Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Errata] [Info page]

PROPOSED STANDARD
Errata Exist
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                          A. ClarkRequest for Comments: 7003                                      TelchemyCategory: Standards Track                                       R. HuangISSN: 2070-1721                                               Q. Wu, Ed.                                                                  Huawei                                                          September 2013RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Blockfor Burst/Gap Discard Metric ReportingAbstract   This document defines an RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report   (XR) block that allows the reporting of burst and gap discard metrics   for use in a range of RTP applications.Status of This Memo   This is an Internet Standards Track document.   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has   received public review and has been approved for publication by the   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on   Internet Standards is available inSection 2 of RFC 5741.   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained athttp://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7003.Copyright Notice   Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the   document authors.  All rights reserved.   This document is subject toBCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of   publication of this document.  Please review these documents   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as   described in the Simplified BSD License.Clark, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 1]

RFC 7003                RTCP XR Burst/Gap Discard         September 2013Table of Contents1. Introduction ....................................................21.1. Burst/Gap Discard Metrics Block ............................21.2. RTCP and RTCP Extended Reports .............................31.3. Performance Metrics Framework ..............................31.4. Applicability ..............................................32. Terminology .....................................................33. Burst/Gap Discard Metrics Block .................................43.1. Report Block Structure .....................................53.2. Definition of Fields in Burst/Gap Discard Metrics Block ....53.3. Derived Metrics Based on Reported Metrics ..................74. Considerations for Voice-over-IP Applications ...................75. SDP Signaling ...................................................85.1. SDP rtcp-xr Attribute Extension ............................85.2. Offer/Answer Usage .........................................86. IANA Considerations .............................................86.1. New RTCP XR Block Type Value ...............................86.2. New RTCP XR SDP Parameter ..................................96.3. Contact Information for Registrations ......................97. Security Considerations .........................................98. Contributors ....................................................99. Acknowledgments .................................................910. References ....................................................1010.1. Normative References .....................................1010.2. Informative References ...................................10Appendix A.  Metrics Represented Using the Template fromRFC 6390..121.  Introduction1.1.  Burst/Gap Discard Metrics Block   This document defines a new block type to augment those defined in   [RFC3611] for use in a range of RTP applications.  The new block type   supports the reporting of the proportion of packets discarded by the   jitter buffer at the receiver, using packet discard logic according   to the jitter buffer algorithms.  The discards during discard bursts   are reported, together with the number of bursts.  This block is   intended to be used in conjunction with [RFC7002], which provides the   total packets discarded and on which this block therefore depends.   However, the metric in [RFC7002] may be used independently of the   metrics in this block.   This block provides information on transient IP problems.  Burst/gap   metrics are typically used in cumulative reports; however, they also   may be used in interval reports (see the Interval Metric flag inSection 3.2).  The burstiness of packet discard affects user   experience, may influence any sender strategies to mitigate the   problem, and may also have diagnostic value.Clark, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 2]

RFC 7003                RTCP XR Burst/Gap Discard         September 2013   The metric belongs to the class of transport-related end-system   metrics defined in [RFC6792].   The definitions of "burst", "gap", "loss", and "discard" are   consistent with the definitions in [RFC3611].  To accommodate the   range of jitter buffer algorithms and packet discard logic that may   be used by implementors, the method used to distinguish between   bursts and gaps shall use an equivalent method to that defined inSection 4.7.2 of [RFC3611].  Note that reporting the specific jitter   buffer algorithms and/or packet discard logic is out of the scope of   this document.1.2.  RTCP and RTCP Extended Reports   The use of RTCP for reporting is defined in [RFC3550].  [RFC3611]   defined an extensible structure for reporting using an RTCP Extended   Report (XR).  This document defines a new Extended Report block for   use with [RFC3550] and [RFC3611].1.3.  Performance Metrics Framework   The Performance Metrics Framework [RFC6390] provides guidance on the   definition and specification of performance metrics.  The RTP   Monitoring Framework [RFC6792] provides guidelines for reporting   block format using RTCP XR.  The metrics block described in this   document is in accordance with the guidelines in [RFC6390] and   [RFC6792].1.4.  Applicability   These metrics are applicable to a range of RTP applications that   contain de-jitter buffers [RFC5481] at the receiving end to smooth   variation in packet-arrival time and don't use stream repair means,   e.g., Forward Error Correction (FEC) [RFC5109] and/or retransmission   [RFC4588].2.  Terminology   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this   document are to be interpreted as described inRFC 2119 [RFC2119].Clark, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 3]

RFC 7003                RTCP XR Burst/Gap Discard         September 2013   In addition, the following terms are defined:   Received, Lost, and Discarded      A packet shall be regarded as "lost" if it fails to arrive within      an implementation-specific time window.  A packet that arrives      within this time window but is too early to be played out, too      late to be played out, or thrown away before playout due to packet      duplication or redundancy shall be regarded as discarded.  A      packet shall not be regarded as discarded if it arrives within      this time window but is dropped during decoding by some higher-      layer decoder, e.g., due to a decoding error.  A packet shall be      classified as one of received (or OK), discarded, or lost.  The      metric "cumulative number of packets lost" defined in [RFC3550]      reports a count of packets lost from the media stream (single      synchronization source (SSRC) within a single RTP session).      Similarly, the metric "number of packets discarded" defined in      [RFC7002] reports a count of packets discarded from the media      stream (single SSRC within a single RTP session) arriving at the      receiver.  Another metric, defined in [RFC5725], is available to      report on packets that are not recovered by any repair techniques      that may be in use.  Note that the term "discard" defined here      builds on the "discard" definition in [RFC3611] but extends the      concept to take into account packet duplication and reports      different types of discard counts [RFC7002].   Bursts and Gaps      The terms "burst" and "gap" are used in a manner consistent with      that of RTCP XR [RFC3611].  RTCP XR views an RTP stream as being      divided into bursts, which are periods during which the discard      rate is high enough to cause noticeable quality degradation      (generally over 5 percent discard rate), and gaps, which are      periods during which discarded packets are infrequent and hence      quality is generally acceptable.3.  Burst/Gap Discard Metrics Block   Metrics in this block report on burst/gap discard in the stream   arriving at the RTP system.  Measurements of these metrics are made   at the receiving end of the RTP stream.  Instances of this metrics   block use the synchronization source (SSRC) to refer to the separate   auxiliary Measurement Information Block [RFC6776], which describes   measurement periods in use (see[RFC6776], Section 4.2).   This metrics block relies on the measurement period in the   Measurement Information Block indicating the span of the report.   Senders MUST send this block in the same compound RTCP packet as theClark, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 4]

RFC 7003                RTCP XR Burst/Gap Discard         September 2013   Measurement Information Block.  Receivers MUST verify that the   measurement period is received in the same compound RTCP packet as   this metrics block.  If not, this metrics block MUST be discarded.3.1.  Report Block Structure   The structure of the Burst/Gap Discard Metrics Block is as follows.       0                   1                   2                   3       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+      |     BT=20     | I |   resv    |      Block Length = 3         |      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+      |                        SSRC of Source                         |      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+      |   Threshold   |         Packets Discarded in Bursts           |      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+      |       Total Packets Expected in Bursts        |   Reserved    |      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+                     Figure 1: Report Block Structure3.2.  Definition of Fields in Burst/Gap Discard Metrics Block   Block Type (BT): 8 bits      A Burst/Gap Discard Metrics Block is identified by the constant      20.   Interval Metric flag (I): 2 bits      This field is used to indicate whether the burst/gap discard      metrics are Sampled, Interval, or Cumulative metrics [RFC6792]:         I=10: Interval Duration - the reported value applies to the         most recent measurement interval duration between successive         metrics reports.         I=11: Cumulative Duration - the reported value applies to the         accumulation period characteristic of cumulative measurements.         I=01: Sampled Value - the reported value is a sampled         instantaneous value.Clark, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 5]

RFC 7003                RTCP XR Burst/Gap Discard         September 2013      In this document, burst/gap discard metrics can only be measured      over definite intervals and cannot be sampled.  Also, the value      I=00 is reserved for future use.  Senders MUST NOT use the values      I=00 or I=01.  If a block is received with I=00 or I=01, the      receiver MUST discard the block.   Reserved (resv): 6 bits      These bits are reserved.  They MUST be set to zero by senders and      ignored by receivers (see[RFC6709], Section 4.2).   Block Length: 16 bits      The length of this report block in 32-bit words, minus one.  For      the Burst/Gap Discard Metrics Block, the block length is equal to      3.  The block MUST be discarded if the block length is set to a      different value.   SSRC of Source: 32 bits      As defined inSection 4.1 of [RFC3611].   Threshold: 8 bits      The Threshold is equivalent to Gmin in [RFC3611], i.e., the number      of successive packets that must not be discarded prior to and      following a discard packet in order for this discarded packet to      be regarded as part of a gap.  Note that the Threshold is set in      accordance with the Gmin calculation defined inSection 4.7.2 of      [RFC3611].   Packets Discarded in Bursts: 24 bits      The total number of packets discarded during discard bursts.      The measured value is unsigned value.  If the measured value      exceeds 0xFFFFFD, the value 0xFFFFFE MUST be reported to indicate      an over-range measurement.  If the measurement is unavailable, the      value 0xFFFFFF MUST be reported.   Total Packets Expected in Bursts: 24 bits      The total number of packets expected during discard bursts (that      is, the sum of received packets and lost packets).Clark, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 6]

RFC 7003                RTCP XR Burst/Gap Discard         September 2013      The measured value is unsigned value.  If the measured value      exceeds 0xFFFFFD, the value 0xFFFFFE MUST be reported to indicate      an over-range measurement.  If the measurement is unavailable, the      value 0xFFFFFF MUST be reported.   Reserved: 8 bits      These bits are reserved.  They MUST be set to zero by senders and      ignored by receivers (See[RFC6709], Section 4.2).3.3.  Derived Metrics Based on Reported Metrics   The metrics described here are intended to be used in conjunction   with information from the Measurement Information Block [RFC6776] and   also with the metric "number of packets discarded" provided in the   RTCP XR Discard Count Metrics Block [RFC7002].   These metrics provide the following information relevant to   statistical parameters, including:   o  The fraction of packets discarded during bursts (Burst Discard      Rate in [RFC7004]), which can be calculated using the metric      "Packets Discarded in Bursts" and the metric "Total Packets      Expected in Bursts" provided in the Burst/Gap Discard Metrics      Block.   o  The fraction of packets discarded during gaps (Gap Discard Rate in      [RFC7004]), which can be calculated using the metric "Packets      Discarded in Bursts" and the metric "Total Packets Expected in      Bursts" provided in the Burst/Gap Discard Metrics Block.   The details on calculation these parameters in the metrics are   described in [RFC7004].4.  Considerations for Voice-over-IP Applications   This metrics block is applicable to a broad range of RTP   applications.  Where the metric is used with a Voice-over-IP (VoIP)   application and the stream repair means is not available, the   following considerations apply.   RTCP XR views a call as being divided into bursts, which are periods   during which the discard rate is high enough to cause noticeable call   quality degradation (generally over 5 percent discard rate) and gaps,   which are periods during which discarded packets are infrequent and   hence call quality is generally acceptable.Clark, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 7]

RFC 7003                RTCP XR Burst/Gap Discard         September 2013   If voice activity detection is used, the burst and gap duration shall   be determined as if silence packets had been sent, i.e., a period of   silence in excess of Gmin packets will terminate a burst condition.   The recommended value for the threshold Gmin in [RFC3611] results in   a burst being a period of time during which the call quality is   degraded to a similar extent to a typical pulse code modulation (PCM)   severely errored second.5.  SDP Signaling   [RFC3611] defines the use of SDP (Session Description Protocol)   [RFC4566] for signaling the use of XR blocks.  XR blocks MAY be used   without prior signaling.5.1.  SDP rtcp-xr Attribute Extension   This section augments the SDP [RFC4566] attribute "rtcp-xr" defined   in [RFC3611] by providing an additional value of "xr-format" to   signal the use of the report block defined in this document.  The   ABNF [RFC5234] syntax is as follows.   xr-format =/ xr-bgd-block   xr-bgd-block = "burst-gap-discard"5.2.  Offer/Answer Usage   When SDP is used in Offer/Answer context, the SDP Offer/Answer usage   defined in [RFC3611] for unilateral "rtcp-xr" attribute parameters   applies.  For detailed usage in Offer/Answer for unilateral   parameters, refer toSection 5.2 of [RFC3611].6.  IANA Considerations   New block types for RTCP XR are subject to IANA registration.  For   general guidelines on IANA considerations for RTCP XR, refer to   [RFC3611].6.1.  New RTCP XR Block Type Value   This document assigns the block type value 20 in the IANA "RTP   Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR) Block Type Registry" to   the "Burst/Gap Discard Metrics Block".Clark, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 8]

RFC 7003                RTCP XR Burst/Gap Discard         September 20136.2.  New RTCP XR SDP Parameter   This document also registers a new parameter "burst-gap-discard" in   the "RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR) Session   Description Protocol (SDP) Parameters Registry".6.3.  Contact Information for Registrations   The contact information for the registrations is:   Qin Wu (sunseawq@huawei.com)   101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District   Nanjing, Jiangsu  210012   China7.  Security Considerations   It is believed that this RTCP XR block introduces no new security   considerations beyond those described in [RFC3611].  This block does   not provide per-packet statistics, so the risk to confidentiality   documented inSection 7, paragraph 3 of [RFC3611] does not apply.8.  Contributors   Geoff Hunt wrote the initial draft of this document.9.  Acknowledgments   The authors gratefully acknowledge reviews and feedback provided by   Bruce Adams, Philip Arden, Amit Arora, Claire Bi, Bob Biskner, Benoit   Claise, Kevin Connor, Claus Dahm, Randy Ethier, Roni Even, Stephen   Farrell, Jim Frauenthal, Albert Higashi, Tom Hock, Shane Holthaus,   Paul Jones, Rajesh Kumar, Paul Kyzivat, Keith Lantz, Mohamed Mostafa,   Amy Pendleton, Colin Perkins, Mike Ramalho, Ravi Raviraj, Dan   Romascanu, Albrecht Schwarz, Tom Taylor, and Hideaki Yamada.Clark, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 9]

RFC 7003                RTCP XR Burst/Gap Discard         September 201310.  References10.1.  Normative References   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate              Requirement Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119, March 1997.   [RFC3550]  Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., and V.              Jacobson, "RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time              Applications", STD 64,RFC 3550, July 2003.   [RFC3611]  Friedman, T., Caceres, R., and A. Clark, "RTP Control              Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR)",RFC 3611, November              2003.   [RFC4566]  Handley, M., Jacobson, V., and C. Perkins, "SDP: Session              Description Protocol",RFC 4566, July 2006.   [RFC5234]  Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax              Specifications: ABNF", STD 68,RFC 5234, January 2008.   [RFC5725]  Begen, A., Hsu, D., and M. Lague, "Post-Repair Loss RLE              Report Block Type for RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended              Reports (XRs)",RFC 5725, February 2010.   [RFC6776]  Clark, A. and Q. Wu, "Measurement Identity and Information              Reporting Using a Source Description (SDES) Item and an              RTCP Extended Report (XR) Block",RFC 6776, October 2012.   [RFC7002]  Clark, A., Zorn, G., and Q. Wu, "RTP Control Protocol              (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) for Discard Count Metric              Reporting",RFC 7002, September 2013.   [RFC7004]  Zorn, G., Schott, R., Wu, Q., Ed., and R. Huang, "RTP              Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Blocks for              Summary Statistics Metrics Reporting",RFC 7004, September              2013.10.2.  Informative References   [RFC4588]  Rey, J., Leon, D., Miyazaki, A., Varsa, V., and R.              Hakenberg, "RTP Retransmission Payload Format",RFC 4588,              July 2006.   [RFC5109]  Li, A., "RTP Payload Format for Generic Forward Error              Correction",RFC 5109, December 2007.Clark, et al.                Standards Track                   [Page 10]

RFC 7003                RTCP XR Burst/Gap Discard         September 2013   [RFC5481]  Morton, A. and B. Claise, "Packet Delay Variation              Applicability Statement",RFC 5481, March 2009.   [RFC6390]  Clark, A. and B. Claise, "Guidelines for Considering New              Performance Metric Development",BCP 170,RFC 6390,              October 2011.   [RFC6709]  Carpenter, B., Aboba, B., and S. Cheshire, "Design              Considerations for Protocol Extensions",RFC 6709,              September 2012.   [RFC6792]  Wu, Q., Hunt, G., and P. Arden, "Guidelines for Use of the              RTP Monitoring Framework",RFC 6792, November 2012.Clark, et al.                Standards Track                   [Page 11]

RFC 7003                RTCP XR Burst/Gap Discard         September 2013Appendix A.  Metrics Represented Using the Template fromRFC 6390   a.  Burst/Gap Discard Threshold in RTP Metric       *  Metric Name: Burst/gap discard threshold in RTP       *  Metric Description: The Threshold is equivalent to Gmin in          [RFC3611], i.e., the number of successive packets that must          not be discarded prior to and following a discard packet in          order for this discarded packet to be regarded as part of a          gap.       *  Method of Measurement or Calculation: SeeSection 3.2,          Threshold definition.       *  Units of Measurement: SeeSection 3.2, Threshold definition.       *  Measurement Point(s) with Potential Measurement Domain: SeeSection 3, 1st paragraph.       *  Measurement Timing: SeeSection 3, 2nd paragraph for          measurement timing andSection 3.2 for Interval Metric flag.       *  Use and Applications: SeeSection 1.4.       *  Reporting Model: SeeRFC 3611.   b.  Packets Discarded in Bursts Metric       *  Metric Name: RTP packets discarded in bursts       *  Metric Description: The total number of RTP packets discarded          during discard bursts.       *  Method of Measurement or Calculation: SeeSection 3.2, Packets          Discarded in Bursts definition.       *  Units of Measurement: SeeSection 3.2, Packets Discarded in          Bursts definition.       *  Measurement Point(s) with Potential Measurement Domain: SeeSection 3, 1st paragraph.       *  Measurement Timing: SeeSection 3, 2nd paragraph for          measurement timing andSection 3.2 for Interval Metric flag.Clark, et al.                Standards Track                   [Page 12]

RFC 7003                RTCP XR Burst/Gap Discard         September 2013       *  Use and Applications: SeeSection 1.4.       *  Reporting Model: SeeRFC 3611.   c.  Total Packets Expected in Discard Bursts Metric       *  Metric Name: Total RTP packets expected in discard bursts       *  Metric Description: The total number of packets expected          during discard bursts (that is, the sum of received packets          and lost packets).       *  Method of Measurement or Calculation: SeeSection 3.2, Total          Packets Expected in Bursts definition.       *  Units of Measurement: SeeSection 3.2, Total Packets Expected          in Bursts definition.       *  Measurement Point(s) with Potential Measurement Domain: SeeSection 3, 1st paragraph.       *  Measurement Timing: SeeSection 3, 2nd paragraph for          measurement timing andSection 3.2 for Interval Metric flag.       *  Use and Applications: SeeSection 1.4.       *  Reporting Model: SeeRFC 3611.Clark, et al.                Standards Track                   [Page 13]

RFC 7003                RTCP XR Burst/Gap Discard         September 2013Authors' Addresses   Alan Clark   Telchemy Incorporated   2905 Premiere Parkway, Suite 280   Duluth, GA  30097   USA   EMail: alan.d.clark@telchemy.com   Rachel Huang   Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.   101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District   Nanjing, Jiangsu  210012   China   EMail: Rachel@huawei.com   Qin Wu (editor)   Huawei   101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District   Nanjing, Jiangsu  210012   China   EMail: sunseawq@huawei.comClark, et al.                Standards Track                   [Page 14]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp