3. Civic TLV with Point Offset ...............................276. Schema Definition ..............................................287. Security Considerations ........................................308. IANA Considerations ............................................318.1. Relative Location Registry ................................318.2. URN Sub-Namespace Registration ............................338.3. XML Schema Registration ...................................338.4. Geopriv Identifiers Registry ..............................34           8.4.1. Registration of Two-Dimensional Relative                  Coordinate Reference System URN ....................35           8.4.2. Registration of Three-Dimensional Relative                  Coordinate Reference System URN ....................359. Acknowledgements ...............................................3510. References ....................................................3610.1. Normative References .....................................3610.2. Informative References ...................................38Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                    [Page 3]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 20131.  Introduction   This document describes a format for the expression of relative   location information.   A relative location is formed of a reference location plus a relative   offset from that reference location.  The reference location can be   represented in either civic or geodetic form.  The reference location   can also have dynamic components such as velocity.  The relative   offset is specified in meters using a Cartesian coordinate system.   In addition to the relative location, an optional URI can be provided   to a document that contains a map, floor plan, or other spatially   oriented information.  Applications could use this information to   display the relative location.  Additional fields allow the map to be   oriented and scaled correctly.   Two formats are included: an XML form that is intended for use in   PIDF-LO [RFC4119] and a TLV format for use in other protocols such as   those that already convey binary representation of location   information defined in [RFC4776].2.  Conventions Used in This Document   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].3.  Overview   This document describes an extension to PIDF-LO [RFC4119] as updated   by [RFC5139] and [RFC5491], to allow the expression of a location as   an offset relative to a reference.                                   Reference                                   Location                                       o                                        \                                         \ Offset                                          \                                          _\|                                            x                                         Relative                                         Location   This extension allows the creator of a location object to include two   location values plus an offset.  The two location values, named   "baseline" and "reference", combine to form the origin of the offset.Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                    [Page 4]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 2013   The final, relative location is described relative to this reference   point.                             ..--"""--..                          .-'           `-.                        ,'                 `.                       / Reference           \                      /      o                \                     |        \                |                     |         \               |                     |          \              |                      \         _\|           /                       `.         x         .'  \_ Baseline                         `._   Relative  _.'       Location                            `--..___..--'   The baseline location is included outside of the <relative-location>   element.  The baseline location is visible to a client that does not   understand relative location (i.e., it ignores the   <relative-location> element).   A client that does understand relative location will interpret the   location within the relative element as a refinement of the baseline   location.  This document defines both a reference location, which   serves as a refinement of the baseline location and the starting   point, and an offset, which describes the location of the Target   based on this starting point.   Creators of location objects with relative location thus have a   choice of how much information to put into the baseline location and   how much to put into the reference location.  For example, the   baseline location value could be precise enough to specify a building   that contains the relative location, and the reference location could   specify a point within the building from which the offset is   measured.   Location objects SHOULD NOT have all location information in the   baseline location.  Doing this would cause clients that do not   understand relative location to incorrectly interpret the baseline   location (i.e., the reference point) as the actual, precise location   of the client.  The baseline location is intended to carry a location   that encompasses both the reference location and the relative   location (i.e., the reference location plus offset).   It is possible to provide a valid relative location with no   information in the baseline.  However, this provides recipients who   do not understand relative location with no information.  A baseline   location SHOULD include sufficient information to encompass both theThomson, et al.              Standards Track                    [Page 5]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 2013   reference and relative locations while providing a baseline that is   as accurate as possible.   Both the baseline and the reference location are defined as either a   geodetic location [OGC.GeoShape] or a civic address [RFC4776].  If   the baseline location was expressed as a geodetic location, the   reference MUST be geodetic.  If the baseline location was expressed   as a civic address, the reference MUST be civic.   Baseline and reference locations MAY also include dynamic location   information [RFC5962].   The relative location can be expressed using a point (2- or   3-dimensional) or a shape that includes uncertainty: circle, sphere,   ellipse, ellipsoid, polygon, prism, or arc-band.  Descriptions of   these shapes can be found in [RFC5491].   Optionally, a reference to a 'map' document can be provided.  The   reference is a URI [RFC3986].  The document could be an image or   dataset that represents a map, floor plan, or other form.  The type   of document the URI points to is described as a MIME media type   [RFC2046].  Metadata in the relative location can include the   location of the reference point in the map as well as an orientation   (angle from North) and scale to align the document Coordinate   Reference System (CRS) with the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS84)   [WGS84] CRS.  The document is assumed to be usable by the application   receiving the PIDF with the relative location to locate the reference   point in the map.  This document does not describe any mechanisms for   displaying or manipulating the document other than providing the   reference location, orientation, and scale.   As an example, consider a relative location expressed as a point,   relative to a civic location:   <presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf"             xmlns:dm="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model"             xmlns:gp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10"             xmlns:ca="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10:civicAddr"             xmlns:rel="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10:relative"             xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"             xmlns:gs="http://www.opengis.net/pidflo/1.0"             entity="pres:relative@example.com">     <dm:device>       <gp:geopriv>         <gp:location-info>           <ca:civicAddress xml:lang="en-AU">             <ca:country>AU</ca:country>             <ca:A1>NSW</ca:A1>Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                    [Page 6]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 2013             <ca:A3>Wollongong</ca:A3>             <ca:A4>North Wollongong</ca:A4>             <ca:RD>Flinders</ca:RD>             <ca:STS>Street</ca:STS>             <ca:HNO>123</ca:HNO>           </ca:civicAddress>           <rel:relative-location>             <rel:reference>               <ca:civicAddress xml:lang="en-AU">                 <ca:LMK>Front Door</ca:LMK>               </ca:civicAddress>             </rel:reference>             <rel:offset>               <gml:Point xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"                          srsName="urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:2d">                 <gml:pos>100 50</gml:pos>               </gml:Point>             </rel:offset>           </rel:relative-location>         </gp:location-info>         <gp:usage-rules/>         <gp:method>GPS</gp:method>         <rel:map>           <rel:url type="image/png">              http://example.com/location/map.png           </rel:url>           <rel:offset>20. 120.</rel:offset>           <rel:orientation>29.</rel:orientation>           <rel:scale>20. -20.</rel:scale>         </rel:map>       </gp:geopriv>       <dm:deviceID>mac:1234567890ab</dm:deviceID>       <dm:timestamp>2007-06-22T20:57:29Z</dm:timestamp>     </dm:device>   </presence>4.  Relative Location   Relative location is a shape (e.g., point, circle, ellipse).  The   shape is defined with a CRS that has a datum defined as the reference   (which appears as a civic address or geodetic location in the tuple)   and the shape coordinates as meter offsets North/East of the datum   measured in meters (with an optional Z offset relative to datum   altitude).  An optional angle allows the reference CRS be to rotated   with respect to North.Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                    [Page 7]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 20134.1.  Relative Coordinate System   The relative coordinate reference system uses a coordinate system   with two or three axes.   The baseline and reference locations are used to define a relative   datum.  The reference location defines the origin of the coordinate   system.  The centroid of the reference location is used when the   reference location contains any uncertainty.   The axes in this coordinate system are originally oriented based on   the directions of East, North, and Up from the reference location:   the first (x) axis increases to the East, the second (y) axis points   North, and the optional third (z) axis points Up.  All axes of the   coordinate system use meters as a basic unit.   Any coordinates in the relative shapes use the described Cartesian   coordinate system.  In the XML form, this uses a URN of   "urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:2d" for two-dimensional shapes and   "urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:3d" for three-dimensional shapes.   The binary form uses different shape type identifiers for 2D and 3D   shapes.   Dynamic location information [RFC5962] in the baseline or reference   location alters the relative coordinate system.  The resulting   Cartesian coordinate system axes are rotated so that the y axis is   oriented along the direction described by the <orientation> element.   The coordinate system also moves as described by the <speed> and   <heading> elements.   The single timestamp included in the tuple (or equivalent) element   applies to all location elements, including all three components of a   relative location: baseline, reference, and relative.  This is   particularly important when there are dynamic components to these   items.  A location generator is responsible for ensuring the   consistency of these fields.4.2.  Placement of XML Elements   The baseline of the reference location is represented as   <location-info> like a normal PIDF-LO.  Relative location adds a new   <relative-location> element to <location-info>.  Within   <relative-location>, <reference> and <offset> elements are described.   Within <offset> are the shape elements described below.  This   document extends PIDF-LO as described in [RFC6848].Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                    [Page 8]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 20134.3.  Binary Format   This document describes a way to encode the relative location in a   binary TLV form for use in other protocols that use TLVs to represent   location.   A type-length-value encoding is used.            +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+            | Type |Length|  Value                         ...            +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+            |  T   |  N   |  Value                         ...            +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+                        Figure 1: TLV Tuple Format   The Type field (T) is an 8-bit unsigned integer.  The type codes used   are registered in an IANA-managed "Relative Location Parameters"   registry defined by this document and restricted to not include the   values defined by the "Civic Address Types (CAtypes)" registry.  This   restriction permits a location reference and offset to be coded   within the same object without type collisions.   The Length field (N) is defined as an 8-bit unsigned integer.  This   field can encode values from 0 to 255.  The length field describes   the number of bytes in the Value.  Length does not count the bytes   used for the Type or Length.   The Value field is defined separately for each type.   Each element of the relative location has a unique TLV assignment.  A   relative location encoded in TLV form includes both baseline and   reference location TLVs and relative location TLVs.  The reference   TLVs are followed by the relative offset and optional map TLVs   described in this document.4.4.  Distances and Angles   All distance measures used in shapes are expressed in meters.   All orientation angles used in shapes are expressed in degrees.   Orientation angles are measured from WGS84 Northing to Easting with   zero at Northing.  Orientation angles in the relative coordinate   system start from the second coordinate axis (y or Northing) and   increase toward the first axis (x or Easting).Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                    [Page 9]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 20134.5.  Value Encoding   The binary form uses single-precision floating-point values   [IEEE.754] to represent coordinates, distance, and angle measures.   Single-precision values are 32-bit values with a sign bit, 8 exponent   bits, and 23 fractional bits.  This uses the interchange format   defined in [IEEE.754] andSection 3.6 of [RFC1014], that is: sign,   biased exponent and significand, with the most significant bit first.   Binary-encoded coordinate values are considered to be a single value   without uncertainty.  When encoding a value that cannot be exactly   represented, the best approximation MUST be selected according to   [Clinger1990].4.6.  Relative Location Restrictions   More than one relative shape MUST NOT be included in either a PIDF-LO   or TLV encoding of location for a given reference point.   Any error in the reference point transfers to the location described   by the relative location.  Any errors arising from an implementation   not supporting or understanding elements of the reference point   directly increases the error (or uncertainty) in the resulting   location.4.7.  Baseline TLVs   Baseline locations are described using the formats defined in   [RFC4776] or [RFC6225].4.8.  Reference TLVs   When a reference is encoded in binary form, the baseline and   reference locations are combined in a reference TLV.  This TLV is   identified with the code 111 and contains civic address TLVs (if the   baseline was a civic) or geo TLVs (if the baseline was a geo).                +------+------+------+------+------+------+                |  111 |Length|  Reference TLVs           |                +------+------+------+------+------+------+                          Figure 2: Reference TLVThomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 10]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 20134.9.  Shapes   Shape data is used to represent regions of uncertainty for the   reference and relative locations.  Shape data in the reference   location uses a WGS84 [WGS84] CRS.  Shape data in the relative   location uses a relative CRS.   The XML form for shapes uses Geography Markup Language (GML)   [OGC.GML-3.1.1], consistent with the rules in [RFC5491].  Reference   locations use the CRS URNs specified in [RFC5491]; relative locations   use either a 2D CRS ("urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:2d") or a 3D   ("urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:3d"), depending on the shape type.   The binary form of each shape uses a different shape type for 2D and   3D shapes.   Nine shape type codes are defined.4.9.1.  Point   A point "shape" describes a single point with unknown uncertainty.   It consists of a single set of coordinates.   In a two-dimensional CRS, the coordinate includes two values; in a   three-dimensional CRS, the coordinate includes three values.4.9.1.1.  XML Encoding   A point is represented in GML using the following template:   <gml:Point xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"              srsName="$CRS-URN$">     <gml:pos>$Coordinate-1 $Coordinate-2$ $Coordinate-3$</gml:pos>   </gml:Point>                       Figure 3: GML Point Template   Where "$CRS-URN$" is replaced by a   "urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:2d" or   "urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:3d" and "$Coordinate-3$" is omitted   if the CRS is two-dimensional.Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 11]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 20134.9.1.2.  TLV Encoding   The point shape is introduced by a TLV of 113 for a 2D point and 114   for a 3D point.                       +------+------+                       | 113/4|Length|                       +------+------+------+------+                       |  Coordinate-1             |                       +------+------+------+------+                       |  Coordinate-2             |                       +------+------+------+------+                       |  (3D-only) Coordinate-3   |                       +------+------+------+------+                         Figure 4: Point Encoding4.9.2.  Circle or Sphere Shape   A circle or sphere describes a single point with a single uncertainty   value in meters.   In a two-dimensional CRS, the coordinate includes two values, and the   resulting shape forms a circle.  In a three-dimensional CRS, the   coordinate includes three values, and the resulting shape forms a   sphere.4.9.2.1.  XML Encoding   A circle is represented in and converted from GML using the following   template:   <gs:Circle xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"              xmlns:gs="http://www.opengis.net/pidflo/1.0"              srsName="urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:2d">     <gml:pos>$Coordinate-1 $Coordinate-2$</gml:pos>     <gs:radius uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9001">       $Radius$     </gs:radius>   </gs:Circle>                       Figure 5: GML Circle TemplateThomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 12]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 2013   A sphere is represented in and converted from GML using the following   template:   <gs:Sphere xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"              xmlns:gs="http://www.opengis.net/pidflo/1.0"              srsName="urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:3d">     <gml:pos>$Coordinate-1 $Coordinate-2$ $Coordinate-3$</gml:pos>     <gs:radius uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9001">       $Radius$     </gs:radius>   </gs:Sphere>                       Figure 6: GML Sphere Template4.9.2.2.  TLV Encoding   A circular shape is introduced by a type code of 115.  A spherical   shape is introduced by a type code of 116.                       +------+------+                       | 115/6|Length|                       +------+------+------+------+                       |  Coordinate-1             |                       +------+------+------+------+                       |  Coordinate-2             |                       +------+------+------+------+                       |  (3D-only) Coordinate-3   |                       +------+------+------+------+                       |  Radius                   |                       +------+------+------+------+                    Figure 7: Circle or Sphere Encoding4.9.3.  Ellipse or Ellipsoid Shape   An ellipse or ellipsoid describes a point with an elliptical or   ellipsoidal uncertainty region.   In a two-dimensional CRS, the coordinate includes two values plus a   semi-major axis, a semi-minor axis, a semi-major axis orientation   (clockwise from North).  In a three-dimensional CRS, the coordinate   includes three values, and in addition to the two-dimensional values,   an altitude uncertainty (semi-vertical) is added.Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 13]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 20134.9.3.1.  XML Encoding   An ellipse is represented in and converted from GML using the   following template:   <gs:Ellipse xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"               xmlns:gs="http://www.opengis.net/pidflo/1.0"               srsName="urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:2d">     <gml:pos>$Coordinate-1 $Coordinate-2$</gml:pos>     <gs:semiMajorAxis uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9001">       $Semi-Major$     </gs:semiMajorAxis>     <gs:semiMinorAxis uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9001">       $Semi-Minor$     </gs:semiMinorAxis>     <gs:orientation uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9102">       $Orientation$     </gs:orientation>   </gs:Ellipse>                      Figure 8: GML Ellipse Template   An ellipsoid is represented in and converted from GML using the   following template:   <gs:Ellipsoid xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"                 xmlns:gs="http://www.opengis.net/pidflo/1.0"                 srsName="urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:3d">     <gml:pos>$Coordinate-1 $Coordinate-2$ $Coordinate-3$</gml:pos>     <gs:semiMajorAxis uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9001">       $Semi-Major$     </gs:semiMajorAxis>     <gs:semiMinorAxis uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9001">       $Semi-Minor$     </gs:semiMinorAxis>     <gs:verticalAxis uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9001">       $Semi-Vertical$     </gs:verticalAxis>     <gs:orientation uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9102">       $Orientation$     </gs:orientation>   </gs:Ellipsoid>                     Figure 9: GML Ellipsoid TemplateThomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 14]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 20134.9.3.2.  TLV Encoding   An ellipse is introduced by a type code of 117, and an ellipsoid is   introduced by a type code of 118.         +------+------+         | 117/8|Length|         +------+------+------+------+         |  Coordinate-1             |         +------+------+------+------+         |  Coordinate-2             |         +------+------+------+------+         |  (3D-only) Coordinate-3   |         +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+         |  Semi-Major Axis          |  Semi-Minor Axis          |         +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+         |  Orientation              |  (3D) Semi-Vertical Axis  |         +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+                 Figure 10: Ellipse or Ellipsoid Encoding4.9.4.  Polygon or Prism Shape   A polygon or prism includes a number of points that describe the   outer boundary of an uncertainty region.  A prism also includes an   altitude for each point and prism height.   At least 3 points MUST be included in a polygon.  In order to   interoperate with existing systems, an encoding SHOULD include 15 or   fewer points, unless the recipient is known to support larger   numbers.Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 15]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 20134.9.4.1.  XML Encoding   A polygon is represented in and converted from GML using the   following template:   <gml:Polygon xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"                srsName="urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:2d">     <gml:exterior>       <gml:LinearRing>         <gml:posList>           $Coordinate1-1$ $Coordinate1-2$           $Coordinate2-1$ $Coordinate2-2$           $Coordinate3-1$ ...           ...           $CoordinateN-1$ $CoordinateN-2$           $Coordinate1-1$ $Coordinate1-2$         </gml:posList>       </gml:LinearRing>     </gml:exterior>   </gml:Polygon>                      Figure 11: GML Polygon Template   Alternatively, a series of <pos> elements can be used in place of the   single "posList".  Each <pos> element contains two or three   coordinate values.   Note that the first point is repeated at the end of the sequence of   coordinates and no explicit count of the number of points is   provided.   A GML polygon that includes altitude cannot be represented perfectly   in TLV form.  When converting to the binary representation, a two-   dimensional CRS is used, and altitude is removed from each   coordinate.Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 16]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 2013   A prism is represented in and converted from GML using the following   template:   <gs:Prism xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"             xmlns:gs="http://www.opengis.net/pidflo/1.0"             srsName="urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:3d">     <gs:base>       <gml:Polygon>         <gml:exterior>           <gml:LinearRing>             <gml:posList>               $Coordinate1-1$ $Coordinate1-2$ $Coordinate1-3$               $Coordinate2-1$ $Coordinate2-2$ $Coordinate2-3$               $Coordinate2-1$ ... ...               ...               $CoordinateN-1$ $CoordinateN-2$ $CoordinateN-3$               $Coordinate1-1$ $Coordinate1-2$ $Coordinate1-3$             </gml:posList>           </gml:LinearRing>         </gml:exterior>       </gml:Polygon>     </gs:base>     <gs:height uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9001">       $Height$     </gs:height>   </gs:Prism>                       Figure 12: GML Prism Template   Alternatively, a series of <pos> elements can be used in place of the   single "posList".  Each <pos> element contains three coordinate   values.Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 17]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 20134.9.4.2.  TLV Encoding   A polygon containing 2D points uses a type code of 119.  A polygon   with 3D points uses a type code of 120.  A prism uses a type code of   121.  The number of points can be inferred from the length of the   TLV.                       +------+------+                       |119-21|Length|                       +------+------+------+------+                       |  (3D-only) Height         |                       +------+------+------+------+                       |  Coordinate1-1            |                       +------+------+------+------+                       |  Coordinate1-2            |                       +------+------+------+------+                       |  (3D-only) Coordinate1-3  |                       +------+------+------+------+                       |  Coordinate2-1            |                       +------+------+------+------+                        ...                       +------+------+------+------+                       |  CoordinateN-1            |                       +------+------+------+------+                       |  CoordinateN-2            |                       +------+------+------+------+                       |  (3D-only) CoordinateN-3  |                       +------+------+------+------+                   Figure 13: Polygon or Prism Encoding   Note that unlike the polygon representation in GML, the first and   last points are not the same point in the TLV representation.  The   duplicated point is removed from the binary form.4.9.5.  Arc-Band Shape   An arc-band describes a region constrained by a range of angles and   distances from a predetermined point.  This shape can only be   provided for a two-dimensional CRS.   Distance and angular measures are defined in meters and degrees,   respectively.  Both are encoded as single-precision floating-point   values.Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 18]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 20134.9.5.1.  XML Encoding   An arc-band is represented in and converted from GML using the   following template:   <gs:ArcBand xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"               xmlns:gs="http://www.opengis.net/pidflo/1.0"               srsName="urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:2d">     <gml:pos>$Coordinate-1$ $Coordinate-2$</gml:pos>     <gs:innerRadius uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9001">       $Inner-Radius$     </gs:innerRadius>     <gs:outerRadius uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9001">       $Outer-Radius$     </gs:outerRadius>     <gs:startAngle uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9102">      $Start-Angle$     </gs:startAngle>     <gs:openingAngle uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9102">       $Opening-Angle$     </gs:openingAngle>   </gs:ArcBand>                     Figure 14: GML Arc-Band Template4.9.5.2.  TLV Encoding   An arc-band is introduced by a type code of 122.         +------+------+         | 122  |Length|         +------+------+------+------+         |  Coordinate               |         +------+------+------+------+         |  Coordinate               |         +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+         |  Inner Radius             |  Outer Radius             |         +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+         |  Start Angle              |  Opening Angle            |         +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+                       Figure 15: Arc-Band EncodingThomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 19]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 20134.10.  Dynamic Location TLVs   Dynamic location elements use the definitions in [RFC5962].4.10.1.  Orientation   The orientation of the Target is described using one or two angles.   Orientation uses a type code of 123.                       +------+------+                       | 123  |Length|                       +------+------+------+------+                       |         Angle             |                       +------+------+------+------+                       |   (Optional) Angle        |                       +------+------+------+------+                    Figure 16: Dynamic Orientation TLVs4.10.2.  Speed   The speed of the Target is a scalar value in meters per second.   Speed uses a type code of 124.                       +------+------+                       | 124  |Length|                       +------+------+------+------+                       |         Speed             |                       +------+------+------+------+                       Figure 17: Dynamic Speed TLVs4.10.3.  Heading   The heading, or direction of travel, is described using one or two   angles.  Heading uses a type code of 125.                       +------+------+                       | 125  |Length|                       +------+------+------+------+                       |         Angle             |                       +------+------+------+------+                       |   (Optional) Angle        |                       +------+------+------+------+                      Figure 18: Dynamic Heading TLVsThomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 20]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 20134.11.  Secondary Map Metadata   The optional "map" URL can be used to provide a user of relative   location with a visual reference for the location information.  This   document does not describe how the recipient uses the map nor how it   locates the reference or offset within the map.  Maps can be simple   images, vector files, 2D or 3D geospatial databases, or any other   form of representation understood by both the sender and recipient.4.11.1.  Map URL   In XML, the map is a <map> element defined within <relative-location>   and contains the URL.  The URL is encoded as a UTF-8-encoded string.   An "http:" [RFC2616] or "https:" [RFC2818] URL MUST be used unless   the entity creating the PIDF-LO is able to ensure that authorized   recipients of this data are able to use other URI schemes.  A "type"   attribute MUST be present and specifies the kind of map the URL   points to.  Map types are specified as MIME media types as recorded   in the IANA Media Types registry, for example, <map type="image/png">   https://www.example.com/floorplans/123South/floor-2</map>.   In binary, the map type is a separate TLV from the map URL.  The   media type uses a type code of 126; the URL uses a type code of 127.            +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+            |  126 |Length|   Map Media Type               ...            +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+            |  127 |Length|   Map Image URL                ...            +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+                          Figure 19: Map URL TLVs   Note that the binary form restricts data to 255 octets.  This   restriction could be problematic for URLs in particular.   Applications that use the XML form, but cannot guarantee that a   binary form won't be used, are encouraged to limit the size of the   URL to fit within this restriction.4.11.2.  Map Coordinate Reference System   The CRS used by the map depends on the type of map.  For example, a   map described by a 3-D geometric model of the building may contain a   complete CRS description in it.  For some kinds of maps, typically   described as images, the CRS used within the map must define the   following:Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 21]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 2013   o  The CRS origin   o  The CRS axes used and their orientation   o  The unit of measure used   This document provides elements that allow for a mapping between the   local coordinate reference system used for the relative location and   the coordinate reference system used for the map where they are not   the same.4.11.2.1.  Map Reference Point Offset   This optional element identifies the coordinates of the reference   point as it appears in the map.  This value is measured in a map-   type-dependent manner, using the coordinate system of the map.   For image maps, coordinates start from the upper left corner, and   coordinates are first counted by column with positive values to the   right; then, rows are counted with positive values toward the bottom   of the image.  For such an image, the first item is columns, the   second rows, and any third value applies to any third dimension used   in the image coordinate space.   The <offset> element contains 2 (or 3) coordinates similar to a GML   <pos>.  For example:     <offset> 2670.0 1124.0 1022.0</offset>   The map reference point uses a type code of 129.                        +------+------+                        | 129  |Length|                        +------+------+------+------+                        |  Coordinate-1             |                        +------+------+------+------+                        |  Coordinate-2             |                        +------+------+------+------+                        |  (3D-only) Coordinate-3   |                        +------+------+------+------+              Figure 20: Map Reference Point Coordinates TLV   If omitted, a value containing all zeros is assumed.  If the   coordinates provided contain fewer values than are needed, the first   value from the set is applied in place of any absent values.  Thus,   if a single value is provided, that value is used for Coordinate-2Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 22]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 2013   and Coordinate-3 (if required).  If two values are provided and three   are required, the value of Coordinate-1 is used in place of   Coordinate-3.4.11.2.2.  Map Orientation   The map orientation includes the orientation of the map direction in   relation to the Earth.  Map orientation is expressed relative to the   orientation of the relative coordinate system.  This means that map   orientation with respect to WGS84 North is the sum of the orientation   field and any orientation included in a dynamic portion of the   reference location.  Both values default to zero if no value is   specified.   This type uses a single-precision floating-point value of degrees   relative to North.   In XML, the <orientation> element contains a single floating-point   value, for example, <orientation>67.00</orientation>.  In TLV form,   map orientation uses the code 130:                +------+------+------+------+------+------+                |  130 |Length|  Angle                    |                +------+------+------+------+------+------+                      Figure 21: Map Orientation TLV4.11.2.3.  Map Scale   The optional map scale describes the relationship between the units   of measure used in the map, relative to the meters unit used in the   relative coordinate system.   This type uses a sequence of IEEE 754 [IEEE.754] single-precision   floating-point values to represent scale as a sequence of numeric   values.  The units of these values are dependent on the type of map   and could, for example, be pixels per meter for an image.   A scaling factor is provided for each axis in the coordinate system.   For a two-dimensional coordinate system, two values are included to   allow for different scaling along the x and y axes independently.   For a three-dimensional coordinate system, three values are specified   for the x, y, and z axes.  Decoders can determine the number of   scaling factors by examining the length field.   Alternatively, a single scaling value MAY be used to apply the same   scaling factor to all coordinate components.Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 23]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 2013   Images that use a rows/columns coordinate system often use a left-   handed coordinate system.  A negative value for the y/rows axis   scaling value can be used to account for any change in direction   between the y axis used in the relative coordinate system and the   rows axis of the image coordinate system.   In XML, the <scale> element MAY contain a single scale value or MAY   contain 2 (or 3) values in XML list form.  In TLV form, scale uses a   type code of 131.  The length of the TLV determines how many scale   values are present:                +------+------+------+------+------+------+                |  131 |Length|  Scale(s)               ...                +------+------+------+------+------+------+                         Figure 22: Map Scale TLV4.11.3.  Map Example   An example of expressing a map is:        <rel:map>          <rel:url type="image/jpeg">            http://example.com/map.jpg          </rel:url>          <rel:offset>200 210</rel:offset>          <rel:orientation>68</rel:orientation>          <rel:scale>2.90 -2.90</rel:scale>        </rel:map>                          Figure 23: Map Example5.  Examples   The examples in this section combine elements from [RFC3863],   [RFC4119], [RFC4479], [RFC5139], and [OGC.GeoShape].5.1.  Civic PIDF with Polygon Offset   <presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf"             xmlns:dm="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model"             xmlns:gp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10"             xmlns:ca="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10:civicAddr"             xmlns:rel="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10:relative"             xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"             xmlns:gs="http://www.opengis.net/pidflo/1.0"             entity="pres:ness@example.com">     <dm:device>Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 24]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 2013       <gp:geopriv>         <gp:location-info>           <ca:civicAddress xml:lang="en-AU">             <ca:country>AU</ca:country>             <ca:A1>NSW</ca:A1>             <ca:A3>Wollongong</ca:A3>             <ca:A4>North Wollongong</ca:A4>             <ca:RD>Flinders</ca:RD>             <ca:STS>Street</ca:STS>             <ca:HNO>123</ca:HNO>           </ca:civicAddress>           <rel:relative-location>             <rel:reference>               <ca:civicAddress xml:lang="en-AU">                 <ca:LMK>Front Door</ca:LMK>                 <ca:BLD>A</ca:BLD>                 <ca:FLR>I</ca:FLR>                 <ca:ROOM>113</ca:ROOM>               </ca:civicAddress>             </rel:reference>             <rel:offset>                <gml:Polygon xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"                     srsName="urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:2d">                  <gml:exterior>                    <gml:LinearRing>                      <gml:pos>433.0 -734.0</gml:pos> <!--A-->                      <gml:pos>431.0 -733.0</gml:pos> <!--F-->                      <gml:pos>431.0 -732.0</gml:pos> <!--E-->                      <gml:pos>433.0 -731.0</gml:pos> <!--D-->                      <gml:pos>434.0 -732.0</gml:pos> <!--C-->                      <gml:pos>434.0 -733.0</gml:pos> <!--B-->                      <gml:pos>433.0 -734.0</gml:pos> <!--A-->                    </gml:LinearRing>                  </gml:exterior>               </gml:Polygon>             </rel:offset>           </rel:relative-location>         </gp:location-info>        <gp:usage-rules/>         <gp:method>GPS</gp:method>       </gp:geopriv>       <dm:deviceID>mac:1234567890ab</dm:deviceID>       <dm:timestamp>2007-06-22T20:57:29Z</dm:timestamp>     </dm:device>   </presence>Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 25]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 20135.2.  Geo PIDF with Circle Offset   <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>       <presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf"            xmlns:dm="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model"            xmlns:gp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10"            xmlns:rel="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10:relative"            xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"            xmlns:gs="http://www.opengis.net/pidflo/1.0"            entity="pres:point2d@example.com">         <dm:device>           <gp:geopriv>             <gp:location-info>               <gs:Circle srsName="urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4326">                 <gml:pos>-34.407 150.883</gml:pos>                 <gs:radius uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9001">                        50.0                 </gs:radius>               </gs:Circle>               <rel:relative-location>                 <rel:reference>                   <gml:Point srsName="urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4326">                     <gml:pos>-34.407 150.883</gml:pos>                   </gml:Point>                 </rel:reference>                 <rel:offset>                   <gs:Circle xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"                         srsName="urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:2d">                       <gml:pos>500.0 750.0</gml:pos>                       <gs:radius uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9001">                          5.0                        </gs:radius>                  </gs:Circle>                </rel:offset>                <rel:map>                   <rel:url type="image/png">                     https://www.example.com/flrpln/123South/flr-2                   </rel:url>                   <rel:offset>2670.0 1124.0 1022.0</rel:offset>                   <rel:orientation>67.00</rel:orientation>                   <rel:scale>10 -10</rel:scale>                </rel:map>               </rel:relative-location>             </gp:location-info>             <gp:usage-rules/>             <gp:method>Wiremap</gp:method>           </gp:geopriv>           <dm:deviceID>mac:1234567890ab</dm:deviceID>Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 26]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 2013           <dm:timestamp>2007-06-22T20:57:29Z</dm:timestamp>         </dm:device>       </presence>5.3.  Civic TLV with Point Offset        +--------+-------------------------------------------------+        | Type   | Value                                           |        +--------+-------------------------------------------------+        | 0      | en                                              |        |        |                                                 |        | 1      | IL                                              |        |        |                                                 |        | 3      | Chicago                                         |        |        |                                                 |        | 34     | Wacker                                          |        |        |                                                 |        | 18     | Drive                                           |        |        |                                                 |        | 19     | 3400                                            |        |        |                                                 |        | 112    | Reference                                       |        |        |                                                 |        | 25     | Building A                                      |        |        |                                                 |        | 27     | Floor 6                                         |        |        |                                                 |        | 26     | Suite 213                                       |        |        |                                                 |        | 28     | Reception Area                                  |        |        |                                                 |        | 115    | 100 70                                          |        |        |                                                 |        | 126    | image/png                                       |        |        |                                                 |        | 127    | http://maps.example.com/3400Wacker/A6           |        |        |                                                 |        | 129    | 0.0 4120.0                                      |        |        |                                                 |        | 130    | 113.0                                           |        |        |                                                 |        | 131    | 10.6                                            |        +--------+-------------------------------------------------+Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 27]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 20136.  Schema Definition      Note: The pattern value for "mimeType" has been folded onto      multiple lines.  Whitespace has been added to conform to comply      with document formatting restrictions.  Extra whitespace around      the line endings MUST be removed before using this schema.   <?xml version="1.0"?>   <xs:schema       xmlns:rel="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10:relative"       xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"       xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"       targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10:relative"       elementFormDefault="qualified"       attributeFormDefault="unqualified">     <xs:annotation>       <xs:appinfo           source="urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:pidf:geopriv10:relative">         Relative Location for PIDF-LO       </xs:appinfo>       <xs:documentation source="http://ietf.org/rfc/rfc7035.txt">         This schema defines a location representation that allows for         the description of locations that are relative to another.         An optional map reference is also defined.       </xs:documentation>     </xs:annotation>     <xs:import namespace="http://www.opengis.net/gml"/>     <xs:element name="relative-location" type="rel:relativeType"/>     <xs:complexType name="relativeType">       <xs:complexContent>         <xs:restriction base="xs:anyType">           <xs:sequence>             <xs:element name="reference" type="rel:referenceType"/>             <xs:element name="offset" type="rel:offsetType"/>             <xs:any namespace="##any" processContents="lax"                     minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>           </xs:sequence>           <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/>         </xs:restriction>       </xs:complexContent>     </xs:complexType>     <xs:complexType name="referenceType">       <xs:complexContent>Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 28]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 2013         <xs:restriction base="xs:anyType">           <xs:sequence>             <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax"                     minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>           </xs:sequence>         </xs:restriction>       </xs:complexContent>     </xs:complexType>     <xs:complexType name="offsetType">       <xs:complexContent>         <xs:restriction base="xs:anyType">           <xs:sequence>             <xs:element ref="gml:_Geometry"/>             <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax"                     minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>           </xs:sequence>         </xs:restriction>       </xs:complexContent>     </xs:complexType>     <xs:element name="map" type="rel:mapType"/>     <xs:complexType name="mapType">       <xs:complexContent>         <xs:restriction base="xs:anyType">           <xs:sequence>             <xs:element name="url" type="rel:mapUrlType"/>             <xs:element name="offset" type="rel:doubleList"                         minOccurs="0"/>             <xs:element name="orientation" type="rel:doubleList"                         minOccurs="0"/>             <xs:element name="scale" type="rel:doubleList"                         minOccurs="0"/>           </xs:sequence>         </xs:restriction>       </xs:complexContent>     </xs:complexType>     <xs:complexType name="mapUrlType">       <xs:simpleContent>         <xs:extension base="xs:anyURI">           <xs:attribute name="type" type="rel:mimeType"                         default="application/octet-stream"/>         </xs:extension>       </xs:simpleContent>     </xs:complexType>     <xs:simpleType name="mimeType">Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 29]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 2013       <xs:restriction base="xs:token">        <xs:pattern value="[!#$%&amp;'\*\+\-\.\dA-Z^_`a-z\|~]+        /[!#$%&amp;'\*\+\-\.\dA-Z^_`a-z\|~]+([\t ]*;([\t ])*[!#$%&amp;        '\*\+\-\.\dA-Z^_`a-z\|~]+=([!#$%&amp;'\*\+\-\.\dA-Z^_`a-z\|~]+|         &quot;([!#-\[\]-~]|[\t ]*|\\[\t !-~])*&quot;))*"/>       </xs:restriction>     </xs:simpleType>     <xs:simpleType name="doubleList">       <xs:list itemType="xs:double"/>     </xs:simpleType>   </xs:schema>7.  Security Considerations   This document describes a data format.  To a large extent, security   properties of this depend on how this data is used.   Privacy for location data is typically important.  Adding relative   location may increase the precision of the location but does not   otherwise alter its privacy considerations, which are discussed in   [RFC4119].   The map URL provided in a relative location could accidentally reveal   information if a Location Recipient uses the URL to acquire the map.   The coverage area of a map, or parameters of the URL itself, could   provide information about the location of a Target.  In combination   with other information that could reveal the set of potential Targets   that the Location Recipient has location information for, acquiring a   map could leak significant information.  In particular, it is   important to note that the Target and Location Recipient are often   the same entity.   Access to map URLs MUST be secured with TLS [RFC5246] (that is,   restricting the map URL to be an https URI), unless the map URL   cannot leak information about the Target's location.  This restricts   information about the map URL to the entity serving the map request.   If the map URL conveys more information about a Target than a map   server is authorized to receive, that URL MUST NOT be included in the   PIDF-LO.Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 30]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 20138.  IANA Considerations8.1.  Relative Location Registry   This document creates a new registry called "Relative Location   Parameters".  This shares a page, titled "Civic Address Types   Registry" with the existing "Civic Address Types (CAtypes)" registry.   As defined in [RFC5226], this new registry operates under "IETF   Review" rules.   The content of this registry includes:   Relative Location Code (RLtype):  Numeric identifier, assigned by      IANA.   Brief description:  Short description identifying the meaning of the      element.   Reference to published specification:  A stable reference to an RFC      that describes the value in sufficient detail so that      interoperability between independent implementations is possible.   Values requested to be assigned into this registry MUST NOT conflict   with values assigned in the "Civic Address Types (CAtypes)" registry   or vice versa, unless the IANA Considerations section for the new   value explicitly overrides this prohibition and the document defining   the value describes how conflicting TLV codes will be interpreted by   implementations.  To ensure this, the CAtypes entries are explicitly   reserved in the initial values table below.  Those reserved entries   can be changed, but only with caution, as explained here.   To make this clear for future users of the registry, the following   note is added to the "Civic Address Types (CAtypes)" registry:      The registration of new values should be accompanied by a      corresponding reservation in the Relative Location Parameters      registry.   Similarly, the "Relative Location Parameters" registry bears the   note:      The registration of new values should be accompanied by a      corresponding reservation in the Civic Address Types (CAtypes)      registry.Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 31]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 2013   The values defined are:   +--------+----------------------------------------+-----------+   | RLtype | description                            | Reference |   +--------+----------------------------------------+-----------+   | 0-40   | RESERVED by CAtypes registry           |RFC 7035 &|   | 128    |                                        |RFC 4776  |   +--------+----------------------------------------+-----------+   | 111    | relative location reference            |RFC 7035  |   | 113    | relative location shape 2D point       |RFC 7035  |   | 114    | relative location shape 3D point       |RFC 7035  |   | 115    | relative location shape circular       |RFC 7035  |   | 116    | relative location shape spherical      |RFC 7035  |   | 117    | relative location shape elliptical     |RFC 7035  |   | 118    | relative location shape ellipsoid      |RFC 7035  |   | 119    | relative location shape 2D polygon     |RFC 7035  |   | 120    | relative location shape 3D polygon     |RFC 7035  |   | 121    | relative location shape prism          |RFC 7035  |   | 122    | relative location shape arc-band       |RFC 7035  |   | 123    | relative location dynamic orientation  |RFC 7035  |   | 124    | relative location dynamic speed        |RFC 7035  |   | 125    | relative location dynamic heading      |RFC 7035  |   | 126    | relative location map type             |RFC 7035  |   | 127    | relative location map URI              |RFC 7035  |   | 129    | relative location map coordinates      |RFC 7035  |   | 130    | relative location map angle            |RFC 7035  |   | 131    | relative location map scale            |RFC 7035  |   +--------+----------------------------------------+-----------+Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 32]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 20138.2.  URN Sub-Namespace Registration   This document registers a new XML namespace, as per the guidelines in   [RFC3688].    URI:  urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10:relative    Registrant Contact:  IETF, GEOPRIV working group (geopriv@ietf.org),       Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@skype.net).    XML:       BEGIN         <?xml version="1.0"?>         <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"              "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">         <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en">           <head>             <title>GEOPRIV Relative Location</title>           </head>           <body>             <h1>Format for representing relative location</h1>             <h2>urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10:relative</h2>             <p>See <a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7035.txt">RFC 7035</a>.</p>           </body>         </html>          END8.3.  XML Schema Registration   This section registers an XML schema as per the procedures in   [RFC3688].   URI:  urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:pidf:geopriv10:relative   Registrant Contact:  IETF, GEOPRIV working group (geopriv@ietf.org),      Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@skype.net)   Schema:  The XML for this schema is found inSection 6 of this      document.Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 33]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 20138.4.  Geopriv Identifiers Registry   This section registers two URNs for use in identifying relative   coordinate reference systems.  These are added to a new "Geopriv   Identifiers" registry according to the procedures inSection 4 of   [RFC3553].  The "Geopriv Identifiers" registry is entered under the   "Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for IETF Use" category.   Registrations in this registry follow the "IETF Review" [RFC5226]   policy.   Registry name:  Geopriv Identifiers   URN Prefix:  urn:ietf:params:geopriv:   Specification:RFC 7035 (this document)   Repository:http://www.iana.org/assignments/geopriv-identifiers   Index value:  Values in this registry are URNs or URN prefixes that      start with the prefix "urn:ietf:params:geopriv:".  Each is      registered independently.   Each registration in the "Geopriv Identifiers" registry requires the   following information:   URN:  The complete URN that is used or the prefix for that URN.   Description:  A summary description for the URN or URN prefix.   Specification:  A reference to a specification describing the URN or      URN prefix.   Contact:  Email for the person or groups making the registration.   Index value:  As described in [RFC3553], URN prefixes that are      registered include a description of how the URN is constructed.      This is not applicable for specific URNs.   The "Geopriv Identifiers" registry has two initial registrations,   included in the following sections.Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 34]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 20138.4.1.  Registration of Two-Dimensional Relative Coordinate Reference        System URN   This section registers the "urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:2d" URN   in the "Geopriv Identifiers" registry.   URN:  urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:2d   Description:  A two-dimensional relative coordinate reference system   Specification:RFC 7035 (this document)   Contact:  IETF, GEOPRIV working group (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin      Thomson (martin.thomson@skype.net)   Index value:  N/A8.4.2.  Registration of Three-Dimensional Relative Coordinate Reference        System URN   This section registers the "urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:3d" URN   in the "Geopriv Identifiers" registry.   URN:  urn:ietf:params:geopriv:relative:3d   Description:  A three-dimensional relative coordinate reference      system   Specification:RFC 7035 (this document)   Contact:  IETF, GEOPRIV working group (geopriv@ietf.org), Martin      Thomson (martin.thomson@skype.net)   Index value:  N/A9.  Acknowledgements   This document is the product of a design team on relative location.   Besides the authors, this team included Marc Linsner, James Polk, and   James Winterbottom.Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 35]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 201310.  References10.1.  Normative References   [Clinger1990]              Clinger, W., "How to Read Floating Point Numbers              Accurately", Proceedings of Conference on Programming              Language Design and Implementation, pp. 92-101, 1990.   [IEEE.754] IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Floating-Point Arithmetic", IEEE              Standard 754-2008, August 2008.   [OGC.GML-3.1.1]              Cox, S., Daisey, P., Lake, R., Portele, C., and A.              Whiteside, "Geographic information - Geography Markup              Language (GML)", OpenGIS 03-105r1, April 2004,              <http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=4700>.   [OGC.GeoShape]              Thomson, M. and C. Reed, "GML 3.1.1 PIDF-LO Shape              Application Schema for use by the Internet Engineering              Task Force (IETF)", OGC Best Practice 06-142r1, Version:              1.0, April 2007.   [RFC1014]  Sun Microsystems, Inc., "XDR: External Data Representation              standard",RFC 1014, June 1987.   [RFC2046]  Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail              Extensions (MIME) Part Two: Media Types",RFC 2046,              November 1996.   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate              Requirement Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119, March 1997.   [RFC2616]  Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H.,              Masinter, L., Leach, P., and T. Berners-Lee, "Hypertext              Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1",RFC 2616, June 1999.   [RFC2818]  Rescorla, E., "HTTP Over TLS",RFC 2818, May 2000.   [RFC3553]  Mealling, M., Masinter, L., Hardie, T., and G. Klyne, "An              IETF URN Sub-namespace for Registered Protocol              Parameters",BCP 73,RFC 3553, June 2003.   [RFC3688]  Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry",BCP 81,RFC 3688,              January 2004.Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 36]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 2013   [RFC3986]  Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform              Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66,RFC3986, January 2005.   [RFC4119]  Peterson, J., "A Presence-based GEOPRIV Location Object              Format",RFC 4119, December 2005.   [RFC4776]  Schulzrinne, H., "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol              (DHCPv4 and DHCPv6) Option for Civic Addresses              Configuration Information",RFC 4776, November 2006.   [RFC5139]  Thomson, M. and J. Winterbottom, "Revised Civic Location              Format for Presence Information Data Format Location              Object (PIDF-LO)",RFC 5139, February 2008.   [RFC5226]  Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an              IANA Considerations Section in RFCs",BCP 26,RFC 5226,              May 2008.   [RFC5246]  Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security              (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2",RFC 5246, August 2008.   [RFC5491]  Winterbottom, J., Thomson, M., and H. Tschofenig, "GEOPRIV              Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO)              Usage Clarification, Considerations, and Recommendations",RFC 5491, March 2009.   [RFC5962]  Schulzrinne, H., Singh, V., Tschofenig, H., and M.              Thomson, "Dynamic Extensions to the Presence Information              Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO)",RFC 5962,              September 2010.   [RFC6225]  Polk, J., Linsner, M., Thomson, M., and B. Aboba, "Dynamic              Host Configuration Protocol Options for Coordinate-Based              Location Configuration Information",RFC 6225, July 2011.   [RFC6848]  Winterbottom, J., Thomson, M., Barnes, R., Rosen, B., and              R. George, "Specifying Civic Address Extensions in the              Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-              LO)",RFC 6848, January 2013.   [WGS84]    US National Imagery and Mapping Agency, "Department of              Defense (DoD) World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84), Third              Edition", NIMA TR8350.2, January 2000.Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 37]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 201310.2.  Informative References   [RFC3863]  Sugano, H., Fujimoto, S., Klyne, G., Bateman, A., Carr,              W., and J. Peterson, "Presence Information Data Format              (PIDF)",RFC 3863, August 2004.   [RFC4479]  Rosenberg, J., "A Data Model for Presence",RFC 4479, July              2006.Thomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 38]

RFC 7035                    Relative Location               October 2013Authors' Addresses   Martin Thomson   Microsoft   3210 Porter Drive   Palo Alto, CA  94304   US   Phone: +1 650-353-1925   EMail: martin.thomson@skype.net   Brian Rosen   Neustar   470 Conrad Dr   Mars, PA  16046   US   EMail: br@brianrosen.net   Dorothy Stanley   Aruba Networks   1322 Crossman Ave   Sunnyvale, CA  94089   US   EMail: dstanley@arubanetworks.com   Gabor Bajko   Nokia   323 Fairchild Drive   Mountain View, CA  94043   US   EMail: gabor.bajko@nokia.com   Allan Thomson   Lookingglass Cyber Solutions   1001 S Kenwood Avenue   Baltimore, MD  21224   US   EMail: athomson@lgscout.comThomson, et al.              Standards Track                   [Page 39]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp