Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Errata] [Info page]

PROPOSED STANDARD
Errata Exist
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                          Q. VohraRequest for Comments: 6793                              Juniper NetworksObsoletes:4893                                                  E. ChenUpdates:4271                                              Cisco SystemsCategory: Standards Track                                  December 2012ISSN: 2070-1721BGP Support for Four-Octet Autonomous System (AS) Number SpaceAbstract   The Autonomous System number is encoded as a two-octet entity in the   base BGP specification.  This document describes extensions to BGP to   carry the Autonomous System numbers as four-octet entities.  This   document obsoletesRFC 4893 and updatesRFC 4271.Status of This Memo   This is an Internet Standards Track document.   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has   received public review and has been approved for publication by the   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on   Internet Standards is available inSection 2 of RFC 5741.   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained athttp://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6793.Copyright Notice   Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the   document authors.  All rights reserved.   This document is subject toBCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of   publication of this document.  Please review these documents   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as   described in the Simplified BSD License.Vohra & Chen                 Standards Track                    [Page 1]

RFC 6793         BGP Support for 4-Octet AS Number Space   December 20121.  Introduction   In the base BGP specification [RFC4271], the Autonomous System (AS)   number is encoded as a two-octet entity.  To prepare for the   anticipated exhaustion of the two-octet AS numbers, this document   describes extensions to BGP to carry the AS numbers as four-octet   entities.   More specifically, this document defines a BGP capability code,   "support for four-octet AS number capability", to be used by a BGP   speaker to indicate its support for four-octet AS numbers.  Two   attributes, AS4_PATH and AS4_AGGREGATOR, are introduced that can be   used to propagate four-octet-based AS path information across BGP   speakers that do not support four-octet AS numbers.  This document   also specifies mechanisms for constructing the AS path information   from the AS_PATH attribute and the AS4_PATH attribute.   The extensions specified in this document allow a gradual transition   from two-octet AS numbers to four-octet AS numbers.   This document obsoletesRFC 4893 and updatesRFC 4271.  It includes   several clarifications and editorial changes, and it specifies the   error handling for the new attributes.2.  Specification of Requirements   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].3.  Protocol Extensions   For the purpose of this document, we define a BGP speaker that does   not support the new four-octet AS number extensions as an OLD BGP   speaker, and a BGP speaker that supports the new four-octet AS number   extensions as a NEW BGP speaker.   BGP carries the AS numbers in the "My Autonomous System" field of the   OPEN message, in the AS_PATH attribute of the UPDATE message, and in   the AGGREGATOR attribute of the UPDATE message.  BGP also carries the   AS numbers in the BGP Communities attribute.   A NEW BGP speaker uses BGP Capabilities Advertisements [RFC5492] to   advertise to its neighbors (either internal or external) that it   supports four-octet AS number extensions, as specified in this   document.Vohra & Chen                 Standards Track                    [Page 2]

RFC 6793         BGP Support for 4-Octet AS Number Space   December 2012   The capability that is used by a BGP speaker to convey to its BGP   peer the four-octet Autonomous System number capability also carries   the AS number (encoded as a four-octet entity) of the speaker in the   Capability Value field of the capability.  The Capability Length   field of the capability is set to 4.   The AS path information exchanged between NEW BGP speakers is carried   in the existing AS_PATH attribute, except that each AS number in the   attribute is encoded as a four-octet entity (instead of a two-octet   entity).  The same applies to the AGGREGATOR attribute -- the same   attribute is used between NEW BGP speakers, except that the AS number   carried in the attribute is encoded as a four-octet entity.   The AS_PATH attribute and the AGGREGATOR attribute carried between a   NEW BGP speaker and an OLD BGP speaker will continue to contain   two-octet AS numbers.   To preserve the AS path information with four-octet AS numbers across   OLD BGP speakers, this document defines a new BGP path attribute   called AS4_PATH.  This is an optional transitive attribute that   contains the AS path encoded with four-octet AS numbers.  The   AS4_PATH attribute has the same semantics and the same encoding as   the AS_PATH attribute, except that it is "optional transitive", and   it carries four-octet AS numbers.   To prevent the possible propagation of Confederation-related path   segments outside of a Confederation, the path segment types   AS_CONFED_SEQUENCE and AS_CONFED_SET [RFC5065] are declared invalid   for the AS4_PATH attribute and MUST NOT be included in the AS4_PATH   attribute of an UPDATE message.   Similarly, this document defines a new BGP path attribute called   AS4_AGGREGATOR, which is optional transitive.  The AS4_AGGREGATOR   attribute has the same semantics and the same encoding as the   AGGREGATOR attribute, except that it carries a four-octet AS number.   Currently assigned two-octet AS numbers are converted into four-octet   AS numbers by setting the two high-order octets of the four-octet   field to zero.  Such a four-octet AS number is said to be mappable to   a two-octet AS number.   This document reserves a two-octet AS number called "AS_TRANS".   AS_TRANS can be used to represent non-mappable four-octet AS numbers   as two-octet AS numbers in AS path information that is encoded with   two-octet AS numbers.  (In this context, four-octet AS numbers that   are not mapped from two-octet AS numbers are referred to as   "non-mappable".) We denote this special AS number as AS_TRANS for   ease of description in the rest of this specification.  This ASVohra & Chen                 Standards Track                    [Page 3]

RFC 6793         BGP Support for 4-Octet AS Number Space   December 2012   number is also placed in the "My Autonomous System" field of the OPEN   message originated by a NEW BGP speaker, if and only if the speaker   does not have a (globally unique) two-octet AS number.4.  Operations4.1.  Interaction between NEW BGP Speakers   A BGP speaker that supports four-octet AS numbers SHALL advertise   this to its peers using BGP Capabilities Advertisements.  The AS   number of the BGP speaker MUST be carried in the Capability Value   field of the "support for four-octet AS number capability".   When a NEW BGP speaker processes an OPEN message from another NEW BGP   speaker, it MUST use the AS number encoded in the Capability Value   field of the "support for four-octet AS number capability" in lieu of   the "My Autonomous System" field of the OPEN message.   A BGP speaker that advertises such a capability to a particular peer,   and receives from that peer the advertisement of such a capability,   MUST encode AS numbers as four-octet entities in both the AS_PATH   attribute and the AGGREGATOR attribute in the updates it sends to the   peer and MUST assume that these attributes in the updates received   from the peer encode AS numbers as four-octet entities.   The new attributes, AS4_PATH and AS4_AGGREGATOR, MUST NOT be carried   in an UPDATE message between NEW BGP speakers.  A NEW BGP speaker   that receives the AS4_PATH attribute or the AS4_AGGREGATOR attribute   in an UPDATE message from another NEW BGP speaker MUST discard the   path attribute and continue processing the UPDATE message.4.2.  Interaction between NEW and OLD BGP Speakers4.2.1.  BGP Peering   Note that peering between a NEW BGP speaker and an OLD BGP speaker is   possible only if the NEW BGP speaker has a two-octet AS number.   However, this document does not assume that an Autonomous System with   NEW BGP speakers has to have a globally unique two-octet AS number --   AS_TRANS MUST be used when the NEW BGP speaker does not have a   two-octet AS number (even if multiple Autonomous Systems would   use it).Vohra & Chen                 Standards Track                    [Page 4]

RFC 6793         BGP Support for 4-Octet AS Number Space   December 20124.2.2.  Generating Updates   When communicating with an OLD BGP speaker, a NEW BGP speaker MUST   send the AS path information in the AS_PATH attribute encoded with   two-octet AS numbers.  The NEW BGP speaker MUST also send the AS path   information in the AS4_PATH attribute (encoded with four-octet AS   numbers), except for the case where all of the AS path information is   composed of mappable four-octet AS numbers only.  In this case, the   NEW BGP speaker MUST NOT send the AS4_PATH attribute.   In the AS_PATH attribute encoded with two-octet AS numbers,   non-mappable four-octet AS numbers are represented by the well-known   two-octet AS number, AS_TRANS.  This will preserve the path length   property of the AS path information and also help in updating the AS   path information received on a NEW BGP speaker from an OLD BGP   speaker, as explained in the next section.   The NEW BGP speaker constructs the AS4_PATH attribute from the AS   path information.  Whenever the AS path information contains the   AS_CONFED_SEQUENCE or AS_CONFED_SET path segment, the NEW BGP speaker   MUST exclude such path segments from the AS4_PATH attribute being   constructed.   The AS4_PATH attribute, being optional transitive, will be carried   across a series of OLD BGP speakers without modification and will   help preserve the non-mappable four-octet AS numbers in the AS path   information.   Similarly, if the NEW BGP speaker has to send the AGGREGATOR   attribute, and if the aggregating Autonomous System's AS number is a   non-mappable four-octet AS number, then the speaker MUST use the   AS4_AGGREGATOR attribute and set the AS number field in the existing   AGGREGATOR attribute to the reserved AS number, AS_TRANS.  Note that   if the AS number is mappable, then the AS4_AGGREGATOR attribute MUST   NOT be sent.4.2.3.  Processing Received Updates   When a NEW BGP speaker receives an update from an OLD BGP speaker, it   MUST be prepared to receive the AS4_PATH attribute along with the   existing AS_PATH attribute.  If the AS4_PATH attribute is also   received, both of the attributes will be used to construct the exact   AS path information, and therefore the information carried by both of   the attributes will be considered for AS path loop detection.Vohra & Chen                 Standards Track                    [Page 5]

RFC 6793         BGP Support for 4-Octet AS Number Space   December 2012   Note that a route may have traversed a series of Autonomous Systems   with two-octet AS numbers and OLD BGP speakers only.  In that case,   if the route carries the AS4_PATH attribute, this attribute would   have remained unmodified since the route left the last NEW BGP   speaker.  The trailing AS path information (representing Autonomous   Systems with two-octet AS numbers and OLD BGP speakers only) is   contained only in the current AS_PATH attribute (encoded in the   leading part of the AS_PATH attribute).   Under certain conditions, it may not be possible to reconstruct all   of the AS path information from the AS_PATH and the AS4_PATH   attributes of a route.  This occurs, for example, when two or more   routes that carry the AS4_PATH attribute are aggregated by an OLD BGP   speaker, and the AS4_PATH attribute of at least one of these routes   carries at least one four-octet AS number (as opposed to a two-octet   AS number that is encoded in 4 octets).  Depending on the   implementation, either the AS4_PATH attribute would be lost during   route aggregation, or both the AS_PATH attribute and the AS4_PATH   attribute would contain valid, partial information that cannot be   combined seamlessly, resulting in incomplete AS path information in   these cases.   A NEW BGP speaker MUST also be prepared to receive the AS4_AGGREGATOR   attribute along with the AGGREGATOR attribute from an OLD BGP   speaker.  When both of the attributes are received, if the AS number   in the AGGREGATOR attribute is not AS_TRANS, then:      -  the AS4_AGGREGATOR attribute and the AS4_PATH attribute SHALL         be ignored,      -  the AGGREGATOR attribute SHALL be taken as the information         about the aggregating node, and      -  the AS_PATH attribute SHALL be taken as the AS path         information.   Otherwise,      -  the AGGREGATOR attribute SHALL be ignored,      -  the AS4_AGGREGATOR attribute SHALL be taken as the information         about the aggregating node, and      -  the AS path information would need to be constructed, as in all         other cases.Vohra & Chen                 Standards Track                    [Page 6]

RFC 6793         BGP Support for 4-Octet AS Number Space   December 2012   In order to construct the AS path information, it is necessary to   first calculate the number of AS numbers in the AS_PATH and AS4_PATH   attributes using the method specified inSection 9.1.2.2 of [RFC4271]   and in [RFC5065] for route selection.   If the number of AS numbers in the AS_PATH attribute is less than the   number of AS numbers in the AS4_PATH attribute, then the AS4_PATH   attribute SHALL be ignored, and the AS_PATH attribute SHALL be taken   as the AS path information.   If the number of AS numbers in the AS_PATH attribute is larger than   or equal to the number of AS numbers in the AS4_PATH attribute, then   the AS path information SHALL be constructed by taking as many AS   numbers and path segments as necessary from the leading part of the   AS_PATH attribute, and then prepending them to the AS4_PATH attribute   so that the AS path information has a number of AS numbers identical   to that of the AS_PATH attribute.  Note that a valid   AS_CONFED_SEQUENCE or AS_CONFED_SET path segment SHALL be prepended   if it is either the leading path segment or is adjacent to a path   segment that is prepended.5.  Handling BGP Communities   As specified in [RFC1997], when the high-order two octets of the   community attribute is neither 0x0000 nor 0xffff, these two octets   encode the AS number.  Quite clearly, this would not work for a NEW   BGP speaker with a non-mappable four-octet AS number.  Such BGP   speakers should use four-octet AS specific extended communities   [RFC5668] instead.6.  Error Handling   This section provides an update toRFC 4271 [RFC4271] with respect to   the error conditions noted here and their handling.   Given that the two-octet AS numbers dominate during the transition   and are carried in the AS_PATH attribute by an OLD BGP speaker, in   this document the "attribute discard" approach is chosen to handle a   malformed AS4_PATH attribute.   Similarly, as the AS4_AGGREGATOR is just informational, the   "attribute discard" approach is chosen to handle a malformed   AS4_AGGREGATOR attribute.Vohra & Chen                 Standards Track                    [Page 7]

RFC 6793         BGP Support for 4-Octet AS Number Space   December 2012   The AS4_PATH attribute and AS4_AGGREGATOR attribute MUST NOT be   carried in an UPDATE message between NEW BGP speakers.  A NEW BGP   speaker that receives the AS4_PATH attribute or the AS4_AGGREGATOR   attribute in an UPDATE message from another NEW BGP speaker MUST   discard the path attribute and continue processing the UPDATE   message.  This case SHOULD be logged locally for analysis.   In addition, the path segment types AS_CONFED_SEQUENCE and   AS_CONFED_SET [RFC5065] MUST NOT be carried in the AS4_PATH attribute   of an UPDATE message.  A NEW BGP speaker that receives these path   segment types in the AS4_PATH attribute of an UPDATE message from an   OLD BGP speaker MUST discard these path segments, adjust the relevant   attribute fields accordingly, and continue processing the UPDATE   message.  This case SHOULD be logged locally for analysis.   The AS4_PATH attribute in an UPDATE message SHALL be considered   malformed under the following conditions:      -  the attribute length is not a multiple of two or is too small         (i.e., less than 6) for the attribute to carry at least one AS         number, or      -  the path segment length in the attribute is either zero or is         inconsistent with the attribute length, or      -  the path segment type in the attribute is not one of the types         defined: AS_SEQUENCE, AS_SET, AS_CONFED_SEQUENCE, and         AS_CONFED_SET.   A NEW BGP speaker that receives a malformed AS4_PATH attribute in an   UPDATE message from an OLD BGP speaker MUST discard the attribute and   continue processing the UPDATE message.  The error SHOULD be logged   locally for analysis.   The AS4_AGGREGATOR attribute in an UPDATE message SHALL be considered   malformed if the attribute length is not 8.   A NEW BGP speaker that receives a malformed AS4_AGGREGATOR attribute   in an UPDATE message from an OLD BGP speaker MUST discard the   attribute and continue processing the UPDATE message.  The error   SHOULD be logged locally for analysis.Vohra & Chen                 Standards Track                    [Page 8]

RFC 6793         BGP Support for 4-Octet AS Number Space   December 20127.  Transition   When an Autonomous System is using a two-octet AS number, then the   BGP speakers within that Autonomous System MAY be upgraded to support   the four-octet AS number extensions on a piecemeal basis.  There is   no requirement for a coordinated upgrade of the four-octet AS number   capability in this case.  However, if an Autonomous System wishes to   use a four-octet AS number as its own AS number, then this document   assumes that an Autonomous System can use a four-octet AS number only   after all the BGP speakers within that Autonomous System have been   upgraded to support four-octet AS numbers.   A non-mappable four-octet AS number cannot be used as a "Member AS   Number" of a BGP Confederation until all the BGP speakers within the   Confederation have transitioned to support four-octet AS numbers.   In an environment where an Autonomous System that has OLD BGP   speakers peers with two or more Autonomous Systems that have NEW BGP   speakers and use AS_TRANS (rather than having a globally unique   mappable AS number), the use of the MULTI_EXIT_DISC attribute   [RFC4271] by the Autonomous System with the OLD BGP speakers may   result in a situation where the MULTI_EXIT_DISC attribute will   influence route selection among the routes that were received from   different neighboring Autonomous Systems.   Under certain conditions, it may not be possible to reconstruct all   of the AS path information from the AS_PATH and the AS4_PATH   attributes of a route.  This occurs when two or more routes that   carry the AS4_PATH attribute are aggregated by an OLD BGP speaker,   and the AS4_PATH attribute of at least one of these routes carries at   least one four-octet AS number (as opposed to a two-octet AS number   that is encoded in 4 octets).  When such aggregation results in   creating a route that is less specific than any of the component   routes (routes whose Network Layer Reachability Information (NLRI)   covers the NLRI of all the component routes), loss of the AS path   information does not create the risk of a routing loop.  In all other   cases, loss of the AS path information does create the risk of a   routing loop.8.  Manageability Considerations   If the BGP4-MIB [RFC4273] is supported, there are no additional   manageability concerns that arise from the use of four-octet AS   numbers, since the InetAutonomousSystemNumber textual convention   [RFC4001] is defined as Unsigned32.Vohra & Chen                 Standards Track                    [Page 9]

RFC 6793         BGP Support for 4-Octet AS Number Space   December 2012   When IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) [RFC5101] is supported, there   are no additional manageability concerns that arise from the use of   four-octet AS numbers.  The bgpSourceAsNumber and   bgpDestinationAsNumber information elements [IANA-IPFIX] can continue   to be used, with a new template record, specifying the new length of   4 bytes.9.  IANA Considerations   This document expands the pool for AS numbers from 0-65535 to   0-4294967295.  The AS numbers are managed by the IANA "Autonomous   System Numbers" registry.  Other than expanding the AS number pool,   this document does not propose any modifications to the existing   policies and procedures pertaining to the allocation of AS numbers.   This document uses a BGP capability code to indicate that a BGP   speaker supports four-octet AS numbers.  Capability Code 65 has been   assigned by IANA per [RFC5492].   In addition, this document introduces two BGP optional transitive   attributes, and their type codes have been assigned by IANA.  The   first one is the AS4_PATH attribute, value 17, which preserves the AS   path information with four-octet AS numbers across old BGP speakers.   The second one is the AS4_AGGREGATOR attribute, value 18, which is   similar in use to the current AGGREGATOR attribute, but it carries a   four-octet AS number.   Finally, IANA has replaced a reference toRFC 4893 with a reference   to this document for a reserved two-octet AS number -- AS_TRANS   (23456).  Also, IANA has replaced a reference toRFC 4893 with a   reference to this document for the "32-bit Autonomous System Numbers"   registry.10.  Security Considerations   This extension to BGP does not change the underlying security issues   inherent in the existing BGP, except for the following:   The inconsistency between the AS_PATH attribute and the AS4_PATH   attribute can create loss of the AS path information, and potential   routing loops in certain cases, as discussed in this document.  This   could be exploited by an attacker.   It is a misconfiguration to assign a non-mappable four-octet AS   number as the "Member AS Number" in a BGP Confederation before all   the BGP speakers within the Confederation have transitioned to   support four-octet AS numbers.  Such a misconfiguration would weaken   AS path loop detection within a Confederation.Vohra & Chen                 Standards Track                   [Page 10]

RFC 6793         BGP Support for 4-Octet AS Number Space   December 201211.  Acknowledgments   The authors would like to thank Yakov Rekhter, Chaitanya Kodeboyina,   and Jeffrey Haas for the numerous discussions that went into the   making of this document.   The authors would also like to thank members of the IDR Working Group   for their review and comments.12.  References12.1.  Normative References   [RFC1997]    Chandra, R., Traina, P., and T. Li, "BGP Communities                Attribute",RFC 1997, August 1996.   [RFC2119]    Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate                Requirement Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119, March 1997.   [RFC4271]    Rekhter, Y., Ed., Li, T., Ed., and S. Hares, Ed., "A                Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)",RFC 4271,                January 2006.   [RFC5065]    Traina, P., McPherson, D., and J. Scudder, "Autonomous                System Confederations for BGP",RFC 5065, August 2007.   [RFC5492]    Scudder, J. and R. Chandra, "Capabilities Advertisement                with BGP-4",RFC 5492, February 2009.   [RFC5668]    Rekhter, Y., Sangli, S., and D. Tappan, "4-Octet AS                Specific BGP Extended Community",RFC 5668,                October 2009.12.2.  Informative References   [IANA-IPFIX] IANA, "IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Entities",                <http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix>.   [RFC4001]    Daniele, M., Haberman, B., Routhier, S., and J.                Schoenwaelder, "Textual Conventions for Internet Network                Addresses",RFC 4001, February 2005.   [RFC4273]    Haas, J., Ed., and S. Hares, Ed., "Definitions of                Managed Objects for BGP-4",RFC 4273, January 2006.   [RFC5101]    Claise, B., Ed., "Specification of the IP Flow                Information Export (IPFIX) Protocol for the Exchange of                IP Traffic Flow Information",RFC 5101, January 2008.Vohra & Chen                 Standards Track                   [Page 11]

RFC 6793         BGP Support for 4-Octet AS Number Space   December 2012Authors' Addresses   Quaizar Vohra   Juniper Networks   1194 N. Mathilda Ave.   Sunnyvale, CA  94089   USA   EMail: quaizar.vohra@gmail.com   Enke Chen   Cisco Systems, Inc.   170 W. Tasman Dr.   San Jose, CA  95134   USA   EMail: enkechen@cisco.comVohra & Chen                 Standards Track                   [Page 12]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp